1 00:00:05,400 --> 00:00:06,120 Speaker 1: Bokn or chillions. 2 00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:08,440 Speaker 2: I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Belchunas. 3 00:00:10,520 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 1: Eric, we got a vip here today, we do. 4 00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:14,080 Speaker 2: I'm excited about this one. 5 00:00:14,160 --> 00:00:14,680 Speaker 1: Who is it? 6 00:00:14,720 --> 00:00:18,480 Speaker 2: We got Blackrocks head of Digital Assets, Robbie Mitchnick, and 7 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:21,760 Speaker 2: I have been told and we've seen him as like 8 00:00:21,880 --> 00:00:25,759 Speaker 2: the guy internally who has really turned Blackrock into this 9 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:29,840 Speaker 2: sort of bitcoin force. And not only has he done that, 10 00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:34,159 Speaker 2: but since the bitcoin ETFs have launched, especially ibit, I bit, 11 00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 2: Blackrocks offering, Yeah, that's their bitcoin ETF. And as an analyst, 12 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:39,960 Speaker 2: I've never seen anything like this. This has to be 13 00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:42,560 Speaker 2: like a golf analyst tracking Tiger Woods in the late nineties. 14 00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:42,960 Speaker 1: What is this? 15 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:44,560 Speaker 2: What is going on here? Let me give you some 16 00:00:44,680 --> 00:00:49,040 Speaker 2: number stroll. So before I Bit, the fastest ETF to 17 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:52,560 Speaker 2: get to ten billion dollars in assets was jp e Q, 18 00:00:52,960 --> 00:00:56,560 Speaker 2: which did it in six hundred and forty seven days. Okay, 19 00:00:56,560 --> 00:00:59,400 Speaker 2: it's like three years. I Bit did it in forty 20 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:03,360 Speaker 2: nine days, and Fidelity no slouch, did it in seventy seven. 21 00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:07,160 Speaker 2: So think about that. Just let that absorb. That is insane, right. 22 00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:11,240 Speaker 2: Another one, if you look at Blackrocks ETFs globally they 23 00:01:11,240 --> 00:01:14,120 Speaker 2: have over one thousand, like one thousand and forty four 24 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:17,760 Speaker 2: something like that. IBID is taken in more money than 25 00:01:17,800 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 2: any of them. IBID is taken in eighteen percent of 26 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 2: all of black Rocks global flows this year, unreal for 27 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:26,800 Speaker 2: a new launch or unreal for any ETF. Even IVV 28 00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:29,680 Speaker 2: doesn't pull off those numbers. And then when we look 29 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:32,440 Speaker 2: at the ETFs in the US, you're to date flows, 30 00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:35,720 Speaker 2: IBID is number two overall. Only VU, the stud of 31 00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:39,520 Speaker 2: all studs, VU is above IBIT this year, so it's 32 00:01:39,560 --> 00:01:42,160 Speaker 2: top one percent in volume. Again, this is after four 33 00:01:42,160 --> 00:01:44,920 Speaker 2: months on the market, and we see thirteen f's come in, 34 00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:47,960 Speaker 2: which is reported holders. There's already two hundred and sixty 35 00:01:48,040 --> 00:01:50,720 Speaker 2: reported holders of this. Normally a new ETF and their 36 00:01:50,760 --> 00:01:53,440 Speaker 2: first thirteen F season will see anywhere from zero till 37 00:01:53,480 --> 00:01:57,560 Speaker 2: five if they're lucky. So again, this is like breaking 38 00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,680 Speaker 2: records by quantum leap style. 39 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:04,600 Speaker 1: And here we are with the guy who came to 40 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:07,400 Speaker 1: Blackrock and said, let's do something a little different. Okay, 41 00:02:07,440 --> 00:02:10,200 Speaker 1: So joining us on this episode of Trillions Robbie Mitchnick, 42 00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:13,840 Speaker 1: head of Digital Assets at Blackrock, and also James Safert, 43 00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:19,760 Speaker 1: an ETF analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, this time on Trillions. 44 00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:27,960 Speaker 1: Blackrocks Bitcoin believer Robbie James, Welcome to Trillions. 45 00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:30,400 Speaker 3: Thanks for having me, Thanks so much for having me on, 46 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:32,799 Speaker 3: and I appreciate the intro. I actually feel like I'm 47 00:02:32,840 --> 00:02:36,080 Speaker 3: the one with celebrities here because we've all been watching 48 00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:37,360 Speaker 3: Eric and James. 49 00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:41,520 Speaker 4: Your guys, their head don't do it. 50 00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 1: So James is a somewhat of a regular on the podcast. 51 00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:49,800 Speaker 1: Robbie obviously so thrilled to have you here. Have you 52 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 1: asked Larry Fink for a raise yet? No? No, okay, 53 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:56,200 Speaker 1: all right, so maybe it's like in the course somebody 54 00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:57,239 Speaker 1: just gave Yeah. 55 00:02:57,280 --> 00:02:59,840 Speaker 2: By the way, I saw Larry Fink on Fox Business. 56 00:03:00,560 --> 00:03:02,799 Speaker 2: I never see him mention tickers. I mean, because he's 57 00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 2: got a thousand of them, but it's like having a 58 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:06,360 Speaker 2: thousand kids you don't really bring up. He talks Macro 59 00:03:06,720 --> 00:03:09,600 Speaker 2: a lot, but he was beaming. He's the biggest launch 60 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 2: ever I been. But it's rare again seeing him talk 61 00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:14,480 Speaker 2: about the ticker. I'm like, that must be a big 62 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 2: deal internally if the big man's talking about it. 63 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:18,239 Speaker 5: Yeah. 64 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:20,399 Speaker 3: I think he's brought a lot of insight and thought 65 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:24,080 Speaker 3: leadership to this right, you think about we talk at 66 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:27,240 Speaker 3: Blackrock a lot about being a student of the markets, 67 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:29,560 Speaker 3: being a student of technology, and Larry's kind of the 68 00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 3: ultimate embodiment of that. So you see that in his 69 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:36,080 Speaker 3: journey on this, and obviously he brings a ton of 70 00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:39,240 Speaker 3: geopolitical and historical context to it. 71 00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 1: So Eric ran through some stats about the launch in 72 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:44,840 Speaker 1: the intro there. But let's rewind the clock a little bit. 73 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,440 Speaker 1: When did you first spot the opportunity and go, Okay, 74 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:50,360 Speaker 1: we got bitcoin and we got Blackrock. How do I 75 00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 1: bring those two things together? 76 00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:55,200 Speaker 3: Well, I joined actually in the summer of twenty eighteen, 77 00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:58,400 Speaker 3: so coming up on six years now, and I had 78 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:03,160 Speaker 3: been at business. I totally fluked into this internship at 79 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:05,400 Speaker 3: a company I hadn't heard of and nobody had heard 80 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:08,560 Speaker 3: of at the time called Ripple, And that was twenty seventeen, 81 00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:13,080 Speaker 3: and I interviewed for that internship in April of seventeen. 82 00:04:13,880 --> 00:04:15,080 Speaker 5: XRP was a two cents. 83 00:04:15,200 --> 00:04:18,040 Speaker 3: Their crypto tooken when I started eight weeks later in June, 84 00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:20,760 Speaker 3: it was a twenty eight cents, and three months after 85 00:04:20,800 --> 00:04:24,599 Speaker 3: I left in January to go back to finish my MBA, 86 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 3: it was at three dollars, and so that explosive journey 87 00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:32,680 Speaker 3: obviously incredible fortuitous fun timing, and I knew at that 88 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:34,760 Speaker 3: point I had to do something in this space. The 89 00:04:34,800 --> 00:04:39,200 Speaker 3: opportunity was just too great and too exciting, and it 90 00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:42,400 Speaker 3: was apparent to me that Blackrock had a lot of 91 00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:46,000 Speaker 3: potential to be a transformative force in the space. And 92 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:50,039 Speaker 3: so August twenty eighteen, I started as full time employee 93 00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:52,480 Speaker 3: number one in the digital assets realm. 94 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:54,440 Speaker 5: And it's been a fun couple of years. 95 00:04:54,600 --> 00:04:55,320 Speaker 1: Who hired you? 96 00:04:55,880 --> 00:04:59,640 Speaker 3: It was really Rob Goldstein in effect, that's who I 97 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:03,280 Speaker 3: first met with it at Blackrock, and we had a 98 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:06,200 Speaker 3: good conversation. I think some of my ideas were probably 99 00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 3: a little premature, let's say, at that time. 100 00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 4: But what were they Well, you know, you might guess, 101 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:16,200 Speaker 4: but you know, if you think about twenty eighteen, or 102 00:05:16,320 --> 00:05:19,040 Speaker 4: at that time was twenty seventeen, the idea that we 103 00:05:19,080 --> 00:05:22,560 Speaker 4: would do a bitcoin ETF would have been totally premature, right, 104 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 4: You did not have the institutional infrastructure, you did not 105 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:29,000 Speaker 4: have the regulatory clarity, You frankly didn't. 106 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:31,520 Speaker 3: Have a lot of interest from our clients in this 107 00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 3: at that time. So as you track through time our 108 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:38,320 Speaker 3: journey there was a confluence of factors over the years 109 00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 3: that evolved to get us to where we are today. 110 00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:44,559 Speaker 1: You were pitching an ETF, a bitcoin ETF even before 111 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:45,159 Speaker 1: you were hired. 112 00:05:45,800 --> 00:05:48,640 Speaker 3: I don't think I was as reckless as outright pitching it, 113 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:50,719 Speaker 3: because I know how that probably would have gone at 114 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:53,880 Speaker 3: that time. It really wasn't the time, right, But I 115 00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:55,599 Speaker 3: would be lying if I didn't think that at some 116 00:05:55,640 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 3: point this was the thing that could happen at What 117 00:05:58,160 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 3: better place for her to do that than black Rock? 118 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:03,800 Speaker 1: If you could have taken the internal temperature with one 119 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:07,280 Speaker 1: of those internal thermometers at Blackrock for what the temperature 120 00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:11,039 Speaker 1: for crypto or digital assets in general was at that 121 00:06:11,120 --> 00:06:12,680 Speaker 1: time you were starting, what do you think it was? 122 00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:16,000 Speaker 3: What was the I think it was pretty similar to 123 00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:20,520 Speaker 3: just about every large traditional financial institution at that time, right, 124 00:06:20,600 --> 00:06:24,960 Speaker 3: We had so predating me. The firm had begun exploring 125 00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 3: blockchain in twenty sixteen, and I think correctly at the 126 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:33,119 Speaker 3: time came to the view that this technology and certainly 127 00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:35,640 Speaker 3: the asset class was nowhere near ready for prime time 128 00:06:35,839 --> 00:06:39,640 Speaker 3: and for our clients. And that was accurate, right, And 129 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:42,159 Speaker 3: there's been a bunch externally. 130 00:06:42,880 --> 00:06:44,159 Speaker 5: Very importantly that's. 131 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:47,240 Speaker 3: Evolved over the years that brought that temperature up to 132 00:06:47,839 --> 00:06:50,479 Speaker 3: obviously a much warmer level. 133 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:53,440 Speaker 1: So it was not ice cold, because it was just 134 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:56,000 Speaker 1: warm enough that they could hire you. So like cold. 135 00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 5: Certainly not ice cold. 136 00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,679 Speaker 3: There was a recognition that this could be a thing, right, 137 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:01,400 Speaker 3: that it's time hadn't come. 138 00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 2: So what's interesting to me is Larry Fink is a 139 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:08,520 Speaker 2: major name, just like Jamie Diamond, and a lot of 140 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 2: his peers generally were not into bitcoin. And there is 141 00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:15,160 Speaker 2: an interview with Anthony Scaramucci on I Think It Was 142 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:18,040 Speaker 2: The Wolf of All Streets podcast and he says that 143 00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:20,559 Speaker 2: he had a private meeting with Larry in late twenty 144 00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:24,880 Speaker 2: twenty one where Larry says bitcoin sucks and Scamochie says, 145 00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 2: I think you're wrong. You should do some research, and 146 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:31,320 Speaker 2: then Scamucci says it was a young kid named Robbie 147 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:34,000 Speaker 2: who came into Blackrock with the idea of creating a 148 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:36,600 Speaker 2: bitcoin et have he orange pill Larry, And I'm going 149 00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:38,200 Speaker 2: to give Larry a lot of credit because he actually 150 00:07:38,200 --> 00:07:40,320 Speaker 2: did the homework. It takes a smart leader to pridefully 151 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:43,040 Speaker 2: say bitcoin sucks and then twenty four months later say 152 00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:45,600 Speaker 2: you know what, I've got this wrong. Blackrock needs to 153 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 2: be part of this? Is that mostly true? 154 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:51,440 Speaker 1: Was the pill actually orange or was it a different code? 155 00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:55,520 Speaker 3: I think there's probably a little bit of hyperbole in that, 156 00:07:55,960 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 3: But like I said, we talk all the time about 157 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 3: being students of them mark markets and students of technology, 158 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:06,360 Speaker 3: and Larry's the ultimate embodiment of that and his journey 159 00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:08,240 Speaker 3: in this space and the work he did in the 160 00:08:08,280 --> 00:08:14,280 Speaker 3: study through various sources. It shows up in how insightful 161 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:16,520 Speaker 3: he is now when he speaks on the topic. 162 00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:19,400 Speaker 6: When you're talking about joining and you're interviewing, they're looking 163 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:22,240 Speaker 6: up blockchain. That's around the time that Larry Fink's famous 164 00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:25,200 Speaker 6: quote about an index of money laundering came out. Could 165 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:26,920 Speaker 6: you just walk us through before we move on to 166 00:08:26,920 --> 00:08:29,840 Speaker 6: talk about the actual ETF What was the actual process 167 00:08:29,840 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 6: of going from that view in twenty eighteen to twenty 168 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:34,240 Speaker 6: twenty one, still saying it sucks to like all right, 169 00:08:34,280 --> 00:08:37,280 Speaker 6: actually I'm changing my mind, Like what were the milestones 170 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:39,720 Speaker 6: along the way? What did you see internally or even 171 00:08:39,720 --> 00:08:43,240 Speaker 6: with Larry specifically that led us to getting Blackrock filing? 172 00:08:43,360 --> 00:08:44,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, and then also. 173 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:46,200 Speaker 2: FTX was part of this. I had to think that 174 00:08:46,240 --> 00:08:48,320 Speaker 2: almost would take you down a few pegs or set 175 00:08:48,360 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 2: you back. 176 00:08:50,559 --> 00:08:55,840 Speaker 3: So first, I think the approach here has always been 177 00:08:56,280 --> 00:08:59,640 Speaker 3: very client focused and very long term right. So, certainly 178 00:08:59,720 --> 00:09:03,240 Speaker 3: FtF was a bad event for the industry, but our 179 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:07,480 Speaker 3: focus was much longer term in nature than anyone company 180 00:09:07,679 --> 00:09:11,960 Speaker 3: or market cycle. Where it started in twenty eighteen after 181 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:14,680 Speaker 3: I mentioned that initial work that happened in twenty sixteen, 182 00:09:14,720 --> 00:09:18,120 Speaker 3: So twenty eighteen where we really spent our time and 183 00:09:18,200 --> 00:09:22,640 Speaker 3: energy was applications of blockchain technology, and that was consistent 184 00:09:22,679 --> 00:09:25,920 Speaker 3: with most of the banks and another large traditional finance firms. 185 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:28,840 Speaker 3: So exploring a dozen or fifteen different use cases of 186 00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:33,319 Speaker 3: how you can use blockchain and the data synchronicity benefits 187 00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:37,360 Speaker 3: across our business and for our clients, and by and large, 188 00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:39,920 Speaker 3: most of those use cases across the industry did not work. 189 00:09:40,720 --> 00:09:43,400 Speaker 3: We actually hit on a couple that were pretty interesting 190 00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:46,200 Speaker 3: and delivered some value, but you didn't see the sort 191 00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:50,000 Speaker 3: of broad based adoption of blockchain of everything right that 192 00:09:50,080 --> 00:09:53,720 Speaker 3: some people thought would happen. That was an important period though, 193 00:09:54,040 --> 00:09:58,559 Speaker 3: for learning, for building comfort, for understanding the technology, and 194 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:03,120 Speaker 3: as factors of evolved. Starting with I would say twenty twenty, 195 00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:06,840 Speaker 3: you really started to see an uptick in client interest, 196 00:10:07,679 --> 00:10:10,040 Speaker 3: you know, kind of in the post COVID aftermath, and 197 00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:15,040 Speaker 3: there's widespread money printing. Obviously bitcoin went up thirteen x. 198 00:10:15,800 --> 00:10:20,520 Speaker 3: You also had a huge amount of venture capital coming 199 00:10:20,520 --> 00:10:22,439 Speaker 3: too the space, right if at almost one hundred billion 200 00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:26,480 Speaker 3: dollars in venture financing the last four years. And that's 201 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:28,840 Speaker 3: also brought with it a lot of credible human capital 202 00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 3: too from big tech, from financial services backgrounds. And so 203 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:37,360 Speaker 3: you saw this institutionalization of the infrastructure of the degree 204 00:10:37,559 --> 00:10:43,160 Speaker 3: that would enable us to potentially build solutions for clients 205 00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:45,960 Speaker 3: that we could be confident in and have conviction that 206 00:10:45,960 --> 00:10:47,920 Speaker 3: we could build to a black Rock and I Shares 207 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:50,840 Speaker 3: quality standard. And the last piece is the regulatory environment 208 00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:55,600 Speaker 3: slowly but surely did moderate over time, right. And so 209 00:10:55,640 --> 00:10:58,920 Speaker 3: when you put those together and then lay that against 210 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:02,720 Speaker 3: what we were doing at the time, first in crypto, 211 00:11:02,760 --> 00:11:05,480 Speaker 3: so we think about this space across three buckets in 212 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:08,600 Speaker 3: digital assets, three pillars crypto. 213 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:09,720 Speaker 5: Stable coins, and tokenization. 214 00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:14,480 Speaker 3: So in crypto foundationally, we built a partnership with coinbas 215 00:11:14,559 --> 00:11:16,960 Speaker 3: Prime starting in twenty twenty one. That was a technology 216 00:11:16,960 --> 00:11:22,079 Speaker 3: focused partnership building their trading and custody capabilities and workflows 217 00:11:22,120 --> 00:11:26,440 Speaker 3: into our Aladdin Investment system, so that Black Croc or 218 00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:31,280 Speaker 3: any of Aladdin's other clients who wanted to get exposure 219 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:33,439 Speaker 3: to crypto as part of the whole portfolio could do that. 220 00:11:34,160 --> 00:11:38,520 Speaker 3: We also concurrently developed this private Bitcoin trust, which was 221 00:11:38,559 --> 00:11:42,040 Speaker 3: really a starting point for us being an asset manager 222 00:11:42,440 --> 00:11:44,960 Speaker 3: in the space, and that was focused on large US 223 00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:48,480 Speaker 3: institutional clients, but it was a key solution that we 224 00:11:48,520 --> 00:11:51,320 Speaker 3: felt was solving part of the problem that our clients 225 00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:52,439 Speaker 3: were experiencing. 226 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:54,360 Speaker 5: Think about stable coins. 227 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:57,400 Speaker 3: We started managing the USDC Reserve or a part of 228 00:11:57,440 --> 00:12:01,240 Speaker 3: it in twenty twenty one. That relationship grew significantly in 229 00:12:01,280 --> 00:12:04,440 Speaker 3: twenty twenty two where we became the primary non bank 230 00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 3: manager of that three billion ish reserve today and invested 231 00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:11,920 Speaker 3: in Circle and started to become a technology collaborator with 232 00:12:11,960 --> 00:12:13,920 Speaker 3: them as well because of the potential we see for 233 00:12:13,960 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 3: stable coins. 234 00:12:15,000 --> 00:12:16,160 Speaker 5: And then finally tokenization. 235 00:12:16,280 --> 00:12:19,080 Speaker 3: We did some private tokenization work with JP Morgan on 236 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:22,640 Speaker 3: their Onyx platform in twenty twenty one that laid the 237 00:12:22,640 --> 00:12:26,400 Speaker 3: foundation for us to ultimately do our first public blockchain 238 00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:29,280 Speaker 3: tokenization earlier this year. So those are all the key 239 00:12:29,320 --> 00:12:31,760 Speaker 3: pieces that ultimately paved the way. 240 00:12:31,640 --> 00:12:34,400 Speaker 2: For Understood But and this reminds you of what's going 241 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:37,440 Speaker 2: on in JP Morgan, but again, all that's happening. While 242 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:40,520 Speaker 2: the CEO does say some things that seem to be contradictory, 243 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:44,079 Speaker 2: but clearly he's also has to service clients, and he's well, 244 00:12:44,080 --> 00:12:46,920 Speaker 2: this is fine, we're serving clients. But personally I don't 245 00:12:46,960 --> 00:12:49,920 Speaker 2: get it because we do see JP Morgan. Jamie Diamond 246 00:12:49,960 --> 00:12:53,000 Speaker 2: is basically slams it like every other week, and yet 247 00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:55,240 Speaker 2: JP Morgan is one of the big aps for ibit 248 00:12:55,559 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 2: and some people are like that hypocritical, but yeah, it's 249 00:12:58,040 --> 00:12:59,760 Speaker 2: pretty much par for the course for a lot of 250 00:12:59,760 --> 00:13:03,400 Speaker 2: firm this is the whatever business they're in, Like, they 251 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:07,000 Speaker 2: can't ignore clients, right, So you could actually be in 252 00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:08,920 Speaker 2: the business without your CEO being all in. 253 00:13:11,720 --> 00:13:15,920 Speaker 3: Yes, although thankfully Larry's been super supportive of this, right. 254 00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:20,120 Speaker 3: I think he recognizes the level of interest from clients, 255 00:13:20,160 --> 00:13:23,640 Speaker 3: and I think importantly the level of frustration that we 256 00:13:23,720 --> 00:13:26,480 Speaker 3: felt from a lot of our clients, which was if 257 00:13:26,559 --> 00:13:30,360 Speaker 3: you want to access crypto or bitcoin directly, that's been 258 00:13:30,480 --> 00:13:33,439 Speaker 3: very hard for most of our clients. With the institutional 259 00:13:33,679 --> 00:13:37,240 Speaker 3: or wealth advisory, right, it's different for retail. Retail has 260 00:13:37,280 --> 00:13:41,320 Speaker 3: their own challenges too, but for financial advisors and for institutions, 261 00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:45,600 Speaker 3: almost impossible practically to hold bitcoin directly. So what they 262 00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:49,840 Speaker 3: do They went to alternative exposure vehicles, and a lot 263 00:13:49,840 --> 00:13:53,120 Speaker 3: of those didn't go well right. They were often high fee, 264 00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:56,439 Speaker 3: high risk, underperform the price of bitcoin in some cases 265 00:13:56,480 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 3: all three right, and so there was this frustration. There 266 00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:03,040 Speaker 3: are other clients who missed the opportunity entirely. Bitcoin turned 267 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:04,960 Speaker 3: out to be the best performing asset in the world 268 00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 3: the last ten years, so that was also a bad outcome. 269 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:09,400 Speaker 3: So I think that recognition that we were in a 270 00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:14,880 Speaker 3: position to solve a real frustration for our clients definitely 271 00:14:14,960 --> 00:14:23,800 Speaker 3: motivated the firm. 272 00:14:24,040 --> 00:14:25,960 Speaker 2: I'm going to go to twenty twenty three now is 273 00:14:25,960 --> 00:14:29,640 Speaker 2: that okay, Okay, I'm on vacation in Kpe. May I'm 274 00:14:29,640 --> 00:14:31,760 Speaker 2: doing my thing. I try to stay off the internet, 275 00:14:31,960 --> 00:14:34,320 Speaker 2: and I try to stay off work email, and I 276 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:39,400 Speaker 2: see my Twitter's blowing up because coin Desk puts out 277 00:14:39,400 --> 00:14:41,120 Speaker 2: a story saying black Rock's about to follow for a 278 00:14:41,120 --> 00:14:44,200 Speaker 2: bitcoin etf. I remember quot shooting. I said, this can't 279 00:14:44,200 --> 00:14:46,880 Speaker 2: be real, ken it. I didn't want to totally shut 280 00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:49,240 Speaker 2: it down because coin desk is pretty good. They've had 281 00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:52,520 Speaker 2: some scoops about four hours later at four in the afternoon. 282 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:55,440 Speaker 2: Bang there it is. So my vacation, thank you, was 283 00:14:55,600 --> 00:14:57,760 Speaker 2: messed up for the next couple of days. But it 284 00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:01,480 Speaker 2: was exciting. I was like, what why would they file? 285 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:03,720 Speaker 2: Like I always thought Blackrock would come out after there's 286 00:15:03,720 --> 00:15:05,680 Speaker 2: a couple filings and they get launched, and you come 287 00:15:05,680 --> 00:15:07,120 Speaker 2: out a year later because you don't need to be 288 00:15:07,160 --> 00:15:10,280 Speaker 2: early you're Blackrock. But you were like leading the way 289 00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:12,440 Speaker 2: and there was no real I mean, as far as 290 00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:15,200 Speaker 2: I was concerned, our odds were one percent that SEC 291 00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:18,280 Speaker 2: would approve one and that day, on that day, on 292 00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:22,360 Speaker 2: that day, and they immediately went to fifty because blackrocks Blackrock. 293 00:15:22,440 --> 00:15:24,720 Speaker 2: And so the whole thing was what does Blackrock know? 294 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:27,560 Speaker 2: And then there was these conspiracy theories that like Larry 295 00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:30,400 Speaker 2: was talking to like Gary and the head of the SEC. 296 00:15:30,240 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 1: Or a lot of conspiracy things. 297 00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:32,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, there was a lot. It was like, well, remember, 298 00:15:33,040 --> 00:15:36,480 Speaker 2: Blackrock is a big time company. You helped bail out 299 00:15:37,240 --> 00:15:40,160 Speaker 2: the whole economy basically with buying bonds with the FED 300 00:15:40,560 --> 00:15:44,880 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty. So Blackrock is like just a monster company, 301 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:47,440 Speaker 2: different than any other company. In my opinion, this wouldn't 302 00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:50,040 Speaker 2: have been as big as Fidelity or even Vanguard filed it. 303 00:15:50,440 --> 00:15:53,320 Speaker 2: So anyway, everybody went crazy. The internet blew up. I mean, 304 00:15:53,360 --> 00:15:55,720 Speaker 2: you broke the internet that day. I wasn't sure. I 305 00:15:55,760 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 2: didn't know. I was like, maybe they saw Greyscale lawsuit 306 00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:00,480 Speaker 2: and you saw that, Hey, maybe the SEC's going to lose. 307 00:16:00,560 --> 00:16:03,280 Speaker 2: We should file now. So my question to you is 308 00:16:03,480 --> 00:16:08,480 Speaker 2: what drove the filing that day at that time versus say, 309 00:16:08,560 --> 00:16:11,560 Speaker 2: just waiting a while until the SEC comes around and 310 00:16:11,560 --> 00:16:13,200 Speaker 2: then you can come in a little later and do 311 00:16:13,280 --> 00:16:13,640 Speaker 2: your thing. 312 00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:15,720 Speaker 4: Yeah. 313 00:16:15,760 --> 00:16:17,840 Speaker 3: Well, I think that we were ready and our clients 314 00:16:17,840 --> 00:16:20,320 Speaker 3: were ready, right, that was the big thing. We had 315 00:16:20,400 --> 00:16:24,160 Speaker 3: laid out all those foundational pieces from the technology side 316 00:16:24,240 --> 00:16:27,560 Speaker 3: with Coinbase in Aladdin, from the Bitcoin private trust side, 317 00:16:28,160 --> 00:16:32,760 Speaker 3: and had conviction that we could deliver an ey shares 318 00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 3: quality product in this space, and it was increasingly clear 319 00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:41,160 Speaker 3: that our clients hungered for that. Right that, at the 320 00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:42,120 Speaker 3: end of the day is what it was. 321 00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:46,000 Speaker 2: You knew that you could decrease friction and cost, which 322 00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 2: is sort of what Larry did say on Fox Business 323 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:50,960 Speaker 2: when he went on and I agree, I mean, ETFs 324 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 2: are so good at that. I get it again. It 325 00:16:53,120 --> 00:16:54,840 Speaker 2: was just a little bit of a shock. We figured 326 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:56,760 Speaker 2: usually the first one to throw in their hat is 327 00:16:56,800 --> 00:17:00,320 Speaker 2: like a van Eck or a grayscale. It was like 328 00:17:00,400 --> 00:17:02,480 Speaker 2: Blackrock playoffs. 329 00:17:04,040 --> 00:17:07,399 Speaker 3: So I will say, you know, I maybe downplayed what 330 00:17:07,960 --> 00:17:11,679 Speaker 3: Scaramouchi said your question earlier, but to his credit he 331 00:17:11,800 --> 00:17:15,959 Speaker 3: did in the summer of twenty two when we launched 332 00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:18,720 Speaker 3: the private Bitcoin Trust, he connected the dots and said, 333 00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:21,680 Speaker 3: I think this is a precursor to them doing an ETF, 334 00:17:21,720 --> 00:17:22,720 Speaker 3: which was a pretty good call. 335 00:17:23,560 --> 00:17:23,840 Speaker 1: Yeah. 336 00:17:23,880 --> 00:17:26,040 Speaker 6: I mean, like you said, our expectation was like people 337 00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:28,480 Speaker 6: like Vanguard and Blackrock are nextually, Like Vanguard's never going 338 00:17:28,560 --> 00:17:31,400 Speaker 6: to happen, but Blackrock we think that will probably happen. 339 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:33,119 Speaker 6: But we didn't think he'd be first or in with 340 00:17:33,240 --> 00:17:35,720 Speaker 6: the first guys. So you talk about clients wanting this, 341 00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 6: I guess what are the client questions you're fielding or 342 00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:41,919 Speaker 6: what were the questions like six months ago versus what 343 00:17:41,920 --> 00:17:44,159 Speaker 6: are the questions now? What type of conversations are you 344 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:46,399 Speaker 6: happening with those clients that wanted you to do this? 345 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,960 Speaker 3: A lot pretty steadily through you know, we're four months 346 00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:58,080 Speaker 3: in now, We've had hundreds of conversations across our client base, right, 347 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:01,880 Speaker 3: You could think of kind of our main distribution channels 348 00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:05,280 Speaker 3: and investor direct which right out of the gate they 349 00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:09,040 Speaker 3: were buying. There no hurdles to them getting access. That's 350 00:18:09,080 --> 00:18:12,560 Speaker 3: been I think the largest source of flows for sure, 351 00:18:13,240 --> 00:18:18,680 Speaker 3: second being wealth advisory channel and third being institutional, and 352 00:18:19,880 --> 00:18:23,720 Speaker 3: those latter two really operate on a longer timescale. Right, 353 00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:27,760 Speaker 3: There's a much longer, as you guys know, education, research, 354 00:18:27,840 --> 00:18:33,200 Speaker 3: diligence journey that underpins their process. So it's a lot 355 00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:37,400 Speaker 3: of conversations with our wealth advisory partners with home offices 356 00:18:37,480 --> 00:18:42,160 Speaker 3: who are considering the approval process for this because many 357 00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:46,280 Speaker 3: of those platforms it's available unsolicited today. Right, you guys 358 00:18:46,320 --> 00:18:49,199 Speaker 3: have covered this in the past, but not on a 359 00:18:49,280 --> 00:18:52,440 Speaker 3: solicited basis. So that's the process that they're going through. 360 00:18:52,480 --> 00:18:56,960 Speaker 3: And then institutional, when this happened, it restarted in many 361 00:18:56,960 --> 00:19:00,840 Speaker 3: cases those conversations of crypto or bitcoin, should we be 362 00:19:00,880 --> 00:19:01,560 Speaker 3: invested in this? 363 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 5: Right that in some cases. 364 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:05,359 Speaker 3: That firm has been having those conversations in twenty one 365 00:19:05,400 --> 00:19:07,520 Speaker 3: and twenty say, for some of they hadn't had it yet, 366 00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:09,119 Speaker 3: but this was a moment where they said, okay, we 367 00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:11,560 Speaker 3: better figure out what this thing is and how it 368 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:13,840 Speaker 3: fits the portfolio. And that's kind of the education that 369 00:19:13,880 --> 00:19:14,480 Speaker 3: we've been doing. 370 00:19:15,040 --> 00:19:17,880 Speaker 2: Let's go to advisors for a second. When we saw 371 00:19:17,920 --> 00:19:21,199 Speaker 2: the first inflows and the trade sizes for IBIT, it 372 00:19:21,280 --> 00:19:23,919 Speaker 2: looks small. It looked like a bunch of minos biting 373 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:27,679 Speaker 2: right occasionally a big bite, right, big trade. The thirteen 374 00:19:27,760 --> 00:19:30,120 Speaker 2: f's showing that there are advisors buying a couple hedge funds. 375 00:19:30,280 --> 00:19:33,400 Speaker 2: No major institutions yet. But when you look at all ETFs, 376 00:19:33,440 --> 00:19:36,240 Speaker 2: I think advisors are like seventy percent of the assets. 377 00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:39,600 Speaker 2: Like they're the biggest users of ETFs generally. And there's 378 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:41,760 Speaker 2: been this sort of debate on Twitter lately about whether 379 00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:44,480 Speaker 2: the boomer advisors are really coming. And let's bring up 380 00:19:44,520 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 2: this part about solicited versus unsoliciteds So what you're saying 381 00:19:47,800 --> 00:19:50,359 Speaker 2: now is that only if a client goes to the 382 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:53,280 Speaker 2: advisor says I need this, can they buy it. But 383 00:19:53,359 --> 00:19:55,720 Speaker 2: over time the advisor will be able to solicit it 384 00:19:55,760 --> 00:19:58,840 Speaker 2: to their clients. And where are we what inning are 385 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:01,200 Speaker 2: we on the solicit sure? 386 00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:01,760 Speaker 5: Sure? 387 00:20:02,280 --> 00:20:05,959 Speaker 3: So the standard process for new ETFs right is typically 388 00:20:06,040 --> 00:20:09,600 Speaker 3: a multi year journey from launch to actually being approved 389 00:20:09,800 --> 00:20:14,440 Speaker 3: for solicitation, right, And so I think what's happened here. 390 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:19,879 Speaker 3: Given some of the historic demand that we've seen around 391 00:20:19,880 --> 00:20:23,719 Speaker 3: this that you talked about, Eric, there's been an acceleration 392 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:27,000 Speaker 3: of that process for a lot of these home office 393 00:20:27,240 --> 00:20:30,760 Speaker 3: platforms at the Wealth Advisor. So that's a long journey. 394 00:20:30,800 --> 00:20:33,800 Speaker 3: There's a very intensive diligence process that goes into that. 395 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:37,200 Speaker 3: There's also an education process, and so we're going through 396 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:39,800 Speaker 3: that with them. Some will be faster than others, that's 397 00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:42,560 Speaker 3: just the nature of it, but certainly over the coming 398 00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:45,520 Speaker 3: months we would expect to see some of those approvals 399 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:48,840 Speaker 3: come online. The institutional piece is interesting. You mentioned that, 400 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:51,600 Speaker 3: remember on the thirteen apps that says of March thirty first, 401 00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:55,399 Speaker 3: So over the last couple of weeks you've started to 402 00:20:55,440 --> 00:20:58,800 Speaker 3: see some of those institutional conversations come to fruition. And 403 00:20:58,840 --> 00:21:02,879 Speaker 3: I think people forget with an investor direct. People say, Okay, well, 404 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:06,960 Speaker 3: that's like small dollar retail. Not necessarily we have within 405 00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:10,240 Speaker 3: that bucket a number of very large positions, right, So 406 00:21:10,280 --> 00:21:13,080 Speaker 3: we're talking about many of our holders are in the 407 00:21:13,160 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 3: ultra high net worth category holding in some cases nine 408 00:21:16,640 --> 00:21:19,680 Speaker 3: figure positions, right. And what we've found, we've been surprised 409 00:21:19,680 --> 00:21:21,640 Speaker 3: by some of the ways that this that ibit has 410 00:21:21,720 --> 00:21:26,040 Speaker 3: resonated with investors, even large existing bitcoin holders. One of 411 00:21:26,119 --> 00:21:28,679 Speaker 3: them that we found is very large holders like the 412 00:21:28,760 --> 00:21:33,800 Speaker 3: fact that one it's extremely liquid, right, ibit trades ibit 413 00:21:33,880 --> 00:21:37,760 Speaker 3: USD larger than many of the crypto exchanges in the 414 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:41,240 Speaker 3: world that's been around for a long time, and you 415 00:21:41,280 --> 00:21:44,320 Speaker 3: don't have to show your hand in moving bitcoin to 416 00:21:44,359 --> 00:21:47,720 Speaker 3: an exchange, right. So Wales hate the fact that people 417 00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:51,760 Speaker 3: monitor the blockchain for when bitcoin is being moved from 418 00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:56,040 Speaker 3: large wallets to exchanges. They don't have to tip, and 419 00:21:56,119 --> 00:21:58,479 Speaker 3: so we've seen actually a lot of very large bitcoin 420 00:21:58,520 --> 00:22:00,440 Speaker 3: holders coming to the product for that reason. 421 00:22:00,480 --> 00:22:03,159 Speaker 2: It is really interesting. In my first book, which I'll 422 00:22:03,200 --> 00:22:07,119 Speaker 2: Plug your Institutional ETF Toolbox, which Joel's read eighteen times, 423 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:13,359 Speaker 2: I remember institutions love the anonymity. They love that. They 424 00:22:13,400 --> 00:22:17,040 Speaker 2: also love liquidity, anonymity and freedom, and it sounds like 425 00:22:17,080 --> 00:22:18,959 Speaker 2: that's what you're talking about. The liquidity had to come 426 00:22:19,000 --> 00:22:21,000 Speaker 2: and you're trading a billion a day, which is that 427 00:22:21,000 --> 00:22:23,119 Speaker 2: that's what they need. So that's interesting that I do 428 00:22:23,200 --> 00:22:26,400 Speaker 2: agree institutions will bite probably more on on that. That's 429 00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:28,960 Speaker 2: why I think you're like the GLD, there can only 430 00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:31,080 Speaker 2: be one super mega liquid one, it looks like you're 431 00:22:31,119 --> 00:22:32,800 Speaker 2: going to be a Fidelities is pretty liquid, and the 432 00:22:32,840 --> 00:22:35,040 Speaker 2: others are pretty liquid, but none are in like the 433 00:22:35,040 --> 00:22:38,199 Speaker 2: top twenty most traded every day consistently like ibit, So 434 00:22:38,840 --> 00:22:41,680 Speaker 2: you get liquidity, jol. That's when that's like the best 435 00:22:41,680 --> 00:22:44,520 Speaker 2: big fish. Yeah, it's like chumming the water. 436 00:22:45,160 --> 00:22:48,000 Speaker 6: So you talked about these whales and people buying ibit, 437 00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:50,920 Speaker 6: I mean, what percentage allocations of a portfolio you're seeing? 438 00:22:50,960 --> 00:22:52,800 Speaker 6: Are you seeing people like you you always hear everyone 439 00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:55,000 Speaker 6: saying one to five percent or something? Are you seeing 440 00:22:55,000 --> 00:22:56,960 Speaker 6: people doing way more than that is? Are you actually 441 00:22:56,960 --> 00:22:58,520 Speaker 6: seeing the one to three percent when you're talking to 442 00:22:58,520 --> 00:23:01,320 Speaker 6: these clients, Like, how are clients looking at ibit and 443 00:23:01,440 --> 00:23:02,439 Speaker 6: just bitcoin in general? 444 00:23:02,920 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think that's probably the most intensive part of 445 00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:11,199 Speaker 3: our conversations and the education journey right now, frankly. And 446 00:23:11,600 --> 00:23:15,320 Speaker 3: it varies by investor type and risk references, et cetera. 447 00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:16,160 Speaker 5: Right, So there's no. 448 00:23:16,200 --> 00:23:19,040 Speaker 3: Kind of one size fits all, but we're doing a 449 00:23:19,080 --> 00:23:21,879 Speaker 3: lot of education with our clients around that, and I 450 00:23:21,880 --> 00:23:24,240 Speaker 3: would say one to three percent is probably the most 451 00:23:24,280 --> 00:23:27,840 Speaker 3: typical range for those who who are allocating. 452 00:23:28,720 --> 00:23:31,640 Speaker 2: And we talk about allocations, how is it being positioned, 453 00:23:31,680 --> 00:23:35,040 Speaker 2: because I see people who will there's all a big spectrum. 454 00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:37,800 Speaker 2: There's the hardcore people who are all in this is 455 00:23:37,880 --> 00:23:40,720 Speaker 2: like their religion. They think sixty forty is a scam. 456 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:42,760 Speaker 2: Will move them aside for a second they're a special 457 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:46,639 Speaker 2: Then they're sort of the more normal sixty forty ors 458 00:23:46,640 --> 00:23:49,000 Speaker 2: who are like, yeah, I don't want to kick myself 459 00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:50,760 Speaker 2: if this goes to a million, so they buy one 460 00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:54,719 Speaker 2: two percent. I would consider that hot sauce. Now, some 461 00:23:54,760 --> 00:23:57,520 Speaker 2: of the bitcoin issuers will try to sell this as 462 00:23:57,520 --> 00:24:01,280 Speaker 2: something that lowers your overall portfolio volatility. It's like digital gold. 463 00:24:01,640 --> 00:24:04,680 Speaker 2: But if you compare bitcoin to gold, bitcoin makes gold 464 00:24:04,680 --> 00:24:07,240 Speaker 2: look like a money market fund. To me, bitcoin would 465 00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:10,119 Speaker 2: be like double black diamond ski slope, whereas gold is 466 00:24:10,160 --> 00:24:13,800 Speaker 2: like the bunny slope in terms of volatility. Have you 467 00:24:14,880 --> 00:24:17,320 Speaker 2: are people understanding that it's hot sauce. The one thing 468 00:24:17,359 --> 00:24:19,240 Speaker 2: I fear is that they look at it as gold, 469 00:24:19,320 --> 00:24:22,000 Speaker 2: but it's not going to move like gold, and that 470 00:24:22,040 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 2: they need to make sure that they are ready for 471 00:24:24,040 --> 00:24:26,200 Speaker 2: this roller coaster ride. Is that how do you brace 472 00:24:26,280 --> 00:24:26,679 Speaker 2: them for this? 473 00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:30,480 Speaker 3: Certainly that's part of the education journey. But I think Eric, 474 00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:33,680 Speaker 3: you've hit on what is probably the most important debate 475 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:37,320 Speaker 3: in the space right now when we think about investment 476 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:42,200 Speaker 3: thesis risk portfolio construction. Is the nature of bitcoin's risk 477 00:24:42,800 --> 00:24:46,159 Speaker 3: and the reason I think it has so many people 478 00:24:46,200 --> 00:24:50,359 Speaker 3: confused is bitcoin has this duality to it. 479 00:24:50,720 --> 00:24:50,960 Speaker 5: Right. 480 00:24:51,600 --> 00:24:56,680 Speaker 3: On the one hand, it's a novel technology disruption, right. 481 00:24:57,880 --> 00:25:02,560 Speaker 3: It is potentially a global payment instrument, right, It's very 482 00:25:02,600 --> 00:25:05,960 Speaker 3: early in that journey. It is something that on that 483 00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:09,840 Speaker 3: basis as a sort of technology play and a beta 484 00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:13,119 Speaker 3: of some sorts to blockchain adoption, you would expect it 485 00:25:13,160 --> 00:25:18,800 Speaker 3: to be highly volatile, correlated and would look more like 486 00:25:19,440 --> 00:25:20,960 Speaker 3: tech or VC in a portfolio. 487 00:25:21,080 --> 00:25:21,240 Speaker 5: Right. 488 00:25:21,880 --> 00:25:26,280 Speaker 3: And on the other hand, it is a global, non sovereign, 489 00:25:26,320 --> 00:25:32,240 Speaker 3: scarce decentralized, global monetary alternative of sorts, right. And so 490 00:25:32,280 --> 00:25:36,359 Speaker 3: that's where the digital goal thesis comes from. And there 491 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:39,240 Speaker 3: you would also expect it to be volatile because it's 492 00:25:39,280 --> 00:25:42,080 Speaker 3: early and it's adoption on that journey, But you expect 493 00:25:42,119 --> 00:25:45,320 Speaker 3: it to be uncorrelated and a potential hedge to some 494 00:25:45,440 --> 00:25:50,880 Speaker 3: of these rich factors inflation, monetary debasement, geopolitical et cetera. Right, 495 00:25:51,520 --> 00:25:54,480 Speaker 3: And that's where the tension comes in because how you 496 00:25:54,520 --> 00:25:56,639 Speaker 3: think about it in a portfolio depends very much on 497 00:25:56,680 --> 00:25:59,520 Speaker 3: which of those narratives prevails. I think the direction of 498 00:25:59,520 --> 00:26:04,000 Speaker 3: travel is increasingly towards the latter, because fundamentally, over a 499 00:26:04,040 --> 00:26:06,679 Speaker 3: longer term, I think that's the bigger component of what 500 00:26:06,800 --> 00:26:09,720 Speaker 3: drives bitcoin. But it's gonna have short term episodes where 501 00:26:09,720 --> 00:26:12,000 Speaker 3: there's a lot of noise around that, so people certainly 502 00:26:12,000 --> 00:26:13,760 Speaker 3: have to be ready for that ride. 503 00:26:13,840 --> 00:26:17,480 Speaker 2: I thought of the best catchphrase for it. It's like gold, 504 00:26:17,640 --> 00:26:20,240 Speaker 2: but as a teenager, you know it's out the party, 505 00:26:20,359 --> 00:26:23,320 Speaker 2: bring all the rules, expect your car to get stolen 506 00:26:23,320 --> 00:26:24,719 Speaker 2: in the middle of the night, like all that kind 507 00:26:24,760 --> 00:26:27,240 Speaker 2: of stuff. It's not going to be dull, right, Gold 508 00:26:27,320 --> 00:26:29,159 Speaker 2: is eight thousand years old. This is like gold is 509 00:26:29,200 --> 00:26:30,040 Speaker 2: like a seventeen year. 510 00:26:29,920 --> 00:26:32,680 Speaker 6: Old role to be fair, the common phrase that people 511 00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:34,640 Speaker 6: meant and including me, for many years, have been using 512 00:26:34,760 --> 00:26:37,439 Speaker 6: is a call option of store value asset, which is 513 00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:43,520 Speaker 6: like a monocle Pooh or super smart one, but like 514 00:26:44,160 --> 00:26:46,080 Speaker 6: a call option in store of value asset is what 515 00:26:46,119 --> 00:26:47,480 Speaker 6: a lot of people have been referring to it. 516 00:26:47,520 --> 00:26:50,040 Speaker 2: As the other description I heard that I thought resonated 517 00:26:50,080 --> 00:26:52,920 Speaker 2: was some guy, this retail person on Twitter, just the 518 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:56,000 Speaker 2: regular guys like, it's like the Second Amendment for money, 519 00:26:56,680 --> 00:26:58,760 Speaker 2: which I thought about it. I thought about it. I'm like, 520 00:26:58,800 --> 00:27:01,160 Speaker 2: I get that it's like protect from your own government 521 00:27:01,840 --> 00:27:05,560 Speaker 2: from devaluing the currency, which honestly sends wealth right up 522 00:27:05,600 --> 00:27:09,040 Speaker 2: to the top. And so this idea of like devaluation 523 00:27:09,119 --> 00:27:11,920 Speaker 2: and you have something to protect yourself from it. How 524 00:27:12,000 --> 00:27:17,360 Speaker 2: much does that resonate with advisors versus just simple Hey man, 525 00:27:17,480 --> 00:27:19,320 Speaker 2: this thing is cool. I don't want to miss out if. 526 00:27:19,240 --> 00:27:23,000 Speaker 5: It goes to a million. It's some of each. 527 00:27:23,720 --> 00:27:27,040 Speaker 3: But I think that in the US and Europe in particular, 528 00:27:27,880 --> 00:27:30,399 Speaker 3: that first piece is a little bit harder to grasp. 529 00:27:30,680 --> 00:27:32,680 Speaker 5: Right. The US has enjoyed this. 530 00:27:33,080 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 3: Incredible run of the post World War two era, basically 531 00:27:37,560 --> 00:27:43,040 Speaker 3: eight decades of pretty remarkable stability and prosperity, right, And 532 00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:48,760 Speaker 3: that is an outlier in human history, in financial history, 533 00:27:49,520 --> 00:27:53,840 Speaker 3: and so it's harder to grasp why you would have 534 00:27:53,920 --> 00:28:01,480 Speaker 3: to worry about the debasement of money or political dysfunction, destabilization, 535 00:28:01,560 --> 00:28:05,640 Speaker 3: et cetera for an American, specifically those of an older generation. 536 00:28:06,119 --> 00:28:10,119 Speaker 3: The reality is around the world, there's about four billion 537 00:28:10,320 --> 00:28:15,920 Speaker 3: people who live in some sort of non democratic regime, right, 538 00:28:16,520 --> 00:28:20,040 Speaker 3: You've got about two billion people who live in hyperinflationary 539 00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:24,679 Speaker 3: or severe inflationary monetary regime. So for those people, this 540 00:28:24,840 --> 00:28:28,720 Speaker 3: is very real and they've lived it. For Americans, it 541 00:28:28,760 --> 00:28:33,600 Speaker 3: can be a little bit more amorphous that this concept. 542 00:28:37,880 --> 00:28:39,280 Speaker 6: When you guys are talking about this, what do you 543 00:28:39,360 --> 00:28:41,480 Speaker 6: view the what do you think it's correlated to or 544 00:28:41,680 --> 00:28:44,880 Speaker 6: inversely correlated to? Are you looking at the dollar real rates? 545 00:28:44,960 --> 00:28:47,120 Speaker 6: Like what inflation? How do you guys talk about this 546 00:28:47,160 --> 00:28:49,840 Speaker 6: with clients? From a correlation's point of view, you've danced 547 00:28:49,840 --> 00:28:51,320 Speaker 6: around with a lot of this talk. 548 00:28:51,360 --> 00:28:51,960 Speaker 1: Let's dive right. 549 00:28:52,240 --> 00:28:57,160 Speaker 3: The correlation is super super important, right, because volatility is volatility, right, 550 00:28:57,320 --> 00:29:00,720 Speaker 3: And because it's so volatile, we're not recommend it in 551 00:29:00,840 --> 00:29:03,640 Speaker 3: large concentrations in a portfolio because then the volatility really 552 00:29:03,720 --> 00:29:07,200 Speaker 3: starts to add to risk. But at smaller concentrations, the 553 00:29:07,240 --> 00:29:14,200 Speaker 3: correlation becomes the key factor. And fundamentally, from a macro perspective, 554 00:29:14,720 --> 00:29:19,360 Speaker 3: you can sum up most of Bitcoin's correlation where it 555 00:29:19,440 --> 00:29:22,400 Speaker 3: exists to so called risk assets. 556 00:29:22,720 --> 00:29:24,000 Speaker 5: Based on real interest rates. 557 00:29:24,200 --> 00:29:28,160 Speaker 3: Right, Bitcoin is massively short real interest rates, it is 558 00:29:28,760 --> 00:29:32,440 Speaker 3: short nominal rates, and it is long inflation expectations. You 559 00:29:32,480 --> 00:29:35,440 Speaker 3: look at the charting of this, it's quite striking, and 560 00:29:35,520 --> 00:29:37,520 Speaker 3: of course the alternative way of thinking about it is 561 00:29:37,640 --> 00:29:42,280 Speaker 3: versus the dollar, and bitcoin is also very inversely exposed 562 00:29:42,280 --> 00:29:44,360 Speaker 3: to the dollar, and of course the dollar and real 563 00:29:44,400 --> 00:29:46,760 Speaker 3: interest rates have their own pretty tight correlation. So that 564 00:29:46,840 --> 00:29:50,320 Speaker 3: explains most of the correlation that exists, because fundamentally, on 565 00:29:50,360 --> 00:29:53,040 Speaker 3: other metrics, you'd expect that correlation to be low or 566 00:29:53,040 --> 00:29:54,840 Speaker 3: even in some ways the negative. 567 00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:58,600 Speaker 6: So the pitch should be basically inversely correlated to real 568 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:00,920 Speaker 6: rates expectations that but. 569 00:30:00,960 --> 00:30:02,160 Speaker 2: Also the volatility. 570 00:30:02,280 --> 00:30:04,240 Speaker 6: You talk about volatility as a bug, but I almost 571 00:30:04,440 --> 00:30:05,880 Speaker 6: I think of it more as a feature. If you 572 00:30:05,880 --> 00:30:07,480 Speaker 6: look at any of this research, if you do any 573 00:30:07,480 --> 00:30:11,080 Speaker 6: sort of semblance of regular rebalancing, whether it's quarterly, semi annually, 574 00:30:11,160 --> 00:30:13,760 Speaker 6: or annually, if you can manage to sell when it's 575 00:30:13,760 --> 00:30:15,920 Speaker 6: a little bit, when it's going way high through the 576 00:30:15,960 --> 00:30:19,080 Speaker 6: roof and these massive bull markets, and buy after it's 577 00:30:19,080 --> 00:30:21,800 Speaker 6: collapsed eighty percent, which happens pretty much every single cycle, 578 00:30:22,040 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 6: that's where a lot of this sharp ratio seems to 579 00:30:24,440 --> 00:30:26,479 Speaker 6: come from any back test analysis that I've done, so 580 00:30:26,880 --> 00:30:28,960 Speaker 6: is that the pitch you're giving to these advisors do 581 00:30:29,000 --> 00:30:31,280 Speaker 6: this put in an allocation and just rebalance it and 582 00:30:31,360 --> 00:30:32,760 Speaker 6: make sure you do it properly. 583 00:30:32,840 --> 00:30:35,120 Speaker 3: Well, I think that market timing is easier said than 584 00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:38,080 Speaker 3: done right because sometimes it may look like the top 585 00:30:38,120 --> 00:30:40,040 Speaker 3: and it's not yet, and sometimes it may look like 586 00:30:40,080 --> 00:30:41,240 Speaker 3: the bottom and there's a. 587 00:30:41,280 --> 00:30:42,160 Speaker 5: Ways to go yet. 588 00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:45,240 Speaker 3: So historically, for bitcoin, the best way to trade it 589 00:30:45,280 --> 00:30:48,120 Speaker 3: was to buy and hold it for a long period. 590 00:30:48,200 --> 00:30:50,120 Speaker 3: The people who had the discipline to do that over 591 00:30:50,120 --> 00:30:54,200 Speaker 3: the last ten years fifteen years did extraordinarily well. So 592 00:30:54,240 --> 00:30:57,480 Speaker 3: we're certainly not trying to advocate market timing. 593 00:30:57,280 --> 00:30:59,719 Speaker 6: For Sorry, I just meant regular rebalancing, which I know 594 00:30:59,760 --> 00:31:02,160 Speaker 6: like bitcoin believers here out there listening to that, and 595 00:31:02,200 --> 00:31:03,320 Speaker 6: that's like blasphemous. 596 00:31:03,560 --> 00:31:07,440 Speaker 2: Well, let's talk about behavior, because I frequently debate this. 597 00:31:07,720 --> 00:31:10,040 Speaker 2: When the bitcoin ets were taking your money, all of 598 00:31:10,080 --> 00:31:15,440 Speaker 2: the degens were thrilled. They're basically celebrating, and then they 599 00:31:15,480 --> 00:31:19,000 Speaker 2: top off a little. There's other sellers. The ETF flows 600 00:31:19,000 --> 00:31:21,960 Speaker 2: seem to be somewhat driving the price, but there's definitely 601 00:31:22,080 --> 00:31:24,520 Speaker 2: the ETF flows have the price going up, and then 602 00:31:24,520 --> 00:31:27,280 Speaker 2: you can tell there's actually like whales selling or somebody else, 603 00:31:27,360 --> 00:31:29,680 Speaker 2: like clearly it's not the ETFs. Then the price kind 604 00:31:29,680 --> 00:31:32,560 Speaker 2: of flat lines and the ETF flows follow, which is normal, 605 00:31:33,080 --> 00:31:34,800 Speaker 2: but in the past sell off there's been like a 606 00:31:34,880 --> 00:31:37,320 Speaker 2: month of like shaky flows. I think it's added up 607 00:31:37,360 --> 00:31:39,480 Speaker 2: to about three percent of total assets, so not a lot, 608 00:31:40,160 --> 00:31:44,360 Speaker 2: but everybody's all, look, the boomers have lettuce hands. Yeah, 609 00:31:44,600 --> 00:31:46,280 Speaker 2: and I'm like, first of all, it's three percent of 610 00:31:46,320 --> 00:31:48,680 Speaker 2: the assets. Second of all, ETFs or hotels, people come 611 00:31:48,680 --> 00:31:50,640 Speaker 2: in and out. It's the way it is. And then 612 00:31:50,960 --> 00:31:53,840 Speaker 2: I do think that ETF investors are usually heads up. 613 00:31:53,840 --> 00:31:55,959 Speaker 2: If you're smart enough to know what an ETF is 614 00:31:56,000 --> 00:31:58,520 Speaker 2: and use it, you've probably used one before, and you 615 00:31:58,560 --> 00:32:01,120 Speaker 2: probably have this as a small occasi. This isn't like 616 00:32:01,360 --> 00:32:04,680 Speaker 2: the whole enchilada, so you can stomach more volatility. So 617 00:32:05,400 --> 00:32:07,880 Speaker 2: my view is there will be some outflows, but over 618 00:32:07,920 --> 00:32:10,280 Speaker 2: time I think these are more diamond hand investors than 619 00:32:10,800 --> 00:32:13,000 Speaker 2: some think. Is that true? 620 00:32:14,240 --> 00:32:17,800 Speaker 3: Well, certainly our client base I think is taking more 621 00:32:17,840 --> 00:32:21,120 Speaker 3: of a long term buy and hold view than a 622 00:32:21,160 --> 00:32:25,440 Speaker 3: lot of the sometimes frivolous trading activity that happens more 623 00:32:25,440 --> 00:32:31,520 Speaker 3: broadly in crypto markets. Ultimately, the ETFs are an access vehicle, right, 624 00:32:31,560 --> 00:32:34,800 Speaker 3: They're an efficient, comedian access vehicle that has taken away 625 00:32:34,800 --> 00:32:38,360 Speaker 3: frictions from some portions of the market that historically may 626 00:32:38,400 --> 00:32:41,120 Speaker 3: have liked or wanted to participate in bitcoin who couldn't, 627 00:32:41,160 --> 00:32:43,880 Speaker 3: and now they are and I think ultimately that's making 628 00:32:43,920 --> 00:32:45,840 Speaker 3: the market more efficient and more liquid. 629 00:32:46,920 --> 00:32:50,400 Speaker 6: So talking about an access vehicle. We've talked about institutions 630 00:32:50,440 --> 00:32:53,120 Speaker 6: a lot, but like thirteen fs, we'veeen granted, there's still 631 00:32:53,160 --> 00:32:55,440 Speaker 6: some time left before they all file, but like, when 632 00:32:55,600 --> 00:32:58,400 Speaker 6: are the institutions coming? I mean, forever you've been hearing 633 00:32:58,440 --> 00:33:01,880 Speaker 6: people on crypto Twitter and elsewhere saying the institutions are coming. 634 00:33:01,880 --> 00:33:04,280 Speaker 6: I heard is coming, But when are the institutions coming? 635 00:33:04,320 --> 00:33:08,360 Speaker 2: I think crypto twitter also thinks advisors or institutions. Crypto 636 00:33:08,360 --> 00:33:11,320 Speaker 2: Twitter thinks anybody without like a coinbase account is like 637 00:33:11,360 --> 00:33:12,360 Speaker 2: an institution. 638 00:33:12,160 --> 00:33:14,840 Speaker 5: Right, I think some parts of crypto Twitter. 639 00:33:14,840 --> 00:33:17,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, they just think someone wearing like pleated khaki pants 640 00:33:17,560 --> 00:33:21,760 Speaker 2: to golfs that's like the institution for them. Well, I'm 641 00:33:21,800 --> 00:33:26,160 Speaker 2: talking about pensions. Someone said someone said bitcoin ETFs are 642 00:33:26,200 --> 00:33:29,160 Speaker 2: for your parents. That was like, I forget what article did, 643 00:33:29,160 --> 00:33:30,760 Speaker 2: but that I thought that was a pretty accurate. This 644 00:33:30,840 --> 00:33:32,800 Speaker 2: is the boomer The boomers are coming. 645 00:33:33,080 --> 00:33:36,320 Speaker 3: We talked about those three buckets, right, and investor, direct, 646 00:33:36,520 --> 00:33:39,920 Speaker 3: advisory and institutional It's just just the longest timescale for sure. 647 00:33:40,120 --> 00:33:45,000 Speaker 3: There's a very significant research, education, diligence process that is 648 00:33:45,160 --> 00:33:48,920 Speaker 3: going into it, and I think that we're still very 649 00:33:48,960 --> 00:33:51,200 Speaker 3: early on that journey. Obviously, there are a handful of 650 00:33:51,200 --> 00:33:54,480 Speaker 3: institutions who over the years, very small number who allocated 651 00:33:54,520 --> 00:33:58,120 Speaker 3: to bitcoin directly, who overcame the pretty significant frictions to 652 00:33:58,480 --> 00:33:58,800 Speaker 3: do that. 653 00:33:59,440 --> 00:34:00,960 Speaker 5: A little bit larger number. 654 00:34:00,680 --> 00:34:05,120 Speaker 3: Who allocated to the sector, to the technology or asset 655 00:34:05,160 --> 00:34:08,360 Speaker 3: class more broadly, typically through funds. Venture funds were a 656 00:34:08,360 --> 00:34:11,399 Speaker 3: popular way to do it, But it's still early. What 657 00:34:11,440 --> 00:34:14,960 Speaker 3: I can say is there's plenty who are on that 658 00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:19,440 Speaker 3: research journey, and that's part of the education that we're 659 00:34:19,640 --> 00:34:20,719 Speaker 3: doing every day. 660 00:34:21,600 --> 00:34:24,120 Speaker 1: What do you think is next for the crypto industry 661 00:34:24,400 --> 00:34:27,960 Speaker 1: as a whole? I mean, not that we have ETFs trading, 662 00:34:28,160 --> 00:34:29,880 Speaker 1: what does it mean for the rest of the industry. 663 00:34:30,680 --> 00:34:34,160 Speaker 3: You know, obviously there's a much longer tail of crypto 664 00:34:34,200 --> 00:34:39,360 Speaker 3: assets than bitcoin or bitcoin and ether. For us, for 665 00:34:39,520 --> 00:34:44,319 Speaker 3: our clients, their interest overwhelmingly has been in bitcoin, a 666 00:34:44,360 --> 00:34:47,520 Speaker 3: little bit in ethereum, and not a whole lot in 667 00:34:47,800 --> 00:34:51,080 Speaker 3: that longer tail of ten thousand plus assets, So I 668 00:34:51,120 --> 00:34:53,960 Speaker 3: think it's important to make that distinction between the two. 669 00:34:54,040 --> 00:34:57,560 Speaker 3: Certainly there's some great projects out there in that larger 670 00:34:57,960 --> 00:35:00,600 Speaker 3: group of assets, but there's also been a lot of 671 00:35:00,640 --> 00:35:04,279 Speaker 3: pretty frivolous projects, right, A lot of tokens that have 672 00:35:04,360 --> 00:35:06,960 Speaker 3: been flashing the pan and they've come and gone, and 673 00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:09,400 Speaker 3: there's been you know, hype associated with them that hasn't 674 00:35:09,400 --> 00:35:12,080 Speaker 3: been backed up by real economic substance. So it's going 675 00:35:12,160 --> 00:35:14,399 Speaker 3: to be a long journey for some of the rest 676 00:35:14,400 --> 00:35:18,239 Speaker 3: of crypto to really start establishing product market fit and 677 00:35:18,440 --> 00:35:22,440 Speaker 3: economic use cases before they start to cross that chasm 678 00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:25,759 Speaker 3: into what we've seen obviously Bitcoin become. 679 00:35:25,640 --> 00:35:27,440 Speaker 1: So bitcoin maximalists. 680 00:35:28,400 --> 00:35:34,359 Speaker 3: Bull maximus would be a little stronger, but certainly it's 681 00:35:34,440 --> 00:35:36,680 Speaker 3: unique and it's where it is today. 682 00:35:36,760 --> 00:35:38,879 Speaker 2: We've seen when they launched bitcoin and ether together, whether 683 00:35:38,920 --> 00:35:40,920 Speaker 2: it's futures or like in Hong Kong, they launched both 684 00:35:40,920 --> 00:35:43,400 Speaker 2: at the same time. I think e've got fifteen percent 685 00:35:43,520 --> 00:35:47,080 Speaker 2: of the assets twenty over twenty twenty. Yeah, I think 686 00:35:47,080 --> 00:35:49,160 Speaker 2: it was a little less. He's more bullish than I 687 00:35:49,400 --> 00:35:52,560 Speaker 2: it was. I tot you funny is to me, Bitcoin 688 00:35:52,640 --> 00:35:55,440 Speaker 2: is the headliner and eth coming out next if it 689 00:35:55,440 --> 00:35:57,799 Speaker 2: ever gets approved would be like the opening Act coming 690 00:35:57,840 --> 00:36:01,799 Speaker 2: out after So I just mostly focused mentally on the 691 00:36:01,800 --> 00:36:05,640 Speaker 2: bitcoin ETFs. I think eth also speaks to what I 692 00:36:05,680 --> 00:36:08,239 Speaker 2: was going to ask you next, which is tokenization, And 693 00:36:08,360 --> 00:36:11,800 Speaker 2: I wanted to ask you about that because when Larry's 694 00:36:11,800 --> 00:36:13,799 Speaker 2: on Fox, he does talk about the bitcoin ETF, then 695 00:36:13,800 --> 00:36:17,239 Speaker 2: he pivots to tokenization. Now, are you talking about tokenizing 696 00:36:17,760 --> 00:36:21,320 Speaker 2: everything so that Microsoft shares and even your own ETFs 697 00:36:21,320 --> 00:36:24,239 Speaker 2: are tokenized? Or we just talking about tokenizing things that 698 00:36:24,280 --> 00:36:28,040 Speaker 2: are hard to get like artwork or farmland in Iowa 699 00:36:28,120 --> 00:36:32,040 Speaker 2: where you can just now places ETFs can't go. What 700 00:36:32,080 --> 00:36:33,640 Speaker 2: are we looking at in ten years? 701 00:36:34,800 --> 00:36:36,680 Speaker 3: So I think if we go back to that three 702 00:36:36,680 --> 00:36:40,319 Speaker 3: pillar frame where crypto stable coins, tokenization is by far 703 00:36:40,480 --> 00:36:43,400 Speaker 3: the least developed of those three right now from an 704 00:36:43,400 --> 00:36:47,000 Speaker 3: industry perspective. Right that said, there's a lot of excitement 705 00:36:47,040 --> 00:36:51,440 Speaker 3: around it because the potential future state and I don't. 706 00:36:51,200 --> 00:36:52,800 Speaker 5: Know whether this will be realized. 707 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:56,439 Speaker 3: I don't think anyone really knows, but certainly possible of 708 00:36:56,680 --> 00:37:01,560 Speaker 3: a world where a blockchain digital asset token becomes the 709 00:37:01,600 --> 00:37:07,759 Speaker 3: primary format for the majority of investment assets and securities. 710 00:37:07,840 --> 00:37:12,840 Speaker 3: Right that's a possibility, and that is a really interesting 711 00:37:12,840 --> 00:37:17,960 Speaker 3: world in a lot of ways, or something that becomes global, universal, 712 00:37:18,200 --> 00:37:23,319 Speaker 3: digitally native, transparent, instantaneously transferable, programmable, all these attributes of 713 00:37:23,760 --> 00:37:27,680 Speaker 3: tokenization that are behind why there's so much optimism for 714 00:37:27,719 --> 00:37:30,560 Speaker 3: it and for us, it's a story of how does 715 00:37:30,640 --> 00:37:35,160 Speaker 3: this increase access and lower costs for our investors. The 716 00:37:35,719 --> 00:37:40,760 Speaker 3: substance today, though, is that tokenization has not yet taken 717 00:37:40,800 --> 00:37:44,640 Speaker 3: off at scale in any meaningful way, right, and so 718 00:37:44,719 --> 00:37:46,960 Speaker 3: there's a lot of work happening. I think what you 719 00:37:47,080 --> 00:37:50,040 Speaker 3: need to see is a coalescence around what are the 720 00:37:50,080 --> 00:37:52,440 Speaker 3: right asset classes to start with? Forget about where we're 721 00:37:52,440 --> 00:37:54,200 Speaker 3: going to finish and what's going to be included in that. 722 00:37:54,400 --> 00:37:56,399 Speaker 3: Where do we start so that we can say there's 723 00:37:56,400 --> 00:37:58,840 Speaker 3: a geography, there's an asset class that we used to 724 00:37:59,360 --> 00:38:02,360 Speaker 3: trade and an issue this way, and now we primarily 725 00:38:02,440 --> 00:38:06,400 Speaker 3: do it using a digital asset token and then having 726 00:38:06,680 --> 00:38:10,440 Speaker 3: the custody and the trading and the regulatory support infrastructure 727 00:38:10,719 --> 00:38:11,920 Speaker 3: to actually make that happen. 728 00:38:12,080 --> 00:38:13,560 Speaker 5: We're just early in that journey. 729 00:38:13,760 --> 00:38:15,960 Speaker 1: Let me ask similar question in a different way, which 730 00:38:15,960 --> 00:38:17,480 Speaker 1: is there anything that the ETF can't do? 731 00:38:22,600 --> 00:38:26,200 Speaker 3: ETS is a pretty good wrapper. It's popular for a reason. 732 00:38:26,719 --> 00:38:28,200 Speaker 3: I haven't thought about that question though. 733 00:38:28,480 --> 00:38:31,640 Speaker 2: I think some of the crypto crowd underrates the disruptive 734 00:38:31,719 --> 00:38:34,239 Speaker 2: ability of the ETFs. I think they think crypto is 735 00:38:34,280 --> 00:38:38,040 Speaker 2: the big disruptor of everything. But ETFs, I think are 736 00:38:38,080 --> 00:38:41,479 Speaker 2: gonna push down costs from the exchanges. If you're doing 737 00:38:41,520 --> 00:38:44,839 Speaker 2: direct indexing for advisors, you're probably charging one percent. You're 738 00:38:44,880 --> 00:38:49,120 Speaker 2: going to get pushed down. There's nothing like a highly liquid, 739 00:38:49,480 --> 00:38:51,759 Speaker 2: cheap ETF, and the US is full of them, and 740 00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:54,880 Speaker 2: these are already at twenty to thirty basis points with 741 00:38:54,920 --> 00:38:59,640 Speaker 2: a billion dollars in liquidity. I can't overstate how powerfully 742 00:38:59,640 --> 00:39:03,280 Speaker 2: attract act of that is to every investor. We're probably 743 00:39:03,280 --> 00:39:05,319 Speaker 2: going to see people come over from other countries who 744 00:39:05,360 --> 00:39:09,040 Speaker 2: are big investors just to get that. It's just hard 745 00:39:09,080 --> 00:39:10,719 Speaker 2: to compete with that. 746 00:39:11,000 --> 00:39:14,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, So what's interesting, you know, comparing the ETF and 747 00:39:14,920 --> 00:39:18,480 Speaker 3: a digital asset token as a rapper. If you look 748 00:39:18,520 --> 00:39:21,160 Speaker 3: at the two things. Two major announcements we had this 749 00:39:21,239 --> 00:39:24,960 Speaker 3: year obviously i BIT in digital asset space and our 750 00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:30,160 Speaker 3: tokenized yield fund on a public blockchain, and they do the. 751 00:39:30,080 --> 00:39:35,800 Speaker 5: Opposite of each other. Yeah, which is i BIT takes 752 00:39:36,320 --> 00:39:37,800 Speaker 5: a crypto. 753 00:39:37,400 --> 00:39:39,839 Speaker 3: Asset underlying investment and puts it in a trad FI 754 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:45,040 Speaker 3: rapper an ETF wrapper, right, And a tokenized fund takes 755 00:39:45,239 --> 00:39:48,000 Speaker 3: a trad FI underlying investment and puts it in a 756 00:39:48,040 --> 00:39:51,560 Speaker 3: crypto wrapper. And you might say, well, that's contradictory, but 757 00:39:51,600 --> 00:39:54,120 Speaker 3: it's really not, because what it's a reflection of is 758 00:39:54,280 --> 00:39:58,960 Speaker 3: across our client base there are various stages of their 759 00:39:59,000 --> 00:40:05,040 Speaker 3: evolution and have very different preferences around infrastructure and access method, 760 00:40:05,080 --> 00:40:08,080 Speaker 3: et cetera. And so for a lot of our clients, 761 00:40:08,160 --> 00:40:10,800 Speaker 3: certainly the majority of our client the ETF is a 762 00:40:10,920 --> 00:40:14,160 Speaker 3: much more efficient convenient way to access something like bitcoin. 763 00:40:15,080 --> 00:40:17,920 Speaker 5: And for some of our clients who are now. 764 00:40:18,080 --> 00:40:21,320 Speaker 3: Crypto fluent or they're active in digital asset world and 765 00:40:21,360 --> 00:40:25,279 Speaker 3: they're used to blockchain wallets and settling on chain, they 766 00:40:25,320 --> 00:40:27,360 Speaker 3: love the idea of having a black rock fund that 767 00:40:27,560 --> 00:40:32,719 Speaker 3: is digitally native, instantly transferable, et cetera. So both are 768 00:40:32,760 --> 00:40:35,640 Speaker 3: happening in parallel, and perhaps one day we see a 769 00:40:35,640 --> 00:40:37,520 Speaker 3: convergence that's the best of both, but I think that's 770 00:40:37,560 --> 00:40:38,279 Speaker 3: a long way off. 771 00:40:38,719 --> 00:40:41,960 Speaker 6: We're coming up on a deadline for some spot theorerem ETFs. 772 00:40:42,400 --> 00:40:44,319 Speaker 6: You guys have an active filing, but what are the 773 00:40:44,320 --> 00:40:46,319 Speaker 6: prospects internally. Do you think we're going to get an 774 00:40:46,320 --> 00:40:47,480 Speaker 6: ethereum spot ETF. 775 00:40:47,840 --> 00:40:50,600 Speaker 5: Given it's an active perspectus, I can't comment. 776 00:40:50,640 --> 00:40:52,799 Speaker 2: If they don't get approved, there'll be five hundred and 777 00:40:52,840 --> 00:40:57,800 Speaker 2: seventy five and two approvals. That's it, look it, hey, man, here's. 778 00:40:58,000 --> 00:40:59,080 Speaker 5: Sure it's never come up. 779 00:40:59,320 --> 00:40:59,840 Speaker 1: Yeah. 780 00:41:01,320 --> 00:41:03,520 Speaker 6: People were like, BlackRock's not going to file if they 781 00:41:03,560 --> 00:41:05,239 Speaker 6: think they could get denied. In my mind, I was like, 782 00:41:05,280 --> 00:41:07,839 Speaker 6: Blackrock doesn't care well if they get denied in their 783 00:41:08,400 --> 00:41:10,719 Speaker 6: record is they're trying to get it approved. Do you 784 00:41:10,760 --> 00:41:13,760 Speaker 6: guys talk about the idea like, we can't tarnish our record. 785 00:41:14,000 --> 00:41:17,400 Speaker 5: We're a lot more focused on the client out. 786 00:41:18,080 --> 00:41:20,000 Speaker 2: The number out there, which Fox never gave me credit. 787 00:41:20,000 --> 00:41:22,200 Speaker 2: But that's okay. Yeah, But it wasn't to say they're 788 00:41:22,239 --> 00:41:23,719 Speaker 2: focused on it was just to say this is how 789 00:41:23,760 --> 00:41:26,799 Speaker 2: powerful and not messing around this company is, right. That 790 00:41:26,920 --> 00:41:29,600 Speaker 2: is some record right speaking of that, like the in 791 00:41:29,719 --> 00:41:32,279 Speaker 2: kind versus cash creations, just to get wonky in kind 792 00:41:32,280 --> 00:41:34,600 Speaker 2: would be ideal for the industry, but SEC would only 793 00:41:34,600 --> 00:41:37,600 Speaker 2: allow cash creations for these spot ETFs. Looks like they're 794 00:41:37,600 --> 00:41:39,600 Speaker 2: doing fine. It wasn't a big deal, but I know 795 00:41:39,680 --> 00:41:41,959 Speaker 2: in kind is what you wanted and others you didn't 796 00:41:42,000 --> 00:41:45,200 Speaker 2: get it, which proves that Blackrock isn't dictating things. Do 797 00:41:45,239 --> 00:41:46,840 Speaker 2: we think do you think we'll get in kind in 798 00:41:46,880 --> 00:41:48,000 Speaker 2: the next year or two? 799 00:41:49,200 --> 00:41:51,600 Speaker 3: I hope at some point our views on it were 800 00:41:51,600 --> 00:41:54,680 Speaker 3: all public in the SEC discussions that we had with 801 00:41:54,760 --> 00:41:58,120 Speaker 3: them on it. And ultimately what we're focused on is 802 00:41:58,880 --> 00:42:03,359 Speaker 3: it's even more from a market structure perspective, better for 803 00:42:03,400 --> 00:42:06,600 Speaker 3: investors that way. And there are a lot of clients, 804 00:42:06,640 --> 00:42:12,080 Speaker 3: frankly who have large Bitcoin positions and they would like 805 00:42:12,120 --> 00:42:14,920 Speaker 3: to hold some or all of that in an ETF, 806 00:42:15,600 --> 00:42:18,920 Speaker 3: but without in kind, they would have to incur a 807 00:42:19,000 --> 00:42:22,560 Speaker 3: tax realization, and so there's some eagerness from those folks 808 00:42:22,640 --> 00:42:23,359 Speaker 3: to have that. 809 00:42:24,120 --> 00:42:27,200 Speaker 6: Crenshaw, who's one of the commissioners, was the I've heard 810 00:42:27,280 --> 00:42:29,719 Speaker 6: is the driving force behind us having castreats and not 811 00:42:29,800 --> 00:42:30,439 Speaker 6: having in kind. 812 00:42:30,440 --> 00:42:31,680 Speaker 1: Who's a Democratic commissioner. 813 00:42:31,960 --> 00:42:34,440 Speaker 6: So depending on what happens in November with the election, 814 00:42:34,600 --> 00:42:36,520 Speaker 6: like all these questions could be completely different. 815 00:42:36,719 --> 00:42:38,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, could be moot because I think. 816 00:42:37,920 --> 00:42:40,839 Speaker 6: A Republican administration will be much more amenable to in 817 00:42:40,920 --> 00:42:42,640 Speaker 6: kind transactions. 818 00:42:43,080 --> 00:42:45,400 Speaker 1: What did you learn about yourself through this? 819 00:42:48,480 --> 00:42:50,840 Speaker 3: I was expecting that one. Now, I think that so 820 00:42:51,480 --> 00:42:56,360 Speaker 3: patience was not something that I would say I necessarily 821 00:42:56,400 --> 00:42:59,799 Speaker 3: have a lot of, but I have maybe a little 822 00:42:59,800 --> 00:43:01,880 Speaker 3: bit more than I thought I didn't. I think that 823 00:43:02,600 --> 00:43:06,680 Speaker 3: for big things to happen in an industry, you have 824 00:43:06,800 --> 00:43:08,520 Speaker 3: to be very patient. 825 00:43:08,920 --> 00:43:10,960 Speaker 5: Right, These things take time. 826 00:43:11,080 --> 00:43:13,560 Speaker 3: Obviously, you know, the digital asset space has had a 827 00:43:13,600 --> 00:43:17,839 Speaker 3: pretty seismic shift over the last decade. But in any 828 00:43:17,840 --> 00:43:20,279 Speaker 3: given year, people might have said, oh, this is all 829 00:43:20,440 --> 00:43:23,239 Speaker 3: not happening fast enough. And if we look back on 830 00:43:23,320 --> 00:43:26,719 Speaker 3: where we've come as an industry and as a firm. 831 00:43:26,880 --> 00:43:29,239 Speaker 5: You know what we've been able to do. I think 832 00:43:29,320 --> 00:43:30,359 Speaker 5: it's actually pretty cool. 833 00:43:30,480 --> 00:43:33,960 Speaker 1: Capital one question, what's in your crypto wallet? 834 00:43:35,000 --> 00:43:38,040 Speaker 5: Oh? Boy, there's obviously some bitcoin there. 835 00:43:38,320 --> 00:43:39,840 Speaker 1: Is it? Or bitcoin? 836 00:43:40,200 --> 00:43:40,680 Speaker 5: It's both? 837 00:43:40,840 --> 00:43:41,600 Speaker 1: Okay, it's both. 838 00:43:41,719 --> 00:43:45,279 Speaker 3: Yeah, there's some eat there. And what's in beyond that? 839 00:43:45,560 --> 00:43:51,759 Speaker 3: I'm not going to say, probably for the best not 840 00:43:51,800 --> 00:43:52,120 Speaker 3: to answer. 841 00:43:52,160 --> 00:43:54,640 Speaker 2: The rest of any XRP people are the craziest. 842 00:43:54,680 --> 00:43:55,400 Speaker 1: Can we agree on that? 843 00:43:55,760 --> 00:43:56,720 Speaker 5: Yes, no comment. 844 00:43:57,719 --> 00:44:00,759 Speaker 2: When they put that foge XRP thing out and I said, 845 00:44:00,800 --> 00:44:02,520 Speaker 2: I called you guys, and they said this is not true. 846 00:44:02,520 --> 00:44:04,560 Speaker 2: I said, it's not true. The price went down to 847 00:44:04,600 --> 00:44:07,719 Speaker 2: normal again, and for a week they just dragged me. 848 00:44:08,680 --> 00:44:12,200 Speaker 2: They were like this suiting. It was longer than a yeah, 849 00:44:12,239 --> 00:44:12,800 Speaker 2: they refused to. 850 00:44:14,080 --> 00:44:16,480 Speaker 3: I mean that there are some pretty intense elements to 851 00:44:16,520 --> 00:44:18,560 Speaker 3: a lot of these token fan bases. 852 00:44:18,880 --> 00:44:20,400 Speaker 5: That's not just XRP. 853 00:44:20,600 --> 00:44:22,320 Speaker 1: All right, And then we got to talk about the 854 00:44:22,320 --> 00:44:24,279 Speaker 1: ticker for a second. We always asked at the end 855 00:44:24,320 --> 00:44:27,959 Speaker 1: of the show, is what's your favorite ETF ticker other 856 00:44:28,000 --> 00:44:30,560 Speaker 1: than your own? I bet also pretty good. I want 857 00:44:30,560 --> 00:44:33,480 Speaker 1: to ask if there was any other tickers that were 858 00:44:33,480 --> 00:44:35,000 Speaker 1: in consideration that Black Rock. 859 00:44:35,120 --> 00:44:37,560 Speaker 5: Well, you hated the ticker, Eric, the first you dragged us. 860 00:44:37,960 --> 00:44:39,520 Speaker 2: I bit was fine. The first one was not going 861 00:44:39,560 --> 00:44:42,360 Speaker 2: to save as a BONDIETF in Europe. It was like IBTC. 862 00:44:42,680 --> 00:44:45,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's too many consonants. 863 00:44:46,000 --> 00:44:47,880 Speaker 2: You gotta have a vowel in there, man, it's like 864 00:44:48,160 --> 00:44:50,279 Speaker 2: a fortune. Give me a vowel and you can make 865 00:44:50,280 --> 00:44:51,680 Speaker 2: it a verb and it's even better. 866 00:44:51,760 --> 00:44:54,520 Speaker 3: But yeah, I would say, I don't know. I so 867 00:44:54,600 --> 00:44:57,440 Speaker 3: I grew up in Toronto and I gotta go with 868 00:44:58,239 --> 00:45:00,960 Speaker 3: cow and MoU. Yeah, it just good ones cows one 869 00:45:00,960 --> 00:45:03,040 Speaker 3: of ours. Moo is a van Eklin. But you know, 870 00:45:03,080 --> 00:45:05,239 Speaker 3: my cousin's growing up north of the city. They had 871 00:45:05,360 --> 00:45:09,200 Speaker 3: had this great farm and they raised cows. You know, 872 00:45:09,280 --> 00:45:11,680 Speaker 3: had fun hanging out up there and have a lot 873 00:45:11,719 --> 00:45:13,200 Speaker 3: of fun memories, all right. 874 00:45:13,320 --> 00:45:15,680 Speaker 1: Robbie Minchick of Blackrock, thanks so much for joining us. 875 00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:16,719 Speaker 5: Thank you, this is fun. 876 00:45:22,680 --> 00:45:25,680 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to Trillions until next time. You can 877 00:45:25,680 --> 00:45:30,560 Speaker 1: find us on the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, 878 00:45:31,160 --> 00:45:33,560 Speaker 1: or wherever else you'd like to listen. We'd love to 879 00:45:33,640 --> 00:45:36,960 Speaker 1: hear from you. We're on Twitter. I'm at Joel Webber Show. 880 00:45:37,400 --> 00:45:42,000 Speaker 1: He's at Eric Altuna's. This episode of Trillions was produced 881 00:45:42,040 --> 00:45:46,000 Speaker 1: by Magnus Hendrickson. Bye