WEBVTT - Dreamfall into the Dark, Part 1

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>If dreaming really were a kind of truce, as people claim,

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a sheer repose of mind, Why then, if you should

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>waken up abruptly, do you feel that something has been

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>stolen from you? Why should it be so sad the

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>early morning? It robs us of an inconceivable gift, so

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>intimate it is only knowable in a trance which the

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>night Watch guilds with dreams, dreams that might very well

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>be reflections, fragments from the treasure house of darkness, from

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the timeless sphere that does not have a name, and

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that the day distorts in its mirrors. Who will you

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>be tonight in your dream? Fall into the dark on

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the wall.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind? A production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>That was, of course a dream by Jorge Luis Borges,

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>an author that we cite and refer to with some

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>degree of regularity on the show, because he was fascinated

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with many of the things we're fascinated with on Stuff

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind, Mirrors, dreams, strange creatures, stabbings. Sometimes

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. And in this episode we're going

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to be discussing the dream world a bit more. This

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is a topic that we also come back to with

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>some regularity on stuff to blow your mind, and for

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>good reason, right, because there is a universality to dreaming,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>and it constitutes an altered and highly subjective mental state

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that runs the gamut from the mundane and the frankly

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>boring to the other worldly to the you know, from

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the specific to the ineffable, and from the comforting to

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the just absolutely terrifying. It's at once entirely shut off

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>from the wake world and yet can greatly impact it.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And we've spent a considerable portion of our conscious history

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as a species trying to make sense of it and

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to figure out to what extent these two worlds are connected,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>or to what extent they're disconnected, and the enigma, in

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>many respects still remains now.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Rob When you first told me you wanted to talk

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>about this, it was in the context of looking at

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>a specific mythical monster, I believe one from Japan, right.

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was kind of I guess, the White Rabbit

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that I followed into all of this because it's an

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting monster and it ties in with sort of practices

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and superstitions concerning the manipulation of dream on our side

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in the waking world, and I think we are going

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to get back to that monster, perhaps in a forthcoming episode.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But as I was reading about this creature from Japanese tradition,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I started reading more about how some of these ideas

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>extended back through Chinese tradition as well, and so I thought, well,

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I should maybe go a little broader and looking at

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the larger slice of Sino Japanese thought concerning dreams, and

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I ended up picking up this really fascinating book titled

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>The Dreaming Mind and the End of the Ming World

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>by Lynn A. Struve, published in twenty nineteen by the

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>University of Hawaii Press. It's an incredible book, and I

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was particularly taken by Struve's discussion early on about the

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>mystique of dreams in various global cultures across time, with

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>particular times and places in which the focus of intellectual

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and or theologic sections of the populace are just particularly

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>focused on the dream world and what is going on

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in dreams and what we should draw from dreams, and

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>how much of our waking effort and time and thought

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>should be dedicated to dreams.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned in the title of the book it

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 2>makes reference to the end of the Ming world. She

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.839
<v Speaker 2>seems to draw attention to the especially the late Ming

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>period in China, as a time when there was a

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of writing produced about dreams and focus on the

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 2>meaning of dreams, compared to maybe the same region of

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the world in earlier or later times.

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. Yeah, And this is something I had never really

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>thought about before, because obviously, to some degree it seems

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like everyone is fascinated with dreams. If nothing else, you're

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be interested in your own dreams. And then

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>any given culture is going to have some degree of

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>ideas about what they mean or what they don't mean.

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, there's going to be sort of

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>a global trend towards you know, modernization and rational interpretation

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of dreams. But I'd never really thought about this idea

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>that there are going to be times and places where

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>if you were looking at i don't know, some sort

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of a mechanism that was giving you the readings. Right,

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what dream fascination is looking like. Uh oh,

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>we have a spike. Why is it spiking? It certain

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 1>or does it seem to spike at certain points, and

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>so Struve is making a point largely for this period

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of time at the end of the Ming daim Honesty

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and its decline, as it's about to fall an end

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and another dynasty is about to come to power. But

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this argument that there are some other places as well,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>where all the elements are just in proper place to

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of push people inward, and particularly to push intellectuals

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of the day inward, those who have more time to

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>devote to these matters, and then also you know, the

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to write about them and have their words passed

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on to subsequent generations. So in the books she naturally

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>discusses the subjective nature of dreams, their wide variety, and

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>how the quote deficit of logic and rationality unquote in

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>dreams has inspired both suspicion and celebration, which is this

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>duality will come back to several times in this episode.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Also key to all of this, of course, is that

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>dreams arise unbidden. Certainly we have no power over what

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>other people may dream, but generally we lack control over

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what our own dreams are going to consist of, and

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this can prove again a source of great inspiration even

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>divine inspiration. You know, Look what the dream world has

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>given to me, Look what the powers beyond the dreams

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>have given me. But in some cases and some worldviews,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it may also be seen as threatening or truly terrifying,

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>especially within worldviews where rigorous control of thought, desire, and

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>emotion are key. You know, It's like, perhaps you're a

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>person and in your religious devotion, you spend a lot

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of time denying yourself, say lustful thoughts, and then you

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>enter into the dream world, and there are no guarantees

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that those lustful thoughts will not arise there and take

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on forms that may seem at odds with what you're

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to do with your waking self.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and of course that can be threatening and unsettling

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to people. But coming back to the first half of

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 2>what you said about dreams being an inspiration and having

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>a kind of power or authority, I think that is

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 2>linked to the fact about them seeming to be unbidden,

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they seem to come from somewhere other

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>than your own thoughts. I mean, you could say that,

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 2>we'll wait, where do your waking thoughts really come from?

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Those if you examine them more closely, might come to

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>seem as unbidden as dreams, but at least we have

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>a sense more like our thoughts in our waking state

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>are more under our control and our thoughts in the

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>dream world or not. And because they feel like they're

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 2>they're less under our control than thoughts in the waking state,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>they can take on a kind of third party authority.

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's like you can report the contents of your dreams,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>or even just contemplate the contents of your dreams, without

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the sort of self doubt and anxiety that you might

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 2>have about if you were just, say, like offering your

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>personal opinion about something. When it's a dream, it's like

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you're reporting something you read in another source as a

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of third party authority. And often because dreams are

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>ascribed to gods or literal powerful figures or ancestors or

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>other you know, beings that have senses and information and

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 2>powers beyond what we have in waking life, the contents

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of dreams can be interpreted to have power and authority

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 2>over other people. Like I can tell you my dreams,

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 2>and that might have a message that you think you

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 2>should pay heed to, because I'm not just saying my opinion,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm reporting what was revealed to me in a dream.

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's interesting to sort of self analyze over this,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Like if if either of us were to tell our

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>spouses to report in the morning, Hey, I had a

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>dream in which I was wearing this green suit. It's weird.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't own a green suit, And then you kept

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>reporting this same dream over and over again, Like how

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>would they interpret it? How would you interpret it? Like

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>at some point would you just be taking it apart,

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of what does green mean to me?

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And like what is this coming from? In or they

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>might think, well, maybe my spouse really needs a green suit.

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's what the root of this is, like deep

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>down they desire it. Like there's so many ways to

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of tease it apart and try and make sense

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of it when ultimately, like the signal itself is irrational.

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it gets even more complicated when the dream

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>is interpreted to include an exhortation or some kind of

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 2>guide to action, because consider the contrast between a couple

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 2>of other things. What if, on one hand, I just

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 2>say to my family, I think I'm going to shoplift

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 2>a green suit out of the clothing store, and I

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 2>just present that as my idea, it seemed like a

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>good idea to me. Versus I say, I have a

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 2>dream in which I take a green suit out of

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the clothing store without paying for it, and I keep

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>having this dream. Well there, it kind of seems like, look,

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 2>it's not It wasn't my idea. You know, it came

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 2>to me from the dream. So it's like somebody else

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 2>is telling me I need to do it.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this idea that there's something about the dream that

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>does not seem to fully originate in ourselves. This is

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a theme that we'll return to again and again here,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>and something that various interpreters of dreams and sort of

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>dream theorists over time have latched onto. Now, coming back

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to lynn A. Struve's book, she says that while in

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>some rare cases dreams have allegedly and allegedly is important

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>because the nature of other people's dreams is always alleged,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and even our own accounts of dreams that's subject to interpretation,

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 1>remembrance and reporting and so forth. In some cases you

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have dreams that have allegedly directly informed history. But otherwise, like,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>what does it matter that people are having dreams and

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>reporting them and focusing in on them. There's sort of

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like two major areas that she looks out at here.

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>One is we'll explore is like what happens when you're

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>fascination with dreams kind of like bubbles over into making

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>decisions about the waking world. But the other one that

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>she touches on has to do with ultimately with like

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how a given society viewed consciousness, how a society views

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>its dreams, especially in highly intellectual and authoritative cultures. You know,

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you can look to the surviving writings on dreams dream journals,

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and they can ultimately reveal much about that culture and

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the individuals doing the dreaming and the writing, as well

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>as the inner workings of the mind. She writes, I

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>submit that dream writing can indirectly contribute to a history

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness, not in the sense of what people were

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>conscious of over time, such as class identity, but in

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the sense of what people thought consciousness was and how

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>they experienced it. Delving into this can illuminate how they

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>felt and understood themselves existentially, which underlay other actions and endeavors.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Consciousness at its most primal is a sense of being

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>an observant entity, and it builds and modifies selfhood by

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the agency of narrating what is observed, attempts to narrate

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that most ineffable kind of observation of what occurs to

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>us in dreams expose this process at the most elemental

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>level that is accessible to others and therefore on which

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>self interacts with society. So dream talk can give us

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>valuable information on how people probed awareness itself, under what

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>circumstances they were moved to do so, and how they're

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>evolving selves negotiated nurotologically with their sociocultural milieu.

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so this is interesting. So Struve is making the

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>argument that even if you don't have people, say writing

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>philosophical treatises on what they believe the nature of consciousness

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to be, you can infer a lot of things about

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 2>what certain people at certain times thought believe the nature

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of consciousness to be by reading their reports about dreams

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 2>and how they talked about dreams. Because in a sense,

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 2>dreams are a dreams are relating and experience of consciousness

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 2>separated from action and waking life.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Right right, Yeah, It provides this this sort of distance

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>on inner thought process. That's and again I'd never really

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>really thought about this either. It's easy to sort of

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think of accounts of other people's dreams as either you know,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting or boring, or interesting only to them, or perhaps

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting in terms of like exactly how it is interpreted

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>based on everything else, and all that's valid, but this

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>added level of like, yeah, you're to some degree, these

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are accounts of people thinking about their own consciousness. Now.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>In this book, Struve ultimately dives into the particularities of

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Late Ming Dynasty China during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries,

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>but she also highlights other times in places that seem

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly focused on the power of dream So, you know,

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's all interesting, I think, coming from our current place

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the consideration of dreams, sort of the tail end

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of what she classifies as an accelerating Western decline in

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the belief of prophetic and oracular dreams. And she argues

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that this decline has been accelerating, at least among the

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>educated since the seventeenth century. I mean, we're still obsessed

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with our dreams, we still talk about our dreams, right,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>They still have the power to fascinate us, terrifies and

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>all that. But we're generally more inclined, it seems to

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>me anyway, to dismiss them as nonsense or the scrambled

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>remnants of waking experience, thoughts and feelings. I remember David

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Eagleman when I initially interviewed him the interview before last,

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>he said that he mentioned that he had always thought

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of it as sticking his head in the night blender,

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was rather apt. You know, this idea

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that yeah, this is what this is what you get.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, these are just the mental leavings from the

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>previous day, and you can pick through them. You can,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you'll find something useful that is provides

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>some inner reflection, but ultimately the thing itself has no meaning.

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It is like a waste product that is extruded from

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the mind.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Well. Yeah. Eagleman's particular theory about the adaptive function of

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>dreaming was that it is a defensive action of the

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 2>visual center of the brain to prevent takeover of that

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>tissue in the brain by other senses during the dark

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>period and the night, so that when you know it's

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>nighttime and you have your eyes closed so you're not

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>using the visual centers of your brain, those brain cells

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 2>don't start to get recruited too much by other functions

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of the brain, because our brains are very plastic, and

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 2>part of the evidence he produced for that was that

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 2>there seems to be across the human life span and

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>across different animals, there appears to be a negative correlation

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 2>between the plasticity of brain tissue and how much dreaming

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>you do.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it was an interesting hypothesis that he came

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to after initially seeing it as the night blender. But

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't hear someone like David Eagleman talking about dreams

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>being the vehicle or the instrument through which God is

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking to him, or to us, or to random people.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you will find it in the modern world,

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, we don't really lean into

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that on the whole.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess technically, I want to say, those

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>are two separate scientific questions. One would be what is

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the adaptive function of dreaming in the first place? Like

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 2>why do we dream? And I think that's the main

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>question that Eagleman was answering when we talked to him

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 2>about that, that the purpose of dreaming is to prevent

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the nighttime takeover a visual tissue by other functions. But

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 2>there's a totally separate question, which is what determines the

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 2>actual contents of dreams, and you could have you in

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 2>a way that's kind of unrelated to the other theory.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 2>You could just say, well that you know, the fact

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>that we need to prevent the takeover of that brain

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>tissue means you've got to have something going on in there.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 2>What's going on in there? What kinds of stuff you

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>see and imagine in a dream? I mean, it could

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 2>be anything. So why do we see the things we see?

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 2>And that's an interesting psychological question that seems somewhat separate.

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I see what you're saying. Yeah, I mean, certainly

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you could have a situation where if the Eagleman's hypothesis

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was correct, that you could still have God speaking through

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the content of the dreams, because it's like the brain

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>just needs something to keep the to keep things visually

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>powered up, but it doesn't particularly care what is in there.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And then yeah, you could have God or God's slipping

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a message in to the stuff in the same way

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that you might be able to cut up open the

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>entrails of an animal and supposedly, you know, determine the

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>future based on what they contain. Ah.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So it's technically there's no conflict between you being

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>able to read the future in the in the guts

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 2>of a chicken, and the fact that the guts of

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 2>a chicken are used for digestion by the chicken.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all right. Coming back to these different periods and times,

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there's been an uptick in interest in the contents of

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>dreams and this idea that there's something meaningful there to

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>really latch onto. One of the periods that Struve touches

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>on is the Romantic period in Europe, particularly late eighteenth

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>through early nineteenth centuries. Shruve writes that the quote felt

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>limitations of an Enlightenment rationalism and mechanism, especially as a

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>concern the human body and the inner workings of the mind,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>led to a kind of increased interest in the non

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>rational and the mysteries of the self, consciousness and the

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>unconscious mind. She writes, quote with growing interest in dreaming

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as a medium through which to link these compulsions. Dreams

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>came to feature prominently in natural philosophy, medical thought, the

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>budding field of anthropology, art in art theory, personal notes,

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and especially creative writing and literary criticism. This occurred as

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>intellectuals responded with elan and or anxiety, hope, or dismay

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to the ethical French Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, rising nationalisms,

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and socio and environ mental changes attendant on the early

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Revolution.

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>If I understand Struve's argument correctly, this seems to fit

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 2>with the pattern of the late Ming period in that

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I think she understands an increased focus on dreaming among

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the people producing writing as a common feature of periods

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>where there is a lot of where there is a

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of strife and rapid change.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, I think so. And I think that's that's

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the main reasons that the Romantic period here

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>is such a nice parallel example. Now, in bringing up Romanticism,

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the mind instantly goes to particular authors of

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that period, say Samuel Taylor Cooleridge, who lived seventeen seventy

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>two through eighteen thirty four, whose work often explored dreams

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as those visions brought about through the use

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>of opium. So I wanted to look at like another

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>text that dealt with this topic, and I ran across

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting book from nineteen ninety eight titled Coolidge

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>on Dreaming by Jennifer Ford, and it explores this naturally.

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>In the specifics of the poet's work, but also in

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the large, the larger context of eighteenth and nineteenth century

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>dream fascination in the West. You see examples of this

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in the work of other notable Romantic authors as well,

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like Lord Byron and Thomas de Quincy, who, of course,

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of course also famously imputed opium. Ford writes that there

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was no consensus concerning the nature of dreaming at the time,

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>during the Romantic Romantic period, with opinions are really centering

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on the big three interpretations. So one potentially divine visions

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, could be could be God sneaking in a

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>voice or a message there, or some you know, supernatural

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>entity with our interests at heart. I guess you could

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>also look at that as too, a font of creativity

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and inspiration, a natural place for the poets in the

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>writer's mind to go in the artist's mind or three

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>dreams as residue or byproduct, which is, you know what.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>We've been discussed this idea that maybe dreams are nothing

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>but just sort of the reassembled contents of things we

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thought about or observed, etc. During the course of our day.

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Coolridge was much inspired by the writings of antiquity on

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the matter, considering the idea of prophetic dreaming especially, but

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he also consumed contemporary writings that included both serious attempts

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to understand dreaming from the vantage point of current medicine

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and physiology, as well as magical and mystical strains of thought.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Now this is kind of an aside here, but one

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things that Ford points out is that one

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of the authors that he would have, of course read

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>from antiquity would be Homer, and who in the Odyssey

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>describes the two gates from which dreams may arise Quote four.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Two are the gates of shadowy dreams, and one is

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>fashioned of horn, and one of ivory. Those dreams that

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>pass through the gate of saun ivory deceive men, bringing

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>words that find no fulfillment. But those that come forth

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>through the gate of polished horn bring true issues to

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>pass when any mortal sees them.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Well in a way, that belief is not very helpful.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's like some dreams could contain prophetic content and

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 2>other dreams are there to deceive and misguide you, but

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>you can't you can't know which or which.

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it reminds me a little bit of the ideas

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>presented by the gomork and the never Ending Story, you know,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the idea of this link bit and creative creativity and

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>deception between dream and creations of imagination and lies. But

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and I guess this get touches on, like one of

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the real problems of valuing the content of dreams is that, like,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes dreams are just stupid. I mean, there are gonna

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be maybe some there's some versions of it where you're like, okay,

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>there's always something there might be cryptic, but there's something

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there that might be your viewpoint regarding dreams. But at

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>times you're gonna have an uphill battle because you're going

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to have that dumb dream where you're what like in

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the the the words of Mitch Hedberg, you know, had

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a joke about a dream in which he had to

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>build a go kart with his old boy, something like that.

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're gonna have dreams that you're really gonna

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have to have to try hard to find some sort

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of prophetic interpretation or meaningful interpretation of what's there. So

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>easier to say, well, you know, sometimes they come through

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>this gate and they mean something. Sometimes they come through

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the other gate and it's just complete crap.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Ford has a section here where she briefly goes through

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioning you know what other writers of antiquity had to

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>say about it, Like Hippocrates and much later Gallan, both

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>agreed that dreams mattered and they were connected to health.

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>They also wrote that Galen in particular wrote that they

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>could contain divine messages of healing contained in dream symbols

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. But for both of these individuals, however,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>food and digestion were deeply linked with dreaming.

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, yeah, you might be an undigested bit of beef

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>for cheese.

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, yeah, exactly the example I thought of as well

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>from a Christmas Carol. Now, Plato, Aristotle, and for the

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>most part, and with some notable exceptions, argue that the

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>dreams were not prophetic. Apparently Cicero kind of was wishy

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>washy on this. Aristotle, however, was pretty firm on the matter.

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>Ford writes, quote he explained sleep as the rising to

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the head of vapors from digestive processes. Dreams could be

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>explained by their relation to the material world and to

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>waking thoughts, and not as a result of prophetic messages

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>from gods. Totally in the potato camp.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Here, there's more of gravy than grave about you.

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>That's Aristotle, yeah, now, but still, this idea of prophetic

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>dreaming cast a long shadow across Western history. And of course,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, outside of what's going on in the like

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>intellectual realms of eating given culture, obviously you every kind

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of deeply rooted folk traditions and so forth as well,

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>which you know, none of the things authors particularly get

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>into that as much. But with the Christian tradition, Ford

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>points out, there was always a lot of back and

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>forth on the matter because the Bible itself seemed to

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be of two mind signs on prophetic dreaming, sometimes championing

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the prophetic power of dreams and other times denouncing it,

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in fact casting out the dream observers with the soothsayers

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and the wizards in the Book of Deuteronomy.

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I feel like this is a repeating pattern, and

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I think this will come up again in some stuff

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.439
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk about later, either in this episode or in

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the next one in the series. But there's always sort

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.959
<v Speaker 2>of a tension in the practice, in the reception of

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the practice of receiving revelations, whether that's through divination or

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>whether that's visions and dreams and so forth, because many

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 2>religions will have that type of content in a sanctioned way,

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:46.959
<v Speaker 2>like maybe some of its orthodoxy or its history, its stories,

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 2>its current priesthood will practice things that involve some methods

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 2>of knowledge of that form, and that will be the

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 2>sanctioned version. But then there is sort of an unsanctioned

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 2>version that is not promoting orthodoxy or is subverting the

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 2>power of the priesthood or whatever, and well, you don't

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 2>want to allow that stuff. So it's kind of like,

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, well, there were some visions and dreams that

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>were legitimate, and that's part of what we believe now.

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 2>But if somebody is telling you new information from visions

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and dreams, then you've got to be careful about that.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's not canon. But anyway, during the time of

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the Romantics, a lot of this increased interest and confusion

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>about dreaming had to do Ford stresses, with quote the

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>perceived unsatisfactory factory, mechanical and associationistic explanations of dreams offered

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>by John Locke, David Hartley, George Berkeley, and others. Interest

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in the forces and features of psychic life began to increase,

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and a concept of the unconscious mind began to emerge.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like a lot of these unsatisfactory ideas

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>involved digestions. So I guess, you know, ultimately it's not

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>very romantic for someone to say, look that dream you had.

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I know it was really inspiring, but it was essentially

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>like you passing gas in the night. You shouldn't give

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>it a lot of attention unless it is, you know,

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 1>interfering with your ability to sleep. But it also comes

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>back to what you said earlier about like a time

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of change, a time of like changing ideas and emerging ideas,

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes this kind of feeling of like, well, no,

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that that can't be right. That's not how I feel

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. That's not what these voices from the past

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>have necessarily agreed with now. Coolerdg himself wrote that he

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>thought much of these discussions were too dismissive of the personal, psychological,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>mysterious nature of dreams, as well as their overall value

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to the dreamer. But he also read the writings of

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Scottish metaphysical rationalist Andrew Baxter and was particularly taken by

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>his arguments that dreams did not originate in one's own soul,

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but were brought on by external beings, so dream spirits

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>were to blame, because otherwise, how could we dream something

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>that we had never witnessed or thought or felt in

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the waking world. How could we meet someone in dreams

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that we had never met in reality.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 2>This seems like an odd thing for Coleridge to be

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>enticed by, because, like, he was a writer, so you'd

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 2>think he'd be more familiar with the concept of creative imagination.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And how like, yes, a character can start talking back

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to you in your mind and you you haven't met them,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>You made them up. This is part of the creative process.

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, it's a good point. I kind of interpreted

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>those being like again to her point, like recoiling a

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit from this. You know what the rational world

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is saying about dreams, You know that it's it is potato.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other hand, you know, wanting this

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that's more in keeping with the muses, that dreams

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are overpowered, that they that they are coming to us

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and giving us something, giving us a creative gift that

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we might run with. And apparently this is the kind

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of thing that Baxter was talking about. You know, the

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that the dreamer is visited during sleep and that

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>quote dreaming may degenerate into possession.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, So you could imagine it being attractive for

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Coleridge and other romantic writers to think like this in

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the same way it might have been attractive for writers

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>who literally believed in the muses as entities, because it

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>gives that same kind of third party authority to what

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>you're writing that I was talking about with dreams earlier,

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 2>like you know, if oh, I didn't just make this up,

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 2>this was given to me by a divine being.

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it reminds me a bit of some

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.719
<v Speaker 1>of our past discussions about the bicameral mind hypothesis, you know,

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as sort of like, okay, there's the idea that a

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>god might speak to you, but here's this other idea

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of gets you to a similar place, but

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>through a different, different strain of more rational thinking. Though

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess at the end of the day, you're still

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about some sort of entity outside of your own

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 1>being in the case of Baxter's writing. So I don't know,

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but I guess I tend to sort of interpret it

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>here as being like, you know, it's the irrational in

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the rational insight. Any given person's mind, and certainly you're

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>able to hold on to and be attracted to conflicting ideas,

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>but still from that idea, it's a short walk to

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>pre existing concepts of dreams brought on by demons and

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the like. Believe Baxter wrote about the incubus and the

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>succubists a bit at least the general concepts the link

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is made between nightmare and madness, and Ford makes special

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>mention of this quote. The notion of dreams as possessing

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the dreamer provides a rich source of anxiety and thoughtful

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 1>deliberation for Coleridge and many others who ventured into the

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>often hostile territory of the dream. Dreams were involuntary events

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and could not be controlled. Often the dream itself was

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>perceived as the controlling force. I know, in my case,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes I will sort of think, you know, vaguely about

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like there being something that is programming my dreams, Like

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a little person in my head that makes a

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of programming choices, like it's a TV channel and

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>often makes just illogical programming choices, like like I'll look

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>at it and be like, well, think of all the

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>things that I did yesterday that I read about, or

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>experienced or watched on television, and this is the dream

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you gave me. This was the programming that was selected

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for my night's entertainment.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 2>We're rerunning transfers five, five times in a row.

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I would love transfer five dreams, but no, it's generally

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more boring. It's like, I don't think you

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>know the target audience here. But anyway, one sees this

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>idea of dreams possessing the dreamer and the works of

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Coleridge to Quincy, Wordsworth and others. But Coleridge again also

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>kept abreast of modern medical writings, as we as the

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>writings of people like the physician Erasmus Darwin, who stressed,

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>quote the terror of involuntary thoughts, sleep and dream as

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a sub human state in which we cannot fully exert

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>our will. So, you know, I guess this seems to

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>be just a common theme that everyone who's thinking about

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>dreams have to come up against, is that there's we

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>can't fully control it. And what does that lack of

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>control mean?

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, again, when I really think about it, the question

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>it raises is what does it mean when we do

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 2>feel like we're in control of our thoughts? What causes

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 2>that sensation because again, like I feel like the closer

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 2>you look at the moment to moment functioning of your

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 2>waking mind, the more mysterious the origins of your thoughts becomes,

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 2>and it can start to feel like a dream. We're like,

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, why did I just think about that?

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Did I really have control of thinking about that? What

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 2>made me say transfers five? Where did that come from? Yeah?

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Though, I know what you mean. Though, I guess at

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>times there are waking thoughts and you know, if we

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have a really active, you know, default mode network, we

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>can kind of self analyze and we'd be like, oh, well,

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this is why my when here, and then you know,

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we can sort of try and trace it. But dreams

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>often are more difficult to interpret along those lines, like

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they're less easy to interrogate.

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess sort of what I'm getting at is

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 2>that it seems like maybe the difference is that in

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 2>dreams we have less of the illusion of control over

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the direction of our own thoughts that we feel we

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>have during waking states.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely so. You can see a number of these

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas reflected in a poem by the romantic author Lord Byron.

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a piece that Ford also references in the book,

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:38.479
<v Speaker 1>but I thought it might be nice to read just

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a portion of it here. Again, this is from Lord

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Byron's The Dream. Joe, do you do the honors? Since

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I read the boretes at the beginning?

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh sure, let's see. So this is an excerpt from

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 2>The Dream. They pass like spirits of the past. They

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 2>speak like sybyls of the future. They have power, the

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 2>tyranny of pleasure and of pain. They make us what

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>we were, not what they will, and shake us with

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the vision that's gone by, the dread of vanished shadows?

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Are they? So? Is not the past all shadow? What

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 2>are they? Creations of the mind?

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, on that note, we're going to go

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>ahead and close out this episode, but we'll be back

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in part two and we'll continue to discuss this idea

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the mystique of dreaming these different places where in

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 1>time where there's there seems to have been a surge

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and interest in the power of dreams and the like,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the practicality even of dreams. So we'll look at a

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>few other different cultures, including the Ming dynasty example that

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Struve is directly mentioning, and eventually we'll get to that monster.

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that may be even further along. But

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end, there's a monster at the end of

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:47.720
<v Speaker 1>this book, is what I'm saying.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Will it steal my dreams? It might?

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>It meant very well, might, or it might just help

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>you build ikea furniture for all night long?

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Will it steal a green suit for me?

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, one would hope, One would hope that monster has

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>connections all right. Well. In the meantime, if you want

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to write in about your dreams, hey, We're always happy

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear them. Our listener mail episodes published on Mondays,

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Wednesdays we do

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a short form monster fact or artifact episode, and on

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Fridays we set aside most serious concerns to just talk

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 2>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 2>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 2>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 2>of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts, from My heart Radio, visit

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 2>your favorite shows

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>With Ratt