Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt America. It's time for
Speaker 1: a bigly backlash Seattle's police, retake the chaz how they
Speaker 1: make attackers into victims across the country, a billion dollar
Speaker 1: cut for the NYPD, new gender language you're supposed to use,
Speaker 1: and so much more. This is the Buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America great, Here
Speaker 1: a great American Again, the Buck Sexon Show begins. He's
Speaker 1: a great guy. Now, welcome, Welcome, everybody to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show and honor a privilege and a pleasure to
Speaker 1: have you here with me. Thank you so much for joining.
Speaker 1: So I want to get right to it because you
Speaker 1: may have seen last night the individual, the husband of
Speaker 1: the duo from out in Saint Louis, who had the
Speaker 1: temerity to try and defend himself, his home, his family
Speaker 1: from an angry mom threatening to kill them. Of course,
Speaker 1: now this has settled into two camps. The two political
Speaker 1: parties represent different sides of this issue. Now, on the
Speaker 1: one hand, you have Republicans who meekly and sort of
Speaker 1: quietly out of the side of their mouth, we'll say, yes,
Speaker 1: you should be able to I mean, come on, you
Speaker 1: should be able to defend yourself, right. And the Democrats
Speaker 1: who are like Dusi's racist Trump was all about retweeting
Speaker 1: it and both they're all freaking out saying that these
Speaker 1: are peaceful protests. I'm pretty sure it's illegal to threaten
Speaker 1: to kill somebody, especially as part of a mob that's
Speaker 1: rampaging through a neighborhood. But we all know that the
Speaker 1: multi multi millionaire overpaid babies on CNN for example, take
Speaker 1: the position, and then you know, how dare you stop
Speaker 1: these new civil rights heroes who are trapsing through your
Speaker 1: frontyard and threatening to kill you? How dare you stand
Speaker 1: in front of your home if you're lawfully registered and
Speaker 1: owned firearm? Well, why is it such a problem they
Speaker 1: ever want to stop? Oh they were so peaceful. Oh
Speaker 1: they they just wanted to have their voices heard. We
Speaker 1: will deal that. There's an essential lie. There's a very
Speaker 1: important component of this that I think has gotten not
Speaker 1: nearly enough attention. I'll return to it in just one moment.
Speaker 1: But here's Mark McCloskey, the Saint Louis man with a
Speaker 1: pink polo and an a R fifteen who has become
Speaker 1: something of a symbol. Because I can tell you this
Speaker 1: right now. If I were issues no socks loafers, if
Speaker 1: you will, I would certainly have been standing out in
Speaker 1: front of my home. I would have had a little
Speaker 1: bit better muzzle discipline. But not everyone has spent as
Speaker 1: much time at the range as other folks have. Right,
Speaker 1: but here is how this is being discussed, or here
Speaker 1: here's what he wants you to know. Play clip six.
Speaker 1: I saw it all going up in flames, and my
Speaker 1: life destroyed in an instant, and I did what I
Speaker 1: thought I had knew to protect my heart, my home,
Speaker 1: and my family. Well, no one was protecting you, and
Speaker 1: they were screaming at you and threatening you and threatening
Speaker 1: to murder your dog and harm you and your wife.
Speaker 1: What do you make of the attacks on you for
Speaker 1: doing what we used to believe every homeowner had an
Speaker 1: obligation to do. Why are they denouncing a racist? I
Speaker 1: don't understand. And you know, here's the interesting thing. I
Speaker 1: spend my career in defending people that are defenseless, for
Speaker 1: people that are having a hard time making their miracle happen,
Speaker 1: for people that don't have a voice. My black clients
Speaker 1: love us. The night that this happened. I had some
Speaker 1: of our black clients calling us up till two thirty
Speaker 1: in the morning telling us how wrong it was the
Speaker 1: way the press was writing us up, telling how wrong
Speaker 1: it was that we should be portrayed as racist. This
Speaker 1: is what I do for a living. I help people
Speaker 1: that are down and the need a hand and the
Speaker 1: people that need a voice. To call us racist is ridiculous,
Speaker 1: but it's necessary for the narrative. It's necessary because the
Speaker 1: symbolism of someone defending his home and using the Second
Speaker 1: Amendment to do it is an affront to this leftist movement.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter what was said, it doesn't matter what
Speaker 1: the real threat was. The left does not care. In fact,
Speaker 1: I can tell you this right now. If they had
Speaker 1: stormed this man's house, Let's say they had actually started
Speaker 1: throwing rocks, and some of these protesters had tried to
Speaker 1: rush hid, which obviously you'd think who would do that
Speaker 1: when someone has a weapon, But maybe they think he's
Speaker 1: not going to use it, and he did have to
Speaker 1: use this weapon in defense of his home. I guarantee
Speaker 1: you every Democrat in the country that would speak on
Speaker 1: this issue would be saying he needs to be tried
Speaker 1: for murder, not allowed to defend your home. How dare
Speaker 1: you there's a movement? Don't you understand what's at stake here?
Speaker 1: Don't you see the civil rights implications of these marchers
Speaker 1: in the streets. Oh, the marchers like the ones you know,
Speaker 1: the protesters and the riders like the ones here in
Speaker 1: New York who last night were chanting at the NYPD. NYPD,
Speaker 1: suck my blank These are the new civil rights heroes.
Speaker 1: Oh no, Buck, that was just one time. Really? What
Speaker 1: about pigs in a blanket? Fry him like bacon. What
Speaker 1: about the time that I heard over a month ago,
Speaker 1: my own ears, my own eyes, protesters screaming that horrid
Speaker 1: phrase at the NYPD. What about the protesters down in
Speaker 1: City Hall who are caught on video here in New
Speaker 1: York mocking the NYPD's saying they're so dumb they didn't
Speaker 1: go to fancy colleges. Can they even read saying this
Speaker 1: to officers, including a black officer that one of them
Speaker 1: went up to and said was a race trader? C
Speaker 1: and entreats these people like they have a valid grievance.
Speaker 1: MSNBC thinks that their civil rights heroes, the New York
Speaker 1: Times backs them to the hilt. In fact, The New
Speaker 1: York Times, the Washington Post, the lib media seems to
Speaker 1: have taken the approach that because they're worried about their
Speaker 1: position in society and their power and their influence in
Speaker 1: the Trump era, if they have to burn down this country,
Speaker 1: if they have to encourage the mob, incite the mob
Speaker 1: to ruin and riot, great. If they can't have it,
Speaker 1: no one can burn it all down. These people are
Speaker 1: a disgrace. I don't have a disagreement with them. I
Speaker 1: think they are odious. That's not the same thing. That's
Speaker 1: how I feel about all of the mainstream media pundits
Speaker 1: and reporters and all them. And of course the protesters
Speaker 1: on the streets who are doing these things. They're appalling.
Speaker 1: You don't hear much about it on some of the channels,
Speaker 1: do you. Why would anyone think that an officer who's
Speaker 1: done nothing wrong. The Democrat leadership, Biden and Pelosi and
Speaker 1: Schumer will say, well, you know, we know there are
Speaker 1: a lot of good cops. Really, because your protesters out
Speaker 1: on the street go up to cops at random, spin
Speaker 1: at them, throw things at them, say the most horrible
Speaker 1: things to them. So are they going after just the
Speaker 1: bad cops. Is that your because they go after cops
Speaker 1: all over the place constantly that they've just met, who
Speaker 1: have done nothing. This is all a fraud. This is
Speaker 1: all a fraud. But I wanted to get to what
Speaker 1: Saint Louis has really exposed. Why does why does this
Speaker 1: bother the Democrats so much? Why are they so upset
Speaker 1: by this? Because this could be the beginning of a backlash,
Speaker 1: not just in rhetorical terms, but in terms of individuals,
Speaker 1: citizens who say enough, who say that they will stand
Speaker 1: up to the mob, they will defend themselves and their property.
Speaker 1: No more looting, no more rioting. It might also encourage
Speaker 1: the feckless and weak Republican party that has done almost
Speaker 1: nothing to protect people in their homes and their rights
Speaker 1: during this time of anarchy and mob rage. Perhaps the
Speaker 1: Republicans will recognize that they have some authority and some
Speaker 1: power here too. Trump is saying that now they're going
Speaker 1: to arrest people for attacking statutes. I want to see
Speaker 1: these prosecutions. I want to see the fullest, the fullest
Speaker 1: extent of the law used to punish people who believe
Speaker 1: that they're above the law. But there's something else here
Speaker 1: that I think you must remember. Why did McCloskey and
Speaker 1: Saint Louis really strike such a nerve? He didn't did
Speaker 1: he harm anyone, did he kill anyone, did he wound anyone?
Speaker 1: He did nothing except stand outside his home on private
Speaker 1: property with his lawful firearm, making it clear that if
Speaker 1: they were going to try to burn out his house
Speaker 1: and kill him and his family, he was going to
Speaker 1: fight back, and that a few of them were going
Speaker 1: to go down in the process. That's often all you
Speaker 1: need for a bully or for a mob to know
Speaker 1: that they're not going to go forward with this if
Speaker 1: they think they're going to get hurt too. Whoa hold
Speaker 1: on a second, Now, this isn't all fun and games anymore.
Speaker 1: Who wants to be the first three across the threshold
Speaker 1: of that man's house that may get hit with a
Speaker 1: five five six round? That sends a very different message
Speaker 1: to the protesters, doesn't it all of a sudden. They're
Speaker 1: not in this position to have you cower in fear.
Speaker 1: They can protest on public property, they can protest as
Speaker 1: long as they abide by the law. But more importantly
Speaker 1: than anything else, they can protest as long as they
Speaker 1: don't think that that means that people will all have
Speaker 1: to hide in their own homes in fear, hoping the
Speaker 1: doesn't turn on them. You see, that's the part of
Speaker 1: this that you won't hear from the media. You're supposed
Speaker 1: to be scared of this mob, if you don't agree
Speaker 1: with it, You're supposed to be fearful to hide. I'm
Speaker 1: not supposed to stand up and say, you know, you
Speaker 1: have your right to free speech. I have my right
Speaker 1: to self defense, to private property and to defend myself
Speaker 1: in my family. They want you to think that you're
Speaker 1: not allowed to do that. They want you to believe
Speaker 1: that there's always this threat of force in the background
Speaker 1: of the mob. Has we've seen them use it? Why
Speaker 1: have there been so many instances of these protests? And
Speaker 1: we know there have been protest movements the Tea Party,
Speaker 1: of course, but there have been protest movements that were
Speaker 1: non violent, that we're law abiding, a peaceful Tea Party
Speaker 1: was entirely peaceful and entirely non violent. But they had
Speaker 1: a message. This is about more than that. These are
Speaker 1: revolutionaries who were hiding among a body of larger protesters,
Speaker 1: so that then they can always have this mostly peaceful
Speaker 1: construct to defend them. Oh no, it's mostly peaceful. There
Speaker 1: were one hundred protests theres only thirty of them were
Speaker 1: involved in the riot. So let's not disparage the whole thing. No,
Speaker 1: if you're part of a protest where there's a riot
Speaker 1: arm that's going to break off, you should be ashamed.
Speaker 1: You should be ashamed because your cause, at a minimum
Speaker 1: is hijacked. But as we know, they have no problem
Speaker 1: with this. The people that are breaking in the windows,
Speaker 1: that are lighting things, lighting stores on fire, toppling statues,
Speaker 1: attacking cops, they're just the action arm. They're the paramilitary
Speaker 1: wing of this Democrat movement. So remember that every time
Speaker 1: you see this talked about on TV. Oh no, it's peaceful.
Speaker 1: Sure it is in some places. In some places it's not,
Speaker 1: and that is part of the power of the movement.
Speaker 1: You better hide in your home when they march past
Speaker 1: your house because maybe you're Maybe you're that instance in
Speaker 1: which they decide to burn down things. Again, maybe you're
Speaker 1: that person, as we've seen in videos, who get attacked
Speaker 1: by Antifa, who gets beaten in the streets. Maybe not,
Speaker 1: but you better be quiet, You better stay inside. You
Speaker 1: better not stand up to them or else. They often
Speaker 1: use force, often enough that any rational person would be
Speaker 1: concerned about one of these mobs using force on them.
Speaker 1: The police aren't coming to your aid. The politics of
Speaker 1: these democrats cities have abandoned rule of law, have abandoned
Speaker 1: pillars of our civilization, quite honestly. So it's all on you.
Speaker 1: It's all on Americans taking it upon themselves to defend
Speaker 1: their own rights, their own safety, and their own freedoms.
Speaker 1: Can rely on the state anymore, not these police forces
Speaker 1: in these democrat controlled cities. But just remember, every time
Speaker 1: you stand up and assert your rights and say you
Speaker 1: will not bend the knee, you will not comply, the
Speaker 1: mob loses a little bit of power. Yet another person
Speaker 1: who does cower in fear is a strike against their
Speaker 1: ability to coerce and demand. And then don't like that
Speaker 1: very much. And I'm here to tell you more of
Speaker 1: us should do it. In fact, every person who cares
Speaker 1: about the future of this country should, if they're capable,
Speaker 1: if they're willing, in whatever way they see fit, stand
Speaker 1: up rhetorically however they should, however they can against this mob.
Speaker 1: It's on us. Government's not going to do it for us.
Speaker 1: It comes from citizens. That's why this situation on Saint
Speaker 1: Louis is so upsetting to the Democrats. What do you
Speaker 1: mean someone could say, not today, not my house. The
Speaker 1: cops have pulled away. You're supposed to be helpless. Will
Speaker 1: deign we the mob, will deign not to burn down
Speaker 1: your home this time. Maybe next time we will. You
Speaker 1: better bend the knee, chant blm at the top of
Speaker 1: your lungs. No, this individual decided that he wasn't going
Speaker 1: to wait to see what the mob thought it should
Speaker 1: do that day. I think a lot of us understand
Speaker 1: just what's at stake here. You're in the freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast, that's right,
Speaker 1: screaming vulgarities at all the cops in New York gathered
Speaker 1: together to protect their right to protest, screaming obscenities at them,
Speaker 1: because this is just about bad cops, right, This isn't
Speaker 1: a movement of anti cop hatred. Because Democrats have convinced
Speaker 1: themselves that the system is their enemy in any period,
Speaker 1: in any point, in any way where they can't control it.
Speaker 1: They have Hollywood, they have the news media, they have
Speaker 1: the Academy, they have Corporate America, they have the Democrat party,
Speaker 1: but anything, you know, the law that text all of
Speaker 1: us is an impediment to Democrat power police who are
Speaker 1: arresting people who break the law, irrespective of disparate impact
Speaker 1: on society or irrespective of what the optics look like
Speaker 1: in a certain place or time. The law is the law.
Speaker 1: That's an impediment to Democrats. That's an offense to their sensibilities.
Speaker 1: What do you mean the law is going to be
Speaker 1: enforced even if it means that some individuals are arrested
Speaker 1: one hundred times, that's unfair. Well, has that individual broken
Speaker 1: the law one hundred times? Like the guy that punched
Speaker 1: the old lady in the head walking past her in
Speaker 1: the street in New York City. Democrats don't want to
Speaker 1: ask those questions. That's too sane, that's too rational. In Seattle,
Speaker 1: I see, they finally decided to clear out the chaz
Speaker 1: or the chop depending on who you asked, the Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill Autonomous Zone or the Capitol Hill Occupy protest. Oh
Speaker 1: you mean this is occupy all over again? This leftist
Speaker 1: revolutionary Democrat movement has come back, same time, actic, same phrases,
Speaker 1: same everything. What did they accomplish the last time? Oh?
Speaker 1: They made some public squares really crowded and smelly. Did
Speaker 1: they change society for the better? No, they did not.
Speaker 1: Did they do anything that they could point to that
Speaker 1: a normal point person could point to and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're really proud of that. I'm sure they'd think of
Speaker 1: some obscure Oh, there's greater transparency for the cops in
Speaker 1: this neighborhood legislation. But we know that it's all crap.
Speaker 1: It's notable that in Seattle they only took action after
Speaker 1: two people were killed inside of the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone,
Speaker 1: and it's notable that they shut this thing down after
Speaker 1: they were already casualties. What is it this twenty three
Speaker 1: arrests as Seattle retake control of the East Precinct and
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill. Wait, you mean that it was a massive
Speaker 1: failure that the mayor Jenny Durkin issuing executive order to
Speaker 1: clear this area. This only came after it was clear
Speaker 1: that this was a really, really stupid idea that harmed people,
Speaker 1: that achieved nothing, and that was all rooted in a
Speaker 1: left wing delusion that the problem in society are cops.
Speaker 1: Cops doing their jobs and enforcing good laws. No, the
Speaker 1: real problems we have are people who are reckless, who
Speaker 1: don't think long term, who act out with violence, who
Speaker 1: believe that they're above the law, who believe that they're
Speaker 1: better than cops, They're better than people that are trying
Speaker 1: to do their jobs every day. Turn out, there were
Speaker 1: a lot of people who had firearms in the area
Speaker 1: of the Chaz in Seattle. Did any that Did that
Speaker 1: concern anybody that there were no cops allowed in people
Speaker 1: walking around with guns? No, of course not. Did it
Speaker 1: concern anybody when a twenty nine year old man is
Speaker 1: arrested who had a large metal pipe and a kitchen
Speaker 1: knife carrying around with him when he was in the
Speaker 1: Chaz with no cops around. No, that's not concerning, of
Speaker 1: course not. This was all going to be like the
Speaker 1: Summer of Love, man, this was gonna be great. Nope.
Speaker 1: Instead it was a free for all zone for Democrat
Speaker 1: voters who are also left wing idiots. And there was
Speaker 1: aggravated assault, larceny, theft, rape, and two murders. Two people
Speaker 1: died because of this little commi idiot experiment in Seattle.
Speaker 1: Will there be anyone mourning them? Will they be martyrs
Speaker 1: for the cause. No, they're already forgotten because that's what
Speaker 1: the left does, destroys and uses and then moves on.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Busts and show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. You cannot overstate how much the
Speaker 1: most elite institutions under liberal control have completely lost their minds,
Speaker 1: whether it's Yale University or NBC News or McDonald's big
Speaker 1: places in corporate America, Facebook, Google, Uber, nuts, totally nuts.
Speaker 1: No one willing to stand up and say, hey, we're
Speaker 1: all going to be adults, right, Like, we're not going
Speaker 1: to do this thing where we all pretend to care
Speaker 1: so much about something we don't really care about because
Speaker 1: it makes us feel good that we're gonna forget about
Speaker 1: in like a month or two, all because we hate
Speaker 1: Trump so very very much. It's absurd, it's crazy. But
Speaker 1: there's a Harvard student. Remember it's not just the institutions,
Speaker 1: the people who work in them get brainwashed. The graduates
Speaker 1: of these hallowed, hallowed universities. Oh yes, absolute brilliant, because
Speaker 1: I went to sessions such No one cares anymore, honestly,
Speaker 1: if you, if you pay attention to it, you know
Speaker 1: that this just doesn't matter. You don't know. It's a
Speaker 1: coin flip. If someone goes to even the fanciest school
Speaker 1: in the country, it's a coin flip. Are they smart
Speaker 1: or not? Who knows. It depends how they get there,
Speaker 1: why they get in. Someone donate a building in their name.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of that going around at the top
Speaker 1: levels of elite circles. Anyway, a Harvard graduate here named
Speaker 1: Clara jan Over said in a TikTok video, Now, TikTok
Speaker 1: is the new thing with the where the cool kids
Speaker 1: are these days. So I'm gonna make producer Mark create
Speaker 1: a TikTok video so that he can show us all
Speaker 1: of his cooking secrets and his favorite funky tunes or whatever.
Speaker 1: The kids doing TikTok. Do you have a TikTok account yet?
Speaker 1: I don't. We gotta get him a TikTok account. So
Speaker 1: it is. I will say I have a TikTok account
Speaker 1: because I want to know what the next generation is seeing.
Speaker 1: And it's a great tool. It reminds me of some
Speaker 1: of those old dystopian movies where they'll just show somebody,
Speaker 1: you know, a reel of footage and they'll just keep
Speaker 1: running in and running in, and it's a way of
Speaker 1: brainwashing people. TikTok is like that, you sit there just
Speaker 1: watching whatever you're into. You know, people doing little dance moves,
Speaker 1: people cooking food. People. There are some very good impressions,
Speaker 1: I will say, of political characters on there. But anyway,
Speaker 1: it's a Chinese spying site for whatever, if you care
Speaker 1: about that or not. The Chinese government controls this thing
Speaker 1: and is harvesting all the data. But a lot of
Speaker 1: people are gonna say, I don't care if China knows
Speaker 1: that I want to cook the best burger possible and
Speaker 1: learn how to do a shuffle dance. Nonetheless, TikTok is
Speaker 1: now Instagram. Too many people over thirty or on Instagram,
Speaker 1: so now it's migrating to TikTok. And this Harvard grad
Speaker 1: who I guess just finished at Harvard, I don't know
Speaker 1: who cares. She did teach me a new term, caucassity,
Speaker 1: which is a new made up word to left uses.
Speaker 1: Caucassity is a combination of audacious or audacity and Caucasian.
Speaker 1: So if you do something and you don't check your privilege,
Speaker 1: you're using caucasity. I would say that the liberals are
Speaker 1: using jackassery and that's the defining, that's the word that
Speaker 1: we should use to define their approach to all this stuff.
Speaker 1: But they can say called Cassidy anyway. Here's the video.
Speaker 1: They're claiming it's satire, but producer Mark please hit it
Speaker 1: next person who has the sheer nerve the sheer entitled
Speaker 1: Cassidy to say all lives matter, I'm a stab you.
Speaker 1: I'm a I'm a stab you, and while you're struggling
Speaker 1: and bleeding out, I'm gonna show you my paper cut
Speaker 1: and say my cut matters too. She sounds like a
Speaker 1: total psycho. I don't know. This has now been viewed,
Speaker 1: It's gone viral to newe hundreds of thousands of times,
Speaker 1: and we're supposed to believe that when she's saying, if
Speaker 1: you say all lives matter, I'm gonna stab you. Now look,
Speaker 1: I don't think that she's really gonna actually stab anybody,
Speaker 1: but what a crazy thing to say. Harvard Grad's now
Speaker 1: walk around saying if you, if you claim all lives matter,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna stab you. Why why exactly are you not
Speaker 1: allowed to say all lives matter? All would include black?
Speaker 1: So oh no, because the purpose of saying black lives
Speaker 1: matter and telling people that they have to agree with
Speaker 1: it is to get them to bay a political movement
Speaker 1: by using a phrase that no normal, reasonable human being
Speaker 1: would even think a half a second about before saying,
Speaker 1: of course, black lives matter. But the purpose of it
Speaker 1: is not to see if people really agree. And also,
Speaker 1: let's understand this, if someone really was such a hateful
Speaker 1: bigot that they had a problem with that phrase, having
Speaker 1: them say it doesn't change anything. As another part of
Speaker 1: this too, this is all about the optics and the
Speaker 1: politics of it. No, why wouldn't you say black lives matter?
Speaker 1: Trust me, Under the right circumstances, you can get somebody
Speaker 1: to say anything if they think it's in their interest.
Speaker 1: Doesn't change what's in their heart. That's why this whole thing,
Speaker 1: this whole game, is absurd. You're making people agree with
Speaker 1: something that they constantly already agree with. Everyone agrees with it.
Speaker 1: So what are we doing? What are you even talking about?
Speaker 1: But if you go to Harvard, Oh I went to Harvard,
Speaker 1: you can run around saying you're gonna stab somebody if
Speaker 1: they say all lives matter. That would be a very
Speaker 1: unwise thing for her to do. Now, she's claiming that
Speaker 1: it's satire. It doesn't sound like satire. That sounds like
Speaker 1: a threat. I don't think it's funny either, And it's
Speaker 1: just as even if it is supposed to be satire.
Speaker 1: She clearly is a BLM want to be activist. So
Speaker 1: that's how upset, that's how enraged she gets by the
Speaker 1: notion that all lives matter. My friends, these people are unhinged.
Speaker 1: We are living in a period of mass media and
Speaker 1: mass hysteria, and the results are not good. You have
Speaker 1: far too many Americans who are bombarded with propaganda. They
Speaker 1: don't even know what propaganda is. They don't know the
Speaker 1: origins of the term of the word or the history
Speaker 1: of it. They don't believe that they should have any
Speaker 1: exposure to harmful thoughts. They've created these cocoons of the
Speaker 1: mind for themselves where they're not allowed to be exposed
Speaker 1: to anything else. It's just going to be the constant
Speaker 1: echo chamber of BuzzFeed listicals and MSNBC slams. And then
Speaker 1: they turn on the Daily Show. Everyone knows stinks, right,
Speaker 1: it's a bad show. They turn on this stuff and yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, Oh man, you would John, one of us
Speaker 1: said he it was Laura, I made from Britain, and
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna make fun of all the stupid Republicans
Speaker 1: and curse a lord and hit the table. Now that
Speaker 1: that's not actually convincing me of anything, but I do
Speaker 1: love that the lives love to bring over liberal people
Speaker 1: from Britain to lecture all of us and how stupid
Speaker 1: the second amount, how stupid Americans are. Yeah, thank you
Speaker 1: for that. We really really want to hear what they
Speaker 1: have to say. Sure. Can you imagine being an American
Speaker 1: and showing up in Great Britain being like, hey, hey, guys, um,
Speaker 1: what's going on with the queen? You want to explain
Speaker 1: this to me? Come on and on a news show
Speaker 1: where you're talking to nothing but Brits. Hey, somebody telling
Speaker 1: me about the Queen. I don't I don't understand this thing.
Speaker 1: What are you guys doing here? People would think, you know,
Speaker 1: you're probably a little out of your out of your element.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, but no, no, not here. You know,
Speaker 1: whether it's your CNN importing Piers Morgan or John Oliver,
Speaker 1: they love all the Libs so impressed, so impressed by
Speaker 1: British accents. Some on our side are too. I'm gonna say,
Speaker 1: I know, I know, it's we got a little bit
Speaker 1: of a little bit of that going on, But oh,
Speaker 1: my friends, this is a period of insanity we are
Speaker 1: going through. At least I have all of you to
Speaker 1: keep me sane, because there's no other way to understand
Speaker 1: this other than these people are completely nuts if they've
Speaker 1: totally lost it. Here you've got somebody from the Democratic
Speaker 1: Socialists of America, which is really just a a group
Speaker 1: meant to help the Democrat Party, but to pretend that
Speaker 1: there's something really different and distinct. Oh no, we're not
Speaker 1: the Democratic Socialist of America. We're the Democrat Party. Sure
Speaker 1: you are. But here she is saying the defunding the
Speaker 1: police is not enough play fifteen. Yeah, there's too many
Speaker 1: uniform police in New York City. And furthermore, when we
Speaker 1: talked about defunding the NYPD, the other part of that
Speaker 1: is to fully fund social services. I can tell you
Speaker 1: out of the encampment, it's obvious we have some of
Speaker 1: the most vulnerable members of our community coming out to
Speaker 1: have their voices heard and start to participate in this encampment,
Speaker 1: and it's clear that what they're saying they need is services,
Speaker 1: mental health services, social services, adequate housing, you know, affordable
Speaker 1: health care, you know, the quality education. These are the
Speaker 1: things that the community is crying out for. And so
Speaker 1: it's not good enough to move money around in fancy
Speaker 1: accounting strikes. It's not good enough to just defund the
Speaker 1: MPT even we have to meet that services that are
Speaker 1: fully funded as well. I mean, this would be laughable
Speaker 1: in a sixth grade social studies class. Yeah, we don't
Speaker 1: need the cops. We just like, we just want all
Speaker 1: the services to be funded. What what? What services are
Speaker 1: currently unfunded? Does she even know? Does she know that
Speaker 1: de Blasio's wife? Sure, Lane McCrae never elected to anything.
Speaker 1: But hey, the Republicans, we're not allowed to criticize nepotism.
Speaker 1: I've been telling you that this is a problem we're
Speaker 1: going to run into. Now what are we gonna do?
Speaker 1: I hope, I hope that was worth it. We're all
Speaker 1: kind of quiet on that one. We'll see. We've got
Speaker 1: our we've got our own problem with that going on
Speaker 1: in the Republican Party. And people didn't want to Oh no,
Speaker 1: I had people said, oh no, they're a very wise choice. No,
Speaker 1: it really is not a wise choice. It's not a
Speaker 1: precedent we want to set. We don't have monarchs here,
Speaker 1: we don't have people giving things to their giving things
Speaker 1: to their family members. But look, I know Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: and Hillary I mean, this has been around for a while,
Speaker 1: but it's really we should not do this. But anyway,
Speaker 1: Schirlane McCray, who's the wife of the mayor of New York,
Speaker 1: spent eight hundred million dollars on some mental health program.
Speaker 1: And anytime a city mental health program, anytime someone says
Speaker 1: what exactly did you do or did it accomplish, it's like, oh,
Speaker 1: we don't you know, I don't know. Ask somebody else.
Speaker 1: There's no no, they have nothing. They have nothing. What
Speaker 1: are the social services that maybe the schools in New York?
Speaker 1: We all have this image in our head. And I
Speaker 1: know this is true of public schools and rough neighborhoods
Speaker 1: across the country. But schools, you know, you go back
Speaker 1: all these movies in the nineties of a teacher who's
Speaker 1: in a rough neighborhood public school and just wants to
Speaker 1: help the kids and turn it all around and like
Speaker 1: teaches them some poetry and then everyone's behaving themselves and
Speaker 1: being like really nice to each other. Right, sure, but
Speaker 1: you always have the you know, the ceilings falling in
Speaker 1: and there's no books, and it looks like it looks
Speaker 1: like bombed out Beirut in these public schools. Maybe in
Speaker 1: the nineties that was true, that's not true anymore. I
Speaker 1: have a friend who works at a school, in a
Speaker 1: public school in New York that's considered one of the
Speaker 1: renaissance schools. Here, tons of funding. They're spending more on
Speaker 1: these students than most people spend on private school in
Speaker 1: the rest of the country. Okay, they have the best
Speaker 1: teachers in the public schoo system that they get to pick.
Speaker 1: They have the best resources, everything that they need, and
Speaker 1: the schools are their facility is brand new, you know,
Speaker 1: nice computers in every classroom. And guess what test scores
Speaker 1: haven't budged, haven't budged. Say, wait, what's going on. I
Speaker 1: don't understand. I thought it was just resources. No, but
Speaker 1: they don't want to they don't want to talk about that. No,
Speaker 1: they'd rather shut down charter schools in New York operating
Speaker 1: outside the traditional number of charter schools are publicly funded, right,
Speaker 1: but operating outside the Democrat power base of the teachers unions,
Speaker 1: charter schools that in some cases, I mean here in Harlem,
Speaker 1: there's Harlem Success Academy. The school is almost entirely black
Speaker 1: and Hispanic. And those those young children, those boys and
Speaker 1: girls are outperforming on math and science. They're peers at
Speaker 1: schools across the state on testing. So it can be done.
Speaker 1: No one's saying it can't be done. But just throwing
Speaker 1: money at the problem isn't going to solve it. You
Speaker 1: know what one thing that charter schools do that democrats
Speaker 1: really don't like. There are a couple of things that
Speaker 1: charter schools don't like. And I can just speak through
Speaker 1: it in the context of New York. I know they're
Speaker 1: different in different places across the country. One, it takes
Speaker 1: away from the power base of the teachers unions, which
Speaker 1: are just a machinery for electing Democrats. Give them, you know,
Speaker 1: the shortest working schedule possible for the teachers, the fattest
Speaker 1: health and pension benefits possible, and all you have is
Speaker 1: the teachers union. And of course the teachers tend to
Speaker 1: be liberal anyway. But the I know a couple of conservatives,
Speaker 1: but they'll just make sure Democrats keep getting elected. That's
Speaker 1: part one. You know what part two is for some
Speaker 1: of these charter schools, and Democrats don't like parents have
Speaker 1: to agree to be involved to parents have to sign
Speaker 1: on for the charter school approach and experience, They have
Speaker 1: to come to parent teacher meetings, they have to make
Speaker 1: sure that child is in school on time. So there's
Speaker 1: a component of individual investment and yes, individual responsibility, and
Speaker 1: it works. It works for kids who are black and
Speaker 1: Hispanic in New York who are coming out of Section
Speaker 1: eight housing. It works. But Democrats don't like that. That's
Speaker 1: not the message that they want to tell. That's why
Speaker 1: they tried to shut down Success Academy in New York.
Speaker 1: That's why Obama when he came into office, initially was
Speaker 1: going to shut down charter schools in DC and there
Speaker 1: was a big backlash against it. His kids were going
Speaker 1: to a thirty five thousand dollars year private school, of course,
Speaker 1: but charter schools in DC for minority students that you know,
Speaker 1: predominantly minority students that are doing really well, Oh well,
Speaker 1: that's a threat to the established order of the public
Speaker 1: school system, which is about a jobs program for adults
Speaker 1: and a vote churnout, turnout system. Churn votes, turnout votes
Speaker 1: for Democrats. That's what the public school system is really about.
Speaker 1: So all these people, all these activist say, oh, we
Speaker 1: need better funding whatever. No, We've already run these experiments
Speaker 1: in cities across the country. We know what works and doesn't.
Speaker 1: They don't want to do things that work. They want
Speaker 1: to spit at cops, pretend that the problem is the
Speaker 1: enforcement of law, not the committing of crime, and not
Speaker 1: look at what's already being done for social services. And
Speaker 1: why why is are such a need for social services?
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe the breakdown of the family is
Speaker 1: a concern for people. You're in the Freedom Hud. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. My question to you is,
Speaker 1: can't you give us a little bit more on schools
Speaker 1: so we can get back to school That there's a
Speaker 1: great deal of evidence and it's actually good, good evidence.
Speaker 1: The kids aren't transmitting this it's rare, and the kids
Speaker 1: are staying healthy, and that yes, we can open our schools.
Speaker 1: I feel very strongly we need to do whatever we
Speaker 1: can to get the children back to school. So I
Speaker 1: think we are in lock agreement with that. Even doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci is like, yo, look, okay, We've had months in
Speaker 1: a mitigation, you know, up down, sometimes up, sometimes down.
Speaker 1: Who knows, got a lot of numbers coming in, A
Speaker 1: little scary scanned because I want you to always be scanned.
Speaker 1: That's Saint Fauci Rule number one, be terrified. Rule number two.
Speaker 1: Do everything I say, even when it's wrong, and even
Speaker 1: when I change my mind every two months. But I
Speaker 1: don't think that children should go to the school. But
Speaker 1: here's the problem. Even though we understand that children are
Speaker 1: at an entirely acceptable risk level from COVID nineteen, and
Speaker 1: we have months and months of data, millions and millions
Speaker 1: of cases to look at, children are basically fine when
Speaker 1: they get this. They don't even know they have it.
Speaker 1: Think about this, We're worried about kids getting a disease
Speaker 1: that is so dangerous for children that children who have
Speaker 1: it don't even know, They don't have symptoms, that don't
Speaker 1: feel sick, they are asymptomatic. Why then, you would ask,
Speaker 1: is it even a question that public schools would at
Speaker 1: all schools would not be open this fall? Ah, it's
Speaker 1: that interesting. Remember we talking before about the Democrat machinery
Speaker 1: of the public school system. Union bosses who run those
Speaker 1: systems and those school superintendents and chancellors, and you know
Speaker 1: we're making two three four hundred thousand dollars a year
Speaker 1: to push some paper around and talking about, Oh, our
Speaker 1: public school system is doing great. Give us more money,
Speaker 1: you know, take the taxpayers. Take the taxpayers harder in cash, more,
Speaker 1: raise their property taxes. That's what they do. They understand
Speaker 1: the stakes for this fall. Kids go back to school,
Speaker 1: people can go back to work, People can go back
Speaker 1: to work. Kids are in school. Things start to look better,
Speaker 1: the economy start to pick up a little bit. Because
Speaker 1: there's no epidemiological reason really not to have a K
Speaker 1: through twelve education. You're not going to open the schools
Speaker 1: based on what even Faucci knows. And when Faucci knows
Speaker 1: that something isn't dangerous, you better be darned certain that
Speaker 1: it's safe. Kids need to be in school. Open them
Speaker 1: all up this fall. Thanks for listening to The Bus
Speaker 1: Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Some
Speaker 1: of you may be wondering why I seem to have
Speaker 1: a beef. If you will with saying Fauci, I mean
Speaker 1: for one thing, I just like to do the Fauci
Speaker 1: voice on the show, that's for sure. It's just fun.
Speaker 1: You can really lean into it, you know. I want
Speaker 1: to start doing a short series of videos like Fauci
Speaker 1: at the ball park. Hey, you know, a hot dog
Speaker 1: usually safe, but I cannot tell right now, I don't
Speaker 1: have the data. Did you cook it to one hundred
Speaker 1: and sixty degree internal temperature? If not, there's bacterium. I'm
Speaker 1: a scientist. I know that bacteria could grow and it
Speaker 1: could give me well we in the scientific community call
Speaker 1: a tummy ache. And I would rather while I'm here
Speaker 1: engage in mitigation with my mask on watching a game
Speaker 1: by myself, because of course no one can go in
Speaker 1: the stands, you get it right. We'd like to joke
Speaker 1: around about about the mister Fauci alumni of my high school,
Speaker 1: which I always just think is so funny. What a
Speaker 1: small world world, But he he is out there telling
Speaker 1: people to be very afraid, and I'm I'm really sick
Speaker 1: of this routine. I think enough is enough. And here
Speaker 1: is an example of remember we've been going through this
Speaker 1: now where it was what lockdown again in March, March, April, May, June,
Speaker 1: going in July. We're in at least March, April, May, June, July.
Speaker 1: We're in the fifth month of this now of lockdown.
Speaker 1: And as I've been telling you, we're still in. We're
Speaker 1: just in semi lockdown. We're not in a phase of reopen.
Speaker 1: We're in a phase of lockdown. We should start to
Speaker 1: think of it that way, because this is oppressive and
Speaker 1: tyrannical and stupid. Doesn't make any sense the other some
Speaker 1: of them. Yeah, sure, sure, some of the stuff about
Speaker 1: mass gatherings, you know, you could have you could have
Speaker 1: stopped that all along. But all this other stuff, Oh,
Speaker 1: you can't do this, You can't do that. You know,
Speaker 1: it's insane. It hasn't saved it hasn't saved lives. The
Speaker 1: data doesn't suggest that it has saved lives. Look at
Speaker 1: countries have lockdowns, don't have lockdowns, Some do really well,
Speaker 1: some don't. How healthy is a population, how much the
Speaker 1: disease spread before we ever know about it. There's all
Speaker 1: these factors. No one ever talks about that though. Just
Speaker 1: listen to fauci and you'll be fine. But step one
Speaker 1: of Fauciism be terrified. Okay, Well, here he is telling
Speaker 1: us that even though we're about what forty thousand cases
Speaker 1: a day, he could see us getting very quickly to
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand play seven. I can't make an accurate prediction,
Speaker 1: but it is going to be very disturbing. I will
Speaker 1: guarantee you that, because when you have an outbreak in
Speaker 1: one part of the country, even though in other parts
Speaker 1: of the country they're doing well, they are vulnerable. I
Speaker 1: made that point very clearly last week at a press conference.
Speaker 1: We can't just focus on those areas that are having
Speaker 1: the surge. It puts the entire country at risk. We
Speaker 1: are now having forty plus thousand new cases a day.
Speaker 1: I would not be surprised if we go up to
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand a day if this does not turn around,
Speaker 1: and so I am very concerned. If we have one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand cases a day and hospitals are not overwhelmed,
Speaker 1: and the fatality rate nationwide continues to go down, there's
Speaker 1: nothing to be concerned about. We are dealing with this,
Speaker 1: and we are making progress toward herd immunity. That's what
Speaker 1: That's what he's not telling you. We have all these
Speaker 1: people that are all you know, waight Foot. A vaccine
Speaker 1: might be six months might be six years, we don't know,
Speaker 1: but just wait any day now or any decade, We're
Speaker 1: not sure. No, I don't want to sit around and
Speaker 1: have my life completely destroyed, ruined because these morons insist
Speaker 1: that we not learn lessons from the beginning of this
Speaker 1: lockdown and look at what we now know that we
Speaker 1: did not know then. But there's something else that he
Speaker 1: said that is particularly I would argue, particularly in idious.
Speaker 1: Notice it's not just oh, there's a surgeon cases in
Speaker 1: some areas. He's like, we need to think about this
Speaker 1: as a surgeon cases in some areas. There for all areas.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, it's coming your way. Those if you listen
Speaker 1: to this right now, who are in parts of Indiana
Speaker 1: or Florida, or North Carolina or North Carolina has had
Speaker 1: a big surge. But you know, wherever you are in
Speaker 1: the country, you know, if you're listening in Iowa, Montana, Arizona,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. The left is pushing, The Democrats are pushing
Speaker 1: with Saint Fauci at the front of the pack for
Speaker 1: everybody to get pushed back into lockdown. That's what this is.
Speaker 1: If the cases get high enough, they'll try to scare
Speaker 1: you into going back into lockdown. But I'm here to
Speaker 1: tell you this is what we have not and I
Speaker 1: will return and if in two weeks on this I'm wrong,
Speaker 1: I promise you I will come on air and I'll say, guys,
Speaker 1: I was wrong. I was wrong about this one. But
Speaker 1: I'm not going to forget this. So keep this in mind.
Speaker 1: There's a there's a reality here. There's a record that
Speaker 1: we're establishing as we go forward. I mean, I'm here
Speaker 1: to remind you that while Saint Fauci is speculating about
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand cases a day, and we're supposed to
Speaker 1: panic again nationally, not just in one area that's having
Speaker 1: a spike, the whole country. As of yesterday, the number
Speaker 1: of deaths in the twenty four hours proceeding was three
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy across the entirety of the United States.
Speaker 1: So you have three hundred and thirty million people, give
Speaker 1: or take, and that's not including illegal aliens, three hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty million Americans, or maybe that is including I
Speaker 1: don't know, although we always think that numbers lover, I digress,
Speaker 1: And three hundred and seventy people died from a pandemic
Speaker 1: that we are told we have to shut down society
Speaker 1: for again. Look, every life lost is a tragedy. We've
Speaker 1: already gone through the false choice of if it saves
Speaker 1: just one life, shutdown all of society. We don't do
Speaker 1: that for anything else, because that's insane. And yes, there
Speaker 1: are people who are at risk from this disease, older people.
Speaker 1: There are people who are risk every day from dying
Speaker 1: of heart attacks and cancer and other and pneumonia and
Speaker 1: the flu and other diseases too. This is just what
Speaker 1: it means to live in a very large country with
Speaker 1: a big population. There are going to people who die
Speaker 1: every day from different things. Here's what I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: if if we allow them to get their way, they're
Speaker 1: going to lock us down again. Even though fatalities are
Speaker 1: eighty percent down on a daily basis from what they
Speaker 1: were in April May, at least eighty percent. I mean,
Speaker 1: you were looking at, depending on whose numbers you want to,
Speaker 1: you know, two to three thousand dead a day at
Speaker 1: the at the peak of this, and now we're at
Speaker 1: three hundred and seventy. And what they're telling us, of course,
Speaker 1: is us wait two weeks, Just wait two weeks. That's
Speaker 1: when you'll really see how terrible this is I'll come
Speaker 1: back to you, mark market on the calendar. I'll come
Speaker 1: back to you on July fifteenth, and we will look
Speaker 1: at where we are. And you know, if we are
Speaker 1: under let's say, under a thousand fatalities a day from this,
Speaker 1: that means that this is under control. That's what it means,
Speaker 1: because we'll have seen you know, yeah, it might it
Speaker 1: might be three hundred, it might be five hundred, but
Speaker 1: I mean we're talking about a huge population Peo. We're
Speaker 1: talking about hundreds of deaths from something that we're going
Speaker 1: to shut down the entire country, or three hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty million people. So unless we get at unless we
Speaker 1: start getting numbers similar to that's why I set a thousand.
Speaker 1: But you know, thousand and fifteen hundred, two thousand a
Speaker 1: day and not all. You know, if you have one
Speaker 1: day where it's fifteen hundred and then the next day
Speaker 1: it's two hundred. This just has to do with the reporting, right.
Speaker 1: It's not that one all of a sudden, a lot
Speaker 1: of people die and then then no one dies from this.
Speaker 1: But fatalities are the single most important metric you can
Speaker 1: use to see how under control this is. And then
Speaker 1: there's another part of this too. Even if it turns
Speaker 1: out that we are in a spike and lethality is
Speaker 1: going up for reasons that a lot of people will
Speaker 1: be arguing over in the weeks ahead, we already decided this.
Speaker 1: This was already talked about as a country. This was
Speaker 1: told to us by all the politicians. Donald Trump has
Speaker 1: said this, Democrats have said this. We are not going
Speaker 1: to lock down forever. We have to go on living
Speaker 1: our lives. So even in two weeks, if I come
Speaker 1: back and you have to say, look, I was wrong
Speaker 1: that the fatality rate did increase in a way where
Speaker 1: clearly this disease has gotten a second wind against us,
Speaker 1: it still doesn't mean we should shut down the whole country.
Speaker 1: Still doesn't mean we should shut down the whole country.
Speaker 1: So so this is take this day as a marker,
Speaker 1: and we'll see where we are in two weeks. Because
Speaker 1: we we keep predicting what they're going to do and
Speaker 1: what their reaction will be, and how they're going to
Speaker 1: try to politically exploit this, and then they act like
Speaker 1: we didn't predict it and they didn't do exactly what
Speaker 1: we said they were going to, And we're still supposed
Speaker 1: to listen to them. Here's the Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick,
Speaker 1: for example, talking about how he views same Fauci play eighteen.
Speaker 1: Reality is a lot different. We've had two thousand, two
Speaker 1: hundred and rather two thousand, four hundred and twenty four
Speaker 1: people die, and New York has had over thirty one thousand.
Speaker 1: Even California has had almost three times as much as Texas.
Speaker 1: And remember, Laura, those two states have been locked down
Speaker 1: the whole time while we have been open. So locking
Speaker 1: down doesn't work. If it did, those two states would
Speaker 1: be going better than Texas. Fauci said today that he's
Speaker 1: concerned about states like Texas that skipped over certain things.
Speaker 1: He doesn't know what he's talking about. We haven't skipped
Speaker 1: over anything. Everything I'm skipping over is listening to him.
Speaker 1: You know, you have a lot of doctors on your show.
Speaker 1: From day one, your doctors have been right almost every time,
Speaker 1: and he has been wrong every time on every issue.
Speaker 1: I don't need his advice anymore. Will listen to a
Speaker 1: lot of science, will listen to a lot of doctors,
Speaker 1: and Governor Abbitt, myself and other state leaders will make
Speaker 1: the decision. No thank you, doctor Fauci, No thank you
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci. A lot more people have to say this.
Speaker 1: And I give credit to Lieutenant Governor Patrick here for
Speaker 1: saying what is obvious. And I've been telling you for months.
Speaker 1: Foucci has been wrong and wrong and wrong again. Why
Speaker 1: are we listening to this person? What does he know?
Speaker 1: What has he told you that you did not already know?
Speaker 1: Wear a mask, don't wear a mask, wash your hands,
Speaker 1: social distance, but I actually wear a mask washing your hands.
Speaker 1: We think it works wearing a mask. Maybe got to
Speaker 1: wear a mask. Don't wear a mask. You're not believing
Speaker 1: in the science. We can only deal with these so
Speaker 1: many times. We can only hear them be wrong so
Speaker 1: many times before we decide that this is just too much.
Speaker 1: And then you after a call the polytics involved. Democrats
Speaker 1: want the country afraid. They want the economy frozen. They
Speaker 1: want things looking bleak and miserable going into November. And
Speaker 1: they don't have to get us all the way to
Speaker 1: November in lockdown for that to happen. They just want
Speaker 1: to extend this out as long as they can so
Speaker 1: that the up ramp to get us back to feeling
Speaker 1: good about the country is more steep. We have less time.
Speaker 1: They're trying to run out the clock on America's recovery.
Speaker 1: That's what Democrats are trying to do. That is the
Speaker 1: purpose of so much of what we're hearing right now
Speaker 1: from them, and we need to remember that. You know,
Speaker 1: here's here's Vice President Pence, thankfully, who is saying that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you look at fatalities, we're actually doing really well
Speaker 1: as a country in handling this pandemic right now, if
Speaker 1: you look at the per capita numbers, I would add,
Speaker 1: we did better than all the major countries in Europe,
Speaker 1: meaning large countries in Europe, Germany, Italy, France, Okay, better
Speaker 1: than all of them. Germany, US I think are pretty close.
Speaker 1: But well, so what does this storyline? We keep getting
Speaker 1: told that Trump failed dereliction of duty, that idiot Biden says,
Speaker 1: it's all nonsense. Pence is saying, Look, we have the
Speaker 1: lowest fatalities play clipped thirteen and because of the dedication
Speaker 1: of our healthcare workers, because of our response and the
Speaker 1: response of the American people, we are grateful that today
Speaker 1: of fatalities are at the lowest level since the end
Speaker 1: of March. We continue to be vigilant as we see
Speaker 1: rising cases. We understand that that could that could change.
Speaker 1: But again to see the precipitous decline in fatalities is
Speaker 1: a tribute to the healthcare workers in this country and
Speaker 1: to the cooperation and the compassion of the American people.
Speaker 1: We are beating this thing. We are winning against the virus.
Speaker 1: You don't hear that from people got found You even
Speaker 1: got one hundred thousand cases ah mass hysteria, dogs and
Speaker 1: cats living together. No, no, that is not what is happening.
Speaker 1: Younger people intermingling who are at low risk from the
Speaker 1: disease with much more testing going on, is not a
Speaker 1: cause for another lockdown. It is getting us to the
Speaker 1: herd immunity that we need and also maybe an indicator
Speaker 1: of the virus weakening, which Italian doctors who are ahead
Speaker 1: of us on this curve in terms of the timing,
Speaker 1: they've been saying that there are prominent Italian doctors who
Speaker 1: say they believe the virus is weakening. And that's obviously
Speaker 1: a very complicated process, but it involves some human immune
Speaker 1: systems that are you know, that are making it when
Speaker 1: the virus is making it such that when the virus
Speaker 1: is transmitted, it's a less virulent strain. After dealing with
Speaker 1: certain people who have after dealing with their immune systems.
Speaker 1: We don't even really understand the mechanisms of this. I mean,
Speaker 1: keep in mind, we can't cure the common cold. Right,
Speaker 1: there's a lot here that is even beyond signs his
Speaker 1: ability to predict and even in some cases to really understand.
Speaker 1: But this is the truth of it. And oh and
Speaker 1: also remember how we were here. Oh, we don't have enough,
Speaker 1: we don't have enough, ppe, we don't have the ventilators.
Speaker 1: We bull Trump gets no credit for this. Now, we
Speaker 1: had Cuomo day after day giving press comments, Oh, we're
Speaker 1: not gonna have it on ventilated. Oh we're gonna run
Speaker 1: out of everything. Oh we're all gonna die. I mean,
Speaker 1: he was the worst. Cuomo was the worst on this.
Speaker 1: They were talking about making him president after I mean
Speaker 1: while this was going on. That's how stupid the media is.
Speaker 1: Here's here's the vice president who's been in charge of
Speaker 1: this everything. Look, we've got we're all stacked, a stacked,
Speaker 1: racked and ready to go here to help people to
Speaker 1: get them the care that they need. Play fourteen with
Speaker 1: regard to testing, with regard to personal protective equipment, with
Speaker 1: regard to ventilators, with regard to therapeutic medicines. We are
Speaker 1: in a strong position all across the affected areas of
Speaker 1: the country to meet this moment. But in consultation with
Speaker 1: the States, we're going to make sure that they have
Speaker 1: reinforcements in healthcare workers. They've got what they need. They've
Speaker 1: got what they need. So there we are, there, we
Speaker 1: have it. That's what you're not hearing from other folks.
Speaker 1: That's what you're not hearing from other people. You're not
Speaker 1: hearing from the media because they don't want to tell
Speaker 1: you the truth about this. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. But I start
Speaker 1: off with the premise Mike that I'm going to follow
Speaker 1: the docs orders, not just for me, but for the country.
Speaker 1: And that means that I am not going to be
Speaker 1: holding rallies. Oh what a convenient circumstance. Not gonna be
Speaker 1: holding rallies. Wow, that's that's because Biden believes in the
Speaker 1: science so much, not because he doesn't want to be
Speaker 1: in front of Let's be honest, a few thousand people,
Speaker 1: Max who are like and hear him saying, that's why
Speaker 1: I'm that's why I'm running for head dog catcher or Tuscaloosa.
Speaker 1: I mean, President, you know, that's what's really good. But ohto,
Speaker 1: he's just believing the Fauci wisdom. That's what he's doing.
Speaker 1: He's just trying to help doctor Fauci get the message out.
Speaker 1: No rallies, no rallies. Why doesn't Biden condemn the rallies
Speaker 1: that are happening constantly on the streets. I'm just wondering
Speaker 1: if he's so worried about health, if he's not willing
Speaker 1: to hold his own rallies because of health concerns, and
Speaker 1: clearly this virus can be lethal, So doesn't he Why
Speaker 1: doesn't he have any words of criticism for the movements
Speaker 1: going across the country right now? Why not? What about that? No? Oh,
Speaker 1: no BLM protests. They're they're magically immune from COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: at least according to the media. Oh, they wear masks.
Speaker 1: A lot of people wear masks. They still somehow get infected.
Speaker 1: We'd never really get to talk about that, do we
Speaker 1: A lot of people that were working in healthcare, you know,
Speaker 1: and healthcare facilities or wearing masks all the time still
Speaker 1: getting infected. That's why it's always the guidance has been
Speaker 1: mask plus social distance, it's not wear a mask and
Speaker 1: then you know, hug whoever you want in the streets
Speaker 1: and breathe on each other all day. That that is
Speaker 1: not the guidance. But Biden, oh what a what a
Speaker 1: lucky lucky moment he has here? Yeah, harm or No,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna do rallies because I believe in science. Also, um,
Speaker 1: you know, sometimes I don't know what time of day
Speaker 1: it is, and so that's tough to be at a rally,
Speaker 1: because where is the rally? Joe Biden? Everybody gonna fix America? Sure,
Speaker 1: thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio Apple or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. My friends, just when you
Speaker 1: thought the country had enough real problems to handle, the
Speaker 1: Democrats decide to cook up at an oldie, but a goodie,
Speaker 1: you know, one that they they have not yet given
Speaker 1: up on Russia collusion slash Trump in Putin's pocket. Here
Speaker 1: we are again, after all this stuff, four years of
Speaker 1: this Special Council investigation and impeachment which we don't even talk,
Speaker 1: we don't even think about this anymore. Impeach this president
Speaker 1: like a bunch of maniacs on nothing on a phone
Speaker 1: call where he's talking to a foreign head of state
Speaker 1: and he kind of says, yeah, you know, look into
Speaker 1: this thing, about this thing if you can, If you
Speaker 1: don't whatever, I mean, like nothing happens. The whole thing
Speaker 1: is just crazy. Oh yeah, So impeach the president over there,
Speaker 1: all foreign influence in our elections or Joe Biden. These
Speaker 1: people are nuts. And yet here we are again, Russia, Russia, Russia.
Speaker 1: You know it's back, and this one ties in Afghanistan too.
Speaker 1: Let me let me just say this, and I want
Speaker 1: to credit Rob O'Neill, best known for being one of
Speaker 1: the Navy seals on the mission to and in fact
Speaker 1: was the man who shot Bin Laden. Rob put out
Speaker 1: on Twitter, guess what, guys, you don't have to pay
Speaker 1: the Taliban for them to kill US soldiers. That they're
Speaker 1: just going to do it. They've been doing it for
Speaker 1: twenty years now. So thank you Rob for seeing through
Speaker 1: the nonsense that we're hearing on this as if oh, oh,
Speaker 1: a Taliban fighter who's offered a thousand dollars to kill
Speaker 1: an American all of a sudden will kill an America.
Speaker 1: But he wasn't going to before I mean, when you
Speaker 1: really think about this, it doesn't make a whole lot
Speaker 1: of sense. Do I think that it's possible that the
Speaker 1: gru had operatives that we're talking to the Taliban about
Speaker 1: creating some kind of bounding system go after US troops
Speaker 1: so they could create headaches for US in Afghanistan? We
Speaker 1: all understand the mirror image of history here that where
Speaker 1: the US was assisting the mujah Hadeen against the Soviets
Speaker 1: back in the eighties. So we know that there's we
Speaker 1: know that there's a real situation here. We know there's
Speaker 1: a reality where that could happen. But why are we
Speaker 1: hearing about this now? And we've been told that there's
Speaker 1: been of us back and forth. Oh, it was an
Speaker 1: INTEL assessment. It was brief to this person, brief to
Speaker 1: that person. Intel assessments gets brief to people and stuff
Speaker 1: all the time. Doesn't mean that they're necessarily true, doesn't
Speaker 1: mean it's necessarily accurate. In fact, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff that ends up getting briefed that is just simply absurd, right,
Speaker 1: simply never going to happen. It's not true. But they're
Speaker 1: making assessments, they're working with imperfect information. This happens. Right.
Speaker 1: Having done, need I remind you, you know, we have
Speaker 1: the whole of rock WMD thing, and there's been some problems,
Speaker 1: been some problems in the intelligence community when it comes
Speaker 1: to assessments. Okay, so now let's take a look at
Speaker 1: the specifics of this. Why are we hearing about this,
Speaker 1: as I've been telling you, it's because they want to
Speaker 1: talk about Russia in a context where Russia is the
Speaker 1: great enemy and Trump isn't doing anything against Russia because
Speaker 1: he is Putin's puppet. And here's a part of this
Speaker 1: that we don't seem to somehow hear about. If Trump
Speaker 1: were Putin's puppet, why would they gru be making life
Speaker 1: harder for Trump in Afghanistan by killing US soldiers? Wouldn't
Speaker 1: that seem you know? They because this is the verbiage
Speaker 1: that they'll use and say, Oh, he's a he's an
Speaker 1: agent of Russian influence in this country. Oh he does
Speaker 1: Vladimir is bidding? Well, why would why would Vladimir's gru
Speaker 1: Putent's gr you do this? It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1: Doesn't make sense if you believe that, And now I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that gr you would never put out this
Speaker 1: bounty I'm just saying, if you believe that Trump is
Speaker 1: actually Putin's puppet, why would they do this? But there
Speaker 1: are there are two big reasons as to why this story.
Speaker 1: I remember this was leaked. Someone leaked this to the
Speaker 1: press because you have all these I've been telling you
Speaker 1: this along. You're gonna have all these people that are
Speaker 1: part of the deep state you've never even heard of,
Speaker 1: that want to be great heroes for the hashtag resistance
Speaker 1: to stop the Trump presidency. And here we have an
Speaker 1: instance where sure enough they have done just that. But
Speaker 1: so you have all these great heroes of the resistance,
Speaker 1: and they're going to share information, even classified information, with
Speaker 1: the press if it hurts Trump. This is on the
Speaker 1: one hand, because they want to just talk about Russia again.
Speaker 1: Even if you know that that's crazy, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: They're not telling you about Russia. CNN, the Washington Post
Speaker 1: aren't covering this for you. They're doing it because Democrats
Speaker 1: in New York and LA and Chicago and across the
Speaker 1: country and you know, all the major blue districts, they
Speaker 1: still believe that Trump is tied him with Russia in
Speaker 1: a way that he's compromised, and they still believe this crap.
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi still says it on TV as of this week.
Speaker 1: So this is what the base wants to hear. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter that it's not true, it doesn't matter that
Speaker 1: it's all a lie. They want to hear this. It
Speaker 1: gets their base fired up, and they're gonna keep doing it.
Speaker 1: But the second part of this has to do with
Speaker 1: the war in Afghanistan. Trump keeps coming up against deeply
Speaker 1: or you know, really overestimated and overrated national security minds
Speaker 1: on the on the issue of Afghanistan. Who they always
Speaker 1: tell them, Oh, you can't pull out, Oh you can't
Speaker 1: do it. Oh you can't end this. You know, Madis
Speaker 1: was one of these guys. Bolton is one of these guys.
Speaker 1: Oh you can't end the war in Afghanistan. What would
Speaker 1: we do without the ability to immediately, you know, call
Speaker 1: in a strike force into Jalalabad. How could how could
Speaker 1: anybody in Kansas or Oklahoma or Oregon or wherever, how
Speaker 1: could they ever sleep at night knowing that we don't
Speaker 1: have US troops ready at a moment's notice to help
Speaker 1: out in Kandahar City. Come on, we have other things
Speaker 1: to think about, other things to do. We've been there
Speaker 1: for twenty years. If after twenty years Afghanistan would collapse
Speaker 1: and crumble into civil war without us, obviously our twenty
Speaker 1: year presidents hasn't had the intended effect and isn't going
Speaker 1: to It's not going to happen. That's why we have
Speaker 1: this deal with the Taliban. I'm just going to skip
Speaker 1: to the end. Here's what's going to happen. The Taliban
Speaker 1: is going to do what it can to make it
Speaker 1: seem like it's you know, not being that violent and
Speaker 1: aggressive toward the United States as we're leaving, as we're
Speaker 1: hitting the exits, and then they're going to go after
Speaker 1: each other, and you're going to have your tribal warfare,
Speaker 1: You're going to have factional fighting and probably some form
Speaker 1: of civil war and Afghanistan. That's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: There is no future in which that is not going
Speaker 1: to happen. Right, we can do we can allow that
Speaker 1: happen now, or we can wait another five years, spend
Speaker 1: billions and billions of more US dollars, have more US
Speaker 1: troops getting maimed and murdered in many cases by their
Speaker 1: supposed you know, Afghan compatriots. Right, these infiltraders who are
Speaker 1: Taliban sympathizers who kill our guys at you know, at
Speaker 1: the shooting range or something because that's how they do things.
Speaker 1: So enough is enough. But there's also there's also that
Speaker 1: segment of the national security apparatus and really the national
Speaker 1: security industry that just doesn't want to see us stop. Oh,
Speaker 1: we can't give up this mission. No, no, no, lose
Speaker 1: our hard fought gains in Afghanistan. I do not know.
Speaker 1: I know many people who serve the military in Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: and I was there for the CIA a decade ago.
Speaker 1: I know. I do not know a single person in
Speaker 1: or formerly or currently in the military who served in
Speaker 1: Afghanistan who thinks that we should keep fighting there. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I don't know one. Now. Maybe some of
Speaker 1: the people that have become very close with their Afghan
Speaker 1: counterparts there from training them and assisting them, you know,
Speaker 1: they have a bond of loyalty to people that have
Speaker 1: been with them, you know, fighting alongside them. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna understand and appreciate that, or at least I can
Speaker 1: appreciate it if I can't understand it, meaning that I've
Speaker 1: never done that. But from a policy perspective. I don't
Speaker 1: know anybody that thinks, yeah, if we stay a little
Speaker 1: bit longer, things are going to get better. So yeah,
Speaker 1: those two factors. This is why we're talking about Russia again.
Speaker 1: We should be talking about China, which just used its
Speaker 1: new national security law to arrest hundreds of protesters in
Speaker 1: Hong Kong, and the crackdown is going to happen. The
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party is going to win in Hong Kong.
Speaker 1: It just is going to take a long time. They're
Speaker 1: gonna wait till people are tired of hearing about this
Speaker 1: in the news and everything. You know, they're gonna win.
Speaker 1: And China is a real national security threat to US.
Speaker 1: But China is a big concern, and it's going to
Speaker 1: use its economic muscle in ways that will make Americans
Speaker 1: poorer and less safe going forward. That's their plan. Russia
Speaker 1: can't even get Russia's got like a trillion dollars total economy.
Speaker 1: Russia is not a Russia's biggest economic output is oil
Speaker 1: and gas. So they're not about to overtake us. Okay,
Speaker 1: We're gonna be Okay, the Russians aren't the big threat.
Speaker 1: The Chinese are the big threat. But you can't even
Speaker 1: talk about that, especially if you're in the NBA, you
Speaker 1: can't talk about it. No, No, if you're the NBA commissioner.
Speaker 1: China's treatment of the Wagers, a Muslim minority population in
Speaker 1: western China, they can be put into concentration camps. They
Speaker 1: are captain concentration camps by the Chinese Communist Party. That
Speaker 1: doesn't get any attention. We have all the social justice
Speaker 1: wars in the NBA who will trash our own police,
Speaker 1: who are honorable public servants doing overwhelming a fantastic job
Speaker 1: keeping us safe until the Democrats don't let them do
Speaker 1: their jobs anymore. But we also have all these NBA superstars,
Speaker 1: multi multi millionaires who want to make sure that their
Speaker 1: jerseys are still getting sold in Beijing, you know, want
Speaker 1: to make sure that they still have those TV rights
Speaker 1: for China to broadcast the NBA coming into the NBA coffers,
Speaker 1: and you have the NBA Commissioner, Adam Silver making that
Speaker 1: very clear. Placlipit has that relationship improved. I feel it has.
Speaker 1: You know, our games are on ten cent distribution platform
Speaker 1: in China. Um. You know, we've continued a dialogue with
Speaker 1: the Chinese with our business partners there in certain cases
Speaker 1: with certain government officials, and you know, we're just going
Speaker 1: to keep at it. We've had a long history in
Speaker 1: China and certain mass of bumping the road in our relations. Obviously,
Speaker 1: I think we all understand each other, you know, as
Speaker 1: I've said before. You know, we come to China with
Speaker 1: a certain set of court American values and principles, and
Speaker 1: I understand also they have a different form of government
Speaker 1: and they have a different view of how things have
Speaker 1: been done I thinks should be done. And hopefully we
Speaker 1: can find mutual respect for each other. Yeah, the NBA,
Speaker 1: NBA commissioner here wants to make sure he shows all
Speaker 1: do submission and obedience to the Chinese Communist Party because
Speaker 1: it's so important. Fun Actually the NBA. Look, look, I
Speaker 1: get it. I'm not saying that the NBA has to
Speaker 1: be always about human rights and social justice all over
Speaker 1: the world or you're in America. I just want to
Speaker 1: point out the hypocrisy of having all these players who
Speaker 1: and the commissioner who take the side of cops are bad,
Speaker 1: because that's really what this movement blms and cops are
Speaker 1: bad and racist. The system is racist and the cops
Speaker 1: are racist. Instruments of that system. But China totalitarian freedom, crushing, descent, silencing, thugocracy.
Speaker 1: China's got a different way of doing things. That's what
Speaker 1: Commissioners Silver has. They's just got a different way of
Speaker 1: doing things. That's right. Then the need of Beijing because
Speaker 1: they're throwing so much cash at the NBA, but spit
Speaker 1: all over our cops, so to speak, because that's going
Speaker 1: to make this country better. It's all about social justice.
Speaker 1: That's the National Basketball Association for you. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Last question,
Speaker 1: real quick. Some have speculator aligned though that you that
Speaker 1: you are subject to some degree of cognitive decline. I'm
Speaker 1: sixty five. I don't have word recollection that I used
Speaker 1: to have. I forget my train of thought from time
Speaker 1: to time. You got twelve years on me, sir. Have
Speaker 1: you been tested for some degree of cognitive decline? I've
Speaker 1: been testing on constantly, TESTIOK. All you know, all I
Speaker 1: gotta do is watch me, and I can hardly wait
Speaker 1: to compare my cognitive capability to the cognitive cape building
Speaker 1: of the man I'm running. Isn't that great? He's asked
Speaker 1: the Democrats? Great hope for the future. Joe Biden, He's
Speaker 1: gonna save us all. He's asked about cognitive decline. He's like, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm testing for cognitive decline every day. What No, he
Speaker 1: meant like an actual test, like has a medical professor.
Speaker 1: I'm constitutly testing for my cog of decline. Proof that
Speaker 1: I don't have any because I'm testing for it all
Speaker 1: the time. That's Joe Biden. There you go. He's gonna
Speaker 1: fix it all, folks. He's got it all under control.
Speaker 1: This is the guy that we want in charge of everything.
Speaker 1: This is the guy that we are going to have
Speaker 1: running stuff. Yep, sure enough. Also not not only is
Speaker 1: he saying that he's not going to campaign because of
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci, he's saying that that the other side, Republicans
Speaker 1: are rejecting science play seventeen. Donald Trump is in retreat.
Speaker 1: Remember back in Mars when I called as he called,
Speaker 1: talked about the needs and act like we were at
Speaker 1: war with the virus. If he called himself a wartime president.
Speaker 1: Remember when he ex exhorted the nation to sacrifice together
Speaker 1: and quote in the face of this inevitable, an invisible enemy.
Speaker 1: What happened? Now it's almost July, and it seems like
Speaker 1: our wartime presidents surrendered, waive the right flag? What white
Speaker 1: flag left the battlefield? Today? We're facing a serious threat.
Speaker 1: We have to meet it. We have to meet it
Speaker 1: as one country. But the President gives no direction and
Speaker 1: he puts us against one another. We can't continue like this,
Speaker 1: half recovering and half getting worse. We can't continue half
Speaker 1: wear a mask and half rejecting science. We can't continue
Speaker 1: half with a plan and half just hoping for the best.
Speaker 1: We can't continue. It's juice time and I want some
Speaker 1: cookies and I need a nap. What is he saying
Speaker 1: exactly about the president retreating now? I think he's he
Speaker 1: has not been vocal enough on the statues and the mobs,
Speaker 1: but that's a separate issue on this issue of COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Retreat to me is going back into lockdown. Retreat is
Speaker 1: thinking that there's a future for America in a series
Speaker 1: of rolling lockdowns while this virus is still out there
Speaker 1: and going to be out there for at least another
Speaker 1: six months, maybe another year, maybe another ten, we don't know.
Speaker 1: We've given ourselves the ability to treat people. We've given
Speaker 1: ourselves the ability to have our medical providers give the
Speaker 1: best care they can to people and get as many
Speaker 1: people recovered from this as they can. And we have
Speaker 1: young people getting this disease and passing through it so
Speaker 1: quickly they don't even know they have it in large numbers.
Speaker 1: And that's how a society, you know, we keep thinking.
Speaker 1: You know, the left, the left elevates the scientists as
Speaker 1: a general thing. The left elevates a scientist to be
Speaker 1: people who always have the answers, and the problem is
Speaker 1: they don't have and they love that because I think
Speaker 1: the state, if they have the answer from the scientists,
Speaker 1: can just do anything that it wants and take over
Speaker 1: every aspect of your life, because you know, they're the
Speaker 1: true experts that understand the humility that we have to
Speaker 1: have in the face of something like this. Our scientific
Speaker 1: community does not have the answers to this. They might
Speaker 1: at some point, but they don't right now. We are
Speaker 1: dealing with a health crisis that is causing social breakdown
Speaker 1: and pain and misery and fouc You and all the
Speaker 1: rest of them have no answers about all the rest
Speaker 1: of that. They don't know. They don't have a path
Speaker 1: forward for us other than absolute mitigation effort of the
Speaker 1: virus continuously while the numbers continue to spike. So what
Speaker 1: we have is going toward her community with the maximum
Speaker 1: amount of pain, dysfunction, loss, and politicization possible. That's a
Speaker 1: bad plan. Thanks for listening to The bus Stson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Okay, everybody, our friend
Speaker 1: David Harsani, he is back in the house. He is
Speaker 1: a senior editor over at National Review. He writes great
Speaker 1: things over there. He does this show a lot. We'd
Speaker 1: like David. He's with us. David, welcome, Thank you for
Speaker 1: having me back. All right, man, let's start. Let's start
Speaker 1: with this one, actually, because I see that you have
Speaker 1: pointed out something that I'm also trying to make as
Speaker 1: much noise about this as possible. You have such left
Speaker 1: wing luminaries as Recline making the argument publicly that the
Speaker 1: disaster of COVID in America is the fault specifically of Trumpism,
Speaker 1: compared to what we see in the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: You had Ben Rhodes, the Obama administration's chief foreign policy propagandist,
Speaker 1: arguing that we have done. I forgot about the specific
Speaker 1: languages that he used. But essentially we're so much worse
Speaker 1: off than Europe because Trump of course, and this is
Speaker 1: just this is just not looking at the actual data
Speaker 1: and the truth. How are people getting away with this? Oh?
Speaker 1: I mean, how do they get away with that? Anything?
Speaker 1: You have a complicit mainstream media or legacy media that
Speaker 1: allows them to say things like this and repeats them
Speaker 1: that you know as well. Obviously it's complicated, right, But
Speaker 1: when you look at death deaths per million of the population,
Speaker 1: which I think is the most important number to look at, right,
Speaker 1: it shows how we react to it, how we treat things,
Speaker 1: we deal with the initial response. We are better than
Speaker 1: most European nations that are similar to us, other than Germany.
Speaker 1: We are better than most authoritarian nations with that which
Speaker 1: a client, you know, easily controlled populations. Usually. Also, we
Speaker 1: can't trust those countries to give us the proper statistics.
Speaker 1: People are dying. It's a tragedy. It's largely out of
Speaker 1: our hands. The second part of that, though, is also
Speaker 1: that trying to blame red states and trump Ism and
Speaker 1: stuff like that is kind of absurd. When more people
Speaker 1: died in New York nursing homes that have died, or
Speaker 1: twice as many people almost nursing homes that have died
Speaker 1: in the entire state of Florida or the entire state
Speaker 1: of Texas or the entire state of Georgia. So that
Speaker 1: argument is just is just really hollow and completely partisan,
Speaker 1: and it feels like there's a really a concerted effort
Speaker 1: going on to not only let Cuomo evade accountability for
Speaker 1: the disastrous nursing home decision. And you know that's not
Speaker 1: just Oh, New York is a dense place, like I
Speaker 1: hit hard. That was a decision he made that I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody defends now. But not only are they
Speaker 1: moving the focus off of that problem, there's still you know,
Speaker 1: they're still give Cuomo a platform to lecture other states,
Speaker 1: notably red state governors like Florida and Texas, about how
Speaker 1: they're handling this, as if that's not completely insane. Oh,
Speaker 1: Karben Rna Pollum telling us to look towards New York
Speaker 1: for those solutions. I mean, the nursery home to decision
Speaker 1: was a deadly decision that was wrong. Now, m Florida
Speaker 1: is also dense right in general, and Florida has an
Speaker 1: older population, and yet they didn't have the same problem.
Speaker 1: So I think that looking towards New York would be insane. Obviously,
Speaker 1: it's not all you know, like you mentioned, there's density issues.
Speaker 1: There's other issues as well. We might not even know
Speaker 1: what the other issues exactly are. But the idea that
Speaker 1: you know, conservatives are at fault here somehow is just
Speaker 1: a crude partisanship. It's also idiotic. It's not true a
Speaker 1: fiction that Donald Trump was in charge of either shutting
Speaker 1: down states or opening states. That's that's a state by state,
Speaker 1: city by city decision that was made, and a lot
Speaker 1: of rest states opened up. So you're going to see
Speaker 1: a spike probably in cases, but you know, they calibrate
Speaker 1: as they move alone. That's how we have to do it.
Speaker 1: We're not a dictatorship here, and we have other concerns
Speaker 1: we have to weigh here. And as you probably mentioned, initially,
Speaker 1: this was about been flattening the fur which we've which
Speaker 1: every state almost other than the New York and New
Speaker 1: York area has done. I gotta tell you, David, I know, sorry,
Speaker 1: I was just gonna say I have to your point
Speaker 1: ab flattening the curve. I had some some conservative friends
Speaker 1: here in New York because they do exist. We just
Speaker 1: keep it quiet. Who said, hey, Buck, you know, I
Speaker 1: really you know, I agree with your analysis on COVID
Speaker 1: and all the stuff, But you gotta look at what's
Speaker 1: happening in Houston. Man. The ICUs are just about to overflow.
Speaker 1: They don't know what they're gonna do. They don't have
Speaker 1: enough beds, they don't you know that we're basically and
Speaker 1: this is and I saw the headlines and I saw
Speaker 1: the news coverage of this, and I thought, WHOA, Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe I missed something here, and I dug into the
Speaker 1: numbers a little bit, and no, it turns out that
Speaker 1: the ICUs in Houston are just kept at a certain
Speaker 1: staffing level, but there are three phases of staffing level
Speaker 1: they can expand they have a surge capacity in individual
Speaker 1: hospitals in that system. And they weren't even close that
Speaker 1: they weren't even close to getting to the point where
Speaker 1: they wouldn't be able to treat people. And this is
Speaker 1: specifically in Houston, which was supposed to be the place
Speaker 1: that was the worst hit. And also the average hospitals
Speaker 1: stay for people who were being admitted for COVID was
Speaker 1: two to three days instead of what we had in
Speaker 1: New York, which is two to three weeks. But you
Speaker 1: had to dig into the numbers to see that, David,
Speaker 1: You had to actually look at what was happening on
Speaker 1: the ground. Otherwise the national media saying, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: the hospitals are overflowing. We're all going to die again.
Speaker 1: Everyone hide under their beds. That's what was happening, right,
Speaker 1: And I'm not an expert on specific cities, but I
Speaker 1: know that there's also that the you know, if you
Speaker 1: saw a little bit of spike going on occasionally, it
Speaker 1: was about a backlog of elective surgeries that were not
Speaker 1: allowed for a long time that people are now allowed
Speaker 1: to go back into the hospitals for. So it's not
Speaker 1: that simple. I don't know why. You know, you see
Speaker 1: these spike in cases. Obviously a part of this from
Speaker 1: more testing, but obviously part of it is also from
Speaker 1: you know, opening up now. But of course numbers have
Speaker 1: not gone. But it's like, this is we made this decision, David,
Speaker 1: like we as a society, as a country, we said, Okay,
Speaker 1: we're gonna we're gonna get this under control. We're gonna reopen.
Speaker 1: There will be some ups and downs in this, but
Speaker 1: that was always a plan. Now all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: we got Faucci and others acting like, whoa, whoa, what
Speaker 1: do you mean there's more cases? Yeah, there's going to
Speaker 1: be more cases. Yeah, I mean it's not going anyway.
Speaker 1: The idea that we can sit around way for a
Speaker 1: vaccine that's going to actually work is crazy. We may
Speaker 1: never really work. We may. I mean, there aren't vaccines
Speaker 1: for tons of viruses. So I don't I don't understand
Speaker 1: what's expect me, and I do understand what's expected from
Speaker 1: some people. From some people, we're supposed to wait till
Speaker 1: November to see what happens, right, I mean it's about
Speaker 1: I mean, I believe Paul Krugman does not want the
Speaker 1: economy to rebound before the election. It's that simple. And
Speaker 1: I'm not saying he wants people to die, but he
Speaker 1: definitely doesn't want the economy to bounce back. And again,
Speaker 1: that's just crude partisanship. It's it's it's kind of disgusting. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't listen. San Francisco has only had six hundred
Speaker 1: deaths right in New York had like twenty five thousand.
Speaker 1: So it's not just an ideological thing. There are obviously
Speaker 1: other factors and other things going on, But I don't
Speaker 1: think we're the ones saying it's all about ideology, right,
Speaker 1: They're saying that they're they're part is an issue for
Speaker 1: the most part. I mean, other than Cuomo, who clear
Speaker 1: he did something right, I don't I don't go on
Speaker 1: radio and constantly, you know, bash the governor of New Jersey,
Speaker 1: which has also had a very high mortality rate, because
Speaker 1: I think that that was spill over from New York
Speaker 1: people getting in. You know, you know, I disagree with
Speaker 1: some of his decisions, but you know, he didn't have
Speaker 1: quite this. He hasn't been held up the same way
Speaker 1: as Cuomo. He didn't have you know, he has not.
Speaker 1: He has not been treated as though he has beat
Speaker 1: this thing. He has a bad record too. But I
Speaker 1: think New York and New Jersey were the first big
Speaker 1: places to get hit and that should be factored into it.
Speaker 1: But but David, I want to switch gears for a second.
Speaker 1: We're talking to David Harsandi of National Review. Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: you told me that there's a case to be made.
Speaker 1: You're the butt gorcitch phenomenon, which is what people say
Speaker 1: about anyone who supported Trump, mostly for Supreme Court judges,
Speaker 1: maybe for some other things, but mostly because I want
Speaker 1: the judges. And now we see some very bad decisions
Speaker 1: if you're a constitutional conservative, including one that that Gorsitch rope.
Speaker 1: But you're saying there's still upside here, This was still
Speaker 1: a good argument, meaning you should support Trump for the judges.
Speaker 1: Tell me about this. I'm not saying there's upside. I'm
Speaker 1: saying it's by far the best argument for Trump. I'm
Speaker 1: saying that it is maybe the last chance to save
Speaker 1: many of the constitutional norms that we had. That's what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. I mean, I think there's nothing wrong with
Speaker 1: making that argument. We are not a democracy. This is
Speaker 1: not about majoritarian rule. We had every right to want
Speaker 1: to rely on the course to stop them. And as
Speaker 1: bad as more such decision might have been, or Roberts's
Speaker 1: decisions are, there are a hundred times better than the
Speaker 1: decisions that will be made right now by Hillary pointed judges.
Speaker 1: In fact, you know, there are the Jat's decision, the
Speaker 1: decision we had yesterday about religious liberty. These would not
Speaker 1: exist if Trump hadn't been present. That's just a fact.
Speaker 1: No matter what Trump's tweeting are doing, and for me,
Speaker 1: it's the most effective and the most important part of
Speaker 1: you know, the argument for Trump. Now, there could be
Speaker 1: other reasons to vote against them. I'm not saying that
Speaker 1: you should vote for him and I vote for him.
Speaker 1: I don't do things like that, But I'm just saying
Speaker 1: that that is a really important argument, and I think
Speaker 1: that people can make the rational decision about the nature
Speaker 1: of transactional politics and vote from because of judges have
Speaker 1: as good a case to vote from as anyone has
Speaker 1: to vote for anyone else before we let you go, David.
Speaker 1: I heard Tucker on his show My Moment was last
Speaker 1: night of the Night before saying that in his assessment,
Speaker 1: I mean his analysis, if the Democrats get unified government meeting,
Speaker 1: Biden wins Senate, Congress, everything's in Democrat hands. They will
Speaker 1: move to pack the Supreme Court, which feels like previously
Speaker 1: maybe for some people at least a red line, did
Speaker 1: you really think they'd do then you think they'd packed
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court if they if they thought that that
Speaker 1: was a path the power Listen, I think many of
Speaker 1: them would gladly do it if they thought they could
Speaker 1: get away with it without any sort of repercussions politically speaking,
Speaker 1: But I'm not so sure that if Biden presidency that
Speaker 1: that happens. In two thousand eight, I thought Republicans were
Speaker 1: finished for a generation, and two years later there was
Speaker 1: a huge revolt among conservatives and everything changed. If Biden
Speaker 1: acts like Obama did it or or worse, I think
Speaker 1: that can happen again. And I think he knows that
Speaker 1: that can happen again and will be a little more careful.
Speaker 1: Least that's my hope. But certainly Kamala Harris or you know,
Speaker 1: these other newer Democrats, I don't think they could get
Speaker 1: away with it. They do it for sure. David Arsani
Speaker 1: of National Review everybody check out his latest National Review
Speaker 1: dot com. David, great to have you all, my friend.
Speaker 1: You take care anytime. Thank you. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, we've
Speaker 1: got our friend Tina Lowe from the Washington Examiner back
Speaker 1: in the mix. Tina, thanks so much for joining from
Speaker 1: down in our nation's capital. Hi. Bye, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: All righty, so tell me what's going on in DC. Now?
Speaker 1: You had been this side of some of the most
Speaker 1: aggressive protest stuff. What was it about last week to
Speaker 1: tear down on the Andrew Jackson statue. How the statue
Speaker 1: topplers calmed down a bit? Is the Capitol Hill Autonomous
Speaker 1: Zone still functioning? What's happening down there? So last week
Speaker 1: I went to a brunch in Clarendon, so ten minute
Speaker 1: drive away from my apartment in Arlington, Virginia. Still still
Speaker 1: very much a part of the DC ecosystem. People were outside,
Speaker 1: people were wearing masks, people were social distancing, and things
Speaker 1: were opid, and it was great. I go downtown to
Speaker 1: make a return, and it looked like a different nation.
Speaker 1: It looked like a third world country. Still storefronts in
Speaker 1: Chinatown either boarded up or destroyed or completely empty. No
Speaker 1: people except put homeless people, and everything is debased. And
Speaker 1: why is that? It is because these protests are no
Speaker 1: longer peaceful. They were peaceful for a time and then
Speaker 1: it turned it into looting and now it's statue toppling.
Speaker 1: I will even the things have calmed down a little
Speaker 1: bit in the sense of the scope of the thing,
Speaker 1: and I've been trying to be a little bit less
Speaker 1: online leading up to fourth of July. But it's pretty
Speaker 1: clear that the energy is an ending we're on almost
Speaker 1: a month. You know, we actually are on a month
Speaker 1: of this thing book because it's joy now and it's
Speaker 1: clear that there is no book that stops with Mayor
Speaker 1: Murial Bowser build the Blasio. I mean, the only reason
Speaker 1: why the Seattle Chatz got taken down was because they
Speaker 1: started threatening the mayor's home. Until then she said, whatever,
Speaker 1: so what if two black men die within chatz? So
Speaker 1: what if women our assaulted? So what if property is destroyed?
Speaker 1: It only mattered once the mayor herself book Britons, do
Speaker 1: you feel like the Republican Party? I mean, you're down
Speaker 1: there where you have the gathering of all of the
Speaker 1: Republican members of the Senate and the House on Capitol Hill,
Speaker 1: and I know you see them in see it's regularly
Speaker 1: see these people walking around the street or whatever. So
Speaker 1: you're in closer proximity and there's just much more of
Speaker 1: a sense of connectivity sometimes to these national level politicians.
Speaker 1: You get the sense the Republican Party is just hunkering
Speaker 1: down and waiting for the storm to pass on this one,
Speaker 1: because it seems there are very few prominent members of
Speaker 1: the GOP that I can point to you right now,
Speaker 1: and if I'm missing some by all means, who are
Speaker 1: saying that this is madness and they don't want to
Speaker 1: make concessions to the mob. They don't want this to continue.
Speaker 1: They're cutting budgets for police forces in New York, They've
Speaker 1: shut down the police force at least in theory the
Speaker 1: city council Minneapolis. This should be a moment for Republicans
Speaker 1: to assert their desire for law, order and safety, and
Speaker 1: yet it sounds like there's a deafening silence at least
Speaker 1: from the Republicans in DC. Absolutely, and considering I know
Speaker 1: a couple of the apartment buildings we have now senior
Speaker 1: members of the Trump campaign and where the Trump administration
Speaker 1: lab and I've seen how badly at least the base
Speaker 1: level of those buildings I have been destroyed. So yes,
Speaker 1: it's kind of shocking to hear people who I mean again,
Speaker 1: you know, I know that you have talked to the president.
Speaker 1: It is just baffled to me, from everything from supply
Speaker 1: chains in China during the coronavirus to these riots taking
Speaker 1: over the American city right now, that Trump hasn't leveraged
Speaker 1: this more because it does fundamentally make the case for
Speaker 1: his initial campaign the fact is, these democrat run cities
Speaker 1: have been ran into the ground for the last half century.
Speaker 1: And this is the natural result. It's the natural result
Speaker 1: of left wing academia becoming increasingly illiberal and helmet on
Speaker 1: identity politics. It's the product of these cities sort of,
Speaker 1: I mean not even just in the past three months,
Speaker 1: but in the last few decades. No disregard for business,
Speaker 1: no disregard, no regard for job growth. This is this
Speaker 1: really does sort of prove the entire point of the
Speaker 1: Republican case for country. How misses being leveraged better politically
Speaker 1: is shocking to me? Your Generation Z, so you get
Speaker 1: to be our unofficial Generation Z correspondent for some of
Speaker 1: these matters. Are you technically a millennial? I technicollenial. I'm
Speaker 1: the last year about Oh, okay, you're the very you're
Speaker 1: the very youngest possible millennial. I'm like the oldest possible millennial.
Speaker 1: So we're at the other ends of the spectrum where
Speaker 1: but it's okay, But you know, a lot of Gen
Speaker 1: Z people, I'm just wondering, you know, when they see
Speaker 1: all this stuff going on, don't they did you ever
Speaker 1: hear people even maybe who have a more liberal point
Speaker 1: of view or Democrats that that are friends with who
Speaker 1: are saying, wow, cities are actually going to be pretty unlivable, Like,
Speaker 1: does does this ever register for them? That everyone who
Speaker 1: knows what it means to be in a place where
Speaker 1: law and order breaks down and has been through that before,
Speaker 1: is like, I'm going to get out of here. I
Speaker 1: mean New York is having an outflow of biblical proportions
Speaker 1: of people leaving. Yeah, I definitely think so. And I
Speaker 1: think that we're seeing that. You know, this was last
Speaker 1: month record gun sales. Some of the highest gun sales
Speaker 1: can recorded American history happen in June to twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: And it makes sense. People clearly do not feel safe.
Speaker 1: You know, I have lived in South Central La Paris,
Speaker 1: New York, and DC, and I have never felt more
Speaker 1: unstafe and never felt personally they need to carry that
Speaker 1: I have this month or this past month, because it
Speaker 1: is clear that cops are crowding out and there is
Speaker 1: just lawlessness on the streets where people live in nice
Speaker 1: areas in DC. So even if they aren't expressly saying it,
Speaker 1: I think the numbers are telling the story. The numbers
Speaker 1: of how many people are fleeing the East Village and
Speaker 1: the numbers of how many people are applying for concealed
Speaker 1: carry licenses. It's nuts. And you know in DC, if
Speaker 1: memory serves, not only can you of course not carry
Speaker 1: around a handgun legally, but I think you're not even
Speaker 1: allowed to have pepper spray? Am I write on that?
Speaker 1: I believe I've been told this before in DC? Yeah, yea, yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it's the idea means for result defense. Yeah, well, palm
Speaker 1: strike to the nose and then run really fast. That's
Speaker 1: the best advice you can give. You of need beat Tina,
Speaker 1: But thank you very much for joining us telling us
Speaker 1: what's going down down there on the chat. Check out
Speaker 1: to Tina's writing at The Washington Examiner and also look
Speaker 1: for her contributions to the First Tina, thanks so much.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and Great Hair.
Speaker 1: Feel those funky beats. It's time for roll. Call Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck sexon to send us message there.
Speaker 1: Please follow us on Facebook if you have not already.
Speaker 1: Also bucksexon dot com. That should be your one stop
Speaker 1: shop for all things things freedom Hunt go to buckxx
Speaker 1: and dot com. Please bookmark that page now in your
Speaker 1: web browser. Check in. We've got stories posted by the
Speaker 1: team throughout the day. I we have video audio clips
Speaker 1: that go up there. We got all kinds of fun stuff,
Speaker 1: so please please do go to buck Sexton dot com
Speaker 1: and you can also listen to the podcast there of
Speaker 1: the show. So if anyone's ever saying, how do I
Speaker 1: listen to Buck Sexton show, just say go tobuckxxen dot
Speaker 1: com and then they can find the podcast that way.
Speaker 1: There you go. All right, any first off, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: I'm listening to your show. I think since you were
Speaker 1: only on Saturdays, I've listened to many conservative radio podcasts
Speaker 1: and I just keep coming back to yours. I was
Speaker 1: wondering if you could talk about Joe Jorgensen. There is
Speaker 1: some thought that she may be she may split the
Speaker 1: conservative vote. What are your thoughts? Thanks for your time, well,
Speaker 1: any thank you so much for being with me. Sounds
Speaker 1: like you kind of duck in and out, but you
Speaker 1: have been technically original Saturday Squad. Oh ss going back
Speaker 1: now at my U my eight year in media. I'm
Speaker 1: sorry eight year. Wait, let me think no, nine years
Speaker 1: it was June. I think seventh is my anniversary of
Speaker 1: the first my first day at the Blaze. I believe
Speaker 1: something like that. So nine years ago, a couple of
Speaker 1: weeks ago, was my anniversary in the media, for whatever
Speaker 1: that's worth. And as for Joe Jorgensen, I don't know
Speaker 1: who that is. Perhaps perhaps I should producer marked. Do
Speaker 1: you know who Joe Jorgensen is? I did google her.
Speaker 1: I think she's a libertarian. Oh that explained well that that.
Speaker 1: Now I don't feel bad. I mean, libertarians, come on,
Speaker 1: kem on, come on, Libertarians, come on. I mean, I
Speaker 1: like you, but you guys are kind of silly. Come on, Kevin,
Speaker 1: I'm just kidding. I love you. Listen to the show.
Speaker 1: Tell your libertarian friends listen to But I mean, kem on,
Speaker 1: h Yeah, Joe Jorganson for president twenty twenty. I never
Speaker 1: heard of this person until now, So yeah, another libertarian candidate.
Speaker 1: I don't think people are going to be too focused
Speaker 1: on libertarian issues as much, although the COVID thing certainly
Speaker 1: does bring them up. But when you're worried about a
Speaker 1: mob pulling you out of your home and beating you
Speaker 1: in the streets, I feel like libertarianism is a tough sell.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna put that out there. I think that
Speaker 1: might be tough. So yeah, thanks for telling me who
Speaker 1: Joe Jorgenson is. I didn't even know. I learned something.
Speaker 1: I learned something new every day on this show. Donna.
Speaker 1: Next up, Hello Buck and Mark. Producer Brandon was good,
Speaker 1: but producer Mark was missed. Of course, we know the
Speaker 1: podcast is always up earlier when Mark is in charge.
Speaker 1: That is also true. Shield's High. Donna from one or
Speaker 1: four point nine w BUV Biloxe, Gulfport, Mississippi, w BUV
Speaker 1: in the house. We haven't heard from our WBUV folks
Speaker 1: in a little while on roll call. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for listening and make sure that people down there
Speaker 1: know that they can listen to the Biloxi Gulfport, Mississippi area.
Speaker 1: I want to go down and visit. I hear Biloxi
Speaker 1: is a great town, same with Golfport. But we're not
Speaker 1: supposed to travel even fourth of July weekend. Now we're
Speaker 1: being told no traveling, no fun, nothing, Just stay in
Speaker 1: your home, peasant, do as you're told, peasant. That's what
Speaker 1: the libs tell us. Now we'll add up to the
Speaker 1: list of Mississippi for the road trip tour we're gonna
Speaker 1: take in twenty twenty two Harvey Tour. Yeah, let's wait
Speaker 1: till the country's not in a lockdown from a pandemic
Speaker 1: for the RV tour, but it'd be fun. Um. I
Speaker 1: am definitely gonna be in Austin, so KLBJ in the house.
Speaker 1: I'm definitely gonna be in Austin this fall for a
Speaker 1: visit because my brother will be down there, so I
Speaker 1: mean that's one hundred. I'm definitely going down to Austin.
Speaker 1: So all finally, and I told him, I said, we're
Speaker 1: just gonna put out the team buck bat signal and anyway,
Speaker 1: we're Gonnau with my brother and I who's also a
Speaker 1: great guy. We're gonna just be at a barbecue joint
Speaker 1: in Austin and people can just show up and hang out.
Speaker 1: That's that's We'll keep it real casual. But I want
Speaker 1: to meet some of the folks, so that's that's what
Speaker 1: we'll do. So I am gonna I know, I've been
Speaker 1: talking about Austin forever. It's all right. Prouser Mark wants
Speaker 1: us to do a you know, a cevich a sit
Speaker 1: down in Miami because that's where he wants the freedom
Speaker 1: Hut to move. But that's another time that way. Isn't
Speaker 1: that like raw fish? Yeah? I mean I like sushi,
Speaker 1: but I only eat the cooked stuff. You're a cooked
Speaker 1: sushi guy. You like California roles. I like a Philadelphia role. Okay,
Speaker 1: at least it's a Philly roll. Hey, guys, is from Phillis.
Speaker 1: I hate Philadelphia, but I like the Philly roll. If
Speaker 1: what is the what is the opposition sports team on
Speaker 1: in any sport that upsets you them? Like? What who
Speaker 1: is the evil professional sports franchise and producer? Mark? One
Speaker 1: franchise or one city. You can give me the franchise
Speaker 1: and then you can give me the city. But what
Speaker 1: is I mean the city in general that most of
Speaker 1: my team's arrivals with would be Philadelphia. Okay I thought
Speaker 1: that was the case. But what is the one team
Speaker 1: that gets under your skin the most? See I don't
Speaker 1: say it about the team, I say it about their fans.
Speaker 1: The New York Yankees. The New York Yankees fan base
Speaker 1: is the most irritating fan base in sports. I can't
Speaker 1: even they just can't wait to tell you, Oh, we've
Speaker 1: won twenty seven championships. Yeah, how many of those championships
Speaker 1: would you win before your grandparents were born? Damn you? Yeah,
Speaker 1: Priuster Mark trov It's a good thing. This is a
Speaker 1: good thing. This is not on WR and NYC because
Speaker 1: a man they hate mail from, although I think it's
Speaker 1: mostly Mets fans that listen to WR. I mean I've
Speaker 1: said similar on that those airwaves before Buck Really yeah,
Speaker 1: the Yankees fans, I hear you. For me, it was
Speaker 1: always the New England Patriots. But I kind of kind
Speaker 1: of respect them too, you know, I hate them in respect.
Speaker 1: It's like the Bulls in the nineties for the NBA.
Speaker 1: I hate them, but I respect them. I'm a Giants fan.
Speaker 1: So like, we beat Brady twice. That's some of the
Speaker 1: two most amazing sporting events I've ever watched. I think, honestly,
Speaker 1: we're the two victories over the Patriots by the first
Speaker 1: one was I mean, they were both great, but the
Speaker 1: first one was just so much better. Yeah. Well, the
Speaker 1: catch were against the helmet. I see, I actually saw
Speaker 1: these things. I remember the Tyree catch and the fact
Speaker 1: that the Patriots were undefeated. Yeah, unbelievable. It almost almost
Speaker 1: as good as the ending of Miracle producer Mark, which
Speaker 1: I watched on your say, so you know that's a
Speaker 1: real sporting event that happened right here. Where are you? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying so you could just say, you know,
Speaker 1: the nineteen eighty US hockey team or the Miracle on ice.
Speaker 1: But I never saw that real game. I've only seen
Speaker 1: the movie. Well were you you weren't old enough freely
Speaker 1: and were you even unborn nineteen eighty? I don't pretty
Speaker 1: only one, Okay, so you weren't even born yet, So
Speaker 1: that makes sense. There we go. Huh, baby, Buck would
Speaker 1: have been all about the American victory over the over
Speaker 1: the Ruskies, though, Sarah, you're kicking us off next year. Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: thanks for keeping a real love the show. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Sarah finally dawned on me why the mask wearing mandate
Speaker 1: brings out the irrational defiance in me. Maybe it's because
Speaker 1: the media has lied to me too many times. They
Speaker 1: tell me that life evolved from pond scum, that my
Speaker 1: unborn there's a mask, not a human, That my daughter
Speaker 1: might be a boy, that manly men are toxic. They
Speaker 1: tell me Trump is a racist, that he colluded with Russia.
Speaker 1: I could go on. They have lost all credibility. Why
Speaker 1: on earth would I believe them anymore? And now they
Speaker 1: want me to mask up because they said, so go
Speaker 1: pound sand I'll take my chance. He's living a clean
Speaker 1: country girl life. PS. Welcome back Mark with a heart.
Speaker 1: You gotta welcome back with a heart, Producer Mark. I
Speaker 1: just like to give the fans what they want. That's
Speaker 1: producer Mark apparently. Yeah, it's just it's one a little
Speaker 1: more piece of producer Mark. That's all you know. Again,
Speaker 1: don't let don't let missus Mark listen to this episode.
Speaker 1: It's all I'm gonna say. But oh yeah, no, snow
Speaker 1: Princess loves producer Mark. Here, that's a whole other Oh oh,
Speaker 1: and you love it. She also loves the Royal Caller. So, um,
Speaker 1: what do we have here? Next? We have Connie Connie.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, wait, there's one thing I wanted to tell
Speaker 1: you guys about that I didn't get to on the show.
Speaker 1: I can't even tell if this is real or not.
Speaker 1: But there is a motherboard, which is I think a
Speaker 1: website has a suggested inclusive sexual health language list that's
Speaker 1: out and I mentioned this at the top of the show.
Speaker 1: So I wanted to get to it. So the gendered
Speaker 1: language on this list, and I don't know if this
Speaker 1: is this almost seems like it can't be real. But
Speaker 1: I don't know. It seems like it's real. It's being
Speaker 1: shared all over social media with the Libs deny this,
Speaker 1: with the Libs say this is wrong. I don't think so.
Speaker 1: Gendered language. Breast feeding should be replaced with chest feeding,
Speaker 1: that's crazy. Female reproductive organs should be replaced with internal
Speaker 1: reproductive organs. A uterus slash ovaries should be referred to
Speaker 1: as internal organs. A prostate should be referred to as
Speaker 1: internal glands. I mean, good it, this gets really A
Speaker 1: woman should be referred to as a person who menstruates
Speaker 1: and it goes on. A mother should be referred to
Speaker 1: as a birthing person. Producer Mark, did you get all that? Yes,
Speaker 1: I'm taking copious notes. Yeah, yeah, we're these are these
Speaker 1: are the words that we're supposed to use now to
Speaker 1: talk about these things. You know, when I tell you
Speaker 1: the left is insane, I don't mean that as a hyperbole.
Speaker 1: I mean they're actually they've actually lost their minds, Like
Speaker 1: they're actually deranged and no longer able to think in
Speaker 1: reasonable logical terms about issues of politics and about issues
Speaker 1: of biology. It would seem too but you know, man,
Speaker 1: I gotta say these libs every day. It's like a
Speaker 1: kick in the internal organs or external organs because I'm
Speaker 1: a dude whatever. You know what I'm saying. So where
Speaker 1: are we now? Oh? Yes, it's more roll call. You're
Speaker 1: in the Hut. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: All right, we continue here with our role call. Connie
Speaker 1: writes in I really wish people would leave our TV
Speaker 1: shows and movies alone. If they don't like them, don't
Speaker 1: watch them, but leave the rest of us alone. I've
Speaker 1: been watching Succession with the Snow Princess. I have to
Speaker 1: say it's quite good. It's quite good. I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: enjoying it very much. But yes, if you go back
Speaker 1: in time, some of the most beloved TV shows of
Speaker 1: all time would not pass the test of wokeness. They've
Speaker 1: had to change Simptons, Simpson's characters and Simpson's content. They've
Speaker 1: had to They've got problems with the show Friends, which
Speaker 1: I will admit I like more than I probably should.
Speaker 1: They've had to change stuff from actually has Seinfeld producer
Speaker 1: Mark You're more Seinfeld guy has that ever gotten in
Speaker 1: trouble for unwokeness, you know, in retrospect, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. Yeah, No, I have not seen this anyone
Speaker 1: come at Seinfeld yet. Yeah, I'm sure it. See I
Speaker 1: did see who's the Cosmo Cramer guy. I mean we
Speaker 1: all saw that he completely lost his mind yet racist
Speaker 1: Michael Richards, Yeah, yeah, Mike. I had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with the show. It just was he whoa, he went.
Speaker 1: He went to a very scary place there anyway. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think he had some kind of a nervous breakdown,
Speaker 1: but he said some very bad things. But you know,
Speaker 1: it's I don't think Seinfeld's goten in trouble. But Friends
Speaker 1: definitely has for fat shaming for uh, you know, LGBTQ
Speaker 1: mocking things like that for sure, even though Friends is
Speaker 1: actually very progressive in its own way. Not that I'm
Speaker 1: gonna get too deep into this conversation because people are
Speaker 1: going to start pressing pause or switching the station. But
Speaker 1: they had a guy that whatever, the guy whose wife
Speaker 1: was actually a lesbian and he's raising the child with her,
Speaker 1: and you know, so there's some progressive stuff in the show.
Speaker 1: But you know, Joey does make fat jokes. Sometimes you
Speaker 1: know Joey Joey was Joey was Joey a very underrated character.
Speaker 1: I think the writing was quite good. Uh, Josh how Buck,
Speaker 1: very grateful as always for your show on KLBJ. WHOA
Speaker 1: Austin yeeha? Is that a pretty good Texas yeha. I'm trying.
Speaker 1: I'm trying every I am a Yankee. Yes, it is true.
Speaker 1: Not a sports team produce will never do that again. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know everyone KLBJ Austin is shaking their head side
Speaker 1: to side to side, like Buck, we're gonna we're gonna
Speaker 1: pull your We're gonna pull your Texas card if you
Speaker 1: ever do that again. And I don't think they just
Speaker 1: do that randomly. I don't know. I'm from New York,
Speaker 1: is what I like to think of Texas. Everyone's like, hey, partner,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't know. I've never been to Texas,
Speaker 1: but I know they don't just go around saying yeeha.
Speaker 1: I know I spent a lot of time in Dallas,
Speaker 1: and in Dallas, the conversations are more like, oh, you
Speaker 1: should come check out our artist in cheese company that
Speaker 1: just opened up in Uptown. I'm like, oh, okay, it's
Speaker 1: they're not like, hey, partner, let's ride a horse. You
Speaker 1: know that's not so. I mean, I assume it's the
Speaker 1: same thing in Austin. If anything, there's probably more artisan
Speaker 1: cheese shops and people pickling their own beats and such.
Speaker 1: All right, Josh writes the event arising before the liberal
Speaker 1: black hole, which is Austin. Have you read the OpEd
Speaker 1: by doctor Simone Gold MD about the uselessness of masks?
Speaker 1: She says the virus is two hundred to one thousand
Speaker 1: times smaller than the pores on cloth masks. It's like
Speaker 1: putting up a chain link fence to keep out mosquitos. Also,
Speaker 1: do you think the NBA will allow messages like stand
Speaker 1: with Hong Kong on the new social justice jerseys shields high? Josh,
Speaker 1: great stuff. I have not seen this op ed by
Speaker 1: Simone Gold, MD, but I'm curious to read it. And
Speaker 1: I keep saying for people that are that are like
Speaker 1: mask superusers, that there's no question that you can get
Speaker 1: the virus, that it is possible to contract virus like
Speaker 1: this through through your eyes. And just ask himbody, if
Speaker 1: you touch a contaminated surface with this virus and then
Speaker 1: you rub your eye, are you at are is that
Speaker 1: a very clear route of transmission for by the answers. Yes,
Speaker 1: so if you can get it by touching something and
Speaker 1: touching your eye, the aerosols or saw as virus getting
Speaker 1: your eyes also a risk. Now they might say it's
Speaker 1: a lesser risk, but I think, how would you even
Speaker 1: do a study on this? How would you even really know?
Speaker 1: So you think these things through and you come up
Speaker 1: with conclusions that are based in logic and reason and
Speaker 1: not what is often politicized. Spokespersons for the scientific community,
Speaker 1: And as for the stand with Hong Kong, the answers, No,
Speaker 1: the NBA will not allow that. I guarantee you the
Speaker 1: NBA will. You know, they will shut down. They're pretty
Speaker 1: much like, yeah, China, China gets to call the shots
Speaker 1: when it comes to the NBA because it's such a
Speaker 1: big market for them and they make so much money
Speaker 1: with NBA games being played in China. Already know NBA
Speaker 1: games being broadcast, I should say in China, that's what
Speaker 1: I mean by played. So yeah, no, they will not
Speaker 1: allow that, that's for sure. And let's see we have
Speaker 1: your Richard Buck I'm with you, cloth masks or worthless?
Speaker 1: Did I say that? I probably did here in Raleigh,
Speaker 1: they passed mask mandate that only includes cloth masks, an
Speaker 1: N ninety five respirator or a half mask full mask
Speaker 1: face shield not included. My wife and parents are all
Speaker 1: higher risks. So I wear my three M half mask
Speaker 1: with P one hundred filters in the store. So while
Speaker 1: I'm wearing that sometimes that will actually work, I'm breaking
Speaker 1: the mandate. I refuse to wear it outside. Meanwhile, bars
Speaker 1: that serve food or open, bars that don't serve food
Speaker 1: or mandated to be closed dance clubs are apparently open also,
Speaker 1: which makes no sense. This weekend, the closed bars in
Speaker 1: town either open to follow the restaurant rules or they
Speaker 1: identified as a club and opened. Either way, they gave
Speaker 1: a giant you know what to the governor, Kami Cooper
Speaker 1: support your local speakeasy shields eye Well, Richard, thanks for
Speaker 1: the updates, my man. I didn't know. But every state's
Speaker 1: got its own penny tyranny going on with the governors
Speaker 1: that are acting like maniacs and not basing things in
Speaker 1: the science. But here we are still being masks shamed
Speaker 1: aamed all the time by people who even five months
Speaker 1: ago we're saying don't wear masks now. They're saying, if
Speaker 1: you don't wear a mask, you're a bad person. Where's
Speaker 1: the scientific evidence that has changed. Just just show me
Speaker 1: the scientific evidence for that change, not just the oh,
Speaker 1: we want to think we're doing something. All right, that's
Speaker 1: gonna be this show for today. Make sure you gotta
Speaker 1: bucksexon dot com. Make sure you also subscribe on YouTube
Speaker 1: YouTube dot com slash Bucksex and gen Z and the
Speaker 1: millennials in the house who are all about YouTube. Come
Speaker 1: on now, go to YouTube dot com slash bucksex, and
Speaker 1: we got videos getting posted every day, and also check
Speaker 1: check them out on Facebook. We'll be back tomorrow, same
Speaker 1: time and place she'll tie