WEBVTT - Silicon Valley is a Failure

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Robert Evans here and welcome to It could

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>happen here. You know, when we started the show, when

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I did the first season of it, you know, the

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 1>one about all the Civil War stuff back in twenty nineteen,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>this was basically a place for me to write long

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>essays explaining my vision of the future and the present. Uh,

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And people seem to like that a lot. We did

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that at the start of this

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>new Eternal daily season of the show. Um, but obviously

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last year or so, it's it's morphed into

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>something very different and something wonderful and successful, and it's

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>brought a lot of new voices, or at least voices

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people maybe hadn't heard from as much out in front

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of the audience, and I've been really happy about that.

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But what I also haven't been doing is writing any

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>more essays about the world and how fucked up shit is,

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I've been managing a bunch of stuff

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's been a lot of work to do. But

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I like doing that stuff, and I think you people

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 1>like it, So I'm gonna try to do more of that.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to kind of start by talking a

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Silicon Valley, and I'm going to say

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>something at the start of this essay that a lot

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of people are probably instinctively going to want to disagree with,

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>which is that Silicon Valley and the tech industry have

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>been gigantic failures by every metric that matters. They have

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>made life comprehensively worse for humanity, and there is no

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>real fact based counter argument to that statement. This is

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a hard pill for people to swallow. I'm sure a

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are frustrated in me for saying it

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, and they're thinking of counter arguments. Most people

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.639
<v Speaker 1>today are critical of the tech industry, obviously, particularly major

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>social media companies, but they still tend to acknowledge the

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>tremendous wealth created by Silicon Valley, as if there's some

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of inherent value to that Behind a number on

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a spreadsheet. Collectively, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, and Google, the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>so called Big five had a seven point I have

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market cap in every person listening to this

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>keeps a device in their pocket made by or using

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the software of one or more of these companies, And

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>so when people want to make the counter argument to

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>what I just said, they'll tend to point out some

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>version of this. Uh yeah, companies like Facebook have done

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>bad things, but the Internet still a tool for good.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>It connects people, YadA, YadA, YadA. Smartphones empower us. You know.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>There's all these positive things about the internet, to which

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I will say, present me with your fucking evidence that

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that has mattered for people really in terms that actually

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>inaggregate improve their lives. I will show you my arguments

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to the contrary. In the period of time from Harry

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Truman's election to the end of the Nixon administration, American

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>productivity on a per capita basis increased at a faster

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>rate than it did at any other point in history.

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>But then something happened. From nineteen seventy three to two

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and thirteen, income growth was eight percent slower than

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it had been in the previous three decades. If productivity

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>had continued to grow with the same rate from nineteen

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy three to two thousand thirteen as it did from

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty six to nineteen seventy three, the economy in

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen would have been sixty percent larger than

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it actually was. Now, I'm gonna guess a decent number

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>of the people listening to this grew up watching the Jetsons.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I know I didn't. For the most part, it was

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a silly, pretty harmless animated show, but at the center

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of it was a dream about the future that seems

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>unfathomable in light of current events. George Jetson, who was

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in the show a pretty normal working class guy, worked

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>three hours a day for three days a week. One

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of the running jokes in the show is that he

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>considered himself overworked despite this pretty idyllic schedule. Now, this

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was never particularly a focus of the show. It was

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just kind of something that was mentioned from time to time.

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's because the idea that a work week might

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>just be nine hours in the future wasn't a joke.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>This was the direction of futurists in the nineteen sixties,

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at that surgeon productivity I just mentioned, and all

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of the middle class wealth that had been created from

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the forties through the early exties. This is the direction

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>they saw us heading in around a decade ago, in

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a period that was still significantly more optimistic than our

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>current age. The Atlantics Alexis Madrigal, when on a reading

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>spree of some early twentieth century futurist novels. His conclusion

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>was this quote. Technological optimists sold the world on automation

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>by telling people it would create unimaginable amounts of leisure

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for them. The big question for the workers of the

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty first century would be how to spend their copious

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>amounts of free time. Now, the future we've actually gotten

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>has given us the opposite of this dream to try

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and cover up the rank and rampant ways modern technology

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>has failed humanity. Think tanks funded by venture capitalists and

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>tech gurus produce an endless stream of identical futurist thinker

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>types who write columns about how the world is actually

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>better today than it's ever been. A good example of

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this would be this June column by Rob Askar titled

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the World's getting better, Here's why your brain can't believe it.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It opens with this paragraph, Life has improved for most

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>people around the world over the past generation, temporary pandemics aside.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>The rub is that you can't get anyone to believe

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the good news, and the result is a toxic political

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>environment and the potential collapse of democratic norms if too

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>few people feel that a stressed system is worth saving.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Now I might point out, for example, that if people

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>don't actually feel like the system is good, perhaps it's

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not really working well. There's a number of counter arguments

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you can make to this. Now, two years later, this

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>again was written in June, we've got a massive war

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. People are worried about nuclear warfare as a

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>result of that. Again, we've got a degradation of democracy

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>worldwide that's continued to pace from where it was in

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>We've got soaring inequality, we've got inflation the likes of

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of people alive have never seen, myself

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>included prior to this point. And we still have a pandemic.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's clear that Rob is at least not as

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>smart as he thinks he is, which is what I

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>would say about everyone who makes versions of the same

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>claim that he was making. Now, this doesn't mean I'm

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that life is worse now than it was at

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>some imagined pre lapse arian version of the past. I

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>actually think that's kind of a useless way to think

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>about the past. In the future, there's different things people

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>would have preferred. There's things that are objectively better, there's

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>things that are objectively indebatably worse. You know, that's hard

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to make those kind of claims about history, especially when

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they often rely on saying, well, X amount of more

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>people have been pulled out of poverty, and the question

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to that as well, I don't know, before colonization of Africa,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>would you say all of those people in what became

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the colonized parts of Africa were in poverty or were

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>they simply not part of a system that measures poverty

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and anyway, whatever. We can go on and on about that.

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>My point is that the metrics these people used to

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>claim the success of our current system to talk about

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>how wonderful things are today are constantly shifting, and they're

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.239
<v Speaker 1>widely arbitrary. The same year Rob wrote his stupid column,

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>an in O r C studies showed that Americans self

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>reported being happy at the lowest levels in fifty years.

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>You can quote jupe statistics about wealth or acts as

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to luxury goods all you want, but the modern world

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and the post two thousand eight financial crash economy, all

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of which was built in the shade of the tech industry,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is making people miserable now. Happiness is obviously not a

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect measure of progress either. Self reporting is always dicey,

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but things like the consumer price index in per capita income,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>which are often used by folks on the optimist side,

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>are also juked and jiggered to hell and back. So

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to provide a bit more of an international scale, I'm

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>going to quote from the Berkeley University's Greater Good magazine quote.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Released annually on the International Day of Happiness, the World

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Happiness Report ranks countries based on their life satisfaction and

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the Gallop World Poll. Residents rate how satisfied they are

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>with their lives in the scale of zero to ten,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>from the worst possible life to the best possible life.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>This year's report also analyzes how global happiness has changed

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>over time, based on data stretching back to two thousand five.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>One trend is very clear. Negative feelings, worries, sadness, and

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>anger have been rising around the world, up by from

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand ten to two thousand eighteen. The others also

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>found troubling trends, and happiness in equality, which is the

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>psychological parallel to income inequality, how much individuals in society

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>differ and how satisfied they are with life. Since two

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, happiness inequality has been rising within countries, meaning

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that the gap between the unhappy and the happy has

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been getting wider. This trend is particularly strong in Latin America,

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Asia and Sub Saharan Africa. And this is kind of

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>getting it. I think, what is an incredibly important point,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, if you want to look at how

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>people have self reported their unhappiness rising. This massive recent

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>surge and unhappiness occurs almost at exactly the period of

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>time that the smartphone takes off and becomes ubiquitous. And

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone is such a bafflingly useful device. I would

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>never want to give mine up as a thing that

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I had access to. And the Internet is incredibly powerful tool.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to give the Internet up either. But

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the usefulness and the the undoubtable brilliance behind these products

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>makes it seem inconceivable to argue that they haven't made

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>us better at accomplishing the things that matter to us.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But the evidence on this is pretty clear. I want

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to quote now from a write up in The Atlantic.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>No matter how aggressively you torture the numbers, the computer

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>age has coincided with a decline in the rate of

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. When Chad Civerson, an economist, at the University

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago's Business School looked at the question of missing growth.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He found that the productivity slowdown has reduced GDP by

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>two points seven trillion dollars since two thousand four. Americans

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>may love their smartphones, but all those free apps aren't

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>worth trillions of dollars. The physical world of the city,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the glow of electric powered lights, the rumble of automobiles,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the roar of airplanes overhead and subways below is a

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>product of late nineteenth century In early twentieth century invention,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the physical environment feels depressingly finished. The bulk of innovation

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>has been shunted into the invisible realm of bites and code.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>All of that code, technology advocates argue has increased human

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>ingenuity by allowing individuals to tinker, talk, and trade with

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented ease. This certainly feels true. Who could spute the

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's easier than ever to record music, market

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a video game, or published an essay. But by most measures,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>individual innovation is in decline. In two thousand fifteen, Americans

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>were far less likely to start a company than they

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>were in the nineteen eighties. According to the economist Tyler Cohen,

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the spread of broadband technology has corresponded with a drop

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>off an entrepreneurial activity in almost every city and in

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>almost every industry. Now you might think from all this

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm left ahead into some sort of techno dum

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>er anti primitives rant here. I'm not. Perhaps I should,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not. I am a person who loves technology.

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I got my start as a journalist as a tech journalist.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I've joyously traveled the world for years visiting conventions looking

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at new gadgets, and a lot of this was in

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that pretty wondrous period if you're a gadget nerd from

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight to two thousand eleven, where there were

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>just these amazing, new, weird sci fi gadgets dropping every

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>single week, stuff that you'd grown up watching, and like

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek, the next generation suddenly getting mailed to your

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>door for you to test out. I tested hundreds of

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>tablets and smart gadgets in that time frame, and there's

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>some really great products that came out from that period.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Bluetooth speakers are wonderful. A lot of people, including me,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>use them happily on a daily basis, But when it

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>comes to legitimately life changing applications of technology that's come

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to us in the last fifteen years or so. I

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>can really only think of three things. Number one is

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the ability to navigate by GPS basically everywhere. Number two

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is the ability to be in constant contact with people

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>around the world. And number three is the ability to

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>store a shipload of media on a portable device. So

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not anti technology. Nor am I saying that big

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>tech doesn't make things that are cool or useful. Nor

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>am I saying we should get rid of this stuff.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>The point I'm making is that viewed at thirty thou feet,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry has produced very little of quantifiable value

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to the human race, and it has caused unfathomable harm

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Now, in my opinion, this has nothing,

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least fairly little to do with how the

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>technology inherently works, and instead has everything to do with

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the ideology behind the people who developed and who continue

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to marshal that technology. In nineteen ninety five, two of

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the smartest guys in the twentieth century by my estimation,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Richard Barbrook and Andy Cameron, wrote an essay about the

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ideology that animated the men who had come to dominate

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first century tech industry. They titled their essay

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Californian Ideology, and I think it still counts as

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the three or four most incisive accurate essays

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of that century. The gist of the idea was that

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as the first wave of the digital boom started to

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>hit in the mid nineteen nineties, the thinkers behind it

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>were fueled by a mix of left wing by a

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>mix of left wing egalitarian, often anti status beliefs that

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>got wedded to right wing free market fundamentalist libertarian ideology

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and created this deeply toxic way of thinking about the future.

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>You can see this in the story of guys like

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Steve Wozniak, the inventor of the personal computer, who was

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>also a former phone freaker. He committed federal crimes as

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a kid, hacking the phone system primarily because fuck the man.

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But then when he's a young man, the waws hooks

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>up with a guy named Steve Jobs, and Jobs is

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant but heartless con man who cares about nothing

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>but market dominance. Jobs recognizes the naive brilliance of Steve Wozniak,

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and he turns it into an engine for wealth creation.

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>At one point, he steals money that Wosniak was owed

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>for a project that they took on together, money Wosniac

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>probably would have just given him if he'd asked, and

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he used it secretly to fund their business, which became Apple.

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>In their essay, Cameron and Barbara, who are much better

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>writers than I, described the Californian ideology this way. The

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Californian ideology is a mix of cybernetics, free market economics,

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and counterculture libertarianism, and is promuligated by magazines such as

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Wired and Mondo two thousand and preached in the books

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of Stuart Brand, Kevin Kelly, and others. The New Faith

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>has been embraced by computer nerds, slacker students, thirty something

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>cap the lists, hip academics, futurist bureaucrats, and even by

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the President of the USA himself. Now, the tech industry

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 1>as we know it got its start courtesy of government money.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knows that the first version of the Internet was

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>developed as part of a Defense Department project, but the

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>entire computer industry, all of the coders and engineers who

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would form the first generation of selincom Valley profit engines.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>All these guys got their start working for or as

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>defense contractors. When the US pulled out of Vietnam, thousands

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of these people were left out of jobs and they

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>were forced to move into the private sector. Everything worthwhile

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that's come out of big tech has involved a titanic

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of public funding, one way or the other. And

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna quote from that essay again. Almost every major

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>technological advance of the last two hundred years has taken

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>place with the aid of large amounts of public money

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and under a good deal of government influence. The technologies

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the computer in the net were invented with the

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>aid of massive state subsidies. For example, the first difference

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Engine project received a British government grant of five hundred

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen thousand, four hundred and seven d pounds a

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>small fortune in eighteen thirty four. From Colossus to ed VAC,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>from flight simulators to virtual reality, the development of computing

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>has depended at key moments on public research handouts or

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>fat contracts with public agencies. The IBM Corporation built the

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>first programmable digital computer only after it was requested to

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>do so by the U. S Defense Department during the

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Korean War. The result of a lack of state intervention

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>meant that Nazi Germany lost the opportunity to build the

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>first electronic computer in the late thirties when the Wehrmacht

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>refused to fund Conrad Zooz, who had pioneered the use

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of binary code, stored programs, and electronic logic gates. One

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of the weirdest things about the Californian ideology is that

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast itself was a product of massive state intervention.

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Government dollars were used to build the irrigation systems, highway schools, universities,

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and other infrastructural projects which make the good life possible.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>On top of these public subsidies, the West Coast high

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tech industrial complex has been feasting off the fattest pork

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>barrel in history. For decades, the US government has poured

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>billions of tax dollars in to buying planes, missiles, electronics,

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and nuclear bombs from Californian companies. Americans have always had

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>state planning, but they prefer to call it the defense budget.

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Now this state of affairs is more or less unchanged today.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is probably the most celebrated modern tech visionary.

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Miss Sundry companies have taken nearly five billion dollars in

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>public funding, subsidies, and government support since two thousand fifteen.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>All of these libertarian visionaries who push in their political

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lives for a world of lossyfair economics and corporate sovereignty,

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>only produce value with the help of taxpayer dollars. Period.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The irrational exuberance of public financing and the narcissism to

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ignore its role in innovation has given us a generation

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of tech industry overlords who seem bound and determined to

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>destroy their own creations. Steve Jobs represented the most successful

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and probably the most intelligent manifestation of the Californian ideology.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Every tech industry ghoul currently boiling away fortunes for the

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sake of their ego. I'm thinking of Zuckerberg and Musk

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>most prominently right now, is trying to be him. Steve's

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>skill was being able to perfectly inhabit the form of

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>a visionary, and he was so good at doing this

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that he convinced this generation they could follow in his footsteps.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But Steve Jobs was only ever playing at being a creator,

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at being an inventor. His skill was not in making things.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>He had other people to do the making Steve was

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>an exceptional confidence man, and like all good confidence men,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>he was able to make money because he understood on

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a deep level what other human beings wanted. This skill

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.719
<v Speaker 1>allowed him to lock Apple into spending hundreds of millions

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of dollars on R and D for what would become

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the first proper smartphone, and for a while he was

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just having them toss that money into an apparent chasm,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly turning back iterations of the product that weren't quite right,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on the strength of his leaf that when they got

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it right, it would be worth it. In the year since,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>we've seen many wanna be Steves try to follow in

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>his footsteps, igniting tens of billions of dollars of venture

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>capital for absolutely nothing. One of the best examples would

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>be Uber. They lost eight point five billion dollars in

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen, six point eight billion dollars. Once upon

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a time, the understanding, the jobs and vision of what

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Uber could be was that all of this ignited VC

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>cash would be worthwhile because eventually the company would succeed

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>in replacing human drivers with autonomous cars, cutting out the

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>primary cost in the entire professional driving industry, and making

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the potential for a shipload of profit, but after investing

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>more than a billion dollars in self driving cars, Uber

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>sold their entire autonomous vehicle division off at a loss.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>All of that expense had resulted in self driving cars

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that averaged one half mile travel per accident. Despite this,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 1>after a two point six billion dollar loss in August

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of two Uber stocks sword Now the realities of what

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>generates profit and loss in the tech industry have been

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>completely divorced from productive reality or value created for quite

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>some time. The delamination of real value in big tech

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>happens subtly. It's not hard to see why Apple, who

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>created a device every human being wanted to have in

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>their pocket, became worth a shipload more money, right pretty obvious.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>The value case for Google's core business, search is also

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious. And as much as I hate Facebook, it

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>became initially successful because it provided people with something of

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>real value, a way to stay in touch with human

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>beings they had met over the course of their lives.

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Younger folks may find this odd because they've grown up

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Internet, but as a kid, I can remember

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>very vividly my parents talking about the friends they'd had

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in high school and in college and how a lifetime

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of moving regularly had severed many of the connections they'd

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>valued with these people. When I joined Facebook and my

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>freshman year of college, I found real value and the

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>ability to maintain and sometimes even build stronger connection with

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>people I would otherwise have lost touch with entirely. There

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is the core of something good, or something at least

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>valued inherently by people in Facebook, and that's true with most,

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if not all, of the Big five companies. When people

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>reflexively leap to defend the tech industry as an engine

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of innovation, they can point to these successes. But the

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>point that I'm making isn't that no good ideas come

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out of Silicon Valley, or that there isn't anything valuable

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that is involved in what these companies do. It's that

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the endless quest for profit and the narcissism of this

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Californian ideology lead inevitably to the destruction of whatever value

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the industry creates. This is why none of these innovations

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have actually led to surges and productivity, why none of

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>them have made us any happier, which I think might

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be more important. Any potential these creations had was smothered

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by the ideology that drives Silicon Valley money. Facebook took

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the connections that they'd made with people and used them

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to feed those same people rage bait. They destroyed the

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>open Internet, shut countless local news sites, put tons of

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>people out of business, while algorithmically pushing millions of folks

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>around the world towards whatever kept them angriest and most online.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Google spent billions on an endless stream of spinoff products

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like Google Plus and Google Glass, which were nearly all

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic failures, at least on a financial sense, and all

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the while they gradually turned the search results they prided

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves on into a sponsored ad feed. Google is less

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>useful now than it was a couple of years ago.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You noticed this immediately if you just get on there

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and start asking it questions. Elon Musk has taken the

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>visionary technology that underpins the Tesla, all created by other people,

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and used the clout from that to shatter any chance

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of California developing a high speed rail system. By the way,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in June of two, Tesla stock value plunged seventy five

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, which is substantially more money than the company

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>has ever actually made. Elucidating the full scale of the

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>failure of Silicon Valley and America and techno optimism would

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>take more time than I'm able to spend right now,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So instead, I want to talk about the idea that's

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>behind so much of the recent big failures that we've

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>seen from big tech, stuff like Meta pissing away ten

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars half the budget of NASA in a year

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to create a worse version of vr chat. The idea

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>is called blitz scaling, and it basically means attempting to

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>achieve massive scale at breakneck speed. You take big risks

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and you spend huge amounts of money very quickly to

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>try enforce apps or other products onto the market that

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are then adopted rapidly by huge numbers of people. This

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>brings in a shipload of VC money and as a

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>way that you can make a fortune. In the years

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>since Jobs brought the first iPhone out on stage, this

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>has become the dominant model of Silicon Valley entrepreneurship. Everyone

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is looking for the next iPhone, right, something that can

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>take over an industry, something you can take over the

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>world that rapidly, that can change human life almost overnight.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>In funding Calls, Mark Zuckerberg says this in Funding Calls,

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg says this very directly, comparing his company's metaverse

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>dreams to the new smartphone. The thing that Mark misses

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>because his ideology renders it invisible, is that Steve Jobs

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't make people want the iPhone. He was able to

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out what they wanted already, what they had talked

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>about wanting for decades, starting with trike orders and communicators

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on Star Trek, and he lashed his dev team until

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>they built the damn thing. Now. The metaverse has some

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>analogs in fiction, including the thing that it gets its

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>name from um, but number one, most depictions of the

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>metaverse in fiction are not aspirational things people want their

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>dystopian uh. There's no evidence that people actually want this

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>thing that he's igniting a fortune to build, or that

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they'd spend meaningful periods of time in it if it existed.

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>There's not a lot of polling on this data, but

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>one in seven but one se person survey I found

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>showed less than respondents respect expressing an interest in meta

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in a metaverse like the one Zuck is trying to build.

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>The last time Facebook provided any kind of information about

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>how many people are on Horizon Worlds, which is kind

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of the core of their metaverse efforts, It was somewhere

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>around three thousand people in the most recent quarter. They

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>declined to provide an update to those numbers, which suggests

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the number has not increased um And if you just

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>want to look at what happens when people create a

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>digital product that actually has a strong base of interest,

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>look at how quickly World of Warcraft went from, you know,

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing that very few people outside of nerds would

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>have known much about, to a thing that was entirely mainstream,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>millions of users, regular references to it on television. You're

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>just not seeing that with any of this metaverse ship

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>because there's nothing in it that people actually want. The

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sheer hollowness of big tech is starting to become financially

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>obvious to Facebook, Stock has lost fifty seven percent of

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>its value in the last year. Amazon is down Google

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>by and even Apple has fallen by fourteen percent. More

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to the point, I think any honest person has to

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the last fifteen years or so in which

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>these companies have ruled our economic and social lives and asked,

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are we better off now? Over the course of the

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, productivity and income rose at unprecedented rates. There

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of brutality in this process, right. We talked,

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, on Behind the Bastards regularly about all of

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the horrible labor things that happened in the nineteenth century.

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It also marked the beginning of the fossil fuel age,

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>which may well kill us all. But while all this

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>was going on, another thing that happened is wages for

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the working class doubled in the first half of the

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century, and the second half. Life expectancy rose faster

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>than it ever had before as well, and that continued

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>through the first part of the twentieth century. Now, near

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first quarter of the twenty one century,

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing that kind of movement. The United States

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is now ending its second consecutive year of declining life

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>expectancy for the first time in any of our lifetimes,

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and real average wage, adjusted for inflation, has remained flat

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for almost half a century. Progress has flatlined, and nothing

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about how brilliant the modern tech industry is or how

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>cool some of these gadgets and products are can change

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>those fundamental facts. It's a failure. It Could Happen Here

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>as a production of cool Zone Media. For more podcasts

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zone media

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com or check us out on the I Heart

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You can find sources for It could Happen Here, updated

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>monthly at cool zone Media dot com slash sources. Thanks

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for listening.