WEBVTT - The 2023 All-Sleeper Team (Ep. 626)

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Wake up, it's sleeper time. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy pros. This is the Fantasy

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast, and this is me be Joey b Jopi's And

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>today we're continuing our onslaught of all teams.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>We had our all Breakout team yesterday with Erl Cone.

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Then we had our All Bus team which was very

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>depressing with Jason Collette. But today we've got one of

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the greats, a legitimate journalist with us, the one, the only,

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Steve Gardner from USA today to help us do the

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>all Sleeper team. And Steve Gardner, you and I mean legitimate,

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like you vote for the Hall of Fame. It's been

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>year three of you doing that. I feel like when

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 1>you got that ability, it was like something for all

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>of us all of a sudden, we can vicariously live

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>through you after.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>All these years.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 1>So I want to know who made your ballot for

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two slash twenty three.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>Who was on there? Who'd you vote for?

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Well? I liked I'm a big Hall guy. I didn't

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>think I was going to be until I actually had

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 3>the vote and the ballot in my hand. But I

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>voted for nine ten This year, I voted for seven.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 3>I believe Scott Roland for one. Congratulations to him. Uh

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Todd Helton might make it in this next year. I

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>voted for him, voted for Billy Wagner, voted for Andrew Jones,

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Gary Sheffield, Carlos Beltron first year on the ballot, and

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 3>also Jimmy Rollins. So those were my guys, and I

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 3>felt pretty good about it. Not not going to get

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>into the mix with Alex Rodriguez and Manny Ramirez, those

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>guys just because they they failed their drug test. And

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 3>if you do that, you know now that Major League

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Baseball has been testing for that for a long long time.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 3>That's that's kind of a disqualifier for me. And so

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>that's that's kind of how my mindset.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Was, and and that is absolutely fair. Welsh knows. I

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>can't get enough with the steroid era of baseball. I

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>wanted all day long. I want those guys all back.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Everybody, just monitor everybody, just you know, grandma falls down,

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>breaks or hip they give us steroids.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm just saying.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Maybe too, I think that's a I would say that.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 5>I do think you I'm getting part of it.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 4>But I think that's one of the problems with baseball though,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 4>is like Steve, you can have that opinion, and I

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of people share that, but then there's

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>literally the exact opposite opinions, and I think having that

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 4>big of a gap and that Baseball can't step in

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 4>and figure out and just be like, hey, you need

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 4>you can't consider this or you like, I think this

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 4>is what makes this whole thing messy because there are

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>because I don't personally agree, I go on, the stats

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 4>are going, the players there might have been cheating. There

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 4>was cheating in the seventies in different ways and stuff

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 4>like that. So to me, it's a non factor. But

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 4>like that baseball doesn't come in and step in and

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 4>try to.

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Get this fixed.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 4>It kind of stinks because then you know you're everyone's

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 4>put in a weird situation. Like see, if you're putting

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 4>a weird situation, especially if someone wants to do like

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 4>a gotcha with the steroid guys.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 5>You just have the perfec argument.

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>But it's like you and the next Hall of Fame

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 4>writer who's voting could have completely different ideological reasons.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>But push it off to the piers.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Now, like I think that's it, right, You're sort of

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you're you're allowing now the players that they played with

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to vote them in, and I think that is a.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Perfectly good way of doing it.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Also, I mean, I don't think we're gonna get this

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>deep into the Hall of face up, but I love

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I can talk about this all the time.

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>It's the players of their era, you know.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Before the testing, you know, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens. I'm

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>perfectly fine with those guys and was perfectly fine until

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 3>they dropped off the ballot. It's just that once major

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>League Baseball finally took a stand, you know, and Bud

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Selig wasn't just saying go ahead, I don't see anything.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>We're making lots of money, you know, once you have

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the testing and people test positive. That to me is

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the difference between the Manny Ramirez and the A Rods

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 3>versus the bonds Is and the Clemenses.

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank goodness, Steve Gardner voice of reason.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Too, because I don't think I knew that, Steve, that

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 4>that's what your stance was on those guys, because you

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 4>just I think it's really important that you differentiated those

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 4>two because I kind of assumed you were clumping all

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 4>of that in together makes a lot of sense, makes

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of sense to what you're saying.

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't have a line somewhere, and that's where I

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 3>particularly choose to draw it, and at least that way,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 3>I try and stay consistent, and that that's what you

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 3>want if you're, you know, listening to people's arguments as

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>long as they don't you know, go all over the

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 3>place and say it's it's good this way and bad

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 3>that way. You just have to have some consistency. And

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 3>that's what I try and do now.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if any of the names we're gonna

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about today are going to end up on the

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>ballot for the Hall of Fame voted by Steve Gardner,

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna get to some of these names because

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they should be on some of your draft lists. So

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>let's start here with the All Sleeper Team. These are

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the again, sleepers are a notion that gets overdone, overwrought,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but really players that are undervalued, underrated, maybe underappreciated, and

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what give some love here.

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 4>I do want to tell you I struggled with this

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 4>one because we just didn't all breakout team, and I'm

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 4>not gonna lie to you guys that the all Breakout,

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 4>the all Sleeper kind of live in a similar They

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 4>live in a similar building. They might be on different floors,

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 4>but they're in a similar building. So like, I had

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 4>to work a little bit harder to not throw all

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 4>the names that you guys expect. I think I did

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 4>throw one that I just can't help but put on

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 4>here because I think they qualify it both, but they.

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 5>Kind of do.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 4>I even did this, by the way, and we've talked

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 4>to this with a jillion times, I was like, what

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 4>is the definition that the Internet.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:29.679
<v Speaker 5>Says of sleeper?

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Because I think there's four hundred different ways killed sleepers.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Because that's the problem is everybody talks about them so

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>much that they end up becoming inflated almost and then

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they have to return too much of whatever that perspective

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 1>value is and that becomes the trouble here. But I

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think this list of you guys put together is really good.

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the catcher here, Welsh, why don't

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you kick things off with yours, which is actually a

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>player we talked about with Frank Stample, we talked about

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>with Aeron Con a catcher who made this team for you,

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Logan o'hapi.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think again, I don't know which one.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 4>You guys would all kind of fine, what's better the

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 4>all sleeper, they all breakout team. I think he kind

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 4>of fits into both. Logano Hopy, I completely agreed with

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 4>it when it was brought up almost his entire minor

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 4>league career. It's a sub twenty percent K percentage, good

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 4>walk percentage, good batting average, has really big power. I

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 4>personally love the guy. It's a unique little fact about him.

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 4>He loves to talk to fans. He did this in

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 4>the AFL. He would walk up, he would stand right

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 4>by the nets. He would turn around, and he would

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 4>start talking to people. And one time there were these

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 4>two guys I'm not gonna go along about this. They

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 4>were talking about Bryson Stott and they were like, ooh,

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 4>did you know the Bryson Stott is blah blah blah

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 4>this in Baseball America's ranks, And Logano Hoppy turned around

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 4>to these gentlemen just sitting there in the stands watching

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 4>this game, and he goes, that's too low, and Logo

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Hoppy's like, that's too low for Bryson Stott, And I

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 4>just I always got a kick out of that is

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 4>my weird anecdotal thing with o'hapi. But like in his

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 4>own right, he was such a talented and is such

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 4>a talented player. He hit fifteen homers with the Phillies

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 4>in double A last year and eleven with the Angels.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 5>There's big power.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 4>It's being undersold by projections. I personally believe the low

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 4>k rate gives him a really good low baseline, and

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 4>he's essentially almost had a two hundred ice so it's

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 4>probably around one ninety his entire career that that really

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>can equate to twenty plus homer and power if he

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 4>can take over the gig from Max Stassy. I think

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 4>he's a massive sleeper. He goes outside of like the

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 4>top twenty in catchers. He's a no brainer in two

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 4>catcher leagues, and if you fall flat kind of in

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 4>a fifteen team, I would try to pick him up

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 4>and see if he can take a majority of the

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 4>gig because he's got twenty plus homer and power in him.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Easy.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Now, Steve, you got a veteran on your list, which

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is great because I love that because to me, sleepers

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are not always just the young players. The improven player.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's undervalued veterans, and yours is Yasmani Grandal.

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I liked him for several years just because of

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 3>the plate patients and the ability to hit for power,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>and he had none of that really last year. It

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>was just a lost season for him, injuries to the back,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the knee, everything. But from all indications he's healthy this spring.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>And the White Sox had injury up and down the

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 3>roster last year, so it was kind of a lost season.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, there was the Tony LaRussa experiment, experience, whatever

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>you want to call it. It wasn't great for the

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 3>White Sox, so I think everybody suffered there. And you

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 3>look at Grundal, He's got a track record for power,

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>had four consecutive twenty plus homer seasons from twenty sixteen

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>to twenty nineteen, and then hit twenty three of them

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty one. So he's still got the power

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and if he's healthy, a this is a solid White

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 3>Sox lineup, and I think he's getting overlooked outside of

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 3>the top two hundred for sure, and I think he's

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>somebody that you could definitely get late and be very

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 3>happy with.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinating to see what that White Sox lineup is

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>when it's healthy, and now that Tony L. Russ is

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>not in the dugout, I kind of want to see

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the combination.

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 2>Of that and see what this team comes.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, all right, let's get to the first basement here, Welsh,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>want you kick things off.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Who made your first base list for the sleeper team

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 2>of twenty.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 5>Three qualifies that?

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Think it multiple of the breakout or sleeper conversation, but

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to do it, especially when you look at

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.599
<v Speaker 4>ADP here it is Miguel Vargas, and we've talked a

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 4>ton about him. This is in that rookie camp. Miguel

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 4>Vargas shows up at first base as the twenty ninth

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 4>first baseman, still with an overall ADP outside the top

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 4>two hundred, the only place I think a CBS where

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 4>he's inside the top one hundred. Also, I don't think

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 4>i've seen this across where we've talked a lot about

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:27.599
<v Speaker 4>like projections and stuff.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 5>That there's the bat and the bat X.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 4>By Derek Cardy and the BATEX I think has a

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 4>few more ballpark factors. Miguel Vargas breaks his system because

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 4>in the bat the normal bat, he's projected twenty homers

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 4>with ten stolen bases. The bat X is thirteen homer,

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 4>six stolen bases with a really really high batting average,

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 4>low strikeouts. Again, I love playing that, and he's a

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 4>cheat code because he's qualify at second base.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 5>He's gonna have that gig all year.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Miguel Vargas had that little I think it was a

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 4>hairline fracture in his wrist or his finger, and he

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 4>hasn't been swinging and he's still getting walked like. He's

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 4>just such a unique individual, who's gonna steal, who's going

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 4>to hit homers. He might not be your traditional first basement,

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 4>but how often can you get double digit stolen bases

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 4>out of a first baseman who will also quite qualified

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 4>a position you're going to move him out. So if

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 4>you want to talk about sleepers, getting a guy for

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 4>a high powered offense, I'll have multi position eligibility and

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 4>is a really really high floor prospect. Getting him outside

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the top two hundred is big time sleeper team stuff.

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna pick micgal Vargas as my first basement here.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>All right over to you, your first basement for twenty

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. All sleeper team is who's Steve.

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's Brandon Belt, another old veteran and another injury

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 3>problem from last year. But I like the situation. Everything

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 3>seems to be lining up well for him going from

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco to Toronto. Number One, Apparently the knee is fine.

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>They're still trying to bring him along kind of slowly

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 3>this spring, but you know, all indications are he feels fine,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 3>and you know, coming off a lost season last year,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine home runs two years ago, you know in

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. Now he comes to Toronto, where they brought

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the fences in, especially for left handed power, it's going

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 3>to be wonderful. It's going to be enticing for him,

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that he's going to be able to

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 3>DH and do that against primarily right handed pitching. So

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, he's got a barrel rates and up with

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 3>the top players in the major leagues. I think ninety

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>fourth percentile barrel rate in twenty twenty one, ninety six

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 3>percentile last year. Despite the injuries. He knows how to

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 3>hit it, and I think in Toronto that's a great

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 3>place for Brandon Belt to land. So even though he's

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 3>thirty four something like that. I think he's got a

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>shot at possibly even hitting thirty homers this year.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Belt's a fascinating case.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I always wonder if he had stayed healthy and not

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>played in that ballpark for his career, what Brandon Belt

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>might have been because in the minor leagues, this was

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy who you know, that rare elite three four

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>five slash where three hundred and four hundred OVP five

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred slugging. You know, when you see that in a player,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that usually a special indicator. And most of the players

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that have that in the minor leagues they tend to

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>become really good players in the major leagues. And you

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>look back at what Brandon Belt was doing back then

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and what he could have been.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 2>And some of those classic what if stories.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>But you're right in Toronto, perhaps a player that's being

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>grossly underappreciated, undervalue too and in deeper leagues should pay

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>attention to, especially with corner being so tough this year.

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, corner is a yeah, you get it's very

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>top heavy at first and third. That's all you can

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>say about it. All right, let's continue all of the

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>infield here. Let's go to second base. Welsh, you are up,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>who is on the second base side for you? In

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the all sleeper realm?

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 4>I went deeper than I think I've probably gone. I

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 4>guess on these last couple of names, this is a

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 4>guy that I find myself drafting really at every single

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 4>spot that I possibly can in deeper leagues. If I

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 4>miss out on second base, middle, infield, he's a target.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 4>And it's Colton Wong with the Seattle Mariners fifteen and seventeen.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Quietly last year with Milwaukee while hit two fifty one

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 4>projection see double digits on both sides again, does not

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 4>strike out a whole bunch is another thing you can consider.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 4>Hitting theoretically at the top of a Seattle lineup, I

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 4>think really works in his favor. And I think the

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 4>run totals could come up. I don't think the RBIs

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 4>will come up. I think he could run a little

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 4>bit more. We talk about, you know where will all

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 4>these new found stolen bases come from? Top middle bottom?

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:25.599
<v Speaker 4>I think those middle guys really stand out to me

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 4>as players that could move into a next level of

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 4>stolen bases. Would not be shocked if Colton Wong dropped

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 4>into twenty And if you've got fifteen to twenty.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 5>Out of him.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Even if you got even if you've got fifteen fifteen

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 4>or ten to fifteen, either of all of those will

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 4>break the adp that he is coming at. Where it's

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 4>in like the two fifties.

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Just a twice two second base line on Fantasy Pros.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to see that again fantasypros dot

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Com slash rankings, you could see the rankings there for

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the MLB and two forty nine. I agree with you

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in those rural formats where you're looking with the spots

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for corner guys, I mean a middle infielders, why not.

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Twenty eight second basement. When you look at the get

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 4>on Fantasy Pros here, and.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 2>If he hits at the top of that order, Welsh,

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>that's the big key.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 5>That's a game changer.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 4>That's the game changer with Coulton long Oh, and again

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 4>doesn't strike out a whole bunch, he can walk, makes

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 4>pretty solid contact, and you're in the spot here where

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 4>this team likes to run. They're gonna other than not

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 4>quite the powerhouse, and maybe some of these other teams are.

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a little bit of manufacturing that happens

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 4>in general. But what if Kelnick is rocking, Julio keeps going,

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 4>and you've got Colton Wong near that top of the lineup.

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a recipe for a huge sleeper at the middle

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 4>endfield at a position that not everybody likes.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>At second pace, and when you're practicing all those mock

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>drafts over the draft Wizard at Fantasy Pros, I mean,

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a great opportunity for you to go and

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>look for some of these guys too and see who

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the ADPs.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Are, especially if in those deeper leagues.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean to me, that's why it's such a great tool,

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>because you could really start to find some of these

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>guys where they're buried in ADP. And again, if you

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't already checked it out, check it out. Fancybros dot

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.359
<v Speaker 1>com Slash Draft Wizard. Go there, run some mock draft simulations.

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You can run by yourself. The mock draft lobby is open.

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You get draft against other people. You get sent links

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and create them with just your friends or your enemies,

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>however you want to do it.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Fancybros dot Com Last Draft as the roads. Download the app.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 2>The app is the way to go. Apps are great.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It's an app for everything except for you know, for

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>what isn't there an app for at this point?

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Welsh At this point, I mean there's apps.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>That's one.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Appetizers, that's what weird.

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>There you go, well the sleep, there you go. All right,

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's uh, it's continue on here. Let's get you

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a second basement here for your team? Who is it,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Steve Gardner?

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with Tyro Estrada again. You know, Uh, wels

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Go's a little bit deeper. I'm a little shallower this

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 3>time and a little younger than my other two's. Uh

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 3>that I that I've picked so far. He's entering age

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven season, and I don't think he's getting anywhere

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 3>near the love that he should have. I'll tell you

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 3>a quick story from last year. I had Tyro Estrada

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 3>in the f SGA Champions League and was looking to

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>make a trade to get some more pitching. I had

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Carlos Korea as well on that team, and I was

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 3>looking to see who I could trade, and in checking

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 3>out their stats was right there in terms of productivity

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 3>with Carlos Korea, and I was like, you know what,

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I could trade Carlos Korea, get pitching and just plug

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Estrata in as my shortstop and I'll be fine. And

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 3>it worked out tremendously. I think I got like Blake

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Snell for Carlos Korea. Blake Snell went on a heater

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the second half of the season and carried me to

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 3>a championship. Can I say that here with the humbly

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 3>all day. Maybe that wasn't the key to It wasn't

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the only thing. But I still think even looking at

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 3>his his stats and where he's sitting, I had to

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 3>move him up in my rankings. I was even undervaluing

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 3>him in my rankings this year. So yeah, first year,

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>last year, played more than fifty five games for the

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 3>first time, had fourteen homers, twenty one steals. Now he's

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 3>got the job all to himself. He doesn't have to

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 3>worry about anybody looking over his shoulder. He could be

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>a twenty twenty guy. And you know, he's I think

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 3>one to fifty somewhere in there in terms of ADP's.

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a pretty good guy to have on your roster.

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 3>And he can play also shortstop or second So I'll

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>slot him here at second base and be very happy.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, the power is something with him that I'm

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>slightly concerned with. But if you look at the minor

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>league track record, he had two eitighty six for his

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>minor league career five hundred plus games, so that's a

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good sample.

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>So there might be an.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Upticken batting average that we haven't seen yet as well.

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I might buy that before more of the power.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But you're right.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Estrado's one of those players that people last

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>year kept waiting for the bottom of drop out and

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>it just never quite did. And he was just a

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>very productive player and there's certainly opportunity for him this year.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to third base to the hot corner.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Who is a hot sleeper for you? The Welsh?

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 4>Well, I went with the Max Mounsey, the Max Monsey

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 4>with the Los Angeles Dodgers. You know, he's actually funny.

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 4>I was taking a look. I was like, is there

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 4>an advantage on the shift? I just don't want to

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 4>throw this anomaly out to you guys when you talk about,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, the shift could change some of these guys.

0:17:58.200 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 5>He actually had a three thirty.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 4>One wow being shifted to twenty one, but on non shifts,

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 4>so that's like a really weird unique one. But he's

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 4>like a weird, unique contact type of player. Hit what

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 4>was the second lowest or third lowest of his career

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 4>hitting under two hundred. It was the third lowest in

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 4>those same years where he had really low babbbs that

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 4>were like under two thirty, he would hit under two hundred.

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 4>That's a little bit of an anomaly. He also got

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 4>very what of the things if you're looking at the game,

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 4>I hope he can fix he's he got really pull

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 4>centric and that also led to him being like getting

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 4>the ball really high up in there is what I'm

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 4>trying to tell you, Like he had a twenty percent

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 4>where was it a twenty percent launch angle or a

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty degree launch angle, which was like five higher than

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 4>the previous and that coincided with his poll rate being

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 4>astronomically bigger than usual. Guy was pressing the whole year

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 4>while also suffering injuries. Projection systems are not on that

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Max Muntzi is going to have another sub two hundred

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 4>batting average. The bat x is at two thirty six.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 4>The highest is actually the bat at two point forty seven.

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 4>He's got thirty home ru In potential can be a

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 4>little bit higher in a lineup with the Dodgers. He

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 4>can move around a little bit. Positions not great. I'll

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 4>take thirty home run power on one of the best

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 4>offenses in baseball. I guess I got two Dodgers already

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 4>in here, but there's reason to be because he is

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 4>cheaper than in previous years. One of the things that

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 4>almost made me not put him on here was he

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 4>still is a little costly. It felt like when I've

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 4>seen in drafts, but on the Fantasy Pros consensus ADP,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 4>he's actually the ninth third baseman. But at a one

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 4>thirty two to EIGHTYP thirty plus homers is worth right

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 4>around a one hundred overall pick at a really bad position.

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with Max Munsey on the bounce back,

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 4>and I think he's a sleeper.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I know we're not going back and forth in every

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>single player here, but Steve, what are your thoughts on

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Max Munsey because this is one that I have a

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>tough time with. Whenever you hit a buck ninety four

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in a season, to me, that's a huge red flag

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>like something else is wrong. I don't know if he's

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>just hit his limit. I don't know if it was

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>just the injuries, whatever it was, Welsh's right, there's still

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>power there. He's still with the twenty one home runs

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in one hundred and thirty six games. But I mean

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I can find twenty home runs from Brandon Drury or

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe Miranda or Matt Chapman a few rounds later. So

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is there any plus to taking Max months you or

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is he a sleeper? In Welsh, you're just saying, hey,

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a down year, wipe it away and then

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>just continue on.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think last year his numbers were rescued a

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>bit because of the elbow injury and coming along slowly

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 3>and spring training. I think he may have rushed to

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 3>get ready for the season, and then when you do that,

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>sometimes your performance is not what it should be. I

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 3>think he hit a lot better towards the end of

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>the season, so I'm willing to give him a pass

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 3>for last year. And you look at his track record too.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he is very consistent, especially in terms of

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 3>power over the last several seasons that it makes last

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 3>year look like the anomaly. So I know you won't

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 3>get a great batting average, but you know that you

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 3>will get power, and at third base you need power,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's you know, He's a guy that

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 3>I've been targeting. I haven't gotten yet in drafts, but

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I would not mind having Max Monsy at all.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 4>And to Steve's point, he hit two thirty in the

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 4>half of the season, so if you want to look

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 4>twoy's not the greatest thing in the world.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's really helping it's but I

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 2>want to.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Point out though, when he was hitting two thirty, though,

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 4>when he was a two thirty two to forty guys,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 4>he was going easy inside the top one hundred, and

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 4>now you know you're going around one thirty, maybe even

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit later. It's just kind of some fun

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 4>qualifications you can get out of him. But I thought

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 4>this was a tough one. I'm gonna be honest with

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 4>you that that third base, third basement.

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Draft Austin Riley, that's my answer. Let's take a quick

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>break in the action to tell you about fan Tracks.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>The fan Tracks team is excited to announce their fan

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Tracks Game Day Experience giveaway. Fan Tracks will be sending

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one lucky Fantasy Baseball League to any regular season MLB

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>game of their choice, along with one thousand dollars towards

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>travel and accommodations, and here's how to enter. Go to

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fantracks dot com slash Fantasy Pros and either create a

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>new league or join an active league, or bring over

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>your existing leagues from another platform for free. Existing fan

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Tracks leagues are automatically included in the giveaway. The more

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>leagues you create and join, the more chances you have

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to win. So one active league, one entry, four active leagues,

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>four entries. You see the math I'm laying out here,

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>So no purchase necessary. Again, that's fantracks dot Com slash

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros for your chance to win the fan Tracks

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Game Day Experience giveaway. And now back to the action.

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to of course Steve's and overachiever. He's

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>got two names here, potentially for third base. So is

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this a position battle? What's going on?

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I started to think that DJ Lemayhew

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 3>is one of those, you know, bounce back guys for

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>last year. But I didn't want to have too many

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 3>of those injury bounce back guys because you know, I

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of get in the rut. I like a little variety,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 3>so I'm gonna go a little bit deeper, you know,

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Whilst taking Max Muncie, who's you know, got a pretty

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 3>decent ADP. I'm going way into like three hundred Jamer Candelario,

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>all right, hear me out on this one. Okay, everybody

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 3>hates the Washington Nationals this year. They may be the

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 3>worst team in baseball. But I think they made a

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 3>smart move in getting Candelario because he coming off a

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 3>bad year with the Tigers. Everybody had a bad year

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 3>with the Tigers, gout of be in the White Sox syndrome.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>But you look at two years ago, he had sixty

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 3>one extra base hits, sixteen homers, forty two doubles. Playing

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 3>his home games in k America, which is one of

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 3>the toughest, if not the toughest pitchers park in all

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 3>of Major League Baseball, so much that they had to

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>move the fences in. He then goes to Washington where

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 3>he's pretty much the unquestioned starter. He's gonna get a

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of opportunity there, and those doubles that he hit

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 3>in Detroit could very well turn into at least some

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 3>of them into home runs in Washington. So they don't

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 3>have a whole lot, but he's gonna hit higher in

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the lineup and we've seen many times examples of bad teams.

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 3>But if you hit, you know, I think of the

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Pirates with with Brian Reynolds and Brian Hayes and those guys.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, they're gonna get so many played opportunities, and

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 3>they'll eventually, at least if they're not putting up great

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, batting averages and stuff, they're gonna get you

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 3>counting stats. And I think that's where Candelario can really

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 3>be a factor and help people because he's practically free

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 3>in drafts.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And Candelario is definitely free ADP of four thirty. He

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was also good in the twenty twenty COVID shortened season two.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 2>He had a good season there.

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>He at two ninety seven, at seven home runs at

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty two games. So it's not like again, playing time.

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>That's what's all about, and there's nobody else to take

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>it away from him. Same thing reason we like cj

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Abrams so much on the show. We always say it's free,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>we go take it now, shortstop. By the way, c

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>j Abrams made your list, so we might as well

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>stay with you said you're going on the all national

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>side of the left side here on the Indie.

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 3>Steve maybe maybe there's a little local bias here. Maybe

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I need a reason to watch the Nationals here in

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 3>the DC area. So but no, I like C. J

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Abrams obviously, you know, coming to Washington and the one

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Sodo trade, lots of prospect hype. And while you probably

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 3>know a lot more about C. J. Abrams and his

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 3>growth than I do, but he's still only twenty two.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I like, the fact that he's got

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>room to grow. He's got room to grow physically and

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 3>as a baseball player, and there's still that speed. And

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I think this year we talk about the bases being

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit larger, the pickoff rules, things like that,

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's tailor made for cj Abrams to take

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>advantage of. And so in Washington they want him to

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 3>settle into the leadoff spot. The Nationals, you know, ever

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 3>since Trey Turner left, have not really had a leadoff guy.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 3>C J Abrams could be that guy for them. And

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, again, just multiple plate you know, plate opportunities,

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 3>chances to get on base, like to see the OBP

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 3>a little higher. I think he can do that. And

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 3>once he does get on base, you know, it's off

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 3>to the races. So CJ. Abrams again not getting a

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 3>whole lot of love in terms of ADP. But he's

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of room to grow and I think that,

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe he takes that step forward this year and.

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot of love on this show because

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>again cheap, he's got the job.

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>He's got upside.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Just be patient, you know, because the Nationals have to

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be patient with him too. They have to show something.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I keep saying, they have to show something for that trade.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 2>See James are gonna have to be that guy, and

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 2>like he's not gonna be won Sodo.

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's gonna be won soda. That's why he's so special.

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>But can he get a good everyday player? And I

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is yes.

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 4>And from fantasy him on my all Breakout team to

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I think he was my second.

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And I've talked about him before and thinking like guys

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of ADP, I think we did we did a

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>show on that that I he he was on my list,

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people smarter than me and Welsh

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>see Steve Gardner over there talking about it. All right,

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>let's get to your shortstop. And this is one of

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>my favorite guys, one of my favorite guys last year.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>We talked about him so much, and all he did

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>last year was hit thirty one home runs.

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about him. Go ahead, Welsh.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm I'm turning even more and more, and I'm

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 4>gluing this all in with my dislike of this back

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 4>end of the deep shortstops that we like episode yeah. Yeah,

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 4>just like in that muddy water. Of those back end guys,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 4>the only one that I really like Williadamas and Williadamas,

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just.

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 5>So impressive that you can have a career.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 4>Low batting average under a career low babbit, and you

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 4>have a career high in home runs. He also his

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 4>RBIs were through the roof. He really found a spot

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 4>in a place to hit. He's a two hundred ice

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 4>so guy. He also lowered his strike you think of this,

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 4>think of this. His batting average and his babbit were

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 4>lowered babbit accuading to batting average dip down. He also

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 4>lowered his strikeout percentage from the previous year twenty six percent,

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 4>which was tied. If you want to get into the decimals,

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.239
<v Speaker 4>it was a little bit higher than one year, but

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty six percent is a career best of what he

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 4>can do, so, he lowered his strikeout percentage while struggling

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 4>from Babbit. The Homers were there. Projections want the batting

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 4>average to kick back up because the Babbitt tells us

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 4>the story it is, but the Homers don't. I don't

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 4>buy that. I think Willia Domins could be a thirty

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 4>five homer player. And when he's sitting around a territory

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 4>of a consistently inconsistent Carlos Korea with injury worries Tim

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Anderson who can't play one hundred and twenty games, and

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 4>littany of a couple other players, I just think Williadomas

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 4>is one of the better deals. I think he's a sleeper.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Even though this is like a top one hundred guy.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 4>I think Willi Domas has got top fifty upside that

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 4>you're getting ADP shows around ninety. I've seen him go

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 4>post one hundred and plenty of drafts and he's actually

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 4>really not the target. When everyone's like, oh, the position

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 4>so deep, give me Tim Anderson. No one's trying to

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 4>get Willia Domas.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But isn't it every year we do this to ourselves,

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>where we go, oh, this is the really deep position,

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and then like by June, we look up and go,

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what happened to that position? It just got decimated or

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. And you know what, just because it's deep, like,

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>don't take.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>It for granted. You know, if you can get will

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 2>that's my point.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you can get Willy at your middle infield

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>spot somehow, it's.

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 4>My two favorite thing to do, now, Joe, my favorite

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 4>thing to do. That's it right there is. I want

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.719
<v Speaker 4>one of those higher end shortstops if I am too,

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 4>even the ability padded also want it because it's good.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't care like I about chasing the other things

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>and chasing talent.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 4>I want to take him off the pool though, too,

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 4>because everyone's like, oh so deep. I want him to

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 4>be gone. I want him at my middle infield. Your

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 4>middle infield this year most likely should be a shortstop.

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't really want it to be Jeremy Panina. I

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 4>don't need it to be Carlisle career.

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather I love the depth.

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 4>If I were to go and take an on'eal cruise,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm taking on a lot of batting average risk. But

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't even hate the idea of getting Willia Damas

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 4>because you know, if I've got some insecurity at shortstop,

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 4>specifically with him. I want another guy.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>You just had. You know, it's funny.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the Wonder Franco home road splits

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>today too, and he struggled at home last year. And

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I just you know that batter's eyes is not great

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa. And I just I know Wonder Franco's not

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>going anywhere for the next I don't know five hundred

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>years he's in that contract on how long it is.

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But you see these guys when they get out of Tampa,

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>what they're able to do.

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 2>It's I mean, it's not easy.

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 4>It's funny about Willia Damas too. If everyone doesn't remember,

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Williadamas was actually the core piece when David Price was

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 4>traded and no one knows who the hell he was.

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Everyone was like, who is this Willy? What was this trade?

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 5>You looked at David Price like what is this trade about?

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 4>And everyone's like, watch out for Willia Damas who was

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 4>at the Tiger system. And now Willia Domas, you know

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 4>he is, uh. I mean, imagine trading David Price for

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Willia Domis right now, just think about that.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's get to the outfielders here and on

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>your list, I've Gardner, You've got Jesse Winker, who is

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite guys that keep talking about because

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he was one of my biggest.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Dayaways last year.

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>He's one of my biggest targets this year because it's

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>all business, is not personal with me.

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 2>The ADP is free in Milwaukee.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>By the way, all these guys in Milwaukee, Oscar Colas

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and Harrison Batter. So let's talk about these three guys,

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>your outfielders. What's special about them potentially in twenty twenty

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:27.719
<v Speaker 1>three where you think they're sleepers?

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 3>All right? Winker, obviously we liked the hitting environment in Milwaukee,

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 3>so coming back to the National League where he had

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 3>so much success in Cincinnati playing in the NL Central

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 3>and he's healthy too. Again, that's kind of a theme

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that runs through a lot of these sleepers. For me,

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the neck and the knee and whatever else he had

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 3>go wrong, you know, personality conflicts or clashes in Seattle.

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 3>But deep down there's still that all star from twenty

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty one that hit three zero five, three nine four

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 3>five point fifty six in Cincinnati, And you know, the

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 3>one thing that you could knock him for in that

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 3>All Star season was that he didn't hit left handed

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 3>pitching well, had just like a ops under six hundred

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 3>against left handed pitching. He hit left handed pitching better

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 3>than he hit right handed pitching last year. So you

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 3>put all that together. Healthy in Milwaukee taking advantage of that,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I see a big bounce back from Jesse Winker.

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the other guys too. It's it's funny,

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Welsh. I say the same things, but it

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds much better when Gardner says.

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't sound much smarter.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, when a Hall of Famer mentions it. Yeah, when

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 4>a Fantasy Baseball Hall of famers.

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 2>So much, he's much better. All right.

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So all right, So let's get to Ocar Colos, which

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of Welsh's guys in Bader, give me your

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>your lowdown on those two.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Baier, I think another one of those guys that

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 3>has the potential to steal a ton of bases this year.

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Obviously with the Yankees, they're gonna have to worry about,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, opponents will have to worry about Aaron Judge,

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think this is an opportunity. Bater's going to

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 3>full time center fielder He's the only center fielder really

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 3>on the roster, so he's going to be in the

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.959
<v Speaker 3>lineup every single day. And he was putting together a

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 3>succession of a better slugging seasons in Saint Louis until

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 3>the injuries last year. Had a four to sixty slugging

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 3>percentage in twenty twenty one. I think he's got the

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 3>potential to hit twenty home runs there in New York

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 3>and steal twenty maybe thirty bases if he can stay healthy.

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the potential is there in New York that

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Harrison Bader can continue his growth and be, you know,

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>a factor there for the Yankees on a team that

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 3>really needs him. You know. I think they showed when

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Aaron Judge was kind of carrying them through all of

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the second half of last year they needed somebody like

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Bater to come in and he did performed for them

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 3>in the postseason. But getting a full season there in

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 3>New York, I think can only help it.

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And colas a player who's going again pretty much free

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>three seventy two Chicago White Sox, we know the talent

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that he brings potentially is the matter of how much

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>playing time he's going to get and do you think

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he is going to be one of those guys from

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the jump that gets it.

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this could be. You know, he may be playing

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 3>for a job, a starting job in spring training. I

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 3>think he's going to make the roster. He progressed through

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the minor leagues, was very successful at Double A and

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Triple A last year, and the only guy in front

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of him, it seems like, is Gavin Sheets. And when

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>you've got a twenty four year old with this kind

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 3>of raw talent, I don't think that it's going to

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 3>take him long to overtake Sheets. The one issue with

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 3>him in the minor leagues is the strikeout rate, and

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 3>he's done exceptionally well in improving on that so far

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 3>this spring. Obviously small sample sizes, but you've got a

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>guy who can hit for power, can steal bases, and

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, if he's not striking out, there's a better

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 3>chance he's going to be getting on base again. I

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 3>like the bounce back for all of this, you know,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 3>White Sox offense. Yeah, Coulos could be part of that

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 3>and a very big part of that.

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a special day on the show because we're

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>recording this on the ninth of March and Welsh.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I had the the over on.

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>This, but you've hit the under the amount of times

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you can mention Lars Newpar So that's it. You've now

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>officially you're done, hit your limit. The quote is done,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>so the rest of the year you can't mention him.

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But he is one of your three outfielders, so if

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>you want to mention him, you ken. But just no,

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>this is it for you. I might do the other guy,

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>but like do the other guy, but I just everybody

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>knows new Bar was on the list here because Welsh

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>has the man crush on him for sure.

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 4>I was also gonna put Jeffrey Springs, but like, I

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 4>just can't keep doing I understand it, but I was

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 4>just struggling with it, like I am so susceptible. By

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 4>the way, if Corbyn, Carroll and large newpar are not

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 4>good this.

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Year, well I'm gonna hear it. Corbyn Carroll, you know

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm all in on.

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the more I watched, the more I watch it,

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just I think he's just such a He just

0:34:58.719 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>handed up so fast.

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's got such.

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Strong quick hands to the baseball, his athleticism. I just

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote this up in a piece for Fantasy Pros too.

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>It's up on there my must haves. He's one of

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>my must haves this year. I think he's almost slump

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>proof because of the athleticism, because of the quick stroke,

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>because like the amount of that paths is gonna get.

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I know, like maybe I'm jinxing it, but I really.

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Want that was a little jinxy, but like I'm with you.

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, honestly, you know that on this show the

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. And I mean, how many years

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>have we've been doing shows together when you and I

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>agree on a player and were this excited?

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 2>How often are we wrong? We? I mean, so I'm.

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 4>Gonna like we did like bold predictions last year in

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 4>mine we're the silliest ever, and they weren't like in agreement.

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 4>This is a full agreement. And like I said, I'm

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 4>just the conductor of these trains. There's a lot of

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 4>people with it and with me on it.

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Uh, it's just very tied to it.

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Large new bars and another one I've talked about it

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 4>at nauseum, but like if you're talking about it belongs

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 4>on my sleeper. Here's the other guy then that I

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 4>can pivot to is Taylor Ward. I think Taylor Ward

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 4>is coming at an exceptional cost. Outside the top one hundred.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 4>You're probably looking easily at a twenty to twenty five

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 4>home run season batting averages to eighty last year, XBA

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 4>maintained almost a two seventy hits both righty and Lefti's

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 4>good hit too, sixty eight against lefties to eighty six

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 4>against righty's and maintained both halves, which is pretty solid

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 4>to eighty six in the first half to seventy five

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 4>in the second half. Just a consistent hitter that's gonna

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of opportunity for running RBI in that

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 4>that angels Ligne up. And I think he's a pretty

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 4>good deal. My other outfielders that I threw out to you,

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually gonna pivot. I want to give you this

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 4>guy first. This is a cheating one, but I want

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 4>to talk about him because he's not doing a outfielder anymore.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but we don't get to talk about d it.

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 4>We don't talk about you two guys in any of these.

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I drafted him yesterday and I drafted him at I

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>drove him yesterday in the league, and I drafted him

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>today in the RST slam. I drafted it, and that's

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>why I wanted to bring up aunt.

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Another Dodger in jad Martinez. And I know he's not

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 4>technically an outfielder, but JD. Martinez is cheat code stuff.

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 4>With the Dodgers still hit two seventy four last year,

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 4>but obviously struggled totally offensively. Batting average looks like a

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 4>going to maintain projections. Love a huge bounce back in

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 4>power to the twenty five range, and I guess at

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 4>the end of the day, like I'm not, I like.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 5>A lot of the Dodgers, but it's just a why

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't you.

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 4>It's a big, huge, powerful lineup, and I keep picking

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 4>on Dodgers that are coming at costs that are way

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 4>cheaper than they were in previous years, and their bounce

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 4>back stuff. I mean, Munsey and uh and Jadie Martinez

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 4>are bounced backs. Miguel Vargas just hasn't gone there. I

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 4>think he's just kind of a no brainer that everyone

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 4>forgets about because he's util only. I don't think he's

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 4>gonna at the outfield stuff, but he's.

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Just they don't sort in the draft, and how many

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:38.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are sitting there where he is an ADP where

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you could legit say there's a chance he goes thirty

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ninety like that. That's that's absolutely the range of outcomes

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for him. And it's not absurd like it's just he

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>came off a down year. We're going to know right away.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think in the first month or two if Jady

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Martinez is washed or if Jady Martinez is gonna have

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a renaissance, I really do go ahead, Steve.

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, guys, there's another reason that I'm bullish on JD.

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Martinez as well. Coming to the Dodgers, they hired the

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 3>guy that turned his swing around. Remember when JD. Martinez

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 3>was essentially a nobody and all of a sudden, wow,

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 3>where did this come from? The guy's named Robert van Skyak,

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 3>And he wouldn't he wouldn't tell me. I remember interviewing

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 3>him like the year after that, and he wouldn't tell

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 3>me the guy's name, and he wanted to keep it secret.

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 3>He didn't want anybody going there. That finally got out

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 3>and the Dodgers hired him as hitting coach or assistant

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 3>hitting coach or he's with the Dodgers this year, so

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 3>reuniting the two of them, you know, whatever might have

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 3>been broken last year for JD. Martinez. I think there's

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 3>a pretty good chance that it gets fixed.

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It's one hundred worth a shot at the ADP too.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what Welsh is driving home. So you've

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>got Taylor Ward, You've got Martinez nut bar. I'll give

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you one more Welsh since I didn't let you use

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>your nude bar today.

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 5>No, I wanted to talk about this one.

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 4>This is important because I actually walked myself into this

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 4>one because I was not about this guy at all.

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:01.479
<v Speaker 4>I was on a bench with Bubba, our dear friend,

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Casey Bubba, and we were talking about the Diamond will

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:03.839
<v Speaker 4>be on.

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 2>The show tomorrow, by the way, on the Friday mock

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Draft show. So there you go.

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 5>Go and listen to that. Yeah, there you go, you

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 5>guys and check us out. Well.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 4>In that show, I started to have this revelation about

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Lordis Curriel and I had brought up the idea. I said, listen,

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sold. When you look at roster, rest of

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 4>resource tells you that Jake McCarthy's a guy. I don't

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 4>believe in it, and I don't know if the contact skills

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 4>are there enough. I also believe you know, the stolen

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 4>baser are going to come from Carol. Whatever, it doesn't matter,

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I said, look out, because the perfect type of guy

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 4>to hit three for a team like this is actually

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 4>a guy like Lordis Gurriel.

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 5>We know what ended up happening. Spring started.

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 4>He's starting almost every single game hitting three for the Diamondbacks.

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 4>It's spring training. Things can change, of course they can.

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 4>But Corb and Carroll against Righty's leading off Kateel Marte

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 4>is firmly at two, and I want to point out,

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 4>in every one of these games, Katel has hit two

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 4>and Lord has has hit three. Walker comes in at four.

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 4>It seems like a foregone conclusion that Lordis Guriel is

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 4>going to hit three. Now, why is that important? You

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 4>have Corbin Carrol maybe going to lead the league in

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 4>solo basis, even if it doesn't, is going to be

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 4>a threat. The fastest man in baseball is your lead

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 4>off hitter. You've got to tell Marte, who is noticeably

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 4>trying to still hit for contact, not for power. Lords

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 4>is not exciting, but he's dirt cheap, dirt cheap, and

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 4>what if those RBI numbers start to represent what he

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 4>did in twenty twenty.

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:23.359
<v Speaker 5>One with the with the Blue Jays.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.439
<v Speaker 4>What if it's into the eighties, what if he gets

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 4>to fifteen homers, He's going to hit for a high

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 4>batting average. I think it's a cheap, free opportunity when

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 4>outfields stinks so bad that you might be able to

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 4>get a couple really good categories outside the top two hundred.

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 4>And I just wanted to point out Lordis Gurriel because

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 4>I kind of walk myself into this him hitting three thing,

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.560
<v Speaker 4>and it has been happening all spring long, and I

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 4>think it's something we should really really pay attention to

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 4>for a diamondback team that is going to try to manufacture,

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 4>it might be a tiny bit better than a lot

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 4>of people expect.

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the pictures. Here the three

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>pictures on your list. Steve Gardner has actually got four

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:02.479
<v Speaker 1>because again overachiever Lucas Gilito, one of my favorite bounce backs.

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Also a guy drafted yesterday in our Fantasy Bros.

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Draft.

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Peralta who we've had mixed things about, so I

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 1>want to definitely get your input on him. Tyler Molly

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Anderson. So two Tyler's a Freddie p and

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:15.839
<v Speaker 1>a Lucas g So let's talk about these guys. We'll

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>take them one at a time, first Giulito, and then

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>run through them for us here, Steve.

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, Gilito, I think we have mutual love the

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Welsh and I on him. I just I think last

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 3>year again it's the white Sox thing. Maybe that's that's

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 3>another theme for today. But where did that, folks, that's

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 3>the sleepers or where did that come from? That's what

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 3>I want to know. I mean, he'd been he turned

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 3>things around since leaving Washington and going to Chicago. It's

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 3>a huge buying opportunity. I mean, the k rate still

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 3>above a strikeout per inning, he's still missing bats last

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 3>year at the seventy first percentile. I just seems to

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 3>me like there was just a mirage last year and

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Gilito is a guy that can come back to ACE level.

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 3>And again you're talking about where he's going in ADP.

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I got him as my second starter in the al

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Labor draft over the past weekend and he was sixteen

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:19.320
<v Speaker 3>seventeen dollars and uh, you know he was somebody.

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Last year, by the way, can we I mean he

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>was just out of shape?

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:23.919
<v Speaker 4>You mean wait, yeah, he noticed a lot. He said

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 4>he lost like thirty five pounds.

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he came up with two forty five this year.

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>He was too eighty last year.

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously the mechanics had you know, it threw

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>that off, It threw off the stem, and it.

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Threw off everything.

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, just coming into camp better shape. I

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think that hopefully's gonna be enough. Steve, I'm with you

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. What about paralitic, because that's a guy's

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>very polarizing because Nick Pollock, I mean literally I didn't

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>sleep the entire night after we had him on. He

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about Freddy Pearulter's shoulder. But everybody keeps saying he's

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>fine and he looks healthy in the spring.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 3>But what do you think, Well, I'm buying into the fact,

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 3>and maybe I should be, uh taking this with a

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.280
<v Speaker 3>grain of salt. But if they say that he's healthy

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and all indications are at this point that he's healthy

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 3>entering spring training, then I love Freddy Peralta where he's

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 3>going right now. I mean we saw what he could

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 3>do over a full season a couple of years ago

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 3>with that era under three one hundred and ninety five

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 3>k's and he just the one thing I like about

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 3>him the most is he doesn't give up hard contact

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 3>and home runs. So you know, when you can limit

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 3>that in Milwaukee and get the you know, your team

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 3>to hit a few extra home runs, that's where Freddy

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 3>Peralta can be, you know. And he's not even the

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 3>number one of the number two guy there in Milwaukee.

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 3>He's their third starter, so the expectations aren't anything that

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:45.399
<v Speaker 3>he has to deal with. And the strikeout rate again high.

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 3>It's been over ten k's per nine for for a

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 3>couple of years. Was down a little bit last year,

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 3>but I attribute that to the injuries. I'm looking for

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 3>the bounce back here and I'm buying.

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>At the dip okay, and then you got Tyler Molly

0:43:57.680 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Anderson on your list.

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about those two guys.

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll get real quick again. Tyler Molly two years

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 3>ago struck out two hundred and ten batters at a

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 3>three seventy five e RA in Cincinnati in a pitcher's park.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 3>You put him in Minnesota with Carlos Carea, Brian Byron

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Buxton or Michael A. Taylor in centerfield. You know those

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 3>guys up the middle there good defense. I think that's

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Taylor made for him to come back and and be

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe not an ace, but certainly much better than the

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 3>sp five or six or whatever. He's being drafted. And

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 3>Tyler Anderson, I don't, I don't get it. I mean, yes,

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 3>he's not impressive to watch, but he does get ahead

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 3>of hitters. That's one of the He's one of the

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 3>best in the majors at getting ahead of hitters, or

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 3>was last year, and that's what I think contributed a

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 3>lot to his two five seven e r A and

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 3>one point zero zero whip. Going to the Angels, it's different.

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, we won't have the Dodgers, won't be shifting,

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 3>and you know they were the one one of the

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 3>best teams at shifting. But still the mentality of getting

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 3>ahead and nobody batters chased balls on him as much

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 3>as they do almost any other pitcher in all of

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Major League Baseball. I think that's the kind of skill

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 3>that can translate to a new environment. So Tyler Anderson,

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:21.879
<v Speaker 3>again way outside the top two hundred, I'm buying.

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:22.879
<v Speaker 2>All right now.

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Welsh you have ge Alito on your list, Andrew Heeney,

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>George Kirby at a mornings to be said about Giolito,

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but Welsh, if you got something there, drop it. Let's

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>get to Heeni and Kirby as well. Why do these

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:34.399
<v Speaker 1>guys make your all sleeper team?

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the only thing I would add with the Gilito

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 4>as well. On top of the weight loss, he was

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 4>pitching inside his body and you could pretty visibly see

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 4>it where he kept his arm inside kind of like

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 4>really close to the vest and then he would explode

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 4>on it. That was something that he changed from years prior.

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Went to drive line again. That's gone, so he's kind

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 4>of changed his delivery. He lost a whole bunch of weight.

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 4>It seems very much like an anomaly. I'm just very

0:45:58.080 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 4>much in on him.

0:45:58.719 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 5>We've talked a lot about Kirby.

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 3>Kirby was a.

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Big guy that Nick Pollock was in on, and you know,

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 4>I've kind of been pretty vocal about it as well.

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 4>I like the nine k per nine. I love that

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 4>he is a command zone pitcher. He's just going to

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 4>pump all across his zone with a multitude of pitches.

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I think he's going to take a big step up.

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 4>I love the spin rates. I just love everything about

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 4>George Kirby I've seen him touch one hundred as well,

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 4>so I think there's always something in the tank for him.

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:25.360
<v Speaker 4>A little bit bigger. Just saw him today actually in camp.

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, he's just adding a little bit more muscle

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 4>onto his body. I think George Kirby set to really

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 4>break out. And you know, Andrew Heeney is someone I

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 4>haven't really talked about recently, but like he was kind

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 4>of Jacob de gram light with what the Dodgers changed

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 4>with him. He only had seventy innings last year, which

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 4>is also a Jacob de Gram light. But okay, Joe,

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 4>you're giving me a reaction there. Joe thirty five point

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 4>five K percentage, which was over thirteen K per nine.

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Of all pitchers who pitched seventy or more innings, Spencer

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Strider had the best K minus Walker twenty nine point

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 4>seven number two Andrew Heeney twenty nine point four percent.

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 4>The Dodgers, like they do, were able to fix him.

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm very hopeful that that is going to come over

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 4>and that is going to take part in Texas, because

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 4>that is an increase in K prinine. He lowered his

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 4>walk per nine last year. He didn't give up as

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 4>many Homers. This is a guy if you can get

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 4>the innings out of him, is crazy, crazy valuable at

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 4>low rounds that people are just not targeting. That has

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 4>him around one hundred and forty innings. Like I said,

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 4>this is like a goodwill version of Jacob de Gram.

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 4>I love the strikeout numbers. I think Texas is going

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 4>to be way better than people are giving credit for.

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 4>So Andrew Heeney is a target. I think he's a

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 4>sleeper and if he gets one hundred and ten hundred

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 4>and twenty innings, he's going to smash his value.

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I just still trying to come down from the

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Jacob de gram comparison there.

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:53.919
<v Speaker 4>But like Jacob, it's like goodwill, goodwill. Jacob de Grod

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 4>thirteen k per nine is the second best case. Can

0:47:57.600 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 4>also only pitch seventy innings.

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I was gonna say the most Jacob de

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 2>gram as thing he can do.

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 1>He's seventy four innings this year. That's probably gonna be

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>uh somewhere in that rage.

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's close x fip better than his HERI yeah.

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 2>Let's close things out with the closers.

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Justin Mason has a great piece on fantasy pros right now,

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the all undrafted team, and this guy's on it.

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, so let's talk about your relief pitcher.

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Uh, as far as relief pitchers go, this is interestingly

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 4>all undrafted.

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:25.919
<v Speaker 5>One.

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 4>I've got Alexis Diaz with the Cincinnati Reds, who's actually

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 4>out right now for the I believe he's I'm trying

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 4>to remember what team he is, but he's out in

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 4>the WBC. And Alexis Daz is just one of those

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 4>dudes that this is. Also I believe he's brothers or

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 4>cousins with Edwin Diaz, so you can obviously kind of

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 4>get excited there. This is a bad team with a

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 4>lockdown closer. So this is kind of like similar to

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 4>like Daniel Bard how you would view it, except I

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 4>think the stuff can be bigger head of one eight

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:55.720
<v Speaker 4>four era last year. The worrisome stuff is the walk

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 4>numbers are really high, and technically his ex FIP was

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:01.800
<v Speaker 4>like at nomically higher, so he got away with a

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 4>lot of stuff.

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 5>But it is.

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Big strikeout numbers, doesn't give up homers, and he has

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 4>the gig and he's going to keep down that gig

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 4>for quite a while.

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 5>So I think as far as the.

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Sleeper goes Ario Cohen talked about alex slang you could

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 4>look at him. Daniel Bard is kind of fun with Colorado.

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 4>But Alexis Diaz, to me, I think has the most real,

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 4>true life closer stuff and if that control can be

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 4>a little bit under control, if you will, then Alexis

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Diaz has a potential to be like a top twelve.

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I actually really think this is like its like Daniel

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Bard where you know Daniel Bard, I guess you got

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 4>him probably like twenty fifth or something encloser and he

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 4>could return top fifteen. I think Alexis d has a

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 4>easy going to do that, and if he has a

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 4>gig all year controls those walks, I think he could

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 4>finish top probably ten enclosers. So he's a guy that

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:48.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to drop absolutely everywhere.

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's playing for Team Puerto Rico. All right, though,

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go for you, Steve Gardner. Close us out here.

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is a closer that I take in almost

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>every mock draft that we do. He has very little

0:49:59.400 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>competition as far as I'm concerned, and I do agree

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:03.399
<v Speaker 1>with Welsh. I think Texas is going to be better

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>than people realize. I'm not sure how. It's just they've

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 1>just knock the talent on their roster the.

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:50:11.320 --> 0:50:13.439
<v Speaker 1>But no, but look, they went out there and they've

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:15.239
<v Speaker 1>spent money and they've run into major league talent and

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that's something that roster's lacked the last three years, let's

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest. So that just off the bat is a

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 1>good thing. So the closer there, jose lea clerk, that's

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>your guy.

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Steve Yes indeed, and uh, you know, if de Grom

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:29.719
<v Speaker 3>and and those guys can get further into the game

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 3>and maybe take some of the pressure off of the

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:34.479
<v Speaker 3>bullpen in Texas to get it to the ninth inning,

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 3>jose Le Clerk is going to be. Uh. It seems

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.439
<v Speaker 3>to me the no doubt closer there. They just did

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:45.880
<v Speaker 3>sign Will Smith this past week, who does have closing experience.

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.879
<v Speaker 3>But again, you like to see the right hander as

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 3>the closer and use the left hander in situations. And

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:55.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, coming back after Tommy John surgery a couple

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 3>of years ago, made it back to the roster throwing

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 3>ninety six again last year, and he has closing experience.

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's done that for a couple of years,

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 3>and now it seems like the job is his I

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 3>think he's in a perfect situation and everybody seems to

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 3>have forgotten about him, at least in drafts that I'm in,

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 3>where you know, nobody knows who's going to close for

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Texas because nobody had many saves for them. He's the

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 3>guy he came back in, you know, towards the end

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:26.839
<v Speaker 3>of the year and took the job over. I think

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 3>he's going to keep it all season long. And if

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 3>you can get a closer who has the job all

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 3>season long and not get traded, then you've got gold,

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 3>especially where he's going.

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I love that we've come full circle here this week

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>because after the show with Collette he had so many

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite names on his All Bus team. You've

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of names that I like Steve Gardner

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:47.799
<v Speaker 1>on your all sleeper team.

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 2>So now I'm feeling a little bit better. It could

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 2>rest easy.

0:51:50.120 --> 0:51:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Those names are at Catri Gasmani Grondal at first, Brandon

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>belt Estrata, Candelario Abrams make the rest of the infield.

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Then you've got Jesse Winker, Oscar colos Ha Bader in

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the outfield, the pitchers, Giolito, Peralta, Molly and Anderson, and

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the closer, jose Leclerk, Welsh's all sleeper team, the slap

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of Yo Hoppy as Ariel Cohen calls him. Miguel Vargas,

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Colton Wong, Max Munsey, William Domas, Lars newtbar Taylor, Ward, Lords,

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Guriel JD. Martinez, then Kirby Heeney and Gildo will Alexis

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Diaz at the end.

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:26.279
<v Speaker 2>So some really good names there.

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, go practice getting these names on your roster over

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:32.319
<v Speaker 1>at fantasypros dot com slash Draft Wizard, download the app,

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>run those mock draft simulations. We got a draft show,

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, coming up tomorrow with Bubba. We're gonna

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>do head to head Rhodo categories. I think we should

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>all draft right next to each other. Welsh, what do

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you think like five six, seven tomorrow.

0:52:44.640 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 5>That's a pretty yeah, all.

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Friends after Still, I think we should do that. Steve

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Gardner go follow him on the Twitter machine at Steve A.

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Gardner. He is first class for a reason, one of.

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:56.839
<v Speaker 1>The best guests, one of the best baseball people I've

0:52:56.840 --> 0:52:58.399
<v Speaker 1>ever met in one of the big reasons I'm still

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.399
<v Speaker 1>kicking in this industry. So Steve, just thank you again

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for your time and coming on sharing your knowledge with everybody.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It's also one of the best fantasy baseball players out

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 1>there too. If you're ever in a league with Steve Gardner,

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna tell you he's gonna kick your ass

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's just I've experienced it myself on more than

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 1>one occasion. So one of the best there is. And

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>check out the USA today that's coming out the special

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Edition very soon. I want to thank the sponsor

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of today's show, and that's fan Tracks. Head over to

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>fantracks dot com slash Fantasy Pros today for your chance

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to win the fan Tracks game day experience for your

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 1>entire fantasy baseball league. Again, that's fantracks dot com slash

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros. And while you're there, join the Black Book

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Challenge over Fantasy Pros. I tweeted the link Joe P's

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a P seventeen on Twitter.

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Check that out. Join it's free. The winner gets a

0:53:41.160 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Fernando Tattist autograph jersey.

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That'll do it for us, but the story of the

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>game goes on for Steve Gardner and the Welsh I'm

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Joey P.

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:49.720
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:54.760
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Baseball Podcast, Follow

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 6>us on Twitter at Fantasy Pros MLB, and subscribe to

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:01.880
<v Speaker 6>our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:02.359
<v Speaker 6>m lb

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 2>M