WEBVTT - Bloomberg Technology Special: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>We're from Mahart. We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and.

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Live from San Francisco to our TV and radio audiences

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>around the world. Welcome to a special edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm Ed Ludlow. In just a few moments in vidio,

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 3>CEO Jensen Wang will join us for a live interview

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>following their latest earnings report, the company posting a revenue

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 3>forecast that beat consensus that fell short to some of

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>the most optimistic estimates, stoking concern that the explosive growth

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>is waning. Let's get right to Bloomberg Semiconductor correspondent Ian King,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 3>who joins me on set. Let's start with the basics,

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the fiscal third quarter forecast and we learned through it.

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that forecast was fine. If you compare it to consensus,

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 4>it was there or thereabouts. And for most of the

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 4>companies in the world, that would be great and everybody

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 4>would be happy. But this is in video. This is

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 4>a company which you know, beats pretty much every quarter

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 4>and by an order of magnitude, and it didn't do that,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 4>and it didn't indicate it would do that, and that

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 4>raised a lot of questions. As we heard on the.

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Call, there are many storylines. I think the demand from

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 3>the hyperscalers is clearly intact, but Blackwell was everything. I

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 3>want to play a SoundBite of what Jensen Wong said

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>about Blackwell. Listened to this.

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>The change to the mask is complete. There were no

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>functional changes necessary, and so we're sampling functional samples of

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Blackwell Grace Blackwell in a variety of system configurations as

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>we speak.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>The main point here is that there was not a

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>design issue with Blackwell itself as had been reported, but

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>based on what Nvidia said, this was about the production mechanism.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Blue Bazine King, you did a very good job in

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 3>the top Life blog of explaining a GPU mask. Could

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 3>you just try to give a short version of that

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 3>to our audience.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the mask is basically the blueprint, which basically that

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 4>is used to burn in the circuit onto the surface

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>of the chip to give it its function, right, and

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>it is a very important step. That's the fundamental blueprint.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 4>And they were saying we didn't get it wrong, but

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 4>when it came to manufacturing, it didn't produce as many

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 4>good chips as we wanted, so we made some tweaks

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 4>to that. Didn't have to redesign it, but made some tweaks,

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 4>and that is helping us to get a better yield.

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 3>It's worth noting at this stage the stocks down almost

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 3>seven percent in after hours, have been down more at

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 3>the conclusion of the call. I think basically because we

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't learn enough about Blackwell. What they said was in

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the fiscal fourth quarter of fiscal year twenty five, there

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 3>will be several billion dollars of sales through Blackwell. Why

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>does the market want more and what does it want?

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 4>They wanted a reassurance from in videos management, and they

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 4>wanted reassurance in the form of details. They wanted gens

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to PuTTY's arm around everybody and say, don't worry, It'll

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 4>be fine. This is how much I'm going to get.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 4>They asked consistently, We're asked questions of how many billions

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 4>and when will those billions exactly come in and collect. Kretz,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 4>the CFO and Jensen Wang essentially avoided that question and

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 4>refuse to give that precise reassurance.

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 3>We're showing some of the after ours reaction, not just

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 3>in in video itself, but some of its peers, both

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 3>on the chip making side the server equipment providers, and

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 3>I think AMD and ARM in particular are very noteworthy.

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloombogty and King stay with us. I want to go

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>out to Chicago and Bloomberg's Ryan for Lostelka on I

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Equities team and Ryan. That's the broad summary from me

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>about the names moving and after hours there's probably a

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 3>bigger picture after ours movement in the markets as well,

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.839
<v Speaker 3>start with in video and work outward from there.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 5>Sure, well, one thing I would say about in videos

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 5>after hours decline is that it does come after a

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 5>very strong year to day performance. I think it closed

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 5>up more than one hundred and fifty percent this year,

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 5>So even though the re forecast was maybe a little

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 5>bit shy of some of the most optimistic expectations, it

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 5>did beat expectations. And it is, you know, coming off

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 5>such a huge gain. So it's not necessarily surprising to

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 5>see a little bit of a consolidation now. And I

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 5>think even the declient is a little bit less and

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 5>the options market was anticipating. So just some context there

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 5>for looking at the declient. But you're right that pretty

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 5>much we are seeing widespread weakness following this report, all

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 5>the megacaps are, you know, modestly lower. We are seeing

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 5>much more pronounced weakness in other chip makers and chip

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 5>design companies and so forth. So yeah, certainly it does

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 5>seem like the initial read through here is negative, but

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 5>again it does come after a very strong start to

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 5>the year.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 3>We made a big deal about this earnings print for

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>quite a long time. I look at something like an

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>investco QQQ, the ETF that tracks the nast that one hundred,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's down around a percentage point, right,

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 3>But in true in the market's reaction, was this the

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 3>macro level event that we thought it was going to be.

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question. I would say that it's kind

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 5>of close enough in line with expectations, even if it

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 5>is a little bit shy the most optimistic ones that

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't think this is going to really cause people

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 5>to really change how they're allocating, change their opinions on

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 5>AI's as kind of fundamental secular driver. But maybe in

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 5>the near term we do see a little bit of weakness.

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, again, some of these stocks have been moving

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 5>up so much there have been sort of kind of

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 5>growing calls about their valuation. Some concerns about that. I

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 5>don't know if this is the kind of absolute blowout

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 5>that will just you know, cause people to continue piling

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 5>into the the way that they were doing earlier this year.

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 3>There is a lot in the news cycle inclusive of

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 3>and outside of video. I think one of the names

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 3>that you note in after ours is super Micro. It's

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 3>down significantly. There's an video relationship to that, and then

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 3>there's the news around that name in and of itself.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Absolutely so. We saw yesterday a short report came

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 5>out Today's delaying the filing of the tin K. You know,

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 5>both of those cars does a weakness in the stock.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 5>I think today it was down more than double digits,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 5>So you know, a lot of reasons to be concerned

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 5>there in general. And it is one of Nvidia's biggest customers.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 5>I think it's the third largest, So you know, this

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 5>is just another reason for people who might have been

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 5>kind of souring on super Micro to you know, maybe

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:20.799
<v Speaker 5>be pulling the cell button.

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 2>A little bit.

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 3>Bloomdo's Ryan for Selica with the after hours action out

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 3>of Chicago. Thank you. Let's get the reaction from the

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 3>cell side with one of the stocks, relative bears d

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 3>A Davidson's Gil Luria had a neutral rating and a

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 3>street low ninety dollars price target on shares of Nvidia.

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>He joins US now and Gil, I guess does that

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 3>change your barished perspective on the stock and your main

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 3>takeaway from the analyst school, the quarter was.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>A very good quarter there. Ability to continue to grow

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>delivering chips at this rate at this scale is fantastic

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and unprecedented. I don't think there's much of a revenue

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>issue here, of a growth issue here. I think a

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a pushback is probably more around the

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>margin situation. You had a good conversation with Ian about

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Blackwell and some of the moving pieces part of what's

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>happening with Blackwell. It's a new product, it's got a

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>few hitches along the way that put pressure on gross margins,

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and then operating margins grew more than anticipated, so less

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of the top line upside flowed to the bottom line.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's probably where investors are getting a little bit

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>more cautious than they were before, because in the last

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>several quarters, the huge upside to revenue flowed all the

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>way to the bottom line, creating huge upside there to

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>believe in and Nvidia right now is to believe twenty

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty six calendar is going to be about two hundred

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>billion of revenue and about four and a half to

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>five dollars of earnings. That's only possible if they continue

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to get this type of growth on the top line

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and more leverage. And the second part of that equation

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>looks a little less certain right now.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Gil. When you said that two hundred billion dollar figure,

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergsy and King, who's covered semi conductors at this company

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 3>since nineteen ninety eight, sat next to me still, for

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 3>what it's worth, gave a little smile. I mean, it's

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 3>an astonishing figure. I think there's a lot of emphasis

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 3>here on Blackwell. How did you react to the news

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 3>of several billion dollars in fiscal fourth with Blackwell and

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the explanation that this was a production issue impacting the ramp,

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 3>not a sort of core design issue around the product itself.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So, first of all, our estimate is far less than

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>two hundred billion for twenty twenty six.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 3>But that's you're a relative bear, Gill and I got

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that bit right.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of Blackwell, what happened to in

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>n videos they used to be on a two year

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>cycle for the data center product, and they decided to

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>aggressively move to a one year cycle and then put

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new feature functionality and bundle into the

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Blackwell platform. So that was a very aggressive agenda, and

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not that surprising that there's some challenges that they

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have to encounter. If they can still ship in their

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>fiscal fourth quarter, that's a very good sign. And by

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, their customers don't really care that much. Their

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>customers are just going to continue to buy the latest

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and greatest, and if that's the Age two hundred, they'll

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just continue to buy h two hundred. They have made

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that abundantly clear on their conference calls, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Google, Tesla.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk made it abundantly clear they'll buy as much

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>GPUs as and Video can produce, at least this year,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>because they're saying the demand signals are there. As long

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>as the demand signals are there, they'll buy whatever and

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Video is selling, and towards the end of the year,

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a piece of that will be Blackwell.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Gil Jensen Wong was it pains and gave a detailed

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 3>answer that basically summarizing video as a systems vendor the

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 3>discussion around Envy link, CPUs, everything beyond GPU. How much

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 3>credit do you assign the company for that, the sort

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of complete systems that they sell.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>A tremendous amount of credit. Let's start with the beginning.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>When history is written, we'll talk about how Jensen Wangen

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia created the capabilities that make generative AI possible today

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in a similar way that Elon Musk is responsible for

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the electric vehicle. And part of the genius wasn't just

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing that this is coming, that accelerate computers coming, AI

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>capabilities is coming well before anybody else did. It's also

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>realizing that in order to create a moat around the chip,

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>they need to do a couple of things. One is

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to own the proprietary software around that KUDA, but the

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>other thing is to enhance the bundle as much as possible.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>These GPUs work in a raise when they work together,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>ten thousands or sometimes tens of thousands of GPUs together.

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>When you box those up in a box with multiple GPUs, CPUs, wiring,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>cabling and firmware, you make it harder for your competitors

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to catch. And they've done a remarkable job of that.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I also wonder about all the rest The story thus

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 3>far has been about the hyperscale is a meta five names,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>essentially being the core customer of Nvidia. We got some

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>detail on low double digit billions sales this year in

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 3>sovereign AI. Do you see evidence that the market is

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.119
<v Speaker 3>broadening out beyond just the cloud providers?

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Not really. It seems like those five are still a

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>substantial amount of the revenue. And those five have in

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>their most recent calls said some interesting things. One of

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 1>them is that they consistently said they are over investing.

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So they said they definitely want to invest more. We're

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing that in results today. But they also use the

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>term over investing. Over investing is something you do before

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you do the other thing, and they made it clear

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're only going to do so when they have

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the demand signals. If for whatever reason, demand for AI

0:11:55.679 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>capacity goes down, for instance, because compute doesn't continue to

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>drive performance of foundational models, you're going to see those

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>same five actors pull back and say, you know, maybe

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we have enough data center capacity, or maybe what we

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>have in the pipeline is enough. And that's the concern

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty five and twenty six is that those

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>very companies could do that. Beyond that, these are the

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>same companies that are developing their own chips. They're at

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>various stages of this, but Google's TPUs are probably as

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>good as in videos, so in terms of their internal

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>use and selling to customers such as Apple, Google's already

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>caught up, Amazon's catching up, Meta and Microsoft are earlier stages.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But these same companies that are buying every GPU from

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>video they can gil will be the ones that will

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>buy possibly less next year in the year after that.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 3>I just want to reflect for our TV and radio audience,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 3>there are people tuned in around the world. My understanding

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 3>is there are watch parties in cities from New York

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>to London. For this earnings. We've hyped it up for weeks.

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Probably this is the most unique earnings print that I've

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 3>covered in my career. What about for you in the

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 3>semiconductor space, Why is this so different?

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, so, first of all, I tried to participate by

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>wearing a video green today. But importantly and video is

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>important because of how much they've added to the cumulative

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings of this in P. Five hundred and the cumulative performance.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>But I wouldn't necessarily extrapolate their success or sometimes setbacks

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the market because what they do

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is very specific. The growth and data center construction and

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>data center a GPU fulfillment into those data centers is

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a very small set of companies. I'd argue, and Video

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is sucking the oxygen for the room from a lot

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of other technology companies. So we celebrate within Video because

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they've added so much value I wouldn't necessarily read through

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of technology.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Guillerya of DA Davidson, the relatively most bearish or perhaps

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 3>the least bullish name on the street. Thank you so

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>welcome to this special edition of Bloomberg Technology for our

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 3>TV and radio audience around the world. Joining me now

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 3>is Jensen One, CEO of Nvidia, straight from the analyst's call,

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>and Jensen, good evening, good afternoon to you. I think

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the market wanted more on Blackwell, they wanted more specifics,

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and I'm trying to go through all of the call

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and the transcript. It seems like a very clearly this

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 3>was a production issue and not a fundamental design issue

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 3>with Blackwell, but the deployment in the real world, what

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 3>does that look like tangibly and is there a sort

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>of delay in the timeline of that deployment and thus

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 3>revenue from that product.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 6>I let's see, that's just the fact that I was

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 6>so clear and it wasn't clear enough kind of tripped

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 6>me up there right away. And so let's see. We

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 6>we made a mass change to improve the yield. Functionality

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 6>of Blackwell is wonderful. We're sampling Blackwell all over the

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 6>world today. We show people giving tours to people of

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 6>the Blackwall systems that we have up and running. You

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 6>could find pictures of Blackwall systems all over the web.

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 6>We have started volume production. Volume production will ship in

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 6>Q four. Q four, we will have billions of dollars

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 6>of Blackwell revenues and we will ramp from there. We

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 6>will ramp from there. The demand for Blackwell far exceeds

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 6>its supply, of course in the beginning, because the demand

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 6>is so great, But we're going to have lots and

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 6>lots of supply and we will be able to ramp.

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 6>Starting in Q four, we have billions of dollars of

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 6>revenues and we will ramp from there into Q one

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 6>into Q two and two next year. We're going to

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 6>have a great next year.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jensen, what is the demand for accelerated computing beyond

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 3>the hyperscalers and meta.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 6>Hyperscalers represent about forty five percent of our total data

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 6>center business. We're relatively diversified today. We have hyperscalers, we

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 6>have Internet service providers, we have sovereign AIS, we have

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 6>industries enterprises, so it's fairly fairly diversified. A site outside

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 6>of hyperscalers is the other fifty five percent. Now, the

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 6>application use across all of that, all of that data

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 6>center starts with accelerated computing. Accelerated computing does everything, of course,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 6>from well the models the things that we know about,

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 6>which is generative AI, and that gets most of the attention.

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 6>But at the core we also do database processing, pre

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 6>and post processing of data before you use it for

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 6>generative AI, trans coding, scientific simulations, computer graphics of course,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 6>image processing of course. And so there's tons of applications

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 6>that people use are accelerated computing for, and one of

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 6>them is generative AI. And so let's see what else

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 6>can I say? I think that's the.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Lever jump in Jensen please on Sovereign AI. You and

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I've talked about that before, and it was so interesting

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>to hear something behind it that in this fiscal year

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 3>there will be low double digit I think you said

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 3>billions of dollars in sovereign AI sales. But to the

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 3>lay person, what does that mean. It means deals with

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 3>specific governments, if so, where.

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 6>It's not necessarily Sometimes it deals with a particular regional

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 6>service provider that's been funded by the government. And oftentimes

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 6>that's the case in a case of in the case

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 6>of Japan, for example, the the Japanese government came out

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 6>and UH offered UH subsidies of a couple of billion dollars.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 6>I think for several different internet companies and telcos to

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 6>be able to fund their AI infrastructure. UH India has

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 6>a sovereign AI initiative going and they're building their AI infrastructure. Canada,

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 6>the UK, France, Italy, missing somebody, Singapore, Malaysia, UH. You know,

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 6>a large number of countries are subsidizing their regional data

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 6>centers so that they could become able to build out

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 6>their AI infrastructure. They recognize that their countries UH knowledge,

0:18:56.680 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 6>their countries data digital data is also their natural resource,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 6>not just the land they're sitting on, not just the

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 6>air above them. But they realize now that their digital

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 6>knowledge is part of their natural and national resource, and

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 6>they are to harvest that and process that and transform

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 6>it into their national digital intelligence. And so this is

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 6>what we call sovereign AI. You could imagine almost every

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 6>single country in the world will eventually recognize this and

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 6>build out their AI infrastructure.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 3>Jenson, you use the word resource, and that makes me

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 3>think about the energy requirements here. I think on the

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 3>cool you talk about how the next generation models will

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 3>have many orders of magnitude greater compute needs. But how

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 3>will the energy needs increase and what is the advantage

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 3>you feel in Vidia has in that sense, Well.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 6>The most important thing that we do is increase the

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 6>performance of and increase the performance and efficiency of our

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 6>next generation. So Blackwell is many times more performance than

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 6>Hopper at the same level of power used. And so

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 6>that's energy efficiency, more performance with the same amount of

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 6>power or same performance at a lower power And that's

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 6>number one. And the second is using luca cooling. We

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 6>support air cool we support air cooling, we support liqual cooling,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 6>but liqual cooling is a lot more energy efficient, and

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 6>so the combination of all of that you're going to

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 6>get a pretty large, pretty large step up. But the

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 6>important thing to also realize is that AI doesn't really

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 6>care where it goes to school, and so increasingly we're

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 6>going to see AI be trained somewhere else, have that

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 6>model come back and be used near the population, or

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 6>even running on your PC or your phone. And so

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 6>we're going to train large models. But the goal is

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 6>not to run the large models necessarily all the time.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 6>You can, you can surely do that for some of

0:20:55.040 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 6>the premium services and the very high value AIS, but

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 6>it's very likely that these large models would then help

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 6>to train and teach smaller models, and what we'll end

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 6>up doing is have one large, few large models that

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 6>are able to train a whole bunch of small models,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 6>and they run everywhere.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Jensen, you explain clearly that demand to build generative AI

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 3>product on models or even at the GPU level is

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 3>greater than current supply. In black Wealth's case in particular,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 3>explain the supply dynamics to me for your products and

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 3>whether you see an improvement sequentially quarter on quarter or

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 3>at some point by the end of fiscal year into

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 3>next year.

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, the fact that we're growing would suggest that our

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 6>supply is improving and our supply chain is quite large.

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 6>One of the largest supply chains in the world. We

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 6>have incredible partners and they're doing a great job supporting

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 6>us in our growth. As you know, we're one of

0:21:56.320 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 6>the fastest growing technology companies in history. None of that

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 6>would have been possible without very strong demand but also

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 6>very strong supply. We're expecting Q three to have more

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 6>supply than Q two, We're expecting Q four to have

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 6>more supply than Q three, and we're expecting Q one

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 6>to have more supply than Q four, And so I

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 6>think our supply, our supply condition going into next year

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 6>will be in will be a large improvement over this

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 6>last year with respect to demand. Blackwell is just such

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 6>a leap and there's several things that are happening, you know,

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 6>just the Foundation model makers themselves. The size of the

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 6>Foundation models are growing from hundreds of billions parameters to

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 6>trillions of parameters. They're also learning more languages. Instead of

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 6>just learning human language, they're learning the language of images

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 6>and sounds and videos, and they're even learning the language

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 6>of three D graphics. And whenever they are able to

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 6>learn these languages, they can understand what they see, but

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 6>they can also generate what they're asked to generate and

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 6>so they're learning the language of routines and chemicals and physics.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, it could be fluids and it could be

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 6>particle physics, and so they're learning all kinds of different languages,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 6>learned the meaning of what we call modalities, but basically

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 6>learning languages. And so these models are growing in size,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 6>they're learning from more data, and there are more model

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 6>makers then there was a year ago. And so the

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 6>number of model makers have grown substantially because of all

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 6>these different modalities. And so that's just one, just the

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 6>frontier model. The foundation model makers themselves haven't really grown tremendously.

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 6>And then the generative AI market has really diversified, you know,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.719
<v Speaker 6>beyond the Internet service makers to startups and now enterprises

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 6>are jumping in and different countries are jumping in, so

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 6>the demand is really growing.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Jensen, I'm sorry to cut you off. I will lose

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>your time soon. You've also diversified. And when I said

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 3>to our audience you were coming on, I got so

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 3>many questions. Probably the most common one is what is

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 3>in Vidia. We talked about you as a systems vendor,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 3>but so many points on in Vidia Gpu Cloud, and

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask finally, do you have plans to

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 3>become literally a cloud compute provider.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 6>No. Our GPU cloud was designed to be the best

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 6>version of Nvidia Cloud that's built within each cloud. Nvidio

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 6>DGX cloud is built inside GCP, inside Azure, inside AWS,

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 6>inside OCI, and so we build our clouds within THEIRS

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 6>so that we can implement our best version of our cloud,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 6>work with them to make that cloud, that that infrastructure,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 6>that AI infrastructure in Nvidia infrastructure, as performance, as great

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 6>TCO as possible, and so that strategy has worked incredibly well.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 6>And of course we are large consumers of it because

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 6>we create a lot of AI ourselves, because our chips

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 6>aren't possible to design without AI, our software is not

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 6>possible to write without AI, and so we use it

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 6>ourselves tremendous, you know, tremendous amount of it self driving cars,

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 6>the general robotics work that we're doing, the omniverse work

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 6>that we're doing. So we're using the DGX cloud for ourselves.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 6>We also use it for an AI foundry. We make

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 6>AI models for companies that would like to have expertise

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 6>in doing so, and so we are AI. We're an AI,

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 6>we're a foundry for AI. Like tsmcs a foundry for

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 6>our chips and so so there are three fundamental reasons

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 6>why we do it. One is to have the best

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 6>version of Nvidia inside all the clouds. Two because we're

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 6>a large consumer to ourselves, and third because we use

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 6>it for AI foundry for to help every other company.

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Jensen one, CEO and video. I want to thank you

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 3>for your time the extended conversation straight off the earnings

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 3>called thank you in earnings fiscal it's good to see

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>you too called second quarter. Then I point out that

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 3>in after hours the stock is down still almost seven percent.

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 3>There'll be a lot of analysis to be done overnight

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 3>by the cell side, by the byside, and we'll bring

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>you the best from Bloomberg's reporters and editors from San Francisco.

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology