WEBVTT - Can Harris Lead? - August 29th, Hour 1 0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160 Well, we have come in your city, gets saying you 0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:15.480 a contun will be desired. Tell and if you want 0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:16.400 a little bang in. 0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.079 A union, I come along DNC and it's media Organs 0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:24.919 engineer a surge of popularity for Vice President Harris based 0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:29.040 upon oh nothing only smoking mirrors. 0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.480 Is it now the position of the Democrats that they 0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:32.880 favored the border wall? 0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.920 Well, you can ask the Horris campaign about that. 0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:37.200 Head. 0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.400 Let's be perfectly clear, the president's medieval vanity project is 0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:43.519 not going to stop them. 0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:54.160 O'clock sixty eight days left until the presidentially election. 0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:56.280 We're coming. 0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:58.400 To your city. 0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.280 Don't play our guest and saying you a conscious. 0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:11.480 Song from coast to coast, from border to border, from 0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:16.479 c to Shining Sea. Sean Kennedy is. 0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:24.280 On, Hello America, and welcome to the Sean Handity Show. 0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.960 Because you're wise and discerning, you probably know this is 0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.720 not Sean Handy's voice. This is Eric Eggers and I'm 0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.480 joined by Peter Schweitzer, and we're so excited to be 0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.840 guest hosting and filling in for Sean again. Here on 0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.680 the Sean Handy Show. We co host a program called 0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.600 The Drill Down, where we regularly expose cronyism and corruption 0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.840 with best selling Peter Schweitzer, who has been leading the 0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.480 charge and exposing the corruption of the Biden family and 0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.480 now in the Kamala Harris presidency potentially Peter Schwitzer, how 0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:51.000 you doing. 0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.480 Hey, I'm doing great. It's good to be here with you, Eric, 0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.040 And Yeah, we're going to talk today about Kamala Harris, 0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.880 Tim Walls, things that people may not have heard about them, 0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.840 and we're also going to try to figure out why 0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.400 all this hype exists around Kamala Harris and what can 0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.440 be done to sort of expose the truth make sure 0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.359 that people understand exactly what these individuals have in their background. 0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.160 Yeah. I love the intro because we just heard from 0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.640 RFK Junior sand and the DNC basically is fabricated like 0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.639 a magic show, the enthusiasm around the Kamala Harris candidacy. 0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.640 And you also heard Bernie Sanders say, don't ask me 0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.760 about what her polhecies are. Ask her. And that's why 0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.360 today is such a big day and why it's so 0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.520 fun to be filling in for Sean on this day 0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.280 because it's almost like Christmas morning because tonight, for the 0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.040 first time in a long time, for the first time 0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.160 actually in sixty three days. Peter Schweitzer, We're going to 0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.120 hear from Kamala Harris. You know, there's that phrase in 0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.400 the land of the blind, the one eyed man is 0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.760 king in the land of political kind of, we're all 0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.240 in the bag for Kamala Harris. Softball pre recorded questions 0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.840 from CNN's Dana Bash passes for real journalism. 0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.600 Yeah, here's the headline. By the way, on CNN, Harris 0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.640 is in an interview. Is the latest highly anticipated moment 0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.480 in a wild presidential race. In other words, this is 0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.000 kind of like a presidential summit. This is like staring 0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.000 down Putin, This is like meeting g. The hype behind 0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.080 this is ridiculous. She's sitting down with Dana Bash. She's 0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.720 gonna be asked softball questions, right, we could assume that. 0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.000 And she actually brought her wingman Tim Walls along. I mean, 0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.400 he's kind of the chaperone to this event. And yet 0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.560 they're treating it like this is some massive interview that's 0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.120 going to be a real test of her ability to 0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:31.919 be president. 0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:33.840 Yea, rather than a summit with g I'd actually more 0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.520 accurately compared to like, let's imagine you left town and 0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.120 you didn't feed your cat, and you've come back after 0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.200 like four days, and that cat is starving and it's thirsty, 0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.120 and they're so excited. That's essentially what Kamala Harris and 0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.720 her handlers have done. They starved the media beast. So 0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.320 now people will lap up anything they have to offer them. 0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.680 And it's been reported that whatever the conditions are of 0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.280 this interview with CNN's Dana Bash and we've got stuff 0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.280 to suggest that she may be something less than a 0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.840 neutral arbiter of truth in this interview. Whatever the conditions were, 0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.840 they weren't CNN's. They were the campaigns, correct. 0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:08.880 I'm sure what the campaign did is they went around 0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.680 to all the media outlets, the friendly media outlets, and said, look, 0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.920 here are our terms. We're gonna give it to you. 0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.560 If you don't agree to them, we'll just go to 0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.599 someone else. So we know that Tim Wats is included, 0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.320 it's not one on one. We know that it's pre taped, 0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.120 so it means if there's a flub, the campaign can 0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.400 can press CNN to edit it out or allow there 0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.200 to be some kind of a modification. And again, this 0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.440 is stuff that is really junior league I mean, if 0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.600 you're gonna be president of the United States. She's been 0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.600 vice president of the United States, she's presumably been overseas 0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.400 and met with foreign leaders. But this fear and this 0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.640 anxiety and this anticipation for it's a friendly interview. It's 0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.200 like it's like Donald Trump going on Fox. I mean, 0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:51.359 you know, he's gonna ask questions, but it's not going 0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.080 to be hostile. And you know it should be something 0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.159 she should be doing regularly, but she's not. 0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.120 You know, it almost sounds like it almost sounds like 0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.000 you're suggesting that we consider the context of this interview. 0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.279 Listen to one of my favorite philosophers and thought leaders 0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.599 encourage us to consider the context of all things. 0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:11.120 My mother used to She would give us a hard 0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.560 time sometimes and she would say to us, I don't 0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.120 know what's wrong with you, young people. Do you think 0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:21.039 you just fell out of a coconut tree? You exist 0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.720 in the context of all in which you live and 0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:26.880 what came before you. 0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.159 The audio doesn't do it justice because when you watch 0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.640 her say that, she does this pause with her face 0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.240 as if like I am crushing it right now, and 0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.600 you guys should be just you are welcome for this 0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.080 so we do we should consider the context in which 0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.799 this interview is occurring. The context is this The last 0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.240 time we heard from Kamala Harris was sixty three days 0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.000 ago on the heels of the presidential debate, when she 0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:50.919 said this. 0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.279 Yes, there was a slow start, but it was a 0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.960 strong finish. And what became very clear through the course 0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.599 of the night is that Joe Biden is fighting on 0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:04.840 behalf of the American people, on substance, on policy, on performance, 0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.160 Joe Biden is extraordinarily strong. 0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.080 Yeah, that's pretty amazing, right, That's what That was her 0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.280 assessment of what Joe Biden did. And of course that's 0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.240 what led that same performance that she was praising and 0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.080 saying is so great is what led Joe Biden ultimately 0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:22.080 to drop out of the race. 0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.200 So maybe not the strong finish she suggested that it 0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.480 had been in fact fact check. Now, what we do 0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.800 at the Government Accountabili Institut, of which Peter Schweizer is 0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.680 the president, what we do on our Drill Down podcast, 0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.080 and what Peter has done successfully in is many number 0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.240 one New York Times best selling books is exposed truth 0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.039 and expose the things that the government tries to lie 0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.440 to us. About what we just heard Kamala Harris do 0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.120 was lie to us about Joe Biden's fitness for office. 0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.200 That lies since been exposed, but we're now being sold 0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.040 another lie, Peter Schweiz, And that's kind of one of 0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.640 the things we're going to talk to you about today. 0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.200 We have a lot of really other cool stuff to 0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.320 talk about. We're going to hear from John Voyd about 0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.520 the film Reagan. We're going to hear from Susan Crabtree 0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.160 Real Politics about another lie the government's telling us as 0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.599 it relates to Secret Service. And we'll hear from people 0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.040 that lived through Tim Wats's Tierney in Minnesota. But the 0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:12.040 lie we're currently being sold is that Kamala Harris is 0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.760 not just competent as a presidential candidate, but maybe the 0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.880 most accomplished and most experienced and most ready to be president. 0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.760 Yeah, that's what we're being told. And I got to 0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.559 tell you I might do something that I've never done before, 0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.320 which is called a personal injury attorney, because I have whiplash. 0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.240 When you look at what the media has done, what 0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.080 they were saying just a couple of months ago to 0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.320 what they're doing now, it's really remarkable and I tell 0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.720 you there's I would encourage people to go and check 0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.840 out this book called The Truce that was published in 0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.800 January of this year by two left wing journalists. January 0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.200 of this year. January this year, that long ago, Yeah, exactly. 0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.640 And this is by two left wing journalists and it 0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.280 is sort of the inside look of the Democratic Party 0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.040 published by a major publisher, Brian Steltzer of you know, 0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.040 previously if CNN says, every thing you need to know 0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.559 about the state of the Democratic Party is in this book. 0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.360 And it's got, you know, great quotes from other people 0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.440 saying what an incredible, deeply reported look this is. And 0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.640 if you go through this book, you find all these 0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:20.440 amazing statements about Kamala Harris, about the toxic culture that 0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.680 existed in her staff. They interviewed hundreds of people and 0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:30.600 they say that they are all remarkably consistent about her mismanagement, 0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.800 the toxic culture. The quote one aid of saying she's 0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.680 not ready for time, prime time, she ain't made for this, 0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.160 and the quotes go on and on and on, and 0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.240 yet now what we're told is this is the person 0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.480 that's going to give us a new amazing administration. That 0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.679 she's energetic, she's you know, full of new ideas, she's creative. 0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.640 In other words, the same consensus that existed in the 0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.960 national media before this was that she is not ready 0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:00.880 for prime time, and in fact, the book even SAIDs 0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.440 the consensus am on White House AIDS was that Joe 0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.320 Biden was going to have to run for reelection because 0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:08.760 she was not ready for it. 0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.160 Which, by the way, is a very important point because 0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.199 you can wonder how did we get to the point 0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.440 where the debate in late June happened where Joe Biden, 0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.000 someone who universally had a seat, it seems, was recognized 0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:21.920 to not be up for the gig, not be up 0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:23.720 for the task. I mean, the debate was held after 0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.480 four pm is bedtime, by the way, So how dare 0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.800 they do that? In some states that's elder abuse. But 0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.160 how is it possible that they were trying to prop 0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:33.920 up a guy that they were so quickly ready to 0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.520 discard if not for what you just said, which is 0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.760 that the replacement was even worse, which, by the way, 0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.560 is what we were told after the fact, Right there 0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.920 was those three weeks that Joe Biden hung on for 0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.880 dear life. Was we were told that Kamala Harris is 0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.480 actually even less popular than he is. Yeah, that's right. 0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.080 And you know, as we've talked about before when we 0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:57.720 guest hosted for Sean before, the real driving force behind 0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.800 Joe Biden leaving office was Barack Obama, and I think 0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.320 that is what pushed him out of office. Barack Obama's 0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.880 close to Kamala Harris, and I think what they have 0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.760 decided because they know of the weaknesses. They talk about 0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.800 her weaknesses in this book. The solution is to simply 0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.680 adopt the basement strategy of twenty twenty. She's not going 0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.040 to do interviews. And by the way, I'm old enough 0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.360 to remember when Ron Reagan was president and he was 0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.760 walking in the White House lawn, Sam Donaldson will be 0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.520 screaming at him. I remember when the CNN correspondent would 0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.480 be screaming at Trump to take questions, to take his question. 0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:33.880 We don't get any of that with Kamala Harris. Nobody 0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.080 is screaming and trying to beat down the doors and 0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.120 say why are you not prepared to even sit down 0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.280 and talk to somebody in the mainstream media about what 0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:42.920 your views are. 0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.480 So Kamala Harris has received some criticism for the fact 0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.000 that she's doing this interview not alone. She's not just 0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.679 doing an interview as for the first time as the 0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.600 Democratic nominee for president. She's bringing her running mate, Governor 0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.800 Tim Waltz with her. You think that's significant. 0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.040 I think it is significant. I mean, look, the official 0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.120 line that they're giving, well after a convention, that's what 0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.480 always happens, that both of them sit down together, but 0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.160 that's when the interview takes place, like right at the 0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.199 convention or after the convention, it's been a couple of weeks. 0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.240 Or maybe even before the convention, after the person's been 0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:14.160 named as the run exactly exactly. 0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.520 I mean this to me, clearly, he is the chaperone. 0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.120 He's the one that if we get one of her 0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.880 word salads, if she kind of goes off and talks 0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.240 about coconut trees again, he's somebody that can kind of 0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.240 bring it back in kind of a strange way. I mean, 0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.880 this guy is not what you would call sort of 0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:35.040 a calming, settling influence. But that's clear to me that 0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.200 that's the reason that he's going to be doing this interview. 0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.320 And then the question is going to become after this 0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.000 because I imagine the interview is going to go pretty well. 0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.480 Dana Bash is going to ask, you know, easy questions. 0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.560 Let's remember that her former husband was one of the 0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.520 fifty one intelligence people that signed that document, you know, 0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.600 helping the Biden campaign saying that the Hunter Biden laptop 0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.040 was Russian disinformation. You know, So it's going to be 0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.160 a pretty easy interview. Then the question becomes one she 0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.720 actually gonna do one on her own with somebody that's 0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.120 even slightly possibly going to ask her aggressive questions. 0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.520 No, it's a great question. I'd like to compare what's 0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.320 happening now to if you ever bought a house, And 0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.160 the way we buy houses in this country is super 0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.760 weird because you look online, you get excited about what 0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.480 you see, and then you like go and tour the house, 0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:20.800 and then you agree to buy the house, and then 0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.920 you do the inspection and then you find out what's wrong, 0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:24.880 and then you question all your life choices and try 0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.319 to renegotiate the price. So we've been sold in Chicago, 0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.800 and for the last forty plus days we see the 0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.640 gloss these Zillow pictures of the Kamala Harris house online, 0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.200 and tonight for the first time we get maybe a 0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.640 sneak peek at the inspection report, we find out, you know, 0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.440 are there cobwebs in the attic? Are there migrants hiding 0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.520 in the basement? Are there structural problems? As lots of 0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.120 the reporting before this time has suggested that there are. 0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.800 So we hope that there's at least something resembling a 0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.600 decent inspection of the presidential campaign. But we don't think 0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:55.280 that that's going to happen. 0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.160 No, I don't think that's going to happen because, look, 0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.280 I mean CNN in addition to having the bias that 0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:01.800 they have, and you know, look, we used to work 0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.720 with CNN all the time, not anymore, but they have 0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.840 their biases. But on top of that, this is the 0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.559 way that the media game is played by the Democrats. 0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.679 If they press her with aggressive questions, guess what, CNN's 0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.600 not going to get any more interviews, They're not going 0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.120 to get any access. They played this game very well. 0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:21.800 And this is where you have to give Donald Trump 0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.640 a lot of credit. Trump goes on CNN, He's agreed 0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.160 to do a debate on ABC News, knowing sort of 0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.160 the hostility of some of the journalists there, so he's 0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:36.040 willing to go off and have tough questions hurled at him. 0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.800 She's not demonstrating the ability to even sit down with 0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.560 friendly journalists, not you know, to mention hostile ones. And 0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.720 of course the question is if if you can't stand 0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.840 up to a hostile media question, how are you going 0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:49.160 to stand up to g how are you going to 0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:50.160 stand up to putin No. 0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.240 It's a great question. It's one that won't be asked 0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.920 by CNN Data Bash tonight. But that's okay, that's what 0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.559 we're here for. We're taking your calls at Winnie hundred 0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.360 nine four one Sean went hundred nine four one one 0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.600 seven three to two six. When we come back, Peter 0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.599 Schweitzer and me Eric Eggers, we'll tell you some of 0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.880 the things you won't hear tonight on CNA. We'll tell 0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.559 you some of the problems that have already been exposed 0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.360 in the foundation of this Kamala Harris campaign. We've got 0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.000 a bit of a lying problem in both Kamala Harris 0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.640 and Tim Moff. We'll tell you about that next and 0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.520 the other side of this break on the Sean Handy Show. 0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:19.280 Thanks for being with us. 0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.000 It's Peter Schweitzer and Eric Eggers. We are filling in 0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.800 for Sean Handerdy joined the conversation one eight hundred nine 0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.640 to four to one Sean one eight hundred and nine 0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.880 four one seven, three, two six. We are talking about 0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.280 Kamala Harris, the anticipation that she's actually gonna face down 0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.960 Dana Bash with Tom tim Waltz. There of course, Uh, 0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.800 the interview coming out tonight, everybody's a buzz. But you 0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.160 were talking earlier before the break about the fact that 0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.600 there is a history here with both Walls and Kamala Harris, 0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.920 with frankly lying about their past in small things but 0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.520 also in some big things as well. 0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.440 Yeah, it seems kind of inconsequential, but when you consider 0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.440 the larger context, if you like, whether or not you 0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.720 consider the coconut tree as part of that, then I 0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.040 think it maybe adds up to wait, why should we 0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.280 believe you? So Kamala Harris started claiming in twenty nineteen, 0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.520 and Breitbart's reporting that some reporting really well done by 0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.040 the Washington Free Beacon. She started claiming that she had 0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.240 a job at McDonald's, you know, when she was younger. 0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.440 But she first mentions it in twenty nineteen. There's no 0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.480 mention of it in either of her memoirs which came 0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.040 out obviously she was launching and building her political career. 0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.920 And then the Washington Free Beacon has gone and gotten 0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.440 a form of a nineteen eighty seven job application in 0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:31.160 which she has been required to list every previous employment experience. 0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:32.360 Guess what's not on there? 0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:33.120 McDonald. 0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:35.400 McDonald's is not on there. And so it's like if 0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.800 they're lying about that, like if Tim Waltz is lying 0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.920 about winning the Young Nebraskan Award, and you know, lying 0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.240 about much larger things like did you carry a weapon 0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.440 in war? What was your rank? I think they starts 0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.280 to add up to a credibility problem that a good 0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.760 media should hold them accountable. 0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.560 For they should and in fact things of really high consequence. 0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.640 We're going to talk about this in the four o'clock hour. 0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.200 Kamala Harris ha is tout of the fact that she 0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.400 has been an aggressive prosecut of sexual crimes against minors. 0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.120 That is perhaps I think the biggest lie that he 0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:07.680 has shown. In fact, we're going to show in the 0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.720 four o'clock hour how she actually covered up massive numbers 0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.160 of crimes in San Francisco when she was a prosecutor, 0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.680 that she did so because the people that were backing 0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:24.480 her campaign financially were desiring that this problem just sort 0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.680 of go away. And it's a massive scandal that has 0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.479 been hinted at by a couple news outlets. The Associated 0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.200 Press covered it in a slight way in twenty nineteen, 0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.320 but we are going to dissect it in this entirety. 0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:37.560 Coming up after this break, we're going to be talking 0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.800 to the great John Voight about the new film Reagan. 0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:46.040 Didn't the IRS scandal and the NSA atrocities convince you 0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:50.680 you need a watch dog on Washington with insider sources. 0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:56.480 You need Hannity every day. Welcome back. It is this 0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.520 Sean Handy Show. Eric Eggers and Peter Schwartzer fill in 0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.720 for Sean, and we're so excited not just about our 0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.320 next guest, but about the film that he's in, which 0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:10.439 debuts in theaters nationwide tomorrow. It's Reagan, which doesn't take 0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.560 a genius figure out. It's about Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan. 0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.560 Peter Schweizer, you actually wrote a book and have been 0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.600 involved in a film about Ronald Reagan as well. 0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:17.320 Yeah. 0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.439 Absolutely, a great, wonderful, heroic figure and I'm thrilled to 0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.440 have John voight with us because not only is one 0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.120 of my favorite actors, but he's actually in this film 0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.520 and he plays I think, a very important role because 0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.119 I've always believed that the people that understood Reagan the 0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.560 best were the Soviets, and that's why they hated him 0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.359 so much, because they knew what he was about. John, 0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:39.960 are you there. 0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:45.400 Yes, I'm with you, guys. I'm you two of my heroes. 0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.000 So I'm just thinking to my heroes doing what they do. 0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.760 You are wonderful. I have enjoyed so many of your films, 0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.600 and I'm looking forward to seeing Reagan. I have not 0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.600 seen it yet. Tell me, John, what was it like 0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.840 when they came to you about this film and they 0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.080 told you, we don't actually want you to play Reagan 0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.080 or whin of Reagan's people. We want you to play 0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:11.000 this KGB agent who's trying to dissect who Reagan is 0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.280 and counter what Reagan does. 0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:18.240 Yeah. Well, I thought that they showed me the script 0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.520 and I it was a big, sprawling script at the time, 0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:28.320 and Dennis was attached to it, and they and I 0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.240 looked at it and I thought it was a very 0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:36.160 good idea that they had to show this fellow who 0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:43.480 actually carry he's assigned to follow the people who might 0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:47.240 be a danger into the future. So they have having 0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:51.119 profiles of various people across the world, and they found 0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.800 this guy who's talking against communism and was a successful 0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.960 actor in Hollywood and then had a political bent too. 0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.640 So they want from the beginning, and they put this 0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.800 in the film. They put this guy onto him. Now, 0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.239 this is not a real character of that name, but 0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.320 it represented several people that were doing this work for 0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.520 the Soviets, and so I thought it was appropriate. And 0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:22.119 I thought anybody who followed Reagan, you know, would be 0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.320 affected by him. And I thought that the film charted 0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.480 that kind of course, and it was a good idea, 0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.480 and I was right. I think when you see the film, 0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:36.439 you'll you'll see that it works quite well. And it 0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:41.520 would have been lesser had had somebody else been the 0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:49.400 narrator of his rise and his challenges and his and 0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.159 interpreting his work. You know. 0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:53.760 Yeah, I think Peter and I both believe this is 0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.520 an important film that occurs in an important moment in 0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.000 time in this nation, and so we're very excited about 0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.080 the fact that so many people will get the chance 0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.720 to see this film. John I did a little bit 0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.680 of research into you in your process, and you've spoken 0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.600