WEBVTT - Trump's VP Pick and Huawei's Shanghai Center

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation of Money and power Collie in

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley NBN.

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed lud Glove.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Now from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Technology coming up a breakdown of Trump's VC pick, JD

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 3>vance and his ties to Silicon Valley.

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Huawei tries to beat US curbs with a one point

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 4>four billion dollar chip R and D center in China.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>We discuss and exclusive Bloomberg reporting on salesforce as the

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>company cuts more of its workforce. First, let's check in

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>on those markets at the moment head because we are

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 3>barreling towards yet another record high on the S and

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 3>P five five hundred. Look small cats doing a lot

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of the heavy lifting today as well. Retail sales come

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>in solid. So even though it's not good enough to

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 3>put off any sort of rake cup comes September, we

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>are still seeing some resilience in the US consumer. We're

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 3>up six tens a percent over the last two days

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 3>on the S and P five hundred, and even though

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 3>we see a little bit of tech money coming off

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>the table when it comes to in video and others

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 3>that led the charge more broadly, we are managing to

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 3>push on to new record highs. But what are you

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 3>looking at in terms of the microdata.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Our top story is former President Trump picking JD. Vance

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 4>the Senator as his running mate, his pick for VP

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 4>on the Republican ticket. We talked a lot about the

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Trump trade in the last twenty four hours. Trump Media

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 4>and Technology Group, the parent of truth Social is the

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 4>most direct example of that.

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 5>So this is a two day chart.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 4>We jump thirty percent or so Monday, biggest jump since March,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>and we're giving some of it back Tuesday. There's no

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 4>negative sentiment per se, but I flag it.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 5>Because true social.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 4>In the first instance, carro is how Trump communicated that JD.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Vance was his pick.

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all about communication at the moment. Stock twits is

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 3>one of the main stocks we can be on. Let's

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 3>go to the communication on the ground from our very

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>own Joe Matthews standing by, and look, there is a

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 3>lot to be said about the prominence of the role

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 3>of JD. Van's in Silicon Valley in venture capital. What

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 3>are you making of it on the ground, Well.

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 6>It's pretty interesting here. Obviously, a venture capital is first

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 6>known to many of our viewers and listeners here on Bloomberg.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 6>But he's also become a much louder voice when it

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 6>comes to economic policy, when it comes to government spending,

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to crypto. Now it's going to be

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 6>interesting to see how he gets into Donald Trump's head here,

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 6>potentially because Donald Trump is not known for taking a

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 6>lot of advice and in this case from a running mate.

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 6>We saw these two together in the convention hall last

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 6>night and it was really about Donald Trump. Jd Vance

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 6>was at his side, smiling, waving a celebration here in Milwaukee.

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 6>But we have to remember this is Donald Trump's convention,

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 6>this is Donald Trump's targeting.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 4>To jump in because I think Joe, sorry to jump in.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 4>I think we lost your mic for a second there.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 4>But you raise really interesting point, which is jd Vance

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 4>has some very established views, for example, in the context

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 4>of antitrust, where the conservative movement might be a little

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 4>bit more split. Tell me about what it was like,

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 4>though you mentioned that all the focus was on Trump broadly,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 4>how did the party react to jd Vance versus some

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>of the other names that have been touted.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 6>Very well received. Look, that's going to be the deal.

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 6>Though in a place hosting the Republican National Convention. Just

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 6>spoke with Senator Bill Haggerty a short time ago, a

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 6>Republican from Tennessee who is very pro crypto but also

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 6>a very old line Republican. He thinks it's a great choice.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 6>We've spoken with a number of officials here in Milwaukee

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 6>who seemed to be embracing this idea. I have to

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 6>admit most people were surprised. To not be surprised. We've

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 6>been talking about JD. Vance on a short list here

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 6>for weeks and weeks, and a lot of folks thought

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 6>that Donald Trump might move in a different direction here.

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 6>So it's an interesting and potentially discipline move, but it

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 6>tells us a lot about the future of the Republican Party.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 6>Jdvans is thirty nine years old and will be the

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 6>heir apparent of the MAGA movement.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 5>Are most Joe Matthew on the ground in Milwaukee, thank you.

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 5>JD.

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Vance spoke with Fox yesterday and talked about China.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 8>I think what President Trump has promised to do is

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 8>go in there, negotiate with the Russians, ukradients, bring this

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 8>thing to a rapid close so that American can focus

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 8>on the real issue, which is China that's the biggest

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 8>threat for our country, and we're completely distracted from them.

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Both presidential candidates want to be seen as tough on China.

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Trump promised to hike tariff on China across the board

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 4>if reelected, and President Biden has boosted levies on Chinese

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 4>electric vehicles.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 5>Joining us now is.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Former Republican Congressman Denver Riggleman, who also served as an

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Air Force intelligence officer. He's the founder of security firm

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 4>Riblemen Information and Intelligence Group.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Morning to you, mister Riggleman.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Let's just start with your reaction to JD. Vance as

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Trump's pick as running mate and as potential vice president.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, it's funny, you were right. I was

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 9>listening to you. It wasn't that much of a surprise

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 9>to me. But I do.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 7>Believe this is very, very good. I would say for

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 7>the Democrats right now. I think his views on women.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 7>I think women voters are really going to carry this.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 7>So I think what they're going to do. They're going

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 7>to attack Jady Vance on multiple policy situations where he's flipped.

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 9>They're going to attack them on what he said about

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 9>Trump before.

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 7>But I think what this really does for the Democrats

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 7>is I think they're actually going to actually look at

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 7>his issues on women, and I think it actually helps

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 7>a Democratic ticket. I was, you know, I wasn't surprised,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 7>but I did think he might go another route, maybe

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 7>a Nikki Haley route or a female vice president.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 9>But I think with JD.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 7>Vance, I actually think it helps the Democrats based on

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 7>what he said about women's issues and things of that nature.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 3>You an author yourself. You co authored a bit with

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Walker titled The Breach, which is published in October

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, all about January this Denver. You're also, I mean,

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 3>someone who feels that you were jettison from your own

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 3>party for having officiated a same sex marriage. So you've

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 3>got an interesting relationship with the Republicans and put that

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 3>out to our audience. But I do want to make

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 3>sort of use of your expertise when it comes to

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 3>cyber to intelligence to ultimately the risks that we heard

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 3>coming from Jdvans about China and whether you think that

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.679
<v Speaker 3>is something to be standing upon, whether that is something

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 3>that you agree with as a key concern, and whether

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 3>it will be tackled by the Republicans.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, regardless of jd Vance's viewer sale on January

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 7>sixth as an election denier or what he does. The

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 7>fact is China is a bipartisan they're sort of a support,

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 7>a bipartisan support to look at China as a threat

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 7>that they are. And you know, we talked about you know,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 7>stealing IP We've talked about things like that with China.

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 7>When you're talking about their AI development or they're talking

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 7>about their technical development, I think we have to be

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 7>very careful about the regulatory structure here in America when

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 7>we're talking about AI development, tech development.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 9>As far as China is concerned.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 7>I think actually, you know, jd and the Dems, you know,

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 7>both sides really have some valid concerns about China. You know,

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 7>I just wrote an opt that I'm trying to get

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 7>in about Chinese drones and the built and Americans that

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 7>use them and actually law enforcement agencies that use them

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 7>and how they can be used as collection sources. So

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 7>I do think right now, as on the China task

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 7>for some Congress, I do believe that China is the

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 7>one bipartisan issue where everybody can gel together, and regardless

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 7>of their past views or things like that, I think

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 7>that China the specific China issue is something we really

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 7>have to worry about.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 5>Congressman.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 4>One interesting point that our correspondent raised on the ground

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 4>in Milwaukee is how much President Trump will or will

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 4>not listen to his vice president. Pick one policy area,

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 4>for example, is big tech and antitrust. This is Bloomberg Technology,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 4>after all, and mister Vance's position has been quite clear.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>He thinks that big tech should be broken up, that

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 4>there is too much power, and he's aligned with the FTC.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Other parts of the conservative movement want to see shrunk

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 4>regulators and shrunk agencies. How do you think that will

0:07:59.440 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 4>play out?

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 7>I don't actually think it's gonna be one of the

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 7>bigger issues when we're going into the election. I think afterwards,

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 7>if the Trump administration is to win, I think it's

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 7>going to be actually a bit of a war on

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 7>anti trust with big tech. You know, I've had my

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 7>own issues with big tech, especially algorithmically and what they

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 7>do in that environment.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 9>You know, my company actually looks at some of this.

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 7>We're looking at social media platforms and disinformation and how

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 7>to use AI and graphical networks to track those. So

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 7>I do believe right now, when you're talking about anti

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 7>trust and tech. I think that is going to be

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 7>one of the biggest things that we talk about after

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 7>the election, on how we either regulate if we break

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 7>them up, or you know, if we look at some

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 7>kind of algorithmic solutions, or we're looking at some other

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 7>ways to see what's happening with big tech and how

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 7>they're actually manipulating information. But I don't know if the

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 7>anti trust stuff is going to go a long way,

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 7>but I do think there's gonna there is going to

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 7>be a reckoning when it comes to how algorithms to us,

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 7>how people are targeted, and what disinformation and things like

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 7>look like on big tech platforms.

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 9>So that's really my opinion on it.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 7>It's a very complex topic, as you both know, but

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 7>I do believe that that's probably going to be one

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 7>of the lesser things they talk about during the campaign.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 7>But after whoever wins, I think there is going to

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 7>be a reckoning with big tech on how we actually

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 7>look at what they're doing on those platforms.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Denva, you've brought us a lot of complexity, Congressman. More

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>broadly to your views of what might hinder or propose

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 3>and be a positive force for JD vance. But as

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 3>a founder yourself. Does it make you positive that he's

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>someone who understands venture capital and investing?

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 7>You know, Actually, he doesn't make me confident at all.

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean when you think about where he's come from,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 7>what he's done. Yes, he's thirty nine, he wrote a book,

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 7>and I am a founder. I am looking at venture capital, right,

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 7>I do have investors.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 9>JD.

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 7>Vance in the business side doesn't make me confident at all.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 7>I really don't think he knows what he's talking about

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 7>in most respects. So I hate to be that blunt,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 7>but again, I think you're going to look at the

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 7>staff around whatever president is elected. That's the people that

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 7>actually do the policy making. I think JD. Bans is

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 7>there specifically to get votes, maybe in rural areas, maybe

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 7>they did polling. I don't think he's there for any

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 7>of his business or technical expertise. So I think he's

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 7>simply there because he's presenting a vision of what MAGA

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 7>policies look like in the future. And I don't think

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 7>it really has to do with his business acumen at all.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 7>And sorry if I'm blunt about it, but that's how

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 7>I feel about it.

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Denver, we like blunt.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate you, of course Denver Riggleman and founder of

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 3>a Rigleman information intelligence group. But crucially, of course former

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 3>congressmen ed what forgot? Coming up?

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Okay, coming up?

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Huawei gets set to break new grounds. Details behind the

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 4>tech giants new one point four billion dollar.

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 5>R and D hub coming up next.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I think we're also taking a quick look at shares

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 4>of event Bright. Just a terminal headline TikTok carriage. Tell

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 4>me what's going on?

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Interesting is we were just discussing China. Of course, TikTok

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 3>has a new partnership with event Bright. We understand that

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 3>these uses can add event bright links to TikTok videos.

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 3>We see an absolute surge in then interday price up

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 3>nineteen percent, but a whole lot of regulatory risks so

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>surrounding TikTok here in the United States. This is a

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 3>blue big technology time now for Talking Tech, A first

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 3>up Match group, well, it's getting a third activist investor.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 5>According to a letter reviewed by Bloomberg.

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Starboard has built a six point six percent stake in

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>the online dating company and plans to make a push

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>for a sale of Match if the company fails to

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 3>turn around its operations. Now Match's largest app, which is Tinder,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 3>has seen its paying customer based shrink for six six

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 3>straight quarters. Plus Microsoft faces a UK investigation. Now the

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>tech giant is set to undergo a full blown anti

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 3>trust probe over its investment in Inflection AI, with emphasis

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 3>over the hiring of former employees from the startup. Now,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the Competition of Markets Authority has set a September eleventh

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 3>deadline on whether it will escalate the investigation further. And

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Huawei nars completion of its chip research center in Shanghai.

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 3>The new development center will house thirty thousand personnel and

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 3>covers one point six million square meters. Huawei is said

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to have spent over one point four billion dollars in

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 3>investment costs for the new facilities and is expected to

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 3>use it to pioneer breakthroughs in semiconductors and whiless networks.

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's stay with that story in Huawei and bringing

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>bloomberg Zy and King here in San Francisco. Those seem

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 4>like big numbers, But if there's one thing you've taught

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 4>our audience in recent years, it's the development of new

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 4>semiconductors and then the manufacturing of them takes a very

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 4>long time. So what are the basics in this case

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 4>with Huawei.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it does.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean it's not like they're beginning from scratch here.

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 10>This is more, you know, something that we should pay

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 10>attention to as a symbolic but also as potential for

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 10>what happens in the future. If they're bringing in more

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 10>people the kind of numbers that they're talking about, that's

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 10>a significant effort that would be at the same kind

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 10>of scale of other companies.

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 5>But it takes years and years.

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, two or three years to design one, then

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 10>to get it into manufacturing, then it's probably not going

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 10>to be that good. Then you need a second generation.

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 10>So nothing to be panicking about this year or next year,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 10>but certainly a symbol of a serious effort that's underway.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, what got usaw panicking originally was the Mate sixty,

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>and we're anticipating a Mate seventy, which of course is

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 3>then new flagship smartphones in and when we get our

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 3>hands on it, how much do we understand of the

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>technology they're using is still US dependent? How much eventually

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 3>can we cut that off? Will it be cut off?

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean that's a very good question, and that

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 10>there are a lot of opinions about the chip that's

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 10>in the current This is called so called seven nanimeter chip.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 10>Some people are saying this just proves that Huawei has

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 10>walked around the efforts to stop it. Others are saying, no, no,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 10>this is a clude job. This, this really isn't that important.

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 10>This doesn't mean anything. They won't be able to get

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 10>any better. So I think you're absolutely right to be

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 10>pointing out that when that new phone hits market, there'll

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 10>be a lot of people pople getting their hands on it,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 10>and the first thing they'll do is so in half

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 10>and look at what's inside.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Not exactly the way in which Huawei. I think one's

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be used for.

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 5>This an interesting one.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 3>Othertheless, Bloomberg's inking, we so value your opinion and expertise.

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. Now let's look at another key story with

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 3>software giants Salesforce, Bloomberg exclusively reporting that the company cut

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 3>three hundred jobs this month. Now it's in an effort

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 3>to streamline operations and control costs. Bloomberg's Ready Ford wrote

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 3>the news for us, and they'd already been doing a

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of layoffs.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 12>The entire tech industry obviously has shared thousands upon thousands

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 12>of jobs over the last two issuars at this point,

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 12>and there's been this question of is it over?

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 5>Are we back to a normal period?

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 12>And I think what Salesforce and a couple other companies

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 12>have shown us is that this is just part of

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 12>the game.

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 12>You know what happened last week. It was just after

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 12>the end of the second quarter, right, and we saw

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 12>Salesforce a few other companies make these cuts. I think

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 12>going forward, we will see tech companies no longer do

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 12>this thing where the headcount is just up into the

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 12>right and definitely rather that they're going to continually kind

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 12>of cut over here, higher over here and just monitor

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 12>those expenses.

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Brady, this is three hundred roles that you're reporting being cut.

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 4>I jump into my Bloomberg terminal dso quickest way to

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 4>check workforce, and I'm seeing seventy two thousand. But as

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 4>you point out, it's a bit of a broader, broader effort.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 4>What's I guess sentiment of Salesforce staff right now? A

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of them watch this program.

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I would say sentiment is that idea of like

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 12>you know, for a long time, large companies, whether it

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 12>was Salesforce into an open text whatever. There was more

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 12>tolerance for Hey, we're gonna have divisions that are more

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 12>speculative events. They're nice to have, and I think they're

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 12>just that ruthless reprioritization going on.

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean into it cut.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 12>I want to say. It was eighteen hundred people a

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 12>week before, and they attribute a lot of it to underperformance.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 12>They said, this is not a head count reduction. We're

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 12>just going to rehire people who are going to be

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 12>doing more relevant work for us. So it's just that

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 12>sense of if you are not producing, whether you're a

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 12>salesperson or some other role, we were able to show

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 12>your hit in the P and L, you might be

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 12>at risk.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 13>I think.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Brady Ford with another piece of excellent reporting.

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, thank you very much.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 3>So Amazon's two day summer sale is underway, with real

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>time data actually suggesting that sales are rising about thirteen

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 3>percent in the first six hours of the event. That's

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 3>compared to the same period last year. That data coming

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 3>from Momentum Commerce, which actually manages about fifty brands in

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>a variety of product categories. CEO John tsche is with

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 3>us and John, you have such a breadth of type

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 3>of things being sold and being demanded by the consumer.

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Is it everything?

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, thank you so much for having me. Yeah, everybody

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 14>should should get there figurative while it's open, because there's

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 14>great deals on Amazon today. At Momentum Commerce, we support

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 14>brands across all kinds of categories, and that's certainly one

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 14>trend we're seeing so far in the early innings of

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 14>Prime Day today. Where historically Prime Day has been an

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 14>event with great participation from consumer electronics gadget brands, back

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 14>to school offerings trying to pull that demand forward, and

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 14>a lot of Amazon's own devices. This year, we're seeing

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 14>great offers from jewelry brands, fashion brands, home and kitchen brands,

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 14>so beauty brands are participating really widely. So it really

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 14>is the everything store. And with Prime Day today, we're

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 14>seeing deals across the board.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 4>John, Amazon's kind of jumped around a little bit on

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 4>the timing of Prime Days. They've experimented a different different

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:02.719
<v Speaker 4>parts of year. Is there any sort of seasonality factor

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 4>that motivates consumers to go out spend early catch deals

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 4>in the summer rather than say, later in the year,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 4>like in October.

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think you know. A few years back, Amazon

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 14>shifted to October for the first time as a function

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 14>of COVID and disruption from COVID, and then they've held

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 14>that and sort of done two Prime Days the last

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 14>few years. You know, what we see in the data

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 14>certainly is that the July the summer Prime Day has

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 14>really been seared into the minds of the US consumer

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 14>in particular, and we're now seeing the entire retail industry followsuit.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 14>So if you wander around the web and go to

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 14>any D two C site, you're going to see callbacks

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 14>to Prime Day offerings, even on a direct site, and

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 14>certainly you see Target and Walmart and others all running

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 14>similar events timed around Amazon. So this is the tenth

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 14>Prime Day and it's certainly become part of culture this year,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 14>which is really exciting.

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 4>What's different for Amazon now, I think is the influence

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 4>and competition from some of the Chinese players Ali Express

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Team Ali Express went so big on the Euros even

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 4>on foss Sport here in the United States, but we

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 4>served thirteen percent growth in the first six hours. What

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 4>do you see in the market more broadly through this

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 4>prime window.

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, well, you know, keep in mind a non trivial

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 14>percentage of goods that are sold on Amazon are from

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 14>factory brands in China that are coming direct via the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 14>Amazon marketplace. And you know, Amazon has designs to compete

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 14>more directly with Timu in the Lakes with a discount

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 14>section that's going to be added to the site. So

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 14>there definitely is competition in that area. But you know,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 14>none of those players can compete with Amazon on logistics

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 14>and distribution. I mean, I bought some legos from my

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 14>kids this morning on Amazon and they're going to arrive tomorrow.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 14>You know, in that premium convenience is really challenging Frowy

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 14>Express and Team Moods to compete with. So it's a

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 14>different proposition there.

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 3>John, You do that in the UK and it arrives

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the same day, which is also very phenomenal, and it's

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 3>interesting you're obviously buying for your children. We see more

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 3>broadly the macro picture of retail sales looking resilient today.

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Every time I opened TikTok, I got an ad for

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 3>sixteenth seventeenth Prime Day and it was Megande Stallion.

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 5>You talk about as.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Being a cultural moment. How much are we seeing gen

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Z driving the money? How much is it you driving

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the money? Who is demographically purchasing right now.

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think historically it's been across the board, but

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 14>it hasn't been as strong with gen Z and younger demos,

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 14>and I think that's probably certainly part of the reason

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 14>why Amazon shows Meg Stallion as the spokesperson to promote

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 14>the event. I think they did a great job with

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 14>the lead in promotions. They also did great you know

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 14>I you know, sadly get an Amazon package at my

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 14>house every day, and the packing tape for the last

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 14>month has been really cheeky kind of promotions getting everybody

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 14>excited about Prime Day. So the lead in has been

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 14>really terrific, and I think we're seeing demographics across the

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 14>board leverage Amazon because it's so convenient, the selection is

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 14>so wide. A lot of the brands we work with

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 14>are beauty brands that are targeting a younger demographic, and

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 14>they're all participating pretty aggressively in Prime Day this year.

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 14>One of our client's first aid Beauty, has incredible discounts

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 14>available today, So seeing a lot of different offerings, I

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 14>think that's the piece that is most interesting.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 9>This year.

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 14>The event seems to be on pace. Our data suggests

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 14>thirteen percent year over year growth through ten am Eastern.

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 14>Generally peak shopping for prime days between ten am and

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 14>one pm Eastern is still really early. But if we

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 14>hold that track, that's going to be four hundred and

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 14>fifty million items sold in two days. Yeah, consumers are

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 14>going to save about three billion dollars. And I think

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 14>the distribution of those sales is going to be across

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 14>a lot of different categories appealing to very different demographics.

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 14>So it's the everything store and the everything sale, and

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 14>people are excited.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 3>John Tch, We thank you, see your moment in comments.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bluemotechnology. I'm Caroline heid in New York

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 3>and I.

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Met love Loow in San Francisco.

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 4>A very quick check on the market and as that

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 4>one hundred is basically flat. Some of the laggards in

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 4>there are the bigger tech company's Microsoft Meta. Some of

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 4>the chip makers as well are selling. For whatever reason,

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 4>we continue to talk about the Trump trade because we

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 4>have the big news item that jd Vance is Trump's VP.

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Pick the two that I pick out our Trump Media

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 4>and Technology Group.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 5>Parent of True Social.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 4>Yes, down almost ten percent in the session, but remember

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>it jumped more than thirty percent yesterday. This is the

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 4>most direct version of the Trump Trade. Many use this

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 4>stock as a kind of reflection or proxy of how

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 4>they assess the odds of either presidential candidate's fortunes. And

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 4>of course, as we talked about earlier, former President Trump

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 4>used truth social to announce jd Vance in the first instance.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 5>I also put Tesla softer, just a few tens of percent.

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 4>But remember it's been buoyant again, some saying Tesla Trump

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 4>trade because Elon Musk came out so quickly, not just

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 4>in support of President Trump following the assassination attempts of

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>the weekend, but also in support of jd Vance's the

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 4>VP pick character.

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And let's just talk about exactly that, the VP pick

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 3>jd Vance, major Silicon Valley investors, the choice of the

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Ohio senator, and former venture capitalists as a runningway, it

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 3>seemed to be celebrating it a move that puts the

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 3>tech industry center stage potentially if Trump wins the White House.

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 3>We see some members of the Founder's fund currently coming

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>out saying the saying we have a former tech we

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 3>see in the White House joining us as Bloomberg's Mike

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Shephard not the only post that was out there, Mike

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 3>we're just hearing about Tesla's performance today. But you know

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 3>Mask himself saying Trump Vance resounds with victory. What do

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 3>you make the tie to venture capital.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 11>Well, it really is a reflection what we're seeing out

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 11>there now, all the champagne quirks popping in so called

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 11>little tech about their sensation that hey, we're being seen,

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 11>we are finally here, we have arrived, and we will

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 11>have a seat at the table. And they have, you know,

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 11>felt for many years that they have taken a back

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 11>seat to the larger tech companies, to their larger brethren

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 11>in the forum of the major tech companies that we

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 11>spend so much time talking about Google, Microsoft, Apple and

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 11>so forth, and the ones that they feel have taken

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 11>advantage of them in some ways. And this choice of.

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 13>JD.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 11>Vance by Trump really sends that signal to the group

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 11>of investors from Silicon Value who've also been supporting Trump

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 11>in increasing numbers too, like David Sachs who spoke at

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 11>the convention last night, and writers as well.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 4>I want to make one point, which is many bench

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 4>capitalists or some bench capitalists are supporting JD. Vance's appointment,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 4>not all. Just would make that point as it was

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 4>raised to me on social media. Give us a little

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 4>bit of the backstory. You know, I think we take

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 4>for granted on Bloomberg Technology. We know quite a lot

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 4>about JD.

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 5>Vance.

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 4>We've been covering, for example, Peter Teel's backing of him

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 4>for quite some time. But there are many in the audience,

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 4>Mike that may be asking, well, we don't get the

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 4>point here.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 5>Who is he and what's he about?

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 11>Well, what they may be seeing is in JD. Vance

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 11>somebody who is a lot more than just a venture capitalist.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 11>He is somebody who's also expressed skepticism about the US

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 11>support for Ukraine in its efforts to repel the Russian invasion.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 11>And people are not just single issue voters. They're not

0:25:55.840 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 11>thinking that, well, because he is from the venture million

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 11>that I therefore must support him. They are going to

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 11>look at a lot of other positions that he has

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 11>taken over the years, including on that as they make

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 11>their choices and as they are trying to decide. One

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 11>interesting thing about Vance is how he has aligned against

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 11>what he calls a big tech oligarchy. He has even

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 11>gone so far as to express praise, rare praise for

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 11>a Biden administration official of FTC Chair Lena Kahan, who

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 11>has been pursuing competition enforcement cases against a lot of

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 11>those big tech companies.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 4>We will get into the antitrust position appointed policy in

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 4>just a little while. Bloombergs Mike Shepherd, who leads the

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 4>intersection of our coverage.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 5>Of tech and politics. Thank you.

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 4>So let's continue the conversation on JD. Vance and bring

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 4>in a former colleague of his. Crystal mckella is a

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 4>former managing director at a Peter teel back growth stage

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 4>fund called Methrill, where she works with Vance. She's currently

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 4>a managing partner at alf VC. Good morning, Welcome to

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 4>the studio. So very similar question to Mike. Give us

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 4>the detail of your time spent working alongside JD.

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 5>Evans and what you learned about him.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 4>And for full disclosure, we got you on the show

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 4>because you are quoted in that Bloomberg story overnight that

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 4>we were just discussing with Michael.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Great.

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 15>Well, thank you so much.

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate the opportunity tunity to be here. I

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 2>had a fantastic experience with JD. I worked with him

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 2>for about a year when he was just starting out

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 2>in Silicon Valley. We was just starting out as a

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 2>venture capitalist, and he was fantastic.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 15>To work with.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, everyone knows how intelligent he is. But one

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>thing that really shone through in those early days working

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 2>with him one on one, sitting down with founders, listening

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 2>to their stories, evaluating deals, was how smart he is

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 2>and how hard working he was.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 15>And he continues to be.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 2>You can't be a polymath and get up to speed

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of different industries unless you're both smart

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and willing to put in the time and put in

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the work. And I found in him an eager, utterly

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 2>without ego, smart, hard working, really fun guy whose values

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 2>were very centered. And you know, and there's been a

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of talk about how JD is a Silicon Valley candidate. Yes,

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and yes, on the one hand, that's true. He's going

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>to be good at for Silicon Valley. He's going to

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 2>be good for the country because he is pro growth,

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 2>he is pro innovation, and he's also pro eliminating those

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 2>regulations that strangle industry, that strangle growth.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 4>But that's really only one quick point on that that

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 4>our editors were at pains this morning to point out

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 4>there's a difference between an association with Bench Capital and

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>the technology industry at large. His position on big tech

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 4>is very clear that actually he's in favor of breaking

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 4>up big tech and increased oversight by the FTC. That

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 4>might be at odds with the rest of the Republican base.

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 4>As a bench capitalist, what do you make of that?

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>As a visure capitalist and as a former antitrust lawyer

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 2>way back when I can say unequivocally that predatory behavior

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>on the part of large firms with market power is

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 2>unequivocally bad for the economy, is that, and particularly when

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 2>those companies control a lot of the speech that we

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>see and control our access to information, is bad for

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 2>our democracy. So, as an former anti trust lawyer, as

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a VC, as someone who cares about our democracy and

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 2>freedom of speech, I unequivocally agree with jd on his

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 2>skepticism and concern about some of the very large technology

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 2>companies in our economy.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in Crystal to go back to it. And

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 3>do you think JD. Vance himself will be kind of

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 3>critical of the way we're all going berserk that there's

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a VC in the White House.

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 15>I'm so sorry I didn't completely well.

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Karr was saying, I'll jump in carry what Caroline was saying,

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 4>is that what do you think JD Vance makes of

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 4>all of the media coverage that he's a bench capitalist

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 4>or format VC and he's now potentially going to be

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 4>in an administration.

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 15>You know, JD is an extremely humble guy.

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I remember when his book first came out, he was

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>gobsmacked by how much attention he got and by how

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 2>much his words meant to so many people. So I imagine

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 2>that he is feeling a lot of humility right now

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>in general for being, you know, at being chosen for

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the vice presidential pick by President Trump.

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 11>Uh.

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think that he would feel this, you know,

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the same way that I'm expressing right now, which is

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally and even on day one when he was in

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley, his driving force is his concern for the

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 2>forgotten working class, the people in this nation, at this

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 2>nation's corps who have suffered because of the hollowing out

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of traditional industry and the opioid epidemic. That was what

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 2>animated his you know, his desire to write his book,

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 2>which was extremely raw, extremely vulnerable, and really he sacrificed

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 2>his own privacy to share to shine a light on

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 2>a huge problem facing our nation's core that he wanted.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 15>To make better.

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that, you know, my experience with him when

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>he was working in venture capital was this was his

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 2>primary This was his primary driving force.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 15>This was at the core of his identity.

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 2>So, yes, he'll be good for Silicon Valley because he's

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>pro growth, his pro andavate, he's pro open source, and

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>he is pro.

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 15>The innovation economy.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 2>And he's going to be really good for the country

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 2>because of his genuine compassion for the forgotten middle class,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 2>for the forgotten working class.

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 3>But Crystal, many feel that venture capital doesn't help the

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 3>forgotten middle class. Many feel that in fact, artificial intelligence

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 3>is going to do a disservice to it. Yet more,

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 3>can you twin for us what seems to be almost

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 3>at loggerheads that here's someone who really cares about the

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 3>hollowing out, who really cares about an operiod crisis, about

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 3>the forgotten, at the same time as he's backing startup

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 3>companies that perhaps will take away jobs some blue collar workers.

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yet further, do you think he was in any way

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to dove tell those two things together when you

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 3>worked with him, Well, I don't.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>See AI replacing steel workers anytime soon. And you know

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that venture capital is an enormous category,

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>everything from social media to national security technology, which is

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 2>a space that I work in, to healthcare, and I

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 2>think that you know, the best technology is the one

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that moves things forward. It's the one that provides enhanced

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 2>capabilities for reduced cost. A lot of venture capital dollars

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>are going in directions that I think.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 15>Are destructive for our society.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>We've certainly seen the destructive force of social media on

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>family structures, on teenagers. So there is a whole category

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 2>of companies that are invested in by venture capital firms

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that are extremely destructive to the fabric of American society.

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And then there is a whole other section of companies

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that are invested in that truly will you answer our

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 2>prayers that will make us as a nation healthier and safer.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>That is the area where I invest that is the

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 2>area where Peter Teel focuses a lot of his attention.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 15>That is where JD was investing. That's where his firm.

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Colin Greenspond, a former colleague of mine who worked with

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 2>JD at his fund.

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 15>That's where his focus is. So I think it's hard to.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Lump all the venture capital together in one bucket.

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Well said, and of course a lot VC cong saying

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that your mission driven founders, and it's all about product

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 3>solving urgent problems. So Crystal, thank you for the perspective

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 3>for bringing us to your knowledge of what jd Vance

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 3>was like.

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 5>To work with. We appreciate it you.

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 3>While coming up, we're going to bring in Cameron Porter,

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 3>general partner at Steel Atlas, talking steel workers, but in

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 3>fact about really the role of energy here, the importance

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 3>of nuclear power in artificial intelligence development, development, and well

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the relevance of energy policy in this US election.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 15>This is Bluebog technology.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 3>So yesterday was the start of the RNC with a

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 3>theme make America Wealthy Again. Now, part of yesterday's discussion, therefore,

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>was around energy. Let's continue the conversation with today's VC

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 3>spotlight Cameron Porter, general partner at Steel at This with

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 3>us joining us to discuss nuclear power. And this has

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 3>become something that we've really wanted to tackle on the

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 3>show because more and more people are saying the energy

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 3>needs of our artificial intelligence can only be solved to

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 3>a large extent by something like nuclear What type of

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 3>nuclear power needs to be brought to bear from your investment.

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 16>Thank you for having me here, Caroline, And yeah, nuclear

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 16>is a critical part for the US policy, both because

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 16>of enterprise technologies like AI, but also because that AI

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 16>can be used in military applications, so it's really a

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 16>national security issue. And for looking at nuclear energy broadly,

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 16>there's really two buckets fission and fusion.

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 13>Fusion's a bet on the future.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 16>Fission is what's here today and that's where we're investing,

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 16>and we're seeing a lot of dollars in the US

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 16>flow into those new advanced reactor technologies.

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Cameron, good morning to you from San Francisco. You know

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 4>you position the firm in your investments is kind of

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 4>industrial technology, something we have.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Discussed on the show.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 4>We also look at some of the public equities in

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 4>the space that have seen in recent months twenty twenty

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 4>four quite incredible gains. Is that evidence enough that this

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.760
<v Speaker 4>is now a point of consciousness for the presidential candidates

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 4>in DC, but also your broader investment community.

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, these public gains are just the beginning of the

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 16>signs that these tailwinds are real and here to stay.

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 16>I think that we even saw the beginnings of how

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 16>important public policy in nuclear and energy more broadly, is

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 16>starting with Trump. Trump began with the Nuclear Energy Innovation

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 16>and Modernization Act. Biden has continued to push forward policies,

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 16>including the Advance Act that was just passed in order

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 16>to make it easier for US to license new reactors,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 16>in order to make it easier for US to finance

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 16>those reactors, and the private markets, both at the late

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 16>stage and the early stage, are now taking note of

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 16>that and investing in companies that can start delivering on

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 16>this demand.

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Former President Trump was on the All In podcasts recently saying,

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm okay with nuclear. They have to do where it

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 3>makes sense. So talk about where you see nuclear making sense.

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 3>What investments you made that make sense. I know that

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 3>you're looking a lot at transmutics in particular. How are

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 3>they doing things differently, where are they based, what are

0:35:58.160 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 3>they solving?

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 16>Look, we backtra mutechs because there were three major problems

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.479
<v Speaker 16>with nuclear in the past. Safety, How do we prevent

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 16>things like Chernobyl and three Mile Island waste? How do

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 16>we make sure that we're not spending billions of dollars?

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 16>I mean in the US, we literally were about to

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 16>spend at yuck amountain one hundred billion dollars to deal

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 16>with the waste problem.

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 13>And then how do we deal with proliferation?

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 16>How do we make sure the nuclear systems we are

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 16>developing here in the US can to be employed globally

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 16>without risking people developing nuclear weapons. And so the reason

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 16>we invested in Transmutex is their use of a particle

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 16>accelerator allows them to develop a reactor that solves those

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 16>three core issues, ushering in what we think is the

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 16>future of nuclear energy.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 4>During that episode of All Lane, I think what Trump

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 4>was discussing with its host was a comparison with Europe, right.

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 4>I think France was the specific example, but the UK,

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 4>where Caroline and I hail from, has some active nuclear reactors.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 4>This is something the United States is not just dealing

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 4>with in twenty twenty four. Talk to us about the

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 4>timeline of what it would take to bring nuclear back

0:36:58.640 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 4>in a meaningful way.

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 16>To look, this is a decade long investment period. It's

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 16>going to take several years for these systems to get licensed,

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 16>and then probably five years in an optimistic case, for

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 16>them to get built. Those are the timelines that we're

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 16>seeing in China, which right now has the most reactors

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 16>under construction and it's worthwhile investment. I mean, I think

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 16>we can look at the case study of France versus Germany.

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 16>Germany went all in on wind and solar. When Russia

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 16>pulled the plug on natural gas, all of a sudden,

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 16>their grid was thrown into a state of shock and volatility.

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 16>That's undermined their manufacturing industry to today. Whereas France, because

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 16>of their reliance on nuclear, which is reliable, self sovereign,

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 16>they've been able to maintain relatively stable energy prices.

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 13>And so that's what the US should index on going forward.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 3>And do you think it will and ultimately how quickly

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 3>do you think policy will change.

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 13>I think policy is already changing.

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 16>We saw under Biden the commitment at COP twenty eight

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 16>to three x nuclear here in the US, and that's

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 16>a commitment now that we're seeing backed up by policy

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 16>like the Advance Act, which I think it's worth noting

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 16>it was an incredibly bipartisan bill, and that's going to

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 16>continue under Trump or Biden. If it's Trump, I expect

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 16>to see more or deregulation to get reactors to market sooner.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 16>And if it's Biden, we're going to see incentives in

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 16>order to help promote the investment in these companies.

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 4>Cameron Port, a general partner at Steel Atlas, on a

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 4>very important nuclear discussion.

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much.

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in Rasanking Kid Smith, COO of Frankfurt based

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 4>Northern Data Group, a specialist tech company providing high performance

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 4>computing solutions. The company also expecting to see revenue triple

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 4>as demand for AI continues to grow. An incredible backstory

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 4>with SAM where in simple terms, you go from being

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 4>largely focused on crypto and mining and through acquisitions high

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 4>performance data center in the AI context, it seems to

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 4>be that part that's going to be the driver of

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 4>this revenue tripling. Explain that long term forecast please.

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think just to sort of contextualize, the

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Northern Data Group is, as you say, a high performance

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>computing solutions provider. We have an established position in the

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>HPC market as a result of our legacy in cryptocurrency mining.

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>But HPC is now front and center, or the pixel shovels,

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if you will, of the boom and generative AI, and

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we're witnessing a real global race to meet the soaring

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>demand for generative AI and it's massive computing requirements. Companies

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are really scrambling to secure access to the latest GPUs

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>which will be housed inside of data centers. And there's

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a real short supply of data censors too, So unlike

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>many others, we are really hyper focused on investing not

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.720
<v Speaker 1>just in the most cutting edge hardware and software technologies,

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>but also in the most sustainable data center environments. Our

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>environments are more broadly powered by one hundred percent carbon

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>free energy, and we might really like to keep that

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon footprint at the most minimal point. The other ethos

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is really really distant to us.

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 4>Arisany we just showed the shares, I point out they're

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 4>probably hiring the session after two hundred and fourteen million

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 4>euros worth of share isssudents earlier. I think I'm right

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 4>in saying this is the first time you've spoken publicly

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 4>since former employees of the company a filed suit and

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 4>made allegations against the management team of fraud, summarizing they

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 4>say that you falsely misrepresented some of the financials at

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the company. We just wanted to give you the opportunity

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 4>to comment publicly on Bloomberg Technology about that suit.

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so, I think anybody with even a cursory understanding

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>of our business will know that those complaints are completely

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with our meriat. We have already filed a motion to dismiss,

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're confident that the legal process will vindicate the company.

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>We're publicly traded, all of our financials are publicly available,

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>along with our stable cash and financial position. So while

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this is somewhat of a nuisance, what we are really

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>laser focused on now is executing against our strategic plan

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and the ultimate credibility of our business and the innovation

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that we drive is built on that delivery. So we're

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>not worried about it at all.

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 3>You're not worried, are you, So therefore not worried that

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 3>you might look at doing another listing here in the

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>United States. It's there's been a sort of a theme

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 3>of companies that will begin crypto and crypto mining, pivoting

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 3>and becoming a key resource in the world of AI.

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 3>I think a core weave here in the US.

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Would you tap investors here?

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So just as a sort of starting point, of course,

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't comment on market speculation, but as I said,

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>our business is really performing well and the AI sector

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>is driving. But of course we want to operate in

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the spaces that are most open to the advancement of

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>generative AI and the business that we are driving. But

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it also just as a point of clarity, of course,

0:41:57.440 --> 0:41:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we are not pivoting from one thing.

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 9>To the other.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We have used our ground route in HPC solutions to

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>develop new lessons and take the learnings from those lessons

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to provide new use cases like generative AI and machine learning.

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 3>How important is the US part of the business versus

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 3>German and versus European How does it differ? Very briefly, Rosa.

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So the European environment is our hearts. So we are

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a European based company with a European hard but we

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>are a global business with a global footprint, and so

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we use the investment and you will have seen, as

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you've mentioned our capital raise that will be used to

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>expand our footprints into the US. So, however, though that

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the business in Europe is truly important to

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 1>us because it provides some of our true usps. We

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are data sovereign, we have access to large amounts of

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>hy electricity, so these are true usps for us and

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the go forward.

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Razan Okay Smith, great to have some time with you

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 3>of Northern Data.

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it.

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Incredible amount to recap a lot of Bloomberg reporting. To

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 4>check it out on our podcast. You know where to

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 4>find it. This is Bloomberg Technology.