1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. 2 00:00:12,440 --> 00:00:16,040 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Charlie Pella. Doug 3 00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:20,599 Speaker 2: Chrisner has the week off. Crude oil rebounded, equities edged lower. 4 00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:24,760 Speaker 2: Is on certainty surrounding US Iran ceasefar talks kept investors 5 00:00:24,760 --> 00:00:29,280 Speaker 2: cautious amid conflicting headlines. Even so, the White House insisted 6 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:33,040 Speaker 2: that peace talks with Iran are ongoing, even as Tehran 7 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:37,479 Speaker 2: publicly rejected US overtures and issued fresh conditions of its 8 00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:41,080 Speaker 2: own to end the conflict that has brought havoc across 9 00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:44,040 Speaker 2: the Middle East and global markets. And for more, we 10 00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:47,400 Speaker 2: heard from Rosemary Kolonik, the director of the Middle East 11 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:51,920 Speaker 2: Program at Defense Priorities, and she spoke with Bloomberg's Heidi Stroud, 12 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:53,280 Speaker 2: Watts and Sherry On. 13 00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:55,120 Speaker 3: Rosemary, great to have you with us. 14 00:00:55,120 --> 00:00:57,720 Speaker 4: Give us, first of all, your reaction on this back 15 00:00:57,720 --> 00:01:00,720 Speaker 4: and forth between Iran and the Trump administry. Then where 16 00:01:00,840 --> 00:01:02,800 Speaker 4: you think is the Tulsa on right now? 17 00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 5: I think that my reaction is that this is a 18 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:11,080 Speaker 5: lot of political theater from the Trump administration. I think 19 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:13,640 Speaker 5: it's quite clear that Trump is planning trying to play 20 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 5: markets and keep them calm during the week so that 21 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:18,959 Speaker 5: he can potentially escalate on the weekend, if not this weekend, 22 00:01:19,080 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 5: some future weekend. Trump's ceasefire plans are not a ceasefire, right, 23 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:29,240 Speaker 5: this is these are you know, Iran gave these counterproposals 24 00:01:29,240 --> 00:01:33,000 Speaker 5: that are ceasefire proposals. What needs to happen for hostilities 25 00:01:33,040 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 5: to cease. The US is trying to negotiate a whole 26 00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:41,280 Speaker 5: comprehensive package, which most countries don't agree to do in 27 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:43,440 Speaker 5: the middle of a war because if they did, it 28 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:47,000 Speaker 5: would just incentivize other countries attacking them. So the US 29 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:49,960 Speaker 5: and Iran are just they're operating on totally different levels here, 30 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 5: and the US side is pretty disconnected from reality. I think. 31 00:01:56,800 --> 00:01:59,360 Speaker 4: Wouldn't be the wouldn't that be the right approach coming 32 00:01:59,400 --> 00:02:02,320 Speaker 4: from the Trumpets, especially if you think of it militarily 33 00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 4: try to hit them the heart is while they're down, 34 00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,600 Speaker 4: instead of putting a ceasefire when the Iran could actually 35 00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 4: rebuild their defenses. And at this point, when the Trump 36 00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:15,240 Speaker 4: administration went into this war, they wanted a bigger package 37 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:16,840 Speaker 4: out of it. Right, we were still a little bit 38 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:19,640 Speaker 4: confused about exactly what the target and would be and 39 00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:23,440 Speaker 4: what they could call victory. But wouldn't this be sort 40 00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:28,799 Speaker 4: of the strategy from the Trump administration, although the rest 41 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:31,239 Speaker 4: of the world might not agree. 42 00:02:32,840 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 5: I disagree with that. So yes, I think the Trump 43 00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:39,120 Speaker 5: administration wants big concessions from Iran. Where I think they're 44 00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:42,480 Speaker 5: wrong is they don't seem to understand how badly this 45 00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:45,520 Speaker 5: war is going for the United States. Right, so, the 46 00:02:45,639 --> 00:02:48,839 Speaker 5: US had a theory of victory that was we decapitate 47 00:02:48,880 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 5: the leadership and within a couple of days Iran surrenders 48 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:55,000 Speaker 5: and the whole thing is over. It's quite clear they 49 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,240 Speaker 5: didn't plan for a long war and they don't have 50 00:02:57,240 --> 00:03:01,040 Speaker 5: the theory of victory for a long war. Meantime, their 51 00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:04,560 Speaker 5: bargaining position has improved by fighting the United States. They 52 00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:08,600 Speaker 5: have now asserted control over the Straight Offoremus. They've stayed standing, 53 00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 5: and they've demonstrated that they can continue to hit the 54 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:16,440 Speaker 5: region pretty much indefinitely, albeit at lower levels, but continually 55 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:19,760 Speaker 5: harassing the region as long as they want. And they're 56 00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:22,359 Speaker 5: you're they're using guerrilla tactics that are that are cheap 57 00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:25,000 Speaker 5: and easy to do that. So, you know, Trump seems 58 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 5: to either not understand what's happening on the ground or 59 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:31,320 Speaker 5: this might just be proposals that he expects Aron is 60 00:03:31,360 --> 00:03:34,440 Speaker 5: going to reject, which they already have. 61 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:40,080 Speaker 1: Is the ordering of thousands of troops to the region 62 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:45,000 Speaker 1: also a negotiation tactic or is it the administration putting 63 00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:48,080 Speaker 1: in place, you know, an insurance policy if this doesn't 64 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:48,560 Speaker 1: work out. 65 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:52,160 Speaker 5: I don't think it's a negotiating tactic. I think it 66 00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:55,280 Speaker 5: is real escalation that Trump was planning, and he's getting 67 00:03:55,320 --> 00:03:58,480 Speaker 5: options for himself to do that escalation. And I think 68 00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 5: it's unlikely that that he's going to back down now. 69 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 5: He should back down. He should back down because ultimately, 70 00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:08,840 Speaker 5: this is a war of attrition now, and the question 71 00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 5: is not who's more militarily powerful, but who cares more 72 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 5: about the outcome? And Iran cares more about the outcome. 73 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:19,880 Speaker 5: So Iran is not going to be cowed. It's not 74 00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:22,280 Speaker 5: going to be intimidated by the US sending more forces 75 00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:24,960 Speaker 5: to the region. And I do think that Trump is 76 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:30,799 Speaker 5: basically using these negotiations as employed by time to assemble 77 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:33,600 Speaker 5: the forces that he wants to take this, you know, 78 00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:38,239 Speaker 5: into an escalation, which would be a terrible, terrible outcome 79 00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:41,159 Speaker 5: for the US getting deeper involved when we have no 80 00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:45,640 Speaker 5: theory of victory or sense of how to extract ourselves. 81 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 3: The element of. 82 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:52,600 Speaker 1: Israel Benjamin it now who also interests me too, because 83 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:55,160 Speaker 1: you know, there's been a lot of analysis that this 84 00:04:55,320 --> 00:04:59,080 Speaker 1: is the war that Israel has been wanting to fight. 85 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: Right in terms of dealing with Iran, do you think 86 00:05:02,080 --> 00:05:04,240 Speaker 1: Israel will so easily come to the table and agree 87 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:08,000 Speaker 1: to a seize bile when perhaps It's objectives different to 88 00:05:08,040 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 1: that of Washington's have not been met. 89 00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 5: Well, Israel is supposed to be the junior partner in 90 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:17,680 Speaker 5: this relationship, and so the United States should be able 91 00:05:17,720 --> 00:05:21,960 Speaker 5: to say to Israel no. Right. As you noted, this 92 00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:25,560 Speaker 5: is a war Israel has been arguing for the United 93 00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 5: States to be part of for at least twenty years, 94 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:29,920 Speaker 5: back to the days of George W. 95 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 3: Bush. 96 00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:33,039 Speaker 5: Trump is just the first president that actually said yes 97 00:05:33,080 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 5: to them. All the other presidents said no, and Trump 98 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:36,920 Speaker 5: can also say no. 99 00:05:36,920 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 2: Now. 100 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:38,880 Speaker 5: I'm sure Israel would not be happy with it. It 101 00:05:38,920 --> 00:05:41,920 Speaker 5: seems quite clear to me they really want regime change 102 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:45,800 Speaker 5: or regime collapse. They want Iran to just be taken 103 00:05:45,839 --> 00:05:51,200 Speaker 5: off the geopolitical game board from their perspective. But Israel 104 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:53,480 Speaker 5: is not supposed to be able to dictate US policy. 105 00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:56,400 Speaker 5: The President does that, and the President could tell Israel no, 106 00:05:57,360 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 5: and the US has enough leverage over Israel that we 107 00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 5: could get them to stop if we really wanted them to. 108 00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:06,800 Speaker 4: We're are Golf states in all of this, and can 109 00:06:06,839 --> 00:06:09,400 Speaker 4: we expect them to get involved in the war if 110 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:13,040 Speaker 4: they hit to their economies and entergy facilities warsin. 111 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:16,840 Speaker 5: That's a great question, and we don't know at this point. 112 00:06:17,640 --> 00:06:20,359 Speaker 5: The more this escalates, the more they will bear the 113 00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:23,599 Speaker 5: brunt of that escalation, and so it's in their interest 114 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:27,000 Speaker 5: for this to de escalate. So if Trump actually goes 115 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:30,920 Speaker 5: through with attacking Iran's energy infrastructure, right their electricity grid, 116 00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:33,680 Speaker 5: then Iran can do the same to Golf states attack 117 00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:37,640 Speaker 5: their electricity grids. And Golf states are much more much 118 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 5: more reliant on desalinization, which of course requires electricity for 119 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:47,320 Speaker 5: their water, whereas Iran depends on desalination for two percent 120 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:48,960 Speaker 5: of their water and the rest of is fresh water. 121 00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:52,200 Speaker 5: So it's not good for the Golf states of this escalates. 122 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:55,080 Speaker 5: By the same token, they can't just let Aron continue 123 00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:58,440 Speaker 5: to attack them without retaliating. So I would not be 124 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:02,559 Speaker 5: surprised if we saw dout Arabia where the UAE joined 125 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 5: the war, other countries may not. We might see a 126 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:09,359 Speaker 5: split among the Gulf states in this scenario. It's unclear. 127 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:11,960 Speaker 5: But Trump has put them in a very difficult position 128 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 5: by starting this war. 129 00:07:14,840 --> 00:07:20,160 Speaker 4: And US allies have also remained quite detached from the 130 00:07:20,200 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 4: conflicting haven't they, especially after President Trump made it clear 131 00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:25,800 Speaker 4: that he wanted their help in reopening this rate of 132 00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 4: horror moves. How likely is it that we're going to 133 00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:33,560 Speaker 4: get any sort of significant backup coming from US allies 134 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:35,360 Speaker 4: at a time when we have seen President Trump really 135 00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 4: renege on a lot of previous zeals, whether it's trade 136 00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 4: or anything else. 137 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:40,880 Speaker 3: Yeah. 138 00:07:41,280 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 5: I think that's a crucial point. I mean, Trump has 139 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:48,160 Speaker 5: alienated US allies over the past year, and he alienated 140 00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:51,280 Speaker 5: them further by not getting them on board before he 141 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 5: attacked Iran. So he attacked Iran, it turned into a mess. 142 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:59,440 Speaker 5: And now he's asking allies that he you know, previously 143 00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:03,920 Speaker 5: you know, had disdain for publicly to help us, and 144 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:06,440 Speaker 5: they don't want to do it because they understand that 145 00:08:06,560 --> 00:08:09,360 Speaker 5: trying to reopen horror moves by force is a very 146 00:08:09,400 --> 00:08:12,160 Speaker 5: dangerous thing to do. So I think it's very unlikely 147 00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 5: that that NATO countries are going to come into this. 148 00:08:14,840 --> 00:08:17,480 Speaker 5: They've said that they won't. They've said that after the 149 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 5: conflict stabilizes, so after the war's over, maybe they will 150 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:24,760 Speaker 5: help with managing, you know, sort of peacekeeping mission, a 151 00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:27,960 Speaker 5: naval peacekeeping mission in a way through horror moves, but 152 00:08:27,960 --> 00:08:29,320 Speaker 5: they're not going to do the heavy lifting. 153 00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:29,640 Speaker 1: Here. 154 00:08:31,360 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 2: Rose Murray Klank, director of the Middle East Program at 155 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:39,480 Speaker 2: Defense Priorities, speaking to Bloomberg's Heidi Stround Watts and Sherry On. 156 00:08:40,280 --> 00:08:43,520 Speaker 2: Coming up, we will take you to Australia where the 157 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:48,440 Speaker 2: Asia Pacific Financial and Innovation Symposium is underway. We'll bring 158 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:53,880 Speaker 2: you our exclusive interview with Sam Cecilia, cio at Host Plus. 159 00:08:54,120 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 2: That's coming up right here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. 160 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:09,640 Speaker 2: Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Charlie Pella. 161 00:09:09,720 --> 00:09:12,559 Speaker 2: Doug Chrisner's got the week off. We go to Australia 162 00:09:12,640 --> 00:09:17,440 Speaker 2: next where the Asia Pacific Financial and Innovation Symposium is 163 00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:21,520 Speaker 2: underway in Melbourne, one of the country's largest funds. Host 164 00:09:21,600 --> 00:09:24,440 Speaker 2: Plus is taking part in the event. We had the 165 00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:29,079 Speaker 2: opportunity to speak to Sam Cecilia, the CIO at Host Plus. 166 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:33,199 Speaker 2: He spoke exclusively to Bloomberg's Heidi Stroud Watts with. 167 00:09:33,160 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 3: The ongoing conflict in the middle of eies. 168 00:09:34,880 --> 00:09:37,600 Speaker 1: Has that affected the way that you sort of run 169 00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 1: your portfolio? Has it meant any changes or thoughts about changes? 170 00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:43,360 Speaker 6: Look at an understandable question, thank you. 171 00:09:43,840 --> 00:09:47,360 Speaker 7: The reality is that we're going to be living in 172 00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:50,400 Speaker 7: a world of uncertainty and a world of volatility that 173 00:09:50,559 --> 00:09:53,920 Speaker 7: is here to stay. But that's always been the case 174 00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:57,720 Speaker 7: when you think back twenty five years, go back to 175 00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:00,720 Speaker 7: the year two thousand. If you were a investor in 176 00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:04,000 Speaker 7: the year two thousand, what didn't you know about the 177 00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:08,480 Speaker 7: next twenty five years. You didn't know about the about 178 00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:12,480 Speaker 7: the dot com bust, you didn't know about Brexit, you 179 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:16,080 Speaker 7: didn't know about COVID, you didn't know about the global 180 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:20,160 Speaker 7: financial crisis. You didn't know about Trump tariffs, you didn't 181 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 7: know about Ukraine Russia war. You didn't know about a 182 00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:27,560 Speaker 7: lot of things. And so you know, you have a 183 00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:30,920 Speaker 7: choice as a long term investor. If you need to 184 00:10:31,040 --> 00:10:34,200 Speaker 7: think and act long term. You can sit by the 185 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:37,600 Speaker 7: sideline waiting for the dust storm to settle, but it's 186 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:41,720 Speaker 7: never going to settle ever, and so as a consequence, 187 00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:45,199 Speaker 7: you should invest throughout that period, which is what we did, 188 00:10:45,480 --> 00:10:49,160 Speaker 7: and so bringing it to your question today, yet another conflict, 189 00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:53,439 Speaker 7: yet another source of uncertainty, yet another source of volatility. 190 00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:56,680 Speaker 6: We need to continue to invest through that period. 191 00:10:57,120 --> 00:10:58,959 Speaker 1: You're as cool as a cucumber, So tell me. Is 192 00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:03,400 Speaker 1: it defensively opportunistically? How are you investing through this period, 193 00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:07,120 Speaker 1: particularly pertaining to the possibility of a higher inflation and 194 00:11:07,200 --> 00:11:07,880 Speaker 1: rate environment. 195 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:11,600 Speaker 6: It's diversified, that's the real answer, right. 196 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 7: You need to look at all the opportunities that present 197 00:11:14,920 --> 00:11:19,559 Speaker 7: before you in terms of deploying capital and take advantage 198 00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:22,640 Speaker 7: of the opportunities where it makes sense and mitigate the 199 00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:24,080 Speaker 7: risks as best you can. 200 00:11:24,360 --> 00:11:26,760 Speaker 6: And the best way to do that is to diversify it. 201 00:11:27,520 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 3: Where does that diversification lie. 202 00:11:29,360 --> 00:11:33,320 Speaker 1: We've been talking about crypto, and that's caused quite a splash. 203 00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:36,679 Speaker 7: Sure well, crypto if we decide to go down that path, 204 00:11:36,679 --> 00:11:39,920 Speaker 7: and we haven't made that decision yet, the mechanism for 205 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:44,320 Speaker 7: doing so, and the rationale for doing so includes that 206 00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:46,840 Speaker 7: it acts as a diversifier to some of the other 207 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:51,680 Speaker 7: investments that we have in the fund. There are different 208 00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:55,959 Speaker 7: ways to access crypto that meets our. 209 00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:58,040 Speaker 6: Fiduciary and regulatory obligations. 210 00:11:58,080 --> 00:12:01,800 Speaker 7: If we can't meet our fiduciary and regulatory obligations, then 211 00:12:01,840 --> 00:12:05,680 Speaker 7: we will not be proceeding down that path. Pretty straightforward, right, 212 00:12:06,440 --> 00:12:11,920 Speaker 7: And the easiest, lowest hanging fruit of accessing digital currencies 213 00:12:12,280 --> 00:12:15,760 Speaker 7: in its generic form is through an exchange trade and fund, 214 00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:18,640 Speaker 7: So you can do it through an ETF, which provides 215 00:12:18,640 --> 00:12:21,480 Speaker 7: you with some level of diversification, that provides you with 216 00:12:22,360 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 7: mark to market pricing. There's a whole set of advantages 217 00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:31,479 Speaker 7: liquidity provisions. So we'll be looking at all of those characteristics. 218 00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:35,920 Speaker 7: But unless we can get satisfaction that all of those 219 00:12:35,960 --> 00:12:40,120 Speaker 7: have been addressed in including custody of assets, and we 220 00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:45,560 Speaker 7: can get our regulator comfort, give them comfort that we 221 00:12:45,640 --> 00:12:49,720 Speaker 7: have crossed and ticked all of those boxes, then we 222 00:12:49,760 --> 00:12:50,680 Speaker 7: won't be proceeding. 223 00:12:50,840 --> 00:12:54,840 Speaker 1: Is that a reflection of what the younger membership cohort 224 00:12:54,920 --> 00:12:57,760 Speaker 1: want to see in terms of alternative asset classes? 225 00:12:58,040 --> 00:13:00,720 Speaker 7: Look, I think there's no doubt that the that the 226 00:13:00,880 --> 00:13:08,719 Speaker 7: overwhelming proportion of requests that we get for digital currencies NFTs, 227 00:13:09,000 --> 00:13:13,880 Speaker 7: there's a whole set of related investment opportunities comes from 228 00:13:13,920 --> 00:13:18,679 Speaker 7: younger demographics. But historically host plus's member base has been 229 00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:22,439 Speaker 7: the hospitality industry, which is a very young member demographic 230 00:13:22,800 --> 00:13:23,480 Speaker 7: to begin with. 231 00:13:25,400 --> 00:13:29,240 Speaker 1: The war is not by far the only risk facing masket. 232 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:31,160 Speaker 1: I wanted to get your views on private credit. We 233 00:13:31,240 --> 00:13:34,560 Speaker 1: heard a bit this morning from Blackrock. We've also heard 234 00:13:34,559 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 1: from Lloyd blank find saying that he sees a firerus there. 235 00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:41,479 Speaker 1: What's your assessment of what's going on on the risk levels. 236 00:13:42,040 --> 00:13:48,080 Speaker 7: So we've had exposure as a fund to private credit 237 00:13:48,160 --> 00:13:52,400 Speaker 7: since twenty ten, and so all of a sudden, everyone 238 00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 7: acts as if this is a new ass a class, 239 00:13:55,160 --> 00:14:01,959 Speaker 7: and it is not. It could be new for retail investors, 240 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:07,520 Speaker 7: but there are institutions, but not for institutionals. It shouldn't 241 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:11,199 Speaker 7: be new to institutional investors, right, and so you'll find 242 00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:15,560 Speaker 7: that if you are investing in private credit with bona 243 00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:21,520 Speaker 7: fide institutional asset managers, then they would have mechanisms in place. 244 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:21,960 Speaker 6: They have. 245 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:30,280 Speaker 7: Credit assessment facilities, workout teams, a whole set of necessary 246 00:14:31,680 --> 00:14:36,000 Speaker 7: infrastructure to access private credit in the right way. We 247 00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:38,560 Speaker 7: know this is true because we've been doing it since 248 00:14:38,600 --> 00:14:41,880 Speaker 7: twenty ten and there's never been a problem. 249 00:14:42,120 --> 00:14:44,040 Speaker 1: So des that men, your fund managers and maybe looking 250 00:14:44,080 --> 00:14:46,520 Speaker 1: for bargains at this point on the secondary market. 251 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:49,160 Speaker 7: Well that's their prerogative. To do so right, we allocate 252 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:51,840 Speaker 7: capital to our fund managers. We then don't restrict them 253 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:56,200 Speaker 7: as to where they see where they sawce those opportunities from. 254 00:14:56,520 --> 00:14:59,640 Speaker 7: And if they can find secondary markets or they can 255 00:14:59,680 --> 00:15:04,160 Speaker 7: find distressed sellers, et cetera, then all power to them. 256 00:15:05,160 --> 00:15:10,920 Speaker 3: Would you be looking at reduce exposure to software? Though, again. 257 00:15:12,160 --> 00:15:15,040 Speaker 6: We need to look at the word software and. 258 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:21,400 Speaker 7: Know and believe that different software companies are differently placed 259 00:15:21,400 --> 00:15:24,880 Speaker 7: to access AI. I presume that's the nature of your 260 00:15:24,960 --> 00:15:30,720 Speaker 7: question there. And so you have certain software companies that 261 00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:34,840 Speaker 7: are laggered in the AI in adoption of AI in 262 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:37,760 Speaker 7: part of their software, they will have a very hard 263 00:15:37,840 --> 00:15:41,040 Speaker 7: path going forward. And then you've got some software companies 264 00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:44,960 Speaker 7: like Canva that are in essence an AI company now 265 00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:48,680 Speaker 7: that have been implementing AI tools. 266 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:51,280 Speaker 6: They've got nearly thirty AI. 267 00:15:51,120 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 7: Tools implemented into their software, and they're ranked amongst open 268 00:15:55,240 --> 00:16:03,040 Speaker 7: AI and Anthropic as the third ranked design tool that 269 00:16:03,080 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 7: has adopted AI. We expect that type of software company 270 00:16:09,520 --> 00:16:12,880 Speaker 7: to thrive in these circumstances. 271 00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 1: As the super nest tag and the pile continues to grow. 272 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:17,960 Speaker 1: There's been lots of questions as to whether super funds 273 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:20,000 Speaker 1: in Australia upgrowing the home market. 274 00:16:20,280 --> 00:16:22,040 Speaker 3: Can you give us an indication of what that. 275 00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:24,960 Speaker 1: Looks like in terms of flows to Australian assets or 276 00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:26,520 Speaker 1: overseas at the moment for you guys. 277 00:16:26,520 --> 00:16:32,200 Speaker 6: Sure. So there's two parts to my response. If we're 278 00:16:32,240 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 6: talking about deploying money in. 279 00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 7: The domestic liquid public markets, equity markets, that's approaching. 280 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:44,160 Speaker 6: Approaching capacity. 281 00:16:45,080 --> 00:16:49,600 Speaker 7: But if we're talking about real assets, infrastructure, real estate, 282 00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 7: nation building assets, show us the projects and we can 283 00:16:54,240 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 7: fund them here, and we can fund them offshore as well. 284 00:16:57,880 --> 00:17:02,160 Speaker 7: The reason we go offshore in a for diversification b 285 00:17:02,720 --> 00:17:05,720 Speaker 7: gives us access to assets that we can't get in 286 00:17:05,760 --> 00:17:10,680 Speaker 7: our home country. And let's remember that our beneficiaries, our 287 00:17:10,760 --> 00:17:13,800 Speaker 7: members are based in Australia. So at the end of 288 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:17,600 Speaker 7: the day, that capital that we invest offshore needs to 289 00:17:17,640 --> 00:17:21,159 Speaker 7: come back home to end up in their retirement accounts. 290 00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:25,399 Speaker 7: And so we should be encouraged if you like to 291 00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:30,239 Speaker 7: look globally for the best opportunities to get the you know, 292 00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:33,600 Speaker 7: the best return we can for our superannulation members. 293 00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:38,639 Speaker 2: Sam Cecilia Cio at host Plus speaking to Bloomberg's Heidi 294 00:17:38,680 --> 00:17:43,320 Speaker 2: Stroud Watts of the Asia Pacific Financial and Innovation Symposium 295 00:17:43,560 --> 00:17:48,639 Speaker 2: in Melbourne. Thanks for listening to today's episode of the 296 00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:52,800 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at 297 00:17:52,800 --> 00:17:57,320 Speaker 2: the story shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. 298 00:17:57,560 --> 00:18:01,760 Speaker 2: You can find us on Apple, SPOTIFYLMBERG podcast, YouTube channel, 299 00:18:01,880 --> 00:18:04,879 Speaker 2: or anywhere else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for 300 00:18:05,040 --> 00:18:08,520 Speaker 2: insight on the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore 301 00:18:08,920 --> 00:18:12,680 Speaker 2: and Australia. I'm Doug Prisner, and this is Bloomberg