WEBVTT - From the Vault: A Taste of MSG

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Vault time.

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It is Saturday. We're going to venture into the vault

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 1>for a classic episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>from August about food additives. Yeah, this is the one

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>where we talked about MSG and the degree to which

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been demonized as some sort of you know, nefarious

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>foreign um substance that's added to food when when really

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>it's far more mundane than that. As far as I

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>can recall, this is the only time I have ever

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>eaten on Mike, so uh, please be be ready to

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>get grossed out when you hear our chewing sounds. We

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sampled some MSG in this episode, and in fact, the

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>MSG just took a bite out of a big old

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>hunk of it. Well, the shaker is still in the office.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually used it yesterday on some microwave lasagna. Was good. Yeah,

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, it enhanced the flavor nice. So all right,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>if you've listened to this episode before, then prepared to

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>experience it again. If not, be prepared to have what

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:11.919
<v Speaker 1>you think you know about MSG completely turned on its head.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick and Robert.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>What if I told you that a silent killer worse

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>than alcohol, nicotine, and drugs is likely lurking in your

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>kitchen cabinets and even your child's school cafeteria. Oh man,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's rough, because silent killers are the worst killers.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I fire prefer the loud ones, so I know they're coming.

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And of those substances that you mentioned, only some of

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>those are my favorites. So um yeah, I'm I'm I'm

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>instantly concerned. I'm going to start looking around in my

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>cabinets and trying to figure out where this nefarious force

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is hiding. Now, lest I be accused of plagiarism, I

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>should give attribution. That is a quote from an article

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>on a on an alternative miss and website called Mercola

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that is about MSG, the food additive MSG. You've often

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>heard of it associated with Chinese food. Probably it's monosodium glutamate,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're gonna be talking about today. But

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to start with some of the scare tactics,

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because you had to hear it right here that MSG

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>is quote worse than drugs, worse than drugs. I love

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that the blandness of that statement. Worse than all drugs,

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>worse than drugs, but but truly better than some drugs.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And then also, are we just talking about what drugs right?

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>The drugs that take our pain away or the drugs

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that that ruin us? I mean, it's there. There's so

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>many different interpretations of that statement. Quick side note, Robert,

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 1>what's your favorite fictional drug from a movie or book? Oh?

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have to go with the spice. But

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I also like Samuda, which is the drug that they

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that some individuals in the Dune universe take and then

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they listen to some sort of weird music Simuda music

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that can only really be processed while you're taking this

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>particular drug. Well, MSG is worse than that too, because

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>what does it do? I don't know, it does a

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff. Apparently, if you listen to to everyone

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>who has ever complained about MSG, it has ever proposed,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, a negative symptom of taking MSG, then

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like just the worst thing imaginable. Okay, So Robert,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>tell me your MSG story. How did you become acquainted

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with this killer? The silent killer chemical? All right, So

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>growing up I was I don't remember ever being privy

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to any direct anti MSG messaging. Like, nobody had me

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>watch a video, nobody made me read a paper about it.

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It was just this thing that you just heard. Oh well,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>MSG is to be avoided. You go to the local

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese restaurant and your small American town, there's likely to

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be a no MSG sign there on the wall, just

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to let you know before you even think about coming

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in the door that there is going to be no MSG.

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And I and not even knowing what it was, I

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of had in my mind that it was

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>some sort of some sort of chemical, some sort of

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>cheating substance that allowed the the individuals that are making

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the food to to trick you into enjoying something. It's

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the anabolic steroids of food, the doping of food. But

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>as we're gonna discussing this episode, there's there's virtually nothing

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to any of this. Uh, this fear of moongering, decades

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>worth of fear mongering that still refuses to completely go away. Yeah,

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we will in the end. Probably be able

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to speculate a good bit on where a lot of

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this fear comes from. But I encountered it to when

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up. So I remember one of my

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite restaurants when I was a kid was this little

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>brick storefront Chinese restaurant in Chattanooga, Tennessee called China Lee.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I love going there. They made some delicious seguan beef.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if i'd still think it was good

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if I went there today. I don't know if they're

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>still open. But at the time, I loved it, and

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>I would go there and I would you know, I

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, but if you had this experience at

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Chinese restaurants when you were a little where you just

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>like eat to the point of pain and then you'd

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>keep going. But I also remember this slight psychological taint

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to the experience because I would hear adults talking about

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Chinese food and MSG. There was this clear link in

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>my mind that I had overheard from adult conversation and

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really understand it. But what I generally did

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>get was that MSG was some sort of dangerous chemical

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was all in Chinese food. But if it

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>was so dangerous, why do we eat it? Why did

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>my parents take me? Yeah? And then the other side

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of it too for me, is that, Okay, it's something

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're using to cheat you into into the they're cheating,

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they're making the food taste better than it is. But

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the same thing can be said of pretty much every

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>food additive that has ever been. Every spice in your

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>cabinet is a way to cheat and make food taste better. Yes,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what that's salt, pepper, everything else like that. Just

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the act of the art of cooking is, Hey, how

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>can we make this particular slab of protein, this particular

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>heap of vegetables, how can we make this biomass, uh,

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, taste better and and be more digestible for

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the human body. Yeah, But of course I don't know.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>I got this message somehow. So when I was a kid,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I do remember one instance where a friend of mine

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was sick. He was like laid out on the couch

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of days, and I remember it was

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 1>attributed to the msg content of some Chinese food he'd

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>eaten the day before. I don't know where that idea

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>came from. I don't know if their doctor told them

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that or if that's just what a parent concluded. But yeah,

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what they said. And then later I think I

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>softened a little bit on MSG, but in a in

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>another disgusting way, because the next time I remember encountering

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it in my life, I was in college and a

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>friend and roommate of mine at the time time was

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>teaching me how to make a recipe for this dip

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that came from his family. I think his grandmother had

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>made it or something. All the recipes you learned in

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>college tend to be going to be a little suspect.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't judge this friend of mine by this dip.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>But the dip in my memory is a little gross.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So it had Philadelphia cream cheese, chopped up sandwich meat

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which I believe was Buddig beef, and then sliced green onions,

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and the fourth ingredient was a container of shakon seasoning

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>called accent. And I was like, what is this? I

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>think I might have seen this in my grandmother's kitchen cabinet,

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>but otherwise I didn't know what it was. And it

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>said wakes up food flavor. Well, that sounds good. You

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want your food to be asleep, So I looked

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>at the ingredients, and the primary ingredient are actually the

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one ingredient in this food flavor alarm clock was monosodium

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>glutamate in MSG, the stuff that had supposedly laid out

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>my childhood friend with a body leveling illness, and the

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that that I always heard these creepy rumors about. Yeah,

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you actually brought in a little container of accent. And

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I love about it is that

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there's there's no mention of MSG. Uh Um.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Monosodium glutamate is mentioned once on the back, and presumably

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to say contains MSG because it is

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pure MSG. You know, they save on the printing for

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this thing because they don't have to print ingredients every time.

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It just says ingredient and ends of the t pull

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and monosodium glutamate. But they it's really an attempt to

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>rebrand it right accent instead of MSG, because MSG sounds

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's the letters are tainted for us

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>because of these just decades of negative connotations, which we'll

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>get into. And I would say it's also by the

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>general problem of chemophobia, people being afraid of chemical names

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of things, which will get to in the end, and

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we should end by number one having an

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>accent or monosodium glutamate if you want to avoid the branding,

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>taste tests on Mike and then see see if anything

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>horrible happens to us. And then also we should suggest

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>some rebranding. Yes, so as as we're going start thinking

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of new names for MSG. Ways we can we can

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>reclaim this chemical for our tasting pleasure. Right, so we

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>should go back and tell the story of MSG, Like

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 1>where did this food additive come from? Yeah, let's do it.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the origin story here. Mono sodium glutamate.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>This chemical was discovered by Japanese chemist Kika Akada back

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen o seven. So he was investigating flavoring and asparagus,

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>tomatoes and especially uh dashy seaweed soup that has a

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>strong umami flavor that that pleasant savory taste. Yeah, we're

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>much more familiar with you, mommy these days. We hear

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>about it all the time in in cooking shows and

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Now. I think decades back, people were

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>way less familiar with the concept of ou mommy exactly

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>what it was. But ou mommy, what is it? It's

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that deeply savory, meaty flavor. It's not the same as

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>something being salty, but it's it's that kind of deep

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>flavor that you get from cheeses and meats and tomatoes.

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's there in anchovies, you know what I mean. Yeah, yeah,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's almost There's some wonderful descriptions out there for huma umami,

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and umami is such a wonderful one word description is

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>just rolling off your tongue once you've tasted it. Uh,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to just go perfectly together. Uh, but yeah, you kind

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of have to have tasted you mommy, and most of

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>us have to really appreciate it. So Japanese cuisine obviously

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>had this concept of ou, mommy, they know what this

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>delicious savory flavor is. But what a Kato was able

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to do was to pinpoint the chemical cause of this flavor,

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>which was this substance that we now know as glutamate

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>yes um. In particular, he pinpoint pinpointed glutamic acid. So

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a meano acid non essential because the human

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>body and various plants and animals can produce it on

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>their own and in the body gluten Glutamic acid is

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>often found as Glutamate one of the most abundant neurotransmitters

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in the body, and it plays an important role in

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>memory and learning, and according to the FDA, you can

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>probably consume thirteen grams of it of it a day

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in the protein in your food. Right, So glutamate is

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>already there in your diet almost definitely you're eating foods

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with glutamate in them. Yeah, if you're having tomatoes glutamate,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't parmesan cheese, glutamate um, and certainly if

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you're having some of the more processed food items out there,

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>various potato chips, etcetera, you having glutamate. Glutamate is just

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>part of eating as humans. Yeah, so there's no there's

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>no magic going on, right that this is just a

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>standard dietary chemical and as such we do have receptors

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of programmed to taste it. Yeah. All

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that Ikeda did here is he took that naturally occurring

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>glutamate and he solved the problem of then, well, how

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>do I how do I synthesize it, how do I

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>mass produce it? How can I get this in a

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>form that's stable to the consumer. And basically what he

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>did here is. He figured out he could synthesize the

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>molecule by first extracting the glutamate from seaweed and then

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>mixing it with water and just common table salt to

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>stabilize the compound. Thus, mono sodium glutamate m s G.

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It's born, it's table salt, and it's glutamate. Yeah, we

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>really can't drive drive that home enough that there's there's

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>no like extreme chemical um process here. There's no weird

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>magical ritual involved. This is just salt and glutamate that

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>come together into a stable form. So I have to

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you that I don't know where I encountered this idea,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but years ago, what I heard about the way MSG

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>works in your mouth is that it literally quote tears

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.359
<v Speaker 1>holes in your tongue to make you taste things more intensely.

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember where I came across this, and I

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>know I passed on this piece of false information to

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>people plenty of time, like it tears a hole in

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the fabric of our reality and then demon taste from

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>another universe comming. I never heard anything quite that extreme,

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but I do remember hearing that it like opens up

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the taste buds with the with the emphasis being that

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it's doing so in an un natural way. In it

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>almost like a drug induced way, right. It would be

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to find out where these rumors started about its

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>its mechanism of action. But anyway, so it went on

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to become a popular commercial food additive. It wasn't just

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>anymore people putting glutamate rich foods into their foods to

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>season it. Like you could put parmesan cheese or or

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>seaweed or something like that into your food to boost

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the glutamate content. Or you could just isolate monosodium glutamate

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and add that to increase the zumami flavor without adding

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the other ingredients. I mean basically, especially now with with

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>your mom a, I feel like it's been very much

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a favorite keyword among foodies over the past decade, uh

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, and maybe longer. But there are plenty of

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>ways to to glued up your food to get that

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>glue to mate in there without MSG. MSG is just

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a a quick and easy way to do it.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Um So, this this quick and easy way is rolled

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>out by the Japanese company h a Geno motto and

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it it's you have this instant crystalline powder. That's uh,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that's ready to just sprinkle on your food, and it's

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>an instant hit. Of course, Uh. They they patented it

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen o nine, and today the form that you

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>encounter tends to be made from beats and corn. It's

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>known as MSG in the States, but a Keita's name

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>still sticks elsewhere in the world. A geno moto or

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>essence of taste. You can still buy with under that

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>name at various you know, an anywhere you buy, you know,

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>your local Asian market should have it, uh with that title.

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And I should also point out that that Akito was

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>like he was tremendously successful with this, It was apparently

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>fabulously wealthy uh in the early twentie century. Japan died

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen thirties, but this was his He really

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>hit it out of the park with this fabulous flavor enhancer.

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So what could possibly go wrong? What could what could

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>possibly stop this juggernaut of taste from just taking over

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. Well we will answer that question right after

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we get back from this break and we're back. So

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Robert MSG glutamate big flavor success story in the history

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of of food flavoring and additives. Yes, big big flavor

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>success story as a huge age, absolutely huge it. Yeah,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it it is immediately a hit just throughout Asia. Allows

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that allows people to get of a meaty taste to

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>non meaty dishes. I've read that it was especially a

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>popular among Buddhists abstaining from meat during periodic absence periods

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>various meat related fasts and uh in America too and

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. Elsewhere in the world it really gains popularity.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you especially have to look back to World

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>War two era post and pre war America to see

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>just how ready we were for a flavor enhancer like this.

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>On one hand, you had you had the military industrial

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>complex here all right. You had the US military needing

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to to boost the flavor and otherwise dull soldier rations.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So they turned to MSG easy way just to enhance

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>some some limited food options there, easier than adding bacon

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to everything, right, and then industrialization of of all that food.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It comes home with them after the war into the

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>American household. But even before World War Two, we were

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>essentially priming ourselves for such an advancement through the home

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>economics philosophy. So there was recently a wonderful um interview

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on NPRS Fresh Air uh with Terry Gross married culinary

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>historians Jane Ziegelman and Andy co appeared to promote their

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>book A Square Meal, the Culinary History of the Great Depression,

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>which it's a great, great interview, definitely check it out. Um.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>But they point out that the home economists of the

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>age that they were not really into flavor. They were

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they were saying, all right, you needed, you need to

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>be fed, you need to be healthy. Uh, you have

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>limited means of pulling that off. Here are some strategies

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it. You can worry about spice when when

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>when things are going a little better for you. So

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>they pushed pushed American science based ways to get the

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>best out of available food rations, often in bizarre dishes, uh,

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>such as the one that they discussed on in the

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>interview as being quote wrong in every possible way, was

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a recipe that featured canned corn, beef, plain gelatine, can pies, vinegar,

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and lemon juice. Oh boy, so so oh man. These

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>these old recipes you see from like magazines from the

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>World War two era where it's like, yeah, poor candle

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>lima beans and spam together there. But but you can

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>see where it's like they're engineering a meal. It's an

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>engineering approach to the American meal. And so MSG is

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is perfect for that crystals that you sprinkle on there. Yeah,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's modernism brought to food. Yeah. And it was apparently

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>when it was first marketed, uh, to the American housewife,

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it was in this slender little bottle, you know, full

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of the flavor crystals. It seemed like the future had

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>arrived in the form of this, uh, this wonderful enhancer UM.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>And here's another important little little fact that Ziegelman and co.

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Point out. Though the home economist of the day, who

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>were creating all these strange rests a piece to make

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the best out of the available rations they could have,

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they could have found a lot of great, healthy and

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>flavorful ways to get the most out of those rations

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>if they turned to America's immigrant communities. But of course,

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for a number of reasons, including implicit or even overt

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>racial bias or xenophobia, they didn't do it. And I'm

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not just talking about um, you know, certainly Asian immigrants,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>but even like Italian immigrants, Um, they they had they

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>had various tactics to to make the best out of

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the available rations so with the with Italian immigrants, of course,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, depending up more on pasta. One of the

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>examples they point out is is using dandelion greens. That

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Italian immigrants carried that tradition with them, and that would

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a wonderful, uh, a wonderful tactic to to

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>educate the American public about, but they didn't. Instead, it's

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>more like gelatine and meat. So yeah, well, us who

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>live in big cities in America today, we're just so

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>used to international cuisine. I think it's a thing that's

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>become thoroughly part of American culture to have a Chinese restaurant,

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>a Mexican restaurant, a Thai restaurant in an Italian restaurant

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and all that, and it can be kind of hard

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for us to imagine what it was like firm, I

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe a lot of Midwesterners or something like that,

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to to see these strange foods from exotic lands. Yeah, well,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we can all um. In many cases,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we can. We can look to older members of our family, particularly,

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember, I think there are stories of this with

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>uh grandparents on my on both my side and my

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>wife's side of the family. Both of them had very

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>similar stories about going to an ethnic restaurant. Uh. In

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>my own grandfather's case, it was a Mexican restaurant, and

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to try any of the more exotic food.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>They're ordered an American hamburger and complain for the rest

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of his life that they served him at quote a

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>hot hamburger. It was a harrowing experience. But but I

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is kind of a universal experience among

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of among a lot of older Americans and now in

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>many cases deceased Americans, where suddenly there were all these

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>these more flavorful options, these exotic options, these new options,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's only natural to approach those, uh,

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>those new flavors with a certain amount of skepticism, to

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>say nothing of you know, your your your own taste,

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>your own palate, being less inclined to enjoy those that

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>new Baraga flavors. But of course, as we have warned

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you at the end of this great MSG success story,

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>did come some backlash. Yeah, and when we say success story,

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not just talking about other Chinese restaurants. But it's

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in it's being used in everything, it's in, it's in

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>children's cereals, soup, it's in soup, It's just all over

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>the place. It's just a become a standard part of

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>the industrialization of food. But also it's like just just

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>cooking in your kitchen. And then we enter a period

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in the in the early sixties where people began to

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>uh to to question some of the chemicals in their food. Uh.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a big book that came out in sixty two

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>by Rachel Carson titled Silent Spring that kicked off a

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of a great deal of backlash just against chemicals

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and cooking in general. I mean, I don't think i'd

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>try to blame Rachel Carson for irrational chemophobia. Indirectly, it

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>might have had this unintended influence. It starts this, It

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>starts as narrative in many people's minds. It forces us

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to to to to ask some good, some important questions

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>about how our foods coming together and where it's coming from.

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But but as we all know, a little information, uh

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>can can sometimes be just enough to spin off some

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of some paranoia. Okay, Robert, where did this narrative of

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Chinese restaurants syndrome come from? Well, it's everyone seems to

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>trace it back to one particular letter published in the

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>New England Journal of Medicine in nineteen all right, and

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>uh it's it's actually written by a Chinese American doctor

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>by the name of Robert home Man Quawk. And he

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>claimed that twenty minutes after eating at a Northern Chinese

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>food restaurant. So we're talking, you know, strong flavoring, seasoning,

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>wheat flour, as opposed to as opposed to, you know,

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>more of the spicy punch of Central Chinese cooking, or

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>or any of the other various culinary traditions to be

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>found in China. I think a Northern Chinese cooking is

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>less rice centric, right, it has more like wheat noodles

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. Yeah, yeah, rice South, know, wheat North.

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So he's saying, all right, eight at this North Chinese

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>food restaurant, and that resulted in quote numbness at the

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>back of the neck, gradually radiating to both arms and

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the back, general weakness and palpitation. Okay, so he ate

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a big meal. That's the that's the thing, and that's

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the That's one of the questions that keeps coming up

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>for me as I read any of these accounts, is like,

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>who among us has not eaten restaurant food, and in

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>many cases eating far more restaurant food than we should

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have and paid a price. Yeah. You you gorge yourself

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>on some salty delights and then you felt kind of

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>bad afterwards. Yeah. Yeah, Oh it was salty and it

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was rich and it was I mean, yeah, I mean,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we we all have those stories. It's a little much

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to start looking around for the one secret ingredient that

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>caused it. Now, in uh, in Robert holmen Quo's letter,

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he's had a couple of theories. He said, Well, maybe

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a certain cooking line that they're using. Maybe it's

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>just that high sodium content, which certainly would not be

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>unheard of in North Chinese cooking. Or perhaps it's that MSG.

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Now not everyone bought this right away, as as Ian

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Moseby points out in his his his excellent paper that

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Wanton sup Headache for Chinese Restaurant Syndrome MSG and the

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Making of American Food. Uh. There was actually one reader

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>who wrote in and congratulated the journal for fooling its

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>readers and suggested that the real author of the letter

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>was surely one Dr hu Man croc As. Then I guess,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like a croc of of uh. I guess that's a

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>play on Homeman quak homan quak. Yeah, but instead of like, yeah,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not a great joke. I'm not putting it

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>out as a great joke. But certainly here's an example

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of someone saying, hey, this is this sounds like malarkey, Um,

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>why did you even print this letter? Well, even if

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this guy was correct, that's no need to make fun

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of somebody's name exactly. Yeah. Um. But the thing is,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>this is not the only person who wrote back in.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Others wrote in with shared experiences, though not all about

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Chinese or even Japanese cuisine. There were even some who

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote in about kosher Deli's where they were having this

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>this experience. So almost immediately there's this just this sense

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of of other there's a sense of xenophobia in the equation. Now, Robert,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I have a hypothesis that I think maybe we should

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we were tricky enough to test this,

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>but sometime we should try out something like this. Just

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>say like, hey, have you ever noticed after you and

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>then name some common but not all too common phenomenon,

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like you ever notice how after you eat uh lamb

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>or you know something like that. I guess I thought

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of that because your name, uh you you have this

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>strange feeling. We will get people writing in saying like, oh, yeah,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I've had that before. Whatever it is, I'm pretty sure

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll get it. Like I anytime I drink a lot

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of fizzy water, I feel like I am going to

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>float up towards the ceiling and uh, you know, and

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>grind up in a fan. Have you ever noticed that

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>every time you drink one of those energy drinks that

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>has taurine in it, you start to see over the

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>dunes of time. Yeah? Yeah, I mean if enough people

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>just sort of raised the question, then we we begin

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to to define the answer on our own recollection. And

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, yeah, that's happened to me. I did feel

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a little weird after that last big meal I ate

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at that Chinese restaurant. But that's one level, right, just

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people talking about it and saying, hey,

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>did that did you? Did you feel weird after you

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>had general sauce chicken, which they wouldn't have at this point,

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, uh is it had not quite been

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>infitted yet if I'm remembering the timeline correctly. But But

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>what complicates things is that science then enters the scenario

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>as well it should, right, I mean, science enters the

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>scenario to answer questions, to get to the bottom of what,

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>if anything, is going on here? Right, So it looks

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like we needed to to have some some studies, some

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>organized scientific investigation of whether MSG is really causing people's

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes to fall out and they're to bleed from the

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ears and their arms to leap out of their sockets. Well,

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're you're exaggerating, but not but not too much. Um. Yeah,

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So that basically the whole episode here gains legitimacy when

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>nero neurologist Robert Bick and pharmacologist Herbert H. Schomberg at

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Albert Einstein College of Medicine published an article in Science

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on February nineteen sixty nine. In this experiment, they administered

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>MSG orally and intravenously to test subjects and then concluded

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 1>that MSG could produce the Chinese restaurants syndrome in typical

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>recipe dosages. So that's essentially the big first scientific shot

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>fired here where suddenly there's a study that seems to

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>back up what everyone is feeling and reporting about their

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>there's their symptoms following consuming Chinese food. Wait a minute,

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you said administered MSG orally and intravenously. Yeah, how many

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>foods can you think of that are fine when you

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>eat them and meet them all the time, But if

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you were to administer them intravenous lee would be a

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>big problem. Yeah, exactly. It's not hooked me up to

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the soy sauce ivan indeed. And that's uh, that's that's

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems that continues to to to to

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>raise its head throughout the scientific investigation of MSG is

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like what kind of dosages are we talking about? And

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>then how is it being consumed? Is it being consumed

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at an empty stomach? Is it because it's on food

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't like really be taking just straight MSG? And

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that, are you shooting up with

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>MSG something that nobody nobody is doing it. It's not

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on the menu at any restaurant, I guarantee. I guess

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to, I don't know, anticipate the scenario where

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody accidentally stabs himself with a fork and then an

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>MSG container spills into the wound, and well, and there's

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>there's also a larger problem here, and that is as

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>as they laid out, MSG was widely used in Asian cooking,

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was also all over the U S food industry.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So where we're why were there not widespread accounts of

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>these symptoms um popping up because someone had a bowl

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of soup? Why are there not cases all over Asia

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>where the stuff had already had like a had a

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades head start, right, body, you know, why

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>why didn't Why didn't everybody in China? Why did everyone

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in Japan suffer these symptoms when they were eating food

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>with MSG in it? And why not the foods naturally

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>containing glutamate? Yeah? And is is that? Ian Moseby pointed

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>out in that article. As early as nineteen nine, fifty

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>eight million pounds of MSG were being produced per year

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So it's in every It's in breakfast, cereal,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>TV dinners, frozen vegetables, condiments, baby food, can soup, it's

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's everywhere, and nobody's talking about it except in reference

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>to Chinese restaurants and occasionally kosher delis. Well, it sounds

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point like some cultural concerns might be as

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>strongly motivating this this worry as any scientific or health concerns.

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, And of course their studies also came out

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty early to sort of spend this uh further out

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of control. In May nine, psychiatrist John W. Only published

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a study in Science that saw large doses of MSG

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and injected into mice, which subsequently suffered a host of

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>distressing symptoms. Yeah. I bet they did. Yeah, And he

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically raised the question of MSG and human pregnancy, and

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>by July only Bick and Schaumberg to Schomberger, the two

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>gentleman from the previous study. They joined up with the

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>consumer advocate and future presidential candidate Ralph Nader to urge

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a Senate committee to ban the use of MSG in

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>baby foods, and they got a number of companies to

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>drop MSG that way, but the National Research Council ruled

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that it was fit for human consumption, but not necessarily

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>by infants. Yeah, so we want to emphasize that, as

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I've read in multiple critiques, a lot of these early

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>studies of MSG were just plagued with flawed method knowledge.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So I've seen claims that they, of course that there's

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the problem of injecting it intravenously in huge quantities into

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>mice and then saying like this seems like what would

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>happen if you ate some with you. I've seen some

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.479
<v Speaker 1>reviews that also claimed that early studies were just not

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>properly blinded. You tell people like, hey, we're gonna give

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you some of this creepy chemical called MSG. Tell me

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>how you feel after you eat it? Yeah, and and

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>plus you know, just think again, think of your your

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>spice rack, your spice cabinet, virtually anything in there. If

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you're taking a high enough dosage, you're gonna hurt yourself.

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean nutmeg for instance. Cinnamon challenge. Yeah, cinnamon challenge

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is another one. Like these are both substances where if

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you take the right amount, then it's either that it's

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>just tasty, maybe it's even has some slight beneficial qualities,

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>but if you take a lot of it, you're gonna

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>make yourself sick. In the case of nutmeg, you might

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>have like the worst high of your life. Do not

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>try it, really the worst, one of the worst, Like

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>all the ounce I've read of nutmeg induced um uh,

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:07.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, psychological effects. They it's it's dreadful, it's not

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>worth worth trying. But it's been pointed out so when

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they say MSG is worse than drugs, is it worse

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>than nutmeg? I can't see that it would be. I mean,

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. Basically, bottom line, you take you

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>take too much salt, you're gonna hurt yourself. You drink

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>too much water, you're gonna hurt yourself. And certainly if

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you take too too much monosodium glutamate you are probably

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna hurt yourself. But it comes down to the question, though,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>how are typical amounts of MSG impacting people? Well, this

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>does bring me to a question that I was curious about,

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily about the long term effects or or the

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed Chinese restaurants in Rome, but I was like, what's

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the acute toxicity of this stuff? Surely it's food additive,

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this has to have been studied. Uh. So acute toxicity

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is expressed in terms of LD fifty. You know, what's

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the dosage per body weight that kills fifty of lab

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>animals that take it? Uh? And so I looked that

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>up and there there is, indeed a study on the

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>acute toxicity of MSG from called Monosodium glutamate Toxic effects

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and their implications for human intake. A review and I

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to read quote. According to a joint inquiry

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>by the Governments of Australia New Zealand in two thousand three,

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a typical Chinese restaurant meal contains between ten and fifteen

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred milligrams of MSG per one grams. I guess that's

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the hundred grams of serving. The oral dose that is

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>lethal to fifty percent of subjects l l D fifty

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and rats and mice is fifteen thousand to eighteen thousand

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>milligrams per kilogram of body weight. That's fifteen to eighteen

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>grams of this stuff for every kilogram of your body.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>By comparison, salt, you know, table salt sodium chloride has

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>an l D fifty of three thousand milligrams per kilo

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a body weight, So as far as acute poisoning goes,

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the LD fifty of MSG is more than five times

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>greater than that of regular table salt. You can kill

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>yourself with a fifth as much salt, and at this rate.

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I did a little math. I hope my math is

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>right here. If it is a one hundred and sixty

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>pound or seventy two point five kim adult, h would

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 1>have to eat at least one thousand, eighty eight grams

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or about two point four pounds of MSG to attain

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:34.399
<v Speaker 1>lethal toxicity. Okay, so that's a lot of accent. Yeah,

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that is a lot of av accent, certainly. I mean,

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>how how much is in the continuity you brought in here?

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's see this is two ounces or fifty six grams,

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>six grams to one thousand and eighty I mean, you'd

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>be eating a lot of these, alright. So there's a

0:35:57.239 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of back and forth. It takes place after these

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>initial old studies. Dozens of studies come out in the

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties seventies, some confirm, some contest on these findings. The

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>harshest critics accused him of fearmongering and exaggerating his findings. Uh.

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And you also see a split overall, with some studies

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at supposed long term consequences of MSG, others looking

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at for short term uh CRS symptoms. All over the

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 1>studies were inconclusive. And uh, A strong vein, if it's

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>not a hardie obvious of strong vein of xenophobia runs

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>through all of this. Um and any and mostly does

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a great job pointing this out in his article, which

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>i'll link to on the landing page for this episode.

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>UH says that, you know, the notion here that MSG

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is is so harmful doesn't really resonate as much um

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.959
<v Speaker 1>in Canada, UH, and certainly not outside of Chinese restaurants

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the in the United States. And you see this

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>tangent that runs through some of the studies, some of

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the critics who are saying, well that the Chinese are

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just miss using it, Chinese Americans, Chinese immigrants are misusing MSG. Yeah,

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if the Campbell's company wants to put a little MSG

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in the soups, I'm sure they're doing responsibly. But I mean,

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>those Chinese restaurants, they can't be trusted. Yeah, clearly they're

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they're tricking us into loving their food so much by

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>using a reckless amount of this this this additive so

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, which is just completely nuts. Um. You know,

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I forget the fact that cases of of any kind

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of like CRS were virtually unknown in China and Japan. Uh.

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>No Chinese cooking was somehow excessive or bizarre. Both of

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>those UH descriptive terms were thrown out in some of

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>these these papers, enough to make ms G seem like

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Along with the idea that the MSG was

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>used in these establishments to perhaps conceal inferior food. That's

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>another labo is that, oh, well they're they're they're cooking

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:56.879
<v Speaker 1>bad food. And I think I got that mean when

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid. These Chinese restaurants they use cheap

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and greedy ins and people put MSG on it in

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>order to trick you into thinking it's good. Yeah. Plus,

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just to give you an idea just how varied the

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the symptoms of Chinese restaurant syndrome become. Again, they kind

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of run the gamut of anything you might complain of

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>after a meal at a restaurant. Um, it was, you know,

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just depended on who was reporting the symptoms. According to

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to Mosby is the paper, they range from you know,

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>mild headache to depression to sexual arousal and quote an

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>irresistible urge to undress. Now that may have been a

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>misinterpretation of people unbuckling their belts after taking a large

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 1>meal at a Chinese food restaurant. Yeah, if you eat

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 1>an enormous plate of general sauce chicken. Once it became

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>established in the nineteen seventies as the the the American

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>vary with the with the emphasis on American Chinese dish. Uh. Yeah,

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you might have to undress a little bit to make

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it home, You may sweat a little bit. You may

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>in some cases feel a little ashamed, as I have

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 1>at times for eating a dish uh so inauthentic at

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant that has more authentic dishes available. Uh. I'm

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sure they don't judge, you know, they're just they're just

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>happy that I'm there. I'm sure, but but but but still,

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>they're just just to drive from the fact that just

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>about anything you might experience after a meal was thrown

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at this just sort of elusive amorphic idea of Chinese

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 1>restaurant syndrome. So to this day, studies continue to be

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>inconclusive regarding the the the additive health effects here. Um,

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a passionate debate on either side of the issue,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's true. I mean, food is one of those

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>things that gets people really animated, especially online. I just

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>noticed people have incredibly intense opinions about food and food additives,

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe even as much is their political opinions. Oh yeah,

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't help either that, you know, the scientific

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>studies continue to look into the the benefits, the pros

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and cons of everything from wine to coffee, to salt

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to various you know, various types of calories. I mean

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it it's hard to keep up, right, because one thing

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>that seems there's a study that comes out and says

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing is bad for you one year, and then

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you just wait a few years and it's flip flopped

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in another study that manages to rise to the surface

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of media attention. Yeah, and I think you know, we

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>should also headge here and say that any food substance,

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>anything that's part of your diet, may have interesting effects,

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>good or bad, that we can find out about. Now

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>us saying that there is not a clear picture that

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>there's anything to worry about with normal levels of intake

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of MSG. Uh. That that isn't to say that you

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>can't use MSG in ways that could be harmful. We

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, maybe if you're eating huge quantities

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff, or maybe future research will will discover

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>effects we don't know about yet, but as of today

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that there is no special reason to be concerned about

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>moderate intake of MSG, right, I mean, maybe of a

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>racial stereotype pro wrestling manager were to throw it into

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 1>your eyes, that would be harmful, but but as far

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>as anyone anyone can tell, the consensus seems to be

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that a very few select individuals may react to large

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>quantities of MSG on an empty stomach, but otherwise it

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is safe for the vast majority of people. So stop

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with those spoonfuls of MSG before breakfast. It's just not good. Yeah,

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, the major food and health organizations don't say

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that there's anything to worry about, right The f d

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>A and World Health Organization too. Yeah, In FDA issued

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a large scale review by the Federal Federation of American

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Societies for Experimental Biology UH and an international research review

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in ven by the World Health Organization and the Food

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations all ruled on

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this as well, and they said, yeah, it's safe for

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of people, which is you know, something

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can say for a vast number of additives

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>out there. People have differing reactions to certain things. But

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, we're not throwing out the salt because of it,

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and UH and and we want to drive home again

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to that glutamates are in other foods. There are other

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to glute up a food product that don't involve

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>actually using monosodium glutamate. If you've seen recipes, and more

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of them are popping up these days as more people

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>come to understand food science. You know that beef up

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a pot of soup or something like that, by adding

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>one of these glutamate rich ingredients to it. They say,

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, add anchovies or add marmite, or add soy

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sauce or something like that, you're adding glutamates. Yeah. So,

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's even if every we're not putting ms

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>you directly, and you're doing pretty much the same thing, right,

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's and as far as we can tell, there's

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing significantly different about about it being carried by the

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>salt crystals as opposed to you being in the food

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in other ways. Uh. Julia Moskin wrote an excellent article

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 1>on MSG for The New York Times back in two

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, and she pointed out that while the

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>USDA U s d A requires labeling for MSG, they

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>don't for all other glutamates in your food, especially processed

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.919
<v Speaker 1>foods like chips um. She uh, there's a quote from

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 1>her article. She says, alternatively, there may also be included.

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 1>There may also be included under certain terms like vegetable

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>broth or chicken broth. Thus, these ingredients are now routinely

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>found in products like Cantuna vegetable broth is listed as

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 1>an ingredient. It contains hydralicized soy protein, caned soup, low

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>fat yogurts and ice creams, chips, and virtually everything ranch

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.919
<v Speaker 1>flavored or cheese flavored. Thus, the richest source of your

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>mommy remains your local convey in its store. Grab a

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>tube of pringles or a bologna sandwich, and glutamic acid

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is most likely lurking there somewhere. This whole thing about

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the labeling of ms G it kind of makes me

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>think about the GM foods labeling issue because in both cases,

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so some people want there to be a law where

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 1>any food that is produced by an organism that has

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>been genetically modified in well through laboratory procedures, because of

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>course all crops have been genetically modified through agriculture is

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>just a less accurate form of genetic modification. Uh So

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>people want these foods labeled, right, so you you label

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:45.919
<v Speaker 1>them so people know what they're getting. And on one hand,

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I kind of can't be opposed to that because I

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know I mean having giving people more information about

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the products that they're consuming. I mean that seems like

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>there's hard it's hard to disagree with that right right

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>transparency information. The only hesitation I would have to it

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is that it does tend to send a signal that

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>there's something inherently to be worried about. With genetically modified foods,

0:45:11.560 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it's almost as if the government is telling you, like,

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>this is something that's maybe dangerous and you should be concerned,

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 1>when there's no indication that's the case. And the same

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>thing is true with with MSG. I mean, I guess

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm in favor of labeling just because I'm in favor

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of all forms of transparency. But I do kind of

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>worry that when you make foods containing MSG have some

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of special label, it stigmatizes it in a way

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know is unfair. There are other food additives

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>we have no indication or any safer than MSG that

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:46.399
<v Speaker 1>don't require a special label. Oh yeah, I agree. I mean,

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean certainly too, when you get into like the

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>fear of chemicals with MSG, chemical itself becomes this bad

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 1>word where we're ignoring the fact that, of course all

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.319
<v Speaker 1>food is made of chemicals. We are chemical beings. We

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 1>live in chemical world. Um our terms have a way

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of getting ahead of us, rolling out of control. Now, Robert,

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Would you ever eat a piece of

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>chicken fowl flesh that has been saturated in a bath

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of dihydrogen monoxide and sodium chloride. Well you put it

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 1>like that? Um, Then I started asking questions. Yeah, I

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that sounds pretty sick. But obviously what I've just

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>described as chicken that has been brined in water and

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>table salt. And you know most good chicken is brine.

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>It helps it stay juicy when you cook it. So yeah,

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 1>these we know that these chemical names bring a lot

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of stigma with them. Like, here's a good one. Do

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know the I U P A C name for

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lactose milk sugar, Uh, lactose milk sugar, just milk sugar, lactose.

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:58.359
<v Speaker 1>It's beta de galacto pyrano sill one four D glucose.

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like something that would in effect an astronaut

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:03.919
<v Speaker 1>when they learned it on a on a doomed world. Right,

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's this, It's this demonic preon that comes out of

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the rocks to take over your brain. So anyway, I

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think we should try to come up with a simple

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 1>rebranding of glutamate that can allow people to consume it

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>without this chemical stigma. Right, so you just called hydrogen

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>monoxide water. Of course, dehydrogen monoxide isn't the primary name

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 1>anybody uses. It's like a it's a hoax name that

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.359
<v Speaker 1>people came up with to make a joke, but of

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>course it does accurately describe the content of water. Yeah,

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think to to come up with some some some

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>rebranding here to come up with a better, better name

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for msg. Uh. We should we should sample some we

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 1>have We have some here on the table. While you

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>were a speaking, I just cut up an avocada here,

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>so uh and I and hey, I even have some

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>shops tips sticks here if you want to get you know,

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.799
<v Speaker 1>semi authentic. Well, let's cut a couple of pieces of

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>avocado here and then put let's have a regular piece first,

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and then put some accent. All right, I'm gonna I'm

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and eat the second one. Eat a

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>normal piece and unaugmented flice here. It's good. Some buttery

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:22.919
<v Speaker 1>definitely definitely right, Avocado is always good. Now I'm going

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to sprinkle some of our additive on there. Mm hmm.

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Now you know it's we didn't properly blind this test,

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.919
<v Speaker 1>did We know that this is not a very scientific

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 1>so we know the difference. But I I would say

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that I think I can naturally taste the difference. The

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>one with the accent on it has a kind of deeper,

0:48:48.760 --> 0:48:53.440
<v Speaker 1>richer meteor flavor. Yeah, there's there's definitely a salt salt

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>nous to it as well, though less salty than if

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I had just poured salt on it. It makes sense, Um,

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>yeah it is. I mean, I'm definitely getting a sense

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the mommy and the salt as if it has

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>almost been like almost like it's been misted with soy

0:49:09.600 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>sauce in some almost invisible way. No, I'm sure you

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:15.320
<v Speaker 1>can edit out some of these gross mouth noises. No,

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 1>no more more gross mouth noises. It's what we need

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:22.280
<v Speaker 1>if he can can find someone one of those websites. Okay, Robert,

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>any irresistible urges to undress or how long do we

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>have to wait irresistible urge to undress? My normal, like

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:33.879
<v Speaker 1>my base level of of of feeling like I need

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to take my clothes off is it remains the same

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as virtually virtually not changed at all thanks to the

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 1>MSG scale of one to ten. What is that base

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>level um in the summer? I guess it tends to

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be like a five. You know. That's the yoga and

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you talking. Is there a special word for this naked yoga?

0:49:56.160 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Naked yoga? There's like hot yoga. I don't know together.

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've seen it. You can go to naked

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:06.759
<v Speaker 1>yoga classes here in Atlanta. Um, I've never been the one,

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but you can go. I mean it. Uh, you know,

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>issues of you know, shared nudity, nudity in a semi

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 1>public and environment aside, Like if you want to really

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 1>feel what your body is doing and see what your

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>body is doing in these various posses, it makes sense, right, Okay,

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:30.359
<v Speaker 1>So rebranding of ms G. What's your word? I came

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 1>up with one, but my wife actually came up with

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a better one. So the one I've tried to do

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was savor. Kind of makes sense. It's savory, put some

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>savor on your food. But we can see it in

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the advertisement to savor savor, my wife Rachel suggested, umami salt.

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's perfect. That's the best one. I mean,

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I think to all the fancy salts you can buy

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:53.839
<v Speaker 1>these day, like the Himalayan pink salt. At our house

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we have this like mushroom and fuse salt salt, so

0:50:57.120 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>mary salt. Yeah, so why not just marketed as mommy

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 1>infused salt? Like that sounds perfect. It sounds a little

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 1>bit uh, a little bit sciency, but steeped in in

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>culinary terms, not chemical terms. And I think that's that's

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of it comes down to, Like the

0:51:11.800 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 1>terminology for your food. Is it are you defining it

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 1>by you know, it's it's exotic aspects and and then

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 1>drawing in whatever you're your opinions are regarding the the

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>foreign nature of the food or is it or is

0:51:29.320 --> 0:51:32.239
<v Speaker 1>it based in in in human chemicals or is it

0:51:32.360 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>something compy and and uh and mouth shaped like o mommy. Well,

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>food always tastes better when it's got a nickname, right,

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you never want the name of your food

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to be all that descriptive, like just accurately descriptive food

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:49.800
<v Speaker 1>names or not appetizing. You don't want chicken packs with broth,

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you know you want I don't know, uh uh uh

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>happy foul package like schnitzel sound is great, right, it's

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>fun that doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but it's

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a fun word. Sounds better than like meat that has

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>been beaten and fried and smothered. Right. So yeah, there's

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot there's a lot in in in the words

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:14.879
<v Speaker 1>we choose to describe our food. And I think that

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the story of MSG are continuing story of MSG really

0:52:19.160 --> 0:52:22.440
<v Speaker 1>drives that home. Now. I know, in the wake of

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode a lot of people are going to be

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 1>very angry with us because we we have not accurately

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>described how all the scientists are bought off Hills and

0:52:30.600 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>how it's there's some evil industry that wants to poison

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>our bodies to get us addicted to drugs that they

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>also sell. I don't know what is the conspiracy theory

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with MSG um the Illuminati created MSG in order to

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 1>fake the rapture so that believers would would ignore the

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:53.399
<v Speaker 1>second coming of the Savior. You're you're getting us back

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>into surgery of getting my notes confused a little bit here. Well,

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>if you do actually want to get in contact with us,

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you can always do so as usual. And hey, pretty

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>soon we're going to be in New York we should

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.840
<v Speaker 1>mention this. That's right. We're going to be at Star

0:53:08.960 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Trek Mission New York. Yeah, that's gonna go from September

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:16.280
<v Speaker 1>two to four. It's going to be in New York City,

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and our panel is going to be on Friday afternoon.

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>So if you're interested in seeing us, you can come

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 1>check us out there. Yeah yeah, see us here us

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there'll be an opportunity to chat with

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:30.479
<v Speaker 1>us um after the presentation as well. And it's gonna

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be fun. It's gonna be a little star treky, but

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>not like so star treky that that you're going to

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>know all the answers already. Personally, I'm afraid that we

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are not star trekky enough for the stark just the

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>right level of star trekking us. You know, it's like

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:47.920
<v Speaker 1>people going to a dessert bar, right and we are

0:53:47.920 --> 0:53:50.759
<v Speaker 1>offering something where people look at they're like, huh, well

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't expect to see that in the dessert bar.

0:53:52.920 --> 0:53:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I will get that instead of putting that's the way

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of looking at it. We're like the surrounded

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>by cookies. We're gonna be the brown ut or nut muffin. Yeah. Yeah,

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we're the fig the fig bar of of dessert delights

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>at this particular conference, and there, you know, if you're

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 1>into Star Trek, it seems like the place to be

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 1>because tons of tons of gas, tons of cool panels

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and talks definitely worth checking out, all right, So Robert,

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, if they want to find us, where

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:22.760
<v Speaker 1>can they do that? Oh, head on over to Stuff

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com, which should have a

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:29.719
<v Speaker 1>facelift by the time this episode comes out. Come check out,

0:54:29.760 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>see how it's all working, let us know what's not working.

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>All the joys of a new website. Uh. And also

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you will find links out to our very social media

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>accounts such as Facebook, Twitter, uh, Tumbler, Instagram. We are

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>blow the Mind on both on all pretty much all

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 1>of those. But you can also generally find us on

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.239
<v Speaker 1>those platforms by just searching for Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And as always, if you want to get in touch

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>with us directly, you can email us at blow the

0:54:53.520 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Mind at how stuff Works dot com for more on

0:55:05.719 --> 0:55:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics. Is it how stuff

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>works dot com? Little Big Believe, I think the differ