WEBVTT - Here Come the Warm Feels

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. A production of

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radios has to works. Hey, welcome to Stuff

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick. And today we're going to be looking

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at a subject that that I started thinking about in

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of a broader question, and the question is this,

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are there unexplored frontiers in understanding what human emotions are?

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>When you think about human emotions, that that is something

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>that's studied by psychology and sometimes by neuroscience. But it

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>seems like territory where we just assume we've got all

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the basics down right. We know what all we know happy, sad,

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we know contempt, we know disgust. You know, there's a

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>broad range of basic emotions, and we just think it's

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>intuitive that, yeah, we we've got names for all of them,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we understand basically what they are, we've felt them before.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>But there is of course something that we all know

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that that there is a a feeling understanding gap that

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>we can feel things without necessarily understanding what they are

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or why we're feeling them. It's why we're sometimes like

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>surprised by our own emotions, Like when you discover without

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>realizing it, that you've been falling in love with someone,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>or you discover without realizing it that someone actually really

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>gets on your nerves and you know it's finally all

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>coming into focus, or you know, all kinds of feelings

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>like that that you can feel for a long time

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>before you have any kind of cognitive awareness or ability

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to describe or put a name to it. And it

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>makes you wonder if there are whole emotional states that

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we go through. We feel them, but we don't necessarily

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have a language for them, or or an understanding of

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>their relationship to external stimuli and the symptoms they produce

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in the body and the mind. Yeah, there's a great

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>deal of complexity to this because on one hand, yeah,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>there's just the awareness of self being able to enter

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at least into moments of awareness, moments of self awareness.

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>And then there's of course this idea of being aware

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of your awareness and how that changes your ability to

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>self reflect and you know, varying degrees of awareness as well.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know, I was I was thinking a

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit on this, and I feel like, to a

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>certain extent, it's kind of like transparent anatomical overlays that

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll find in like an anatomy book, you know, where

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like the base is the skeleton, and then you have

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>like a transparent overlay that then puts um I don't know,

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the circulatory system, and then you you know, add other

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>systems or muscular layers on top of that. You're getting

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>very tool album art on me, right, right, I know

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>your mind. Obviously this has also been a explored in

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in tool album art as well, yes, by the excellence

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of the excellent visionary artist Alex Gray, of course. But

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>there is actually something pretty interesting about that art, which

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is that it layers real anatomical strata of things you

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>would see like muscles and blood, vessels, nerves and all that,

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>with other things that are non physical. They're you know,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>abstracted layers on sort of concepts of the soul on

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>top of the body and another transparent overlay, right. And

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so I can't help but think about that in terms

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of feelings, language, and awareness, because there's certainly the experience

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of an emotional state that we have, and then there's

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>another transparent page that we can put on top of that,

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>representing like a person shaped word cloud that provides a

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>definition and an analysis as well of what I'm feeling,

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>though perhaps uh, you know, we also needed a second

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>overlay to really have captured that second part, you know

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>what that what our culture is saying about what we

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>think we're feeling and how we should feel about it.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of all of this, we have

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>awareness and the awareness of awareness, and the knowledge that

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this entire page is going to turn that this state,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, if it is going to be fleeting,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>no matter how much we want it to last forever

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>or how much we dread that it will last forever.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think it can sometimes go something like this, Right,

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel something, and then my language gives that feeling

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a name, say sadness, And then my culture tells me

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that say sadness, that sadness that I'm feeling is inappropriate

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>for my gender or inappropriate for a given situation, etcetera,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and um. And then I yearn for other labeled emotional

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>states and somehow this uh, this linguistic tag does not

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>summon the emotion I want. It doesn't generated out of nowhere,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm sad and ashamed for being sad. Um.

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So basically the short of it is, there's there's this

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>relationship between how we label our emotions and the emotions

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we feel. Uh. And also it does that thing that

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that language does. Right, We're able to tag something for

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>further study. We're able to take something that is difficult

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to explain, we put a single label on it, and

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then we can discuss that label in comparison to other subjects,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 1>other examples, etcetera. Well, Yeah, once you name something, you

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>can start to figure out what it is and what

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it is not. Uh. If you didn't have a name

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>for the thing, it's a lot harder to start trying

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>to describe the characteristics it does or doesn't possess. Yeah,

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And like as a as a parent, I have encountered this.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, where my son is feeling something and either

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, he doesn't have the self awareness and self

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>reflection to really think about it yet, or or perhaps

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't even have a good word, a good description

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for what it is he's feeling, and you have to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of try and try and walk them through what

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling and try to get them to identify it

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so that you can discuss it so you can get

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of it to whatever extent you can.

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that naming of things, especially naming of internal

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>states can have tremendous and often well tremendous positive and

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>negative power. One example of positive power I think of

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is I'm not going to say who, but just somebody

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I know. At one point when they became aware of

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the cycle logical concept of rumination, uh, you know, the

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>process of repeatedly going over cycles of negative thoughts in

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>your mind and entertaining worst possible scenarios. Just becoming aware

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that that was a concept that was already known of

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and had a name had a lot of power for

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this person to help them overcome when it was affecting them,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because suddenly they didn't just think, oh, I'm doing this

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>terrible thing again. They thought, I'm ruminating. This is a

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>psychological symptom that's negative, and they felt it was easier

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to break out of the cycle after knowing the word

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for it exactly. And it come back to sadness for example,

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's one thing that's to realize I am feeling sad,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but then language allows us then to focus in on

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more specific versions of that, saying, you know, not only

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>am I feeling sadness, perhaps I'm feeling the particular sadness

0:06:54.400 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of loss or rejection or homesickness or defeat or alienation um.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And and then we can we we can better utilize

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>our our own minds and even uh resources, either in

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the community or in just sort of the the general

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>human um in a world around us, to try and

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>figure out how we should react uh and or solve

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the situation at hand. Yeah, exactly. I mean that makes

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>me think of another thing you're sort of alluding to there,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>which is that when you have a name for an

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>internal state, that helps you find other people who also

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>experience the internal state because you sort of have a

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>common search term or something that you can use to

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>get together and figure out Oh okay, and you can

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>compare your experiences with others uh. And of course, you know,

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>again this cuts both ways. I'd say overall, is probably

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a positive thing to have names for internal states like this,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>because it can help people find solidarity get advice from

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>other people who feel the same way they do. But

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it can also lead to you know, people finding one

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>another based on like anger based or you know, negative

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>internal states and and building a kind of negative solidarity

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of stoking one another's bad emotions, right, or what happens

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>when you have a legitimate emotional state, but the terminology

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>end up using to describe it is is not helpful, say,

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>say that you end up using like say, highly religious

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>terminology to describe these things that in some cases may

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>not provide a lot of tools for dealing with it.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Like what if you broadly categorize various emotional states as

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>being sinful? Um, well, then that means that you're only

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ways of really addressing whatever you're feeling lie within the

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>religious doctrine that you are in which you're classifying everything,

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and limits you in that respect. Or believing that

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>say a state like depression or something consists of having

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a demon which you know you can certainly understand why

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it could feel that way. And yet on the other side,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>there are examples of personifying negative emotional states that can

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>be liberating, you know, being able to say, personify one's

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>fear and then reject it. So it's it's it's certainly

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about human emotional states and our awareness

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>of them and our dealings with them, there's a great

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>deal of complexity here. There's not necessarily a one size

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>fits all. We're not going to be able to unwrap

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all of these questions today, but we will discuss an

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>emotional state that has largely gone unnamed, at least in

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the English language. Yeah, at least if this group of

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>researchers that we're gonna be talking about today are onto something.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So I came to this topic today of of emotions

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that we don't yet have names for, by reading an

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>article and eon by the psychological anthropologist Alan Fisk, who

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And in this article, Fisk summarizes a bunch of research

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>that's been going on in the past few years of

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot a lot of which he's been a co

0:09:55.000 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>author on um, which he believes identifies an extremely imp hortoned,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>everyday emotion, not something unusual, but something we all know,

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we feel all the time, that's incredibly important to our lives,

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that's been with us all along, but that he argues,

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>has not been recognized as distinct and unified as an

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>emotion in itself, and instead has been called a lot

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of kind of other things in its different facets. And

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the term he uses for this emotion is karma muta

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>k a m A m u t A. So what

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>exactly is karma muda? As Fisk would argue the term

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:37.239
<v Speaker 1>karmamuda comes from ancient Sanskrit, in which it means moved

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>by love. So this emotion of karma muda is a

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>social emotion, and Fisk describes it as an emotion evoked

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>by the sudden intensification of communal sharing. Now, this doesn't

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>just mean sharing in the sense of like sharing your

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>toys or sharing your kitcat bar, or you know, sharing

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the payout from the bank ice uh, though all of

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>those could probably be moments that would evoke karmamuda. But

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a broader sense of sharing. This is what

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Alan Fisk has called another work communal sharing relationships, and

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that's briefly defined in one of his papers as relationships

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>quote in which participants feel that in some distinctive way

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they are equivalent, belong together, care for and trust each other.

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of like a strengthening of social bonds

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and a signaling of trust and mutual caring. This is

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>why you do trust falls at your place to work, right,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know you would think that this makes me think

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of a funny thing I kind of want to come

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>back to and later in the episode, which is like

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>ways that if this is truly a unified emotional experience

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.479
<v Speaker 1>in the way they're describing ways that it is definitely

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>exploited in in like in business and in media. One

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that I know you and I have talked about

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>before is all the things that love to tell you

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they're your family, but are not your family, like your

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>workplace that says like we're a family, and it's like,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I understand that can be a nice thing to say,

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like you're trying to say, you know, you should feel

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>belonging here, but you know, people actually have families that

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are families. Or you know, if Olive Garden says when

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you're here your family, that there's something in common there.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to do something to you. What is that

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>thing they're trying to do. Yeah, they they they're they're

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>co operting the idea of family. Or and here's another one.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The Sawe family that Shank saw Massacre um UH series

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>franchise will sometimes pull that one out and they're like,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe maybe it is, but probably not.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, Drayton's being manipulative. One he says that he's

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to turn leather Face into a bitter old woman

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>hater like he is, but okay, okay, okay. So there

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of separate emotional states that we recognize

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that Fisk argues actually all share the features of this

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>one unified thing that he's proposing, this unified state of

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>kama muta, and so different examples of words people use

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for this thing that he actually says is all the

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing is being moved, being touched, team pride, patriotism,

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>being touched by the spirit burning in the bosom, the

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>fields like that, or he says also when evoked by memory,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it's nostalgia. So that's a lot of ground to cover.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel, for instance, I feel nostalgic when I think

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>about movies from I feel a sense of communal belonging,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when I am saying church, where I'm in a yoga class,

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and when I'm hugging my wife and child, I feel

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>something that I might describe as his loved belonging or

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, you know, structural completeness. Yeah, there are

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously a lot of different scenarios here that he's saying

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are all going to evoke this one emotion he's talking about.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we should drill down into the details of

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how he describes this emotion and it's emptoms in order

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to understand better what exactly it is he's talking about.

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's roll through it. Well, wait, no, maybe

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we should take a break first, and then when we

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>come back, we can we can look at the features

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he lists. All right, we're back. So we're talking about

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>karma muta, and we're gonna begin to roll into the

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>six features that occur together in this broad categorization of

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>emotional states rights, as argued by the anthropologist Allent Fisk.

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's been a bunch of studies on this. We

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at a few of the studies individually

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and in a moment here, But just to start off

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>at the top level, what are the main takeaways? Fisk

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>argues that karmamuta is described by six features that occur together,

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and he says, so, first of all, it's evoked by

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>quote the sudden intensification of communal sharing and again sharing

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this not just like sharing materials, but this thing that

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, Situations where participants feel in some distinctive

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>way that their equivalent belong together, care for and trust

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>each other. Broadly, situations that we describe as examples of

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>love and to a certain extent, you could you could

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think of this as a you can think of communion

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as an example of this, right um, or you could

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think of a potluck dinner as an example of this.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know. I guess one of the

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>things is that it has to spark that feeling right

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for it to be real. You could have an overly

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>ritualized version of anything that is then devoid of the

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>emotional residence. It makes me think of the Eddie Izzard

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>joke about us singing Hollelujah and the Anglican Church. No,

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no offense to Anglicans. You know, I have great love

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Anglicans, but you know he's got this whole

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>bit about them singing hu. I think the point he

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>makes is a good one, which is that like something

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to be an overwhelming outpouring of spontaneous joy, can,

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>if ritualized in a certain kind of way, become rather drab. Yeah,

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point because on the other end of it, um,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when people come together in song like that is a

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that is a great way to potentially feel this shared

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>emotional state. Absolutely, because we're becoming one voice. Okay, so

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's evoked by this sudden moment of communal sharing where

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you feel a belonging, a trust, and a love with

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>other people. But the next point he says is that

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it very crucially, this emotion is brief. He says, it

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>typically lasts less than a minute or two, though it

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>can keep repeating in rapid succession, so like you'll get

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a burst of it. It's less than a minute or

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>two long. You can do it again, but it's not

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>something that you know, lasts all day. And I think

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this is one thing that, uh, that makes it very

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>important here. It's distinct from love itself the way Fisk

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>describes it. Uh. Fisk says, the important distinction is that

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>love is an enduring sentiment. It's more like a kind

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of like semi permanent state of affairs that sticks with you,

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>but beyond the moment to moment. Yeah, I mean, it's

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>always important to remember that the love endears even as

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a variety of emotions play out. Uh. Not to say

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>that love is impervious to fleeting emotional states, but it

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>does not inherently vanish when happiness stades or anger seeps in, etcetera. Yeah,

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the really interesting and special things

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>about love right, that you can like love somebody even

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're angry at them or something like that. But

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but in contrast to that, he says, karma muta is

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this intense, momentary flare up of emotion that occurs when

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>love is shared. So when something happens that signals that

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the sharing of love has intensified. And again, this love

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>can be between two people. It can be between a

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>deer and a dog, It can be between it. Seriously,

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know all these videos on the Internet of like

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a deer and a dog playing together. In fisks terms,

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>these are pure karma muta porn. We're we're just watching

0:17:55.640 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>these moments of like of social reciprocal trust and ending

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>between you know, species that you might not expect or something.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Or it can be not even that personal. It can

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>be between a large group of people who feel solidarity

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and common purpose. A big thing that features into this

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is the invocation of common muda and political context, like

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>say in a demonstration or a march, people will often

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>feel the exact same symptoms were about to get into

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that that are described as typical of karma muda. This

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, burning in the bosom for for a feeling

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of togetherness with all these people who share a common purpose.

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Now on the detail of it being fleeting, uh, I

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>wonder if it is fleeting, because like other emotional states,

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it kind of eludes awareness. I always come back to

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cormick McCarthy quote. I think this was from all

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Pretty Horses, Uh, that goes quote. If you want

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to see it, you have to see it on its

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>own ground. If you catch it, you lose it. And

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where it goes there's no coming back from not even

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>God can bring it back. And the metaphor that he's

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>exploring here is that have a snow flake that you

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot catch the snowflake. You can only experience it in

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment, and you can't catch or keep it. And

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that's often what it feels like with happiness. Right You're

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>feeling good, then you think, hey, I'm feeling good, and

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>then you then it begins to run away. You know.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like, don't look directly at the happening happiness, or

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you will scare it. Uh. Yeah, I think that's a

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>really good point. I mean, one of the things is

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think you can improve a moment of

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>happiness by examining it, but I do think by examining

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>happiness generally, maybe that can be a good thing. Like

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>if if you try to look at any individual moment

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and become analytical about it, it undercuts the emotional power

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of it. But maybe it is good to have a

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>pre existing uh understanding or awareness of emotional states that

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>come from examining previous versions of that emotion. Oh. Absolutely,

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think understanding the fleeting nature of happiness is key

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>to being able to have a healthy relationship with happiness. Um,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you, you don't get happy by by thinking about

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be happy, right, But I also don't want

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to make it. I don't want to imply, though, that

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>happiness is disrupted by awareness that you would necessarily just

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>remain on this happiness high if you weren't able to

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>then to self reflect on it, because I don't think

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the case. I get the impression that these bursts

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of common mouta, if we're going to to use that

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that term, um, they are supposed to be bursts. Yeah, Well,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like all emotions, I mean, all these emotions are fleeting.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what makes again these individual emotions different than these

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>longer sentiments or states that we hold in our minds.

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Like love, right, I mean it comes back to sensory

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>information as well. It's like when you taste of strawberry,

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you're not happy for six years straight. Following the year

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a burst of flavor, a burst of understanding, And

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it makes sense to that our emotional states

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>would would follow similar patterns. Okay, what of the next

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>four characteristics. So we've got that it's evoked by the

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>sudden communal sharing. We've got that it is brief and fleeting. Uh.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The next thing is, of course, that it feels good.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>This emotion is inherently pleasurable, and people seek whenever, whenever

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they're able to repeat it, they want to keep having

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>it over and over right, And if you can monetize it,

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>all the better, right, No, all the more evil. Um So,

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So it feels good. It's naturally pleasurable, even though, and

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>though there's a thing that it's often part of a

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>bitter sweet kind of feeling, something that we do have

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a name for, that it feels good even when being

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the near proximity to or the context

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of recognizable negative emotions like sadness. Yeah, we've talked about

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this in the show before in context to say, nostalgia. Um,

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there's something else we talked about recently. They're being like

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the bitter sweet aspect to it. Um was it? Oh

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it was thankfulness? Oh yes, of course gratitude. Yeah, absolutely,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a sense of it is a vulnerability to these moments, uh,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>such as like embracing family members, Like there is like

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>this sort of hyper like meta feeling, like all the

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>all the possibilities, all the potential potential and an actual

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>past and future, joys and sadness and tragedies all just

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>bundled up into a single snap of the finger. You know,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you kind of feel all of that at once, which

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>can be overwhelming. Like imagine if that didn't that wasn't

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just a burst, that would be I mean, if it

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can be overwhelming even as a burst of emotion. Okay.

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The next thing that the research has found here is

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that kamamuda is accompanied by a very consistent, characteristic set

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of physical sensations in the body and physical symptoms and behaviors.

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>So one is a warm, fuzzy feeling in the center

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of the chest. Another is is tearing up of course

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is crying moistenus in the eyes. Another is being choked

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>up lump in the throat, which often goes along with

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the tears in the eyes. Another is chills or goose bumps. Uh.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>One is a smile or putting, putting a palm on

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the chest. And one is the expression, especially in English

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of awe. Yeah. Ah is a big one because when

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we when we we we coup awe at the side

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of a kitten, we are we're generally inviting those among

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>us to share in this moment with us, or we

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are you know, we're signaling solidarity with you when we

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>with the kitten, with the kitten or the you know,

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever the cute embodiment happens to be. That's a good point.

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>We should come back to that in a minute, because

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like cuteness doesn't fit into this framework quite

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>as obviously as most of the other things that trigger

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it do. But I think there might be good reasons,

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think you're definitely onto something there. Uh. So

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the next thing is that it actually is a motivating emotion.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>It motivates devotion, and Fisk says, uh compassion to communal sharing,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>also known as loving kindness. So it generally like what

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>these studies have found. One of the studies I was

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at so is if you show people video of

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>two people having like a communal sharing experience that causes

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>this emotion in the viewer, the viewer also feels an

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>increased sense of community with the two characters, these these

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>other characters being observed. And then another one is that

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>there are common types of expressions across many languages that

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that basically translate to something like this. It means like

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>being moved in its various translations, or being touched in

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in various translations. Like that all often refers to something

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>having to do with this idea. So I want to say,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>at first glance, in reading about this, I resonate strongly

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>like I know exactly what he's talking about. But I

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it is that we needed a new

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>term for it. Maybe we did. I'm not sure if

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm decided on that issue or not, But I'm not

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sure what term you would use otherwise, Maybe you could

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just try to lump it under one of these sort

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of capturing it pre existing things like like feeling moved

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>or something that might be kind of broader than than

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>what exactly this is talking about. But this, this experience,

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in all of the aspects of it that he lists

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>feel absolutely real in my own experience, Oh absolutely, the

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the the, the emotional experience is certainly real. Any disagreement

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>we have is just about like, to to what extent

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>this categorization is useful, To what extent we can actually

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>group all of these things under this big umbrella of

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Kama muda. Yeah, I think I'm undecided about that, but

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.479
<v Speaker 1>we can explore it more as we go on. By

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, none of this is to be confused with

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Mooda scale. The Mooda scale, yes, which any anyone

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>out there who is a pro wrestling fan might be

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. Mooda scale is an unofficial means of measuring

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>how much blood a pro wrestler has bled via blading

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or juicing. That's when a professional wrestler will intentionally cut

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>their forehead with a razor or sometimes there is more

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>like a hard juicing technique where it's by actually bumping

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>into something, but they will intentionally usually uh cut themselves

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on the forehead. The blood will flow, the blood will

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>mix with with sweat and create quite a visual display

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>of a bloody face or crimson mask. Is it's sometimes

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>called I feel like this is not something you're supposed

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to do in the main circuits right um or it's

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>not done as much these days, certainly in modern pro

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>wrestling companies like mainstream pro wrestling companies, because of course,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of objections one can make to

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>intentionally bleeding all over the place, right, But on the

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>other hand, it is a highly physical performance and therefore

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>people will get busted open accidentally, and sometimes the show

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>goes on just bite a little blood. Now is the

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Muda scale named after? Does it come from Sanskrit? No,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes basically it's of Japanese origin because it's referring

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to a pro wrestler, legendary pro wrestler out of Japan

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>by the name of Keji Muto, who would also perform,

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>especially in the United States, has the Great Muda, And

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's referring in particular to a nineteen nine New Japan

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Pro Wrestling match with Hiroshi has in which Muda blades

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and just gets a really brilliant crimson mask all over

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>his face. His face is just covered in blood and

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of like Kane, Yeah, it does have

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of It reminds one a lot of various um,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, face painting, Uh scenarios, but it has

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>such an impact on pro wrestling fans of that time

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>period they kind of decided this would be the starting

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>point for considerations of any blade job. Uh. You know,

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>where is it on the MOODA scale like a three

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>here of four? Does it go beyond the type of

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>blood letting that that Muda shows off in this match? Um?

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's different from Karma Muda. But at the

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>same time, I think the given scenario, like this match,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>you could have the performer themselves feeling a sense of

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Karma Muda. You could have the audience viewing this spectacle, uh,

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>certainly feeling this communal sense of Karma muda. You know,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're all a part of this big sporting event. It's

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a almost a you know, it's not quite patriotism,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but like a unity of love for the performance or

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>for one of the two or both performers. Oh. I

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's absolutely there in fan communities of things, you know,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>people feel a solidarity with their fellow fans based on

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>their shared interests. There's an there's an inference of kind

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of like shared values and common cause, even if that

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>might not necessarily be the case, kind of feels that way, right,

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Like when if you're a pro wrestling fan, if you

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>knew what the Muda scale was, you knew who the

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>great Muda uh is, then perhaps when I mentioned it,

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you al too a little bit of that. You felt

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this connection to me and you knew that we we

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>shared something in this uh, this brotherhood of blood. All right,

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're going to take a break, but

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, we will jump back in to

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the karma muta. Than alright, we're back. I figured we

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>should just take a brief glance and a few of

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the studies out there in UH, in the journals about

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>karma muda, this this emerging idea of this this unifying

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>emotion based on the intensification of communal sharing. So the

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>first one is that I wanted to bring up is

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>by fist at all in Emotion Review published in twenty

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen called the Sudden Devotion, Emotion and Karma Muda and

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cultural Practices whose function is to evoke it? And

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this paper UH briefly just it argues that quote, cultures

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>have evolved diverse practices, institutions, roles, narratives, arts, and artifacts

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>whose core function is to evoke karma muda. And it

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>also argues that karma muda quote mediates much of human sociality. Uh.

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is probably right, right, I mean

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>whether whether or not like the term is the right

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>term to use. A huge amount of media and culture

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and art is based on this. It's like watching people

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the act of this sudden intensification of communal emotion

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and bonding. Yeah. Like, I'm reminded of the very Super

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Bowl ads that come out, like the really emotionally manipulative

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>ones that have like animals coming together, people in their pets, etcetera.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Um and and yeah, it brings people together, perhaps in

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the you know, so you can sell a product to them,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but still the the the images themselves, the idea of

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the story, the music, it all comes together to create this, uh,

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this shared feeling. Now, this paper in particular does specifically

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>mention cuteness as one of these cultural models. And we

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly discussed cuteness on our our podcast in the past,

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>especially as it concerns monsters and the cutification of formally

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>horrifying monsters. Yeah, this is an interesting question, like why

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>does cuteness seem to evoke all the same psychological and

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>physiological symptoms as comma muda brought on by more traditional stimuli,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>which would include either like communal sharing between one person

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and another, communal sharing between observed others. Um just to

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>go quickly to another paper and then we can come

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>back to this. Because this has to do with cuteness.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>There's this other one called too cute for Words. Cuteness

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>evokes the heartwarming emotion of comma muda, published in Frontiers

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and Psychology in twenty nineteen, and the authors they're hypothesized

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the cuteness is a type of stimulus that makes people

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>feel an automatic sense of communal sharing with the cute

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>entity just based on the aesthetics of cuteness alone. It's

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's in line with some of the biological theory about

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the nature of cuteness, which says that cuteness is a

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>series of visual skima designed to make adults feel like

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>obligated to take care of the cute thing and to

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>watch out for its best interests. So the cute face

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>asks you for help without any words, and you just

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>feel compelled to comply, And it's the assumption of that relationship.

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>They hypothesize that that provides the kamma muda link here

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why cuteness feels in a way communal. The latest

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>cultural example of this, I think would be the child

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>m a k a. Baby Yoda from the television series

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>The Mandalorian, which spoilers please, yes, now you have you

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't been on the internet, so I don't know what

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. It's impossible to avoid the spoiler that

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there is there is a creature that is unofficially called

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>baby Yoda in the show. Um, it is never called

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that in the show, just called the child or the

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>asset and um, and yeah, you look at it, and

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it really, uh, it really pulls out your heart strings.

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It's really it is really cute. And uh it shares

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>us some screen time with none other than Werner Herzog,

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the acclaimed German director and occasional actor, also very cute

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>wealth uh more, well, no, he's he's menacing. Let's let's

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>make no too. Let's not lie about that for awhelming

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and collective murder. But but he I think he explained

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it well via Indie Wire when he's talking about sharing

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>screen time with with the child, he said, it is

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal technological achievement. But beyond the technological achievement. It's heartbreaking.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And apparently, when he learned that they were going to

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>shoot alternate takes of these scenes in case they wanted

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to replace the puppet um child with a c g

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I child, he reportedly told them, quote, you are cowards.

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Leave it an ultimately. But but yes, um, the child

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is very cute and the show is is terrific as well.

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But to come back to that that paper, uh, the

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sudden devotion emotion Um. This is what they had to

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>say about cuteness in karma muda quote. The fact that cuteness, vulnerability,

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and need evoke karmamuta makes sense given our assumption that

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the phylogenetic source of karmamuta is maternal bonding to newborns.

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>The generativity of human karmamuta makes it flexibly adaptive. This

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>explains why karmamuta occurs in response to babies, kittens, marriage

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>proposals and weddings, rituals of solidarity, religious moments of union

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>with divinities, homecomings and reunions, the kindness of strangers, sentimental

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>narratives and cinema, addiction, recovery groups, keen spirit, moments in

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>war and sports, oratory marketing, choral singing, making and listening

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>to music, dancing, rowing, and so forth. I see it though,

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I see it. Yeah, there is this through line and

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like all those things they mentioned that I would not

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>have unified in my mind before, but now it's it

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me. This concept is interesting to me

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>because there is something I feel that's similar when something

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is very cute versus when I have like a moment

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of personal love and connection, versus when I'm I'm part

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>of like a political moment that feels positive and significant

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with many other people. Like, those things seem so different.

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>What would be unified between them? Why are there these

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>similar sensations in the body and kind of feelings in

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the brain. Well, there's a way to bring these together, Joe,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and that is a baby Yoda. Obviously it's got my vote.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That thing is going to be used to sell the

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>world's awful ast atrocity. How baby Yoda is a holy,

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>blameless creature. Okay, to look briefly at another paper that

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Fisk was involved in. Another one is Fisk at all?

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>In Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture in seen called the

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>best love story of all time, Overcoming all obstacles to

0:35:56.040 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>be reunited evoking Kama Muda and basically here they just

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>point out that if you go back through the history

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of literature, one of the most common types of stories

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is that beloved people are separated and then they have

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to overcome overwhelming obstacles in order to get back together. Yeah.

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the ram the Ramayana right there at

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the story of rob and Sita separated and then brought

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>back together following military conquest and adventure. Yeah. I mean,

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's there all through ancient literature, you know, the novels

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Greco Roman period. You have tons of stuff

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>like this. But then to go into like you know,

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>modern manipulative cuteness cinema, I just think about how much

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of a sucker I've always been for stories of people

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>being reunited with lost pet. It's just an undefendable weakness.

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I was a kid, the end of

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the movie Homeward Bound. You remember that movie. I wasn't

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of my sisters loved it and would

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>watch it over and over again, you know, I saw

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>multiple times because I was a kid when it was

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>out and big and out on video. I think it

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>was a good thing for parents or teachers to put

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on you know, uh, and it just destroyed me, like

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>this sudden upwelling of uncontrollable happiness and tears at the

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>scene spoiler alert where this fictional trio of pets two

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.160
<v Speaker 1>dogs and a cat you know, after a great journey,

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>are reunited with their fictional humans. There is an excellent

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Futurama episode title Jurassic Bark that evokes the same sort

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of feeling in me every time I really watch it,

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>even though it is it is you know, it is

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 1>a comedy as a farce, and despite the fact that

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it expressly dodges such a reunion, like the reunion between

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the human and the dog does not occur, but it

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>has such a bitter sweet ending where it is it

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is shown that the the the reunion wanted to happen,

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could say. And another weird example of

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this uh that and I know you've seen this is

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>um uh And this one probably works due mainly to

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the musical choice, but the ending of the Simpsons episode

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Radioactive Man, in which the director returns to Hollywood after

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>this grueling experience of filming on location in Springfield where everybody,

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the politicians, the townspeople, they're all taking advantage of these

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>poor Hollywood types. And then he comes back and he's

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 1>welcomed back into Hollywood with open arms. And then the

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Bill Withers classic lean on Me begins playing. Uh, and

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>then they you know, they pan out and it it

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a satirical moment, but clearly they're you know,

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they're they're playing with this idea of you know, of

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of Hollywood versus small town morality, etcetera. But since they're

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>playing lean on Me, it gets me every time, Like

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it makes me feel all the fields. Despite the satirical

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>nature of the content, that song is like the perfect

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.719
<v Speaker 1>karma muta song. It is, yeah, lean on Me when

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not strong. Yeah, it's it's about trust and depending

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>on each other. Yeah, it's just pure, uncut common mood. Uh.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And I would also say there seem to be major

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 1>genres of internet media that are based entirely on exploiting

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>people's desire to feel common mooda like emotions at the

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>push of a button over and over again. It's like

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>your you know, your cocaine button in the rat cage,

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>except it's karma muda, you know, the the upworthy style

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. The video is titled like he almost kicked

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a turtle into the trash compactor, but what happens next

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>will melt your heart. Yeah, and you want to click

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, I'm like, okay, I'm I want to have

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>my heart melted. Let's do it. Yeah. But this kind

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of content is incredibly potent for virality. You know, when

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>there are these like studies about what kind of content

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>actually goes viral. Uh, there's a reason that these media

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>companies went for content like that, because that stuff hits

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the button. I mean, I think because of our negative

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>view of virality, we often tend to think of like

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of nasty memes as being the most viral content.

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But this karma muda exploitation video stuff is hugely viral. Yeah.

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>To come back to the corna McCarthy quote about about

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the snowflake and the fleeting nature of the feeling. Uh,

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>one solution is, oh, well, well, it's all right, there

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of snowflakes in the air. I will

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just run around all day catching them and do nothing else,

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>just to get that hit after hit after hit of

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 1>good old fashioned common motive feeling. Uh. So, Luckily, there's

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a there's a there's a machine in my hand with

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a program that is designed to do nothing but just

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>keep clicking. Yeah. I mean, I guess I don't know.

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe there are downsides that I'm not thinking of.

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess it's better that people keep watching

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that they go down some horrible radicalizing YouTube

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>trail or something and end up a member of the

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:39.959
<v Speaker 1>anti human Front or whatever, anti human but pro baby

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yoda where you end up in landing. I guess yeah, okay, okay, sorry,

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>next study just quickly. This is one called Moment to

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>moment changes and feeling moved match changes in closeness, tears,

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:57.240
<v Speaker 1>goose bumps, and warmth time series analysis, published in eighteen

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>by Schubert at All. This study looked at the moment

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>went to moments sensations like body sensations of people experiencing

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>what the researchers believed to be karma muda, as evoked

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>by video clips showing scenes meant to display these intense

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>communal sharing relationships, these moments when these relationships intensify and uh.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>The study found strong and consistent cross correlations between clips

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that people scored with karma muda associated words like moved

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or touched distinct from clips that were judged as merely

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>happy or sad. This is like a separate thing than

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>being happy or sad, and that the Kama Muda clips

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.760
<v Speaker 1>were associated with this with moment to moment physiological symptoms

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>or sensations of tears or moisteness in the eyes, goose

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>bumps or chills, and feelings of warmth in the center

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of the chest. So again back to what we were

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier, there were a couple of studies that

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 1>looked at a cross cultural analyzes basically like is there

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a similar thing going on across different languages and cultures.

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>There was one study that looked at UH the United States, Norway, China, Israel,

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and Portugal published in the Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in teen by Cibit at all Uh, and this just

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>generally did find that there was there was a lot

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of consistency across the different cultures. And then there was

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 1>another one published in the journal Emotion in twenty nineteen

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:22.800
<v Speaker 1>by zike Field at all UH looking at nineteen different

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>nations across fifteen different languages, three thousand five dred and

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 1>forty two participants to see if there was consistency about

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 1>which types of experiences evoked karmamoda like emotions h to

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>read from their abstract quote. Our results are congruent with

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>theory and previous findings showing that karma muda is a

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>distinct positive social relational emotion that is evoked by experiencing

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>or observing a sudden intensification of communal sharing. It is

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>commonly accompanied by a warm feeling in the chest, moist

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>eyes or tears, chills or pilo erection, feeling choked up

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>or having a lump in the throat, buoyancy, and a zilaration.

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>It motivates affective devotion and moral commitment to communal sharing.

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>While we observed some variations across cultures, these five facets

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of karma muda are highly correlated in every sample, supporting

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the validity of the construct in the measure. So it

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>looks like this is, at least according to this research

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at so far, this is a pretty universal

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>emotion and that we might have some different words for

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 1>it across different cultures, but there's something pretty consistent going

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>on about like what types of things we can see

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>or be a part of, and what kinds of feelings

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it gives throughout the body, and what kind of behaviors

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 1>it triggers in us afterwards. So what do we learn

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>by naming and characterizing an emotion? We sort of started

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>off by talking about this a bit. Yeah, and you know,

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that this my initial reaction to

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>this topic, not being familiar with the the particular concept,

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>with the named concept of karma muta, my initial response

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>was what good does this dois? Why do we need this? Uh?

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Be and and uh you know, And I'm I'm not

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that I was completely biased against it, but

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because I'm but the thing is, I'm clearly already experiencing

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>these emotional states, right, but for more nuanced reasons, with

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>more nuanced terminology, do I really need to catch all

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Sanskrit term to refer to them? Uh? And uh And

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That's been something I'm just trying to to figure out now. Now.

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Certainly I'm not opposed to bringing in Sanskrit terms or

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Sanskrit Loan words or or you know, words from say

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Hindu or Buddhist u Um religion, you know, because I

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.839
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot of times these are very useful terms,

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>such as things like say Brahmin and sam Sara. I

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think these can be incredibly helpful and and they certainly

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>stem from a language and a culture that devoted a

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:55.280
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of mental energy to contemplating psychological and metaphysical concepts.

0:44:55.960 --> 0:44:59.919
<v Speaker 1>But in this particular instance, does kama muta like really

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>help us out? I could not help. But but think

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>about another case in which we have reached out to

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>another language for a term that we have they were

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>lacking in English to describe an emotional, very specific emotional state,

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and that is the German concept of schadenfreude, which is

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure derived by someone from another person's misfortune. Like,

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a specific term for it, like a

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>single word for it in English, but in German, uh,

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they have it and and it is kind of useful

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, to be able to take schadenfreude out of

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the German language and then use it as a way

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to reflect on how we're feeling about things in our life. Well,

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we now have a loan word for

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it in English, I think that makes it much easier

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for us to recognize when it's happening, to say, I

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>am feeling schadenfreude and not something more useful like actual sympathy.

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>To be able to draw a line between sympathy and

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 1>schadenfreuda despite the fact that they are very they're very connected, Like,

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the kind of the flip side of

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the coin. Um, you know, we can this gives us

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>again the power to label, to discuss it, to pull

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it aside and UH and even then lean into the

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>more positive UH side of the coin, to lean into sympathy.

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>But that brings us back to karmamuta because instead of

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>going from broad to specific, as we're feeling with with schadenfreuda,

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>how about how does karma mouda help us? How does

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it help us to be able to go instead of

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>from the large too small, to go from the small

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to the large. Well, I mean, I think one thing,

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 1>if they're on the right track. I mean, obviously these

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>researchers could could maybe be wrong about this, but you know,

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it looks like there's a body of research building up

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>here that's pretty supportive of the idea that this is

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>actually a fairly consistent phenomenon across cultures. There are these

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>like things linking all these disparate UH phenomena, and there

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are of course plenty of emotional states that are broad,

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>like happiness is extremely broad the situations that cause happiness

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:06.880
<v Speaker 1>or or you know, you can't list them all, right,

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But then again, nobody's coming along and saying, Hey, I

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:11.720
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you about this new concept. It's called happiness.

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>The only one thing that did come to mind that

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>reminded me a little bit about this though, um is

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>via a say, partial understanding of serotonin or media overuse

0:47:23.800 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of serotonin, the discussion of serantonin serotonin, we end up

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>reminding ourselves of neurotransmitters in regard to any given emotional state,

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know where, So what do you mean. I'm saying like,

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody's gonna come along and have to explain to you

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>what happiness is. But at some point in your life someone,

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>like much later someone might have come along and said, hey,

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>let me talk to you about that happiness and what

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you're and let me tell you about serotonin's role and

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 1>how you're feeling. Are you saying like giving you a

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>good explanation of serotonin's role or oversimplified oversimplified version, which

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I think is the version that we often encounter, uh,

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly just in the media at large, and perhaps we

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>encounter for the first time, combined with sort of they

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>need more serotonin than I can be happy, right yeah.

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Or it's also just kind of like when you first

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hear about it, you may have it. You will probably

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.919
<v Speaker 1>have an incomplete understanding of it, and that may also

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 1>lean into this this understanding of it. So on one level,

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a making something familiar new again with

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>new terminology. I wonder if karma mutas kind of it

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:31.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of provides that it kind of takes this sort

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of broad you know, area of the fields. It gives

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>them a new term, and then ultimately it does allow

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 1>us to to potentially analyze it a new to think

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of it in a new light without actually recategorizing it

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:51.879
<v Speaker 1>is something drastically different. I mean, I think again, if

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the researchers are on the right track here, I think

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 1>one thing that could be useful about it is that

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you when you identify a phenomenon where a bunch of

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>things that previously looked unrelated are actually very related, new

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>cause and effect relationships occur to you as possible, and

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you can start testing for them. So, for example, one

0:49:13.360 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 1>thing that that seems to come out of this is

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that uh karma muda seems to at least in some

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of this research motivate a sense of increased community with

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>the objects of whatever you're watching. So if you watch

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a you know, video of two people having this this

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>moment that makes you feel the karma muda, you feel

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 1>increased community. You don't just feel the fields in your

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 1>chest and all that. You feel increased community with the

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:40.120
<v Speaker 1>people in the video. And I think another potential way

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to look at this in a positive way would be

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 1>when you don't understand what's bringing people together. Say you

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:48.800
<v Speaker 1>turn on the news and there are some protesters and

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't agree with what they're protesting about, or you're

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on the other side if they're protest and you need

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to understand them. Or if you, like me, are not

0:49:56.320 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a like team sports person and you find everyone else

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in your city is obsessed with the local soccer team

0:50:04.040 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>um or let's say you're not a religious person and

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you see footage or you see friends and family engaging

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in a religious experience. We're going to church and and

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you and maybe you don't completely understand what they're doing.

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you if you define it all under a

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 1>kamma muta, you can look to the examples of comma

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>muta that you do engage with and then potentially have

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a better understanding, or at least some understanding of why

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 1>people are united in protest here, why people are in

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a house of worship here, or why people are all

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>wearing the same color and going to a colisseum here.

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Right to understand that. You know, you might not get

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:43.360
<v Speaker 1>what people like about sports, but there's some similarity in

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the feelings in the body and the pleasure that pervades

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 1>your brain when you experience cute kitten videos that other

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:53.439
<v Speaker 1>people do when they're part of a team sports thing. Yeah,

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:56.839
<v Speaker 1>everything is baby Yoda. Basically, that's the thing to drive home.

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>If you don't understand it, just remind yourself that's baby

0:50:59.600 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Yoda to you. All right, So there you have it.

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Karma muta. Obviously, we would love to hear from everybody

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>about this because this concerns a broad categorization of human

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>emotion that we can all relate to. Uh, So, hit

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 1>us up with your examples, your thoughts, your contemplation on

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:20.799
<v Speaker 1>what we've discussed here. Does the term karma muta? Does

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:23.239
<v Speaker 1>that help you? Uh? Or do you feel like it

0:51:23.400 --> 0:51:25.359
<v Speaker 1>is in some way a hindrance? I don't know. We're

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>open to discussion on all of that. In the meantime,

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out other episodes of Stuff

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind, you can find us wherever you

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:36.400
<v Speaker 1>find your podcasts. Um the Mothership is no longer with us,

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but you can still go to stuff to Blow your

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com and that will redirect you to the

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I heart Media listing for our podcast. But wherever you

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>get the podcast, just make sure you rate, and you

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.280
<v Speaker 1>review and you subscribe. Uh. These are the three acts

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of devotion that help us out in the long run.

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Huge things. As always to our excellent audio producer Seth

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>with us with feedback on this episode, it or any other,

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to suggest topic for the future, just to say hi,

0:52:03.200 --> 0:52:05.839
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.