WEBVTT - Listener Questions #22

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a new comment approaching from deep space. Could we

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>get sick if it's dust gets in our face?

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>The jewel wasp parasitoid feels around its host brain. How

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>did evolution come up with this? It's totally insane.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Scientific theory, model, hypothesis or law. Do these words really

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>mean anything or naw?

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Whatever? Questions keep you up at night. Daniel and Kelly's

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>answers will make it right.

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another Listener Questions episode on Daniel and Kelly's

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary Universe.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>We've done twenty two of these.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Hello.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kelly Wiersmith. I study parasites and space, and all

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>of these questions today have a bit of biology in them,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>so I'm pretty excited about it.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and I'll admit

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of biology in everything we do.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, but there's not physics in everything we do,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>so that's good news.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, no, of course there physics is everything.

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess I should have gone with chemistry, and then

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 2>we could have bonded even though we knew we were

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>wrong exactly.

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then we could confirm each other's biases.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yep, anyway, I blew it, I'm sor right moving on.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But today we're not here to talk about my biases

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or about your biases. We're here to answer questions from you,

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>from people out there wondering how the universe works, trying

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sense of it and scratching their heads a

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit, And.

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 2>We try to help you scratch your heads for a

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>slightly shorter amount of time. And so if you have

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 2>a question that is keeping you up at night, send

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>it to us at questions at Danielankelly dot org. It

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>might take a few months for the answers to come

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>back to you and go online, but we answer every

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>question at least by email, and some of them even

0:01:58.400 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>make it.

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>On the show because we believe in the value of

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>human curiosity. I'm interested in particles, Kelly's interested in parasitoids.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But everybody's curious about something. And my favorite thing about

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>science is that we're all curious about different things, which

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is why we get to learn about so many different

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>amazing things in the universe, even chemistry, and.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 2>All of the questions that we get I feel like

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 2>are super fascinating and make me think about things in

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>different ways. So feel free to help expand our minds

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 2>by getting us to think about a new question.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and because this podcast is not just about

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're curious about, it's about what everybody's curious about.

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So join the conversation. Send us your questions to Questions

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>at Daniel and Kelly dot org.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>And our first question today comes from Tim, who lives

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 2>in the greatest of these United States, which is of

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 2>course Virginia.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>What did we say about confirming our biases today?

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>That it's great, That's probably what we said.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's hear from Tim, who, unfortunately it lives

0:02:58.520 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Daniel and Kelly, it's Tim from Virginia.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 4>I was watching YouTube and watching videos about our newest

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 4>interstellar visitor, Atlas and Omama and.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>What was the other one called?

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Not Benue the other one? So anyway, this is Atlas,

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 4>is the third interstellar visitor that we've had in our

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 4>solar system. And they were talking about how it doesn't

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 4>pose a threat to Earth. But I was wondering, if

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 4>it leaves a debris field and its wake, what are

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 4>the chances that it has some sort of unknown virus

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 4>or bacteria or like maybe even like their version of

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 4>tartar grades which can survive in space that they just

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 4>deposit in our Solar system. That could possibly if a

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 4>planet goes through its trail, could get scooped up by

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 4>a planet and cause problems. Thought it might be a

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 4>fun question for both of you to answer. Thanks for

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 4>what you do.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Bie, Oh, this is a fun question. So not that

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>long ago you and I talked about umumout no ooh muama.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Recently you and I talked about o muamua and Avi

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>lobes hypothesis that it was an interstellar visitor and if

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>anybody wants more information they can go pull that up.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Hypothesis is being very generous to Avi.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, idea while smoking banana peels might be uh.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Better sensationless nonsense cooked up to sell his book.

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah yeah, we are not pulling any punches today.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>And so Daniel remind us what do we know about

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>these interstellar visitors?

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So most of the comments we see come from inside

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>our Solar system. They either come from the Kuiper Belt,

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a big chunk of rocky, icy stuff out

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>there deep in the Solar System, or long period comets

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>come even further out from like the Ort Cloud, a

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical never yet observed bunch of icy rocky blobs way

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>way way out past Pluto. And so most of the commets,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Haley's comment, and the other stuff that we see come

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.559
<v Speaker 1>from inside our solar system. But you know, our solar

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>system is not alone in the galaxy, and every once

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in a while an icy rocky chunk from another solar

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>system will drift over and enter our backyard. And until

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, we'd only ever seen two of those. Omiamua

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>famous because it was the first and sort of surprised everybody.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>We saw it pretty quickly after we turned down a

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>telescope capable of finding these things, which is always awesome

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>because we didn't know how often we would see these.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you see one immediately you're like, oh, wow,

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe these aren't so rare.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I gotta say, one of my favorite facts

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 2>that I've learned while working with you is that the

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 2>ort cloud is a maybe it's a thing that we

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 2>think exists but haven't actually confirmed, and that I think

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>was something that you discussed in response to a listener's question.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 2>And so anyway, love what I'm learning. Keep going.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.559
<v Speaker 1>So twenty seventeen, we saw O mum it was pretty weird.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It was like a bare object that was either long

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and thin or very flat, and it was rotating weirdly,

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and so the reflections were strange. Lots of speculation about it.

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>In the end, it looks like it was mostly the

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>nucleus of a comet that had already lost all of

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>its stuff and outgassed a little bit on the way

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the Solar System, giving it a little bit

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of acceleration. Then in twenty nineteen we saw the second one, Borisov.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a bigger object, more like a standard comet,

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>had a coma. It was outgassing. Still very cool to

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>see these things from deep in space. And you know,

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this is awesome because, as you say, a lot of

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>our knowledge about the rest of the galaxy is hypothetical.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>It comes either from just observation or from speculation and

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>from models. So to see something come and visit us,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we get to study in much more detail and learn

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the rest of the galaxy. And so

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five we're very excited to see the

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>third one, which is called Atlas.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, and you must have been very excited because you

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>are really into aliens, and oh, Muhamoua was sent by aliens.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>It was an interstellar ship, right, That's what I heard.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a lot of really interesting stuff about

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>oh muha And it's totally reasonable to ask, like, does

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this look like a natural object or is it weird?

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And could it be artificial? That's totally legitimate, and we

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>should be excited and open minded about what we could

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>see and all the people out there excited to have

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>aliens come visit. I'm definitely near the top of the list,

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But we also should be skeptical about it. And those

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>claims require a lot of evidence. And there's a lot

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of push by the chair of the Harvard Physics Department

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to call this thing aliens, and he wrote a whole

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>book about it, and we did a whole episode about it,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's lots of videos describing in detail how this

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>was not an effort sort of primed by scientific integrity unfortunately.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're very sure that oh Muamua is a comet

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it's interesting and sort of planetary physics

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of ways, but it's not an alien object.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, got it. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Yeah,

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 2>And so tell me more about the twenty twenty five

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Interstellar Visitor.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this is pretty fresh and new, and it's

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>still approaching us right It hasn't reached the closest point

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Sun that it's going to reach.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>It.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's coming into the Solar system still, which is exciting.

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>When we found Omuumu was already on its way out

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and moving really fast. So every day it got more

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>distant and smaller and harder to image. But this is

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>coming closer, and so we're getting better and better and

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>crisper and crisper photographs of it. So the first images

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we had got of it, you can look these things

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>up online. These come from the two meter twin telescope.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>These are ground based telescopes, and they show it like

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a big, fuzzy blob. And from those pictures we couldn't

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>really tell what it was or how big it was.

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>We could tell it's something around twenty five to forty

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>kilometers across, but we didn't know how much of that

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was like the actual thing, and how much of it

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>was like a dusty coma or gas being boiled off

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of the surface by the Sun. So those were our

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>first measurements about it, and we knew where it was

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and how fast it was going, so we could tell

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it was coming from outside the Solar system, but we

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't yet know what it was.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Is a coma just the like dust and stuff that

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 2>trails behind a comet.

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, And most of that comes from the sun, right,

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Solar radiation, the particles, the photons, the electrons, the protons

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that come from the Sun will impact the comet and

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>boil some of that stuff off, and we'll dig into

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute. But that's where the comet's tail

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>comes from. And the tail should grow as it gets

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>closer and closer to the Sun. And so right now

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>still pretty far from the Sun and the coma sort

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of small, but we expect that as it gets closer

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and closer and it heats up and the Sun fries

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it more, it's going to get it longer and longer tail. Yeah.

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Can we tell the difference between the junk that's getting

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>kicked off because of the Sun and the center of it.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it clear enough to differentiate?

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>We can, in fact, And so we have also space

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>based imaging. So we have Hubble, we have sphere X,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>which is a deep infrared telescope, and we have James

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Webb's based telescope. But before those space telescopes were able

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to take a picture of it, there's a lot of

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>discussion about what is this thing. It turns out it's

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>coming in sort of close to the plane of the ecliptic,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the planet that all the planets are on.

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>And so our friend Abvi Lobe made a big deal

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about this, and he suggested that this was evidence that

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it was an alien visitor sent intentionally to visit our

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>solar system.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>So he's still on the same kick.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He is still on the same kick, okay. And he

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the fuzz around the object, and he misinterpreted that

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to be like motion smears, like if you're taking a

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>slow picture of a fast moving object, it will smear,

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't understand that astronomers already know about that

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>effect and build it into their telescopes with tracking to

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>avoid motion smearing. So he was arguing that it wasn't

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>a comet, that it was a bare object, maybe metallic,

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and the fuzz was from motion smearing. Astronomers told him

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>how he was wrong, he mostly ignored them. Again, it's

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not a discussion that's inspired by scientific integrity. He's just

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to sell his books. And then we've got space

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>based telescopes to take a clear picture of it, and

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you can see in those pictures a very bright core

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and a fuzzier coma, so you can tell the difference

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>from the coma and from the core, and then SPHEREx

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 1>can do some really cool stuff where they see the

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>spectrum of light that comes off of it. So the

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>core of it is like two to four kilometers and

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it is a fuzzy coma. And what's

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating is that that fuzzy coma is mostly carbon dioxide.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>So these things that are from deep space, they have

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>rocky cores, but there's a lot of ice on them,

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's carbon monoxide ice, carbon dioxide ice, and then

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>water ice, and these things evaporate at different temperatures. Carbon

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>monoxide evaporates at a pretty low temperature like forty kelvin.

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't take a lot of solar rays to fry off

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>all the carbon monoxide. Carbon dioxide at about one hundred kelvin,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and water at hundreds of kelvin. But we don't see

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>any carbon monoxide in the coma. So this thing is

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>probably a combination of CO two carbon dioxide and water,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and since it's still far out on the Solar System,

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly outgassing the CO two which sublimates on the surface.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And when it gets closer, we'll probably see some water,

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>some water ice turn into steam.

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Is there rock in there too, and that's just not

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>getting kicked out into the coma.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. Probably there's also rock out there. And you know,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Avi responds to this and saying he thinks actually the

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>thing glows on its own and it's not just reflecting light,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>which astronomers pointed out was just him misreading a plot

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in a paper, maybe intentionally, maybe not, who knows. Anyway,

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you should mostly ignore all of his nonsense and pay

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>attention to the astronomers who actually know what they're talking about.

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's a fascinating object. We're going to learn something

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>about deep space, and you know what things are made

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>out of. This thing is probably a chunk of ice

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and rock from somebody else's ort cloud, right, some other

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>star has ort clouds, and we snagged a piece of

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it because they lost it. It's going to be really interesting.

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to come close to the Earth. So

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're worried about this thing because it's a bit

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>chunk of ice and rockets about the same size as

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the one that ended the dinosaurs. But it's not gonna

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>hit the Earth. In fact, when it makes its closest

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>approach to the Sun, we're gonna be on the other

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>side of the Sun.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>That's reassuring. I like that, although I'm sure we'll see

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.319
<v Speaker 2>it less well, and that's a bummer, but trade offs.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>All right. So that's the setup. Tim has a really

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fun question. He's wondering, like, what if this thing really

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>does come from aliens? What if it's like loaded with

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>their viruses or alien tartar grades and those things boil

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>off and they sort of make a path through the

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Solar system and some of them come to Earth. Are

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>we in danger?

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Awesome question. Yeah, well, we're not gonna pass through any

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of dense part of its tail, Like we're gonna

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>be on the other side of the Sun when it turns around,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna exit the Solar system. So it's not

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's gonna leave a long wake that we're gonna

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.359
<v Speaker 1>fly right through. But you know, it is leaving particles

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and bits of itself in our solar system, and so

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>who knows if this thing actually is from aliens and

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>like seeded with all sorts of weird microbes, maybe they

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>designed this thing to like explode when it comes close

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Sun and spray all of its stuff everywhere

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>through the Solar system, in which case some of them

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>will come to Earth and could potentially, you know, come

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>through the atmosphere and land on the surface and infect

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>people's brains and convince them to live in Virginia rather

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>than California. I mean, we're talking deep tragedies here.

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh give me a break, man, That's where.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>He was going, right. They might even convince them to

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>study chemistry. I mean, those aliens, who they're up to

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>no good.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean that would be a nefarious plot, absolutely so,

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 2>But do you think so? Okay, So, when we were

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 2>doing our tartar grade episode, which we did a little

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>while back, we showed that, yes, tartar grades are like

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 2>resistant to tons of things, but when you expose them

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>to the radiation in space, they do kick the dust. Yeah,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>they can't survive that indefinitely, and I would have to

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 2>imagine there's not a lot that could survive in interstellar voyage.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 2>But I guess we can't rule it out.

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think it depends? I mean, you could

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>survive an interstellar voyage if you're the core of one

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of these objects, right, if you're shielded by a lot

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of ice and rock, then yeah, you could survive the radiation.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether you could survive being frozen that long

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your metabolism could restart, you know, I think that's

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a biological question. But I think we've seen that in

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of critters here on Earth. So I think it's

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>plausible for things to be frozen at the core and

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>survive the interstellar trip and even the solar wind. But then,

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, once it disperses in our solar system, you know,

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>then it's vulnerable again. And I think that's the most

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>dangerous point.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when it gets kicked out of the coma or

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>kicked into the coma.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and less of course they come out in you know,

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>tiny little microscopic alien ships, and so they have their

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>own shielding. I mean, if we're going to speculate here, like, let's.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Go all in, right, let's go lob style.

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's pretend we're the chair of the Harvard Physics.

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Department, that would be pretty solid.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, So Tim, this is a really exciting event. It's

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>super fascinating. There's no evidence that it's aliens, like the

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>astronomers want to believe that it's aliens, but so far,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing that points in that direction. But of course

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't know. And it could be that it comes

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>deeper into the Solar system and we learn new stuff,

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in which case we're all very happy to believe that

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's aliens if the data points that way. And in

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that scenario, it's not going to directly leave a wake

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>for us to fly through, but it could disburse stuff

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>which eventually will come to Earth. I mean, there's a

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of cosmic dust that falls to Earth every day,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>so he could contribute to that. We could all be

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>breathing in bits of an alien package one day.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Could we have all already breathed in o mua mua bits?

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah?

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely nice exciting. We are connected through space and time.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's see what Tim thinks of our answer.

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Is he going to sleep well tonight or not? Let's

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 2>find out.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Daniel and Kelly, thank you for answering all of

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 3>my questions.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I can rest assured now knowing that Earth won't go

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 4>through an alien comments tail and gain a whole bunch

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 4>of microbes.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 3>That will convert us to alien life forms. Keep up

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 3>with the good work.

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. All right, we are back when we're answering

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>questions from listeners, questions we get every email and also

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>questions on our discord. If you love thinking about the

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>universe and hearing us chat about it, you might want

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to chat with us. We are very active on our discord.

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>If you want to join, it's for everybody who's curious

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about the universe. Go to our website www dot danieland

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Kelly dot org. Well you'll find the link to join

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the discord. So many fun, nice people talking about the

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>universe and asking questions. Kelly tell us about this question.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, at first, I'd like to just note that we

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 2>also have the best moderators, so you know, another good

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 2>reason to come join us. All right, So Marco from

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Discord had this question about parasite manipulation of host behavior.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And Marco is not just another Kelly sock puppet account.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you'll never know, You'll never know.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Daniel and Kelly, I have a question about the

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 5>jewel wasp discussed in Ed Young's book An Immense World

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Horrified as an understatement, as is the sentence. I had

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 5>a nightmare about this. In the book, Young describes how

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 5>the jewel wasp feels around for the cockroach brain with

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 5>its stinger, and I keep wondering about the evolutionary mechanisms

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 5>at play here. The wasp doesn't know what a brain is, obviously,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 5>but how on earth could it have evolved the precision

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 5>to accomplish this. I'm well to side This strongly implies

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 5>that the wasp has not only absurd command of its

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 5>own body, but the body of the cockroach as well.

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 5>There's a ton of evolutionary time to miss the sweet

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 5>spots and the cockroaches back and head and not be successful.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 5>There's a neat series I've been watching on octopuses, and

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 5>it discusses how these intelligent creed learn everything on their

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 5>own without parental support. Wasps aren't teaching their young where

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 5>to sting, So how does this amazing ability emerge from

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 5>this tiny little wasp brain? Just realized I've been listening

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 5>to the podcast long enough to realize the answer is,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 5>we don't know. Thanks for everything, love the show. Can't

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 5>wait to hear the answer, all right.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>So, first of all, I love that Marco clearly has

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 2>been paying attention and suspects that there's a high probability

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the answer is going to be I don't know.

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Good job, Mark, welcome to the forefront of science.

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Everyone great, that's right, And so yes, the answer at

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 2>the very end for a lot of these questions is

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 2>going to be we don't know. But let's talk about

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 2>some of the things that we do know first, because

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I love this system and I'm going to use it

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>as an excuse to tell you all about it.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so tell us about the jewel wasp and what

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it does to poor cockroaches. Are we going to feel

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>sympathy for cockroaches at the end of this?

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh maybe? And then I got to talk about the

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 2>parasitoids that manipulate web building behavior in spiders and actually

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 2>makes you feel sympathy for spiders. That's another day. I

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 2>love those systems. Their videos are just like nuts.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, all right, today we're pro cockroach. Tell us why?

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well I'm gonna I'm actually gonna end up on

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 2>team Jewel Wasp. But anyway, so right, So jewel wasps.

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>They're beautiful, they're kind of iridescent. They need to lay

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>their eggs somewhere and provide their babies with a meal.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And so essentially what they're going to do is paralyze

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 2>a cockroach, hide it in a really great spot, lay

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 2>an egg on it. That egg is gonna hatch, eat

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 2>the cockroach from the inside, and then leave its carcass

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 2>when it's done. That's the big overview.

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And the cockroach is alive while these things are growing

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>inside of it.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 2>The egg is attached to the outside of its body.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 2>But then the baby does eat its way in. Oh yes, yeah,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>it's it's pretty gruesome.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And why does the cockroach have to be alive? Is

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that so that it stays fresh and tasty the way

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you like put like living lobsters into pots.

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, I don't feel comfortable about that. Don't do

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it myself. But anyway, so this would be like you

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't want to leave the puid spinach for your baby

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 2>out on the counter for like a week. You know,

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 2>you want your cockroach and your spinach to be fresh,

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>all right, So here's here's how the process goes down.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 2>So the jewel wasp and the cockroach get in a

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 2>tussle because the cockroach knows that the jewel wasp is

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 2>bad news. So the first thing that the jewel wasp does,

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 2>if it gets lucky enough and can get the angle right,

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>is it stings the cockroach in the thorax so like

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the chest kind of region, and this will paralyze the

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 2>cockroach's front legs for up to five minutes. And so

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>this makes it so the cockroach can't fight back quite

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>as well, and the jewel wasp will deliver its second sting.

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 2>The second sting is in the head, so it goes

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>through the neck kind of moves through the tissues until

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 2>it finds the brain. It's got this like ovipositor that

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>delivers the sting, so it's almost like a needle at

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the end, and so it puts this needle up into

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the brain and it delivers another sting. And this sting.

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 2>I know it's nasty, this sting, but I love it.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 2>This sting does a couple of different things.

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>It's nasty and just the way Kelly loves.

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, nature's horrible but fascinating. And so now the

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 2>cockroach starts grooming itself furiously, and I think we're not

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>totally sure why that is happening. Maybe it's because they

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>want the meal to be like super fresh, no, like

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 2>bacteria infecting your meal, And so the cockroach cleans itself

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 2>up a lot. And then another interesting thing is that

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the cockroach technically is capable of moving, but its desire

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 2>to initiate its own movement pretty much goes away. So

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 2>it can move, but it doesn't it's desire.

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about what it's like to be a cockroach,

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Like we're in the mind of the cockroach thinking about

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what it wants.

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>So all right, I'm being a bit anthropomorphic about it.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what the cockroach is thinking. But whereas

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 2>usually cockroaches in an area where they know that there's

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 2>like something dangerous, ye would initiate movement and would get

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 2>out of there, this cockroach just kind of stands around.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's still capable of moving because the parasitoid will

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>like find a good nesting spot and then come back

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and grab the cockroaches antenna and lead it to a

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 2>nesting spot, and the cockroach will follow.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yes, it's like driving it. Yeah, so this

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>way that way.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The way it's usually talked about is like it's

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 2>like walking a dog on a leash or something like that.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 2>It just follows and so then it gets moved into

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>this little like nook where everything can be hidden so

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 2>that nothing will eat the cockroach and also eat the baby,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 2>because the cockroach can't fight back really anymore, and it

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 2>will the mom will put the cockroach in the nest,

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 2>lay the egg somewhere on the cockroach, I think, like

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 2>near its leg, and then seal up this little nest

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>site with you know, leaves and rocks and stuff like that.

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 2>And then the rest of the process takes about eight days.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 2>The egg hatches, eats the inside of the cockroach, pupates inside,

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 2>so it goes through a couple developmental stages in the

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 2>body of the cockroach.

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's basically laid the egg along with some food.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like a chicken egg is the embryo

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>with the food, but the chicken provides it instead of

0:23:58.720 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>stealing it from a cockroach.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, Yeah, that's exactly right. And a lot of

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 2>parasitoids do this. There are parasitoids, you know. Just the

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 2>other day I saw a parasitoid dragging a giant spider.

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>It had paralyzed, and it was dragging it to its

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 2>nest so that it could then lay eggs on it

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>and keep its meal fresh. And so what's special about

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 2>this system, not from the perspective of the cockroach, of course,

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>but is that a lot of parasitoids will paralyze food

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 2>and then lay their eggs in or on it as

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 2>a meal for when they hatch. But you've got this

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>extra layer where the parasitoid is also able to like

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 2>direct the cockroach to go to a particular location, rather

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 2>than needing to like physically drag it there, which a

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 2>bunch of others have to do. Wow, amazing, yes, amazing.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So the cockroach like participates in its own demise.

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>It does it does?

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It's complicit.

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 2>That's gross complicit. I don't know that. That's that word

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>has too much human baggage. It unwillingly, unwittingly does, does

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>the wasps bidding? Okay, So Marco was interesting in the

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 2>fact that when that second sting happens, and the sting

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>is happening in the brain, the wasp that is stinging

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the brain, it's mom isn't there to teach it how

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to do that. So how does it just know where

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 2>to sting in a brain? And at the end of

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the day, the answer is going to be we don't

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 2>really know, but I'm going to give you a little

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>bit more detail about what is actually happening when it

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 2>stings the brain. So we talked about how it puts

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 2>its little like hypodermic needle esque but into the neck

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 2>of the wasp and it starts going up to the brain.

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>And there have been some experiments trying to figure out

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>what happens inside the cockroach's brain. So one thing they

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>did was they injected carbon fourteen radio labeled amino acids

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 2>into the stinger and then they look to see where

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 2>it ended up in the cockroach. And it does end

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>up in this area called the subsophageal ganglion, so it's

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 2>like kind of the bottom part of a cockroach's brain.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So injecting carbon fourteen labeled amino acids this is just

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a way of tracing like where something go. Like add

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like a little dye to so you can see where

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>something goes. But in this case, it's not a visual die.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like you're measuring the radioactive decays or how does

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that work?

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeap, that's exactly right.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating, Well, yeah, yeah.

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Pretty cool experiment, Okay, And then they did some other

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>experiments to try to figure out what it is that

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 2>the wasp is queuing in on, to figure out where

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 2>it's supposed to deposit what we we call this the

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>stuff that gets deposited during the sting venom, which is

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 2>awesome anyway. So they've done things like humanly euthanize a

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 2>cockroach and then remove its brain and then give it

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 2>back to the wasp. And when you do that, the

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 2>wasp spends a bunch of time like searching and not

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>delivering its venom. It's like, what something is missing in here,

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 2>and so it's like it's definitely.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's looking for the brain.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>It's looking for the brain, and it gets kind of

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>confused when it's not there. And so then the scientist

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 2>looked a little bit closer at the ovipositor and they

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 2>found sensors on there, and some of the sensors are

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 2>mechanical receptors, so they like can touch things, and some

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 2>are chemical receptors. And so first they wanted to dive

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 2>into what happens with the mechanical receptors, and so they

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 2>took all the mechanical receptors off of the wasp, and

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the wasp just kind of like searched around for a

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>really long time. It was super confused because it couldn't

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>feel anything. Then they humanely euthanized the cockroaches and they

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 2>put a very soft substance that wasn't very brain like

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 2>into the head of the cockroach, and the wasp also

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 2>searched around for a really long time and was like,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>what is going on? But then they put a hard substance,

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 2>harder substance that's more like the brain, and the wasp

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 2>responded more quickly. So it doesn't have to be a brain,

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>but it's got to feel right.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So they're testing what the wasp wants to sting, and

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>they're like, how about a squishy brain having an actual brain?

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>How about some of it feels like a brain. They're

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>like exploring the space of what the wasp is willing

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to engage with. That's fascinating.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And if you like kind of mix up

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the brain and kind of change its consistency, like mixing

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 2>it up with like scissors or something, they also are

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 2>confused and are like, what the heck is going on here?

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.719
<v Speaker 2>So it looks like the mechanical stuff really matters, And

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 2>so that suggests to me that there's some genetic coating

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 2>that gets passed from generation to generation, doesn't need to

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 2>be learned where they know, like it goes in the neck,

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and then you look for something that feels a certain way.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think we've looked close enough in this

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 2>system to understand exactly how that happens. But we have

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>looked at other behaviors that are you know, what we

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>would say is innate. They just happen without learning.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's so important that it touches the brain that

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the system has evolved requirements to ensure that it only

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>happens when there's like an actual brain there to be

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>delivered on, not just like randomly spraying this stuff in

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the head of the cockroach.

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Yah. So presumably the chemical cocktail that gets delivered into

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the brain is expensive to make in some way, like

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 2>requires a lot of energy or certain nutrients or something.

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 2>So you don't want to go stinging things and wasting it.

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 2>And so if this cockroach seems like it's totally off

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, then you abandon it.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, go go find the cockroads through the bigger taste

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of your brain.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Well, there are other parasitoids that can test

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 2>and see, like, are there already parasitoid wasps living inside

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of this insect because I don't want my babies to

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>have to compete with babies that had a head start.

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 2>And so there's all sorts of like crazy stuff that

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>happens when the wasp is like evaluating its host for quality.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, So this is really fascinating and very complex behavior.

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like Marco's question is essentially, how does

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the wasp evolve this kind of behavior? The mom is

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not there to teach it, which means it must be

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>somehow innate, which suggests that it's like in the code

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of the DNA, which means it comes from evolution, not

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>from like the wasp culture. How is such a complex

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>process ever evolved? It feels impossible to imagine that you

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>develop such an intricate system because it needs many parts

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to work all at once.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe your imagination is limited, Daniel, No, I'm just kidding. Yes,

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>it is very complicated. So one of the ways that

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 2>we look at the evolution of complex behaviors is that

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 2>we'll look at things that closely related species are doing,

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes you can see the steps that build in

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 2>a more complicated behavior. So, for example, this system has

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 2>two stings, and one of them is a little bit

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 2>more complicated, but a lot of other parasitoids, as we've

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>already talked about, do one sting to paralyze their prey.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 2>So you can see that as like a beneficial early step.

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 2>We have not in this system been able to work

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 2>out the order in which all of these complicated things

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 2>evolved and sort of built up.

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So let me just make it explicit. You're suggesting that

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a complex series of behaviors, but there probably are

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>simpler versions of it that are also beneficial. You don't

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>need all the complex pieces in order to gain some benefit,

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and that would allow you to tell the evolutionary story.

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that the argument that yep, that's exactly right, and

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>every intermediate step needs to be beneficial in order for

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 2>it to keep passing through the population, unless you've got

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 2>drift going on. But anyway, okay, so these are there

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 2>are beneficial steps, and you know, you can imagine something

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 2>like initially the jewel wasps only stung the cockroach once

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and paralyzed it, and then you had to drag it.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 2>But then there was one wasp that had some mutation

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>that made it extra stabby, and it stabbed once in

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the thorax and once in the brain, and that did

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>something that made the cockroach a little bit easier to handle,

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 2>which meant the mom could lay more eggs and could

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>do this more times. And maybe that got passed on genetically,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 2>and you can imagine generation after generation that's just honed

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and more and more beneficial.

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And maybe my imagination is limited, but does the phrase

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>extra stabby appear in the biological literature anywhere?

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>No, that that's just because I'm super creative. You know,

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that was my creativity. I'm just kidding, You're very creative.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, so we don't know exactly the path that

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>this took, but you can imagine how it would have

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 2>built up, and then you know, it's possible somebody could

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 2>test this by looking at closely related wasp species and

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe if you understood more mechanistically about how this was

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>all happening, you could understand how one step could happen

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 2>after another. But for this system, I would say, we

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 2>don't have a really good evolutionary answer.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that all makes sense that complex behaviors of

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>all from simpler behaviors that are also beneficial, and it

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes takes a while to figure out what path you

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>can take from simpler to more complex. I think the

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that blows my mind is that these complex behaviors

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>feel kind of fragile, like everything has to work for

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this to happen, and it feels like there's so many

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>ways for it to go wrong. It's incredible that it

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>relies on such a complex system. And then it mostly works.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And then I look at you know, like humans, I've

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>raised a child. It's complicated. It feels like there's so

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>many ways it can go wrong. And then I walk around,

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, wow, all of these humans, they were raised

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by people. It seems to mostly work. It's incredible. Yeah,

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, biology seems so fragile, but it is pretty robust.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it is incredible. But you know, there's

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>plenty of times when jewel wasps go after cockroaches and nature,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 2>and the cockroach wins and the jewel wasp doesn't get

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to sting.

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Or heay cockroache, hey cockroache.

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Or you know, the jewel wasp dies for one reason

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 2>or another or just doesn't. Like, there's plenty of times

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 2>in nature where these things do fail, and those individuals

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>usually just get wiped out of the population, And just

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>so it doesn't sound like I'm saying, well, whenever we're

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.959
<v Speaker 2>talking about complex behaviors, we always just imagine a picture.

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 2>There are systems where step by step we've sort of

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 2>figured this stuff out. And I'm working on finding a

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>behavioral geneticist to come on the show to talk to

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 2>us about those answers. So stay tuned.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I think that's a pretty good answer

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for Marco. Let's inject that into his head and see

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>how his brain responds.

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Did we lead you to the answer, Marco? I promise

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 2>we won't lay any eggs on you.

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 6>After hearing your answer, I admit I'm no less terrified

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 6>of jewel wasps. I can only hope I don't have

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 6>another fever dream frantically trying to keep one from stinging

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 6>the back of my head by jumping into water. I

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 6>can't find forever in awe of evolution, coming down to

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 6>random events and mind boggling numbers until some advantage emerges

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 6>and gets successfully encoded. I keep going back to a

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 6>couple of points you made. One is that without passing

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 6>down knowledge genetic coding instructions and organisms behavior, the LOSPs

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 6>are compelled to behave as they do the.

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 5>Evolution handles the rest.

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 7>As with most of the podcast episodes, we end up

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 7>with more questions like how did Kelly end up on

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 7>Team Jewel Wasp. I can't side with that freak show.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 7>I fully support Wally's cute sidekick, not the Jewel Wasps.

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 7>That feels like siding with monstrous killers, or the seventeen

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 7>percent of people that prefer white chocolate not tolerate it

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 7>but like it better. It truly is an extraordinary universe.

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Daniel and Kelly.

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Next up, we have a question from southern Scotland. And

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I am so excited because I got to go to

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Scotland for the first time last month. I was in Edinburgh,

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 2>which is probably not where Ben is from. But Ben,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 2>your country is beautiful. I loved it, and vegetarian haggis

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 2>a plus.

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to Scotland next week for a wedding

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>in Inverness.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you're gonna wear kilts.

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna wear a kilt exactly all right. But today

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the question is not about Daniel's wardrobe at Scottish weddings.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 1>It's about what these terms in science mean. So let's

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>hear Ben's question.

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 8>Hello, Daniel and Kelly. It's Ben here from Cukubree in

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 8>southern Scotland. I'd really like to know what you think

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 8>is the difference, if any, between a theory, a law,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 8>a hypothesis and a model. I'm especially curious about Darwin's

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 8>theory of the origin of species. Is this a typical

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 8>scientific theory? Does it of predictive power? Can it be

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 8>refuted by experiment? I feel I really need the combined

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:10.479
<v Speaker 8>advice of a particle physicist and the powascientologist to help

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 8>to settle these questions. I really enjoy your podcast.

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh this is a really great question.

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>This is a really fun question. I'm really glad that

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Ben asked it, because it's one of these questions where

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if you ask philosophers or if you ask scientists, you'll

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>get a different answer. And if you ask different philosophers

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and different scientists, you'll get lots of different answers. It's

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>something a lot of people are not very precise about.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Frankly, yeah, I think when I was an undergrad, I

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 2>remember in my biology class there were definitions of all

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>of these terms, and then I was very confused later

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>on when they were used in ways that were not

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 2>at all consistent with what was in that textbook. And anyway,

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 2>now I know we're all sloppy.

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, scientists are practitioners who are not experts

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in the philosophy of science. We go out there and

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>we do science, and we say theory, we say law,

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>we say model. We haven't all taken philosophy classes or like.

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>The distinctions between these things are argued by nerds who

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are super excited about it. You know, we're excited about

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the biology or the chemistry or the physics or that

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. And so when you hear scientists talk

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about it, they're not often being very precise because they're

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>not experts in the definitions of these terms. Philosophers of

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>science are the folks who really narrow down on this.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But again, also philosophers of science disagree reasonably with each

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>other about how to describe this stuff. So I'll break

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 1>it down for you in a way that makes sense

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to me, but definitely other people will have different definitions

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>of this. This is not definitive in any sense, and.

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 2>If I could just mention that, I also think another

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 2>thing that makes it complicated isn't just that most of

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 2>us don't actually know what these terms mean. It's that

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 2>even if we did, when you understand something, it's not

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 2>usually like there's a clear yeah switch that gets flipped

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.359
<v Speaker 2>where you're like, oh, now we've entered law lands. Before

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 2>we were in hypothesis land. It's like you need to

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 2>slowly accumulate and it's not always clear when it's time

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to like update to a new term. And so anyway,

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 2>that probably complicates things too.

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, So let's start with laws. I think of

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>a law as something the universe actually does. There's some

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:10.439
<v Speaker 1>truth out there, and one of the basic assumptions in

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>science is that the universe follows laws and we don't

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>know them, but we can do experiments and think about

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it and all this sorts of stuff to try to

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>figure them out. So we think the universe follows some

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of concise, simple fundamental rules, and those are the

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>laws of the universe, all right, still with me?

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeap?

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Cool? Now we don't know who those things are, but

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we can have theories about it, so we went it

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from law to theory. Theories are like our explanations for

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>how the universe works. So general relativity, for example, is

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a theory about how matter bends space and how space

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>tells matter to move. Quantum mechanics is a theory that

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 1>tells us that space is filled with oscillating fields. These

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>are theories. They're like our explanatory frameworks to describe the

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>things that we see in the universe, and we hope

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that those theories line up with the truth the laws

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that are actually out there in the universe. And so theories,

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a fuzzy term, right, Theories are sort

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of like our ideas. They include a bunch of evidence

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and they come together to give like some sort of

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>coherent explanation for how something is working in the universe.

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 1>A theory is not just like a random guess, not

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:26.439
<v Speaker 1>just like, hmm, maybe it's this, right, like a fan

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>theory to explain the ending of some movie you just saw. Right,

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It's something that's really based in evidence and has been

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>tested and it's sort of part of our explanation of

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the universe.

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, lots of different labs have looked at it. It's

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 2>been looked at from lots of different angles. Predictions have

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 2>been tested.

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, agreed, Yeah, so the whole like, you know, gravity's

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just a theory, man, doesn't mean that like we don't

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>know anything about gravity, or it's just like one of

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>ten options to explain why we stick to the surface

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Earth. Right, A theory can be something that's

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>very well developed and understood.

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, was vity really the best pick. There

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 2>seems like there's a lot we don't know about gravity.

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot we don't know about gravity. That's

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the other thing about a theory is that they're never complete, right,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>They're evolving, their changing. You know, gravity is a wonderful,

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing theory, but there's definitely a lot we don't know about,

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's going on at the center of black

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>holes or the early universe, or fundamentally how gravity works

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for particles.

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:40:22.480 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, it's a not complete explanation of the universe. It's

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:28.919
<v Speaker 1>an explanation of part of the universe. And we don't

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have a unified theory. We'd love to have one, because

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we think there is one set of laws, but we

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have sort of piecemeal theories that we think are approximating

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>those laws.

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Excellent. I'm glad we have a scientist slash philosopher on

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So there are laws out there. We try to build

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>theories about how the universe works and follow those laws.

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>What's a model in that sense, and model is a

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>very overloaded term in physics, we use model to mean

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of a simplified version of a theory, because theories

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are complicated. If you wanted to calculate the orbit of

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the Earth around the Sun, you couldn't use general relativity.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows how to do that calculation. General relativity really

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>really nasty. The only times we've ever been able to

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>solve problems with general relativity are in simplified settings, like

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>an empty universe, a universe with just a black hole

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in it, a universe filled with uniform dust. None of

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>those correspond to our reality. Our reality is too complicated

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to solve with the full theory, and so we build

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a model. We can simplify the universe. We can say, like,

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>let's assume the universe is empty except for the Earth

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Sun. Now, let's do the calculation, and we

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>hope that the calculation is still relevant to the real universe. Right,

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we find a simpler version something we actually can crank

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>on and hope that the answer is still irrelevant. Or

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>we can simplify the calculations. We can say, well, let's

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 1>use an approximate version of the theory. You know, Einstein's

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>equations for general relativity. If things are far apart and

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>masses are not too high and they're slow moving, they

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>reduce to Newton's theory. And so you can use Newton's

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>theory for most stuff. You want to calculate whether your

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>cannon ball is going to fly over the castle walls,

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to use general relativity. You're going to

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:16.560
<v Speaker 1>get basically the right answer using a simpler model, right,

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a model of general relativity, which is just Newton's equations.

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, spherical cows are a fun joke

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.879
<v Speaker 1>because that's the kind of thing physicists do. We're like, well,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.439
<v Speaker 1>let's replace a complex situation with a simpler situation where

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the answer is basically the same. And so a model

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is a simplification. Either you've simplified the universe or you've

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 1>simplified the theory so that you can get some answers out.

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and models are great. They help you decide if

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 2>you know your simplification.

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeap.

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 2>When you do a simplification, you're making assumptions that some

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 2>things don't matter that much. And so then when your

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 2>model gives you an answer and you test it, you

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 2>can see, oh, was I right? That the thing doesn't

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 2>matter that much? And you know, ideally it's an iterative process.

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.399
<v Speaker 2>The model gives you a prediction you can test, You

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 2>actually go out and you test it, and then you

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 2>update your model as needed.

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and it's import to understand that every calculation

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>anybody has ever done uses models, uses simplifications. All of

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>physics uses approximations. If you want to calculate how the

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Earth goes around the Sun, in principle, you need to

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 1>include the gravitational tug from every single object out there

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in the universe which is pulling on the Earth. Most

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of those are negligible, and some rock out there in Andromeda.

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really not going to change the path of the

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Earth in a way we can measure, but in principle

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it does, so we always do approximations. It's impossible to

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>ever do full calculations in any of our theories for

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>any situations. So all of science is approximate to some degree,

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's where a lot of science happens is figuring

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>out how to be clever about it. What approximations can

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I make so the answer is still useful and irrelevant right,

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and I can get this done in a PhD length

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of time and not be here for ten thousand years.

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:53.919
<v Speaker 2>That can often be a very painstaking part of the process. Though,

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 2>What are my parameter estimates that are reasonable and useful

0:43:57.560 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and that can be a lot of work.

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And so that's what a model is. And

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>let me say that model is used very differently in

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 1>different fields. Like I talk to computer scientists and machine

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 1>learning people. For them, a model is like a trained network.

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 1>They talk about neural networks as my model or their

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>boosted decision tree is a model. They use model I

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>means something they very different than physicists do. And I

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>know biologists talk about like model systems. They're studying the brain.

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>They're doing it in mice, or they're doing it in rats,

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>or they're doing it in flies. To them, that's the

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.839
<v Speaker 1>meaning of model, like which model system are you using?

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 2>But when someone says to you, you know, what do

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 2>you do? When you say, oh, I do modeling, they

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 2>know that that means that you are using equations to

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 2>try to capture the dynamics of a system and are

0:44:38.320 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 2>making predictions that way. So I think we use the

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 2>word model in a couple different ways, one of which

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 2>is model systems.

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think that fits in because, like you're

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 1>using the mouse as a model system to understand Alzheimer's

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because you can't and you shouldn't, do experiments on humans,

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and so use the mouse brain as a stand in

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:00.399
<v Speaker 1>as an approximation for the human brain. Because know, it's

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 1>not okay to do the things the humans that you

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>do to mice, and maybe it's not okay to do

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to mice either, but it's maybe more okay. I think

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the argument biologists make.

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, depends on who you're talking to, but I

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:11.919
<v Speaker 2>guess I'd prefer it happened on mice.

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, And so the last term was hypothesis.

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>We test our model by generating hypotheses. We're saying, here's

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>my model of the universe. I think that this interstellar

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 1>comet is made of ice and co.

0:45:24.120 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Two.

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me generate a hypothesis about what James Webspace telescope

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see when we point it at it, and then

0:45:30.600 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I can compare that hypothesis to what we actually see.

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So the model predicts something that's our hypothesis, and then

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we compare it to reality in order to learn whether

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the model is correct or not.

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Cool. So we have laws, theories, models, and hypotheses. And

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the last bit of Ben's question was a sort of

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>loaded question about Darwin's theory. I hear a lot of

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>this discussion online about how evolution is just a theory man,

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>and because it all happened in the past, it's not

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 1>really predicting anything. It's just descriptive, and therefore it's unfalsifiable

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and not really scientifically valid. And I wonder if these

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>critiques are really done in good faith. You know, these

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are folks attacking evolution, trying to use the language of

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>science to undermine it. But I don't think they really

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in the scientific process personally. Yeah, agree, So let's

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. Darwin's theory is definitely a theory. I mean,

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it provides an explanation for how speciation happens. Right, There's

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of evidence out there that it's pulled together. It

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>definitely qualifies as a theory, and in that sense, it's

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not just like some dude's random guess, right, It's a

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>well established explanation for a huge variety of stuff that

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>we see out there.

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Yes, so for one hundred and

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 2>fifty years, we've been trying to decide if evolution through

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 2>natural selection is supported by the data. And you know,

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 2>there's probably evolutionary biologists in every department that does research

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 2>around the world, and we have found results that make

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.240
<v Speaker 2>us think about evolution through natural selection in a different way.

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 2>But in one hundred and fifty years, none of us

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 2>have come up with a result that's like, oh, definitely,

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 2>we drop this theory. So we've got one hundred and

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 2>fifty years of researching coming up with predictions based on

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:09.879
<v Speaker 2>this theory that are supported by future work. So yeah,

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you.

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And Ben asks like, is this a predictive theory?

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the answer is absolutely. You know, it

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>predicts lots of things about what you should find out

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.320
<v Speaker 1>there in the world. You should find fossils, you should

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>find simpler behaviors leading to more complex behaviors. You should

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 1>see real time evolution, you know, when communities respond to

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>changing circumstances. You should see a connection between the species

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that we observe and the genetic information that leads to them.

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>This is I think a really powerful confirmation of natural

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>selection is finding the sort of mechanism the DNA, the

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>biochemistry that underlies all of this, and seeing confirmed in

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the history of that evolution in the DNA, I think

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it's super fascinating. You know, we can learn things about

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like when community is diverged by seeing the differences in

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 1>their DNA.

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yep. And you know, yeah, Darwin is clearly like

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the best scientist of all time. Sorry, Daniel. And so

0:48:04.800 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 2>if you could be the scientist who finds the data

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 2>that refutes this theory, yeah, you could replace the name Darwin, right,

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 2>And so there's no.

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Mainstream narrative the biology is trying to protect.

0:48:17.080 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right, that's right.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Now every scientist out there wants to overthrow the mainstream

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>narrative because that's how you become a famous scientist. And

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>also that's what we all want to do. We want

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to learn the truth about the universe. We're driven by

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 1>our curiosity to reveal the truth, not to support some

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of dogma. But you raised I think the last,

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe the most important point is that the question about

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:42.799
<v Speaker 1>whether this could be refuted. So can you, Kelly, imagine

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 1>some evidence that hypothetically would undercut this theory of evolution.

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 2>At this point, we have so much evidence. It's kind

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of hard to imagine something we could have missed and

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.920
<v Speaker 2>like one piece of information that would refute everything. So

0:48:56.960 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I think at this point, if you had a finding

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:05.319
<v Speaker 2>that like multi cellular life existed before we found unicellular life,

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 2>like it just popped into existence or something, we would

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 2>have to look really hard at, like have we collected

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:12.520
<v Speaker 2>all the data and all the different places, Like yeah,

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:14.680
<v Speaker 2>because there's this mountain of evidence and you've got this

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 2>one thing that maybe doesn't fit. But I do think

0:49:17.880 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 2>that if there were evidence out there, scientists would be

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 2>open to considering it and looking at it and trying

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to understand if that makes us wrong, or if it's

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:30.319
<v Speaker 2>just a shady corner in the room of evolution that

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 2>we haven't explored yet and we just need to move

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 2>into that into that area instead.

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think the question is reasonable, Like we

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.959
<v Speaker 1>expect theories to do more than just describe the data

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen. We want them to generalize. If they really

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>are coming close to the truth the laws of the

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>actual universe, they should be able to predict things we

0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen. And Ben's question is like, well, hasn't this

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff happened in the past Yeah, a lot

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff has happened in the past, but we

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it yet, and so we can predict, like

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I predict what I'm gonna find when I dig into

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Yeah, the stuff is already there and the

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>events already occurred, but if we haven't seen it yet,

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>then it's fair to predict it and to treat that

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>as a test of the theory.

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yep, agreed.

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Ben, let us know if we answered

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>your question about the definition of these terms and their

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>application to Darwin's theory of the origin of the species.

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, Daniel and Kelly, even though the classification of groups

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 8>of ideas is obviously a complicated topic, I just knew

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 8>that it would come up with some clear insights. Thank

0:50:26.800 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 8>you very much, and it's good to hear that Darwin's

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 8>amazing theories are currently being used by scientists to help

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 8>both explain and predict many phenomena. I wish you all

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 8>the best for your trip to Inverness, Daniel, and I

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 8>hope the weather matches that in southern California so you

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 8>can stay comfortable wearing that kills.

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, that was a ton of fun. As always, I

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 2>learned a ton hopefully the listeners learned a ton too.

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Please remember you can write us at Questions at Daniel

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 2>and Kelly dot org. You can join us on our

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Discord channel. You can find us on Twitter and Instagram

0:50:58.200 --> 0:50:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and Blue Sky.

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Out to us please and let curiosity drive you through

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>your day.

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio. We

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 2>would love to hear from you.

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>We really would. We want to know what questions you

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>have about this Extraordinary Universe.

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:24.439
<v Speaker 2>We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:27.480
<v Speaker 2>for future shows. If you contact us, we will get

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 2>back to you.

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 1>We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>at Questions at Danielankelly.

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Dot org, or you can find us on social media.

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 2>We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 2>all of those platforms. You can find us at D

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 2>and K Universe.

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Don't be shy, write to us