WEBVTT - Mutuality feat. Andrew

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Agree. This is Andrew Sage bringing yet another episode of

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 2>it could happen here? As my granny us to say

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>when she answered the phone, what's happening? And the answer

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>in this case is anarchy. Last episode, I gave a

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>definition of anarchism. The anarchism is the political philosophy and

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 2>practice that opposes all authority along with his justifying dogmas,

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and proposes the unend in pursuit of anarchy, a world

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>without rule where selfterimation, mutuality, and free association form the

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 2>basis of our society. And then we took that definition

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 2>and we broke it down a bit further. You go

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 2>back to the episode if you want to hear how

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 2>but I left my explanation a bit incomplete. I didn't

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 2>get into the positive side of the definition. So today

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I am joined once again.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>By Miir Wong also who does this podcast and who

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>was excited to talk about building the new world in

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Michelle the.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Old Let's go. So anarchism proposes the unending pursuit of anarchy,

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>a world without rule where self determination, mutuality, and free

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>association from the basis of our society. See unin pursuit

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>element is another important part of the definition. You know,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>it's ongoing. It's a strive. It's not something some perfect

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>utopia that we reached and staggering with it. In fact,

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 2>it's not even a suman of when people become perfect anarchists.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 2>It's about currently and constantly pushing to be better, to

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>create systems that produce better outcomes and greater anarchy. It's

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a continuous redevelopment of the value is necessary to maintain anarchy.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>To never get complacent and understand that this is a

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>species level project. The idea of anarchy being a world

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>without rule is actually something that gets some pushback from

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>some anarchists as well. There's this sort of rules not rulers,

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>a version of anarchism that has a lot of sway

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>in some circles.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 3>The Inarco Constitution is.

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>The anarcho constitutionalists. You know, it was popularized, but the

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of direct democracy libertarian Marxist crow that kind of

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>got their popularity needs these to mageties. But it's not

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 2>something that I consider an accurate representation of what anarchism

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 2>strives for. You know, now that we have access to

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>more historical anarchist literature than ever. If you dive into

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 2>any of it and you get to the root of

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>what anarche is. It becomes very clear that anarchists, we're

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 2>not into this whole theraph democracy thing. They want to

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>really into any form of democracy, as in the rule

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 2>by majority or the rule by some abstraction called the people.

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Anarchism is really about. It's not just no rulers, also

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 2>no rule. I've been brought into this understanding by the

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>efforts of the translator and sort of scholar of anarchist

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 2>history Sean Wilbill, who, in my opinion, is putting forward

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>some of the best historical analysis of anarchism today. He's

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>actually who inspired a lot of my definition of authority

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>and anarchism, and so I'll have his work links in

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 2>the show notes, of course. But in this get into

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>this sort of no rules staff A SHAVANARKI, A lot

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>of people might ask, you know, but we still need rules.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 2>But of course enforceable rules are just really a full

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>of laws that are backed by authorities, which I guess

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 2>what I pose is, and unenforceable rules are not really

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>rules at all. They're close. It's a norms of behavior.

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 2>And if living in a society tells you anything, you

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 2>should know that norms should be as open to question

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>as the most rigidive rules. In fact, norms can be

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>even more dangerous if we let them slide. It's just

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 2>the way that things are and the way we do

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>things around here.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like patriarchy, for example, something that is I mean

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 3>yet like obviously, yes, pre chacuation enforced by the state

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 3>and by like explicit violence, but it's also really really

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 3>enforced by norms. Yeah, in a way that like you know,

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 3>requires you to like reckon with norms as a concept theoretically.

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a concept of authority that is inherent in patriarchy.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>That is also the set of norms that exist to

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 2>aid and to reinforce, you know, that authority. We tend

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 2>to speak a lot of you know, the people in

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the community and stuff and anarchist circles, but I think

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 2>it's important to make sure it's clear that something special

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 2>about quote unquote the people or quote unquote the community.

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, what the people of the community thinks is

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>right and wrong should not be all litmust test and

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 2>what is right and wrong. There's no virtue in being

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 2>a majority, and there's also no virtue in being a minority,

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 2>because you can see within instances where there are minorities

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 2>such as the elite, the rich, who obviously have asvo

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>all the time and their instances, the majority is that

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>does exist to reinforce a lot of the rules and

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 2>norms and authorities that are keeping all of us down.

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>So oligmus test is not a majority use what a

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 2>majority votes for, what the majority wants, or what minority

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 2>use desire. It's really the absence of authority, the sons

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 2>of this sort of power over others at all. And

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 2>it's also inevitably the absence of permission and probisu the

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 2>ability to permit things, the ability to prohibit things. When

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 2>a thing is allowed and the thing is disallowed. Yes,

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>people can do what they want, but every el khols

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>do what they want, and so that creates the incentive

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>to be thoughtful and responsible in what you do, and

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to be thoughtful and responsible in how what you do

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 2>affects other people. You do things, and your things are

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>open to any number of consequences, and so if you

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 2>want to avoid negative consequences, you can't get informed. You

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>have to learn about how your actions might affect others

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>through communication with individuals and groups, and you have to

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 2>find compromises and solutions to points of conflict. You're not

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 2>an island. Your part of a web of mutually interdependent relationships,

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and that's something that exists in every kind of society

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 2>at mutual independence. The problem with hierarchy is in a

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 2>hierarchy society, to access that web of mutual independence, you

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 2>have to obey authority, you have to take part in

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the authoritaian systems, so we have access to human community.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 2>So in anarchic society, you don't have as well be

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 2>an authority, but our behavior is still regulated quote unquote

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>in a sense that we are dependent on other people

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 2>and we want to have as much as possible a

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 2>harmonious relationship with those other people. Perhaps controversially, I could

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.239
<v Speaker 2>say that it's actually the absence of rules and rulers

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 2>that makes anarchism work, because, for one, harm can ever

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 2>be fully captured by rules and rules cand of capture

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>all the possible circumstances where harm could occur. Because of

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the two, the existence of rule often provides protections for authority.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>This is something we talked about in our definition of

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 2>authority in the last episode. This idea that the authority

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 2>is there's a right that grants it privileges and protections.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 2>You know, the idea that the police officer can beat

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 2>you up, but you cannot raise a hand in defense

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>of yourself. You know, the bank can evict you from

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>your home, but you can't be throwing all its alveaus

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>into the bank. You know, that sort of thing is

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a very unequal relationship that is enforced and defended by rules,

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>by the rights granted by those rules. And so rather

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>than approaching society with a one size fits all approach

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 2>to rules that are enforced by some type of authority,

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 2>we can instead create solutions that are tield specific problems.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>And yes, you might approach concepts like best practice and

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 2>solving problems in conflicts, but I'll be different from rules.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's something that that's not enforced, and then

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>that's constantly in in negotiation. So then it's constantly taken

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 2>into practice and developed and shifted, and it's far more flexible.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 2>And I know that it can be difficult to break

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>away from the idea that we need rules and that

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 2>the rulers are essential, but it's necessary that we can

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 2>conceptualize anarchy from that angle. With that implication. It's difficult

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 2>because of how we've been socialized how we tend to

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>view human nature. You know, it take time to develop

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>these ideas, to join them food that I'm still grasping

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 2>some of these things and trying to understand them. But

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, between this episode and the next, and all

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the books and all the work that is being put

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>out there to sort of develop anarchism, to bring it

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 2>to more people, and of course through practice, we can

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 2>get a clearer sense of how anarchist organization can work

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>in all of its harmonious complexity. And I say organization

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>and complexity specifically, because it is often assumed that the

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>presence of anarch is the absence of organization or the

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>absence of complexity, because those terms are often associated with

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 2>are synonymized with hierarchy and authority. But you can have

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>organization and complexity without them. So on the next part

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of the definition, we get into the idea of anarcheb

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, well, where self determination, mutuality, and free association

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 2>form the basis of our society. Self attimination is probably

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 2>the easiest to explain it for three terms that I

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>use to define such a society, because it's just the

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>idea that individuals can define and pursue their own paths

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 2>is the belief that people individually and collectively have the

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>capacity to live and organize themselves in ways to reflect

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>their own needs, desires, and values. It rejects the notion

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 2>that others, whether they be states, corporations, religious institutions, or

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>other elites, should have the power to dictate the lives

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of individuals or impose structures exploitation and control. Self detimination

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>is the basis of autonomy, which is necessarily followed by

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.839
<v Speaker 2>free association. The first and foremost I want to get

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 2>into the idea of mutuality. Mutuality is feeling an action

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 2>in a relationship that is based on shape benefit between

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 2>individuals and groups in a society. There is reciprocity and

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 2>its communication. It's a shar enough sentiment and an exchange

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>of positive actions, and it's not unique to anarchy. Weutral

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 2>into dependence, which is a component of mutuality, is also

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>not unique to anarchy. It can be free found in

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty much every society because we rely on neutrality to

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 2>survive and progress through our day to day life, whether

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>we're working together to clean the house for Christmas or

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>troubleshooting a problem in the workplace, or taking part in

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a club or sport, or sharing resources follow in a

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 2>natural disaster. Mutuality happens constantly, informally and often without recognition.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 2>This is something that Creator talks about in Debt of

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 2>First five thousand Years. He says, this is the glue

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>that who will society together? Not contracts or power, but solidarity, empathy,

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and the natural human inclination to care for others. All

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>world is so divided, and we still find ways to care.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Are there obstacles that care? Of course, you know the

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>various presuences, propagandized mindsets, socio economic systems, and material conditions

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that limit our practice of mutuality. But these are problems

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 2>that he seeks to rectify. Obviously, it's used like cluialism

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>and white supremacy are fractured societies along racial lines and

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 2>create a distress and competition where mutuality could flourish. The

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 2>propaganda perpetuated by states and corporations also limits our capacity

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to imagine mutuality and create this sense of ssty in

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 2>this competitive mindset that creates an unnecessary dichotomy between the

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 2>success of the individual and success of the collective. Because

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 2>of the very nature these hierarchical systems are forcing us

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>intexplosive relationships. Things like mutual aid and are being replaced

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 2>by transactional exchanges. Care and community become commodities, basic human

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>needs become profit driven markets, and the state takes on

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the role that was formerly filled by mutuality.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Just the idea of disaster response, for example, is dominated

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 2>by bureaucratic agencies that monobilize and direct the resources that

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>could be used and more effectively used by people addressing

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>their own needs locally. And of course, with the implementation

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>of the property regime, with privatization fencing off the commons

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that once supports at communal life, it creates that sort

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>of scarcity that the limits or interpersonal practice of neutrality.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 2>And when people are poor, when they're struggling intermediate will needs,

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>they often lack the resources or energy to extend help

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.599
<v Speaker 2>to others. Food and secure families may not have the

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 2>capacity to engage in community support networks. Or you know,

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 2>if you look at how cities are often designed their

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 2>structure to isolate people, they make it harder people to

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>form balance of trust. The existence of all these non

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 2>places like highways, the absence of third places, and the

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 2>prevalence of civil and sprawl or make it more difficult

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>for us to form bonds of trust and solidarity. And then,

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of course you have the intervention of the state into

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>people's efforts to engage in mutual aid. You know, the

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>states punishes and criminalizes mutual aid efforts for migrants or

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 2>for homeless people. You will often see the police or

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 2>border authority is preventing people from helping those people, charging

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>them with criminal penalties just for trying to help their

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>fellow humor and all these are things that limits the

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 2>free and full flourishing of mutuality. Or we shouldn't look

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>to the limits of mutuality in our current system as

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 2>an indication of how it might be limited in another system.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 2>In fact, we can look at these limits and see

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>what ways mutuality could flourish even further when they no

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>longer exist. So by taking the time to dismantle prejudices,

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to challenge propaganda, to build alternatives, and to create abundance,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 2>we can start to recognize the potential of our mutuality.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And so really getting from zero point A to point B,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 2>it becomes a matter of expanding our solidarity, which would

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>expand our capacity for mutuality to drive our social organizations.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Solidarity is about establishing and recognizing the bond between all people,

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>understanding that I center gain from you doing well and

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 2>vice versa rememother. Our system incentivized selfishness that acts to

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the detriment of others. So anarchy doesn't need perfect people,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>it just needs systems to have better incentives. So anarchic

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 2>systems would incentivize generosity and selflessness, of course, But the

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 2>real trick is really in creating systems that utilize selfishness

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>to the benefit of others, making it so that even

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the most self interested and self absorbed people are a

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 2>net positive or at least a net zero on the

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>impacts of the rest of society, because they will find

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>themselves acting in ways that are generous and that are

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 2>selfless in order to get the gains that they desire

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>for themselves. You can call it to kind of a

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 2>selfish selflessness.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And it's funny because like that's the sort of

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 3>justification that capitalism uses, that like, oh, if everyone that

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 3>purely acts into self interest and everything will get better

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 3>for everyone, you know. But it's effectively just like a

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>code of paint that's been put on a system that

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 3>people use their self interest to make things better for

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 3>egas exactly them.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So clearly the system of capitalism has these systemic

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>incentives and structures that allow for selfishness that not only

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 2>expand and propagate and be reinforced, there also ensures that

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 2>that impulse that in inclination has an extraordinary impact on

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the lives of millions of people. An individual selfish person

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>cannot do that much to impact others, but put them

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 2>in a position of power, and all of a sudden

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>their decisions can impact the lives of thousands, millions, even billions.

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 2>So the practice of anarchy is a way of creating

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>a society where no one stands above another, and where

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 2>lives are built in cooperation instead of domination. Reshape and

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 2>how we practice mutuality why building new habits of cooperation

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that work without rulers. And that's what social revolution is

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>all about. It's an ongoing and intentional transformation of our

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 2>society for economy and culture and philosophy and technology and

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>relationship and politics. It's the ongoing indication of all forms

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 2>of authority and prejudice and the ongoing affirmation of freely

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 2>associated equals. There is, in many ways a reconstitution of

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 2>our natural initiative or capacity of mutuality and our responsibility

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>for ourselves and each other. And that starts here and now,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 2>not at some distant points in the future. It won't

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>be easy, but it's necessary to unshackle our mutuality to

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 2>create a society where it can flourish. And this is

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 2>where we get into things like mutual aid. It's confused

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>with charity very often, but it's a manifestation of our mutuality.

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a voluntary and mutually beneficial exchange of services and

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>resources in a society. And so it's not about tit

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>for tat peedback or measuring each person's contributions. It's what

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>taking responsibility for one another as members of a society

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 2>and building social relations that sharpen our ability to collaborate

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and share. To part phrase Peter Creputkin, practice and mutual

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 2>aid is the surest means forgiving each other into all

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest safety, the best guarantee of existence and

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>progress bodily, intellectually, and morally, but mutually. Like I said earlier,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 2>it derives its basis from our interdependence, which is another

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 2>component of mutuality. Mutual independence is the very basic idea

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 2>that we rely on each other for various aspects of

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>our lives. In every kind of society and an he

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 2>our mutual interdependence is unrestricted by authority and instead guided

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 2>by complementarity, so we are all approached and appreciated as

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 2>unique equals cooperated on that basis. Mutual responsibility is another

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 2>manifestation of mutuality, as the idea that in the absence

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 2>of legal order, in the absence of authority, when society

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 2>is no longer guided by laws that are binding and

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 2>enforceable by some authority, we must be guided instead by responsibility.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 2>But actions are pre authorized or pre judged by an

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.199
<v Speaker 2>external rules, but that each action is undertaken freely and

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 2>subject to any number of responses positive and negative. Are

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>you curious about this idea of legal order and permission,

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 2>prohibition and unusual responsibility? I recommend Sean Wilber's and new

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>glossary on the Libertarian Labyrinth, as it offers the exploration

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 2>of that concept and a lot more to synthetic anarchism.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 2>So anarchy demands a high degree of self awareness, care,

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and reciprocity from individuals and communities, not through coercion or enforcement,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 2>but through voluntary continue us and conscious negotiation. Incentivized by

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 2>the nature of the system itself, with its basis in

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>cooperation and the desire to prevent annecessary conflict. In hierarchical systems,

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 2>humans of justice often escalates conflict. Imprisonment, for example, tends

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to breed resentment and resistance and further criminalization. In anarchy,

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 2>the absence of preauthorized retaliation encourages us to find that

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 2>dialogue and to create restorative practices. If a conflict arises

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 2>over a resource, people have an interest in reachion and

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 2>resolution that benefits both rather than escalates and things and

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 2>prolonged disputes. So, such as society, you will necessarily require responsibility.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 2>They're both responsibility for the environment and responsibility for other people.

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you are costing the ecosystem its resources,

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.239
<v Speaker 2>it can just offload that cost onto everybody else, As

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 2>it's common in captive systems. You have to be in

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>dialogue with other people to ensure your actions are balanced

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 2>by replenishing the resource, by mitigating harm, or by securing

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 2>so kind of collective agreement. And if somebody is creating

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 2>a disruptive situation, if they're blasting out music at night,

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 2>we kind oft rely on an external authority to mediate,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 2>but we have to mediate in some way. We have

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to find ways to ensure that they bear the costs

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 2>of disturbing others, whether involves apologizing or making amends or

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 2>just in their behavior, or if they don't want to

0:19:54.880 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 2>take on other people facing other consequences as necessary. So

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 2>social revolution really aims to prepare us for that responsibility. It's,

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>as Wilber describes, a basic principle for encountering, recognizing, and

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 2>engaging with others. It's our beefed up and extremely demanded

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 2>version of the Golden rule. The organic emergence of this

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 2>responsibility and the incentives of this system could create a

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of a mutual understanding, which is another aspect of neutrality.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 2>As people will necessarily form norms of behavior that will

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 2>guide the interactions between them. They'll facilitate consultation and negotiation

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to restrain the escalation of conflict. They'll maintain the viability

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.479
<v Speaker 2>of shared commons and libraries of thiths, and similarly, our

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 2>desire to prevent the escalation of conflict, to prevent threat

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to our being and prevent threats to our social harmony

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 2>or society's integrity with thus developed a sense of mutual

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 2>defense it's in all of our interests to minimize the

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 2>potential Hoever, our actions to proctively seek out solutions to

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 2>potential and actual conflict ensure that we won't get flack

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 2>and pushback and negative consequences to the things that we

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 2>do and threats to the sustainability of our society and

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 2>our lives I. Thinyet. Another manifestation of mutuality become to

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the idea of mutual interests, which are what make free

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 2>association as the basis of an arctic social organization possible.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 2>Free association is the founding principle of an archic social organization,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 2>and it refers the ability of each person to move

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 2>around to association disassociated with others as they so choose,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>without being subject to authority. Free association is free from

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the impositions of wage labor, from the boundaries of citizenship,

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 2>and from all other hierarchical relationships. This is different from

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the sort of liberal idea of freedom of association, where

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 2>under capitalists that freedom of association is the freedom that

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 2>comes with signing contracts and control in private property. So

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 2>being free from authority, we still have to do what

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 2>we have to do, because we're still muchly interdependent, but

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 2>that free association empowers people to connect with others and

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>to form groups based around shared interests or as add

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 2>actions to pursue those interests. Of actions. So interest maypy

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 2>as broad as onet and to eat, or as niche

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 2>as wanting to maintain the traditional Japanese art of wood joinery.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Or they might span the globe or whatever unique to

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a particular interest, such as those who are interested in

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 2>the mantia and the cleanliness of a local river. So

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.239
<v Speaker 2>groups don't just exist for the sake of existing. They

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>don't exist to perpetuate on existence. They exist with a

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 2>particular goal in mind, whether that is mintian roads, producing

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 2>a distributing food, or building housing. And then such groups

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 2>may exist for a long time, or they may dissolve frequently.

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 2>They may split, or they may emerge. They may overlap

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>or come into conflict, and the spaces where they interact

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>could be called spaces of encounter, taken place in factories

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 2>or in gardens, specifically to at online platforms or some

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of community center. So free association may occur on

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the level of networks of individuals or federations of groups.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 2>But I need to explain the commune and the federation,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 2>because those are things that can be interpreted in a

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>few different ways. You know, federations people who might think

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 2>of government, communes people might think of well, local government

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 2>or con geese or something of that nature. Yeah, be

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 2>cult too. So i'm a key is about funding ways

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to cooperate in ways that are not bound by the

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>traditional boundaries of authority, and that includes didditional boundaries of

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>shared territory. The Anech's commune has been confused very often

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 2>with things like intentional communities or administrative divisions. But if

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 2>we're going by Kropotkin's description in Words of a Rebel

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Chapters Tend to eleven, he makes it clear that commune

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>describes any group forming on the basis of free association.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 2>In fact, he juxtaposes the free commune with traditional conceptions

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 2>of the commune. He says, for us quote, commune no

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>longer means a territorial agglomeration. It is rather a generic name,

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>a synonym for the grouping of equals, which knows neither

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 2>frontiers nor walls. The social commune soon cease to be

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 2>a clearly defined entity. Each group in the commune necessarily

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>be drawn towards similar groups and other communes. They'll come together,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 2>and the things that federate them will be as solid

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 2>as those that attach them to their fellow citizens, And

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 2>this way they will emerge a commune of interests whose

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 2>members are scattered in a thousand towns and villagious. Each

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>individual find the full satisfaction of his needs only by

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>grouping with other individuals who have the same tastes but

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 2>inhabits one hundred other communes end quote. Scropotkin's commune is

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 2>essentially a fluid collective of individuals and groups wherever they

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>find themselves, coming together their own volition and according to

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 2>their shared interests, projects, and activity, without being bound to

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>territorial designations. So I expect to see a bunch of

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 2>like mini governments all over a bunch of mini community

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 2>governments or over energy. Because an abstract group in the

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 2>community may not even necessarily share many real interests in common,

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>as trying to put them all into one body, one

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 2>polity that is responsible for identifying and enacting their will,

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 2>it tends to be dominated by the group's most dominant voices.

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>It tends to subordinate individuals to the will of a

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 2>nebulous collective nebulous majority as The alternative to this sort

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of polity form, as Willard describes it is the federative

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 2>principle understood in its most radical anarchic sensus, So not

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 2>in the sense of networking conventional static polities like a

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>confederation of city states, but instead bringing together the information

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and perspectives necessary to facilitate the dynamic process of free association.

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 2>We could look to antionomies of democracy. Another bit of

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 2>writing by Wilbur which fud explains how the federative organization

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 2>is the process by which we identify specific social cells

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>as an interests or needs and establish the involvement in

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 2>large scale collectivities that are formed on the basis of

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 2>those conversion interests. So these collectivities might exist on a

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of a consultative basis as they seek out and

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 2>disseminate information or advice. It relates to interests, but the

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 2>recognition we're relevant of expertise, so there might be such

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 2>associations based on armed defense or cohousing construction or agro forestry.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 2>The RepU consultative associations with a journalistic focus or with

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 2>a rewildin focus or an accessibility focus. They may exist

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>on any scale, depending on the specificity of the information needed,

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 2>from as the locals an apartment building to as far

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 2>reaching as a consonant or even the entire globe. Consultative

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 2>associations could create bluepference. They could document the viewable label

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 2>and expertise, They can source resources, and they can share feedback.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Also that interested and affected individuals and groups can easily

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>access everything they need to make informed decisions. So in anarchy,

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll see a variety of individuals grouping together and interacted

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 2>in ways that are perhaps illegible from our top down

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 2>view of society, but in ways that work to accomplish

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>their goals, resolve their conflicts, and maintain social harmony. It

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>can be difficult to imagine this possibility due to how

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 2>thoroughly our disempowerment in dovestigation has been We live under

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a global order that seems to deny any alternatives and

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 2>extors its understanding of human nature as the only valid interpretation.

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>The propaganda of our education on mass media and our

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 2>inherited understanding as subjects in hierarchical society has limited our

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 2>consciousness of our situation and thus our drives and powers

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 2>to transform our situation. There are those of us who

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 2>can overcome this through theoretical and historical study. But there

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>are others who can only overcome this condition through demonstration.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Some are not convinced by intellectual anarchist arguments. They have

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 2>to be transformed through experiences. So to borrow the terminology

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>of innovation adoption, it is up to us early adopters,

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 2>those who are into the revolution before it becomes cool,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to convince the majority of the possibility of freedom by example.

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 2>And furthermore, as William Gillis wrote in The Distinct Radicalism

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>of Anarchism, quote, to reach a moment where we sit

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>back entirely satisfied would be to abandon anarchism to the

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 2>radical of It is no alitmus for due diligence, no

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 2>final finish line, no moment where we pat ourselves on

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the back. The vigilance of the radical is never as satiated.

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>End quote. And that's it for me today. We'll get

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 2>more into revolution, powers, drives, and consciousness and more in

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 2>future episodes. In the meantime, you can check out my

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>channel Andraism on YouTube. I took all things like this

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 2>all the time I've been ondre siege. This is it

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 2>could happen here. All power to all the people peace.

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>It could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>coolzonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>now find sources for it could Happen Here listed directly

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.