WEBVTT - Scramble for Battery Metals Puts Chemistries in Focus

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Hi, this is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switch

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on the B n A of podcast. Today we talk

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>about battery metals, which are experiencing record high prices due

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to supply chain pressures, inflation, and demand growth. And it's

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>no wonder since the sales of electric vehicles and stationary

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>storage have grown, which in turn require batteries and then

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.159
<v Speaker 1>in turn require the metals that they're made of. But

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with most things, it's not quite that simple, and that's

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>why we decided to bring our lead metals and mining

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>analysts onto the show today. So let's take a quick

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>step back and if we look at benfs annual Long

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Term Electric Vehicle Outlook, they look at the future of

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what demand for electric vehicles could look like. The transition

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is underway and road transport oil demand could peak as

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>soon as the electric vehicle market opportunity between two and

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>well it could be fifty three trillion dollars according to

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>BENFS Economic transition scenario. So in short, this demand sees

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>no lindes of abating in the future. But in order

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for any of this to happen again, we're going to

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>need more batteries and therefore more battery metals, So what's

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>important for a metals analysts to consider when thinking about

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the future of supply and demand in this space. In

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>order to discuss this complexity with us and many of

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the factors just swimming around in his head, Quoisium Popo

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>joins us today and he is the lead analyst on

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>metals and mining for BENOF. To research more about these

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>topics and to access the underlying data be enough subscribers

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>can go to the Bloomberg terminal or b enof dot

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>com or BNF smobil app and I recommend reading the

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>piece titled one Battery Metals Outlook Supply Turbulence Ahead. As

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a reminder, B and e F does not provide investment

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or strategy advice, and you can hear our full disclaimer

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the very end of the show. And also if

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear more of our shows on the

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>future of energy, transport and sustainability and be alerted to

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>when they come out, make sure to click subscribe on

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast player you're listening to us on today. And

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>now let's speak with Quzily about battery Metals Crazy. Thank

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you very much for coming back to the show. Thank

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you you know so the last time we were here,

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you and I discussed cobalt specifically, but today we're actually

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>going to take it back and we're going to talk

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>about kind of all battery metals because you recently did

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a market outlook for this group of metals. So as

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we get started, can you outline what are the battery metals? Yeah,

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so it really depends on who you ask, right, which

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>batching technology that you're looking at For us specifically Bloom

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>again the f When we talk about boutchy metals, we're

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to concentrain it within the contest of my technology

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>called lethio, my own batteries. So little iron batteries have

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>become the dominant battery technology in the space. That means

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot to us, which is i e. The electric

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>vehicle industry and also the stationary storage. So what is

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>a little iron batteries? So it's a battery wa I said,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>name sounds there's a lithium in there. So if you

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>forget any battery metal, Danta, don't forget that lithium. Yeah,

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it's in the name exactly what is in the name? Yes,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>so that is number one, number two. It also depends

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>on which battery chemistry beyond just having a lithium in there.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It depends on which battery chemistry. Are quite a number

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of them, but what we've come to realize is that

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a few metals that are consistent with the

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>dominant chemistry that is in our electric vehicles today as

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 1>well as in our stationary storage. So I would name

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>just those ones that we believe are quite dominant and

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>also from a supply chain perspective, have a lot of

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>importance because they would make the ev adoption dream happen ultimately.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So number one I've mentioned lithium. I also want to

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>add another one called nickel. So nickel you will find

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it in the min Southeast Asia, in Indonesia, you can

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>also find it in countries like Australia. And then third

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to that, you have cobotes. And you reminded our listeners

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of our inter action the last couple of months ago

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>where I just returned from the d r C as

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>part of my work to identify what is actually happening

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in the cobalt industry. So that is the third one.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>The fourth one we have manganese. So manganese is predominantly

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>extracted in South Africa, so they are the market leaders

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>in the extraction of manganese, so that is also used

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>as a battery metal. And I think in terms of cathode.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Cathode is that if you ever had a look at

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a battery, there is a plast and a minor sign.

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So the plas sign represents what we call the cathode.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So these four metals are the ones that are bloomed. Again, yes,

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we cover and classify them as the cathode. There is

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>also a minor sign in another for there to be

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that extrage of energy. I own was moving from one

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>point to data. So the minor sign on your battery

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is what it encompasses of a metal called graphic to

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a material called graphic. So all in all data I've

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>mentioned five materials or metals. We've got lithium, we've got

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a nickel, we've got cobalts, we've got manganese, and then

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>graph FLI. So for the battery metals that we're covering,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>or actually for battery metals generally, which are the raw

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>materials that go into making these vehicle batteries that they

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>were talking about as we're looking at electrifying transport, and

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that was covered actually in a previous episode where we

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>talked a bit about the electric vehicle outlook that we

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>put out every year. Do we have a sense for

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>how much the cost of the raw materials the metals

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>actually are in terms of the overall cost of the battery. Absolutely,

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is also a very interesting area. So depending

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>on which chemistry use, you realize that a huge component

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of your battery it's coming out of the metals. But

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the key take home is the fact that

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>most expensive component if you slide o peanut buttery, is

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a metals in there. And by this I'm not saying

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that please go slide open and electricy vehicle battery. Just

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>take the motel cells. It's not safe. Don't do that.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Although when you're done with it, circular economy recycling, that's

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a whole another show. We can have those battery metals

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>like professionally extracted and reused. But anyway, I digress. We'll

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>do that another day. So you're saying once you're in

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the battery, so once you in battery. So there are

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>some chemistries where the battery, the total battery costs from

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>materials will be able six of the total costs, so

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>much cereals the total cost of the battery. And there

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are some chemistry day now that it could go as

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>high as it really depends on the battery chemistry, but

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>those are the ranges that acquis and our modeling is

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>telling us that it could get through. Do you think

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that when individuals who are doing development on the battery

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>chemistryes I know they're looking at batteries that will last longer,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>have longer range in theory for these vehicles when they're

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>making them, do you think that they're also trying to

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>remove dependence on specific metals and reduce the need for

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>specific metals for various reasons, whether it be human rights

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>issues around the extraction of that particular metal or around

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the costs, which is what we're really and delve into

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>today because the supply and demand side of things, as

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at inflationary environment and supply chain disruption certainly

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is hitting this industry as it is so many. Do

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you think that that is a place where people are

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>specifically trying to change the chemistry is to adjust to

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>or is it really much more around battery performance battery life.

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So we actually looked at this question and analysis and

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>we singled out cobalt. Right. We mentioned that a couple

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of months ago I came here, we talked about my

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>experience in the DRC and the fact that there's still

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>consense around ethical supply chain. At that time as well,

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the cobalt prices were at record high. To just stand

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that one of the major mining companies which extract cobalt

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>had to shut down the MIND because the prices were

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 1>not favorable for them. So what happened between that time,

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>which is somewhere around twenty nine and now, is the

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that automakers reacted to first of all, the high

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>price and then the ethical challenges associated with the supply

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>chain what they do. So remember how I just talked

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that they are different battery chemistries. In

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>other ways, there are different metals which form the catholic

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>materials or the battery itself. So automakers realize that if

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they can divect to other chemistries like the lethio myron

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>phosphate battery technology which uses lethion, iron and phosphate that's

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>its name sounds, and they DIVECT from the high nickel

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>chemistry which uses nickel, cobalt and manganese. If they could

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>do this diversion, it would have saved themselves quite a

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of money simply because iron in phosphate are low

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>cost metals. But then most importantly, they would have weaned

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>themselves of cobalt because there's battery technology that's not require

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you to use cobalt. So that is absolutely happening. And

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>when we run the numbers, what we've realized is that

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty what bloom begin he thought would be the

0:08:55.360 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>total demand for cobalt from batteries by have been reduced

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>by half, simple because which is quite big cause I

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>think for me it ended up being my favorite chart

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and also my most revealing experience during the production of

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this report. So you do realize that initially I was thinking, oh,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>maybe did we get it wround at the beginning, And

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>actually it's industry that was switching. So let me do

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of name calling companies that are actually

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.479
<v Speaker 1>switched into this. I own little my own phosphate technology.

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the obvious one, Tesla, which was a big

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>surprise to me because if four years ago you had

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>told me that Tesla is going to use a battery

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>technology that is currently dominant in China, that Chinese company

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>c t L is the biggest manufacturer of LFP, If

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you have told me that Tesla and American company will

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>switch to a China dominant battery chemistry four years ago.

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I probably have laughed. Right, that was the reality when

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>elon mask Dancer stage and opened the Shan High factory.

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Months later, they announced that their entry model or this

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>standard model, Model three, is going to use the LSP

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>battery technology in China and there are discussions of even

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>extending it to Europe. Just this morning, I woke up

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and then I had the fod 's also announced that

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>its entry level electric vehicle is also going to use

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the LFP. Mes Cities has done that already, BM doub

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>has done that. So you're absolutely correct when you mentioned

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that the demand side or electric vehica manufacturers are very

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>open to change and they will switch or react to

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>conditions within the supply G and B it's prices or

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ethical concerns. Now for a very short break, stay with us. So,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>which are the battery metals that you would say are

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the ones to watch right now and which ones are

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>having kind of the greatest constraints on pricing. It feels

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like looking at your children and then trying to decide

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>which which of the metals. Yeah, I had a chat

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with our transport team led by Collins, my colleague Collins,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>about which of these is important, which of these should

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we highlight as the most at risk? And it turns

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>out all of them, Dana, when we did the numbers specifically,

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>so to be able to put that in contest, let's

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>just shorten the time frame. So when we looked at

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>this year, which of them from a supply needs in

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>demand perspective is the one at most risk? All of them?

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>And it comes down to a couple of factors that

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we've been experienced. And I know you talked about inflation earlier,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but beyond just inflation, which are probably addressed down the line,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Beyond just inflation, you would realize that over the last

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>three years the world has gone through and not so

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>good experience. Particularly we covered right, We've lost some life

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sadly that people who have not been able to recover

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and they're experiencing long symptoms. It's not really been a

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>very good experience. Beyond just this experience as well, the

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>supply chain has taken a hit, and part of that

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hits is the fact that companies that were supposed to

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>bring on production to me growing demand had to readjust

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>their capital location right if you're printing and on certain

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>market where you don't know what tomorrow is gonna look like,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to retain as much cash as you can

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on your balance sheet. So what that means is that

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're supposed to invest in expanding in Indonesia, or

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>building a new plant in South Africa, or even diversifying

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>into a new market in the United States of America,

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you think about that twice simply because there's so much uncertainty.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>And that is what happening at the supply side. That's

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened there where companies failed to invest in their

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>expansion programs but demanded and stop. China did not stop

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>buying electric vehicles. Europe did not stop buying electric vehicles.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>They kept growing. So we are in this year where

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>hold on, we've realized that actually there's some enough supply.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Litm is faced on that challenge and prices have risen

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>between seven six hundred to seven percent over the last

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months. In day now, if you're in a business

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>where the price of your input commodity has risen to

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that level in eighteen months, you matter as well. That's

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>packed right, because everything changes and these are costs you

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot easily pass on too. You can assumer if you

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>look at cobalts as well, there are things happening in

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the d r C that is beginning to threaten some

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>percentage of supply which will make supply inadequate to meet demand.

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>If you look at manganese so fit as well, lack

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of investment in China and elsewhere in the world is

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>leading to a scenario where the world would have to

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>think twice whether there is enough to meet demand. Also,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>if you extended to graph it it's a little bit balanced.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that I wouldn't be worried about

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>graphite this year so much. But then just in one

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is nickel, and we are actually quite both in the

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>nickel space and called a deficit that we might actually

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be heading into a deficit of thtor tons. That's not much, right,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but these are the things that drive prices and also

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>slow down their adoption to electric vehicles, because if auto

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>companies cannot lay hands on these metals that are who

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>shell to the productional electories, they get till manufacturing they

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are not able to produce, and then it's just extense

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the delivery of electric vehicles and it begins to eat

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>into our ability or electric vehicle ability to penetrate markets. Yeah,

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>because this isn't just a discussion around prices and whether

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or not prices are high and those will get passed

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on to the consumer. It's about delivery of these things altogether.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Will we be able to make enough to electrify in

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the timelines that have been so clearly outlined for us

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the carbon budget for example, this being

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the key ways of decarbonizing transport.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit actually just about where

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this might break down and whether or not we are

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>already seeing or we think we may see in the

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years, real slow down in terms of

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, production and delivery of vehicles. Are there specific

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>choke points that that you're watching super closely at the

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>moment where your things are just not getting to where

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they need to be physically, given that this is a

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>truly global supply chain, So we tried to use a

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>qualitative way of you know, testing the pose of how

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this is translated into their consumer and then obviously being

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>being there if we're also very data heavy, so we

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to use a quant way of defining this. So

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>then if you have a friend that has ordered a

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Tesla folks World an electric version or a BM doub

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle, just ask them how the weight in time

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>game has been going the last few weeks or the

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>last few months, and I think not many people are

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>having good experiences because the weight in time keeps getting

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>longer and longer. And as test that reported in this

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>recent update company update, what material shortages or the supply

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>chain shortage is actually becoming a material concern for them

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's beginning to impact the ability to produce. So

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that is a qualitative way where we realize that these

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues are beginning to translate an impact in

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the end consumer. The second way we look at it

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is we do think that the tipping point for electric

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>vehicle adoption is actually going to count from costs. Then

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>if you worked in the showroom and you could get

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the price of an internal combustion let me name call again, Corolla,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the same price as you get an electric vehicle Tesla

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Mod three. Well, the option which would you choose? Probably

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the Corolla it's less expensive, right, But then if they

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>were the same price as a Tesla, it's the same

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>price maybe the Tesla. Yeah, the Tesla they see, and

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that is where we believe that it will be the

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>tennant point for mass adoption of electric vehicle when you

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>walk into the showroom and you don't have concent about

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I need to pay extra money to be able to

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>afford an electric vehicle. But then it's just a matter

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of which one appeals to be more So, I think

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the tipping point will be that price, what we call

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>price priority, and our storage team has crunched the numbers

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that what battery price would we attain price parity, and

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we came down to hundred dollar, taking on what our

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>right that is the holy grown number that we do

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>believe that all we that the industry is working towards.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>At what point that's the average price of batteries reach undred?

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately for us at Blue Bag year for our storage

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>team has built authority in this area where every year

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we push out this report and initially, prior to the

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>supply chain concerns, our working census, based on our modeling,

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 1>our forward looking model was stating that we could attained

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that price parity between twenty twenty three. Guess what that's

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>feeling pretty far away? Yeah, exactly, once we started baking

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>in a scenario of these higher commodity prices as a

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>result of these shortages, what we're seeing is that the

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>earliest we could not reach it. If these challenges, supply

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>chain challenges extending to next year is beginning to look

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like and if it goes even further out, these four

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>fatility goes further out, we could be looking at probably

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>later in the decade. Right. So that is also the

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>second way where we try to quantitatively assess what the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>impact of these higher prices would be on the electric

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>vehicle consumer. So when I talked about the fact that

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I find out from your friends Collis family who have

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>ordered an electric vehicle and asked them how the weiting

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>game is going at the moment, and I'm pretty sure

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they will tell you that it keeps getting longer and longer.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>And two, at what points are we going to be

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>able to attain a hundred dollar you know, a particular

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>at our battery cost on average, and you realize that

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that access tended further than what we initially thought. And

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that is the point where we believe that evs will

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>reach price priority with internal composting engine. And if that

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>goes further out, then the mass abdorction of ev could

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially end up being delayed. So you mentioned as a year,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just want to be really clear on that.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>And I know it's impossible to predict the future. We

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are trying to say, when do we all things remaining

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>constant today, when do we think things may normalize? And

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I know in the natural gas space, for example, and

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we've covered that on this show. You originally it was, oh,

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be another two years, and then now

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that timeline is looking like it's it's it's kind of

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>going further away. When all things constant you expecting start

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to normalize in the battery supply chain space or could

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it be significantly further out than that? So let me

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>let me think I'll listener through it. Behind the scenes

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.959
<v Speaker 1>of very polt I published in January. Right in January,

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg any of published It's fast Battery Metals Price Outlook,

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>where we trying to look at where prices would be

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty thirty and actually went on stage to confidently

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>present these results at our San Francisco summit, so focused

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>on batteries, right, like, that's one of the topics that

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>comes up a lot of the San Francisco summit exactually

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and I confidently said at that time that base on

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>where we have seen supply chains, and I'm we don't

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>think that list. Your price at that time was forty

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars on average parametric m. We don't think that we

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>will see it go higher. We potentially might have hit

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the roof at that time. Three months later, prices doubled,

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I have to do the hard and difficult

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>job of presenting the reports to a clients every now

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and then. So what I did then there is that

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>rather than use that report I saw a forecast of

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the future, I used it to teach our clients how

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not to forecasts. So I think that is how I'm

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>going to answer your question, right, okay, so how not

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to poecast? So so what did you learn from that experience?

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Because again, you know, we can only make decisions, not decisions.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>We can only think about for looking scenarios based on

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the information we have today. But what were the moving

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>parts that you now feel are potentially too volatile to

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>be able to really confidently look too far out? The

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>short term should not be deterched from the long term.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>They are they are. There are two parts really joined

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>ot the hip right, and at that time we're pretty

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>confident that nothing in the short term would matter dramatically

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to impart our long term average. Few a month later,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the Russia War happened, and then it just change you

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>organized supply chain against I think the key s and

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we learned is that you should one way or the other,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>find a way to connect the short term which our

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>long term view, not just number one. Number two. We

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>need to also understand that if the historical challenges, or

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>if the historical factors that drove the market to where

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it is now have not been resolved, it's very important

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>not to assume that the future is going to be different.

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think if we have thought about that a

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit more and realized that the overhang. Yes, I

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>live in London and if you if you sat in

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the tube in London today, you probably assume that COVID

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist anymore, right, But then if you go to

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>countries like China where they are still aggressively enforcing policies

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to contain COVID, you would come to a realization that

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>some key markets that actually drive the commodity market are

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>still under the not so comfortable more difficulty impact of

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>COVED and that is a factor in the manufacturing. So

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>if we have thought about the fact that if these

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>challenges that were experienced last year, last two years have

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not been eliminated globally still persists, then the challenge that

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>drove us to higher prices will still remain. So that

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is less than number two, right, And I think less

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>than number three is the fact that the market is

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>not as rational as we probably as human is right.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Where prices would only move based on supply demands, sometimes

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>government policies in key countries also impact prices. Sometimes short

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>term reactions like what has happened would end up being

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>long term also impact prices. So I think these are

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the three things. And to answer your question as to

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>where we see prices, so let's take number one. The

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>short term factors that are beginning to look long term.

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Have they been resolved And the answer is no. If

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at Russia and other issues that we thought

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>would just be a short term issue, they're beginning to

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>look long term and they will continually impact supply chain.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So what that What does that mean for prices? It

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>means that whatever prices are today is very unlikely that

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they will move below what it is today because those

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>challenges have not resolved to COVID issue of COVID, it's

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>not been resolved yet in China right, China is still

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>aiming for a zero COVID policy that is affective manufacturing.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>So would we see a tsunami of supplied come on

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>line this year? No, So if we're not gonna see

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>scenami of supplied but demand keeps growing, does that mean

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see prices begin to fall? Probably not right.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think these are the two things that I

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>would say what probably lead us to having prices remain elevated,

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically for major battery matters in a short to near term,

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>so until probably about the end of next year, I

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>would say that prices are likely to remain elevate. It

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>what I can confidently tell you that I don't think

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we will see a seven percent to jump in the

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>next eighteen months like we did the last eighteen months.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what we've seen in the LFP on

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>switching battery chemistry, right, because when you go beyond a

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>certain limits the market, you just destroying demand. Because the

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>market and alternatives now for a very short break stay

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>with us. So you're saying that there are a number

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of things that have disrupted the market that frankly, we're

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 1>fairly unpredictable. And one was around this Russian invasion of

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine. Another one was around COVID containment policy in China.

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And another thing that I know that we've not really

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.239
<v Speaker 1>mentioned much but is definitely actively affecting pretty much all

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>commodities markets and anything moving from place to place, is

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>disruption within the shipping industry due to COVID and movement

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of you know, things in ways that they weren't moving

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>prior to that. And we're still kind of recovering from

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that a couple of years on getting ships back to

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>where you know, they previously had been to manage supply

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and demand balance. So here we are, we've got these

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>points of disruption. You're mentioning that things are going to

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>start leveling off. That's how I interpret you saying that,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the prices have risen, but we're not going

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to see them rise to the same volume as before.

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But within that we still are going to see rises,

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>right Like, things are still going to get more expensive exactly.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So in the industry there is something probably like most industries,

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.479
<v Speaker 1>is something called demand destruction, right And if you recall

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Ale and I talked about the fact that based on

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>what was happening in the DSc with cobalt and the

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that prices rules overnight to dollars pero metric tone,

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>companies started looking for alternatives. Right, So you destroy a

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>portion of demand, because, look, money has a way of

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>really making people think beyond their comfort. Zonne. Right, if

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you are in a business where your commodity put commodity

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>costs champs over a thousand percent in a matter of

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.959
<v Speaker 1>days or months, you don't just think about where you're

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna look for money to pay that thousand percent in

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>commit You start thinking about what could actually be substituted

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>for the ex expensive commodity. And we saw that happening

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the grid the utility industry, where when copper prices

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>shot up so high you're under certain limit, companies realize

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we're hold on Actually aluminum doesn't conduct so good as copper.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you can do the job data, maybe we

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>can sort of create aluminium lies instead of copper. So

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that is what could potentially happen if prices rise as

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>rapid as they did the previous man, you destroy demand

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and companies start looking for alternatives new technologies, new ways

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of developing batteries, new ways of looking at the supplies,

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a new deposits that are not reliant on certain countries,

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>and people really start putting on the innovation cup. So

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's going to happen if the trend

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>keeps going that way. What I can series that I

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's in the the supply side interest not

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to push the ball further. So now I understand why

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the title of your most recent battery Metals market outlooks

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that bumpy road ahead. Certainly there's a lot to consider here.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me just back up and say that, you know,

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>these are fundamental principles within understanding economics that are coming

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to light. And I don't think I've ever heard so

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>many people discuss economics so often. How are we integrating

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>information from economics which is, you know, not historically something

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>that we have researched, But we have a team within

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomer that does how have you integrated this into your research?

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Because there seems to be an almost seemingly never ending

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>list of variables that is included in your analysis. And

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>where does one draw the line? So there are two

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>ways we look at it, right from the Dumont side

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and the supply side, And I think let's start with

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dumont And I like my holiday's data. I do

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>try to go on one holiday. But then since ahead

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that there is a probability of our recession, I started

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking twice about some of the things that I actually

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>do with my investment. So now I have a secularly

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about the various subscriptions I'm on. And I think a

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies also start thinking about things this way

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>whenever they are talks about recession or an impending recession. Right,

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>so you realize across board demand begins to decline. But

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what we've actually seen, particularly in our electric vehicle outlook,

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is that one of the few industries that could be insulated,

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is our view or is electric vehicle industry. Sales of

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles is expected to grow this year and it's

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>expected to grow next year as well, similar to when

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>what we saw during the pandemic, where we thought that

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>demand the struction will impact e V outlook, and it

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>did not. So I think for the demand side, the

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>demand for these battery metals will still remain. What does

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>economic recession and inflation do to supply and that is

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>where the dynamic, it's quite different. So then I've always

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, I've promised I will take you on the

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>mind one day. If one day I get to do it,

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there are two days where you would land on the mind.

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that your three most important cost factors. Number one,

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the diesel you use in your trucks, so you hauld

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>your large boulders, big rocks with large trucks. And to

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>put it in contest, if you're looking at the Caterpillar

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>seven seven seven, which is a brand new for one

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of those mega trucks, high loss two high loss right,

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're putting them side by side, the tire of

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the caterpular truck is bigger than a two high locks.

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>These are more stross equipment you're looking at, and you

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>need barrels of diesel to fill them, to power them.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And to put that in contest again, if you're operating

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a five hundred thousand olysis capacity gold mine, you will

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>need about a hundred and ten million dollars on your

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>diesel annually. I learned, okay, So that is one. Number

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>two is your electricity bill that you will use to

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>power your smell test and your processing plant. So this

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is also quite very very important part. So about of

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>your cost is going into the electricity, and the third

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>one is your labor and a cross board for all

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>these three things, what is happening. We've seen high inflation

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for diesel or gas depending on where you are. We

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are seeing high inflation on the electricity builds as well.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And finally, also labor cost keeps going and going cost

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>labor but schedually becoming scared. So that is going to

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be the impact of inflation on the operations of mind right.

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And what that means is that even though we have

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing prices elevate and other and people are thinking Minus

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>are cashion, they're probably not because inflation is catching upward costs.

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And once this happens, you don't have that much money

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sitting around on your balance sheet to invest in new project,

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to invest in new capacity, to invest in growth. So

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest impact that this current inflation crisis

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>would have on MINUS or mining company or companies that

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>supply battery metals is a fact that I'm depending on

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>where you sit, there will be much more capital discipline,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just like I have been cutting back on holiday and

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>subscriptions I don't need. Similarly, they would also be cutting

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>back on projects that could have potentially helped us to

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>meet growing demand. In future, they will have a second

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>look at that. So that would be the impact of

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>inflation on the mind. In terms of a potential recession.

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>We still don't know for set to whatever will happen.

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>What we do know is that it's very unlikely to

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>impact himand in fact, demand is actually going to grow

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this decade. So crazy. Where do we

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>go from here? What other questions? These are the things

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to cover. So I remember watching a box

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on game and it was a gunny and I just

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>fought in Las Vegas, and he was asked the same

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>question and he said, I'm going home. Okay, fair enough,

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>But then I'm just going on. I'm going to spend

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>time to think about a couple of facts. So crazy.

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, as we're looking at this, I think this

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>has been more of a discussion around complexity in the spaces.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>We're all trying to grapple with what this really means

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>for the future. We know that demand for electric vehicles

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is up and right, as many of the charts are,

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>but this is definitely bumpy. This is changing how we

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>think about the for delivery of what the electrification of

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>transport could it could potentially look like. And it's a

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>really important factor as you outlined huge amount of the

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>overall cost in a in an an electric vehicle, because

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the battery is a huge amount of the overall cost

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of an electric vehicles. So give me some final things

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about. What are the main things that I

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>should just keep in the back of my mind as

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking to analyze this space myself going forward. Yes,

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>so number one, I think let's start with the optimistic

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>fans right just so far that demand growth is common

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that remains from change, and if we look across various

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>scenarios of what the future hosts economically for countries and

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>us from a global perspective, I think that all the

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle or the battery metals demand market is quite

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>insulated and we expected to grow up to about now

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we're doing quite a few millions in terms of material

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>demand that could reach about eighteen million metric tons by

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty from the ton batteries alone. Number two, the

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>little market is in a tight balance right like currently

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there has been delayed investment and delayed production expansion that

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to change. That ship needs to turn and we

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>need to see a lot more capital. My colleague Albert,

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>who leads our global analysis every year, put other report

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>which looks at the amount of investment going in the

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>energy transition. Unless start with the electric vehicle. Last year,

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and seventy billion dollars went into the electric

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>vehicle industry. At the same time, seven billion went into

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the storage industry. At the minding level, less than one

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>billion went into direct investment that went into products. So

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>this needs to change if we need to balance the

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>equation between supply and demand. For let's number three, for

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>nicol as well, there are certain things that are beginning

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to become a concern. Indonesia produces about twent of global

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>nickel's supply, and if you look at Indonesia where we

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are getting the supply form those corners of the world

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are places that have one of the most polluting grids,

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly coal. And all the government is thinking about using

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>hydro electric power as well as other sources of clean

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>energy for these minds and these smeltors, but until then

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>they remain one of the most pollutant And if you

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think about the fact that the world would depend on

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>nickel and by extension Indonesia's nickel. Something drastic needs to

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be done about that. Number four. I've talked about cobalts,

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about the supplies and challenges with ethical

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>issues around and child living the g r C. Inspite

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of the demand instruction that this has caused and the

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that companies have switched significantly two technologies like LFB,

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>there's only that much that you can switch, right, because

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>he has this limitation of range. And regardless of that,

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.479
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at long range electric vehicles, you still

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>need cobalt inclusive batteries speaking generally right, So we'll still

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>depend on cobalts and demand will ultimately grow when you

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>look at it from the overall market perspective, and as such,

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>we cannot do our way with the DRC. You've seen

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>quite a number of companies actually move into the DRC

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to work with our tisanal minors, and I think that

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that will be the writing to do, where companies partner

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>with these small skilled protests to ensure they do the

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 1>right things, so we can bring their supply chain into

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the ethical sources of COBA as well to ensure that

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't follow over a cliff. But then we do

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have consistent supplied that would enable us to me demand,

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and once we do that, prices will be contained and

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't have the adoption of EVI is being delayed.

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think the fifth one, I would sort of

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>deviate from all that I've talked about in our report,

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and I would say that don't panic. We've talked about turbulence.

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But then one thing that I have not talked about

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>yet because obviously it's out of scoope, is the ingenuity

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of human capability that we've seen quite a number of

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>industries where there are points where you sort of hit

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the wall, but look, humans, humans, human intelligence, news, no limitation.

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Out of nowhere, there could be a potential new technology

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to extract lythium, and there's directly to instraction technology that

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a companying Leila is currently trying. Out of nowhere, you

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>could have a different battery chemistry that would go to

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>market within a short period to address some of the

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>supply chain concents. Out of nowhere, we're gonna make a

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>newer mineral deposit who knows in the country like America, Europe,

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia, South America, which would ease the supply crunch

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>were out of nowhere, we could have most of these

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues resolved. And also out of nowhere we

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>could have world peace, whether disruption term disruptions that we

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have seen now would be eliminated, and by then these

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>turbulence that I did talk about, which could actually impasse

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 1>CV adoption, EV sills and the EV revolution would have

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>been resolved. And I'm pretty sure that we'll get back

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 1>on track, So don't panic. Well, on that optimistic note, Quaise,

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>You've certainly given us a lot to think about. I'm

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not so sure that world pieces on the cards underpinned

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>by the battery metals market, but I do appreciate your

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>very positive outlook on things, but also the fact that

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know there's certainly maybe it's the better way to encapsulate.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From my end, what you were just saying is, don't panic,

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but do analysis. And also the innovation is central to

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>not just this industry, but so many industries of the

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 1>topics that we cover, and that certainly is true. I mean,

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the amount of change even just since we started doing

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>this show. It's been a couple of years, not that long,

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and I have seen so much innovation and convention market

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>over these conversations that we've had and just like you

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 1>were saying regarding the you know, coldball chart, that you

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>were looking at the change in battery chemistries, it's truly

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to see how things are developing going forward. So

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>on that note, I look forward to having you back

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on the show to see what has happened in the

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>battery metal space over the next year to a couple

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of years. And in the meantime, we'll keep producing market

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>outlooks to ponder these and thank you for joining us today.

0:38:53.560 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, and thank you to listeners as well. Today's

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>episode of Switched On was edited by Rex Warner of

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>gray Stoke Media. Bloomberg an e F as a service

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>does not constitute, nor should it be construed as investment advice,

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>investment recommendations, or recommendation as to an investment or other strategy.

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ani F should not be considered as information sufficient

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>upon which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>LP nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>contained in this recording, and any liability of this recording

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is expressly disclaimed.