WEBVTT - Fantasy Things Scorecard (2/8/2017)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal I'll that for me.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>You want to be happy for Dake Edith state is that? Whoo?

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Whoam and Dan and Tye welcome back to the Soliburbal

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Boys girls. My name is Ty hilden Brand joining me

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 2>as always fine gentlemen. You know him and actually I

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>see his face. What's up? He's in the same room

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 2>as me, a gentleman named Dan Rubinstein.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Ty, how are you doing?

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing well. I feel like I feel like we've

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>recorded a lot in twenty seventeen in person. That's true,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 2>We're not used to this.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>No, we've recorded a good amount of person. This is

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the first time we're recording in this specific place. We

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>are in the Estimanation lounge within the new Vox Media

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>office space, so this is the first time we've recorded here.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting on a very comfortable suede couch. You're in

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a large chair.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the most comfortable I've ever been podcasting.

0:00:58.680 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Really, is that?

0:00:59.320 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 2>And true story?

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Usually when I podcast because I'm cheap, the spare bedroom

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>in which I have all my gear I am sitting

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 2>on solid wife's old keyboard stool. It does not have

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>a bad You gotta be more comfortable. Horrible ergonomics. What

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>are you doing with your life? So I'm in a chair,

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 2>it's got a back ki.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>You are well in, You're dirty.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 2>The other half lived in.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I'm living great here right now. I'm

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>life is good. So you were in New York. We

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>were taking care of some business. But we are doing

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>We have a themed episode right now. Yes, we are

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>going to finally, I mean, it's not the Verbiy's, although

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we will get to the Verbies sooner than

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we did last year.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 2>At some point. Yeah, last year it was like May.

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>It was it was deep into we push it off

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 2>until May. We're yeah, that's not good. So we're gonna

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna try and get that out of the way.

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So sure, But what we're gonna do right now, and

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about doing this, we're gonna score the Fantasy

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Things draft that we had. Uh it was last summer,

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>last July, I believe. Yeah, put together we eat drafted

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what like ten different items something around.

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 2>The sheet in front of us here about ten issue.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, ten or eleven items each and we're going to

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>score it out and figure out on a scale from

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>one to five for each item, how strong each of

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>these items performed for us or not so strong. So

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to score that and we're going to figure

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>out we're just going to get to the bottom of

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>who is more accurate as for predicting college football things.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. So the genesis of the fantasy things.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 2>If you're picking it up, it's the off season. I

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>want to listen to college football, but I don't know

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>where I could listen to college but you just found

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>This was something basically that you and I did to

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 2>kill time, yes, in the office, and because the people

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>demand it, and because the people demand it of course now,

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 2>but we did. This is the second year that we

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 2>did it. And instead of drafting college football players like

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 2>a fantasy team, I'm uncomfortable with that, you know, instead

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 2>of doing something like that, we decided how about we

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 2>put our own little spin on it. Draft storylines. Yes, right,

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 2>so again the one I'll harken back narratives, as our

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 2>friends in Long Island would tell you, Yeah, thank you, narratives.

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>But to harken back to year one of fantasy things,

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>I drafted Mike Gundy's hairline, yes, which at the time

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 2>was a horrible selection.

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>It was not great.

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 2>If I had kept it through to this year, it

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>would have been like Ladanian Tomlinson, it would have been

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to the point where it seemed weird that you were

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>able to predict Mike Gundy's hair becoming a storyline. And

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I have this problem. Do you play fantasy sports anymore?

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Not anymore?

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>No, I have this problem with fantasy sports. Yeah. I

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 2>do it in football. I do it in baseball. I'm

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 2>all in on the prospects. But like a year or

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 2>two early. Okay, all right, so perhaps some of the

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 2>ones that I drafted here, see I'm always looking pop

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>in twenty seventeen.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>My fantasy strategy used to be, I don't do it anymore.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to find that Phil Rivers. I want to

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>find that Paul Konerko, so like I would have drafted

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>something with like Howard Stellenberger this year, that he would

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>have come out, come back and made some sort of

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>com Yeah. This was when you look at our teams.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>There's not a lot of great pics that we made,

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's there's a lot of solid picks here, so

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we we're going to score this. We are going to

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>just catch up on life. I think afterwards we had

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been a while since we've talked talking.

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 2>We haven't heard hide Door hair for you since you

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 2>went to Mexico.

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>It's sure. I was in Mexico City in Houston before that.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>What do we do?

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>We aired Adam Amean, we did our live show together,

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>did we record?

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>What do we do between that? I don't even remember

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>what was our last show? I don't remember what I

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 2>had for breakfast day? Okay, just making we did our

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 2>live show, we aired a show that we did with

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 2>Adam Aman.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>What do we do after that?

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Signing Day? I forget?

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I was sick and in the middle of

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm still I'm perennially sick right now. I don't like

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this at all, But yeah, I did that the signing

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>day show from the Houston Convention Center. So okay, I'm

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>glad that we can just slow down, grade this out

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and just catch.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Up the people demanded.

0:04:59.520 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 2>The other part of the Fantasy Things story that I

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 2>did not tell was that we decided this year we

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>were going to get serious about it. Absolutely because again

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>we came up with this idea. We didn't know what

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 2>it was going to be, very just trying to kill time.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>First year, we just figured out we'll keep track on it.

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Roughly speaking, I'm going to put any real tabulation behind it.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>This year, the people demanded a real scoring sheet, and

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 2>we put one together. In fairness, I have a very

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 2>sophisticated sheet here, and we kept sort of track of

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>it through about half way ye season. It goes up

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 2>to about halfway exactly, and then it trailed off and

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 2>as conveniently enough, we were tied at nineteen nineteen. So

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 2>now we're actually going to go fresh slate. Let's take

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>a look at this and see what happened.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to talk about news after?

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Sure?

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean Alabama's had three offensive coordinators in like

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, so there's that. But yeah, let's do that.

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's begin.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>We got ground to cover. We each picked ten different narratives.

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>If you will, I will start with mine. This is

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 2>an order of.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to go back and forth? We want

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to go all through yours.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's go back and forth. Okay, First, my first one

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 2>was Tom Herman coaching rumors. This is my first pick

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 2>such a strong pick. So if we're grading on a

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 2>scale of one through five.

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, five being inescapable. Right everywhere you turn in college football,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing is there, one being complete non factor.

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to go four.

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right.

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Tom Herman coaching rumors because it was not something you

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>could ever escape.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, so LSU fires their coach early. So there's

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that Texas has the rumors all year long that actually

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to fruition. Oregon looks like they're on the hot

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>seat all year long, and he has the connection to

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast and the offense that Oregon runs. So

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>there were I think throughout the season it was pretty

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>persistent that Tom Herman was most likely going to end

0:06:58.160 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>up somewhere big.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I reserve the right to go back and amend this

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 2>to a five if we go the full way through

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>and we decide that maybe it should be bumped up

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.239
<v Speaker 2>to a five. The reason I say four is because

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the rumors sort of ceased being rumors about midway through

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the season. It was apparent that he was either going

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>to go to LSU or Texas or some other big name.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Even early on when people were doubting Clay Helton and

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>his future at USC when they when they were one

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and three, and everybody assumed that they were going to

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be a huge bus hers from the LA area.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>You knew he was going to go somewhere. There was

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 2>no need for rumors.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think four is right because I think in the

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>middle pocket of the season, with the loss to SMU,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>with the lost to Navy, I think his sort of

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Q rating took a hit, and I don't think it

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was as persistent. So I think four is fair.

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I'm gonna I actually, I'm gonna keep

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 2>track of it right in our spreadsheet here, okay, as

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I have four a four in yep, all right, So

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>that that is you. Mm hm.

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So I took the weekly College Football ranking show as

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>being a discussion point.

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>In escapable, unescapable for the second.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Half five and six weeks.

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely discussion point. Mm hmm. This was This was

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>very much a Paul Canerico kind of pick. I think,

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>so disserviceable.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It was a well, it was a stronger year two

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>because the discussions were more robust, I will say, because

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody quite understood what was happening with the logic involved,

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>why why certain teams were as high as they were

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>or not as high as they were. So I feel

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>like this is in the three to four range.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:31.559
<v Speaker 2>I would say three.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'll take the three.

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Three. Are we going just integers? Are we going to

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 2>go decimals as well? No?

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we should just keep it into yeah, whole.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Numbers, good and integer reference. Thank you?

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Y Yeah.

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>So all right, I'm up four to three. Baby, why

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 2>don't we bookend this crap?

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, you go again. Okay, that's a snake. Yeah,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>that's true.

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So my number two pick appears to be Michigan State disrespect.

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so this is going to be a spirited debate

0:08:58.320 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>disc So here's the question.

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, it is going to be a debate.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>What do we define as disrespect? Because yes, I can

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>make the argument Illinois football disrespected Michigan State this year.

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I can make the argument that the entire Big Ten

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>disrespected Michigan State and did not respect their previous results.

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 2>In state, disrespected Michigan.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State disrespected Michigan States. But I think I have

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to be if I'm going to be one of the

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>pillars of the Fantasy Things draft and league. Down between

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the two of us, the founding Father. I think I

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have to go with the spirit of this pick and

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of Michigan State disrespect is Michigan State being

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>good but not being acknowledged rightfully, so not getting their deal.

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State after beating Notre Dame, everybody figured it was

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>good at the very least was good. But then they're

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>just immediate downfall sort of ended the possibility of disrespecting

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>how good Michigan State was.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>This was a Ryan Leaf caliber bust right here, right.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 2>But we made this.

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I made this pick in July, so I had all

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of July and August of listening to Michigan and Ohio

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>State exclusively correct. Was there a team in the Big

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Ten that was probably disrespected like Michigan State had been disrespected?

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I would argue Penn State was that team. Nobody believed

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>in Penn State until it was too late. They kept

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>winning and ultimately they won the conference.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I believe I believe that Michigan State disrespect

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>was handed to Penn State. I'm going to say Michigan

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>State disrespect because of July and August and because of

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>early on in the season.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I will say two. Two feels about right. Okay, I'm

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 2>looking at our score sheet here. Yeah, so keep in mind,

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 2>this wasn't like a normal season. We did this what

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 2>first week of July ish, from the eleventh of July,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, through Christmas time is what I have on

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the sheet here. From July through the the third week

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 2>of September, there were only three weeks where we did

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>not tick a market award.

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State disrespect.

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so early early on it seemed as if you

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 2>were gonna be really rollinated here, right, I would contend

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>to my earlier point. Yeah, Michigan State disrespect could be

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 2>a hell of a pick for this coming season.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where, Yeah, because you built.

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 2>In a year or two early, they might have had

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 2>that off year.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>There's so much organic disrespect that's been built up with

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State. It's a really good year to get out.

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They started to and now they beat Furman and they

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>beat Notre Dame and they're ranked and then they lose one, two, three, four, five, six,

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>seven straight games.

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how many non Rutgers Big Ten wins

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they had this year? It would be zero point zero,

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>zero point zero. So what a bad year? Sorry sparty,

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right.

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to I feel comfortable with it. Two.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>That brings it back to me.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what do you have?

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 2>My second pick was Bill Hancock's bullshit.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>A pretty good pick given the history of Bill Hancock.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 2>A good pick given his history, But even on my

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>own scoring sheet only had two weeks where he was

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to spin something. That's really what this gets to.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 2>The quintessential Bill Hancock bullshit is him trying to pull

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, spinning things is very popular day. Yes,

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Bill Hancock was the original.

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Can I tell you something, I have a little bit

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>more respect for Bill Hancock in this day and age.

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine giving him more than two. No, it's

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>just there just wasn't all that much. There was some

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>spin coming to future scheduling one. I think one is

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>fair here.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like one is fair here. Yeah, we will

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 2>get more Bill Hancock bullshit.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>In the future.

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, but probably when we least expect it. Yes, Okay.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>The reason that I took this pick so high it

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 2>was sort of coming on the heels of them putting

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>college football playoff games on New Year's Eve. Right, still,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>by and large, a disaster, not as big a disaster

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 2>as it had been the year previous. This coming season,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 2>we're not going to have that. Well he has.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>He's like literally a grandfather and he's grandfathered in too.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean he runs the BCS, he helps to run

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the playoff whatever iteration we have of college football postseason

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that we have next, even if it's called the Bill

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Hancock is definitely not involved with this playoff system system. Oh,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>who's the executive director? It appears to be Bill Hancock.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Hancock is cutting things.

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, so I go one here.

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm giving you that one.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Not enough bullshit? All right, let's snake around. We got

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot to get through. I have Jim Harrbass Slash

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 2>SEC feud as my third.

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously white hot to start off things, whitefall? What do

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we think about the during the season.

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 2>Kind of cooled off? Did cool off? It cooled off?

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't they have an ACC team in a bowl

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>game they don't get the SEC.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I can't go higher than a two. Okay, I feel

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>like two is the proper score here. Yeah, because it

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>started off so white hot. It feels a lot to

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 2>me like the Michigan State disrespect, right, But I can't

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 2>go high than too because it did cool off.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, if we were talking talking about Jim

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Harbaugh Western Europe feuding, yeah.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>That might be a thing moving forward.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But he is taking his act away from Florida, away

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>from the IMG Academy. I mean, we'll see what happens

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with satellite camps moving forward. But unless you were watching

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the Paul Fine Bomb Show, I don't feel like there

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was much in the way of going back and forth too.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, go one and a half. If we were doing decimals, I.

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Think the satellite stuff and the discussion point in August

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think gets you at too.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Two. Okay, it's in the books for two. Your turn.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is back to me. I have Mark

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>ricked as a Miami alumnus.

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Did he go to Miami? Went to Miami? Really?

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It was Miami of Florida, the University of Miami. Okay,

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the U.

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's great that he is now had football coach

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>in Coral Gables.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Okay, it is a crazy coincidence. I'm going to

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>give myself a four here. Really, I'm going to give

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>myself a four because you could not watch a Miami

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>broadcast without at least being mentioned once Okay, so that's

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>very specific to Miami games. The problem though, is how

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>many big Miami broadcasts were there, like Big Nash on

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the national stage, Notre Dame, Notre Dame. Yeah, I mean

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bowl game?

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They ever? He got attention on signing day they signed

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a real nice class.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>My my initial thought was three.

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, why three? Just because Miami was not in the

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>constant conversations.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll take a three. I feel like a three, but

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>no lower than a three.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wouldn't take lower than the three because it

0:15:58.160 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was consistent.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I a way bad only giving you a three for that.

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 2>This is another tweeer for me.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was consistent, But how consistently.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Were we all watching Miami games, that's right, or at

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>least listening to Miami broadcasts or taking Yeah, I feel

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>like that cooled off over the course of the season. See,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at yours just through three picks, and we

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 2>got a motor here because we're falling behind schedule. Okay,

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>but look, you've got a three to two and a three.

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I've got a four to a one in a two.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd much rather have two threes than a four to

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 2>two and a one.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you've got a lower floor, maybe a higher ceiling.

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we're gonna snake back around Josh Rosen's

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen draft stock.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Rough rough year for the draft stock. He's not even

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the draft stock king of Los Angeles. I'm not even

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>sure I heard the words draft mentioned in accordance with

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Josh Rosen after like, well.

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was hurt halfway into the year.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, no one's even talking about Rosen.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Serious nerve damage. I think people are much more concerned.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's gonna be a new offense. So yet

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>again for UCLA, they fire fire Kennedy Palm, They're bringing

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Jedfish more pro style again, though, I'm gonna have to

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 1>give myself a one.

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>This is a one.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It has to be a one.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 2>This is a one. I was all in on Josh Rosen. Two.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I wanted Josh Rosen's draftstock on my team.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Oh man, all right, let's circle back to you.

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you got Christian McCaffrey's versatility?

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Stanford sort of fell off a cliff attention wise

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty early on in the season.

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you why I believe I came up

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 2>with this storyline. I'll tell you why I came up

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>with it and why I picked it. Okay, this is

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>one of those things like Tom Hammond's Random Factory. Just

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 2>some nervous Time'm using the word tick a lot on

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 2>this show, and I don't know why. Maybe it's my

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>own little tick coincidentally enough, but it is one of

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 2>those announcer things that they focus in on that they

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 2>just they can't get enough of. They can't help themselves

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about how versatile this guy is. This may be

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>another Michigan State disrespect kind of situation where they mentioned

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 2>it a lot last year. Yeah, they didn't mention it

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot this year because he was hurt. They will

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 2>talk about it a ton in the NFL now, absolutely well.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>I think also part of this was there was so

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>much off the field Christian McCaffrey stuff as well. He

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>can play instruments, he's traveled, he's a great student, whatever.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 2>So the versatility did not diminish. What diminished was the

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 2>coverage of said versatility.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I might give you a one here, This is a one.

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna have to take this one.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a one, A total bust pick here. Yeah, versatility,

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and he's not any less versatil.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>He got injured during the year. He had a ton

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of quarterback troubles. Yeah, I'm gonna go with the one

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>really bad offense from Stanford for a chunk of that season. Yeah,

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:47.959
<v Speaker 1>I think you got to take the one there. All right,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>let's circle back. What you got for the next pick?

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Hype for a recently unsuccessful Pac twelve school. Okay, this

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 2>is a two for Tuesday here. Yes, even though it's

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 2>a Wednesday. That would be USC and Washington. I feel

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>like I kind of have both here.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, neither one. USC has been relatively successful recently.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 2>They had six losses a year ago. That's true, Okay,

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 2>all right, Washington, of course, you know, made the playoff.

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 2>They were a great team this year.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 2>The hype I feel very quickly turned into real world

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh this team is good?

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't. Okay, So aside from my own personal

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>energy towards the University of Washington that I tried to

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>generate the PAC twelve, especially the PAC twelve North with

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Stanford and Oregon sort of quickly, even though Stanford finished

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with ten wins, sort of taking themselves out. Stanford got

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>completely murdered by Washington. Oregon was a total train wreck

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, while Zoo was pretty good, but nobody really

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>had a concept for them, and they themselves have a

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>ton of hype because of their early season losses. I

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>was at Poise State and Eastern Washington. Oregon State was

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a wreck until the end of the season. Cal was

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a wreck all year long. The problem with Washington had

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Washington, but they didn't have the

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>big games outside of Stanford early and USC late, in

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>which they lost. So after they lost that USC game,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>people said like, Okay, they're still probably in a good

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>position to get to the playoff. But people this, listen,

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to trust you better than I because I

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>am biased as an Oregon fan. Were people enthused about

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Jake Browning and Chris Peterson and Washington. I think people

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>just sort of accepted the fact that there was a

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>good shot that they'd beat in the playoff.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 2>They accepted it, and I feel like they accepted it

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>almost by default, right by default, because we talked about it.

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>How many times did we talk about this, Dan, Yeah,

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 2>it was very apparent last five weeks of the season,

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>six weeks of the season, we knew who was going

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 2>to be in the playoff, right I mean they were

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 2>going to have Colorado or Wazoo, and generally speaking, who

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 2>was going to be in the Penn State. Injection this

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>energy of Penn State into that conversation was interesting, but no,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I think by and large we kind of knew that

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>the hype was more than just hype fairly early on

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 2>with Washington. Here is why I'm inclined to give myself

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 2>a three.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'll listen, because I have you down as a

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>two for this.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Say three is because there was a lot of late

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 2>season hype that built on USC. Okay, and now as

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 2>we enter into the off season at Ross Bowl, it's

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 2>going to be at a fever pitch yep. I feel

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>like I got in on the coattails there of the USC.

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of Washington early, a lot more USC

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 2>late after a tough one in three start. Yeah, kind

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 2>of not much in the middle.

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll give it too for USC the USC W Like.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like USC is like at a two and

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington's at like a one. So because the actual category

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>is hype for a recently unsuccessful Pac twelve school, but

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>is it for recent Pact twelve school or Pack twelve schools?

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I have singular down here? Oh, I have single down here?

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Wow? So so do I? Wow. So USC didn't have

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>hype till the end of the year. They had a

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 2>complete vacuum of hype.

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Early.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 2>We need like the ninth circuit court of a pipe

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>to figure this out.

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Does yours say school or schools?

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 2>It says school, It says school unsuccessful? But it does.

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I correct, it didn't mine. But we're not talking. But

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is it the hype that we're talking about? Hype could

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>be plural, right, wow, But but the fact that it's

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>hype hype for a school?

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow?

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you think I early on with Michigan State disrespect,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I said spirit of the and listen, you can.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Go either way with spirit of the pick was Washington

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>right at the time. Okay, spirit of the pick was Washington.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 2>So you're thinking one.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>No, Well I said two. You said three. I said two.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll go too, Okay two. It is grinding me down. Okay, Yeah,

0:22:58.520 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 2>we got some mad reads here.

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what are we have?

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Blue? Apron? Ever hear blue? Op? Oh my god, I

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 2>am actually getting very hungry. What will time mispronounce? It is?

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 2>It is later in the day five forty four to

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 2>be exact, in a Wednesday. People will be amazed at

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>how quickly we turn this around. Be out by ten pm,

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little later tonight. But I am hungry right now.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I could go for some Blue Apron right now. Oh

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Apron knocked on the door right here and said, we

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>want you to cook up some cashew chicken stir fry

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 2>with tango mandarins and jasmine rice. I would say, yes, yeah,

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll be all about that. But here is the way

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 2>this works. Basically, you sign up for a Blue Apron and

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 2>they will deliver fresh ingredients to your doorstep. They can

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>delivered a ninety nine percent of the United States ninety

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 2>nine point five percent hell yeah, of food deserts. So

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 2>no matter where you are, they they can hit you up,

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>make pre portioned ingredients, stand no food waste. Cook together

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 2>as a family, builds lasting relationships to cooks. That's what

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 2>they do. And now, how much she thinks something like.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>This costs twenty dollars. Now they're shipping it right to you.

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a good deal for fifteen or twenty bucks. How

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>much are we talking.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 2>We're talking less than ten dollars per person per meal.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 2>If you want a really good meal, it's a lot

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 2>more than that if you go out to eat, It's true,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 2>less than ten dollars per person per meal Blue Apron.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 2>They will deliver all the ingredients, everything you need and

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 2>easy to follow recipes from over what one hundred and

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 2>fifty local farms, ranches, fisheries all across the good old

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 2>US of A again, right to your door. They will

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 2>ship exactly what you need home cooked meals in forty

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>minutes or less, for less than ten dollars per person

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>per meal.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's something great about knowing what's going into your food.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>We all like takeout, we all like going out to eat,

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but like you to treat yourself right, you should you

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>should create make something.

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 2>In addition to the cashew chicken stir fry which I've

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 2>already bestowed upon you.

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 2>Oudon noodle soup with miso and soft boiled eggs. Hm.

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 2>I've never had a soft boiled egg. Really, I have

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 2>no idea what that is, deliciou, how do they? What

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 2>is that?

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>It's just inside it's not so you know what a

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>hard boiled Yes, of course inside it's just softer.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>It's just not you don't boil it as long, literally

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 2>softer it is a literal softer boil. Is it runny?

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's runnier?

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, interesting.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's good.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Roasted pork with apple walnut and farrow salad. You know

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a farrow is no idea, Really, it's sort of it's

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a grain. It's like a bulgar wheat kind of thing.

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And crispy barrel munday with quenewa and roasted carrot salad.

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 2>No idea. What bear Monday is?

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>It's bar mundy bear Monday.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Don't know. I'm not positive it's a fish, a fish

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 2>type of fish.

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can get all that. No delivery, absolutely, they'll

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>live and tell you how to cook it. Ty, I

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>pulled something up. Where where should they go for this?

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, is there a password?

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, password is blue Apron dot Com slash solid. Done,

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Blue Apron dot Com slash solid. You'll get your first

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 2>three meals for free with free shipping.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ty on my computer screen. I'm gonna do

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this every ting, every single time Blue Apron has an

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>ad read with us. Yeah, okay, I'm going to bring

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 1>up a food word, foreign food word, foreign food, foreign

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>food word, and you have to tell me how you

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>think it's pronounced. I'm gonna put you on the spot here.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I made words. So but this is this is.

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>This is a baked egg dish from the Middle East. Okay,

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what is that first word in the recipe headline?

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Give me Middle East or norwigin jack Shuka, shock shuka.

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>You did pretty good shock shuka. Okay, just it's really

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>that was the only game. That's the only game. If

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you have the opportunity to try shack shuke, if you're

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>listening to this or if you're Tie Hildenbrandt or wife Kate,

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very good. Baked eggs in the sauce.

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Wonderful, sounds delightful. I like the picture.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Uh. The other paying sponsor this evening is our good

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 2>friends over at Movement Watches.

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh, wearing one right now? You are where it is

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>right there?

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I like it. Yeah, looks very shark MVMT watches dot

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 2>com is actually the u r L, but it's Movement Watches.

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 2>They were founded on the belief that style shouldn't break

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the bank. Then started actually a lot like us. Yeah,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 2>just two guys. They wanted quality watches. They didn't want

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 2>to pay an arm and a leg. They figured, let's

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>do it. Ourselves. And so what they've done now is

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 2>they cut out the middleman. They sell exclusively online. They

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:15.239
<v Speaker 2>sold over five hundred thousand watches to one hundred and

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 2>sixty countries worldwide. You have one, I have one?

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh?

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 2>You got new digs here we do at the studio

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 2>beautiful comedies to get this week? Do you know what that? What?

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 2>How many compliments I've gotten?

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be telling I was in Mexico City. We

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>can talk about that a little later. My brother specifically commented,

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I need a new watch. And also my

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:39.199
<v Speaker 1>brother and my fiance's friend's husband was like, I need

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a new watch. I love your watch. Where is it from?

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>This is one hundred percent true. He also tried on

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>my jacket. He was very forward about liking my stuff.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>But it was the watching jacket and it's my mvmcha.

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Fashion Maven Dan Ruper absolutely, so here is how this works.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I gotta watch how out I say this. I don't

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>know if these walls sound proven or not not at all.

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 2>And the they cut out the middleman. They sell exclusively

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 2>through mvmtwatches dot Com. Their watches start at just ninety

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 2>five dollars.

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Dan it's a great deal. Ninety It feels more expensive

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>on my wrist.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Next week is Valentine's Day. M hmm, all right, So

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if your bow or your bell out

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>there likes a nice stylish watch. Just consider it. Do it,

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 2>even if it's not for Valentine's Day. Just consider it.

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Take a look. They start at just ninety five bucks.

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 2>That's a fraction of what you pay if you go

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 2>to a fancy department store and want to buy a watch,

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 2>or to buy a nice time piece, go to MVMT

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>watches dot com. Step up your watch game right now.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>If you go to mvmtwatches dot com slash solid, you

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>will get fifteen percent off, plus you get free shipping

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 2>and free returns. Hell of a deal. Join the movement. Absolutely,

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>it is a hell of a movement MVMT watches dot Com.

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I could not imagine a single profession where if you

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>had to tell me I had to be come a watchmaker,

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that I would freak out more. I am so bad

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>with my hands and so like to look at a

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>microscopic backing of a watch and like, oh you have

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to create a timepiece. I would just look at it

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and as if it were a microscopic lego and go

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>foh no, no, no, I would that would terrorize me.

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Cool little microscopic thing that you wear on you don't

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 2>want to know. That's why I'm glad mvmt's around so

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to do any of that. Huh. Okay,

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>well check them out. Nice watches. Dan's got one on.

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 2>It really makes him a better person and I can

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 2>see that visually, yep, seated across. Okay, now we left

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>off at hype for a recently unsuccessful.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>You got a deuce for that.

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Uh that brings us to your pick and Dan, oh man, Dan,

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>do we have a first five? Hear me smiling here?

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Strong's Dower Die season was a pick for you.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I gotta gett. I did give myself a five.

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh hell yeah.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Every single week ends up and this is nothing I enjoy.

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't like when people lose their jobs. Luckily, Charlie

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Strong was able to land someplace that's I think as

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>good a non Power five job as there is because

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of where it's located in their recent success at USF.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of consistency, in terms of how much

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Strong was spoken of nationally, locally, regionally, I think

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>we have our first five with Charlie Strong Steward I.

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 2>See in Texas. What makes this pick beautiful?

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Value pick too, value, pick fifth round. Yeahd damn, you're

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 2>like the New England Patriots.

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen, it's all about value.

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Here is what makes this pick beautiful.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I like how you say beautyful.

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing. I'm doing the Yeah, this is the Trump thing.

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing. I'm doing the Trump thing with my.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're raising three fingers. It's an eg now.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the iOS kids, what makes this pick beautiful

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that Charlie Strong not only usually do

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 2>or die is a figure of speech. Yeah, he both

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 2>did and died in the same season.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>What can I tell you?

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 2>There were moments this season where it looked like he

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 2>was gonna hold onto the show.

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>There were specific drives that were do or drives for

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Strong. It was such a micro level pick, and.

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>There were obvious points throughout the course of the season

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 2>where he was legitimately dead. Yeah, then came back to

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>life and then went back to being dead.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>This is true.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a five. This would be a six.

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>The fact that they started out beating Notre Dame in

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>the fashion that they did. There was the do, there

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>was the do. Oklahoma State, Kansas, Kansas was the die. Yeah.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So I mean we've got it all in one pick.

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna hand myself a five.

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 2>This is not the best value pick though, No, I

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 2>don't believe it is. My last round pick is is

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 2>pretty good.

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>It's wonderful.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it will be enough to put

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 2>me over the top. Right now, you're coming in, all right.

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So my second pick here is the internet freaking out

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>over a Southern QB's girlfriend. Okay, who is it? Shaye Patterson,

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Shape Patterson. We had early on Trevor Knight with the

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Duck Dynasty. We had Blake Barnett is dating some sort

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of professional surfer from southern California.

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Blake Barnett.

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe not Shape Patterson. Here's the other thing, though, Tye,

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>where I don't think you've calculated, and I'm going to

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ask you for your consideration. I haven't decided how I

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>feel about it. This is going to be very personal

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to you too.

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Personal.

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Rodgers is.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 2>A Southern QB, but I think the spirit of it

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 2>is active Southern QB active Southern QB.

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, wow, because we are just talking about freaking out.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 2>You put a new spin on this dance. So Jordan

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Rodgers was the Bachelor, Bachelor, Winner, Bachelorette. He won JoJo's

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 2>heart on The Bachelor.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>A Bachelorette, so he was one of many okay.

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Are friends over at my brother. My brother and me

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 2>would refer to this as a very serious zag that

0:32:59.400 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 2>you've done to me.

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I have zagged. So here's here's why I'm not going

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to accept it. It is about an active quarterback, and

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it is the freak out is like if you go

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to like busted coverage or one of those sites where

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just like you have to check out you know

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this text A and M, this Auburn, this Florida state whatever.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>That was the spirit of it. So I'm not going

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to accept the Jordan rod If we were to accept

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Jordan Rodgers element. Also, the it's sort of like

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the object It's like the person being objectified is this

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is the girlfriend, which is not cool at all, but

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Bachelorette turnaround, in the Bachelorette zag, it is

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Rodgers who's being objectified. So it is this beautiful

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>what's her name? Jojo Jojo? So so Jordan Rodgers was

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the object of JoJo's affection. So I don't feel like

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Rodgers was being put on websites as you can't

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>believe who Jojo is dating and pictures of Jordan Rodgers.

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to accept it put it as

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a zag.

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 2>This is part of the reason why we're america Most

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>honest college Football podcast. I was voted my senior year

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>of high school most honest. Okay, either that or I'm

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 2>a great liar. But we're trying to bring honesty here.

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 2>That's true, and I appreciate that.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So I'm just saying I considered it if it

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be, if it was going to make its

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:19.919
<v Speaker 1>way through, that was a definite five.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 2>What do we give it? Man?

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't think it was a needle moving year.

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>As for attention, like if it were a J. McCarron

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Catherine White year, I would have gone five. Catheryne Webb,

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, Catherine Webb? How quickly we forget that's true.

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give myself a three because I thought

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it was there was the consistent drum beat, But I

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Anybody really spiked the needle. Okay, So are you good

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 2>with the three for that? A three feels a little aggressive? Really?

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay? But I see the problem is I don't think

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>either one of us really patronizes, patronized or whatever reads

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the sites that are posting.

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 2>This all that often. I'll give you a three, Dan, Okay,

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take the three. I'll give you a three

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 2>because I'm a nice guy.

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I appreciate it.

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay. O.

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Man, if only Blake Barnett had held onto his starting position,

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I would have definitely had four.

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>All right. That brings us to me, what do you

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 2>have an attacking mentality?

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 2>So here's what's interesting about this. The reason I brought

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 2>this up is because every year there are teams who

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 2>get a new defensive coordinator. And what does every defensive coordinator,

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 2>every new defensive coordinator want to bring to the table

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that his predecessor did not have?

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Can I tell you we are going to bring pressure

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with an aggressive attacking mentality?

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you? Yeah, thank you. They all want to have

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 2>an attacking mental bring a lot of pressure, and it

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 2>seems as if they all say that. Now, what's fascinating

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to me about this is at least through half of

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the season, this got more points than hype for a

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 2>recently unsuccessful school, more points than Bill Hancock's bullshit, and

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 2>one fewer point than Tom Herman co rumors. This did

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 2>surprisingly well through at least the halfway point. Hm, I

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 2>would not have, in my wildest dreams imagine a situation

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 2>in which I'd be thinking about maybe giving this a four. Okay,

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 2>but I could probably build a strong case for giving

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 2>this a four. What is your caseuse?

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.720
<v Speaker 1>This is a pick centered around December, when new defensive

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>coordinators are being hired.

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Right December January. It's centered around that, but it's also

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 2>center around August when everyone is talking to the.

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Me a new defensive coordinator. Yeah, yeah, you're right.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 2>So my case for it is that this came up

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot more in the early part of September than

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I expected. Okay, with that in mind, I can't in

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 2>good faith give this a four, But I can't give

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 2>it a three.

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm okay with three because if I were

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to ask you right now, who in December or early

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>January was a defensive coordinator higher that everybody like, sir

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 1>so going into the season. Bob it was a Bob

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Shoop who everybody was given us links, was talking about

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>having an attacking mentality. I don't feel like there was

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a big enough higre as I look across you know, LSU.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>They keep Dave Veranda, so there is not that huge

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>press conference Todd Orlando. I don't think there was a

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>big word about being more attacking and more aggressive for

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Texas at Oregon. Jim Levitt, you know, he's a big personality,

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>but I don't feel like there was. Maybe I missed it.

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel like there was that initial burst of aggressive, attacking,

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>bring pressure quote wise. So I feel like it was consistent,

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.399
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't hear it from huge names all over

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the place. So three feels right, Okay, consistent but not consistent,

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>drum beat but not loud.

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that gives me three. That gives me thirteen overall.

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 2>So you've got like one in hand here and you

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 2>still got seven. Yeah, so you're you're gonna come on

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 2>top here. This one, I feel could be a spirited debate. Okay,

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready, Texas A and M's quarterbacks heads are falling.

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 2>So this is my second This was a good one.

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 2>This was your sixth round selection. Yeah, what is the

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 2>origin of this pick?

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>The origin of the pick is both Kyle Allen and

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray transferred in very short time away from Texas

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>A and M giving them I believe at the time

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it was just JQ Hubeck, Hubaneck whatever Cubanc and then

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Knight eventually used his grad transfer year to move

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>south from Norman to College Station and took over and

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>at least solidified things in terms of depth charts and

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>having multiple quarterbacks play. He does get hurt against Mississippi State.

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>They're going to rely on some young quarterbacks moving forward,

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but this one peaked early. I think I have to

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:56.919
<v Speaker 1>give myself nothing higher than a two.

0:38:57.520 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would go I was going to say one

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 2>or two. Yeah, I'll be generous. I'll go too.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'll take it.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll go to Okay, move to you, move to me.

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 2>See this is where I think there's going to be

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 2>some spirited debate. You want to go back and forth here? Yeah, okay.

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Mine was My next pick was Ohio State's attrition.

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this one was dead. I tried to

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 2>warn you. I feel like it was dead. There was

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of action up front. Yeah, people talking

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 2>about this. There was a little bit of action late,

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>people talking about how much how much of an impact

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State players would have on the draft in twenty seventeen.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:41.479
<v Speaker 2>This is a one.

0:39:41.880 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem. I think one is right. The worst

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thing that could have happened for this pick was Ohio

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>State blowing out Oklahoma. Yes, it was the worst thing

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that could have happened. And thank you Noah Brown, thank

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you Samuel Weber Brown. They had a huge offensive game,

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they shut down for the most part, a very good.

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:02.439
<v Speaker 2>O' the twenty four years, right, we'll score of that game. Yeah,

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm with you.

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And what the funny thing is, though, the story about

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State, in terms of narratives from my Long Island friends,

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is the overarching thing with Ohio State this year was

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what is wrong with Ohio State and especially what is

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong with JT. Barrett, which was the opposite of attrition.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>So the worst thing was the Oklahoma bludgeting. So that's

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>why I would agree with that. And we made a

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:34.720
<v Speaker 1>sound for the baby buck Eyes.

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 2>We had this whole little shtick worked up, and it

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 2>was proof positive that you can't plan these things.

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 1>The problem is with that pick in retrospect, Ohio State

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>recruits far too well to really hone in on attrition.

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you live, you learn what was a later

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 2>round pick. It's true I took a flyer on it.

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 2>You absolutely didn't quite pan out. All right, let's go

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 2>back to you then. Okay, this is one I did

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 2>not keep keep tabs on.

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm gonna I'm gonna verify things right now.

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 2>So you picked country singer on game day? Yes, this

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 2>is a staple. It happens at least once a year.

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Who who is the guy who just likes every team?

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Kenny Chesney?

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Was Chesney on this year? Do we know.

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 1>He had to have been? But I'm going to go through.

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go through.

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So let's see, that's two thousand guest pickers. Oh, this

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 2>is not doing it. This is just names. Do we

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.280
<v Speaker 2>have a good list anywhere on the internet?

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sure there is. I'm gonna find game day ESPN.

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna use Wikipedia college game day locales. Man, I

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>need to find the guest pickers. Let's oh, here we go.

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>I should be able to have.

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's put it this way. We don't we don't

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 2>need to boil this down to an exact science. It's

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 2>not a one because there's always a country singer on

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 2>game day, and if there's not a country singer, we

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 2>could do another bit of a zag and say that

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 2>it's got something to do with the game day intro.

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's a guest picker spirit though where is

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's some website called Cole's Game Day Blog. Shout

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 1>out to Cole and he lists it here. So it

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.439
<v Speaker 1>was twenty seventeen, twenty sixteen.

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Twenty sixteen.

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not very good, so I can tell you all

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of the guests, Okay, okay, So Aaron Rodgers definitely not

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 1>a country. How many weeks with their fifteen sixteen seventeen weeks?

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>How many country singers would we need for that for

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it to be a legitimate like three?

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Like four pickers? I would say four? Four?

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay. We had Dale Earnhardt Junior, not a country center tangential,

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>but not a country singer. Laila Ali as far as

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I know, not a country singer. Steve Spurrier, not a

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>country singer. Phillip Fulmer. No, Eric Church is that a

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>country I.

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Believe, so that'd be one.

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's one.

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Chain Smokers definitely not, definitely not. Do you like

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the Chance Smokers. I like one song by the Chean Smokers.

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I think their secret garbage or maybe they're out in

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the open garbage. I don't know. I don't like them

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>at all.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that. I think the problem with the

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Chain Smokers is that they have the one guy part

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 2>of the Chain Smokers who thinks he can sing. Chain

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Steve Chain is that Steve Chang, Steve Chain, he thinks

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 2>he can sing. But Steve Chain and the smoke, I

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 2>think he's in it for the girls. But that's just

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 2>my theory.

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Same uh Rick Flair not a country singer. Verne lundquiz

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 1>not a country singer. Frank Caliendo not a country singer.

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Lil Wayne has he done a country duet? Not going

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to count it, spirit Joel McHale not a country singer.

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jennings not a country singer. That's it.

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's a one.

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:51.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a one, all right. It was a very soft

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:53.399
<v Speaker 1>year for country singers. On Game day.

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Back to me, yep, I have this in quotations. What

0:43:56.880 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 2>do you have this year's Iowa? Okay, this is a one.

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be one. This is a one who

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 2>was there. The spirit of this pick was that there's

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 2>going to be an underdog team that is going to

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 2>be referred to no right week schedule, Sorry Iowa fans,

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 2>but week schedule they run their way through it. They

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.320
<v Speaker 2>somehow burst into well here was the problem. National conversation

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 2>on the heels of that.

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>The problem was there was a team in their division

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>who was formidable and in it till the end, and

0:44:28.120 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>people weren't fully sure if they were going to be

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>able to run the table. The problem is Wisconsin is

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a bigger brand of football than Iowa. So you can't

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>say out of nowhere because Wisconsin's played in a bunch

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of rose balls recently.

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 2>If if one weren't the absolute floor here, yeah, I

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 2>would give it a zero. This bad pick, bad bad pick.

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking here. Yeah, it wasn't going to be you

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>know what, but even Nebraska, you can't say Nebraska is

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like to come from nowhere. Isn't playing anybody? They played

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Oregon early on in.

0:44:56.840 --> 0:45:01.320
<v Speaker 2>The traditional blue blood national right championsh of caliber programs.

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Like it would have had to have been from here.

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It would have to be Illinois, Minnesota, Northwestern, Purdue. I

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>would have taken teams in another conference. It had to

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have been like NC State something like that. Didn't happen,

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not a not a dig on n C State, but

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, not nothing the biggest brand name.

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 2>So that's a one.

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>That's a one.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Are we going back to me? Back to you locker

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:27.680
<v Speaker 1>room coach dancing? Oh okay, who is big this year?

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:33.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not had coach dancing thing, So you had

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>big speeches. The Dino Babers thing was big, but not

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a dance. The Dino Baber's speech was large. PJ. Fleck

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 1>animated inspiring to the Western Michigan team. Row the boat,

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>row that boat. But the coach dancing thing there was

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of dabbo. There was a little bit

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of this. I don't feel like it had this sort

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of attention that it did the year before.

0:45:56.360 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 2>So one, I think I'm also going to give that

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 2>a one. Two straight ones are not good for my

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 2>bottom line. All right, back to me. Weird neutral site games. Okay,

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 2>this has to be at least a two. Okay, I

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 2>could go higher, give me your case. The weirdest of

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the weird was the game between Virginia Tech and Tennessee

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 2>at Bristol Motor Speedway or that was a weird one

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Cal Hawaiian in Australia, Cal Hawaii in Australia. Yeah, the

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 2>week before the first week of the College Boss. It

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 2>wasn't just weird neutral site games in venue. We just

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 2>had like a lot of odd matchups. Didn't Mississippi go

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 2>or Mississippi State go up to play like Boston College yea,

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:45.080
<v Speaker 2>excuse me in it yeah, same same wow. But we

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of games like that that just it

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 2>wasn't so much that they were playing on like a

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 2>cruise ship, but they were just two teams that you

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't expect to be playing each other. True, So I'm

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 2>inclined to go three. Yeah, I'd take a three because

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:01.479
<v Speaker 2>the Bristol Motor speed thing, but that like we knew

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 2>that going in like LSU Wisconsin just doesn't feel like.

0:47:06.800 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel i'd give you more enthusiastically the three.

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is obviously your false. Notre Dame had a

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>garbage season and they where did they play this year?

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 2>They played a weird game in Jacksonville, Army. Yeah, they

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 2>played a game it was San Antonio. Yeah, I feel

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 2>like it's a three. I'll give you the three.

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>It definitely was a weird year, but like, yeah, it's

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a scheduled thing.

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, okay, all right back to you. This is

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 2>your last one, then.

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:38.319
<v Speaker 1>College stadium is selling beer. I didn't hear a peep

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>about this during the season.

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 2>You picked this one because it was the last pick available, yes,

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 2>you had.

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I had no enthusiasm for this.

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Pick, none whatsoever. So this is this is a one?

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Kay? Was there were there any good beer stories from

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the season.

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Dodd wrote one very early on, very early on

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 2>about it, but it was not a controversial take. It

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 2>was were akin to, hey, you're going to see more

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 2>stadium selling beer. The reason that we put this one

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.240
<v Speaker 2>on the docket was because we thought, and I believe

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 2>we described it as such, that there would be a

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:17.240
<v Speaker 2>crotchety old man column from some guy in like des Moines,

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 2>not to single out anyone into moy, there was gonna

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 2>be some crotchety old white sports writer, yeah, bitching and

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 2>moaning about the kids.

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>So what I really needed for this pick, I really

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 1>needed one of the stadiums to have like a revolt,

0:48:33.080 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and I needed like beer thrown on the field, you know,

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody's throwing their their plastic hands of beer or something

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. I needed that big seminal moment of stadium

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 1>beer injecting itself into a game, and I just didn't

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>get it. I just didn't get it.

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is going to come down to the wire. Yeah,

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 2>it's unbelievable that it's going to come down to this.

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:48:54.200 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 2>My final selection was titled second guessing. Brian Kelly went

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 2>on a lot this season. I think this is we

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 2>can debate this a little bit though it's at least

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 2>a four.

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's okay. I think at least a four

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is good. I can argue three a little bit because

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of how bad Notre Dame was and how little they

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.839
<v Speaker 1>were talked about outside of like what's wrong with Notre Dame?

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>What happened to Notre Dame's powerful defense? You know, they

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.359
<v Speaker 1>have this returning quarterback that everybody thinks is a first

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.920
<v Speaker 1>round pick. They have this defense that people I think

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we're still pretty high on considering the talents, even with

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>injuries in the secondary. It felt like it was more

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of a defensive story, which is not Brian Kelly's purview.

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 2>It was a defensive story. Both literally and figurative true,

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 2>because Brian Kelly was very defensive. Yes, just as a

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 2>human being. About where this whole season went. So initially

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 2>it was the defense, right, they get rid of Brian

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 2>van Gorter. Defense stinks, Then they get rid of Brian Kelly,

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 2>or excuse me, I need to be very careful. They

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.919
<v Speaker 2>get rid of Brian van Gord, Yes, and then Notre

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Dame keeps losing.

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, but not necessarily because of the defense.

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 2>The defense solidified, not because of the defense, but primarily

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 2>because they couldn't get all facets of their team firing

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 2>on all cylinders in the same game. They had a

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 2>couple of good games, but not many because it went

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 2>four and eight down the stretch. Then it started to

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 2>become every one second guessing Brian Kelly as head football

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 2>coach for this football team, will he retain his job now?

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I can't honestly say, as somebody who follows noting very closely,

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 2>that there was ever a real moment where I thought

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 2>they were going to fire him. I do believe his

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:42.359
<v Speaker 2>seat has warmed, sure, and his seat is tepid. I

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:47.239
<v Speaker 2>still cannot bring myself to a point just in any

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 2>reality in which I honestly believe they're going to get

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 2>rid of him. I think Brian Kelly's going to leave

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.920
<v Speaker 2>on his own volition, if he leaves at all. But

0:50:55.200 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 2>there was plenty of second guessing for Brian Kelly. So

0:50:57.560 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 2>at a minimum this is a four. It could be

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:00.760
<v Speaker 2>a five.

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I struggle to see the case for a five, just

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:10.319
<v Speaker 1>because who outside of you know, Notre Dame fans in

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the last month month and a half of the season,

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>who was talking about Notre Dame beyond like, you know,

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody that beats Notre Dame loses, you know, every Notre

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Dame sort of a disaster, but like nobody, I don't

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>think people were going super in depth about what was

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>wrong with not They're not.

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Going in depth. But Notre Dame was a laughing stock.

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 2>They were a laughing stock in the way that Feurig

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and eight Oregon was not a laughing stock. And I

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 2>know that because our friends right here at espnation dot com.

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's true.

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Friends, Matt Brown, who I love and adore and poke

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 2>fun at and have no real malae towards. Okay, I know, Matt, Yeah,

0:51:47.280 --> 0:51:50.839
<v Speaker 2>but you guys even look alike a little bit. Yeah,

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 2>he was making the Foreign eight jokes. Richard Johnson, another

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 2>guy whom I adore, who does great work for espenation

0:51:57.040 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 2>dot com making the four and eight jokes jokes regularly.

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:03.640
<v Speaker 2>You could count all of that tangentially as part of

0:52:03.680 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 2>this second guessing. Brian Kelly, Ah, you could if you

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:09.240
<v Speaker 2>had drafted Notre Dame jokes.

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a shoe in five. I don't think saying, but

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>remember Notre Dame is four and eight is actively second guessing.

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:20.359
<v Speaker 2>Brian Kelly, I'll give you a four. I will take

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a four.

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, take your four.

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Here's why that's interesting. That gives me twenty two. That

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:29.919
<v Speaker 2>gives you twenty two. All right, let's wrestle. Take off

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:33.400
<v Speaker 2>that shirt, let's wrestle, let's jelly up. You mean to

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:36.840
<v Speaker 2>tell me that we both finished with twenty two on

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 2>our own arbitrary scoring.

0:52:38.080 --> 0:52:42.239
<v Speaker 1>So I took three straight singles to finish this out

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:45.720
<v Speaker 1>country singer on game day, locker room coach, dancing, college

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>stadium selling beer. You finished with one, three and four

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>this year's IOWA weird neutral site games. Second guessing, Brian Kelly.

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>The problem, the only problem I have with this with

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>your end scoring is weird neutral site games. They don't

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.360
<v Speaker 1>come about during the season. They don't adjust during the

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>season unless at some point the a venue is changed

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to something ridiculous because of weather or construction or act

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of God whatever. I can't not give you a three,

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if that is a thing. That

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is something that you can either predict or not predict.

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:24.919
<v Speaker 1>So this is all a way of saying, let's wrestle.

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's wrestle, let's wrest Well, here's what we do. Yeah,

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 2>we're an interactive tea. By the way, I am perfectly

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 2>fine tying with you. Yeah, I'm perfectly comfortable losing tea.

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of very old school college football of us

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.839
<v Speaker 2>to tie exactly. Yeah, so let's throw it out. Let's

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 2>let's make overtime be the foot ballers. Okay, all right,

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 2>you can write in soliverable at gmail dot com. Yeah,

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 2>make your case for any of the twenty different.

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>What did we underscore?

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Overscore narratives that we rest here? Yeah, all right, we

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 2>will go back through in the end, I'll give you

0:53:57.560 --> 0:54:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the official tabulation of how all this shook out. Yeah,

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and you can write in, you can tweet us, you

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 2>can facebook us. We will even post the scorecard I'll

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.879
<v Speaker 2>make a little scorecard up on Facebook. Go on there,

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:14.879
<v Speaker 2>go everywhere, and tell us where you think we were right,

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 2>where we were wrong, but at least as it stands now.

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Time of recording, six fifteen on what is this February eight, Yeah,

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday the eighth, twenty seventeen, twenty two to twenty two.

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 2>That's incredible, Wow, dead heat.

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Any thoughts on news time.

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't have the soundboard with me, otherwise I'd.

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Play yeah boo boo. Okay, So Sarc leaves Alabama after

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>so Sarco's oh to one, Lane Kiffin goes what thirteen?

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And oh fourteen? And oh Blaine Given's and Fau Sark

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is at the Atlanta Falcons. Makes perfect sense, total sense.

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Sarc leaves after game. The word was that he and

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Saban didn't particularly agree on many things, and it

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:00.840
<v Speaker 1>was better for all parties.

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Sabin and Kiffin were at odds. Sabin and Sark were

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 2>at odds. Okay, laying Lane Kiffin, he lands on his feet,

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Sark lands on his feet. Nick Sabin here in a sense,

0:55:14.400 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 2>has the bully pulpit because he is Nick Saban. Yeah,

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 2>and because they're on a horde of national championships and

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 2>continues to recruit well, win thirteen games a season, get

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:27.360
<v Speaker 2>to the playoff, gets the national championship, and if you

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 2>coach for him, you are generally getting an even better job,

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 2>or even a more powerful job out of it. For me,

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 2>as a college football fan, I am less interested in

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Sark going to the Falcons and more interested in some

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of the rumored names I've heard, as two of the

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 2>three are offensive coordinators, right, Mark Helfrich being one, chip

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Kelly being another. Yes, those are the two that I

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 2>think have the most steam, and them obviously anything involving

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Chip Kelly is going to pop in college football spheres.

0:55:57.000 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 2>That to me would obviously be the most interesting, almost

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 2>borderline unfair name. Yes, to put down there in Tuscaloosa.

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Are there any other names we've heard? No, there's it's

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 2>There was one other name.

0:56:08.120 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I forget what it is right now. It did not

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:13.359
<v Speaker 1>have the same cachet with Bruce prop excuse me. Bruce

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Felman tweeted, out's Chris God say something like that? But

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Chip Kelly would be enormous if he went to Alabama.

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Unfair. He wouldn't be there for longer than a year,

0:56:23.960 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 2>but he could install something that would reap benefits for

0:56:26.880 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 2>years to come, especially with a mobile quarterback in Jalen Hurts. Yes,

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 2>you know that's sort of his calling card, with.

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>A mobile quarterback in Jalen Hurts, who, by the way,

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark Helfrich would also be a pretty big boon, although

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a year with a lot of turnover recruiting

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 1>wise for Alabama. In terms of the coaches who have

0:56:44.080 --> 0:56:46.880
<v Speaker 1>left who have been successful recruiters led by Mario crystobaal

0:56:47.160 --> 0:56:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Mark Halfritch is not necessarily known as a huge recruiter,

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:52.320
<v Speaker 1>whereas Chip Kelly, I think could could succeed.

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you this, Yeah, if we're going to

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.279
<v Speaker 2>talk strategery here on the show, please, if you are

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:01.239
<v Speaker 2>Nick Saban and you have your pick between Hip Kelly

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 2>and Mark Helfrich George George Gotzi, if you have your

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 2>pick between those two ex Oregon head football coaches, do

0:57:12.239 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 2>you take Chip Kelly because you feel he is superior

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:23.880
<v Speaker 2>schematically and also probably an exact body, double exact mind,

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:28.000
<v Speaker 2>double mind meld of Nick Saban in his you know

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:32.160
<v Speaker 2>how thorough and detailed specific reality, but you know he's

0:57:32.160 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 2>only gonna be their year, right, Or do you take

0:57:34.480 --> 0:57:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Mark Helfrich whom probably at least three similar sensibilities, but

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 2>will be there a little bit longer.

0:57:42.320 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Helfrich. I think Helfrich because he'll install a

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of what Oregon did offensively. You can recruit without him.

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's still I think a decent recruiter. He's

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>just not He doesn't have the force of personality of

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a successful head coach at a huge place like Oregon.

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I just it's not going to work out for Mark

0:58:01.000 --> 0:58:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Helfrich at a place like that anytime soon. He is

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>regarded as extremely nice and extraordinarily bright, like he is

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 1>an ex's and o's savant. He's he's easy to get

0:58:12.640 --> 0:58:15.080
<v Speaker 1>along with, which I think is where maybe Sark and

0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Lane Kiffin were less so. So I think Helfrich would

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be able with a quarterback, which he's had. He has

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:25.400
<v Speaker 1>been a very good quarterback coach when he's had the

0:58:25.480 --> 0:58:29.440
<v Speaker 1>actual talent to work with, and it was his fault

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 1>he didn't at Oregon. The Chip thing, it would be

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:35.440
<v Speaker 1>very strong for a year, but it would burn out

0:58:35.480 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>fast because Chip is going to go take like the

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>UCLA job next year or something.

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:44.200
<v Speaker 2>God for there is undoubtedly a burning desire to go

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:46.520
<v Speaker 2>out and get the big fish and Chip Kelly. Yes,

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I would not fault Nick Saban if he wanted to

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:52.840
<v Speaker 2>go that time. I think, yeah, nobody would. Nobody would.

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's not as if Chip Kelly went from being

0:58:55.040 --> 0:58:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a receivers coach to a head coach. Chip Kelly was

0:58:57.280 --> 0:59:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an offensive coordinator at Oregon at New Hampshire like has

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that experience.

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 2>It would be an absolute tourd of force if they

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:06.040
<v Speaker 2>bring him in. Yep, But there are no bad options

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:08.560
<v Speaker 2>if you're Nick Saban, and if you get Mark Helfrich

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:11.439
<v Speaker 2>that almost makes more sense long term.

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And who's to say. Mark Helfrich though, won't be available

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>next year after Chip leaves, So maybe you do both.

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 2>There you go, Maybe you hope for both. Okay, is

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:20.320
<v Speaker 2>there any other news? Yeah?

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a bunch of assistants leaving after signing day.

0:59:22.840 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I know Florida lost a pretty well regarded DB's coach,

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 1>which is always a bummer because they hang around in

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their contracts are like just through signing

0:59:29.720 --> 0:59:33.360
<v Speaker 1>day and then they take off, which again, kids commit

0:59:33.400 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to the school, commit to the school, don't commit to

0:59:35.640 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the coach if at all possible. You know, there's always

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:42.560
<v Speaker 1>rules changes that are involved with things. Oregon fired another

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>assistant coach. He was in the car with the tight

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ends slash co offensive coordinator who was arrested for a

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 1>duy who was let go, and he has moved on

0:59:52.640 --> 0:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this receivers coach who is also in the car. He

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is now the receivers coach and like passing game coordinator

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for UCLA Jimmy Doherty. Harbog I was at Michigan last

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>year as an offensive analyst, So a little bit of

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>turmoil there.

1:00:05.120 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Still, Baylor fired a coach as part of a prostitution

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>sting that he got caught up here.

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Strength coach Baylor, and the report came out about Baylor

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and it was just horrific. Yeah, I don't know what

1:00:15.960 --> 1:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you do. It's it's beyond the NC double A. Still

1:00:19.800 --> 1:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel I feel like the NC DOUBLEA has very little,

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if not any business meddling into legal affairs.

1:00:26.680 --> 1:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, Matt rule. There's a reason they gave him

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 2>more runway in a seven year contract.

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:00:34.120 --> 1:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if.

1:00:35.240 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It was his strength coach though that followed him from coach.

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>It was unfortunate and you know, just oddly coincidental that

1:00:44.080 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>this would be the kind of thing that his guy

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>would get tied up in down at Baylor, especially given

1:00:50.240 --> 1:00:54.439
<v Speaker 2>all that's going on there. But I definitely had more

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>than a handful of conversations with some friends who said, Wow,

1:00:57.160 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 2>do you wish Matt Rule had had twice about this? Right?

1:01:01.880 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this would have changed the game.

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I think he knew what he was walking into. He's

1:01:05.080 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>a bright guy. But is Matt Rule here's my question now,

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>sorry to interrupt you, is Matt Rule Texas Bill O'Brien

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>like if he immediately turns Baylor into if they go

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>eight and four in twenty eighteen, nine and three and

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen, like they have a better than expected season.

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, he puts he's a solid presence in Waco.

1:01:29.640 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Everybody regards him really well, Like I think everybody regarded

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Bill O'Brien really well during.

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>His brief time in state college. Is it a situation

1:01:36.640 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>where yes, it's seven year deal, he goes nine and three,

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>he's going to take like the A and M job,

1:01:40.800 --> 1:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>or he's going to take UCLA or coach their briefly,

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>he's going to take James Franklin moves on, he takes

1:01:45.840 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the Penn State job. Do you think there's that possibility.

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd even thought of that because if let's say James

1:01:51.600 --> 1:01:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Franklin has another we're going like we're playing dumb people

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>chess right now. James Franklin has another extraordinary season, goes

1:01:57.920 --> 1:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>eleven and one, ten and two in twenty seven team

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and he takes The Eagles fans hate their coach already.

1:02:04.920 --> 1:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming they do.

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's his name, they do, Doug Peterson.

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Doug Peters like Peter they do, Okay.

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Probably only because they have Carson Wentz. Okay, so maybe

1:02:14.120 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 2>they like Doug Peter.

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The Giants fans hate their coach Ben McAdoo.

1:02:17.840 --> 1:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they they like Benett like Ben mcado Okay,

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>let's say, you know, it's finally time for some NFL

1:02:24.680 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>team to move on from their career. What I meant

1:02:27.640 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>to say about Doug Peterson is Eagles fans always hate

1:02:30.400 --> 1:02:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the coach. They don't hate him as much as they

1:02:32.800 --> 1:02:36.200
<v Speaker 2>would normally because they really like Carson Wentz, right, and

1:02:36.240 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 2>they really didn't like Chip Kelly. Correct.

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's okay. So let's say, whoever, some I.

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 2>There there is a pre eminent job available in the Northeast. Yeah,

1:02:48.400 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>is having success down in Waco. I could see a situation.

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, maybe Marvin Lewis moves on the Cincinnati wants to make.

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:00.920
<v Speaker 2>In which Matt Rule would leave. Okay after two years,

1:03:01.160 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>two three years, ok As, do I see that? Yeah?

1:03:04.080 --> 1:03:06.479
<v Speaker 2>I could totally see that. But just a bad state

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of affairs looks really bad for our brills. I wouldn't

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>expect we're gonna see our Briells in the game, just

1:03:13.280 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>such scum at any point in time. Yeah, so that's

1:03:16.560 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a tough tough pill to swallow if you're in the

1:03:18.200 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Art Briles camp, say the least. Otherwise, though, I don't

1:03:21.560 --> 1:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>do we have any other news. I think I think

1:03:23.040 --> 1:03:24.280
<v Speaker 2>that pretty much covers.

1:03:23.960 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>It, not too much, Okay, we have plenty of time

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this offseason to hit any news we may have missed.

1:03:28.440 --> 1:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>So again, here are my picks. Yeah, Tom Herman coaching

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 2>rumors four, Bill Hancock's bullshit one, Jim Harbaugh slash se

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>C feud two, Christian McCaffrey's versatility one yep, hype for

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a recently unsuccessful Pac twelve school aka Washington. Yeah, that

1:03:49.280 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 2>was a two ye and attacking mentality three. Ohio State

1:03:52.680 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 2>attrition one. This year's Iowa and quotes. One weird neutral

1:03:57.120 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>site Games, three second Guessing Brian Kelly four.

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay Mine our weekly ranking show. Three Michigan State disrespect

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>two Mark rick as a Miami alumnus. Three Josh Rosen's

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen draft stock one, Charlie Strong's Doeward I Season five,

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet freak out of a Southern Quarterbacks girlfriend. Three Texas

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>A and M's quarterbacks heads are falling off. Two country

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>singer on game day. One locker room coach dancing, one

1:04:21.320 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>college stadium selling beer. One tell us who we have

1:04:24.760 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps over or underscored. Also, this has nothing to do

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:32.439
<v Speaker 1>with anything. I cannot recommend Mexico City enough.

1:04:32.560 --> 1:04:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah it is. We've been talked much about this.

1:04:35.400 --> 1:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Mexico City is amazing, and I mean the Spanish which helps.

1:04:38.680 --> 1:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I know a little bit of Spanish. But I went

1:04:40.040 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>with my brother and friend of the show Bill Barnwell,

1:04:41.960 --> 1:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>who is the one who found the amazing rate that

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we went on. It's going I've said this to a

1:04:46.880 --> 1:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>number of people tie and it's going to sound stupid,

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's the only way I can sort of put

1:04:51.320 --> 1:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>this forth. There is so much Mexican food in Mexico city.

1:04:55.880 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 1>There is so because they're twenty million people.

1:04:58.200 --> 1:04:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Never would have known that.

1:04:59.200 --> 1:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But okay, every but it's it's not that there's so

1:05:01.800 --> 1:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>much in terms of the percentage of food available as Mexican,

1:05:05.240 --> 1:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, but side streets there's just like random people

1:05:09.120 --> 1:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>grilling up tortas and quesadias and everything like that because

1:05:12.200 --> 1:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there are twenty million people that need to get fed

1:05:14.280 --> 1:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and there is so much. It was amazing. It was

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It's my new homeland.

1:05:18.160 --> 1:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

1:05:18.680 --> 1:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I loved I can't wait to get back. I

1:05:20.720 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>went on a taco tour. I ate, you know, super richly,

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I ate super poorly. It was everything I wanted. The

1:05:27.400 --> 1:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>weather was amazing, very walkable, inexpensive. Again great, great reviews.

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Me this important question, very important question.

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready.

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to wipe that smile off.

1:05:36.320 --> 1:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Your fathos and takes. I'm very serious.

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, this might be our final, okay talking point here. Yeah,

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 2>show for a long time on the program.

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>M HM.

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:49.720
<v Speaker 2>The first eight years of the program, your plan, if

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you were ever out on the LAMB trying to escape

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the FEDS was to grow a mustache, change your appearance,

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>go by an alias, and work at like a beach

1:05:59.800 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>side taco stand in San Diego. Yes, would you now

1:06:03.360 --> 1:06:05.360
<v Speaker 2>consider Mexico City if you could get out.

1:06:05.200 --> 1:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Of the country, Well, Mexico City, I believe will that's

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>an extradition thing, right, Mexico or Mexico in.

1:06:12.320 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 2>General, if they can find it, if they can find me.

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I would stand out more as a

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>gringo in Mexico City than I would in San Diego.

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm going to be on the lamb, I'm

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna want to fit in a little bit better. Okay,

1:06:27.320 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that said, not fugitive wise, I might be able to

1:06:32.320 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>live in Mexico City. Yeah, I feel like I could

1:06:35.000 --> 1:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>get by in Mexico City. I looked at a little

1:06:37.680 --> 1:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of real estate down there. I'm not gonna lie,

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and it is affordable. It is affordable. But yeah, Mexico's

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not seafood wise, like I was planning in San Diego.

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not where you go for seafood in Mexico City necessarily.

1:06:50.240 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you are looking to travel in the in

1:06:54.920 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the Western Hemisphere, if you look and travel in North America,

1:06:57.720 --> 1:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>someplace that's perhaps not super expensive, and you want to

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>eat super well and the weather is like extraordinarily mild,

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's like seven thousand feet altitude. Whatever. Mexico City

1:07:08.040 --> 1:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is great.

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it is great with a capital sha glowing review.

1:07:13.080 --> 1:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We stayed in Polanco, which is a really nice neighborhood,

1:07:15.440 --> 1:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but we walked everywhere. Meet Placido to not made a

1:07:18.880 --> 1:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Placido Domingo. No, it was extraordinary. Really if you're into

1:07:24.880 --> 1:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're into Mexican food, no brainer, gotta go.

1:07:28.880 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Awesome.

1:07:29.520 --> 1:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I have one final note. Please, I don't do this

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>often on the show. Serious note.

1:07:34.240 --> 1:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh by the way, Brady Hoak is also a volunteer.

1:07:37.240 --> 1:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh good, Yeah, what is your final notes? Final note?

1:07:40.680 --> 1:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Is I am raising money? Oh?

1:07:43.360 --> 1:07:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am raising money. Say close attention, very quick story.

1:07:47.160 --> 1:07:51.400
<v Speaker 2>But my baby niece, Juliana, beautiful baby niece, was born

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>with a congenital heart condition and the fine folks at

1:07:54.920 --> 1:07:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Chop as we call it, they

1:07:59.400 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>treated her so well. They performed a life saving surgery

1:08:03.160 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 2>on her. She is doing well, but it is something

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>that a number of other babies have to deal with

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and parents have to deal with. So I am doing

1:08:11.880 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>what's called the Philly spin in. I'm going to be

1:08:14.560 --> 1:08:16.920
<v Speaker 2>up on a bike for some indeterminate period of time

1:08:17.680 --> 1:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>doing a spinning session to help raise money for Have

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you done it before? I have not done this before.

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what it involves? No? I am a

1:08:27.400 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>little concerned that they may need to do open heart

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:34.719
<v Speaker 2>surgery on movie after this. I've done it for charity. Yeah,

1:08:34.840 --> 1:08:37.439
<v Speaker 2>the spin is what is the name of the place?

1:08:37.520 --> 1:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you know?

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea?

1:08:38.880 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So I did this at a place called have you

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>heard of Soul Cycle?

1:08:41.479 --> 1:08:41.599
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:08:41.840 --> 1:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You've never heard of Soul Cycle?

1:08:43.000 --> 1:08:45.200
<v Speaker 2>No? Oh my god, Kate is shaking her head right now.

1:08:45.560 --> 1:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It's popular everywhere. It's rough.

1:08:49.280 --> 1:08:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's rough, and it's I'm not going to say

1:08:52.479 --> 1:08:54.599
<v Speaker 1>anything bad about their intentions because they want to get

1:08:54.640 --> 1:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>people in shape and they want to raise money for

1:08:56.479 --> 1:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>this wonderful charity. Obviously, it is dark and it is loud,

1:09:01.240 --> 1:09:05.599
<v Speaker 1>and they yell at you, and it is like everybody there.

1:09:05.640 --> 1:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a lot of women, but there's there's some

1:09:07.360 --> 1:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>men too. It is. It is cult like. Okay, but

1:09:10.880 --> 1:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you'll get a good sweat in for

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>a good cause.

1:09:12.560 --> 1:09:14.080
<v Speaker 2>You get a good sweat in. It's for a very

1:09:14.080 --> 1:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>good cause. Yeah, and it's the least I can do

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to help out the find folks with a very noble

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>cause here to support cardiac research and care at Children's

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Hospital Philadelphia. So if you go to I set this

1:09:26.400 --> 1:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>up solid verbal dot com slash donate, anything you're willing

1:09:32.160 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to donate to the cause would be greatly appreciated. As

1:09:37.360 --> 1:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>a group, we've already reached our goal, but we want

1:09:39.320 --> 1:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>to try and drive that a lot higher because it's

1:09:41.439 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>it's such a good cause and it's near and dear

1:09:43.160 --> 1:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to our hearts. So soliverbal dot com slash donate. I

1:09:46.760 --> 1:09:48.479
<v Speaker 2>don't ask for much, but if you're willing to pitch

1:09:48.520 --> 1:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>in a few bucks here or there, it would be

1:09:50.320 --> 1:09:53.400
<v Speaker 2>greatly appreciated and certainly help out some others who are

1:09:53.439 --> 1:09:58.600
<v Speaker 2>in in this situation. Yeah, all right, that's all I

1:09:58.640 --> 1:09:59.800
<v Speaker 2>got time, That's all I got TI.

1:10:00.040 --> 1:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope to be a little bit more healthy.

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Do we got to get you healthy? I know you've

1:10:04.120 --> 1:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>been sick for like four months.

1:10:05.400 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this at all.

1:10:06.600 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, we got to get some food in you.

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:10.960
<v Speaker 2>We gotta get some fluids in you. Get that voice

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:13.519
<v Speaker 2>back at your pep back. Guess we will be back

1:10:13.760 --> 1:10:17.040
<v Speaker 2>in a week talking more college football. Yes, we will

1:10:17.360 --> 1:10:20.200
<v Speaker 2>do stay tuned to the Twitter feed at soliverbal. We

1:10:20.240 --> 1:10:23.320
<v Speaker 2>are on Facebook, Facebook dot com slash Soliverbal, and you

1:10:23.360 --> 1:10:28.080
<v Speaker 2>can subscribe at iTunes dot com slash soliverbal Yeah guess easy,

1:10:28.280 --> 1:10:30.439
<v Speaker 2>and the website soliverble dot com. Done for that guy

1:10:30.680 --> 1:10:34.200
<v Speaker 2>literally over there, Dan Rubinstein for myself, ty Hilda Brand,

1:10:34.200 --> 1:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>thanks again for tuning in, tweet us, write us, let

1:10:37.439 --> 1:10:38.200
<v Speaker 2>us know you're out there.

1:10:38.400 --> 1:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Say hi.

1:10:39.040 --> 1:10:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Until next week, Stay solid, peace,