WEBVTT - Stocks Gain on U.S. Tax Plan; Bitcoin Rallies

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Just

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>how at risk are you of having a flood? Well?

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>When it came to Hurricane Harvey, about forty percent of

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the people who suffered damages of homeowners were outside of

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the flood zone and did not have insurance through the

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>National Flood Insurance Program. Here to talk about how to

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>assess your risk of flooding and why it is important

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to consider private insurance is Mark Aunky Larry uh CEO

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of Various Analytics and I enjoy us here in our

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloombrick eleven three our studios. So, first of all, what

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>is Various Analytics. Well, Various Canalytics has some great data

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>which provides our customers, insurers, natural resources area as well

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>as financial services with great insights into the risk and

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>about the decisions they need to make. So how do

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>people determine truly their risk if they are not in

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a flood zone and they are not on the coasts.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what goes into that? Sure? Well, I mean

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the first thing you have to understand is long ago

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the hundred year plane is really about lenders. Lenders want

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that their assets, the mortgage that they're

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>putting on a home, had insurance. So over the course

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of time, Um, there is a lot of floodplane prone

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>areas that aren't covered by those maps. So you're at

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>risk well outside those maps. And the fact you just

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>provided inside of Harvey of the loss was outside of

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>those traditional floodplanes. So risk is much bigger and much expected.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of consumers have no idea, and at the

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>same time, the actual boundaries of flood are extending every day.

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So I just have to wonder, when you start to

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>do analytics on this kind of thing, what are you

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>looking for? Are you looking for the elevation, the whether

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>they're hills, whether it's just a flat plane, whether it's

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>covered in concrete, the soil. I mean, what do you

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>look for? So great, great opening almost all those So

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of very advanced models that take a

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>look at all that. So if you price or understanding

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>homeowner's insurance policy. A lot of those perils are all

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>captured in that. So the models are very effective and

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>understanding both the floodplains. But what they do is they

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>go beyond to understand how rising water will effect an area,

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's paved or not paved. An example, distance to coast,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>distance to you know, the various natural tributaries, tributaries. The

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>elements of risk are beyond just what has been a

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>UH map that's been around for a long time that

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>has been kind of altered for different legislative problems and issues.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So how who pays you? I mean do insurance companies basically,

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's basically the insurers who are looking to write

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>those risks. So I think there's a great opportunity to

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>take some of what is you know, the flood insurance

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and bring it to the private market so insurers can

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>provide that to consumers. And I think that's a very

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>viable and opportunity. I don't really see how they could

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>do that if they could compete with the National Flood

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Insurance Program of the U S which is set to

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>expire later this year. But I'm sure we'll get pasted

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>again because politically it would be unviable for them to

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>say to all the people on the coast of Florida

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and North Carolina, well, go go fish, go go figure

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it out for yourselves, and we're not going to insure

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 1>you anymore. Um. But a lot of people have said

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's not an economically viable program, that there will

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>be much bigger losses than the income that they bring in.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So any private insurance policy would be vastly more expensive. No,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think the answer is not necessarily to replace

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>uh the n f I paper. I think that needs

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to continue. I'm not going to get into the politics

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of that, but the reality is there should it needs

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to be private insurance to augment it, to provide insurance

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to those who are in a floodplaine that have risk. Um.

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think what we are looking to do is try

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to provide the same type of options and flexibility that

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are available from a homeowner's perspective, trying to provide things

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that's affordable and available from a private perspective outside those

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>flood zones. And I think, you know, you need to

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>actually have some actual sound rating information so that the

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>pricing is accurate. Your point is valid there, it's been

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit subsidized, a little bit subsidized. It's a

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>very very diplomatic way of putting it, compared to some

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the language I've heard from other people. Uh, just

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>can you give us a sense of which insurance companies

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>are interested in underwriting this type of policy. So right now,

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a group of very large insurers they're called write

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>your own um. Historically they have been kind of focused

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on providing is a distribution channel to the n f

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I pay um. I think under some of the more

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>recent legislation, they will now be allowed to both uh

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>distribute the n f I P insurance as well as

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>write your own I think many sharers, both on the

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>commercial and personal lines will write the program to get

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the proper pricing and rates. And I'm sure that it's

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>not too hard to find investors who want to put

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>up the capital on the other side, because everyone's looking

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>for yields, and you can probably get a good yield

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>for this, right I would agree what kind of yields

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are looking at? Well, I think you'd see that from

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>an insurance perspective, r O s IF in the industry

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have historically been around seven percent, So I think most

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>people who are kind of coming in from an alternative

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>capital are going to look something that would be low

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>sick double digits. All right, thank you so much, low

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>double digits eleven twelve. In a time like this of

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>nine point seven trillion dollars of negative yielding debt, I'm

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>sure they could find some some takers for that mark.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Uncle Larry, thank you so much for joining us chief

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>operating Officer of various Analytics, which takes a look at

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the risks that are implied when people take out flood insurance. Uh.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>Of course, if you want to know the truth. I

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>actually bought my apartments specifically because it was an elevation

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that would not get flooded. But now I'm going to

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>have to go back and this will be another thing

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that I can worry about later to late at night

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>when I don't have anything else to worry about. Semi

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>followed Cebo opening up for bitcoin futures trading last night,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and the results have been pretty good. They have not

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>seen major hiccups, they have seen the trading volumes that

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>they have been good. All systems seem ago here to

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>put this into perspective and figure out whether this paves

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:51.799
<v Speaker 1>the path for more institutional money flying into this cryptocurrency

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>as Ken Fisher, Founder, chairman and co chief investment officer

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of Fisher Investments. Ken, thank you so much for joining us.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with I want to start with

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin because it seems to be the rage right now,

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and because it's sort of highlights the degree of desire

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for volatility and bigger profits than you can get elsewhere.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on it? Are you investing in it?

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Are you staying away from it? Do you see it

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as a sign of a bubble? Uh? So I've got

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to take on it that I haven't had until last week,

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>which is last week. I'm in Manhattan, and I'm appearing

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in various places, and I'm commenting on bitcoin, and I

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>was routinely in print, taken out of context and misinterpreted

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in almost everything that I said by people who seem

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to have some other goal. And I've never seen that

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>happen before. So I've made a conscious decision as of

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>last week, I'm not talking about bitcoin ever or crypto ever,

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's a crazy world. People just cannot keep themselves

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to the facts. The things that I said, which was

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>all actually on TV, are clear because there's a clear

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>record off I didn't do any other interviews, and there's

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>all these other things that appeared online in print saying

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>things that I said, things that I never said. I

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's crazy, and I think that's an awful lot

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of what goes on with the rest of bitcoin. Oh.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm to go back that stuff on CNBC

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and on the street dot com. And you know, basically

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>all that I said was I don't know if the

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>bubble or not. I hate that term bubble, but the

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>price movement in trading days before and after where we

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are as of last week is in percentage magnitude bigger

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>than any of the bubbles of history. That doesn't make

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>it a bubble. It just makes it a big price movement. Uh.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that I've said and that I'll say

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin is it in every long bull cycle, there

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is some non stock market phenomena or close to stock

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>market phenomena that gives you a kind of a you

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>into a kind of a window pane into the coming

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>euphoria stocks. Coming back to John Templeton's line, the bull

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>markets are born on pessimism, growing skepticism, ature on optimism,

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and die of euphoria, and that euphoria, which is normally

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of a bull market unless something governmental comes

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>along and noxious under first is something it's always not

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>clear fully that we're going to get to. But I

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>think the crypto thing is the first real sign we're

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 1>seeing in this long cycle of the coming of euphoria.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the window pane into the coming of euphoria for stocks.

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So what are you looking for to determine whether that

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>euphoria has started to bleed over? I mean, how do

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that we aren't there yet? Oh, that's easy,

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that's trivial. Look at all of the nonsense that people

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>worry about that they stop worrying about when you get

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to euphoria. I mean, I've been doing this stuff, you know,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>since the early seventies. And when you get to euphoria,

0:09:57.760 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>people stop worrying about things like are there too many

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>new highs? Uh? They stop worrying about things like as

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the markets pe two high, they stop worrying about all

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of the kinds of things like uh, the next said hike.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Because you actually get to that point when there's euphoria

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>where they invert the yel curve and nobody much pays

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>attention or notices because they conclude that it doesn't matter.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the worrying stopping about the things that people have

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>worried about over and over and over again wrongly, which

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>ironically is about the time to get worried. But we

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>still have those things. We still have people that have

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a fear of heights, that think the market has been

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>too strong, particularly in America. That's true more so than

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>overseas because of the UH you know, if you look

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>overseas Britain, some continental Europe, more the equity returns have

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>been muted by currency strength, and so there's has been

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so buoyant normally in the late stages of bowl markets.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>As you move into that eusphoria phase, you get some

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>multiple big years this cycle, and we haven't really had

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that normally. The first third of time of a ballmark

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty steep, the middle thirds flatish in the back

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>their steep and of the return comes in the first

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and last the ball market only about the middle third.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Before I came on, there was a comment that we've

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>had the most new high since nineteen which is true, um,

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but also people forget that NT was at seven percent

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>year and still had years ahead of it in the

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>ball market. Uh, an interesting point that I think people

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of miss in context. We still have a long

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>ways to go unless the government does something stupid, which

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is so possible. Well, so if that's the case, it

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds like, are you getting more heavily invested in risk

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>your stocks? I mean, is this time the time to

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>go all in if we still have the last third

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>of games to go? The time to get all in

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand and nine, and I've been nearly endlessly bullish,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>but not in what you think of as risk gier stocks.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>In the back third of the time of the ball market,

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>the categories of stocks that typically do best are not

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the ones that people think they will, because the market

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>is a function that works off surprise. The things that

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>do best in the last stage of a ball market

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are categorically what you could call comfort stocks. They're big,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they're reputationally impeccable. There are things that are not thought

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>of as needles in the haystack, but as too obvious

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to likely do well. They're perfectly the stocks that the

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>last greater fool who gets into the market that was

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>too afraid to buy a single thing one week before

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is ready to dip his toe into because their comfort stocks.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So this would be big, global, high quality, well branded names.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>This is why the Fangs are doing so well. Uh.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's classically big pharma for the same reason. The person

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>with money, who is typically older, buys the drugs, knows

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>his friends would buy the drugs. Big global name, high quality,

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>easy to do. The last people to get into the

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>market to push it up the most. You keep pushing

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it up even as it's starting to fall. Those people,

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they were too afraid to buy anything before, so they

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>might buy the stock of the company they worked for.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>They might buy the stock of the company their spouse

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>works for. They might buy the one that brother works for.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And when you get a little beyond that, they buy

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>big global, safe names. Ken Fisher, thank you so much

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Ken Fisher, Founder, chairman and co chief

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>investment officer of Fisher Investments. Shoppers spent a record seventy

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>seven point five billion dollars online. That's just since November

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one through yesterday. Every single one of those forty four

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>days has been a billion dollar day. Some shocking statistics,

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>uh from Adobe Sense and I'd love to get some

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>insight on what we can expect in the remaining a

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>few months and weeks of the year to America. Affney

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>joins us now. She's senior director of Adobe Digital Insights,

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>which has been looking into some of the data from

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest online retailers and trying to project what we

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>can expect. Tamara, thank you so much for joining us.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. It's great to be here. Good morning. So

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>so let's just get us start with how much can

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we see online sales accelerate before it becomes a logistics nightmare. Oh,

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a really great question. We actually are seeing right

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>now about a thirteen point one percent growth in online

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>shopping versus last year. We're expecting that to end up

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at thirteen point eight percent because the last couple of

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks of of the month actually turned out to be

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>higher growth rate months weeks because of the fact that

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>people can ship later and later, Which brings me to

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>your question, which is how much more can we ship?

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, I think that is we're just lucky that

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had any big storms to slow down any

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of those shipping and delivery services. Well, I mean we've

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>already heard about ups, for example, being worried about some

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of logistic interruption. I'm sure that they're all racing

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that their stations are up to speed.

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>We know that UPS and FedEx both are considering having

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>some kind of voluntary pick up at drug stores or

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>local businesses to try to expedite some of the the deliveries.

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, is the infrastructure okay with this growth?

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>At what point will it not be Well? At this

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>point seems to be okay, but you do see the

0:15:55.400 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>pure play online retailers investing in actual physical store look stations,

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and part of the reason why they be doing that

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is to make sure they do have a place to

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.239
<v Speaker 1>drop off when the event happens that online shopping overcomes

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>our logistic capacity and trucking just becomes overloaded. Uh. The

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>other thing is going on right now is that the

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>average order value that's how much is put into a cart,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit down, but the amount of orders

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is up, and that means there are more and more

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>boxes floating around. I was in Manhattan last year and

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a sea of boxes. I'm sure it's like

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that today. So it's so yes, this is going to

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>be a challenge. But Amazon Whole Foods now, so anywhere

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole Foods. If they want to ship to

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that location, they might be able to just have people

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going to pick up stuff. So is the the sales profile?

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it pretty much even across the retailers. Is it

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>mostly Amazon dot Com that's sucking up all the gains

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>here or were also seeing an increase in Walmart and

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>even in same Nordstrom. Well, you know, in my data set,

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I need to give you more broad answer, so I

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that the law are just retailers. The

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ones who have a massive shopping catalog where it's a

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>one shop kind of deal are picking up much more

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>than average. The place where small retailers are winning is

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in the mobile shopping category. They're actually with a more

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>targeted catalog and more specific items that you go there

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy. It's much easier when you're under mobile phone.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but if I want to

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>go find something like a silver bracelet, I don't want

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to look at a thousand pages on my phone. So

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>that so there's a place for small retailers. There's obviously

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the big places for the super large retailers. The middle

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>guys are not doing so hot. What about apparel? Apparel

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting It's one of the only categories that

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>continues to see discounts even after Christmas is over. Right

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 1>now with discounts, we're still seeing some fairly good deals.

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>TVs are at about fifteen point three percent discount that's

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>coming off of though on Black Friday, So things are

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to get more and more sensitive. But a perilous

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>one of those areas that doesn't get more expensive. It

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>actually gets cheaper as soon as you get into January.

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing tech really still being the hot spot?

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>And if so, is it all concentrated in one area

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is it pretty much across the board with basically kids

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>across the world seeing what my children do, which is

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>just they want anything and all things tech. It's true,

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>tech is one of those categories that just keeps growing

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and growing. In fact, it's almost hard to differentiate a

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>toy from tech at this point. Is the new video

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>game console the PlayStation for Pro with VR is that tech?

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Or is that a game or toy? What is that now?

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the electronics category is seeing iPads and air

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>pods and Amazon Fire TVs and echo devices flying off

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the shelves, and those discounts are pretty good right now

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Computers, for example, are at about seven percent down.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday saw six discounts, So again all of that

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be under the Christmas tree and giving

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>gifts to all those from every category from kids to

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>two dads to moms and and and even grandparents are

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>getting in on the tech tech buying. To Mary Gaffney,

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us to Mary Gaffney

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>is Senior director of Adobe Digital Insights. There's been a

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about retailers that have slowly been dying

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years, and the question has been

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>when are they going to finally kick the bucket? You know?

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And today I looked at a story at Bonton's Stories

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to lead a December fifteenth payment on some of its debt.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Hasn't a fault yet. They still have a just grace period,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of eching closer to that sort of

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>tipping point. Bert Flickinger here with us, managing director at

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Strategic Resource Group UH Bonton is one of these stores

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that has been on death watch. Is this the final nil?

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It could be the final nil, Lisa for three reasons. One,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>it's primarily a rust belt retailer, and the better economy

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gotten to the regions where many of the retail

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>stores are to Uh, the off price retailers from Burlington

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to t j X Max Marshalls have opened very aggressively

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>against them, So that's very problematic. And three, they've had

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of leadership changes. So when when they when

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>they lost a couple of good CEOs back to back.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>The vendors had been supportive of the Bontan stores, but

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the Herburger stores have been in recently in North Dakota, Minnesota,

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>upper Midwestern region, Carson's in Chicago. Uh, inventories a little light,

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the circular pages, the ad pages a little light. Uh

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>So getting the cash in for Christmas, Hanukah, New Year's

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be concerning to your important point. Well,

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I just have to wonder though, also whether we're reaching

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a point given the increasing pressure from Amazon dot Com,

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there have been so many years when

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>these struggling retailers have failed to turn themselves around. Dr J. C. Penney,

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking Claire's, I'm talking uh years, I'm talking you know,

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you're your sort of a list of laggards. I'm just wondering,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>is next year going to be the one when we

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>actually start to see the fallout here. Next year is

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be the one. And then uh t TM

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>or trailing twelve months is you You and your team

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg News have reported well as well as the

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal twenty retail chains of file for either bankruptcy

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or liquidation this year, so in the last twelve months.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And but the key ones to your your key point

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in and nineteen and primarily eighteen

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>where the vendors are seeing price deflation. Ors Tom Keane

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>always says, I want to know, ay, you are average

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>unit retail and the vendors are seeing average unit retailer.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>The retailers are seeing average unit retail. And if you

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>can't drive higher sales like the well capitalized competitors, the Bonton's,

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the Sears, the Claire's, all the key concerning change of

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>referenced are are brilliant for tough times. What's the what's

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the catalyst here? Why now? Or why next year? Why now?

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Is the toys r US bankruptcy really caught the vendor

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>community by surprise. We've met with the vendor community over

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the summer. They've been fully supportive. UH two toys r

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>US and you could see it in the Toys her

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>US ads that ran last weekend and uh pre and

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>during Black Friday it's only four pages, while Target is

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>putting out a seventy two page full color toy book.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And so it is your referencing Amazon shifting the sales,

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Target Walmart shifting the sales. The under capitalized retailers aren't

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>getting the extra money to advertise TV, radio, social, digital

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>connective and the key circulars that go to the homes

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 1>in the in the Sunday papers, and with that it

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>hurts customer count. And Bontan and the others don't benefit

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>from Star Wars setting box office records this weekend. They

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have the FAO Schwartz toys, not the Star Wars license toys.

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>So sad. I'm looking at Bonton bonds. I mean, they've

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>been doing terribly for a long time, but they are

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>trading even lower right now. I'm looking uh less thirty

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>one cents on the dollar. I'm looking at. These are

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the ones that come to one that is not a

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>very encouraging sign. Lowest in trading days. So I guess

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that there was one lower, but it's it's close to

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the lowest price on record. But it seems to be

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>uh that there also is a shift in debt markets.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a key shift in debt markets. You're referencing that

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>no one other than you and Bloomberg are reporting because

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you're not able to refinance now the way you would

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>have been able to refinance even a quarter go. So

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it's beyond toys or US. It's like you said, it's Bonton,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's sears. Pet Smart bonds on the Bloomberg terminal have

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>traded way down. What happened there, It's it's a it's

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a combination really good reverse category killing by Walmart and

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>b J's Wholesale Club and Albertson, Safeway, Windco, a number

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of others because pet and all the way to pet

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>accessories is the fastest growing category and retail. But pet

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Smart hired a lot of consultants that didn't know what

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the devil they were doing, didn't know the detail of retail.

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Bad releases, bad capex decisions, the new new stores are

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>losing money, and uh, the the stores really aren't aren't

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>built efficiently, so it should be best of times for

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>pet Smart, But it's dick and esque. It's worst of

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>times to your point on the Bloomberg terminal with the

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>bonds today on pet Smart, well, just to play devil's advocate,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these companies, these stores is have managed to

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of limp along for a while, and perhaps they've

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>closed stores enough, and perhaps they'll close more stores next year.

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>What's not to say, you know, there is a place

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for brick and mortar. We're seeing Amazon move more into

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar. You know, they can drag along for

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a little long there. There they can drag along, and

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there clearly is a place for brick and mortar. But

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, we were going through the bontan

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Herberger stores in the north central states between the Dakotas

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and Minnesota, Wisconsin. We were also going through Chuck and

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Don's super Pet stores, a local entrepreneur one shop now

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>has dozens of stores. It's just pounding pet smart into

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the ground with a lot of natural and organic pet food.

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Fleet Farms now owned by kkr I and Menard's and

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a number of others are also doing really well with

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>pet and pet smart. By going to the big house

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>consulting firms lost a lot of the great leadership they

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 1>had that built the company up during the twentieth century

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>until about five six years ago. Uh. And and just

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>real quick, what are you expecting with uh with this

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>year's holiday sales. I mean, I've heard from some people

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>that it seems like it's pretty strong so far. Would

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you say that that's what you're hearing? Very strong? We

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>also checked the post office. Is the FedEx deposts and

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the UPS deposts. I've never seen the shipping deposts so packed,

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with a record two million parcels to be shipped bet

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>between million between between the big three post office UPS, FedEx,

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg terminals. Reporting FedEx near a fifty two week

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>high today. I think, thinking part that should should go

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>higher because the volumes just astounding. But the retail stores

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:46.719
<v Speaker 1>with new leaders, good merchants are bouncing back, and Penny

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>On the Bloomberg terminals actually going up in terms of

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the bonds that prefers and the the equity and sympathy

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that they'll get. Ship shoppers who see out of stocks

0:26:56.359 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bonton shift to Penny and seares the shoppers of

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>already safe save Penny during during the last two years too.

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Bert Flickinger, thank you so much. The only one I

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>know is they're counting the boxes that are lined up

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that are ready to get shipped out for the holidays.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Burt Flickinger, thank you as always, Managing director at Strategic

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Resource Group. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio