1 00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:03,559 Speaker 1: Hey, film Spotters. The film Spotting archive has reviews, top 2 00:00:03,640 --> 00:00:06,160 Speaker 1: fives and more going back to two thousand and five. 3 00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: This week, with Selene Song's Materialists new in theaters, we're 4 00:00:09,600 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: sharing our twenty twenty three review of Song's debut Past Lives. 5 00:00:13,760 --> 00:00:16,720 Speaker 2: Past Lives narrowly missed our top tens in twenty twenty 6 00:00:16,760 --> 00:00:19,079 Speaker 2: three out them, but we did both like it quite 7 00:00:19,120 --> 00:00:22,320 Speaker 2: a bit. From June twenty twenty three. Here's that review. 8 00:00:24,520 --> 00:00:26,040 Speaker 3: What a good story this says. 9 00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:31,520 Speaker 1: Childhood sweethearts to reconnect twenty years later and realized they 10 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:34,240 Speaker 1: were meant for each other, and the story I would 11 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 1: be the eviloid American husband's standing in the way of destiny. 12 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:42,160 Speaker 1: Shut up. We just can't get away from storytelling. Here 13 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 1: on this week's film Spotting, a bit from the trailer 14 00:00:44,479 --> 00:00:47,080 Speaker 1: for Past Lives, the feature debut from writer director of 15 00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:49,960 Speaker 1: Selene's Song. We have been hearing about this film, Josh, 16 00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:53,520 Speaker 1: since January, when it premiered at sun Dance to almost 17 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:56,680 Speaker 1: universal acclaim. It was then picked up by A twenty 18 00:00:56,720 --> 00:00:59,480 Speaker 1: four for distribution. That's usually a good sign, and then 19 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:01,440 Speaker 1: in May it was program is part of the Chicago 20 00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 1: Critics Film Festival. More people we like and trust got 21 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:07,640 Speaker 1: to see it and praise it. I will ask you 22 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:09,319 Speaker 1: if it managed to live up to all the hype 23 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:11,959 Speaker 1: in a second, but we will quickly set up the plot. 24 00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:14,279 Speaker 1: The clip you heard more or less tells you everything 25 00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:16,959 Speaker 1: you need to know. Twenty years or so after getting separated, 26 00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:20,640 Speaker 1: when one of them emigrates from Korea to Canada, two 27 00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 1: former childhood sweethearts reunite, complicating things. The one that left 28 00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:29,959 Speaker 1: Greta Lee's Nora is happily married to John Mazarro's Arthur. 29 00:01:30,319 --> 00:01:33,880 Speaker 1: The long lost friend, Hey Sung is played by you Tail. 30 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,240 Speaker 1: A simple story, Josh, why all the praise? 31 00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:39,200 Speaker 3: Oh? 32 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:43,960 Speaker 2: A lot of reasons? This is delicately and quite beautifully made, 33 00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:48,560 Speaker 2: especially for a feature directorial debut. I think for me 34 00:01:48,760 --> 00:01:53,320 Speaker 2: the storytelling is just an intriguing premise and interestingly handled 35 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:57,280 Speaker 2: inventively spun out as a narrative. For me, it's these 36 00:01:57,280 --> 00:02:03,960 Speaker 2: two performances. I just stunned at the sense of connection 37 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 2: they could establish between these two characters who are mostly 38 00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:11,640 Speaker 2: not together. And then what happens when they do come 39 00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 2: together is this electricity that is, it's like an impossible 40 00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:22,000 Speaker 2: scenario romance, which we've seen others of those but I 41 00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:26,919 Speaker 2: don't think those always capture the combination of rigria and 42 00:02:27,080 --> 00:02:31,520 Speaker 2: romance that are all taking place in one scene. And 43 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:36,800 Speaker 2: again it's due to songs staging to her decision of 44 00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:39,680 Speaker 2: when to bring them together and how to bring them together. 45 00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:44,040 Speaker 2: That's absolutely a part of it. But it's just these 46 00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:49,760 Speaker 2: two in You and Lee, the way they I mean, 47 00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:51,160 Speaker 2: we talked about you know who did we like that 48 00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 2: are a little bit Shortzman or Johansson in Astroid City. 49 00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:56,120 Speaker 2: And I don't want to always pit two leads against 50 00:02:56,120 --> 00:02:58,919 Speaker 2: each other. But for me, when I think about this movie, 51 00:02:59,080 --> 00:03:04,200 Speaker 2: Lee is wonderful. You're just kind of like Crumple inward. 52 00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:09,520 Speaker 2: When I think about how tail You looks at her, 53 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:16,600 Speaker 2: how Hessong looks at Norah here when she's looking at him, 54 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:20,160 Speaker 2: when she's not looking at him, it is the mo 55 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:23,959 Speaker 2: It is the saddest thing I think I've seen an 56 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 2: screen in a long time, and the way he embodies that. 57 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 2: This is an actor I'm mostly unfamiliar with. He was 58 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,160 Speaker 2: in decision to leave and a number of other projects 59 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:36,880 Speaker 2: he's been in, but this is the first time I've 60 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:43,960 Speaker 2: really watched him closely. It's stunning what he can encompass 61 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 2: without saying much, and then when he does deliver some 62 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:52,040 Speaker 2: of these lines written by song, it's just like punches 63 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,240 Speaker 2: you in the gut after you've already kind of like 64 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:54,920 Speaker 2: been crumpled. 65 00:03:55,680 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a really wonderful performance, right, and they both are. 66 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: But I too, And I just saw this late last 67 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 1: night and am still thinking about it quite a bit. 68 00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 1: When I think about the film and I think about 69 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:11,440 Speaker 1: the moments that are the most kind of subtly devastating, 70 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:14,520 Speaker 1: I am thinking about his face. And I think part 71 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:17,000 Speaker 1: of that is that, for lack of a better term, 72 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:19,840 Speaker 1: there's a little bit of a puppy dog to him. 73 00:04:19,880 --> 00:04:23,240 Speaker 1: He seems to be the one who is holding on 74 00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:27,480 Speaker 1: to feelings more strongly about her, for sure, and there's 75 00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:30,440 Speaker 1: a lot of reasons for that, including that she has 76 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 1: moved on and she's gotten married. But I think it 77 00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:36,080 Speaker 1: actually fits with their characters too. And I'm not going 78 00:04:36,160 --> 00:04:40,559 Speaker 1: to ruin the line at all, because there's a great 79 00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:44,839 Speaker 1: revelation between the two characters, and even saying that makes 80 00:04:44,839 --> 00:04:46,800 Speaker 1: it seem bigger than it is. No, it's a it's 81 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:51,120 Speaker 1: a profound moment, but it's not a huge plot development 82 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:53,440 Speaker 1: or treated like an epiphany, because this is a movie 83 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 1: that is really about these small interactions and these quiet moments. 84 00:04:56,520 --> 00:04:58,119 Speaker 1: I want to talk about that a little bit more, 85 00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:04,720 Speaker 1: but there's there's a realization about the differences between them, 86 00:05:04,800 --> 00:05:09,680 Speaker 1: or the main difference between them, and that's who She is, 87 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:13,719 Speaker 1: the one to have some ambition and to want to 88 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:16,039 Speaker 1: always be moving forward, and he's the one who wants 89 00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:18,040 Speaker 1: to stay in the past a little bit more. Well, 90 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:22,080 Speaker 1: you read that, You read that in every every look, 91 00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:27,040 Speaker 1: every time he looks at her, you sense that in him, 92 00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:31,240 Speaker 1: And for me, You're right. Delicate's a great word. This 93 00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: is a movie that is in that same realm as 94 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:40,320 Speaker 1: films by directors like Celine Siama and Koganata, where they 95 00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:45,560 Speaker 1: are full of dramatic tension. There is conflict, but the 96 00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:49,520 Speaker 1: film at no point escalates any of it. And I 97 00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 1: think it ends exactly where it should and how it should. 98 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:57,200 Speaker 1: But all I could think about, Josh was Wow, this 99 00:05:57,240 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: is where a lot of films that would be mining 100 00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 1: similar material. This is where they'd be just beginning. This 101 00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:05,680 Speaker 1: would be this would be at best the middle of 102 00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:09,280 Speaker 1: the film, and maybe maybe more, because those movies would 103 00:06:09,320 --> 00:06:12,440 Speaker 1: be all about taking those tensions and trying to ratchet 104 00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:16,800 Speaker 1: them up. And create more drama, and ultimately it would 105 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,800 Speaker 1: probably be more mellow dramatic, and we don't get even 106 00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 1: a hint of that here in this film. 107 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:26,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think it ends just perfectly for what it 108 00:06:26,360 --> 00:06:29,280 Speaker 2: wants to do in the story that it's telling. Yeah, 109 00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:32,880 Speaker 2: it's fascinating to think about as you're describing his character. 110 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:36,400 Speaker 2: You're right, and those qualities that make us both feel 111 00:06:36,480 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 2: drawn to him and remember him. I think there's a 112 00:06:39,320 --> 00:06:45,200 Speaker 2: braveness to Lee's performance as Nora that she doesn't shy 113 00:06:45,279 --> 00:06:49,400 Speaker 2: away from making Nora somewhat of the harder character, the 114 00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:52,760 Speaker 2: more driven character. And so maybe it's not fair for 115 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 2: us to say, well, I like this performance better, because 116 00:06:55,640 --> 00:06:58,480 Speaker 2: really she they're just giving us who these characters need 117 00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:02,039 Speaker 2: to be. This relationship would not evolve this way if 118 00:07:02,279 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 2: Nora were less driven, less headstrong, less independent. Those are 119 00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:13,080 Speaker 2: all qualities that are positive qualities of hers. It's why 120 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:16,120 Speaker 2: she's able to make her way through this early childhood 121 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:19,400 Speaker 2: while middle school when her family immigrants experience. It's why 122 00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 2: she's able to establish this artistic career and move to 123 00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 2: New York City and have the level of success that 124 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:28,280 Speaker 2: she does have. So these are all good qualities, but 125 00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 2: when we're seeing them strictly through the lens of this relationship, 126 00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:37,160 Speaker 2: it's tempting to say, oh, man, like, if only she 127 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:39,000 Speaker 2: would open up to him a little more, that's kind 128 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:40,880 Speaker 2: of what we want. But again, the trick of this 129 00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:44,280 Speaker 2: movie is that they're just more learning that where they've 130 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 2: ended up is probably where they should be. And perhaps 131 00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:50,520 Speaker 2: she just comes to recognize that a little sooner than 132 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:54,320 Speaker 2: him because of her internal makeup, her psychology. And that's okay, 133 00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:56,520 Speaker 2: But you do still come away feeling not that they 134 00:07:56,560 --> 00:07:58,760 Speaker 2: should have gotten together, that he was right, that his 135 00:07:58,880 --> 00:08:01,560 Speaker 2: pining should have been real warded. I don't mean that 136 00:08:01,800 --> 00:08:03,960 Speaker 2: at all, but it's just more in terms of the 137 00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:06,960 Speaker 2: character that at least I became a little more attached to. 138 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:09,240 Speaker 2: And you can see it in the way, you know 139 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:13,000 Speaker 2: these are separate sections. When they do separate again, she's 140 00:08:13,040 --> 00:08:16,600 Speaker 2: the one who says goodbye, and you know, at least 141 00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:19,640 Speaker 2: in the first two rather curtly, these are decisive. It's 142 00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:23,240 Speaker 2: again part of her character, like we're separating, that's what 143 00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:26,160 Speaker 2: I've decided it's gonna happen, and this is how, and 144 00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:28,720 Speaker 2: it's just done, and he's kind of left there in 145 00:08:28,960 --> 00:08:32,680 Speaker 2: you know that beautiful shot that she actually returns to 146 00:08:33,120 --> 00:08:37,480 Speaker 2: of diverging alleyways that they separate as kids. We see 147 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:40,079 Speaker 2: early on. It's like in the first ten minutes that's 148 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 2: how Nora knows the path she's going to, and she's 149 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:45,880 Speaker 2: gonna head up it after sayta quick goodbye, and he 150 00:08:46,040 --> 00:08:50,319 Speaker 2: is going to linger a bit and look uncertainly at 151 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 2: the direction he's going to head away from her. 152 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, and everything you said is true. But part of 153 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:58,199 Speaker 1: the magic of this movie, in both the performance of 154 00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:01,520 Speaker 1: Greta Lee and so songs writing and direction, is that 155 00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:06,200 Speaker 1: you never feel as if she's somehow cold no, or 156 00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:10,120 Speaker 1: that she's not. She's not responding to him with as 157 00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:15,280 Speaker 1: much longing or at least strength of feeling that he's 158 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:19,439 Speaker 1: also showing. And they're processing it in different ways, including 159 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:21,200 Speaker 1: she is the one, as you said, who earlier on 160 00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:23,280 Speaker 1: because they this is something I didn't get from the 161 00:09:23,960 --> 00:09:30,280 Speaker 1: from the trailer, they actually do reunite earlier in their lives, 162 00:09:30,600 --> 00:09:32,800 Speaker 1: and then where we see a good chunk of the film, 163 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:35,160 Speaker 1: they're now twelve years beyond that. So we see him 164 00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:37,960 Speaker 1: twice come together, but they separate each time for an 165 00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: expanse of time, and you you understand that she's making 166 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,200 Speaker 1: that decision, but she's also making it and she's making 167 00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:50,880 Speaker 1: that tough call because of the weight, the weight of 168 00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:54,760 Speaker 1: this relationship on her and the fact that it doesn't 169 00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:58,560 Speaker 1: seem to ever have the potential future that they both want. 170 00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 1: So you are always feeling both sides of her character. 171 00:10:03,240 --> 00:10:06,320 Speaker 1: And what is I think you could say a dilemma, 172 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:10,240 Speaker 1: this dilemma of this this space that is between them. 173 00:10:10,480 --> 00:10:13,760 Speaker 1: I won't say it's a disappointment because I didn't. I 174 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:16,280 Speaker 1: didn't hold it against the movie, Josh. But maybe where 175 00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:20,920 Speaker 1: it was different than my expectations is I just got 176 00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:23,160 Speaker 1: the sense from the trailer that it might be even 177 00:10:23,240 --> 00:10:28,800 Speaker 1: a little bit more poetically realized, a little more experimental visually, 178 00:10:29,200 --> 00:10:32,719 Speaker 1: how it sort of danced around in time, and it's 179 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:35,080 Speaker 1: fairly linear. You know, it starts in the past, it 180 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,000 Speaker 1: works up to the present. There are these occasional flashes 181 00:10:38,120 --> 00:10:41,600 Speaker 1: back to who they were and moments they shared together, 182 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:47,280 Speaker 1: but it is all beautifully observed, and those flashes to 183 00:10:47,360 --> 00:10:51,600 Speaker 1: the past are perfectly employed. Yeah, and I also think 184 00:10:51,600 --> 00:10:57,880 Speaker 1: that that song intrinsically understands and feels exactly when to 185 00:10:58,040 --> 00:11:00,880 Speaker 1: use and hold on a longer take and let the 186 00:11:00,880 --> 00:11:04,480 Speaker 1: moment play out in front of us, utilizing two shots 187 00:11:04,520 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 1: as well, versus relying on a lot of cross cutting 188 00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:10,520 Speaker 1: or putting them in their own individual frames. We are 189 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:14,040 Speaker 1: often looking at these characters together. Now, there's also some 190 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:17,440 Speaker 1: moments where there's three characters in this space, but the 191 00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 1: camera is only showing us too. Yes, and that matters 192 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: a lot as well. But it's always about the shared 193 00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:26,600 Speaker 1: experience that they're having. And so then I think that's 194 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:29,319 Speaker 1: what heightens as well, every look and gesture and reaction. 195 00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:32,679 Speaker 2: Yeah. So the filmmaking, You're right, those insert shots of 196 00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:37,240 Speaker 2: earlier moments, meaning twelve to twenty four years earlier moments 197 00:11:37,760 --> 00:11:40,280 Speaker 2: are perfectly handled in one to drop them in and 198 00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:42,400 Speaker 2: how long to hold them, not to push it too hard. 199 00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:45,800 Speaker 2: And also what I liked about her filmmaking style was 200 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:50,880 Speaker 2: the way she moves the camera. I think you said patiently, 201 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:53,000 Speaker 2: which is right. It's almost as if the camera is 202 00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:56,160 Speaker 2: going to slowly track along or even pan until it 203 00:11:56,200 --> 00:12:00,439 Speaker 2: finds exactly what it is looking for. A couple of 204 00:12:00,520 --> 00:12:04,280 Speaker 2: early examples of that would be when she does announce 205 00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:07,079 Speaker 2: as a middle schooler, as a young girl in class 206 00:12:07,080 --> 00:12:10,040 Speaker 2: at school to another girl that her family is leaving, 207 00:12:10,120 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 2: and the camera kind of starts on that conversation and 208 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:17,200 Speaker 2: then slowly finds its way without cutting to see Hassung 209 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:20,480 Speaker 2: sitting there hearing this, and you get the sense this 210 00:12:20,559 --> 00:12:22,360 Speaker 2: is maybe the first time he's heard it, maybe not, 211 00:12:22,480 --> 00:12:25,960 Speaker 2: but it's it's really becoming real for him in that moment. 212 00:12:26,040 --> 00:12:27,959 Speaker 2: And I just like how we don't start with him 213 00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:31,240 Speaker 2: and overhear it. The camera just slowly moves there. Another shot, 214 00:12:31,640 --> 00:12:33,560 Speaker 2: and this is later. It's a jump ahead when he's 215 00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:37,960 Speaker 2: serving in the army and the camera starts on a 216 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:41,600 Speaker 2: bunch of young men sitting eating their food. I think everyone, 217 00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:45,640 Speaker 2: almost everyone is eating alone. It's a very despondent, lonely scene. 218 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:50,480 Speaker 2: And it starts with a different group of soldiers until 219 00:12:50,520 --> 00:12:53,640 Speaker 2: it drifts to the left and then finds him and 220 00:12:53,679 --> 00:12:54,440 Speaker 2: he's there alone. 221 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:56,320 Speaker 1: We even have to find we have to find him 222 00:12:56,360 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 1: as viewers have to pick him out. 223 00:12:58,160 --> 00:12:59,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, good point, because he's not the only person on 224 00:12:59,920 --> 00:13:02,640 Speaker 2: the screen. And then it rests there and lets us 225 00:13:02,679 --> 00:13:05,439 Speaker 2: watch him. Those are just two minor examples, but that's 226 00:13:05,760 --> 00:13:08,960 Speaker 2: felt kind of like the primary style she employed, which 227 00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:13,280 Speaker 2: again is thoughtful, contemplative and to your point, allowing us 228 00:13:13,320 --> 00:13:16,280 Speaker 2: to consider maybe not in that last example, but the 229 00:13:16,280 --> 00:13:20,360 Speaker 2: classroom one. Everyone involved in this drama. 230 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 1: Well, how about just the economy of it too. Twelve 231 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:26,760 Speaker 1: years later, the first shot we get after that text, 232 00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:30,239 Speaker 1: I think it says twelve years pass is this military 233 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 1: moment and them all eating, and it lasts maybe thirty seconds. 234 00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:38,440 Speaker 1: I feel like that's really all we get of him 235 00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:42,559 Speaker 1: in that moment. It's as if that's that's enough. Zilian 236 00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:48,080 Speaker 1: Song understands that, like just from getting the feeling of 237 00:13:48,280 --> 00:13:51,640 Speaker 1: the loneliness of that scene and understanding that he was 238 00:13:51,640 --> 00:13:54,320 Speaker 1: in the military, Like, we are getting some information about him, 239 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:57,120 Speaker 1: but we're getting it just through twenty to thirty seconds 240 00:13:57,160 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 1: of really, I think a single shot. And this is 241 00:13:59,679 --> 00:14:03,000 Speaker 1: something that it's in the trailer, this concept that's invoked 242 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:07,439 Speaker 1: of of Inyon. I hope I'm saying somewhat correctly, this 243 00:14:07,559 --> 00:14:10,160 Speaker 1: idea of fate people coming together as if they were 244 00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:14,200 Speaker 1: destined to and and they've encountered each other in past lives, 245 00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:19,560 Speaker 1: as the title suggests. But I love how the movie 246 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:23,440 Speaker 1: doesn't overplay that doesn't doesn't try to get sort of 247 00:14:23,440 --> 00:14:28,200 Speaker 1: too mystical with it, and yet watching it you do 248 00:14:28,240 --> 00:14:30,800 Speaker 1: feel I felt the whole time that I I was 249 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 1: watching characters, and certainly by by the end of where 250 00:14:33,560 --> 00:14:36,280 Speaker 1: it comes out, I felt as if I was watching 251 00:14:36,400 --> 00:14:41,640 Speaker 1: characters who were part of something larger that that they're 252 00:14:41,760 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 1: They're considering these these important questions about about their identities, 253 00:14:47,280 --> 00:14:51,080 Speaker 1: not just love and happiness, but but fundamentally who they 254 00:14:51,120 --> 00:14:54,040 Speaker 1: are as as people and who they who they want 255 00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:56,840 Speaker 1: to be as people. And where I'm going with this 256 00:14:56,960 --> 00:14:59,160 Speaker 1: is this is a half baked idea. Again, I haven't 257 00:14:59,160 --> 00:15:01,200 Speaker 1: had enough time to actually try to come up with 258 00:15:01,240 --> 00:15:06,120 Speaker 1: an eloquent or maybe logical way of phrasing this, Josh, 259 00:15:06,120 --> 00:15:09,840 Speaker 1: but I felt by the end that Past Lives is 260 00:15:09,880 --> 00:15:14,680 Speaker 1: the year's other great multiverse movie, despite the fact that 261 00:15:14,720 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 1: it's so grounded in everyday life and it's not as 262 00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 1: if we actually travel to any alternate universes or other realities. 263 00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:28,720 Speaker 1: But I felt as if these characters truly were part 264 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:31,880 Speaker 1: of this larger continuum, that there might actually be other 265 00:15:32,080 --> 00:15:36,480 Speaker 1: versions of these three characters interacting with each other past, present, 266 00:15:36,520 --> 00:15:37,000 Speaker 1: and future. 267 00:15:37,640 --> 00:15:39,520 Speaker 3: He was just this kid in my head for such 268 00:15:39,520 --> 00:15:43,560 Speaker 3: a long time, and then he was just this image 269 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 3: on my laptop, and now he is a physical person. 270 00:15:49,040 --> 00:15:52,200 Speaker 3: It's really intense but I don't think that that's attraction. 271 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:55,440 Speaker 3: I think I just missed him a lot. I think 272 00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:56,400 Speaker 3: I missed soul. 273 00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:00,000 Speaker 1: Did he miss you? 274 00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:03,360 Speaker 3: I think he missed the twelve year old cry baby. 275 00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:09,600 Speaker 3: He knew a long time ago you were a cry baby. Yeah, 276 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 3: most of the time, he'd have to just stand there 277 00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:16,040 Speaker 3: and watch me. When is the leaving again? 278 00:16:17,120 --> 00:16:20,160 Speaker 2: When you consider the John Baguyro character, her husband, her 279 00:16:20,200 --> 00:16:23,280 Speaker 2: eventual husband, which is a significant part, it's not just like, 280 00:16:23,520 --> 00:16:26,200 Speaker 2: you know, he shows up once and yeah, we know 281 00:16:26,240 --> 00:16:28,320 Speaker 2: who he is, and then that's always in our minds. No, 282 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:32,880 Speaker 2: he becomes an integral member participant in this story, which 283 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:35,840 Speaker 2: speaks to your point. I think about there's another universe 284 00:16:35,880 --> 00:16:39,160 Speaker 2: where they do not meet, and she's actually we learn 285 00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:41,600 Speaker 2: about that concept in Yon when she is speaking with 286 00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:44,280 Speaker 2: him and first meets him out a writer's retreat. That's 287 00:16:44,280 --> 00:16:47,240 Speaker 2: the first time it's introduced into the story. So, yeah, 288 00:16:47,240 --> 00:16:51,720 Speaker 2: there are some maybe less Spider Verse and more everything 289 00:16:51,760 --> 00:16:55,520 Speaker 2: everywhere all at once vibes going on here with the 290 00:16:55,880 --> 00:16:57,760 Speaker 2: alternate romances that could have been. 291 00:16:58,280 --> 00:17:00,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, and just connecting to that a little bit and 292 00:17:00,960 --> 00:17:03,560 Speaker 1: going back to the klip we played. I also really 293 00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:07,040 Speaker 1: do like the way song plays with that idea of 294 00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:11,399 Speaker 1: narrative framing, and that the movie opens on the camera 295 00:17:11,600 --> 00:17:14,720 Speaker 1: showing these three characters sitting together later in the film, 296 00:17:14,840 --> 00:17:17,239 Speaker 1: sitting together from across the bar, and we only hear 297 00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:20,680 Speaker 1: the voices of people. It's our eyes looking through the camera, 298 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:24,280 Speaker 1: but people saying, what's their story? Who are they to 299 00:17:24,440 --> 00:17:28,600 Speaker 1: each other? Asking themselves all these things. Well, we of 300 00:17:28,640 --> 00:17:31,160 Speaker 1: course are trying to make sense of that as well 301 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:35,640 Speaker 1: as viewers watching that, and we're paying attention to all 302 00:17:35,680 --> 00:17:39,440 Speaker 1: of the body language and how they're sitting near each other, 303 00:17:39,520 --> 00:17:41,960 Speaker 1: and who's looking at who, and who's smiling and is 304 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:44,919 Speaker 1: at a wistful face? And what does that mean? And 305 00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:48,520 Speaker 1: then when we returned to that scene, it's not as if, 306 00:17:48,560 --> 00:17:51,399 Speaker 1: at least in my recollection, song completely subverts it and 307 00:17:51,440 --> 00:17:53,720 Speaker 1: turns it all on its head in some radical way. 308 00:17:54,000 --> 00:17:58,320 Speaker 1: But I noticed all these these moments where the way 309 00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:02,159 Speaker 1: I interpreted it as a viewer at the beginning, not 310 00:18:02,400 --> 00:18:04,720 Speaker 1: knowing the characters and also not actually being able to 311 00:18:04,720 --> 00:18:07,440 Speaker 1: hear what they're saying, it was completely different, Josh. 312 00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:07,560 Speaker 3: It was. 313 00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:12,959 Speaker 1: It was a completely different experience later informed with more knowledge. 314 00:18:12,720 --> 00:18:15,320 Speaker 2: That whole sequence where the three of them go out 315 00:18:15,359 --> 00:18:19,359 Speaker 2: to dinner and then afterwards hang around for drinks as well. 316 00:18:19,560 --> 00:18:22,439 Speaker 2: I will I'm very eager to watch quite closely on 317 00:18:22,480 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 2: a revisit, and I will be seeing this movie again 318 00:18:25,160 --> 00:18:29,760 Speaker 2: because it does ultimately work. But in the moment, as 319 00:18:29,760 --> 00:18:34,120 Speaker 2: you're describing, there are some interesting choices in terms of 320 00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:37,439 Speaker 2: where the camera's placed, as you said, who's in it 321 00:18:37,520 --> 00:18:42,399 Speaker 2: and who's not, and the editing as well. That was 322 00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:45,639 Speaker 2: a bit jarring, but has to be to a purpose, 323 00:18:46,760 --> 00:18:49,280 Speaker 2: I'm saying, just because of the ultimate effect of the sequence, 324 00:18:49,320 --> 00:18:51,800 Speaker 2: but also knowing how we've discussed, you know, the careful 325 00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:55,160 Speaker 2: choice is made earlier. But it's a very complicated sequence 326 00:18:55,960 --> 00:18:58,520 Speaker 2: in just the filmmaking, let alone the performances that are 327 00:18:58,560 --> 00:18:59,160 Speaker 2: going on there. 328 00:19:00,160 --> 00:19:03,720 Speaker 3: You strangers walk by each other in the street and 329 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:09,840 Speaker 3: their clothes accidentally brush. That means there have been eight 330 00:19:09,920 --> 00:19:18,440 Speaker 3: thousand layers of emyon between them. Instead. 331 00:19:21,080 --> 00:19:23,320 Speaker 1: Access to the full film Spotting archive going back to 332 00:19:23,320 --> 00:19:24,960 Speaker 1: two thousand and five is one of the benefits of 333 00:19:25,040 --> 00:19:28,160 Speaker 1: joining the film Spotting Family, plus bonus shows, weekly newsletter, 334 00:19:28,400 --> 00:19:31,360 Speaker 1: early access to events, and more. Learn more at film 335 00:19:31,400 --> 00:19:35,000 Speaker 1: Spotting Family dot com. Film Spotting is listeners supported join 336 00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:37,879 Speaker 1: the Film Spotting family at film spotting family dot com 337 00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:40,920 Speaker 1: and get access to ad free episodes, monthly bonus shows, 338 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:43,399 Speaker 1: our weekly newsletter, and, for the first time, all in 339 00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:46,560 Speaker 1: one place, the entire film spotting archive going back to 340 00:19:46,560 --> 00:19:49,480 Speaker 1: two thousand and five. That's a film spotting Family dot 341 00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:53,120 Speaker 1: com panimally