WEBVTT - André Calantzopoulos on Profiting from Nicotine

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Ethan Natalman, and this is Psychoactive, a production

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio and Protozoa Pictures. Psychoactive is the

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>show where we talk about all things drugs. But any

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of you has expressed here do not represent those of

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Media, Protozoa Pictures, or their executives and employees. Indeed,

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>heat as an inveterate contrarian, I can tell you they

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>may not even represent my own and nothing contained in

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this show should be used as medical advice or encouragement

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to use any type of drugs. Hello, Psychoactive listeners. My

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Andre Collinsopolis. He is perhaps the most

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>famous current figure in the world of big tobacco. He's

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>worked at Philip Morris International, the huge tobacco conglomerate, for

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>almost forty years. He's been the chief operating officer, the

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>chief ex ecutive officers now chairman of the board. And

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to be talking to him today for two reasons.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>One is, you know what's it like to head one

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of the most vilified companies in the world selling a

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>product that kills half the people who use it as designed.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time he has been the most

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>forward thinking and outspoken of the big tobacco leaders in

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>advocating for a rapid transition from cigarettes and other combustible

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>forms of tobacco to e cigarettes, inhalable forms and other

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>harm reduction approaches. So, Andre, thank you so much for

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>agreeing to talk with me on Psychoactive. Well, Leathan, thank

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you very much for having me, and thank you for

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this very nice introduction, which I don't think I deserve

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>everything you said, but I'm very happy to be on

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the show. Okay, so let me let me revamp it

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit dead. So some people, you know, would regard

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you as sort the devil incarnate, right, the guy who's

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>leading one of the biggest companies in the world that's

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>selling these tobacco cigarettes cancer sticks that kills half of

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>all long term users when used as directed Right, you know,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>eight million people are going to die this year around

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the world from smoking, either directly or from second hand

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>smoke in some cases. On the other hand, you've also

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>been the head of a company which is made what

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>appears to be of all the big tobacco companies, the

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>most serious commitment to to basically shifting out of combustible

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>cigarettes into other forms of nicotine consumption. That are widely

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>believed to be much safer. So I want to start

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>off by saying, you know, I saw the fellow. I'm

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not sure I pronounce his name, Old Jack, your CEO.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>The guy who worked for you for many years, has

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>replaced you as a CEO he said. Last year, he goes,

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to allow this company to leave smoking behind.

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I think in the UK ten years from now maximum

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you completely solve the problem of smoking. And when he

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was then asked that then, Philip Morris, we started selling

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>traditional cigarettes in the UK within that time, he replied, absolutely.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 1>So say a little more about that. Well, let's give

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>some context for the audience. Clearly it's very well down.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Cigarettes cause disease and unaddictive and premature deaths. So what

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is less known is the reason or the main reason

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for that. And the main reason for that is combustion,

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we burn tobacco, and that's what creates

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>most of the toxic substances that cause morbidity and mortality.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So the answer to resolving the problem for the people

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that would otherwise continue using cigarettes is not to combast

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a substrate. And the first thing we did is to

0:03:55.800 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>develop a portfolio of products that comprise heated tobacco, so

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>heated the temperatures that don't create combustion, which diminishes very

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>significantly the toxical is generated by We also have products

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 1>in what is more known in the US, like vapor products,

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and we also have products that are in the form

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of pouches that contain no tobacco at all. So all

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>these products do contain nicotine because that's important for smokers

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to switch, but they don't combast, so we have a

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>very substantial reduction in their toxicity. The second thing to do,

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and we've done, is to substantiate scientifically that these products

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>actually in pre clinical and clinical trials demonstrate reduction of

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>toxicity exposure to the toxicans and eventually you know, the

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>promise of a re action in morbidity and mortality. And

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we have submitted these studies to many countries, including to

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the US Food and Drug Administration, which issued in order

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that these products reduced the exposure and authorize their sale

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US. So I think, on one side, we

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>need manufacturers to invest in developing these products and then

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>put their hearts and their money behind convincing existing smokers

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to switch to these products. But this is the first

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>step and the second step clear and I'm sure we'll

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>discuss this, is to have regulators in the US and

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world adopting the right policies that differentiates these products,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that cigarettes, recognizing the absence of combustion and the lower toxicity,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so the potential benefit to public health, so that we encourage,

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>through commercial activities on side, the regulatory frameworks on the

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>other side, smokers to switch. And if we do that properly,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we can phase out cigarettes very fast. Now,

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what do you say when people say, you know, until

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got longitudal studies twenty three or thirty years of data,

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it's all bullshit. I mean that we don't really know

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>what these things are going to do to people twenty

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty years from now. So let's just hold your horses

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and let's you know, hold back and making a big

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.679
<v Speaker 1>switch into the non combustibles. What's your response to them, Well,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>my response is that every day we lose in letting

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>people having as an alternative only to continue smoking or

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>quitting is a lost day in public health. The second

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>thing is that all the precursors to what you call

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>epidemiological studies or long term studies is pretty clinical and

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>short term clinical studies, and if you have very substantial

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 1>reduction in exposure two toxicans, is very natural to assume

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you will have reduction in disease caused by these toxicons

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>because the toxicans are known. If we do nothing, nobody

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>will adopt this product. And you know that the subject

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is a bit complex, but it's not different from essentially

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to convince consumers to move from using fossive fuels

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to renewable energy. It's not that the renewable energies are

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>proven to have zero impact on the environment. Actually they don't.

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>They're must be better than vernicle or fossil fuels. And

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we do both the you know, the products and the

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>regulatory measures to convince people who consume energy to switch

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to this alternative. So we're trying to apply an extreme

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>precautionary principle here, but clearly there are also legitimate concerns.

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>There are legitimate concerns that we need to minimize impact

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in undesirable audiences, particularly youth. Also people that have quit

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and because these products are better than cigarettes, maybe they

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>will come back. That's why the regulatory framework has to

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>be fair district on how you commercialize this product at

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>all that is physible. This is not a reason not

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to allow these products on the markets and then deprived

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>smokers forever from these products because they have their right

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>also to be informed that these products exists what they are,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>but they are not because they still contain ecotiner addictives.

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not zero risks, but they're much better than cigarettes

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>for the ones who would like to continue using nicotine products.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Now people will come back and say, well, why don't

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you just get out of the damned cigarette industry entirely?

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Like when it comes to the rest of the industry,

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>do you guys talk with or another? Do you talk

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to their CEOs or chairs? Do you guys lead? Are

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they just looking if you get too far out of

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>head on shifting a harmyduction just to scoop up your

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>market share? Uh? You know, are you better than all

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the other guys? You know, I mean British, American Tobacco,

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Japan Tobacco, Imperial, all those. What's the nature of industry

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>at at at the executive the top level in terms

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of the movement of harmy option. Okay, clearly we have

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>been leading in this domain for various reasons. Other companies

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the industry where slower in entering this domain, and

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we can examine why. But the thing is, once these

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>products start being available to consumers and consumers starts reaching

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to them, I don't think there is an option from

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a pure competitive point of view for other manufacturers not

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to enter the domain now to do these products. If

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you start today, you're not going to have a product tomorrow.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>It takes years to develop the products, and once you

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>have a developed product, you believe it's just the ability

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>to switch consumers. Then you need to do all your

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>quick clinically clinical trials, and then after that you need

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to do the right market surveillance to avoid unintended audiences,

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but long term established epidemiology as well. So it's a

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>big investment to make and it takes multiple years. We

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>talk or as it took, maybe we're slow, but it

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>took us six seven years to develop the first heated

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>tobacco product and another three or four years to do

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the substantiation. So it's a ten year investment of multi

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Because these products because they have lower taxes

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of the regulatory UH framework, they also

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have higher margins that justify your investments. Then once we

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>reach a sufficient critical massive smokers that have switched to

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>these products, then do side measures or other regulatory interveneurs

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like up and trade or nicotine reduction as the Fday

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is discussing. So you've kind of further incentivize consumers to switch,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but also manufacturers on a stick and currot base to

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>start investing now because you know in ten years, fifteen years,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the measures are going to be so drastic on the

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>people that have not invested in these new products that

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it will be not sustainable from a business perspective. And

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>what is important, sorry if I sound like a broken record,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is that public health authorities and governments get aligned behind

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Haart reduction. Because if you're a manufacturer and you have

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>very ambiguous views in your country about what this products

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>should be authorized or not. In some countries they banned

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>vapor products. In some countries they banned both in vapor

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>products and heated tobacco products as precautionary principle, So that

0:11:55.840 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't incentivize manufacturers around the world to invest heavily in

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this product. So having the governments and public health being

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>aligned that yes, the best thing is to quit, but

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>if you don't quit. Then the second best is to

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>move to this products and create the right incentive. Says

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that stick and current. Yeah, sometimes get this sense and

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they tell me if it's wrong or not. That in

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the countries that are good on harm reduction, like the

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom or maybe New Zealand, that in those countries,

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you p M. I are willing to kind

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of really you know, be very non aggressive with selling

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>your cigarettes, really to pull back and you know, not

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do anything that people would I mean they don't like

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>you selling in the first place, but that you're not

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>going to push it hard. Where's a country like Mexico

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>which is banning basically all the harm reduction products, or

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly east cigarettes and heat not burn things. You know,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you're more so I saw. I think

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got a letter from some of the harm reduction

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>supportive scientists saying, you know, what do you do with

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Marlborough shuffle? There's a Marble shuffle. Some product you have

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico is a marketing campaign, especially attractive to young people.

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It's got these capsule things. It's actually to try different flavors.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there that sense that if a government

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to shut you out on harmonduction. You're just

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a little more of a bad boy when

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to marketing cigarettes. Absolutely not. Uh. First of all,

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just to give a little bit of perspective here, um today,

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the markets where we are present with this product, okay,

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>or we can be present, and if you look at

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>pre mind total, more than eighty percent of our commercial

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>money marketing sales forces go behind this products, although we

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>still represent a fraction of the pond, okay, So we

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>put our money to our mouths. Secondly, uh, you know,

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not that if you are aggressive in marketing certain products,

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of retaliation with every governments, okay, becauseural governments

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>don't care about these things. The second thing is in

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>certain markets where I mean Mexico essentially banned the importable

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>these products, okay, So the only thing is to continue

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue with the government to convince them that that

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>was not the brightest idea they had. Okay. And on

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the other side, you need to do a minimum in

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the cigarette market where you have nothing else in order

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to maintain at least your market share. That where you're

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just from a shareholder's perspective, you move your market share

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to competitors. But we are not investing behind cigarettes, okay.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And whenever a market is makes it possible for us

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to commercialize these products, we do commercialize, Okay. I would

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>love Indonesia to finally adapt all the regulations necessary. Philippines

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>were moving in the right direction and we started I

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>link this products there, and I hope you mentioned in Mexico.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, people in Mexico will see the opportunity in

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the government and take the right measures other than banning

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the products and condemning people to only smoke. But there

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is no we pro void the two okay, So let

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>me press you harder. I mean, then we'll get more

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>into the harmony duction stuff. And some of the other

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>skeptics will say so when it comes to, for example,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>bands and tobacco advertising, that there was recently a referendum

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland right where you live, you know, and I

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think that P might other companies opposed the Swiss referendum

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to ban virtually all tobacco advertising. Now was that because

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it was also a ban on noncombustibles or what was

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>your why were we doing that? Correct? Not applies in

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>general you know to all institutions, mightly to them is

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to follow different shade noncombustible products from combustible products, okay,

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>or scientifically proven reduced risk products, let's call them. And

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>then you can do whatever you want with cigarettes. In

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>any case, in many countries, that is not much more

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that is available. Two you know prohibit So the reality

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is on cigarettes. You know, as I said, be my

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>guests and do whatever they want. Right. But but but you're

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>saying p m I. Now when it comes to you know,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if governments want to increase taxes on cigarettes, bean advertising,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>limit where you can take it. At this point, p

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>m I is not opposing those types of things anywhere,

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>so long as it's focused on cigarettes and not on

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the noncombustibles. Is that right. Let's let's take one after that.

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about tobacco products or even words all

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>nicotine products, and you apply all the same rules to

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>all this products, then clearly your favorite cigarettes. Because the

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>new categories various degrees are relatively unknown smoke, so you

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>need some differentiating factors so you can explain to consumers

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what these products are. I'm not saying TV advertising or

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>radio advertising or things like this, but the ability to

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>contact people, the ability to them to try this product,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean you have countries where you cannot offer a

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>consumer the possibility to try a smoke free product by law.

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So how how is a smoker going to try this

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>product and spend money to buy it if they can

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>try it. So it's the minimum necessary to communicate with consumers.

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is you do need differentiated taxation between

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the two categories, because one is easy to market, is

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very well known. The other requires, as I said previously,

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a very significant investment in product development and scientific assessment

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>priclin clinical. So we don't have the same spend by

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>any measure between the two. I mean, if you want

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to create any cigarette, you just maximum you will do

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>is adapt the geometry of the packaging and you have

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a new product in six months, and the others have

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>horizons of four to eight years. So this has to

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be recognized. In terms of taxation. We've always said governments

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>always increase excess taxes, and they will continue increasing both

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>form for revenue reasons but also as a measure to

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>diminished consumption. So they can increase. Always say don't do

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>abrupt to one nots, have a plan and increase every

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>year by the amount you want, and then this is

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect Okay, we know what's happening. If you have one

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of you have contraband, and then the legitimate sales go

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>down and illegal products get the market. But what is

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>more important is that they keep some differentiation between the

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>smoke free category and the smoking right collects because the

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing we do for electric cars, they pay less

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>taxes and so on. So I understand we're saying something

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that is unreasonable. Yeah, you know it makes sense. Let

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>me ask you, what's your thoughts on these menthol bands

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>or I think European Union did it? The US did it?

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Used to work? I think you first started working with

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>p m I in Poland. Poland's one of the biggest

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>consumers of mental aid in cigarettes. Are they a good idea?

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Okay? First of all, the European

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Union did the band mental in cigarettes. The US has

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>not yet bunned. Okay, so that's the first thing. Yes,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm supporting the measure as a measure that when we

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>have good availability of vapor product, executed tobacco products or pouches,

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a nice way to push consumers of menthol into

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the new categories. Just happen in the right time, Okay,

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll try bunning menthol without having smoke free alternatives. Essentially,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the European Union is that the most

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>smokers reached to normal cigarettes, I mean to non mental cigarettes. Okay,

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>class you see some people buying mental and mental lating

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>their packs because it's very easy. So I don't think

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we had the effect that we wanted to have, and

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>we would have much better effect if it happened the

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>way you describe, if alternatives were on the market, and

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>then you give a very good chance to these new

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>products to be adopted. But people didn't really quit. We'll

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be talking more after we hear this add Now, there's

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 1>this other proposal that's been put for in the US

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in June of this year to basically reduce the level

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of nicotine and cigarettes to the point where they're almost

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>not cigarettes anymore, and there's not cutting it by half.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>By cutting it by and the estimatest would save millions

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of lives. My senses, it might actually be the movement

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>where we switched to a defective tobacco prohibition and launch

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>cigarettes into the big leagues of major global drug trafficking.

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But what's your views on this reduced nicotine thing. Will

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>there ever be a moment where this makes sense to

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>do or is that just pushing on the supply side

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>controls too far. The supply side controls, as I said,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is measures you can take when you have good availability

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of alternatives to avoid what you just describe sitrate self

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>nipotinization and so on. Okay, so people spike their cigarettes

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that have no nipotine with nicotine and so on. I

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>think this has to be seen in the US in

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the context of the policy announced a few years ago

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>by the Commissioner and reaches a lot of the head

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of tobacco in the FDA that they saw and dual strategy.

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The one is on one side, we may alternatives available

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that are scientifically proven and authorized, and on the other side,

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in the right moment, we reduced nicotine in cigarettes as

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a measure. It's not the only one, but that's the

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>only one the FDA has under control. Now. If we

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about cup and trade and other measures of this nature,

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 1>probably they are more effective. But the principle of allowing

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>alternatives and then do the right regulatory measures at a

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>certain stage to accelerate the phase out are rational regulations.

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>The danger in general will take one side of the

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>regulation and we forget the other. Okay. So to me,

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a measure that is a stick and currot measure.

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a phase out measure, and it has to be

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>seen with other possible measures and not on its own, Okay.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But the principle, I think it's clear from abiating myself,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you need availability of this product, you need the right framework,

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually the phase out measures at the right moment,

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and that I'm fully supported. You know, part of this

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bi monthly conference call with a lot of the leading

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 1>tobacco control experts who are sympathetic to harmonaduct share, and

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to say, you know, none of them fully

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>trust you p m I. Big tobacco people vary in

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>these things, but the one issue everybody's on is, you know,

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>p m I is out there claiming that there's twelve

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half million adult smokers who have switched completely

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to icos from cigarettes and stopped smoking, not counting Russian Ukraine,

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so even more than that, And the question is how

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>do you know? And they're asking you for data. You know,

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they say, if you're claiming what your market share is

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>with icos and all this, there must be data, and

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not being transparent. You're not handing over the information.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>You're sending your people to meet with them, and you're saying, yes,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we understand, blah blah blah blah blah, but that basically

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you're holding back on providing the formation that can really

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>substantiate what you claim to be the powerful substitution effects

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for icons for people switching. So why why are you

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>holding back? Why not be as totally transparent as possible

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in this stuffs of all we want to be transparent. Okay.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, icons and vapor products are rather recent phenomenon. Okay,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So in the cigarette market you have fluctuations over the

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>last three years that are fairly big. You had covid

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or in some countries, you increase consumption the US, In

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>some countries you had a decreasing consumption of cigarettes. In

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>some countries you still have icons and vapor being a

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>small part of the market five six p so, and

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you have price changes and touch change. So the data

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>needs to be cleaned up from all this in order

0:24:55.040 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to be available to scientists to study, and the only

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>way to do that is to have the right scientists

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with you. So you explain all the other influence in phenomena. Okay,

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a fact that we know from all the consumer

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>surveys we're doing. We're gonna make available all the panel

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>data that people who switched to icos. You know, if

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>out of hundred people switch to who buy icos, I'm

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sorry about stay with icos and sixty problem with sevents

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>which completely to and that you have the follow up

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the consumers, you can say it's a bit bias

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>data by the panel and that's a fact. On the

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>other side, as the Icons in particular share is building up,

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly the data will become more visible. It's very visible.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>In Japan the category is at almost thirty percent of

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the market, so it's very visible. I think the visible

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>cigarette sales as exactly. So you do you start seeing

0:25:57.520 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>in Italy another market, So I think it's a question

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of time. But there's not a lack of transparency. The

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>data is there. But if we make the effort to

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>clean up the data from other factors, the data also

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>can be used. But you need to take price increases,

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>price changes, tax increases and the COVID period. So it's

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>not something to take off the show and you give

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we need to do the analysis. That's all. Yeah, I understand,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>just just a little, you know, piece of advice or

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>encouragement that for the people who are most sympathetic to

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>your you know, what you're trying to do in terms

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of your transition and combustibles, being as transparent as possible

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to evidence would actually make a real difference. Now let

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>me turn to the opposition to this thing, Mike Bloomberg,

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>who has put hundreds of millions of dollars. Uh, you know,

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>initially it was all about trying to fight smoking. He's

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>still trying to fight smoking. I assume at this point

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you probably agree with a fair bit about what Bloomberg

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is doing to try to you know, restrict smoking, increased restrictions,

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff. But meanwhile, he's adopted an

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>aggressively anti tobacco harm reduction position, and he is a

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>major funder of the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, which

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to have evolved from an anti smoking organization to

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a nicotine abstinence organization. He's then ambassador official ambassador World

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Health organization, which seems to be taking anti scientific positions

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and harm reduction. You know, what do you think striving

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys? Sometimes people act on ideology, sometimes on self interest.

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult for me to understand sometimes why people that

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>used to be all harm reduction, all of a sudden,

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, they move the debate from comparing the smoke

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>free products with cigarettes, which is the problem, to a

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>zero risk product. So I guess it's ideology. I guess

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of panic because when you don't have

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>an enemy or the enemy is doing the right things. Uh,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, some ngeo's think they're going to lose their purpose.

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Some of the audience remember that years ago we had

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>head we called the value disease, so people that we're

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>inhaling something and they had serious problems with the lens

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and eventually some of the people died, which is terrible.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But this had nothing to do with invapor products. These

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>were it was proven that were people that used I

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, kind of be noise or legally produced THHC cartridges.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So it has to be entirely about some knuckleheads putting

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>vitamin e acetate into the th HC cartridges. But everybody blamed,

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the vapors, the east cigarettes and nicotine cigarettes,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's stuck in the public consciousness, and it

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>really appeared that, you know that that the anti tobacco

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and anti harmonduction forces really took advantage of a broad

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>public misperception in order to advance their agenda. I don't

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm just putting saying exactly what you were

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>going to say there, but probably well model as you

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>are saying correctly. And the question I ask is who

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is accountable for that? Because you know, after the peak

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of this crisis, unfortunate crisis even in Europe, in France

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and many other countries, who had six of the smokers,

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>who started to believe that evapor products are equally bad

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>or worse than cigarette, which I think is a public

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>health disaster. So I've heard some people say that that,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it makes sense to me in a way

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you guys probably still make more money

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>from cigarettes than you do from all these harm reduction things,

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that you know it's basically a cash

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>cow for big Tobacco that keeps selling cigarettes, and that

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Bloomberg and w h O and Campaign Redaco Free

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Kids and all these anti harm reduction folks by virtue

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of putting out all these lies and blocking the adoption

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of harm reduction, that dave essentially become your biggest allies.

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>That essentially you should be sent a thank you note

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to Mike Bloomberg at least for the short term, because

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he's helping post your cigarette sales. And in fact, it

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>does appear that in some places cigarette sales have stopped

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>going down because people no longer see the you know,

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>East cigarettes and he not burn devices as as safer.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you say, are they basically the factor your

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ally now in terms of short term profits. Factually, you

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are correct. By demonizing the better products. You know, you

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>make people believe that cigarettes are the only alternative, and

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>frankly speaking, yes, they help the people that want only

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to sell a cigarette, because it would be ideal if

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the World Health Organization was at least neutral on this product. Right,

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's the short term bottom line in terms of

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the profits of cigarettes, well, the profits of cigarettes, you know,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>as I said many times also to investors, the margin

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we make on these products, spoke for products is better

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>than cigarettes. So we don't only have a model incentive.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We have a financial incentive to sell these products, and

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they're better because we convinced the regulators around the world

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to give us better tax treatment than on cigarettes, and

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>they understand that if you have a better product, you

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>need to incentivize both manufacturers and consumers to switch to

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this product. Okay, so I think it makes sense to

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>us not to sell cigarettes. Yeah. Yeah, But I mean

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what people also say, right is look what

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what what you pick tobacco or in p M I

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really wants is they want to evolve from a world

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in which a billion plus people are smoking cigarettes and

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million are using these harm reduction products, these

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>reduced risk products, to a world in which two billion

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>people are using the reduced risk products and only a

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred million people are smoking. And that's the way they'll

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sustain their profits. People will still be a to nicotine.

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh now, I mean personally, it seems to me that

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>from a public health perspective, that's a major advance. But

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's in fact that the objective here that imagining a

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>world in which you know, you know, even more people

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>are using these nicotine products and currently smoke, but we're

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the humutive harms the health or much lower. Is that

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is that the long term strategy. No, the long term

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>strategy is to switch smokers, minimize initiation to any nicotine

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>product and then continue diversifying the company into new domains

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or our revenues. I'm talking about Philip Morris, our competitors

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>mm hmm, where we have other sources of revenue than

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>nicotine products. And recently we want to harma companies because

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we have some expertise in oral and inhalation delivery, so

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we think we can repurpose certain existing drugs into fast

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>delivery through in elation, so that we start moving away

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from pure nicotine in dependence. I don't think it's feasible,

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>even in the wildest imagination of a tobacco company, to

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>believe that we're going to increase the number of people

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we use nicotine products of the time. This is not

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you why not. I mean, if you

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>think about it, when tobacco came out of you know,

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the America's three years ago, it's sort of swept the world.

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's basically I think it's only second only

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the coffee, maybe an alcohol. There's something incredibly compelling about it.

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>People enjoy the drug effect of nicotine, and if you

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>can turn nicotine into something that's barely more problematic or

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 1>dangerous for people than coffee, why not. Why shouldn't we

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>look forward to a world in which nicotine is sold

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in forms that are you know, safer than alcohol and

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>almost as safe as coffee. It's just part of uman

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>existence and human pleasure and human functioning. What's wrong with that?

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Why not have that as your objective? Is it just

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>that you can't say it because it's not to say it? Well, Look,

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>nicotine is addictive, okay, but the only form of addictiveness,

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>as you're right, and the set of nicotine is through

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>cigarettes that has all the toxic Now, people do not

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>use nicotine products just for nicotine. They use them for

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the taste, They use them for the ritual, the same

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>way you know, delivering an alcohol peel to people is

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be as pleasurable as a glass of wine,

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean for the ones that consume wine. Okay, So

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>there are many elements in the whole experience of a

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>smoker that you cannot dissociate entirely. Yes, we can imagine

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a world where we have demonstrated that needs to be

0:34:56.080 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>too demonstrated, that say, a nicotine pouch used with the

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>right moderation, probably cause there's no disease, no premature deaths,

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we will have the debate whether these products

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can be made available in a different regulatory basis or not.

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But these products have to remain regulated as alcohol is

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>regulated and so on. Now, the task we have is

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not to recruit new people. The task we have is

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to convince the existing smokers to move to this product.

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>There will be people who start with nicotin products, and

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I think from a public health perspective, if they start,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the best thing is that they will never start, and

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that is our advice. But if they start, they started

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>with products that reduced there is from day one, not

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>after thirty years. So I think we need to go

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>step by step here in the public health debate, because

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we still have disagreement or whether for smokers that smoke

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>for thirty years we make new products available. Once we

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>resolved that debate, we can discuss about nicotine ten years

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>down the line. Okay, that's but what about tetral medical

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>value of nicotine? I mean, you know, you read some

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 1>reports that how may be helpful, visit the Parkinson's, the Alzheimer's.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why isn't there more scientific research on this front?

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And can you envision nicotine becoming a widely prescribed medical

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>substance for all sorts of ills are and are you

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that kind of research? Clearly in the literature, there

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are some diseases you you just named them sterotypicalities Arkinson's

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>where there's less prevalence and most people with nicotine. And

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>we're doing some research in this area. Okay, but that

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is a limited number of diseases. Uh, that where nicotine

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>or nicotine derivatives can be a therapeutical molecule. Okay, that's

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>a medical product. So um, the problem we're facing today is, yes,

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 1>there are certain uses of nicotine that could be therapeutical

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and have a positive effect. But as you said previously,

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem today is that we move the debate that

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>nicotine is the cause of disease, and I think we

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>need to clarify that debate. You said it yourself, isn't

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that nicotine and the FDA said it, Yes, it's addictive,

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's probably not certainly not the primary cause of disease.

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's just finish up with a few personal questions here. Andrea,

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you and I are I think

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we're born in the same year in nineteen fifty seven,

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>but we've had very different you know, life trajectories. And

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious. You know, you started off as an engineer,

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, working on robotics, and then you left at

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>age to join Philip Morris. And I'm curious when you

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>made that decision back in the eighties to join a

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>tobacco company. Did you have the qualms about going to

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>work for big tobacco? Did you take some ship from

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your friends or family for doing that. We're already a smoker.

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how did you think about it back then? Well,

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, actually yeah, I started as an electrical engineer.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Then one day it took the decision to take a

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Master in Business administration and changed my career orientation. And

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>actually joining Philip Morris was purely accident. I had to

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>go and do my military service in Greece after my MBA.

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>The a lot change that didn't have to do, uh,

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and I looked for something last minute and I had

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>some of us actually for the anecdote from companies like Motorola,

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>let pick Western Young and but here comes to this

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>company that offers me not an engineering related job to

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>some degree, but you know, a job in business development

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and planning and finance, which over the areas I really

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to learn. So I didn't have any issue with cigarettes.

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Did you smoke come from I used to smoke cigars

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>then much more, Uh, but you know I come from Greece.

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 1>At that point in time, there was not so much,

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, stigma on cigarettes. Yes, some friends asked me,

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>why you join an industry that will disappear in the

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>next ten years. Actually it never happened, but they didn't

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you're joining it? I mean they didn't. Actually, why are

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you joining an industry where you know, have the people

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>use it are going to die? And you didn't get

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that kind of flak at you can not really? Yeah,

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the people have the choice and they

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>can decide whether they smoke or not. It's a bit

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>more complex than that, as we learn in reality, But

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, okay eighty five Now, okay, it's

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's so many years ago. But also, when you enter

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a company, you realize that many of the things that

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the industry was accused were not real. Some of the

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>things could have been done better, undeniable in the past.

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But that also gives you an opportunity to change things

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are within a company, and you know, once

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I became a bit more senior, in the company. It

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>was rather obvious to being many others that the best

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>contribution we can make is to change the product. And

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's precisely what what we have done. The whole thing

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about harm aduction is it's something that kind of hits

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you or you began to appreciate a late nineties or

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand's Was there an aha moment for you

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to say we got to move in this direction? Was

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>simply the fact the new technologies were emerging that made

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it possible. It's a combination of all that. It's uh,

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it was clearly you know, it was mid nineties. While

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I was in a position and many others of my generation,

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we always said, look, it's a combustion that is the problem.

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So we have the ability to change the product. Yes,

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the technology was not there yet, there was some first

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>embryance of technology. Then, Philip Morris says, you know, it

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:07.799
<v Speaker 1>was the first company to publicly recognize that cigarettes are

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>addictive in post disease. Once you recognize the impacts of

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>your product, that's the first step to innovate against the product.

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that applies to food, to applies to energy.

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>The moment you say my product causes impacts, and many

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do in this plan on this planet. Then the next

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>step is, okay, let's move it. And that gives you

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>every reason tell your R and D that now is

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the time to do it in the technologist game, and

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>we are lucky enough to have the products. Okay, but

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you need determination to do this, and you need also

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the acceptance of the impacts of your product. And that's

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>something that too many CEOs. Is one thing I've learned

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that my advice, recognize the impacts of your product, whether

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in food, whether you're in whatever industry, because then

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you can tell you our and day we can do better,

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and then you have innovation that reduce the impacts of

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the products, which we oddly need on Earth. Let's take

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a break here and go to an ad oftentimes. If

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at the big auto companies, right,

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they just kept making the gasoline power cars

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>forever and ever. They would look at electrical stuff, but

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they weren't pushing it hard. Until you get a Tesla

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>coming along, and you know that's outside that basically wants

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 1>to take down the big auto companies. And then they

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>have competition from outside. And I wonder in terms of

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>big tobacco. I mean there's a sense of yeah, we

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>can do this, we'll do it our own pace, will

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>make the transition slowly. But that was probably missing to

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>some extent. Are there really the Tesla equivalents? I mean,

0:42:56.080 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Jewel was that until Altria brought a third of them? Right? Um?

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>You know you have small companies like Enjoy that are

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 1>pure plays on the East cigarettes. Um, but sometimes I wonder,

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, what you real actually really need to get

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys, not just pm I, but the other companies

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to really move faster is a company that was totally independent,

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>had no commitment to cigarettes, that essentially wanted to take

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys out as competition, and that that's what's missing. Well, actually,

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think who were the ones who disrupted this industry?

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Because we started the process of developing these products well

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>before June. It was even a thought. Okay, So we

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>started in two thousand and four to thousand five. H

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we build the R and D from zero. We had

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to hire people from the outside. Only joined this company,

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, because they believe these products have an important

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 1>role to play in public health. They most came from Karma,

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 1>So we created the infrastructure to do this and as

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and eight nine we started really pushing

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:03.399
<v Speaker 1>this products. Was no jewel or the more evapor products,

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but vapor products we developed. Also, we knew that for

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>existing smokers immediately they will have less ability to convert

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>them fully than heat the tobacco products, not because of

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the nicotine, but also because of the taste characteristics that

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are important for the smoke. So I think we decided

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt our own industry on our own because also

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 1>my thought and the thought of the senior executives on

0:44:32.120 --> 0:44:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the board is if we don't do it, somebody else

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>will do it. Okay, So we did it, and I

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>think we opened the way for other companies to do

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the same. And you see much more products now than before.

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You guys, for a long time, you know, you have

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the network, distribution trains, the production, all that sort of

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 1>stuff that made the big tobacco companies remain dominant for

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so long. Once you shift away from combustibles into these

0:44:56.600 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>other types of devices, isn't there the potential from great

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a competition from companies that have not previously been involved

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in the tobacco nicotine field. Absolutely there is, and clearly

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for us is to remain at the forefront of the

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>technological development and consumer service. I mean, we learned a

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>lot with these new products. Because they have electronics. You

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 1>need a completely different consumer journey. You need to open

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>your own stores. You need to hand hold the people

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>who buy your product for weeks and come back often

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to them so they don't fall back to cigarettes. It's

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:39.959
<v Speaker 1>very easy to develop a product convincing, you know, doing

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the scientific assessment and convincing people to use it. It

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>takes some knowledge in some science. And for as long

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 1>as you're at the forefront, you know, you remain competitive.

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, many people can do search engines like Google. Okay,

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not difficult to do a surgeon doing it well

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>in every aspect. It takes a lot of note and

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope we have accumulated that knowledge and could continue

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>building it every day, so we remain at the fall front.

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the ambition, right, Okay. And you say you're diversifying

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>other industries and healing devices and stuff like this. I

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>saw that you some years ago brought a little or

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>brought into a smallest Raeli company, Sick Medical, which is

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>developing a medical cannabis in healer. And I'm looking at

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that like Altria. You know, it's already investing

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty substantially into alcohol deer companies investing into marijuana companies

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. What about p M. I are you guys

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at the at the whole cannabis field. Have you

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>made any significant investments? And if not, why not? Yeah, Look,

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 1>we've been looking at this and uh, I've got this

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>question a number of times. So there are too if

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we look into the future, not the current situation. That

0:46:54.160 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is a situation in flux with everybody making claims about

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>cannabies without any clinical, clinical, substantial proof. I mean, we

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.479
<v Speaker 1>made a commitment to be science based company, so we're

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>not going out there and make, you know, promises to

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>consumers that are not true. And we need to warn

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the consumers about this product, what the products are. And

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not and that requires scientific analysis and research cannot

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>be done just fly by night. So I gotta ask

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:27.439
<v Speaker 1>you this. I mean, you grew up in Grease, which

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>has a long tradition of cannabises. Have you smoked marijuana?

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Have you enjoyed it? Do you Greece has a tradition

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 1>of cannabis. Oh not not really, And I have to

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>tell you I've never I have never smoked. Uh, so

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I don't have any expertise in this every

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it's practically legal and Switzerland any time

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in America, I'm happy to share a joint with you.

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you probably you know, you know, what is

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:03.800
<v Speaker 1>it important? Because I think about I've never liked cigarettes personally, um,

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know, in some places, whether in Europe or

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the US, people typically mix the hash or sometimes marijuana

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with cigarettes, right, And so I think it is important

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>down the road that even though there's a consumer market

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 1>for combining the two products, that there has to be

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>some commitment that there will never be a marketing of

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>cannabis combined with nicotine. I mean, is that something that

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you commit to down the road or you think the

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>industry will commit to. Well, I'm not, I'm not an

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>expert in this domain, but I think anhalation of something

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you burn is the worst form of delivering any substance.

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't recommend to anybody to burn something in

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>order to deliver the substance. That's exactly what we're trying

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to move away. And so yes, I can make that

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 1>commitment any time you want to not deliver when it

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to the harmy when it comes to the orals

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 1>or the noncombustibles. I mean, and the thing I do

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 1>worry about is it's pretty clear for people who's mukmarro

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 1>waned occasionally that even smoking it, because it's you consume

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so little, it doesn't seem to present many harms to health,

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's sometimes the most efficient way to take it

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 1>into your into your body. But the concern is if

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the noncombustible start to get mixed with cannabis

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in various forms, because then you can bind the sort

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of addictive potential of nicotine with a psychoactive, you know,

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>appeal of of cannabis, and that could potentially be a

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 1>new public health problem that I that I do worry about. Okay,

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 1>so my last two questions quickly on one personal one bigger.

0:49:34.600 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>On the personal level, I mean, you spent you know,

0:49:36.680 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>virtually your entire adult life of Philip Moore as international.

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>You know you've been a huge success there. When you

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:46.720
<v Speaker 1>look back, what do you regard as your greatest accomplishment

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:50.399
<v Speaker 1>and what do you regard as your greatest failure disappointment.

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I still believe my biggest accomplishment is the development of

0:49:56.840 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>commercialization of this product, the smoke free products, And I

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably something I can be proud of. Failures

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I can enumerate a lot if we stay in this domain.

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.879
<v Speaker 1>You know why we have not done it earlier, why

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we've not done it faster. Um. You know, I learned

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>one thing in managing companies that if you have to

0:50:27.360 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>do something, do it now rather than wait beat. Concerning

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>products or people, I didn't wait much, but probably should

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>have pushed more. Having said that, I think I'm happy

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that we have this products, a bit disappointed that we

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>don't still have the full backing of the public health

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:52.879
<v Speaker 1>community and regulators. That's something that you know, I will

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>continue working on and that the whole management team is

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:01.479
<v Speaker 1>continue working on. And picture, I mean, do you think

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that this harm reduction future is inevitable, that this transition

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>from combustibles to nonsmokables is inevitable? I hope so, and

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I think it's inevitable because existing smokers

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>will be increasingly convinced to switch. Obviously, the most difficult

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>group is the older people and lower socio economic strata.

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:32.360
<v Speaker 1>There you need a bit more positive approach from government

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to convince them but the encouraging thing also is that

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 1>less young people use cigarette or start with cigarettes. So

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a world without cigarettes it's perfectly visible. At

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>least I hope we're gonna see it. Not during my

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>stay in Philip Morris, because it's not good to be

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that long anymore, but definitely I'm sure I'm going to

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>see it during my lifetime. I have to say, I

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>think I'm skeptic, you know. I think that if you

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.840
<v Speaker 1>look at how appealing cigarettes has been for so long,

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that we can see a major transition to the nonsmokables,

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but that there's going to still remain, you know, five

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of the world or whatever that just insists on

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:16.439
<v Speaker 1>taking it in that form, And if we ultimately move

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>towards ultimate prohibition, we're going to see a vast black market,

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>just like we've seen with heroin, cocaine, f amphetamine and cannabis.

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>And they're talking about the future of a smoke free

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:31.320
<v Speaker 1>world is utopian, and sometimes they worry almost dangerous, because

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it may result in US ultimately embracing the sort of

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:39.840
<v Speaker 1>criminalizations and criminal justice prohibitions that generated the horrific global

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>drug war we've had for many decades. I understand what

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you say. Look, I don't think my arm twisting only

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you're going to achieve this. It has to become organic. Uh.

0:52:51.200 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And the more companies work on things and convinced consumers,

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the less cigarettes are fashionable and better products for the

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:01.360
<v Speaker 1>ones as you said that one use nicotine and taste

0:53:02.360 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>uh m hm, becomes the the better way of doing it,

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the most accepted way of doing it. I don't think

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:15.239
<v Speaker 1>we're an un twisting situation. What at an organic acceptance

0:53:15.239 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that these products are better now. If you ask me

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 1>ten years around the world, they will be still security. Yes,

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they will be because there will be smokers that you

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:27.319
<v Speaker 1>will never convince not to smoke. But if you ask

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 1>me twenty years, maybe we will be there. Yeah. Sometimes

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.240
<v Speaker 1>think about I think about all the governments that's signed

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 1>onto prohibiting cannabis decades agoing there didn't even know what

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it was, and now they have very substantial cannabis using populations.

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an ebb and flowing consumer taste and

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that people inevitably come back to these things. But listen,

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you for taking the time to

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 1>talk with me. I really appreciate this frank conversation. I

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 1>wish you, you know, all the best luck in making

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this transition out of combustibles and into the smoke free

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:59.279
<v Speaker 1>products as soon as possible. So thank you for the

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:02.359
<v Speaker 1>leadership you provided at the industry level in this and

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>I hope it can happen even quicker than our opponents

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to harm reduction think is possible. Thank you anything, thank

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you for your time, and thank you for giving me

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity as well, and I hope we'll talk against.

0:54:20.960 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 1>If you're enjoying Psychoactive, please tell your friends about it,

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:27.279
<v Speaker 1>or you can write us a review at Apple Podcasts

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. We love to hear

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. If you'd like to share your own stories,

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:36.399
<v Speaker 1>comments and ideas, then leave us a message at one

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 1>eight three three seven seven nine sixty that's eight three

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>three psycho zero, or you can email us at Psychoactive

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.879
<v Speaker 1>at protozoa dot com or find me on Twitter at

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Ethan natal May. You can also find contact information in

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>our show notes. Psychoactive is a production of I Heart

0:54:56.960 --> 0:55:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Protozoa Pictures. It's hosted by me Ethan Naedelman's

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 1>produced by Noam Osband and Josh Stain. The executive producers

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:09.880
<v Speaker 1>are Dylan Golden, Ari Handel, Elizabeth Geesus and Darren Aronofsky

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>from Protozoa Pictures, Alex Williams and Matt Frederick from My

0:55:13.200 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, and me Ethan Nadelman. Our music is by

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Ari Blucien and a special thanks to A Brio s F.

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Bianca Grimshaw and Robert BP. Next week we'll be talking

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 1>about the Mary Pranksters, the Grateful Dead, and the psychedelics

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>revolution of the nineteen sixties with Mountain Girl Garcia. These

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>were nice parties, you know, where we looked after people.

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>We made sure people didn't get lost on the way

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to the parking lot. The whole point was to introduce

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>people to a rather weak solution of LSD in these

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:58.880
<v Speaker 1>jugs of kool aid, and so they wouldn't get they

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't get overload it. But if that turned out to

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:05.439
<v Speaker 1>be super fun, subscribe to Cycoactive now see it, don't

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 1>miss it.