WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off August 1st, 2022 (Ep. 564)

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, friends, and welcome in to leading off right here

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Pros without Joey P. No Joe piece of Pia.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I do a pretty good trumpet, by the way. It's

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the few impressions that I can do. I

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>am Chris Welsh. I am your host for the foreseeable future.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I apologize that you have to you have to live

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>on without Joey P. But we will do so because

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>joe did actually leave, literally in the craziest, most important

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>time of the season, because oh, you know, like this

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>is where we're gonna win our fantasy championships, this is

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>where people are gonna go and play fantasy football. We

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of it. And oh, I don't know a

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline where all the big players and all the

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>big news is gonna move on. But I am not

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>doing it's solo because today joining me is the athletics

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>own Mike Curlin. You can find them on Twitter at

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Underscore Curlin. Sleepy k No more? What's up, Mike?

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Body?

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean? No more? I'm still sleeping.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm just on podcasts, just leaving it. Man, those are

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>good times.

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I was.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I had that whole conversation with my wife the other

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 3>day about it's been like three years since I started

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>podcasting on my couch on and that's why I fall asleep.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>You don't podcast on a couch, don't do that, So

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I recommend obviously.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 2>It's been one heck of a journey. And thank you

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>for having me. Man. It's always fun to get on here,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 2>and I'll hang out with you a little bit.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It's good to have you. I mean, this is actually

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a perfect situation for you as well. You know, Mike

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>has been known for all of his crazy, big breakdowns.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do a lot of breakdowns into this with

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>all of the coverage over at the Athletic also the

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>basis loaded podcasts. Do you have anything going rest of season?

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I know the turn is happening. What are you still

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>doing over at the Athletic right now?

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>So I think I might have one more lineup article.

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>What I do over the Athletic is it's kind of

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 3>a niche of mind as I drop everything I had

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 3>prepared in terms of notes and pen onto the it's

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>a I do the whole uh. I do lineup breakdowns.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I look at playing time situations. Who's playing platoons?

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm really big.

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm focusing on those, so it seems like the Giants

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 3>and the Rays really frustrate me. But what I do

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>is I do that for the for the athletic, I

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>talk about, you know, potential call ups, who's going, who's

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 3>affected in which way and why whenever there's a new

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 3>player added to a team or a new player called

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>up and all that. Just always quick to be on

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>it and try to break it down as to like

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 3>who you might want to look at and deeper formats.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the times this affects deeper formats and

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 3>then I carry that over and for the Patreon I

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>do that for them like once a month in season,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and then for my patreon at patreon dot com slash Skplaybook,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 3>I do like three or four of these write ups

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 3>a week, just again team by team, what's happening, who's

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 3>hitting well, who's doing poorly? Is there any new platoon forming?

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>Is there playing time issues popping up? And it's just

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 3>a constant. It's almost like just daily. It's like a

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 3>daily concept of it's a daily grind.

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 2>It really is.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Because I've stopped doing it every day because some of

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 3>it gets redundant.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 2>So I do.

0:02:58.120 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 3>That's why I try to get two three day chunks,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 3>because you'd be surprised how much changes in a two

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to three day period between injuries. Between this guy's oh

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 3>suddenly he went from starting every day vers lefties to

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 3>now he's only started one of three. And these are

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 3>types of things that we keep an eye on and

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>really focus on and discuss how this input, how these

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 3>can have this fallout in your fantasy lapse and maybe

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 3>you should make us add to your team or drop

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 3>this player, or maybe throw them on your bench stashing

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 3>for a little bit, because this trade inline has been

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 3>a big focus of mine in these write ups because

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 3>so much has set the change, and.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk a lot about a lot about

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this doctor. Glenn shout out and says, who is even

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Joey P I need one of those. I can't be

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like Chrissy Dubbs. That doesn't quite work have the same

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>ring to it. And I appreciate Wonky as she says,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I prefer my host to have hair and shout out

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to Wonky too. The pleasant surprise as the football crew

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>just completely ditched us and I was ready to go

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>full board with some of the show sheet and Wonky

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch of stuff ready. So I want to

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>give a big shout out to Kelly for doing all

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of that, and you will see Wonky on Wednesday for everybody.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into all the stuff here for the day,

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all of the craziness, because we actually have a weekend

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to cover and the trade deadline is thirty hours away

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>something like that, twenty eight hours away. But we had

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the one big massive trade and a little bit of

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>pokey pokey me here, Curly, and you weren't here for

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>this obviously, But everybody in the chat should know one

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>thing I do get. I do not get to have

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a hat tip of fran miil Reyis, as I have

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>been reminded about this year, but I do get a

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>hat tip about my takes on the trade deadline and

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Mariners, because the Mariners made a big trade

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, and I had been saying Joe kept asking,

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>oh trade trades, and I kept saying, I think the

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Mariners need to strike first, they need to go. Luis

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Castillo was one of those names. I think that was

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>literally what he asked before we left on Friday, Hey,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>who should? Maybe it was Thursday? Who should? Or where

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>should Luis Castillo go? I said, I think the Mariners

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>make sense. I think they should strike first before the market,

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and that is exactly what they did. And they shocked

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people by moving to wel Vi Marte,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge Di Dynasty piece. They also moved

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Edwin a Royo was actually a really big trade. I

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>broke it down over on the Prospect one podcast if

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys want to hear it for the Reds and

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>what the Reds are looking like now. But Carlin, I

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you Luis Castillo, not a lot of

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>wins are actually going to talk about that here in

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit A struggling offense with Cincinnati, the

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff is there. Do you see a big fantasy uptick

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>now that he is over and he is with the

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Mariners that are fighting and they're in contention, maybe

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a better ballpark, some better offense. What type of fantasy

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>uptick do you see Luis Castillo as a Mariner?

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I think you hit right on. It is first off

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 2>this year.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Specifically, oddly enough, over his career from what I saw Castillo,

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>who's era was actually worse on the road.

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you manage that one.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 3>But at the end of the day, better ballpark, better

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>team context, more chances for wins, which is a category

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 3>in some fantasy in most fantasy formats, even points leagues

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 3>where wins get you like what seven points depend on

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 3>your format, five points whatever.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll really helps all around.

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 3>This year alone, he has like a one and a

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>half ur difference between his home and road splits too,

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 3>So it's there's nothing not to like here, you know everything,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 3>it's all arrows pointing up.

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's it's something that I'm pretty happy about.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy with the move, especially if you're a Luis

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Castillo owner. I would, I would feel really good about it.

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>There's also something you could throw out to say that, like,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if you were to own Luis Castillo, that trade move

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>when he hasn't had a start yet really could get

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a solid return in a dynasty if you're not quite

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in it. This is a big boost to his dynasty value.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Why you hold and you don't move off of talented

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>players that might have some weird struggles and I don't know,

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>even into redraft, if you're wanting to mix stuff up,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing really good on the sp side. It's

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>something that you can take a look at, and huge

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>move for the Mariners. I wonder if they're done. I

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of don't think they're done. I think there's got

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>to be something else in the works. It does not

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>look like it's going to be one Soto. Been reports

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>out that the Soda Sweepstakes is down to three teams,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>though I am waiting for the crucial fourth team, mystery team.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>There's always mystery team that has joined in. The current

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sweepstakes participants are the Padres, Cardinals, and Dodgers Corilin I

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>have been very vocal about the Padres being the team

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for over a month, even when it wasn't. The Cardinals

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to kind of maybe have the best mixture that

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>fits with them, and I think you never count out

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers. It's something. I actually created a Dodger Soto

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>trade on itl Fantasy Baseball the other day. So does

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>one Soto get traded in the next twenty four hours

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and to whom.

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe for having this discussion, but I do

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 3>think he gets dealt because I think they're desperate to

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>move some of these They're trying to offload Corbin with them.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>That contract is horrendous, and I think they're going to

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>have to offload that contract in order to justify trading

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Soda in the first place, because realistically, Soto is gonna,

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, the money it's gonna take to resign them,

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the hall that it's gonna take to obtain them. There

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>is no such thing as a big enough return I

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 3>think for a jan Soda, because Won Soto is what

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 3>you hope all these prospects even become a third of

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean. So I think the Padres

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 3>ultimately do have the best chances. And I'll say that

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 3>because they have Abrams and Ruiz, two guys right now

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>for some reason are called up and aren't even playing.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>But there's still two of the top prospects in this

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 3>in this organization they get thrown up.

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 2>They have the depth to make this move. Not to mention, I'm.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Starting to get the idea that they don't care for

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 3>their prospects. I mean, you don't call up Abrams. No

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 3>other team in the major leagues would probably call up

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Abrams in Ruiz and just to sit them on the

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 3>bench or platoon them. But the Padres have and they've

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>done it in favor of guys like Mazara, guys like Voight,

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>gets Dh Hosmer, all these guys. That's like, why are

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 3>these guys getting in the way of these young, potentially

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>potential studs or young guys that have all this upside

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>that produce at the highest levels of the miners aren't

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>even getting a chance to play even somewhat regularly in

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 3>the majors.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>So it almost makes sense that the way it.

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Appears the Padres view their top prospects would be why

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 3>they would be so willing to ship them off and

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 3>include others in this deal to go get a Wan Sodo,

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 3>a guy that is better than a other prospects plus

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 3>will slot right into a need for them and produce

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 3>right And though that lineup.

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, funny. A couple funny things. I'm actually undergoing this

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>thing I do on my In This League Patreon In

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>This League dot com. It's called the p one ADP

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>mocks and it's designed to create a prospect ADP which

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>does not exist. And it's a value chart as well,

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's really valuable. People want to check

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it out that they're literally being drafted right now. It'll

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>be on the Patreon this month. But a funny thing

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>just to this point was we found CJ. Abrams was

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>actually still in the system. He's the only one that's

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in the system because he had met requirements of being

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on the roster but not overpass the at baths marker

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>where he lose prospect eligibility. He's the only one of

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all those guys he's been around so long that he

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>has been on the roster so much he still has

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not got the at bats that takes him off of

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>roster qualifications. The value system that they have on him

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and where they have put him and the chances to

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>succeed have been really minimal. There was a tweet out

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>about ten fifteen minutes ago from MLB Network with a

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical on Soto, and it's pretty much what we've talked

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>about on this show for the last couple of weeks.

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Soto for Abrams, Mackenzie Gore, Robert Hassel, James Wood, who

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>is their number three prospect, and Jackson Merrill, who a

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>side note, James Wood and Jackson Merril are best friends

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and like when Wood was rehabbing, Meryll was also rehabing,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they would like watch each other play out here in

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>complex blah blah, blah, it doesn't matter. That's a huge

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>prospect Hall. I don't think another team can really necessarily

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>compete with that prospect Hall. But the key is going

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to be do they want those major league guys? And

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where the Dodgers provide the pitching side, and the

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals I think provide the hitting side, and guys like

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Gorman and Dylan Carlson if they were to be provided,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>if they were to come out there. So it'll be

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>really really interesting to see. There's some other trade rumors

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>going on. Montes is a target for the Padres, Twins, Yankees,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and Blue Jays. I saw John Hayman report last night

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Yankees their sole focus is on Frank Montas.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>The Astros are looking at Christian Vasquez in addition to

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Contreras. I have been putting Wilson Contreras on with

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the Astros for the last couple of weeks. I think

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe pedro Leone would make sense, even though I know

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a rental. The Guardians have inquired about Sean Murphy.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>The A's are making him available. They're making all the

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>guys available, and the Phillies are interested in Ramon Lariano.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So the A's are going to have a complete, just

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>decimation of their roster. Do you expect any surprises? Just

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>real quick at the trade ladline, do you think we're

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>going to see anything nuts and crazy? As someone we

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't been talking about. My biggest crazy suggestion has been,

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>if Juan Soto gets traded today on Monday, I expect

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Shohiel Tani to be traded on Tuesday. If it comes

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>down to the wire, I'm gonna kind of put it

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>as a fifty to fifty. But it's just my little

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>prediction is if Soto has moved on Monday, Otani has

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>moved on Tuesday. I don't know if that's that much

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of a shock. But Mike, do you expect any shocks

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in the next thirty hours?

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I think if there's to be one, it's gonna it's

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of a cop out because I have a hard

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 3>time giving a true name, but I would I would

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 3>think it could be a guy that was signed to

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>a deal that people maybe we're surprised the deal happened.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Like a hobby Baye is habby Baya is for for

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>the Tigers, a team that doesn't similar they're going to

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 3>be competing in the near future, although maybe they think

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 3>their window might be next year the year after. Maybe

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 3>they realized because they've already talked about pretty much everyone

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 3>being on the table. Maybe Hobby Bias is like one

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 3>of those guys that's like, well, you know what, maybe

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 3>this was a mistake. Let's see if we can salvage

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 3>this and see if the team team will take them on.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I doubt Chris Bryant.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 3>But maybe that's the type of thing, like maybe one

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 3>of these guys, if Trevor Story was healthy with the

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox kind of leaning towards being buyers and sellers.

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 3>The reports say both, and that they never mentioned Story

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 3>being safe. They've mentioned, you know, Bogarts by name, at

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 3>least I haven't seen their reports, but they've mentioned Bogart's

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 3>by name and others by name, Dev's they are safe.

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's like maybe one of these offseason signings that

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 3>were surprising in the first place, Marcus Stroman, guys that

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 3>were on teams that like, okay, this is weird that

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 3>they made these signings become trade bait for these teams

0:12:58.640 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden.

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe by goes back to the Mets something to throw.

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know, they rEFInd him there, Dan, this is

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>actually a good question. Well, the trades trade away a catcher,

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they should. I think Danny Jansen should be someone they're

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>putting out on the market who would make a ton

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of sense. Bring Gabriel moreno back up to go with

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Ali hndro Kirk. Trade from your strengths as much as

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>possible to fix some of those weaknesses. Because the Blue

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Jas are not really tied with anybody, So that's actually

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a really good question. I think they should. Finishing up

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the headlines, Aaron Judge continues to be the biggest beast

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on the planet. His I was saying this yesterday. His

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>stats through July thirty first, our stats for an entire

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>season that every single player would kill for and we'd

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>get them all the money in the world. Judge homer

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>three times over the weekend, now up to forty two,

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>which is ten below his career high set in twenty seventeen.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And here is a marker I want to give you

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Aaron Judge has more homers than any single

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>person in our home run contest. And we've had the season.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Every single day of baseball, we have been able to

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>make picks on these guys and Aaron Judge has more

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>homers in real life than we could just picking players

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>every single day. That's pretty fun. And then then lastly

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Clay Holmes blew a save, giving up a three run

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>homer to South President the ninth as they lost eight

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to six, and my dreams and hopes of Clay Holmes

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>being the closer down the drain some injuries. Chris Bryant

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>left Saturday's game with foot pain. Curly, I'm out on

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bryan. I've been saying, I'm pretty far out on

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bryant. Do you have hopes of salvaging the rest

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of this season for him? Which has just been really

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>about a month he's had about a month that worked.

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>All of his homers I think came in the month

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of July, if I remember correctly. Do you have any

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>hopes on the back half of this year?

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 3>I did until I think reports came out that he's

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>been dealing with like planter fasciitis over the like of

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>late I think since the All Star break or so.

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I remember reading about it yesterday and dealing with that.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>You know how that can be for athletes in general,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter the sport, and that could hinder his progress

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the year, and I was really hopef

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 3>But you know what this reminds me of. It's the

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 3>whole Daniel Murphy deal, like twenty nineteen and wherever it

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 3>was when Murphy went over to the Rockies, the.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Hype build the hype built up.

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>It was a similar skill set in terms of being

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>like a really solid bat just going to Coors again,

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 3>a chance to really exploit course for what it was,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>and injuries derailed them. Age Duriel Murphy obviously not a

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>direct comp but it was one of those things where

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 3>it's like I bought in preseason. I was like, all right, cool,

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna jump his adp up. I got him in

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a few spots. I was really happy, and then early

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 3>drafts I was even happier. I was like, sweet, I

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>got him at the discount. I was happy to take

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>them near a pick like eighty ish. I think it

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 3>was early on and because just because the skill set,

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately it's me trying to justify why I took

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>him early. Well, at the end of the day, it

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 3>seems like it feels like a busted pick, and I

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 3>don't seem much.

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he's a sell like at all costs

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>type of thing, because I think obviously it's a sell,

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but you get trade deadlines happening. I just had a

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline end in the Scott White League that I

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>play in. But some are going to go through. I

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>think some standards on a lot of side of like

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>August thirteenth, I want to say, right in that range

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is like a general fantasy trade deadline. If you had

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a team poking around want to take a shot, is

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>there a low that you wouldn't take on Chris Bryant

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I would I'd be willing to. I definitely redraft. I'd

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>be looking to sell for sure. Dynasty, I'd actually if

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 3>you're a contender or if your windows next year, I

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 3>think he's a great buy if you can right now,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>because I do think the value is dropping even though

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 3>we know a healthy Chris Bryant can be pretty solid,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and I do think he'll get right in the offseason,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and you know, Chris Bryant has these moments of like

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 3>being injured, playing well, but maybe he'll miss some time

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>next year or whatever. Dynasty lees, I think he's more

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 3>of a bye redraft.

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 2>That's tough.

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I think I would obviously at this point, if someone's

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 3>willing to give me anything that can help my team,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I would probably sell. I'd be willing to sell seventy

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>five per cents on the dollar type of deal probably

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I think so Zark is a trade for Chris Bryant

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>threw weeks ago. It wasn't too much better. I really

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>really do Bobby Witt. The day after Julio Rodriguez was

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>hit on the wrist, which I want to point out

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>around the hand. Scott Bogman was at that game and

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I told him for for handcock rules, he's no longer

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>around him because he hurt him. The day after, Bobby

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Wit Junior was sidelined after getting hit on the hand

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>by a pitch. No xt rays have been done as

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of yet, which is probably a good sign. Not so

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>great for Hulia Rodriguez though the X rays were negative.

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>He had some swelling and they put him on the

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>EL so he's on the IL for a tiny bit.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Wit no necessarily no necessary sign of it yet.

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Miguel Sino back to his home, which is the IL

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on Friday with knee issues. He just lives there and

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Key Brian Hayes, Eric cosmer Typrance, Tyler O'Neill, all considered

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>day to day with various injuries across the board. Here's

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a fun fact getting back to the top of the show.

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>This is an amazing one too, and this is kudos

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Towonke for putting this on Red's pitcher. Luis Castillo is

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>one of just seven pitchers to enter the All Star

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Break with an ERA under two eight and no more

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>than three wins with at least thirteen starts on here

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the others? Are you ready for the others? Here? Clayton

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw twenty eighteen, Jeff Samarga fourteen, by Lecky in nineteen

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety two, Steve Carlton in nineteen eighty five, Swan in

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy eight, and Phoebus in nineteen seventy. I don't know.

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that's Phoebus, like a little phoenix in there.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Those are the names. There hasn't been anybody since twenty

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.239
<v Speaker 1>eighteen and since two and since two thousand there's only

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>been two Jeff Samarga and Clayton Kershaw. The undervalue of

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>potential wins is mind blowing on Luis Castillo. That is

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>why you hit home like this is a huge plus

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for him being in Seattle. This is a huge potential

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>plus on wins. Let's get Julio Rodriguez back. Though it

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>might be the most important thing of all of those

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this day in baseball, I thought this was just interesting,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>though not like fascinating. Nineteen forty three Rip Suol of

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates throws his do drop ball in a game.

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Souel loops the ball eighteen to twenty feet high on

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>its way to the strike zone. Later it's called a

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>blooper or an ethis ball. The pitch is more than

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a gag and Soul is on his way to a

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty win season. But an eighteen to twenty foot dip

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's like curveball stuff, Curlin like I love, I love

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea of that. That is actually one of my

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>only things I think I really really love about old

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>old time baseball. I don't have the tradition like a

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people with most of this stuff, but

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like weird just wind ups and just video game like

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>backyard type of throws. It is one of my favorite things.

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I get really locked into you know those Instagram

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>videos of like, hey, this is the best game to

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>play and it's like that whiffle ball game, but the

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>ball like curves and they got I'm such a sucker

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for that. Like those type of video game things are

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>my favorite thing on the planet. Just goofy looking pitches, and.

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Every so often we actually get pictures at the major

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 3>league level it looks like those whiffleball pitches, Like that's

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the maze sink two seamer sinker. Everyone call it his

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that frisbee. It's more difficult than it is whiffable. I

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 3>think I saw shout out to and someone put that

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 3>was like word for word. Ryan Nancy on Twitter tweeted that.

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I was like, that's very true. We're about to see

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 3>all these gifts of them. But he doesn't usually miss

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of bats with it. But yeah, it's fun though,

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 3>because MLB pitchers, man, they've really and coaches obviously really

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 3>figured out how to make a baseball moving ways that

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 3>I never thought i'd see the day that they do that,

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 3>you know you're going as fast as they are.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Who has the most giveable pitch in baseball? Because you

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>just bring up a really interesting thing to me, I

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would say, Dustin May is that two seamer. Emmanuel Clasi's

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>cutter has got to be in there. That one pitch

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.959
<v Speaker 1>by Aaron Ashby, which I think was a two seamer

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that won this year, that went like whoop, like right

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>out was on there. I don't know if I think

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of any breaking pitches though, a really good knuckling curveball.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Is there a good change up like with with good

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 3>fade away from like last year already?

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Like okay, but can you think like I'm gonna say,

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you think someone Yeah, like I'm talking like a specific

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>pitch from Devin Williams. Oh, Devin Williams his uh whatever

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>you call it, the terminator or whatever. Yeah, okay, so

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this would be such a great pull Devin Williams whatever

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the pitch is, dominator, Emmanuel Classe's cutter or Dustin May's

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>two seamer which people probably forget about. And that's what

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Brad and Brad's right here immediately went Devin Williams, change up.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious that the chat. If you guys have any others,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>tell me who's the most gifable pitch and pitcher the

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>pitcher with their pitch I would love I would love

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to know, because the Devin Williams is a really really

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 1>good one. Manuel Classe is the first person that came

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to my mind when I thought about that. Let's go

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>through some stat heroes on the weekend. Jaco to Rizzy.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>How often do you say Jaycotrizzy is a stat hero

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>seven innings, eight strikeouts, giving up only two hits for Houston.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Plante eight with eight strikeouts. Merril Kelly seven innings, eight strikeouts,

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>three hits, a couple walks. I think he should be

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a potential trade bait guy. Read debtmer seven innings, twelve strikeouts,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>giving up one and run and Carlos Forradon ten strikeouts

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on seven is read Debt Meer's fixed curling.

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, everything I'm seeing on Twitter A lot of guys

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 3>that follow pitching way more closely than I do. I'll

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 3>be the first to admit hitting my strength in terms

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 3>of analysis.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 2>But it looks like it.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 3>You just look at some of the stuff, the changing

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 3>pitch mix, the changing movement profile and some of the pitches.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 3>It's it's everyone's talking about it, and I think this

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 3>is the detmos we're all hoping for come, you know,

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 3>when we're all kind of hyping him up preseason type

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 3>of thing, and he's hitting on that potential. Now, what

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>will always hold him back in fantasy is obviously the

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 3>lack of two start weeks given the Angels always going

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>six man in the rotation, but that could change if

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 3>they do. You mentioned if Otani's on the move, they

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 3>maybe they go five man and Detmvers gains even more value.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 3>But I do think the Detmors we're seeing now is

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 3>there's something to it. Maybe he won't sustain this level,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 3>as you know MLB teams adapt, but he is.

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 2>What he's doing seems very real.

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean he's a movement command guy. He's not

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>a huge, big, crazy blowaway stuff guy, and he's found

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>his command. I mean he you know what, Dept. Meer's

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>has got some big, old loopy curveball sliders that he throws.

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Some others by the way, that got thrown in here.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Riley said, brash is slider. That's a great one. That

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is a super gift of a one. Brad said, Seth

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Lugo's curveball. Okay, I'll give you that one, that's for sure.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's see I thought I saw, oh, and Walker's right.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>This was the other one that I thought of immediately

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>was that was the older school Kershaw twelve to six curveball. Like,

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing gets me going. I love crazy wiffleball looking pitches,

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>but nothing gets me out of my seat and makes

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>me act like a crazy person than a knee buckling

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>change up. I'll just oh, you know, it's just like

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a gift. Like the guys are like, oh, like, that's

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what gets me. It happens when I see just a

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>knee buckling twelve to six curveball. So I completely agree

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>with that one. On the hitter side, Alec Bohm four

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for five this weekend with a homer and RBI. Corey

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Dickerson went three for four with a homer. James Outman

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>had a home run in his major league debut. I

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>saw him in the Arizona Fall League. I don't know

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>if there's a ton Ton there. Him and Large Newbar

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>both played together. I thought new Bar was much more

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>impressive player. But three for four with a homer, there's

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a little something there. I just don't believe the Dodgers

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>would give him enough time. I believe someone asked in

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the chat. Hunter renfro Good four for four with a bomb.

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Rizzo had a homer with three RBIs. Anthony Santander

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>had a homer three for four. Ramon Lariano before he

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>gets traded, had a bomb, jerks and pro far Charles

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>l Block and Matt Chapman with a homer over the weekend.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Some stat zeros, I never like to see my boy

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Shae McClanahan in here. But he went four and one third,

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>give me up seven hits, five earned runs. He had

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>three walks, only five four strikeouts, Pablo Lopez. A lot

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of rumors. Craig mischs had actually you're wearing your Marlins hat.

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Curlin Mish had talked about the last start maybe being

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>his last one and had speculated again about him getting traded. Well,

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>he got lit two and two thirds, twelve hits, six

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>earned runs. What type just quickly Pabolo Lopez getting traded

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and what would a return have to look like? Do

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you think for your Marlins?

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the Marlins have what like two or

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 3>three years left of control too, so that that's like

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 3>a big there's gonna be. It's not gonna be obviously

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the level of a Montas or Castillo, but you gotta

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's gonna at least bring back a solid like

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>at least one solid prospect, one upper top tier prospect,

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 3>from a system and maybe a couple. You know, I

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's going to bring back like you know what,

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 3>what did Castillo bringing like two.

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Or three other top five prospects back in return?

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 3>I think, I think I think Pablo uh Sandoval, WHOA.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Bubo Sanaval would be good in the trade.

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But know what mean, Yeah, Pablo Lopez.

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Sandoval is way better than Pablo Lopez obviously, but Pablo

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Lopez I think would bring back at least one high

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 3>end prospect, maybe a second, depending on what teams get

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 3>involved in, how desperate team gets if they miss out

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 3>in both Castillo and Montas, so that right there, the

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 3>market could right there push itself up. But Lopez is

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 3>a solid real life pitcher as well as fantasy.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 2>He will give you innings.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 3>The shoulders always concerned, but it's ull up this year

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 3>and again that those years of control really matter and

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 3>it should bring back quality versus quantity.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 2>But it's also the Marlins. I don't know what to

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 2>expect anymore.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>They don't exactly develop hitting well either, So I'm optimistically

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 3>they get some hitting prospects, but they haven't been able

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 3>to develop the hitting.

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 2>The best over the years. So I don't know how

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 2>much yeasty to.

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Me to cut you off. I feel like the Yankees

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>are the key for them. Yankees are trying to move

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>all to Oswell Praza and a lot of trades. No

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>one will take that Oswal Praza for Pablo Lopez would

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just make all the sense in the world. But you

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>know him getting lit up could always theoretically hurt the

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>trade value.

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 3>J D.

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Brewbaker, I'll give up seven earned runs as well. On

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the hitting side, of course, I took a Goldie weekend.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>He went over five for three strikeouts. Hear me, Cole Calhoun,

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>oh for three three strikeouts, Hilliard and Andrews both with

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>three k's as well. Friendos Oh, you know what, I

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't even look if they're everyone's going to be so

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>mad if there's a brand new board, and I don't

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>think there is so Unfortunately, I can't give you guys

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>good news that there's a brand new home run board.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 1>But we have the same We have the exact same winner.

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Things have not changed. But the night King of the

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>North is mounting a comeback, as he had a Kyle

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>schwarber Baum over the weekend got him up to thirty five,

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so high Cubby twenty sixteen still has thirty seven. Night

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>King North has thirty five, and we got it. Let's

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>see Eskyl and de Blum at thirty four, and then

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the crew just kind of moves down. Mike Mayer is

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 1>still on the list, so apologies. I'll see if we

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>can get the home run board back here into the

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>near future so you guys can see that. But we

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>still got our main guy, and they do not have

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>as many homers as Aaron Judge. They're missing by five

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>friendos some bets. Go check out our friends over at

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bet mgm. Download the app or go online bet mgm

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Use the promo code leading off. If you're

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>watching on the YouTube and video you see it right

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>below me leading off right now. They're offering a one

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars risk free first bet when you use the

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>code leading off. Let's do it, and let's do that together.

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's do that, somewhody do it. Let me know, and

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>let's get your thousand dollars risk free bet together, and

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>let's see if we can win that sucker. What I

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have done for you guys today is two things I'm

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna for the foreseeable future. I'm gonna give you the

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>number one total base prop and the number one strikeout

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>prop according to Bettingpros dot com. They have their MLB

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>prop cheat sheet, which I think is invaluable. Go and

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>check it out, and I'm gonna give you the top props,

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna give you two. I like the top

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>prop over at the as Joe would say, the sugar

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>house is Jordan Alvarez. Jordan Alvarez total bases versus Boston

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros hasn't projected at almost four and you get

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>plus money at one and a half. That's a pretty

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>good bet plus money one oh five. The top strikeout

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>prop is Andrew Heeney under last week man four and

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a half. I took it. He was on a pitch count,

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>he got to four. He would have destroyed it if

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't gonna only throw sixty pitches. They're projecting five.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The number is six and a half on fan duel

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is the un or. It's pretty juice stuff though.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>The two players I like Drake's Scooble strikeouts those are

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.479
<v Speaker 1>at five and a half minus one fifteen. And this

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is probably my favorite bed of the day is Starling

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Marte total bases minus one oh five. It's almost even money.

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 1>It's against Patrick Corbin. I believe in the month of July,

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Starling Marte had eleven multi hit games multi hit games,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>So the odds are in his favor, and they really

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>always are whenever Patrick Corbin is on the slate. Couple

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>DFS stuff. You know, Joe's huge on the DFS side.

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>On DK A couple pitchers, I might want to take

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a look at Susier is gonna be your big play.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>He's ten point six. Drake Scouble I like the strikeouts.

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's Minnesota and he's eight thousand. I think

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that would be a really great pairing that you could

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.479
<v Speaker 1>put together over on FanDuel A couple pitching prices eleven

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>point six for Sersier, John Gray is at ten and

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Scooble is nine point eight. If you're looking to get

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>some stacks together, Mets, Mets meet, the Mets meet, the

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Mets gonna hit up Patrick Corbin, and then I can't

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>say other, you know, inappropriate things about Patrick corbyan that

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>would happen there Mets. I would stack them Guardians and

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>White Sox would be my three stacks. Those are also

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>very heavy on implied run totals today if you want

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to tag those teams. Mister Kurlin, we have a home

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>run contest. You have not been here all season, so

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't necessarily annoint that this would be worth forty points.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So you're immediately in the discussion. But please give us

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>your home run call for the day. Put our people

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in a good position. Who do you got You're muted?

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 3>You're muted, of course, I am. I had to do

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 3>one rookie mistake before this show ended.

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Ninety five percent of the show in you were nailing it.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You were perfect. Nothing, you were This is the last thing.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the last thing.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 3>I love it, all right, what's you that's sleepy ca

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 3>coming out right there?

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 2>It's the obvious, it's it has to be done.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, you're talking about a guy who's coming

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 3>off a weekend they just had, having his career year,

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna get signed to a massive contract, and it has

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 3>to be Aaron Judge, right. I mean, he has a

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 3>nine to fifty one ohps against lefties. He's gets to

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 3>face Mark Gonzalez, which you know, soft tossing lefty.

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>As as we all know, like it's it just makes sense.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't see how.

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 3>No one's slowing him down right now, and one thing

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna slow him down is not playing tonight.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 2>So I got you gotta go with the obvious at this.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Point, Yeah, Brad's ass. Does Judge have a shot at

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the record? Bonds had forty five homers at the end

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of July in two thousand and one. We're not that

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>far off, my friend, we are not that far off.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Pete Anzo. I'm gonna go against

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Corbin. Give me big bombs on Pete Alonzo. I'd

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>be comfortable with a total base marker in him as well,

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna go with the leadoff guy. I'm gonna

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>go with the guy at the top of the lineup

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with the New York Mets against Patrick Corbyn. But I

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>am super super comfortable with Pete Alonzo in both of

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>those and he will be my home run call. I

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>know Joe has Aaron Judge in perpetuity. I see. I

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think Mayer updated that, so we're gonna have to

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It'll just be me and the guests that's going on,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and I just jinxed it. Maybe I did that is it?

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Find Mike Curlin on Twitter at Mike Underscore Curlin. Mike,

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you were just pimp and you got probably one more

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>article over at the Athletic that people can find. But

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>people can always find your stuff over on your Patreon,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>which what is that.

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:15.239
<v Speaker 3>Again, patreon dot com slash skplaybook. That's where you can

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 3>find all my constant ongoing So the rest of the

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 3>baseball season and should be throwing some football stuff on

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 3>there not a football show.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 2>No one cares about football, but if you do like both,

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 2>there will be both.

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh and Mayor is taking pee a Lonzo, so he

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is with me. We're about dang it. Come on, Mare,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>take somebody else, don't take the guy. Not that I'm

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>hitting any any by the way. So if anything, this

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is a curse for Mike mirir well Mike currently, he

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>did fantastic. Everyone go check him out, follow him on Twitter.

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a great follow, especially in the baseball season when

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for those notes. Curlin has got you covered. Friends.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys for hanging out with me. Joey is gone,

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>but I am here for you the rest of the

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>way through coming up tomorrow trade deadline. Casey Bubba is

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 1>going to be joining me on the show, and we

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>will be here, like you know, six or seven hours

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>before it's all over. Probably have lots of trades to

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>hit through, so make sure you're checking us out on

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube live and the podcast for Mike Curlin. I

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>am Chris Welch. This is leading off. We are out

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of here, my friends,