WEBVTT - Especifismo Ft. Saint Andrew

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome everyone to the It Could Happen Here podcast. My

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>name is said Andrew, and I'll be your host as

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>we talk about politics stuff with me today is Garrison Hello,

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and Christopher Hello, and Sufie him. And today we will

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>be tackling or rather we'll be taking a trip to

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the anarchist activism in Latin America with A specifies more.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But first we need to get into some context here.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>The first organization to promote the concept of a specifies

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>MOO was the Federation Anarchista Uruguaya or the FAU, which

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is founded in nineteen fifty six by anarchist Milton's who

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>embraced the idea of an organization that was specifically anarchist.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>But those who don't know, not long after, rather two

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>decades after ni UM, the US installed a dictatorship in Uruguay,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the last from nine. The FA you survived that dictatorship

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and went on to establish connections with other South American

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>anarchist revolutionaries. So they helped to support the founding of

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the Fedahao Anarchista Gaochia or fer G. I don't know

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>if I'm pronounced that correctly. The Federes shall an Artista

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Kola and the Ferres shall an Arkista the Rio de

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Janeiro or f the r G in their respective regions

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of Brazil, and they also helped to found the Argentinean

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>organization as Alka, which means rebel. While only coming onto

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>stage in Latin America within the last few decades. The

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>ideas that really make up A specifies more tasan a

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>historic threat that's really run to the anarchist movement internationally

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning. UM. It may as we get into

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>like what is spect feasion is and stuff, it may

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>sound very similar to platform is um. Are you all

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>familiar with that current Yeah, I'm from familiar with platforms

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but we can probably, I don't know,

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>explain it for the people at at at home who

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>are not as, who do not spend as much time

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about old, old, old anarchist terms right right right,

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>so their generic listener or viewer or whatever. UM. Platform

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is UM began with a document that was written in

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>nine by the former Peasant Army leader Nestor Maknu either

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Met and other militants of the Yellow Truda or Workers

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Cause group. They published the document called Organizational Platform of

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the Libertarian Communists and it was written in response to

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>well being exiled from the Russian Revolution um and having

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to struggle really to find their foot in after the

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Bolsheviks turn the work of Soviets into instruments of one

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>party rule. UM. So the Power Space Group, the Deal Truder.

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>They really criticized the anarchist movement for a lack of organization.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So they proposed an alternative that is controversial to some anarchists,

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's essentially a general union of anarchists based on

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>anarchist communism that would strive for theoretical and tactical unity.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And I focused on class struggle and labor unions. Obviously,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>platform is um like all political ideas, it's not a

0:03:55.800 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>static you know, the world has progressed sick significant lee

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in a century, so um. While there is an emphasis

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and workers struggle and class struggle. UM. When you speak

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to most platforms today, I would say, um, obviously I

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have stats on that. I would say most platforms

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>can recognize that, you know, the no war with the

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>class war is a bit reductive. UM. I've also noticed,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>actually that platformism has been getting a bit more popularity lately.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's just me and my perception.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know if you' all seen that I have.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I've not seen tons of it here. A lot of

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the type of anarchism I'm around, or at least see

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is is not is not in this vein. But most

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>most of the stuff I see is like around UM,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like the kind of like live anarchy type kind of

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>strains um and more individualists. Right, But that's just I

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>think a very like Pacific Northwest specific thing that the

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>anarchists here just kind of generally trend in that direction.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure what it's literally like across like

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>this country in other places around the world. Yeah, I know,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, I've definitely seen it. Especially I

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's it's I don't know, almost think

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's bigger a few years ago. But back like there

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is a big spike of black rose um serious group

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and yeah, people who like called themselves

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like anarcho communists or anarcho syndicalists kind of generally swam

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in this general ocean. Yeah, I definitely saw that as

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a bigger thing in than now, at least like locally

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>from my area. And I think I will say, yeah,

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the blacks people. A lot of them, like very very

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically were specific based, and a lot of it was

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>based on like people who had like experiences with a

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>specific moment very as ways, right right, yeah, because I

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was actually just about to say, I think that black

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Rose is more as specificity than Platform is. But of

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>course there is you know, a lot of overlap between

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>these two currents, right, Um. As for my experience with

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like platform and some and stuff, have seen UM discussions

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of it happening more. I mean, that's all I can

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>really see that I've seen. UM. Have you ever read once?

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But at least if discussions are happening, the likelihood of

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>things coming out of it might be a bit. In Greece,

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess another current that UM has been part of

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the anarchists milieu, psychgeist wave whatever is organizational dualism, which

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>came out to the nineteen twenties Italian anarchist movement. So

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they use the tomb to describe involvements of anarchists both

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>as members of anarchists specific political organizations and also as

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>militants in the labor movement. In Spain, the Friends of

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Druti group emerged to oppose the Gradual reviews Cell, the

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Smash Revolution n and they also ended up emulating some

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of the ideas of the platform by criticizing you know,

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the cnt F phase, c ant f AIS, gradual reformism

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and collaboration with republican government. Um. So the spars of

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>war and stuff. You know, there's a lot of forces

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that play and we're gonna get into now, but it is,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say, as a side note, important to recognize

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that there is no model it when it comes to

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>like these sort of civil wars and historical events. Um,

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you really have to look at things in context and

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not trying to strip them away from

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the goings on at the time. Also, the Chinese anarchist

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>movement of the nineteen tens um advocated for similar ideas.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try to pronounce the name of the group,

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>hopefully don't get castled, but it's the who Shuang Fu Kong,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Shan Jui Tong, She's a way, I think, which is

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the Society of Anarchists Communist Comrades. And yeah, they advocated

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of similar ideas. So there's a lot

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of different currents around the world influenced by you know,

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the historic conditions. But the general thread that you know

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>anarchists need to get together and work as a unit

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is you know what's thrust in it, right and specifies more,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is just a fresh continuation of this threat of this trend.

0:08:55.679 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So what is that? What is the specifies more exactly

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>the three key concepts um that I see emphasized again

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>and again. One the need for specifically anarchist organization built

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>around a unity of ideas and practice. Two, the use

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:20.359
<v Speaker 1>of the specifically anarchist organization to theorize and develop strategic

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>political and organizing work. And three active involvement in and

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>building of autonomous and popular social movements, which is described

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as the process of social institution. So kind of core

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to the whole specificity current is which is rather antithectical

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the trends that I've seen in the past

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. It's sort of a rejection of this

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>left unity idea, right, this idea that there can be

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these this sort of big tent organization that can somehow

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>estab ash all these different visions simultaneously. Right. So I

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>specificity reject the idea of just unity of unity's sake,

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because they feel it boils down to sort of Louis

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>common denominate to kind of wishy washy politics. They feel

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it when unity is preferred at all costs, it leaves

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>very little room for unified action or developed political discussion.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in my experience, when you have like a

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of political heterogene um, there tends to be a

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of unproductive drama lack of better word. Obviously, people

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of different political stripes should work together, um, And there's

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>no like harm in that. But at the same time,

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to certain types of organizations, having a

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of ideological unity is I would say pretty important.

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>As you know, you don't want to have all these

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>different groups constantly butting heads for all these different visions.

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you want to have at least some sense

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're moving in sync. Right, So you're not going

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to have some people who are trying to establish social

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>democracy and some people who are trying to get like

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>this workers state code and code, or you know, people

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 1>who just want i don't know, like a higher minimum reach, right.

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everyone's on a different stage of their political journey.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But what specificity try to emphasize is that while we

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>can work within these larger social movements, um, it's important

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that artists specifically come together to try to shape those

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>movements in an organized way. And I'll explain because it

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of sounds a bit like anangotism for some people,

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you know, these this cabal of like

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>revolutionaries are trying to manipulate things behind the scenes. But um, really,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>what a specificitts argue is that and I guess needed space.

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>They need space for like common strategy and reflection and

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>collective responsibility and you know, a place to discuss plans

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and build trust and share analysis and you know, put

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>together shorts and long term goals all that jazz. Um.

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So will the specificitys do reach out to and work

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>with social movements regardless of whether they fit this code

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and code anarchist purity test um. And I see that

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>with my tongue planted family and cheek of course, Um,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>they want to make sure that they can sue still

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as an active minority, so that these movements aren't diluted.

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I noticed like throwing out a lot of

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>different woods and freezers and ideas, um, you know, things

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like ideological unity and the need for sort of a

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>consensus within the group. Um. And speaking of I've spoken

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>about consensus on my channel before, so I have a

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>breakdown on it. People can check out if they're like, um,

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I was spoke of unified strategy, right, So you're not

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just joking around, you actually have mapped out sort of strategy.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Like for example, black socialists in America. They aren't like

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a specifically a specificity or to my knowledge, but you

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>can see um that they have like a unified, like

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.719
<v Speaker 1>clearly leader strategy and they're making moves to make it

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to achieve it, and they're very public about those moves, right. Um.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I also I want to emphasize, of course, in the

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>specifies more the whole idea of this active minority. You know,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a bunch of like it's not like

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a path of book club, right. And a specificity group

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is a group of people who are passionate about you

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>know this cause um, and obviously passionate people have this

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>habit of for they can more than they can chew. Right.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So what I would advise like a specificity and a

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>specificity judgment adjacent groups and really just organizations in general,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is that keep your size in mind, keep achievable goals

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>within sight, because if you don't you know, it's very

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>easy to burn out very quickly. Yeah. Um. With the

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>specificity groups, it's important that they understand their responsibility, but

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>also that they understand their limits. Lastly, and very importantly,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>social institution, I think is one of the most important

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>parts for specificity mo and I think even if you

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>do want to take anything away from like specificity specifies more,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you at the very least like implement social institution or

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at least concepts within social institution into organizing, right because obviously, um,

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and I guess a kind of fewer number. But what

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>social institution tries to point out I guess, or tries

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to develop within a movement, it's just awareness that the

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>people who are making these moves from organizing and whatnot,

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that they don't relinquish their power to like other figures

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:51.359
<v Speaker 1>or forces or parties or whatever the case may be. Right, Um,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Social institutions times in the belief that the oppressed but

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the most revolutionary sector society and the seed of future

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary transformations society lies already in these classes and social groupings.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't mean socialization doesn't mean like acting within

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>single issue advocacy campaigns or you know, like trying to

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>take over people's existing struggles. It means getting involved in

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>daily fights and daily struggles people to better their own conditions.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>It means, you know, connecting with workers, connecting with immigrants,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>connecting across neighborhoods, working towards racial liberation, working within students

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>struggles and tenant struggles. As people are like part of

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>these struggles, they become conscious of their place in society, right,

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And part of our rule is to try to develop

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>their consciousness. So as people are tempered and tested and recreated,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>they see their position in the what we're looking for

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in the pecking order. Right. They see that there are

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>forces that play that are keeping them down, their structures

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>play that are keeping them down, and they change from

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just being like social classes to being active social forces.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're brought together by organic methods and by self

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.239
<v Speaker 1>organized cohesion. What you notice of the popular movements, like

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>for example, Black Lives Matter, is that the unlike what

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>some conservatives might assume, the Black Lives Matter organization wasn't

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the one like pulling the strings, you know, like the

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>official group wasn't there, you know, telling people okay, march here,

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>puting that right here, move that you know, it's like

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the people themselves came together and you know, really expressed

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the desire for change. And so really, as they become

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>self conscious actors, aware of their power, of their voice,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>of their nemesis, which is the ruling elites that control

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the social order, a specificitys try to keep that thrust. Right.

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>What a specificity argue is that essentially there's an anarchist

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>on the current two popular social movements that should be

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>preserved and maintained and cultivated. Right with popular movements, Um,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they're very quickly co opted by impositions of leadership or

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>by you know, academic elites or by political parties. But

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>specificity aren't there to try to make groups identify as anarchists, right,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They're there to just maintain that thrust, to be self

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>organized and to fight for their own interests because ultimately

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that's our natural impulse as months. You know, it's really

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the propaganda that tells us, you know, um, like you

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have to go through these proper channels. You know, you

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>have to vote with your dollar or you know, food

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for these politicians or whatever the case may be. Converse,

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and all these different things call up your representatives. The

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>natural thrust of a person is not to like relinquished

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>control of themselves, you know, it's to try to maintain

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that um and so a specifics trying to push against

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the propaganda that keeps us from maintaining that, push against

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>the co optation that ships that from us. Soup. Do

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>any sort of automatic critiques of a specifies move come

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to mind for y'all? I'm not sure about like critiques

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>per se. We need to think about it more, But

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a few things that come to mind around so, like

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you talked a bit about like the difference between like

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>left unity and creating like an anarchist unity, um, and

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for people at home, I would like to maybe extrapolate

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>why those are different things. I know you have a

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>good video on left unity already, but like in terms

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of trying to like, you know, if if one of

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the goals being creating like an anarchist organization that kind

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of unifies different anarchists, how that is a different type

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>of unity than just left unity in general. UM. I

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>think that might be a point of clarification. And then

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I was wondering about is like how

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 1>does this intersect in terms of like individual goals versus

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like group goals or like organizational goals and so like,

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>because like there's a there's a back and forth between

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>like personal autonomy and then you know these type of

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>social movements that kind of almost gained their own thrust.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeh right, right, Yes. To the point about the difference

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>between Left unity and anarchist unity, um, well, obviously artists

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>or soon fairly heterogeneous. Um, I think our general thrust

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for self determination and autonomy and that kind of thing

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>is it brings us together. You know. The difference between

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like say anarchist unity, where they're differently some I would

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>say key disagreements within the milieu and left unity is

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that I feel there are some extremely incompatible factors that

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>prevent Left unity from being viable. Yeah, when there's a

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>thrust among significant segments, I mean really every non libertarian

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>segment of you know, they couldn't get left to uh

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>funn our popular energy towards state institutions, whether it be

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>through insurrectionary social democracy or reformist social democracy in a

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>case of amounts and stock damage respectively. Um, I think

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that that really keeps us from really working together on

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>anything more than small goals and small projects. I mean,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we've really seen the whole left unity idea of fall apart,

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, through wars and through even just like what

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>should be discussions between people, you know, like the First

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>International literally split because of the differences between you know,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the so called left currents, you know, between the anarchists

0:22:55.160 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and the other socialists. So last unity is now something

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that I even to achieve. I think most people know

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that about me by now, um. But regard to like

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>anarchist unity, and of course the differences between an artists,

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the general rusted to maintain the autonomy and

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>self determination of the people and of the social movements

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>via inserting ourselves in is what really clues us together.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And of course that alone, I don't know if that's

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>enough to maintain in a specificity organization, because you know,

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:38.719
<v Speaker 1>like I noted, a specificitys try to um develop deeper

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>level you know, strategies and theoretical discussion and that kind

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing, And so with those sort of discussions, you

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna see a lot more of the distinctions

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bearing out. But at the very least, UM, I think

0:23:53.640 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>anarchists generally could benefit from a degree of at least

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>unity in the sense of maintaining or soularity in the

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>sense of maintaining the libertarian thrust of popular movements. I

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>asked the other thing that you had noted about the

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:17.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of friction between individual goals and organizational goals, between

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>autonomy and sort of how social movements end up taking

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on like an energy of their own. Um. To be

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>quite honest, I don't think I have like a fully

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>developed answer for that. Yeah, um, Because, on the one hand,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a social movement that forgets that it is about, you know,

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>deliberation of individuals is you know, in my view of

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>social movement that's quickly going to and obtaining against the

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>people who are you know, fueling it. At the same time,

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I interacting with like a lot of people what pretty

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>selfish or pretty egotistical or just argumentative for the sake

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of it. Sorry, So if you're gonna say something, yeah,

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.479
<v Speaker 1>I was just like, the thing that keeps popping up

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>into my head is, you know, one of the things

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that gets misconstrued all the time is who's calling the shots.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of feel like what you're saying is

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>everybody in a way, right, Yeah? Yeah, I think that like,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>which is good sometimes but not good other times. Obviously

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly because I think it's it's very easy to fall

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>into this sort of um almost reactionary I like island

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>mentality not island mentality is incribean islan mentality isn't fussiness

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and as an island around like autonomy and you know

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>personal freedom, you know, like this renting idea that you

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>know on step map property, you know that kind of

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>thing just let people do whatever. It's kind of like

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.719
<v Speaker 1>most alarchrocaplist conception of what like freedom and autonomy is

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I think an important part of autonomy and you know

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>freedom and yeah, like this project is you know, accountability

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and is you know, like consequences like social consequences and

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>how your actions affect others. You know, like what you

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>said he was to recognize is that we are not

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact islands. You know, our actions or behavioral words

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>affect other people. And so I think it's going to

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be a constant project to sort of balance um individual

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>personalities and BROADERCT goals. But I mean, yeah, it's it's

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>trick right, Like you know, we're you're talking about like

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>some kind of you know, group organization to work together

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to kind of you know, think of achievable goals and

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>create steps to get there um. And I feel among

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who proudly declare themselves anarchists and

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at least like and they're extremely vocal. Like these are

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>like people both like online and in person organizing that

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are very are very like vocal and try to very

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>much like make their place known. We've seen trends away

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>from this direction in terms of like rejecting the idea

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of goals and demands and just you know, like this

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this more insurrectionary kind of tendency of just making total

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>destroy for the sake of it and committee, yeah, and

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and and and that. I mean, like I know that

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like platform is m is kind of like it's not

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>like Antiens insurrectionary, but it's like it's it definitely critiques

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that type of instructionary rend um. So I'm thinking about, like,

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, this idea and like how with with with

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this kind of general you know, decentralized, no no demands,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>no goals kind of general kind of direction that like

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>capital a anarchists are are doing. How like what's what's

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe some parts of a specific that we can actually

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>take into account to be like hey maybe there's you know,

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>like I I don't like, I don't like being called,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:35.479
<v Speaker 1>like any adjective anarchist. I think it's silly. I like

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I like the parts, um, I think earlier this year

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, the last year, Like I just got to

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the point for you, I'm an anarchist, you know that's yeah, Yeah,

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I like the parton desert. It's like, I'm an anarchist

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of many adjectives. I'm not, I'm not I'm not always

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>an insurrectionary, I'm not always a syndicalist. I'm not always

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. Um.

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like that's would be really useful kind

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of thing for people to focus on more in terms of, yeah,

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it can be fun to make total destroying that it's

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a very base instinct, but it also would be great

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to like improve people's lives a little bit um and yeah,

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's like to to to kind of like dueling things.

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Um and in terms that's why I do really like

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the part of like this type of stuff that it's

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>really appealing to me just because I kind of already

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>work on this myself, so I'm like, oh, I'm I'm

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>already doing this, but it's like the it is it

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is like the social the social insertion side of things,

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think is something that would be a much a

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>much better way of thinking about. Like everyone hates talking

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>about optics because yeah, it's frustrating, but I think the

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>social insertion method is a better framework for kind of

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>dealing with some of those same problems. Um. And yeah,

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and then like you know, there is even among insurrectionaries

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and all those you know, all those types, there still

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is like a decent amount of like group projects and stuff,

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is I think a really good thing to

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on because but yeah, there's not many anarchists, and

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be cool if there was more. And if

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we just focus on the parts that make people go,

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>oh that's kind of silly and pointless, then we're not

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>really going to grow anarchism that much. Um. So highlighting

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the parts they are like, oh, yeah, you're actually helping people.

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna convince a lot more people who are kind

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of already trending in that general general direction, and then hey,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe in a few years they can also be doing

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>silly destruction for fun, because it is it is fun sometimes, right, Yeah,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Like this, as you mentioned optics, I reminded it is

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of pet peeve I have with some you know,

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>instant people where they try to treat like ideologies or

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically anarchism as like a pr project that we have

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to like constantly be trying to shift the optics and

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>micromanaged like every aspect. Like No, I think that as

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>remedy for like, because you're not going to match the

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>power of mass media. What you can do to push

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>back against a sort of propaganda is help people, and

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>help people and identify as anarchists as you're helping people, right, Like,

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the easiest and quickest way to dispel people's notions

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and like conceptions of what an anarchist is. If we

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>were to take like socialization right and sort of, I

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>would say, there's still it's a bit and individualize it

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Um. I would say that as a practice,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, just even if you don't know any any

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>other anarchists in your area, right, just being there, being

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in these movements helping people and you know, saying you know,

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what I believe. Um, Just talking to people

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about what you believe as a place and as you're

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>helping them, you know, that goes a long way, much

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>longer than any you know, poster UM campaign or like

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>wheat pasting initiative or artwork um you know, wall arts

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, you know, like actively helping people. Of course

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>wall lot has its place and double little bit myself,

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know it's it's not it's ultimately like talking

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to people and helping people and being their people and

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>being honest about your intentions that I think, you know,

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we should working towards. And I think those types of

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>projects are something that the specific model like excels that

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like creating like a unity of anarchists

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>who get like who have like a goal in mind

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and then go out to achieve the goal. Helping people

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like doing like doing like like like direct directly helping

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>people is something that that type of organization model is

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of the best at UM because you can yeah,

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>really like or aize things much better with a small

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>group like that and create goals that are actually very achievable,

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it be you know, building a community kitchen or

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>building you know, heating centers for like for the winter,

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like under under bridges or whatever. You know, all those

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>types of starting community gardens, all those types of things

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>are I think what this type of model really excels

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at and Yeah, you don't need to change your ideology

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to this one word because that's that's silly. But you

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>can pick up different parts of it, be like, yeah,

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that actually seems like a useful way of the world

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that you want, you know, a politicians just ruling hand,

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>co opt our project, you know, like just basic things

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, you know, and then from there, you know,

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>as you are talking with people and meeting people who

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>are passionate about issues in these social movements. You know,

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>not only does it keep you from developing this sort

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of um pretumularly online um in group kind of mentality,

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it also opens up opportunities you to develop your and

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this is on the topic of like the individualist social institution,

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it prints or presents oportunities for you to develop your

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>own had no like book club, and then from that

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>book club could come and a specificity organization. You know,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>as you begin to develop your politics and your shared politics,

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 1>more can come out of it. So don't underestimate, you know,

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the potential of just putting in the work and talking

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to people. Yeah, you know, just being there on the ground.

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the best things you can do to help

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>stay alive in the well things are heading in the

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>direction that they're heading societally is like making friends and

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>forming a friend group and then yeah, like actually doing

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff together. That makes dealing with everything else that's happening

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so so much better. And hey, remember our old friend

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Nest Nest remarking started with a book club, so hey,

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, you never know where book clubs could lead

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly. It's actually really interesting. Um video clip of

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Marie book Gin talking about book clubs and like the

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>power and potential book clubs. Um. I don't know if

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we could probably link that in the show notes, but

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like a really interesting make sure drinks. So ultimately,

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>a specificity believe that social movements we reached their own

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>logic of creating revolution. Not when they all just decide

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to identify as anarchists and weave the black flag, but

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>when the majority reach a consensus and a consciousness of

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>their power and the ability to exercise their power in

0:35:55.719 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>their daily lives. So even if they do not adopt anarchism,

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they still consciously adopt the ideas embedded within it. They

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>are multiple political currents will exist within any movement, and

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>so it's important that we as anarchists, and I guess

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 1>specifically as a specificity are there to actively combat the

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunism that come from you know, these forces from this

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>whether electoral or find goddess within these social movements as well,

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we can also help to push them further through um,

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, pushing for more direct democracy and consensus, through federalism,

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and confederating with other social movements through you know, building

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>up the mutual aid within these movements. Like if you are,

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>for example, part of a mutual aid group in one neighborhood,

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you can push them to start reaching out with mutually

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 1>groups and other neighborhoods and creating a network of mutual

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>aid groups that can build into something bigger, you know,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>combining resources and manpower to really push the revolution, you know. Lastly,

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I will say that for those who are trying to

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>like get into the whole specifies more thing. Um. I mean,

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you could start a new organization from scratch. But again,

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like the easiest thing to do is suggest getting there

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to people and be honest with the people. And I

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>keep saying the people, even though I have my critiques

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of this amorphous conception of the people, but the point

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>remains that our goal is to spread our ideas, not

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to get people on any particular ideology, but to get

0:37:56.320 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>a liberatory consciousness on the ground and to generalize that consciousness.

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And for those who are curious about the specifies more

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in action and social institutions, specifically the Federal show Anarchista

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 1>GAUSHA in Brazil has worked with neighborhood committees and urban

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>villages and slums. They've built alliances with the rank and

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>file members of the rural land as workers movement the

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>must and they've also worked with trash and recyclables collectors

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>UM Brazil. For those who don't know, as a lot

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of high levels of temporary uh and contingent employment, underemployment

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and unemployment. So the working class isn't how will you

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>traditionally conceive it as like just surviving primarily off of

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>wage labor, but it's more so this is sort of

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>subsistence work informal economy, gig economy can deal. So being

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>able to connect with these when trash collectors, for example,

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>who are part of this out of the economy, the

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>FIG has built a strong relationship with them and help

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>them to form their own national organization to you know,

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>push for their interests and to collectivize their recycling Operations

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:19.439
<v Speaker 1>specifies More is also um worked with the has also

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 1>worked in the efforts of the Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Front

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa, as they also are strong opponents of

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 1>social institution and you know, really being embedded in these

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>social movements in Argentina, in Brazil, in South Africa, and

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in the US in the case of Black Rows Anarchist

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Federation specifies, More has been building as a key point

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>reference and so I'll leave us off with a code

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from the use of Front Collective, an anarchist group online.

0:39:56.000 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>If libertarian socialists merely organized with libertarian socialists, and they

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>will lose contact with the broader population they need to

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>be reaching. If libertarian socialists merely joined social movements without

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>advocating various libertarian socialist practices that can be used, then

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>social movements can easily drift into being susceptible to reformist

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and strategic liberal and Lendinist tendencies and opportunists. If libertarian

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 1>socialists merely joined social movements and try to spread ideas

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and practices in mere individual ways, they'll be far less

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>successful than a well thought out, coordinated effort. And if

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>theoretically specific libertarian socialist groups try to control social movements

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and popular organizations from the top down. Then such specific

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>groups sacrifice their own principles and would reproduce hierarchical organizer.

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:48.720
<v Speaker 1>In contrast to authoritarian fine goddess conceptions, specifies more groups

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and a specificity put their activity towards a self organization

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of movements and organizations ultimately, as I honestly love this

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>code from Shanti Alston, power to the people, where it

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 1>stays with the people. Peace, Yes, Andrew, please please plug

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>your plug doubles because they are good and people should

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact listen to them, right, Thank you, Safety Foost.

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I will say that you can follow me

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Underscore Seeing Drew and on YouTube at

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>st Andrew's um and you can find me here apparently

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:33.320
<v Speaker 1>twice a month, which is pretty great. Shout out. It

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:40.720
<v Speaker 1>could happen here. Take care everyone, Peace again these again

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it could happen here as a production of pool Zone Media.

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 1>cool zone media dot com, or check us out on

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts. You can find sources for it could

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>happen here, updated monthly at cool Zone. You get dot

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:02.760
<v Speaker 1>com slash sources. Thanks for listening.