WEBVTT - Biden in Poland and Apple's $200K Bonuses

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Jack in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. President

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden in Poland at the center of Ukraine's refugee crisis

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>as Russia's military focuses on taking full control of the

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>dome bas region, but falters in Key. We'll look at

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the continuing fallout from the war from cyberspace to outer space,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>plus Apple dolling out an additional unusual bonus to Key

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>engineers some upwards of two hundred thousand dollars. How to

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>keep staff loyal as the post pandemic war for talent

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>ramps up. We'll have more on that. Bloom School and

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>install cart also trying to lawre new employees by taking

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>an unexpectedly lower valuation, slashing its own valuation by almost

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>from thirty nine to twenty four billion dollars. This is

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>public market volatility continues. We'll discuss another work school all

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of that in a moment, but first let's get a

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the market. Tech stocks and in the week

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>down are at Ludlow here now with the latest and

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not all bad news right now. Okay, look we're

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a little lower flat on a Friday, but we did

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>see a late come back from the ASTAC one D

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>very tech heavy index. Of course, that's his oil trim games.

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>You see w t I West Texas in the media

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>above a hundred ten dollars a barrel higher a hundred

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen aout in US tenure yield at two point four

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>seven percent nears two and a half percent. But coming

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>me into my bloombow terminal, will look we have some

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sustained momentum in tech stocks and has that one hundred

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>having his first back to back weekly gain since the

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>beginning of February that despite the backdrop of higher yields.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Of course, yields has impacted tech stocks with higher multiples.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>This concerned, of course, that it discounts the present value

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of future profits Elsewhere big tech names on the move,

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, this Friday, looking at Meta parent company of Facebook,

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the US and EU has reached a

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>deal and accord over data movement, the flow of data

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>between the two continents. Facebook was a company to express

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>concern their octa continues to be lower off that high

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>can Spotify ending its ad platform, add back platform, free

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to play platform in Russia as well. Emily, all right,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for that update. I want to move now to

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>our top story. Talks between Russia and Ukraine are making

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>no progress, according to a top aid to the Ukrainian president,

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but President Biden did make progress with EU leaders on

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a plan to wean Europe off Russian oil and Titan sanctions.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>The President also visiting troops near Poland's Ukrainian border as

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the war enters its second month. Joining US now works

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Aggie Council from the ground in Poland. Aggie, you have

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>been near the Polish border since almost the beginning of

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the war. Talked to us about how the refugee crisis

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing is evolving. Yes, So when I first came

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>here several weeks ago now, the waiting times for people

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to try and cross the border was up to sixty hours,

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which in a Polish and Ukrainian winter can be a

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>real risk to people's lives, and that was a real

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>concern for the border guards and for the authorities on

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the border. Now we're seeing that that

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>process of getting people over the border has been streamlined,

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's also coupled with the fact that there are

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>actually fewer people crossing the border now than where a

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. When I speak to volunteers on

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the ground here, a lot of them think that quite

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the people who have already crossed the

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>border are those who are already going to do so,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the ones who remain in the Ukraine are

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>choosing to do so to be closer to their families. Now,

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>President Biden's visit to the Polish border, is any of

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this changing how he feels how the US will respond

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to Russia. Well, to be honest, there is an immediate

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>effect of Biden's visit in the fact that the day

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>before he arrived here in Gejov in Poland, he and

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>now or the White House announced that the USA would

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>be taking in a hundred thousand of the Ukrainian refugees.

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that pales in comparison to the two million

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>that Poland has has taken in. However, that is a

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>significant step on the part of the United States, and

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>him coming here is also a signal to Poland that

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they're acknowledging the humanitarian relief that Poland is doing here.

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And also Poland has been pushing for the EU to

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>give them greater aid when it comes to financially supporting

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>them throughout this refugee crisis. What's next for the president

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>worth He after he's heading to Warsaw after this, So

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he's going to meet with more people in Warsaw. Today

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>he already met with the age second airborn here in

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>chechov Um and now he's going on to Warsaw, the

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>capital of Poland, in order to have further meetings. And

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so a key factor of this this meets, these meetings

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's having here in Poland is not just the

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian angle, but also the security angle President due to

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Polish President said in his press conference today with

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>President Biden that he that he saw that his country

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>was essentially the front line of the current concerns that

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Native Alliance have when it comes to Russia's aggression

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>against Ukraine. All Right, bloombergs Aggie Control for us with

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>an update from Poland. Thank you, Aggie for your reporting

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there from the ground. Meantime, cybersecurity defenses around the globe

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>remained boosted as the war on Ukraine persists. Joining US

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>now Tony Anscomb, chief cyber threat officer of SET, the

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>group that detected the latest round of cyber attacks targeting

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>various Ukrainian organizations, and talk to us about this latest salvo. Tony,

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what is significance about the tactics you're seeing from the Russians. Well, firstly,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>these cyber tanks were data wipers, so I mean, we're

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all very familiar with things like ransomware. They're encrypted data

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and you can get it back if you pay pay

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the cyber criminal. These are just malicious pieces of code

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that actually do exactly what they say on the tin.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>They wipe the data so it can no longer be

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>accessed or recovered in any way. So it's very very malicious.

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And what is interesting about these particular variants is there

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was intent here because they were compiled some of them

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>back in the end of last year, and they've been

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>sitting on systems and we think they've been there for

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>some time prior to actually being implemented. We don't know

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>how they got there, but we certainly know they've been

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>there for some time and then unleashed to coincide with

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Russia's attack on the Ukraine. Now, yeah, we can't attribute

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>where these came from or who's who have who wrote

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>these pieces of code? Um, But yes, they're they're causing

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>causing damage. You've detected a couple of other attacks in

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks, But there is this lingering question of why

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing more and more devastating cyber attacks from Russia.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? Well, I have my own opinion here, Emily,

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it could well be that. Um. You know, firstly, it's

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>very hard to attribute a cyber attack. If somebody launches

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a cyber attack, actually turning around and saying it came

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>from this personal or this this group is very difficult

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and complex. So if all nations states have the ability

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a cyber attack on each other, it could

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>actually be that we're sitting here looking at the new

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>digital deterrent in the same way we think of a

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>nuclear deterrent. Everybody has one and it's hopefully everybody using it.

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's the case where we're sitting with a digital

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>deterrent that each side knows that they both have access

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to tools that could do untold damage in both in

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>societies all over the world, and maybe we're seeing that

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that play out. Now, how strong do you think cyber

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>defenses are. Of course, we've been hearing these warnings from

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the Widen administration that companies need to buckle up boost

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>all of their defenses. Is it going to work? Well? Hopefully.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's be clear, over the last several years,

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we've seen so many cyber attacks and so much infrastructure

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and finance and education get at tanked by ransomware, all

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for monetization purposes. So a lot of organizations are already

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>very well down the path of having the right pieces

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in place to keep themselves protected. This is just another

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>bump on the a cybersecurity teams to turn and say, right,

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to do a little bit more.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is not you know, we're not

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>starting from scratchy, And that's my point. One thing that

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>concerns me though, is if you look at the number

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of for example, water water utility companies here in the US,

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's fifty of them, and many of them are very

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>very small and very regional, and I think they probably

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>lack a lot of the skills and resources needed to

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>actually create that cyber secure environment. I'm I mean, I'm

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not far from you down in half Moon Bay, and

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly the one here in Half Moon Bay is

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>very small and very rural. All right, Well, let's hope

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that all of these companies, all of these different organizations,

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>these utilities, have what they need when it comes to

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>protecting themselves. Tony Anscom of e Set, thank you for

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>giving us an update on cyber space. Coming up, grocery

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>delivery giant Instacart slashing its valuation by almost but saying

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>too good thing for employees. At least, we'll discuss why next,

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Bloomberg, Apple is paying a small number of engineers

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>another round of special stock bonuses. This is part of

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>an unusual push to retain Key Town. According to people

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>with knowledge of the matter. Let's bring in Bloomberg's Mark

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>German on yet another scoop. So, Mark, look, Apple pays

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>out bonuses all the time, but this one seems more unusual.

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Why are they doing this? Yes, so this is a bonus.

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Is the second time they're doing this. This is restricted

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>stock you and so these vest over four years right now.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously inflation is very high. Bay area high housing prices

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are increasing per usual. Uh, you're seeing a lot of

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>poaching being done from Amazon, Microsoft and particularly Meta Slash,

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook of Apple employees to help build their metaverse. They're

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>also having their stringent return to work policy kicking into

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>place over the next several weeks. So Apple wants to

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>do everything it can to really retain that key talent.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So they're giving these massive bonuses to people working in

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>their software from car division, software engineering, and hardware engineering,

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and those four your vesting periods are designed to keep

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>those people in place for the next little while. Now,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple is you know, certainly one of those places that

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>has always been a magnet for top talent, and they've

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.599
<v Speaker 1>managed to keep people for years despite all of this competition.

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Is Apple facing you know, a bigger challenge with other

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies at this moment because of the post

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>pandemic environment. I think every tech company is facing the

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>same issue. Right. You have people leaving Google, you have

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>people leaving Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, you have people leaving all

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, right, so they're all competing with different

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>benefits to keep their top talent. Uh. Interestingly, Apple is

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the place that you go to me be if you're

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a veteran in your field, Right, if you're the type

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of person who wants to work on a product that

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know is going to be used by hundreds of

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>millions or billions of people. That's not necessarily the same

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>perk that you get by working and maybe Meta or

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Google or Facebook if we're talking about hardware or one

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>unified service. So it is pretty enticing, you know, for

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>certain people to work at Apple. Now, Apple doesn't always

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>pay as much as competing companies, right, I know, Meta

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know is paying more than Apple for a number

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of very similar positions if you compare it Apples to Apples. Right.

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Meta also has their remote work policy in place, so

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you could work at Meta. You can work remotely for

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>as long as you want, whereas Apple for three days

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>per week you're expected in the office. Likewise, with Google

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you to be expected in the office three days per week.

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>So everyone is competing for top talent in order to

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>keep turning out these products. All right, well we'll see

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>how that shakes out. Apples to Apples, as you say,

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, as always, thank you, meantime grocery to every upstart.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Instacart has slashed its valuation by almost to reflect public

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>market declines across the tech industry. The company raised money

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at a thirty nine billion dollar valuation last year. The

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>new valuation twenty four billion dollars, but the company believes

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the new number will give new employees more upside. I

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Bloombergs Jackie Dablos now for more

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>details on this, another bloomberg scoop, So Jackie, insta cart

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is voluntarily lowering its valuation. This is fairly unprecedented. But

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of course if you look at companies like door dash

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>where we've seen massive declines, Shopify, where we see massive declines,

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they say, this just makes sense. Give us a more

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.239
<v Speaker 1>context on why they're doing this. You put it perfectly,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>This is not that unusual for perhaps a public company

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that is already you know, has employees eyes on their

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>share price. What instacart is doing is behaving more like

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a public company. There's been so much speculation that they

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>could potentially I p O this year, but when you

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on in the public markets, they

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>took a step back and said that there's a bigger

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>issue at play here outside of going public, which is

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the war for tech talent. Exactly what's going on in

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>other companies around Silicon Valley, and so what's happening here

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>now is that they're going to prioritize these recruitment efforts

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>new hires entice them in by giving them shares at

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a lower price and then unlocking that upside as the

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>company continues to grow. Now, as I understand, in insta

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>cart CEO Fi g c MO explain some of their

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>reasoning at an all hands meeting at the company today.

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Instacart also released this statement to us, saying, we're confident

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in the strength of our business, but we're not immune

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to the market turbulence that has impacted leading technology companies,

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>both public and private. We can't control the market, but

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we can control how we respond. How do you think employees, Jackie,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to respond to this. I mean, it is

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>one thing if you come into a company at a

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine billion dollar valuation, and it's a different thing

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>when you find out the next day it's worth billion dollars. Instead,

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a delicate balance, and they are taking a look

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>at what it's going to take to get to the

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>next level, to achieve that next phase of growth, and

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they will need the people to get there, and so

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely for those long time employees, for even the employees

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of Caper. As you recall, they acquired a company for

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>stock earlier in October. Those employees will now only you know,

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>see a cut of about less from where the purchase

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>price was. So there are going to be winners and losers.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But this is about the long term play. And here

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>instacart is saying we want to be a real player

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in this search for talent, and I think they're going

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish it. But you also have to think about

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what this means for for investors. They came in at

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a thirty nine billion dollar her valuation this time around.

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Last year they poured in two hundred and sixty five

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>million dollars heavyweights like Andreas and Horowitz Sequoia. So there

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to be those that don't benefit from this

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>type of move, But overall, the long term play is

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have the talent to really take them

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to the next level. Al Right, Well, our very own

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Bradstone is gonna be sitting down with insta Cart CEO

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>fij cmo at Shop Talk next week. I'm sure this

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>will be on the top of his agenda to talk

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to her about, so we'll be looking for highlights from

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that conversation. Jackie Dablos, who covers in stacart for us,

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Coming up in video eying a deal with

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest rivals it has, and that is Intel.

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>How the competitors could be looking to collaborate to end

0:16:45.120 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the chip crisis. That is next, This is Bloomberg. After

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>returning to making computer monitors, Apple should now go back

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to another market, home WiFi routers. Five years ago, Apple's

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Mac business was a mess. The Mac mcpro had dropped

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>key features, The MacPro was a disaster, and updates to

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the Macikre and mc minnie were nowhere to be found.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple had even stopped making routers and monitors. The story

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>today could not be more different. Maxim have a fair

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>blend of performance, battery life and aesthetics, and Apple external

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>monitors are back on sale. Next up should be those routers.

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Turned back the clock and Apple was one of the

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>first major proponents of WiFi, launching an airport face station

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>accessory that let users plug in Ethernet cable to give

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>their entire home wireless Internet. Over time, Apple launched several

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>new variations like the high end Airport Extreme, a low

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>end Airport Express, and the Time Capsule for wirelessly backing

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>up Mac data. But then Apple discontinued its routers without

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>giving any real explanation, seating the market to competitors like

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Arrow and others. Apple should now return to making privacy focused,

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>well designed, and well integrated routers for its own product

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hardware ecosystem. That router, of course, should be mesh, so

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it should include multiple pieces to expand wireless Internet reliably

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>across an entire home. Apple could even jam those routers

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>into a home pod Mini, taking a page out of

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Nesson's book and creating a product that competes nicely with

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>both the Google and Amazon ecosystems. I'm Mark German. This

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is power On. You can subscribe to Mark's weekly power

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>On newsletter at Bloomberg dot com. Now let's get an

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>update on the world of chips within video. One of

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest chip makers said earlier this week it

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is considering tapping its main rival Intel to manufacture those chips.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's get more on this with our very own in King,

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>who of course covers the chip industry for us. Why

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>would nvidio Ian decide to use Intel as its foundry. Yeah,

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's important to put these remarks in context.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Kind of typical piece of Jensen lying the CEO, kind

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of talking really he said, look, we're open to looking

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>at any new suppliers. Having as many supplies as we

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>can possibly get makes sense Intel, if you know, if

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>they can get back to leading edge, if they can

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>get back to you know, the best production, best performance,

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>then will definitely look at them. So what's the next

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>step here, what's going to get Intel over the line

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 1>or an invidio say over the line? Yeah, I mean

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the the other side of the gentsen wing experiences. He

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he makes positive complementary remarks about Intel, says

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the right thing for Intel to do, and

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>then says, oh, by the way, yeah, you know, getting

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to be as good as TSMC is going to be

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>really difficult. They'll have to change their whole culture. And

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he starts on this long list of comparisons, unfavorable comparisons

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>with TSMC and Samsung and says how good they are.

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So the bottom line is, he said, it will take

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Now, yesterday we slash you also broke

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>some news about the arm I p O and looking

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>at a sixty billion dollar valuation. This, of course, that

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 1>deal that in video couldn't close. Sixty billion seems high,

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it It does? I mean if you compare it

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to what the semi conductor sort of average multiples would

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>give you its turn twenty billion dollars above what even

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the highest end would be. But if you look at

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.479
<v Speaker 1>it from the price of what the video transaction had become,

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 1>given the appreciation of video shares, it's about on par

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with what in video would have ended up paying for ARM.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And what we're being told is that this is really

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>just trying to set a floor in people's minds about

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>what really soft Bank thinks this company is worth, because this,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>as Massa Sonders said, this is a really pervasive company.

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>These companies everywhere. It's way more than just another chip company.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>And this ARM I p O is way more than

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>just a traditional I p O. Right, It's kind of complicated,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I mean, there's obviously a lot of stake.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>There's obviously one of the most important companies in the

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor industry, what will be the largest I p O

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in the sector by a long way. And at the

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>same time, soft Bank, as we said in the stories,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>topping these tapping these banks and saying, oh, yes, if

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you want to underwrite this I p O, then you're

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>going to have to basically loan us some money. You know,

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's attaching multiple billions of dollars of margin loans

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to the mandate, which again is is an interesting way

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to do things and obviously has you know, potentially positive

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>consequences for softbanks liquidity. Alright, and King, thank you for

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>those updates and all the news this week coming up,

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Why everyone seems to be searching for evs on Google

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this month? Put the more on Ukraine and rising gas

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>prices be an inflection point for the world's transition to

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>electric cars. We love more on that next, plus advice

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for startups in uncertain times as the war on Ukraine

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and inflation rattle markets worldwide. This is Bloomberg. Welcome back

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Technology. I'm only chang in San Francisco. I

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about what's going viral now. As gas

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>prices surge at the pump this month, swarms of people

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>took to Google to search all things ev top of

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the pile of questions, how much does it cost to

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>charge an electric car? Searches for that phrase. We're up

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this month according to Google, trends are at Ludlow is

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>here with why and and we've all felt that pain

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at the pump and it hurts. Could all this searching

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be the beginning of a big transition, a big momentum

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>shift for e v s. Yeah, that's what everyone's been

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Right now is a good time to own

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>an EVY. You look at the relative cost of running

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a car on gas versus running on electricity, and the

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>gap has just got wider in terms of costs of ownership.

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Plugging in and charging has been more cost effective. So

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it. People take to Google. There's other third

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 1>party data out there through online auctions, for example, second

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>hand car websites. They're thinking, where can I get an

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>EVY as soon as possible. Celebrities are also jumping in

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on the fun here, and there was a tweet from

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>iced Tea that got a lot of attention. Iced Tea

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>so he makes this joke right that he's at the

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>gas station and he's been robbed. He says, I've been robbed,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and he has this kind of long, dire tribe through

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the tweet. Get to the end of the tweet and

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you realize he's talking literally, of course, about the price

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of gas, not that he's literally been physically robbed while

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>filling up his car right pump number nine, I believe

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was the culprit. I think it's got it's got like

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a million likes. Um. Then there was Elon Musk dancing

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. How do we know this has to do

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>with gas prices and not just enjoying Elon's dancing moves.

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>There's that tweet. This is the other point, right that

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>there are all these people that have decided because things

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>are so bad at the gas pump. They're talking about

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're venting on Twitter that they want an e

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>V and Elon Musk was dancing in Berlin because they're

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>opening up a new factory, right, they're going to slowly

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>ramp up production there. The picture look how happy is

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But the pictures speak to a much bigger point. There's

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all this potential in the world right now, the Austin

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Planet in Texas, other EV makers coming online. I know

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous, isn't it, But the point is that those

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>things are exciting. They're not here right now, and it's

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really hard to get hold of an electric vehicle. If

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>youve gone Testa's website and try by one that's being

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>built in Fremont or in Europe. The wait times are

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so long. So yeah, things are really tough right now

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>at the gas pump. There's lots of excitement from Musk

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and co. About the future for evs, but getting your

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>hands on one, it's really difficult. Does Ellen have moves out?

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? I declined to answer that one.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And the pawing of the drone that was the best?

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you well. With the war on Ukraine

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>still raging along with inflation, investors and companies around the

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>world are reassessing how long will it will last? What's

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the path forward? Let's talk about all this and more

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>with Mercedes Bent of light speed Ventures. Mercedes, how are

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you assessing what the impact this is? What impact is

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have? Obviously we're seeing what's happening to public markets,

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but what about private markets? Thanks so much for having

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the Emily, and I would say for the private markets,

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been noticing that the later stage is being affected

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot. A lot of the crossover hedge funds had

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>come into the market and now their core is really

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>diving down quite a bit, and so that's meant that

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>people are being much more wary of late stage rounds.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the comparables. Also for the late

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>stage rounds. You know, private companies might be raising at

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>ten x or a hundred x revenues multiples. But then

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you see that same company with a very similar business

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>model and the public markets is trading at three to

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, six x, and so then you ask yourself, well,

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>what's really the possibility for this company if it was

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to go public anytime soon? Should I be paying this

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>high of a multiple. So that's happening on the growth side,

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>but then on the early stage side, we are seeing

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of activity that doesn't seem entirely affected yet.

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>So when I say early stage, I'm talking about seed

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>A s, those rounds, and that has still been kind

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of business as usual. We just saw insta cart slash

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>its valuation by from thirty nine to twenty four billion dollars.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that? And are we going

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to see more companies doing this? I think we're going

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>to continue to see more companies who are having to

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>reassess what the dollar about, what the revenue is worth,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and think through whether or not the prospects for the

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>next twelve months are the same. We certainly are thinking

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>about it across our entire portfolio and being much more

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cautious about our kind of growth stage valuations. Meantime, we

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>were speaking earlier with a chief economist at City talking

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about inflation, Andrew Holland Horse. Take a listen to what

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he had to say. This is not four percent inflation,

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>This is not five percent inflation. This is inflation that's

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>around eight percent and set to pick up closer to

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>nine percent in the next monthly reading on a year

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on your basis um. And so that's why there's been

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>such a change in expectations for what the FED will do.

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>This is really a FED now that is in inflation

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>fighting mode. And when you're in inflation fighting mode, you

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>need to get rates to a level that actually provides

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>some restraint on the economy. Mercedes, this is going to

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>impact companies on all fronts. How are you telling them

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>to manage this? We're certainly telling our companies at the

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>early stage to, you know, think about how they're building

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>their models in a much more sustainable way. You might

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be entering the bear market, you might be entering the

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>period where capital is not going to be successful, and

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so they really need to have a plan for how

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to support themselves. With the funding they have

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and also rely on insider funding for the next eighteen

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to twenty four months. We also have a number of

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>businesses that affected from a supply chain perspective, and so

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been working with them over the last few really

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>quarters and years, because this isn't just the most recent phenomenon,

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's been going on during will with COVID, we've

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>been working with them on alternative supply chain routes and

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that you know, they are even getting their demand

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>forecasted further and further ahead so that they don't have

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to be as reactive to short term supply chain fluctuations.

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, mercedeses Bent light Speed Adventures partner, thank you

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for giving us your perspective on all of this coming up.

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Volatility also still the name of the game in crypto.

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about it all with a Kantrovich

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of falcon x. Are Crypto segment is next. This is

0:29:43.320 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomber time for our crypto report now, as Ethereum is

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>rising for another day, outperforming Bitcoin for a second week,

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about it all with our crypto contributor Sinali Boss. Sectionally,

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what's giving ethereum a boost. It's really interesting to look

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at but we should first look at bitcoin here, Emily,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because with a fifteen percent rise in Bitcoin over two weeks,

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it is over forty four thousand dollars. It's really over

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>forty four thousand, four hundred dollars. Here significant lift in

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days. But to your point, you

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>are right, it is not rising as fast as Ethereum

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>has been rising over the last two week period, where

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you see more than twenty percent rise in the price

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>over the two week period. People seem to be getting

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>very excited here a about the merge, the move to

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>proof of stake concept. But it will be interesting. Remember,

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>ethereum has a lower base to rise off of, so

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the percentage rises are easier to see over there. The

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>market cap is still a very wide between the two cryptocurrencies,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so let's see what investors prefer. Still a long way

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for Ethereum to go. Okay, So Noal I stay with us.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be talking about this and more with our

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>next guest, Ia Kantorovich, head of institutional coverage at Falcon

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as Iah, what do you make of Ethereum's latest run.

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Does it have to do with the merge or something more.

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely Shanali hit the nail on the head. I think

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>right now we're seeing seeing two things in the market.

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>The first is with the bullish activity around bitcoin, possibly

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>fueled by the news that Terra was planning on purchasing

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>roughly three billion dollars worth of bitcoin for their treasury,

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and then seeing a lot of a lot of hedge

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>funds and retail investors, h and aggregators taking profit share

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>off of Bitcoin and transferring that into E and all

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:04.479
<v Speaker 1>coins asnally mentioned into that two point oh merge and

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the excitement around that, Well two questions there for you,

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what what more heat do you have behind eat when

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you see some of the money already moving over and

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>what more room do more old coins like Terra have

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to run here with that excitement that other funds have

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>behind it. So a lot of it has to do

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with the growth of the applications that are being built

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on top of these layer ones. So whether it's a

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>theory m or you're seeing that price activity also happening

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>on top of layer ones like Avalanche this week, and

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that interoperability happening with bridging Bitcoin into

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>these different layer ones being able to use that store

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>value asset as collateral for usage on those platforms. In addition,

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just to overall more protocols and projects working on the

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>travel rule and tackling that in order to make define

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>more accessible. All of these are very exciting for the

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>application of these layer ones. Meantime, I we're still seeing

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin trade within this fairly narrow range, and it's been

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>happening now going on two months. Why is that given

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>all of the activity, A lot of it has to

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>do with the fact that bitcoin is now adopted by institutions,

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we're seeing that volatility drop which really needs

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the mass adoption, both with what we're seeing across the desk,

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in the conversations we're having with institutions across the board,

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're starting to see bitcoin trade very similar to

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the assets in traditional finance, and so in

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>general there's more liquidity in the markets. Uh, and you're

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing bitcoin and the price of bitcoin being driven by

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>institutions as opposed to crypto native volatility traders. It's still

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten a good lift here over the last couple of weeks.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It is really proven itself in some ways. But what

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is really going to give bitcoin another leg here and

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>make more institutions comfortable with the cryptocurrency. So you know,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>there are a number of institutions still going through due

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>diligence with applying bitcoin, whether it's onto their balance sheet

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>or into their investment thesis. So we still don't have

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred percent of institutions in crypto, and so we're

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to and continuing to see that trickle roll into

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the space as institutions are looking for a store value

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>asset and also just for returns across their portfolio in

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the market as today. Meantime, Falcon Acts has some pretty

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>big ambitions to get the next billion crypto users on board.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Reports that you've are marked a hundred fifty million dollars

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for acquisitions globally. Talk to us about your expansion plans.

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're really excited about the talent that we've brought

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>onto our executive team, very excited about to see Walter

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>suj Gelotti and John Kaplan coming to us from Bloomberg,

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Carda Ripple and Pinterest and having that caliber of talent

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us with a vision of a token ie feature.

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>You know you mentioned before are about this preference for

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>some funds to get into either I'm wondering, I, as

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you talk to all of these institutions as you grow,

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.720
<v Speaker 1>how much is energy consumption a topic as you go along?

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>S G is very much top of mind, and so

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to the earlier point that you mentioned, this transition from

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>proof of work to proof of steak is going to

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>be very very important to the adoption that institutions view

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>for ethereum. How are you watching the war on Ukraine

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as it plays out? Obviously we've seen bitcoin be used

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for humanitarian efforts, We've seen this executive order from President Biden,

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>but there are also these remaining concerns about Russians specifically

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>using cryptocurrency for illicit things to circumvent sanctions for example,

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>How does all of this continue to play out specific

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to Ukraine? What we've seen in the effort to support Ukraine,

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's within Ukraine itself, be a Dows or enough

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Teeth projects that more global Ukrainian projects. Uh, it's really

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>just the validation that cryptocurrency is adopted and the interest

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is widespread. We're seeing that real time value in action

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>across this currency system, and more broadly, you know, very

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>um in terms of how it looks for all of

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the players in the ecosystem. We're continuing business as usual

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>with the continued k y c amail that we have

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>across the board, which is also super important about the

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>underlying blockchain and its ability to be traceable and trackable.

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>And there's this question going on also about you know,

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>whether bitcoin can really replace traditional currencies, what function it

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>has for for example Ukrainians who are using it to

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>convert their money or to raise money via n f

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>t S or etheroryum or otherwise. When you're talking two

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>institutions as well, do they see it becoming a replacement

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>over some period of time. That's a great question. I

0:36:55.440 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>would say today institutions aren't viewing these major cryptocurrency assets

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>as replacements uh, more so as uh something that goes

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>alongside more. Really, where the focus is is around stable

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>coins and that widespread adoption uh and the way it's

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>being adopted overall across all of the institutions using it today.

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I cantavish falcon X always great to have you here.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, along with Bloomberg's Shanali bassik Alright coming up

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the space race of the century. Russia remains a key

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>leader in numerous space technologies, but with the War on Ukraine,

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a new era maybe taking flight that is next. This

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. The war in Ukraine isn't just changing the

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>game in cyberspace, but outer space as well. Satellite companies

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that relied on Russia's soy Use rocket to get to

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>orbit are down looking for a new ride amid sanctions

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and Russia cutting off access. US launch providers like Northrop

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>in ul A use Russian built r O D one

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>eight engines. Now Russia's ross Cosmos is facing competition not

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>just from the likes of SpaceX, but also startups focused

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>on building rocket engines. One of those startups is are

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>some Major whose founder and CEO Joe Loreenti, joins us

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>now alongside our very own at ludload. Joe, thank you

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. So I'd love for you

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to set the stage here. What's happening in outer space

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>since the war on Ukraine started. We're seeing some big

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>shifts in the sort of center of gravity if you will,

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for space technologies. Yeah, you touched on two of the

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>big headlines. There's the lack of launch from soy US

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>for Western players. Famously, in the last couple of weeks,

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:57.720
<v Speaker 1>one way of the UK based company has been forced

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy launches from a competitor in space X has

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>their own Internet constellation. So that's one big piece of

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the story. And the second is the embargo on Russian

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>rocket engine in which Russia announced that they will no

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>longer be selling here to the US. So I think

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the most common question I get on that piece of

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 1>news is the US was buying Russian rocket engines. I

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>think that one always surprises folks. Yeah, it is a

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of a surprise, isn't it, given that the police

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>coll tensions and you know, I think folks forget that

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>before SpaceX, there wasn't a lot of options out there, right, Joe,

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>So this must be pretty good news for you in

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>your currany. Is your phone ringing quite a lot to

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ask about the readiness of your rocket engine? Is? Yeah?

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>The obviously, the international piece of this has been extremely busy.

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>The US government has been extremely busy, and then the

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>commercial side is extremely impacted here as well. Uh. SpaceX

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>obviously is doing a tremendous job of filling filling their

0:39:55.280 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>manifest with satellite operators. But the entire world is gone

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 1>from a position of is the launch market oversaturated? To

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>why is one web buying launches from a competitor. So

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're going to continue to stay really busy,

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and luckily it's just shining a light on the propulsion

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>industrial based globally and how how companies like as A

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Major can come to help out both commercial entrants and

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>uh the US government. So talk to us about that.

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>How is URSA Major different from SpaceX or Blue Origin

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or what the Russians have to offer. Well, we're different

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Russians and that we're entirely domestic, so we

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>can provide rocket engines here to the US government and

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the US players and Western players as it suits them.

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>But uh, as far as our business model and how

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>we differentiate ourselves from a SpaceX or Blue Origin, were

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>entirely propulsion focused. So our engines are designed to meet

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a wide range of needs from space launch on orbit

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to hypersonic testing in the case of some of our customers.

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's a technological advantage there in which the engines

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are designed for a wide range about gins and pretty

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>diverse capability. But there's also an economic side of it

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in which we have a production line that we just

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>got rolling in this year, So there are some economies

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of scale for for us delivering the same type of engine.

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>The multiple customers are multiple applications. Hey, joy, let's talk

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>about that production line. I actually was listening to Elon

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Muskin Texas recently talk about how SpaceX is building one

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Raptor engine a day almost, but of course SpaceX doesn't

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>sell their Raptor engines to anyone else. What kind of

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>pace of production of you guys got, and how quickly

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and how to build these things? Three D printing right, Yeah,

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>one of day is a tremendous pace. So we just

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>started production in January of this year, and we hope

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be delivering thirty engines to customers by the end

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of this year. But the focus is really shifting us

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>from a capacity perspective of how many engines per year

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>to a rate much like Elon said, an engine a day.

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>We'd like to be at two engines a week here

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in the not too distant future. So the ramping there

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is really limited by how quickly we can assemble the engines.

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>You touched on the three D printing piece. Almost every

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 1>part of these engines that is a primary component or

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a metallic component is three D printed. We then hand

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>assemble them here in Colorado and test them about a

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards from where they are assembled. So I'm sitting

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 1>not too far from where we fire our rocket engines. Joe,

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>There's another part of the story, and that is hypersonic weapons.

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>The US has confirmed that Russia has used hypersonic weapons

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.880
<v Speaker 1>against Ukraine. But the US is behind not just Russia,

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but also China in hypersonic weapons, and the government is

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>calling on companies like you to help change this. Talk

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to us about why this is important. Yeah, that's that's

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the coin of the story here.

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>We just saw We just saw Russia claim that they

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>had used the first hypersonic weapon and warfare. So the

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>US has been developing hypersonic capabilities for many years now,

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but seen over the last couple of years as a

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of focus on flight testing hypersonics. So our engines

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are unique in that they are capable of being used

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on a number of applications, number of different vehicles, and

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>they're capable of things like deep throttle or multiple restarts,

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so we can simulate flight across a pretty wide range

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of hyper missions. And that's really important for this next

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>phase of development because the US will be forced to

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>develop not just new hypersonic vehicles, but new technology and

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>new capabilities, and that flight testing is an enormous component.

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey Joe, we only got a few seconds. How much

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>money you guys gonna make this year? It's hard to say. Yeah,

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the years definitely early, but we were excited to see

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty heavy focus from the DoD budget that was

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:47.359
<v Speaker 1>just recently approved on hypersonic testing and space flight. So um,

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>some some nice tail wins for us. All right, fascinating

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff what you're doing and what's happening out there in

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>outer space or some major founder and CEO Joe Loreenty

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg's at Ludlow, Thank you both. That does it

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Join us next week

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for a conversation our very own brad Stone will be

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting down with Insta cart CEO v G Cimo at

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the shop Talk conference in Las Vegas, along with Georgash

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>president Christopher Payne. Also next week, I'll be speaking with

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Uber CEO Dara Causa Shah. He will be joining you

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:24.360
<v Speaker 1>live from shop Talk. Don't don't forget to tune in

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of interesting conversations. I'm emily changing in

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.879
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, have a wonderful weekend everyone, and don't forget

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to check out our podcast, This Is Bloomberg