Speaker 1: Now here's a highlight from Coast to Coast AM on
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio and welcome back to Coast to Coast. George Norri
Speaker 1: with you. Mark Carpenter with US anthropologist explorer Arthur. A
Speaker 1: couple of his books are on his website mark acarpenter
Speaker 1: dot com. He has worked on Mayan archeological excavations on
Speaker 1: the Yucatan Peninsula. He has analyzed prehistoric Mexico. He spent
Speaker 1: years living alongside various Native American tribes and Polynesians and
Speaker 1: North America and Hawaii studying their ancient traditions. And his
Speaker 1: expertise is of human origin paradigms, and he is considered
Speaker 1: a rogue cultural scholar, accusing the scientific establishment of conspiracy
Speaker 1: to distort human history. Mark, we're going to talk about that,
Speaker 1: but welcome to the program. Well, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for having me. I really appreciate it looking forward to this.
Speaker 1: How did you get involved in anthropology and archaeology. Well,
Speaker 1: it went back to my childhood. Like a lot of
Speaker 1: eighties kids, I thought Indiana Jones was a very cool character.
Speaker 1: And my father and his family had some rural land
Speaker 1: out in Ohio, the Ohio River Valley, and there were
Speaker 1: burial mounds out there. Not on our land per se,
Speaker 1: but you know, when we used to drive through, I
Speaker 1: was fascinated by these burial mounds. And my father didn't
Speaker 1: really have a satisfactory explanation. So that's kind of where
Speaker 1: it all began. Fascinated ever since, haven't you. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: was hooked. I had to know. I had to know.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the Smithsonian. Tell us about that. Is
Speaker 1: it kind of like a depository of all the old
Speaker 1: relics or what is that place? Yeah, that's a good question.
Speaker 1: It masquerades as this beacon of education. That's what we've
Speaker 1: always been taught that it is. And that's that's easy
Speaker 1: to believe because that's what we wanted. We wanted to
Speaker 1: be that, and it should be. Um, you know, a
Speaker 1: society like ours should have that. Um. But that's not
Speaker 1: the reality. The reality is institutions like the Smithsonian, particularly
Speaker 1: the Smithsonian, we're founded, um, you know, buy elites, the
Speaker 1: secret society, frat boy types, and they were building a nation.
Speaker 1: They were building a nation, and um, what it really became,
Speaker 1: or what it really is, is a beacon of their
Speaker 1: version of human history that they want us to learn
Speaker 1: and and right and think about it. They collect the
Speaker 1: they collect the artifacts and the remains, and the and
Speaker 1: the arts, and the culture, and and and the relics
Speaker 1: and everything. And they may draw their own conclusions behind
Speaker 1: closed doors, But as far as they're concerned, it's it's
Speaker 1: a it's a mechanism by which the few control the many. Um.
Speaker 1: They like this divide of information and knowledge. They think
Speaker 1: of it as their uh, their aristotle, uh aristocrat, thank you,
Speaker 1: their aristocratic privilege. Is what I was trying to say, Well,
Speaker 1: what wasn't What was it, Mark that got you to
Speaker 1: start thinking this way? You're not alone in this, by
Speaker 1: the way, But what was it that got you to
Speaker 1: think this way? My paradigm was lost in in Mexico.
Speaker 1: Um I was. I was head first in to be
Speaker 1: a PhD. And uh, I was prepared to spend my
Speaker 1: life toiling in the jungles of Mexico to understand the
Speaker 1: Maya and their disappearance or they're alleged disappearance. And how
Speaker 1: I just it was like the dissolution disillusioned tale of
Speaker 1: a film. I found myself. My naivete was just shattered.
Speaker 1: I found that this was a rigid orthodoxy and you
Speaker 1: were gonna get in line or you were going to drown.
Speaker 1: And um I was obsessed. I still am with Pocoll
Speaker 1: and the Red Queen at the ancient mayansight known as
Speaker 1: Plank and what I found there was a cover up.
Speaker 1: Those remains are missing, the DNA from Pocal and the
Speaker 1: Red Queen. And for anyone who's not familiar or Pocall
Speaker 1: and the Red Queen, think of them as like the
Speaker 1: King tut of of Mayan archaeology. These are rock stars
Speaker 1: of the Mayan archaeological world. Most important find in the
Speaker 1: history of my min archaeology too, Christine Rulers tombs discovered
Speaker 1: in burial chambers within pyramids. Well, why do start the
Speaker 1: information about them? That is? That is such a such
Speaker 1: a priceless question. Why uh? To understand that question, we
Speaker 1: really have to go back to what we were talking
Speaker 1: about before the founding of institutions like the Smithsonian, and
Speaker 1: we need to understand how these institutions operate. Who controls
Speaker 1: them the money, of course, and in this case we've
Speaker 1: got the i NAH, which is the National Institute of
Speaker 1: Anthropology and History. They're essentially the Mexican Smithsonian. They were
Speaker 1: funding this day dollar on a dollar for dollar matched
Speaker 1: basis with the Rockefeller Foundation. That's pretty extensive. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: and and and the Rockefeller Foundation and the Smithsonian and
Speaker 1: National Geographic and you NESCo. These are all tentacles of
Speaker 1: the same creature. Um. And so back to the question,
Speaker 1: why distort this, Well, because because it impacts the human
Speaker 1: history narrative, which they did, which they want us to
Speaker 1: believe their narrative. Yes, yes, exactly exactly you see there there.
Speaker 1: You can trace this back a good crystallization of this.
Speaker 1: You can trace back to John D. Rockefeller. He essentially
Speaker 1: founded the Board of Education. I believe this was nineteen ten.
Speaker 1: It could have been nineteen oh one. I get the
Speaker 1: one in the zero mix up. But when he did so,
Speaker 1: I forget what it was a billion dollars three hundred
Speaker 1: million in nineteen o one ten. Anyway, he said, he's
Speaker 1: known for this quote, I want I don't want thinkers,
Speaker 1: I want workers. So if you really want to boil
Speaker 1: it down, that's I think the human history narrative is
Speaker 1: designed to enslave the public. What would they want us
Speaker 1: to believe? Mark, Oh, well, they liked their social Darwinis
Speaker 1: narrative that I think most people kind of in their
Speaker 1: hearts but do believe that we are the product of Yeah,
Speaker 1: we are the product of them. Now that's a tricky
Speaker 1: business there, because it's we're we're not going to discount
Speaker 1: all of evolution, but what we're really talking about there
Speaker 1: is the origin of species, which is a huge misunderstanding.
Speaker 1: The point being that if humans believe, the public believes
Speaker 1: that they are essentially animals and the product of this
Speaker 1: evolution and the focus of their life really is what
Speaker 1: materialism then consumerism, Well they like that just fine, and
Speaker 1: they would rather not tamper with that, and these discoveries
Speaker 1: most certainly would do that in the hearts and minds
Speaker 1: of people. Hence why I am here on this program.
Speaker 1: Do they not want us to believe in God? Mark?
Speaker 1: They don't. They don't want us to believe in God.
Speaker 1: M They pretend like religious freedom is the important to
Speaker 1: them or to the nation, But that's not the reality
Speaker 1: that they would prefer. Because you see a public that
Speaker 1: is devoted to a deity, and mind you, this has
Speaker 1: nothing to do with what someone what the reality is,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter, you can you know, we're not drawing
Speaker 1: any divisions here, but a public that is devout in
Speaker 1: their religious beliefs. Well, those their deity and their beliefs
Speaker 1: then are the supreme authority in their hearts and mind. However,
Speaker 1: if they are reduced to animals, you know, worker bees
Speaker 1: in a colony, well then the state authority is essentially
Speaker 1: their god. Why would they care mark what we believe? Mmm?
Speaker 1: Because they care about their delusional empires um power. Is
Speaker 1: this the simple answer. There they their rule, their rule
Speaker 1: over the masses, and there their empire, which by the way,
Speaker 1: again is kind of a delusion. It doesn't really belong
Speaker 1: to them. They think it does because they control the money. Um.
Speaker 1: But so that's yeah. They they they would just prefer
Speaker 1: our box, meaning our mental box, to be smaller, not larger.
Speaker 1: We started this program talking about the Kennewick Man. Can
Speaker 1: you explain a little bit more about him and why
Speaker 1: you believe there could be a little controversy here? Yes, so,
Speaker 1: Kennewick Man. The reason I wanted to begin with this
Speaker 1: is because Kennewick there's been for years, many years now,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure you're very familiar with this. There's been
Speaker 1: rumors and claims of it Smithsonian conspiracy, as we said,
Speaker 1: to distort human history, and most of these claims revolve
Speaker 1: around the early twentieth century, late nineteenth early twentieth century
Speaker 1: discoveries of abnormally large skeleton giants giants on Earth in
Speaker 1: the burial mounts, just like the ones I was speaking
Speaker 1: of earlier, Marietta, the Ohio River Valley. Okay, So Kennewick
Speaker 1: Man is the proverbial smoking gun that proves definitively here
Speaker 1: and now a Smithsonian conspiracy to distort human history by
Speaker 1: way of concealing abnormal human remains. Where are the remains
Speaker 1: as we speak? The Kennewick Man's remains as we speak,
Speaker 1: were allegedly repatriated to a secret location back near where
Speaker 1: he was discovered by indigenous tribe. Allegedly a ceremony with
Speaker 1: two hundred natives and some scientists allegedly repatriated these remains
Speaker 1: back in Kennewick, near where they were found, Allegedly. You
Speaker 1: still think they're at the Smithsonian, don't. I don't know,
Speaker 1: you know they're They're compromised. They're so compromised, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be surprised if they if they pulled some sort of scam,
Speaker 1: there would the skeleton of Kennewick show us that he
Speaker 1: might have been a giant. Yes, I think so. They
Speaker 1: claim he was five foot seven, one hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: some odd pounds, but I can prove definitively and by
Speaker 1: their own evidence. When when when the Kennewick controversy initially erupted,
Speaker 1: the Smithsonian, who likes to play hide and seek with
Speaker 1: these bones, was suddenly caught with their pants down and
Speaker 1: there was like a nine year court case over this
Speaker 1: and all that one. Yeah, exactly because of the controversy
Speaker 1: between the government, the scientists, and the Native Americans, there
Speaker 1: was suddenly mass media interest in these bones. Yeah. The
Speaker 1: Native American tribes claim those bones were theirs, right, Yes,
Speaker 1: yes they did. They had. The Native Americans claimed those
Speaker 1: are our bones and we want them repatriated under the Act,
Speaker 1: and the government, you know, I was sort of playing
Speaker 1: tug of war with them. Interestingly, the court ultimately ruled
Speaker 1: that the US Army Corps did act in bad faith
Speaker 1: and they ended up having to pay two million dollars
Speaker 1: with the Native Americans court costs. So they were by
Speaker 1: way of legal precedent, they were lying in course. But anyway,
Speaker 1: the point is mass media like NPR and and the Smithsonian,
Speaker 1: they were forced to reveal photographs of these bones, because
Speaker 1: there was too much interest by too many people who
Speaker 1: were not involved in any kind of conspiracy for them
Speaker 1: to play dumb like they normally do, or or just
Speaker 1: claim nonsense, right with the older bones, Oh, those bones
Speaker 1: never existed, whatever, But everybody knew these bones existed. Was
Speaker 1: a big story back in six it was. It was big.
Speaker 1: It was it was international news because of the scientific
Speaker 1: weight of it, you see, right. And so they, when
Speaker 1: they would normally not like to reveal these bones to
Speaker 1: anyone ever, they suddenly found themselves, you know, being hounded
Speaker 1: by powerful media journalists demanding photos of these bones that
Speaker 1: they know they have. And so if you carefully examine
Speaker 1: now the bones, the real bone photographs were quickly eclipsed
Speaker 1: by loads of photographs of replicas. Now they admit that
Speaker 1: they're replicas. But the trick it, the devil is in
Speaker 1: the detail those The replica's skull and skeleton is quite
Speaker 1: different than those original photos. If you examine those original
Speaker 1: photos carefully, what you discover is a radically deformed skull
Speaker 1: and a large skull at that a very very large, deformed,
Speaker 1: very I mean, I've seen a lot of form skulls
Speaker 1: in my day, and this is one of the most
Speaker 1: warped I've ever seen. Now, what makes that so significant? Yeah, so, well,
Speaker 1: it's not just the warped skull he all. Another more
Speaker 1: careful examination of the bones also reveals that he has
Speaker 1: five fingers on his right hand, but no thumb, and
Speaker 1: he has the additional bones for a thumb. He certainly
Speaker 1: had a thumb, and this would mean that he had
Speaker 1: six fingers, and that would make him a polydactyl. Was
Speaker 1: that common in that time period nine thousand years ago? Well,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you where it is common. Is it's common
Speaker 1: in ancient tradition in relation to narratives regarding these hybridized
Speaker 1: giant species, like the biblical Nephelim. Okay, the Book of
Speaker 1: Samuel specifically says cross between man and angel, right, correct,
Speaker 1: And that's right. The Nepheline, for any who are not familiar,
Speaker 1: according to the narrative, were the hybridized offspring of non
Speaker 1: human beings, angelic beings if you like, watchers, many names
Speaker 1: for them, and the daughter ran yes, thank you. And
Speaker 1: they interbred with mortals humans and they created these gigantic,
Speaker 1: invasive hybrids, and they were lawless and evil and cannibalistic.
Speaker 1: How tall would Ken A. Wick Man be if we
Speaker 1: were able to get to that skeleton? In your opinion, well,
Speaker 1: I could speculate. Now I can't prove this, but what
Speaker 1: is interesting about the photo of the skeleton is that
Speaker 1: the entire photo taken on a black surface. The bones
Speaker 1: are deliberately laid on a See. They did that on purpose,
Speaker 1: because now you have no reference scale reference. That's right,
Speaker 1: there's really no telling that thing to be huge. I suspect,
Speaker 1: and this is pure speculation, but I would guess that
Speaker 1: he was probably well over seven feet I would say
Speaker 1: he's between seven and eight feet tall. Listen to more
Speaker 1: Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at one am Eastern,
Speaker 1: and go to Coast to Coast am dot com for
Speaker 1: more