WEBVTT - Understanding the Real Fight Over Water in Arizona

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloy.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Tracy Arizona Water.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I'm really fascinated by this topic, and I

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>also have a really hard time wrapping my head around it.

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>We sort of hear different things. So just to lay

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>the groundwork here or the groundwater. We have interviewed a

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>land broker in Arizona, and we have also interviewed an

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>alfalfa farmer. Yes, and water has come up every time,

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and we sort of hear different things from those two stakeholders.

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 2>So I remember the farmer was sort of blaming the

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>property developers for water shortages, and then the property developers

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>are like, actually, agriculture uses the majority of water in

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the state, and at the same time, you have concerns

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>over water availability, and we saw some news on that

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>front recently.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So at the beginning of the month, I believe

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>the governor of Arizona announced this plan to sort of

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>constrain the amount of new development that will be allowed

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>around the Phoenix area, which is of course one of

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing areas. And as you mentioned, like the

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>developers will say, oh, we have plenty of room to

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>add more homes because the farmers are taking up eighty

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of the water that we have in the desert.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And the farmers say, well, there wasn't really a problem

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>with water until everyone started moving to our state.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm imagining that Spider Man meme of everyone pointing fingers

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 2>at each other. But I think the big difference and

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>what's happening now is that we are starting to see

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>water shortages or constraints affect development decisions.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, So then the big question is, like, Okay, so

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Arizona and some of these other Southwestern states that in

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>part get their water from the Colorado River all have

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to conserve water to somewhat to some extent, there's been

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this meggage round in the Southwest for I think like

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years now. From the underground aquafers, they're depleting

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>at some pace. The water from the rivers is lower

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>than it used to be. So then and we hadn't

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 1>even you know, we're talking about housing versus agriculture. There's

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of industry, industry and the semiconductors. Yeah,

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>so we sort of have to get a sense I

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think of the big picture of like frankly, who's going

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose out? Who is going to who has water

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>today that won't have access.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>To it in the future, Right, And how do you

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>make those decisions? How do you decide what to prioritize.

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, Because with all utilities, it's never like a pure market.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>There's not just like I don't at least I don't think,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like when you like try to wrap

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>your head around like.

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>How the Texas grid works.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not like there's like some price of

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>electricity and who pays the most. It's like there's auction mechanisms,

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there's subsidies, et cetera.

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>All kinds of Texas gread is a bit of a

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>special case. But point taken, I think I.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Think Arizona Water might also be in that case of

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>many special cases. So we really do have the perfect

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>guest who is steeped in water and water policy and

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>made a whole career of it. We're going to be

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking to Katherine Sorenson. She's the director of Research at

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Kyle Center for Water at the Morrison Institute for

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Public Policy at Arizona State. Previously, she was the head

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of Phoenix Water Services.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>So someone who.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Really knows water and going to break it down. So,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Sorenson, thank you so much for coming on odd

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Lots really appreciate you joining us.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. I'm really excited for our conversation.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't you start just in the very sort of

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>just go back a little bit a few weeks ago

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Governor of Arizona did announce these constraints to

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>some extent on new construction capacity around Phoenix.

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 3>What what was announced and why?

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a great question, and there is a complicated

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 4>answer to that.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And I told you it's not going to be an

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>easy one.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 4>But it's not an easy one. So what that related

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 4>to is actual it was actually a sustainable groundwater management

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 4>in the Phoenix metropolitan area. So in Arizona we have

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 4>some of the most progressive groundwater management laws that you

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 4>will find not only in this country, but literally in

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 4>the world. Back in nineteen eighty we passed groundwater management

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 4>that effectively ties water availability to the ability to grow.

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 4>And so what that means is that if you're going

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 4>to subdivide land, which is typically how growth occurs, particularly

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 4>for you know what we call subdivisions, right like residential

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 4>subdivision in the Phoenix metropolitan area. If you are going

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 4>to subdivide land and grow, you have to prove that

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 4>you have one hundred years of water available for that development.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 4>It is a really high bar to me, necessarily so

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 4>because you can imagine that people will only invest in

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>our economy. Enterprises will only come to the Phoenix area

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 4>if they understand that we have secure water supplies, because

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 4>we're out here in the middle of that destr right.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 4>So what the governor announced was actually that all the

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 4>groundwater in the Phoenix metropolitan Area is essentially spoken for.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 4>It is allocated and expected to be used by those

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 4>who have a right to it over the next one

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 4>hundred years. So our announcement really was that you can

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 4>continue to grow, but if you are going to continue

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 4>to grow, it needs to either be in a place

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 4>that already has demonstrated this one hundred year assured water supply,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 4>or if you're going to grow out on the fringes

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 4>of the Valley of the Sun, outside of the boundaries

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 4>of places that have this one hundred year assured water

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 4>supply designation, you can't grow on groundwater. You can grow

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>on other water supplies, but not groundwater. So it is

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 4>essentially a way of protecting the groundwater so that it

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 4>is available for those who already have a claim to

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 4>it and for those who come after.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 2>So let me ask, let me back up even further

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>all the way I guess to like the Paleolithic era.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 2>But when we talk about water availability in Arizona and

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 2>in Phoenix specifically, setting aside constraints, currently, how much water

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>is there and where is it coming from? Because of

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>course you make the you distinguish between groundwater versus other sources.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>So what exactly is available in that area?

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, I love this question because it's super important.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Central Arizona in particular is blessed with very large and

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 4>very productive groundwater aquifers. That means, in layman terms, there's

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 4>a lot of ground. Unfortunately, it's fossil groundwater, meaning that

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>it is not annually renewed by Mother Nature at any

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 4>significant rate. It's like an oil field, right, okay, and

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 4>probably more valuable to us, I will say so. But

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Arizona also, of course has its own rivers. Those rivers

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>are depending on snow melt from our mountains, and Phoenix

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 4>in particular is located where three of the state's main

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 4>rivers come together. So Although people, you know, criticize Phoenix

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 4>for being a big city out in the middle of

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 4>the desert, what they don't really understand is that Phoenix

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 4>was actually very carefully chosen by ancient Native Americans who

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 4>first settled there and who have lived there since crime immemorial.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 4>Because Phoenix is where three big rivers come together, so

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 4>there's a large amount of service water. There's also this

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 4>native groundwater, fossil groundwater, and then we import Colorado River

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 4>water from western Arizona into central Arizona as well, so

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>there is a lot of water. There's enough water for

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 4>what we most value. I think the question is that

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 4>there is probably not enough water for everything. So we

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 4>really have to dial in on what are these things,

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 4>what are these enterprises, What are these uses of water

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 4>that we most want.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll just keep jumping back and forth between

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the current time and history the ancient era. But you know,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that per the Governor's New Order, that if

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to build or grow in certain areas, you

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>can still do it.

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 3>You just have to.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Find another source of water that's not the groundwater. That

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the ground that the one hundred years of groundwater availability

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is essentially spoken for already can you talk through I

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>guess some of the maybe it's the economics or the

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>considerations that would go you know, into thinking like, Okay,

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>some entity wants to grow what is the second best

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>source of water for them that if they no longer

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have access to the sort of underground fossil water.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 4>So it is all about economics. There are alternatives. The

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 4>question is how expensive are those alternatives and would you

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 4>not just be better off economically by developing more in

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 4>the center of the value of the sun and the

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 4>Phoenix metropolitan area where there is already one hundred years

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 4>hird water supply designation. Right, So this in some way

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 4>balances the economics between continued sprawl which was cheaper on groundwater,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 4>versus infield development where water supplies and warsure. But yeah,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 4>there are alternatives. There are farmers that are willing to

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 4>basically sell their higher priority water rights, and an entity

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 4>could theoretically purchase those water rights off of the main

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 4>stem in western Arizona, the main ten mouth of the

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Colorado River, and to import them through the Central Arizona

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Project Canal into Central Arizona. That is hugely controversial, not

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 4>to mention extremely expensive, but for example, the town of

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Queen Creek, which does not have a designation of a

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 4>one hundred year shared water supply. The town of Queen

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Creek is in the process of doing just that because

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:48.599
<v Speaker 4>they want to continue to grow, so for them, the

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>economics work.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 5>For individual developers, I think that's a much steeper proposition, right.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 5>It's one thing for an entire town to decide to

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 5>import those types of supplies.

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 4>If you're just an independent developer, that might.

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 5>Be substantially more efficult kinds it, but that is a possibility.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 4>There are also Indian tribes in central Arizona that at

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 4>least historically have been willing to lease some of their

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 4>water for these purposes. It's really expensive, but it's possible.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 4>There are also groundwater basins outside of the Phoenix metropolitan

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>area that are specifically designated for the purpose of being

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 4>pumped and transporting that groundwater into the Phoenix metropolitan area,

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 4>sort of like in Owens Valley in California. If you

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 4>know that story. You pump someone else's groundwater basin dry

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 4>and import it into an urban center, not saying that's sustainable,

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 4>but it is legally feasible in a z on them

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 4>and then of course, there's reclaimed water, there's the potential

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:10.479
<v Speaker 4>to use desalinated breckage groundwater or ocean water. There are alternatives.

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 4>These are all just really really expensive. So if you're

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 4>a developer, you got to be thinking, Okay, would I

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 4>rather try to pursue this continued sprawl type subdivision development

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 4>or might I be better off purchasing more expensive land

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 4>that comes with an assured water.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Sorry to jump back and forth again, but can I

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>ask another backup question.

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Wherever you want? It's all good.

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I think we're on like two separate timelines.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>No, but I find it helpful for about like the

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>different types of water, and you're totally right.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, so just on this note, But the current

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>water constraints, what are they being caused by? Is it

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>simply economic development and population growth? Is it climate change?

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I imagine it's a combination of a bunch of different factors.

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 2>But can you maybe explain the constraints to us and

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>then how those constraints inform the current thinking around water availability.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 4>So the constraints relating to groundwater that I described I

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 4>have to do both with farming and with continued urban development.

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 4>You can imagine there are a lot of demands on

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 4>our aquifers. Right there's continued farming in the Valley of

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 4>the Sun. Farming in the desert Southwest is a very

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 4>water intensive enterprise. Farmers continue to draw from the aquifer

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 4>and they have the ability to do so in perpetuity.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 4>They were essentially grandfathered in to the groundwater pumping restraints

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 4>under the nineteen eighty Groundwater Management Act, so they have

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 4>a perpetual right to come and they continue to do so.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 4>And then, of course the cities have grown in population

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 4>as well, particularly since World War Two, and you know,

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 4>they draw on the aquifer for potable water needs as well.

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 4>And then there's various industries that also draw from the aquifer.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it's a combination of all of

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 4>those demands that are creating the constraints on groundwater. Essentially,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 4>what the state is coming out and saying is that, look,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 4>all that groundwater is spoken for, you know, and not

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 4>just spoken for today. The state looks out one hundred years.

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 4>We're very proactive about our water management out here in

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 4>the desert because we have to be. But what the

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 4>state is saying is that that groundwater over this one

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 4>hundred year chunk of time is spoken for. So those

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 4>constraints are kind of caused by a combination of all

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 4>those demands, but also the intentional regulatory decision to protect

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and guard those resources for the future. Right the state

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 4>is essentially signaling no, we're not just going to let

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 4>you deplete this awkward for Chiller's and nothing left. Regarding

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 4>surface water, that's a really different constraint. So I mentioned

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 4>that we have that Phoenix is located where three major

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 4>rivers come together. The value of the sun is lucky

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 4>to enjoy the flows of the Salt and Verting rivers.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 4>That river system is actually managed by the Salt River Project.

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 4>It's called it is one of the Beerau Reclamation's oldest

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 4>projects and dates back I believe to Oh my goodness,

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 4>nineteen oh, nineteen ten. I don't know. I probably have

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 4>that wrong. It's very old. It predates statehood for us.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 4>The flows of that system actually are relatively resilient and sustainable,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 4>even in the face of climate change. There's a couple

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 4>of reasons for that. Scientists has studied the hydrology of

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 4>those watersheds, and certainly climate change will affect those watersheds.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 4>We can expect some diminishment of snowpack and precipitation in

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 4>our mountains. But the way I understand it, not being

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 4>a hydrologist, is that they're saying that, look, you know,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Arizona is already baked, right, It's already it's already hot

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 4>and dry here, and yeah, it might give us feel

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 4>hotter and dryer, but they don't expect that the flows

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 4>of the Saltenbodi River system will be affected as much as,

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 4>for example, the flows of the Colorado itself might be affected.

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 4>And then if you add to that the fact that

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 4>the entire value of the sun the whole Phoenix metropolitan

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 4>area used to be agricultural, and that again dates back

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 4>all the way to time immemorial with the Native Americans

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 4>who first farmed this valley, and in fact, our modern

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 4>day canal system follows in many ways the same ancient

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 4>canal systems that Native Americans first dug. So we were

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 4>always in an agricultural valley. Particularly during World War II.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 4>A lot of that agriculture increased because of the need

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 4>to grow cotton for war material and at the time

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 4>that bull weav was decimating cotton in the southeast, and

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 4>so Arizona was a natural place to grow it. And

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 4>our cotton yields are very high because it turns out

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 4>all cotton needs is water and sun, and we got

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot of sun. So we've been in an agricultural valley. Now,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>what's interesting about that is that it takes on the

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 4>order of three to six acre feet per acre to

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 4>grow cotton or alf alpha in our hot desert sun,

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 4>whereas it only takes about an acre and I'm sorry,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 4>an acrefoot per acre to grow a subdivision. Urban water

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 4>uses are much less intensive per acre than farming dist

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 4>And so interestingly, as the Valley of the Sun converted

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 4>from what was largely an agricultural valley into an urban one,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 4>there was a natural water savings built in. So whereas

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 4>we used to use about one and a half million

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 4>acre feet of water off the Salt and Birdy River system,

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 4>today that system delivers about half that amount. So there's

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 4>just this very natural water savings that was built into

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 4>the way we grew. And then I'm sorry being really

0:18:55.400 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 4>really interesting. Okay, good stop me at any time. But

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 4>then if you take a look at the Colorado River system,

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 4>that's where we have just some real problems. The Colorado

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 4>River system is overallocated, probably at least by one point

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 4>two million acre per year, maybe more. And then if

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 4>you add on top of that the fact that we've

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 4>been experiencing, you know, as you said, twenty years of

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 4>what has been one of the worst routes on the

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 4>paleo record, and the fact that the climate is changing

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 4>and scientists are telling us that the flows of the

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Colorado River might diminish by as much as thirty percent.

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's a really big problem, right, and I

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 4>think that's why the Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 4>came out and said, hey, look, guys, you're gonna have

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 4>to cut millions of acre feet in water consumption to

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 4>stabilize this river system.

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, that was a great answer, and you

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of hit on things that both of the other

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>guests that we've talked to about this topic brought up

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and see it from their angle. And so, you know,

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>we talked to Chase Summerson, a real estate broker, and

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he made the exact point that you made that actually,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as Arizona's water consumption shifts from agriculture to residential use,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it actually results in the net savings and actually improves

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the sustainability.

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand. You know, we talked to an.

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>LFLFA farmer and he's like, you know, our family's been

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>doing this on this land for eight generations or something

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. And so, you know, as you noted, you know,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that farmers are sort of grandfathered in. So

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>can you sort of quantify or talk about the sort

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of implicit subsidy to agriculture that comes from having been

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>grandfathered in? And like, what is the gap between how much, say,

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>farmers are willing to pay for an acre foot of

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>water versus you know, a housing developer either inside the

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Valley of the Sun or nearby.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, the subsidy doesn't really come in the form

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 4>of water. Okay, let me explain that in a couple

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 4>of ways. Yes, under the nineteen eighty Groundwater Management Act,

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 4>farmers were basically grandfathered in and they have a perpetual

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 4>right to pump groundwater. I guess you can view that

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 4>as a subsidy, though the cities and private water companies

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 4>that also lay claim to groundwater don't really pay much

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 4>for that groundwater either, Okay, Right, And I don't know

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 4>that I would say that farmers are subsidized so much.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 4>I think that the difference in the cost that a

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 4>developer pays for water versus what a farmer pays for

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 4>water really has more to do with the fact that

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 4>development is not allowed to rely on mining this fossil groundwater,

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 4>and instead they have to invest in and renewable surface

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 4>water supplies and particularly in the infrastructure necessary to deliver

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 4>it to customers tabs. So I think that in turn

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 4>that really the cost difference has more to do with

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 4>the acquisition of renewable water supplies and the need to

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 4>develop infrastructure, if that makes sense. And on the Colorado

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 4>River it's different. So the Groundwater Management Act applies to

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 4>central Arizona, it does not apply to western Arizona. And

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 4>in western Arizona on the main stem of the Coloratda River,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 4>the farmers and Indian communities have the highest priority water

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 4>rates because of course Western water lies based on first

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 4>and time first and right, turns out Native Americans we're

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 4>here first. Turns out, you know, farmers kind of came

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 4>along the text, and so they just they have the

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 4>highest priority water rates. Any subsidy that they receive really

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 4>relates more to the infrastructure that often but not always,

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 4>has been built by the federal government, typically with repayment provisions,

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 4>though at times those repayment provisions are lax. I guess

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 4>it does.

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 2>It leads into something I wanted to ask you, which

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 2>is you mentioned infrastructure there, and I guess one question

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I have. You know, maybe even before we get to

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 2>tougher decisions about constraining development or maybe pricing water in

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>a different way, but to what degree can these water

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>constraints be solved with better water management and newer infrastructure.

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Reinvestment in aging infrastructure will certainly help, but it will

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 4>not be the answer. It's difficult to deploy that at scale.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 4>So for example, when I was a director of Phoenix

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Water Services, I asked the engineers to calculate how much

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 4>water the city of Phoenix was losing two leaky pipes. Now,

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 4>to put this in context, here in central Arizona, the

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 4>cities have are regulated such that their water losses in

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 4>their distribution systems cannot exceed ten percent, which is very low.

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 4>If you look nationwide, water losses are probably at least

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 4>something more like thirty percent. But because water scarce here

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 4>were regulated, you know, to a higher standard. But the

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 4>amount of water that is lost in Phoenix water distribution

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 4>system pipelines is about twenty five thousand acre feet of

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 4>water per year. That's a lot of water. But when

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 4>you're talking about a problem on the Colorado River that

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 4>is on the order of two million acre feet, you're

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 4>not going to get there. Probably a part of the

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 4>solution space, I think an important one. I can get

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 4>out my pipeline soap box if you want me to,

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 4>but I think that investing in pipelines is probably one

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 4>of the best things here for water quality and for

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 4>water resiliency, but it's unlikely to be deployed a scale

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 4>to fix the problems from the color.

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a question about perspective, because you know,

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any impulse. I mean, I really like

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the Southwest, but it's very unlikely that I'm going to

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be moving to Arizona anytime soon. That being said, I

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 1>regularly do consume food, including beef that may have come

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from colors, that may have eaten elfalfa that was grown,

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Arizona.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 2>So I have a fancy racehorse.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I don't know a horse that consumes it.

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But like eat, I eat food, and the desert, other

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>than not having much rain, seems to be a pretty

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>great place to grow food due to stable conditions and

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>other things that you've already talked about. When thinking about

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Arizona water policy, you know, obviously there's the interest of

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the developers and the people who want to move to

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix for cheap land, et cetera. But how should we

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>weigh sort of US food security, the interest of food exports,

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>then the interests of fairly affordable food, and how much

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>does that inform sort of policy choices that go into

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the state's water use.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, the US is a very large country,

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 4>and certainly we have enough land to grow what we

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 4>need to grow. It comes down to economics and inefficiencies. Right.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Culture in the desert Southwest tends to be very efficient

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 4>because we have so much sun, and it is for

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 4>that reason. It is also very water intensive. Alfalfa growers

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 4>in the desert Southwest can get something like ten to

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 4>twelve cuttings per year. If you're trying to grow alfalfa

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 4>in Montana with a short growing season, you're probably going

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 4>to get I don't know, two, yeah, four.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's not crazy. So it's not I mean, it's not.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Crazy that we grow like that is a very big

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>advantage setting aside the water issued there's a reason that

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Arizona became a big hotbed grown.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 4>A lot of alfalfa here. Now that other parts of

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 4>the country grow a lot of alfalfa as well, would

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 4>you have to use more land to get a comparable

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 4>total amount? Maybe? Is that the worst thing ever? Probably not.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 4>I think those types of changes could potentially happen over time,

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 4>particularly in the face of continued water stress on the

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 4>Colorado River. But more important is the question of vegetables.

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Because I'm sure you've heard western Arizona, the Yuma area,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 4>and the Central Valley of California grow the majority of

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 4>the winter greens that you know, New Yorkers and Minnesotan's

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 4>and I don't know, Michiganders, whatever you're called. All these

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 4>people love to eat, and that is that could be

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 4>replicated elsewhere. But replicating the growth of vegetables in the

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 4>wintertime is a very complex undertaking. It's not just about

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 4>water and sun. You could probably find that in other places.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 4>It's also about the logistics of refrigeration, the labor supply,

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the quality control. All of this is it is very

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 4>highly it is highly complex agriculture. It is in industrial agriculture.

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 4>It is not you cute little family farms in Massachusetts, right,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 4>So that I think is a more difficult proposition. But

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 4>there will be increasing stress on farmers in western Arizona

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 4>who have these higher priority water rights, precisely because they

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 4>have the higher priority water rights, and as the Colorado

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 4>River continues to diminish, the cities in Cintil, Arizona, who

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 4>have lower priority water rights to the Colorado River by nature,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 4>are going to be looking to acquire those higher priority

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 4>water rights. Farmers don't have to sell, and certainly there

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 4>are real consequences for rural communities, for their economies, for

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 4>their cultures, for all sorts of things. I don't mean

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 4>to make of that, but that pressure will only increase

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 4>over time. Pharmers don't have to sell, but it turns

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 4>out that at the end of the day, a lot

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 4>of them like to, you know, when they want to retire,

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 4>when the kids don't want to take their over. You know,

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 4>that pressure will only increase.

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>So we've already been talking about I guess the realities

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>of different water sources and preferences for different water sources.

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering what would happen if, you know, for instance,

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 2>we see the property developers have a preference for groundwater

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 2>because it tends to be cheaper. But what would happen

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>if Arizona came in and put a more concrete pricing

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 2>structure on these rights, like a what would that look like?

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 2>How would it work? I hear that term pricing water

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 2>quite a lot nowadays, but I don't quite understand it.

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And then be how would that impact I guess the

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>mix of Arizona's economy between say, agriculture industry and real estate.

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it would have a big impact. Looking

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 4>at the kind of the legal issues surrounding that that

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 4>the state would have to impose some sort of tax.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 4>That's how you would price water differently, you, Yeah, the

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 4>state could come in theoretically and impost some sort of

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 4>tax on the consumption of water, the consumption of Colorado

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:35.239
<v Speaker 4>River water, on the consumption of you know, groundwater. And

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 4>certainly I think you know, farmers not always, but you

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 4>know often operate you know, on the margin of profitability,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 4>depending on what kind of crop they're growing, And so

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 4>certainly I think that could potentially have an impact. I

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 4>will tell you, I don't see how that would be

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 4>politically viable or so. Sure. I'm an economist. I always

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 4>love to go to pricing to fix things, but I

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 4>think that would be a very difficult proposition politically. For context,

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 4>the consumption of groundwater in central Arizona is taxed in

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 4>these areas where groundwater is highly regulated, but the legislature

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 4>put a very specific cap on that tax, and really

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 4>that was for political reasons, and so that tax is

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 4>so low that it really doesn't alter behavior in any

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 4>meaningful way.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting.

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You brought up the reality that culture and politics and

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>everything aside, the pressure on farmers to sell is.

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Likely to grow.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And we even brought this up. We talked to a

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>farmer and we said, are you going to sell? And

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>he said no, And then he said, well, you know,

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>right now the highway is ten miles away, and so

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but maybe one day the highway will it'll be two

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>miles away, or you know, one mile away, and so

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at some point there might be a real real.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Estate bid for that area.

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to touch on another dimension that we haven't

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hit on yet, but that is industrial uses of water.

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And we know that a lot of the new semiconductor

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>factories that are coming to the US are coming to Arizona, Intel, TMC,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Semiconductor production, I think battery production to fairly

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>water intensive process. It has to be really extremely clean water.

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about that, how that plays into the

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>demand mix, and how that's being accounted for.

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm glad you asked that, because when you were saying, hey,

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, should we really be consuming vegetables and dairy

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 4>and things that's dependent on agriculture and the desert south west,

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 4>the first thing that popped into my mind is, well,

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 4>you're already consuming semiconductors that are produced here, and that's

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 4>also very water intensive. Yeah. So it turns out that

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 4>the desert is a great place not only to grow

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.239
<v Speaker 4>cotton and winter vegetables, but it's a great place used

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 4>to grow the high tech industry because we do not

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 4>have natural disasters, don't have tornadoes, we don't have blizzards,

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 4>really doesn't flood often once in a while, you know,

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 4>no tornadoes, it's no earthquakes. It's very stable. Our climate

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 4>is very stable, and the high tech industry likes that. Yeah,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 4>that's why there are a lot of server farms out here.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 4>That's why we have Intel, and that's one of the

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 4>reasons why we recruited t SMC to build semiconductors as well.

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 4>And yes, those industries are very water intensive. That goes

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 4>back to the idea that we don't have enough water

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 4>for everything. Right, human wants are always unlimited, Our ability

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 4>to fulfill them is limited. We don't have enough water

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 4>for everything. What do we have enough water for? If

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 4>the state wants to continue to pursue the high tech

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 4>industry that it is very water intensive, that will entail

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 4>shifts of how we consume water in this state and

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 4>what it's used for if by nature just has to

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 4>because there are tradeos.

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 2>So just on this point, this might be a slightly

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 2>unfair question or a difficult question, but I mean, looking

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 2>to the future, is it just inevitable that water constraints

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 2>are going to themselves act as a constraint on economic growth?

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so, because I think that we are

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 4>capable of managing our water supplies to meet the purposes

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 4>that we find most valuable. The politics of that are

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 4>really hard, but we are capable of doing that. The

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 4>technologies exist. It is not that difficult from an economic

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 4>or technological perspective to move water from where it is

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 4>today to where you want it to go to meet

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 4>those increased demands. So no, I personally don't. I think

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 4>that the economic benefit that comes from these types of

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 4>enterprises is such that it will be worthwhile for us

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 4>to manage water to meet them and that and we

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 4>will do so.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what I find really fascinating by this conversation is,

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think when people think about climate change,

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they think about, oh, you know, like we've we've invested

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 1>so much in the desert, et cetera, and we're really

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>going to pay the price as the climate continues to change.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But in many ways, as you've described, are some like

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>real advantages. As you said, the Arizona is already baked.

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It's already an area.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 2>That climate stability, extreme heat exactly.

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 3>And then it's really funny, Yeah.

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 4>People like, what are you going to do about climate change?

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 4>You're like, are you kidding me? It's already hot and

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 4>dry here, Like you're you're saying it's going to become

0:36:59.280 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 4>hotter and drier.

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>We know how to do that, you know, right, So

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like the potential disruptions to say, where people think

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 1>about climate change, winters and you know, the Northeast, maybe

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it'll be more disruptive. But as you point out, you know,

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>or as the farmer points out, extremely stable climate I mean,

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is stable weather. There's not droughts because there's no rain

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. There's not floods because yeah, yeah,

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>right right. And then for the industrial uses, you know,

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no earthquakes or tornadoes, et cetera, which of course

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is really important for the precision equipment that goes into semiconductors.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 1>So it really is striking the sort of like combination

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of things like that, other than the lack of rainfall

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>brings together Arizona.

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. And what's important about that context is people need

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 4>to remember that people have been moving water for thousands

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 4>of years and it's actually something we're good at. Right.

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 4>It is not technologically difficult to do it. The solutions

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 4>are known, is it expensive, is it difficult, is it

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 4>politically fraught with danger? All those things? Right, But it's

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 4>very doable. And I think also it's interesting to me.

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, this country was settled originally, you know, of

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 4>course by Native Americans, and then the next kind of

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 4>way that came over were Europeans from a temperate climate.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 4>And I think that idea of life in a temperate

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 4>climate steaks with us, and people forget that desert cities

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 4>are actually among the oldest cities on the planet, that

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 4>humans have always lived in deserts and will always live

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 4>in deserts. And I think in this country we just

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:56.760
<v Speaker 4>have this weird cultural norm that comes from the fact

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 4>that many of the people who came over here and

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 4>found it, you know, this government, were from a temperate climate.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 4>That's not how all humans experience the world.

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, no, I like this sort of like

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the optimistic idea that part of the human seriously, that

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the human experience and part of being human

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>is like we're going to find a way to build

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a city.

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 3>In the desert.

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, you mentioned transportation of water, and one

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>technology that theoretically if electricity costs fall is desalinization of water.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>And despite the existence of the song titled ocean Front

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Property in Arizona, there is no ocean front property in Arizona,

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>though it's a great song. Can you talk a little

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:44.239
<v Speaker 1>bit of the George Strait song? I think, can you

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about desalinization and the sort of

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that we're good at moving water and as

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a solution in the future or even currently from the

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>oceans to Arizona for various purposes.

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it's very it is feasible right now, it's

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 4>too crazy expensive to be deployed at scale, is what

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I'll say. I think, like other solutions, you know, investing

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 4>in leaky pipelines, I think it's a tool. I don't

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 4>think it will be deployed at scale, certainly not in

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 4>the next, say, twenty years. It's hard for me to

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 4>imagine it ever being deployed at a scale that kind

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 4>of fixes the Colorado River. But I think it is

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 4>important for us to continue to pursue it. But more importantly,

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 4>at the end of the day, from an economic perspective,

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 4>it will just be less expensive to buy out higher

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:45.240
<v Speaker 4>priority water rights, So I think that's the thing to match.

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 4>And it is. While it is less expensive to buy

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 4>out higher priority water rights, it is also exponentially politically

0:40:55.040 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 4>more difficult. So you're going to have this weird conflict

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 4>between what is less expensive economically and what is more

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 4>expensive politically, And I don't know how that's really going

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 4>to play out. I think that'll be interesting to watch.

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, this was actually going to be my next and

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 2>probably my last question. But you know, we're talking about

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 2>deciding on who gets certain rights to water that may

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 2>be more valuable than others. Who gets to make that

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 2>decision ultimately.

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 4>So for the most part, those decisions are already made

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 4>in the West, with some important exceptions I'll talk about.

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 4>In the West, for the most part, we already know

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 4>exactly who has rights to the Colorado River, to the

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Saltenburdi river systems, to groundwater. So much of that is

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 4>already determined, and it's more and so changing the use

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 4>of that water is more about entering into voluntary transactions

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 4>for leases, for the sale of that water, et cetera. However,

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 4>there is a really important exception to that, and that

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 4>relates back to Native American communities. Many Native American tribes

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 4>in Arizona have gone through the process of settling their

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 4>water rights claims and know exactly how much water they

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 4>are entitled to and where it comes from. Other tribes have,

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 4>not notably the Navajo Nation. So there is this outstanding

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 4>question about how much water they are entitled to offer

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 4>the Colorado River system. And in an over allocated river system,

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 4>there isn't just this water out there floating around that

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 4>something isn't already using So that entails claiming that water,

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:57.479
<v Speaker 4>going through the adjudication process, and then dealing with those

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:01.439
<v Speaker 4>who are currently making use of that water and stay. Yeah,

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 4>it's an interesting situation where you can kind of, you know,

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 4>the most part who has rights to water, exactly where

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 4>those rights fall in terms of the priority system, with

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 4>some notable and very important exceptions.

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 1>And that was going to bring out Catherine Srenson. This

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was a very helpful and clarifying conversation on a complicated topic.

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate you coming on odlags.

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh it's been so I think it's must r.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Tracy.

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I found that to be an immensely helpful conversation, you know,

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think this sort of where this is going

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is what Trevor Bale is sort of hinted at that essentially,

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>at some point the bid for those premium water rights, yeah,

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is just going to naturally move a lot of this

0:43:57.000 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>water to the housing development.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm going to slightly refine priors because going

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 2>into this, I was thinking, you know, water wars, big

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.840
<v Speaker 2>constraint on economic growth. But to Catherine's point, it's more

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 2>about deciding on that mix. It feels like.

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And it does feel to me that to some extent,

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the concern is.

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Actually not about Arizona.

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>The concern is the people who eat food that is

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 1>like grown in Arizona that, as she pointed out, there's like,

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the housing developers can will pay more for

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>those water rights, people will live there probably that you know,

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor, but the w But then it's like, okay,

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but someone has to grow those vegetables.

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 2>She also kind of solved a mystery for me, which

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 2>is why do we keep building very water intensive technology

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the desert, And her explanation that actually,

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 2>in many respects, this is a very stable climate that

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to worry about things like hurricanes and tornadoes

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:53.879
<v Speaker 2>and earthquakes. That makes a lot of sense.

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:55.959
<v Speaker 1>It makes a ton of sense. And I hadn't really

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 1>thought about that dimension before. And then I have to say, like,

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I loved her point that like there's always

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been desert, Like we sort of think it's like, oh, well,

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we developed air conditioning and so or you know, modern

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 1>plumbing or something, so like we're going to build a

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>city in the desert now. But I like the idea

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that like, even before all this like humans have always

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to build cities in the desert.

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit dystopian. The idea of like climate

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 2>change means we're all going home to our desert origan.

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a little creepy, but I take the point. Like

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 2>to her point, Arizona has a long history of dealing

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 2>with water scarcity issues and probably on that basis, might

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:37.800
<v Speaker 2>be in a better position to do so than places

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Northeast.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>And as a species we find a way that's sort

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of like that. I got very I was like, I

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>was expecting.

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:46.919
<v Speaker 2>This to be much from Jurassic No.

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting to be like way more pessimistic. And

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I leave like the conversations being like, humans find a

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>way to do it.

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly a much more nuanced topic than like the

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:01.360
<v Speaker 2>water wars have started. So from that perspective, it was incredibly.

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Useful, incredibly useful.

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Shall we leave it there, Let's leave it there, all right?

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.800
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy.

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Alloway and I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me on

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at,

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Arman at Dashel Bennett at dashbot, and for all

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Bloomberg podcasts, check out the handle at podcasts.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And for our odd Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>com slash odd lots, where we have a blog. We

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>post the transcripts and the newsletter and come chat in

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>our discord. We have a water room, although maybe I

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's turned into a climate room, but anyway, people

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:39.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about water in there a lot, so this should

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>be a fun thing to talk about. Go to discord

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:42.919
<v Speaker 1>dot gg slash.

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Odlogs, yep, and you can stream Bloomberg TV on Apple Originals, Roku,

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Samsung or any of the other streaming platforms, and make

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 2>sure to tune in to Bloomberg TV at ten pm Eastern.

0:46:54.640 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining in.