WEBVTT - The Quantum Shift in Biomedical Discovery

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Malcolm Globwell and you're listening to Smart Talks with IBM.

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:11.079
<v Speaker 1>When doctor Laura Jahi began treating epilepsy patients in the

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>early two thousands, she noticed something unsettling. Different surgeons could

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the exact same case and recommend completely different treatments.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>One surgeon might remove one part of the brain, another

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a different part, and a third might not operate at all.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Doctor j Hi believed there had to be a better way,

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>one grounded in data. That conviction set her on a

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>path that would lead her to become Chief Research Information

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Officer at Cleveland Clinic and the executive program lead for

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Discovery Accelerator. The Discovery Accelerator is a ten year

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>partnership between Cleveland Clinic and IBM where researchers are using

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>AI and quantum computing to make incredible discoveries in healthcare

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and life sciences. I sat down with doctor j High

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to explore what's happening now, what's possible with quantum computing,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and where this next era of biomedical discovery is headed.

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Epilepsy was your kind of specialty within neurology?

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:13.919
<v Speaker 2>Correct? Yes?

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>What led you to that?

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I was always fascinated by the brain. You know, it's

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the part of our body that leaves still to this day,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 3>the most to be discovered. So I was always intrigued

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>by areas that leave more for discovery, and epilepsy was

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 3>my pragmatic side, wanting to choose a subspecialty where the

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 3>problem can be fixed. In epilepsy, there are many medications

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 3>that are very effective, and there's a brain surgery that

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 3>we can do to stop seizures when medicines don't work.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>That attracted me.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, compared to other areas in neurology, like stroke,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>for example, or dementia, where usually the damage is more.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to be able to tell my.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Patients that you have a big problem, but here's what

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 3>I can do to fix it, and epilepsy offered me that.

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>But what would there must have been interesting and intriguing

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>unsolved problems in neurology.

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, it's the whole brain, isn't it. Before

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 3>starting to deal with artificial intelligence and research. Right in

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>the neurology, I'm dealing with real intelligence, the human brain

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and how it works and how we think and how

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>we make decisions, and how it can grow and evolve,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>and so there is many untapped questions in neurology, and

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that's part.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Of the fascination in it.

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 3>In epilepsy in particular, it's an electrical disease in the brain,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 3>it's actually one of the conditions in neurology. That's a

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>perfect alignment of all of the scientific disciplines. It's biology

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 3>and physics and chemistry all working together to make us

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>who we truly are.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, So every.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 3>Other discipline, if you think of computing, for example, it's

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 3>purely electricity. Or if we do drug development or drug discovery,

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 3>that's mostly chemistry. Experiments in the lab, that's mostly biology.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 3>But the human brain is all of those put together.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 3>The cells in our brain secret these chemical substances that

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 3>diffuse everywhere and hook up where they need to to

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 3>trigger certain circuits and then trigger some effects afterwards. So

0:03:53.400 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 3>it was just an elegant science that has big impacts.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>We're shortly going to get there and talk about you've

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>taken on this kind of very technology focused roller Cleveland Clinic.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about if we go back to when you

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>were just starting out at Cleveland Clinic. Yeah, how much

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>were you thinking about this sort of technology piece about

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>what technology could do for your specialty. About was that

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>on your mind or is this something you've come to

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>more recently.

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's been a journey, right, And when I started

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 3>training as a clinician, my priority was just to learn

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>how to better care for my patients and how to

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 3>be a better physician. And then I realized that clinical

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>practice provides an immediate reward. I'm interacting with a human

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 3>being and helping them in the moment, so there is

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>that immediate reward that comes with that. But that wasn't enough.

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 3>I wanted something more. So then I learned biomedical research.

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 3>Pract this is and research offered me this path towards

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>a future. You know, the reward there is more long term.

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm studying discovering things that could help many people in

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the future, even though I will never get to see

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>them or meet them, or you know, have that immediate satisfaction.

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 3>So that shifted me from being a pure clinician to

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 3>being a clinician scientist. And as that journey progressed, it

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 3>became very clear, as medicine evolved over the past twenty years,

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 3>that we cannot do any good biomedical research without understanding

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 3>data and technology. You know, the balance is shifting from

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 3>most of the research is happening we call it, you know,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 3>on the wet bench with actual experiments, physical experiments, to

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>a place where most of the work is happening through

0:05:55.640 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>compute and simulations and data. So I became much more

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>involved for my personal research in building big data models

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 3>and learning about AI and you know, learning about technology

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>in general. And then as that journey progressed, I was

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 3>fortunate enough to be an enroll for Cleveland Clinic, where

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 3>my job is to bring that technology and bridge it

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>to research for all researchers across our health care system.

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 1>When you were talking about how in your own research

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>you were moving in that direction, what was your own

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>research focused on. What were you looking at?

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at brain surgery for epilepsy. It's an

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>intervention that's been around for decades actually, but when I

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 3>started practice, I was shocked by, you know, the practice

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 3>that we had were making decisions around surgery, like, you know,

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 3>what patients should get it versus not, how likely is

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 3>it to work, what part of the brain should we remove.

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 3>All of those decisions were at the time and the

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 3>early two thousands driven by clinical opinions, Right, you know,

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 3>you have an experienced surgeon, they decide to do this.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Somebody else might decide to do something completely different, and

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I didn't feel that that was the right.

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Way to practice medicine.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, that we needed to be more evidence based

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and data driven. So I went in the business in

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 3>research of building models, predictive models that can ingest data

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>from all of the tests that we would do about

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 3>on these patients before to.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Figure out surgery.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 3>So I learned how to analyze all types of data,

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 3>from genetic data and individuals to pictures to electrical recordings,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and then combine those into these prediction.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Models you're looking at. You're taking large numbers of surgeries

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>for epilepsy, and you're seeing what kind of connection there

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is between the success of the surgical intervention and the

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>underlying presentation of.

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 2>The patient exactly.

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 3>So I would be telling the patient, what is your

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 3>specific chance of becoming seizure free with surgery instead of

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 3>giving them statistics about you know, like you know, in general,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 3>how well is that going to be effective? So that

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>piece of individualizing medicine.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>So Cleveland Clinic decides to create a post called Chief

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Information Officers.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 3>If research information we have research, yes, always chief information

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 3>officer runs it.

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yes, chief research information.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it for research.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>This is parenthetically a huge job. Yes, so you apply

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for this, do you know that you're going to be

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>thinking and talking and dealing with quantum.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I started in January twenty twenty, and like every leader

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 3>who's put in a position, remember, everybody tells you should

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 3>read that the first ninety days great how to plan.

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So I was reading that and doing my listening tours

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 3>to understand, and then COVID hits and I got a

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 3>call from our executive suite about all, there is this

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 3>thing called COVID that's coming. We will start testing people

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 3>in four days. People will want to do research with COVID.

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 2>Make it happen. So it was there's no chapter in

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the book about that, you know.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 3>So so I then it really it was like a

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 3>pressure cooker, you know, test with. Yeah, I have to

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>create this access to data, structured you know, resources, so

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that we can learn from it as.

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Quickly as possible.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>And so that was a catalyst. So then comes twenty

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty one. That was the year of our centennial one

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 3>hundred years for Cleveland Clinic. So everybody, not just me,

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 3>we were in a mindset where we were thinking long,

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 3>long term, you know, like what made us specialized? Now

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 3>how do we stay relevant? Where is the world going

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to be ten years from now? And what should I

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 3>get going right this moment to shape that and be

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 3>ready for it. And that's when quantum came in my mind,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 3>where unless we invest in it now twenty twenty one,

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 3>we will not be ready for this next computer revolution

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 3>that's coming after AI.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Everybody in the world right now is doing nothing but

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about AI, and you are already thinking one step

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond a quantum what's different about the opportunity that quantum

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>creates for a metic research than AI?

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Biology?

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 3>The human body, by definition, is much closer to fundamentals

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 3>of quantum, you know, to quantum mechanics and quantum physics

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 3>than it is to AI. AI is a classical computing

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 3>approach that in essence, reduces every piece of data to

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>a black or white binary categorization of a one or

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 3>a zero. At its core nature around us, the human body,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 3>there is nothing categorical about it. It's it's that whole

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, continuum of colors of life. Quantum its principles

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 3>are that, you know, so there's all the scientific principles

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 3>about quantum physics and superb position and in tankerment, you know,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 3>all of these complex things that people have a hard

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 3>time with, but for in essence, it.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Really is much more aligned.

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Like if I want to draw a colored picture, I

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 3>will not go and pick up charcoal. You know, it's

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>much easier for me to draw it if I had

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 3>a colored palette with me, and quantum offers that. There

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>is plenty of situations in medicine that are just intractable,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, meaning it's not an issue just of it

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>being AI being slow, or it doesn't have enough data,

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>or if only we got more GPUs, you know, we

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>can answer those questions. There are some problems in medicine

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 3>that are fundamentally such that even if you give me

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 3>all the GPUs in the world, there is no way

0:12:55.160 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 3>that AI can model accurately how these mollyules in the

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>body are interacting among each other, or how compounds electrons

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 3>are moving within the mitochondria. These are the engines within

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 3>our cells. There's these fundamental things in biology that AI

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 3>and classical computers are just not built to be able

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 3>to stimulate.

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So you must go to dinner parties, Doctor j. High.

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>People must ask you what is quantum computing? What do

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you tell them?

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Although I often, you know, we talk about other

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 3>things at dinner.

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Parties, eventually it comes down to you. If I was

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at that dinner party with you, I would ask you

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>what is quantum computer?

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I would say, depends on how much time we have

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 3>at the party to explain it. The short answer would be,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a completely different way of working with computers than

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 3>what we're used to Right now, you can imagine that

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 3>AI as being like a car that you take to

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 3>go from one place to another. No matter how fast

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 3>that Ferrari can get and how much fewer you put

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 3>in it, it's never going to be a fighter jet.

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 2>It's never going to be a plane.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 3>AI is the car, the plane is quant They are

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 3>ways to get from point A to point B, but

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>they work very differently, and we always use them in together.

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>If I'm flying from Shaker Heights to Yorktown Heights, I

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 3>drive to the airport, get on the plane, then take

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 3>an uber to get to Yorktown Heights. In research, we

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 3>will do the same. We do some piece of it

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 3>in AI, some piece of it in quantum, and then

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 3>go back and.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Forth back in twenty twenty one, Cleveland Clinic and IBM

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>announced that they were starting something called the Discovery Accelerator.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>What is that.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 3>It's an initiative, a program, a partnership really that is

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 3>designed to bridge advanced computational tools and technology through the

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>leader in that space, IBM, with biomedical science and research

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 3>and life sciences problems, and that is a Cleveland Clinic.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 3>We called it a Discovery Accelerator because that was our goal.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>We were both on both sides challenged with the fact

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>that discovery in medicine was just taking too long. The

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 3>classical example that really brought it to life to us

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>then was drug discovery that it took over a decade

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 3>and it still does actually over a decade. From the

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 3>moment that there is a compound that someone in a

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 3>lab biomedical lab thinks it would be effective to treat

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 3>a certain disease, it takes about ten to thirteen from

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>that moment to when that drug is on a shelf

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 3>for a patient to get to from a pharmacy. And

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 3>that was just too much of a gap to allow

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 3>when we have so many health conditions that we needed

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 3>to address, and a big part of that gap could

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>be computationally solved better simulation of compounds, designing drug trails

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 3>that are.

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>More efficient, you know, that would finish faster.

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So that was the motivation to bring computational tools and

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 3>technology closer to biomedical researchers.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Click and IBM team up. And I'm assuming the

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>IBM quantum guys and other people descend on Cleveland and

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you have your first meeting with them. Are they telling

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you things you would never thought of? Or I mean,

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious about what's the difference between what you

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>thought was the potential was and what you discovered the

0:16:58.960 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>potential was.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 3>That is an excellent question. If I had to prioritize.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 3>One lesson that I learned over the past few years

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 3>of doing this, it is that you can never know

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 3>what your you know where your brain is going to

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 3>go and discovery until you talk. You know, you have

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 3>to open it up and really listen to try to

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 3>learn what the other people are saying.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 2>It's it went both ways.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you give me an example.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 3>So, okay, we built a quantum right, so it took

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 3>it took like eight months to get this machine put together,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 3>and we put it in our cafeteria.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 2>That's the whole other.

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Story where you put the quantum machine computer in your cafeteria. Yes, yes, yes,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>can you see it when you're eating lunch?

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Yeah, we have people eating lunch around it all

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 3>the time. We wanted to have a machine that people

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 3>can see. Otherwise it it the program wouldn't launch properly,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 3>so I needed to have it physically. So we had

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to look at retro fitted in existing space, and the

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 3>cafeteria space worked out. It was far enough from the street,

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, there was no vibration that it was a

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 3>double floor, you know, so the ceiling was high enough.

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 3>It just like technically fit all of those requirements. And

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 3>it was either there or we put it in our

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 3>data center, which is a building and like another city

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 3>close to Cleveland, and we picked the cafeteria.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, I know this is sort of this is

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of hilarious, but there's a serious point I I

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>want to touch on, which is why do you need

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it on premises?

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 3>On the premises Cleveland kinnect research. We needed to change

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 3>how we think about research and shift the mindset of

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 3>all of our researchers. And all of our researchers, I'm

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 3>talking about three thousand individuals who are one hundred percent

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 3>doing biomedical research in Cleveland Clinic, two hundred and thirty

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>labs individual pis. So that's the scale that I'm talking

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 3>about that we had to create an impact on. So

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>having it, having it be there was as much for

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 3>inspiration and to trigger our motivation to change as it

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>was a you know, a practical solution, say, because we

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 3>had the space and the connections and all of.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>That I saw in it IBM headquarters. They're beautiful, they're

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>works of art.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 3>They are They're gorgeous, and the one that we have

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 3>is the most gorgeous.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 2>One of all. This is not me, you know, the mom.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Bias talking about it.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, they got an award, the Red Dot Award

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 3>for Design went to IBM and Cleveland Clinic for our

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>quantum and the quantum that IBM built for RPI a

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 3>couple of years after hours. They modeled it after hours,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>not after the you know the ones from before.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Just just so people know, we're talking about basically a

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>small garage eleven.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 3>But size eleven foot by eleven eleven feet eleven feet,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>you know the cube, So it's a it's a glass

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 3>cube and the glass comes all the way from Italy.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 3>It's the same glass that protects the crown jewels and

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 3>you know the Mona Lisa and all that. So so

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 3>there's a glass all around, and then there is the

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 3>tube that you see, the stainless tube that's shiny, you know,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 3>and clean. But the technologies are inside of it, you know,

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 3>the chandelier and then the processor and the bottom and

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 3>it's just a fascinating thing to watch and it hums.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 3>It makes the sound so even it sounds alive.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>You have a great deal of affection for your computer.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 2>And we love our machine.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something you said before,

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>which is when you had your initial conversations with IBM,

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>both sides learned things that they hadn't previously thought of.

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Give me an example of something that either side hadn't

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>realized could be done with this new technology.

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I mean on the equivalent clinic side, we thought

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 3>that what quantum should be good for is that it

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>would be a faster computer, right, so that we have

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 3>these big data sets that are requiring much more compute

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 3>power and you know, GIP used than what we have

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 3>and we should just run them on the quantum. And

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 3>what we came to realize is that Quantum actually does

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 3>not do well with these large data sets. What it

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 3>does well with our smaller, better defined data sets, but

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 3>ones where simulation is more important. You know, we have

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 3>to run them through multiple models, multiple simulations of how

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 3>they interact. As an example, one of the very first

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 3>projects we threw at Quantum was wanting to predict complications

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 3>cardiac complications from general surgery using electronic.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Health record data.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 3>So data from our electronic health records are by definition

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 3>these really big data sets. You have in them every

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 3>single thing that you know about the patient that you've collected,

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 3>and we thought that Quantum would help us build models,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>better models with this data.

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 2>And it failed miserably. It wasn't good, you know, at

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 2>doing that thing.

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>And why didn't it like that problem because it's too

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>it's too bigger than wieldy.

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, because the hardware isn't tready right, So the hardware

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 3>with Quantum, that issue was back then. You know, now

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 3>we've upgraded our processor, but still Quantum now is limited

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 3>by noise and by its ability to correct for errors

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 3>when it's doing computation. And the more data that you

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 3>throw at it that you require it, you know, to

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 3>put in its system you know, to model interactions, the

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 3>more errors it's likely to make, so then the harder

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 3>it is for it to get to an answer.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 2>That you can trust.

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, we made a lot of progress sense, which I'm

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 3>sure we'll get to I hope we'll get to with

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 3>some recent breakthroughs that we made in that space with

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 3>modeling large compounds and interactions.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 2>But the way that got us.

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 3>To where we are now, where we could model large interactions,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 3>it took us figuring out that we shouldn't be doing

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 3>everything on quantum.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So give me an example of a problem that quantum

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is ideally suited for that the quantum really likes.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 3>In drug discovery, for examine chemistry. It likes chemistry a

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 3>lot because in chemistry what it has to what we

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 3>wanted to model is how a drug that we put

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 3>in our body is going to interact with We say

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 3>the protein you know, the target, the ligand that it

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 3>needs to buy in too. Like you know, the drug

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>is a key and it needs to fit in a

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 3>lock in certain parts of the body to open it,

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 3>get in, do it stay. And there are many keys,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 3>many potential compounds that we could test for many parts

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 3>of our body. We don't really know how they're going

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to interact. Traditionally, what we do is we have to

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 3>build all the keys. We have to manufacture all these

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 3>compounds and then do actual trial clinical trials. Put them

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>in people, put them in animals, and see what happens.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>See which one is best?

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 3>See yeah, which like two fit best together. So we

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 3>use AI to try to help us with that. But

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 3>AI can only model what it had learned.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, So for.

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Rare diseases conditions that there isn't enough information out there

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>on what the you know, the locks look like, it's

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 3>really hard to then model it with AI and get

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 3>an accurate prediction of whether there's a fit or not.

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Quantum does not rely on the previous data for its modeling.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Quantum does its modeling purely based on the physical characteristics

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of the compound of the key you know that you're designing.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 3>So that makes it ideal because it's then untethered with

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not limited by do we have enough samples or

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 3>don't we have enough samples, or you know, what the

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 3>previous studies find or not. It's purely based on those

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 3>physical properties, those quantum properties. So we found ourselves in

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 3>situations where we were able to predict a fit between

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 3>certain targets and where in conditions like Alzheimer's disease. For example,

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 3>we published where the quantum based modeling of the compound

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 3>was much better than what we would have gotten with

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 3>what we got right, Like, we did it both ways,

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 3>and the quantum one was the better fit than the

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 3>AI generated one.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>This is fair. Quantum is a little more of an

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>artist and a little less of a of a kind

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of nerd us nerdy to me, what seems like creative

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and artistic?

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Creative?

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, creative, it's like people.

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it opens up path that you never knew existed.

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 3>That's why when I get asked about what do I

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 3>see is the best, you know, the the most important

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 3>breakthrough that quantum is going to allow us to do,

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 3>my answer is I really don't know, because we you know,

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 3>when other people invented these new technologies, I don't think

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 3>they really knew that they're you know.

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Like think of laser.

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the person who invented laser thought that

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 3>they will be used to scan groceries at the grocery store.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 3>But so technology developing technology, the way I think of

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 3>it is like having a baby you know, you raise

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>it as best you can, but then they're going to

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 3>go off and do their thing, and you will be

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 3>tying them down if you restrict them to just what

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 3>you thought they should do.

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 2>You know. So it opens up that.

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Space, that creative space for us to ask questions differently

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 3>than we used to. We should train our mind to

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 3>stop starting from classical and then trying to squeeze it

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 3>into quantum. We have to learn how to think quantum

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 3>up front, right from the beginning, which we haven't really

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 3>been doing as a scientific community since our inception. We

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 3>were trained, and how do you convert what you're thinking

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 3>into a formula that you can ask from a computer

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 3>which is a classical right computer with quantum because of

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 3>how it works, it can answer questions, It can look

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 3>at problems in a very different way. So we have

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to think differently about the questions and how we ask them.

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>With IBM, you recently modeled protein with over twelve thousand atoms.

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about that and why it's so meaningful

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>for job discovery.

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 3>So in October of twenty twenty four, so just eighteen

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 3>months ago, the largest compound biological compound that could be

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 3>simulated with quantum was ten atoms big, and it was

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:34.479
<v Speaker 3>unfathomable back then that we will get past the one

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 3>thousand or few thousand atom simulation in the foreseeable future.

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 3>And what our team with IBM and with Rieken and

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Japan published last month April twenty twenty six is a

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 3>simulation of the electrical properties of an enzyme trips in

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the body that is twelve thousand, six hundred atoms bit

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 3>for you know, orders of magnitude beyond what anybody thought

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 3>was possible in that span of time.

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why.

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 3>That happened was because of a you know, innovations in

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the technology itself where the teams stopped thinking of quantum

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 3>and AI as competitors and instead thought of them as

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 3>different members of.

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 2>The same team.

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, you're we're now in basketball season in the US

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 3>the NPA, and you need the you need defense, but

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 3>you also need your center, somebody to shoot. You need

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 3>all of the pieces to work together. So with this,

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 3>it was figuring out where do I put you know,

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 3>when do I put AI on the field, When do

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I put quantum on the field, and how do I

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 3>tell them.

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>To work together?

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 3>It's the scientific terms the quantum centric super computing. So

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 3>quantum is at the center, but we're using our supercomputing

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 3>tools AI classical to interact with it and split that

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 3>big problem of the twelve thousand, six hundred atoms into

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 3>pieces where some pieces are best served with quantum and

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 3>others are best served with classical.

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>This distinction that we now cling to AI and quantum

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>are these very different things develop by different people for

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>different purposes. What you're suggesting is that's probably going to

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>go away. Yeah, in the future, these things will work together.

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It's going to become teamwork and not one on one

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>competition exactly.

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 2>And it is that now in Cleveland Clinic.

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean the way we've evolved our priority is with IBM.

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a realization that both organizations have come to where

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 3>really to for progress to happen, we should stop seeing

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 3>them as separate. We should put them together and work

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 3>to the best of what each piece of technology can provide.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>One theme running through a lot of your your what

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you've been talking about is that the arrival of this

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>new technology requires the researcher to behave differently and that's

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why you want the quantum machine

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and the on full display, and then you were talking

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about how you have to ask different kinds of questions.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, can you can you? Can you elaborate on

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit? So take me back, for example,

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to your earliest days. If I had given you all

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>these tools that people now, how would your research have

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>proceeded differently? What would you have done differently?

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 2>You know, I would have looked at the molecular.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Components of the human brain as they relate to outcomes

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 3>of brain surgery way earlier than I did. The first

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 3>ten years of my career doing research was all spent

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 3>building models that were purely based on brain.

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Waves and pictures of the brain.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't until after I hit a wall with my

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 3>models aren't getting past that eighty percent accuracy threshold that

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I started thinking, oh, you know, there must be something

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 3>genetic or you know, more biological that is influencing this.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Had I been exposed to quantum at least as a concept,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 3>right to quantum computing and what quantum science is back then,

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it would have opened up my mind to

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 3>realize that it's not just about what I see. You know,

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:26.280
<v Speaker 3>there is hidden relationships that exist within the human body

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 3>and that's our genetic makeup and our chemical makeup that

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 3>influence what comes to the surface that urge to dig deeper.

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 3>The other thing it would have changed is it would

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 3>have made me reach out to engineers and physicists and

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 3>mathematicians much earlier in my career.

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah. And how would it have changed This

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is a very kind of prosaic question, but just kind

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day to day life of someone doing better research.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the oh wow, you walk into the office

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. How does your day proceed differently when

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you're when you have these kinds of tools at your fingertips.

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 3>That's the fundamental question in biomedical research right now, and

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 3>it's it's less to do with quantum, more to do

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 3>with agentic AI, right, these agents that we can work

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.919
<v Speaker 3>with now to help us how to think more creatively

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and how to do work that up until now was

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 3>more like Scott work that the researchers had to do,

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 3>whether it was you know, so the hypothesis generation has

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 3>always been the most creative part of aspect of scientific research.

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 3>But what comes after it with the data collection for example,

0:35:55.320 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 3>that was always such a repetitive, you know, exercise, and

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 3>then the analysis after that was something that was very

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 3>resource intensive and you had to try so many different

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 3>approaches before you get to an answer, and that was

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>fairly complex.

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, with access to.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Urgantic AI and you know, some quantum, of course, we

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 3>can spend more of our energy on the creative thinking

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 3>part of the aspects of the work and less on

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the you know, just that repetitive.

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>When you look around, I'm assuming you walk around Cleveland

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Clinic and you have lots of conversations with some of

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the most brilliant medical researchers in the world. Are you

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>satisfied with how quickly and aggressively they are adopting these

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>new technologies or do they still need encouragement from you

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to do? You have to say, people, wait, I've got

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this machine in the cafeteria. You should be using it

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for this problem. How much are you doing that kind

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of encouraging in cheerleading or is it unnecessary?

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 3>No, there's plenty of cheerleading that's necessary people. You know,

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 3>humans don't like to change. It's hardwired in us. So

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 3>there is plenty of cheerleading. But what happens is, I mean,

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the way we built our program to where we are now,

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 3>so Cleveland clinic now is pretty much winning every global competition.

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 3>And Quantum for life sciences, whether that's the welcome trust,

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, Quantum for biological applications, we our partner. There

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 3>was a startup in Finland Algorithm Make there brilliant. We

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 3>worked with them to develop a photodynamic drug therapy for cancer,

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 3>or whether it is the NIH with they had an

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 3>ex price challenge for Quantum or universities that we're collaborating with,

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 3>we have a program that's bringing startups to our ecosystem.

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 3>We give them access to the machine if they have

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 3>a question that is significant enough for life sciences, universities

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 3>that we're building a bachelor's, master's, PhD programs with on

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 3>quantum computing, we developed that whole ecosystem around it. If

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 3>that's not cheerleading, I don't know what else would qualify

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 3>for cheerleading. But then what happens is these early adopters,

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the risk takers, become the cheerleaders themselves, right, and then

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 3>they work with it, they achieve success, and we're nothing

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 3>but competitive in medicine and science. Right, So then it

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 3>becomes okay, so and so I did this with this machine,

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Let me learn it so I can do the same

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 3>and it becomes this verse virtuous cycle of then innovation

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 3>and growth and people wanting to work together.

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:10.320
<v Speaker 2>It's just been fascinating to watch.

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You said that people don't like change, but you clearly do.

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I do. That's the mindset of researchers, right.

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 3>A researcher is someone who is not afraid to fail,

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 3>actually sees failure as a chance to learn something right,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 3>to do better the next time. So we get rejected

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 3>all the time and we don't care, right, we keep

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 3>moving on with papers.

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Grant applications.

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 3>So that mindset is what all of research is built around.

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's a very forward looking mindset. And Cleveland Clinic

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 3>as the health system, we wouldn't have survived one hundred years.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 3>We wouldn't have done all of the firsts that we had.

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Serotonin the chemical that drives the whole all science of

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 3>psychiatry and neuroscience that was discovered in Cleveland Clinic. So

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 3>as an organization, we have enough of people who think

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 3>that way that they will be the early adopters who

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 3>will pull the others with them.

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. One last question, look look ahead tenures. Pat me

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>a picture of what quantum and related technologies look like

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>for a place like Cleveland Clinic and tenures.

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I hope is that ten years from now,

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 3>if I if I'm seeing a patient in clinic who

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 3>has bad epilepsy and for the love of you know,

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't figure out what medicine do I need to

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 3>prescribe to them to make them seizure free, I will

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 3>be able to send them to get a blood test

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 3>that we can then run through some analytical platform that

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 3>leverages both quantum and AI that can model exactly for

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 3>that patient, what compound, either existing or not to be developed.

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 3>It's some new chemical that we haven't tested for that

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 3>indication yet is going to treat them, you know, make

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 3>them seizure free. It's and I think quantum is ideal

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.279
<v Speaker 3>for a condition like mine epilepsy, because we are a

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 3>rare disease, and I think that benefit that it's going

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 3>to have will start with rare diseases, you know, as

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 3>I explained earlier, So take any other rare disease, we

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 3>should start there and then expand from that to more

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:57.399
<v Speaker 3>complex things like cancer for example, and others. But those

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 3>rare conditions where we are left now completely scratching our

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 3>heads and going by intuition. It will make our care

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 3>truly precise, and it will make drug development a more

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 3>tailored exercise than the way it is now, where it's

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 3>like a hammer that's looking for nails?

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Am I right in thinking that of all of the

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>over the one hundred year history or more now of

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland clinic, this sounds like the absolute best time to

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be a Cleveland clinic.

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I love it, No complaints, no complaints, And I

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 2>am hiring.

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 4>I need I need those quantum researchers, those people who

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 4>are wanting, you know, to apply quant genetic research, imaging research,

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 4>every single aspect of biomedical research.

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 3>We can't afford to just wait on the sideline and

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 3>until the technolog she's ready, and then you know, then

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 3>it was teach us it is ready now. That twelve

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 3>thousand atom simulation wouldn't have happened just a year and

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:11.320
<v Speaker 3>a half ago at Quidin Yahn.

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 1>So the headline of this conversation is we're hiring, we hired.

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Yeah, that's a good headline. We're growing, how about that.

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Ramano, Amy

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Gains McQuaid, Trina Menino, and Jake Harper. Engineering by Nina

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Bird Lawrence Mastering by Sarah Bruguerer, Music by Gramoscope, Strategy

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 1>by Cassidy Meyer, Sophia Derlon and Tatiana Lieberman. Special thanks

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to doctor Laura Jahi, Alicia Real Cooney, and the Cleveland

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Clinic team. Smart Talks with IBM is a production of

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Industries and Ruby Studio at iHeartMedia. To find more

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin podcasts, listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. This is a

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>paid advertisement from IBM. The conversations on this podcast don't

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies, or opinions.