WEBVTT - Ken Rogoff Talks Risks Facing US Fiscal Health

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. My book of the

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>summer hugely successful for Ken Rogoff was Our Dollar Your Problem.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I put it out last night. Is a summary along

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with Rick Atkinson's wonderful second volume on the American.

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Revolution, The Rogue Off Revolution.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>As he has done with Carmen Reinhardt a decade ago

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and through his career, is to consider our debt, our deficit,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>our battle with austerity. Professor Rogoff joined some Harvard this morning. Ken,

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Congratulations on the book. Give us

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>an anecdote, Ken of the success of the book. I

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>want every economic student to read it.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Are they? Oh, as people are starting to read it,

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>they're really enjoying it. I'm getting all kinds of emails, letters,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 3>not to mention countless reviews where people has sort of

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>been surprised that it's so fun to read. It's great.

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>At Lisa noted that Grace Slick is in the early pages.

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 2>He's got Jeff in there early.

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Ken Project Syndicate A blistering essay Foreign Affairs Magazine,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>A blistering essay. This time is different? Are we finally

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>unraveling our debt and our deficit?

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 3>To crisis. Well, in my book, I thought it would

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 3>take five to seven years. On the current track, we

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 3>are I think Trump, as you said earlier, as an accelerant.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's certainly not a sure thing. A lot

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 3>of it goes around what are the underlying interest rates

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>if we go back to the zero interest rates, real

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>interest rates of the twenty tens up through twenty twenty

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 3>two in the pandemic. Well, sure, debt is a free lunch.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean you can spend and you basically don't have

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>to pay anything. That's what all the I call them

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 3>to Austerians were absolutely convinced, and some very smart people

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>you had them on your program, followed this. I mean

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 3>there was Larry Summer's secular stagnation. He's very nuanced about it.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>To be fair, Olivier Blanchard, president of the American Economic Association,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 3>said we shouldn't look at debt anymore. Paul Krugman, you know,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 3>wrote constantly about this. But what do you know? Interest

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 3>rates have gone up, and the big question is are

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 3>have we normalized or is this just something after the pandemic.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I think for many reasons. If you look at the

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 3>history of real interest rates, they're probably about where they're

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 3>going to be for a long time, in which case

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>we are in trouble. So that's that's a long winded answer,

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 3>But it's really about interest rates, not just about that.

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to get this in on interest rates. Paul's

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>got eight questions he wants to jump in here. But

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the answer, Ken Rogue is I'm auditing X ten with

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>Jason Furman, did a fancy logarithmic thirty year bond. We

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the Ken Rogoff six percent thirty year bond,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Paul late next year, like autumn of next year. Ken,

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>do you still model a six percent yield for the

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>United States of America?

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think a six ten year treasury is more

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 3>likely than one in three quarters treasury that we had

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 3>for a long time. Absolutely. I mean, it's very hard

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 3>to predict interest rates, but I think they're as likely

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 3>to go up as down.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Professor. I've been in this market since for thirty five years,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 4>and we've been talking about the national debt and deficits

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 4>every single year. Yet nothing changes. And I guess I've

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 4>been told by others that say, hey, as long as

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 4>people continue to buy our treasury bonds, we're okay. How

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 4>do you think about that?

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>The question is at what price? We've gone through this

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 3>period where interest rates have gone down and down and down,

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 3>and our debt, you know, has gone up from maybe

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent of GDP in nineteen eighty to sixty percent

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>to ninety percent to over one hundred and twenty percent,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>and the interest rates had been coming down until they didn't.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 3>And if you look at history, there have been long

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 3>periods where interest rates were rising where they're in decline,

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>and I think they're in a period where they're normalizing.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 3>So people were too focused on debt and not looking

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>enough at well, what's the interest on the debt? That's

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 3>what's changed.

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 4>What do you what would you if you were sitting

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 4>in Congress and you had a couple of folks on

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 4>both sides of the aisle with you, what would you

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 4>suggest they do to address this issue?

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, why don't you at least give a try to

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 3>running a two to three percent deficit instead of a

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>six or seven percent deficit? You know, while you organize,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, the solutions are well known. You

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 3>could improve the tax system, their ways to make it

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 3>more efficient. We don't have a very efficient system. Would

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 3>be the Understatement of the year. You know, they're all

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 3>kinds of suggestions for improving growth, but I think sort

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of a sober thing to do would be to at

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 3>least not run what we call a primary deficit, means

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 3>above and beyond the interest payments, which right now are

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 3>about three percent of GDP.

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to drop in here with an important

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>announcement separate from Ken Rogoff, and we're thrilled you're listening

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to us across the nation today and indeed around the

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>world and in a fractious United Kingdom. Angelo Rayner resigns

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is US Deputy Prime Minister. I'm not going to go

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>into the nuances because they don't understand it, but there

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>has been an uproar and the Labor Party wrapped around

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the Deputy Prime Minister. She resigns and also will resign

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 1>various posts at the Labor Party as well. So that's

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>breaking news in the United Kingdom. What perspective you as

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we can we continue with Kenneth rowg Golf, Paul, why

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>don't you pick it up with Professor Rogoff.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 4>So Ken as we think about just kind of global

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 4>economic growth here and we've got we're now in a

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 4>world of teriffs, reciprocal tariffs, all kinds of barriers going

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 4>up the global trade. As you step back and look

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 4>at it from in a thirty thousand foot level, what

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 4>does that mean to you for kind of global economic growth?

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think near term, you know, the growth has

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 3>held up better than anyone would have guessed with all

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>this noise going on. That's been a surprise. Now we

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 3>may find you're getting the labor data today and you

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 3>know it wasn't as good as we thought it was.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to know what's going on. I might interject.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, labor data, Johns Day's always been the big

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 3>number because it's the most reliable number that we get

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of in real time. Maybe now and going forward,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to be considered as reliable. And I

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 3>don't know what we're going to look at.

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Can I look at your book? And I want to

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>bring this back, folks to a summary of all the

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>crises across Ken Rogoff's Young Academics is just it's amazing

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>shows up for a job interview in a polyester suit?

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 2>How did that go?

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Ken Rogoff?

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>You showed up in early in the book Young rogueoff

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>chess guy, shows up in a polyester suit.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>How did that go?

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Ken?

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 3>It was my Rhodes Scholarship interview, and I had just

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 3>never worn a suit. I never bought a suit. I

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't know what it looked like. So I had this

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of it was really beautiful colors, you know, I

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>looked like I was probably some kind of entertainer. And

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 3>everyone who was else was wearing gray blue suits. And

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I tie it in later to when I go to

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Poland playing in a chess tournament and I'm describing how

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 3>they their suits are awful because they have, you know,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>centralized planning, and they're looking at my suit and say,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh, do all Americans have such great suits?

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Can I look at our dollar problem and it speaks

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of crisis just as a general statement, and I'll let

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>your work off it. How close are we to the

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>collective fears of global Wall Street of August nineteen ninety eight,

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the unraveling of various em crises Ecuador, Mexico, and the

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>rest or something tangible like the IMF bailout of the

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>UK many decades ago.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, there are lots of small countries in crisis, in fact,

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 3>way more than in a long time. I mean, the

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 3>World Bank reported that almost half the developing and low

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 3>income countries were basically in default. We have the Sri Lanka's,

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 3>there's always Argentina, Lebanon. I mean, there's all kinds of

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 3>countries that are in trouble. I should say Argentina is

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 3>doing much better now, but of course it has a

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 3>very big debt problem. Those often are the Canarya and

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 3>the coal mine for when something larger happened. If you

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 3>go back to the nineteen eighty three debt crisis, that

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>was really you know, the Latin American debt crisis the

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>last decade. Actually, if you go earlier, before Mexico, Brazil

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 3>and everyone else, there were a lot of small countries.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 3>So when you have interest rates high, this much volatility

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 3>going on, very high debt everywhere, it's you know, like

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 3>a forest that's very dry and something can set it off.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 3>But it you know, I don't know what it would be.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 3>It would not surprise me if we did have a

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 3>major country run into big problems, which could run anywhere

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 3>from you know, a Latin American country to Japan over

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>the coming year.

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Ken given kind of that uncertainty, global uncertainty, this Federal

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Reserve is really in a tight spot here, and not

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 4>to mention the political pressures on this federal reserve. What

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 4>do you make of the kind of how the Fed's

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of been working here the last several months, and

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe what it to do over the coming months.

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, the big call is actually not whether to take

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the SHORTERM interest rate down half a percent or a

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 3>quarter percent, or when to do it. The big call

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 3>is where are we headed. If we're headed back to

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 3>these very low interest rates, which some very smart people think,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a debate, then they have a

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of room to cut without triggering inflation. They'd sort

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 3>of be moving the market to where it should be.

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, if that's not the case, which

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I believe, and I think by and large the Fed

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>staff is very skeptical of the lower forever review, then

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 3>they need to be cautious. It's so hard to read

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the data. The combination of Trump, AI and everything makes

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 3>it very hard to know what's going on.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You can comment, honey, are singing and this is of

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>course we're with Jorgensen at Harvard and many other giants.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to call it, folks, the dynamics of productivity

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's a school Ken down the street where I

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think they came up with total factor productivity. I can't

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>remember quite but Ken on productivity. The great theme of

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>our liberal state is productivity and technology to the rescue.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you observe that or is that over emphasized? Well,

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>it's certainly not overemphasized. It's very important. It's sort of

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>hard to know how to make it come and how

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to make it go away. I think Wall Street obviously

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 2>has been very excited about AI their air pockets, where

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 2>the productivity has been very clear. I do think some

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of what we're seeing in the high Wall Street prices

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>reflects labor share falling, profits and businesses share rising, which

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 2>means it isn't growth. It isn't all growth. Some of

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 2>it's just a reallocation that has very different political implications.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Ken, congratulations on my book of the Summer.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I just can't say enough, folks. Whatever smart ale kid

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got, I don't care how they're smart, Like Roguoff,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>they're dumb li king. The answer is cover to cover

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred pages, our dollar, your problem. It is the

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.599
<v Speaker 1>arc of Ken Rogoff's career and the view for it

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University,