WEBVTT - This Market Says Maybe America Isn't So Great Again Yet

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>America's GDP is growing at an amazing three percent. Unemployment

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is at the lowest level in sixteen years. The stock

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>market is reaching a new record high every day. The

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>U s economy is just going to keep on booming, right, Well,

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>not so fast. Stocks might be surging, but investors trading

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sixteen trillion market for US treasury securities are

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>taking a more nuanced view. If you look at what

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the bond market is signaling, not only is there not

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a huge surge in growth, but things

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>could conceivably slow down. At the very least, there's skepticism

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that inflation will ever become a problem. Welcome to Benchmark.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Scott Landman, an economics editor with Bloomberg News in Washington,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Daniel Moss, economics writer and editor at Bloomberg

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>View in New York. So, Dan, every time I opened

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter feed, it looks like President Trump is talking

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>about how the economy is going gangbusters, the market is

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>always at a record high. But I never see him

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>talking about the bond market. Well, the stock market is

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>easy for Twitter, good economic or financial news. The market

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.639
<v Speaker 1>goes up with the bond market. It's more complicated strong

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>economic news is often greeted with a decline in the

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>bond market, and the inverse is also true. All right, well,

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.279
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in our guest for some more insight. David

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Aider has been following the bond market for thirty years.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>He's currently the chief macro strategist at Informa Financial Intelligence,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 1>and he's been the number one ranked US government bond

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>strategist by Institutional Investor magazine for more than a decade.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Connecticut. David, thanks

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for being with us on Benchmark. Good to be here. So, David,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>ask most people to talk about the markets and they'll

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>start talking about the stock market it. But why should

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>people care more about the bond market instead. Well, because

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>people borrow money, Corporations borrow money. The government borrows a

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, not just this government, but governments around

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the world, and the bond market determines the cost of

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that money. So if you were to see the bond market,

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if you were interesting, interest rates rise, for example, presumably

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>people will borrow less and that can have a slowing

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>impact on economic growth, certainly on inflation. So it impacts

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>us in a big, big way. So when people talk

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>about government borrowing. They're not talking about the U. S.

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Treasury or the British Treasury walking down to city bank

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and saying, hey, can I have a loan? They're talking

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>about these securitized lending facilities. So when when the government,

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>when the U. S. Treasury borrows money, now, it doesn't

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>go down to a bank and ask for a loan

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and fill out an application. It goes to the markets.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And the markets do include banks, um, they include central banks,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and they have an auction process which determines what the

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>interest rate is going to be. So there's a demand

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>factor that plays a huge amount um into how much

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>how much it's going to cost the government to borrow money.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's not quite like you or I going down

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to a bank, but still there is a market rate

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that is determined now, the market rate for borrowing. It's

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>more it tells a broader story than just how much

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the government has to pay to borrow money. Uh. You know,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the widely followed benchmarks, just like people follow

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five D for stocks, you have the treasury

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>security maturing in ten years. You know, people just refer

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to it as the tenure. It's a pretty common benchmark

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and those are currently yielding somewhere around two point four.

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? What? What does that tell? What?

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>What kind of story does that? Well? You you you

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>can look at the tenure, which indeed is the benchmark,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but the treasury market, the the the runs the gamut

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>from you know, short term bills sometimes a matter of

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>weeks to thirty year paper, so that's known as the

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>yield curve. The tenure is merely a point on the

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>yield curve, which has become popular because you know, corporations

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>tend to borrow in the tenure sector and the rest

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of the world um tends to borrow in the ten

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>year sector. So two point four is only one um

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>one spot on the curve. You could go down to

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 1>look at the two year note, for example, which would

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>be something on the order of about one eighty, or

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>go out to the end of the curve to take

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a look at the thirty year which would be considerably higher,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>considerably higher, So you have what is known as the

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>steep yield curve. The interest rate from the short term

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to the long term has has a spread, but actually

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not that steep right now, you know, when we're getting

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit of the market jargon. Now, but

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>you hear a lot about the yield curve flattening, and

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>people seem to think that that might not be such

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a great development. What is happening there? How would you?

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you explain it? I'll put my economists head

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>on and offer that it depends. But but what's going

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>on is this? When when the yield curve is steepening,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>meaning one the spread between the very short terms borrowing

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to the long term is wide, it usually tells you,

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>historically that we have a lot of growth in the economy.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>The set is is is allowing I guess you would say,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>um for some inflation concerns. The steep deeal curve tells

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you that the market is concerned about growth and inflation

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>as a as an anecdote or a derivative of growth.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The fact that there are two things going on. Not

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>only has the yield curve been flattening, but it's been

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>flattening only because short term rates arising. Long term rates

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing anything, and that is the concern, because that

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>suggests that growth is slowing or will slow at least.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>The Marcus perception that inflation is going to remain low

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and that the said might be making a mistake. They

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>might be hiking raising short rates too aggressively. Now let

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>me just challenge you on that point. The lack of

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation has been a defining characteristic arguably of say the

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>last twenty yes, certainly in the post financial crisis here,

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and yet economic growth has been solid, if unspectacular. There's

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>been all sorts of warnings since the economy began growing

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and nine that we're on the verge

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of a double dip, etcetera. Hasn't happened. You short signaling

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown? Am I sure signalians slow down? You know,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this time might be different. The The difference might be

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that that we are facing an era. The next ten years,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see UM a lot more treasury bond issues,

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more treasury market issuance because the deficits rising,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and if this new tax plan goes through, and it

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>likely will, we'll see the deficit rise even more so.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>The treasury, our government has said that they are going

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to increase issuance UM at the shorter end of the

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>yield curve. So you have the Fed hiking, you have

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>more issuance at least in the near term at the

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>short end of the yield curve, So it could be

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a concern about um simply supply and what the Fed

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is doing. However, historically speaking, the yield curve has been

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a very good um predictor or prognosticator of of economic activity.

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And while it is true we've had unspectacular that's how

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say it GDP growth, but we continue to

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have very, very very subdued inflation. And I think that

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve is giving us some warning that the

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Feds hiking in here when inflation is low. This is

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're nine years into this expansion and we

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>still haven't seen inflation. We haven't seen it on the

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>income or the wage front, and it we're getting kind

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of late in the cycle um to see that develop.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what the bond market is telling us.

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So are the bond market and the stock market telling

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>two different stories about the economy, two stories that cannot

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be reconciled? Are they just telling two sides of the

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>same story. Maybe that the stock market is showing that

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>corporate profits are expected to keep increasing, yet the bond

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>market set well, maybe just not at a spectacular pace.

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you're dealing with a bond guy, and

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>as you said earlier, when the economy is doing poorly,

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>me as a bond guy, I'm in my I'm in

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>my my zone that I like to see that. So

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say that they are telling you two different stories.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And one of the stories that's been going on with

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. Obviously we have we do have a

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>recovery steady issue, if not spectacular, so we go that.

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that has helped um In fact,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe the thing that has helped the stock market over

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>these last few years is low interest rates. Why because

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>corporations have been borrowing a huge amount of money, tremendous

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>amount um. They issue bonds like the government, and what

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are they doing with that cash. What are they doing

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with the bonds that raise money for them? They're buying

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>back their own stock. So you've seen you there is

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>less stock out there today then there was five ten

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago, the buy back situation, and so that has

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>been one of the things that has helped prop up

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, the fact that they've been using so

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>much cash to buy back their their own stocks. They're

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest buyer of the stock market, and that happens

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 1>when interest rates are low, and the this spread with

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the corporate bond spread between you know, treasuries and corporate

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>bonds is also very tight. So it makes a lot

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>of sense, but they're not investing, and I think that

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that will prove a problem. That's why I think the

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>bond market is more right or more correct than the

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>stock market, because if we do see interest rates rise,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>or if we were to go into an extended period

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the slowdown, I think all that corporate barring could

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>prove to be a problem. Now we've often heard not

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just from government officials, but from investors as well, this mantra,

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the U s Treasury market is the largest, most liquid,

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>most secure asset class in the world. Does what's going

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on in the US treasury market now reflect things that

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are going on outside the United States as well as

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>issues like Treasury Department sales, tax plan FED Well, it

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly does. You know, the bond market is I mean

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>our bond market. All bond markets are are international. The

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the largest holders of US treasuries are overseas, and one

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of the largest holders are foreign central banks. Well, when

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they they have had their about of what is known

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>as quantitative easing meeting. Central banks have been buying bonds

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep interest rates low. They have negative yields in Europe,

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, and so we have we have positive yields.

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean we don't. You don't have to pay the

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>government when you buy a bond. So the point is

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the point is that the demand for U. S. Treasuries

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is very much influenced by activity overseas where there is

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>some growth going on. Absolutely, but there are not a

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of bonds around because other central banks have bought them,

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and the yields and bonds overseas in many cases are negative.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>There's something on the order of ten trillion dollars worth

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of bonds overseas and have a negative yield. Well, if

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you want a positive yield, come to the US are

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>yields might be low or appears to be low, but

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>at least there's a yield, right, But does that necessarily

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>mean there's going to be a slowdown? I guess what

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is we've heard this idea multiple times since

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine, that the economy is headed for

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a double dip. Hasn't happened. I'm just wondering whether this

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>reflects the relative attractiveness of the US versus others. The

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>other economy that the US is often compared with is China,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet their bond market very different and much more

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult for foreign investors to access. So, I mean, it

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is a good question. And of course, at any given

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>moment in time, you know, we try to make it simple.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>The yield curve says this UM, and there are these

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>other influences we've We've not experienced, you know, in in

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>my thirty years a lot of time when there's ever

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>been negative yields. So certainly there's a component to that.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>There's certainly a component to it. But I do think

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that we can't dismiss the yield curves shape, or or

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the low yields that we're having UM as simply a

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>matter of you know, there's there's a strong demand from overseas,

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, because of these negative yields. The fact of

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the matter is here we are nine years into a recovery.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>That's a very long time. That's a very long time.

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So when I say we're late cycle, you know, we're

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to the next recession than we were now. The

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>yield curve may be hinting at that UM not yet,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but maybe on on the radar. But the other thing

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is inflation, so we're dealing with like we saw today

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>with the with the core CPI number very low, came

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit lower than expectations. We look at

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the other measures of inflation also very very low one

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>point three percent, one point five when we're looking at

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's preferred measures, so low interest rates, particularly at

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the long end of the Yelk curve. The longer maturities

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>are always a reflection of both current inflation and inflation expectations,

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the surveys that come out or other uh known,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>what the said would call market measures of inflation. Those

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>two are pointing to very low inflation um in the

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>coming months, in the coming year. David will have to

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>wrap it up there. Thanks for explaining that story. It's

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely not something that we normally hear out of President

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Twitter feed at eight. Are great to have you

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>on today. Benchmark will be back next week with our

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>two part year and special. In the meantime, you can

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, our

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg app, as well as on Apple Podcasts, pocket Cast,

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and Stitcher. While you're there, take a minute to rate

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and review the show so more listeners can find us

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and let us know what you thought of the show.

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at at scott Landman Dan,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you are at Moss Underscore Eco and our guest David

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't on Twitter, but you can find insights from his

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>firm at at I f I Underscore. Financial Benchmark is

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>produced by Topor Foreheads and Magnus Hendrickson. The Head of

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesca Levy. Thanks for listening, See you

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>next time.