WEBVTT - Talking 'Space Chronicles' with Neil DeGrasse Tyson

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb. My name is Julie Douglas,

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and we have a guest for today's episode. As you

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>probably gathered from the title, we are talking once again

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>with Neil deGrasse Tyson, that's right, via the phone. Um.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We have a bunch of questions that that we locked

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>at him, Uh, mainly having to do with his wonderful

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>book which is called Space Chronicles, and it really is

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a retrospective of NASA and space exploration, and it is

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating and has every single aspect of space that

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you would ever want to cram into your brain, including

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>killer asteroids and whether or not aliens might exist. Um,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So we had a chance to read that and then

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to ask some questions, and we also had a chance

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to give Dr Tyson some of your questions that you

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>provided on Facebook. Yeah, you might remember about a month back,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>well maybe a little a little longer, when we first

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>learned that we were going to do this interview. I

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>put the call out on Facebook or Facebook addressed by

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's uh, stuff to blow your mind. Just

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>type that in do Facebook and you'll find us put

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the call out for questions that you guys had for

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Dr Tyson, and we received a whole list of them,

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and so we went in, we picked like the five

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>best and then asked as many of those as we

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>could during the time that we had him. And really,

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the answers to your questions were

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the best, uh as you'll as you'll discover in this

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this episode. Yeah, I think you guys excited his imaginations.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So but first of all, I do need to mention

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>again this is a great book, um Neiodle grass Tyson.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>For those of you who are not familiar with him,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there's and really you have no excuse not to be

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>familiar with Neiodo grass Tyson because he's everywhere. He is

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a mass communicator. He is out there as a spokesman

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for science uh or our understanding of the cosmos, for

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>our continued exploration of the cosmos, and for just science

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>literacy in our culture and UH in this book is

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>just another great example that it's very readable. It is

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>not a you know, and it's not a heavy, heavy,

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to read science book. It is a very readable

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>uh text that that is I mean It even has

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>his tweets in there, which I thought was and I

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>touched because he's a he's a big, big time tweeter.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Become Twitter user if you if you would rather, and

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you can find him on Twitter at Neil Tyson. That's

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>in E I L T Y s O N. Follow

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>him there. He's always throwing out some some neat little

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>tidbits about the scientific world, or he's questioning the science

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of a major motion picture. He's always a lot of fun,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right, And uh, I think I had mentioned it,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>but he really does lay out, um some some of

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the mysteries of the universe in a very elegant way,

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course with his signature humor, which is pretty awesome.

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well that being said, let's let's break into

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the interview itself. Well, first of all, welcome to Stuff

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind. Well, thank you. On our podcast

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we when we're all about trying to communicate science and

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing topics with our listeners and so you you were,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of course one of our heroes, so it's always a

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to have you on the show. Well, thank you.

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Now I have to live up to that. Uh well,

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we thought we'd just go ahead and start talking a

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit about space chronicles, Facing the Ultimate Frontier UM,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the collection of essays that you have and really addressing

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, from soup to nuts space exploration. UM. I

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to to talk about the political party partisanship that

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about in the book, and I wanted

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to sort of ask you if you thought that showing

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the sausage making part of that would kind of help

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the public to better understand some of the challenges that

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>face NASA in terms of budget constraints. Well, almost everything

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is partisan today except for maybe veterans benefits, you know,

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>some things that are so sacred in the budget. And

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the more people see the sausage making, the

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>more they might become disgusted with the fact that there's

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>sausage making at all for things that are fundamentally bipartisan

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>or or better yet, fundamentally nonpartisan. So to expose it,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is a good thing. Not that I had

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>any secret access to what's going on in Washington, but

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I offered an analysis of how progress on NASA's budget

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and progress in space had been had fallen victim to

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>partisan grandstanding. And you know, space historically has never been

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>partisan at all. In other words, if you liked space,

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so you didn't like space, it was uncorrelated with whether

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you were left or right, or Democrat or Republican or anything.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It was just simply because you had an opinion. And

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing about topics, I think, and it

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>means you don't sort of ascribe to how other people

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>want you to think about something. You can come up

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>with your own views. And that's in a way has

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>transcended that and that's I think it's been one of

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>its strong points. And in fact, most people, particularly in

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the past forty years or so, most people who think

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of America and listed things about America that they liked,

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>most people that is, around the world, NASA would be

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>like number one on that list, Number one. Right, It's

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>not the President's and it's not the FBI or the

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>CIA or the military or anything. It's NASA. So what

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a you know, what a what a point of diplomacy

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that represents when you think about it in a geopolitical way.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's it's high time that people

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just sat down and recognize the value of projects that

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>allow you to dream, empower you to dream about tomorrow.

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>The value that those projects have on our ambitions, on

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>our culture, on our educational pipeline, and and the urge

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>to get people interested in the STEM field of the science, technology, engineering,

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and man. Excellent well, Dr Tyson. In your book, you

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>point out that half a penny on the tax dollar

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is the total cost of all space born telescopes, planetary probes,

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the rover on Mars, the International Space Stations, space Shuttle,

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and telescopes in orbit. You also point out that space

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>exploration has yielded myriad indirect benefits, everything from cordless tools

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and vitable braces and long distance telecommunications to two water filters.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you had your druthers, how much more would

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>you allocate to NASA on the tax dollar and what

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>might that yield in terms of the direct and indirect returns. Yeah,

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>so so that I think that's important and excellent question.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But I want to unpack it into sort of multiple

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>variables that are contained within it. So, for example, we

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>could list spinoffs from NASA direct spinoffs, and I give

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a list in the book. Although I don't do well

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on that list, I just offer the list and then

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I keep going. Because if you went to the list

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of direct spinoffs which would include temper foam and and

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>cordless power tools, high torque battery operated tools that all

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>came from UH pioneering efforts to enable space walking astronauts

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to repair things while they're in space. You can't just

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>look for the nearest hunter in ten volt plug to

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>plug in your tools, and UH you know, things like

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the inexpensive and accurate lasic surgery. The list is long

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's impressive, right on back to the original urge

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to miniaturized electronics in the first place. That was not

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>an interest of industry or the public. It was an

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>interest of NASA to reduce the weight of anything you'd

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be launching from Earth surface to orbit or anywhere else.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you've ask your grandparents, you know what the

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>radio look like, they'll say it was a piece of

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>nature in their living room. And at that time, no

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>one is thinking, Gee, I want to carry that on

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>my hip pocket. It's just not a fault that they

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want. It. Don't occur to anybody that that's what

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you might do with a radio one day. So, yes,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>there's all these spinoffs, there's no doubt about it. But

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the value of those spinoffs, compared

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. In other words, the net sales let's say

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>all those spinoffs and compared to NASA's annual budget, it

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>doesn't compare. It's smaller than NASA's annual budget. So you

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can't justify NASA's budget based on the economic value of spinoffs.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't work. So I only tell I ever

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about it is when someone else brings it up.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's only in the book because I have some

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>obligations just to show all the force that NASA represents.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>The real impact of NASA has to do with its

0:08:53.240 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>influence on a culture and the urge to embrace innovations

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>science and technology, because the benefits the discoveries or science

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and technology are large daily in the papers. When that's

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the activity you're engaged in, and you ask anyone who

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>has wanted to become a scientist or an engineer, just

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>ask them. Occasionally it's the great science or engineering teacher

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>in school. It's the case who twelve would because you

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>had a great science teacher. That's not the majority. The

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>majority of the cases is a kids saw something in life,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they were exposed to some grand vision statement that that

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>something bigger than themselves was undertaking right. It wasn't just

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>some science class, wasn't just some science kit that whose

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>experiments they performed at home or in school. It was

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>bigger than that. Essentially of my generation who entered science

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>entered science because they saw that we were going to

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the moon. That's how old I am, right, So they

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>would not sign a science teacher. Those science teachers for

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>hel up in them get along or making them appreciate

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it all the more. But you can't undervalue how much

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of a force of nature NASA is on on the

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>hearts and minds and the dreams of it culture. And

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to excel at NASA, you have to innovate. And when

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you do that in a big way, the country becomes

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>an innovation nation. And that's that's the real return. So

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the return is you want to assure your economic survival

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future because you are stimulating people to innovate

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and innovations and science and technology century the engines of

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's economy. Well, there you have it. There it is,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And you don't have to beat people over the head

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to make them interested in this stuff. You

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>get that for free. You don't have to worry about

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>keeping your factories here because we'll be making things that

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>no one knows how to make yet. Because we'll be innovating.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to worry about keeping kids interested in

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>science because the headlines will do that. And everybody looks

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>at these challenges of America of falling behind is a

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>series of band aids that they need to apply, and

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>then everything is somehow fixed without looking at the root

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>cause of all the lost vision statements that the citizen

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>m um is uh has been has been that that

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>has evaporated from our culture over the past ten and

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. Um. In your book, you speak about the

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>three factors capable of stirring human cultures to engage in megaprojects.

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>UH talk about war, economics, and less common these days,

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>obedience to a god or some some royal figure. So

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>does it really boil down to two negative motivations for

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>culture as a whole? Is it is? It doesn't have

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>to be fear or agreed? Do you think to really

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>get the megaprojects such as space exploration out there? Depends

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of how you use the word negative, how you judge it.

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And I try not to value judge the thing that

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I just put it put it out there, and I

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>lead the value judging to others. I would say that

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the greatest driver of human expenditure of capital, be it

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>financial capital or human capital, is war. Now you can

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>interpret that as defense, all right, And that's the Great

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Wall of China for example. That clearly was not a

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>military project for offense. It was a defensive military project,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and that was constructed in the interests of the safety

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and security of its citizens. So I wouldn't You can

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think of it as negative because it's in response to

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a threat, all right. And then you have economic return

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely negative if it's sort of badly exploiting people. But

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in its purest form, economic growth is a good thing

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for the world. Uh. Those nice nations that are wealthier,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>they live longer and happier lives and with less disease.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So economic wealth, though while not as powerful a driver

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>as war is, comes in a very close second. And

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you just look at you know, there's Queen as Abella.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>He didn't stay to Columbus, go to the New World

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and come back and tell us about the botanical uh

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>explorations you did, and and and show us the maps

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and we can put it up in our library. No,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it was here's some flags wherever you go, put the

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>flag put to the Spanish flag down, and you know,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to clear these lands for the Spanish Empire. And by

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, try to explore as much as you can

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the natural resources so that we can have trade partners

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>or we can become wealthier. And so yes, there's a

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of a hit geministic motive there at the end

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of the day. So you know Spain, Spain got wealthy

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>because they valued exploration as an economic activity. Columbus, I've

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>never met the guy, but surely he did this because

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he and his heart was an explorer. And so the

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>explorer explores, but somebody's got to write to check. And

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the history of this activity has demonstrated that the check

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>writers or governments when you're exploring where no one has

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>gone before, and private enterprise comes in later and exploit

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>those activities in the financial interest of the nations. Yeah,

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>so in America's financial incentive to go into space, not

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>because you're going to read the benefits of spinoffs, but

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>because an innovation nation competes economically. In the twenty one century,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>if exploration is not a good note of reason for

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you to do it, then do it because you don't

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>want to die poor. Well, you don't want to see

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a future of America where we are economically weak or

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>powerless on the world's stage. I am reminded that in Economists,

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Paul Krugman speculated that the discovery of an impending alien

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>attack would fix all of America's economic woes in about

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months. So if if Paul Krugman were to approach

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you about faking such a threat, what would you say. No,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say that there's no doubt of America's resolve

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>when we feel threatened. I think that's there's just no

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>question about it. And because a threat transcends politics, if

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone feels threatened, then you're not gonna have one person

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>say well, we're not threatened. If everybody feels threatened, and

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you have all pistons running aligned in Congress and moneys

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>get the budgets get past, and military investments on flow

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>legged rivers. This is a major thesis of the book,

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>based on my read of the history of human conduct.

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>What all I would say is the value of these

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>investments not only would return in your security because you

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>want to deflect the asteroid rather than go extinct, but

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>also you become the kind of economy that thrives on

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>innovation and those If that's my only point, it becomes

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>an investment at that point, and the very question, oh

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>can we really afford of course you can afford it

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>because you invest it. You're investing, and you're expecting a

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>return on that investment in the form of a wealthier

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>nation in the decades to come. And by the way,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that transcends time scales of quarterly reports and annual reports

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and congressional re election times. So somebody needs the foresight

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>necessary to put this into motion to assure a future

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>stability of our nation's economy. You know, you're talking about

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>taking the long view, and um, I can't help but

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>think about the long U and asteroids near Earth objects.

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Um oh you can, huh, you can't. Decades this has

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>been you know, we have any astrophysicists in arms reach.

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You could have told you all about the asteroid threat.

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And apparently we are as a culture, as a world,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we are feeble minded such that we don't believe it

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>until it happens, and then it's kind of too late.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a little you know, excuse me, somehow,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as threat asn't real unless it's staring you in the face.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>The good thing about science is that you can dicked

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the coming of a threat. Yet that's apparently not enough

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>to trigger people's actions. The good thing, the silver lining

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of the euros meteor in Russia, is that nobody died.

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Many people injured, but nobody died. And so therefore, if

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we had to be slammed by something and learn a

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>lesson from it, it was an ideal sort of lesson

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because everybody just needed to get a little patched up

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and going about their way to fix a few walls

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and windows. What a lesson that is. What a shot

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>across the bow that was. But again, if we were

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>already into space, this would be a trivial extension of

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>activities we were already engaged in. If all you're gonna

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>say now was listening to space so that we can

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>stop an asteroid, are you're missing the point? You're missing

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the point. That's like saying I tried to analogize to

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the building of the interstate system in the country. If

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>someone said, let's build an interstate to connect New York

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and Los Angeles, well, that's useful, for sure, but I

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.239
<v Speaker 1>will how about all the rest of the country. How

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>about that? How about the other cities? What are you

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>only going to do it to bring people one place

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>to another, because that's all you can think of doing

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>when there's all the rest of the country that's that

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>is waiting to be explored. So I viewed the entire

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>solar system as our backyard. And when you do, you know,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's asteroid miners. One day and we show them

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>our latest telescope data and they say that an asteroid

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>headed our way. Could you guys snare it be where

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>it puts us at risk? And they'll go ahead and

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>stare it because there they know how to manipulate a

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>maneuver and mine asteroids. The government wouldn't even people ever

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would pay for that, but they wouldn't have to like

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:42.239
<v Speaker 1>launch it themselves. All right, we're just gonna take one

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>quick break and when we come back, more questions with

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>neutograph types and including your question. All right, we're back.

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump right back into the interview with the ductor

0:18:55.600 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and new of the draft type. Yeah. I just a

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>very elegant explanation of asteroids and long period comments in

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>your book and space chronicles, and I thought it just

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>really laid out the reasons why we can detect some

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and the reasons why I can why we can't detect others.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>In particular, you talk about apopis, which I know you've

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about before in the media, and how this is

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>actually something that's very serious that we need to focus

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>on UM and I thought that maybe you could talk

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that, um in practical terms, how

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we confront a problem like this and asteroid that's in

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>our view. And then a second part to that, I

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe we could talk a little bit about the

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>role of privatization of asteroid mining and how that may

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or may not affect asteroids. Yeah, you know, if your mato,

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you might say that, lets blow the sucker out of

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the sky. You know, you got nukes in the silos

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>left over from the Cold War put into good use.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know what I say often and as all

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that I know of the American Armed Forces tells me

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this is true, that we're really good at blowing stuff

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>up and less good at knowing where the pieces will fall.

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And that seems to have applied literally and metaphorically to

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>our military policy, where if you're objective to be to

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>blow up an asteroid, i'd be concerned that the one

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>spot that was originally targeted by this asteroid is now

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>headed to two places instead of one. So what have

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you done? Um, now you have to evacuate both coasts,

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, so there's some emerging consensus among those

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>who have studied the problem. Myself included that the soundest

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>way to approach this problem is through an asteroid deflection scenario.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The asteroid will continue to live another day and possibly

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>harm you in another day, but the advantage of it

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is you get to nudge it slowly, and you get

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to watch how effective you've been, and you keep doing

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it until you are as effective as you needed to be.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>And so with a paphos, the idea of this is

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that when it comes very close to the Earth, that

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you alter its course with it so that in its

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>return orbit it doesn't slam into the Earth precisely because

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the later you hit you get to the problem, and

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the more the all your capacity to solve that problem dropped. Gotcha,

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of us is looking into the crystal ball.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there's been to talk about asteroid mining

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and private companies taking that on because you know, at

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at some point it might yield some some profits, certainly

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>not right away. Uh. The question I think for us is,

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>if you have so much space junk, if you have

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>near Earth objects in orbit, and you have private companies

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>up there now with their equipment, do they then have

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>an obligation to help clean up space junk to help

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>deflect near Earth objects. Yeah. I wouldn't call it an obligation.

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I would just call it no. How you know, who

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>do you get? I mean, forgive me for referencing the

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>movie Farm again, But they had a task set out

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>in front of them in the film to bury a

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>nuke in an asteroid, because otherwise it won't blow it apart.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So in the ranks of NASA there was no one

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>who had any experience drilling into solid rock or something

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to penetrate, and so they got Bruce Willis and

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>his craft team of guess their oil rig drillers or something,

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and so they had a very specific talent set unique

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to the task. So, if we are busy turning the

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Solar System into our backyard, then there will be a

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>mining company of exploiting asteroid. So we would presume that

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>if if asteroid mining was an activity and economic activity,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 1>then they would know how to get to asteroids, how

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.959
<v Speaker 1>to mind them, how to turn them around, how to

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>tow them from one location to another to be better

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>suited for their access. And if you have that capability,

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>then why wouldn't they be the ones you would task

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to uh deflect an asteroid and it becomes an asteroid? Right?

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Is one coming out way? I want you to take

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it and mind it for all it's worth, and and

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're done with it. Would that'd be kind of

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>cool if every asteroid that would end life on Earth

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>simply became a source of natural resources to help life

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.479
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. That's the kind of thinking that goes on

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're in an innovation nation. A storm is ready

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to hit the coast, you know, do you run away

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>from it and buy up all the water from the

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>shelves or what do you say? How can I mitigate

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that storm? How can I deflect that storm? How can

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I tap the psychlonic energy contained within it and drive

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the energy needs of the city that it's about to destroy?

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't call it an obligation. I'll just call it. Yeah.

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course they'll do it, and of course and they'll

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>know how to. Other people will have money, but not

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to know now, so you pay them. I mean it's

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a company and they use their resources. You're paying to

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>use their resources. You know, the Post Office doesn't fly

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>their own airplanes. They pay commercial carriers to fly mail

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>US mail in their belly. The government has had this

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of relationship with a business forever. You know, how

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>do we make the cheap? In World War Two government

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>gave money the Christler said the Christler had a good design,

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>They built the cheap and they still make cheaps and

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>they make money off of it. That's how we're in

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a capitalist society. That's how you know, that's how that's

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to work. Obviously, the wave of public and political

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>support for a space explanation has that been flowed over

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the years. Um, but what if we had somehow maintained

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it at its level? How far would we be today? Oh?

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So at it? So at the level you're talking about

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>would be the Mateen sixties six level. That's where NASA's

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>funding had peaked as a percentage of the federal budget.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It peaked at about four. In fact, there's a huge

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>set of appendices in Space Chronicles where I plot the

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>NASA's budget over fifty years, and in there is the

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>original founding document of NASA. NASA has sounded like the

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>same week I was born, So I feel NASA pains

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and joys and challenges. So in there you can see

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the plot of it's of the budget and it's it's

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a stunning difference between the commitment that we made as

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a nation over that period and the commitment we're making now. Now.

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to always keep the commitment at high

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>if the nation gets wealthier. If the nation gets wealthier,

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>which it has done over the decades, then your percentage

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.239
<v Speaker 1>could go down, yet your net money could go up.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's how that works if you're always referencing

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>your budget as a percent of the federal budget. But

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to give to put some numbers on this, it was

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>four in ninety six going into nineteen. That was so

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the peep build up of the Apollo program. And if

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we have that money now, NASA's budget would be eight

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>times a factor of eight larger than its current value.

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>If NASA we're we're appreciated at the same percent of

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the federal budget that it was back then, and I

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>would claim that at a much lower price tag than that,

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you can turn the entire solar system into your backyard.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You can reach a space rentier. And these are stories

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that the press would write about. I want to desk

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>if you thought that an earthlike plant might be discovered,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know in fifty years, a hundred years. And

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think that it's something like citizen science that

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>will be a part of it in the absence of

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a sput Nick moment or an alien attack. The sput

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Nick moments and the alien attacks are the kind of

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>forces that galvanize an entire society. But in any society,

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>there are always people. In any wealthy society, there are

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>always people who will spend their mental and emotional energies

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking about discovery. It's been going on. The people are

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>doing that ever since at the beginning. You know who's

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the first one to leave the cave. That's somebody who

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to discover. It's an urge within us that I

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think we should stand and denial of. Although many

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>people have forgotten what it is or what it felt

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>like to explore, every child knows what it's like to explore.

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>They turn over rocks and climb trees, and pluck your suburban,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Your climb trees, They plucked petals off roses jump two

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>feet in puddles. They you know, this is what kids do.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>They catch snowflakes in their mouths, and adults somehow lose

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this playful curiosity about the world around them. And all

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>you need to do is keep it. You don't have

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to create it from scratch. It was already there. Just

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>find find ways to foster it and nurture it, and

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>then you're you're coming along nicely. So now that the

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thrust of your question was, I just wondered if you

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>thought that an earth like planet might be discovered in

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the next fifty years, and do you think that citizen

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>science will be a part of that, since we're somewhat

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>handstrong in terms of budgets to to to really look

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>very hard for an earth like planet. Sure, well, we

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>already have earth like planets in the catalog. So the

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>challenge is an earthlike planet in the habitable zone, the

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Goldilocks zone of its host star, not too close otherwise

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>if it had liquid water, it would evaporate, and not

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>too far because if it had liquid water would freeze

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's not useful to life as we know it,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>which requires liquid water. So we have planets that have

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>been discovered that just not many of them. This might

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>handful fewer than five out of the we're rising through

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a thousand exoplanets that are in the catalogs today. Citizen

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>science is a is a wonderful exploitation of the Internet,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and we should have more of it, especially since in

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the astrophysics community we are overrun with data, the scales

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of data that we simply can't analyze ourselves, and I

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good thing. I think there should be

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>more of it, especially for the data heavy fields such

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>as my own. But that's itself is not going to

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>transform a culture. That's gonna that's a side activity for

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people who already know they like science. Okay, how are

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you doing on time? Do you have time for a

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>few of the listeners submitted questions or do you know

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen more minutes? Okay, well, I'm gonna go through these.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>If you don't like the question, are you I'll take

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>any question to give me. Okay, all right, Well, this

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is the first question comes from a listener named Mike.

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike asked, can you expound in a simple way on

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>how dark matter and energy seem to bind and expand

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the matter we see as the visible universe. Uh yeah,

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you think of mass, all right, mass can

0:29:55.040 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be manifested in two ways. In one form it is energy.

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>In another form it's matter. Okay, they think of that,

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 1>think of it that way, and each of those contain

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>mass were mass equivalent. And our understanding of the universe

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is beginning, it's evolution. Its end sort of flows through

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that understanding, and you can look at how much mass

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>there is in the universe and what it's doing to

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Over the years, beginning in ninety six, we

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>learned that there's more going on in the universe than

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just what our mass is doing. So in seven we

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>discovered us there's gravity out there that has no known

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>point of origin. And then in to two decades ago,

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in late nineties, that is, we found that there's a

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>pressure in the vacuum of space that's forcing the universe

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to expand. So and those are huge fractions of all

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that is driving the universe. If you add up the

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>extra gravity, which we call dark matter, with the extra

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the in the vacuum of space, which we

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>call dark energy, it's of everything we know. So you know,

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you can say we're just completely stupid about how the

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>universe works, although the part we do know works really

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>really well, so that's a good thing. But the rest,

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>if you can if you combine them. So there's our

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of mass, which is matter and energy, and then

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the the the the the dark matter, and the dark energy.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>All of this is what's driving the universe. And the

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>total sort of energy content in the universe is contained

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in the sum of those three. And we don't know

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what's causing the dark matter, and we don't know what's

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>causing the dark energy. Okay um. Our next question comes

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to us from listener Jerry. Jerry asked, how do we

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>communicate science effectively? And what other science communicators do you

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>admire other than the great Sagans or at for us?

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, in America we do we do a few

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>things very well, or at least we do a few

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>things famously. One of them is that we make jets,

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>all right. Another one is it's our entertainment industry. You know,

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>America entertains the world with our movies, our TV shows,

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>our podcasts, our our broadcast content. Is an extraordinary gift

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to the world. Any of us remember when you visit

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>other countries when you were a kid, you put on

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the TV and there's your favorite TV show dubbed in

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the local language, whereas we don't have any of their

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>TV shows dubbed in English. Right, So there's clearly a

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>one way street going on here where we're entertaining the world.

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>It would be irresponsible of anyone who is trying to

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>teach an electorate if it could be irresponsible if they

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't exploit the power of media, entertainment, media and delivering

0:32:56.200 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the messages. So that's just an important fact. Okay, we

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>have another question that comes to us from listener Cody.

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Cody asked, what's your view on the connection between science

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and philosophy. There's a very long tradition of a marriage

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>between science and philosophy that goes back forever. And if

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at what the philosopher does, the philosopher assesses

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the landscape and then sits in a chair and thinks

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>about it, deep thoughts, and then comes up with some

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>new understanding, with some new outlook on that landscape. Philosophers

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>at their best, that's what they do. The scientists, as

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:43.959
<v Speaker 1>scientists at their best, will assess the landscape, propose an

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>idea for how or why that landscape should be something else.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Or something different or something more nuanced, and then they'll

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>divide an experiment to test the idea. If the idea

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is not supported by experiment, they discard the idea and

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>then move on to the next one. So the difference

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>between the philosopher and the scientist is that the philosopher

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>has no laboratory, pilosopher has no telescope. Plosopher has no

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>particle accelerator. And when physics, which I'm using sort of

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>as elite science in my answer to your question, when

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>physics left the tabletop, which is basically the hundred and

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, it left the tabletop and entered the

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>realm of the quantum, which which lives wholly outside of

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>human experience and human common sense, and it looked at

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the large scale structure of the universe. These two extremes

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>fall so far away from your life experience that you

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>can't sit on a couch and deduce the nature of

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the world from your own life experience, because your life

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>experience doesn't contain that which the experiments are demonstrating that

0:34:56.440 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the how the actual world behaves. Now, of course Einstein

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>conjured up relativity, you know, not quite out of the blue,

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but there were some puzzling things that could not be understood,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and he wrote a mathematical formalism for his theory, and

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 1>then that came up with predictions, so that we tested

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the predictions and if theories turned out to be true.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's a good thing. Philosophers don't tend to bring

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>math to the problem in the way actual scientists do.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>The more sort of idea driven than calculation driven. Historically,

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how that's been the case. So I could a

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>philosopher have come up with relativity, I suppose, but they didn't.

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>A philosopher surely could have come up with evolution because

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the data were available, although Gdarin had some extra data

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to really drive it home, but that one didn't require

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>from financy equipment to have resolved biology. Philosopher in principle

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>could have come up with evolution by natural selection, but

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. It was a scientist. And so you look

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>at progress in our understanding of the natural world in

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the last hundred years, the last hundred and fifty years,

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that progress has primarily been by the thinking of scientists,

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>not of philosophers. Now you can say some scientists are

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking philosophically. I don't have a problem with that, But

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, let us train people in philosophy so that

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they can become better scientists, I don't. I don't improve

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of that at all. That my read of how that

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>has gone in the past century tells me that you

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>are removing yourself from the frontier cosmic discovery. Now there's

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>some branches of science that are brand new, like spanking

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>brand new, like neuroscience. All right, that's only been on

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the map, you know, ten years tops before then. There

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 1>are people, you know, poking around the brain, but it

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really taken off as its own, as its own

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>field where you can get degrees in it. And that's

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>early enough that and plus, the mind is so fascinating

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and so complex, and there's so many ways that can

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.479
<v Speaker 1>think about how it works and how it doesn't work.

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It might benefit from the efforts of philosophers. And I

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>know there are a bunch of sort of neuro philosophers

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>who are orbiting the field in an effort to contribute.

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>And my hope is that they can and set things

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 1>in directions that they need to be in the way

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>early philosophers with regard to physics did for physicists. There

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are other branches of You know, this philosophy of ethics

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is religious philosophy. There are other kinds of philosophy out there.

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You were, specifically, I presume, referring to philosophers in ways

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that they might contribute to the advancing frontier of science

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and your questions the philosophers asked that are just simply

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 1>not useful to a scientist, like how do you really

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>know the moon is there? To say, well, I have

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:49.879
<v Speaker 1>light and the well, that's just the light of the moon.

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, how about the moon itself, Well, I can measure, well,

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that's just a measurement of the light of them. And

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and you could down many kinds of beer discussing the

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.720
<v Speaker 1>there's another there's a whole there's a chunk of philosophers

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>who are asking the question, is it the molecule H

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>two oh water? If you isolate a single H to

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a molecule, is that water? Whereas Warter the macroscopic properties

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we give when you have countless numbers of these, and

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>then you then it flows and its liquid e And

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not a liquid, it's not a solid,

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not anything. So it's a molecule. The philosophers

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 1>arguing this publishing papers on this, and the scientist just

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have time. The luxury of time. I call them

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>beer conversations, conversations where you just sort of question the

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>existential conversations about knowledge and life and mind matter. You know, okay,

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not useful in the laboratory. UM let me

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 1>just follow up on that too. I was thinking about

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ethics in terms of philosophy, and many times it comes up.

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about out, for instance, bringing back the

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>woolly mammoth, or if you're talking about artificial intelligence, you're

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about ethics. They're um making certain that some sort

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>of piece of technology isn't gonna show up on the

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>black market. How much of that should science be concerned

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with before after the creation the possibility. So I'm curious

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 1>whether there is a negative argument to cloning a mammoth

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>other than no, it's extinct, will leave it extinct? You know,

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't someone's going to clone a mammoth.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you get the tissue out of the glacier

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>as the glacier melt, because all our glaciers are melting,

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so all kinds of fun I say, creatures are going

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to be spilling out of that glacier glacier probably a

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>few caveman while we're at it, and so, yeah, we

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have the power to clone it. Somebody's going to clone it.

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Now to ask what the ethics of that is, I

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.399
<v Speaker 1>think there's there are more interesting ethical questions that are

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in front of us. And whether we clone in mammoth like,

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, cloning people who are cloning or creating deadly viruses.

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, that could be used genocidally. I mean, so

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>if you had to rank the topics top to bottom,

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you know what we do with the mammoths. I don't

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 1>think people are going to protest. I agree. I think

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that what I'm thinking about is how much of the

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>scientists concern him or herself when they are going through

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the motions of what is possible, what can be created?

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Is this out of the realm of scientists? Should they

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>concentrate on what is possible? And you know, does the

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 1>just society create the ethics? Does should there be any

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of overlapping there is that? Is that a job

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that the scientists would think about ethics? Yeah, that's an

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>excellent point. I think it's the job of the scientists

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as a citizen to think about it. You know, all

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>citizens should be thinking about the ethical conduct of the species.

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And fortunately, at leave there's been some good investment in this,

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in this along these lines over the decades and over

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the centuries, so that there's half actually been ethical shifts

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in our conduct over the years. Right. You know, their

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>books written on how to treat your slave ethically, and

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>they don't address the question of why you would have

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a slave in the first place. Right, So, so fortunately

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a collective sense of what is good and what

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is right that is not anchored in some time past

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>where the needs and the conduct of what was considered

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:46.240
<v Speaker 1>reprehensible behavior, reprehensible behavior of the past defended by whatever

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>documents people had or whatever their upbringing was. That the

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>stuffing that does not carry into the future. I'm glad

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for that, right, I am free because of that. So

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>so that's fine. So I think the ethics can be

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 1>an evolving conversation. I'm old enough to remember all this

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>conversation about um in vitro fertilization, the first test tube baby.

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Should we isn't you know? Now? It's it doesn't even

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even make a news story if someone is

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>born from a test tube it's a non story and

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so but at the time people know it's the ethics

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of this, and it's like, you know, chill out, you know,

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just try to think it through and you know, look

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at the benefits and is there a downside that isn't religion?

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, religion is always telling you what you shouldn't do.

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And so if your only revival is religion and you

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>haven't really thought it through rationally, then you're missing some

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 1>further conversations that should be had about what goes on.

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>There's something else that's true that that needs to be

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on the table. That science fiction writers are awesome at

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>depicting futures where science goes bad, and they create terrifying

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>images of nuclear energy gone bad. You know, uh, just

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>cloning gone bad. Um uh, virus has gone bad. And

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm happy to report that there has never been

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>science gone bad by the efforts of mad scientists who

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>wants to take over the world. But we really have

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to watch out for our mad politicians, right even the

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Adam bomb as ass Yes, that was the whole set

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of complicit physicist who made that bomb, there's no doubt

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. But somebody paid their way. Somebody wrote their paycheck.

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Somebody funded that entire enterprise, and those are governments. Those

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the congress, that is the electorate, that is a president,

0:43:54.880 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that is a president's cabinet, somebody else by geopolitical forces

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>are deciding what they want to do with the science,

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and you will you will never find scientists leading armies

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>to invade other countries. It's just not what we do.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So the the the ethical conduct is not so much

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of what a science just does, but how does the

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 1>society react to the discoveries of science, And that needs

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 1>to be a in the Some over lap there, of course,

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 1>between the two. But ethics is a cultural problem, not

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.360
<v Speaker 1>simply that of what a scientist does. Almost every scientific

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:41.320
<v Speaker 1>discovery that we've ever found has extraordinary benefit to humankind.

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary the early days of of of nuclear physics, where

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we found radioactive materials, and Marie carry died of some

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of cancer. I think it was leukemia, surely as

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>a result of her playing around with radium named because

0:44:57.760 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of his radioactive properties. There's an entire branch of medicine

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>called radiology, which is the benefits of the investments of

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>physicists who are trying to understand nature at its most

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>most basic level, so extraordinary benefits to society await us

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>by every scientific discovery. Uh that is to come, history

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:27.839
<v Speaker 1>tells us. Okay, well, that concludes the interview. I hope

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that you guys have enjoyed that. Again, thank you guys

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for giving us some great questions for him to answer.

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think we have time for a bit

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of mail here. Let's see. Let's call the robot over.

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, we heard from listener Adam, and Adam writes

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>then with an email title discovering Nutmeg in India, of course,

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 1>responding to our episode that we did on the science

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 1>and history of nutmeg. He says, Hey, guys, I went

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on a tour of Kerala's backwaters basically huge waterways that

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people live alongside, and we went to a spice farm.

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Guess what was there? Meg? My first thought was your

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast about nutmeg last year. As the guide explained it,

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>he went part by part. The red part inside is

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>called mace in the local language and is extremely expensive.

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It's used in Indian dishes like very Yanni. The best part, however,

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it was when he described how you could get a

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote kick from eating too much nutmeg. I don't

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think the others understood, but thanks to your podcast, I

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>knew exactly what he meant. Thanks again and keep up

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the great work. Some pictures from the two were attached

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:29.359
<v Speaker 1>with the nutmeg at the bottom. And Adam, of course

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is the chief Happiness Officer who has been traveling around

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the world and and regularly writes into our podcast and

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a few other house tofforks podcasts as well, and you

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can find out more about what he's up to at

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>happiness plunge dot com. But yeah, he sent us a

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>number of these pictures and as always, just fascinating glimpse

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 1>into his travels. Yeah, I love that to the the

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.439
<v Speaker 1>tour guide had a little wink wink nudge nutge because

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>they're referring to the hallucinogenic properties of nutmeg, which we've

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>probably said us a million times by now not worth it. Uh.

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>If anybody is like, wow, that has hallucinatory properties, that

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is not the stuff that anybody really wants to play with,

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I should say. We also heard from a couple of

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>listeners out there who were really taken by our our

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>episodes that dealt with the shadow self as it relates

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to well. In one episode of Pro Wrestling in the

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>other episode, we talked about undercover cops who have a

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>false identity that they're using, and also actors and method

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise that are that have to put cloak themselves

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.399
<v Speaker 1>in some level of fiction in order to do their thing.

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So we heard from Josephine Josephine Wrightson and says, Hi,

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Julie, I really enjoyed your last episode on

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the self and the roles we play. I really enjoy

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>your podcast your other podcast as well, of course, and

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of things to contribute to the discussion. First,

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I went and listened to Bandy Newton's Ted Talk, and

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>at one point she mentions feeling that she didn't have

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a self since she was able to play other people

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so well. That reminded me of another actor who supposedly

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>felt the same way, Peter Sellers on the subject of

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:58.959
<v Speaker 1>playing characters as an actor, myself, I find it best

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to take some method step to get to the right

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>place emotionally. But I find the strangest thing in my

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>case is that though I always have my home self,

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>whatever character I'm playing at the time usually rubs off

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>on me a bit. It's sort of like who I

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>normally am is being shown through the lens of another personality.

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember one character I played, Charles, the second of

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>England's Minister nel Gwen, who was very happy and positive,

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>had a particular effect on me. And my mom's always

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.799
<v Speaker 1>said that she can come back anytime she likes. Can't

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 1>wait to hear your next podcast, Sincerely, Josephine in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting, UM, And I can't help but think of personality.

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like a prism and it kind of

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 1>depends on which direction the light is hitting it and

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>which you exhibit whatever feelings or personality at that time. Um.

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And we've talked about this before, about how it's related

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to consciousness and the unconscious, so again it's it's very

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me to know that personality isn't something that

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>is always a stable thing. You really have to work

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>out it because it's part of that instruction of our reality.

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We also heard from a listener by the name of Stephanie.

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie writes in and says hello, Robert and Julie, greetings

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 1>from Toronto. Another one and she's responding to the same episode,

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. I wonder if they know each other. Um,

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>she says, I recently enjoyed listening to your episode on

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:19.320
<v Speaker 1>undercover Actors in the Shadow sell. You invited undercover agents

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and actors to write in and share their experiences of

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>identity and role playing. While I don't fit either of

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>those descriptions, I thought you'd be interested in my perspective

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on the issue, since I suffer from what they might

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>be diagnosed as a particularly acute form of imposter syndrome

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the way people respond to my

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 1>outer self. Yes, it's much different from my inner self.

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm thirty with a PhD and a tenure track appointment

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 1>at a major Canadian research university, but I look like

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm about seventeen, with wide blue eyes and a small

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:48.399
<v Speaker 1>stature at five two and about a hundred pounds. While

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the situation is well situated for winning the biggest stuffed

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.240
<v Speaker 1>animal prize of the AID, guesting carnival booth, and convincing

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a class of undergraduates that you're a child genius, a

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.719
<v Speaker 1>real life dugie howser, it often just makes me feel

0:49:59.760 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>clause trophobic in my own body. The way I'm treated

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>by others never seems to match my sense of self.

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Since starting his faculty at the University. Of this past summer,

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the situation has become its most intense. Each new person

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I meet, students, staff, or fellow faculty member treats me

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like a first year student unless I correct them, which

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, I've given up doing. After encountering

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 1>this response multiple times a day from a range of

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:23.320
<v Speaker 1>people for the past several months, I'm beginning to feel

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:25.799
<v Speaker 1>like a young actor playing a grown up role. I'm

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not sure if this is just a serious case of

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>imposter syndrome or whether a more fundamental shift in my

0:50:30.360 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of self is happening. Your discussion made me wonder

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'd be like, who I'd be if the way

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>others respond to me had always aligned with my age

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and general intelligence level. I've attached a picture of me

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>on my honeymoon that illustrates this issue. More evidence available here.

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And then she said a Flickr page, so it love

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:49.879
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, Stephanie, and I did see that picture, and yes,

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 1>she she does come across as very young, and I

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have to say that I understand what she's saying because

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to a certain age I had the same problem. And

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it is a little bit odd because people don't expect

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you to sort of come out as is the person

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that you are. They think that, and not that I'm

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:07.359
<v Speaker 1>petite and I look like I'm eighteen, because certainly there's

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 1>neither one of these. It's true. Uh, but people don't

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>always expect, you know, a certain personality to come out. Yeah,

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. It was a really fascinating email to read,

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, to think about. You know, you know what

0:51:17.920 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens when who we feel we are inside is

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>out of step with her outer self, be it because

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of our physical appearance, or because the way we end

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>up carrying ourselves in the world, or even just how

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:31.759
<v Speaker 1>we are in first impressions versus how how we really are,

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and you do get into this complex question of who

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are we really you know, well, and especially if you

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>look at the studies that say that an infticular, are

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 1>men who are taller tend to have more responsibilities put

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>upon them and tend to get promoted more, and so

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth, and that that's a huge generalization.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But actually I should dig up that study so I

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 1>can talk about it a little bit more in detail.

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But things like that that, you know, color people's perception,

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the way that you get to operate in

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>the world. Uh so if you are that person, or

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're not that person, or if you're blonde or

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so on and so forth. You know, how, how does

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that affect the way that you accept certain responsibility in

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the world or don't accept them. Yeah, I mean, I, um,

0:52:12.320 --> 0:52:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm six two or six three, depending on you know,

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>how I want to measure myself. I guess I guess

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm sixth three, but sometimes I hold it at six

0:52:18.920 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>two because it feels like a good cutting off point.

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 1>But you were just promoted to like president of the universe, No,

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I think now I grow my sideburns long and so that, like,

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, people might see me and they're like, who's

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that tall guy. We should promote him to a level

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:32.839
<v Speaker 1>of incompetence, and then they do my sideburns and they're

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like maybe not, maybe not. You just cited the Peter principle,

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>did I know? Yeah? Of course, yeah, yeah, yeah, Well,

0:52:40.480 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I have been there to varying degrees in

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the past. Before I want up here and groom my

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 1>side burns out. So yeah, you've been to the Peter principle. Well,

0:52:48.400 --> 0:52:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I have found myself being when I was in newspapers.

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I found myself gaining more and more responsibilities that I

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't really want or enjoy and or or even was

0:52:57.400 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>necessarily that good at them. But yeah, no, I think

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>every buddy has stepped into Peter's suit at one time

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or another. So my advice is grow your cideburns out

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone ladies too. Yeah, I say, I'm with my mind

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>all right. Well, if you have anything you would like

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to share with us, be it about this whole you

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>can undrew we were just talking about related itself, about

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the shadow self, and if you have any feedback or

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>anything to add regarding the neotographed Tyson interview, we'd love

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you again. It was a tremendous treat

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to speak with Dr Tyson, and I really enjoy getting

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to share your questions with him. So I really think

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.959
<v Speaker 1>from now on, whenever it's it's possible, I will reach

0:53:31.960 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 1>out to people on Facebook and let you guys contribute

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 1>at least some of the questions for our our interviews.

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to do that, if you want

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to find us on Facebook and follow us so that

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you can be on top of that. Um again, Facebook,

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we are stuff to blow your mind. We're also stuff

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to blow your Mind on Tumbler and on Twitter. We

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>go by the handle below the Mind, and you can

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>always drop us a line at blow the Mind at

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Discovery dot com For more on this and thousands of

0:53:57.920 --> 0:54:03.839
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Does it how stuff works out? Up? Could

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>e