1 00:00:09,840 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily 2 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg We're 5 00:00:30,760 --> 00:00:32,800 Speaker 1: gonna rip up the script here right now. We've got 6 00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:38,800 Speaker 1: a wonderful expert, a true expert with ubs on emerging markets. 7 00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:41,599 Speaker 1: But I'm going to go right to China and the 8 00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:47,520 Speaker 1: domestic China Jeff Dennis, that you know, in their predilection 9 00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:52,519 Speaker 1: towards reminiscence of a stock operator, they seem to like 10 00:00:52,800 --> 00:01:01,240 Speaker 1: their investment fads within China, and China has a very 11 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:07,160 Speaker 1: large bitcoin interest, doesn't. Yes, yes, it does a pretty 12 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 1: large bitcoin interest. UM. I think the fad with investment 13 00:01:12,560 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 1: in China is though fading gradually over time. Your listeners 14 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:22,000 Speaker 1: will know that pretty much half the economy at one 15 00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:27,000 Speaker 1: stage was investment that is starting to come lower. The 16 00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:30,560 Speaker 1: economy in China is beginning to rebalance there for away 17 00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:34,320 Speaker 1: from investment, back towards consumer I know, back towards towards 18 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 1: consumer spending, towards services and less manufacturing. And I think 19 00:01:39,720 --> 00:01:41,760 Speaker 1: that's a long term trend. So although they've had this 20 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:44,280 Speaker 1: love affair with investment, and I'm sure bitcoin is part 21 00:01:44,319 --> 00:01:48,280 Speaker 1: of that. UM, the long term fate, so to speak, 22 00:01:48,440 --> 00:01:50,640 Speaker 1: outlook for the Chinese economy is going to be much 23 00:01:50,680 --> 00:01:54,120 Speaker 1: more driven by the resilience and the growth of consumer 24 00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:57,800 Speaker 1: spending as as Chinese people, as indeed in a lot 25 00:01:57,800 --> 00:02:01,240 Speaker 1: of countries, get wealthier. Jeff, I'm going to take a 26 00:02:01,320 --> 00:02:04,560 Speaker 1: leaf from my colleagues book. Tom is always interested in 27 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:07,720 Speaker 1: where the money flows, right, where does it go? Because 28 00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:11,079 Speaker 1: there's smart money out there, and it seems as though 29 00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:13,720 Speaker 1: there's a lot of money that's going into Asia, but 30 00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:17,320 Speaker 1: it's not going into Japan and it's not going into 31 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 1: exchange traded funds. Is that accurate? And what does that 32 00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:24,119 Speaker 1: tell you? Um? I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. First 33 00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:26,679 Speaker 1: of all, of course, the Japanese market has been very 34 00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:29,520 Speaker 1: strong recently, and it's a market that we've we've favored 35 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:33,079 Speaker 1: our strategies to favor that at the global level. UM. 36 00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:39,000 Speaker 1: And although we've seen tremendous inflow into emerging market funds 37 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:41,800 Speaker 1: this year over fifty five billion dollars, which is pretty 38 00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:44,480 Speaker 1: much the best year we've ever had except two thousand 39 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:48,880 Speaker 1: and ten UM. About seventy of that is still gone 40 00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:52,359 Speaker 1: through the e t f UM channel, so to speak. 41 00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 1: So let's call that twelve billion dollars has gone to 42 00:02:56,120 --> 00:02:58,799 Speaker 1: I've gone into active em funds, which is certainly a 43 00:02:58,840 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 1: big improvement in recent years. And it's very interesting because 44 00:03:01,639 --> 00:03:04,200 Speaker 1: this year has been so disparate in terms of performance. 45 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:06,679 Speaker 1: Have you've been long technology and long growth, you've done 46 00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:10,440 Speaker 1: very well. And if you've gone more the value way 47 00:03:10,520 --> 00:03:14,680 Speaker 1: towards the commodity sectors energy and materials and also financials, 48 00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 1: you've done much less well. So it has been a 49 00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:19,920 Speaker 1: good year for active managers. But UM money has gone 50 00:03:19,960 --> 00:03:23,240 Speaker 1: to Asia, has gone to Japan, but above all, in 51 00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:26,800 Speaker 1: my world this year money has gone to Asian technology, 52 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:28,960 Speaker 1: which is of course blown the doors off in terms 53 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 1: of price performance. Does that mean that you believe it 54 00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:35,000 Speaker 1: will continue or is it time to rotate financial stocks? 55 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:37,760 Speaker 1: For example the regulation in the United States. We've got 56 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 1: an interview with Lloyd blank Find of Golment Sex coming up. 57 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:43,040 Speaker 1: We we think the story is much more plain villa. 58 00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 1: In terms of financials, we've about over fifty of the 59 00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:50,200 Speaker 1: market in them. The index is financials and Technology so 60 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 1: you've got to make a relative bet about them. We 61 00:03:53,040 --> 00:03:56,160 Speaker 1: are arguing to our investors now that you should be 62 00:03:56,160 --> 00:03:59,360 Speaker 1: a little bit more careful about being long technology. It's 63 00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:03,160 Speaker 1: not my sively expensive, it's just very, very over owned. 64 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:06,320 Speaker 1: And we want people to rotate a bit more into financials, 65 00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 1: where you begin to see US colity improvements begin, see 66 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 1: loans growth cycles beginning to pick up. And indeed, if 67 00:04:12,480 --> 00:04:14,680 Speaker 1: you are going to see a modest rise in bond 68 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 1: deals around the world in two thousand nineteen, which is 69 00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:18,679 Speaker 1: all cool, you may even have a bit of an 70 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:21,800 Speaker 1: interest margin story in financials as well. I mean, I mean, 71 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:23,360 Speaker 1: I'm looking, folks, as the way you do this in 72 00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:25,800 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg you got to w E I go and 73 00:04:26,440 --> 00:04:29,080 Speaker 1: it's got so much wonderful information and then you can 74 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 1: currency adjust. Let's adjust this. I don't even know what 75 00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:36,440 Speaker 1: this exchange is. The whole cheat men's stock market. I'm 76 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:40,200 Speaker 1: guessing Vietnam very and you're still using w E I. 77 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,240 Speaker 1: You don't do the launch launchpad. You know more than 78 00:04:43,279 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 1: I do. But I'm looking at the whole cheatman stock 79 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:51,760 Speaker 1: market up dollar based. Every single person Jeff Dennis and 80 00:04:51,760 --> 00:04:55,560 Speaker 1: the Jeff Dennis world knows these puppies revert to the mean. 81 00:04:56,640 --> 00:05:00,120 Speaker 1: Is there a trend there that's discernible? Um? I mean, 82 00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:03,440 Speaker 1: first of all, for upside in Vietnam, which is a 83 00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:07,200 Speaker 1: frontier market according to the index provider, is actually not 84 00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 1: wildly out of line. It's not wildly strong. China is 85 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:14,800 Speaker 1: above the Hong Kong China Enterprise Index, which is the 86 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:17,040 Speaker 1: way we look at China in terms of foreign investment. 87 00:05:17,440 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 1: Career has been very strong. You've seen some tremendous games 88 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:22,720 Speaker 1: this year. The really important thing has happened in emerging 89 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:25,239 Speaker 1: markets this year. You've seen a sharp drop in the dollar, 90 00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:28,000 Speaker 1: You've seen a nice rebounded commodity price, you've seen a 91 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 1: boom in the technology sector. And you've seen a consequence 92 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:35,320 Speaker 1: of all of that, or or consequence of some of that, 93 00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:39,320 Speaker 1: you've had a really big explosion of earnings growth in them, 94 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 1: which looks like it's going to be well north of 95 00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:44,320 Speaker 1: growth this year, best year since two thousand and ten. 96 00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:47,200 Speaker 1: So although EM has done very well this year, it 97 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:49,680 Speaker 1: is not actually got that much more expensive because the 98 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:52,240 Speaker 1: earning story has been very good. So the issue is 99 00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 1: if EM has got a little richer and the valuations 100 00:05:55,000 --> 00:05:57,720 Speaker 1: are somewhat high, does the cost of capital stay low 101 00:05:57,800 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 1: du bon less say low to justify those moves. So 102 00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:02,560 Speaker 1: we're not worried that some of these markets are a 103 00:06:03,880 --> 00:06:07,080 Speaker 1: it's really been broadly justified by a very strong recovery 104 00:06:07,120 --> 00:06:09,240 Speaker 1: and earnings growth. Well, let's pick up on something that 105 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:13,240 Speaker 1: time focused on, having to do with dollar denominated returns. 106 00:06:13,279 --> 00:06:15,160 Speaker 1: You think the dollar is going to remain weak or 107 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,280 Speaker 1: get weaker. Our view is the dollar will go down 108 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 1: again in two thousand and eighteen, not as much as 109 00:06:21,160 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 1: it's gone down this year. We've got the dollar euro 110 00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:27,359 Speaker 1: ending two thousand and eighteen at one five. It's about 111 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 1: one eighteen today, so nothing, not as big a move 112 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:34,120 Speaker 1: as as um as this year. What is interesting is, 113 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:36,480 Speaker 1: although the dollar has been weak this year, emerging mark 114 00:06:36,480 --> 00:06:39,479 Speaker 1: currencies have not gone up that much against the dollar. 115 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:42,680 Speaker 1: We've gone up about four percent, whereas dollars gone down 116 00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:45,200 Speaker 1: a long way against the euro. But the bottom line is, 117 00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:47,640 Speaker 1: even if you don't get much translation effect for EM 118 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:50,520 Speaker 1: returns because the dollar is is that week against some 119 00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:53,039 Speaker 1: of these EM currencies, what you get is when the 120 00:06:53,080 --> 00:06:55,599 Speaker 1: dollar goes down to liquidity comes out of the US 121 00:06:56,000 --> 00:06:58,800 Speaker 1: and chases yield and chases risk overseas so you've got 122 00:06:58,839 --> 00:07:01,839 Speaker 1: a very beneficial uidity effect. And if the dollar goes 123 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:04,240 Speaker 1: down again next year, which is the U B S cool, 124 00:07:04,920 --> 00:07:07,600 Speaker 1: that liquidity is going to continue at the margin to 125 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 1: come towards em and it's going to give us a 126 00:07:09,880 --> 00:07:12,400 Speaker 1: decent year again next year. Jeff Dennis with the UBS 127 00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:36,560 Speaker 1: right now on oil, And let me just get this 128 00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:38,400 Speaker 1: out of the way. We're not going to send out 129 00:07:38,440 --> 00:07:41,800 Speaker 1: to you the Short Report, and it's gorgeous venusia on 130 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:45,720 Speaker 1: veils and pistons and pumps, because we protect the copyright 131 00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:48,760 Speaker 1: of our guests. Contact Mr Short when he's not watching 132 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:53,800 Speaker 1: the Tenant one Philadelphia Eagles. Stephen, good morning, Good morning. 133 00:07:54,760 --> 00:07:57,600 Speaker 1: What is the distinctive feature here at the top of 134 00:07:57,640 --> 00:07:59,960 Speaker 1: the home on the range. We're right up against the 135 00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:03,360 Speaker 1: range on w T I in Brent. What's the thing 136 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:08,480 Speaker 1: you're watching as we hit this range peak right now? 137 00:08:08,560 --> 00:08:12,320 Speaker 1: It's that big magical sixty number. There's nothing special about it, Tom, 138 00:08:12,440 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 1: It's just the fact that it's a psychological number. The 139 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:19,480 Speaker 1: next handle in the iteration. But to that point, we're 140 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:24,160 Speaker 1: getting up and we're pushing up eight dollars. Momentum is 141 00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:27,240 Speaker 1: starting to stall, and in fact, some of the technical indicators, 142 00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:31,320 Speaker 1: momentum oscillators so forth indicate that the market has peaked, 143 00:08:31,840 --> 00:08:35,120 Speaker 1: at least for a short term. That is to say, 144 00:08:35,160 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 1: we did get the announcement, Uh not unexpected that we're 145 00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 1: going to get the extension with OPEC and the quotas 146 00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:45,840 Speaker 1: all right now. There really isn't any kind of follow 147 00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:49,960 Speaker 1: through on the NOMI strikes. This question came up like 148 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 1: four times today. Does Vienna matter to American oil analysis? Uh? No, 149 00:08:57,679 --> 00:09:01,000 Speaker 1: it's actually it's an excellent point. We essentially for the 150 00:09:01,040 --> 00:09:03,240 Speaker 1: past ten years have I had a fiber caded markets 151 00:09:03,880 --> 00:09:08,160 Speaker 1: in that the US now becoming a powerhouse with regard 152 00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:12,199 Speaker 1: to its own entry production and becoming a significant exporter 153 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 1: on the refined products and a burgeoning exporter in the 154 00:09:16,360 --> 00:09:21,440 Speaker 1: crudel market. Essentially, we're having two different market areas here. 155 00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:25,800 Speaker 1: So you have the United States, North America essentially Canada 156 00:09:26,040 --> 00:09:30,079 Speaker 1: and the United States. Unfortunately Mexico, given their infrastructure issues, 157 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 1: is not part of that. But and then you have, 158 00:09:32,960 --> 00:09:36,119 Speaker 1: of course the global market and the growth with Asian refiners. 159 00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 1: Pim Fox were here by pause a listener in London, 160 00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:43,600 Speaker 1: Brandon emails in wait. The eagles are ten and one 161 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:47,960 Speaker 1: question mark best Inlite. Question Mark, thank you for listening 162 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 1: on Radio London this morning. Absolutely, we're here in Philadelphia, 163 00:09:53,400 --> 00:09:58,320 Speaker 1: as shocked as anyone that about anyone that sounds like 164 00:09:58,360 --> 00:10:01,319 Speaker 1: you're from Philadelphia A Steven. I want to put you 165 00:10:01,400 --> 00:10:03,360 Speaker 1: back on track here having to do with oil and 166 00:10:03,360 --> 00:10:06,079 Speaker 1: and perhaps something that I know I missed over the weekend. 167 00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:10,200 Speaker 1: On Sunday, there was a big conclave in Saudi Arabia. UH, 168 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:15,040 Speaker 1: the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salmon. He brought together forty 169 00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:21,240 Speaker 1: other islam Islamic countries and they are in a agreement 170 00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:24,920 Speaker 1: of a counter terrorism alliance. I'm wondering if you could 171 00:10:24,920 --> 00:10:28,120 Speaker 1: just speak about that and the calls by the Crown 172 00:10:28,240 --> 00:10:31,280 Speaker 1: Prince to introduce what he describes as a more moderate 173 00:10:31,800 --> 00:10:38,040 Speaker 1: form of Islam into Saudi Arabia and whether that will 174 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:41,280 Speaker 1: in some way change the dynamic of you know, Iran 175 00:10:41,640 --> 00:10:47,240 Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia, because we'll get the geopolitics in a second. Yeah, absolutely, 176 00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:52,000 Speaker 1: yeah him, And we essentially saw back when the bear 177 00:10:52,120 --> 00:10:55,920 Speaker 1: market in oil began, it was prompted by Saudi Arabia's 178 00:10:56,080 --> 00:10:59,360 Speaker 1: refusal to take oil off of the market. UH. And 179 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:03,080 Speaker 1: that had and three Thanksgivings ago when A ministers met 180 00:11:03,160 --> 00:11:06,720 Speaker 1: indianna Um. What was left on set is the previous 181 00:11:06,800 --> 00:11:11,800 Speaker 1: Monday UH back in Vienna, the West sat down with 182 00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:15,319 Speaker 1: Iran with reguards to the nuclear ambitions of Turan, and 183 00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:18,800 Speaker 1: Tahurran got up and walked away from the table. UH. 184 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:23,800 Speaker 1: That simply, in my estimation, UH prompted Saudi Arabia to 185 00:11:24,040 --> 00:11:26,920 Speaker 1: go into an economic warfare with with Iran, and hence 186 00:11:26,960 --> 00:11:29,480 Speaker 1: we had oil plunge from seventy five dollars down to 187 00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:33,560 Speaker 1: about twenty five dollars a barrel. However, shortly thereafter be 188 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:37,480 Speaker 1: not exacquiesced and struck a deal with Iran. So that 189 00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:41,040 Speaker 1: kind of put a Saudi Arabia's plans on hold, but 190 00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 1: certainly with the growing tension UH with a Saudi Arabia 191 00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:49,800 Speaker 1: and Guitar essentially pushing potentially Quitar into Iran's arms, right 192 00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:55,199 Speaker 1: because Iran and Qatar were not invited to this summit. Yeah, exactly. So, 193 00:11:55,200 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 1: So it's the age old soony shea ripped within Opec UH, 194 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:04,280 Speaker 1: and that is certainly the black Swan event out there 195 00:12:04,360 --> 00:12:06,360 Speaker 1: for the new year. All right, So if that's the 196 00:12:06,400 --> 00:12:08,960 Speaker 1: black Swan, how would you trade that You're at crewe 197 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 1: to fifty seven and change right now. Absolutely, I'm yeah, 198 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:16,600 Speaker 1: I think that we are on the top of the 199 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:20,839 Speaker 1: range at this point. Uh. This is a level high 200 00:12:20,880 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 1: fifties for North American producers, mid sixties, uh, for the 201 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:29,880 Speaker 1: global producers. Opportunities to hedge. And what what you always 202 00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:32,720 Speaker 1: want to look at, guys, is who's been doing the buying, 203 00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:35,720 Speaker 1: who's been doing the selling? And right now the buyer 204 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:39,880 Speaker 1: has been a speculator Wall Street very short term view. 205 00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:43,720 Speaker 1: More importantly, it's he's been doing the seller. To keep 206 00:12:43,720 --> 00:12:46,240 Speaker 1: in mind that a crude all producer has to sell. 207 00:12:46,320 --> 00:12:48,240 Speaker 1: He's the only one who has to sell his barrel. 208 00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:51,520 Speaker 1: And we look at the hedging activity, we're looking at 209 00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:56,240 Speaker 1: hedging at an all time high at these levels. Yes, well, 210 00:12:56,240 --> 00:13:00,240 Speaker 1: that's a one way that you're you're predicting lower right, Uh, yeah, 211 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:02,040 Speaker 1: I think we're at there. I think we are are 212 00:13:02,120 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 1: really pushing up against the top of the market, and 213 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:08,000 Speaker 1: I would expect to see moderation uh into the new year. Okay, 214 00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:11,240 Speaker 1: but why don't we go to Stephen short barrel or 215 00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:13,880 Speaker 1: whatever you're predicting a year ago? I mean, is is 216 00:13:13,920 --> 00:13:16,080 Speaker 1: it just because demand is kicked in to put a 217 00:13:16,120 --> 00:13:20,079 Speaker 1: floor under the range. Yeah, we're essentially you know, we 218 00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:23,840 Speaker 1: we yell yoed in between that that low forty dollar range, 219 00:13:23,920 --> 00:13:27,640 Speaker 1: mid fifty dollar range over the past year. Uh. Certainly 220 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:31,640 Speaker 1: we've had a significant rally UH in the market or 221 00:13:31,840 --> 00:13:35,079 Speaker 1: fall since post Harvey. Actually uh, and then you had 222 00:13:35,080 --> 00:13:38,680 Speaker 1: to disconnect, um to be expected between the Brent market 223 00:13:38,880 --> 00:13:42,199 Speaker 1: and the oil market given the impact that they had 224 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:46,400 Speaker 1: on the storms had on logistics in North America. So 225 00:13:46,520 --> 00:13:49,120 Speaker 1: at this point, yes, there there is demand. But let's 226 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:53,560 Speaker 1: keep in mind also that speculators have certainly come into 227 00:13:53,559 --> 00:13:57,440 Speaker 1: the market recently. For the latest update from the c FPC, 228 00:13:58,200 --> 00:14:01,320 Speaker 1: Wall Street is now sitting on already six week high 229 00:14:01,880 --> 00:14:06,120 Speaker 1: in their long position UH, and they've cut their short 230 00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:10,200 Speaker 1: position to a thirty week glow. So certainly when you're 231 00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:13,960 Speaker 1: cutting your short position, you're buying back the market, and 232 00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:16,440 Speaker 1: that certainly has been in impetus to some of the 233 00:14:16,440 --> 00:14:18,520 Speaker 1: strength in the market. Steven S, thank you so much. 234 00:14:18,520 --> 00:14:38,320 Speaker 1: The short report greatly appreciated. Ashwin Alan Carr joins us. 235 00:14:38,360 --> 00:14:42,680 Speaker 1: He is, of course, said right, Jannis Henderson, Global Asset 236 00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:48,680 Speaker 1: Allocation and Risk Management. And you know Ashwin, Tom during 237 00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:52,920 Speaker 1: the break, we were talking about how fear and emotion 238 00:14:53,720 --> 00:14:58,200 Speaker 1: can change the way you trade risk. And you mentioned 239 00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:02,720 Speaker 1: something earlier that I just want you to maybe expand 240 00:15:02,760 --> 00:15:06,680 Speaker 1: on having to do with people that are not experts 241 00:15:06,760 --> 00:15:12,720 Speaker 1: or veterans of trading risk now participating in this market. 242 00:15:13,080 --> 00:15:16,880 Speaker 1: Could they be the weak link where things go bad? 243 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:20,480 Speaker 1: I think you're exactly right. I think they because they're 244 00:15:20,520 --> 00:15:23,800 Speaker 1: not experienced. If fear is going to set in, it's 245 00:15:23,840 --> 00:15:28,200 Speaker 1: going to set in first with those who are uncomfortable 246 00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:34,560 Speaker 1: or exploring an unknown territory. And there are many, many investors, 247 00:15:34,600 --> 00:15:40,320 Speaker 1: from very risk averse institutional investors to even retail investors 248 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:45,480 Speaker 1: who have jumped on this bandwagon of selling volatility, whether 249 00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:48,600 Speaker 1: it be interest rate volatility, whether it be currency volatility, 250 00:15:48,600 --> 00:15:52,200 Speaker 1: whether it be equity volatility, the first sign of stress. 251 00:15:52,680 --> 00:15:55,000 Speaker 1: Who are the first people to jump off the train? 252 00:15:55,360 --> 00:15:59,560 Speaker 1: It's those who are not who are inexperienced, who haven't 253 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,760 Speaker 1: gone through these ebbs and flows before. So that is 254 00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:07,600 Speaker 1: the weak link. UM that link drops, the whole chain 255 00:16:07,720 --> 00:16:10,200 Speaker 1: is going to get impacted. UM. This is not only 256 00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:14,760 Speaker 1: going to impact volatility levels, this will also impact the 257 00:16:14,800 --> 00:16:18,680 Speaker 1: flattening we see in the term structure of interest rates UM. 258 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:22,120 Speaker 1: So those holders and everyone is moving into the long 259 00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:25,960 Speaker 1: end of the curve um. Risk comes back term premium 260 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:30,760 Speaker 1: by definition must come back term structure. Stephens. One of 261 00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:34,640 Speaker 1: the biggest crowds today is long the long end of 262 00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:37,480 Speaker 1: the curve um and underweight the short end of the 263 00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:40,920 Speaker 1: What happens when that reverses, We'll have to see. I 264 00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:42,480 Speaker 1: want to rip up the script or ash and I 265 00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:44,840 Speaker 1: don't want to use in trouble with Mr gross or 266 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:47,760 Speaker 1: with a general council of Janice Anderson. But I've got 267 00:16:47,760 --> 00:16:52,680 Speaker 1: to ask with your mathematics about the auction process, the 268 00:16:52,680 --> 00:16:57,800 Speaker 1: bid asque process of bitcoin. We've all seen this before. 269 00:16:58,440 --> 00:17:01,000 Speaker 1: Market pros are like, how many times have we been 270 00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:05,760 Speaker 1: down this road? And so much of this is not 271 00:17:05,920 --> 00:17:09,080 Speaker 1: only the mystery of who's on the bid and who's 272 00:17:09,119 --> 00:17:14,320 Speaker 1: on the asked, but the small set of people or institutions. 273 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:17,640 Speaker 1: Do I have that right? Do you exactly have that right? 274 00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:21,840 Speaker 1: That bitcoin? A lot of people, in my opinion, are 275 00:17:22,080 --> 00:17:26,760 Speaker 1: misinterpreting the bitcoin as the block chain. The blockchain has 276 00:17:26,840 --> 00:17:30,800 Speaker 1: tremendous value to it because it's a ledger um. It's 277 00:17:30,840 --> 00:17:37,399 Speaker 1: a real time authentic um apparently bulletproof ledger, distributed ledger. 278 00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 1: It's a distributed ledger um. The bitcoin, however, is just 279 00:17:42,200 --> 00:17:46,960 Speaker 1: one key to that ledger. There are many cryptocurrencies, there's 280 00:17:47,040 --> 00:17:51,560 Speaker 1: many keys to the that that vault that the blockchain provides. 281 00:17:52,200 --> 00:17:56,320 Speaker 1: Um So, Bitcoin by itself, it's not clear what value 282 00:17:56,320 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 1: it has. It's very clear the blockchain has tremendous value. 283 00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:04,119 Speaker 1: You the blockchain is a game changer, but bitcoin is 284 00:18:04,240 --> 00:18:10,560 Speaker 1: just one key to that chain. Um So, people should 285 00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:14,639 Speaker 1: be wary of bitcoin. I don't believe bitcoin presents systemic 286 00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:17,680 Speaker 1: risk for exactly the reasons you said, Tom right that 287 00:18:17,800 --> 00:18:20,679 Speaker 1: a small group of people who are participating, um so, 288 00:18:20,760 --> 00:18:24,880 Speaker 1: it's not a systemic event. But seeing me is going 289 00:18:24,920 --> 00:18:28,960 Speaker 1: to launch futures on bitcoin. Um as more and more 290 00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:33,440 Speaker 1: people have access to cryptocurrencies, and these people, once again 291 00:18:33,480 --> 00:18:38,040 Speaker 1: are inexperience. They're not technologists, they don't really understand truly 292 00:18:38,480 --> 00:18:41,600 Speaker 1: the intricacies of what a cryptocurrency are. Just like the 293 00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:46,400 Speaker 1: inexperienced people who are selling volatility today. It creates a 294 00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:49,920 Speaker 1: dangerous recipe. This has been hugely valuable actually occur with 295 00:18:50,000 --> 00:19:11,800 Speaker 1: us with Janis Henderson, Thank you so much. The single 296 00:19:11,800 --> 00:19:14,359 Speaker 1: best essay of the day, and Marvin good Friend has 297 00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:16,800 Speaker 1: been Mr Emmons of Intellectists of course for years at 298 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:19,560 Speaker 1: Pimco as well. Ben, I'm going to go right to 299 00:19:19,600 --> 00:19:23,000 Speaker 1: the punchline, which is, with Mr good Friend coming on, 300 00:19:23,600 --> 00:19:27,040 Speaker 1: it makes the Stanley Fisher's slot, the vice chair slot, 301 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:31,200 Speaker 1: that much more important. How does it change the who 302 00:19:31,240 --> 00:19:34,159 Speaker 1: of the vice chair? Hi, good morning, Tolum, Thanks for 303 00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:38,080 Speaker 1: having me. Um, Well, it changes because good friends. You know, 304 00:19:38,119 --> 00:19:41,640 Speaker 1: as you've been described montros econumnists, you know that vice 305 00:19:41,720 --> 00:19:44,200 Speaker 1: chair is really the person that brings it all in 306 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:47,200 Speaker 1: balance right against the others and um, you know sort 307 00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:51,240 Speaker 1: of so that is an important critical boymans. So if 308 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:54,440 Speaker 1: that would be someone was also a more monitors view 309 00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:58,360 Speaker 1: of fat policy, then we really are shifting next year. 310 00:19:59,119 --> 00:20:01,679 Speaker 1: This is almost like the Supreme Court in that I 311 00:20:01,720 --> 00:20:04,919 Speaker 1: guess if you get five to four monitors versus Keynesian, 312 00:20:05,359 --> 00:20:09,520 Speaker 1: that's a big deal. How close equivalent is the f 313 00:20:09,720 --> 00:20:14,600 Speaker 1: O m C process to a five four Supreme Court? 314 00:20:14,800 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 1: Either way? Yeah, I think it's changing. My sense from 315 00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:22,479 Speaker 1: this is that the you know, with power coming on 316 00:20:22,600 --> 00:20:25,720 Speaker 1: this chair, that we are seeing somewhat of a shift 317 00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:27,639 Speaker 1: of the agenda. At least, you know, there's there's a 318 00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:30,400 Speaker 1: focus on growth. I thought that testimony that power was 319 00:20:30,560 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 1: emphasizing that this is my interpretation. So I think we 320 00:20:34,320 --> 00:20:36,760 Speaker 1: are you know, as you described the Supreme Court's way, 321 00:20:37,280 --> 00:20:40,119 Speaker 1: like yeah, you get this balance of different people on 322 00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:42,960 Speaker 1: the board. You know, it's just expressing your view about 323 00:20:42,960 --> 00:20:45,800 Speaker 1: the economy in a different way than before. The change 324 00:20:45,880 --> 00:20:47,840 Speaker 1: in view that I think is the f has followed 325 00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:50,480 Speaker 1: the law of the last number of years, maybe shifting. 326 00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:53,280 Speaker 1: It may not be pure monitors, but it's that has 327 00:20:53,280 --> 00:20:55,520 Speaker 1: a certain tone in there. But then I just want 328 00:20:55,560 --> 00:20:57,000 Speaker 1: to follow up on what you said having to do 329 00:20:57,080 --> 00:20:59,679 Speaker 1: with with growth, as if the current makeup of the 330 00:20:59,680 --> 00:21:03,560 Speaker 1: Federal Reserve is not focused on growth, it seems to 331 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 1: be doing everything they can in order to maintain growth, 332 00:21:06,040 --> 00:21:08,640 Speaker 1: whether it's you know, maintaining that nice big balance sheet 333 00:21:08,680 --> 00:21:13,440 Speaker 1: although the runoff is beginning, or accommodative interest rates now 334 00:21:13,440 --> 00:21:15,560 Speaker 1: that's rooping. I mean, it's it's it's it's not like 335 00:21:15,640 --> 00:21:18,280 Speaker 1: they actually are adverse to growth. But I think the 336 00:21:18,280 --> 00:21:20,840 Speaker 1: point about it is more it is is that you know, 337 00:21:20,880 --> 00:21:23,000 Speaker 1: we're a full employment on air and that's sort of 338 00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:26,040 Speaker 1: the conclusion. We know inflation remains on the target, but 339 00:21:26,359 --> 00:21:29,240 Speaker 1: you know what's missing has been growth, really right, I mean, 340 00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:32,200 Speaker 1: we have been you know, two percentage sort of growth, 341 00:21:32,320 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 1: so that the way the fat can stimulate that is 342 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:37,560 Speaker 1: really about this coordination with the government right of what 343 00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:39,800 Speaker 1: the type of reforms need to take place, whether it's 344 00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:43,600 Speaker 1: through regulation or labor market reforms, in order to get 345 00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:46,560 Speaker 1: the growth really back on track. I think that's the 346 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:49,840 Speaker 1: key critical element which came It was a lot of 347 00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:53,440 Speaker 1: that discussion in the Powell testimony. I think that's that's 348 00:21:53,480 --> 00:21:56,199 Speaker 1: the change here. I mean, obviously, low interest rates have 349 00:21:56,240 --> 00:21:59,359 Speaker 1: stimulated the economy to an extent, but not to degree 350 00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:01,679 Speaker 1: that you would have expected that would have happened normally, right, 351 00:22:01,720 --> 00:22:04,320 Speaker 1: that growth would have rebound aboff trend that only has 352 00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:09,800 Speaker 1: happened temporarily two and two fourteen. So really looking at 353 00:22:09,880 --> 00:22:13,119 Speaker 1: something I think the Feathers focused on working with the 354 00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:15,600 Speaker 1: government on the right amount of reforms in labor market 355 00:22:15,640 --> 00:22:19,040 Speaker 1: and bank regulation. You're bringing a smile to to Tom's 356 00:22:19,160 --> 00:22:22,760 Speaker 1: to Tom's face here, yeah, I'm glad to hear that, 357 00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:25,760 Speaker 1: because you know, it would be great if it actually 358 00:22:25,760 --> 00:22:28,480 Speaker 1: works right And as of course, yeah that actually you know, 359 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:31,600 Speaker 1: if those those are difficult words when you're talking about 360 00:22:31,600 --> 00:22:34,520 Speaker 1: the future of the economy, I just want to post 361 00:22:34,560 --> 00:22:36,600 Speaker 1: you one one question here having to do with this 362 00:22:36,920 --> 00:22:42,000 Speaker 1: appointment and growth is blowing a hole in the federal deficit? 363 00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:45,320 Speaker 1: Is that a way to do this? Yeah? And so 364 00:22:45,600 --> 00:22:48,359 Speaker 1: there's a point about that that needed that deficits and 365 00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:51,560 Speaker 1: recession or closely closely links, right, I mean that it's 366 00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:54,560 Speaker 1: been the pass like that before. Right. That's that's critical 367 00:22:54,600 --> 00:22:57,080 Speaker 1: of course, Like how can the depth shit that you 368 00:22:57,200 --> 00:23:01,560 Speaker 1: increase really generators growth that avoid the recession? Right? That 369 00:23:01,560 --> 00:23:04,560 Speaker 1: that's what we're going to be challenged with. You know, 370 00:23:04,760 --> 00:23:07,560 Speaker 1: the the yuker flattening that we've had this year could 371 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:10,040 Speaker 1: be interpreted shot shot that you know, it is not 372 00:23:10,080 --> 00:23:12,720 Speaker 1: a streaming price in the yuker for the deficit rater. 373 00:23:13,520 --> 00:23:16,359 Speaker 1: The market interprets the increases the deficit as a as 374 00:23:16,400 --> 00:23:19,480 Speaker 1: an probability of a recession increasing over the number of 375 00:23:19,720 --> 00:23:23,120 Speaker 1: next number of years. That's an opposing view to the 376 00:23:23,400 --> 00:23:25,080 Speaker 1: point east that we're getting now on the board. Right. 377 00:23:25,119 --> 00:23:27,560 Speaker 1: That's with this more GDP focus, I want to get 378 00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:30,920 Speaker 1: the phrases right here as we go to the nomination process, 379 00:23:30,920 --> 00:23:33,280 Speaker 1: and what I would suggest will be important scrutiny of 380 00:23:33,400 --> 00:23:36,879 Speaker 1: Professor good Friend. You keep using the word monitorius. Marvin 381 00:23:36,920 --> 00:23:39,280 Speaker 1: good Friend is out of Union College connected a good 382 00:23:39,320 --> 00:23:43,960 Speaker 1: morning Mohawk Valley and Brown University, which is the land 383 00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:47,480 Speaker 1: of Bill Pool. I mean huge influence decades ago. The 384 00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:51,680 Speaker 1: former president of the St. Louis FED. Is Marvin good 385 00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:56,879 Speaker 1: Friend a monitoriust like M one, M two, M three 386 00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:01,119 Speaker 1: and Mr Pool? Or is he a deaf kind of 387 00:24:01,240 --> 00:24:05,400 Speaker 1: moderist in a modern age? So I think the monterist 388 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:08,359 Speaker 1: idea of that is that you and referring to his 389 00:24:08,440 --> 00:24:12,840 Speaker 1: paper at the Kansas Fat where he was focused on, 390 00:24:13,600 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 1: you know, taking away the lower zero bounds because that's 391 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:20,320 Speaker 1: a constraint of multipolicy. Um. You know, that speaks to 392 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:23,600 Speaker 1: the view about price stability more thans opposed to the 393 00:24:23,720 --> 00:24:27,520 Speaker 1: target right. And I think that idea is about that 394 00:24:28,000 --> 00:24:31,440 Speaker 1: that the ECB that has I think from that perspective 395 00:24:31,440 --> 00:24:35,040 Speaker 1: of monsters view that Monterrey transmission works better on our 396 00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:38,480 Speaker 1: price stability than then this target right because it sets 397 00:24:38,520 --> 00:24:42,640 Speaker 1: too much of a numerical level on inflation as opposed 398 00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:46,440 Speaker 1: to having you know, around about in faction at two 399 00:24:46,520 --> 00:24:50,920 Speaker 1: or two. So I think that's really the idea other 400 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:53,720 Speaker 1: than they did a freedment view of about mount policy 401 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:58,000 Speaker 1: as in and and times velocity equals out boot times prices. 402 00:24:58,160 --> 00:25:01,159 Speaker 1: That's not what we're talking about here right now. I 403 00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:03,960 Speaker 1: don't think so. I think it's I think it's important. Yeah, 404 00:25:04,160 --> 00:25:06,520 Speaker 1: I agree to them. I think it's more about I 405 00:25:06,560 --> 00:25:08,320 Speaker 1: think good Friend is more about I want to take 406 00:25:08,359 --> 00:25:11,920 Speaker 1: away the constraint on multi policy on the lower Gero bounce. 407 00:25:12,160 --> 00:25:14,760 Speaker 1: That's that's important. Okay, But Ben, but just because the 408 00:25:14,760 --> 00:25:16,399 Speaker 1: time we're gonna have to run here in one minute, 409 00:25:16,720 --> 00:25:22,399 Speaker 1: the great book by Lawrence Meyer of Washington University of St. 410 00:25:22,440 --> 00:25:27,360 Speaker 1: Louis uh a term at the FED. He got nowhere 411 00:25:27,400 --> 00:25:31,720 Speaker 1: with Alan Greenspan. Why do we think any governor, including 412 00:25:31,880 --> 00:25:37,320 Speaker 1: Professor good Friend, is going to get anywhere with Chairman Powell. Yeah, 413 00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:39,639 Speaker 1: and that that's a fair point. I he will be 414 00:25:39,720 --> 00:25:42,359 Speaker 1: one voice good Friends, one voice on the board. So 415 00:25:42,720 --> 00:25:45,600 Speaker 1: that is the position. So again back to the earlier question, 416 00:25:45,920 --> 00:25:48,280 Speaker 1: who's going to be the appointee of the vice chair 417 00:25:49,040 --> 00:25:53,359 Speaker 1: is critical in that respect. He will have influence. Of course, 418 00:25:53,480 --> 00:25:56,640 Speaker 1: just point out in the note Charles Blosser and and 419 00:25:56,640 --> 00:25:59,840 Speaker 1: and and the als past Fisher back into thousand thirteen 420 00:26:00,119 --> 00:26:02,080 Speaker 1: made it a really strong case to and quee and 421 00:26:02,160 --> 00:26:06,440 Speaker 1: ultimately Bernanke did follow somewhere through on that on their 422 00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:08,960 Speaker 1: arguments right, and so a good friend will make that 423 00:26:09,119 --> 00:26:13,720 Speaker 1: voice too of know how to conduct policy, but the 424 00:26:13,800 --> 00:26:16,760 Speaker 1: vice chair makes a big difference there. So um I 425 00:26:16,800 --> 00:26:21,960 Speaker 1: would agree that he will fully influence the policy by himself. 426 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:26,639 Speaker 1: Obviously it really heightened the vice chair choice. Uh this morning, 427 00:26:26,680 --> 00:26:29,440 Speaker 1: and I should mentioned Ben Emmon's thank you so much 428 00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:33,320 Speaker 1: I'm short, not his terrific essay for his intellectist partners clients. 429 00:26:44,480 --> 00:26:48,720 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and 430 00:26:48,760 --> 00:26:54,080 Speaker 1: listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast 431 00:26:54,119 --> 00:26:58,359 Speaker 1: platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane. Before 432 00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:02,240 Speaker 1: the podcast, you can always catch just worldwide. I'm Bloomberg 433 00:27:02,320 --> 00:27:02,600 Speaker 1: Radio