WEBVTT - Surveillance: Chadha on 'The Wobble'

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene, along

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Farrell and Lisa Abramowitz. Join us each day

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for insight from the best an economics, geopolitics, finance and investment.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe to Bloomberg Surveillance on demand on Apple, Spotify and

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you get your podcasts, and always on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 2>What is around a table here in New York? Binki Chata,

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 2>chief global strategist, a head of UST allocation over at

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Deutsche Bank. Morning, Binkie, Good morning. I love a title

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 2>in Southside Research, the wobble. Can we talk about the wobble?

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>What is the wobble in the secuity market? What is that?

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>The wobble is that, you know, we are basically overdue

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 3>for a three to five percent pullback.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 4>It would be normal, believe it or not.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>We are now running in you know, ninety fifth percentile

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 3>plus in terms of the duration, even though it seems

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 3>rather short since March, since we had a three to

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 3>five percent pullback. As I said, you know that's pretty normal.

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Three to five percent pullbacks happen every two to three months.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>So it's getting a bit extended. Number one. Number two,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 3>as you know, you know, the rise in positioning this

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>time around has been you know, pretty vertical, especially on

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the discretionary investor side, and so it's an additional reason

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.199
<v Speaker 3>really for looking for you know, when that process is over.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not.

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Being normative about this as do what should happen, but

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, if it when that does happen, we'll tell

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>you that that part sort of played out.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>What is a chata process to buy on the dip?

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated you're sitting there like Ayce Greenberg years ago

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bear Strings, you got buy tickets over here, sell

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>tickets over here. What's the chata process to buy in

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the dip?

0:01:58.320 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 4>To buy on the dip? I mean, you have to

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 4>have a view on what's the you know, the.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Catalyst for a current three years out, not three years out,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 3>but you know what's driving a pullback. So the kind

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>of pullback I'm talking about, it's really more sort of

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 3>a consolidation and you know, sort of you want to

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 3>see positioning rise gradually rather than vertically as it sort

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 3>of did starting in late May.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Does it make you nervous that everyone on your on

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 5>Wall Street. All of your colleagues are revising upward their

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 5>expectations for the S and P.

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't make me nervous.

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>It's probably a little bit overdues the way I would

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 3>put it.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 6>Okayl like welcome.

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>We are just reporting, basically, you know, the second quarter

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 3>of pretty solid sequential growth in earnings. You know, so

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>if this was GDP we were talking about, and you

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 3>were getting strong growth two quarters in a row, I

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 3>think it would have an impact.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 4>The equity market tends to look at things.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 3>On a year and year basis, so you know, the

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>turning that makes the turning points very fuzzy to be

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 3>able to tell. If you look at headline earnings growth

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 3>year and year, yes, you know we are still running negative,

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of that just simply has to do

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 3>with the oil prices from last year. You take energy

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>earnings out, and you know, it's first quarter of positive

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>growth year and year after four negative quarters. I think

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 3>it's more important to look at earnings growth on a

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 3>sequential basis and also on an underlying basis. And really,

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 3>if you look at underlying earnings, which is taking out energy,

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>taking out the financials loan loss provisions, we've had two

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>quarters now or four percent plus growth. Yeah, and we

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>only fell six and a half percent last year.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>So actually the line.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Earnings are at a new high, and you know the

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>narrative is about a recession.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, some people are also pointing to small business optimism,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 5>which came out this morning earlier, the highest levels in

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 5>eight months, right, so sort of edifying your view. How

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 5>much do yields push against that? We were talking about

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 5>what's more important for your equity called this week? Is

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 5>it going to be CPI on Thursday or is it

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 5>going to be the Treasury auctions? And how many people

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 5>step up to buy them?

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think yields matter, but it's really been much

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 4>more over the last eighteen months. It's really been much.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 3>More about the volatility or if the message coming out

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>of the rates market, rather than the level of rates.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 3>So as long as we were talking about you know,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty five basis points here and there, Yeah, this doesn't

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>really impact my view. If we get a big acceleration

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>and inflation and a big you know response from the

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Fed and uncertainty increases, then you know it's a bigger

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>concerned and a bigger pullback.

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I would say, how many of these stocks are actually

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 2>growth stocks anymore. I'm looking at their multiples and they've

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 2>got pretty tidy growth multiples on them, but how many

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>are actually delivering growth?

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I would say, you know, the focus

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>shifts over the course of the cycle. What we've basically

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 3>seen is, you know, the megacap growth in tech stocks.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Their earnings turn around first and very strongly in the

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 3>first quarter, and it was pretty V shaped move if

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>you're looking quarter by quarter, and that's now sort of

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 3>widening out, is the way I would put it. So

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're catch up. It is so first Tech

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 3>caught up with everyone else who hadn't fallen by as much.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 3>And the two of really since late May megacap growth

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>in tech and the rest of the S and P

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 3>five hundred they've they've moved really in tandem. But it

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>does mean that since megacap growth in tech earnings since

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 3>and amaze very short period, but their earnings.

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Do grow faster.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>So actually, on a relative multiple basis, all the valuation

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 3>is coming in.

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>You might be annoyed with me for bringing up a

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>single name, but I think everyone's fascinated by the move

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>with Apple at the moment. Yeah, and for five straight

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 2>days into today. Yes, they're trying to snap back this

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>morning a bounce, but ultimately are they producing the growth?

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 2>Can we have this the biggest waiting on the S

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.799
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred, the biggest waiting on the NaSTA

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.679
<v Speaker 2>one hundred traded a multiple as something like thirty times

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>forward earnings when it's not delivering any growth.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 3>So, I mean, you know, as you know, I don't

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 3>come and from evaluation perspective, what the signal is that

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>you take away from that name at the moment and

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the way it's performed. Sure, but I think that's part

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of the process, you know, of sort of the rally

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 3>that we've seen so of our broadening out. It's precisely

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>that question that broadens the rally out because you.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Know, if we are.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, the market's running with the soft landing narrative,

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>and if the soft landing is going to happen, then

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 3>you're going to have cyclical growth and so you should

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 3>be rotating and the market has you know, it's sort

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 3>of sitting.

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>In the middle now. I mean, we're moving in tandem.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>As I said after, you know, growth stocks just leading

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 3>the charge, and at some point I would expect you know,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 3>the next case you.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Got a wobble, the wobble, the chatt to wobble is

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in place. Does that mean you reset your sp X outlook?

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, no, no, we get five thousand this morning on pullback.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that you know, it's important to keep in

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>mind that we haven't fulfilled even the three percent correct

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, pullback yet, so we were down basically. I think,

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, a return of normality after this big repricing

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>that we've had, you know, would be helpful just.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>For our listeners and viewers. John, I mean, can we

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>get tried to go to five thousand today.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 4>With the wobble? Not today, but yes it is our

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 4>soft lending target.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you for kind of fun pleasure. Thanks

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 2>got to say it.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get a brief ound these markets right now.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And I love what she says about August and summer

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>mirror pandit with US Global Market Strategy JP Morgan Asset Management.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You'd said, Tom, you're jogging in place. You sound like

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire King family, because that's what I do. I

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>jog in place. What does jogging in place mean for

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a market that's been a moonshot since.

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 7>October when we think about the market and the risks

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 7>here going forward, there's not.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 8>A whole lot of upside risk here.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 7>But I think that the downside risk is somewhat limited

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 7>because if we think.

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 8>About where we are with the markets.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 7>We are in between in between the inflation spikes and

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 7>the FED hikes, but also waiting for the economy and

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 7>profits to sour. So I don't know that there is

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 7>a whole lot of upside catalyst in a world where

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 7>profits are just better than feared. We need to see

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 7>some more out of the profits landscape in order to

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 7>get some more upside from stocks that have already rallied

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 7>really hard and that have already experienced in pretty high valuations.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 8>But at the same time time, until we see.

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Some more souring in profits in the economy, I think

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 7>we're in an environment where stocks are essentially jogging in

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 7>place where we are today.

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 8>And that's not just for stocks. I think it's similar

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 8>for yields.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 7>The pop and yields we've seen more recently, I would

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 7>attribute that mostly to the pop and growth. Yes, there

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 7>was a Fitch downgrade, Yes we're seeing some inflation break

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 7>evens move a bit higher, But really it's all about growth.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 7>If we think about this higher yield environment since May,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 7>since the May FOMC meeting. So if we considered that environment,

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 7>you know, I think that yields too for the rest

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 7>of the year could kind of jog in place until

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 7>next year.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You're charm at JP Morgan. This is English major out

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of tough CFA, which I think is the coolest thing going.

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine what the CFA was like for you

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>coming out of that wonderful background. You write the documents

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>at JP Morgan, You actually craft the documents that you're

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>putting out. What are you writing right now about sixty forty?

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 7>Right now, if we think about the sixty forty, it's

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 7>had a huge rebound over the course of this year.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 8>Las year the sixty forty was dead.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 7>But I think what's important to think about with diversification

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 7>is that markets and the economy look in opposite directions.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 7>Markets are very much forward looking. The economy is at

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 7>best looking at where we are today, but also looking

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 7>backward at the data we've already seen. And if we

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 7>look at periods in history where the sixty forty has struggled,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 7>take two thousand and eight, take nineteen seventy four, if

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 7>you look at the next year, nineteen seventy five, if

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 7>we look at two thousand and nine, those were by

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 7>no means good economic years, but you did see the

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 7>markets rebound. I mean, two thousand and nine is a

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 7>great example where you see markets bottom in March, we

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 7>start to get out of recession in the summer, and

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 7>actually the unemployment rate continues to rise until October.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 8>I think that's a helpful guidepost for.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 7>Where we are today, and that the market has priced

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 7>in a whole lot of bad news and a lot

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 7>of risks and threats, and we have yet to see

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 7>all of them crystallize. But the market is already sort

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 7>of looking a little bit beyond there, and that's a

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 7>good environment for diversification.

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 5>What do you say to a client who theoretically comes

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 5>up to you and says, hold on, this time is different.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 5>Inflation's going to accelerate, These bonds are going to be worthless.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 5>It's going to wreck our evaluation of the stocks of

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 5>the sockholdings that you currently have focused on. Something that's

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 5>really problematic. We want to just hide in cash. I

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 5>don't see how you could be calling for yields to

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 5>go back down to something that was normal, What do

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 5>you say to them.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 8>Ultimately, if we look at.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 7>Cash right now, clients love a guarantee. If you can

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 7>get a guaranteed five percent in a CD, that seems great.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 7>But the reality is if you think about something like

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 7>a six month CD, you have some reinvestment risk there.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 7>When we think about the arc of the year, and

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 7>with yields where they are now with above trend growth,

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 7>well above trend growth really for four quarters in a row,

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 7>if we even start to see slightly subtrend growth, you're

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 7>going to start to see yields come down. If we

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.839
<v Speaker 7>see inflation soften a little bit more, you're going to

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 7>see yields come down. Doesn't mean they need to create

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 7>this year, and again they could be jogging in place

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 7>a bit. But as we head into next year and

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 7>we look at that twelve month out look, yields can

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 7>start to come down.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 8>So when you sit in cash, you have this.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 7>Opportunity cost where you're in come can potentially come down,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 7>but also you don't get the benefit of the upside

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 7>within stepping out a little bit in the risk spectrum

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 7>to bonds, you can potentially lock in income for a

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 7>longer period of time, and in addition, have that potential

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:13.239
<v Speaker 7>for capital appreciation.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 5>We've been talking about the auctions this week and how

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 5>the US Treasure Department is selling a greater amount of debt.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Are you saying this is a good time to buy

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 5>that four percent on a ten year yield to lock

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 5>that in seems like a really nice opportunity.

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 7>The window for the bond market has been extended over

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 7>the course of the summer. It is, of course a

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 7>setback in terms of that recovery that we were hoping

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 7>to see throughout this year, but it does extend that

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 7>window of opportunity from an entry point standpoint. One of

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 7>the biggest challenges that investors are dealing with today is price.

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 7>Where do you find something at a reasonable valuation? Now,

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 7>I will fully concede that if we look at debt

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 7>and deficits over the next decade plus, with deficits coming

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 7>in at five and a half to seven percent on average,

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 7>that is historically high, and we are going to deal

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 7>with it a yield problem over time. But I think

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 7>given the economic backdrop in the near term, this is

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 7>a pretty good entry point.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>What does it sell right now to high net worth

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>people about cash at a five percent yield? Are they

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with that, or they're saying, wait a minute, why

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>can't we buy more Apple.

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 7>You see that clients are comfortable with it because again,

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 7>you haven't had that type of yield in so long.

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 7>But I think getting back to your question about the

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 7>sixty forty and how we broaden out that allocation, we're

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 7>also seeing that people realize this is not a market

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 7>for easy money. It's not just that you're going to

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 7>experience data that's going to go up. So people have

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 7>to be a little bit more discerning in how they're investing,

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, not only around the world, but in terms

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 7>of types of vehicles, thinking about alternatives to enhance different

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 7>outcomes for income diversification, capital appreciation. So I think that

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 7>people are really sharpening their cells, and.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>This time active management wins into twenty twenty four, active

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>management will beat index.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 8>Take a look at profits, take a look at companies.

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.599
<v Speaker 7>Even within the same sectors or industries, you're seeing a

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 7>lot of differentiation in terms of how management is handling

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 7>higher prices, higher wages, more headwinds thrown at them.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 8>So certainly it is a time to pick.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 7>And choose which managers and which management of companies are

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 7>doing the right things in this environment.

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Mur thank you. It's going to see you more pandit

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the f JP Morgan as in management, this is.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>An important interview with our question, our interview of the

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>day in fixed income and all that means across equities, commodities,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in foreign exchange. Rob Waldner is out of the vintage

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of Newtonian calculus that would be engineering at top East

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Coast schools with a heritage back two hundred years. He's

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Princeton civil engineering. And that is a rigor about statics

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in dynamics that he brings to fixed income right now.

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>This is not statics in the fixed income market. What

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is the dynamic of all the algebra and the math

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of fixed income right now? What's the dynamic that you're

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on?

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, Tom, you were talking about it earlier in the

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 9>second in the show, which is the news around disinflation

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 9>and and almost sort of seems like deflationary sort of

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.479
<v Speaker 9>vibes that we have out there. So we're getting USCPI

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 9>data on Thursday, we get Chinese data tonight. Chinese data

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 9>CPI is likely to come in negative year and ear

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 9>us I think the Bloomberg consensus is will get a

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 9>point two on core and point two on headline month

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 9>and month. So the data is starting to come in

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 9>as we've been anticipating, very disinflationary, and it looks like

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, in certain areas like China and the trade

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 9>data we got overnight feels more like deflationary. And I

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 9>think that's what's going on in the bond market here

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 9>is people are finally realizing or looking at that and thinking, hey,

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 9>if I can get a five and a half percent

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 9>for investment grade bond portfolio, and we are in a

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 9>dissinflationary environment where really where growth is going to be

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, mediocre, That sounds pretty good, right, So that's

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 9>where the buyers come from.

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 2>So there's a tug of war right now between disinflationary

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>forces and additional tracery supply. You don't think that Tracey

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>is apply wins out. You don't think it's as important

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 2>as the disinflationary forces when it comes to what this

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>bond mark is going to.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 9>Take day to day. The turury supply can drive things,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 9>and I think you were talking about it earlier. That's

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 9>probably part of what revalue things last week is looking

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 9>forward to that supply. But we know that in any

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 9>medium term. You know, month type horizon supply is not

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 9>the driver. It's the macro forces that are the drive yields.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 6>So have you been buying this bond sell off?

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 9>We have been, Yeah, we have been. We are positive unduration.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 9>We've been looking at this treasury if you want to

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 9>talk about the treurgy for a second. You know, we

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 9>think the tenure has been in this three and a

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 9>half to four percent range. I'm actually getting a little

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 9>more positive that. So thinking about that here is a

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 9>great buying opportunity because one, as I said, you have

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 9>a disinflation environment with relatively moderate real growth and so

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 9>that in the medium sure, that's quite good. And then

0:16:58.360 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 9>if I start to think about the risks in there,

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 9>the risk scenarios are that the FED overstays it's welcome here.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 9>You know, we have several FED members saying they think

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 9>they need to hike again even though we believe we're

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 9>in a disinflationary environment. That could be quite negative for

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 9>the growth outlook. That could create you know, a dislocation,

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 9>and that would be very positive for the treasury market.

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 5>So in other words, when we're talking about these auctions

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 5>this week, are you basically saying yes, let's go. I

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 5>can't wait to load up on both ten year and

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 5>thirty year treasuries.

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 9>I think that you know, this is a great time

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 9>to buy fixed income and if you want to buy treasuries,

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 9>if that's your asset of choice.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 6>So who is coming in and joining you?

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 5>Are you seeing more institutions who are doing the same

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 5>thing that you are or is it still the international

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 5>buyer still the same buyer base, and that we're all

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 5>just making a lot of noise over nothing.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, you have the same buyer base, The same international

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 9>buyer base is still there. You know, fixed income flows

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 9>have not turned incredibly positive yet, but you know we

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 9>think that's likely to come.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Can we talk about the new floor in global fixed income?

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 2>The POH is pulling back, the ACP has pulled back,

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 2>the Federal Reserve has taken rates to five and a

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 2>half percent, and people think maybe they only come back

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to maybe four three and a half something in between.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 2>What is the new floor for global fixed income? If

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you get into trouble, what do you runny down too?

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Just in terms of years? What are the limits of

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 2>that running because people don't think it's zero anymore? What

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 2>is it?

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, we'll have to see where that pans out. And

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 9>it depends on what a recession looks like.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 2>How far we get back to developed thoughts on.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 9>But you know, we think that it's something in the

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 9>range of sort of two, a more normalized Yeld curve

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 9>would see, you know, a more steep Yeel curve. And

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 9>if short rates get down to one, you're talking about

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 9>ten years at two two and a quarter, you.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Think short rates will potentially come back down to one.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 9>In a recessionary type environment.

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, interesting because least the kind of pushback I've heard

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 2>is that perhaps you come down to three and a

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 2>half four something like that. I think it was Mike

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Gapan's point over at Bank for America.

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 5>The essentially inflation would be stickier for longer, and that

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 5>would keep the FED at a higher level that we're

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 5>going to go back to the low rate kind of environment.

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 5>And I just wonder how much this is really the

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 5>polls of the debate right now, people who believe we're

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 5>going back to the environment we were in before and

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 5>those who say this time really is different all.

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 9>And I would I would really point, you know, we

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 9>live in a nominal world. I think sometimes you get

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 9>confused by this real and and and and and break

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 9>even stuff. We live in a nominal world. Nominal growth

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 9>is coming down very very quickly. So inflation's coming down

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 9>and uh uh, growth is coming down. So you know,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 9>if you think going forward, were nominal growth somewhere in

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 9>the four and a half type of range, that's a

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 9>that's a tremendous environment for fixed income, right and and

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 9>if nominal growth settles at something below that, then you

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 9>could see rates come back down.

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, this was great, Thank you, sir, web the Vivesco.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Good to see you in person.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 4>What we're going to do is.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Dive in now with expertise at Bloomberg Intelligence. Long are

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>going far away. You did what you could, just steal

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the research of prudential research and one leak cli he

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was read worldwide and across this nation on boring stuff

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like trucking in rare roads. In this strange word, logistics

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>senior logistics analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence is a gift we

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have them today. I want to conflate in here the

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy of Yellow with what we see in ups. Given

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>these events, can they raise rates? Can they raise and

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sustain revenues by raising rates? Yeah?

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 10>I mean that's what UPS is going to have to do,

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 10>and they do have pricing power because at the end

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 10>of the day, there's really two main competitors at UPS FedEx.

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 10>Obviously the US Postal Service are some smaller players, but

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 10>they have the ability to raise rates. And not only

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 10>can they raise rates, but they're also going into markets

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 10>that are more profitable for them, So they're going to

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 10>the small mid size shipper versus the big enterprise shipper.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 10>So they're kind of pivoting away from the Amazons of

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 10>the world, if you will, and going, you know, kind

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 10>of down market because those those customers tend to be

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 10>more profitable, and they're going into more profit verticals like healthcare,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 10>which starts.

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>To make more money for these You don't do by

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hold cell, John, But you know, to me, you wonder

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>if this is just like back up your truck.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 4>And load the boat.

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 2>We're not about to do it byhold a south on

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 2>that night either.

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Is back up to the brown truck and load the boat.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Right here, Can we bring in the volume story into

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the conversation and just talk to me about what's happening

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 2>domestically in America because we're hearing from some domestic focused

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 2>airlines for instance, Jet Blue Southwest mentioning that maybe things

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 2>aren't as great as people are saying. What are we

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 2>learning about the domestic US economy from this company?

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, we've been in a freight recession for quite some time,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 10>and that's really driven because we're everything's being normalized, right,

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 10>recalibrating back to where we used to be before the pandemic.

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 10>So freight is declining. So what we're seeing is what

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 10>we view is kind of like the bottom of that.

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 10>And you know, there's been a lot of destocking by

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 10>retailers and we're pretty optimistic that you're going to see

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 10>some sort of seasonal uptick into the fourth quarter. We're

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 10>not calling a huge peak season, but last year there

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 10>was no peak. We think there's like maybe a slight

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 10>speed bump of a peak this year. And you know

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 10>what's that telling us is that the consumer is still

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 10>resilient and things should look better for UPS or a

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 10>FedEx into twenty twenty four. On a volume standpoint, you

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 10>have that plus pricing, you have that plus productivity improvements

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 10>from tech. It's hopefully going to offset some of the

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 10>increase that they got in cost from that new labor

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 10>agreement with the teamsters.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 6>So how significant was that?

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that was really my question, is that a

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 5>smoke screen, this whole agreement with the teamsters to cover

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 5>some real fundamental weakness that they're facing or competition, or

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 5>is this truly going to create a challenge their profits

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 5>going forward in a more material way.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 10>It's definitely going to challenge things. But I would say,

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 10>is that in the second quarter, well, you know, second quarter,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 10>that's a has been quarter. They did a fantastic job.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean they beat by four cents in EPs, and

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 10>it was all on margins. It wasn't on pricing, it

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 10>wasn't on volumes. They actually disappointed. So they disappointed on

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 10>the top line and they they surprise on the upside

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 10>on the EPs, and that was real on margins. Their

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 10>domestic business was you know, it was about one hundred

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 10>and thirty basis points better than expectations, and it was

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 10>only thirty basis points less than what people were thinking.

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 5>If they can absorb it, what's the message to other

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 5>logistics companies, to other trucking, shipping, flying companies that are

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 5>also facing some organized complaints about the lack of wage growth,

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 5>the lack of pass through of some of their profits

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 5>to the employees.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, at the end of the day, labor is increasing

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 10>and we're not going back to a twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen,

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 10>twenty nineteen level. So you know, if you're a truckload carrier,

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 10>you had to increase the what you paid your drivers.

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 10>Rates have gone down considerably, and so what that's doing

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 10>is forcing a lot of smaller companies out of the market,

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 10>and that will firm up rates and bring rates back up,

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 10>and so the night swifts of the world will have

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 10>much better margins in the coming quarters.

0:23:58.720 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 8>So with higher prices.

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 10>With higher prices, right now, the truckload market is terrible,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 10>like the spot market is pretty much bottoming. We should

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 10>probably start seeing increase in spot rates into fourth quarter,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 10>and contract rates are down by low double digits, and

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 10>we expect that to kind of invert positively in twenty

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 10>twenty four to see maybe mid mid single digit truckload

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 10>rate increases on the contractual side.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>If there was high single digit even double digit revenue

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>growth and that reverts back to mid single digit, low

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>single digit revenue growth. The slog of logistics, if you will,

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>can they sustain a given margin down the income statement.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 10>Really depends on what sub segment of the market you're

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 10>talking about, you know, the lesson truckload market where yellow

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 10>defile bankruptcy. That's a very consolidated market. So they have

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 10>pricing power. Fedexups, they have pricing power. Railroads they have

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 10>pricing power. Truckload carriers not so much because it's extremely fragmented.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 10>So it really depends on what market you're in, whether

0:24:57.840 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 10>or not you have the pricing power, and whether or

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 10>not you can push those higher costs onto your consumers.

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Leate, this was great. It's good to see you. Come

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 2>back soon. I will leak Alaska there at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Brambinson, time can you throw that David Rubinstein could

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>join us this morning. This is perfectly timed because Nova

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Grants has been the pinata of bitcoin when it goes down.

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>It's been the genius of bitcoin when it goes up.

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And all of a sudden, Larry showed up at the

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>door to say, hey, big respectable firms can prosecute and

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>do bitcoin link Lawrence Fink of black Rock to Mike Novagrants.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, what's happened is people, as you suggest, make fun

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 11>of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. But now the establishment. Larry

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 11>Fink at Blackrock is now saying they're going to have

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 11>an ETF if approved by the government in bitcoin. So

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 11>you're saying, wait a second, If the mighty Blackrock is

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 11>willing to have an ETF and bitcoin, maybe bitcoin, it's

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 11>going to be around for a while.

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Lisa wants to jump in here, but I'm going to

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.359
<v Speaker 1>cut to the news moment. Is Carlisle announcing this morning

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin advocacy.

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 11>No, I don't think so, but there's no doubt that

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 11>bitcoin is something that I wish I had bought it

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 11>at one hundred dollars a bitcoin when when Mike and

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 11>overgot started buying it. It's now at twenty nine thousand dollars,

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 11>so he's made a lot of money and a lot

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 11>of people who bought it at one hundred dollars or

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 11>less are feeling pretty good now. It went up as

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 11>high as sixty one thousand, I think, even down to

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 11>thirty one thousand or even twenty nine thousand. Now it's

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 11>still a pretty good profit if you're bought at one hundred.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 5>We all wish we would have bought it at one hundred,

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 5>and to write it up, it's one thing for Black

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 5>Rock to come up with an ETF because they believe

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 5>the proposition of bitcoin. It's another because they see a

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 5>profitability proposition where they can basically take advantage of the

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 5>interest other people have. I mean, isn't that more of

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 5>what this is? That basically Wall Street is saying, if

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 5>there is a market for it, and we can viably

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 5>make one for them and make some money, why not.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, remember Wall Street is in business to make money,

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 11>and this is something they can probably make money. You

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 11>have to remember the United States government has been somewhat

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 11>skeptical of it. I think Democrats in the Congress and

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 11>particularly the people regulating the SEC are skeptical of bitcoin

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 11>and other cryptocurrencies. But outside the United States there's a

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 11>lot of interest in it. I think FTX really hurt

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 11>when it went bankrupt, and it hurt the crypto industry.

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 11>But a lot of people around the world want to

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 11>be able to trade in a currency that their government

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 11>can't know what they have, and they want to be

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 11>able to move it around rightly or wrongly, and so

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 11>I don't think bitcoin is going away. I think the

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 11>Republicans on Capitol Hill are been pretty supportive of it.

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 5>There's a difference between having a seamless cross currency payment,

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 5>basically saying that instead of going to Western Union, I

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 5>can go and just to transfer something in bitcoin if

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 5>it has a stable enough price. That's one proposition, But

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 5>the proposition of bitcoin is a store of value that

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 5>could kind of be bid up the way that gold

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 5>or silver could seems to have been parked. With the

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 5>advent of yield suddenly that you can get for actual money.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, isn't that sort of the feeling that you're getting.

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, there's no doubt that when and interest rates are as

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 11>high as they are, you don't need to have gold

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 11>or other kinds of things to get you some solid

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 11>return because when you get five percent on treasuries, but

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 11>eventually five percent will be coming down at some point.

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 11>I don't think bitcoin or cryptocurrencies that are the better ones,

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 11>the better known ones. Bitcoin a number of brothers are

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 11>going to go away. There's enormous interest around the world

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 11>and be able to have something you can transfer without

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 11>the government knowing about it and keep it private. And

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 11>you know, you can say people shouldn't do that, but

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 11>that's not going to stop people from doing it.

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Mister Novagrats and mister Gensler, What did you say about

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the efforts of our chairman of the Securities in Exchange Commission.

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, Gary Gensler, who's the chairman of the SEC, is

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 11>not a big fan of cryptocurrency. I think that's fair

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 11>to say. But he lost the major case recently in

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 11>court where he was trying to argue that one of

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 11>the cryptocurrencies Ripple was a security and he lost that case.

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 11>So I think the SEC has not been able to

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 11>convince these the government yet or at least the courts,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 11>that crypto currency is such a dangerous thing. And I

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 11>remember a lot of people in the government now are

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 11>thinking that Gary Ginster won't be the chair of the

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 11>SEC forever.

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Everyone to go.

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these guys just wait them out, right.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 11>I think that's a strategy. It's very popular in Washington.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 11>Waiting out regulators you don't like.

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 5>That seems to be something that has worked given some

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 5>of the turnover that we've seen.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 6>I want to shift gears a little bit because we've

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 6>been talking.

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 5>All week about banks losing talent to your world, to

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 5>private equity and to the sphere of private debt and

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 5>inequity that has continued to take more and more market share.

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Have you seen that accelerate recently as people really take

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 5>a look at what they can earn and the potential

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 5>opportunities in your world.

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 11>There's no doubt that some of the large investment banks

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 11>like Goldman, Sacks and others, but not just Goldman Sacks

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 11>have people leaving. But that's actually relatively normal. People are

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 11>leave all these firms all the time now. After people

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 11>typically retire from Goldman in their early fifties, whereas regular

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 11>kind of job you might retire in your sixties. So

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's that unusual right now. And I

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.239
<v Speaker 11>think Goldman has obviously got a deep bench. I think

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 11>it's in pretty good shape. But there's no doubt that

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 11>people think that in private equity, if you do well,

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 11>you can make more money than you can invest in banking.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 11>That's generally been accepted for last ten twenty thirty years

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 11>or so.

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 5>Do you think that that's going to get pressured at

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 5>all as there is more competition and frankly in the

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 5>higher yield environment, and if there is some sort of

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 5>default cycle and a little bit of stress.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, remember in private equity, it's harder to do private

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 11>equity deals typically today because the interest rates are harder

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 11>at borrow and so forth, but that gives people more

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 11>opportunities to buy things in the distress debt area. So

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 11>there's always people who want to buy things at some

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 11>kind of value chain proposition. And right now there's a

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 11>lot of view that you can buy things relatively cheaply,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 11>probably in the near future, in distress real estate or

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 11>other kinds of areas. So I don't think all of

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 11>a sudden people that want to make be investors are

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 11>going to say there's no opportunity.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>In what you're doing at Carlisle with your team. Is

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there malinvestment in AI right now? Is there a frenzy

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>going on where dumb decisions.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Are being made?

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, I don't want to speak for Carlisle. I would

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 11>just say gen Net generally AI has caught at tension

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 11>and people are putting money into it. Whether you're going

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 11>to make a good return on that money, I don't know.

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 11>There's a conventional view that the best way to invest

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 11>in AI is investing in the large companies like Google,

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 11>Microsoft and so forth. Other people say you should go

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 11>find the next startup of open AI. I don't really

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 11>know which is going to prevail, but there's no doubt

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 11>that people are putting money to AI, and they will

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 11>for some time.

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 5>I want to just pick up on one thing that

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 5>you said that in the dear future, there's going to

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 5>be a good amount of distress, particularly in some.

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Real estate areas. Where are you talking about in particular, Well, I.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 11>Don't think it's a secret that in the commercial real

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 11>estate office market in major cities New York, San Francisco,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 11>among others, people are not coming into offices, and therefore

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 11>employers are thinking, I don't need as much office space

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 11>as I once thought I did. And also, because interest

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 11>rates are higher, the value of buildings goes down. Is

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 11>an inverse relationship. So if you interest rates are high

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 11>and the rally of real estate goes down and people

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 11>don't need as much real estate as they did before,

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 11>and then they renew their leases, they're going to take

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 11>less space. It's probably gonna mean the value of these

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 11>buildings are going to come down.

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 6>How concerned are you about New York City?

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, people have been concerned about New York City for

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 11>the last two hundred years or so. For two hundred years,

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 11>people always say New York City is going to fall apart,

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 11>and for two hundred years that survive. So I got

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 11>a lot of things I'm worried about in New York

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 11>City's not the number one, David.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. David Rwinstein with us here. Subscribe

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>else you get your podcasts. Listen live every weekday starting

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>at seven am Eastern. I'm Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on Bloomberg Television and always I'm the

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal. Thanks for listening. I'm Tom Keen, and this

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg