1 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:13,400 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:14,760 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway and. 3 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:15,560 Speaker 2: I'm Joe Wisenthal. 4 00:00:16,079 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 1: Joe, do you remember the episode we did. I think 5 00:00:18,680 --> 00:00:21,080 Speaker 1: it was just a couple months ago with the core 6 00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:25,799 Speaker 1: BOO strategist Samuel Rhines about companies are telling us the 7 00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:27,360 Speaker 1: real reason they're raising prices. 8 00:00:27,440 --> 00:00:30,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, there was great episode that sort of helped me 9 00:00:30,280 --> 00:00:33,279 Speaker 3: like analyze like corporate earnings calls from then on and 10 00:00:33,320 --> 00:00:36,520 Speaker 3: really like think about particularly in the consumer space, where 11 00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:39,200 Speaker 3: he had this thesis that companies are like very explicitly 12 00:00:39,240 --> 00:00:43,200 Speaker 3: willing to sacrifice volume expansion in favor of higher prices 13 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 3: and higher margin. 14 00:00:44,159 --> 00:00:48,280 Speaker 1: Right, he called it price over volume. And since that episode, 15 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 1: so we actually wrote an article based on that episode 16 00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:53,960 Speaker 1: and we had a lot of quotes from Sam. We 17 00:00:54,120 --> 00:00:58,680 Speaker 1: also cited a research paper from an Odd Lot's favorite, 18 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:02,400 Speaker 1: Isabella Weber, and we talked about this phenomenon. We called 19 00:01:02,400 --> 00:01:06,200 Speaker 1: it excuse flation. So this idea that companies are using 20 00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:10,120 Speaker 1: all these one off emergencies as an excuse to raise prices. 21 00:01:10,520 --> 00:01:14,959 Speaker 1: But since then, this whole idea has exploded into the 22 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:19,679 Speaker 1: public consciousness in various ways under different umbrella terms. So 23 00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 1: Isabella used the term seller's inflation. I've seen like profit 24 00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:28,480 Speaker 1: led inflation, creedflation, although I think that's a bad term 25 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:31,440 Speaker 1: for it personally, but it's everywhere now, right. 26 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:34,160 Speaker 3: And it's funny because it's one of these things where 27 00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:38,200 Speaker 3: you know, economists are sort of like scandalized by sort 28 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:41,480 Speaker 3: of alternative ideas about inflation. And it's like they have 29 00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 3: certain things like some people say money, so they say 30 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:47,000 Speaker 3: like labor costs and wages, but like it feels like 31 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:49,840 Speaker 3: on Wall Street there's kind of less mystery. It's like, no, 32 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:52,120 Speaker 3: they're like, at least you know, according to people read 33 00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 3: the calls. It's like, no, they're telling us they're willing 34 00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 3: to push price, and I guess the question is like, 35 00:01:57,720 --> 00:01:59,800 Speaker 3: you know, well, there's lots of follow on questions, but 36 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:03,080 Speaker 3: I think there's some really interesting policy ramifications from some 37 00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:04,640 Speaker 3: of this identification. 38 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 1: Totally, And it is funny. It's not PEPSI isn't talking 39 00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:09,520 Speaker 1: about like, oh, the money supply is increasing, therefore we're 40 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 1: raising our prices. They're talking very explicitly about, well, we 41 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:16,240 Speaker 1: have these one off reasons maybe to raise our prices, 42 00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:17,840 Speaker 1: and so we're going to see how far we can 43 00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:21,600 Speaker 1: take it to the consumer so anyway, everyone is talking 44 00:02:21,600 --> 00:02:24,160 Speaker 1: about this, whether you call it gre inflation, excuse flation, 45 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:28,200 Speaker 1: profit led inflation, seller's inflation. We need to go back 46 00:02:28,240 --> 00:02:30,880 Speaker 1: to one of our favorite guests, Yes, who's done a 47 00:02:30,919 --> 00:02:34,240 Speaker 1: lot of academic work on this topic. We specifically cited 48 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 1: her work in the piece that we did. We're going 49 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:37,400 Speaker 1: to be speaking with Isabella Weber. 50 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:39,160 Speaker 2: I'm psyched on set all. 51 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:43,560 Speaker 1: Right, Isabella Weber, economics professor at University of Massachusetts Amherst. 52 00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:45,040 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for coming back. 53 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:47,079 Speaker 4: On Thanks so much for having me back. And it's 54 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:48,760 Speaker 4: a true passion to be in person. 55 00:02:48,919 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, this is this is a tree. 56 00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:52,359 Speaker 3: I didn't realize up until like five minutes ago that 57 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 3: you were gonna be outset. I think we're going to 58 00:02:53,639 --> 00:02:53,920 Speaker 3: look at the. 59 00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:58,040 Speaker 1: First time we're actually meeting in person. Have you been 60 00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:02,360 Speaker 1: surprised at all by how quickly this seems to have become. 61 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:05,079 Speaker 1: I hesitate to call it mainstream because people are still 62 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:07,000 Speaker 1: debating it, but it's in the Wall Street Journal, it's 63 00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:09,919 Speaker 1: in New York Times, certainly in Bloomberg coverage. 64 00:03:10,960 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 4: Yeah. 65 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:14,160 Speaker 5: I think it has been very surprising, especially since some 66 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:17,239 Speaker 5: of the key data on the profit margins actually already 67 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 5: came out in the fourth quarter of twenty twenty one. 68 00:03:19,760 --> 00:03:22,280 Speaker 5: So and you guys have actually been covering that at 69 00:03:22,280 --> 00:03:25,600 Speaker 5: the time. You were covering the profit margin explosion that 70 00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:28,840 Speaker 5: happened at the same time as inflation started to take off. 71 00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:32,360 Speaker 5: And in this by now probably infamous Guardian piece that 72 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 5: I wrote, I actually started by saying, there is so 73 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:40,760 Speaker 5: far pretty much undiscussed phenomenon, which is an explosion of 74 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:44,440 Speaker 5: profit margins that coincides with inflation, and we should take 75 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 5: a closer look at that. So I think in many ways, 76 00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 5: when our paper came out at the beginning of this year, 77 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 5: it has kind of been something that had been going 78 00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:55,240 Speaker 5: on for a long time, and companies have been saying 79 00:03:55,240 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 5: this on earnings calls for a long time. The groundwork 80 00:03:57,840 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 5: folks have been calling this out for a long time time, 81 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:01,680 Speaker 5: but now it really took off. 82 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:06,360 Speaker 3: So I guess one of my questions and have many, 83 00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:08,480 Speaker 3: is you know, there are different factors that people talk 84 00:04:08,520 --> 00:04:12,320 Speaker 3: about driving inflation, and obviously the tight labor market, fest 85 00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:15,600 Speaker 3: wage growth, high levels of consumer demand, a lot of 86 00:04:15,600 --> 00:04:18,680 Speaker 3: the supply chain bottlenecks that we've talked about over the 87 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:20,919 Speaker 3: years on the show, the supply side factors. 88 00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:22,560 Speaker 2: Why is it important. 89 00:04:22,920 --> 00:04:25,320 Speaker 3: That's sort of it to sort of like think about 90 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:28,200 Speaker 3: correct identification of different causes. 91 00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:32,840 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean when economists talk about causation, they have 92 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:35,200 Speaker 5: very high standards, right, So I'm not yet there to 93 00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 5: say like what I did. It's like a cause analysis. 94 00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:40,080 Speaker 5: Just to put this out there, it's kind of a disclaimer. 95 00:04:40,120 --> 00:04:41,520 Speaker 5: But I think this is kind of part of the 96 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:44,480 Speaker 5: challenge that we face because we are in a really 97 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:48,960 Speaker 5: unprecedented moment in the world, in the economy, in the 98 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:51,480 Speaker 5: global economy, right, and inflation is kind of part of 99 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:55,040 Speaker 5: that whole unprecedented moment. So you are getting these pieces 100 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 5: of data that are coming out and you kind of 101 00:04:56,920 --> 00:05:00,680 Speaker 5: have to reason on them. However incomplete the data might be. 102 00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:04,000 Speaker 5: And if you just look at it from the perspective 103 00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:07,200 Speaker 5: of your standard inflation paradigm, then you basically just look 104 00:05:07,240 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 5: at money supply, aggregate demand, and maybe wages, and you 105 00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:12,119 Speaker 5: don't look at all these other stuff that you guys 106 00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:15,160 Speaker 5: have been reporting about four months and months and months, right, 107 00:05:15,360 --> 00:05:17,719 Speaker 5: But if you sit in a corporate boardroom, then you 108 00:05:17,760 --> 00:05:20,360 Speaker 5: are actually looking at all this other stuff. So then 109 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:24,159 Speaker 5: from your perspective, prices present themselves as something very different. 110 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:27,080 Speaker 5: So what we are doing with this research, I think, 111 00:05:27,240 --> 00:05:30,040 Speaker 5: is to kind of say, let's take the information that 112 00:05:30,080 --> 00:05:34,200 Speaker 5: we have, however incomplete it still may be, and try 113 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:37,400 Speaker 5: to make sense why we are seeing what we are seeing. 114 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:40,200 Speaker 5: What we are seeing is that on earnings calls time 115 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:43,600 Speaker 5: and again, corporate leaders are saying that they can take 116 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:46,440 Speaker 5: pricing and that they can increase prices in ways that 117 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:48,920 Speaker 5: they might not even have expected, and that they can 118 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:52,240 Speaker 5: increase prices even when volumes are going down, which is 119 00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:55,840 Speaker 5: just against the logic of basic supply demand right where 120 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:58,840 Speaker 5: we would expect that demand going up the prices going up, 121 00:05:58,839 --> 00:06:02,200 Speaker 5: and not the other way around. Now you might say, well, 122 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:04,599 Speaker 5: it's about the bottleneck, and then demand is strong, so 123 00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:06,960 Speaker 5: therefore it's still a demand kind of story. But then 124 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:09,080 Speaker 5: I would say, well, if I look at their earnings 125 00:06:09,120 --> 00:06:13,080 Speaker 5: calls in the latest quorder right where clearly the bottlenecks 126 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:17,040 Speaker 5: for the most part have ceased and taking price when 127 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:19,599 Speaker 5: volumes are going down, then ka, this is also not 128 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:22,480 Speaker 5: a pure kind of bottleneck type of story. 129 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 1: Well, maybe just to step back for a second, talk 130 00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:28,160 Speaker 1: to us about what seller's inflation this is the term 131 00:06:28,200 --> 00:06:31,719 Speaker 1: that you use actually is, and how maybe it differs 132 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:36,559 Speaker 1: to traditional conceptions of greedflation, because this is one reason 133 00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 1: I remember when we were writing that piece shoe, this 134 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,320 Speaker 1: is one reason why I wanted to call it something 135 00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:44,360 Speaker 1: other than greed flation, because it's not like everyone woke 136 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:47,160 Speaker 1: up in March twenty twenty and suddenly decided to become 137 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:47,840 Speaker 1: more greed. 138 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:50,919 Speaker 2: Which is a common critique of like that, yeah, right. 139 00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:54,080 Speaker 5: Yeah, and quite frankly, I think that everybody agrees on that. Like, 140 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 5: no one is saying that there has been this sudden 141 00:06:56,800 --> 00:07:00,480 Speaker 5: grady impulse where firm leaders just became more greedy than 142 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:02,040 Speaker 5: they used to be, right, that is just not a 143 00:07:02,080 --> 00:07:02,640 Speaker 5: good theory. 144 00:07:02,839 --> 00:07:04,720 Speaker 4: So the question is, how. 145 00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:09,160 Speaker 5: Can it be that in incredibly concentrated industries we had 146 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 5: decades of surprising price stability, right, even like deflation in 147 00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:20,120 Speaker 5: some periods, and now in the same highly concentrated kind 148 00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:23,239 Speaker 5: of setup, we suddenly get this price of a volume 149 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:24,560 Speaker 5: type of pricing behavior. 150 00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 4: Right. 151 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:28,480 Speaker 5: And what we are arguing in our paper is that 152 00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 5: there's basically different components that coordinate price hikes in ways 153 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 5: in which they could not be coordinated without these emergencies happening. 154 00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:41,080 Speaker 4: So one prominent thing is a cost shock. 155 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:43,800 Speaker 5: I mean, we have had gigantic cost shocks coming out 156 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:47,000 Speaker 5: of energy, right, that kind of stand a signal to firms, Okay, 157 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:50,440 Speaker 5: now is the time to increase prices, which means that 158 00:07:50,480 --> 00:07:53,119 Speaker 5: they can be fairly sure that their competitors are also 159 00:07:53,160 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 5: increasing prices, because the way that they are pricing is 160 00:07:55,960 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 5: to protect their profit margins. So the first goal is 161 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 5: to make sure that they profit margins are not going 162 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 5: to collapse, which means that if costs go up, they 163 00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 5: are going to. 164 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:05,200 Speaker 4: Increase their prices. 165 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 5: Now, this is like kind of the most benign form 166 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 5: of coordination, but they can also be bottlenecks that can 167 00:08:11,320 --> 00:08:14,960 Speaker 5: then coordinate pricing behavior, and that can coordinate this pricing 168 00:08:15,000 --> 00:08:18,600 Speaker 5: behavior even when the actual bottleneck might already start to cease, 169 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:21,080 Speaker 5: because there's still this signal to the whole sector that 170 00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:25,560 Speaker 5: something different is going on. And then there is I guess, 171 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:28,720 Speaker 5: the component that the excuse flation label is getting at, 172 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:32,480 Speaker 5: or from the perspective of the consumers, it's also more 173 00:08:32,760 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 5: legitimate to see prices going up when there are clear 174 00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:38,080 Speaker 5: reasons why they're going up. But if you imagine you 175 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:41,600 Speaker 5: go to your favorite coffee shop every day, and then 176 00:08:41,800 --> 00:08:44,439 Speaker 5: from one day to the next, the coffee costs twice 177 00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:47,560 Speaker 5: as much. Then you would probably say like, oh, somehow 178 00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:49,400 Speaker 5: the guy who's running the coffee shop went nuts. 179 00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 4: Right. 180 00:08:49,960 --> 00:08:52,360 Speaker 5: If this guys has been telling you over and over 181 00:08:52,360 --> 00:08:54,679 Speaker 5: again that they are expecting a rent increase, and then 182 00:08:54,720 --> 00:08:56,720 Speaker 5: you come back and the price of coffee goes up, 183 00:08:56,760 --> 00:08:59,520 Speaker 5: you'll probably go like, oh, yeah, of course makes sense, right, 184 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:03,480 Speaker 5: something like this. But on a sectoral, global level, I 185 00:09:03,520 --> 00:09:06,079 Speaker 5: think has been going on, for example, in the food 186 00:09:06,120 --> 00:09:08,559 Speaker 5: sector where no one can judge. I mean, you had 187 00:09:08,559 --> 00:09:12,320 Speaker 5: this amazing episode on grain prices and prices of food 188 00:09:12,400 --> 00:09:15,120 Speaker 5: items that use grain, right, And I mean as a consumer, 189 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:17,640 Speaker 5: I don't know how much is the cost component of 190 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:20,040 Speaker 5: grain in my pasta, right or my bread? But if 191 00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:23,320 Speaker 5: I hear on the news in the radio on TV 192 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 5: that grain prices are exploding and I see pasta price 193 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:28,800 Speaker 5: going up, it kind of makes sense. So there is, 194 00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:33,760 Speaker 5: in other words, also a component of legitimacy in pricing behavior. 195 00:09:33,840 --> 00:09:33,920 Speaker 4: Right. 196 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:36,120 Speaker 5: It's something that in economic theory we have a very 197 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:39,440 Speaker 5: hard time capturing. It's not like people walk around with 198 00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:42,480 Speaker 5: a budget constraint and a given set of preferences on 199 00:09:42,520 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 5: their mind, and like robots, they react in the price 200 00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:47,320 Speaker 5: that they see, But they look at the context. Right, 201 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:50,080 Speaker 5: So if in normal times or if normal times, there 202 00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:53,439 Speaker 5: are basically two things that would constrain firms in their 203 00:09:53,480 --> 00:09:56,559 Speaker 5: pricing behavior. On the one hand, competition, that is, fear 204 00:09:57,000 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 5: of losing market shares to their competitors, right, which would 205 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:03,439 Speaker 5: happen they start hiking prices and kind of a unilateral action. 206 00:10:03,640 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 5: Then that fear is kind of gone once these price 207 00:10:06,360 --> 00:10:09,080 Speaker 5: hikes start to be more or less coordinated due to 208 00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:11,080 Speaker 5: these emergency situations. 209 00:10:11,320 --> 00:10:14,120 Speaker 4: And the second constraint would be fearing that customers are 210 00:10:14,160 --> 00:10:14,480 Speaker 4: just not. 211 00:10:14,440 --> 00:10:17,160 Speaker 5: Willing to pay these prices, right, like, whether they actually 212 00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:20,080 Speaker 5: can pay these prices or not, they might just be 213 00:10:20,200 --> 00:10:23,600 Speaker 5: deterred if prices suddenly go up for no obvious reason. Now, 214 00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 5: if there are obvious reasons, they seem to be more 215 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 5: willing to accept these price increases. So therefore, both of 216 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:34,079 Speaker 5: these constraints quite dramatically softened in this emergency situation that 217 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:35,000 Speaker 5: we have been living through. 218 00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:38,840 Speaker 3: So some economists might listen to the story and now 219 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 3: they're head say, yeah, this makes sense. But for whatever reason, 220 00:10:43,640 --> 00:10:46,240 Speaker 3: prices are going up and workers are going to demand 221 00:10:46,480 --> 00:10:49,280 Speaker 3: higher wages to compensate for the higher prices, And you 222 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:53,240 Speaker 3: get this self sustaining you know, increase more demand, and 223 00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:56,200 Speaker 3: they're like, okay, I can fit this into the typical 224 00:10:56,240 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 3: inflation expectation story, and therefore defense should be hiking rates regardless, 225 00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:06,800 Speaker 3: Like why could this fit into a typical inflation expectation story? 226 00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:08,200 Speaker 2: This is how it becomes entrenched. 227 00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:10,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe it's like a different thing than like nineteen 228 00:11:10,720 --> 00:11:12,880 Speaker 3: seventies inflation, but it's still the thing, and ultimately the 229 00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:14,200 Speaker 3: fittest to respond the same way. 230 00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:15,120 Speaker 4: Yeah. 231 00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:17,880 Speaker 5: I mean, first, on the wage part of that story, 232 00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 5: what we are seeing is basically, eventually labor is trying 233 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:26,040 Speaker 5: to fight back against collapsing real wages as workers are 234 00:11:26,040 --> 00:11:27,640 Speaker 5: basically losing purchasing power. 235 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:30,199 Speaker 4: Right. But this is a very different story. If you 236 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:31,839 Speaker 4: have an initial. 237 00:11:31,679 --> 00:11:34,079 Speaker 5: Cost shock that comes from the energy market, that comes 238 00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:36,960 Speaker 5: from commodity markets, comes from shipping and so on, basically 239 00:11:36,960 --> 00:11:40,400 Speaker 5: comes from upstream stuff, and then you have a propagation 240 00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:43,679 Speaker 5: amplification of that shock as firms react by. 241 00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:46,600 Speaker 4: Pricing over volume type of behavior, right, and. 242 00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:49,480 Speaker 5: Then eventually labor goes like wait a minute, like my 243 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:52,559 Speaker 5: purchasing power has collapsed and I'm trying to fight back 244 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:53,760 Speaker 5: to regain some. 245 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:55,040 Speaker 4: Of this lost territory. 246 00:11:55,400 --> 00:11:58,880 Speaker 5: Then this is a reaction to inflation rather than the 247 00:11:58,880 --> 00:12:02,360 Speaker 5: origin of inflation. This really matters for how we think 248 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:06,160 Speaker 5: about what to do against inflation. But secondly, also, I 249 00:12:06,160 --> 00:12:09,240 Speaker 5: mean when we talk about expectations and expectation anchoring and 250 00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:11,760 Speaker 5: so on, we somehow think that firms look at the 251 00:12:11,800 --> 00:12:14,520 Speaker 5: fat and they kind of like reread these signals from 252 00:12:14,520 --> 00:12:17,720 Speaker 5: the fat to anchor or de anchor the inflation expectations. 253 00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:19,800 Speaker 5: I'm not saying none of this is going on, but 254 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:22,240 Speaker 5: when I am reading the earnings calls, I don't see 255 00:12:22,240 --> 00:12:24,280 Speaker 5: them talk about the fat a lot. I see them 256 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:27,720 Speaker 5: talk about what their competitors are doing. I see them 257 00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:30,880 Speaker 5: talk about rational pricing environments. I see them say things 258 00:12:30,920 --> 00:12:34,080 Speaker 5: like this new force measure, like the winter storm, Alliot, 259 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:37,880 Speaker 5: this has made our pricing environment even more conducive. So 260 00:12:37,960 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 5: they are looking at their immediate environment. They are looking 261 00:12:41,240 --> 00:12:44,920 Speaker 5: at our customers accepting of these price increases, which is 262 00:12:44,920 --> 00:12:48,559 Speaker 5: a completely different set of expectations than what we think 263 00:12:48,600 --> 00:12:51,200 Speaker 5: of when we talk about expectations in this kind of 264 00:12:51,480 --> 00:12:53,760 Speaker 5: central bank center type of factory. 265 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:14,480 Speaker 1: So throughout economic history, I mean, the classic worry about 266 00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 1: inflation has always been this wage price spiral that you 267 00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:21,320 Speaker 1: kind of just outline. But if that's not what's happening here, 268 00:13:21,480 --> 00:13:24,520 Speaker 1: or if it's not the actual cause of higher prices, 269 00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:27,439 Speaker 1: if instead we have, like I guess, a profit price 270 00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:31,000 Speaker 1: spiral of some sort, what should we do, like what 271 00:13:31,200 --> 00:13:34,680 Speaker 1: actually arrests this behavior, Because again, if you listen to 272 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:38,080 Speaker 1: the company earnings calls, you can see the executives talking 273 00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:41,960 Speaker 1: about how surprised they've been, about how strong customer demand 274 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:45,560 Speaker 1: has been, how far they've been able to push up prices, 275 00:13:45,679 --> 00:13:48,920 Speaker 1: and also you see the share price reactions they're getting 276 00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:52,560 Speaker 1: rewarded for raising prices. So it seems like there's very 277 00:13:52,559 --> 00:13:56,200 Speaker 1: little incentive or a catalyst for this to actually stop. 278 00:13:56,480 --> 00:13:59,760 Speaker 5: Absolutely, And I would actually say that the investors expectations 279 00:13:59,760 --> 00:14:03,040 Speaker 5: and is another set of expectations that's probably more immediate 280 00:14:03,559 --> 00:14:06,640 Speaker 5: from the perspective of people taking pricing decisions. 281 00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:06,960 Speaker 4: Right. 282 00:14:07,080 --> 00:14:10,120 Speaker 5: When representatives of let's say Morgan Stanley, just to pick 283 00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:13,520 Speaker 5: a random example here are asking questions on earning scores 284 00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:17,200 Speaker 5: about pricing, they are also asking on behalf of a 285 00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:20,080 Speaker 5: player that is actually going to invest quite substantial amounts 286 00:14:20,120 --> 00:14:21,520 Speaker 5: of money, right, So there's that. 287 00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 4: Layer to the expectations story too. 288 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:27,760 Speaker 5: But to actually go to your question, I think, first 289 00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:31,640 Speaker 5: of all, we need to stop these impulses, right, I 290 00:14:31,640 --> 00:14:34,640 Speaker 5: mean these like gigantic cost shocks. 291 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:36,800 Speaker 4: That then coordinate these kind of price hikes. 292 00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:40,080 Speaker 5: If they can be arrested kind of in the onset, 293 00:14:40,520 --> 00:14:44,240 Speaker 5: that I think would have made a huge difference. I 294 00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:47,120 Speaker 5: think something like the strategic Pictronum Reserve, which of course 295 00:14:47,160 --> 00:14:50,880 Speaker 5: eventually was mobilized in twenty twenty two. If that had 296 00:14:50,920 --> 00:14:54,080 Speaker 5: been mobilized sooner, because there was a mindset on the 297 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:57,560 Speaker 5: part of policymakers to say oil prices going up as 298 00:14:57,560 --> 00:15:00,240 Speaker 5: they started going up in twenty twenty one is a 299 00:15:00,280 --> 00:15:04,000 Speaker 5: problem and has the potential to undermine price stability and 300 00:15:04,040 --> 00:15:07,400 Speaker 5: economic stability, then they might have acted sooner, and they 301 00:15:07,440 --> 00:15:10,880 Speaker 5: might have acted more decisively. Now it's of course not 302 00:15:11,040 --> 00:15:13,640 Speaker 5: only about oil. It's also about gas are the sources 303 00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 5: of energy. It's about other forms of raw materials, and 304 00:15:17,160 --> 00:15:20,840 Speaker 5: importantly about grain. I think for grain, actually we ideally 305 00:15:20,880 --> 00:15:24,520 Speaker 5: would need some sort of a coordinated international buffer stock, 306 00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 5: which is an idea that Keane's had for the Bretton 307 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 5: Woods Institutions, something that he wanted to see as one 308 00:15:30,240 --> 00:15:33,000 Speaker 5: of the breton Was institutions, but that did not materialize, 309 00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 5: and there have been proposers like this in the seventies, 310 00:15:35,680 --> 00:15:38,720 Speaker 5: when I mean, obviously they were also very major commodity 311 00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:40,640 Speaker 5: price cycles. 312 00:15:40,200 --> 00:15:41,200 Speaker 4: Going on at the time. 313 00:15:41,280 --> 00:15:44,320 Speaker 5: So I think these type of ideas are pretty important. 314 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 5: And they are important not only like looking back and saying, oh, yeah, 315 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:50,040 Speaker 5: the last three years, somehow we'ren't great, but now we 316 00:15:50,080 --> 00:15:51,040 Speaker 5: are back to normal life. 317 00:15:51,040 --> 00:15:52,040 Speaker 4: So this is a nicet for. 318 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:54,600 Speaker 5: Editor of Anicdotter or something like this, but they're important 319 00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:57,320 Speaker 5: because we are living in an age of overlapping emergency 320 00:15:57,800 --> 00:16:01,160 Speaker 5: and as far as I understand, people in the grain 321 00:16:01,240 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 5: market are saying things like we are basically one major 322 00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:07,960 Speaker 5: weather event away from another price bike in grain, right, 323 00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:11,480 Speaker 5: and if there are bad harvests that are related to 324 00:16:11,640 --> 00:16:14,640 Speaker 5: climate change happening much faster than many of us might 325 00:16:14,680 --> 00:16:18,320 Speaker 5: have thought, tipping points being reached much sooner than climate 326 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:21,760 Speaker 5: scientists to stay projected not that long ago, or then 327 00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:24,880 Speaker 5: I think this is something that is quite likely to happen. 328 00:16:25,000 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 5: So what I'm thinking about here is really a form 329 00:16:27,200 --> 00:16:31,880 Speaker 5: of economic disaster preparedness, so that we have shock absorbers 330 00:16:32,040 --> 00:16:35,520 Speaker 5: where shocks to these systemically important things like grain, like 331 00:16:35,640 --> 00:16:38,880 Speaker 5: energy can be absorbed locally so that we don't even 332 00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:42,480 Speaker 5: get this gigantic impulse in the first place. Now for 333 00:16:42,600 --> 00:16:47,560 Speaker 5: this propagation and amplification that comes as firms react to 334 00:16:47,640 --> 00:16:50,320 Speaker 5: these shocks, I think what we basically need is some 335 00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:54,160 Speaker 5: sort of a binfall profits tax that would kick in 336 00:16:54,240 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 5: whenever there is a major emergency, because we have now 337 00:16:57,120 --> 00:17:01,360 Speaker 5: learned that in these emergencies, these pretexts that happen can 338 00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:05,040 Speaker 5: present situations where prices can go up very quickly. And 339 00:17:05,160 --> 00:17:08,080 Speaker 5: I think that if corporate leaders had to learn this 340 00:17:08,080 --> 00:17:11,240 Speaker 5: this time, then next time around they have a playbook 341 00:17:11,240 --> 00:17:14,840 Speaker 5: in hand, right, they know how price over volume works, 342 00:17:15,240 --> 00:17:18,080 Speaker 5: they know what to look for, they know what they 343 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:21,040 Speaker 5: did last time. And if this is a coordination issue 344 00:17:21,080 --> 00:17:23,639 Speaker 5: in the sense that it depends on what your competitors 345 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:25,840 Speaker 5: are doing, and last time it worked out really well 346 00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:29,000 Speaker 5: because everybody kind of implicitly agreed to be doing exactly that, 347 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:31,920 Speaker 5: then next time around they just have to look back 348 00:17:31,920 --> 00:17:33,040 Speaker 5: at what they did last time. 349 00:17:34,119 --> 00:17:38,600 Speaker 2: Winfall profits tax. How does that fight inflation? 350 00:17:38,760 --> 00:17:40,199 Speaker 3: Because some people would hear that it's like, oh, you're 351 00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:42,600 Speaker 3: going to add taxes, You're going to add cost Maybe 352 00:17:42,640 --> 00:17:45,879 Speaker 3: there's some like redistribution element or punishing the ranch or 353 00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:46,719 Speaker 3: punishing the success. 354 00:17:46,760 --> 00:17:47,080 Speaker 4: What does the. 355 00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:49,920 Speaker 2: Mechanism via which this is an inflation fighting tool. 356 00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:55,000 Speaker 5: Well, it's a mechanism that basically takes away the incentive 357 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:58,680 Speaker 5: to do a price over volume strategy, right because price 358 00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:02,080 Speaker 5: over volume makes if you can't increase prices so much, 359 00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:04,800 Speaker 5: then even when you are selling less, you still end 360 00:18:04,880 --> 00:18:08,320 Speaker 5: up making more money because you have hike prices so much. 361 00:18:08,400 --> 00:18:10,800 Speaker 5: Right now, of course, there can be situations where price 362 00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 5: over volume happens to just protect profit margins, so a 363 00:18:13,960 --> 00:18:17,119 Speaker 5: winfo profit sex would not have with that, But we 364 00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:20,280 Speaker 5: have seen situations where firms actually have managed to quite 365 00:18:20,359 --> 00:18:24,119 Speaker 5: dramatically increase their margins with this kind of pricing behavior. 366 00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:26,760 Speaker 5: So it would kind of cut off the edge of 367 00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:29,679 Speaker 5: that process, right, would cut off what we are calling 368 00:18:30,080 --> 00:18:33,480 Speaker 5: in our paper amplification. So you have this initial shock, 369 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:36,000 Speaker 5: and then this shock is actually not just propagated through 370 00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:39,600 Speaker 5: your system, but it's amplified as as it coordinates these 371 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:42,800 Speaker 5: additional profit increasing price hikes. 372 00:18:43,600 --> 00:18:47,680 Speaker 1: So what do traditional ways of fighting inflation? How do 373 00:18:47,800 --> 00:18:51,520 Speaker 1: they actually play out in a seller's inflation world? So, 374 00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:55,280 Speaker 1: for instance, the FED hikes interest rates in theory, that's 375 00:18:55,280 --> 00:18:59,400 Speaker 1: supposed to curb demand and therefore prices start going down. 376 00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:02,000 Speaker 1: But what's instinct on how that actually plays out in 377 00:19:02,040 --> 00:19:06,040 Speaker 1: a world where companies are the driving force behind prices. 378 00:19:07,160 --> 00:19:10,080 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, at best in a very roundabout way. 379 00:19:10,119 --> 00:19:13,480 Speaker 5: I mean, in any cases, it's always a very roundabout instrument. Right, 380 00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:15,119 Speaker 5: we have to keep in mind that this is a 381 00:19:15,240 --> 00:19:19,280 Speaker 5: very very indirect tool of fighting inflation, which, by the way, 382 00:19:19,840 --> 00:19:21,720 Speaker 5: if we are in a situation where we are already 383 00:19:21,720 --> 00:19:23,560 Speaker 5: at the edge of a recession, where we are already 384 00:19:23,600 --> 00:19:25,480 Speaker 5: at the edge of a banking crisis, where we have 385 00:19:25,560 --> 00:19:27,479 Speaker 5: had a pandemic, and we have a war, and now 386 00:19:27,560 --> 00:19:31,560 Speaker 5: let's say we have another major climate shock, and let's 387 00:19:31,600 --> 00:19:33,680 Speaker 5: say we have already hiked interest rates to a point 388 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:37,880 Speaker 5: where even hawkish people feel like, okay, really shouldn't go higher. 389 00:19:37,960 --> 00:19:39,680 Speaker 5: I mean, what are you going to do, right if 390 00:19:39,720 --> 00:19:42,160 Speaker 5: you have another shock that unleashes this kind of process. 391 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:44,200 Speaker 4: So, first of all, I would say. 392 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:49,119 Speaker 5: It's too blunt of a tool to deal with frequent, 393 00:19:49,600 --> 00:19:53,560 Speaker 5: extremely sectorial shocks, as I think they have become more likely. 394 00:19:53,640 --> 00:19:56,399 Speaker 5: Of course, no one hopes that they will happen. I 395 00:19:56,440 --> 00:19:58,159 Speaker 5: don't hope they are happening, but I think they have 396 00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:00,720 Speaker 5: become more likely, So I don't think we are prepared 397 00:20:01,200 --> 00:20:05,240 Speaker 5: to actually achieve price stability with the tools that we 398 00:20:05,359 --> 00:20:08,080 Speaker 5: have in terms of just relying on the center bank. 399 00:20:08,760 --> 00:20:11,800 Speaker 5: I also think that if it is the case that 400 00:20:12,080 --> 00:20:14,440 Speaker 5: there is such a big energy shock, which then center 401 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:17,320 Speaker 5: banks would say, oh, we are actually looking through this, right, 402 00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:19,359 Speaker 5: then your mindset is like, oh, yeah, this is something 403 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:21,240 Speaker 5: that is not part of the core inflation. I'm just 404 00:20:21,280 --> 00:20:24,120 Speaker 5: looking through this like la la la, that's not happening, right. 405 00:20:24,560 --> 00:20:26,240 Speaker 5: I think this is not the right mindset that we 406 00:20:26,320 --> 00:20:30,000 Speaker 5: need because this is like a very very dangerous impult. 407 00:20:30,080 --> 00:20:32,400 Speaker 5: So it's kind of leading us in the wrong direction. 408 00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:35,800 Speaker 5: But also, at the end of the day, what happens 409 00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:38,800 Speaker 5: with interest rate hikes is that it's designed to cool 410 00:20:38,840 --> 00:20:41,440 Speaker 5: down the labor market. Right now, if it is a 411 00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:45,440 Speaker 5: case that inflation erases purchasing power and rage increases, we're 412 00:20:45,480 --> 00:20:48,240 Speaker 5: not the origin of this inflation. This means that the 413 00:20:48,280 --> 00:20:51,520 Speaker 5: majority of page dependent people are actually being hurt by inflation, 414 00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:53,960 Speaker 5: and then then I kind of punished a second time 415 00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:56,399 Speaker 5: by cooling down the labor market. 416 00:20:56,480 --> 00:20:56,720 Speaker 4: Right. 417 00:20:56,880 --> 00:20:59,520 Speaker 5: So, I think, even from a kind of justice perspective, 418 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,560 Speaker 5: that is mutually problematic, but it's also not very effective 419 00:21:02,560 --> 00:21:04,600 Speaker 5: because it's kind of getting it the wrong thing. 420 00:21:04,960 --> 00:21:08,399 Speaker 3: So I take your point about things like the strategic 421 00:21:08,440 --> 00:21:11,359 Speaker 3: petroleum Reserve and how the logic of these sort of 422 00:21:11,600 --> 00:21:14,960 Speaker 3: buffer stocks, particularly of commodities could be used in like 423 00:21:15,080 --> 00:21:19,879 Speaker 3: future shocks as buffers in both directions. But how do 424 00:21:19,960 --> 00:21:23,439 Speaker 3: you think about this idea with respect to services, because 425 00:21:23,480 --> 00:21:25,280 Speaker 3: it's hard to believe. Okay, maybe we keep a lot 426 00:21:25,280 --> 00:21:27,280 Speaker 3: of oil that we don't use in tankers. Hard to 427 00:21:27,280 --> 00:21:29,320 Speaker 3: believe we would say, like, you know, we're not going 428 00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:32,359 Speaker 3: to underbook, you know, have all flights be eighty percent 429 00:21:32,359 --> 00:21:34,840 Speaker 3: booked or all hotels be eighty percent book they're all 430 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 3: veterinarians like carve twenty percent of their time and services 431 00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:41,080 Speaker 3: in terms of right now, even like you know, in 432 00:21:41,320 --> 00:21:44,879 Speaker 3: spring twenty twenty three, like services inflation is particularly what 433 00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,360 Speaker 3: the FED is like focused on. So how do you 434 00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:49,919 Speaker 3: like think about some of these things outside of the 435 00:21:50,080 --> 00:21:52,600 Speaker 3: sort of pure goods commodity realm, like applying some of 436 00:21:52,600 --> 00:21:53,800 Speaker 3: the same insight and logic. 437 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:57,080 Speaker 5: Yeah, so I think if we look at services, shipping 438 00:21:57,119 --> 00:22:00,600 Speaker 5: has probably been the most important service that had a 439 00:22:00,760 --> 00:22:03,240 Speaker 5: very large price explosion that I would see as part 440 00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:05,640 Speaker 5: of the impulse stage. And I think what we saw 441 00:22:05,760 --> 00:22:08,400 Speaker 5: there is that basically you had I mean a literal 442 00:22:08,440 --> 00:22:10,880 Speaker 5: butter deck, right, Like if you think back to how 443 00:22:10,920 --> 00:22:13,919 Speaker 5: the Port of la looked, I mean, this is the 444 00:22:14,040 --> 00:22:18,120 Speaker 5: image of a bottle deck, right, And shipping companies could 445 00:22:18,160 --> 00:22:22,920 Speaker 5: increase their freight rates several times over, so prices went up, 446 00:22:23,000 --> 00:22:27,200 Speaker 5: and they had actually the largest profits in years and years, right, 447 00:22:27,400 --> 00:22:30,800 Speaker 5: So they were in a situation where as I mean, 448 00:22:30,800 --> 00:22:32,440 Speaker 5: if I was a leader of one of these large 449 00:22:32,440 --> 00:22:34,600 Speaker 5: shipping companies, I was in no rush to get out 450 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:37,200 Speaker 5: of this buttle deck because it's the best of times 451 00:22:37,240 --> 00:22:37,480 Speaker 5: for me. 452 00:22:37,600 --> 00:22:37,840 Speaker 4: Right. 453 00:22:38,320 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 5: So for example, for shipping, I think a we need 454 00:22:41,760 --> 00:22:44,520 Speaker 5: protocols like I mean, how do you unblock a port 455 00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 5: and be some sort of a price couching legislation of 456 00:22:47,840 --> 00:22:50,399 Speaker 5: the type that the New York State Attorney General is 457 00:22:50,400 --> 00:22:54,320 Speaker 5: currently introducing. Also for essential stuff that is further up 458 00:22:54,320 --> 00:22:58,000 Speaker 5: the value chain rather than just the essential consumer facing stuff, 459 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:00,639 Speaker 5: I think could be really helpful. Because this is not 460 00:23:00,680 --> 00:23:02,640 Speaker 5: to say that prices cannot go up at all if 461 00:23:02,680 --> 00:23:05,080 Speaker 5: this kind of emergency happens, and shipping companies have higher 462 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:08,840 Speaker 5: costs because things get complicated, But it's to say that 463 00:23:08,920 --> 00:23:12,879 Speaker 5: they don't get these perverted incentives of having freight rates 464 00:23:12,880 --> 00:23:16,160 Speaker 5: that increase multiple times over which I think would actually 465 00:23:16,160 --> 00:23:18,679 Speaker 5: also give them more incentive to get out of the 466 00:23:18,680 --> 00:23:22,960 Speaker 5: blockage as opposed to basically profit from the situation. So 467 00:23:23,040 --> 00:23:25,359 Speaker 5: this is an example of a very specific service industry, 468 00:23:25,400 --> 00:23:28,040 Speaker 5: but I think one that matters quite largely. 469 00:23:28,720 --> 00:23:30,320 Speaker 1: So just on this point, can you talk to us 470 00:23:30,359 --> 00:23:35,280 Speaker 1: a little bit about investment, because the classic argument against 471 00:23:35,440 --> 00:23:39,360 Speaker 1: some sort of windfall tax or price control would be, well, 472 00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:42,000 Speaker 1: you don't want to artificially bring down the prices. You 473 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:44,680 Speaker 1: want people to make a ton of money, and that 474 00:23:44,720 --> 00:23:48,120 Speaker 1: way they'll invest more in their business and build out capacity, 475 00:23:48,240 --> 00:23:50,639 Speaker 1: and eventually the additional production is going to be the 476 00:23:50,680 --> 00:23:53,840 Speaker 1: thing that maybe starts to resolve the bottleneck and bring 477 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:57,040 Speaker 1: down prices. How does that work? And is that a 478 00:23:57,119 --> 00:24:00,440 Speaker 1: viable critique of some of the measures that you're talking about. 479 00:24:01,359 --> 00:24:03,800 Speaker 5: Well, I mean, first of all, I would say that 480 00:24:04,040 --> 00:24:07,840 Speaker 5: hiking interest rates is a recipe designed to bring down investment. Right, 481 00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:10,240 Speaker 5: So if we are talking about different ways of fighting inflation, 482 00:24:10,400 --> 00:24:12,960 Speaker 5: that I am more worried about the interest rate hiking 483 00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:16,040 Speaker 5: policy than I am about an emergency price couching law 484 00:24:16,160 --> 00:24:18,560 Speaker 5: or a a national emergency win. 485 00:24:18,520 --> 00:24:19,800 Speaker 4: For a profit tax or something like that. 486 00:24:20,119 --> 00:24:21,680 Speaker 5: But also we have to see that if we are 487 00:24:21,720 --> 00:24:24,640 Speaker 5: talking about price over volume, then were in a situation 488 00:24:24,680 --> 00:24:27,679 Speaker 5: where with lower volumes firms can make more money, right, 489 00:24:27,720 --> 00:24:31,359 Speaker 5: which means that they are basically contracting their capacity. And 490 00:24:31,400 --> 00:24:34,240 Speaker 5: I think that if we look at the oil sector, 491 00:24:34,320 --> 00:24:37,159 Speaker 5: which on my mind has been a very important element 492 00:24:37,160 --> 00:24:41,119 Speaker 5: in this inflation story, that it's quite clear that they 493 00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:44,000 Speaker 5: are saying very explicitly on the earning scolles that they 494 00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:47,399 Speaker 5: are taking a discipline approach to investment because they are 495 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:51,320 Speaker 5: reaping record profits as they have reduced capacity. 496 00:24:51,440 --> 00:24:54,800 Speaker 1: Everyone remembers twenty thirteen and the big expansion, and they 497 00:24:54,800 --> 00:24:56,200 Speaker 1: don't want to repeat. 498 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:57,400 Speaker 4: That exactly exactly. 499 00:24:57,440 --> 00:24:59,959 Speaker 5: So it's not necessarily the case that if you can 500 00:25:00,080 --> 00:25:01,960 Speaker 5: and I mean if you have learned that you can 501 00:25:02,080 --> 00:25:06,120 Speaker 5: actually re record profits when your supply is constrained, that 502 00:25:06,280 --> 00:25:09,000 Speaker 5: this then encouragters you to have a lot of redundant 503 00:25:09,119 --> 00:25:12,600 Speaker 5: extra capacity or to hugely expand your capacity and therefore 504 00:25:13,040 --> 00:25:16,199 Speaker 5: go for big investments. Where there are areas where we 505 00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:20,560 Speaker 5: are particularly worried about curtailing investments. With these kind of 506 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:24,359 Speaker 5: policy measures, I think you could have a policy that 507 00:25:24,440 --> 00:25:28,880 Speaker 5: basically stipulates that if you're investing in, like let's say, 508 00:25:29,040 --> 00:25:32,120 Speaker 5: green technologies, Like let's say you are using the crisis 509 00:25:32,119 --> 00:25:36,040 Speaker 5: a moment to upgrade your technology to become a low 510 00:25:36,119 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 5: carb and manufacturer or something this, that you could have 511 00:25:39,080 --> 00:25:42,000 Speaker 5: a tax right off for these kind of investments that 512 00:25:42,040 --> 00:25:44,280 Speaker 5: we really want, that we want for a green transition, 513 00:25:44,760 --> 00:25:46,840 Speaker 5: which that would not count towards the ways in which 514 00:25:46,880 --> 00:25:50,199 Speaker 5: your mindful profits tax is calculated, so that in this 515 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:53,200 Speaker 5: kind of situation, these firms might still have an incentive 516 00:25:53,200 --> 00:25:54,680 Speaker 5: to do a price or a volume, but at least 517 00:25:54,720 --> 00:25:57,439 Speaker 5: they would use the money that they get to invest 518 00:25:57,480 --> 00:25:59,359 Speaker 5: in the stuff that we really need to make our 519 00:25:59,400 --> 00:26:03,720 Speaker 5: economy more resilient rather than to Buybeck shares or do 520 00:26:03,880 --> 00:26:04,480 Speaker 5: these kind of things. 521 00:26:04,520 --> 00:26:07,320 Speaker 3: You know, it's interesting in going back to this point 522 00:26:07,400 --> 00:26:09,760 Speaker 3: that part of the impulse or part of the expectation 523 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:13,359 Speaker 3: comes from investors themselves, and these sort of expectations you're. 524 00:26:13,200 --> 00:26:15,080 Speaker 2: Going to push price too. You're going to push price too. 525 00:26:15,760 --> 00:26:19,760 Speaker 3: Do you think there's any element here where corporations themselves 526 00:26:19,760 --> 00:26:21,520 Speaker 3: would like to get out of this game that you 527 00:26:22,400 --> 00:26:25,479 Speaker 3: that a sort of like third party administrator of supply 528 00:26:25,720 --> 00:26:28,920 Speaker 3: of price of investment comes in and actually like solves 529 00:26:28,920 --> 00:26:31,600 Speaker 3: the problem for corporation so that they get off this treadmill. 530 00:26:31,600 --> 00:26:34,359 Speaker 3: Because one thing that I think about sometimes is any 531 00:26:34,359 --> 00:26:38,640 Speaker 3: individual company may benefit from higher prices and higher margins, 532 00:26:38,920 --> 00:26:41,760 Speaker 3: but on the whole, a series of like fed rate 533 00:26:41,840 --> 00:26:44,720 Speaker 3: hikes to high inflation is not great for stocks, which 534 00:26:44,760 --> 00:26:45,280 Speaker 3: is how most. 535 00:26:45,119 --> 00:26:47,320 Speaker 2: Of these you know, a lot of executives get paid. 536 00:26:47,960 --> 00:26:50,160 Speaker 5: Yeah, absolutely, I think there is like, on the one hand, 537 00:26:50,200 --> 00:26:52,520 Speaker 5: a lot of coordination, right, But these price hikes, on 538 00:26:52,520 --> 00:26:54,760 Speaker 5: the other hand, there's a lot of coordination fail if 539 00:26:54,760 --> 00:26:58,160 Speaker 5: you want so, because there are outcomes of this process 540 00:26:58,160 --> 00:27:01,639 Speaker 5: that in sometimes not sustainable, right. And actually, if we 541 00:27:01,720 --> 00:27:04,320 Speaker 5: look at what happened after World War One, when you 542 00:27:04,440 --> 00:27:07,160 Speaker 5: had like kind of price hikes coming out of a 543 00:27:07,200 --> 00:27:10,840 Speaker 5: bottleneck kind of transition from ward to post war economy, 544 00:27:11,160 --> 00:27:14,760 Speaker 5: you had a very short lived boom that was very inflationary, 545 00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:18,199 Speaker 5: and then a sharp turn into a deflationary recession. I 546 00:27:18,200 --> 00:27:20,439 Speaker 5: don't think that such a sharp turn is in the 547 00:27:20,520 --> 00:27:24,280 Speaker 5: cards because now we have these very concentrated sectors for 548 00:27:24,440 --> 00:27:27,800 Speaker 5: most of the economy, which means that in these sectors 549 00:27:28,080 --> 00:27:31,919 Speaker 5: firms are pricemakers, and they tend to not lower prices 550 00:27:31,960 --> 00:27:34,000 Speaker 5: in these kind of sudden ways in which we would 551 00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:36,679 Speaker 5: see it in commodity markets or price taking markets. So 552 00:27:36,680 --> 00:27:38,560 Speaker 5: I'm not so worried about this sudden turn as I 553 00:27:38,560 --> 00:27:42,080 Speaker 5: would have been in a different setup. But nevertheless, yes, 554 00:27:42,119 --> 00:27:45,480 Speaker 5: it does trigger. It does trigger rate hikes. It does 555 00:27:45,720 --> 00:27:48,480 Speaker 5: create a situation where I think a lot of corporate 556 00:27:48,520 --> 00:27:50,840 Speaker 5: leaders are also nerve. It's like, how hard can we 557 00:27:50,920 --> 00:27:51,280 Speaker 5: take this? 558 00:27:51,520 --> 00:27:51,720 Speaker 4: Right? 559 00:27:51,760 --> 00:27:54,119 Speaker 5: It's like it's a bit like you're in this gambling 560 00:27:54,200 --> 00:27:57,440 Speaker 5: game where you keep winning, but you kind of don't trust. 561 00:27:57,320 --> 00:28:00,760 Speaker 1: And everyone seems surprised that it's actually paid off much 562 00:28:00,960 --> 00:28:01,680 Speaker 1: for so long. 563 00:28:01,840 --> 00:28:04,560 Speaker 4: Right, Yeah, everybody seems to be really surprised that that. 564 00:28:04,680 --> 00:28:07,679 Speaker 5: I mean that, yeah, so the degree of coordination on 565 00:28:07,720 --> 00:28:09,800 Speaker 5: that front has been totally surprising. But then you can 566 00:28:09,840 --> 00:28:11,800 Speaker 5: also not chicken out, right. I mean we saw in 567 00:28:11,920 --> 00:28:15,720 Speaker 5: Walmart and for very short blips of time was making 568 00:28:15,720 --> 00:28:18,280 Speaker 5: announcement that they are Discounter and that they are not 569 00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:20,640 Speaker 5: going to play this price hiking game, and then they 570 00:28:20,960 --> 00:28:23,480 Speaker 5: had this share sell off, right, So I mean there's 571 00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:25,960 Speaker 5: also like kind of a discipline from financial markets to 572 00:28:26,040 --> 00:28:27,920 Speaker 5: keep doing this, But at the same time it's kind 573 00:28:27,920 --> 00:28:31,200 Speaker 5: of clear that maybe it cannot keep going. But also 574 00:28:31,200 --> 00:28:33,679 Speaker 5: we have to see that if we look at the 575 00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:38,560 Speaker 5: data of changes in profit margins, it's very roughly speaking, 576 00:28:38,600 --> 00:28:43,040 Speaker 5: about two thirds of sectors that benefited and one third 577 00:28:43,160 --> 00:28:45,160 Speaker 5: or so that did not benefit. I don't have a 578 00:28:45,240 --> 00:28:48,440 Speaker 5: very clear picture yet like how this distribution works, but 579 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:51,160 Speaker 5: in any case, we know that there are that there 580 00:28:51,160 --> 00:28:54,880 Speaker 5: are also sectors, and that they are firms that are suffering. 581 00:28:54,400 --> 00:28:55,800 Speaker 4: Pretty badly from this. Right. 582 00:28:55,880 --> 00:28:59,000 Speaker 5: And if we think of a capitalist economy as being 583 00:28:59,160 --> 00:29:04,480 Speaker 5: coordinated by the profitability of different things, right as the 584 00:29:04,520 --> 00:29:09,440 Speaker 5: most important signal for capital allocation, and this profitability gets 585 00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:13,440 Speaker 5: kind of random because in some sectors firms can play 586 00:29:13,440 --> 00:29:15,520 Speaker 5: this price of a volume game, and then some other 587 00:29:15,560 --> 00:29:17,840 Speaker 5: sectors it might be more difficult to pour this off. 588 00:29:18,240 --> 00:29:23,360 Speaker 5: And this doesn't have reasons that necessarily tied into the 589 00:29:23,640 --> 00:29:28,040 Speaker 5: entrepreneurial genius of one firm versus the other, or the 590 00:29:28,120 --> 00:29:30,800 Speaker 5: necessity for society for production of. 591 00:29:30,760 --> 00:29:31,720 Speaker 4: One thing over the other. 592 00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:35,000 Speaker 5: But it just has to do with whatever specific constellation 593 00:29:35,120 --> 00:29:36,920 Speaker 5: enabled these kind of price hikes. And I think we 594 00:29:37,480 --> 00:29:40,760 Speaker 5: us really have a problem, right if profitability becomes random. 595 00:29:41,120 --> 00:29:44,400 Speaker 1: Right, So, maybe like the egg companies do really well 596 00:29:44,480 --> 00:29:47,720 Speaker 1: for some reason because everyone's heard about bird flu for instance, 597 00:29:47,760 --> 00:29:50,000 Speaker 1: we did a whole episode on it. And so all 598 00:29:50,040 --> 00:29:52,280 Speaker 1: the egg companies raise their prices at the same time 599 00:29:52,320 --> 00:29:54,960 Speaker 1: and make a lot of money. But meanwhile, there's some 600 00:29:55,040 --> 00:29:58,280 Speaker 1: I don't know, software startup doing something really cool, but 601 00:29:58,360 --> 00:30:02,080 Speaker 1: they can't push through the same kind of price increases. 602 00:30:01,960 --> 00:30:06,560 Speaker 5: Absolutely, and even like between product lines in individual firms. 603 00:30:06,560 --> 00:30:07,360 Speaker 4: Like if you look at what. 604 00:30:07,360 --> 00:30:11,440 Speaker 5: Happened in the car sector, right, were suddenly because I 605 00:30:11,440 --> 00:30:14,240 Speaker 5: mean there you actually had a real physical bottleneck, and 606 00:30:14,440 --> 00:30:17,160 Speaker 5: car companies decided to only, i mean not only, but 607 00:30:17,280 --> 00:30:22,280 Speaker 5: predominantly produce higher end models that then recited a situation 608 00:30:22,320 --> 00:30:25,760 Speaker 5: where all these cars that normal people are driving became 609 00:30:25,960 --> 00:30:28,200 Speaker 5: basically not available on the market, right, which is an 610 00:30:28,240 --> 00:30:31,360 Speaker 5: outcome that is in many ways undesirable because then maybe 611 00:30:31,400 --> 00:30:33,680 Speaker 5: people can't make it to work because they can't afford 612 00:30:33,680 --> 00:30:35,920 Speaker 5: a car, which then like kind of makes the labor 613 00:30:35,920 --> 00:30:38,400 Speaker 5: market less fluid in a situation where we already have 614 00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:40,120 Speaker 5: labor shortages in a certain areas. 615 00:30:40,160 --> 00:30:58,920 Speaker 1: So but yeah, so since we're on the topic of 616 00:30:59,080 --> 00:31:03,520 Speaker 1: capital allocation and capitalist economies and how it's supposed to work, 617 00:31:03,760 --> 00:31:07,720 Speaker 1: can we maybe talk about slightly less capitalist country. But 618 00:31:07,920 --> 00:31:09,560 Speaker 1: the first time we ever had you on the show, 619 00:31:09,600 --> 00:31:12,760 Speaker 1: it was to talk about China, and I'm wondering, if 620 00:31:12,760 --> 00:31:16,800 Speaker 1: you contrast and compare inflation in the West, in Europe 621 00:31:16,840 --> 00:31:18,840 Speaker 1: and the US with what's going on in China, it 622 00:31:18,880 --> 00:31:21,600 Speaker 1: does seem like, although there are some pockets of high 623 00:31:21,680 --> 00:31:24,800 Speaker 1: prices in the East, it does feel like on the 624 00:31:24,840 --> 00:31:30,400 Speaker 1: whole it's less of an inflation story. So what are 625 00:31:30,440 --> 00:31:32,480 Speaker 1: you thinking about in terms of that comparison. 626 00:31:33,160 --> 00:31:37,080 Speaker 5: Yeah, I think it's really an important thing to look at. 627 00:31:37,240 --> 00:31:40,000 Speaker 5: I think we haven't discussed this like generally enough that 628 00:31:40,080 --> 00:31:43,960 Speaker 5: there has been really this pretty dramatic divergence between Europe 629 00:31:44,000 --> 00:31:46,560 Speaker 5: and the US with this high inflation in China, with 630 00:31:46,640 --> 00:31:48,840 Speaker 5: almost a deflation kind of problem. 631 00:31:48,640 --> 00:31:49,440 Speaker 4: In some stretches. 632 00:31:49,520 --> 00:31:51,360 Speaker 5: I think, of course, it has to do a bit 633 00:31:51,400 --> 00:31:52,840 Speaker 5: the different timeline of COVID. 634 00:31:52,960 --> 00:31:55,040 Speaker 4: I mean, no question about that, right. 635 00:31:55,080 --> 00:31:58,000 Speaker 5: I mean they have had shutdowns when we were not 636 00:31:58,080 --> 00:32:00,520 Speaker 5: in shutdown, and they were open when we were in 637 00:32:00,560 --> 00:32:03,960 Speaker 5: shutdown and so on, right, So clearly, microeconomically speaking, they 638 00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:06,440 Speaker 5: are at a different point. They also did not have 639 00:32:06,800 --> 00:32:08,920 Speaker 5: the kind of similars packages that they had in the 640 00:32:08,960 --> 00:32:12,120 Speaker 5: global financial crisis and so on, So certainly the macro 641 00:32:12,200 --> 00:32:15,320 Speaker 5: environment is different. But I think there's still the question 642 00:32:15,560 --> 00:32:19,720 Speaker 5: of how did the global food and energy price shock 643 00:32:19,920 --> 00:32:23,640 Speaker 5: arrive in China, right, and why did this shock not 644 00:32:23,840 --> 00:32:26,440 Speaker 5: unleash similar kind of dynamics, right. 645 00:32:26,320 --> 00:32:29,200 Speaker 1: It didn't seem to get propagated as much as it 646 00:32:29,240 --> 00:32:30,000 Speaker 1: did elsewhere. 647 00:32:30,280 --> 00:32:32,400 Speaker 5: Yeah, so I think that like different layers. So first 648 00:32:32,440 --> 00:32:34,360 Speaker 5: of all, I mean for grain, which I think is 649 00:32:34,360 --> 00:32:36,720 Speaker 5: an important one. For food, they have, of course a 650 00:32:36,800 --> 00:32:41,040 Speaker 5: gigantic national reserve system, right, and they basically have to 651 00:32:41,440 --> 00:32:45,480 Speaker 5: a certain degree buffer their domestic prices against international prices. 652 00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:50,000 Speaker 5: So Chinese prices used to be for important grains like rice, 653 00:32:50,040 --> 00:32:53,920 Speaker 5: sweet used to tend to be higher than the international prices, 654 00:32:53,920 --> 00:32:57,520 Speaker 5: but stable, and when the international prices exploded, they kind 655 00:32:57,560 --> 00:33:01,720 Speaker 5: of stay, broadly speaking, where they wear. And the way 656 00:33:01,760 --> 00:33:05,920 Speaker 5: that they have managed that is that, first of all, 657 00:33:05,920 --> 00:33:08,080 Speaker 5: they have a very high self sufficiency rate. But I 658 00:33:08,120 --> 00:33:10,080 Speaker 5: don't think this is enough because I mean, the US 659 00:33:10,120 --> 00:33:12,600 Speaker 5: has a very high self sufficiency rate, right, It's even 660 00:33:12,640 --> 00:33:15,280 Speaker 5: like a major exporter. Germany for example, also has a 661 00:33:15,360 --> 00:33:17,920 Speaker 5: very high self sufficiency rates, also an exporter. But still, 662 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:20,680 Speaker 5: these international price movements have a right, right In China, 663 00:33:21,120 --> 00:33:25,960 Speaker 5: they have not because the import quota is very strictly managed, 664 00:33:25,960 --> 00:33:28,640 Speaker 5: and it's basically a situation where most of the imports 665 00:33:28,680 --> 00:33:30,480 Speaker 5: are managed by a very large state. 666 00:33:30,320 --> 00:33:31,440 Speaker 4: Owned company KOVCO. 667 00:33:31,920 --> 00:33:35,240 Speaker 5: And then domestically, so in that sense that the international 668 00:33:35,360 --> 00:33:38,200 Speaker 5: domestic prices are not really as interlinked as they would 669 00:33:38,200 --> 00:33:40,560 Speaker 5: be in other situations. And domestically they still have a 670 00:33:40,560 --> 00:33:44,480 Speaker 5: minimum purchase price so that they basically ensure that wherever 671 00:33:44,560 --> 00:33:48,160 Speaker 5: it's it's reasonable to cultivate with this minimum purchase price, grain. 672 00:33:48,040 --> 00:33:49,000 Speaker 4: Is being cultivated. 673 00:33:49,520 --> 00:33:52,800 Speaker 5: And then they have these grain auctions where they would 674 00:33:52,840 --> 00:33:55,360 Speaker 5: be adding supply to the grain market if there is 675 00:33:55,400 --> 00:33:58,320 Speaker 5: a shortage from basically a state owned reserve system. So 676 00:33:58,320 --> 00:34:01,560 Speaker 5: in some sense they have for grain what the US 677 00:34:01,600 --> 00:34:05,560 Speaker 5: has with the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, just on a probably 678 00:34:06,280 --> 00:34:10,000 Speaker 5: even much more gigantic scale. And I'm saying probably here 679 00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:12,840 Speaker 5: because we don't really know the size of the reserve. 680 00:34:12,880 --> 00:34:13,800 Speaker 4: It's a state secret. 681 00:34:13,840 --> 00:34:16,919 Speaker 1: I think there's a strategic pork reserve as well, right, 682 00:34:17,040 --> 00:34:20,719 Speaker 1: it is my favorite whenever they replenish. 683 00:34:20,200 --> 00:34:24,400 Speaker 5: The Yeah, so there's actually I mean there's actually also 684 00:34:24,440 --> 00:34:28,680 Speaker 5: a live pick reserve. In other words, like state owned 685 00:34:28,840 --> 00:34:31,560 Speaker 5: pork farms a picktort. You can't have a pork farm, 686 00:34:31,600 --> 00:34:35,120 Speaker 5: you only can have a pickform, so state owned pick farms, 687 00:34:35,160 --> 00:34:38,440 Speaker 5: they have frozen pick reserves, and they are also like 688 00:34:38,560 --> 00:34:40,640 Speaker 5: kind of attempts of the state. 689 00:34:40,760 --> 00:34:43,480 Speaker 4: But again, these auctions. 690 00:34:42,840 --> 00:34:46,839 Speaker 5: And I mean purchases and auctions to basically send signals 691 00:34:46,880 --> 00:34:49,520 Speaker 5: into the market. So it's not really just about the 692 00:34:49,600 --> 00:34:53,239 Speaker 5: physical supply, but it's also about like let's say there's 693 00:34:53,280 --> 00:34:57,200 Speaker 5: a price hike for pork and then there's an announcement 694 00:34:57,400 --> 00:35:00,640 Speaker 5: that the state is now doing a major auction of pork. 695 00:35:00,680 --> 00:35:03,160 Speaker 5: Then this is sending a signal to all market players 696 00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:06,440 Speaker 5: that this price hike might not continue, which then should 697 00:35:06,920 --> 00:35:09,360 Speaker 5: encourage people to get rid of the inventories. 698 00:35:08,880 --> 00:35:10,480 Speaker 4: In there by also at supply. 699 00:35:10,840 --> 00:35:13,600 Speaker 3: So it sounds like, I mean, we have our SPR 700 00:35:14,160 --> 00:35:16,960 Speaker 3: and it was never really used as a price stabilizer. 701 00:35:17,040 --> 00:35:19,600 Speaker 3: So in addition to all these vehicles like the strategic 702 00:35:19,680 --> 00:35:22,759 Speaker 3: pork supply and other it seems like they also have 703 00:35:22,840 --> 00:35:26,279 Speaker 3: practice in this that actually like unlike OURSPR, which was 704 00:35:26,320 --> 00:35:28,040 Speaker 3: sort of pivoted or like, oh, we don't have to 705 00:35:28,120 --> 00:35:30,759 Speaker 3: use it just for strategic purposes, that this is like 706 00:35:30,880 --> 00:35:33,320 Speaker 3: part of like a more ingrained in macro management. 707 00:35:33,360 --> 00:35:36,720 Speaker 5: There absolutely and I mean the pork example is actually 708 00:35:36,719 --> 00:35:39,839 Speaker 5: one where it doesn't work that great because hawk cycles 709 00:35:39,880 --> 00:35:42,200 Speaker 5: are a thing, right, and they are I think China too, 710 00:35:42,239 --> 00:35:45,520 Speaker 5: and you have like millions of small holders farming pigs, 711 00:35:45,520 --> 00:35:48,239 Speaker 5: so you have very intense hawk cycles. So you can 712 00:35:48,280 --> 00:35:50,279 Speaker 5: smoothen the cycle, but you never get rid of it. 713 00:35:50,640 --> 00:35:54,399 Speaker 5: But it's technically not at all simple, right, I mean 714 00:35:54,440 --> 00:35:56,960 Speaker 5: you need to have basically a system that can store 715 00:35:57,040 --> 00:35:58,920 Speaker 5: that stuff in a way that the pork that they 716 00:35:58,960 --> 00:36:01,319 Speaker 5: sell is the pork that you want to buy an 717 00:36:01,320 --> 00:36:03,719 Speaker 5: e eat, right. You need to have agents that are 718 00:36:03,760 --> 00:36:07,560 Speaker 5: able to purchase this on a relatively large scale. You 719 00:36:07,640 --> 00:36:10,160 Speaker 5: then have to have these auctions that have to be 720 00:36:10,200 --> 00:36:13,080 Speaker 5: professionally organized. And you also have to understand the market 721 00:36:13,120 --> 00:36:15,840 Speaker 5: really well. I mean, remember when there was an announcement 722 00:36:15,880 --> 00:36:18,520 Speaker 5: earlier this year that the US war was going to 723 00:36:18,560 --> 00:36:21,680 Speaker 5: buy back or to replenish its strategic petronium reserve, and 724 00:36:21,719 --> 00:36:24,040 Speaker 5: then oil prices started spiking, right, So you have to 725 00:36:24,080 --> 00:36:27,520 Speaker 5: have a very good handle on how to communicate with 726 00:36:27,600 --> 00:36:30,399 Speaker 5: the market, like when to say something about what you're 727 00:36:30,400 --> 00:36:32,319 Speaker 5: doing and when not to say something about what you 728 00:36:32,360 --> 00:36:34,800 Speaker 5: are doing. So it's quite demanding and a lot of 729 00:36:34,840 --> 00:36:35,640 Speaker 5: things can go wrong. 730 00:36:35,880 --> 00:36:39,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, and even in China, where they do have practice 731 00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:42,320 Speaker 1: doing this. I mean I remember with pork specifically after 732 00:36:42,440 --> 00:36:45,680 Speaker 1: the African swine fever outbreak, they actually made the cycle 733 00:36:45,840 --> 00:36:49,160 Speaker 1: even worse because they told everyone ramp up production and 734 00:36:49,160 --> 00:36:51,520 Speaker 1: then it was too much, and then prices collapsed and 735 00:36:51,560 --> 00:36:54,120 Speaker 1: everyone got out. And so it's just been going like 736 00:36:54,239 --> 00:36:55,680 Speaker 1: sea sawing ever since then. 737 00:36:55,920 --> 00:36:58,560 Speaker 5: Absolutely, and it's actually been for the first time a 738 00:36:58,560 --> 00:37:02,880 Speaker 5: situation where European pork importers have had difficulty selling in 739 00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:06,799 Speaker 5: China because suddenly the prices collapsed in China and in 740 00:37:06,840 --> 00:37:09,800 Speaker 5: Europe they were going up with the very high grain prices. 741 00:37:09,960 --> 00:37:12,000 Speaker 5: So that Yeah, absolutely. 742 00:37:12,880 --> 00:37:16,239 Speaker 1: I didn't mean to make this a pork discussion, But 743 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:18,440 Speaker 1: can I can I ask a personal question? 744 00:37:19,080 --> 00:37:22,400 Speaker 4: Oh? Can I say what more? Sorry? That's awkward. 745 00:37:22,719 --> 00:37:24,719 Speaker 5: So actually, I mean you're saying you didn't want to 746 00:37:24,719 --> 00:37:26,920 Speaker 5: make this a pork discussion. But the funny thing is, 747 00:37:27,120 --> 00:37:29,239 Speaker 5: while I was in China, I was seeing many interviews 748 00:37:29,239 --> 00:37:32,440 Speaker 5: with people on inflation, including foks from the Word Bank, 749 00:37:32,560 --> 00:37:35,880 Speaker 5: from the IMF, from major banks and so on, And 750 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:38,719 Speaker 5: eventually every single economist that I talked to started to 751 00:37:38,760 --> 00:37:41,120 Speaker 5: talk about pork. How they even have all these like 752 00:37:41,280 --> 00:37:43,520 Speaker 5: jokes on pork, so they say, like the CPI in 753 00:37:43,600 --> 00:37:48,279 Speaker 5: China actually send for the China. 754 00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:51,239 Speaker 1: That's pretty I love that all the economists are viewing 755 00:37:51,280 --> 00:37:52,680 Speaker 1: inflation through the lens. 756 00:37:52,360 --> 00:37:54,040 Speaker 2: Of pork, like we do with the oil here in 757 00:37:54,120 --> 00:37:54,640 Speaker 2: this country. 758 00:37:54,680 --> 00:37:58,520 Speaker 1: It's true. But can I ask a personal question, which 759 00:37:58,560 --> 00:38:01,360 Speaker 1: is you know you mentioned well, we started off this 760 00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:04,759 Speaker 1: conversation talking about how this idea of seller's inflation has 761 00:38:04,880 --> 00:38:08,680 Speaker 1: really gathered steam in recent weeks, and you mentioned the 762 00:38:08,760 --> 00:38:12,600 Speaker 1: Guardian article where you talked about price controls, and I 763 00:38:12,680 --> 00:38:16,680 Speaker 1: remember when that came out, you got a ton of 764 00:38:16,719 --> 00:38:21,640 Speaker 1: criticism online, lots of Twitter people calling you various names. 765 00:38:21,680 --> 00:38:26,239 Speaker 1: Paul Kirkman said, some not very nice things. But since then, 766 00:38:26,400 --> 00:38:29,719 Speaker 1: we've seen price controls in Europe. We've seen on the 767 00:38:29,719 --> 00:38:32,879 Speaker 1: subject of seller's inflation and maybe windfall taxes. We've seen 768 00:38:33,239 --> 00:38:37,160 Speaker 1: the UK, for instance, talking about capping grocery items and 769 00:38:37,200 --> 00:38:40,239 Speaker 1: things like that. How do you feel about how this 770 00:38:40,320 --> 00:38:42,880 Speaker 1: is sort of seeping into the mainstream. 771 00:38:43,960 --> 00:38:47,600 Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, maybe to act to your list. We 772 00:38:47,640 --> 00:38:51,000 Speaker 5: have also, of course seen the European gas price cap, 773 00:38:51,040 --> 00:38:54,880 Speaker 5: which is an international i mean transnationally coordinated kind of 774 00:38:54,960 --> 00:38:58,080 Speaker 5: price cap, and the OI price cap against Russian or 775 00:38:58,239 --> 00:39:00,839 Speaker 5: which I mean principle could be for all oil, right, 776 00:39:00,840 --> 00:39:02,840 Speaker 5: I mean just in terms of the technicality of the 777 00:39:02,880 --> 00:39:07,719 Speaker 5: price control mechanism. So yes, absolutely, it's been a totally 778 00:39:07,800 --> 00:39:11,200 Speaker 5: astonishing to me. The reason why I wrote this article 779 00:39:11,320 --> 00:39:15,719 Speaker 5: at the time was because a I felt that the 780 00:39:16,040 --> 00:39:20,759 Speaker 5: debate amongst economists was polarized between those who were saying like, Oh, 781 00:39:20,840 --> 00:39:22,759 Speaker 5: we don't have to worry about inflation too much, it's 782 00:39:22,760 --> 00:39:25,680 Speaker 5: just transitory, and those who were saying, oh, inflation is 783 00:39:25,719 --> 00:39:26,280 Speaker 5: really a problem. 784 00:39:26,320 --> 00:39:28,920 Speaker 4: Therefore we have to hike interest rates yesterday. 785 00:39:29,520 --> 00:39:32,560 Speaker 5: And I felt like there was a position missing there, 786 00:39:32,600 --> 00:39:35,240 Speaker 5: which is like, yeah, we have very large price spikes 787 00:39:35,280 --> 00:39:37,719 Speaker 5: and they are a problem. But if you have a 788 00:39:37,719 --> 00:39:39,919 Speaker 5: fire in the kitchen, you don't set your whole house 789 00:39:40,000 --> 00:39:42,160 Speaker 5: under water, but you try to put out the fire 790 00:39:42,160 --> 00:39:44,799 Speaker 5: in the kitchen. Right, So, not as an apologis of 791 00:39:44,840 --> 00:39:48,280 Speaker 5: price controls, but to say, hey, there is something sector 792 00:39:48,400 --> 00:39:52,000 Speaker 5: that we can do, and direct means of price civilization 793 00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:55,960 Speaker 5: can be an emergency measure to buy time when you 794 00:39:56,040 --> 00:39:59,200 Speaker 5: are faced with these kind of crazy price spikes. Now 795 00:39:59,400 --> 00:40:01,879 Speaker 5: the key word here, I think is emergency measure, and 796 00:40:02,080 --> 00:40:06,880 Speaker 5: my sense is that the more urgent the emergency became 797 00:40:07,600 --> 00:40:10,240 Speaker 5: the more acceptable these kind. 798 00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:12,200 Speaker 4: Of measures ended up being. 799 00:40:12,280 --> 00:40:14,040 Speaker 5: And I think that in Europe you can see this 800 00:40:14,640 --> 00:40:18,600 Speaker 5: very clearly in terms of the reactions to the war. 801 00:40:18,800 --> 00:40:20,839 Speaker 4: But then also like basically, as it. 802 00:40:20,880 --> 00:40:24,440 Speaker 5: Became colder, right, and the fear of winter just became 803 00:40:24,640 --> 00:40:28,840 Speaker 5: very real, the perceived emergency became more intense, and the 804 00:40:28,880 --> 00:40:33,600 Speaker 5: willingness to take these kind of measures became greater. The 805 00:40:34,040 --> 00:40:37,960 Speaker 5: Sellus inflation story, I feel like it's related but also 806 00:40:38,680 --> 00:40:42,800 Speaker 5: kind of slightly separate in the sense that the price 807 00:40:42,840 --> 00:40:45,879 Speaker 5: control debate is really about emergency measures that you take right, 808 00:40:45,920 --> 00:40:49,000 Speaker 5: and the Sellus inflation paper is really about how do 809 00:40:49,080 --> 00:40:52,600 Speaker 5: we understand this kind of inflation? But I think the 810 00:40:52,640 --> 00:40:55,200 Speaker 5: shift that we are seeing now that of course it's 811 00:40:55,239 --> 00:40:57,399 Speaker 5: not complete and so on, but that at least it's 812 00:40:57,400 --> 00:41:02,160 Speaker 5: becoming more acceptable to think about other ways of understanding 813 00:41:02,160 --> 00:41:04,560 Speaker 5: how inflation came about. It's kind of the first step 814 00:41:04,719 --> 00:41:07,560 Speaker 5: that we need to take to move towards a different 815 00:41:07,640 --> 00:41:11,120 Speaker 5: kind of economic stabilization paradigm that I personally think we 816 00:41:11,400 --> 00:41:15,120 Speaker 5: really need in this age of overlapping emergencies. So it's 817 00:41:15,160 --> 00:41:19,080 Speaker 5: been quite a wilde, right, but I guess talking today 818 00:41:19,080 --> 00:41:21,919 Speaker 5: and it has been very wide, so God knows what's 819 00:41:21,960 --> 00:41:22,840 Speaker 5: going to happen next. 820 00:41:23,560 --> 00:41:24,840 Speaker 4: It looks like there has. 821 00:41:24,719 --> 00:41:28,959 Speaker 5: Been some movement in a good direction in the sense 822 00:41:28,960 --> 00:41:31,680 Speaker 5: that the discourse is becoming more open, and I think 823 00:41:31,760 --> 00:41:34,640 Speaker 5: that an open discourse is really what we need if 824 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:38,640 Speaker 5: we are faced with these unprecedented situations. Because he cannot 825 00:41:38,719 --> 00:41:42,000 Speaker 5: respond to an unprecedented situation by saying we have always 826 00:41:42,040 --> 00:41:43,480 Speaker 5: known how exactly works. 827 00:41:45,080 --> 00:41:47,080 Speaker 1: Isabelle A weavor. Thank you so much for coming back 828 00:41:47,120 --> 00:41:50,439 Speaker 1: on our thoughts. Really appreciated having you in person as well. 829 00:41:51,040 --> 00:41:52,799 Speaker 2: Thank you, Thank you so much. 830 00:42:06,360 --> 00:42:09,080 Speaker 1: So Joe, I always enjoyed talking to Isabella. It is 831 00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:12,600 Speaker 1: crazy to see how quickly things seem to be changing 832 00:42:12,719 --> 00:42:15,000 Speaker 1: in this particular area of discourse. 833 00:42:15,680 --> 00:42:17,399 Speaker 3: Totally and you know, I know we didn't really get 834 00:42:17,440 --> 00:42:19,840 Speaker 3: into it, but I also just think that like the 835 00:42:19,920 --> 00:42:23,319 Speaker 3: Internet and Twitter and like it sort of cuts in 836 00:42:23,320 --> 00:42:25,440 Speaker 3: both directions because you can put out an idea and 837 00:42:25,480 --> 00:42:28,120 Speaker 3: get tons of abuse and backlash, but there's also like 838 00:42:28,160 --> 00:42:31,200 Speaker 3: a really rapid way which ideas proliferate in a way 839 00:42:31,239 --> 00:42:33,359 Speaker 3: I don't think would have happened in like, you know, 840 00:42:33,440 --> 00:42:35,680 Speaker 3: a different era where you like wait like five years 841 00:42:35,719 --> 00:42:38,759 Speaker 3: to get a paper you know, referee in a journal or. 842 00:42:38,760 --> 00:42:39,319 Speaker 2: Something like that. 843 00:42:39,480 --> 00:42:42,080 Speaker 3: But I'm fascinated, as I think we both are, by 844 00:42:42,160 --> 00:42:44,560 Speaker 3: like how ideas like can move so fast and like 845 00:42:44,719 --> 00:42:46,080 Speaker 3: especially in the native crisis. 846 00:42:46,120 --> 00:42:48,400 Speaker 1: Absolutely, And the other things that stood out to me 847 00:42:48,480 --> 00:42:51,920 Speaker 1: are one you mentioned this treadmill idea of like, you know, 848 00:42:51,960 --> 00:42:54,879 Speaker 1: it sounds great companies raising prices in order to pad 849 00:42:54,920 --> 00:42:57,840 Speaker 1: their profit margins, but at some point you have to imagine, 850 00:42:57,880 --> 00:43:00,640 Speaker 1: like there are some executives who get nervous about how 851 00:43:00,719 --> 00:43:01,920 Speaker 1: far they can actually push this. 852 00:43:02,120 --> 00:43:05,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, I like Isabella's a point about like the gamble, right, 853 00:43:05,120 --> 00:43:07,600 Speaker 3: because at some point, like you could imagine where you're 854 00:43:07,600 --> 00:43:10,319 Speaker 3: like going with a pricing strategy and you really miss 855 00:43:10,320 --> 00:43:13,239 Speaker 3: time it and suddenly you really do like lose share 856 00:43:13,280 --> 00:43:16,280 Speaker 3: in like a meaningful way or you damage your brand, 857 00:43:16,400 --> 00:43:19,280 Speaker 3: which seems plausible. It's like, oh, this company is greedy 858 00:43:19,360 --> 00:43:21,520 Speaker 3: at a time, and so it sort of depends on 859 00:43:21,960 --> 00:43:24,839 Speaker 3: the sort of coordination. And I do wonder whether like 860 00:43:24,960 --> 00:43:28,760 Speaker 3: executives whatever like off the treadmill. Yeah in some way. 861 00:43:28,880 --> 00:43:31,240 Speaker 1: Right, they're sort of they're pulling the lever of every 862 00:43:31,320 --> 00:43:34,360 Speaker 1: quarter and so far it's paid out each time, but 863 00:43:34,560 --> 00:43:36,799 Speaker 1: maybe one day it won't. The other thing that really 864 00:43:36,840 --> 00:43:39,520 Speaker 1: stood out to me was, I mean, what we're talking 865 00:43:39,520 --> 00:43:44,600 Speaker 1: about is basically the need potentially for more interventionist government 866 00:43:44,920 --> 00:43:48,279 Speaker 1: in the economy in one way or another, whether it's 867 00:43:48,360 --> 00:43:51,200 Speaker 1: you know, trying to smooth out some of those production cycles, 868 00:43:51,440 --> 00:43:55,400 Speaker 1: trying to smooth out big price spikes. And I feel 869 00:43:55,440 --> 00:43:59,719 Speaker 1: like that's always going to be controversial. 870 00:43:59,280 --> 00:44:00,640 Speaker 2: Particularly political. 871 00:44:00,800 --> 00:44:03,439 Speaker 1: It's always going to be political, particularly in the US, 872 00:44:03,520 --> 00:44:06,040 Speaker 1: but it is you know that said, we have seen 873 00:44:06,080 --> 00:44:09,720 Speaker 1: some inklings of it with for instance, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. 874 00:44:10,080 --> 00:44:11,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, And I think this is really the key, like 875 00:44:11,880 --> 00:44:14,239 Speaker 3: to my my takeaway from all this is people look 876 00:44:14,239 --> 00:44:17,359 Speaker 3: at this green inflation story whatever, and they're like, yeah, 877 00:44:17,360 --> 00:44:20,080 Speaker 3: but inflation is still really high, right, and so we 878 00:44:20,160 --> 00:44:23,120 Speaker 3: got to do something about it. And I think isabeut 879 00:44:23,120 --> 00:44:27,320 Speaker 3: this point, like it's important by looking at different dimensions 880 00:44:27,320 --> 00:44:29,080 Speaker 3: and not just saying, oh, it's because of wages or 881 00:44:29,160 --> 00:44:31,719 Speaker 3: not just because of like rates or money supply, it 882 00:44:31,760 --> 00:44:33,640 Speaker 3: allows us like the sort of like mental space to 883 00:44:33,680 --> 00:44:35,080 Speaker 3: open up, and some of them like we may not 884 00:44:35,120 --> 00:44:36,840 Speaker 3: have the tools, Like we may not have the tools 885 00:44:36,920 --> 00:44:40,160 Speaker 3: right now to like stabilize keep grand prices stable. We 886 00:44:40,200 --> 00:44:43,080 Speaker 3: don't have the sort of equivalent, but like thinking about like, 887 00:44:43,160 --> 00:44:45,120 Speaker 3: is rate hikes really going to be the best way? 888 00:44:45,160 --> 00:44:45,440 Speaker 2: Here? 889 00:44:45,880 --> 00:44:48,640 Speaker 3: Is the cost in terms of like general welfare and 890 00:44:48,680 --> 00:44:51,719 Speaker 3: employment worth it? If this is really not what the 891 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:54,280 Speaker 3: story is about, I think it's still like very useful. 892 00:44:54,280 --> 00:44:56,239 Speaker 3: From that perspective, it is like, Okay, how good are 893 00:44:56,239 --> 00:44:58,279 Speaker 3: these tools? And if we're going to use a blunt tool, 894 00:44:58,600 --> 00:45:00,600 Speaker 3: like right, how much damage you're we're gonna do? 895 00:45:00,840 --> 00:45:03,000 Speaker 2: Yeah with this mediocre tool. 896 00:45:03,080 --> 00:45:06,520 Speaker 1: Well, again, going back to the investment point, if the 897 00:45:06,600 --> 00:45:10,239 Speaker 1: issue is a bottleneck in production, then maybe maybe you 898 00:45:10,280 --> 00:45:13,560 Speaker 1: don't want to raise the cost of investment and production. 899 00:45:13,680 --> 00:45:15,560 Speaker 3: You want to raise the cost of a real estate 900 00:45:15,600 --> 00:45:17,160 Speaker 3: developer at a time when rent is one of the 901 00:45:17,239 --> 00:45:18,480 Speaker 3: highest things like that. 902 00:45:18,760 --> 00:45:20,560 Speaker 1: You know what, Joe, I've decided I'm going to base 903 00:45:20,600 --> 00:45:23,920 Speaker 1: my entire personality going forward on campaigning for a strategic 904 00:45:23,960 --> 00:45:25,200 Speaker 1: pork reserve in the US. 905 00:45:25,680 --> 00:45:28,360 Speaker 2: But it's hard, it's hard to I guess even that, 906 00:45:29,040 --> 00:45:30,120 Speaker 2: But yeah, I support that. 907 00:45:30,239 --> 00:45:33,920 Speaker 1: Bringing home the bacon. That's my mind. Shall we leave 908 00:45:33,920 --> 00:45:35,600 Speaker 1: it there, Let's leave it there, all right? This has 909 00:45:35,640 --> 00:45:39,000 Speaker 1: been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. 910 00:45:39,040 --> 00:45:41,359 Speaker 1: You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy. 911 00:45:41,000 --> 00:45:43,719 Speaker 3: Alloway, and I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on 912 00:45:43,760 --> 00:45:47,279 Speaker 3: Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guest Isabella Weber on 913 00:45:47,360 --> 00:45:49,080 Speaker 3: Twitter at Isabella M. 914 00:45:49,160 --> 00:45:49,520 Speaker 2: Weber. 915 00:45:49,640 --> 00:45:53,200 Speaker 3: Follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Armant and Dashall 916 00:45:53,200 --> 00:45:56,560 Speaker 3: Bennett at Dashbot. And for more odd Lots content, go 917 00:45:56,600 --> 00:45:59,359 Speaker 3: to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we have 918 00:45:59,360 --> 00:46:02,279 Speaker 3: a blog, we have transcripts, we have a newsletter that 919 00:46:02,320 --> 00:46:05,640 Speaker 3: comes out Friday. And check out the discord Discord dot 920 00:46:05,680 --> 00:46:08,479 Speaker 3: gg slash odd Lots hang out twenty four to seven 921 00:46:08,520 --> 00:46:10,600 Speaker 3: with other listeners and talking about all these topics. 922 00:46:10,880 --> 00:46:15,960 Speaker 1: And you should stream Bloomberg originals on Samsung TV, Roku, Apple, 923 00:46:16,080 --> 00:46:19,279 Speaker 1: any other of these streaming platforms and make sure to 924 00:46:19,360 --> 00:46:22,640 Speaker 1: tune in on Bloomberg TV at ten pm. Thanks for 925 00:46:22,719 --> 00:46:49,200 Speaker 1: listening and watching