Speaker 1: The Weekly Standard has a piece in it that very,
Speaker 1: very rarely has this ever happened to me? In fact,
Speaker 1: I can't ever remember it happening. I'm sure it has,
Speaker 1: because it's been twenty seven years I've been doing this.
Speaker 1: The headline of this and it's not a hit piece,
Speaker 1: it's not a criticism, it's it's it's the headline is
Speaker 1: going to mislead you. The headline is no, Ted Cruz
Speaker 1: did not invent the term undocumented democrat. Apparently, Senator Cruz
Speaker 1: has been running around after this spat with Marco Rubio
Speaker 1: on immigration and amnesty and legalization, Cruz has been using
Speaker 1: the term undocumented democrat instead of illegal alien as a
Speaker 1: means of demonstrating what the Democrat's interest in this whole
Speaker 1: thing is. So now that you know that, here's the
Speaker 1: Weekly Standard story. Consider in his current quest to out
Speaker 1: Trump Trump, Ted Cruz has begun referring to illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: is undocumented Democrats. This is hardly original. The phrase has
Speaker 1: been a staple of the Rush Limbaugh program for at
Speaker 1: least five years, and the joke also migrated from the
Speaker 1: Limball Show to a j Leno monologue in two thousand
Speaker 1: thirteen as well. If there's any story here, it's the
Speaker 1: cruise is making a strategic decision to appeal to ditto
Speaker 1: heads by lifting Russia's language. That is significant in so
Speaker 1: far as why a Limball has not endorsed Trump. He
Speaker 1: has tended to be very very friendly towards the estate
Speaker 1: mogul on his radio show. Okay, so, perhaps it's too
Speaker 1: much to ask for the New York Times and NPR
Speaker 1: reporters to listen to Rush regularly, though, given that he
Speaker 1: remains a singular figure on the right, it would certainly
Speaker 1: bolster their reporting if they tuned in at least every
Speaker 1: now and again. But this is a revealing episode in
Speaker 1: that it shows how little many in the mainstream media
Speaker 1: really understand about the American right. This is not an
Speaker 1: example of journalists consciously skewing a story. Instead, these two reporters,
Speaker 1: two of the most prestigious news organizations in the US,
Speaker 1: were simply unaware of the term because they know that
Speaker 1: nothing of limbo. Well. Here, what's happening is that Cruise
Speaker 1: has been crucified. The media can't believe that crews would
Speaker 1: actually call them undocumented democrats. There's nothing there, and they're
Speaker 1: illegal aliens. They're brilliant people, their acts of love or
Speaker 1: whatever they are. And the Weekly Standard guy's point is,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, you idiot reporters, do you not know
Speaker 1: that this term has been floating around for five years
Speaker 1: and it cruises lifting it And that's not a criticism.
Speaker 1: This guy's criticism is of the reporter's upset a cruise
Speaker 1: because they are blind, they willingly ignore the news and
Speaker 1: the happenings, the thoughts, the fears, all of that of
Speaker 1: over half the people in this country i e. The
Speaker 1: American right. So again, Weekly Standard story, This isn't an
Speaker 1: example of journalists conconsciously skewing story. Rather, these two reporters
Speaker 1: at two of the most prestigious news organizations were simply
Speaker 1: unaware of the term because they know nothing of limball,
Speaker 1: a massive success whose ratings are roughly on par with
Speaker 1: Morning Edition, Nor apparently do they know much about googling.
Speaker 1: Had either reporters simply searched a term undocumented Democrat, they
Speaker 1: would have seen that Crews did not invent it. Indeed,
Speaker 1: Iowa Congressman Steve King, who has endorsed Cruz, used the
Speaker 1: term in an interview this spring. And by the way,
Speaker 1: when Cruz takes it a step further and starts using it,
Speaker 1: referring it to anchor Democrats. Oh that's been out there
Speaker 1: before too. That's awesome. I mentioned this to you because
Speaker 1: it is I'm not aware of having been credited. You know,
Speaker 1: gorb asm inventedete word feminazi invented at work now part
Speaker 1: of the American Alexicon. Well, yes, yes, yes, in some
Speaker 1: in some corners and in some bedrooms, I do get
Speaker 1: credit for the term feminazi. You're right, but that that's
Speaker 1: not it's I wouldn't say credit, Mr Snerdley. It's more
Speaker 1: like blame. I mean, they they don't say that happily.
Speaker 1: They day don't day, don't day, don't like the term.
Speaker 1: But GORBSM that was that was one of the early
Speaker 1: inventions or creations here. Ah. And of course it corrects
Speaker 1: the drive bys before I even have the chance to
Speaker 1: or even the inclination to. But I'll tell you what
Speaker 1: it is. It's it's a it's a subtle move by
Speaker 1: Cruise because it is the exist it's it's the only
Speaker 1: reason that the Democrats support this. It's not compassion, it's
Speaker 1: not humanitarianism, it's none of that. I'll say it again.
Speaker 1: The Democrat Party requires a dependent and permanent underclass. Now,
Speaker 1: people in that underclass can improve and move out of it,
Speaker 1: but they need to be replaced. The Democrat Party cannot
Speaker 1: survive if the population as a whole improves itself economically
Speaker 1: to the point of not being dependent on government. If
Speaker 1: that were to ever happen, to be the end of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party as we know it today. So they
Speaker 1: need a permanent underclass. They need permanent poor people, uneducated people,
Speaker 1: and and the greater challenge speaking English, the better, the
Speaker 1: more dependent, the less educated, the less worldly, the better.
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter what the impact on the country is. All
Speaker 1: that matters is keeping Democrats in power. Because the Democrats, no,
Speaker 1: they're never gonna live where these people live, so they're
Speaker 1: never going to be affected by this in their own thinking,
Speaker 1: in their own minds. They're never gonna live in barrios.
Speaker 1: They are going to live in in ghettos. They're never
Speaker 1: gonna live in inner cities. They are going to live
Speaker 1: where these people that they bring in the country gonna
Speaker 1: end up being. And they're not going to hire them,
Speaker 1: not gonna be around them at all. That's for the
Speaker 1: rest of us to deal with. They're gonna be insulated.
Speaker 1: But they need that permanent underclass. That's why I proposed. Hey, look,
Speaker 1: I will support amnesty, I will join the Democrats. I
Speaker 1: will join I will change. In fact, I promised to
Speaker 1: do this. I promised to guarantee a shift in support
Speaker 1: among my listeners sizeable number. If Amnesty had a lasting
Speaker 1: provision in it that no recipient of Amnesty could vote
Speaker 1: for twenty five years, call it a poison pill. I
Speaker 1: wasn't doing any other than illustrating the truth. You put
Speaker 1: in a provision that the new newly amnutized for lack
Speaker 1: of it, I can't vote for years, and bingo Democrats
Speaker 1: stop caring about them. There's no compassion, there's no humanitarianism.
Speaker 1: Not one person, Republican or Democrat ever called me on that.
Speaker 1: And let me tell you something. If I were at
Speaker 1: any day in the future to announce that I've changed
Speaker 1: my mind and now support comprehensive immigration reform and a
Speaker 1: path the citizenship with no provisals, They'll be all over me.
Speaker 1: They'll be they'll call, they'll ask me to join them
Speaker 1: doing things here. They will celebrate all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: I'd become one of greatest guys in the country. But
Speaker 1: when I threw in the requirement they can't vote for
Speaker 1: twenty five years, I was universally totally ignored by everybody, Democratic, Republican, independent, communist, fascist, socialist,
Speaker 1: you name it. I didn't hear from one jan in
Speaker 1: New Jersey suburb. You're next. We head back to the phone. Hello,
Speaker 1: hi us, How are you good? Thank you. I'm a
Speaker 1: little nervous about being on here. Um, I do work
Speaker 1: for the government, so um, that's okay, no problem, okay.
Speaker 1: So I just want to talk about the immigration problem
Speaker 1: that we have that has gotten a lot worse over
Speaker 1: I would say since the summer before, since last summer.
Speaker 1: And we're vaccinating so many, so many people that don't
Speaker 1: speak English. We're seeing tons and tons and tons of kids.
Speaker 1: We're seeing diseases that we haven't seen in decades, and
Speaker 1: I feel like nobody's talking about it. And in my opinion,
Speaker 1: watching this happen, watching the number US go up of
Speaker 1: of people coming into the country, I don't see how
Speaker 1: any Republican will win because they leave us they have
Speaker 1: driver's license, and I believe it, don't vote. I mean hopefully,
Speaker 1: I'm jaded, but I don't think so. Um, it's it's
Speaker 1: a real, real, real you're you're you're not no, you're
Speaker 1: not jaded, You're you're you're, you're, you're exactly right about
Speaker 1: a great possibility that's out there. Uh, there's there's there's
Speaker 1: no question. This is something that I want to plan
Speaker 1: on getting into greater detail I get back in the
Speaker 1: next year, because, uh, it's outside the political norms, it's
Speaker 1: outside polling data, it's outside every bit of analysis people
Speaker 1: use to determine who we're talking about fraud. Essentially, we're
Speaker 1: talking about, uh steps Democrats, will they get people to vote?
Speaker 1: Are not legally able to and and still we'll be
Speaker 1: allowed to so forth. Anyway, jan I appreciate