WEBVTT - Rule Changes and Mailbag

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Be Around the NFL Podcast, quit the small talk, indeed,

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>quit it, don't need it, don't want it, and Welcome

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to another edition of the Around the NFL Podcast. My

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>name is Dan Hands, come to you from a virtual

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>room filled with the heroes, Mark Sessler, Greg Rosenthal. We

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>are key minus seven days away from the NFL Draft. Greg,

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit of a sneaky, humble brag right

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>before we started, mentioned that every year you like to

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>do a hardcore cram sesh, uh, just chewing up tape

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like a true, true tape dog. I, on the other hand,

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like to go the route of just see whoever's mock

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>drafts I respect, and then base my analysis on where

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>those guys put certain players, and then once the NFL starts,

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>then I can plug in in a real way. I

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to fake it. I mean, but I

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>respect that you do with Greg, but it's it's kind

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of like in school cramming for a chemistry final that

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't pay attention all year, you're not really

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to soak in the information in

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a way that makes you successful. Yeah or n Yeah,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Because the difference between someone faking it and not is yeah,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>almost indistinguishable. Most of most of the people talking about

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the draft are faking it, but it does. It gives you,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like a little bit of fire beneath your Joe Mixon tape,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, I remember I watched him. I was like, Wow,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this Joe Mixing guy. Okay, he's got some problems, but

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>my god, could he run the ball. And so you've

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>got a little extra fire. But you could fake that

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>too if you really wanted to. Of all the examples,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon considering his pre draft buzz, you know what

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, I was right, be careful he's I

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was right that he is a great running player running back.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned about cramming for a test? Am I the

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>only one that like, Um, I've been having horrible dreams

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, but like I still have dreams where

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I am, you know, walking towards like a college math

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>class where I suddenly realized I have a final and

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I've not been to even been to the class um

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in three or four months, and like all fortunes are

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>about to get completely ripped away if I don't ace

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>this thing um and then the dream end. Mm hmm.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a common one, doesn't it feel good? Though I

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone since it feel I'll have a dream like that,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>or it will occur to me, Oh, isn't it nice

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>that we never have to study for a test ever

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>again or have that sort of stress. So you should

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>just like appreciate it. It's nice, and I'll and I'll say,

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>although it you know, you pay for it with a

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of internal mental anguish in the moment when you

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>make a list of the sneaky best feelings in life.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Waking up from a nightmare and then realizing none of

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that was happening, and then you go back to sleep,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right near the top of the way. It is special.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I had one last night where I was in an

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>airport and there was all sorts of chaos. I couldn't

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>find my wallet and so I couldn't board the plane

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of my family, and I was lying

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>on the floor with all these people being inspected by

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the government. And then I woke up and I was like,

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>why wallets on the mantel in our house? This is amazing,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>so much for a quit it with the small talk,

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Yeah, that's true. That's true. By the way.

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>The the inverse um of what I just explained is

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're having like a lovely dream, like if you

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, like you were dreaming about you were

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>dating your high school crush and your seventeen and then

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you wake up and you're terribly alone and you have

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>acne and you know nobody likes you like that. There's

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there's the flip side as well, but I like to

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>focus on the positives. This is the Around the NFL podcast.

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't a sad and alone person in high school,

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way. It wasn't one of those people. But

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really figure out anything until college, and you

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>saved yourself at the end. I was a little worried

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that you woke up from this dream where you wish

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you were with your high school girlfriend. Then you woke

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>up and you realize, oh, I'm next to my wife

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and my kids are I mean, those dreams exist to

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>past flames pop up for the first time in eleven years,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't mean that I'm questioning anything. Mark has

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>these dreams all the time, and it's smart. If you're listening,

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Happy Birthday. They're about freedom and no, you're right, it

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>is my wife's birthday tomorrow, so we don't need to

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>dig deeper into that topic necessarily. All right, today's show,

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna catch up on some predraft news and uh none,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do something we haven't done in a while,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>which has hit the mail bag, and give the listeners

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a chance to interface with us. The quote unquote heroes.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>What a joke call ourselves heroes. The real heroes are

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>out there up on the lattice putting out fires in

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the military. You ain't heroes. That's a great sweet to

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>get every once in a while. How about your relax

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, how about you? You just have a little

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>bit of a sense of humor about life. Okay, here's

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>something I portable though, when when like Siciliano or any

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>really host like welcomes us as a group as heroes,

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>like I like it when we call ourselves that that works.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean the other side of that is Greg, You're

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>almost always uncomfortable. So no, that's just the brand is strong.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's do some news talk is cheap, motherfucker. Is it

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>random that DMX is our intro into the news, Yes,

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it's random, But I wanted to touch on him real

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>quickly because in the pre show prep today, um, I

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about the Steelers quarterback depth chart a little

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>teaser for the mail bag later, and for some reason

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it made me. The thing that can't flash to my

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>mind was it's dark and hell is hot, um and

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>rest in peace, d MX. And I just want to say,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like DMX was he's he falls under the category of

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's like a celebrity, a musician usually for me,

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes an actor. Um, where they die and then

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, I really did like that person. I

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>wish I appreciated them more before they died. Because if

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you were a person of a certain age and Greg,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you and I are very close in age, Mark, you're

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in the ballpark. Um, it's a big ballpark. It's like

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>old Yankee Stadium when they put Monument Park in center field.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But like it, DMX filled a certain level of like

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>when you're a teen a late teen, high school college

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and you have that aggression inside you and if if

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you're our age, Um, it was either DMX or like

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Limp Biscuit and together a tour that was that they

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>were like co headliners and and that's synergy. That makes sense.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>But I was never about any of that aggro rap

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>rock stuff. I hated that stuff so much. But DMX

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>when he was going and the stuff that he was

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about, I'd always connected with me. You know, he

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>crossed lines black white whatever. You understood the rage within

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>DMX because some of us and all of us have

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it to a certain extent. He changed the game, you know,

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift taking a page out of his notebook. I

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>don't remember anyone else dropping to number one albums in

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the same year. That was like that kind of blew

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>people's mind that he came out out of nowhere. It

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was like the number one album in the country, and

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>then like seven months later did it again. It's like that.

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like people do that all the time now.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're acting like my equivalent was like Desi

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>ar Nett. So I don't know how to get into

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, but I appreciate what you're saying. I would

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>say maybe like told the wets Rocket perhaps or I

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>could not stand that band. But but but in that

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but at that time period had other bands that would

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>fit the bill to some degree. I was gonna ask

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>as a follow up, Greg because as everyone knows, Uh,

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg likes rap Um. Sometimes you you act about you

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about your two lane uh education as being in

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this bubble where it's like all like dirty South and

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't even know what Fountains of Wayne was, and

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you were so just like steeped in that culture. DMX

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>made it down there, you're saying, because he was. He's

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>from Yonkers, which is on the other side of the

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Tez Bridge where I grew up. He was huge in

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the Northeast and I think the whole country, but didn't

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>make it down there that the bubble. He maybe not

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>as dominant, but he did. Yes, there was a bit

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of a South South versus the New York type of

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>things that they didn't give him all the love that

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>he should have gotten. Interesting, all right, let's get into it.

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Do some news. Let's start with rule changes made in

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. They go into effect, uh, starting in the

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>seas and we kind of went over this um when

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they a lot of them were proposed. But just so

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows, um, there's been changes to a well relaxation

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of rules for the numbers that certain players can wear

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>at certain positions. That's a big one. Everybody's pumped up

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>about that. Running backs, wide receivers, tight ends, defensive backs

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and linebackers can all wear numbers in the single digits

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>now if they choose, um, the only person who's really

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>getting banked here. Offensive linemen are still locked into the

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>old days on this one. Um Tom Brady on social media,

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>and we never know if Tom Brady is actually running

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>his own social media or whatever. But he was all

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>fired up about it. Couldn't tell if he was being

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a jokester or what mark. Do you have any takes

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>on more of fluidity in the numbers choosing game in

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL? Well, I would just um comment on Brady

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>real quick. Did he put out a second um diet

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tribe where he said, why not let the lineman wear

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want to? Why have numbers just have colored jerseys?

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Why not wear the same numbers dot dot dot dum

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at NFL at NFL p A and then above it

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>all in massive type font dumb again. So I don't

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>view that to be like some social media goon as drunk. Again,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm not sure what's going on there.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>He seems fired up, but I don't, you know, I'd

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>love to hear a player's perspective on why that would matter.

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're if you're an offensive guy trying

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out who to block and call protections. I

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>don't see a huge change here other than the fact

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that like for me m visually like if a linebacker

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we're number two, I find that to be disorienting. Um.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But on the offensive side also, like I just wish

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they would change the quarterbacks and allow it to be

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>more than one to nineteen. I guess that's anti traditional,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'd like to have a quarterback that's like nine.

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That to me that grosses me out, which acts like

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a big thick like th h I c c big

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>bodied quarterback that needed like kind of needed to to

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>eights to kind of show how big he was. I

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like if my if Zach Wilson came into

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the league and he if he was number twenty six,

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, no, this guy is out of the

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>league and three one. He is very slight. He's not

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>double number in him. I mean Brady, how fired up

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Brady is? Who It was an absurd explanation why Zach

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Wilson only have a number in the single digits, But

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>go on, it's I mean Brady's worried about like recognizing

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>where pressure is coming from and whether they're linebackers, defensive lineman,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff. It's like, okay, fine, buddy, Like

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>fans like it. Every rule that's been made since Tom

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Brady's come in the league and for the you know,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>ten years before that was to help the offense and quarterbacks.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So maybe this hurts just a tiny bit for people

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like Brady who are next level um in terms of

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>identifying people. But one thing I want to point out

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with this rule is it doesn't totally go into effect

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. For players that want to wear these numbers

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 1>this year that had a different number last year, they

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>have to buy out the NFL's inventory of that number.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's like a lot of money. Especially I think

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's like a big player where like a lot

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of jerseys have been printed, if it's kind of a

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>no name, it might not make that big of a deal.

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But this is what happened when Oto Sinko want it

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to change his number, and he made pretty good money

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in his career, and he didn't want to do it

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>because it was too much money, so he had to

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>wait the year. So it might be one year from

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>now when you see the deluge of of changes. That's sneaky. Yeah,

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>another rule change approved a one year experiment and an

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>attempt to make it easier to recover onside kicks on

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the receiving team on kickoffs will be limited to nine

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>players within twenty five yards of the ball, only three

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of sixty seven on side kicks. Uh, we're recovering lass season,

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>which you know that means it's broken. And the Eagles

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>UM had been had proposed that teams be given an

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>option to gain fifteen yards on one offensive play from

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>their own twenty five as you remember, um to retain

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>possession after a score. That's not happening. But they're trying

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 1>to maybe even things out while not making the game

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>more dangerous. That's stupid. I want to add this fourth

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen thing. Let's try moving up it. I hear

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot. It's like, oh, they've made the once

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>i'd kick so boring, and it's like, I don't know,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is the once kicked that big of a deal that

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we need to save it? How about we just mix

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it up for a year and see. I bet people

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>would love the fourth and fifteen thing. I bet people

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>would go nuts for and they never they would never

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to take it away. And I'd at least say, like,

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna you know, put us through preseason games,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>employ all these rules in the preseason and almost like

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>urged teams to try it just to see what the

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>response is, how it looks, how it feels, And finally

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they did make some replay modifications. UM owners rejected UM

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:37.359
<v Speaker 1>more hardcore proposals for a full time sky judge UM.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens had called for a full time booth umpire,

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>but the owners instead decided to give existing replay officials,

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.599
<v Speaker 1>who sit in the press box of each stadium, the

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>authority to consult with referees on certain quote specific objective

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>aspects of a play when clear and obvious video evidence

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is present, according to the language of the rule. I

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>read somewhere that this was already happening informally, which is

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a little weird and strange when you talk about competitive

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>balance and all that UM. But now it's something you

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>can do within the letter of the law, right. Don't

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you remember last year there would be those really bad

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>calls that like Romo would talk about for twenty seconds

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and then like everything would just kind of slow down,

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it would be like, actually they are, you know,

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing the flag, and that that was it, Like it

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>was you could tell it was sort of happening. I

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like that because at anything that actually avoids the official

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>review process but like quickly changes obvious calls like this

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that would make our friend Chris Wessling happy,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and that that makes sense to me. Like I don't

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>know why they don't just put them in their ear

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole time and let them talk to it. What's

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the big deal? But I think they're getting there, Like

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>sky Judge just found sounds very old testament to me. Um,

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know we I wouldn't I wouldn't mind someone with

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the authority just to say, you got to look at

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>your humans. You've got this wrong. Um, I see something

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't see. Let's correct this. But they mark save

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it for the Theology podcast and other news material put

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>into that pot at this point. By the way, Eagles

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>head coach Nick Sirianni refuses to name Jalen Hurts as

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the team's starter in week one. He says there will

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be a quarterback competition. People are going nuts. Let's hear

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it from Sirianni himself to name any starters at this

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>particular time. I just we've been working with these guys

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for two days, right, We've been working with these guys

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for two days. My biggest thing is competition. It's again

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we've talked a little bit about my core values. It's

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>my second core value, it's his team's second core value.

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Competition is a huge thing, um, and we're gonna have

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>competition at every position. What are people going to stop

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>getting so fired up about these type of quotes? Like

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I I saw some talking can he'll go on name

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because he's a little close to the family, if you will,

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>just like teeing off on Sirianni is being an absolute

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>fool for even going down this road. And it's like,

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I get it, you're looking to fill a camera time

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and and go viral and all that stuff, But like,

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it's you that looks like a fool because this

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is what head coaches say all the time. And there's

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a very good chance Jalen Hurts is starting over Joe Flacco.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It's almost it's definitely happening, you would think, But he's

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say that because head coaches don't like saying

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. Come down. It's a reminder too. There are

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some teams in facilities this week, so I guess football

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is back. That's another time we can, we can start

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>saying football is back. The Patriots I think are in

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>their facilities somewhat. I um. I also do think though,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance the Eagles add someone to this competition.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Not that that's why he said this, but whether it's

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a rookie or like a Teddy Bridgewater, if he becomes

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>cheap enough for something like it, just wouldn't it just

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't surprise me. Just give it a break. Just someone

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'm just saying, they might add someone you never

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>know in the draft and then go ahead. Mark always

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just say this though, like I I'd find it a

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>bit tiresome that he's getting killed because it is coach speak.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you get to the end of this journey

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>um into August and we're treating the preseason as a

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>true competition between Joe Flacco and Jalen Hurts, I mean,

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>people in Philadelphia are gonna like crescendo their cars off

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the interstate into total darkness. It's just unmarketable. So just

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>at some point, get real with it. This is your quarterback.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You traded Carson Wentz. Just a bit of sense along

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I think about it, though, because he's a head coach

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and coaches think a certain way, and he views it's

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>his first training camp. He wants it to be a competition,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's got this. He doesn't really know these guys.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and here's the other quote, that everyone's killing

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Sirianni for hit it, Ricky. I think some of you

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>guys are wondering, like, what game? We didn't go air

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>shattering on these games? Right? I played a couple of

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>them at Rock paper scissors. Right. I was as easy

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>as that rock paper scissors. Let's see how competitive you are.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm competitive. I'm gonna be talking trash him. Did you

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>talk trash back to me? Right? That is in friends

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to speaking with some draft prospects about just trying to

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out their competitive fire or whatever. H He also

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>got killed for that. I will say this for Sirianni,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he's in a very tough spot. I think you have

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to go back to maybe Jim Tomsula the last time

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I felt like a coach took a job and already

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>had his back against the wall, where the fan base

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>was not feeling it, and the organization felt like it

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was in flux, and nothing felt like it was set

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>up well for him. That's how I feel about Nick

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Sirianni because it just seems like there's a target on

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>his back already. Well, I would, I know, I think

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that you are cutting against the grain to

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of lift him up and you know, take some

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>of the heat that he's taking, you know, consistently away.

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>But there's just me uh, there's something about his sort

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of overall presentation that leaves me, um, a little something

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to be desired there. But but I'm willing. But you

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what, let's just that's not his job entirely.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how it goes come game time. He's right, like,

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing quite like talking during Rock paper Scissors. You're

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just like, yeah, you know what's up. I just got

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>your I just got your your rock. Like it's like, yeah,

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I just smashed your scissors. That's like layers on like

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a tape, like two second tape to lay you know,

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Rock paper Scissors is not the right if you If

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you actually watch this, and I think this podcast will

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>also be up on YouTube, you could see the exact

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>moment where Greg deliberates whether to bail on his bit.

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It was it was a nice little moment there. Um

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I enjoined. I was always an odds and evens guy,

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know rock paper scissors something with my brain.

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>It always confused me a little bit, as simple as

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it is. So I was just no, let's do odds

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and evens odds it even shoot, let's fly. They're not

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>drafting you like that just sits there, dumbfounded. You can't

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>handle this. Hit me up on Twitter if you found

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>rock paper scissors a little bit confusing. Uh. In other news,

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers signed head coach Mike Tomlin. Actually, don't hit

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>me up on Twitter. I don't care. Steelers had coach

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tomlin signs a three year extension with Pittsburgh forty

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>nine years old, signed now through Uh, the Steeler. I

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>love this that it's my favorite. Um kind of NFL

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>fun fact that the Steelers, if he stays through the

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>end of this deal, will have had three head coaches

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and over fifty five years, how many head coaches have

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>there been for the Jets and Browns mark since we

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>started this podcast, hate, I don't know, like triple this amount.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Tomlin is still there and uh, And I

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>guess you could say, oh, but what about the meltdown

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and at the end of last season, and sure, Greg,

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of get I know where Mark is

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Steelers, so I want to hear from Greg

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>on this first Um, But do you think it's it's

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>smart for the Steelers to just stay in business with

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Toma no matter what? Do you think this brings a

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>level of calm to an organization that maybe is still

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a little rock by what happened at the end of

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the year. I do, just because it's a different way

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to approach things. And he's won more games and it's

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>is fourteen seasons than any NFL coach in history. It's

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. He's he's never had a losing season, so

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think stability has a lot to be said for it,

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's delivered. I know they haven't always won in

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, but that he has a six fifty winning percentage,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just like I don't I do like the idea

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that coaching shouldn't be you have to win a like

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a playoff game or two every other year or you

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>lose your job. Well, I and you know, I have

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>been tough on the steel I've had my fun with

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. But when it comes to Mike Tomlin, Um,

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>to me, he is like the total alpha male. UM.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>He has weathered all storms in Pittsburgh. I know that

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know there are certain Steelers fans to get agitated

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with him, But if the grass is always greener, I

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>mean he he has basically been UM as good as

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Bill Cower, and he's not far away from surpassing Bill

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Kaur and wins. So I don't know what in years two.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It really puts it into perspective that this year he'll

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>match Bill kaer Uh in terms of just the tenure

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that Cower. Yeah, I'm trying to think where I would

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>put Tomlin in my coach power rankings. If he's not

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>top five, I would say he's probably top seven, top

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>five personally. I just want to keep in the building.

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Um in retirement news, Jordan Reed, see you later, Buddy.

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>The third round pick back in two thousand thirteen. Always

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>um skillful as a pass catching tight end, but always

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>dealing with injuries. UM more specifically head injuries, and that

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>history of concussions is really the reason why he's stepping

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>away from the game. He missed fifty three games over

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>his eight seasons, so he heads into retirement at the

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>age of thirty. Sometimes these guys take a year off

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and they come back and he's certainly young enough to

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>do that mark. But at the same time, um, you

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 1>totally understand where he's coming from here, trying to protect

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>himself for the next fifty sixty years of his life. Yeah,

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of these total what if careers because

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you look back on like he did in when he

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was like a total fantasy stud um eleven touchdowns, seven catches,

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the best playmaking tight ends around and it's

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the concussions And there was other injuries too, But I

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>part of me was just like, with these guys that

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.239
<v Speaker 1>have multiple head injuries, like why are they Why did

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>he come back even last season. I'm sure there's a

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>competitive fire, but you just worry. You know, there's just

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>there's too much murky um and and known evidence about

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>what these can lead to in life, and so you know,

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of happy for him to see him part

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>ways with the game. He was part of the sea

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>change at the in terms of just concussions, Like he

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>came along at the time when people when the league

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>started taking more seriously. I think of him in Brandon

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Stokely as two of the guys sort of most affected

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>by the changes uh, and finally in the news. Here's

0:23:54.560 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a report from rap Sheet earlier this week. The Giants

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are slated to pick number eleven in the NFL draft,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and trading back is already something they are internally considering.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh hit it hit the trope alert Ricky, that spot

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>will have real value? Ian right, how rare would it trade?

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Doown be? Dave Gettleman has never traded down in the

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>first round in eight drafts as a GM. Let's hear

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>from Gettleman himself. Nobody believes him. It's become a bit

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of a trope itself. Uh having discussions about uh, Dave

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Gentleman not trading um, the discussions of the trope has

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>become a trope. It's pretty hardcore. Let's here from Gettlman

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>had a great line, nasco will have right right terms

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>before DJ trades back. Helm a line had a good laugh.

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, honest, I've tried to trade back, but it's

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be value. I'm not getting fleeced. I refused to

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>do it. And if you know somebody wants to make

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a bad trade back, God bless him. But you know,

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had opportunities. I've tried. You have to understand like,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>first of all, he that was Daniel jeremiahs that DJ

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of that clip who made the NASCAR joke.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a solid one. And gentleman, if you if you

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't see this press conference, is wearing a button down

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>shirt and like a grandpa cardigan buttoned up over the

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>shirts the best though, it's a sweater vest. It's a

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>sweater vest. You don't see that too often, and it's

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>just like and it's this is you know, I don't

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>want to like overstated, but sometimes it just feels like

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Giants have a GM that's playing checkers while other

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>GM's are playing chess, and when he answers the certain

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>questions this way, you just wonder if he's looking at

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the sport and the game that he plays within the

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sport in a competitive way when compared to other guys

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in the game. Well, what do we have to look

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>at other than his track record, which is, you know,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there have been select is over eight years and he's

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>never traded down once. So it's like, you know, I

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>think this thing about not getting fleeced this year does

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.239
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit different because if you look at

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins Niners trade if you want to climb up

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>even just you know, a third of the draft, Like

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the cost right now is high, and you're gonna be

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>measured against that Niners trade to some degree. I mean,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>each of these deals are a little bit different. But

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's gonna have to get something that can't

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just get henpecked by the New York media if he

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get great values. So maybe there aren't those deals

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>out there. Maybe he's playing chess though, and and sweater

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>vests are coming back and he's ahead of it. I mean,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I just saw this whole thing. You know, the baggy

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>jeans are coming back now, that's mid nineties ghettomen. There

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>was a decent amount of sweater vest. It was like

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some New York just like style. I was like, give

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>me a break, but that. But maybe the sweater vests

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>also coming back because they had a moment there. They

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>had a moment about thirty years ago. That's usually the

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>cycle thirty years And by the way, he is of

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>grandfather age. It's not like you know a ma any

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>old wearing a sweater vest. And although I actually read

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>an article myself recently that that isn't you guys like

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>diving deep and all the fashion reads on the net.

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I like, not this article proposed or you know, there

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>was evidence that, um, you know, even younger than millennials

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>are now dressing as grandfather's as it's as a chosen style.

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So maybe gettleman to Greg's point, is on the cutting

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>edge of various things. I love how grandfather's dressed. I

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>can't wait. It's it's a great look. My grandfather God

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>dressed his soul. Baba Um used to wear a hat

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and actually it's one thing that I kept after he

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>passed away that just said this is my retirement outfit.

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It was just like a hat that had that text

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and then like a golf pin in a hole or something.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.479
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, all right, that's that's a that's grandfather fashion.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what he's about. My grandfather would wear a suit

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on Saturdays to sit down and read the newspaper and

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not not leave. I mean, the type of men simply

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>do not exist in our society right now. I think

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that's clear. There was the opposite sides of the spectrum. Um,

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, that's what's happening in the news. All right,

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while. We love our fans. Ah, the fans.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>The listeners. We never gave the listener like some shows

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>give their listeners a the name. We don't really have that.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's something to think about down the line. But

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if we're this deep into the show, maybe that's just

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna ever be a thing. Well, it's because our

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>name around the NFL is kind of generic. Maybe we

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>need to change that to get the listeners. You know, well,

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't get to decide to change the name of

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>our own show. We get told by shadowy league figures

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>as around the league we used to be. Now we're

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>around the NFL, just waiting for our next marching autor

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point remarkable power that we're harnessing here. We

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>we can't even decide what the title of our show is.

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what our listeners are called. Direction lists.

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Three kind of sad guys talking football. Uh, let's get

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>into it. I hope you guys bring your a game

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because the listeners always sharp. Let's start right here with

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul Holland, who asks, do you see the Steelers trying

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to move up in the draft for a QB. Big

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben is nearing the end and the other qbs on

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the roster probably aren't the long term answer. And um,

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>good question. I thought about this one, did a little

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of research. So there's that Jerry Jones uh, the

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>famous draft pick trading chart, the Draft Chip draft pick

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>value chart, it's known as And the Steelers are picking

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. Tough spot for if you're looking for a quarterback,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's worth forty points according to the uh Jimmy Johnson scale. Um,

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to get up in the draft and

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>go after somebody, if they gave up their second pick,

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that's worth fifty, that's worth points overall. That gets them

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to ten ninety, which would put them around fourteen fifteen

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in the draft. The problem is, boys, I don't know,

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>even if they made an aggressive play to move up

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the draft board, if there's gonna be somewhere and they're

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>sitting for them, is it Is it crazy that mac

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Jones or Tree Lance or Justin Fields could be there

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the first round. Not crazy, but

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>probably not likely. Sitting where they are now, it would

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>probably be someone that surprised people. I think I would

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>just say this, I don't know if the Jimmy Johnson

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>trade value chart applies as directly this time around. You

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>just look at that Niners trade again up to Miami.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>With Miami, I mean what they gave up, that's going

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to be expensive. I mean, you're not gonna suddenly live

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in a different world costwise. And I think Kevin Colbert

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>has traded up or down in twenty drafts maybe four times.

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if that's their culture either. I

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just don't know if this is the year that will

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>happen with considering where they're sitting. No, Kevin Colvert values

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>those picks. Is always about value that it's it's hard

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to imagine. I think it's one of the reasons they

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>brought Roethlisberger back, is what where they're drafting. Even think

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the Roethlisberger draft, where, by the way, it

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was Kevin Colvert making the pick and they didn't move

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>up to go get Ben Roethlisberger. They sat there and

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>patiently waited and hoped that one of those big three

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks really was going to be Rivers. Roethlisberger felt to

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>them and it did and it worked out perfectly. So

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine it. I mean, yes, behind Ben Roethlisberger

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, Mason Rudolph, Josh Dobbs, Dwayne Haskins, and with

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with what we saw last year with Big Ben, it

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is certainly possible he falls off the cliff entirely. That

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is within the range of outcomes. Here are the Steelers.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I would be really surprised if they don't have somebody

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in the building um early draft pick style they like.

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They like Mason Rudolph. He was a pretty early draft pick.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>He was the second round draft got a lot of

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks too. They've got Dwayne Haskins, it was a first

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>round draft. I'm just saying that you might not like

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph, Dan, but they like Mason Rudolf. Hmm. We'll see,

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess. I guess we'll stay tuned until about ten

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>days from l see where they stand on that. Up next,

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Kenneally asks, with the draft coming up and a

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>few teams and high spots that could potentially be open

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to giving away their spot, what team is most likely

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to a trade away their spot and be who was

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>most likely to trade up into a new higher spot.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I I we just talked about the Steelers. I could

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely see them making a play if they if a

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback starts falling, Greg, do you see another team in

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that realm. I think the Falcons, instead of making like

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a big statement in terms of drafting their quarterback of

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the future fourth like Thomas Demit drafted with Matt Ryan,

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually can see them going the other way. We're

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>using that number four pick to pick up a ton

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of picks, kind of like the Dolphins did still have

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a draft pick in the top ten or eleven and

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>start their rebuilding process that way. I don't know who

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>trades up there, but you know, in a in a

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>fun world, it would be my New England Patriots. Well yeah,

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I would see New England as a team that you

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>know is gonna want to move up if they have to,

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, heat seek a quarterback to go somewhere else

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>than Cam Newton. You know, I think the Panthers, after

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>swinging and missing um, not really getting their first choice

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback, and you know you've got Sam Donald, who

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you want to take a look at. Maybe

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they go from number eight and say, let's if we

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>can get value and someone really wants to get into

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>number eight, will go down. I mean just I think

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>at some point it would have gone the other way.

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>They would have traded up. That's what they tried. To do.

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think the Falcons are gonna want to

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>trade with the Panthers to give Carolina the franchise quarterback

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>inside the same division. I mean, they're also a little

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>bit hamstrung financially at quarterback the Panthers, because they're gonna

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>have to pay Teddy Bridgewater wherever he ends up. You're

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to You're hearing that they're picking up the

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald option, so you have a lot. Are you

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring in a high priced or a high drafted

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback? On top of all that, it just seems

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like a lot. They need a left tackle though, and

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they are in the perfect a cat bird seat to

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>take the top left tackler at least number two. This

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>from Paul Silva. You think rookie Qubs will take a

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>step back in now that there will be fans in

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the stands. Okay, Um, here's my thought on that. And

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about rookie Qubs, Joe Burrow, two U

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Herbert Jalen Hurts, those are the kind of four guys

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know who knows when if

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll like freak out. I'm sure all these guys played

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in front of big crowds their whole careers. Um So

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. But at the same time, it

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>is kind of an interesting experiment, sociological experiment, if you will,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole season. I guess it will be different for

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys that all of a sudden they're playing at

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this level in front of seventy screaming fans. Hypothetically, it's

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>it is a beguiling question. I mean, I liked the

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>question because it makes me have to think about that.

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>But if anything, I think last year would have been

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the step away from the norm. I mean, these guys

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't from the wilderness. They've been playing in front of

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>like big, cheering crowds for a decade plus his football players,

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's not that atypical. And if anything, I think

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>it may be energizes certain players and certain athletes. Well,

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Herbert's in a unique spot though, charges fans, you gotta

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 1>start filling up that stadium. We haven't seen what this

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>stadium is gonna be with the Chargers, but he might

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's playing sixteen road games. That's what the

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>last Chargers quarterback, Philip Rivers, felt like, So that could

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>be an additional trouble. I'm worried about Herbert. I I

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>got a lot on Herbert right now. I just want

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>him to be a little too. I want him to

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>be the next guy. I'm not not loving the coordinator now,

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this this question has me a little freaked. Though it

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is it is interesting. We we kind of hit paused

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because of COVID on all the Chargers melodrama about are

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they going to really truly find a home in the

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>l A market? And now they have this giant stadium

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>and how are they gonna fill it up? And is

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it gonna become road games where justin Herbert's calling time

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>out on offense because he can't get he can't get

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>his signals in and all that, Like, all that stuff

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was on the back burner. When the stadiums are empty,

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all gonna be back on the front burner, hopefully.

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Um alright, this from the broadcast podcast. You know Ricky

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>always signed it away to plug your own brand. Uh,

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>these all suck. I guess the questions you're referring to,

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>what eight teams would you choose to break away from

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the NFL to create their own Super league? Dash Broads

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for light. Now, I only have a vague level of

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledge on this greg and maybe you could fill in

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the dots, but there was major drama over on the

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>other side of the pond around uh, their version of football.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So why don't you set the table and then we'll

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. Well, I think most sports sands probably

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>know the story of the Super League already collapsing, where

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>basically the richest, biggest soccer teams from all over the

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>globe different leagues tried to break away and form their

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 1>own league and the fans are vaulted and it didn't happen.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>For this question, it would be like, you can't you

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine some owners doing this at some point, like we

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta get more money, we gotta get more money. And

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>so I'm thinking more about who who has the most

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>dough and who who has the biggest brands, And so

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting with the Patriots, the Cowboys, you know, Jerry

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Craft are leading the way. I think you

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta get the Packers in there. It just feels like,

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what's a football league without the Packers. I'm putting the

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Steelers in. The NFL would be asking the same thing.

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, It's like, wait, they're bringing and the Cowboys.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>They're breaking apart. The NFL is not happy. The Steelers.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You gotta put in there with the tradition, and Mark's

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be happy about this. But I'm putting the

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Ravens in there too. The Browns. Forget about the Browns,

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>but I like having a little bit of a rivalry.

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens Steelers thing. Bring that to the new league.

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Their well run. Uh, the Chiefs, you gotta bring my

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>homes to the news, so they're coming. And then finally

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you got you need another West Coast team. The Seahawks

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.879
<v Speaker 1>makes to me, I like bringing their fan base into

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>this league. And the Raiders, Um so really we're just

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>ripping the guts out of the NFL. Your move? Can

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I Can I just say that Roger Gods Network, by

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the way, go ahead. I know that you're thinking, I

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:15.959
<v Speaker 1>probably like listed the Browns and a bunch of teams

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the Browns could beat in the Super League. But you

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>know the questions coming from the from Erica and the

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Broads like that. You know this is about money, Okay.

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So I basically have the exact same list as Greg

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>save four the Seahawks. I replaced with the Niners just

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a little bit older than you guys, and

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>like I grew up with those Niners dynasties, and I

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think that that's my West Coast team, and I have

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. I don't know who that replaces from your list,

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but I had the Saints in there as well, so

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>very similar, Greg, because I think this is about making

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the cash. M hmm, let's get this. Um, I'll work

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>off Greg's list as the master, and then I'm with you.

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So you're putting the Saints in, Mark, is that who

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you took out? The Raiders and the Seahawks were replaced

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Saints and the Niners. Okay, I agree the

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Raiders have to be in the league. I think they

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be there. Um, But this anti New York bias,

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it. The Giants are boring and the Jets

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>are a mess, But we've got to have a New

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>York team in there. It's a Tiffany franchise. You gotta

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have the Giants involved in the mixed for me. So

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I got I'm gonna get rid of I'll get rid

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Ravens personally. Sorry, alright. The more they just

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>like to be told they're pretty and and nice and

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, you're the greatest organization. I just and

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>with Lamar too, just trying to give him a little

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>pat on the back. Well, there's a I like that

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Steelers Ravens rivalry to kick off. This super league is

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:39.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna need a lot of help. You know, you don't

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>these are I mean, please, I'm not gonna any help.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna be like TV and ratings for the

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>roof and the NFL is going to be left by

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the side of the highway in this scenario. So all right,

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so there you go. Moving on this from m Boucher.

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Who's the top contender for the Team of a t

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>L this year? And why is it the Lions? Okay,

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had one in two years, by the way,

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:02.439
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things to unpack here. First of all,

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>um our great man, great friend Chris Westling, we we

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>took and it kind of annoyed him, which was always fun.

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I used called the Team of West t L because

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>we could never get anything rubber rubber stamped unless West

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>was behind the team. Um So with West not here

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with us, I don't know, maybe Team of a t

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>L T West the l That's that's something in the

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>history of this podcast. But there's a second part of

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this as well, which is the only time the team

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of a t N really worked was when it was

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>organic and we all gravitated towards a team that we

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 1>liked and maybe, just maybe, and I think West would

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like this too. If we felt that way naturally about

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a team this season, uh, then there will be a

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>team of a t N. The one thing I know

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>it will not be is the Detroit Lions. It's tough though,

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>because we're like both eight, we're in the a f

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>C East. There's too many like competing rivalries between the

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>three of us. But I know the one that unfortunately

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>has the hooks back in, which is you know, my

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>pick almost every other year, which is the Chargers. I

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>was so mad about Philip Rivers. I forsake them for

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>about ten seven games last year. But now with Herbert like,

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the one I'm gonna get overly excited about again.

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I could be drawn towards the Niners on the Chargers

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>are one for me too, But look at I like,

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>if you've listened to the show, I spent last August

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you guys how the Lions were gonna

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be spicy and relevant and you know, fun to watch.

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And I you know, I actually spent more time watching

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>them trying to make that be the case, and I

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was punished for it visually. So if you think I'm

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>going back down that road two years in a row,

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I've gotta learn some lessons when we cover this sport,

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope. Okay, up next, Brock right asks, super Bowl

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Sunday is now the day before Valentine's Day. Remember it's

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.839
<v Speaker 1>a seventeen game schedule. Now everything gets pushed back a week.

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Do the heroes foresee that that causing marital strife on

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>any level? Now, I could tell you this. I don't

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 1>know Brock from a hole in the wall, but I

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>bet he's a younger guy because he is under the

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>impression that Valentine's Day has any meaning to married people.

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't exist if it happens to fall on a

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Friday or Saturday, and that happens to fall on a

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 1>night where you have a babysitter and you go out

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>for the night. Hey, you're you're out on Valentine's Day.

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But there is no such thing as Valentine's Day for

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 1>grown ups. It's over very very important and impactful when

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you're a teenager through college. O your college girlfriend was

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>nuts about Valentine's Day. In your twenties, absolutely, they use

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it as benchmarks about how seriously they should take you

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.960
<v Speaker 1>depending on your performance. But that all fades away eventually.

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it as a big issue overall. I

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know either. I find the holiday to be

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like an ultrasham on multiple levels. And and if I

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if I were to suggest that the ups and downs

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>one goes through UM in a marriage relationship hinges entirely

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>on Valentine's Day, I mean, you don't. You don't want

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to do nothing, you don't want to be hyper apathetic

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>about it, but UM, you got to address it. You're kind,

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you're stuck doing it. But I mean, it's to me,

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 1>it is I'm not doing nothing. I'm not I don't

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>do nothing. I don't think that's that's from my I

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>did try that once, and I did not find that

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a very successful UM approach. But I don't

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>do much either, And I think as time goes on,

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you do less and less, and UM, it's a concoction.

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't every relationships different. Every relationship is different, not

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>one size fits all that said, I totally agree with

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>everything Dan said. In my relationship, I somehow found someone

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>less sentimental than me, so she didn't. That's remarkable. And yes,

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl Sunday falling on Valentine's Day itself, that's a

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 1>problem for you twenty somethings out there, and good luck

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to you. I'm glad I don't have to worry about it.

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Um all right, Mark up next, this one from war

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>war Werner war Warner. Let's work on that handle. This

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>one is mainly for Mark Sessler. What actor would be

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>chosen to play each podcast hero, including Erica Tampose? Alright,

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I knew I knew this question was coming,

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So I did a lot of research, by the way,

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and um, I'm going to start with Dan because Dan,

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you're gonna cast this film, let's just

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be real. Dan has to be a home run, um choice,

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>who is essentially the main thing, because then the real

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Dan is just going to be upset. That's the only

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the main thing. Why it's got That's also a

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>fact he's going to be offended by almost anyone. You

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a factor. But you can't get some you

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can't get some super unknown risks. It's got to be Ham.

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It is not him. I'm not going with him. I

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>am going with an actor who I think has leading

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>man vibes. It's to John hamm is a little older now,

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he doesn't quite sync up with the old Zeuser.

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>He's the older than you, you know. I also never

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate your your ham nous, but I do see

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that unless there's the other part of this now that

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.799
<v Speaker 1>now that that the new old Blue Eyes is really

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>taken off, more and more people are plugged in on

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the baby Blues and Ham unless you put in the

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>context anyway, I'm gonna stay out of the way here.

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 1>John ham could have in a great choice. But I'd

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 1>like to see what you have Mark. I'm not sure

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that it's taken off the way that others would use

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that descriptor. But I'm going Josh Brolin, and I want

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you to take a look at this photo right number one.

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Great hair Um has alpha male leadership qualities. I recently

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just watched No Country for Old Men for like the

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>eighth time, and he is sensational in it. And you

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>know what, he is a true actor, I mean the

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 1>son of an actor. He was in Goonies way back.

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:27.359
<v Speaker 1>When this guy has a long career, you can trust

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>him to deliver a powerful performance. And I think he

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>has also secret more comedic chops that would lend to

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.440
<v Speaker 1>some of what Dan offers to the podcast Great Hair.

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I have no problem with Josh Brolin portraying me

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in a film Thank You years old. So yeah, it

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>fits in with like, oh well, so Gregan part of

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I Am a little bit exactly. He played fanos. They

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can see g I am all they want. Um. All right,

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Greg next. And Greg is going to

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>get someone that I've known. People have noted online multiple

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>times that Gregg looks like this person, Adam Brody. Yeah.

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the look is very close. Um, but

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know he's got the acting chops from Gilmore Girls,

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>from the o C. And I read this that he

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>was described Adam Brody by the Los Angeles Times as

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>TV's sexiest geek and by Time is having, in quotes,

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>redefined the screen persona of unapologetic nerdiness. So you've got

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the personality, you've got the traits. Um, what do you

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think Greg? I mean, I like that he married Um

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Summer from the show in real life, right, didn't he don't.

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for it. I'll take it. I'll take all

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the Adam Brody um comments as a compliment. The problem

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is I only get those like on Twitter that's never

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:54.839
<v Speaker 1>happening in real life, so I'm not sure I'm buying

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 1>this as the other good thing. The other good thing

0:46:57.360 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for you, Mark is you try to get this project

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>off the ground. Don't know if you're epeeing it or what,

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>but Adam Brody definitely available, very available, ready to go

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um, Erica, Ricky Hollywood. Uh, there are a

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways you could go here, but I went

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:13.479
<v Speaker 1>with an actress who um I loved in the show

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Party Down, Lizzie Kaplan. Let's take a look. Um. She's versatile.

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I think she can bring the requisite sassiness to the

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>rule and uh, you know, I've also went through you know,

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>photo at galleries each of these actresses and actors, and

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>she can look versatily different in different rules and stuff.

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how Ricky feels about that, but

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it is a compliment coming from me. She's a good actress.

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Erica feels nothing about it, so we will move on. Uma,

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Erica are you on our show or what. Yeah, no,

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm here. I just wasn't sure if you were gonna,

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep rifling them through. No. I think it's

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a good pick. I think it it works okay. By

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, this one is the first one I take

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:59.839
<v Speaker 1>issue with a little bit. I love Lizzie Caplan, great actor. Um.

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a right right Church, wrong Pew situation here.

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Linda Cardinelli Freaking and many other projects would

0:48:09.640 --> 0:48:11.799
<v Speaker 1>be very good. This may have been a case where

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, the podcast was starting soon, having

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>to kind of get the act together with some of

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 1>these choices. I love Cardinelli to once saw her, um,

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, at a sandwich shop in the middle of

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 1>doing jury duty. She is at least a decade and

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a half older than Yeah. She was born in nineteen

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and I was born in ninety two. I was looking

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for someone in the age. Did you see the Irishman?

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You can age people down, no problem then, um Mark,

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we had discussed before the show. You wanted me to

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>handle your casting, which I understand. I have an option

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>first though that I think that you know, I think

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>would just sometimes it's easy just to pull these things off,

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think I've gone with a selection that the

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>audience would see an organic connection with Eric. If you

0:48:57.560 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>want to bring up the person to play Mark, it

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>would just be it would be Brad Pitt because I

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's just a lot of connective tissue there m visually,

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:09.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of energy wise. Right. Well, now that the comedic

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>portion of the segment is clear, let's let's move to

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 1>more natural terrain. Okay. And I leaned on my wife,

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 1>my wife Emily, who works professionally in the casting industry,

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and asked her, who would you cast to play Mark?

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So here's here's three choices. I asked for three options.

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>One ed Norton. Okay, and this is what Emily wrote

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>to me, because we only communicate via text. Smart guy

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>who is internal and cerebral in his performances, threads in

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 1>intensity into every character he plays. Number two. Yeah, where's

0:49:47.560 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>where's the photos for this? Ricky? Number two? Aaron Paul

0:49:52.920 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a sensitive, nuanced actor who tells everything through his eyes.

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Very soulful and sensitive and someone in audience roots or

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but he can turn on a dime if you push

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 1>him enough. God damn, that's right. That's pretty good. I

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's the winner and the final choice Ben Mendelssohn

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is probably the weirdest idea. But when Mark is in

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:16.320
<v Speaker 1>his fifties, uh, and we're knocking on the door, he's

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the guy. He's an actor who possesses quiet ferocity, which

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 1>he delivers in every performance could be could be referred

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to as a quote quiet storm. I think Emily has

0:50:26.560 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 1>done an absolutely excellent job. And you know, Emily and

0:50:29.640 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I we connected on casting once because I essentially discovered

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Felicity Jones Um long before society did, and Emily recognized

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>that talent within, so I certainly recognized hers. And I

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>think mendelssohn Um is one of my favorite actors. So

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I think it's a knockout job there. I'll

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:49.839
<v Speaker 1>take any one of those three, maybe maybe all three

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:53.359
<v Speaker 1>would play me during different stages of the film that Wow,

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot, it's a big it's a big expense

0:50:56.600 --> 0:51:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to play play marxis alat of a lot of Now

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to actually see what this movie is about. Really. Yeah, Emily,

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you did a great job, but I think she missed

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the obvious choice. Greg German of some

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>in German gets I get well. When everyone saw the

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>movie Juno when she was like pregnant in sixteen. Everyone's like,

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you look so much like Elliott Elliott all right, there's

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>been a shift in that realm. Yeah, I don't know

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>if I totally agree with the actually clean up there, Ricky. Yeah. Um,

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:38.320
<v Speaker 1>speaking of knockouts, when are Greg and DJ going to

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:40.759
<v Speaker 1>have a boxing match for charity? You know, I like

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this one. I mean I would definitely not box DJ

0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in what wait I would be Uh, I would be

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in trouble there. I'm giving up a lot of reach.

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would take my chances in some other

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:56.840
<v Speaker 1>athletic endeavors, but boxing would be troubling. I remember, is

0:51:56.920 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this where you circle back and tell us that you

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:01.360
<v Speaker 1>played tennis competitively? No, I'm just saying, like, give me

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a sport that, uh that we can compete at. I

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think boxing. I'm not basketball upper upper body strength.

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that the height is definitely a problem there

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with basketball, but I could I could try maybe get

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>a two on two going here. I don't like your

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>chances in the ring. I'm again being older than you.

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I as a kid with a bunch of dads and kids,

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we piled into this one um friends house like twenty

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>five of us to watch Tyson Spinks. And remember the

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>host father um was put had put like microwave popcorn

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>into the microwave and the fight was nine seconds and

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the popcorn wasn't even popped by the time it was over,

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's back in their houses two hours later. I

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.719
<v Speaker 1>see this fight going in similar fashion. I mean, now

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I would be like I would be like Floyd Mayweather

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:47.759
<v Speaker 1>and just dancing around the ring, and then the crowd

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and start booing, and I would like turn around to

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:51.439
<v Speaker 1>them because they're not getting their money. Was like break

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 1>it on, and I just wouldn't let him touch me.

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 1>You get a chair over the head. But some of that.

0:52:56.960 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And finally this from Chance zep, Hey, the are we

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>getting a Mark Sessler mock draft this year? Sure? I

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:08.759
<v Speaker 1>started about twenty minutes before that designated episode next week

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and roll it out once the episode starts. He likes

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to pretend he doesn't put much into it, but he

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>he's like already started. He knew that, you know, he's

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.359
<v Speaker 1>been working on it. Well, I can also just take

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>m j d s and just say it's mine, like

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:24.520
<v Speaker 1>no one would know. So the thing about the Sessler

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>mock draft it's absolutely true. Is that it's definitely set up.

0:53:29.160 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It's set up for Mark in a way that if

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:36.319
<v Speaker 1>he gets everything wrong, oh I don't care anyway, if

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he gets a few right, it's like, hey, look at me.

0:53:38.880 --> 0:53:41.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm the seer on Mark Sessler, like nailed six.

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think last year something like that, it was quite remarkable.

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>What what is a good grade in these mock drafts?

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And they all say it that I don't care about

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 1>my mock draft, but they all care, Like what what

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>constitutes success with a mock draft? I would love to

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:57.800
<v Speaker 1>know a number if the Jimmy if the Jimmy Johnson

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>draft chart is something that people takes easily, why isn't

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>there something that represents a grating curve on the East

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>draft mock drafts which are everywhere, it seems to be

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>no accountability because I would say, if you're if you're

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:13.400
<v Speaker 1>someone that's spending like six months putting these together and

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't get ten out of thirty two, like, well,

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Like some years are impossible, like it

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:25.399
<v Speaker 1>all depends on your No. One, but like last year,

0:54:26.960 --> 0:54:30.319
<v Speaker 1>but there's some years where actually it goes pretty chalky. Yeah,

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's less information right now because of COVID

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:37.919
<v Speaker 1>and the opt ins and opt outs that we'll see.

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:39.880
<v Speaker 1>That's what we said going into last year's draft, and

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, people missed where guys were going.

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:45.359
<v Speaker 1>But the first round was somewhat predictable. There's some years

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>where it's like impossible to get anyone, no one has

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:51.200
<v Speaker 1>any idea, which is nice. Yeah, and that's typically how

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>these thing. You know, when a trade happens, everything gets

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>shaken up. Yeah, but we we will have a Sessler

0:54:57.400 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mock draft coming. That's good. Speaking it was next week. Yeah,

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>speaking of draft week, Mike's marks Mark Draft will be

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 1>part of our five Days of podcast starting Monday, So

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 1>we'll have shows Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and then Thursday night.

0:55:15.400 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 1>After Round one, will jump on immediately and I will

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have I believe, if the draft goes Chalk in the

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>first two picks, I will have my Zach Wilson Chipotle burrito,

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't have to be trend setting, it doesn't have

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to be some type of transcendent game changing item. It

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just has to be tasty and I am looking forward

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to it. Um. So we'll break down all of the week.

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:41.719
<v Speaker 1>The Round one picks as we do every year, and

0:55:41.800 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>then we'll be back Saturday night. It's the only Saturday

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:48.319
<v Speaker 1>night show we do all year. Um, thank god. Well,

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll recap the rest of the draft. That's right after

0:55:51.880 --> 0:55:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the seventh round concludes with Mr Irrelevant. I can't believe

0:55:55.520 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr Irrelevant hasn't gotten whacked yet by the PC police.

0:55:58.760 --> 0:56:00.839
<v Speaker 1>That's gotta go, right, that's going to be gone very soon.

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>If I mean, you wrote that article probably six seven

0:56:03.280 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 1>years in a row. Was sort of an anchoring franchise

0:56:06.000 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for you that I don't I don't think that offends anyone, know,

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, they do like they do a parade, they don't,

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they give it. This guy gets a little

0:56:15.160 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 1>extra pop than then I get a feeling that, well,

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it will be renamed all right, I'll make a prediction

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'll make a sandwich prop long range. In

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the next five years, it won't be called that anymore.

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:30.359
<v Speaker 1>It will be something that's very much softer and celebratory

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the player. Last but not least right, because well,

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be deemed as it doesn't truly

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:41.360
<v Speaker 1>celebrate the man for what he achieved to get to. Okay,

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen. By the way, I will say, someone

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>who's like way more irrelevant is the person picked just

0:56:47.280 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>before last, who doesn't have a nickname or a title,

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:53.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get a parade, doesn't have an article written about him.

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the person no one ever heard of. That's it's

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>simply not irrelevant. They they're making you relevant, They're forcing

0:56:59.400 --> 0:57:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it upon us. I want to go get my lunch

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:05.439
<v Speaker 1>dot org. You know you gotta put that this long

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>term one. I don't know if we've ever had a

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>five year timeline. Let's put another one, putting a sandwich on, like,

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>will there be a show in five years? We still well,

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I guess I'll say, you know, let's

0:57:19.560 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>be optimistic there. I'm just saying, we're negotiating with DraftKings,

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we will have a show in five years. Let's put

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that up to I'm just saying, it's a lot of

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of faith. What kind of sandwich is will

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 1>our show exist in five years? What is wrong with you?

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm putting it on it. It's up to you

0:57:38.120 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to take me up if you disagree. So you're saying,

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm saying there will be a show. So

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like, so I can get nothing else, so I

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:50.800
<v Speaker 1>can collect this sandwich that they haven't changed. Mr Irrelevant,

0:57:50.840 --> 0:57:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's not happening. That's not happening. If the show

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ends and you think I'm going to be giving you sandwiches, um,

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, for free two years later or something like that,

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you're you don't know, treat and even now you don't

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 1>even now I know, I know I'm not going to

0:58:03.920 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>be giving you anything. So sure of it. Everybody settled up?

0:58:08.640 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff, good show. We have our network program.

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>We are going dark draft week um next week, so

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this is our last network show for a couple of weeks.

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So make sure you tune in tomorrow Friday on NFL

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>networking around the NFL broadcast, Please dvr it. Give it

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a shot back at June noon Pacific this week and

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you can figure out what that in the time zones.

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Pacific is the best. That's let's make that the what

0:58:37.640 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone says, that's my new movement right listed pt slash

0:58:41.240 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>et from here on out. It's always been reversed. It

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you need it needs to be something catchy to stick.

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think you now that Greg with Pacific is

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the best. All right, that's it. This Dan has a

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 1>signing off four by Storm the old boss, Ricky Hollywood.

0:58:58.960 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Behind the virtual glass. They're gonna age CARDINALI down, Ricky

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 1>way down. Okay, get ready until Monday. Heed the call.