WEBVTT - Take Back the Customer: Social Commerce in 2019

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm off my game today. No, you're not. People are

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start making better content. I think

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about this for a long time.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>When you program for everyone, you program for no one.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that we're purpose driven platform, like we're

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to substance. How is that? Are you

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>happy with that? This is marketing therapy right now? It

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>really is. What's up on? Laura Currency and I'm Alexa Kristen.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back at Landia twenty nineteen. Happy New year. So

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>today we are starting off our year kicking it with

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>one of the smartest people in the industry, Rachel Typograph.

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>She's back on the show. She is the founder and

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Micmac. Really excited to hear about what she

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>sees happening in the social commerce space. And I think

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody's been asking question, is everything that's been happening with

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Facebook going to affect my business? Is it gonna actually

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>make an impact? It has in the media space. We

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>know that on the publisher side, but is it really

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>going to impact brand? Are they willing to think about

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>potentially moving spend off the platform as a result? Will

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see as somebody who's built her business

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>around that model, Like has the bottom line been affected

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or will it be? Or will it be? And I

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think one thing that you and I have talked about, Laura,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're super interested in is is there another platform?

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Is there another platform? Maybe that's not going to take

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the place of Facebook, but do we enter into maybe

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a more disintermediated world of social media. Is that happening

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or is it the fact that we have big companies

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>now merging and acquiring other platforms to create massive entities

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that may be able to compete with the Facebooks and

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the Googles of the world. And you're implying with legacy companies,

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>which act is very interesting. So we will be right

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>back with Rachel Typograph and we're back in the studio

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with our first episode of with Rachel Typograph, founder and

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO of mic Mac. Rachel, welcome back to the show. Hi, Rachel, Hey,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>excited to be back. So, Rachel, we couldn't think of

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.839
<v Speaker 1>anyone else to kind of kick off for us. One

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>start with who is mic mac? What have you done

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.119
<v Speaker 1>and where have you kind of gone from? So mic

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>mac is the e commerce platform for social video and beyond.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Our business is broken into two parts. We call our

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>software micmac Attached in its simplest form, it's a vertical

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>video product details page that can connect to any e

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>commerce card, so it could be d t C or

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>third party retailer like an Amazon, Target or Walmart. And

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>then we have a second part of the business, which

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>is called micmac Studios. It's our creative service arm. We're

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>literally all day long. We only do two things. We

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>either optimize existing assets to get people to hit add

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to cart, or we create original content from the ground

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>up that gets people to hit add to cart. Obviously,

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>so much has happened since, both within the social space,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>obviously advances in technology, more around trust and transparency. How

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>has the business evolved to be honest? Um, we're on fire.

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Last year was the craziest year of my life. Professionally.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Our business grew and the reason being is that all

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>trends point to mcmac. The reason I say that is

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>because we live in a world now. We're fundamentally everything

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that I've been preaching people finally understand, which is if

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you give up your first party data, you give up

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your brand. And the way that you capture your first

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>party today to today is via direct response, Performance Marketing,

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and e com and we literally sit at the nexus

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of that. You know, the business has grown three and

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we're working with partners like Bows, Campbell's Essay, lauder Craft,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Glauria Levi's Mattel, PNG, under Armour, Unilever. I could literally

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>go on and on um And the reason why we're

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>signing all of these brands is that a major evolution

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in our products since we spoke last is our integrations

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>with third party retailer cards. So when we spoke in

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>November two tho seventeen, my business was primarily focused on

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>working with direct consumer brands, and I began to take

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>this very contrarian point of view in the market, which

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is personally, I don't believe we're going to live in

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a world where you go to paper towels dot Com

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to buy your paper towels and deodorant dot Com to

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>buy your deodorant. And as I saw the entire media

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>landscape and overall retail landscape applaud every single director consumer

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>brand that came to market, I go, there's gonna be

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a point of saturation where there's too many of these

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>brands in market. Cost for customer acquisition is going to

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>get too high, and the pendulum is going to swing

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the other way. And I felt like the company that

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to win in the landscape would be the

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>one that could take all the principles of direct to

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>consumer brands and apply it to third party retailer environments.

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's when I began to integrate with Amazon, Target, Walmart, Alta, Sephora,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>best Buy, Exporting Goods, pet Co, and my business changed

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>overnight because the majority of the COM sales today actually

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 1>still come from those major third party retailers that I

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>just went through. And when you're a brand and you

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>are driving traffic to those environments, you literally only know

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>three things impressions, click, curate in your overall sales. You

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything that happens after that click or after

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that swipe up with us. You now know everything. So

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we get these brands that more often than not have

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>been these legacy brands that are heavily reliant on third

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>party retailers to drive the line share of their eCOM sales,

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and we get them to act more likely to see brands,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning they now know the entire customer journey, they understand

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the media channel effectiveness, they can measure influencer effectiveness, they

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>can measure creative effectiveness, they can capture all of that

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>data in their d MP or their CRM, and that

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>has been a huge, huge turning point for our business.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And the other part of that, which is directly related

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is the evolution of our audience product. So we call

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it the micmac Engager audience, and what we have found

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with nearly all of our clients is that it's actually

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>become either the top performing or within the top three

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>most effective audience within their ad managers. Going back to

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>like this example of like a c retailers, you drive

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>traffic to an environment like Amazon. The moment someone arrives

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon product detail page, you've completely lost that audience.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Because our software replaces that product detail page, we now

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>can collect that audience. We collect that audience on behalf

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the brand, and we pass it directly back to them

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to live within their preferred ad manager, meaning for literally

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the first time ever, they can go retarget that audience

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to close the sale. They can use that audience within

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>their future prospecting media. So that's one of the major

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>differences between brands that are heavily reliant on third party

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>retailers and DD C brands right, because the moment a

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>D two C brand acquires a customer, they now own

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that customer. And the high pothesis is the next time

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that they go remarket to them, their overall cost for

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>customer acquisition should be lower and their effectiveness therefore effectiveness

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is much higher. Correct some of the portfolio companies, they've

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>gone all in. It's literally the end all be all.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>If you talk to the CMO any brand marketer, it's

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a part of their daily lexicon. And then there are

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>other portfolio companies where you're just overall concerned for their

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>future because they're not talking that way. What are they

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>talking about? If they're not talking about this, what are

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they talking about? I would say it's all over the map,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>But there are certain categories that I absolutely feel are

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>more standout than others. So, I mean, the beauty brands

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>are all over it. I would say they're the most

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>progressive of you know, the overall legacy brands UM, and

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>then after beauty, uh, you know, consumer electronics, apparel and footwear.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>They're definitely ahead of the races, and I'd say we're

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a lad But this is one of

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>my big best for two thousand nineteen are people who

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>are within the food in BEV overall grocery category. I

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna you're gonna see people make leaps this year.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm very very bullish on grocery, but it's very new

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to them from a customer standpoint. Within grocery, especially with

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>like perishables, we're all becoming a lot more comfortable never

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>touching our food before we buy it. So that's more

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of like a societal evolution and combined with more plays

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>within the on demand commerce space. Meeting Yah, I buy

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>melons in the morning and by the time I get

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>home from works at my door. Is why I'm getting

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>very very excited about grocery and two thousand nineteen for

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>brands to have a different relationship in grocery, that category

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is where things start getting really interesting. And also to

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>me is the opportunity where brands can start working with

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about bundling, thinking about bundling in a

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>different way, right um, where brands can work together, where

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>there can be new products actually created with shared kind

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of I P or shared data. And you're starting to

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of the portfolio companies think that way,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>like the brands of these organizations have been mostly siloed,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're absolutely coming together for bigger portfolio plays right now.

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>You started really focusing on DTC brands. You spent a

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>ton of time last year with big legacy brands. Who

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 1>are you going to put your money on in terms

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of really being competitive and being able to push this

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>new mindset but also new practices kind of into the industry,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>they're all becoming one of the same. Meaning, if you

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>walk into Target today, you are beginning to see all

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Darling direct to consumer brands available on the

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>shelves of targets. And the reason being is that one

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>of the tradeoffs with D two C is that you

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>begin to experience limited reach and growing costs per customer acquisition,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to be able to increase your reach,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you end up on the shelves of Target, and the

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>moment you do that, you are no different than the

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>legacy brands that you were trying to cut out from

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>their market share. So we're starting to get a lot

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of inquiries from all of those brands because they're like,

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, we've now given up all of our

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>first party data. How can we begin to reown that

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and that's been really interesting, and I would say I've

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>experienced more and more that over the last six months.

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's definitely a big undercurrent happening. And with the

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>legacy brands, so they had that massive distribution. But three

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>reality is, you know, performance marketing and producing creative that converts.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It's totally new to them. So the amount of education

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that we need to invest, both on the brand side

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>as well as the agency side that services these brands

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is enormous. What you're not saying is that brand is

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>less important. You're actually saying brand is actually more important

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>as a function to pull through to sale. Oh I

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>am the biggest, biggest, biggest pertonent of brand. UM. Brand

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>will lower your cost for customer acquisition. Brand will increase

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>your recall. UM it is the end all be all

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at and in both situations, you're going to need to

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>do both. Like there's there's literally no director consumer brand

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that will not have a wholesale play at some point

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in their company's tractorate. One of the things that I

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>love about you is that you don't just talk to talk,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you walk the walk and inen you developed mic mac

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Academy is that the name and the purpose of that

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>was to actually go out and educate brands about the

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>use of an implications of working in the social commerce space.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>What led you to create that? I decided to productize

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the educational arm of what we do for a few reasons.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>One is I love it um. It's honestly what energizes me.

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the favorite parts of what I do

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at Mick mac Um. Two is there's a major skill gap.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting because I personally do not feel any

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of this is rocket science. It's more about access. And

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>if you've been put in a job where you never

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>were encouraged to go inside of Facebook ad manager and

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>start buying ads and experimenting and see how it works,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>then you live in the darkness. And what we try

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to do here at mic mac is explained to everyone.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>This isn't rocket science. We're going to teach you the

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>core principles. We're going to sit with you while you

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>navigate this new world and allow you to begin to understand,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>uh the effectiveness of the partners that you're working with,

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>including me. Right. So, the more I educate the client,

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we're just raising the standards for everyone who's involved. And

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what is the skill gap? Because Alex and I talked

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit about the talent and the need to

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>integrate skill sets that weren't previously needed, let alone train

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>for right. So, what are the things that you're seeing

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that the industry needs to be aware of and begin

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to implement? Probably yesterday, I think so over simplify it, uh,

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just within like you know, the world that I primarily touch.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Most of these brands, these legacy brands that are readily

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>available at third party retailers, they've been producing creative and

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>buying media the same way since you know, the dawn

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of television, which is that the majority of their focus

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>has been on awareness. So spray and pray. Let's make

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sure every person under the sun understand what our product is. Secondly,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>let's produce creative that can communicate this mass message more

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>often than not through the lens of television. It doesn't

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>work online. And what I constantly explain to our partners

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is that there's really just three things that I want

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you to think about. Campaign objectives, niche, audience targeting, and

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>creative formats. And so when we sit down with legacy brands,

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the first things that we have to do

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is convince them that a portion of their media cannot

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be bought against awareness, It actually has to be bought

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>against more bottom of the funnel conversion metrics. The second

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>thing is helping them leverage perhaps internal audience data that

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they already have within an existing CRM, or start to

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>develop niche audiences that they can use in their ad

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Tiger day. And then the third is producing creative that

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is literally designed to get people to add to cart,

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>which is a totally different creative muscle. So to boil

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>down what's missing is honestly just an understanding of what

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>works within performance marketing. I know that MAC advises and

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>works on production as well. Are there agencies that you've

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>been particularly impressed with in the performance space, that is

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that are actually creating great creative that pulls through to sale.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are great agencies that we work within performance,

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>but they're mostly focused on media. Um, what we have

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>found to be the most effective creative teams are the

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>internal creative teams. They run with the creative best practices,

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>there's less ego involved, and they personally are accountable for sales.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a huge white space for an agency. You've

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and I actually think a really great, really great b

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Two B talent needs to come over into this space,

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if it's come over. It's like

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>they're there, but people aren't thinking about them like this

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're in the the you know, the B two

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>B world is kind of gone. It's like over on

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the side. So that's what we do right at MCMAC Studios,

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>but in complete transparency, Like I don't make money from

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>mcmac studios. MICMAC Studios is an enabler for my software

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and the reason why is that the content space is

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so competitive that content has become commoditized and it is very,

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>very very hard to make big margins on content. I mean,

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw it in the media landscape this year. Digital

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>publishers like so uh, it's it's a hard game. And

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why, you know, we are in service of training everyone.

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I'll train agencies, We train internal creative teams to be

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>able to produce content that converts because wherever the content

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>comes from, as long as it follows the key creative

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>best practices that we see day in and day out,

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if I didn't touch the content. We

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are just in service of educating the market on how

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to do this and how to do it at scale.

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But are there things that still surprise you, like questions

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that you get asked that you're like moving into, Like

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't possibly still be asking that question. Yes, I

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>mean like there's obvious things like well, literally receive creative

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>where you don't see the product. I mean like you

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>know this, this isn't an aspirational perfume commercial where the

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>girl's hair is blowing in the winds in a convertible. Like,

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got to show the product. Number one, and you

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>need to show it right away. Number two is a

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are still so hesitant to put calls

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to action on their creative. If you want someone to shop,

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got to tell them to shop. Um, so you

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's all obvious things. Uh, you know, developing

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>niche creative. So you know we do an enormous amount

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of working beauty. Uh, we do a lot of work

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>these days in hair care. I am curly hair. If

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you show me a piece of creative with straight at hair,

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a wasted impression. And meanwhile, we get creative all

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>day long. That that doesn't speak to that sedimentation. Um,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.719
<v Speaker 1>so you know there are obvious things that happened day

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in and day out, but there's internal bureaucracies that often

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>handcuffed my clients from being able to change. Let's talk

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>about Facebook and talk about you know, your business. I think,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like many businesses, media publishers, technology companies, creators, creators, in

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, we're really dependent on Facebook. I don't think

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>your business was dependent on Facebook, but Facebook was an

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>important platform to your business. How has that changed in

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the last two years and what's the future uh for

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Facebook with your business? But also what are you seeing

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and hearing from brands that you work with in terms

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of are they going to continue to be on that platform,

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are they going to abandon that platform, are they looking

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to replace that platform maybe with the platform of their

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>own or otherwise. So when we opened up and I

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>introduced mic Mac, you know what I said was were

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the e commerce platform for social video and beyond the end.

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Beyond part is what's very new to the Atlantia audience. So, uh,

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what I began to notice the beginning of two thousand

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen was media budgets were getting consolidated. The essentially were

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>centered around Facebook, Google and Amazon, and CPMs were getting

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>really expensive and by the end of March of two eighteen,

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I began to feel that media budgets were starting to shift,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that partners were looking for other alternative places to place

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>their dollars to lower that CPM, and partners were coming

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to me and saying, hey, we want to use you

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in programmatic, we want to use you in paid search,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>we want to use you in YouTube, Pinterest, et cetera.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So this summer, uh Mic Math essentially released a feature

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that allows our partners to traffic us everywhere. And that's

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>how my partners use me now. So they put us

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in programmatic, they put us in paid search, they put

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>us in YouTube, they put us in interest, and so

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we become the default destination you are l in our

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>partners digital and social media period. That is what success

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like for us. And in terms of the Facebook ecosystem,

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>uh it still has a very strong footing, and the

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>reason being is that pretty much the only entities that

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>can rival Facebook in the amount of data that is

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>available for deep segmentation is Google and Amazon. So that's

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>the real realities of the dr landscape. And what we

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have seen though, is with missteps that happen, I have

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>seen clients react and typically what happens in those um

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>reactionary moments is that they will pause their Facebook media,

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but then they eventually restarted, so they're not and reallocating

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it elsewhere. They're just holding they they hold UM. Sometimes

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>will reallocate and they'll give some money to Snap or

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>pinterest UM. But it's a temporary thing. And the reason

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>why it's temporary is that Facebook is just effective when

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to d R again, Like it's really hard

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>to rival the effectiveness of that platform. And the reason being,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>and I think I talked about this in two thousand

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and I remained to be bullish on it, is

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook has had their pixel and market for nearly

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>seven years now. The amount of audience data that they

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have collected compared to the other social platforms that literally

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>only released a pixel last year, like you just can't compare.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Are there indicators that you've seen in that as we

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>moved to we ought to be thinking about in terms

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of channels or platforms that brands are going to need

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to put on their radar quickly, I e. Audio going

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>into chatting with you guys, I was thinking about, you know,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what are my major predictions for two nine? That's where

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going and one of them is around alternative distribution. Um.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing this across the board. Uh, you know,

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>cost per customer acquisition is getting really high, and a

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of the mains popular consumer categories and so now

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>you need to diversify. And so I think social is

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>going to remain to be a really strong play. Um,

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>but in it's not just going to be Facebook. I

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>do think that Snap has made an enormous amount of

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>investments in their d R ecosystem last year that is

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>going to begin to pay off this year. I have

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, we continue to see amazing results within YouTube,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>So I'm super bullish on YouTube, and I think that

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>they've done a lot in terms of investing in brand

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>safety that a lot of people are going to start

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>shifting dollars back there. Um. I think that we're going

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to begin to see that messenger is actually going to

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>replace our email inbox. So in terms of customer attention,

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>loyalty and all the traditional ways you used to convert

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>someone via email, I do think it's going to move

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to messenger. To finally, because we've been talking about this

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for four years, do you think finally do you think

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen is the year This happens. Yeah, you're going to

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>see it in a really big way within the SMB market.

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And and once we all start to experience that more

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes a more part of our daily life,

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it will then infiltrate the large brands audio. I see

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, continued d our investments in audio. Everyone that

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I speak to in terms of advertising on podcasts continually

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>says how strong it is for their business, and so

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think that people will start to begin to

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>invest more in that uh space, especially from a programmatic lens.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>And then in terms of voice, um, you know, voice

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>will continue to infiltrate search and will be the place

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for recall. And then you know, we just touched upon

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this um. But in terms of the alternative distribution lens,

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I am very bullish on third party retailers.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that as Amazon makes investment in their private

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>label business, it forces as other retailers to think about

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>attracting smaller indie brands in a different way, and that's

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>going to create a lot of interesting warfare. And the

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>stronger that your brand equity is, the better it will

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>be for you to negotiate with these large retailers, because

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>they want your brand consignment. I just think that from

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a societal standpoint, we're looking to reuse, recycle and old.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>What's old is now new again, um And the first

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>place that you can look at this isn't within the

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sneaker market. And I think that you're going to start

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of interesting brand plays happen within

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>consignment in a way that we haven't thought about before.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And I actually think it's going to allow eBay to

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>begin to become more relevant. And you talk about a

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 1>company that's sitting on an enormous amount of first party

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>data with actually a really interesting advertising business. For me,

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that's exciting. And then I think that we're going to

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>start to see commerce really start to scale in more

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>alternative spaces like coworking spaces and airlines. Sky Mall was

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the original major retailer, and I think that uh as

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see travel increase, especially amongst gen Z

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and gen Y, and you look at the use you know,

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>airline mobile apps and the amount of time that we're

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>spending on planes, I truly believe that there's a major

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>major retail play that's gonna be resurging within that environment.

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a massive opportunity for airlines. I do think there's

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be you know, other big swings that happened two

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen that are outside of distribution. Let's talk offline though,

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Like when you think about out of homegoing digital, I

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>think out of home, especially in two thousand eighteen, has

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>become super relevant. The thing about out of home though,

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is that I do most people buy it through that

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>awareness lefs so being able to connect that within the

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>DR ecosystem that's going to require partnerships between clear Channel

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook and whoever. UM. I would be interested to

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>see if that happens. I hope it does happen. UM.

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>But I also think that what we saw in two

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen and we'll see more of in two thousand

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>nineteen people using physical stores through the lens of out

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of home. Yeah, we have been talking about how certain

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>brands in particularly in the New York market, have literally

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>been built in the subway. Like when you think about

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the awareness factor, but then the ability to demo or

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>try or sign up to buy or preview whatever the

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>case may be. UM, there's just too many steps removed

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But again, how tech and social commerce

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>can potentially play UM a role in consolidating that experience

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I think is a real opportunity in I do think

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that two will be the year that every single physical

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>store will understand that it's no longer a distribution channel.

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>It is a place to have your greatest brand expression

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and deliver on a service that you can't deliver on

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>within the digital world. Yeah. And a you know a

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>retailer that I I just have so much excitement around

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, And I just never thought I would say this.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's Cold. It's a female CEO, and she's just so

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>open to making radical changes. You know, this summer they

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>announced you can come to Cold to return your Amazon packages. Ah.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see more retailers um begin

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to adopt that type of mentality, and for me, that's

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>really exciting. So is it fair to say will be

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the year of radical change in retail? I think obviously

0:30:55.400 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we say that every year, but the bar continues to raise, right.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We're all seeing people increase their competency within this space.

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that every single time that Amazon

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>makes a move, there will be other people who benefit

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.959
<v Speaker 1>from being the alternative solution. Yes, so, Rache, you know

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the drill killed by d I Y what would you

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kill by do yourself in I would kill the metric

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of row as being the only thing that matters at

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. I believe that's incredibly shortsighted.

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I would buy a company like Channel Advisor or quotient um.

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Quotient was formerly known as coupons dot com. So uh,

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>these are companies that have been the historical players within

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>shopper marketing. And if you can't tell from my business,

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe that shopper marketing is incredibly sexy and I

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>would buy them. And in terms of D I y honestly,

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>if I could sit down with every traditional brand marketer

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and spend one hour teaching them how to do performance

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>soudual marketing, I would do that myself. Well, how about

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we do that together in as a special micmac at

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Landia pop up. I love that idea. Rachel, You're the

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>best happy we know. We will be talking to you again. Thanks, Rachel,

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>than you, bye bye. So Rachel, thank you so much

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>for coming on, always insightful, always inspirational, calling out the

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>key things that we need to be thinking about, particularly

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>in the retail space as we kick off the new year.

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Rachel again keeps pointing us to brand and bottom funnel

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>activities are together. What she's learning from, you know, all

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of the legacy and DTC brands is that they may

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>have more in common than they ever thought. So I

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a huge opportunity for us to reinvent

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>how brand plays in certain spaces and how you really

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>own that cart experience, both physically and digitally. And I

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>think if you're sitting and listening to this episode on

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the publisher side or the agency side, there's a massive

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>call to action around thinking about what your creative solution

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is to support brands in the performance space. The fact

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that she couldn't name one, one, not one creative agency

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that is stepping up and producing content to really capitalize

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>on the success that she's seeing on places like Facebook

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way that she believes is the future. It's

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like huge opportunity and a huge opportunity. Rachel didn't leave

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>us with her email address. We know she'll be cool

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>with us dropping it. So it's Rachel at mcmac dot tv,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and she would like us to say m I K

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>M A K dot TV. So nineteen we're back, a

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>whole new year of exciting conversations with some of the

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>industry's most inspiring practitioners. More Places, More Spaces nineteen. You

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's gonna hit you, but first, big thanks

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to our producer Dana, all of our friends and family

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>at Panoply. We'll be back in two weeks. Mm hmm.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Full disclosure. Our opinions are our own.