WEBVTT - How to Prevent AI From Causing an Economic Catastrophe

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to the stage Maren's Somerset Web.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Maren Talks Money Listeners, It's Meren Sunset Web. Before

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we get back to our regular programming in early September,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we are bringing you something very special, recordings of the

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>conversations I had at Pania House for the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Now,

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who don't know, the Fringe is

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>a three week arts and culture festival that began in

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty seven and it takes place in Edinburgh and

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Scotland every August. For the past few years I have

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>been hosting conversations about markets, economics and investing from one

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of the most special locations in Edinburgh as part of

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this festival. I do it from Panmia House, which is

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the last home of Adam Smith, philosopher and father of

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>modern economics, is where he completed the last editions of

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>his best sellers, The Theory of Moral Sentiments and The

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Wealth of Nations. This year we did a three day

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>run to was the end of August, and we are

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>bringing you the slightly edited conversations from those three days.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>The panel I hosted on the second day, featured again

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg senior reporter John Steppek, also Richard Wilson, CEO of

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the UK second largest investment platform, Interactive Investor, and Dominic Frisbee,

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>author of the Flying Frisbee investment newsletter and also author

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of a new book just out.

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Called The Secret History of Gold.

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we will probably go straight into the show

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>because you all know my jokes from last year already.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>There was no point in going through them again.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I have three excellent guests, and what we're going to

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>do is keep the format exactly as it has.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Been in the past.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's going to tell me their favorite Adam Smith quote.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Well it's not quite their favoritecause everyone's got quite a

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of favorites. John, how many favorites have you got

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at least haven? And then we're going to talk around

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>their quote. So we're going to The idea is to

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>make it a very open conversation between the panel.

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 3>So my guests on my right, I've got John Stappek.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Who lots of you probably know already. John writes the

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Money Just Sold newsletter for Bloomberg. On my left of

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Dominic Frisbee, who has just written a brilliant new book,

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The Secret History of Gold, and you will know I

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's brilliant because I say so on the back

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the book.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 2>You do say, you say it is possibly the best

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>timed book ever. What a lovely endorsement.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, my pleasure. Dominic also writes the frying, Frying,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Flying Frisbee newsletter.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>And on my.

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Far left we have Richard Wilson, who is the CEO

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>of Interactive Investor and the COO of Aberdeen Asset Management,

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>right right, the first quote is going to come from Richard.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 4>And thank you very much for having me today, and

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 4>hello everybody.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 5>So my quote was.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Labor was the first price, the original purchase money that

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 4>was paid for all things. It was not by gold

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 4>or by silver, but by labor that all wealth of

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 4>the world was originally purchased. And I'll sit in there

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 4>obviously mulling over that and thinking about our current reflections

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 4>on technology and AI, and you've kind of have to

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>and there's I think there are two different views of

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 4>this story. There's a view of AI that it's a

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:22.399
<v Speaker 4>life enriching thing that everyone will have, you know, their

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 4>roles will be enhanced and there will be time to

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 4>invest in the things that you enjoy.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 5>And then there's the sharp end that I work in, where.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 4>I have about a thousand people in I are working

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>very hard to make you fabulously wealthy and happy, and

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>every day we're trying to improve our efficiencies so we

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 4>can improve our experience and ultimately improve our price position.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 4>But the raality is is that we have in our

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>company every year currently now we see you're probably twenty

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 4>five percent and improvement in productivity.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 5>This year as an.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Example, year to date this year versus last year, we're

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent bigger than we were last year, thank you

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 4>very much.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 5>But we have ten percent less calls.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 4>That come into our contact center, and those calls are

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 4>handled about fifteen percent faster because of the tools that

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 4>are available.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Can I interrupt quickly to ask you when you say

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>there are fewer calls coming in?

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Why are their fewer calls coming in?

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Because people are finding the answer to their questions why

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>are the chabbot or something like that.

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 4>So it's a great question, and we look at that

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 4>as if we're kind of we master all of our information.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 4>And I think there are several factors, but one of

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 4>them is the experience is just better because you don't. Obviously,

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 4>customers call in to tell me how wonderful they think

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 4>I am. See if that's never happened.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 3>It will now.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 5>So they call in because they're.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Struggling to find the answer to a problem or a decision,

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 4>or they're not happy with something, and if your experience

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 4>is better, you have less reason to call. And theres

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 4>an example last year in terms of basic coding, nearly

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 4>two million lines of code was written by AI for us,

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 4>and we wouldn't put ourselves out to be particularly special,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 4>so part of that is just the experience being learning

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 4>faster to help more people. So we've about half a

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 4>million customers, different age, demographic, behavior norms, context. The experience

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 4>needs to be something that works for each of those individuals,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 4>and they don't. One person's simple is not the same

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 4>as somebody else's, so it needs to be adaptive and smart.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 5>So you've got that picture and a look more broadly.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 4>In the UK today we have about one point three

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 4>million people work in contact centers, ne hundred thousand people

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 4>are work in software development, four hundred thousand people are

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 4>taxi drivers, four hundred thousand people are in HGV or delivery,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>and another six or one thousand in.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 5>Other those roles.

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 4>As I look at what's happening to us, you can

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 4>see quite rapidly some of those roles simply disappearing because

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 4>the machine just does it fast.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 5>And my worry for us.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Is that I think today we've got some like thirty

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 4>three million people in employment in the UK that we're

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 4>going to see us in the next three four five

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 4>years a material shift which is going to challenge some

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 4>of the basic premise about what the price of the

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 4>value of labor is and the ability to reskill is

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 4>going to be very, very difficult. And it wouldn't surprise

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 4>me if we're talking about structure on employment which is

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 4>one two three million over the next three to five years,

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 4>which is very hard to deal with.

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, the very thing that you're

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about is the great productivity revolution that we've been

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>waiting for for so long that could transform the way

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>that the economy works in general.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 5>But that's okay, there's that thesis.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Now you look at somewhere, if you're looking at somewhere

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>in the Midlands where the only employer in the town

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 4>is the contact center, and they have more than one

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 4>generation in the contact center, and the people who run

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>the local shop run because people of the contact center

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 4>spend their money there. The notion that skills are fungible

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 4>and or mobile and the ability to learn new skills

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 4>is a single generational thing. I think it's just made

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 4>up where I come from. When they close the opencast

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 4>minds and the textile mills, those jobs, that was a

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 4>two generation issue. If you took massive action to try

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 4>and fix it it, otherwise you created significant social and dislocation.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 4>And I think my sense is that that's without massive action,

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 4>that's where we'll be. What kind of action you need

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 4>to have forced forestry skilling. You've got to have enormous

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 4>incentives to learn new skills, which have to be sponsored

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 4>at a state level, or you'll you'll end up with

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the case in Dundee. We know that post the timeclosure,

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 4>thirty years of a structural social whole because you haven't

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>forced the community to move into new skills.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what are these new skills?

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Because this is a question that I mean, we're talking

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>about questions right now, but you're all thinking when it

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to question time, you're going to ask what are

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>my children learned?

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 3>What skills are my children gap? What do they study.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 3>What's going to be left?

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, certainly, I mean from when I look at what

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 4>we're I mean, the health care is an enormous thing.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Data is an enormous thing. And data it's not going

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 4>to be simple data analysis because the machine will do

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 4>all that. This is data from a kind of a

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>neuroscience perspective, where you're learning how people's brains function, the

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 4>response to data so you can improve outcomes for them,

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 4>the ability to understand the structure of information. So data

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 4>health education they will be. And obviously today defense there

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 4>will be big things tomorrow, all these mechanical skills, coding, answering, phones,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 4>doing accounting. Most accounting work is collating information or gone,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 4>and god help us the self driving cars that shall

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 4>be emerging fairly soon.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that it sounds like all the lower end

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>jobs will be gone and only higher end jobs will remain.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Yep, So you have a situation where you have and

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 4>you have a real situation because that gives you social unrest.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, gives you again as if income disparities, wealth disparities

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and no end of problems, which might bring us back

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to universal basic income, so we can return to in

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a minute, except rhin. Now Dominic is desperate to say something.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I just wanted to ask a question. Is like,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 2>I can just see, you know a lot of people

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>just sinking into the welfare trap, the same welfare trap

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>that all the miners fell into in the in the eighties.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, is welfare the answer?

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, it can't be the answer because it's unproductive. I mean,

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 4>where I came from, you had more than one generation

0:09:55.480 --> 0:10:00.239
<v Speaker 4>on welfare, so that was that became normalized, and that

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 4>that creates all sorts of side effects that we'll read

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the stats about and drug abuse and various olids. So

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 4>you can't let that happen. You've got to You've got

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 4>to fire hose the skill set and force it out,

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 4>create incentives, push people to actually do things that choose

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 4>not to do because humans are pretty I am pretty lazy.

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 4>If you don't force it and force that people to

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 4>take those risks, you will end up with a welfare

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 4>trap which you can't get out of.

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Now you're talking about massive changes to the welfare system

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>and changing the incentives built.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Into the world.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 5>You actually have to do that is.

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 3>The kind of thing that won't happen for a long time.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 4>For those who don't take those actions and welfare you

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 4>have to frankly provide penalties if they don't take those actions.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, that's that's extraordinarily definitely cult a suppose

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 6>and then that is the whole point of it. Well,

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 6>and then what are the actually landin if the reate

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 6>at which EA is starting to suck the jobs out

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 6>of the market is that high? I mean, what was

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 6>the thing? Because I guess I always kind of go

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 6>back to the thing of but every time we say

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 6>technology is going to replace jobs and actually we do

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 6>end up being fine or having new ones. And you're right,

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 6>the local communities that are screwed over by these things

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 6>aren't fine, and we should find a solution to that.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 6>But in terms of things like mass unemployment that robots

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 6>were going to cause, like twenty years ago, that kind

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 6>of thing hasn't happened to you. I mean, do you

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 6>think that AI really is the game changer on that

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 6>front or well?

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 4>The answer of course is who knows. But I look

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 4>at what we're doing today, which is accelerating and it

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the power of this stuff is extraordinary. It's

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 4>just extraordinary, and it moves not just what it does,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 4>but the right it's learning is extraordinary. So we have

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 4>now you have a context where we'll receive ten thousand

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 4>bits of correspondence a day, and we have a bunch

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 4>of people whose job it is to ee all that,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:02.599
<v Speaker 4>put it in a file and send it to the

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 4>right person. The machine within sixty days had learned how

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 4>to do all that kind of ninety nine point four

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 4>percent accuracy and.

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.599
<v Speaker 5>Just did it. And you're thinking, again, Okay, that's a

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 5>bit uncomfortable, but.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>It also feels like in a world of falling fertility

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and falling population growth, etc. This seems like a wonderful

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>thing in that we have fewer workers. We're going to

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 1>have many fewer workers going forward, and at the moment

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we try and solve what turns out to be a

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>non existent problem with immigration, but possibly the.

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Problem doesn't exist.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't need a rising workforce, and so yours a

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the solution to all the problems that

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>are running through air.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, although you have an aging population as well and

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 4>a pay as you go social system, so you bankrupt

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 4>yourself in the meantime because you can't who's going to

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 4>pay my bills in my eighties?

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Because it's making it very difficult to make this conversation

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>go in an optimistic direction, really.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Doing the opportunity. But you have to skill up. This

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 5>is a thing. You can't sit back and when.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Wait, I'll say something, I sort of take up on

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 2>John's point that that I mean, I am absolutely captivated

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 2>by everything you say, but I sort of take up

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 2>on John's point that a lot of these things we

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 2>say it's going to happen, and then we find a

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>way of muddling through that said, I mean, having sat

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 2>in a self driving Tesla in Florida earlier in the

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 2>year and gone, this is a far better driver than

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I am. And you know I'm an okay driver, and

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>but but you know, I just think I just think

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>driver's cars are pretty much inevitable. And the main barrier

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 2>is regulatory and so you know that's the government's choice

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 2>when they want to allow it, and you know they

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>can stop it happening, but you know, it just means

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll lose because we'll be less productive. But in any case,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 2>so that's you know, a million jobs, is it We're

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 2>going to lose a driver.

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Or the tax hit drivers there are four hundred thousand,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 4>and then there are three hundred thousand HTV drivers another

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 4>six hundred thousand delivery drivers.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so according to Lama for so maybe so one

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 2>point three million driving jobs, it's going to go to

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>We're going to lose between half a million and a

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 2>million jobs, aren't we.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 6>That is a superb thing. I mean self driving cars

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 6>would be late.

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 4>But the question is is not whether it's a wonderful

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 4>thing for the consumer. It's a great experience, and the

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 4>question is between that point and the next opportunity for

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 4>that community, how do you get there? And how much

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 4>is there is a is it a shock versus a transition?

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>To ask you a question of you dominic that again,

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to I'm taking all your conscience in. I

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>know what you're thinking about, and you're thinking exactly what

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, which is that when the roads are full

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of self driving cars, surely nothing will ever move because

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>every teenager, I know, every teenager in Scotland will amuse

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves by running up and down the road so that

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>all the cars constantly stop.

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 3>So that's what self driving cars do.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Every time there's anything front of them, they immediately have

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to stop because they must preserve life.

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 3>And if I was a.

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen year old boy. I mean, I can already see myself. Yeah,

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>my life is spent.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 4>No, but because all trucks fill between nine pm and

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 4>three am, you won't see them anymore because they'll optimize

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 4>their their their No, they because they don't need to sleep.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 4>They just manage and they don't need to be far apart.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 4>You'll have convoys of aerodynamic vehicles three feet apart between

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 4>ten pm and three o'clock in the morning.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't really answer my question, but I'll agree to move on.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>You said Merin that it was a low end job

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 2>thing like as those of you that know me, I

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>do about seventy three different jobs, and one of them

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 2>that I've done ever since I left drama school when

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 2>i was you know, fifty five, So this is a

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 2>long time ago. Very good, Thank you.

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Dominics does health tips, by the way, in his certain newsletters.

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 2>But one of the ways i'n't my living is doing

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>voice shows. Now that has been kind of annihilated by AI,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and so that industry is thirty percent of what it was.

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I write my finite flying Frisbee substack, but I use

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 2>AI all the time to get air to proof edit it.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>For me. So what you used to do John at

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>a time you're out of a hand job, I get it.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>It writes really good titles. It writes much better titles

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>than I do I use. I get the picture at

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>the top of the article designed by AI. So I'm

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 2>reducing work for graphic designers. But then at the same

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 2>time I would never have used a graphic designer. So

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>it's created something that I make my unacceptable music videos,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and the guy who I make the unacceptable music videos,

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>we both use AI like absolutely mad. So at the

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 2>same time as losing me work, it's also made me

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>more productive. And if you go back to Choices Canterbury Tales,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>when however, any many people, each of varying walk to

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Canterbury in whenever it was thirteen and eighty something. Of

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>those twenty nine or thirty jobs, I think twenty six

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 2>of those jobs still exist today. Now, obviously the nature

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 2>of those jobs has changed, but the job still exists.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's been through industrial revolutions, digital revolutions. Goodness knows what.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>So I put it to you that while work will change,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>there will still be most jobs, just the nature of

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 2>those jobs will change.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very fair every time there is a

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>big revolution, we assume that everyone will end up unemployed

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and new jobs just sort of come out of the woodwork.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>There's always something And if you think about the jobs

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that many of our children do today, we can have

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>imagined them thirty years ago.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 3>So that's a fair point.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 5>I think that's valid.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 4>But this is all about the transition speed because the

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 4>humans in evate will always be kind of learning new tricks.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.479
<v Speaker 5>But it's how fast you can move which is the customer.

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Before we leave AI, because we do like to all

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>well investments, John, should we be investing in AI related shocks?

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 6>I mean, honestly, I think the problem the only problem

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 6>with AI is the is the valuations, isn't it. And

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean in the last couple of days even we've

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 6>had a bit of a drop and the big AI

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 6>stocks again now, I mean they've got the momentum behind them.

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 6>Everyone's spending an awful lot of money. My feeling is

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 6>that it's probably you know, a Capex bubble and it'll

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 6>pop and it's probably a wee bit late to start

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 6>buying in the video now. But at the same time,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 6>you know it's you can't it's probably what's having a

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 6>bit of exposure and your way.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>To what Richard has said, then every stock is in

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>AI stock.

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 6>Well except for the ones that go busts.

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>If every company is going to massively enhance its productivity, yeah,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna see profit imagines go up across the board.

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 3>And doesn't matter what you invest.

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 4>In, don't that's not yeah, and I certainly these are

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 4>mass the valuable companies, but it's the valuations now which

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 4>for some they're they're so enormous. I mean, I want

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 4>you look at Palanteer as an example. The valuations are

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 4>so high that you're using that as a bubble trigger,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 4>which says, Okay, I'll wait for that to come off

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 4>and I'll sell, but because you're expecting a shock.

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 6>The US is currently about seventy percent of the MASCI wordldendix,

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 6>which is why you know, personally speaking, I think that's

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 6>too much. And it's not always been like that. I mean,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 6>Japan at one point was something iculous but not quite

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 6>seventy bits high. And I think the MASCI seventy percent

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 6>of the US. And then the next one is Japan

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 6>we are about five, and the next one is the

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 6>UK We're about three and a half, So yeah, okay,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 6>well that's interesting.

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 4>And about of our customers, so we've got about half

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 4>a million and in terms of single stocks about twenty

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 4>percent are non UK, eight UK and twenty percent are international,

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 4>of which ninety percent is US.

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I say, we're gonna have to move on to

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>do another quote where we're already running out of quote time, John.

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean, this is sort of downstream you're talking about, Richard,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 6>but this is Adam Smith talking about the state of

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 6>the public finances. And this is back and obviously when

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:22.360
<v Speaker 6>malt Nations published seventeen seventy six in Great Britain, from

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 6>the time that we had first recourse to the ruin,

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 6>this expedient of perpetual funding, the reduction of the public

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 6>debt and time of peace has never borne any proportion

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 6>to its accumulation in time of war. So nothing's really nothing.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 3>To be changed, obviously.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 6>And I mean when you go back to the seventeen seventies,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 6>so Adam Smith was talking about a time but you know,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 6>there was a lot of war obviously, because you know

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 6>it was there's always a lot of war. When I

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 6>think about it, can hardly talk about you know, the

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 6>seventeen hundreds and not thinking well, the nineteen hundreds were

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 6>pretty bad as well. But so but over this period

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 6>of time, from about say the sixteen nineties onwards, we'd

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 6>gradually been working out different ways to fund the war

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 6>and raise new debt. So the Bank of England was

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 6>founded in sixteen ninety four, for example, which was all

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 6>about the kind of various wars that were going on

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 6>in Europe at the time. So it was like in

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 6>the Nine Years War, which was basically everyone against France,

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 6>and then there was a War of the Spanish Succession

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 6>which was basically everyone against France, and all of these

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 6>things kind of like led to various kind of the

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 6>evolution of various ways to kind of raise money for war.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 6>And as Adam Smith says, the problem is that after that,

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 6>because I mean it's the same problem we faced just now.

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 6>You build up the debt during the time of crisis,

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 6>and during the time of crisis like COVID, the reason

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 6>for building up the debt is because there's an emergency.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 6>The mergency is either war or nowadays it is a

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 6>thing like either two thousand and eight or COVID. But

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 6>the problem is that afterwards you don't I raised taxes

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 6>sufficiently because people objected paying taxes. I mean they objected

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 6>to paying taxes then too, and you so as a result,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 6>by the time the next crisis comes around, you've built up.

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 6>You're building debt on top of debt. So COVID hit

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 6>when we were just starting to get over the hump

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 6>of the amount of mine we'd spent in two thousand

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 6>and eight. And so the question now, obviously is what

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 6>does Rachel Reeves do at the next budget, because really

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 6>she's kind of boxed herself in because the thing that

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 6>she actually needs to do is increase the tax base

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 6>across the board. But the Labor government has specifically said

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 6>that that is not what it's going to do. It's

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 6>not going to raise taxes on working people, which means

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 6>people at the lower end of the income.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Scale, the lower and the median worker.

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 6>Watually the median worker. Yeah, Actually, that's an interesting because

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 6>the median worker actually pays less as a proportion of

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 6>their income than they did I think it's even fifty

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 6>years ago.

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>The medium work worker in the UK has been fooling

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>for thirty fourty years, and the percentage being compaired by

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the high end by the higher there has been rising

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and rising and rising, and we pay the medium worker

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in the UK pays significantly lower rate of income TAXT

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>than the medium worker across Europe.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 3>The funny dynamic.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to now making you, if you

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>want to write a lot of money in the UK,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>just lap beautiful points on income tax.

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 6>Income tax is what you would need to raise I

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 6>make from because their tax base is very narrow. And

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 6>again that sort of means that the lay, you're vulnerable

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 6>to people at the top going somewhere else, But you're

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 6>also whacking productivity because obviously the higher, the higher up

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 6>the income ladder you go, the more your marginal pound

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 6>is tax. Now a lot of people have today graduates

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 6>in the room who have managed to you know, get

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 6>any well paid jobs. Then you know there's a point

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 6>at which for every once you earn over one hundred

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 6>thousand pounds, every extra pound g am, you're getting to

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 6>keep less than thirty pence of it actually if you're

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 6>paying the kind of graduate debt back as well. So

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 6>that's very much a kind of barrier to aspiration basically.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 6>And then the top of that, because something I hadn't

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 6>really considered until actually read Adam Smith talking about the

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 6>tax side of things, just kind of very quickly, is

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 6>that we also have a very large number of people

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 6>on benefits who aren't paying any tax at all, and

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 6>you can sort of see that as actually, that's that's

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 6>the base of the untaxed pyramid. So you know, you

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 6>kind of need to somehow, you know, one way he

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 6>kind of reduced the amount of spending would be to

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 6>trim that bit. And at the you know, all the

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 6>things like the motibility payments and the personal independence payments

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 6>which are not necessarily actually going to the people who

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 6>need them, do need to be looked at. Now. Of course,

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 6>we don't have the time.

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite stidoetics during the during the arguments

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>paut Pep was that there was something in the newspaper

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about how if pips were if pips were bought down

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to the level that that the government wanted to in

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the last round, thirty percent of people and more than

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that the but let's sake, woman, say, fifty percent of

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>people woul suffer financially, which maybe go, we'll hang on

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the other fifty percent didn't need it in the first place, and.

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 3>So we have a lot of that going on.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But Let's assume let's play the tax game. Let's assume

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that spending will not be cut, because it's not going

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to be cut. We all know that, right, So new

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>taxes are required. Anyone got a really great idea for

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a new tax?

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Thank you?

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Come on, That's not how it works.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>That's not how it works.

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Anyone in a favorite of CDT on primary homes. I

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>am actually, yeah, idea you have to pay, won't any others?

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? And what.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, I don't think that's going to fly either,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's really all of this anything else for huh,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>tax them, tax them already down all the substas of

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>falling anyway, yeah, sub season of falling electric cars, aren't they?

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't think you have to be a very low

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 6>road tax, be right. They are looking at reforming it

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 6>because which there was a country recently that's just changed it.

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 6>I think maybe in Norway because and it's now because

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 6>they went from saying, oh, yeah, we're not getting tax

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 6>road tax on kind of electric cars as much so

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 6>that you can all buy electric cars and that's so

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 6>good for the environment, and now they're sort of like

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 6>making the argument because there's so many more electric cars.

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, I mean it's unfair when people who don't

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 6>use the car very often that they're not getting taxed.

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So but all these things imaginal, this is now a

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. There is no way, no way to

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>raise large amount of money with that income tax.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 6>You need to raise one of the big four, you know,

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 6>you raise vat income tax NI or corporation tax and

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 6>all those four corporation tax raises the least and the

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 6>kind of the best thing to do would be either

0:26:55.960 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 6>expand vat just blanket make vat twenty percent on everything.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 6>Then as opposed the older might dre exclusions. I mean,

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 6>think about them court team that's taking it complaining a bit,

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 6>but working it with a jaffa cakes or a cake

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 6>and a biscuit. I mean that kind of really, you know,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 6>these some of these cases been going for years and

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 6>you're the same thing with complaining. We don't have enough

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 6>court capacity. So no, there's a lot of speeds to

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 6>simplify it. It's justically it's when I was and loser.

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>The one thing we should probably worry about is pensions, right,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>That's where that's where the money is.

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of money there, right, Richard.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Thirteen trillion in property or trillion in pensions.

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>They want it, they want it, but probably it's hard

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to attacks everyone gets niggas in the West. You know

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that the houses, But pensions is easier because most people

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>don't understand their pensions, so they don't know how much

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>money is being taken.

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 3>So you can change the rules there very easily. You

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 3>nerverouspout that, Richard.

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 4>It's not hard to go for the biggest pool. Yeah,

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 4>pensions number one income tax. So if you don't go

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 4>up the King of Come tax, you can't really make

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 4>it work. And they've just made a promise they shouldn't

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 4>have made.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 2>One about of Smith's canons of taxation is that the

0:27:55.359 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>tax should be easy to levy. Yes, and well, which

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 2>so well, that's the that's the problem that ragel Reeves has.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 2>The other factor in all of this is that fifty

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>percent of government revenue comes from income tax and national

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 2>insurance roughly. But if we get Richard's mass unemployment scenario,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that a.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Lot of trouble.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but your AI should make the public sector so

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>much more productive.

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 4>That opportunities for wealth creation. And I'm only talking about

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 4>a couple of million unemployed people long.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Work, and their workforce is not as big as it was.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Third quote, So my quote which I use in in

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the book, in the new book, all money is a

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>matter of belief. And in the course of writing the book,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>when I had somebody come in and fact check the

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 2>book at one point, and we discovered that Adam Smith

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 2>did not, in fact say all money is a matter

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 2>of belief, but it sort of goes along with much

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of what he believed and much of what he's argued.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those attributed quotes. Now, the word belief

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 2>and the word credit, of course, have precisely the same roots.

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 5>And if you look.

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 2>At, you know, a pound note or a twenty pound note,

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 2>nobody uses hardly a something like ninety nine percent of

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 2>money is now digital and only one percent is cash.

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 2>But even that one percent that is cash, it says,

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>of twenty pounds. So even the cash notes that we

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 2>use are a promise, and as it turns out, they're

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 2>a promise of nothing, because once you would get your

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>pound of sterling silver, but now we don't even get that.

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 2>And the JP Morgan quote is credit is everything, and

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 2>everything is credit. Credit is an evidence of banking, but

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 2>it is not the money itself. Money is gold and

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 2>nothing thing else. And if we think about you know,

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>we've sort of gradually left gold since nineteen fourteen. We've

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 2>been leaving, leaving and leaving leaving gold, but gold and silver.

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 2>I have a gold I actually have a silver coin

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in my pocket. I was going to carry a gold coin,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 2>but because we live in a low trust society, I

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 2>felt it was stape.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 5>But here we haven't.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Here we have an old US dollar which was just

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 2>under an ounce of solid silver. And if I, you know,

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 2>pass that to one of you, which I'm not going

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to do, the.

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Value trust me if you trust me.

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Of course, but the value of that money has now

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 2>immediately transferred to Merin because tells the silver and now

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>John and so it's a bear asset. Whoever holds the

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 2>money itself has the has the value. And that is

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>what money used to be. It is nobody else's liability.

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 2>But now today we live in the world now meren's

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>very reluctant to hand it back.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 5>It's nice.

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I was going to prove to you that we're a

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>high trust society by passing it around the audience and

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>sing if it came back.

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately your listenership, meren is not representative. But in any case,

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 2>the the we live in this system where obviously central

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 2>banks now still hold gold, and we have the role

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 2>of bitcoin, which is a digital bearer asset. In other words,

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 2>whoever has the bitcoin has the value. But everything else

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 2>in the world is somebody else's liability. It is credit,

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 2>it is belief. And when you suddenly look at the

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 2>money and the way that the financial world is built,

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 2>we just realize just how flimsy the whole thing is.

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>And that is what I'd like to highlight in my

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 2>little discourse.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we all agree entirely with everything you have said. Right,

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So if we are going to hold gold, how should

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we hold it? And how much did we hold as

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the centers of let's say our total wealth.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have a thing in the Flying Frisbee where

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 2>we have a thing called the doultch Fadniente portfolio, which

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>stands for the sweetness of doing nothing. And it's a

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 2>portfolio that you would put your money in and you

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 2>don't need to look at it every day, you don't

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>need to think about it. You reallocate maybe once or

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>twice a year, and we start off with a fifteen

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 2>percent allocation to gold and five percent to bitcoin. But

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 2>obviously you know this is many years ago, and so

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 2>those positions have grown outs, and you would say, and

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a sensible portfolio manager would reallocate. But at the moment,

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I just think all roads lead to gold and bitcoin.

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>So we're not reallocating, and we're just oversized. We have

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 2>a large section to to equities, but of which the

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 2>largest is the US equities, and we have twenty percent

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>in wealth preservation in bonds as a starting point, but

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>that's probably now maybe five percent or something because they

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 2>will be so rubbish. So but yes, I thought this

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.239
<v Speaker 2>was an old Wall Street saying and I've used it

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 2>in my writing many many times, but it turns out

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 2>when you google it the person who said it is me. So,

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 2>but the saying is put five percent of your net

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 2>worth in gold and hope it doesn't go up. But

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I think in this times you want to be you

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 2>want to be overweight gold and overweight bitcoin.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And we do still hold more gold than bitcoin in

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>percentage terms.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't, but it's they.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Still hold you hold more bitcoin than gold. Yeah, in

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 3>percentage term.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>But the I find with bitcoin you tend to think

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>there's a sort of it's generational, and there are two

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 2>different things. One's a digital asset, one's an analog asset,

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 2>a physical asset, And you tend to five nineteen seventy

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 2>is about the dividing point, and anyone born after nineteen

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 2>seventy tends to be a bit more pro bitcoin. And

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the further you go, and every time anyone born before

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy tends to be less and more pro gold.

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's stick with from it. What about gold mining stocks?

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 2>I would recommend everyone to have zero percent of their

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 2>portfolio in gold mining stocks.

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 5>They've got much trouble than they're worth.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Why would why would you even hold gold as opposed

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 4>to a gold ETN? Why hold the underline?

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, because I mean, even though you can retrieve the

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 2>goal from the ETN, the point of holding gold is

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the bearer asset, and so as soon as you add

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 2>an ETN to it becomes somebody else's liability.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 5>So if you're a purist, I mean.

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Also isn't it it's the ultimate insurance and it's your

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>last resort asset. So if you are a gold believer,

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Dominic and then I'm a gold believer. To if you're

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a god believer, it makes surely logical sense to have

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at least a small part of your gold held physically.

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Not a new house, by the way, not in my house,

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not buried in my garden. And you don't know where

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>I lived or where Dominic lives, but it makes sense

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to hold some physical gold surely.

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, where it is? What about gold isn't the anti currency?

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 2>It is an anti currency to say, yeah.

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 6>I suppose the thing is the physical thing is about

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, if you have to get out of dodge quickly,

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 6>and that's the same bitcoin because the main although I've

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 6>always been not skeptical, just kind of agnostic, and bitcoin,

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 6>one of the things I can see it's useful for,

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 6>and actually better than gold for in some ways, is

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 6>if you are in an unstable regime like Venezuela, say,

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 6>and this happened, you can ship your mind. Well you

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 6>don't even need to ship, but you just need to

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 6>leave the country and then collect your bitcoin wherever you

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 6>end up. And if you've got gold coins, I mean,

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 6>my dad knew a guy who had to move out

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 6>of South Africa in a hurry, kind of like about

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 6>forty odd years ago, and he smuggled his wealth out

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 6>in gold coins, hitting down the back of the washing machine.

0:35:58.840 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that is.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 6>Washing machines was anyway.

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think the reason to old own gold

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 2>is apocalypse. I just think if we just look at

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 2>what we were talking about tax and you know how

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 2>the government going to pay for everything, you can be

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 2>sure that one of the reasons whey is going to

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 2>pay for its currency debasement, and and so that's why

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 2>you own gold and.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 5>The Trump the anti currency.

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, precisely, the US authorities have said we are going

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 2>to devalue the dollar. We need a cheaper dollar. The

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 2>dollar is not going to be the reserve currency of

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the world in the way that it was because that

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 2>we need to get our balance of payments, we need

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to reshore manufacturing, we go. The dollar is going to weaken,

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the pound is going to weaken. All roads lead to

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 2>golden bitcoin. You need to own them. And it's it's

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 2>not just an apocalypse thing. It's it's a it's a

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>just a everyday practical thing.

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, I tell you what we'll do.

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Well end very quickly with asking O three panelers what

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they would invest in. Now I didn't warm them know

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about this, don.

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 6>Okay, Well, as soon as I said, gorget, I can

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 6>take it up from dormantic. I think, yeah, UK stocks

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 6>because there among the cheapest ones in the developed market,

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 6>and I think that people the Americans organize on them.

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 6>That is we which at least is you know, slightly optimistic.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks John.

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 2>So, Dolly do you want? Do you want a general

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 2>thing or a racy stock on a racy stock tip? Okay,

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:23.919
<v Speaker 2>my racy stock tip for you is a company called

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 2>comstock Load, which, oh my god, that's just the reaction

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I want, which is doing two things. It has a

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be America's largest recycler of solar panels

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 2>there is, and it's it's building various plants in Nevada

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and in California. You can't put solar panels into landfill,

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 2>so they have to export them out of the state.

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 2>And it's building all these solar panel recycling sites on

0:37:56.840 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 2>the border with California next to the freeway, and and

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 2>extracting silver and aluminium. And it's a very cash generative business.

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 2>And it also has a business in sustainable aviation fuels

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>is one of its subsidiaries that is raising money for

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.959
<v Speaker 2>at a billion pounds while it currently a billion dollars

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 2>while it currently only has a market cap of a

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>one hundred million dollars.

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>That was racy and exciting, but it was not investment advice.

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>That was investment information.

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I saw you waggling your finger at me as I spoke,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 2>and I was whitsterering.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>On too because you're whispering, and I figured they can

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:36.399
<v Speaker 1>all go and look up the details later.

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 3>But thank you for thatstic.

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm going for armaments and defense tech.

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's coming, which is effectively a social good exactly, sustainabilityability,

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sustainability of life.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 3>We have to end it there.

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, we've gone on a bit long, but thank you

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for coming today. We really appreciate it, and

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you to my brilliant panels today.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you everyone, Thanks.

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>For listening to this week's Marrin Dog's Money. If you

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>like our show, rate review, and subscribe wherever you listen

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts. I keep sending questions or comments to Marrior

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Money at Bloomberg dot net. You can also follow me

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in John on Twitter or x I'm at Mariness w

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and Johnny's John Underscore Stepec.

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 3>This episode was.

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Hosted by me Marin zumset Web. It's produced by Summersadi

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Sound designed by Blake Maple's special thanks to my guests,

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Blair Barrows and all the rest of the team at

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Pamia House