WEBVTT - The Fed Weaponized The Dollar To Crush Other Countries | Brent Johnson

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brent Johnson, Santiago Capital on Twitter. I always

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>love sitting down, hanging out with you and catching up,

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited what we have to talk about today.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's just get right into it if you want

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to get to a philosophical level, but even just like

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a realistic level, like the whole world is based off

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of energy, Like the whole world is based off of energy.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like through disastrous policy decisions over the

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>last decade of shutting down energy throughout Europe and even

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States UM, and through inflationary policies, we've kind

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of created this perfect storm UM and it seems that

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it's put a lot of pressure onto UM the sovereigns,

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>if you will. Right, So, now you have Germany, for example,

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that's been a net exporter, but now they're a net

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>importer or their energy costs are so high now they're

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>having to shut their manufacturing down, which is bad, that's

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>long term effects of d industrialization. But they're also now

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a lot of nations are being forced

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to dump maybe US treasuries to get the money to

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in the energy UM. And at the same time,

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the Fed is trying to fight inflation,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which most of inflation is being caused by energy. So

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems like this energy, it seems like energy and

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this inflationary system is like at the center, the epicenter

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of this entire storm the world is is kind of

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>facing right now. I mean, it's it's the end of

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this debt cycle, potentially the sovereign long term debt cycle.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But then you have energy that's maybe the pin pricking

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the bubble. How would you how would you look at

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that now? I I think they're I think that's absolutely right.

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Like energy is a huge part of what's going on

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>now for a couple of reasons. Um. Number one, you know,

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>anybody who's seeing dune right knows that the spice must

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>flow right. And in many ways, you know, oil is

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the spice that keeps the global economy running. So to

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>think that we could talk about all these big macro

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>events that are going on and that somehow energy wasn't

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a part of it would be kind of silly. Um.

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think whether it's a byproduct of everything else

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, or if that's the cause, I I

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>don't really know, but I know it's a huge factor. Um.

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>And to your point. You know, these these uh all

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>use the word disastrous. People can use whatever the report

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that they want. These these these kind of disastrous energy

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>policies and green mandates, um that have been put in

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>place before we were ready to have any kind of

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a transition is kind of exacerbating it, right and so

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and and of course, the way I always come out,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I I always come at from the big picture down

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and I and you know, my focus is on currencies.

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>It's important to to understand that there's a couple of

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>dynamics that affect currencies that that are that are directly

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a tied that are directly tied to energy, right um.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And then this plays into geopolitics and military issues that

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>are going on with Russia and China and Ukraine and Europe. Right.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's all kind of interconnected. It's hard to it's

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to talk about just oil without seeping into these

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>other areas. But but you know, obviously the big issue

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>with oil and with many other commodities is that they're

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>priced and typically traded in dollars, and you know, whether

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you're doing business in the United States, that's typically the case.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>That's changing a bit on the edges, But by and large,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the world still trades on dollars, and energy trade around

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the world takes place in dollars. Part of the issue

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that's happening now is that over the last let's just

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>call it ten years, UM, the US has become more

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>self sufficient in energy terms. Now again, I think there

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of years where we were actually a

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>net exporter. I think in the last year we're kind

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of maybe a march back to being a marginal net importer. Um.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It kind of depends on whether shales currently pumping or not.

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But but this is important for a couple of reasons

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>because as the US becomes more energy self sufficient and

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is not it does not need to buy oil from

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East or Venezuela or Russia or wherever it is.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Um that that not only helps their domestic industry, but

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it also ends up meaning that less dollars are getting

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>distributed outside the United States. Right, for years and years

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and years, we were a huge net oil importers. So

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we would the oil would come in and the dollars

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>would go out, and then those dollars would exist in

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the eurodollar market and it would provide liquidity for the

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>eurodollar market. But as the US has become more energy

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>self sufficient. They don't have to export dollars for as

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>many imports of energy as they used to and so

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>but but a big part of it is that a

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the US dollar debt that exists in the

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>eurodollar market was extended or put in place. However, you

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>want to think about that while the US was exporting

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dollars. So you have a situation and

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of credit was extended and a lot

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of debt was taking on when there was a lot

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.559
<v Speaker 1>of liquidity. But now moving forward, due to the fact

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're exporting fewer dollars and that the US is

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>tightening monetary policy, it just means that there's less dollars circulating,

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>not just in the United States, but especially in the

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>euro dollar market. And so then it just becomes this

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>vicious cycle. And you know, we've talked about this several times, right,

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but now you have a situation where UM due to

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>these UM energy policies, due to the military conflicts and

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>geopolitic political conflicts that are going on, and due to

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>UM you know, the tightening of the money supply in

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States, you've already got UM oil rising in

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all terms, but even more so in other country terms. Right,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>so if you think about the euro and the yen

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>or even the yuan, um, you know, their currencies are

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>down in the in the UK, their their currencies are

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>down anywhere from five this year. Well, if oil is

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, ninety bucks or whatever, eighty eight bucks or

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is today, and then and then and oil

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>prices are going higher, and then your currency is losing

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>value versus the dollar. That's another ten or percent kicker

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on top of it. And then you get into the

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues where energy could gap up even higher.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've kind of got this perfect storm for um,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, chaos really lack of a better words. But

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>but in short, I think I think oil and energy

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is a huge, huge part of this, and energy is

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in many ways driving the geopolitical conflicts right now, right

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>between Russia and Ukraine or in you know, Europe and Russia.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you can't, you can't. Really, These are very sticky

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>situations or interconnected situations. You can't really look at one

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>without the other. Now, um, it seems that you know,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>this whole war with Russia is really being a you know,

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>who knows where it started or whatever. But I mean,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really about the energy right now, right, And it

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like Putin has come out and said that the uh,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you say, the economy is of fake imaginary

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.239
<v Speaker 1>wealth are being inevitbly replaced by the economies of real

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>assets or whatever, right, And I think he's talking about

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the fake FIAT system is being replaced with real commodities.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And he said what he was like trolling. He's like, um,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna do heat your homes with social

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>media companies? He said something to that effect. You know, Um,

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but I mean he he has some very good points.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I think Putin is one of

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the smarter world leaders that there is. And and you know,

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I think to a certain extent he's played his cards

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. I don't necessarily think he's a three DHS genius.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, you can't credit him or you

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can't discredit him for the moves he's made so far. Yeah,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you know, we have the situation going on

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to your point, um, gold priced in euros or yen

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is way is a way bigger problem than it is

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>priced in dollars. Um, So I'm saying, uh, kind of

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like back to this this war, if the

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>fence trying to fight inflation, um part of keeping the

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar propped up or making the dollar stronger than it

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>helps offset that inflation that we're seeing versus other nations

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that are forced to buy oil with with a d

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>de valued currency. But on top of it, then they're

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>being forced well not maybe being forced, but like Japan

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is like trying to maybe prop up their currencies at

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time as they're having to import oil at

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>these crazy levels, right, so they're down at the same

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>time that they're doing to yield curve control on their bonds,

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>which so they're there, they have they have a bunch

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of cross currents going at the Bank of Japan here. Yeah,

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so you're obviously the dollar milkshake guy. The theory is

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that the dollar will suck up the liquidity from all

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the other currencies and be the last one standing. We're

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely witnessing that plane. But this is kind of all

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>part of that, right, So as Japan is forced to

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>defend it, I mean, they're going to continue to value.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So my so my thesis has always been that whether

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fed wants it or not, ultimately the dollar will

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>get away from them to the upside. And the reason

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I say get away from them is I think currently

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>they want a stronger dollar, and we should probably talk

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about that. But even I think that before this is

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>all said and done, um, the dollar will go higher

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>than they want it to go. And it doesn't mean

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go on a straight line, and there

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>will no doubt be periods of dollar weakness along the way.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know the well, even though the Fed might

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>want a stronger dollar in the short term, they don't

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>want a dollar that's rising so fast that it's out

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of control because that will literally wreck the entire monetary system.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the monetary system wasn't set up for a

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>for a for a continually increasing dollar. It will literally

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>cause the system to crash. So while they may want

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the dollar higher in the short term, I don't think

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>they want it significantly higher in the long term. But

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately I think that will happen. Now in the short term,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that that they actually do want a stronger

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar because a stronger dollar right now accomplishes several things,

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think some of these things they would admit to,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and some of them I think they would not admit to.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And some others they may vehemently deny even though really

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they do want it. Um but you know, right now,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for better for worse. Even though they want inflation, a

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>small amount of inflation over time that allows them to

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>inflate away the debt, they don't want double digit inflation

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>year over year. And the reason they don't want that

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>high of inflation year over years because that is very

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>politically hard to handle. UM. It causes too much stress

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the local economy, it causes

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>citizens to push back on business leaders, government leaders, officials, etcetera, etcetera.

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So the government would love to get three or four

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that they say they're their target is too. I think

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>they would love three or four percent inflation for you know,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>five or ten years and they inflate the dead away.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they would absolutely love that. The problem is

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to get three or four percent consistent inflation.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>What you what you get is this, you know, very lumpy,

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, crazy inflation that we've had over the last

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>college year or two years. And so because of the

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>political pushback that they're getting and because of um, what's

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>going on in the global economy with all this inflation,

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>they are trying to dial it back down, not the

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>least of which is their reputation, right. They don't want

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>to blow up their reputation, and they're very embarre. The FED,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the Fed's very embarrassed that inflation came

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in so high and they and they were they were

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong on the transitory nation nature of it, and so

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>they want to get it back down for a few reasons.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>They want to get it back down in order to

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>restore their reputation, but they also want to get it

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>back down so that, you know, the pushback economically and politically,

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>UM is less um. And the way that they're trying

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to do that is by killing demand. Right. They don't

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>really have control over the supply side of the equation,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>but they think they have control over the demand side

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of the equation. And if you tighten monetary supply, which

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>means you know, you're taking liquidity out of the system,

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>either through open market operations of the FED or through

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates, tighter monetary supply should lead to less growth,

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and it should, you know, push demand down. And so

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>they're everybody broken. Then nobody buys anything, right, Well, I mean,

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>here's here's the funny thing mark. It's not funny, it's

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>actually tragic. But you know, I think again, for better

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for worse. I think Powell has been about as clear

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>as clear a speaking central banker as I've ever heard.

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>All year, he has come out and said, we need

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to get inflation under control. It's our primary concern. We're

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>going to raise rates, and whenever the market has misinterpreted him,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>he's come out a few days later, a few weeks

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>later and said, hey, hey, hey, I want to be clear.

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You guys aren't listening to me. I'm going to raise rates,

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and we are going to have some pain. And that

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>means that people are gonna have to get paid less,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have to lose their jobs, and house prices

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have to come down. And even though those

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>are bad things, that will be less bad than letting

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation run hot. I mean, he's been very very clear

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>about it. Now, you might think he's lying, you might

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think that he's wrong, you might think he's misguided. That's fine,

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's really no confusion in what his words are saying.

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, and so I think that raising

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>rates and getting the dollar stronger is what they are

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to do in order to get inflation down. Now

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>ironically or an ironically, depending on I guess where you're sitting.

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that by trying to tampen down inflation domestically by

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>raising the dollar, they're actually exacerbating inflation overseas. And what

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is is if the dollar is

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going up ten or fiftcent, that means other currencies are

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>going down ten or right. And so if we already

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have high levels of inflation in the US and now

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>those same goods are even more expensive in euro terms

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or end terms or Australian dollars or whatever it is, um,

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it's causing those other countries to support

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>their currencies because their currencies are losing value too much.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And those other countries, in addition to trying to support

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>their currencies, they're also trying to support their bond markets.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>UM through some form of QE. You get into a

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>situation where you're exacerbating the the same issues that the

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>FETE is fighting domestically are being exacerbated outside the United States.

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've talked about this before, but this

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>whole situation, UM, there's a name for it. It's called

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Triffin's dilemma. And Triffin was an economist back in the

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>sixties and heat coined to this term, and he said,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>if an individual countries currency is used as a domestic

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>currency and simultaneously used as the global currency, at some

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>point along the way, it will come into con the

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>needs of the domestic economy will come into conflict with

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the needs of the global economy. And and that's literally

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>right exactly where we're at. Um, you know, the rest

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the world, because it trades in dollars, and because

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the dollar is higher, their local currencies are worthless. It's

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>making their funding costs higher, it's causing their economies to slow,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's just a real mess, right, And so you know,

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we're right in the heart of this Triffan's dilemma where

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the US needs one thing and the global economy needs

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the other, and the FED and the other central banks

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>around the world are trying to thread this very very

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>small needle hole. Yeah, the proverbial soft landing, right. Um, Yeah,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, how I think that's just such a

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>horrible analogy where you kind think that like they're this

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>fighter jet with a million controls, but really it's like

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a hot air balloon. Right. All they can really do

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>is like the soft landing is when you're both you

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and your friend are both thrown out of a third

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>story window. He it's the ground and you land on him,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so for you it's a little softer. But I mean

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially what it is. Um you know. And then

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>there's one other part of this that I didn't mention yet,

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember if we've talked about this before

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>or not. We probably have, um I put I personally

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that there's another thing that's going on here that,

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>while not the direct reason that they're raising rates, is

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a is a byproduct that they don't mind, and that

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is that I think that part of the reason that

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they raise rates is it at least in the short term.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Now we can probably have a big argument of how

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this ends up in the long run, but in the

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>short term it cements the United States position as then

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on the top of the mountain. And what I mean

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>by that is if the whole world is slowing down

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a can omically and having these these uh, these problems,

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>but the US is in a relatively better place, and

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>by raising rates in the US because that's what the

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>US needs, but by not but by you know, but

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>also hurting other countries in the process. Even if everybody

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>is going down, those other countries are coming under more

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pressure than the United States is, so on a relative basis,

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the US is securing its spot on top of the mountain.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>The other part that it does is I think that

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>it if it will force countries to choose sides. And

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by that is, I think we can

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>probably all agree that, you know, Whereas for the last

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty years, the whole world was kind of

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>moving towards one globalized economy and you know, peaceful, you know,

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>one world, you know, over the last couple of years

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that that started the fracture. And now we're we're going

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 1>away from globalization more towards the globalization, and we're gonna

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>have rather than have one supply chain, we're gonna have

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to or multiple supply chains. Countries are going to have

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to try to become more self sufficient rather than relying

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>on others. And in that whole you know, in that

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>whole dynamic, there's you know, East versus West, China versus

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States, Russia versus the United States, Russia versus Europe.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>So there's all these geopolitical um you know issues as well.

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think by putting countries that are maybe on

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the margin, you know, they're not quite sure whether they

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>would be better off to go with the East or

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the West, or with the U S or not with

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the U S. If the U S can put them

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in a vulnerable spot, UM, it could then force them

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>or try to force them or at least, you know,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>manipulate that country um into join in the US and

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe the USS something like, you know, we

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>will help you out with your funding needs, or we'll

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>give you a swap line, or we'll help you on

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>some trade deals, give you a break on some prices,

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but in in exchange, we're gonna need you to vote

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>with us at the u N on this thing, or

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need you to sign this trade agreement or

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. But I think only forward where in

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the past we've you know, handed out swap lines, are

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, been more willing to use dollar policy to

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>help the global economy. I think now we're going to

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be more focused on using the dollar to help the

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>U S specifically, and then helping our friends where where

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>where we think it's most advantageous to do so yeah, no,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I think, um, what's interesting though,

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is back to as I said that Putin's comment before

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>about the the fake economy versus the real economy. If

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you're a third world nation that you desperately need whatever commodity,

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>wheat or you know, energy inputs or whatever, what is

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the US can offer you dollars? That doesn't solve your problem, right,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>because if a dollar is only a medium exchange, what

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I need is the commodities. I need the inputs. So

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Russia says, hey, here's the inputs, and and the U says, well,

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>here's the dollars, Like which one you're you need the inputs, right,

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And so that that kind of creates it. I think

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a I think it's a little bit of both.

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>So I I understand the point you're making, and I'm

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>an energy basis and maybe like a fertilizer basis and

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these other resources. I totally get you

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in and I think we're in agreement there. Where I

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe that view is a little bit overplayed

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 1>is again, if everybody goes to this, right, if if

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody now goes to self sufficiency and you know, no

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>more trading and you know, only trading with your friends.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the US is probably, on an overall basis

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the most self sufficient country in the world. And while

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>we might not manufacture iPads and tractors and all that

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, would do manufacture more food and you know,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the world in the US than anywhere else in the world.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And if we get into this energy crisis, that then

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>translates into a food crisis. Right. I think the food

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>that we create here will be pretty be valuable and

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>will be in in need, and that itself could be

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a bargaining tool. Um. But but I do get your point,

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is what makes it so interesting, right, Um.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I think to a an extent, we both agree that

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of FIAT or or the or the what's

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the right way, that the end of the monetary system

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as we know it is probably on the horizon. Um.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And whether that is successful or not successful, I think

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the transition or the lack of transition will probably be chaotic. Yeah,

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And the question is how how far can they keep

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>kicking the can? But we know at some point that

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>can and absolutely we I don't know about you, but

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I've thought, like a lot of other people, thought that

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it would have come already, but they can pull more

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>magic tricks out than you have to guilty, guilty, many more,

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, that that's what I mean. I would

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>have guessed this would have happened ten years ago, you know,

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>between two thousand eleven and after after everything we went

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>through in the global financial crisis, I thought we would

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>have another crisis by two thousand eleven and two thousand

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>fourteen at the end, at at the forest, right, And

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>we did start to have a crisis in the Eurozone

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eleven twelve. But you know, Mario Droggy

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>kicked that can down the road better than anybody I've

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. And so here we are. And that's kind

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of how these big, big, you know, macro trends, they

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>always take longer than you think that they're going to take.

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and that's why I've started saying that,

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, this could last another three years,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe last another five years, ten years, I don't really know.

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But what I do think, and I think you agree,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, we were not only are we

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>coming up on the cans in the road, but there's

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>more than one can, right we we we we we've

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>not only kicked economic problems down the road. We've kicked

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>social problems down the road, We've kicked political problems down

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the road, We've kicked geopolitical problems down the road. And

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is it's not just us, Like, you know,

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe's kicked all these cans down the road, and uh,

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>China's kicked all these cans in Japan, and also you know,

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>all of these countries have kicked all these cans down

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the road. And now the whole I feel like the

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>whole world is converging on this intersection, and this intersection

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is just filled with cans. Yeah, and you know it's

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very hard to clear all those cans out

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of the way without somebody getting hurt. And you know,

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it just I don't know what will happen. I just

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think it will be smooth. And and so that's

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of where I come down. I think the US

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>still has the longest road ahead of us, you know,

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think to the to the point you were making,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with I think, uh, you know, we

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>go into a multipolar world. We probably have three or

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>four kind of economic trade zones. The US is more

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>isolated probably just maybe northern hemisphere, northern southern hemisphere kind

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of thing like that. But I want to jump back

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to what you were talking about with the maybe the

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>FED kind of fighting back weaponizing the dollar kind of

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Um. I know, I remember in Miami we

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>were hanging out by the pool that day and we

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were kind of talking about that topic specifically. But I

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thought I had seen you on Twitter also saying that

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>you don't think the FED. Anyone who thinks the FED

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to defend the dollar doesn't understand it or something

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to something that something that effect, right, So like the

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.959
<v Speaker 1>FED would you were kind of like taking the position

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>like what do you mean the FET needs to protect

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the all the fect to have to protect anything? Um,

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But now you're saying the FED might be actually trying

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to fight back. Well, so maybe we have a definition

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>of terms problem. Right. I view what the FET is

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>doing as offense. I don't view it as a defense. Right.

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>When when an emerging markets currency is plumbing and they

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>raise rates in order to save it from following to zero,

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and too attract capital, to me, that is

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>defending a currency. But if you're if you're already the

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>strongest currency and you continue to raise rates even though

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>money is already flowing into your currency. To me, to me,

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that's you walking around to these other countries and cutting

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their heads off with a sword. That's not your standing

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>behind your shield, ducking down hoping that you don't get mauled, right,

0:24:55.240 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and so from a position is not a position of weakness. Yeah, exactly, exactly. Now,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>could you say that they're using their offensive weapon in

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>order to defend their overall position. I suppose you could. Sure,

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we we're looking at it from that perspective,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I I can see where you're coming from. Um, But

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me, this is not an accident. Um.

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>To me, this is is being deliberately done. Well, I

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>know Powel is doing it deliberately in order to crush inflation.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has very clearly said that, and you know,

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I think that's about the only tool he

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>has to try and crush inflation. You know that the

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>FED has no control over supply chains, right, So I

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>do believe him when he says that, But I also

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>believe there's these other factors that they probably would not

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 1>admit that they also don't mind that are happening. Now.

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>M talking about this fighting back or this war. Um, obviously,

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>who are seeing it happen all over the world. Let's

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about a couple ones here. So, Um, Trump started

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>economic war. I've often said that World War three is

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>probably over economic and information. It's like more than a

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>kinetic war, hot war at least. Maybe I'm just I'm

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>optimistic and hopeful, but maybe Trump started this economic war

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with China with these with these tariffs, right, it was

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like a trade war. And then he started he started

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>attacking their tech with Huawei and even trying to ban TikTok.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>The Biden administration just kept those right in place, which

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is surprising. I thought the Biden and his son were

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in the back pocket of the Chinese, but either way,

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>they seemed to keep that in place. And now was

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it last week like Biden the Biden administration like dropped

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the hammer on China with the whole chip saying, I

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>mean just and then there was something subsequent to that

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. But yeah, sorry I'm interrupted, but yeah, I

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. So just like out of nowhere, it's like, hey,

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>by next week, any American is gonna lose their citizenship

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if they don't come back to the United States and

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they're just cut off completely. I mean, that seems like

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this big escalation in this economic war. What was the

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>other thing that led to that? You think, Well, so

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that happened was when was I think

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this was on Monday. Um. A lot of people didn't

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>see it, and it didn't get much press coverage, but

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice came out and had a big

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>press conference with you know, the Attorney General, the Attorney

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>General of New York, all these different people, you know,

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>six or seven people at this press conference, and they

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>arrested I can't remember if it was five or eight

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese nationals and for spying in the United States. And

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>and typically when something like this happens or or or

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>historically when something like this has happened, the US has

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of treated it with kid gloves. They would often say,

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, they would never say it was the Chinese government.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It would they would say it was someone from China,

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>but maybe they were acting on their own or whatever

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it is. But they were. They not only didn't use

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>kid gloves, but they went out of their way at

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this press conference to make it very clear that this

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>was a Chinese government operation and that China's government was

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to influence political and legal decisions in the United Dates.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So to me, that was just another signal that, you know,

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the gloves are kind of off, or if they're not off,

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>they're they're being rapidly pulled off. Right, And because I

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>just you just haven't typically seen it be that that

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that overt um, and considering all that's going on in

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the world, I guess it's it's it's not shocking, you know,

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>before I forget, I should say, you touched on Trump

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>started this kind of this economic war with China, I

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>would I would say this, And I know because Trump

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is such a hot button issue for many people, I

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>hope that you can put whatever personal feelings you have

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for Trump aside if you just focus on two things,

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>If you focus on the fact that he very clearly

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that our relationship with China was perhaps not

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>quite as friendly or should not be quite as friendly

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as everybody else UM thought it should be, and that

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they were in many ways taking advantage of our relationship.

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he was the first one to very publicly

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>declare that without worrying about the political ramifications of doing so. UM,

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and he did it in a very clever way. I

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>thought he did it in a way that he said listen,

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I like z. I think, jeez, he's really smart. If

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I was him, I would probably do the same thing.

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's been out negotiating our guys. So he

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>did it. He did it in a way that wasn't

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily attacking China, but he was just showing weakness in America.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But regardless of how you view that, you know that

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that was the beginning of of bringing all this stuff

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to the fore and and and showing that it's not

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it has been somewhat of a one way of relationship

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be addressed. Um So, so I think

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty interesting. Um. The other thing that I was

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>going to say was that, um, I think also with

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>shout you know what now, I can't remember this other point.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say it was something it was something

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>else related to China. But I think the fact that

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>he's brought it forward, and then the fact that that

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden didn't just like you said, turn around and squash it,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and and oh I know what I was gonna say,

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with with this chips thing, right

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>like this. The point here is that you know, Trump

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>made the point that, listen, we're still America. You know,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we still have a lot of things that we can do.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't just have to back down to China and

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>do whatever China wants. And so part of my thesis

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>has been the despite all the mistakes we've made, and

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that we maybe are not held in

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>as great of a steem as we used to be,

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that we are still a global power and there are

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>still a few tricks up our sleeve that we can use.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, this thing with the chips, and

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought that was a pretty clever way,

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the US to pull some of its

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 1>own tricks. You know, to me, that's as much as

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a three D chess move as anything else that's happened

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. Does it have some back blow blowback on

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the U s Yeah, potentially, But you know, if all

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>these workers leave China that that's not exactly great for

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>China either, right, So to me, it's it's just another

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>way that you know, the global hedgemont is showing that,

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we may not be quite as strong

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as we used to be, but we're also not just

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>going to roll over and walk away. Yeah, the one

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>benefit that the US has. Well, there's many, um, but

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>one big one is that, um, the US could We

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>don't make the iPads here, but we could we design

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>them here. Right. Uh. We don't make all the chips here,

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>but we design of them, right we So we could

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>make all that stuff here if we want it, because

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we design it. But but most importantly, we are the consumers.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>We buy it. Right, So our companies could make it

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and we could buy it where China can keep making it,

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.479
<v Speaker 1>But who's gonna buy it? I'm so glad. I'm so

0:31:50.520 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>glad you brought this up. And I didn't have to

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>bring this up because a lot of times when I

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>bring this up, people say, oh, no, the middle class

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and China is growing very fast and they're gonna overtake us,

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, maybe, but as of right now, that's

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>not the case. And again to your point, our consumer

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>class or consumer society, many people see it as a negative,

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and I understand those arguments, but it is also that

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer society is the engine that he or it's the

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the lubrication that runs the engine of the world. Right.

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have a market to sell into, that

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help you to make all these products, um, and

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so on a relative basis the US. You know, again,

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to have all these iPads. Um, you

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>have to have food, right, So well, you don't have

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to have an iPad, you probably do need to eat.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And if it really got down to brass tacks, I

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>think we could probably feed ourselves better than anywhere else

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Oh yeah, we have more arable land

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and river and water than anybody. Um.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I was just I was telling you. I was just

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>down in Mexico and they don't have a consumer market

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there and so because of that, there's no opportunity. And

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>there's this town called portost Candido that we've been going

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to for years, and this one section of town has

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.239
<v Speaker 1>gotten really you know, all these digital nomads have come in.

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Europeans come there, and the locals aren't

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>super happy because now it's gotten all touristed out and

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people. But I was telling my daughters,

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of trying to explain this to him. I said,

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>but look at now all these businesses, restaurant shops that

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have opened up. Hundreds or even thousands of people are

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>now employed, and now they're making money, they can go

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>spend money, and so yeah, you need the consumers and

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>otherwise is an opportunity. Uh. Now, let's let's jump over

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to another war, and that's now with Saudi. And I

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>think this one's even bigger because to the point we're

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>making earlier with the oil. Oil has been priced in

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars and uh, we we can speculate about what's going on. Potentially,

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Biden went over there to beg for oil.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>They said no, they thought they had this backdoor deal

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't there. And Saudi has come out two things publicly.

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>They said. One was that you're manipulating the market by

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>these spr reserve releases. You're manipulate in the market, and

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>so we'll just cut production. We can go harder than you.

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But then their energy secretary came out and said, uh,

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>something to the effect of it's not going to be

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>good for you without reserves this winter or something to

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that effect. Right. Um, and then there's the president I

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>believe of South Africa, which is the s in the bricks,

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>said that Saudi is going to join the bricks. Uh.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We could speculate about that, but it looks like it's

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a good probability that could happen. What would be

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the implications to the dollar if that were to happen? So, look,

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the headline of that, Let's say

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that if Saudi Arabia came out and said we are

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>joining the bricks and we are no longer selling our

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>product in dollars, my guess is just the headline of

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it would probably make the dollar initially fall potentially, although

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that would also be seen as a potentially an active war,

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>which could send the dollar much higher. But but the

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>point I'll make is is if if if they stop

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>selling oil in dollars, that means there's even less trade

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>taking place in dollars than there was before. And I

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>already explained the fact that we're not importing as much

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.439
<v Speaker 1>as we used to means we're sending less dollars out.

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>If they're not even selling oil in dollars anymore, then

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there's even less dollars circulating. But all of that dollar

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>debt and all that dollar credit that's been extended in

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the euro dollar market still exists. So now you've got

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>an even tougher time servicing all that and paying for

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all that. Now I know many people will say, yeah,

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but now they don't they don't have to pay those

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>debts anymore, so they'll just default. Okay, that's fine. But

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>here's the issue is those dollar debts outside the United

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>States are also dollar assets out the United States. In

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>that situation, you're not defaulting on the United States. You're

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>defaulting on whoever you did business with outside the United

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>States that that that invoiced it in dollars. Turkey defaulting

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>to France, and it's Japan defaulting to Brazil, and it's

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, Saudi Arabia defaulting to or whoever it is, right, yeah,

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and can can you start trading in gold or can

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you start bartering and stuff? Sure you can, but it

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>will not be a it will not be a easy

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 1>or or smooth or efficient process. So and and while

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that would certainly if they stopped selling dollars or so

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>oil in dollars, of course, in the long term overall picture,

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 1>that would probably be bad for and they were able

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>to maintain that, right, that would probably be bad for

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. But I actually believe that the that the

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 1>chaos that that would cause on a global basis would

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>cause the dollar to go higher, at least in the

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>medium term until that all those kinks and um intricacies

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and efficiencies were worked out. That's an unpopular opinion, but

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think. When you say it would be

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>bad for the dollar, what does that mean? What would

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 1>bad be? Well, I mean, part of the reason that

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the dollar enjoys um it's status in the world is

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the biggest network in the world. Right. The reason

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody uses dollars is because everybody uses dollars, right, just

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like the reason everybody uses twitters because everybody uses Twitter.

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Everybody uses Facebook because everybody uses Facebook. And even though

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's been competing sites and platforms that have

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>popped up and tried to drop people away from Twitter

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook, you know, yeah, a few people go over there,

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's happening at the margins, but Twitter and Facebook

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>still dominate. It's kind of the same thing here. You know,

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the dollar dominates global trade. And yeah, there's a few

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>countries that trade amongst themselves in another currency, but those

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>platforms aren't nearly as big as the Facebook and the twitters.

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And but but if everybody, you know, or you know,

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if a big portion of people leave Facebook and go

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else, you know, it starts to hurt and if

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't come back, you know, it will

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>over time mean that Facebook will fail. And so if

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody left the dollar over time, it would mean the

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar would fail. And what does that mean? The dollar

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just continues to lose purchasing power. Yeah, I think it

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>would just continue to lose purchasing power, and it would

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe and it would maybe no longer be the global

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>reserve currency. Right, And therefore, you know, for the for

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the most part, Americans don't have to think in two currencies, right,

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>they don't have We've grown up just thinking about the

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar because you know, we buy whatever we need in dollars.

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>But people all over the world grow up thinking in

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>two different currency terms, their local currency terms and dollar terms,

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.479
<v Speaker 1>because that's what they need to operate. Um. And so

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of people have called having the

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 1>global reserve currency the exorbitant privilege for that exact reason.

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You can print money in order to go buy oil

0:38:57.560 --> 0:38:59.319
<v Speaker 1>or these goods and these that and that that that's

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>called the exorbit and privilege. You know. Now in the

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>last few years there's been to come upas thing. Yeah,

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but it has long term detriments too. So it's you know,

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an exorbitant burden. Um, you know, it's a double

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>edged sword. But you know, one of the analogies I've

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>used is having the global reserve currency is kind of

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>like being a vampire. Right, Yeah, there's downsides, but the

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>flip side is that you're really strong and nobody can

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>kill you, and you can run around and just you know,

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much do whatever you want. And so, um, you know,

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe this would be if everybody left the dollar, or

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if a big portion of people left the dollar, that

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>would be you know, the rest of the world driving

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>a stake through the vampire's heart. Yeah, you know, and

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I they might eventually get him and kill the vampire.

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>But my guess is that he'll kill a few people

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>along the way before that happens. Now, when we talk

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about all these currencies losing value, Um, you know, the Euro,

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the end down, the Turk, you mentioned Turkey. The Turkish

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>layer is down eighty I don't know over the last

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>five years to the US dollar. Right, So if you

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 1>look at the Turkish lira over five years is down

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is at this point. Um, other currencies are down,

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever amounts they're down Argentina's down more probably,

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's all compared to the dollars. So you your theory,

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the milkshake theory is always the dollars getting stronger, which

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>it is right, um, but it's getting stronger to other currencies.

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But if we look at the same five year period,

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the dollars down to the SMP five D, it's down

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>forty percent to media in real estate since January. So

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the dollars getting stronger to currencies, but it's also getting

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>weaker two assets at the same time. How do you think, Well,

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's you know, that is kind of the theory.

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have the dollar. Milkshake theory has never

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>said you should just buy dollars, leave it in cash

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and just sit there and buy everything when it's really cheap, right.

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 1>The theory has always been that we will ultimately get

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>into a situation where the US dollar and US dollar

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>denominated assets rise versus the rest of the world. So, um,

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've always said that we'll get into a

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>situation where we will have the dollar, gold, and the

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Dow all rising together and I potentially US real estate too,

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and that that is a situation where

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe everybody's printing maybe maybe the whole world is doing QWI,

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>including the US. But all of that money that's being

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>printed comes into the United States. It goes into stocks,

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that goes into gold, it goes into houses, that goes

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 1>into commercial real estate or land or whatever it is. Right,

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and so you get this situation where equities are going higher,

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>land is going higher, gold is going higher, the dollar

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is going higher. Um, but those those assets are going

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>higher versus the dollar, but the dollar is going higher

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>versus all the other currencies. So UM, I mean that

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's ultimately what the milkshake is. I don't think

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that people should just be sitting in cash. So just

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>using the all or as your unit of account, your

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>measuring stick. Yeah, exactly, exactly in the US market as

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 1>your safe haven. Yeah. Alright to two more things I

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about one. Uh man, Uh do you

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:15.879
<v Speaker 1>always see on Twitter people say I can't believe there's

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>app is free? Um? I would imagine, um, a lot

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of people love you and Luke going back and forth.

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it's great, it's great. I know it's friendly.

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh what would you say that you disagree on and

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:31.399
<v Speaker 1>not who's right or wrong? But what do you think

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 1>is that main disagreement there? Well, the first thing I'll

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>say is for anybody who has anybody who's watching this

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and has seen Luke and I go back and forth

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, Twitter, I think sometimes loses context. And when

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Luke and I are going back and forth at each other,

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you he's trying to sing me, and I

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you I'm trying to sing him. But what you

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see is maybe we're smiling behind the screen. You know,

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I not there like pounding the table saying I hate

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Luke and he's really stupid. You know, he's a bad guy,

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I'm responding, right, And so if it

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>comes across as mean on Twitter, I can absolutely guarantee

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you it's not mean behind the scenes. But I will

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>also say that part of the reason that I have

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 1>pushed back as hard as I have against his views

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is because I think there's a lot of people who

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>will read his work and will say, Wow, that's really interesting,

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that's really smart. I can see that plane out and

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Luke says it in such a convincing way, in such

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain way that I think they they then assign

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a higher probability of those things happening than I think deserve.

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen this with retail investors before, where they

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have a hunch and they buy a bunch right. And

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>so the reason I've pushed back as hard as I

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>have is I said, oh, hold on a minute, these

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>might be probabilities, or they might be possibility, they may

0:44:01.239 --> 0:44:04.600
<v Speaker 1>even be probabilities, but what you're talking about is not

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a high probability. And so I don't think everybody

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>should run out sell all their dollars put it all

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on something else, because I don't want people to get hurt.

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 1>And a part of the reason I've pushed I think

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to us and I don't. I would say this if

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Luke was here, and so if he disagrees with it,

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 1>If he hears us and he disagrees with this and

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to tell me that I'm wrong, that I

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>will absolutely accept that. But I tend to think that

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Luke talks about the way he thinks things should be

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or the way things could be, whereas I try to

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 1>take a more kind of real politic, hard nosed this

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is what's actually going to happen point of view, whether

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I like it or not. But what What is that though?

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that he thinks he thinks he thinks

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.879
<v Speaker 1>like hard assets like gold, energy, and maybe bitcoin are

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 1>really going to move to the forefront, and currencies are

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 1>are being replaced. But you think that that's not happening

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 1>so fast. I think that I think that's not going

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to happen. I think I think our system is in

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>real trouble. I think the powers that be will do

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>everything that they possibly can and use every tool and

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>deceitful method to defend it. Right, So I don't think

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>this movement to a non fiat hard asset system will

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be as easy or smooth or as likely as as

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he thinks if that does happen. If I

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 1>am wrong and that does happen, I think that the

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.839
<v Speaker 1>US has a better portfolio of hard assets than any

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 1>country in the world. Now, sure there's a few others

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that have good portfolios as well, but if you're taking

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>just hard assets and real goods and all of that

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff put together, I don't think if I had my

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>choice out of all the countries, I would choose the

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>United States in that type of an environment. So, even

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>if he is correct on that, I don't think that

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a bad thing for the United States. UM. And

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>then I think the other thing is that, UM, some

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of these geopolitical realignments that he has spoken about being possible.

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Of course, anything is possible. But the idea that the

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Europe was going to just give up on it's decades

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>old relationship with the United States and their defense umbrella

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of NATO and all of these longstanding institutional relationships and

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>side with Russia over the United States, to me, while

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe it made sense from an energy perspective, just wasn't

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:32.760
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. And so that's probably why I pushed

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 1>back on stuff like that as as hard as I do.

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these these things, these things that that we're

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about changing, they may very well change, and I

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think we're in the type of an environment where those

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.720
<v Speaker 1>things can change, but they aren't going to change without

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility. And when I say volatility, I

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 1>don't just mean economically, I mean economically, socially, militarily, all

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of these different things. To me, this is this is

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the big, big game, right And what I mean by

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, we often when we're talking about

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>China and Russia and the United States and Europe, it's

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>always chess versus checkers, and I don't know, I think

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that is the completely wrong analogy. I literally think this

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is the game of thrones. I think this is you know,

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this is all the big boys and girls are out

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there and they're fighting for the top spot, and I

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:25.400
<v Speaker 1>think they will use all the dirty tricks and methods

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that they have at their disposal to do that. And

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 1>so regardless of whether and when I look back at

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the last fifty years, whenever there's been a crisis, the

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:36.759
<v Speaker 1>dollar has gotten stronger, I don't think it's different this time.

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think when we get into this crisis, I

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>think that means the dollar rises. I don't think it

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>means it falls. And so that's I think that's that's

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>how I understand the difference. He might think differently, and

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's no guarantee I'm right on this, but

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he would say something similar. I think this

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>will go into the last last topic, but I think

0:47:56.480 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it goes into time frames. So yeah, absolutely, no, no question.

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times I see two people that completely

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>disagree at my at my at my conference, I had

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Stephen van Meter and Greg FoST there. One loves bonds

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and one hates bonds, but when you got them there together,

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>they actually agreed more than they did exactly. That's true.

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I was there for that. I remember that you were there, right,

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And so it's like, well, Stephen is talking about for

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the short time frame. Greg's thinking of over a long

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>time frame, right, So a lot of it's that, but

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, so let's let's talk about that a little bit.

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 1>So well, you know, just really before I forget, let

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>me let me make this point because this kind of

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 1>came up recently with Luke and I were talking back

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and forth, and again, I kind of hate talking Luke

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:36.680
<v Speaker 1>when he's not here. I like to kind of always

0:48:36.719 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>do it when the person is there. But I'm pretty

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>sure that we would have a similar conversation if we

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>were together. Is that, um, you know, the whole you know,

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 1>actually happening versus wanting it to happen. Right. I think

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:54.960
<v Speaker 1>there's this. I think that there is this and I'm

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>not saying that this is for Luke, but I think

0:48:56.560 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 1>when Luke writes this stuff that you know, the U.

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:03.000
<v Speaker 1>S isn't potentially in trouble for these things. To me,

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there's this kind of this zeit geist in the United States.

0:49:06.360 --> 0:49:09.439
<v Speaker 1>And I call them the self loathing Americans, and that's

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bad way to say it, but it's the

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>people who are woke enough to realize that maybe we're

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>not the best, you know, person or the best country

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and maybe we've kind of overplayed our

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.360
<v Speaker 1>role as the hedgeman, and maybe we're actually the cause

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of these problems rather than the solver

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:27.839
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of these problems. And you know, we've

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>spent all this money, we can never pay it back.

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's almost this there's this romantic version or idea

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that the US needs to get what's coming to it right.

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And so then when they when they see somebody write

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>something or say something that sounds like it's going to

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be bad for the US, they want to latch onto

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that because that's what they think needs to happen from

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of this moral perspective and um and and as

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a result, I think people will often ascribe a higher

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>probability to an event than the and is actually warranted.

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Um And there was another point I was gonna make

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on the end of that, and I can't remember what

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 1>it is now, but I agree with you. I mean,

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree with all that all the stuff that we've

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about, and I think, uh, um to it. You know,

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 1>America's hands down, no doubt about the best country in

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:18.839
<v Speaker 1>the world still today. Now. Uh, the trajectory that we're

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>on is disappointing, but it's still America's to lose. We

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>have the land, we have the energy, we have the industry,

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we have the creativity, we have the consumer base, we

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 1>have like we have everything. Um, it's our it's ours

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to lose. Um, and so UM. You know, hopefully the

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:40.879
<v Speaker 1>trajectory changes. UM. But uh so let's let's talk about

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the time frame and base cases and we'll kind of

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>end it with that. But uh, you know, I like

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that you talk like that. I think, yeah, And I

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think that the whole time frame is the thing I think.

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Luke and I probably agree that ultimately the

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>US is going to pay for all these PROFLI good,

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you know endeavors Um. No, but he stays on top forever.

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Everything comes going to end. We all know that. UM.

0:51:04.560 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But the timing I think is much different. UM. I

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 1>happen to think. I think he thinks it comes much earlier. UM.

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it comes much later. And I think that

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>if it does happen. Um, it won't necessarily happen in

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the way he thinks it will happen. Well, I tend

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to think I tend to think that the next system

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>will be another fiance system. I think that and my fear,

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:35.799
<v Speaker 1>this is my fear. My fear is that you know,

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we are going to have some kind of military conflict

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that will resolve this, and whoever is the winner of

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that military conflict will not necessarily see the world as

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a place that they want to treat very nicely. They

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 1>may want to treat it the way they think is

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the best for them, right, And whether that's the US

0:51:55.760 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 1>or somebody else, I don't know, Um, but I I

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that they would then institute a new you know,

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Fiat standard or Fiat style system rather than going to

0:52:10.400 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a free market bitcoin or gold or

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>some something else. I don't see somebody winning this big

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>battle and then just handing over the power to somebody else.

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That very very rarely happens. Let's let's back up just

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and then we'll come back to that.

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So earlier you had said, you know, how far can

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to kick the can down the road? You maybe there's

0:52:28.960 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 1>another three five eight years, Like you don't know, right,

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so three f eight years, Um, it seems like right now,

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the FED keeps saying we're gonna crush inflation and crush inflation,

0:52:37.920 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 1>raise rates, raise, raise rates rates. But the markets are

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>almost like calling their bluff because they like, no, like, look,

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you're only like, we know you're committed, but if the

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>whole system sees is up, you're gonna be forced to change.

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So will the market sees up before the Fed gets

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:56.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation down? And so the markets are kind of calling

0:52:56.520 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 1>their bluff. Uh, this can is coming to this proverbial

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and at some point I think you kind of said

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the whole world too and quei together and everything got

0:53:05.880 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>melting up. So do you think this happens? You know,

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe the FED hits that proverbial wall in the next

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, then over the next five years we qui

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>meilt up together. Yeah, So I'll make a prediction. And

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:25.160
<v Speaker 1>here's the funny thing is a lot of people say

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you should never make predictions because you know, you get

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can never get to get the time probabilities.

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, I don't. I don't. The reason I

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:35.760
<v Speaker 1>don't mind making predictions is I don't mind being wrong.

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean the idea. I mean, our job is essentially

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to predict the future and then put assets in a

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 1>way that's gonna benefit from that. Right. I can't think

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of anything more arrogant than to think that you can

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 1>predict the future with perfect accuracy. So if what I'll say,

0:53:52.080 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>what I think is gonna happen, and if it doesn't happen,

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be funny. I I promise you I will

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>get through it. But my my thought is that we

0:54:00.560 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>will probably make a new low sometime in the first

0:54:04.719 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter of next year, and then after that, I think

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the FED will pivot and what what what exactly the

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>pivot means whether they just slow hikes or stophikes or

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:18.720
<v Speaker 1>go back to I don't know, um, but I think

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a crisis will be required to pivot. I don't think

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to pivot when inflation is still high,

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 1>unemployment is still low, and asset prices are still higher

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>than they were in March. I mean, that's what you

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:36.799
<v Speaker 1>got to remember, right, Like, markets are down anywhere from

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>fift you know, this year, but they're still up from

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:45.640
<v Speaker 1>where they were two years ago. Right, So the fact

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>that asset prices have come down a little bit. I

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think necessarily bothers the FEDS will the FED pivot.

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:54.840
<v Speaker 1>The FED will absolutely pivot, because that's their job. The

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>whole reason the central banks are in existence is to

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 1>step in and save the system when it comes under threat.

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:06.200
<v Speaker 1>But they're not necessarily put in position to save the

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 1>market when it's not needed. And for all those reasons

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I talked about earlier, about him being embarrassed and they

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>got inflation wrong, and they need to protect their reputation,

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I think necessitates the crisis before they come back in.

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:19.879
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, when I see markets the way

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they are up today, I understand why they're up, and

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:24.799
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense to me why they're up, But I

0:55:24.800 --> 0:55:27.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's right. I don't. I don't think the

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 1>markets making the right decision. I don't think that they

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the FED has already decided to pivot,

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna pivot next week. Now. If they do,

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wrong, that'll be fine too, right, Like I'll

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:39.680
<v Speaker 1>just have to react to that and deal with it um.

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 1>But I think your reason is, your reasoning is right.

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:46.080
<v Speaker 1>The timing could change, but at some point, yeah, yeah, exactly,

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and it could sooner than you think. It could break

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it next next month, Right, we could run out of

0:55:50.200 --> 0:55:52.600
<v Speaker 1>thee who knows, right, so that you could easy, it

0:55:52.840 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 1>could happen in two weeks. Right, could wake up one

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>morning and you know something happened and now they have

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to go, you know, Mark, I mean, here's the amazing thing, right.

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you were watching um the markets yesterday,

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but after the close yesterday Apple reported earnings and Amazon

0:56:06.640 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>reported earnings and the you know, markets were down three

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>or four percent and after hours and now today they're

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 1>up two or three percent. So there's a seven points

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 1>swing in less than twenty four hours. I mean, markets

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:21.239
<v Speaker 1>are just really psycho right now. And I think anybody

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 1>who has certainty and what's going to happen is a

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fool because nothing is certain right now. So I want,

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump back to where we were so

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Man, timing is impossible, but I think

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the trigger points are right, and could it does happen

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:37.320
<v Speaker 1>next month or early next year, we don't know. But

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump back to the last part, which

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is UM which kind of shocked me. Uh is another

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Fiat system on the back and and and the reason

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:49.520
<v Speaker 1>why that kind of shocks me is there's a theory

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I forget the guy's name what it's under, but it's

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>basically says that, oh, it's like the theory value of

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:57.879
<v Speaker 1>money or whatever, right where like um. So, like when

0:56:57.960 --> 0:57:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Zimbabwe blows up their currency, they get a new currency

0:57:00.840 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that's pegged to the dollar again, and then they blowed

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 1>up again, they repack it to the dollar. So they

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have to create a new currency. It has to be

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pegged to something of real value. Um. And the dollar

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was created based off of a peg to the gold value.

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So how do you create a new fiat currency that's

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>not anchored to anything? Okay, So the way I would

0:57:22.400 --> 0:57:27.160
<v Speaker 1>describe this is two things. Even if they don't peg

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the new fiat system to something, that doesn't mean that

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:31.919
<v Speaker 1>gold won't go to five thousand or ten thousand dollars.

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a huge gold bowl long term. I think

0:57:34.400 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever the transition to a new system, I think we'll

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>see gold be much much higher than it is today.

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So but that doesn't mean that it will be officially

0:57:43.000 --> 0:57:45.720
<v Speaker 1>recognized as money. The other thing is it wouldn't shock

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>me if they use gold as part of the new

0:57:48.680 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>system or in some way use it to restore confidence

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in the short term. But I don't think we're going

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>back to a to a situation where we will have

0:57:57.200 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a standard gold standard and it is used as the

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>global money and the whole world just you know, agrees

0:58:04.280 --> 0:58:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to it. Um. I think if anything was chosen that

0:58:08.040 --> 0:58:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole world would accept, it would be gold. But

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think whoever wins this grand battle um

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to do that. The other thing I would

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 1>say is it doesn't have to make sense for something

0:58:18.800 --> 0:58:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to last. And what I will use as an example is, um,

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Russian ruble after the World War Two, Right, Um,

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the Russian ruble and the Russian of the whole Soviet economy, Um,

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:34.320
<v Speaker 1>from you know, nineteen forties to the nineteen nineties was

0:58:34.360 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing to be excited about. Right, didn't do a good

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:41.440
<v Speaker 1>job of protecting purchasing power, Their economy didn't thrive. Um.

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 1>There was no free market principles there that guided its

0:58:45.800 --> 0:58:48.440
<v Speaker 1>value up or down. But yet it lasted for fifty

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>years because the Communist party. So if your Communist party

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>said this is the way we're going to do it, right,

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the rule, And if you don't follow the rules,

0:58:57.840 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you end up in Siberia working in a labor camp

0:59:00.360 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for four years. Um. And I've my fears is that

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that could happen again. Um again, I don't want that

0:59:08.280 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen. That's not what I would choose to do.

0:59:10.160 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But the idea that we're gonna have this big grand

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:14.760
<v Speaker 1>battle and then after that we're going to have peace,

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 1>love and harmony. I I love the idea and I hope,

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope that that happens. But I'm a little skeptical. Well,

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm rooting for peace, love and harmony, but I am too, man,

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it together. Yeah, yeah, yeah, alright cool, um yeah.

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. The bitcoiners hope is that it places restraints. Right. So, um,

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>if I was having a party at my house and

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I started kicking everybody out of my house party, Um,

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I've lost control over them. They've gone to start their

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:45.840
<v Speaker 1>own party and I no longer have control. And enough

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>people opt out of That's what happened with the fall

0:59:48.320 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of the USS. Are enough people opted out of the economies,

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>created black markets, parallel markets, and then the uss are

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 1>lost control, which is why nations always imposed capital controls.

0:59:57.160 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 1>At the very end, they have to keep people and

0:59:58.920 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that's why black markets of always existed. Right. Yeah, so

1:00:01.680 --> 1:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like if, if, if, and and even we've seen

1:00:04.320 --> 1:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Christine the Guard talk about that we have to close

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the exits, she says, And so if enough people can

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>get out of their system and into a new system

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that they can't control, then they just lose control and

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they just there's no way to get now, throw out

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of a gun. Right, they have monopoly on violence, I

1:00:18.880 --> 1:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>suppose to your point, and people would say, don't don't

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>underestimate the amount of violence they have. But I think

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the hope, is that maybe there's a way

1:00:26.040 --> 1:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that people can go get into a new system that works,

1:00:28.640 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there's no threat of violence, but we'll see,

1:00:33.040 --> 1:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. Um, well, we'll wrap it up with that.

1:00:36.600 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that was a long conversation. I appreciate it. Uh.

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get into your musical chair analogy, which

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought was great. But you have it on your Twitter,

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So people should just go check out your Twitter um,

1:00:47.720 --> 1:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>which is still an anonymous account kind of by the way.

1:00:52.120 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't have your face or your name

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:56.959
<v Speaker 1>on there, but Santiago Capital will make sure to link

1:00:57.000 --> 1:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that in the show notes down below. Um, anything else

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that people should be aware of other than your Twitter No,

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know just I I do a number

1:01:06.840 --> 1:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of these type of podcasts. I always annoyed talking to you. Um,

1:01:09.720 --> 1:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've I've talked about this stuff a lot,

1:01:11.840 --> 1:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, at conferences, interviews, uh, podcasts. Um. If you

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>go on Google or YouTube and you type in Santiago

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Capital or dollar milkshake at this point, there is a

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of links that will come up, and um, on

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>my my pen tweet on Twitter has like a little

1:01:26.440 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>five minutes summary that kind of explains it in more

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>detail as well. But listen, I think that the thing

1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that I always tell people is number one, don't worry

1:01:35.160 --> 1:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>about being wrong, because everybody's wrong. Um, nobody gets it

1:01:38.200 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>always right. And the other thing is don't there's a

1:01:40.920 --> 1:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>difference between certainty and conviction. It's totally fine to have conviction,

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but don't have certainty on anything because this is gonna

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>get really crazy. And the one once you're certain about something,

1:01:50.680 --> 1:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know you're about ready to get hit in the

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>head because nothing is certain anyway. I'll just leave it

1:01:54.960 --> 1:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>with that, all right, brand, Thanks thanks for your time,

1:01:57.600 --> 1:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. All right, thanks man, all right, that's a rap.

1:02:01.080 --> 1:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully you enjoyed that conversation with Brent Johnson of Santiago Capital.

1:02:04.280 --> 1:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Check them out on Twitter. Always insightful stuff. Man. We've

1:02:07.720 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>covered a lot and hopefully I really want you to

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>take away a couple of things. One, there is no

1:02:13.520 --> 1:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>such thing as certainties. There's only probabilities. As he said,

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we have convictions, and convictions are okay, but don't believe

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that things are certain. You need to be prepared for

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:26.439
<v Speaker 1>whatever is going to happen. Create your base case, set

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>up your portfolio accordingly, and then always monitor the situation

1:02:29.920 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to understand when to pivot. Anyway, I'd love to hear

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what you think, and that's what I got to your

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>success about