WEBVTT - Nate and Maria’s 2025 Predictions

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:28.764
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:28.804 --> 0:00:31.524
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanikova.

0:00:31.244 --> 0:00:32.404
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Nate Silver.

0:00:33.124 --> 0:00:35.564
<v Speaker 1>Nate Today is going to be a fun show. You're

0:00:35.604 --> 0:00:39.564
<v Speaker 1>taping from Tokyo, I'm taping from New York, so from

0:00:39.644 --> 0:00:43.044
<v Speaker 1>opposite sides of the world. We'll be talking about our

0:00:43.084 --> 0:00:46.244
<v Speaker 1>predictions for twenty twenty five on a whole number of things,

0:00:46.484 --> 0:00:49.004
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of topics, from you know, economics and

0:00:49.044 --> 0:00:53.564
<v Speaker 1>politics to pop culture and lots of things in between, sports,

0:00:53.884 --> 0:00:57.124
<v Speaker 1>fashion choices. I think you'll enjoy this one. Let's get

0:00:57.124 --> 0:00:57.404
<v Speaker 1>into it.

0:00:57.484 --> 0:01:02.284
<v Speaker 2>Nate, Happy twenty twenty five.

0:01:02.324 --> 0:01:07.804
<v Speaker 1>Everybody Happy twenty twenty five. It's a quarter thing century.

0:01:08.124 --> 0:01:12.124
<v Speaker 1>It's a good boy, all right. Yeah, that's insane. God,

0:01:12.484 --> 0:01:17.324
<v Speaker 1>what were you doing on New Year's two thousand? On

0:01:17.524 --> 0:01:20.444
<v Speaker 1>New Year's two thousand, Oh my god, I was still

0:01:20.604 --> 0:01:27.044
<v Speaker 1>in high school, I was God, yeah, I was in

0:01:27.124 --> 0:01:30.244
<v Speaker 1>high school. So I was with my family. Where were

0:01:30.284 --> 0:01:31.364
<v Speaker 1>you twenty five years ago?

0:01:32.724 --> 0:01:36.324
<v Speaker 2>I was in on a beach in Key West, Florida, nice,

0:01:36.644 --> 0:01:42.284
<v Speaker 2>doing various substances that may or may not have been

0:01:42.364 --> 0:01:44.644
<v Speaker 2>legal in the state of Florida. And we'll leave it

0:01:44.684 --> 0:01:44.964
<v Speaker 2>at that.

0:01:45.084 --> 0:01:47.484
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good. I think there's I think you're good on

0:01:47.524 --> 0:01:53.764
<v Speaker 1>the statute of limitations. Okay, okay, all right, so let's

0:01:53.764 --> 0:01:56.404
<v Speaker 1>get into it. So we have a bunch of different

0:01:56.444 --> 0:02:02.164
<v Speaker 1>topics ranging from you know, crypto to pop culture. Do

0:02:02.204 --> 0:02:04.084
<v Speaker 1>you want to start it off with kind of one

0:02:04.084 --> 0:02:05.964
<v Speaker 1>of the big topics that we've talked about on the

0:02:06.004 --> 0:02:10.444
<v Speaker 1>show multiple times, which is bitcoin. What do you think

0:02:10.524 --> 0:02:14.724
<v Speaker 1>nate will be the highest price that bitcoin will reach

0:02:14.804 --> 0:02:16.324
<v Speaker 1>this year? And what do you think will be the

0:02:16.364 --> 0:02:20.044
<v Speaker 1>lowest price bitcoin will reach? If you want, I can

0:02:20.044 --> 0:02:24.524
<v Speaker 1>start a soft way. So we're looking at polymarket, where

0:02:24.524 --> 0:02:28.084
<v Speaker 1>I'm an advisor says that the over.

0:02:28.004 --> 0:02:32.924
<v Speaker 2>Under mark is roughly one twenty k by market thirty first.

0:02:33.164 --> 0:02:35.764
<v Speaker 1>That's not the end of the year, yeah, and any.

0:02:35.604 --> 0:02:38.884
<v Speaker 2>K on the lowest and by March thirty first. You know, look,

0:02:38.964 --> 0:02:41.204
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you had to like, this is a

0:02:41.244 --> 0:02:43.044
<v Speaker 2>really hard question, it is a really hard question.

0:02:43.124 --> 0:02:45.684
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:46.124 --> 0:02:50.324
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let me say the high is the high is

0:02:50.404 --> 0:02:53.804
<v Speaker 2>one forty is my over under, and the low is

0:02:55.804 --> 0:03:01.004
<v Speaker 2>sixty right, Okay, all right, that's I'm just doubling. I'm

0:03:01.044 --> 0:03:05.004
<v Speaker 2>just doubling polymarket. I trust that people in poly market

0:03:05.164 --> 0:03:07.044
<v Speaker 2>a lot of crypto friendly types there. I trust that

0:03:07.124 --> 0:03:09.284
<v Speaker 2>the market is smarter than I am, and I'm just

0:03:09.444 --> 0:03:12.964
<v Speaker 2>doubling the range. Sure, So yeah, March thirty first through

0:03:13.004 --> 0:03:13.564
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year.

0:03:13.604 --> 0:03:16.564
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's pretty smart. I am going to go higher

0:03:16.644 --> 0:03:21.164
<v Speaker 1>than you. I am going to say one eighty high

0:03:21.364 --> 0:03:24.524
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty five. So I think that there are

0:03:24.524 --> 0:03:26.964
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, a lot of smart crypto people

0:03:26.964 --> 0:03:28.804
<v Speaker 1>who think it will hit two hundred and might even

0:03:28.844 --> 0:03:30.564
<v Speaker 1>go over two hundred. I don't think it will go

0:03:30.644 --> 0:03:33.164
<v Speaker 1>that high, but I'm going to be bullish and I'm

0:03:33.164 --> 0:03:36.924
<v Speaker 1>going to say one eighty. And on the low side,

0:03:37.124 --> 0:03:40.244
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. I will say seventy. I will say

0:03:40.284 --> 0:03:41.404
<v Speaker 1>seventy as the low.

0:03:41.724 --> 0:03:43.924
<v Speaker 2>So are you buying I mean that sounds pretty asymmetric

0:03:43.964 --> 0:03:46.924
<v Speaker 2>where you should be buying bio. Are you buying bitcoin?

0:03:47.644 --> 0:03:52.164
<v Speaker 1>I am not currently buying bitcoin, but I think that

0:03:52.604 --> 0:03:56.124
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is actually something that potentially I should start buying.

0:03:56.364 --> 0:04:00.564
<v Speaker 1>Especially as Donald Trump comes into office. We know that

0:04:00.724 --> 0:04:04.404
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't necessarily delivered on, you know, things that he's

0:04:04.444 --> 0:04:07.404
<v Speaker 1>promised in the past, but so far there are positive

0:04:07.444 --> 0:04:10.684
<v Speaker 1>signs that he is going to be pretty pro crypto,

0:04:11.004 --> 0:04:14.324
<v Speaker 1>and if all of those things come to pass. You know, normally,

0:04:14.364 --> 0:04:16.364
<v Speaker 1>the way that you look at markets is, oh, you know,

0:04:16.404 --> 0:04:18.684
<v Speaker 1>smart people have already priced this in, right, So the

0:04:18.684 --> 0:04:22.644
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin already reflects people being optimistic about Donald

0:04:22.644 --> 0:04:24.924
<v Speaker 1>Trump and what he's going to do and his policies.

0:04:25.404 --> 0:04:28.884
<v Speaker 1>But I think that with crypto it doesn't necessarily work

0:04:28.924 --> 0:04:31.284
<v Speaker 1>that way, and the market doesn't price things in quite

0:04:31.284 --> 0:04:33.724
<v Speaker 1>the same way as the stock market. I would say

0:04:33.724 --> 0:04:36.684
<v Speaker 1>that it's less efficient in some ways and much more volatile, right.

0:04:36.724 --> 0:04:40.924
<v Speaker 1>We see, you can see in the cryptocurrency world, you

0:04:40.924 --> 0:04:43.204
<v Speaker 1>can see something go up five hundred percent, right, That

0:04:43.324 --> 0:04:46.644
<v Speaker 1>just does not happen on the regular stock market. So

0:04:46.644 --> 0:04:49.644
<v Speaker 1>so I would say that there's the upside is asymmetric,

0:04:49.764 --> 0:04:50.164
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:04:51.204 --> 0:04:53.884
<v Speaker 2>See, I might argue that crypto is almost my definition

0:04:54.044 --> 0:04:58.684
<v Speaker 2>ary vibe spased, right, Yeah, and it may over anticipate,

0:04:59.284 --> 0:05:01.564
<v Speaker 2>it may overly be pricing it in, you know what

0:05:01.604 --> 0:05:01.924
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:05:03.204 --> 0:05:05.444
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's also very possible.

0:05:06.164 --> 0:05:07.724
<v Speaker 2>And in general I'm wonder if there's like a little

0:05:07.724 --> 0:05:11.164
<v Speaker 2>bit of irrational zoo Brenth. I mean, President's is hard, right,

0:05:12.684 --> 0:05:16.604
<v Speaker 2>He's inheriting a pretty unhappy electorate. He will be surrounded

0:05:16.604 --> 0:05:19.364
<v Speaker 2>by a mix of people, some of them are confident

0:05:19.364 --> 0:05:21.844
<v Speaker 2>in many of whom aren't. He has very narrow majority

0:05:21.964 --> 0:05:27.324
<v Speaker 2>in the House, right, Yeah, he's old. He and Eli

0:05:27.404 --> 0:05:30.444
<v Speaker 2>will probably have a falling out at some point. B

0:05:30.444 --> 0:05:33.524
<v Speaker 2>A BFFs. I don't know. I think there's kind of

0:05:33.564 --> 0:05:39.924
<v Speaker 2>a I think the average Trump new convert enthusiast crypto

0:05:40.084 --> 0:05:45.444
<v Speaker 2>enthusiast is a little high on fumes right now. And

0:05:46.324 --> 0:05:50.124
<v Speaker 2>I remember, you know, kind of when uh, whenever there's

0:05:50.204 --> 0:05:52.284
<v Speaker 2>new president, when there's a switch of parties, right, like

0:05:52.364 --> 0:05:56.204
<v Speaker 2>people people don't understand how difficult it starts to look

0:05:56.804 --> 0:06:00.404
<v Speaker 2>three to six months in right, you're doing your one

0:06:00.484 --> 0:06:03.084
<v Speaker 2>hundred days stuff, although it's harder now than it used

0:06:03.084 --> 0:06:05.284
<v Speaker 2>to be. But Trump will do some executive orders. We'll

0:06:05.284 --> 0:06:07.164
<v Speaker 2>talk about that in a bit, and then I know,

0:06:07.204 --> 0:06:12.564
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a short term bare case on Trump

0:06:12.644 --> 0:06:14.844
<v Speaker 2>I think is probably worthwhile. And how that turns it

0:06:14.884 --> 0:06:17.884
<v Speaker 2>to the crypto is not linear entirely. But like, it's

0:06:17.884 --> 0:06:19.364
<v Speaker 2>hard to be president, that's all I'm saying.

0:06:19.364 --> 0:06:23.204
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with that. But because we're looking at

0:06:23.284 --> 0:06:27.364
<v Speaker 1>by the you know, this year in total, right, we're

0:06:27.404 --> 0:06:29.244
<v Speaker 1>not actually doing a prediction of where it's going to

0:06:29.244 --> 0:06:31.004
<v Speaker 1>be next month or where it's going to end up.

0:06:31.004 --> 0:06:33.004
<v Speaker 1>We're just saying, like, what is the high for twenty

0:06:33.044 --> 0:06:35.964
<v Speaker 1>twenty five? And I actually think that the irrational exuberance

0:06:36.004 --> 0:06:40.044
<v Speaker 1>will get us to that high at some point, and

0:06:40.084 --> 0:06:43.324
<v Speaker 1>then it might crash right precipitously. And the reason I'm

0:06:43.364 --> 0:06:45.284
<v Speaker 1>not buying bitcoin, by the way, is that I'm not

0:06:45.364 --> 0:06:48.964
<v Speaker 1>confident enough in my ability to predict, you know, when

0:06:49.004 --> 0:06:51.724
<v Speaker 1>those crashes will come and when those changes and sentiment

0:06:51.764 --> 0:06:53.844
<v Speaker 1>will come. But I do think we're going to see

0:06:53.884 --> 0:06:57.684
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So I think that there's a lot

0:06:57.684 --> 0:07:00.204
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of things to be said for pre caution,

0:07:00.364 --> 0:07:03.164
<v Speaker 1>but also for you know, let's put some of those

0:07:03.164 --> 0:07:08.044
<v Speaker 1>irrationally exuberant predictions in there. Let's switch gears a little bit,

0:07:08.084 --> 0:07:10.324
<v Speaker 1>sort of sort of because this is related to Trump.

0:07:10.684 --> 0:07:14.204
<v Speaker 1>So how about a prediction about Trump's We've talked about

0:07:14.204 --> 0:07:16.964
<v Speaker 1>the cabinet right and about his nominees. Do you have

0:07:17.164 --> 0:07:20.844
<v Speaker 1>a prediction for how many cabinet nominees and this is

0:07:20.844 --> 0:07:23.484
<v Speaker 1>starting now, so Gates does not count, will either be

0:07:23.564 --> 0:07:28.124
<v Speaker 1>rejected or withdraw No Gates. Yeah, let's so gate Gates

0:07:28.164 --> 0:07:30.644
<v Speaker 1>does not count because that has already happened. So starting now,

0:07:31.684 --> 0:07:32.884
<v Speaker 1>let's bench tracker with poly Market.

0:07:32.964 --> 0:07:34.884
<v Speaker 2>Poly Market says Pete haig Seth is an eighty six

0:07:34.924 --> 0:07:38.844
<v Speaker 2>percent chance of being confirmed, Tulsa Gabbard seventy five percent,

0:07:38.924 --> 0:07:42.644
<v Speaker 2>Cash Hotel eighty nine percent, RFK Junior eighty five percent,

0:07:42.884 --> 0:07:46.444
<v Speaker 2>and then there are some other people that probably nobody

0:07:46.484 --> 0:07:49.924
<v Speaker 2>cares about. Right, So let me do math fifteen twenty five,

0:07:51.164 --> 0:07:55.084
<v Speaker 2>fifty sixty and then a little pocket change we get.

0:07:55.124 --> 0:07:59.284
<v Speaker 2>So poly Market says that the best bet is probably

0:07:59.404 --> 0:08:06.964
<v Speaker 2>one or zero. I'll go with zero. I think that

0:08:07.044 --> 0:08:10.364
<v Speaker 2>like we saw the scalp with Mac, I think if

0:08:10.364 --> 0:08:12.564
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have somebody else that it would have

0:08:12.644 --> 0:08:16.004
<v Speaker 2>happened sooner in this kind of pre because the further

0:08:16.084 --> 0:08:19.564
<v Speaker 2>you go, the more embarrassing to Trump, and most Republicans

0:08:19.604 --> 0:08:22.364
<v Speaker 2>in the Senate actually don't want to embarrass Trump. And so,

0:08:22.484 --> 0:08:24.684
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, the market says that Gabbard is

0:08:24.684 --> 0:08:28.644
<v Speaker 2>the most likely wild card, and but but I think

0:08:28.644 --> 0:08:32.484
<v Speaker 2>they've mostly survived. I mean out they'll survive the vetting

0:08:32.564 --> 0:08:36.084
<v Speaker 2>making them look good, right, But there's no objective standard here, right,

0:08:36.124 --> 0:08:38.404
<v Speaker 2>it's do you have fifty votes in the Senate? And

0:08:38.484 --> 0:08:40.764
<v Speaker 2>I think I think they've probably survived it in a way.

0:08:40.844 --> 0:08:43.564
<v Speaker 2>Mack age students. So I'll go with zero. I'll go

0:08:43.644 --> 0:08:44.724
<v Speaker 2>he'll bet one thousand.

0:08:45.284 --> 0:08:47.364
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the way, I actually agree with you,

0:08:47.444 --> 0:08:49.444
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say zero. I don't think that

0:08:49.484 --> 0:08:51.724
<v Speaker 1>anyone's going to withdraw, and I don't think anyone is

0:08:51.764 --> 0:08:53.684
<v Speaker 1>going to be rejected. I think we're going to see

0:08:53.684 --> 0:08:55.844
<v Speaker 1>the falls light confirmed. I think that people will tow

0:08:55.884 --> 0:08:58.044
<v Speaker 1>party lines, and I think that we're going to see that.

0:08:58.204 --> 0:09:00.244
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see everyone sail through. I don't even

0:09:00.284 --> 0:09:02.204
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be particularly close.

0:09:03.564 --> 0:09:09.404
<v Speaker 2>Next question, you are eluding this, Maria, number of press

0:09:09.484 --> 0:09:12.284
<v Speaker 2>secretaries in twenty twenty five.

0:09:12.844 --> 0:09:15.884
<v Speaker 1>I am going to say that in twenty twenty five

0:09:16.244 --> 0:09:18.964
<v Speaker 1>he is going to have two. That's going to be

0:09:19.004 --> 0:09:19.564
<v Speaker 1>my prediction.

0:09:20.164 --> 0:09:23.924
<v Speaker 2>Maria, we're agreeing too much here. I'm two seems like

0:09:23.924 --> 0:09:27.684
<v Speaker 2>the rational modal number. It's a fucking hard job, it is.

0:09:28.564 --> 0:09:31.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I kind of feel like press secretaries of

0:09:31.364 --> 0:09:33.804
<v Speaker 2>the one people should be allowed to lie, you know

0:09:33.844 --> 0:09:35.964
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, because you can't really do the job

0:09:36.004 --> 0:09:36.524
<v Speaker 2>without lying.

0:09:36.724 --> 0:09:38.084
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think. I mean, I think there's a

0:09:38.124 --> 0:09:43.844
<v Speaker 1>difference and between lying and spinning, and there is, so

0:09:44.644 --> 0:09:47.164
<v Speaker 1>I do. I'm not trying to play semantics here, right,

0:09:47.484 --> 0:09:50.204
<v Speaker 1>So there's lying where like you're just like flat out

0:09:50.924 --> 0:09:53.724
<v Speaker 1>saying something that you know is not true. And then

0:09:53.964 --> 0:09:58.604
<v Speaker 1>there are like misrepresentations, which in some ways is worse

0:09:58.724 --> 0:10:01.084
<v Speaker 1>right because it's harder to be like you lied. You

0:10:01.124 --> 0:10:03.164
<v Speaker 1>can be like, well, no, like if you parse the

0:10:03.284 --> 0:10:07.684
<v Speaker 1>sentence semantically, I didn't. Technically, I did not lie. And

0:10:07.724 --> 0:10:11.004
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's more what press secretaries do. They're

0:10:11.044 --> 0:10:13.564
<v Speaker 1>more spin doctory than they are.

0:10:13.964 --> 0:10:16.684
<v Speaker 2>It's like a poker player, you know. Some poppe plays

0:10:16.724 --> 0:10:20.684
<v Speaker 2>will not like actually lie about the contents of their hand. Right.

0:10:21.564 --> 0:10:23.164
<v Speaker 2>You'll be like, do you have a pucket kings? And

0:10:23.204 --> 0:10:25.204
<v Speaker 2>they'll be like, well, it's a big pair or something,

0:10:25.204 --> 0:10:28.044
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. Yeah, I just lie about

0:10:28.044 --> 0:10:30.204
<v Speaker 2>the kindents of my hand all the fucking time. In poker,

0:10:30.244 --> 0:10:31.924
<v Speaker 2>it's like allowed.

0:10:31.964 --> 0:10:35.324
<v Speaker 1>It is allowed, It is allowed. I don't do it there, No,

0:10:35.564 --> 0:10:38.124
<v Speaker 1>I don't do it, but but it is absolutely allowed,

0:10:38.164 --> 0:10:40.924
<v Speaker 1>and I totally don't blame you for doing it. The

0:10:41.004 --> 0:10:42.764
<v Speaker 1>funniest thing, by the way, can we just do like

0:10:42.804 --> 0:10:46.604
<v Speaker 1>a poker aside is when people lie about their hand

0:10:46.724 --> 0:10:50.124
<v Speaker 1>on stream, on televised stream when their cards are shown,

0:10:50.564 --> 0:10:53.404
<v Speaker 1>and it will become very very clear that they're lying.

0:10:54.244 --> 0:10:57.684
<v Speaker 1>Scott sever does this all the time, and he'll just

0:10:57.724 --> 0:11:00.924
<v Speaker 1>like with a straight face like be like fold you

0:11:00.924 --> 0:11:03.084
<v Speaker 1>know I've got it, or like he'll he'll or just

0:11:03.124 --> 0:11:05.644
<v Speaker 1>like completely lie what hand he has and like you

0:11:05.684 --> 0:11:08.244
<v Speaker 1>can see he's lying and he just doesn't care. So

0:11:08.724 --> 0:11:11.404
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that that is definitely very accepted.

0:11:11.804 --> 0:11:14.924
<v Speaker 1>I am more of the I don't like telling people,

0:11:15.124 --> 0:11:17.764
<v Speaker 1>you know, what I had and they if they don't

0:11:17.884 --> 0:11:21.044
<v Speaker 1>take that for an answer, I'll just say yes, right, Sullivan,

0:11:21.524 --> 0:11:22.324
<v Speaker 1>did you have Kings?

0:11:22.404 --> 0:11:22.564
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:11:22.604 --> 0:11:25.044
<v Speaker 1>Did you have Queen's Yes? Did you have JACKX Yes?

0:11:25.324 --> 0:11:26.124
<v Speaker 1>Did you have Ace King?

0:11:26.244 --> 0:11:26.484
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:11:26.604 --> 0:11:29.724
<v Speaker 1>Like I will, and if you start asking me more

0:11:29.764 --> 0:11:31.644
<v Speaker 1>than one hand, you will realize that I'm just saying

0:11:31.724 --> 0:11:34.404
<v Speaker 1>yes to everything. So I'll just do something like that,

0:11:35.204 --> 0:11:38.444
<v Speaker 1>which you know will will normally shut people up. But

0:11:38.524 --> 0:11:40.884
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to tell people what I have, as

0:11:40.884 --> 0:11:42.604
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about before on the show, and I think

0:11:42.604 --> 0:11:46.324
<v Speaker 1>this is an important point outside of poker. Information equals power.

0:11:46.444 --> 0:11:49.684
<v Speaker 1>Do not give people information when you don't have to, right,

0:11:50.044 --> 0:11:53.684
<v Speaker 1>have them know as little as possible about your intentions,

0:11:53.684 --> 0:11:57.404
<v Speaker 1>how you play everything else. So yeah, two press secretaries.

0:11:57.724 --> 0:12:00.564
<v Speaker 1>First ones never hold on. I mean, Trump just goes

0:12:00.604 --> 0:12:03.244
<v Speaker 1>through press secretaries like none other. I wouldn't even be

0:12:03.324 --> 0:12:05.164
<v Speaker 1>surprised to see three. But I think two is the

0:12:05.604 --> 0:12:09.044
<v Speaker 1>right prediction. All right, we've got one more Trumps? What

0:12:09.124 --> 0:12:11.444
<v Speaker 1>we have more than one? Trump has said he will

0:12:11.444 --> 0:12:15.084
<v Speaker 1>declare a national emergency on his first day in office

0:12:15.124 --> 0:12:18.644
<v Speaker 1>to begin mass deportations. Do you think he will do

0:12:18.684 --> 0:12:20.924
<v Speaker 1>this on January twentieth? Is there going to be a

0:12:21.004 --> 0:12:22.364
<v Speaker 1>national emergency declaration?

0:12:24.204 --> 0:12:27.724
<v Speaker 2>Again? There is a market to calibrate to polymarket says

0:12:27.764 --> 0:12:31.684
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent chance on day one he does issue at action.

0:12:31.604 --> 0:12:32.924
<v Speaker 1>I have that seems high.

0:12:33.004 --> 0:12:38.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, look, I mean one of the things you

0:12:38.284 --> 0:12:40.524
<v Speaker 2>can say Trump had a mandate to be elected on

0:12:40.684 --> 0:12:44.844
<v Speaker 2>was immigration, right, and he clearly cares a lot about that.

0:12:44.844 --> 0:12:46.484
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's kind of core to his brand. I

0:12:46.484 --> 0:12:50.164
<v Speaker 2>think it's within the purview of the one House issue

0:12:50.164 --> 0:12:54.204
<v Speaker 2>executive action. So I'm going to say, yes, right, I

0:12:54.244 --> 0:12:56.604
<v Speaker 2>have no reason to like, like, this is kind of

0:12:56.644 --> 0:12:58.564
<v Speaker 2>what you promised. This is what he promised to do

0:12:59.244 --> 0:13:00.924
<v Speaker 2>if you voted for Trump. This is what you were

0:13:00.924 --> 0:13:02.524
<v Speaker 2>supposed to get, and I think he's going to do it.

0:13:04.444 --> 0:13:08.844
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you're probably right, but I'm just

0:13:08.884 --> 0:13:12.004
<v Speaker 1>gonna get of a completely. So this is the opposite

0:13:12.044 --> 0:13:13.764
<v Speaker 1>of what we do here on Risky Business, which has

0:13:13.924 --> 0:13:16.724
<v Speaker 1>use our rational minds to do predictions. I'm just gonna

0:13:16.884 --> 0:13:19.244
<v Speaker 1>say he won't do it because I don't want him to.

0:13:19.604 --> 0:13:23.284
<v Speaker 1>That is not how you make decisions. So the rational answers, yes,

0:13:23.364 --> 0:13:26.524
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be a national emergency. My emotional

0:13:26.564 --> 0:13:30.524
<v Speaker 1>answer is I hope there isn't and I hope that

0:13:30.564 --> 0:13:34.124
<v Speaker 1>there are no mass deportations. But you're absolutely right that

0:13:34.204 --> 0:13:37.164
<v Speaker 1>this is something that people that people you know did

0:13:37.204 --> 0:13:37.684
<v Speaker 1>vote for.

0:13:38.404 --> 0:13:41.484
<v Speaker 2>And so I mean if the reason why I think

0:13:42.084 --> 0:13:43.764
<v Speaker 2>you want to take the yes and bet is like

0:13:44.284 --> 0:13:48.364
<v Speaker 2>ify for whatever reason, is influenced by uh, I mean,

0:13:48.444 --> 0:13:51.044
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley doesn't care as much about the illegal immigration,

0:13:51.084 --> 0:13:54.084
<v Speaker 2>but if he's influenced to like take a softer line,

0:13:54.644 --> 0:13:56.604
<v Speaker 2>I think he would still issue an executive order of

0:13:56.684 --> 0:13:58.644
<v Speaker 2>some kind. It would and it would have fewer teeth

0:13:59.164 --> 0:14:00.844
<v Speaker 2>or they wouldn't fight for it as much in the

0:14:00.884 --> 0:14:03.804
<v Speaker 2>courts or right. I think he kind of has to

0:14:03.844 --> 0:14:08.204
<v Speaker 2>like do this to kind of maintain face. What if

0:14:08.204 --> 0:14:10.684
<v Speaker 2>he gets in and he's like, it's all long con

0:14:11.084 --> 0:14:13.244
<v Speaker 2>it's all long coin of been a Democratic all time,

0:14:13.324 --> 0:14:16.204
<v Speaker 2>including the first term. I know what place that.

0:14:16.244 --> 0:14:18.964
<v Speaker 1>Was that was not Trump, I'm not sure who that was.

0:14:19.564 --> 0:14:25.884
<v Speaker 2>Adam Sandler never, that was embarrassing, most embarrassing when williams. Hey,

0:14:25.924 --> 0:14:29.844
<v Speaker 2>let's move on the next question. Will Elon Musk become

0:14:29.924 --> 0:14:35.524
<v Speaker 2>the world's first trillionaire in twenty twenty five. His current

0:14:35.644 --> 0:14:38.284
<v Speaker 2>net worth, according to Bloomberg, is four hundred and twenty

0:14:38.324 --> 0:14:42.444
<v Speaker 2>six billion with a B dollars.

0:14:42.804 --> 0:14:45.404
<v Speaker 1>I say no, I say he will not become a

0:14:45.444 --> 0:14:51.044
<v Speaker 1>trillionaire in twenty twenty five. And I say this because

0:14:52.084 --> 0:14:55.484
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has had disappointing sales this year. I realized that

0:14:55.484 --> 0:14:58.404
<v Speaker 1>that's only one small part of his net worth, but

0:14:59.244 --> 0:15:01.484
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's an important one. And I also

0:15:01.524 --> 0:15:03.484
<v Speaker 1>think that there's going to be some fallout with his

0:15:03.524 --> 0:15:08.284
<v Speaker 1>association with Trump, including a fallout with Trump at some point,

0:15:08.364 --> 0:15:12.404
<v Speaker 1>because I don't don't know of anyone, like any high

0:15:12.484 --> 0:15:15.964
<v Speaker 1>profile marriage that Trump has had that has lasted, obviously

0:15:16.004 --> 0:15:19.524
<v Speaker 1>including his actual marriages, but what I mean right now,

0:15:19.764 --> 0:15:23.364
<v Speaker 1>you know, marriage with any kind of close political confidant. Right,

0:15:23.404 --> 0:15:26.684
<v Speaker 1>he's broken up with all of them. He elevates advisors,

0:15:26.724 --> 0:15:29.844
<v Speaker 1>He's like, you know, they're BFFs. They're really close, and

0:15:29.884 --> 0:15:32.444
<v Speaker 1>then always there's you know, I don't know if it's

0:15:32.484 --> 0:15:34.804
<v Speaker 1>ego clashing or what it is, but there's always a

0:15:34.844 --> 0:15:37.324
<v Speaker 1>falling out. And I think that that's going to hurt Elon,

0:15:37.604 --> 0:15:40.044
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to happen in twenty twenty five.

0:15:40.884 --> 0:15:43.524
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think he's going to become poor, but

0:15:43.644 --> 0:15:47.404
<v Speaker 1>I definitely do not see him becoming a trillionaire. There's

0:15:47.444 --> 0:15:52.084
<v Speaker 1>also the AI component, and you know, I think it

0:15:52.124 --> 0:15:55.124
<v Speaker 1>does matter whether you're bullish or bearish on the financial

0:15:55.164 --> 0:15:57.884
<v Speaker 1>prospects of AI, and I don't think they're going to

0:15:57.924 --> 0:16:00.964
<v Speaker 1>figure out their cash flow finances, you know, how to

0:16:00.964 --> 0:16:03.164
<v Speaker 1>actually make money in the coming year.

0:16:03.964 --> 0:16:06.684
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Nate, So if someone else becomes

0:16:06.764 --> 0:16:11.444
<v Speaker 2>a billionaire a trillionaire before, you also lose this bet.

0:16:11.524 --> 0:16:12.124
<v Speaker 2>Is that correct?

0:16:12.564 --> 0:16:14.524
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because he's the first trillionaire.

0:16:14.724 --> 0:16:20.284
<v Speaker 2>Okay, oh yeah. For Look, the long term average for

0:16:20.484 --> 0:16:22.844
<v Speaker 2>super rich guys that they increase in net worth by

0:16:24.364 --> 0:16:26.964
<v Speaker 2>probably around twenty percent per year, which is very very

0:16:26.964 --> 0:16:30.004
<v Speaker 2>good relative to how most Americans do. But take take

0:16:30.044 --> 0:16:32.244
<v Speaker 2>four to fifty whatever is now and add twenty percent,

0:16:32.284 --> 0:16:34.564
<v Speaker 2>and you're not that close. There's a little bit of

0:16:34.564 --> 0:16:37.244
<v Speaker 2>a thing before about like to the extent that like

0:16:37.404 --> 0:16:41.244
<v Speaker 2>assets that Elon owns have been priced up, that's kind

0:16:41.244 --> 0:16:43.404
<v Speaker 2>of priced in to some extent already. I tend to

0:16:43.444 --> 0:16:46.204
<v Speaker 2>agree that, Like, I mean, you see these periodic reports

0:16:46.964 --> 0:16:50.004
<v Speaker 2>that Trump was like Elon's getting a little carried away here,

0:16:50.124 --> 0:16:52.684
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, I think this is a a It's not

0:16:52.724 --> 0:16:58.404
<v Speaker 2>impossible to imagine, but I'd say, like, I think there's

0:16:58.444 --> 0:17:05.164
<v Speaker 2>maybe a one in five chants and then tweet that

0:17:06.004 --> 0:17:09.884
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent down to like eighteen because now and then

0:17:09.884 --> 0:17:12.124
<v Speaker 2>someone else gets there first, like in the AI scenario

0:17:12.164 --> 0:17:13.204
<v Speaker 2>where this is the year where you have like a

0:17:13.204 --> 0:17:16.164
<v Speaker 2>big AI boom, then like the Nvidia people and other

0:17:16.164 --> 0:17:18.964
<v Speaker 2>people that are a bit more like directly tied to

0:17:19.804 --> 0:17:21.604
<v Speaker 2>AI might benefit first. Right.

0:17:23.444 --> 0:17:26.404
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, okay, so we agree on this one as.

0:17:26.324 --> 0:17:33.564
<v Speaker 2>Well, and we'll be right back after this break.

0:17:42.324 --> 0:17:44.564
<v Speaker 1>What's up next? Let's do some poker.

0:17:44.524 --> 0:17:49.164
<v Speaker 2>Poker over under on Nate and Maria's net tournament winnings

0:17:49.204 --> 0:17:52.404
<v Speaker 2>for the year, i e. Winnings minus buy in. Let's

0:17:52.404 --> 0:17:56.724
<v Speaker 2>assume this is all live tournaments, right, so we'll ignore

0:17:56.764 --> 0:18:01.604
<v Speaker 2>any any sketchy uh online stuff that we might or

0:18:01.684 --> 0:18:05.324
<v Speaker 2>might not do. So it's trackable in theory.

0:18:05.724 --> 0:18:10.364
<v Speaker 1>It's hard. You know, tournaments are so incredibly it's such

0:18:10.404 --> 0:18:14.764
<v Speaker 1>a volatile thing, right, and there's so much variance there

0:18:15.084 --> 0:18:17.844
<v Speaker 1>that it's really really difficult to have predictions. I mean,

0:18:17.884 --> 0:18:20.444
<v Speaker 1>I've had years where I've been down a lot, and

0:18:20.484 --> 0:18:22.724
<v Speaker 1>I've had years where I've been up a lot, And

0:18:24.004 --> 0:18:26.324
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would like to have a nice optimistic

0:18:26.404 --> 0:18:30.724
<v Speaker 1>prediction that but and I think you have to. If

0:18:30.724 --> 0:18:34.364
<v Speaker 1>you're a tournament player, you have to be optimistic. It's

0:18:34.444 --> 0:18:37.404
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an entrepreneur. You realize that, you know,

0:18:37.444 --> 0:18:39.804
<v Speaker 1>most people lose money, but in order to do it,

0:18:39.844 --> 0:18:41.604
<v Speaker 1>you have to believe that you're one of the few

0:18:41.644 --> 0:18:44.644
<v Speaker 1>that's going to succeed. So I think you kind of

0:18:44.684 --> 0:18:47.124
<v Speaker 1>have to have that mindset I'm in.

0:18:47.164 --> 0:18:52.084
<v Speaker 2>Look in the book, I did some simulations for a

0:18:52.084 --> 0:18:58.484
<v Speaker 2>assuming a very good tournament player, maybe if we're being honest,

0:18:58.524 --> 0:19:00.564
<v Speaker 2>probably not too far from where you and I, Maria,

0:19:00.564 --> 0:19:02.324
<v Speaker 2>but maybe a little bit better in that book then,

0:19:02.524 --> 0:19:05.924
<v Speaker 2>you know, but in that vicinity, right, and if this

0:19:06.044 --> 0:19:10.724
<v Speaker 2>player PENELOPEA I named her, if she plays two hundred bullets,

0:19:11.604 --> 0:19:14.204
<v Speaker 2>two hundred entries, that is bullets. We don't want to

0:19:14.244 --> 0:19:16.924
<v Speaker 2>use violent imagery, but that's what pokers say. When you

0:19:16.924 --> 0:19:20.604
<v Speaker 2>buy into a tournament, you fire a bullet. She buys

0:19:20.644 --> 0:19:23.484
<v Speaker 2>into two hundred bullets per year in live poker tournaments

0:19:23.684 --> 0:19:25.244
<v Speaker 2>with a schedule that probably looks a lot like what

0:19:25.284 --> 0:19:27.324
<v Speaker 2>you are. I might play Maria the mix of tournaments,

0:19:29.284 --> 0:19:34.644
<v Speaker 2>and she loses money about forty to forty five percent

0:19:34.644 --> 0:19:37.884
<v Speaker 2>of the time out of two hundred entries. I might

0:19:37.884 --> 0:19:40.404
<v Speaker 2>play fifty entries this year. You might play more. You

0:19:40.484 --> 0:19:42.044
<v Speaker 2>might be I don't know where are you seventy five,

0:19:42.044 --> 0:19:45.764
<v Speaker 2>one hundred or something like. Well, probably the brutal truth

0:19:46.684 --> 0:19:49.204
<v Speaker 2>is that the odds are that we will have a

0:19:49.204 --> 0:19:51.964
<v Speaker 2>losing year, or at least I will with fifty entries.

0:19:52.164 --> 0:19:54.084
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to win money with fifty entries. Sometimes you

0:19:54.124 --> 0:19:56.724
<v Speaker 2>win a lot of money, but like probably sixty percent

0:19:56.764 --> 0:19:58.284
<v Speaker 2>of the time, you wind up with a losing year

0:19:58.324 --> 0:20:01.084
<v Speaker 2>with that, with that volume, even with with with an edge,

0:20:01.644 --> 0:20:04.164
<v Speaker 2>I assume poker tournaments, we remain pretty soft. But like, so, yeah,

0:20:04.164 --> 0:20:07.564
<v Speaker 2>probably my over under is like negative ten thousands. Okay,

0:20:07.604 --> 0:20:08.444
<v Speaker 2>I won't speak for you.

0:20:08.524 --> 0:20:12.724
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna I'm gonna be optimistic, but I'll

0:20:12.764 --> 0:20:17.444
<v Speaker 1>be I'll be cautiously optimistic. We'll stay in the five

0:20:17.484 --> 0:20:21.324
<v Speaker 1>figures instead of six figures. So so I'll say that, uh,

0:20:21.764 --> 0:20:25.364
<v Speaker 1>I predict my net tournament winnings this year to be

0:20:26.524 --> 0:20:31.044
<v Speaker 1>forty five thousand, twenty twenty five. I don't know where

0:20:31.084 --> 0:20:34.924
<v Speaker 1>that number is coming from. It's it's trying, it's tempering expectations,

0:20:35.004 --> 0:20:40.524
<v Speaker 1>but trying to hope for the best. The thing is,

0:20:40.564 --> 0:20:41.164
<v Speaker 1>it's it's.

0:20:41.004 --> 0:20:43.684
<v Speaker 2>Actually kind of hard to have the forty five thousand plus.

0:20:43.684 --> 0:20:46.604
<v Speaker 2>It's like like you kind of have like you almost

0:20:46.604 --> 0:20:49.684
<v Speaker 2>want to say like negative fifty thousand, or like I

0:20:49.724 --> 0:20:52.164
<v Speaker 2>think something in three hundred k right or five, you

0:20:52.164 --> 0:20:54.244
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean, because that's kind of where the distribution.

0:20:54.404 --> 0:20:57.244
<v Speaker 1>It's true, it's true, but you know, like thinking of

0:20:57.284 --> 0:21:01.724
<v Speaker 1>this past year, you know, I had a horrific World series,

0:21:02.364 --> 0:21:03.924
<v Speaker 1>but I had a really good year at the end.

0:21:04.004 --> 0:21:06.484
<v Speaker 1>But I had you know, I had some really big scores,

0:21:06.524 --> 0:21:08.764
<v Speaker 1>but because my world series was so bad, I was,

0:21:09.004 --> 0:21:11.924
<v Speaker 1>you know, down over one hundred thousand dollars. Like that

0:21:12.124 --> 0:21:16.204
<v Speaker 1>really detracted from from the big scores. So so at

0:21:16.244 --> 0:21:19.444
<v Speaker 1>the end I was positive, but it could have, you know,

0:21:19.444 --> 0:21:21.564
<v Speaker 1>it could have very easily. It took a number of

0:21:21.644 --> 0:21:26.284
<v Speaker 1>big scores to get me to the positive part, right, So.

0:21:25.764 --> 0:21:28.204
<v Speaker 2>So what's on the what's on the schedule, even what's

0:21:28.244 --> 0:21:30.164
<v Speaker 2>on this because fucking France I was gonna go.

0:21:30.204 --> 0:21:34.044
<v Speaker 1>To I know, I know, it's very sad. It's very sad.

0:21:34.124 --> 0:21:36.804
<v Speaker 1>EPT Paris, which was supposed to be the first European

0:21:36.844 --> 0:21:40.964
<v Speaker 1>Poker Tour stop. Poker Stars my sponsor, I'm an ambassador.

0:21:41.204 --> 0:21:45.724
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've got We've got lots of descibers this show. Unfortunately,

0:21:45.764 --> 0:21:48.564
<v Speaker 1>because of French regulations that got that got canceled. They're

0:21:48.604 --> 0:21:51.204
<v Speaker 1>trying to reschedule it. I'm really hoping that it will

0:21:51.204 --> 0:21:53.764
<v Speaker 1>be rescheduled. But right now, the first EPT stop is

0:21:53.764 --> 0:21:56.364
<v Speaker 1>going to be Monte Carlo. That's going to be in April.

0:21:56.444 --> 0:21:58.324
<v Speaker 1>I will be there and you should com nate. Monte

0:21:58.324 --> 0:22:01.844
<v Speaker 1>Carlo's gorgeous. It's right on the water, absolutely.

0:22:01.364 --> 0:22:05.324
<v Speaker 2>Beautiful, Robbie. You look at Monta Carlo.

0:22:05.604 --> 0:22:10.524
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's a beautiful probably a pretty easy, beautiful hotel, probably.

0:22:10.284 --> 0:22:12.244
<v Speaker 2>Pretty easy to persuade, beautiful.

0:22:11.844 --> 0:22:15.724
<v Speaker 1>Location, great fields. It's a really wonderful event. I think

0:22:15.764 --> 0:22:17.924
<v Speaker 1>you should come and we can do we can do

0:22:18.004 --> 0:22:20.484
<v Speaker 1>some bets for the show and for our listeners, and

0:22:20.524 --> 0:22:24.244
<v Speaker 1>we can do a podcast episode from Monte Carlo. So

0:22:24.444 --> 0:22:29.764
<v Speaker 1>let's then move on to AI. Oh I hate this question.

0:22:29.964 --> 0:22:33.964
<v Speaker 1>It's so sad. Will a consumer AI model be able

0:22:34.044 --> 0:22:39.364
<v Speaker 1>to host risky business by the end of twenty twenty

0:22:39.404 --> 0:22:44.324
<v Speaker 1>five that will be indistinguishable from meat space, you and me?

0:22:46.044 --> 0:22:48.444
<v Speaker 1>Or and if not, then in what year will that

0:22:48.484 --> 0:22:52.564
<v Speaker 1>be possible? So what's our pe doom for podcast hosts?

0:22:54.644 --> 0:22:58.244
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree, and I think it will be a while,

0:22:58.324 --> 0:23:02.724
<v Speaker 2>if ever. I mean, like, I think personality is a

0:23:02.804 --> 0:23:09.404
<v Speaker 2>very high fidelity problem that like I don't think there's

0:23:09.564 --> 0:23:13.764
<v Speaker 2>like enough. I don't know. Yeah, it's it's hard to Yeah,

0:23:13.764 --> 0:23:15.564
<v Speaker 2>it's pretty hard. I mean like it can kind of

0:23:15.604 --> 0:23:18.644
<v Speaker 2>like make inferences about people that are very smart, right,

0:23:18.684 --> 0:23:21.924
<v Speaker 2>but like because it kind of sees what the essential

0:23:21.964 --> 0:23:24.444
<v Speaker 2>features are I think, but like the nuances are very

0:23:25.164 --> 0:23:27.964
<v Speaker 2>are very tricky. Like AI is not a very good

0:23:29.804 --> 0:23:31.844
<v Speaker 2>stylist at writing. I mean, I don't think it's very

0:23:31.844 --> 0:23:34.004
<v Speaker 2>good at like art. I think people misunderstand art. This

0:23:34.044 --> 0:23:35.564
<v Speaker 2>is a band, but like it is for another time.

0:23:35.604 --> 0:23:37.924
<v Speaker 2>But like I'm not worried about this in the short thing.

0:23:37.924 --> 0:23:39.764
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you. I don't think it's good

0:23:39.804 --> 0:23:44.364
<v Speaker 1>at creative things in general, because it's good at regurgitation

0:23:44.604 --> 0:23:48.004
<v Speaker 1>and at making things formally look like they're like on

0:23:48.044 --> 0:23:51.724
<v Speaker 1>the surface good formalistically, but I don't think it's able

0:23:51.764 --> 0:23:55.764
<v Speaker 1>to have creative insight. It's not able to connect ideas

0:23:55.884 --> 0:23:58.724
<v Speaker 1>or answer questions in ways that haven't been done before

0:23:59.284 --> 0:24:01.284
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't actually think right. It doesn't actually have

0:24:01.324 --> 0:24:04.724
<v Speaker 1>a brain. All it's doing is kind of connecting information.

0:24:05.684 --> 0:24:09.604
<v Speaker 1>And there's also that there's also the garbage in garbage out.

0:24:09.844 --> 0:24:13.564
<v Speaker 1>As more and more people are saying, you know, don't

0:24:13.604 --> 0:24:17.604
<v Speaker 1>train AI on our ship, then you see that the

0:24:17.604 --> 0:24:22.044
<v Speaker 1>AI output actually degenerates pretty quickly. So so I don't

0:24:22.404 --> 0:24:25.084
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're coming for our jobs yet.

0:24:26.324 --> 0:24:29.364
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not sure I agree that it doesn't think.

0:24:29.444 --> 0:24:32.604
<v Speaker 1>Well thinking, So I guess. I guess this is a

0:24:32.724 --> 0:24:35.444
<v Speaker 1>much deeper philosophical discussion, which we can have on another

0:24:35.764 --> 0:24:37.644
<v Speaker 1>episode of the show because it will take too long.

0:24:37.724 --> 0:24:40.484
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is a very interesting question about

0:24:40.484 --> 0:24:45.564
<v Speaker 1>what thinking actually is and how we should define that.

0:24:45.884 --> 0:24:49.004
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, let's let's table that and let's have an

0:24:49.004 --> 0:24:52.164
<v Speaker 1>episode about that, because I actually think it's really interesting. Nate,

0:24:52.204 --> 0:24:55.924
<v Speaker 1>there's a question that's specific to you. You have ten

0:24:56.004 --> 0:24:59.324
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars and you can bet it on any line

0:24:59.444 --> 0:25:02.284
<v Speaker 1>in sports this year, but you have to bet right now.

0:25:03.004 --> 0:25:06.244
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think the Oklahoma city is shay. You'll

0:25:06.324 --> 0:25:09.004
<v Speaker 2>just Alexander is a good bet. When the MVP A

0:25:09.124 --> 0:25:13.124
<v Speaker 2>were and he was at something like minus one twenty before,

0:25:13.204 --> 0:25:15.244
<v Speaker 2>which implies what is that like if you know fifty

0:25:15.284 --> 0:25:17.124
<v Speaker 2>five to sixty percent chance. I think he's more lucky

0:25:17.164 --> 0:25:19.404
<v Speaker 2>than that to win the award. He is averaging let

0:25:19.444 --> 0:25:23.164
<v Speaker 2>me look up his stats, so he's on the best

0:25:23.164 --> 0:25:26.764
<v Speaker 2>team in the league. He's averaging thirty one point three

0:25:26.804 --> 0:25:30.684
<v Speaker 2>points per game, five and a half rebounds, six assists,

0:25:31.044 --> 0:25:33.804
<v Speaker 2>almost two steals per game on the best defense in

0:25:33.804 --> 0:25:36.444
<v Speaker 2>the league, on the best team in the league. Nicola

0:25:36.524 --> 0:25:39.124
<v Speaker 2>Jokich is an incompetition great player, but the Nuggets kind

0:25:39.164 --> 0:25:41.284
<v Speaker 2>of suck. I think I think he is more lucky

0:25:41.324 --> 0:25:44.004
<v Speaker 2>than Vegas assumes to win the MVP. And when I

0:25:44.004 --> 0:25:45.804
<v Speaker 2>get back in any country we're betting is legal, I

0:25:45.844 --> 0:25:48.724
<v Speaker 2>will be betting, probably not ten K, but betting some

0:25:49.044 --> 0:25:49.684
<v Speaker 2>money on that.

0:25:50.044 --> 0:25:54.164
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well you heard it here first, Nate. Does

0:25:54.164 --> 0:25:56.724
<v Speaker 1>this mean that I should quickly open a sportsbook account

0:25:56.964 --> 0:26:00.684
<v Speaker 1>and bet that I don't have? It's probably I've never

0:26:00.724 --> 0:26:02.764
<v Speaker 1>done any sports betting. By the way, ever, in my.

0:26:02.644 --> 0:26:06.204
<v Speaker 2>Minus war twenty is fifty five percent animals at sixty,

0:26:07.764 --> 0:26:12.804
<v Speaker 2>So the answer is probably probably not okay, right, I

0:26:12.844 --> 0:26:15.084
<v Speaker 2>mean because like, well, if you get like all the

0:26:15.124 --> 0:26:18.484
<v Speaker 2>bonuses from the sports betting account, then sure, right, like

0:26:18.724 --> 0:26:20.364
<v Speaker 2>a reason why I like you don't want to make

0:26:20.564 --> 0:26:26.044
<v Speaker 2>Like in theory, these long term future's bets are fairly profitable, right,

0:26:27.524 --> 0:26:31.964
<v Speaker 2>but in principle, if I am betting now on January,

0:26:32.044 --> 0:26:37.044
<v Speaker 2>that ties up my capital for for several months, right,

0:26:37.164 --> 0:26:39.244
<v Speaker 2>And then theory that like takes like a little tax

0:26:39.284 --> 0:26:40.724
<v Speaker 2>on it, where like in theory, if that's in the

0:26:40.764 --> 0:26:43.964
<v Speaker 2>s and P. Five hundred over four months, then you

0:26:44.044 --> 0:26:46.684
<v Speaker 2>make whatever two and a half percent or something like that,

0:26:46.764 --> 0:26:48.444
<v Speaker 2>And so like that's a little bit of a tax.

0:26:48.484 --> 0:26:51.164
<v Speaker 2>It's meaningful. But then look, I don't know, I think

0:26:51.204 --> 0:26:52.684
<v Speaker 2>it's a good bet. I'm gonna make that bet when

0:26:52.724 --> 0:26:52.964
<v Speaker 2>I can.

0:26:53.084 --> 0:26:54.364
<v Speaker 1>All right, sounds good.

0:26:56.364 --> 0:27:02.644
<v Speaker 2>And we have a question for Maria what cognitive bias.

0:27:03.484 --> 0:27:07.044
<v Speaker 2>They're all excited they went to the cognitive bias New

0:27:07.124 --> 0:27:10.884
<v Speaker 2>Year's party, And can you imagine and like different cognitive

0:27:10.924 --> 0:27:11.564
<v Speaker 2>biases at a.

0:27:11.484 --> 0:27:14.244
<v Speaker 1>Post that would be a hilarious skit.

0:27:14.564 --> 0:27:17.124
<v Speaker 2>Well, what kind oftive bias will win the second annual

0:27:17.204 --> 0:27:20.004
<v Speaker 2>Daniel kind of a Memorial Cognitive Bias of the Year

0:27:20.164 --> 0:27:21.564
<v Speaker 2>Award for twenty twenty five.

0:27:21.684 --> 0:27:23.484
<v Speaker 1>Right, So we just had the Golden Globe Awards, and

0:27:23.524 --> 0:27:26.244
<v Speaker 1>now cognitive biases are looking to see which one of

0:27:26.284 --> 0:27:29.484
<v Speaker 1>them is going to win. I am going to vote

0:27:29.524 --> 0:27:34.284
<v Speaker 1>for the recency effect as the bias of twenty twenty five.

0:27:35.124 --> 0:27:38.724
<v Speaker 1>And what the recency effect also known as the availability bias?

0:27:38.964 --> 0:27:44.764
<v Speaker 1>It means that basically, we overvalue what's happening, what just happened,

0:27:44.844 --> 0:27:47.284
<v Speaker 1>things that are easily available to memory, and kind of

0:27:47.284 --> 0:27:50.404
<v Speaker 1>forget the rest, right, Like it's a kind of amnesia

0:27:50.724 --> 0:27:54.484
<v Speaker 1>where you forget selectively forget history and what's come before,

0:27:54.884 --> 0:27:58.204
<v Speaker 1>and you overwet your decisions based on the information and

0:27:58.244 --> 0:28:00.484
<v Speaker 1>the events that have just happened and that are most

0:28:00.684 --> 0:28:03.644
<v Speaker 1>easily accessible in your mind. And I think we already

0:28:03.644 --> 0:28:06.204
<v Speaker 1>started to see that. You know, it's funny, I just

0:28:06.244 --> 0:28:08.484
<v Speaker 1>made the joke about the Golden Globes, but you already

0:28:08.524 --> 0:28:10.644
<v Speaker 1>saw that in the goal in globes where basically no

0:28:10.684 --> 0:28:13.324
<v Speaker 1>one talked politics, right, it was like, if you remember

0:28:13.404 --> 0:28:16.524
<v Speaker 1>what happened after Donald Trump's first election, everyone had it

0:28:16.564 --> 0:28:18.804
<v Speaker 1>in their speech and there was all this stuff, and

0:28:18.844 --> 0:28:21.284
<v Speaker 1>this time it was just like, h okay, right, like

0:28:22.604 --> 0:28:25.804
<v Speaker 1>moving moving on, We're not gonna we're not going to

0:28:25.844 --> 0:28:28.724
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. We don't we don't really care. And

0:28:28.844 --> 0:28:31.044
<v Speaker 1>so it just goes to show that, you know, our

0:28:31.324 --> 0:28:35.884
<v Speaker 1>memories are short, and we accept kind of new normals

0:28:36.004 --> 0:28:38.924
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly. And I think we'll we'll see a

0:28:38.924 --> 0:28:42.484
<v Speaker 1>lot of collective forgetting happening in the year twenty twenty five.

0:28:43.964 --> 0:28:45.724
<v Speaker 2>I was host. I don't know if it's the same

0:28:45.844 --> 0:28:47.044
<v Speaker 2>or the opposite. I was going to kind of go

0:28:47.124 --> 0:28:50.484
<v Speaker 2>with the with the hot hand bias, right. I think

0:28:51.404 --> 0:28:54.964
<v Speaker 2>Trump and Republicans are likely to overreach and overestimate their popularity,

0:28:55.004 --> 0:28:57.444
<v Speaker 2>and like we talked about before, being president is hard.

0:28:58.804 --> 0:28:59.524
<v Speaker 2>But we'll see.

0:29:00.004 --> 0:29:03.124
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's also quite likely that's they're

0:29:03.124 --> 0:29:06.284
<v Speaker 1>not they're not mutually exclusive. I think both of these

0:29:06.284 --> 0:29:13.484
<v Speaker 1>things could absolutely be true. Yeah, and we'll be back

0:29:13.564 --> 0:29:28.364
<v Speaker 1>right after this. Let's move on to a multiple choice

0:29:28.364 --> 0:29:31.844
<v Speaker 1>around about TikTok Okay, what's going to happen to TikTok

0:29:32.324 --> 0:29:36.964
<v Speaker 1>a banned in the US? So Alpha Jen Alpha Riots

0:29:37.404 --> 0:29:41.324
<v Speaker 1>b sold to a non Chinese company, C, nothing remains

0:29:41.364 --> 0:29:45.084
<v Speaker 1>under Chinese corporate control or D none of the above.

0:29:45.364 --> 0:29:47.604
<v Speaker 2>So Trump has asked the Supreme Court to pause the

0:29:47.684 --> 0:29:50.644
<v Speaker 2>law that could ban TikTok. I'm gonna, I'm gonna, Marie,

0:29:50.724 --> 0:29:53.284
<v Speaker 2>why aren't you in foremost, will I cheat by looking

0:29:53.324 --> 0:29:54.044
<v Speaker 2>at polymarket?

0:29:54.964 --> 0:29:58.524
<v Speaker 1>I think it is going to be sold to a

0:29:58.564 --> 0:30:03.204
<v Speaker 1>non Chinese company, because so that's that's option B. I

0:30:03.284 --> 0:30:04.964
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going to be banned. I think that's

0:30:05.044 --> 0:30:10.004
<v Speaker 1>too politically kind of risky. And Donald Trump does not

0:30:10.084 --> 0:30:12.044
<v Speaker 1>like to do something that's going to hurt his popularity

0:30:12.084 --> 0:30:16.604
<v Speaker 1>that much. But he you know, with tariffs, et cetera,

0:30:16.684 --> 0:30:20.244
<v Speaker 1>it's not like he cares that much about alienating China

0:30:20.324 --> 0:30:22.844
<v Speaker 1>on some level. So I think that that might be

0:30:22.924 --> 0:30:26.724
<v Speaker 1>the compromise that that ends up that ends up winning out.

0:30:26.924 --> 0:30:30.324
<v Speaker 1>So sold to a non Chinese holiday market, all right, tell.

0:30:30.124 --> 0:30:32.564
<v Speaker 2>Me it's a forty three percent chance that TikTok has

0:30:32.604 --> 0:30:36.444
<v Speaker 2>banned in the US before May twenty five, and so

0:30:36.604 --> 0:30:39.764
<v Speaker 2>like if you exchect it out to anytime, that's surprisingly high.

0:30:39.804 --> 0:30:43.124
<v Speaker 2>But like, so we do this law in place right

0:30:43.164 --> 0:30:46.004
<v Speaker 2>that required it to be sold, So Trump will kind

0:30:46.044 --> 0:30:50.364
<v Speaker 2>of have to go out of his way to prevent that, right,

0:30:50.364 --> 0:30:52.364
<v Speaker 2>And I guess you're right, right because like, I think

0:30:52.404 --> 0:30:58.724
<v Speaker 2>Trump concluded that like TikTok was probably helpful to him

0:30:58.804 --> 0:31:00.964
<v Speaker 2>in the general election, right, Like it seemed to be

0:31:01.004 --> 0:31:06.804
<v Speaker 2>boosting a lot of the campus protest type of stuff. Right,

0:31:07.924 --> 0:31:13.084
<v Speaker 2>But Trump is also hawkish on China. I'm going to

0:31:13.124 --> 0:31:16.804
<v Speaker 2>follow the polymarket logic. I'm gonna go that like TikTok

0:31:16.844 --> 0:31:19.284
<v Speaker 2>will be banned in the US with above fifty percent

0:31:19.324 --> 0:31:21.604
<v Speaker 2>probability by the end of the year, not by May.

0:31:21.604 --> 0:31:26.124
<v Speaker 2>I'm going n trusting the market here by May. And

0:31:26.164 --> 0:31:27.324
<v Speaker 2>then yeah.

0:31:27.244 --> 0:31:29.404
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we'll see what happens. Does it get

0:31:29.404 --> 0:31:31.644
<v Speaker 1>banned or does it get sold to a non Chinese company.

0:31:32.564 --> 0:31:34.964
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the loser of this has to post to TikTok.

0:31:35.004 --> 0:31:37.364
<v Speaker 1>We'll see about that. I'm not committing, not committing.

0:31:37.604 --> 0:31:40.684
<v Speaker 2>I haven't thought it. So if I'm wrong, So if

0:31:40.724 --> 0:31:44.724
<v Speaker 2>you're wrong, TikTok is banned, so you don't have to post.

0:31:44.764 --> 0:31:45.684
<v Speaker 2>That seems unfair.

0:31:45.924 --> 0:31:49.804
<v Speaker 1>That is unfair. Yeah, it's true. Well, we'll we'll figure out.

0:31:49.804 --> 0:31:54.484
<v Speaker 1>We'll figure out another That is funny. That is very funny.

0:31:55.404 --> 0:31:57.884
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do a lightning round for pop culture.

0:31:58.324 --> 0:32:00.724
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you care about this, but I've

0:32:00.764 --> 0:32:03.244
<v Speaker 1>been following Will the Oasis brothers have a fight on

0:32:03.324 --> 0:32:07.284
<v Speaker 1>stage during their twenty twenty five world tour? Absolutely they will.

0:32:07.644 --> 0:32:11.564
<v Speaker 1>Those people, those two guys cannot coexist. I think they've

0:32:11.604 --> 0:32:13.844
<v Speaker 1>thrown shit at each other every single time they've been

0:32:13.884 --> 0:32:16.284
<v Speaker 1>on stage, or one of them has stormed off every

0:32:16.324 --> 0:32:18.444
<v Speaker 1>single time that they've tried to do a reunion tour.

0:32:19.124 --> 0:32:20.844
<v Speaker 1>If they care about their bottom line, I think the

0:32:20.884 --> 0:32:23.604
<v Speaker 1>only reason they're having a reunion tour is because one

0:32:23.804 --> 0:32:26.404
<v Speaker 1>or both of them wants money. They'll probably try not

0:32:26.484 --> 0:32:27.644
<v Speaker 1>to do it at the very beginning.

0:32:27.844 --> 0:32:29.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it might be a fake fight, but like they'll

0:32:29.844 --> 0:32:32.244
<v Speaker 2>have it. I mean that's a pretty logical bet.

0:32:32.324 --> 0:32:35.124
<v Speaker 1>I agree. All right. Kim Kardashian visiting mar A Lago.

0:32:36.084 --> 0:32:37.484
<v Speaker 2>Is she taking a stance on Trump?

0:32:37.764 --> 0:32:40.044
<v Speaker 1>No, but I think she will because I think she

0:32:40.284 --> 0:32:42.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, she was married to Kanye for so long

0:32:42.324 --> 0:32:47.164
<v Speaker 1>or whatever he's calling himself now. Yeah, yeah, so I

0:32:47.204 --> 0:32:49.484
<v Speaker 1>think I think there's a good chance that she that

0:32:49.564 --> 0:32:52.124
<v Speaker 1>she goes there, and she's also very business savvy, so

0:32:52.164 --> 0:32:54.684
<v Speaker 1>I think she will do whatever's better for her bottom line.

0:32:54.684 --> 0:32:58.244
<v Speaker 1>And I think that she'll she'll probably uh that that

0:32:58.324 --> 0:33:00.724
<v Speaker 1>means coosing up to Trump, So I would I would

0:33:00.724 --> 0:33:02.004
<v Speaker 1>say there's a good chance she doesn't.

0:33:02.244 --> 0:33:04.764
<v Speaker 2>I have no opinion. I'm proud to have no opinion.

0:33:04.884 --> 0:33:08.084
<v Speaker 1>Sounds good. Best Picture winner? Do you have an opinion?

0:33:09.524 --> 0:33:13.804
<v Speaker 2>Uh, I know it's about dyla movie good.

0:33:15.924 --> 0:33:18.844
<v Speaker 1>I have not seen it yet, so so I don't know.

0:33:20.404 --> 0:33:24.764
<v Speaker 1>I'll put uh, let's put the Brutalists there. Seems like

0:33:24.804 --> 0:33:28.404
<v Speaker 1>it seems like a good one. Oh, this is interesting.

0:33:28.484 --> 0:33:31.724
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna have to speculate on this chance

0:33:31.764 --> 0:33:36.404
<v Speaker 1>that Nate wears skinny jeans, which are supposedly back. So

0:33:36.404 --> 0:33:38.644
<v Speaker 1>so you know with one hundred percent certainty whether it's

0:33:38.724 --> 0:33:39.164
<v Speaker 1>yes or no.

0:33:40.804 --> 0:33:43.764
<v Speaker 2>And I don't. I don't know where's it. Where's a

0:33:43.804 --> 0:33:45.084
<v Speaker 2>threshold for seini jeans?

0:33:45.964 --> 0:33:48.484
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know. This is very interesting, and

0:33:48.524 --> 0:33:50.844
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably different for men and women because

0:33:50.884 --> 0:33:53.644
<v Speaker 1>straight leg jeans for women are not skinny jeans. For women,

0:33:53.684 --> 0:33:55.484
<v Speaker 1>they really have to be like skin tight. But I

0:33:55.484 --> 0:33:59.164
<v Speaker 1>feel like for men there's more of a there's like

0:33:59.284 --> 0:34:01.804
<v Speaker 1>more of a window for them to be like a

0:34:01.844 --> 0:34:05.644
<v Speaker 1>little bit less than skin tight. I'm gonna I can't

0:34:05.684 --> 0:34:10.924
<v Speaker 1>even speculate on this. Well, no, okay, I'm.

0:34:10.804 --> 0:34:14.564
<v Speaker 2>Turning forty seven years old in a week, Marie, I'm

0:34:14.564 --> 0:34:16.404
<v Speaker 2>not going to be wearing skinny jeans. I don't think.

0:34:16.444 --> 0:34:18.644
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, I'll talk to your partner about this

0:34:18.764 --> 0:34:21.564
<v Speaker 1>and see. I think it depends on it depends on

0:34:21.604 --> 0:34:22.844
<v Speaker 1>how the styles go.

0:34:23.364 --> 0:34:26.524
<v Speaker 2>If I win, if I win an event at Monte Carlo,

0:34:26.604 --> 0:34:29.284
<v Speaker 2>then I'll celebrate by buying some All right, let's do

0:34:29.324 --> 0:34:31.204
<v Speaker 2>skinny jeans in Europe. Let's do it.

0:34:31.564 --> 0:34:33.924
<v Speaker 1>And finally, do you have a long shot bet for

0:34:33.964 --> 0:34:36.364
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, the thing that probably isn't going to happen,

0:34:36.444 --> 0:34:38.004
<v Speaker 1>but you look like a genius if it does.

0:34:40.044 --> 0:34:41.324
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I actually do have one.

0:34:41.564 --> 0:34:42.044
<v Speaker 1>What is it?

0:34:43.684 --> 0:34:46.924
<v Speaker 2>Remember the drone thing?

0:34:47.244 --> 0:34:48.404
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the New Jersey dress.

0:34:48.644 --> 0:34:51.404
<v Speaker 2>There are efforts of all these like drones over New

0:34:51.484 --> 0:34:53.324
<v Speaker 2>Jersey and then it kind of went haywire and then

0:34:53.364 --> 0:34:56.484
<v Speaker 2>it died out yep, and you know, people forgot about it.

0:34:57.764 --> 0:35:03.284
<v Speaker 2>I think there's like a one in three chance that

0:35:03.444 --> 0:35:07.964
<v Speaker 2>later reporting reveals that the initial spark of something was

0:35:08.044 --> 0:35:10.204
<v Speaker 2>something real.

0:35:10.404 --> 0:35:14.124
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's I think that's a really interesting prediction.

0:35:15.844 --> 0:35:18.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because the issue is like, once it became this

0:35:18.924 --> 0:35:21.764
<v Speaker 2>big viral thing. Then like the signal to noise ratio

0:35:21.924 --> 0:35:25.124
<v Speaker 2>went way down and people were like just seeing like playings,

0:35:25.204 --> 0:35:27.924
<v Speaker 2>learning at new work and every old you know, the

0:35:27.924 --> 0:35:30.844
<v Speaker 2>moon and shit like that, right, But like you did

0:35:30.844 --> 0:35:33.484
<v Speaker 2>have like the initial reports seemed more credible and like

0:35:33.524 --> 0:35:35.844
<v Speaker 2>also like if you were like and there are a

0:35:35.844 --> 0:35:37.964
<v Speaker 2>lot of military bases around there, if you were like,

0:35:38.364 --> 0:35:40.404
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's anything like super exciting, right, but

0:35:40.524 --> 0:35:43.564
<v Speaker 2>like let's say you were testing out some new type

0:35:43.564 --> 0:35:46.684
<v Speaker 2>of surveillance drone, right and you're running them back and

0:35:46.724 --> 0:35:49.884
<v Speaker 2>forth between different military bases, and the US military, by

0:35:49.924 --> 0:35:53.284
<v Speaker 2>the way, like has lots of drone technology, doesn't deny

0:35:53.364 --> 0:35:57.004
<v Speaker 2>that it's an important part of a defense arsenal these days, right,

0:35:58.364 --> 0:36:01.364
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like reasonably likely that like they were

0:36:01.524 --> 0:36:03.444
<v Speaker 2>doing this a little too much, and like some people

0:36:03.444 --> 0:36:06.964
<v Speaker 2>who were noticing carefully detected a change and the number

0:36:07.004 --> 0:36:11.604
<v Speaker 2>of drones relative to baseline, and then kind of people

0:36:11.644 --> 0:36:13.884
<v Speaker 2>that carried away and they were like and their denials

0:36:13.884 --> 0:36:16.404
<v Speaker 2>weren't very They were like, well, there are lots of

0:36:16.444 --> 0:36:19.804
<v Speaker 2>things in are drones in the sky, which is true, right,

0:36:19.844 --> 0:36:22.164
<v Speaker 2>and became more and more true. Was more reports surfaced

0:36:22.644 --> 0:36:24.164
<v Speaker 2>but if you were doing that shit, like let's say

0:36:24.164 --> 0:36:29.244
<v Speaker 2>you have like a little pilot project or no puninitendies

0:36:29.364 --> 0:36:33.564
<v Speaker 2>unpiloted project, you probably cut the fuck out of that

0:36:33.604 --> 0:36:36.964
<v Speaker 2>once you once you get scrutiny on it, right, So

0:36:37.004 --> 0:36:38.484
<v Speaker 2>I think there might have been something real there. I

0:36:38.524 --> 0:36:41.044
<v Speaker 2>think the media was like not very basying in how

0:36:41.044 --> 0:36:44.164
<v Speaker 2>I thought about the story, right, And like the military

0:36:44.204 --> 0:36:47.484
<v Speaker 2>has drones, and like there ever reports about activity over

0:36:47.924 --> 0:36:51.844
<v Speaker 2>over air force bases for years that are fairly credible

0:36:51.844 --> 0:36:53.604
<v Speaker 2>and reported batlets like the Wall Street Journal, and I

0:36:53.684 --> 0:36:56.564
<v Speaker 2>thought people were much too smug about that. And in

0:36:56.644 --> 0:36:59.524
<v Speaker 2>the in the Trump era, there's a certain type of

0:36:59.724 --> 0:37:04.004
<v Speaker 2>story where like where greater skepticism of the establishment I

0:37:04.004 --> 0:37:08.124
<v Speaker 2>think might be might be helpful. Yeah, so that's my

0:37:08.124 --> 0:37:10.724
<v Speaker 2>weird I wouldn't take it even money, But like I'd

0:37:10.724 --> 0:37:13.844
<v Speaker 2>say one in three that some credible news outlet publishes

0:37:13.884 --> 0:37:17.124
<v Speaker 2>a story probably opaquely sourcing, like yeah, there was a

0:37:17.124 --> 0:37:18.964
<v Speaker 2>little something there, It was no big deal, but like

0:37:19.124 --> 0:37:21.444
<v Speaker 2>people weren't totally making this up, and there was like

0:37:21.484 --> 0:37:24.804
<v Speaker 2>a discrete increase for a couple of weeks Stare in

0:37:24.844 --> 0:37:25.324
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey.

0:37:25.604 --> 0:37:28.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that sounds very plausible. To me, you

0:37:28.124 --> 0:37:32.084
<v Speaker 1>know when I you know, living in Vegas near a

0:37:32.124 --> 0:37:35.364
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of military bases, you actually see

0:37:35.364 --> 0:37:38.884
<v Speaker 1>weird shit in the sky all the time, including drone displays,

0:37:38.964 --> 0:37:41.204
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that you know, there, you're just

0:37:41.244 --> 0:37:43.324
<v Speaker 1>kind of used to it. You're like, there's Nellus, you know,

0:37:43.804 --> 0:37:48.604
<v Speaker 1>there's all this stuff, and I think that there, I'm

0:37:48.604 --> 0:37:52.964
<v Speaker 1>actually I think your prediction is a pretty solid one.

0:37:53.124 --> 0:37:57.564
<v Speaker 1>Mine was not nearly as fun or as interesting or

0:37:57.564 --> 0:38:01.804
<v Speaker 1>as technology well sort of technology oriented. But I'm predicting

0:38:02.044 --> 0:38:04.484
<v Speaker 1>that twenty twenty five is going to be the year

0:38:04.644 --> 0:38:09.004
<v Speaker 1>that we see a nuclear power resurgence, That all of

0:38:09.044 --> 0:38:12.564
<v Speaker 1>the countries that have brought their power plants offline are

0:38:12.604 --> 0:38:14.364
<v Speaker 1>going to bring them back online, and we're going to

0:38:14.364 --> 0:38:17.484
<v Speaker 1>see the first new nuclear power plants open for a

0:38:17.524 --> 0:38:20.764
<v Speaker 1>long time. That what makes you say that AI energy

0:38:20.764 --> 0:38:24.044
<v Speaker 1>needs our power, We need power. Yeah, energy needs are

0:38:24.844 --> 0:38:28.684
<v Speaker 1>are rising and companies don't know how to meet them

0:38:28.724 --> 0:38:31.404
<v Speaker 1>and nuclear This will make them much friendlier to nuclear

0:38:31.444 --> 0:38:33.884
<v Speaker 1>power than they ever have been before. And I'm actually

0:38:33.964 --> 0:38:35.884
<v Speaker 1>very pro nuclear power. I think this is a good thing.

0:38:35.924 --> 0:38:38.284
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be one of the good consequences

0:38:38.324 --> 0:38:40.324
<v Speaker 1>of AI because I think it's a really nice, clean

0:38:40.404 --> 0:38:44.684
<v Speaker 1>energy source. So that's my prediction on that note, Nate,

0:38:44.724 --> 0:38:46.524
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to get to an airport right

0:38:46.564 --> 0:38:50.164
<v Speaker 1>You're you're in Tokyo, You're about to fly, and I

0:38:50.204 --> 0:38:52.844
<v Speaker 1>need to get to a comedy show. I am seeing

0:38:52.924 --> 0:38:56.164
<v Speaker 1>Alex Adelman and I'm very, very excited about that. So

0:38:57.044 --> 0:39:00.284
<v Speaker 1>yes we will. We're both having two exciting destinations. Mine

0:39:00.284 --> 0:39:01.724
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more exciting than yours.

0:39:02.884 --> 0:39:04.404
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm going to the airport. I'm not even

0:39:04.404 --> 0:39:06.244
<v Speaker 2>the nice airport in Tokyo, go to Henata.

0:39:06.364 --> 0:39:09.964
<v Speaker 1>All right, there we have it. Safe travels and we'll

0:39:09.964 --> 0:39:11.724
<v Speaker 1>see you next week. Happy twenty twenty five.

0:39:11.764 --> 0:39:33.244
<v Speaker 3>Everyone.

0:39:34.084 --> 0:39:36.204
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what you think of the show. Reach

0:39:36.284 --> 0:39:41.764
<v Speaker 1>out to us at Risky Business at Pushkin dot FM.

0:39:41.844 --> 0:39:44.964
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Konnikova.

0:39:44.884 --> 0:39:46.244
<v Speaker 2>And byb Nate Silver.

0:39:47.124 --> 0:39:50.644
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:39:51.164 --> 0:39:54.724
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer

0:39:54.804 --> 0:39:58.324
<v Speaker 1>is Gabriel Hunter Chang. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein.

0:39:58.924 --> 0:40:01.044
<v Speaker 2>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:40:01.044 --> 0:40:03.124
<v Speaker 2>so other people can find us too, And if you

0:40:03.164 --> 0:40:05.524
<v Speaker 2>want to listen to an ad free version. Sign up

0:40:05.524 --> 0:40:08.124
<v Speaker 2>for Quskin Plus. For six, ten and nine a month,

0:40:08.164 --> 0:40:10.884
<v Speaker 2>you had access to ad free list. Thanks for tuning in.