1 00:00:05,320 --> 00:00:08,240 Speaker 1: What's going on? Everybody. Welcome into Fantasy Pros. This is 2 00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: the Fantasy Baseball Podcast. I'm your host, Joe Rico, and 3 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:14,760 Speaker 1: today we're bringing you part two in our ADP Battle series. 4 00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:16,600 Speaker 1: If you missed Pitchers last week, be sure to check 5 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:19,159 Speaker 1: it out. We are moving into the infield today, going 6 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:22,120 Speaker 1: to bring you guys two battles at each position, including catcher, 7 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:23,920 Speaker 1: for a total of ten. And we have a couple 8 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:26,759 Speaker 1: of fantastic guests on the show. You're definitely familiar with 9 00:00:26,760 --> 00:00:29,320 Speaker 1: both of their work, Derek Van Riper from The Athletic 10 00:00:29,400 --> 00:00:32,240 Speaker 1: and Jeff Erickson from Roda Wire Fellas. I really appreciate 11 00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 1: you taking the time today. How's it going. 12 00:00:34,560 --> 00:00:36,159 Speaker 2: It's going great. Thanks for having us on. 13 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:40,880 Speaker 3: Absolutely can't wait to battle here with Derek fight No. 14 00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:43,959 Speaker 3: Very excited about this. You know, it's been a long 15 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:45,960 Speaker 3: time since Derek and I used to do pods together, 16 00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:48,000 Speaker 3: so it should be fun to do one together for 17 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 3: a while. 18 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:50,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, that was part of the reason when I was 19 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:52,080 Speaker 1: pairing people up for this, I thought, okay, you guys 20 00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: know each other. We were We took a car ride 21 00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 1: together in Arizona to go down to one of the games. 22 00:00:55,920 --> 00:00:57,920 Speaker 1: I forget which one it was. But you guys know 23 00:00:58,000 --> 00:00:59,360 Speaker 1: each other. We've been familiar with each other for a 24 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:01,440 Speaker 1: couple of years, and I don't think there's anybody really 25 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:04,440 Speaker 1: better to start breaking down these ADPs. We're going to 26 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:06,559 Speaker 1: start behind the dish and we're gonna work our way 27 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,080 Speaker 1: around the diamond. We're going to kick things off here 28 00:01:09,160 --> 00:01:12,319 Speaker 1: with Salvador Perez and cal Rawley, and I'm using the 29 00:01:12,319 --> 00:01:16,480 Speaker 1: Fantasy Pros Consensus ADP. There will be some differences depending 30 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: on which platform you are drafting on. Of course, if 31 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:20,479 Speaker 1: it's a points league head to head roto, there will 32 00:01:20,520 --> 00:01:23,200 Speaker 1: be some differences. But I did try to capture battles 33 00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:27,040 Speaker 1: that are generally about the same on each site. So DVR, 34 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:29,080 Speaker 1: let's start with you on this one, Salvi Perez and 35 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:31,319 Speaker 1: cal Rawley, which one have you been landing on more? 36 00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:32,480 Speaker 1: If you're landing on either of them? 37 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:34,959 Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't land on them very often, but it 38 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:37,320 Speaker 2: would be Sal for me. I think there's a chance 39 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:38,960 Speaker 2: he slips every now and then you get into a 40 00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:41,320 Speaker 2: room where everybody just writes them off because he's old. 41 00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 2: But the thing that makes me a little more confident 42 00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:45,800 Speaker 2: in Sal is that the batting average downside is a 43 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:48,520 Speaker 2: lot lower, and they're both high volume catchers. Sal doesn't 44 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:50,360 Speaker 2: catch as much as he used to thanks to Freddy 45 00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:52,880 Speaker 2: for meen. But when you talk about high volume catchers, 46 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,200 Speaker 2: that's when the batting average liabilities become more of a 47 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:57,240 Speaker 2: problem for me. For the guys that share the job, 48 00:01:57,280 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 2: I don't care if they hit two ten or two twenty, 49 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 2: because you're not taking on as much dead weight in 50 00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,960 Speaker 2: that category. So I wanted to give up a little 51 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:04,920 Speaker 2: bit of power, maybe a little bit of run production, 52 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:08,440 Speaker 2: and go the route of salth Perez. I'm choosing from 53 00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:10,400 Speaker 2: this bucket, but I've found that more often than not, 54 00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:12,760 Speaker 2: I mean, they're investing earlier or I'm waiting a little 55 00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:14,560 Speaker 2: bit longer to get that catcher one. These are two 56 00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:16,239 Speaker 2: guys that I've generally steered away from. 57 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, you broke my heart and Labor. You did go 58 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 3: early on William Contreras at three five. I would have 59 00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:25,560 Speaker 3: taken him there in that draft just last Tuesday, Derek. 60 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:28,840 Speaker 3: But I do land on these guys a couple of times. 61 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 3: But I think you make a really good point about 62 00:02:30,440 --> 00:02:32,200 Speaker 3: the batting average, and in fact, that's one thing I've 63 00:02:32,200 --> 00:02:35,320 Speaker 3: been kind of trying to tweak my valuation system is 64 00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 3: to account better for batting average, because I found myself 65 00:02:37,560 --> 00:02:40,560 Speaker 3: in this particular draft, I took cal rally, and I 66 00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:42,919 Speaker 3: found myself chasing batting average for the next like eight 67 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:46,000 Speaker 3: rounds because of the amount of bat Betsy gets in 68 00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:49,200 Speaker 3: because two twenties in play. So you know, I was 69 00:02:49,240 --> 00:02:51,480 Speaker 3: aware of it enough to not take Kyle Schwarber. In 70 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:53,600 Speaker 3: a number of leagues, I always take our ozuna or 71 00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 3: a rooker instead, But I need to pay a little 72 00:02:56,760 --> 00:02:58,360 Speaker 3: bit more attention to that. I feel like there. So 73 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:01,680 Speaker 3: if you look right now in retiwar my rankings probably 74 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,280 Speaker 3: have Rally ahead of Salby, But I think I want 75 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:05,959 Speaker 3: to do it the other way around in my next draft. 76 00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:08,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think that's totally fair. I think the Royals 77 00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 1: are going to be very careful with South to try 78 00:03:10,560 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 1: and keep him healthy. He's going to get more first 79 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:15,000 Speaker 1: base in DH days, as for Mean gets more time 80 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:18,360 Speaker 1: behind the dish, and with Raley, the lineup is not 81 00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:21,240 Speaker 1: good against Seattle, and on top of that, the ballpark 82 00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 1: is a serious detriment. So I don't know. There's been 83 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:26,960 Speaker 1: talk about the batter's eye getting changed, but I don't 84 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:28,720 Speaker 1: think that's happening this season. I think that might be 85 00:03:28,800 --> 00:03:30,320 Speaker 1: something that they do in future years. Have you guys 86 00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:32,400 Speaker 1: heard anything along those lines, because early in the offseason 87 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 1: there was a lot of talk about potentially making it 88 00:03:34,920 --> 00:03:36,840 Speaker 1: a bit of a more hitter friendly park, but I 89 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:38,280 Speaker 1: haven't heard much about that in a while. 90 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:41,640 Speaker 2: I haven't seen any follow ups indicating that it's going 91 00:03:41,680 --> 00:03:44,680 Speaker 2: into effect this year. We've talked about it on Rates 92 00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:47,400 Speaker 2: and Barrels a few times. The center field wall is 93 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:51,280 Speaker 2: not like straight on with home plates slightly angled. There's 94 00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 2: some issues with the sun at different times of day. 95 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:57,480 Speaker 2: The environment itself, just the atmospheric conditions aren't conducive to 96 00:03:57,480 --> 00:03:59,400 Speaker 2: the ball flying in that park. It's a little bit 97 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:02,040 Speaker 2: of everything. It also seems like it's worse on righties 98 00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:04,640 Speaker 2: than lefties too, so that's something I've tried to factor 99 00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:07,200 Speaker 2: into my overall analysis of hitters. It's a lot worse 100 00:04:07,200 --> 00:04:09,040 Speaker 2: for guys going into that park for the first time 101 00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 2: as opposed to players that have been there for multiple years. 102 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:13,240 Speaker 2: So I do worry about the park as far as 103 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 2: like a secondary effect on Raleigh because it seems like 104 00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 2: for the most part, he's adapted well enough. And look, 105 00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 2: I mean for catchers easily the most power in the 106 00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 2: pool ninety one homers the last three seasons sALS second 107 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:26,479 Speaker 2: was seventy three, So you are getting that sort of 108 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:29,400 Speaker 2: Schwarberian boost behind the plate, but it comes with that. 109 00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:33,640 Speaker 3: Risk absolutely, and to your point too, like Seattle, they 110 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:36,920 Speaker 3: know they have this world class rotation, they know they 111 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:39,279 Speaker 3: have this known deficiency in terms of the batting eye, 112 00:04:39,279 --> 00:04:41,320 Speaker 3: they know they have this lineup that really struggled to 113 00:04:41,320 --> 00:04:43,920 Speaker 3: score runs, so they probably did nothing this offseason. I 114 00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:45,480 Speaker 3: am heads up to them for that. 115 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,279 Speaker 1: Horiy Polanco being your key acquisition, I guess him returning 116 00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:51,479 Speaker 1: is not enough. I thought Pete Alonzo was going to 117 00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:53,040 Speaker 1: Seattle for sure. They had a bit of an opening. 118 00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:57,280 Speaker 1: At first, I thought it made sense, but yeah, the 119 00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:00,800 Speaker 1: bitching is unimbeachable. Five guys. You can probably take those 120 00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:02,599 Speaker 1: five rotation names and throw them at a wall, and 121 00:05:02,600 --> 00:05:05,800 Speaker 1: however you arrange them, you could live with it. But yeah, 122 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:07,600 Speaker 1: the lineup does leave something to be desired. So I 123 00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 1: think it's unanimous there on Salvi Perez, not much of 124 00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:11,640 Speaker 1: a battle there to start off. Well, let's see if 125 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: I can put these two against each other on the 126 00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:15,760 Speaker 1: next one, and that's JT. Real Mudo and Logan o'hapi 127 00:05:16,279 --> 00:05:18,800 Speaker 1: roughly around pick one sixty. Again, this will vary a 128 00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:20,680 Speaker 1: little bit, but this has been a decision I've had 129 00:05:20,720 --> 00:05:22,760 Speaker 1: to make a couple times in my drafts. Jeff, let's 130 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 1: start with you on this one, between real Mudo and 131 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:25,560 Speaker 1: Logan o'hapy. 132 00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 3: I might be out of out of line on this one, 133 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 3: but it's clearly Ohappy for me. With real Muto, so 134 00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 3: much of his value is generated from a speed. They're 135 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:38,599 Speaker 3: talking so much about playing him less this year. I'd 136 00:05:38,680 --> 00:05:40,640 Speaker 3: rather take the guy in the Rise of Ohapi, who 137 00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 3: I understand has some known deficiencies. He's not gonna run 138 00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:45,440 Speaker 3: a whole lot either, but I'm not counting on that necessarily. 139 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,760 Speaker 3: I am looking at the power, the power ability from him. 140 00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:51,480 Speaker 3: I think there's some days there's gonna be a twenty 141 00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:54,280 Speaker 3: five homer season from Ohapi. I'm going Ohapi here. 142 00:05:56,040 --> 00:05:59,320 Speaker 2: I like Logan o'happy too. I mean, I think, if 143 00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:02,039 Speaker 2: I'm choosing straight, I'm with Jeff o'hapis the way to go. 144 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:05,279 Speaker 2: I do think the demise of jt Reel Mudo is 145 00:06:05,320 --> 00:06:08,680 Speaker 2: being overstated in some circles. At least, I think the 146 00:06:08,720 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 2: batting average floor for the position is still high. Even 147 00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:12,040 Speaker 2: if he's going to give up a little bit of 148 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:14,280 Speaker 2: playing time, he's still going to probably be top ten, 149 00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:17,080 Speaker 2: top twelve and played appearances For a catcher, I'd be 150 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:19,320 Speaker 2: surprised if we dipped more than that. Even in a 151 00:06:19,360 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 2: down year last year, we still had a double digit 152 00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 2: barrel rate, So he's making enough hard contact to get 153 00:06:23,680 --> 00:06:26,279 Speaker 2: to the power. I think it's twenty homers and a 154 00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:28,679 Speaker 2: good batting average with good run production because of the lineup. 155 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:30,280 Speaker 2: But I think the stolen bases used to get from 156 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:33,840 Speaker 2: jt Reel Mudo those days are probably over. Like fifteen 157 00:06:33,880 --> 00:06:36,320 Speaker 2: plus steals seems unlikely. You're probably getting five to seven 158 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:39,520 Speaker 2: bags over a healthy full season if that. So we're 159 00:06:39,560 --> 00:06:42,360 Speaker 2: seeing him age pretty gracefully. I think the injury last 160 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:44,479 Speaker 2: year makes it look a little worse than it really was, 161 00:06:44,520 --> 00:06:47,600 Speaker 2: and some of that may have just been also compounded 162 00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:50,040 Speaker 2: by year over year workloads, working a ton in the 163 00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:52,040 Speaker 2: regular season and going to the playoffs, and maybe that 164 00:06:52,120 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 2: was starting to take its toll a bit in twenty 165 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:55,880 Speaker 2: twenty four on jt Reil Mudo. 166 00:06:56,560 --> 00:06:59,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, I understand both sides of the real Mudo coin. 167 00:07:00,160 --> 00:07:02,240 Speaker 1: The barrel rate, like you said, was still in double digits. 168 00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:05,159 Speaker 1: The sprint speed was still seventy eighth percentile. I don't 169 00:07:05,160 --> 00:07:07,720 Speaker 1: think Garrett Stubbs is gonna you know, take over catch 170 00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:10,080 Speaker 1: and partial like maybe he gets the odd day here 171 00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:11,840 Speaker 1: and there, but I don't think he's gonna lose a 172 00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:14,080 Speaker 1: ton of playing time. But I think still when you 173 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:16,280 Speaker 1: look at the Angels lineup and o'hapy, a lot of 174 00:07:16,280 --> 00:07:18,560 Speaker 1: it depends on if Mike Trout stays healthy. But I 175 00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: think that lineup is kind of underrated a little bit 176 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 1: this season. Again, if Shrow get hurt gets hurt, all 177 00:07:23,720 --> 00:07:26,480 Speaker 1: bets are off. But I think o'hapy is probably the 178 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:28,800 Speaker 1: way I would lean. I had been kind of, you know, 179 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:30,480 Speaker 1: going back and forth between the two of them, but 180 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:33,040 Speaker 1: I think you fellas have talked me into the logan o' 181 00:07:33,040 --> 00:07:35,440 Speaker 1: hoppy side a little bit here Before we keep it 182 00:07:35,440 --> 00:07:36,720 Speaker 1: going on, I'll give you guys a bit of a 183 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: heads up. We have a great giveaway going on, a 184 00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:42,880 Speaker 1: John Smoltz signed Braves jersey. Just a fantastic giveaway from 185 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:45,280 Speaker 1: our friends over at Pristine auction dot com. All you 186 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:47,120 Speaker 1: have to do is to enter a subscribe to the 187 00:07:47,160 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 1: Fantasy pros MLB YouTube channel, and drop a comment on 188 00:07:50,240 --> 00:07:50,760 Speaker 1: any video. 189 00:07:50,880 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 2: That's it. 190 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:53,480 Speaker 1: We're gonna announcing the video right here on the channel, 191 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:55,320 Speaker 1: So make sure you guys turn on those notifications you 192 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:58,000 Speaker 1: can know what to claim your prize. Really a fantastic gift. 193 00:07:58,040 --> 00:08:00,400 Speaker 1: I wish I was eligible to claim this one, Nfortunately 194 00:08:00,440 --> 00:08:02,640 Speaker 1: I am not. We're going to move on to first 195 00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:05,480 Speaker 1: base here, and we're going to start with Josh Naylor 196 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:09,040 Speaker 1: and Christian Walker. It's interesting because Naylor essentially replaced Walker 197 00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:11,880 Speaker 1: out there in Arizona. I have some interest in both, 198 00:08:11,920 --> 00:08:14,440 Speaker 1: but for me, I think it's Christian Walker. But DVR, 199 00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:15,680 Speaker 1: I'll let you start off with this one. 200 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:19,360 Speaker 2: I like Walker as well. I think with Josh Naylor, 201 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:21,920 Speaker 2: one thing that's overlooked is the difficulty of hitting for 202 00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:24,480 Speaker 2: power on the left side at Chase Field. It is 203 00:08:24,560 --> 00:08:26,760 Speaker 2: one of the worst park factors for left handed homers. 204 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 2: Leaving Cleveland, I think he ends up going from kind 205 00:08:29,040 --> 00:08:31,480 Speaker 2: of a neutral, maybe slightly above average park to actually 206 00:08:31,480 --> 00:08:34,040 Speaker 2: a well below average one in that regard, I think 207 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:36,280 Speaker 2: Naylor is a good, solid all around player. I think 208 00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:39,080 Speaker 2: the thing I've always liked about him high batting average floor, 209 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:41,040 Speaker 2: not a lot of swing and miss in his profile. 210 00:08:41,120 --> 00:08:44,080 Speaker 2: All of that's still true. He's not a particularly great runner, 211 00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:46,360 Speaker 2: So you look at the run count from last year, 212 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:48,559 Speaker 2: eighty four seems like a high water mark, even though 213 00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:50,560 Speaker 2: he's going into a better lineup. So I do think 214 00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:53,080 Speaker 2: he's going to take a step back from a power perspective. 215 00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:55,680 Speaker 2: I think that's where That's where my main issue lies 216 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:57,959 Speaker 2: with Josh Naylor. It's just like a little bit worse 217 00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:00,360 Speaker 2: across the board and being in a more difficult spot. 218 00:09:01,040 --> 00:09:02,880 Speaker 2: I think it's like a bounce back an average, but 219 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:05,120 Speaker 2: at the expense of maybe five to seven homers. 220 00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:08,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's totally fair. I mean, Christian Walker's batt at 221 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:10,760 Speaker 1: Baldata is still so good. Going to the Crawford boxes 222 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:13,840 Speaker 1: is definitely appealing. Are you on the same side there, Jeff, I. 223 00:09:13,960 --> 00:09:16,600 Speaker 3: Like them both. I think both of these guys are 224 00:09:16,640 --> 00:09:19,559 Speaker 3: targets for me. Slight worry for me about Walker is 225 00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:21,760 Speaker 3: the age. You know a lot of times first Baseman 226 00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:23,679 Speaker 3: kind of fall off a cliff at thirty three, thirty 227 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:25,920 Speaker 3: four years old. You know, I don't think this is 228 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,520 Speaker 3: going to be jose A braw two point zero or 229 00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:31,760 Speaker 3: anything like that for Houston, but I got a smidge 230 00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 3: of a concern there. You know he's starting to miss 231 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:36,000 Speaker 3: more time due to injuries, had the oblique injury last year, 232 00:09:36,320 --> 00:09:39,800 Speaker 3: But overall, I think you're right. I like Naylor though, 233 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:43,800 Speaker 3: because what he loses for loses out on a park, 234 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:46,240 Speaker 3: I think he gains in lineup. I think he joins 235 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:48,240 Speaker 3: an Arizona lineup that just is going to score a 236 00:09:48,280 --> 00:09:49,839 Speaker 3: ton of runs this year, so I think his counting 237 00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:52,480 Speaker 3: stats are going to remain pretty steady. You may lose 238 00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:54,000 Speaker 3: you trade a couple of homers for a couple of 239 00:09:54,000 --> 00:09:56,240 Speaker 3: points of average, I think it'll all kind of wash out. 240 00:09:56,280 --> 00:09:57,319 Speaker 3: So I like them both this year. 241 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:00,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, Arizona. I don't think a lot of people would 242 00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:02,040 Speaker 1: be aware of just thinking about it. They would probably 243 00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:04,080 Speaker 1: say the Dodgers or the Yankees maybe, but Arizona had 244 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:05,880 Speaker 1: more runs than any other team in Major League Baseball 245 00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:08,600 Speaker 1: last season. With Corbyn Carroll kind of struggling for half 246 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:10,120 Speaker 1: of the season, he still ended up with one hundred 247 00:10:10,120 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 1: and twenty of them. So definitely a prolific offense there. 248 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:15,360 Speaker 1: I like both of these players. I think i'd probably 249 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:18,679 Speaker 1: lean slightly to more towards Walker. I've heard it. I 250 00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:20,680 Speaker 1: forget who exactly was, and I'm sorry for not giving 251 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,559 Speaker 1: them credit. But when you compare Christian Walker's profile to 252 00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:27,120 Speaker 1: Mattelson Pete Alonso, there's a lot of similarities there that 253 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:29,520 Speaker 1: you can kind of just get this same guy who 254 00:10:29,640 --> 00:10:31,280 Speaker 1: is maybe not exactly the same, but thirty home or 255 00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:34,199 Speaker 1: one hundred RBI potential several rounds later. So that's kind 256 00:10:34,200 --> 00:10:36,360 Speaker 1: of the narrative I've bought into with Christian Walker. The 257 00:10:36,400 --> 00:10:38,760 Speaker 1: age does worry me a little bit, but I think 258 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:42,400 Speaker 1: he is really interesting this upcoming season. These two are 259 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:44,760 Speaker 1: going neck and neck on a lot of NFBC drafts, 260 00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:47,679 Speaker 1: going on to the next battle here, Vinnie pas Quentino 261 00:10:48,040 --> 00:10:50,640 Speaker 1: and Tristan Casses. A lot of the time these two 262 00:10:50,679 --> 00:10:52,360 Speaker 1: are neck and neck and the ADP and on the 263 00:10:52,440 --> 00:10:54,720 Speaker 1: draft boards they'll be right beside each other. Jeff, we'll 264 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:57,160 Speaker 1: start with you on this one. Any concern with the 265 00:10:57,200 --> 00:10:58,880 Speaker 1: bit of the circus that seems to be developing in 266 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 1: Boston with Rafa is not happy and Cass is commenting 267 00:11:02,080 --> 00:11:03,240 Speaker 1: on it that factor. 268 00:11:03,520 --> 00:11:06,000 Speaker 3: What does think about that? You know, what does he 269 00:11:06,040 --> 00:11:08,199 Speaker 3: think about the closing job in Baltimore? I need to 270 00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:13,000 Speaker 3: know these things. Uh, small lean towards Vinnie here. Although 271 00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:14,800 Speaker 3: it's kind of funny, I think he piled up a 272 00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:17,080 Speaker 3: lot of those RBIs in a year where he wasn't 273 00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:20,199 Speaker 3: especially strong last year. But I think the reasons why 274 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 3: he was strong are going to remain. I think he's 275 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:24,839 Speaker 3: a smack dab in a great lineup. Uh not in 276 00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:28,400 Speaker 3: a great lineup, but smack dab behind Bobby Witt and 277 00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:31,160 Speaker 3: Salvador Perez. If I want Perez, I'm gonna want to 278 00:11:31,240 --> 00:11:34,000 Speaker 3: pass Spontino too. I think there is another level still 279 00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:37,319 Speaker 3: left in him in terms of the power. You know, 280 00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:41,959 Speaker 3: obviously he hasn't quite gotten there just yet. I think 281 00:11:42,160 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 3: if Cassis gets dealt elsewhere to kind of in the 282 00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:46,880 Speaker 3: wash of trying to make the playing time work, as 283 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,559 Speaker 3: was once rumored in Boston, he probably lands in a 284 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:52,880 Speaker 3: better spot. So I think you can make a case 285 00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:55,199 Speaker 3: for Casses too. I mean, there's a reason why these 286 00:11:55,240 --> 00:11:57,480 Speaker 3: guys are close and why we're actually and why he 287 00:11:57,520 --> 00:11:59,520 Speaker 3: selected this as a battle because they are very in 288 00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:00,400 Speaker 3: similar straits. 289 00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:05,240 Speaker 2: I think, yeah, I like both players too. I think Cassis, 290 00:12:06,120 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 2: from a long term league's perspective, is a great target 291 00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:10,360 Speaker 2: if you're trying to trade for someone a keeper or 292 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:12,839 Speaker 2: dynasty league that could give you surplus value for the 293 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:15,280 Speaker 2: next couple of seasons he could do it. I wonder 294 00:12:15,400 --> 00:12:18,440 Speaker 2: if the fallout from things getting more crowded there could 295 00:12:18,600 --> 00:12:21,680 Speaker 2: actually cost Cassis some playing time at a certain point. 296 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:23,960 Speaker 2: I think he could get caught up in that, maybe 297 00:12:24,080 --> 00:12:26,319 Speaker 2: end up in more of a strict platoon. I don't 298 00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:28,400 Speaker 2: think that happens with viny pass Quentino. So as much 299 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:30,679 Speaker 2: as I like the Red Sox supporting cast more than 300 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 2: the Royal supporting cast, Benny pass Quentino was doing some 301 00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:35,880 Speaker 2: pretty interesting things in the second half last year, had 302 00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:38,800 Speaker 2: an injury that cost him time, but looked much more 303 00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:41,360 Speaker 2: like the player he did before shoulder surgery by the 304 00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:44,199 Speaker 2: end of last season. It's hard to find anyone in 305 00:12:44,240 --> 00:12:47,760 Speaker 2: the pool that hits the ball hard often and keeps 306 00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:50,160 Speaker 2: the k ra as low as Vinni pas Quentino does. 307 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:53,160 Speaker 2: Kind of intrigued by some of the conversation I saw 308 00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:55,280 Speaker 2: from him. He was going back and forth with Tom 309 00:12:55,360 --> 00:12:57,120 Speaker 2: Tango a few weeks ago about some stuff he was 310 00:12:57,160 --> 00:12:59,320 Speaker 2: doing at to play. Just seems like he's very, very 311 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:02,920 Speaker 2: cerebral about craft, but also puts together a profile that's 312 00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:04,959 Speaker 2: unique for the position. You might get a really high 313 00:13:04,960 --> 00:13:08,400 Speaker 2: average with twenty five plus home run power. Kaufin Stadium 314 00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:10,640 Speaker 2: is a park that does hurt homers, kind of like 315 00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:13,199 Speaker 2: we talked about Chase Field earlier. But I think the 316 00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 2: good thing is it boost runs all around. So I 317 00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:18,640 Speaker 2: think this is an overall really solid player. Slightest of 318 00:13:18,720 --> 00:13:21,480 Speaker 2: edges to Vinnie because I think of their respective injuries. 319 00:13:21,760 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 2: The cassis ribb thing from last year basically just a 320 00:13:24,440 --> 00:13:27,440 Speaker 2: tear of the rib cartilage from swinging the bat too hard. 321 00:13:27,760 --> 00:13:29,920 Speaker 2: That gives me more long term concern. That's more like 322 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:32,040 Speaker 2: a wear and tearor sort of problem, kind of like 323 00:13:32,120 --> 00:13:34,920 Speaker 2: a chronic back injury as a as a long term problem, 324 00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:37,840 Speaker 2: whereas with pascent Twina. At Pascentino, we saw more evidence 325 00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:41,199 Speaker 2: that he was just over the major injury, having the 326 00:13:41,280 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 2: surgery and then playing a lot better over the course 327 00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:44,719 Speaker 2: of the season last year. 328 00:13:45,040 --> 00:13:47,480 Speaker 3: Absolutely one other thing real quick, I'll throw in. You know, 329 00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 3: you mentioned that Vinie's a cerebral player. I think those 330 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:54,680 Speaker 3: of us in the analytic community tend to favor these guys. 331 00:13:55,040 --> 00:13:57,599 Speaker 3: I mean, I still remember, like Brian Vanister, like I 332 00:13:57,720 --> 00:14:00,360 Speaker 3: wanted that to work so much. I was really a 333 00:14:00,520 --> 00:14:03,079 Speaker 3: standing for him so hard does never quite happened. But 334 00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:05,079 Speaker 3: I do feel like we sometimes like to give that 335 00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:06,480 Speaker 3: little plus to those sort of guys. 336 00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:09,640 Speaker 1: Absolutely, yeah, we see a player that wants to invest 337 00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:12,240 Speaker 1: more in their own development, and that will peak our 338 00:14:12,280 --> 00:14:15,240 Speaker 1: interest over the guys who, to use an extreme example, 339 00:14:15,320 --> 00:14:17,080 Speaker 1: like the Rendows of the world, who just don't seem 340 00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:20,480 Speaker 1: to care. There's definitely a difference in opinion there, and 341 00:14:20,760 --> 00:14:23,760 Speaker 1: I agree completely that past when they're close, but pass 342 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 1: Pentino gets a slight edge, and I think, especially if 343 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,120 Speaker 1: we're talking a very underserved part of the fantasy world, 344 00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:31,160 Speaker 1: which is points leagues, I think pass Quentino certainly gets 345 00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:34,080 Speaker 1: the edge there. He just doesn't strike out. There's less concern, 346 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:36,120 Speaker 1: I think as we've gotten farther away from that labor 347 00:14:36,160 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: and it's I think he's healed. I think he's healed 348 00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:39,840 Speaker 1: very well, and I think the team is going to 349 00:14:39,880 --> 00:14:42,080 Speaker 1: be smart about keeping him healthy. He's gonna not just 350 00:14:42,120 --> 00:14:43,840 Speaker 1: play at first base one hundred and sixty two times. 351 00:14:43,880 --> 00:14:45,960 Speaker 1: He's gonnadh. He'll get some days off, So I think 352 00:14:45,960 --> 00:14:47,360 Speaker 1: they'll be smart about it, and I think that pass 353 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:50,440 Speaker 1: Quentino is the way that I would go there as well. 354 00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:53,040 Speaker 1: Before we keep going, I want to remind you guys 355 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,320 Speaker 1: about fan tracks. It is the home of fantasy sports 356 00:14:55,360 --> 00:14:59,000 Speaker 1: for year round engagement, offseason trades, real time updates, seamless 357 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:01,920 Speaker 1: player transactions, keep the excitement going three hundred and sixty 358 00:15:02,000 --> 00:15:04,840 Speaker 1: five days a year. There's multi team trades. You can 359 00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:09,120 Speaker 1: customize literally everything. You can have team or roster sizes 360 00:15:09,160 --> 00:15:11,280 Speaker 1: that are two hundred plus managers, you can have these 361 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:14,440 Speaker 1: massive leagues. You can do so much stuff. The most 362 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,640 Speaker 1: customization available for sure is on fan tracks and right 363 00:15:17,720 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 1: now they're giving away a sign Vladimir Guerrero Junior jersey. 364 00:15:20,960 --> 00:15:24,360 Speaker 1: Really great stuff at fantracks dot com slash Fantasypros. That's 365 00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:28,920 Speaker 1: fantracks dot com slash Fantasy Pros. Okay, let's jump back 366 00:15:29,040 --> 00:15:31,600 Speaker 1: up into the top one hundred ADP and we're gonna 367 00:15:31,600 --> 00:15:34,640 Speaker 1: put Jose Altuve and Ozzy Albi's up against each other here. 368 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:38,080 Speaker 1: This one's a little spicy. I can see going both ways. 369 00:15:38,520 --> 00:15:41,120 Speaker 1: There are reasons to be kind of a bit pessimistic 370 00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:43,320 Speaker 1: about both of them. DVR, do you have a strong 371 00:15:43,440 --> 00:15:44,400 Speaker 1: lien here one way or the other. 372 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:47,160 Speaker 2: It's definitely not a strong lean, but you do have 373 00:15:47,320 --> 00:15:49,640 Speaker 2: to look at these guys and decide who you dig. 374 00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:51,760 Speaker 2: If you're sitting in the early rounds and want to 375 00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:54,120 Speaker 2: cover second base. I have Albi's just the head of 376 00:15:54,240 --> 00:15:56,280 Speaker 2: LTVA literally written next to each other on my overall 377 00:15:56,360 --> 00:15:59,320 Speaker 2: hitter rankings right now. The main reason for it comes 378 00:15:59,360 --> 00:16:02,040 Speaker 2: down to support cast. I mean, these astros are not 379 00:16:02,240 --> 00:16:05,760 Speaker 2: quite the same as the astros that made seven consecutive 380 00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:08,000 Speaker 2: trips to the ALCS, right like, this is just not 381 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:10,960 Speaker 2: the same loaded supporting cast, and they're still good. We 382 00:16:11,080 --> 00:16:13,560 Speaker 2: have some questions now about Jordan Alvarez's health already in 383 00:16:13,600 --> 00:16:16,600 Speaker 2: spring training, though, and he's becoming increasingly important to that 384 00:16:16,760 --> 00:16:20,280 Speaker 2: lineup in a post Kyle Tucker world as well. So 385 00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:23,400 Speaker 2: I think Atlanta's going to be more likely a lot 386 00:16:23,480 --> 00:16:26,200 Speaker 2: healthier in twenty twenty five than they weren't twenty twenty four. 387 00:16:26,680 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 2: They had a lot of injuries and they were key 388 00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:31,040 Speaker 2: impactful guys up and down that lineup. So you get 389 00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:35,240 Speaker 2: healthy Riley healthy, Acunya healthy, Albi's himself healthy, Michael Harris, 390 00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:37,120 Speaker 2: I think that's going to go a long way towards 391 00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:39,920 Speaker 2: making the run and RBI counts pop. I don't think 392 00:16:39,960 --> 00:16:42,680 Speaker 2: we're seeing any indication from this organization that they're going 393 00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:44,960 Speaker 2: to back off their everyday guys all that much. So 394 00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:48,080 Speaker 2: I think you're still looking at a possible max playing 395 00:16:48,120 --> 00:16:51,240 Speaker 2: time sort of ceiling, which is appealing. So slightest of 396 00:16:51,360 --> 00:16:54,680 Speaker 2: edges to Ozzie Albi's And you know, with l tv Man, 397 00:16:54,960 --> 00:16:56,800 Speaker 2: the move to left field is just weird. I wonder 398 00:16:56,800 --> 00:16:58,280 Speaker 2: if they're actually going to follow through on that, at 399 00:16:58,360 --> 00:17:00,680 Speaker 2: least as of now, it seems like they will. But 400 00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:02,600 Speaker 2: I don't think that's gonna have any sort of negative 401 00:17:02,640 --> 00:17:05,800 Speaker 2: impact on him. I just see a slowly eroding supporting 402 00:17:05,840 --> 00:17:08,040 Speaker 2: cast around him, whereas Atlanta still looks like it could 403 00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:09,880 Speaker 2: hit a stride similar what it did two years ago. 404 00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:13,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, sorry, I was gonna say. I'll tell his second 405 00:17:13,240 --> 00:17:16,120 Speaker 1: base metrics are just brutal, so I can understand moving 406 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:17,680 Speaker 1: him off of second. He's never been a great defender, 407 00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:20,000 Speaker 1: but it's gotten progressively worse. But go ahead, Jeff No. 408 00:17:20,480 --> 00:17:23,600 Speaker 3: I just think it just overall supports the thought that 409 00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,439 Speaker 3: there's an erosion of overall skills. You know, speed metrics 410 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:28,840 Speaker 3: are a little down, the x slug is a little down, 411 00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:33,000 Speaker 3: the expected batting average was a little below what he did. 412 00:17:33,400 --> 00:17:35,840 Speaker 3: All these things indicate that there might be a next 413 00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:37,959 Speaker 3: stage of the decline for him. I think moving him 414 00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:41,159 Speaker 3: off second might help, you know, as long as he 415 00:17:41,320 --> 00:17:44,360 Speaker 3: doesn't have like the growing pains, the embarrassment of having 416 00:17:44,440 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 3: some struggles in the outfield. Sometimes you see that. Sometimes 417 00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:49,359 Speaker 3: you get like Robin Yellt where it works out really well, 418 00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:51,160 Speaker 3: where you move him out off of short stop, moving 419 00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:54,000 Speaker 3: to the outfield. Oh, it's great, it extended his career. 420 00:17:54,320 --> 00:17:56,200 Speaker 3: Other cases that you just feel like it seems like 421 00:17:56,280 --> 00:17:57,760 Speaker 3: it's a fish out of water. So I'm kind of 422 00:17:57,800 --> 00:18:00,320 Speaker 3: curious to see how that plays out. But I do 423 00:18:00,560 --> 00:18:03,959 Speaker 3: slightly have Albi's ahead of Altuve, And there's a lot 424 00:18:04,000 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 3: of talk about you know, availability is a big ability, 425 00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:08,960 Speaker 3: and you know Albi's hasn't had that. But it's always 426 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:11,600 Speaker 3: been these fluke injuries, you know three you know, twenty 427 00:18:11,680 --> 00:18:14,200 Speaker 3: twenty two it was like a broken left foot, a 428 00:18:14,240 --> 00:18:18,080 Speaker 3: broken pinky finger. Those aren't like chronic muscle type issues 429 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:21,800 Speaker 3: or anything like that. Last year fractured risk, fractured toe again. 430 00:18:22,440 --> 00:18:24,400 Speaker 3: Not the sort of thing where it's like, oh, he's 431 00:18:24,440 --> 00:18:26,959 Speaker 3: always breaking down, he's got that hamstring again. No, it's 432 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:29,320 Speaker 3: not that. It's not that case with Albi's. So I 433 00:18:29,440 --> 00:18:31,159 Speaker 3: also have Albi slightly ahead of al Tuo. 434 00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:31,280 Speaker 2: Ba. 435 00:18:32,440 --> 00:18:34,120 Speaker 1: I have had al Tuova ahead, but I think that's 436 00:18:34,119 --> 00:18:35,959 Speaker 1: something I really need to look into. Like as much 437 00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:38,760 Speaker 1: as I like Christian Walker and he saw parates, they 438 00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:41,200 Speaker 1: are not quite Kyle Tucker and Alex Bragman, so that 439 00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:44,879 Speaker 1: is a downgrade. Altuove's quite a bit older. You know 440 00:18:45,000 --> 00:18:46,920 Speaker 1: that you guys have made a lot of the good points, 441 00:18:46,960 --> 00:18:48,480 Speaker 1: and I think that that is something I'm going to 442 00:18:48,520 --> 00:18:50,440 Speaker 1: have to look into. I think that they're still relatively 443 00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:52,919 Speaker 1: close because al Tuove he's always just defied the metrics. 444 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:54,640 Speaker 1: He's never been somebody that you would have expected would 445 00:18:54,640 --> 00:18:56,080 Speaker 1: have had the career he's had to begin with, and 446 00:18:56,960 --> 00:18:58,280 Speaker 1: I almost want to give him the benefit of the 447 00:18:58,320 --> 00:19:00,359 Speaker 1: doubt until we see him fall off a cliff. But 448 00:19:00,440 --> 00:19:02,600 Speaker 1: at the same time, I'd rather be out a year 449 00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:05,200 Speaker 1: early than out a year late if those are the options, 450 00:19:05,240 --> 00:19:07,800 Speaker 1: and I think that I'll be's in that lineup. I 451 00:19:07,880 --> 00:19:09,479 Speaker 1: think it is the way that makes sense. But there 452 00:19:09,560 --> 00:19:10,960 Speaker 1: was a report I saw today I think it might 453 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 1: have been a Rode Wire blurb that al Tuve is 454 00:19:13,480 --> 00:19:15,800 Speaker 1: looking more and more likely to be in the outfield. 455 00:19:15,800 --> 00:19:18,240 Speaker 1: So I guess that multiposition eligibility is also nice. The 456 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:22,159 Speaker 1: infield and outfield switch. But yeah, he's he's not what 457 00:19:22,280 --> 00:19:24,440 Speaker 1: he once was in his postal too. 458 00:19:24,520 --> 00:19:26,320 Speaker 3: And they want to make sure it's one or the other. 459 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:28,080 Speaker 3: They don't want to move him back and forth. Is 460 00:19:28,119 --> 00:19:30,280 Speaker 3: that I think his spots point about that there is 461 00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:32,879 Speaker 3: they really want to focus on. Okay, you will be this. 462 00:19:33,880 --> 00:19:36,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's been some examples of middle endfielders going to 463 00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:38,720 Speaker 1: the outfield in the last couple of years tattoos Chisholm. 464 00:19:39,200 --> 00:19:40,640 Speaker 1: But they do it. They don't do it at thirty 465 00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 1: five years old. They do it when they're quite a 466 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:44,080 Speaker 1: bit younger. So interesting to see how that one will 467 00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:46,520 Speaker 1: will play out. The other one I have down here 468 00:19:46,560 --> 00:19:50,159 Speaker 1: at second base is Bryce Terrang and Luis Garcia generally 469 00:19:50,240 --> 00:19:54,160 Speaker 1: about pick one thirty one thirty five on average. Bryce 470 00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:56,600 Speaker 1: Tranger getting a ton of speed, where with Garcia a 471 00:19:56,640 --> 00:19:58,800 Speaker 1: little bit more of a balanced approach. They did send 472 00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:00,640 Speaker 1: him down a couple of years ago, twenty twenty three, 473 00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:02,440 Speaker 1: when he was having a decent year. The Nationals do 474 00:20:02,600 --> 00:20:04,840 Speaker 1: tend to do that sometimes, but I think that they're 475 00:20:04,880 --> 00:20:07,040 Speaker 1: both relatively similar in value. Jeff, We'll start with you 476 00:20:07,119 --> 00:20:09,040 Speaker 1: on this one, Bryce Terrang or Luis Garcia. 477 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:12,720 Speaker 3: I'm a little ahead on Garcia. I think then Terrang, 478 00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:16,880 Speaker 3: I worry about Terreng's ability to actually hit Still, I think, 479 00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:19,040 Speaker 3: you know, there's always the green light with both of 480 00:20:19,119 --> 00:20:20,960 Speaker 3: these teams actually that you know he's going to be 481 00:20:20,960 --> 00:20:22,600 Speaker 3: able to run if he can get on. But I'm 482 00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:26,399 Speaker 3: kind of worried about Terang second half. I think they 483 00:20:26,480 --> 00:20:30,440 Speaker 3: have alternatives. They're not super strong alternatives, but say if 484 00:20:30,480 --> 00:20:33,080 Speaker 3: he gets off to a terrible start, unlike the blistering 485 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:34,920 Speaker 3: hot starready got off to you last year, maybe there's 486 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:37,800 Speaker 3: even a possibility of moving down the lineup, maybe even 487 00:20:37,880 --> 00:20:39,680 Speaker 3: sitting a day or two here or there. I feel 488 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 3: like Garcia is a little bit more on stable ground 489 00:20:43,040 --> 00:20:44,320 Speaker 3: WUDBR Yeah. 490 00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:47,639 Speaker 2: Same overall read, I find myself kind of moving away 491 00:20:47,760 --> 00:20:50,080 Speaker 2: from second basement in this part of the draft. I 492 00:20:50,119 --> 00:20:53,480 Speaker 2: think part of it's that I see similar Rodo skills 493 00:20:53,560 --> 00:20:57,440 Speaker 2: in Andreas Jimenez as Bryce Terrang and Menez available later. 494 00:20:57,520 --> 00:20:59,639 Speaker 2: I think Bryce and Stott does some similar things. His 495 00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:02,440 Speaker 2: situation as a hitter looks a little more stable than 496 00:21:02,480 --> 00:21:05,719 Speaker 2: Terrang as well. I mean from May first on last year, 497 00:21:05,800 --> 00:21:08,439 Speaker 2: Bryce Terrang had a seventy nine WRC plus you can 498 00:21:08,480 --> 00:21:10,680 Speaker 2: stay in the lineup every day being that bad when 499 00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:13,960 Speaker 2: your defense is that good. But that doesn't mean I 500 00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 2: want you on my fantasy team. And I just don't 501 00:21:16,600 --> 00:21:19,040 Speaker 2: see a path to more power. Terrang's not one of 502 00:21:19,080 --> 00:21:21,080 Speaker 2: those guys you look at and say physically he's going 503 00:21:21,119 --> 00:21:23,159 Speaker 2: to get a lot stronger and develop that part of 504 00:21:23,200 --> 00:21:25,840 Speaker 2: his game. It would just take a lot of changes 505 00:21:25,920 --> 00:21:29,400 Speaker 2: for him as a hitter to become even a league 506 00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:32,040 Speaker 2: average guy at this point in his career. So it's 507 00:21:32,119 --> 00:21:35,119 Speaker 2: Garcia for me, but it's a tier that in general 508 00:21:35,200 --> 00:21:36,680 Speaker 2: I'm steering away from in redraft. 509 00:21:37,720 --> 00:21:39,480 Speaker 1: Joe Pisapa will be happy to hear that, because he's 510 00:21:39,480 --> 00:21:44,080 Speaker 1: been a big, big stand for Luis Garcia this draft season. DVR, 511 00:21:44,119 --> 00:21:46,520 Speaker 1: I wonder, though you're you're in Milwaukee, you're a Brewers fan, 512 00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:51,520 Speaker 1: is the lineup? Has it taken a step back this season? 513 00:21:51,600 --> 00:21:53,240 Speaker 1: You think with the loss of Willia Damas, with the 514 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:56,720 Speaker 1: question marks around Christian Yalich's status, what's your opinion on 515 00:21:56,800 --> 00:21:57,919 Speaker 1: the team as a whole. Do you think they're going 516 00:21:57,960 --> 00:21:59,240 Speaker 1: to be worse than last year? Offensively? 517 00:22:00,040 --> 00:22:02,320 Speaker 2: I think you have to assume a slight step back 518 00:22:02,520 --> 00:22:06,840 Speaker 2: just because replacing a Dames alone and the season a 519 00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:10,000 Speaker 2: Damis just had is particularly difficult. So I think Joey 520 00:22:10,119 --> 00:22:13,359 Speaker 2: Ortiz could be seventy percent of that player overall from 521 00:22:13,400 --> 00:22:15,280 Speaker 2: a real life perspective, he does it a different way, 522 00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:18,560 Speaker 2: less power, a little more speed. Ortiz actually ran into 523 00:22:18,600 --> 00:22:20,639 Speaker 2: a tarp last year and was a much better player 524 00:22:20,760 --> 00:22:22,760 Speaker 2: pre injury than post injury. It caused some kind of 525 00:22:22,880 --> 00:22:25,119 Speaker 2: neck problem for him, so keep that in mind. I 526 00:22:25,160 --> 00:22:27,399 Speaker 2: guess when you're looking at how they're using him and 527 00:22:27,520 --> 00:22:29,760 Speaker 2: what he's doing early in the season, I look at 528 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:32,560 Speaker 2: guys like Caleb Durban and I can't quite see what 529 00:22:32,640 --> 00:22:35,680 Speaker 2: the Brewers see beyond the fact that their speed and 530 00:22:35,760 --> 00:22:37,719 Speaker 2: there's a versatile glove, and they'd like guys they can 531 00:22:37,800 --> 00:22:40,600 Speaker 2: mix and match. But you know, you could look at 532 00:22:40,640 --> 00:22:42,440 Speaker 2: Jackson Turio and say, a Churio is going to be 533 00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:44,439 Speaker 2: ten percent better than last year, and Ortiz is going 534 00:22:44,520 --> 00:22:46,680 Speaker 2: to be seventy percent of Willia Dames, and then they're 535 00:22:46,680 --> 00:22:48,960 Speaker 2: gonna need more out of someone like Garrett Mitchell. They're 536 00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:50,879 Speaker 2: gonna need to bounce back from Brye Hoskins. It's a 537 00:22:50,920 --> 00:22:53,040 Speaker 2: pretty long list of things that need to go right 538 00:22:53,119 --> 00:22:55,600 Speaker 2: for them to hold the level they were at last year. 539 00:22:56,160 --> 00:22:58,119 Speaker 2: But they also are not built like a lot of 540 00:22:58,200 --> 00:23:02,280 Speaker 2: other lineups right now, built more on speed than power. 541 00:23:02,520 --> 00:23:04,640 Speaker 2: So I think a lot of it's just putting balls 542 00:23:04,680 --> 00:23:08,080 Speaker 2: in play, putting pressure on opposing defenses to make plays, 543 00:23:08,119 --> 00:23:10,680 Speaker 2: and it seems like it serves them pretty well. So 544 00:23:11,080 --> 00:23:14,400 Speaker 2: slightly worse, but still probably getting a lot of things 545 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:16,159 Speaker 2: right and beating projections. 546 00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:18,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, I've seen them around eighty two and a half 547 00:23:18,840 --> 00:23:20,520 Speaker 3: in the win total projections here and there, and you 548 00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:22,199 Speaker 3: know it's you know, they won ninety three last year, 549 00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:24,719 Speaker 3: so it's quite of a drop down. I don't think 550 00:23:24,760 --> 00:23:26,679 Speaker 3: they lost. I don't think they're eleven games worse than 551 00:23:26,760 --> 00:23:29,760 Speaker 3: last year. But on the flip side, you know, some 552 00:23:29,840 --> 00:23:32,119 Speaker 3: things did work right. As DVR said, I think two 553 00:23:32,200 --> 00:23:35,560 Speaker 3: keys are Garrett Mitchell, who DVR alluded to in South Freelik. Also, 554 00:23:35,640 --> 00:23:37,320 Speaker 3: I think, you know, both of those players need to 555 00:23:37,400 --> 00:23:39,400 Speaker 3: kind of do a little bit more and they'll get 556 00:23:39,400 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 3: a full season out of Mitchell. I think Mitchell's a 557 00:23:41,080 --> 00:23:42,880 Speaker 3: really good player. It's just a matter of him being 558 00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:44,800 Speaker 3: able to stay on the field. But I think there's 559 00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:47,800 Speaker 3: a chance that he could help advance that cause a 560 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:49,479 Speaker 3: little bit. I also think they'll be better and run 561 00:23:49,560 --> 00:23:52,280 Speaker 3: prevention this year. I think get Woodrof for some portion 562 00:23:52,400 --> 00:23:54,400 Speaker 3: of the season. I think Nestor kirk Tez will fit 563 00:23:54,480 --> 00:23:58,000 Speaker 3: well there. And I like Tobias Myers, who another player 564 00:23:58,080 --> 00:24:00,960 Speaker 3: DVR snatched from my loving arms in the LABR draft. 565 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:03,840 Speaker 1: Tobias Myers, I forget who it was the other day, 566 00:24:03,840 --> 00:24:05,879 Speaker 1: but somebody said that, and I've forgotten about this, that 567 00:24:05,960 --> 00:24:08,000 Speaker 1: he was traded for Junior Camenaro a few years ago, 568 00:24:08,040 --> 00:24:10,560 Speaker 1: and I've completely forgotten that one. That was just boggling, 569 00:24:11,480 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 1: But it happens, and. 570 00:24:13,600 --> 00:24:16,760 Speaker 3: Then released and then released by the Giants, finally lands 571 00:24:16,760 --> 00:24:22,080 Speaker 3: in Milwaukee and resuscitates his career. But interesting, whiney, twisty 572 00:24:22,119 --> 00:24:22,680 Speaker 3: path for him. 573 00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:25,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, you never know, you never know what these young guys. 574 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:28,399 Speaker 1: Let's move on to third base and this one is 575 00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:31,000 Speaker 1: the only triple battle that we have today. It's a 576 00:24:31,200 --> 00:24:35,520 Speaker 1: spicy one for sure. Rafael Devers, Manny Machado, and Austin Riley. 577 00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:37,760 Speaker 1: Now Devers has started to fall a little bit, but 578 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:41,240 Speaker 1: he's still generally going in the third round. This is 579 00:24:41,280 --> 00:24:42,600 Speaker 1: a debate that a lot of people have to make 580 00:24:42,640 --> 00:24:43,960 Speaker 1: on the third round if they want to lock down 581 00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:48,080 Speaker 1: a third basement here. Devers Machado and Riley DVR. We'll 582 00:24:48,160 --> 00:24:50,200 Speaker 1: kick it back to you on this one, any preference. 583 00:24:50,920 --> 00:24:52,760 Speaker 2: I feel like these guys have been stuck together for 584 00:24:53,040 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 2: three draft seasons now, and they're still very close. In 585 00:24:55,920 --> 00:24:59,560 Speaker 2: my rankings right now, I've got Machado just ahead of Riley. 586 00:24:59,640 --> 00:25:01,520 Speaker 2: I think the difference for me is Machado runs a 587 00:25:01,560 --> 00:25:04,200 Speaker 2: little bit. I think there is a little more batting 588 00:25:04,240 --> 00:25:07,240 Speaker 2: average downside, just that reflected in some projection systems. But 589 00:25:08,480 --> 00:25:11,200 Speaker 2: Machado's track record is just so hard to bet against. 590 00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:13,320 Speaker 2: So when you're looking at very similar players, that's something 591 00:25:13,400 --> 00:25:15,720 Speaker 2: I can use as maybe a tiebreaker. I just have 592 00:25:15,880 --> 00:25:18,679 Speaker 2: Devers as a slight downgrade from these two right now, 593 00:25:18,760 --> 00:25:21,040 Speaker 2: because when you get to spring training and you had 594 00:25:21,040 --> 00:25:23,040 Speaker 2: a chronic injury that you played through and played pretty 595 00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:25,520 Speaker 2: well through last year, I'll say too, and it's still 596 00:25:25,560 --> 00:25:27,760 Speaker 2: a problem in the early weeks of spring training, that 597 00:25:27,760 --> 00:25:29,280 Speaker 2: doesn't give me a lot of confidence that there's not 598 00:25:29,359 --> 00:25:32,840 Speaker 2: something more problematic on the horizon. So I look at 599 00:25:32,880 --> 00:25:35,960 Speaker 2: Devers and think maybe last year is a more accurate 600 00:25:36,040 --> 00:25:39,120 Speaker 2: reflection of who he's going to be, if those shoulders 601 00:25:39,119 --> 00:25:41,520 Speaker 2: are going to just bother him all season long again, 602 00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:44,719 Speaker 2: not that worried about moving off third base and him 603 00:25:44,760 --> 00:25:47,760 Speaker 2: being frustrated about that. I think that's he's there to hit, 604 00:25:47,920 --> 00:25:50,440 Speaker 2: and I think he's ultimately going to realize that. And 605 00:25:50,480 --> 00:25:53,000 Speaker 2: I think winning is a lot more fun than not winning. 606 00:25:53,080 --> 00:25:56,199 Speaker 2: And their best lineup is probably playing Alex Bregman at 607 00:25:56,240 --> 00:25:58,800 Speaker 2: third and using Devers a lot more as a DH. 608 00:25:58,960 --> 00:26:01,639 Speaker 2: So yeah, I look at that group and that's the 609 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:04,040 Speaker 2: that's the main separator between them right now. It's just 610 00:26:04,119 --> 00:26:06,640 Speaker 2: like Child's got the slightly longer track record than Riley 611 00:26:06,680 --> 00:26:10,680 Speaker 2: and he runs. Devers just doesn't seem like he's completely healthy. 612 00:26:10,720 --> 00:26:12,520 Speaker 2: And we're talking about this in the first week of March. 613 00:26:13,320 --> 00:26:16,199 Speaker 1: Both shoulders have had problems with both shoulders. I mean 614 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:18,480 Speaker 1: that you got to start worrying a little bit. I 615 00:26:18,800 --> 00:26:22,800 Speaker 1: think that with the whole position thing, Devers will realize eventually. 616 00:26:22,840 --> 00:26:25,199 Speaker 1: I agree with you there that like he's there to hit, 617 00:26:25,320 --> 00:26:27,120 Speaker 1: he's not there so he can win a Gold Glove 618 00:26:27,160 --> 00:26:29,200 Speaker 1: at third base. And he's locked up until he's I 619 00:26:29,240 --> 00:26:31,720 Speaker 1: believe thirty five or thirty six, so it's not like 620 00:26:31,800 --> 00:26:34,359 Speaker 1: he's going to get another big, long term contract after this. 621 00:26:34,600 --> 00:26:36,359 Speaker 1: I don't think it really matters where he's where he 622 00:26:36,440 --> 00:26:38,440 Speaker 1: is in the field, Jeff, where do you land on 623 00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:38,800 Speaker 1: this one? 624 00:26:39,800 --> 00:26:43,800 Speaker 3: Same order as DVR. Joe Shehihen wrote in his Zoos 625 00:26:43,880 --> 00:26:46,280 Speaker 3: letter when this thing flared up about Devers not wanting 626 00:26:46,359 --> 00:26:49,040 Speaker 3: to move off at third base, titled it that's what 627 00:26:49,160 --> 00:26:52,400 Speaker 3: the money's for, you know, after the great mad Men scene. 628 00:26:52,560 --> 00:26:55,680 Speaker 3: And he's absolutely right, you know, shut up and help 629 00:26:55,720 --> 00:26:57,840 Speaker 3: your team win. You got paid already, so you need that. 630 00:26:58,080 --> 00:26:59,680 Speaker 3: I think this hangs over the team for a while. 631 00:26:59,760 --> 00:27:03,239 Speaker 3: I think this is something that is a negative effect. Uh, 632 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:05,800 Speaker 3: he's not playing for a contract, so it's nothing of 633 00:27:05,920 --> 00:27:09,200 Speaker 3: that nature either. I also tried not to draft any 634 00:27:09,240 --> 00:27:11,800 Speaker 3: of these three where they go. I would go a 635 00:27:11,880 --> 00:27:13,480 Speaker 3: shadow if I was gonna go one of them there. 636 00:27:13,840 --> 00:27:16,840 Speaker 3: But more often than not, you know, maybe I've already 637 00:27:16,920 --> 00:27:19,680 Speaker 3: taken the advantage of like a Sodo dropping or or 638 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:22,680 Speaker 3: for that matter, Jordan Albert is dropping. So I'm missing 639 00:27:22,720 --> 00:27:24,440 Speaker 3: a little bit of speed. I'm either looking for speed 640 00:27:24,520 --> 00:27:27,000 Speaker 3: or I'm looking for a pitcher in this spot. I 641 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:29,800 Speaker 3: when I got when I did get William contraras when uh, 642 00:27:29,920 --> 00:27:32,840 Speaker 3: when DVR took him, I pivoted a pitcher. I would 643 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:34,920 Speaker 3: I would have done that even if like Riley was 644 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:36,960 Speaker 3: sitting there for me, or Devers was sitting there for me. 645 00:27:37,000 --> 00:27:38,640 Speaker 3: I think that's the route I would have gone. Still, 646 00:27:39,080 --> 00:27:42,240 Speaker 3: so because I like other third basement downstream a little 647 00:27:42,280 --> 00:27:44,920 Speaker 3: bit more. I like, uh, the two guys were gonna 648 00:27:44,920 --> 00:27:46,680 Speaker 3: be talking about in our next battle, but also Jake 649 00:27:46,760 --> 00:27:50,879 Speaker 3: Berger I like, I like Bregman in Boston. I think 650 00:27:50,920 --> 00:27:53,159 Speaker 3: there's one one more good year, at least out of him. 651 00:27:53,359 --> 00:27:55,560 Speaker 3: I think he landed in the absolute right spot. And 652 00:27:55,640 --> 00:27:58,960 Speaker 3: I end up on a Juenio Suarez often as well. 653 00:28:00,080 --> 00:28:03,240 Speaker 1: Not somebody that's talking about a lot. Asuarez was ridiculous 654 00:28:03,320 --> 00:28:05,320 Speaker 1: in the second half last year. It was the best 655 00:28:05,440 --> 00:28:08,159 Speaker 1: stretch of his career. I think I agree on the 656 00:28:08,280 --> 00:28:09,919 Speaker 1: order here that it's Machado at the top, and then 657 00:28:09,960 --> 00:28:12,040 Speaker 1: it's Riley, although it's close, and then there's a slightly 658 00:28:12,080 --> 00:28:16,760 Speaker 1: bigger gap between him endeavors there. You know, I never 659 00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:19,400 Speaker 1: know how much to factor in the whole mental aspect 660 00:28:19,440 --> 00:28:21,600 Speaker 1: of things when players are mad TV are you had 661 00:28:21,640 --> 00:28:25,040 Speaker 1: it with Corbyn Burns last year the year before where 662 00:28:25,080 --> 00:28:29,040 Speaker 1: there was an arbitration battle debate and then it seemed 663 00:28:29,080 --> 00:28:31,320 Speaker 1: like he wasn't happy, he wasn't and then the performance 664 00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:33,720 Speaker 1: kind of lagged behind a little bit that season. That 665 00:28:33,840 --> 00:28:37,600 Speaker 1: could just be anecdotal stuff, but you do wonder about 666 00:28:37,600 --> 00:28:40,080 Speaker 1: how much stuff gets into players heads when there's some 667 00:28:40,240 --> 00:28:42,760 Speaker 1: discontent within the team there. Does that go into your 668 00:28:42,800 --> 00:28:45,280 Speaker 1: evaluations at all, DVR, not just with the situation, but 669 00:28:45,360 --> 00:28:46,160 Speaker 1: for any situations. 670 00:28:46,640 --> 00:28:48,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I try to get a read on 671 00:28:48,280 --> 00:28:50,400 Speaker 2: that as best I can. I guess, in the example 672 00:28:50,440 --> 00:28:52,840 Speaker 2: of the Burn situation, you know, being frustrated about how 673 00:28:52,880 --> 00:28:55,080 Speaker 2: arbitration played out, I kind of feel like that's more 674 00:28:55,120 --> 00:28:57,240 Speaker 2: of a motivating chip on my shoulder going to come 675 00:28:57,280 --> 00:28:59,360 Speaker 2: out and do everything I can do to go get 676 00:28:59,400 --> 00:29:01,920 Speaker 2: a free agent, big free agent deal and leave like 677 00:29:02,160 --> 00:29:04,280 Speaker 2: that was that all seemed like that was pretty much 678 00:29:04,280 --> 00:29:07,120 Speaker 2: written on the wall in that situation. It's it's hard 679 00:29:07,120 --> 00:29:09,479 Speaker 2: when we're on the outside looking in. We're going on reports, 680 00:29:09,520 --> 00:29:11,440 Speaker 2: trying to trust the best beat writers that are there 681 00:29:11,440 --> 00:29:13,720 Speaker 2: every day and trying to make sure that you know 682 00:29:13,840 --> 00:29:18,160 Speaker 2: what's being reported is actually a problem in some of 683 00:29:18,240 --> 00:29:20,880 Speaker 2: these cases, right, It varies pretty wildly, I think from 684 00:29:20,960 --> 00:29:24,040 Speaker 2: person to person, from clubhouse to clubhouse. So I try 685 00:29:24,080 --> 00:29:25,760 Speaker 2: to account for it, but I feel like it's a 686 00:29:25,840 --> 00:29:27,760 Speaker 2: it's a weakness in my game. If there's a skill 687 00:29:27,840 --> 00:29:28,520 Speaker 2: to be gained from it. 688 00:29:29,640 --> 00:29:32,400 Speaker 1: That's that's totally fair. Let's move on to the other 689 00:29:32,480 --> 00:29:34,480 Speaker 1: one here, and this is the two young and ascending 690 00:29:34,560 --> 00:29:37,120 Speaker 1: targets a third base, both of their prices arising, one 691 00:29:37,160 --> 00:29:38,800 Speaker 1: of them more so than the other. So this one, 692 00:29:39,040 --> 00:29:41,080 Speaker 1: within a couple of weeks, people won't be saying, Junior 693 00:29:41,120 --> 00:29:42,880 Speaker 1: Cameron Aro is going in the third round of my league? 694 00:29:42,920 --> 00:29:45,680 Speaker 1: What are you talking about? But Junior Cameranaro and Mark 695 00:29:45,720 --> 00:29:48,840 Speaker 1: Fiento's roughly around pick one hundred, generally a little bit earlier. 696 00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:51,080 Speaker 1: We'll kick it to you, Jeff for this one. You 697 00:29:51,280 --> 00:29:53,240 Speaker 1: buying into the hype of Junior Cameronaro. 698 00:29:53,480 --> 00:29:57,840 Speaker 3: I am. I think that this will be the last 699 00:29:57,920 --> 00:30:01,800 Speaker 3: year we'll get them in anything below fit. I think 700 00:30:01,880 --> 00:30:03,760 Speaker 3: this is one of a total star in the making, 701 00:30:04,400 --> 00:30:06,880 Speaker 3: able to hold his own at twenty at the big 702 00:30:06,960 --> 00:30:09,640 Speaker 3: league level. You know, defense isn't a problem with him 703 00:30:09,680 --> 00:30:12,240 Speaker 3: as opposed to Vientos, which I think is something we'll 704 00:30:12,240 --> 00:30:14,920 Speaker 3: have to watch for in the future. Add in the 705 00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:17,160 Speaker 3: fact that he's going to get a ballpark improvement over 706 00:30:17,200 --> 00:30:19,280 Speaker 3: the next two years in terms of how the ball 707 00:30:19,320 --> 00:30:21,280 Speaker 3: should carry you. Now, if he were left handed, even 708 00:30:21,320 --> 00:30:23,320 Speaker 3: be more of a benefit, but I still think he 709 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:25,959 Speaker 3: benefits by that. The humidity there. I think that's all 710 00:30:26,040 --> 00:30:29,160 Speaker 3: going to work in canon Eero's favor. I want to 711 00:30:29,200 --> 00:30:31,280 Speaker 3: be on board the train. Yeah, I'm already seeing him, 712 00:30:31,320 --> 00:30:33,360 Speaker 3: Like you know, I play a lot of NBC League 713 00:30:33,400 --> 00:30:35,480 Speaker 3: formats and I'm seeing him going around pick seventy five 714 00:30:35,600 --> 00:30:38,440 Speaker 3: there already. So yeah, there's a lot of helium associated 715 00:30:38,480 --> 00:30:41,160 Speaker 3: with him. Nothing against against Biento's. I love Viento's too, 716 00:30:41,920 --> 00:30:44,479 Speaker 3: and if I miss miss out on Kennero, I'll take 717 00:30:44,520 --> 00:30:46,520 Speaker 3: Biento's in the next round. But I think there's a 718 00:30:46,600 --> 00:30:48,080 Speaker 3: rounds worth of difference between the two. 719 00:30:49,200 --> 00:30:53,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think the strikeout rate with Viento's is a concern. 720 00:30:54,040 --> 00:30:56,360 Speaker 1: The lineup is probably a little bit better in New York. 721 00:30:56,480 --> 00:30:59,040 Speaker 1: Not probably, it is better, Yeah, but well the ballpark 722 00:30:59,160 --> 00:31:02,120 Speaker 1: may be negate some of that with Tampa DVR. Are 723 00:31:02,160 --> 00:31:03,000 Speaker 1: you landing on this one. 724 00:31:03,720 --> 00:31:06,400 Speaker 2: I've got Junior Cameron Aro ranked probably about twenty spots 725 00:31:06,400 --> 00:31:09,160 Speaker 2: ahead of Ventos on my overall hitter rankings, And I 726 00:31:09,280 --> 00:31:12,480 Speaker 2: realized that the fallacy can be that you're hoping for 727 00:31:12,640 --> 00:31:15,520 Speaker 2: the season. Mark Ventos just had as like a median 728 00:31:15,600 --> 00:31:17,840 Speaker 2: sort of outcome from Camanaro, but you're paying the premium 729 00:31:17,920 --> 00:31:21,040 Speaker 2: because Junior Camanaro's ceilings should be higher. Projections give you 730 00:31:21,240 --> 00:31:24,720 Speaker 2: probably a twenty point edge in batting average. With Junior Camonaro, 731 00:31:25,240 --> 00:31:26,360 Speaker 2: I think he's going to hit in the heart of 732 00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:28,840 Speaker 2: that lineup. Vento's might slide a little further down just 733 00:31:28,920 --> 00:31:32,640 Speaker 2: because there's more quality in the Mets lineup as it's built. 734 00:31:32,680 --> 00:31:35,600 Speaker 2: But man, I keep thinking about the way Steinbrenner Field's 735 00:31:35,600 --> 00:31:38,360 Speaker 2: gonna play compared to the Trop, and it's not making 736 00:31:38,440 --> 00:31:40,400 Speaker 2: me run away from Raised pictures because I think that's 737 00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:41,960 Speaker 2: a good group of pictures, but I think their top 738 00:31:42,120 --> 00:31:44,600 Speaker 2: end bats have a higher ceilings as a result of 739 00:31:44,760 --> 00:31:47,440 Speaker 2: not playing in a place that's generally very difficult to hit. 740 00:31:47,480 --> 00:31:50,840 Speaker 2: We know the Trop boosts strikeouts and suppresses runs. It's 741 00:31:50,880 --> 00:31:53,760 Speaker 2: a very challenging environment for hitters to deal with. So 742 00:31:54,440 --> 00:31:57,320 Speaker 2: two thumbs up on Junior Cameronaro, and I think picks 743 00:31:57,320 --> 00:31:59,520 Speaker 2: seventy five. I don't know about you, guys, but that's 744 00:31:59,600 --> 00:32:02,080 Speaker 2: the rain. Like that end a round five. If I've 745 00:32:02,120 --> 00:32:04,120 Speaker 2: gone pretty boring with my build up to that point, 746 00:32:04,520 --> 00:32:06,840 Speaker 2: I'm happy to take more risk on if I draft 747 00:32:06,880 --> 00:32:08,120 Speaker 2: a guy in the fifth round and he gives me 748 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:11,000 Speaker 2: ninth or tenth round value that's not going to ruin 749 00:32:11,080 --> 00:32:13,920 Speaker 2: my season, And I'm getting the possibility of having someone 750 00:32:13,960 --> 00:32:16,320 Speaker 2: who might be a second or third rounder next year 751 00:32:16,400 --> 00:32:18,600 Speaker 2: on my team. So I think that's that's why I'm 752 00:32:18,640 --> 00:32:21,120 Speaker 2: comfortable taking on that extra risk and sort of dreaming 753 00:32:21,160 --> 00:32:23,520 Speaker 2: on the potential showing up in twenty twenty five with 754 00:32:23,560 --> 00:32:24,800 Speaker 2: a player like Junior cam and Arrow. 755 00:32:25,560 --> 00:32:27,240 Speaker 1: So with the hype train on cam and Arrow, where 756 00:32:27,280 --> 00:32:29,960 Speaker 1: would the price have to get to make you tap out? Where? 757 00:32:30,040 --> 00:32:32,000 Speaker 1: What would be the point where you say, Okay, somebody 758 00:32:32,040 --> 00:32:34,160 Speaker 1: else can can take this chance on him? 759 00:32:35,720 --> 00:32:38,520 Speaker 3: Well, yeah, go ahead, Jeff, I was just going to say, 760 00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:41,920 Speaker 3: probably around pick fifty or so, like if he goes 761 00:32:41,960 --> 00:32:46,280 Speaker 3: into where Royce Lewis was going last year, that's probably 762 00:32:46,320 --> 00:32:46,720 Speaker 3: too much. 763 00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:47,680 Speaker 2: Mm hmm. 764 00:32:47,880 --> 00:32:48,240 Speaker 3: That's fair. 765 00:32:48,720 --> 00:32:50,120 Speaker 2: I would agree, because I think a lot of the 766 00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:53,000 Speaker 2: pictures I still like as sp ones are available then, 767 00:32:53,080 --> 00:32:55,320 Speaker 2: so I'm giving up a lot of value by passing 768 00:32:55,400 --> 00:32:58,560 Speaker 2: got a picture to take him there. I think even 769 00:32:58,600 --> 00:33:00,640 Speaker 2: some of the bats that go in that if you 770 00:33:00,640 --> 00:33:03,200 Speaker 2: get him up closer to the Wyatt Langford territory and 771 00:33:03,240 --> 00:33:06,120 Speaker 2: even Langford's creeping up himself. I think there's to me, 772 00:33:06,240 --> 00:33:08,440 Speaker 2: there's more categorical balance than some of the players that 773 00:33:08,600 --> 00:33:11,680 Speaker 2: go around that pick forty five, pick fifty range. So 774 00:33:11,800 --> 00:33:15,240 Speaker 2: that's probably where I would back out completely for redraft purposes, 775 00:33:15,320 --> 00:33:17,360 Speaker 2: even though the long term ceilings phenomenal. 776 00:33:18,360 --> 00:33:20,320 Speaker 1: All right, we are all in. It seems like wheels 777 00:33:20,360 --> 00:33:23,680 Speaker 1: up for Cameron Aro. You know, sometimes the players just 778 00:33:23,760 --> 00:33:25,720 Speaker 1: get super hyped in spring and then they fall on 779 00:33:25,760 --> 00:33:27,640 Speaker 1: their face a little bit. But this doesn't feel like 780 00:33:27,720 --> 00:33:30,560 Speaker 1: that situation between his talent between the ballpark. I really 781 00:33:30,640 --> 00:33:32,360 Speaker 1: like the raised lineup around him. I think this is 782 00:33:32,920 --> 00:33:35,120 Speaker 1: a good spot, and I understand what you said about 783 00:33:35,400 --> 00:33:37,440 Speaker 1: we're kind of hoping that he has a Viiento's type 784 00:33:37,480 --> 00:33:39,680 Speaker 1: of season. But the upside for Cameron Aro is the 785 00:33:39,720 --> 00:33:42,200 Speaker 1: first round second round player, and I don't think Vanto's 786 00:33:42,200 --> 00:33:44,200 Speaker 1: can get there, even what the great lineup he has 787 00:33:44,240 --> 00:33:47,320 Speaker 1: around him. Before we keep it going, I want to 788 00:33:47,360 --> 00:33:49,480 Speaker 1: remind you guys about the Draft Wizard. Use a draft 789 00:33:49,480 --> 00:33:52,040 Speaker 1: wizard to get expert rankings, perform quick mock drafts, and 790 00:33:52,120 --> 00:33:54,280 Speaker 1: receive real time advice during your draft to build a 791 00:33:54,320 --> 00:33:57,160 Speaker 1: winning team. You might see things like Christopher Welsh hates 792 00:33:57,200 --> 00:33:59,880 Speaker 1: your draft. Joe Rico loves your draft Joe Piezopia is 793 00:34:00,120 --> 00:34:01,920 Speaker 1: kind of whatever on your draft you'll get, you'll get 794 00:34:01,920 --> 00:34:03,680 Speaker 1: those kind of things. It won't be those exact kind 795 00:34:03,680 --> 00:34:05,960 Speaker 1: of phrasings, but our team of experts will give you 796 00:34:06,040 --> 00:34:08,840 Speaker 1: their insights in real time. When you complete these drafts 797 00:34:08,920 --> 00:34:11,640 Speaker 1: using the Draft Wizard, practice your strategy in minutes at 798 00:34:11,680 --> 00:34:15,000 Speaker 1: any time, fast realistic mock drafts powered by our insights, 799 00:34:15,239 --> 00:34:18,080 Speaker 1: and you get live advice and recommendations every time you're 800 00:34:18,120 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 1: on the clock. So if you're ready to win, head 801 00:34:19,719 --> 00:34:22,760 Speaker 1: to fantasypros dot com, slash MLB Draft Wizard or download 802 00:34:22,800 --> 00:34:25,360 Speaker 1: our app, the MLB Draft Wizard App, and start drafting 803 00:34:25,440 --> 00:34:28,560 Speaker 1: smarter today. All right, guys, we're down to the final 804 00:34:28,600 --> 00:34:31,000 Speaker 1: position and that is shortstop and we're gonna go inside 805 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:32,359 Speaker 1: of the top one hundred. Here we're kind of going 806 00:34:32,440 --> 00:34:34,600 Speaker 1: in and out. But this one is O'Neil Cruz and 807 00:34:34,760 --> 00:34:37,759 Speaker 1: CJ Abrams. I have kind of mixed feelings on both 808 00:34:37,800 --> 00:34:39,160 Speaker 1: of them at DVR. I'll kick this one to you. 809 00:34:40,640 --> 00:34:42,920 Speaker 2: I like go to you A Cruz a lot more 810 00:34:42,960 --> 00:34:47,600 Speaker 2: than CJ Abrams, and I'm not against cj Abrams at all. 811 00:34:47,920 --> 00:34:50,239 Speaker 2: I think there's a reason to believe he could still 812 00:34:50,440 --> 00:34:52,440 Speaker 2: take a few steps forward. But the main thing for 813 00:34:52,600 --> 00:34:56,440 Speaker 2: me with O'Neil Cruz, he does enough damage to get 814 00:34:56,480 --> 00:34:58,280 Speaker 2: away with the high k rates, So if he stays 815 00:34:58,280 --> 00:35:00,160 Speaker 2: at a thirty percent k rate, that's fine. I think 816 00:35:00,200 --> 00:35:02,080 Speaker 2: he had a little bit better against lefties last year, 817 00:35:02,120 --> 00:35:04,040 Speaker 2: so he's less of a liability, less likely to fall 818 00:35:04,080 --> 00:35:06,960 Speaker 2: into a platoon, and that team has no business platooning 819 00:35:07,040 --> 00:35:09,960 Speaker 2: O'Neal Cruz. Look at that depth, Shart, you can't possibly 820 00:35:10,120 --> 00:35:12,480 Speaker 2: justify have him out of the lineup on a day 821 00:35:12,480 --> 00:35:14,439 Speaker 2: where he's healthy other than just like needing a little 822 00:35:14,440 --> 00:35:16,840 Speaker 2: bit of maintenance. I think the other part of O'Neal 823 00:35:16,880 --> 00:35:20,520 Speaker 2: Cruz's game that could still take another step forward is 824 00:35:20,840 --> 00:35:22,960 Speaker 2: what he could do on the base paths eighty eight 825 00:35:23,000 --> 00:35:25,080 Speaker 2: percentile and sprint speed. So even if it's not getting 826 00:35:25,080 --> 00:35:28,399 Speaker 2: to the power more consistently, who's to say he can't 827 00:35:28,400 --> 00:35:31,200 Speaker 2: go twenty forty And I just I trust that power 828 00:35:31,280 --> 00:35:33,960 Speaker 2: floor from cruise the ceiling is good in that category. 829 00:35:34,239 --> 00:35:37,879 Speaker 2: The improvements we've seen with some more exposure have been nice. 830 00:35:38,239 --> 00:35:40,920 Speaker 2: I just I see a guy that does more ticks, 831 00:35:40,960 --> 00:35:44,640 Speaker 2: more roto boxes, whereas the CJ abrams profile. Even going 832 00:35:44,680 --> 00:35:47,080 Speaker 2: back to last year, I looked at where he was 833 00:35:47,160 --> 00:35:50,000 Speaker 2: going and I saw more of that sort of Andres 834 00:35:50,080 --> 00:35:53,520 Speaker 2: Jimenez Bryson Stott sort of player with maybe more stolen 835 00:35:53,600 --> 00:35:56,600 Speaker 2: base potential. But just given the way he faded in 836 00:35:56,640 --> 00:35:58,720 Speaker 2: the second half, and I don't care about the casino 837 00:35:58,800 --> 00:36:01,839 Speaker 2: incident and the little suspend, I'm past all that. He's 838 00:36:01,840 --> 00:36:04,000 Speaker 2: probably their lead off hitter, he's probably the ever very shortstop. 839 00:36:04,760 --> 00:36:07,960 Speaker 2: I just wonder like, is there more power and can 840 00:36:08,040 --> 00:36:11,479 Speaker 2: he be even good in the batting average category, because 841 00:36:11,480 --> 00:36:13,400 Speaker 2: I think those are two things that could really kind 842 00:36:13,440 --> 00:36:15,799 Speaker 2: of pull that value back down to the point where 843 00:36:15,800 --> 00:36:18,000 Speaker 2: he ends up being at overpriced this draft season. 844 00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:21,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we've been trying to reach for steals 845 00:36:21,480 --> 00:36:24,359 Speaker 1: for forever really, or at least a long time. I've 846 00:36:24,360 --> 00:36:26,680 Speaker 1: been playing Fantasy Baseball for the last ten or twelve years, 847 00:36:26,719 --> 00:36:29,200 Speaker 1: and we don't really need to do it as much anymore. CJ. 848 00:36:29,239 --> 00:36:31,440 Speaker 1: Abrams feels like such a specialist for steals in the 849 00:36:31,560 --> 00:36:33,239 Speaker 1: third round, maybe in the fourth round that I just 850 00:36:33,480 --> 00:36:35,279 Speaker 1: I don't necessarily feel that need to take that chance. 851 00:36:35,320 --> 00:36:38,400 Speaker 1: For with O'Neil Cruz sixteen percent barrel rate, hard hit 852 00:36:38,480 --> 00:36:40,279 Speaker 1: rate well over fifty percent. If he raised the launch 853 00:36:40,280 --> 00:36:42,720 Speaker 1: angle a little bit and hit thirty homers, I wouldn't 854 00:36:42,719 --> 00:36:45,160 Speaker 1: really be surprised, Jeff, you have a strong preference between 855 00:36:45,200 --> 00:36:45,480 Speaker 1: these two. 856 00:36:45,800 --> 00:36:47,640 Speaker 3: I thought this was supposed to be an ADP battle 857 00:36:47,680 --> 00:36:49,680 Speaker 3: and not an ADP. I know we agree on everything, 858 00:36:50,200 --> 00:36:52,600 Speaker 3: you know, because I'm in lockstep with you guys on this. 859 00:36:53,160 --> 00:36:57,520 Speaker 3: I just what is the ultimate upside of cg Abrams? 860 00:36:57,560 --> 00:36:59,560 Speaker 3: You know, the hard hit metrics set suggests this is 861 00:36:59,640 --> 00:37:01,520 Speaker 3: as good as it gets. And you know, we saw 862 00:37:01,680 --> 00:37:03,880 Speaker 3: like the the twenty twenty three looks more like an 863 00:37:03,920 --> 00:37:06,480 Speaker 3: outlier than we you know, because even before the gambling thing, 864 00:37:06,920 --> 00:37:09,239 Speaker 3: you know, he was already in decline pretty hard in 865 00:37:09,280 --> 00:37:11,399 Speaker 3: the second half there maybe coming back to level there. 866 00:37:11,719 --> 00:37:14,920 Speaker 3: We've seen one full season out of O'Neil Cruz. I 867 00:37:15,320 --> 00:37:17,960 Speaker 3: think that's one of the big arguments in favor of him, 868 00:37:18,080 --> 00:37:21,840 Speaker 3: is there's still something left to be attained by O'Neil Cruz. 869 00:37:22,040 --> 00:37:24,799 Speaker 3: There could be a trajectory that he hasn't hit yet. 870 00:37:25,200 --> 00:37:27,040 Speaker 3: The fact that he's going to the outfield that that 871 00:37:27,160 --> 00:37:29,000 Speaker 3: kind of skews both ways again, and we talked about 872 00:37:29,040 --> 00:37:31,600 Speaker 3: that with al Twov. They except Cruz is younger. You know, 873 00:37:31,719 --> 00:37:33,759 Speaker 3: this is one of those where you know there's still 874 00:37:33,800 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 3: growth to be had. I just want to see a 875 00:37:35,600 --> 00:37:37,279 Speaker 3: full season out of Cruise. I don't want to see 876 00:37:37,320 --> 00:37:39,480 Speaker 3: them messing around with them. Just put them in one spot, 877 00:37:39,600 --> 00:37:42,160 Speaker 3: let them hit every day, let them hit it against 878 00:37:42,200 --> 00:37:45,120 Speaker 3: both sides. Let him just do his thing. And there 879 00:37:45,440 --> 00:37:47,680 Speaker 3: is nothing stopping the Pirates from doing that. They can 880 00:37:47,719 --> 00:37:50,040 Speaker 3: do all the stupid non spending things they want, but 881 00:37:50,239 --> 00:37:52,279 Speaker 3: just getting out of the way of Enel Cruz, just 882 00:37:52,360 --> 00:37:54,120 Speaker 3: letting him develop as a player, is the best thing 883 00:37:54,120 --> 00:37:54,920 Speaker 3: they could do this year. 884 00:37:55,920 --> 00:37:58,279 Speaker 1: I completely agree. And it's funny because the previous show 885 00:37:58,320 --> 00:38:01,200 Speaker 1: we did, part one was Pictures, and it was Enosaurus 886 00:38:01,239 --> 00:38:03,480 Speaker 1: and Nick Pollock, and I think they disagreed on nine 887 00:38:03,560 --> 00:38:06,440 Speaker 1: under the ten pictures that I have. That's awesome, So 888 00:38:07,600 --> 00:38:09,600 Speaker 1: we'll see if we can get some disagreement here on 889 00:38:09,719 --> 00:38:13,200 Speaker 1: the last one. And it's Xander Bogarts and Ezekiel Tovar. 890 00:38:14,040 --> 00:38:16,400 Speaker 1: I think Bogarts really makes sense from a roto standpoint. 891 00:38:16,440 --> 00:38:19,239 Speaker 1: He just really balanced. Tovar for me, feels like a 892 00:38:19,360 --> 00:38:22,080 Speaker 1: bit more of a risk. Maybe it's the swinging strike 893 00:38:22,160 --> 00:38:25,760 Speaker 1: rate pushing twenty percent. I know there's a couple of reasons. 894 00:38:25,840 --> 00:38:28,759 Speaker 1: Maybe it's the Rockies lineup around him. Jeff, where do 895 00:38:28,800 --> 00:38:31,239 Speaker 1: you land between Xander Bogarts and Ezekiel Tovar in twenty 896 00:38:31,280 --> 00:38:31,719 Speaker 1: twenty five. 897 00:38:31,960 --> 00:38:35,200 Speaker 3: I'm going Tovar over Bogarts. I'm agist here as the 898 00:38:35,400 --> 00:38:38,440 Speaker 3: old guy in the industry now anti my own age. Now, 899 00:38:39,440 --> 00:38:41,600 Speaker 3: I just think there's just this could be what we 900 00:38:41,680 --> 00:38:43,640 Speaker 3: see from Xander Bogart's going for. And I know he 901 00:38:43,719 --> 00:38:45,960 Speaker 3: had the injury late in the season, but you know 902 00:38:46,520 --> 00:38:48,520 Speaker 3: he was miserable in San Diego all along, but he 903 00:38:48,560 --> 00:38:50,840 Speaker 3: was already starting to decline in Boston before that. You know, 904 00:38:51,080 --> 00:38:55,160 Speaker 3: I just think this has all the auspices of being 905 00:38:55,200 --> 00:38:58,640 Speaker 3: a bad Pooh holes in contract there, except worse because 906 00:38:58,680 --> 00:39:00,520 Speaker 3: Pooh Hooles was actually good for a couple of years. 907 00:39:01,520 --> 00:39:03,759 Speaker 3: Maybe I'm holding the contract against Bogers, but what does 908 00:39:03,840 --> 00:39:07,640 Speaker 3: he do? You know he's gonna hit. He maybe hits 909 00:39:07,680 --> 00:39:09,600 Speaker 3: for average. Maybe this is but maybe not. Maybe it 910 00:39:09,680 --> 00:39:11,719 Speaker 3: doesn't come back. You know, he's not going to hit 911 00:39:11,760 --> 00:39:14,279 Speaker 3: for more than fifteen homers in San Diego. I think 912 00:39:14,280 --> 00:39:17,239 Speaker 3: at least Tovar there is an upside again, and we're 913 00:39:17,280 --> 00:39:19,560 Speaker 3: at the point in the draft too, where you can 914 00:39:19,640 --> 00:39:21,840 Speaker 3: take some chances again where if it doesn't work out, okay, 915 00:39:22,080 --> 00:39:25,799 Speaker 3: well that's a problem. The two hundred strikeouts are super 916 00:39:25,840 --> 00:39:28,839 Speaker 3: scary by Tovar, But you know what, he still won 917 00:39:29,000 --> 00:39:32,200 Speaker 3: twenty six, you know, twenty six and seventy eight despite 918 00:39:32,280 --> 00:39:35,919 Speaker 3: those strikeouts, still hit to sixty nine somehow. Now gets 919 00:39:35,920 --> 00:39:37,560 Speaker 3: see he gets the benefit of the batting average in 920 00:39:37,600 --> 00:39:39,120 Speaker 3: course field. Give me Tovar every day. 921 00:39:40,320 --> 00:39:41,680 Speaker 1: What do you think you are? Yeah? 922 00:39:41,719 --> 00:39:46,040 Speaker 2: The corpus situation makes it much more possible for me 923 00:39:46,160 --> 00:39:50,480 Speaker 2: to roster a player that has the plate discipline of Tovar. 924 00:39:50,520 --> 00:39:53,520 Speaker 2: I mean, Tovar is one of the more aggressive, free 925 00:39:53,560 --> 00:39:55,960 Speaker 2: swinging players in the pool right now, but he's a 926 00:39:55,960 --> 00:39:58,399 Speaker 2: phenomenal defender at short. He's young enough where he could 927 00:39:58,400 --> 00:40:00,360 Speaker 2: get even just a little bit better. You look at 928 00:40:00,400 --> 00:40:02,360 Speaker 2: things like the underlying hard hit rates. He hits the 929 00:40:02,400 --> 00:40:05,160 Speaker 2: ball harder than Bogarts at this stage of their respective careers. 930 00:40:06,160 --> 00:40:09,680 Speaker 2: I do think while I prefer Tovar, I end up 931 00:40:09,719 --> 00:40:11,319 Speaker 2: with a lot of Bogarts. I think I got him 932 00:40:11,320 --> 00:40:14,719 Speaker 2: in labor. I keep looking at Bogarts and saying, you know, 933 00:40:14,840 --> 00:40:17,400 Speaker 2: why can't he do something like what he did in 934 00:40:17,440 --> 00:40:19,440 Speaker 2: twenty twenty three. He's an injury that cost him some 935 00:40:19,520 --> 00:40:21,799 Speaker 2: time last year, pretty significant shoulder injury that he made 936 00:40:21,840 --> 00:40:24,160 Speaker 2: it back from faster than expected, but he was a 937 00:40:24,200 --> 00:40:27,120 Speaker 2: homer and a steal away from going twenty twenty in 938 00:40:27,200 --> 00:40:29,600 Speaker 2: twenty twenty three. He has to play every day because 939 00:40:29,600 --> 00:40:32,360 Speaker 2: of the way that roster's built in San Diego. You 940 00:40:32,440 --> 00:40:34,840 Speaker 2: got a high batting average floor and you probably have 941 00:40:35,480 --> 00:40:39,000 Speaker 2: useful production in every single category with pretty good balance. 942 00:40:39,120 --> 00:40:41,839 Speaker 2: So I like Bogarts more than most, but I would 943 00:40:41,920 --> 00:40:43,960 Speaker 2: take Tovar ahead of him if I'm looking at those 944 00:40:44,000 --> 00:40:47,920 Speaker 2: two straight up, because Cores really helps mask one of 945 00:40:47,960 --> 00:40:51,320 Speaker 2: the major major flaws with Tovar's free swinging approach. 946 00:40:51,960 --> 00:40:53,880 Speaker 1: Maybe there will be some drafters who look at it 947 00:40:53,960 --> 00:40:56,520 Speaker 1: based on how they've already put their team together, where 948 00:40:56,520 --> 00:40:58,400 Speaker 1: if they've gone a little bit risk heavy early on, 949 00:40:58,520 --> 00:41:01,040 Speaker 1: maybe they'll offer a Bogart, where As if they've gone 950 00:41:01,040 --> 00:41:03,359 Speaker 1: a little bit safer, maybe that's where they'd be more 951 00:41:03,400 --> 00:41:05,920 Speaker 1: willing to take a tow bar. Interesting though, and we 952 00:41:06,000 --> 00:41:08,040 Speaker 1: finally had a little bit of disagreement. We finally got 953 00:41:08,080 --> 00:41:10,960 Speaker 1: to some but that is the way it goes. Smart 954 00:41:10,960 --> 00:41:13,480 Speaker 1: people are going to agree and DVR and Jeff are 955 00:41:13,560 --> 00:41:16,319 Speaker 1: two of the absolute best, smartest the industry has to offer, 956 00:41:16,719 --> 00:41:18,480 Speaker 1: and I really appreciate them taking the time today. I 957 00:41:18,480 --> 00:41:20,040 Speaker 1: want to give them a chance to just let you 958 00:41:20,120 --> 00:41:21,839 Speaker 1: guys know where their work can be found. I think 959 00:41:21,840 --> 00:41:23,400 Speaker 1: if you're familiar with our guest from last week, you 960 00:41:23,480 --> 00:41:25,759 Speaker 1: know you probably know DVR. But Derek tell us where 961 00:41:25,760 --> 00:41:26,719 Speaker 1: everybody can find your work. 962 00:41:26,760 --> 00:41:26,880 Speaker 3: Man. 963 00:41:27,640 --> 00:41:29,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, listen to the Rates and Barrels podcast for five 964 00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:32,800 Speaker 2: days a week now this season, so tons of content 965 00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:35,400 Speaker 2: coming out there. I've got some hitter rankings dropping on 966 00:41:35,560 --> 00:41:37,960 Speaker 2: the Athletics soon if I do right. It's not very often. 967 00:41:38,080 --> 00:41:40,279 Speaker 2: It is over at the Athletic and I'm over on 968 00:41:40,360 --> 00:41:42,600 Speaker 2: Blue Scott's DVR over there, so if you want to 969 00:41:42,640 --> 00:41:44,759 Speaker 2: follow me over there, please please do. Yeah. 970 00:41:44,760 --> 00:41:46,239 Speaker 1: It's hard to keep track of who's on the Twitter 971 00:41:46,239 --> 00:41:49,439 Speaker 1: and who's on the Blue Sky, but follow both locations. Jeff, 972 00:41:49,480 --> 00:41:50,719 Speaker 1: what about you? Are you on the Blue Sky? 973 00:41:51,440 --> 00:41:54,160 Speaker 3: Hi? I am Jeff dash ericson. Just like on Twitter, 974 00:41:54,239 --> 00:41:55,960 Speaker 3: I wasn't the first to get my own name there, 975 00:41:56,040 --> 00:41:59,320 Speaker 3: So I'm Jeff Underscore on Twitter and Jeff dash on 976 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:02,680 Speaker 3: Blue Sky because they don't do underscore at a Blue 977 00:42:02,719 --> 00:42:04,960 Speaker 3: Sky either, but I'm overexposed. You can catch me in 978 00:42:05,040 --> 00:42:07,759 Speaker 3: Serious XM. You can catch me on vsen now five 979 00:42:07,840 --> 00:42:10,520 Speaker 3: days a week, Monday through Friday at eleven to twelve 980 00:42:10,640 --> 00:42:13,520 Speaker 3: Best Coast that's West Coast for you guys that are unaware, 981 00:42:14,280 --> 00:42:16,640 Speaker 3: and then also of course on rote wir just jo 982 00:42:16,800 --> 00:42:19,040 Speaker 3: check us out there rodewire dot com slash Try. You 983 00:42:19,080 --> 00:42:22,200 Speaker 3: can see everything we have to offer. Our rankings. Our 984 00:42:22,440 --> 00:42:24,920 Speaker 3: latest roundtable rankings will be going up again tomorrow there 985 00:42:24,960 --> 00:42:26,880 Speaker 3: with four of us in a composite set of rankings 986 00:42:26,920 --> 00:42:29,840 Speaker 3: to go with that, all of our draft kits stuff there. 987 00:42:29,920 --> 00:42:31,839 Speaker 3: Just check it out free two day trial rodwire dot 988 00:42:31,880 --> 00:42:32,560 Speaker 3: com slash Try. 989 00:42:33,160 --> 00:42:36,040 Speaker 1: Fantastic sites. Rode Wire's blurb feed is fantastic. It's a 990 00:42:36,080 --> 00:42:37,759 Speaker 1: great site to subscribe to. You and I mean Rates 991 00:42:37,800 --> 00:42:40,000 Speaker 1: and Barrels. I think is probably my number one podcast 992 00:42:40,080 --> 00:42:42,799 Speaker 1: whenever there's a new episode, essentially drop what I'm doing 993 00:42:43,080 --> 00:42:45,040 Speaker 1: and go put the earbuds in. So great work from 994 00:42:45,080 --> 00:42:46,560 Speaker 1: both of these guys, and Jeff, I definitely hear you 995 00:42:46,640 --> 00:42:48,719 Speaker 1: on the overexposed front. I'm starting to feel that way 996 00:42:48,760 --> 00:42:51,520 Speaker 1: myself a little bit doing three different podcasts this season. 997 00:42:51,600 --> 00:42:54,359 Speaker 1: It definitely feels a little overexposed, but fantastic stuff from 998 00:42:54,400 --> 00:42:56,080 Speaker 1: both of you. I really appreciate you taking the time. 999 00:42:56,360 --> 00:42:57,839 Speaker 1: Make sure you follow both of these gents, and make 1000 00:42:57,840 --> 00:42:59,640 Speaker 1: sure you subscribe to the channel if you haven't done so, 1001 00:42:59,760 --> 00:43:02,279 Speaker 1: all go check out that show with Eno and Nick 1002 00:43:02,520 --> 00:43:05,680 Speaker 1: and next week Blad Settler versus Kevin Massa Rajon who 1003 00:43:05,680 --> 00:43:07,480 Speaker 1: you probably know better as the Rodo Surgeon. So it's 1004 00:43:07,560 --> 00:43:10,920 Speaker 1: Roto Gut versus the Rodo Surgeon next week talking outfielder. 1005 00:43:10,960 --> 00:43:13,799 Speaker 1: But until then, everybody, take care, have yourselves a great night. 1006 00:43:14,120 --> 00:43:17,239 Speaker 3: Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast. 1007 00:43:17,560 --> 00:43:19,920 Speaker 3: If you love the show, the best freeway to support 1008 00:43:20,000 --> 00:43:22,880 Speaker 3: us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts 1009 00:43:22,960 --> 00:43:26,600 Speaker 3: or Spotify, follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at 1010 00:43:26,680 --> 00:43:29,600 Speaker 3: Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube 1011 00:43:29,640 --> 00:43:31,840 Speaker 3: dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB