WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: What Makes a One-hit Wonder?

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, chuck here and it's Saturday, and that means

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that I am hungover. I'm just kidding. I feel like

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a fresh daisy. And right now I'm going to listen

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to this one again, and I think you should too.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>The Stuff you Should Know select this week is called

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what makes a One Hit Wonder? Super super Cool stuff

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>about pop culture and music. From March two, enjoy m

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of I

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Say something. Um, yeah,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even say say something funny. I just said

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>say something I know. Frozen. Yeah, it's all right, man.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>That's good quality in a broadcaster to freeze up on

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the air and a professional talker. Yeah, yeah, how you

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>doing was great? Freezing? Um? I'm good man. I'm This

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is a fun, goofy little topic and we haven't done

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>one like that in a while. This was a fun

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>article written by a guy named Charles W. Bryant, the

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>writer for the site. Yeah, I will go ahead and

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.639
<v Speaker 1>say one thing I was disappointed in in this article,

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and I would still like to see someone tackle this

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in documentary style. Maybe is the psychology of being a

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder? Oh, like what it does to your psyche? Yeah?

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it better to have that one hit and fade

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>away and at least you had that? Or is it

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>better to have never? You know? I just I would

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be real curious to see a series of interviews with

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonders to see like how they feel about it.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, is it better to have hit and lost

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>than never to have hit at all? Exactly? And I

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really find anything on that. So I'm sure there's

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one or two who like, listen to the podcast, and

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>if you do, right in, let us know how it is.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:53.919
<v Speaker 1>We're interested. Loue Bega, Yeah, the very least lou Vega listens,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the fake loue Vega. So, Chuck, I wanted to commend

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you for this article because you really like this is

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a tough one for With how stuff works articles, we

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>typically take a topic that is, you know, has a

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of research done on it, it's very well defined,

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we deconstruct it. This one is like I

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>looked on the internet and if you type in one

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hit wonder, there is like zero scholarly work done on

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it for good reason. Yeah, well, I mean it's interesting

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>though too. Like you brought up the psychology of being

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a one there shouldn't been anyone ever done a study

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>like that. There is nothing. It's all just lists. And

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually did find one good website. It's called um

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>one Hit Wonder Central dot Com and they have everything

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can play like every song they have it

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>by years who the one hit wonder was from like

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the sixties to the two thousand's, maybe fifties. There are

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the greatest songs to me, or some of

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the one hit Wonders. And I mean that's the points,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, one hit Wonder is just something that

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody liked at one time. We just didn't like whatever

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>else they were making, right, Um, at least as a

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>large collective group. Anyway, back to me commending you, Um,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you had to take something that was really amorphous that

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody knew and we knew if you got wrong, and

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>whipping into shape like a definable shape, and you got

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it right. I think you did a great job. So Um.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>The first thing you pointed out was that no one

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>is certain of the origin of this phrase. That's right,

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>but we figured out that it was it first came

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in print. Right, Well, that's what phrases dot org says,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't find anything to dispute it. But a

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>writer there wrote the sentence in July seventy seven about

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Abba instead of becoming what everyone expected a one hit wonder,

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they soon had a string of hits behind them. And

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>although the website phrase dot org does say it appears

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to have already been a used phrase, but this is

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the first time they've seen it in print, right, and

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and so, and there actually is like a definition for

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder, like there's well, a hit, I guess

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you define a hit, and then it's got to be

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on the because we're so American centric, has to be

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>on the billboard top and then specifically in the top

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>forty to be considered a hit. Right, Yeah, technically for

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>like when most people like there have been books written

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>about one hit wonders and that's usually what what they say. Okay,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>so that wasn't just you or anything saying. And I

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a great definition. No, it's a good definition,

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but that's the generally held definition. But then that's where

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it gets really blurry. As we're about to find out right, Well,

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, I mean, yeah, you make a point

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of one hit wonders by that definition.

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Who are legendary musicians like Jimi Hendrix one hit, Janis

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Joplin one hit, Garth Brooks as Chris Gaines. Yeah, that's

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this only Billboard hit. Yeah, this is only Billboard Top

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>forty hit. Yeah, but he had country hits, just lived

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>on the country top ten. But yeah, as in the

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>mainstream top forty. His only hit was Chris Kayes with

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the haircut and the soul patch Man. That was Yeah,

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the song that was even I

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>don't um beck Yeah, the Dead, The Dead, the White Stripes,

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>lou Reid, Iggy pop Divo, some like iconic bands and

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>musicians that have only had one hit. Um. And then

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got artists who never had that hit but are

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>still considered one hit wonders. Because what you end up

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>realizing is, despite the definition of what a hit is,

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a one hit wonder is something different. It's just an

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>artist and a song who captured something for a moment

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in time. It doesn't matter if it was a top

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>forty hit. Right like you you say, um, Wallavoodoo's Mexican Radio. Absolutely,

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not a top forty hit. No, but that's definitely

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a hit. Sure in the zeitgeist did you put it? Absolutely?

0:05:55.160 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Who else? I'll melt with you Modern English, the Weather Girls,

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's raining man, Like you would say, all of these

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>are definitely one hit wonders, and none of them had

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>top forty hits. Right, So, but sticking to the strict definition,

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>um that, I mean that still works too. Write like

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Penguins, Earth Angel. Yeah, in the fifties, right, Um,

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties you had um Summertime Blues by Blue Cheer,

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>but they really spent blue on like their one there,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing there, one shot was covered in blue. Blue

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Cheer did Summertime Blues? Green tambourine? Remember that song? No,

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean tambourine. It was very like psychedelic No

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Lemon Pipers. You know. It's one of those

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>songs where sort of like h in the seventies, Argents,

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hold your head up like everybody knows that song. But

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I bet ninety nine people out of a hundred I've

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>never heard of the band Argent. No, they probably think, oh,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that The guests who or wasn't that in Joe Dirt?

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Or yes, wasn't that in? Was it? Yeah? Really I

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>never saw that movie. What I never saw Joe Dirt?

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, such a great like keep your Chin up

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>movie is so good. Like I really can hate David Spade,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you can hate all of that kind of comedy, but

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that movie has such like it's got heart, it's a

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>cute movie. Well, I had friends. It's on Netflix streaming. Yeah,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I had friends that worked on it. And that's where

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I have my Gary Busey insider story. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I told you. You You know he was He

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to play the father and if you'll notice

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the film, he does not play the father. No,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it's done by one Fred Ward. Yeah. So Gary Bucy

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>was on set for a day and it didn't work out.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.559
<v Speaker 1>He made it. Wish I could tell the whole story.

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>He made it into Black Sheep with Chris Farley and um,

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>David Spade. That. Yeah, he was like the crazy guy

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>who lived in a school bus in the woods. It

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>was the part he was born to play exactly. Please

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>don't come to our office, Gary. Um. All right, So

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that was the fifties and that's generally when the rock

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>era in the fifties is when you people say you

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>can start talking about things like one hit wonders, like

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not some guy who had one big band hit in

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen thirties, although I'm sure they were there, you

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>know that's true. Uh, there's been one song that was

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a one hit wonder for two bands, which is interesting.

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, let's hear funky Town really yeah, Lips Incorporated.

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And then I don't know if you remember Pseudo Echo.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>They did a version of that in it was a

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>little more electric and upbeat, and that was a bona

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>fide top forty hit as well. Seems can't people couldn't

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>get enough of Funky Town. I hope whoever wrote that

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like really cast in. Yeah, so the sixties all right, Now,

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the sixties was the green tambour in seventies songs like

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Spirit in the Sky by Norman Greenbaum. Yeah it's a

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>good song. Uh, it was an Apollo thirteen one took

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>over the line. I I literally wrote shutter next to that,

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>what like, oh you hate that song? It's pretty bad.

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Brewer and Shipley and then Seasons in the Sun, great song.

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Terry Jack's never heard of the guy no no, no

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>rev no re um. And you also make the point

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that the seventies were lousy with disco one hit wonders.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>And in our Disco episode we talked about why because

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it was all producer driven rather than artists driven. Exactly.

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even bother to like list any in here.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's you can just name a disco song

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>and there you have it. The eighties, of course, you

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>had bands like Soft Cells, Tainted Love and Oh Mickey,

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>You're So Fine, Tony Basil, Uh, I Want Candy by

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Bow Wow Wow Kajago. Remember what song I don't remember?

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that who? That was too shy shy? Yeah. Uh

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>so the eighties was lousy with it, but a lot

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of those songs are great songs, and a lot of

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the artists in the eighties were popular in other countries. Yeah,

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>and are known as one hit wonders here in the US.

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>Like I was reading an article on I think Cracked

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe about one hit Wonders and they were saying, like,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Aha had Take on Me, which was a hit here

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, but that was it. But they're

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like one of the top fifty grossing bands of all

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>time worldwide. Yeah. Well, and Aha falls into another weird category,

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a band that's known as a one hit

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder who actually had a quieter second hit. Oh really Yeah,

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>they had a song called the Sun Always Shines on

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>TV that was like a top twenty hit. I nick, wow,

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that one. Nobody does. They're good though,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>now they're awesome. Um. And then remember right said Fred

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on Too Sexy huge in England, Yes, like there I'm

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Too Sexy was actually only hit number two in England.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 1>They had another one that hit number one, but here

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in the States, I think it hit number one here.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And then that was it for right side Fred. Uh,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the same with Frankie Goes to Hollywood and uh yeah,

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>they were really big in Europe. And Gary Newman, Yeah

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that was a good song. That song holds up car

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to cars. Yeah, that dude was

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a good musician. Well, and he was hugely popular and

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>still like tours today. Yeah, so he's he's one of

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys that's like, please don't call me a one

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>hit wonder. I had a long successful career. Look at

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>my house. You know it's a car No, I think

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like a mansion. He lives in his car. It's

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>predel safest, he can lock all his doors. Uh Falco

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and oh yeah, Nina, we're really big in German speaking countries.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, I could see that. But you know, had

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the ninety nine red balloons balloons and then Falco's rock

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Me on My Dais. Yeah, huge hit here. It's like

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it didn't occur to my young brain that that wasn't

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>from the Ama Dais soundtrack, because remember it came out

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>at about the same time as the movie, and um,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like I just thought it was part of the soundtrack, yeah,

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the movie soundtrack. Well, the point with this, though, is

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that one hit one or is sort of a sort

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of a derogatory term to throw on unearnest. So a

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of these people are like in America, like you jerks,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I was huge in Europe or maybe some other country

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah, who cares so much for you? One

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>hit the nineties crash Test Dummies, remember those dudes. Well

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the song. Oh yeah, yeah, that's right, the Makrana,

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>even though I don't even like to count that. Um,

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>what about Faith No More is epic? Yeah, see that's

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a band that hugely critically popular and had a big

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>cult following. But yeah, just the one hit the epic. Yeah,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that was the name of it, right, you want it all,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>but you can't have it. That was I remember here

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that song in the first time. This is the coolest

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>thing I've ever heard. Yeah, and that lead singer, what's

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>his name, Mike something, he's like super respected. He's been

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>another band like Mr. Bungle. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, it's a

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>big like has a big cult fall and not not

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>among colts, even like among people who aren't in cults.

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, so that's music, that's an overview. Yeah. You

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>make a really good point in this article that, like

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder, that derogatory term isn't just um aimed

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>at people only in the music industry, although that's where

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the lion's share of it is, but it shows up

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in sports. You pointed out a couple of them, a

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 1>couple of instances. Yeah, well, if you have one hit

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in baseball, then you've been a complete and utter failure.

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But a couple of guys have had one hit and

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that one hit was a home run, which is pretty cool,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty interesting. Who was that? There was a

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>guy named um Chris Jellic whose name might recognize for

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some reason. Yeah, And I don't follow the Mets or anything,

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but I guess I just saw that that bit of

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>trivia before that he had one hit and there was

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a home run. Yeah. Maybe. So there's a guy who

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a hit UM named Eddie Goodell. He had

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>one plate appearance in a nineteen fifty one game for

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees, and he was a little person. Oh yeah,

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and they put him in against the St. Louis Browns

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and he drew four consecutive um uh balls and got

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a walk. Really yeah, and his jerseys in the Hall

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of Fame, and it's you can't see me doing this

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>right now, I'm rubbing my face. His number was one

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>eight really yeah. But he was I guess you could

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>say a one hit sports wonder. It was kind of

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a fun story until then. Yeah, but I mean that's

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that was his jam. That's what he got paid for,

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's I mean, he was aware that he was

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a little person. So money off. What about the art world,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>design world, there's a very famous person, Harvey Belle, who

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>has the perfect name for what he did. Why is

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it the perfect name, Harvey bell It sounds like the

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>creator of the smiley face. Yeah, the iconic seventy smiley face.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>He created that as a marketing campaign UM kind it

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>sounded like an internal um morale campaign for State UH

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Mutual Life Assurance company UM and it took off. I

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the company made the money or what,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but he was paid two forty bucks for it. And

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he never had another artistic hit. And I looked to

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>see if there were any other artists who were considered

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder and I found some, but I didn't

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>recognize any of them. I did recognize one grant would

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the painter of American Gothic. Oh, yeah, he painted that

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and was He won all sorts of prizes, became like

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>this like caused celeb like all over the art world,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and the media started digging into his life and realized

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that he was a middle aged bachelor who lived at

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>home with his mother and sister, and like wanted to

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>know more about that, and all of a sudden, he

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>like just really couldn't handle the the limelight. And it's

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty sad story. I think I read an

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>article about it on Mental flass. It was worth reading.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So he never painted again, or I don't think he

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>ever kind of went for the Gusto if he didn't

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just stop painting altogether. I don't remember the end of

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the article. Well, the art world certainly has a lot

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of people famous, pre famous for a single painting, but

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they may have been, you know, very revered in other

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>areas like faith no More. That's right there, the Faith

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>no More of the art world. I told just all

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the scream this last trip to New York. Oh yeah,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, yeah, this was like I can't see

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>what you're I mean, like you build something like that

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>up in your head, see it everywhere, and then just

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to see the real one. It's either going to go

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>one of two ways. You're gonna be underwhelmed or amazed.

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I completely agree. And that's been my uh,

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been what's happened to me with art because you

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>know how I feel about art. I know how you

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>feel about art. I love it. Well, now we're on

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the road, driving in your truck. Want to learn a

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>thing or two from Josh can chuck it stuff you

0:16:46.440 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>should know? All right? What about books? Yeah? Um, To

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Kill a Mockingbird. Yeah, that's the one most often cited

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>as the one hit wonder because Harperlely wrote one book

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that's um one of those rare ones where I actually

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>think the movie is better than the book. And I

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>love the book. It's one of my favorite books of

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>all time. And I hadn't read it in a while,

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and I went back and read it, and then I

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>watched the movie shortly after. I was like, holy cow,

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the movies better than the book. Yeah, Gregory Peck, I

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah, talk about one of the best casting. But everybody,

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like all of those actors were amazing, every single one

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of them. Yeah, Yeah, that's good stuff. She wrote, um,

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the one book, and she worked on a second for

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a while called The Long Goodbye, but shelved it. Then

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties she started another book and never

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>finished that one either. And I guess she just procrastinated.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think she just I don't know. I don't know

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>if anyone has an answer why she never wrote again.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Same with the Sallenger, Yeah, Catching the Rye. That was it,

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>except he wrote short stories too, but I mean I

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>think he never published another novel. Yeah, And I will

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>never know. And John Kennedy tool sure, Confederacy of Dunce

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>is how often do you think about that book just

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in your normal life? How I don't know. Almost never.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe yeah, a couple of times a year, maybe when

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like a movie in the works that never happens.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about that movie or that book yesterday

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and I hadn't read this article yet. Have you read it? No? Yeah,

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's good. It's like I think a lot of people

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>have these expectations because it's known as his like genius

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>work after this guy committed suicide, and it is really good.

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>But um, I don't think it's like one of the

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>greatest books of all time or anything. Yeah, so what

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>happened to him? Do you know? No? I I just

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>I've never read the book. I don't know much about it.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I know it's kind of like a wacky Southern Gothic

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>yea yeah, um kind of novel I lived his aunts,

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I think, or something like, yeah, this crazy character in Louisiana.

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It's always grabbed my attention because it's just like a

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect title, and then the guy's name is perfect as well,

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>John Kennedy tool or the character his the author got you, well,

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he killed himself. He was clearly now suffered some sort

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>of mental illness, and um could not get published, and

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that drove him to eventually commit suicide in nineteen nine,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and his mother made it her life's work to get

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it published and did so. And then his second book

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was published, The Neon Bible, I think in six and

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that was made into a movie. So he's not a

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder then, well, Neon Bible wasn't a huge hit.

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, I would say he's a one hit wonder. Um.

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And you also bring up movies too, man, Yeah, and

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>on books again, Sylvia Plath is on here for the

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Bell Jar. I kinda wish I hadn't put that in

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>here because she was a well known poet. That's why

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't mentioned it, you know. But she did write

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the one book and then would you do stick her

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>head in the oven or something. I don't know how

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>she killed herself. I think Virginia Wolf drowned herself, right,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Sylvia herself on herself? I think did she That sounds right?

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember that scene in Wonder Boys where Toby McGuire

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>rattles off the famous celebrity suicides. It was really great.

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>That was a great movie. Joseph Heller with Catch twenty two. Yeah,

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly a one hit wonder um. So yeah, movies, um,

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean there more directors and actors that you could

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>even mention that had one hit, but legit super super hits,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>people like Michael is it Chimino or Samino? Samino? I think,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>although if it's if you're speaking in the Italian, it

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>would be Chimino. Uh. He did The Deer Hunter, of course,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one Best Picture in four other Academy Awards. Did he mal? Huh?

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Did he mal? That's what they tell him when they're

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>like making them play Russian Roulette? Did he Yeah, except

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they scream it. Yeah. Yeah, that scene was so intense.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw that very young, really young to be seeing

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that movie in retrospect, like it made an impression on you.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, huge? Um. But yeah. He famously made Heaven's

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Gate um as his follow up, which was one of

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the notorious disasters along with Ishtar. Wasn't like water World

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Skate Warren Baby movie too? Or is that Heaven Can Wait?

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>He was in Heaven Can Wait an Ishtar? So what

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>about Heaven's Gate? What was that about? Yeah? I think

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>it was a Western if I'm not mistaken. Yeah, And

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it was just a notorious failure and a very expensive one.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>And then Tomino never he made a few other movies,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>but you haven't heard of many of them. He did

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a year of the Dragon was like with Mickey Rourke,

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>which the only other like notable movie that was supposed

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a good one. Yeah, but it was far

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>from a hit, you know what I'm saying. And then

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>my favorite, uh, Steve Gordon, one of my favorite movies

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of all time. I have not seen it. You didn't

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>see Arthur. Not only have I not seen the original Arthur,

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen the remake that includes our friend Hodgeman

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as a candy store manager. I believe that was terrible,

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not Hodgman's bit, not Hodgement was great,

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but the remake was really bad. And it was so

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>sad because Arthur is one of the movies that I

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>hold very very dear to me, and Steve Gordon wrote

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and directed it and then died afterwards. It was the

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>only movie he ever made by his own hand. No.

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he had a heart attack or something and

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>died young but young ish, uh. And it was just

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so like it was a gut wrenching experience watching the

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>remake for me? Why did you watch it? Like? For example,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Red Dawn is one of my favorite movies

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of all time. There's not a chance that I will

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>ever see the remake of Red Dawn. Well, I'm not either,

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>And I learned after Arthur. Yeah, so that's the one

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that taught you the lesson. Yeah, I'm not gonna watch

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>anything that was really precious to me if they rebooted

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or remake it again. Never again. It sounds like Hodgeman

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>tell you a valuable lesson. Yeah. And I like Russell Brand,

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I thought, you know, they made Helen

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Mirre and John Gielgood's character and was just enough of

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a spin where I was like, well, that's could be interesting.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But then everything about the movie was just some new

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>little spin to make it different. And it was like, hey,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>let's make the man a woman, Let's make the the

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>white guy, uh Puerto Rican, you know, and it was

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>like Louis Guzman and it was just it was bad,

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>so bad. Yeah. Well that's it for Arthur. Yeah. Um,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want to learn more about Arthur, you can

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>type that word in this search part. Isn't that what

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this podcast is about? I forgot? Yeah, this Arthur one

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>hit wonders More, that's what it was. You should read

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>this article by Chuck, it's a good one. Um. You

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>can type one hit wonders in the search bar how

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com and it will bring up this

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>article again. Uh, commendable article. Thanks Uh and I said commendable.

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's time for word from our sponsor. Well, now

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we're on the road, driving in your truck. I want

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to learn a thing or two from Josh can chuck.

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It's stuff you should know. All right, thanks, Now it's

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>time for listener mail. Josh, I'm gonna call this. Uh,

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give this guy's wife a tongue last year.

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh jeez, what you do? You'll see dudes have been

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>an avid listener since shortly after its inception. I'm a

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>huge fan, especially enjoy listening to it while I'm stressed out.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>That always a soues my nerves to hear your band.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Over the years, I've tried to convince my now wife

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth to listen. Unfortunately, she's always insists that you two

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are stoner and that you're retty Repartee is contrived. It

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is so far off. She makes me change over to

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:09.719
<v Speaker 1>this American Life or Radio Lab great shows, which are

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast I download to fill the time between stuff you

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>should know releases. I've repeatedly informed her that you guys

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are not stoners. You've done frequent podcasts on the l

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.719
<v Speaker 1>effects of drugs, and this is not uh convinced her

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>still listen within the When you read letters during listener

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>mail about couples who enjoy listening together, that's so sad.

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>If I'm not mistaken, one pair even became engaged during

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a listener mail segment. Yeah, we don't know about that yet.

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not vouch you for that. Um. It recently struck

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>me that perhaps if you were to give Elizabeth a

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>shout out at the end of the show, she might

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be impressed enough to become a fan as well. You

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>could say hi to Elizabeth at the end of the show,

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd be contributing to my marital blizz. So wait a second,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>way second, you realize what's going on here? For being manipulated, Yeah,

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to to say hey to somebody who doesn't even like us,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, I feel like there should be some money

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>exchange for this. Well, no, I feel instead of saying

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>hi to Elizabeth, but she needs to get a tongue

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>lashing for these baseless accusations. Yea of us sitting around

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>like in a garage smoking marijuanaking a marijuana and just

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like talking. Yeah, that's b s. That's someone who's never

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>listened to the show. We had banter. We might go

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>off on tangents and we might say like five million

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>times in this sentence, but we're not sitting around smoking

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>weed just rambling. Yeah, we're just relaxed. A lot of

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>work goes into the show. So Elizabeth mellow out. Dude, Yeah, seriously,

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe you need to go in the garage. Not so Anyway,

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>this guy is a neurologist and he said the alien

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>hand syndrome part struck close to his heart. Awesome. And Devin,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>if this doesn't do it, then Elizabeth, you can just

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>go listen to this American Life and Radio life. Let

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>her hang out with our glass. It's cool. And I'm

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>sorry for your marriage because it is clearly clearly headed

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong direction. I think we had her until

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>just that last sence right there. No, she's great in

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Churchill Partill tune in. Um, we'll find out. Let us know, Devin,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>will you if you want us to say something specific

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to somebody you know, Um, we very well might do

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it if you ask you might. We have before um.

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You can tweet to us at s y s K podcast.

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>You can join us on Facebook dot com so list

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know. You can send us an email

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff Podcast at how stuff Works dot com and

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as always, joined us at our home on the web.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know dot Com. Stuff you Should Know

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is a production of iHeart Radios How stuff Works for

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts for my Heart Radio, isn't the iHeart Radio app,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite shows