WEBVTT - House on Fire

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm only Quinn this week right now.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>An attempt to invade Tail one, there's a great deal

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of risk that that would fail. And if you were

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to try to invade Taiwan, kill the Chinese economy and

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>then also not be able to take Taiwan, that would

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>put him in an extremely precarious position domestically in China.

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think he would take that risk at

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this moment. Bloomberg Executive Editor for Greater China, John Lure

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in New York for the first time since Maitland China

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Open for Travel, joins for an extended conversation about China's

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>direction of travel, politically and economically. Later, at some point,

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the House cream concuss people. The radicals are going to

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>believe that McCarthy sold them out, whether it's after no

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>shutdown at all or after a three month shutdown. They're

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna think, oh, if only the government closed two more weeks,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we would have gotten everything we wanted. And then if

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they use that and decide, well, let's get rid of

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the speaker, they may do that. Bloomberg Opinions Jonathan burns

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>enjoins to discuss the aftermath of the fifteen round speaker

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>election in the House and what comes next for the Congress.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So to China now, and the question over what kind

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of leader President she Jin Pink turns out to be

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for China's economy and markets over the coming years. Bloomberg

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Executive Editor for Greater China, John Leeu joins. So, John,

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken a lot on the show to Shooli Wren

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>for updates on how China has been faring through COVID

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>zero and the pivot away from that. So I wanted

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to zoom out a little bit and ask you some

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>larger questions about China's direction of travel under President she

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Now that he's effectively consolidated power for life or for

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as long as he wants, is this position solid? First

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>of all, is there anyone in the CCP providing a

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>checker balance? I think he's got a pretty solid grasp

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of power. There does not seem to be any challengers

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Like you said, he's consolidated power in

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a way that that has been actually quite surprising to observers.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>At the Party Congress. The new Standing Committee is filled

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with his allies. There are no political opponents there. He

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>should have quite a large amount of flexibility in terms

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of policy, in terms of decision making, and as you said,

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think he's in a position to be

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in power for quite some time. How popular is he

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>among the one point for billion people or so of China.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that's a large question. You know, it's hard

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to say because there is not publicly available polling as

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>you have in many other places like the United States.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>But I would say he's probably more popular than not.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And the reasons for that are one. Corruption during his

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>time in power has really been reined in. I remember

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>when I first got to Beijing, our colleagues were telling me,

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, they used to bribe their school teachers so

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that their kids could sit at the front of the class,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and that that's just unheard of now. Pollution has gotten

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>much much better. You'll remember the stories a couple of

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago about you know, there are being so much

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>smog in Beijing that planes couldn't take off, for example,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's it's the skies have gotten much bluer under

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>she and so as a result of that, I think

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>there there is a lot of reason for people to

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like some of the changes that they've seen under j Ping.

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, there are things when it comes

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to the room for descent, when it comes to cracking

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>down on things like rights lawyers or or even women's

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>rights groups. There are other parts of society that have

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of reasons to oppose many of she policies, and

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and where he's not that popular, and there does seem

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a new found well I'm not sure how

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a new found it is, but desire to protest sometimes.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the protests that we saw at the end

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of November because of COVID that was There are protests

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in China. They're exceptionally rare, but they do happen. I

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think what stood out about those protests were that they

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>happened basically over the same weekend across cities all over China,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and for the same reason. And in the past when

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we've had protests, they've been largely about very local issues

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>like I don't want to landfill in my back yard

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm going to protest. But that situation, you

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>had people in different cities all over the country protesting

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, and so that would have made it

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>made that situation more alarming for the government. How will

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>he provide for or so of China's youth who are unemployed,

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he certainly doesn't want to see it any discontent in

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that group. I think opening up, you know, exiting COVID

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>zero is going to go a long way and helping

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>provide jobs, especially in the service industry, which has been

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>really hit. So if you think about restaurants, if you

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>think about airlines, if you think about tourism in general, hotels,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>those are all businesses that you still employ lots of people,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>especially younger people. Uh And if if people start traveling again,

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>people start shopping again because they're not being locked down,

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to do testing all the time, then

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that will go a long way again the economy going

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and providing job opportunities for for that segment of society.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>In terms of markets, John, how much does she want

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep international market participants interested in China. It did

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 1>seem like there was a it to a more domestic agenda,

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but that could have been just through COVID. I think

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see uh we I think we've already started

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to see in three and the latter part of real

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on growth. I think the embrace that we've seen

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of weeks of private business at

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>financial for example, getting the right to recapitalize add more capital. UH.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>They've the government has shown a lot more tolerance for

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the big internet companies. We had the Party Secretary of

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>jo John Province where Ali Baba is based visiting the company.

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that UH is part and parcel of

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to add confidence, not just to global markets,

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>with domestic markets. I think the government right now is growth, growth, growth.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>They will do anything to get the economy going, and

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that means sacrificing things like that domestic agenda that you

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about. There's one big elephant in the room. How

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>soon before he decides Taiwan needs to be back in

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>his fold. Markets were quite stressed about that question before

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Russia and bad did you train? And I think there's

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>still an underlying tension among investors. I mean, I think

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the I don't know what the answer to that is,

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>but in my opinion, I think currently markets are over

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>pricing the risk of an invasion the short term. I

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna happen in the short term, and

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason I think it will be further off than

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>people expect is that Jijimi has two things he wants

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to do. He wants to revitalize the economy. He wants

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to get China to you know, make it a rich nation,

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a developed nation, catch the US in terms of GDP.

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of this revitalization of the Chinese nation

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that he talks about all the time. And and part

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of that revitalization also includes bringing Taiwan into the fold. Well,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>those those goals are contradictory. And so if he were

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to if there were an invasion of Taiwan, it would

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it would crash the global economy, and it would definitely

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>crash the Chinese economy. And you know, right now an

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>attempt to invade Taiwan is not there are there's a

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>great deal of risk that that would fail. And if

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you were to try to invade Taiwan, kill the Chinese

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>economy and then also not be able to take Taiwan,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be that would put him in an extremely

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>precarious position domestically in China. I just don't think he

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>would take that risk at this moment, as someone who

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>studied him quite a lot. How capricious is he is

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>there a danger that something like that might just happen

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>overnight on a whim. I think he's he's uh. From

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>what we can tell, he seems to be a very

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>studied person, considers his steps very purposeful in his actions.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the recent reopening that we've seen in China,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's surprised a lot of people and the speed and

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the pace that it's it's happened, and there's a lot

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of things about it that are that are hard to defend.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Why they didn't do it until why didn't they didn't

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>get vaccination rates higher before trying to do it? But

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, I think it suggests an ability

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>at course correction that is greater than people had expected.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think being able to take a pragmatic approach,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is something that has you know, benefited the

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party, and I think is something that she in

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this sense, has shown he can do. It was extraordinary

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sudden flexibility, So there had been no flexibility. But then,

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as you say, because of so unexpected, it did seem

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like maybe he can be flexible when he wants to be.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think with COVID, they found themselves, they

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>had paid themselves into a corner where there was no

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>other choice, And I think it's very apparent to them

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that reopening will lead to a large number of deaths,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>especially among the vulnerable population, the elderly, those with underlying conditions,

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and they ultimately made the decision that they would reopen

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in spite of that, because the economy was in such

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad place, they had people protesting. They just couldn't

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to execute COVID zero without causing even more distress.

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And at least delta was over, so perhaps the number

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of deaths won't be as great as would have been

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>if it was. The delta a variant A little bit

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>about the economy, if you don't mind so. In terms

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>of consumption, there's a lot of chatter about whether we'll

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>see a V shape or an L tape recovery. These

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>letters are back. We used to talk about them in

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States a lot before we had other things

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to worry about. What happens in China. I think you

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>will see a slow economy in the first quarter because

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>with the reopening a lot of people are getting sick.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We will see absentee ism because people are sick, they

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>won't be able to work. They won't go to the factory,

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>they won't go to the office. I think by the

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the first quarter, you will start to see

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of reopening becoming more visible. People going out shopping,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>people going to the beach, some greater amount of confidence

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>about spending being instilled into the economy. At the same time,

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the government is going to be, in terms of monetary

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and fiscal policy, doing more to get the economy going again,

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think that will start to show up. We

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about the embrace of private business, of of the

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>internet companies. The government's also trying to do more to

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>help stabilize the property market, and I think that will

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>start to show up as the year goes on, and

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think through the second half the latter parts

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of the year, growth will be stronger than the first part.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>John lieu There Bloomberg Executive Editor for Greater China. John

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>continues with us in moments, it has certainly a debt problem,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and it is certainly a vulnerability. The government understands that.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>They see that very clearly. I think what we are

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing is this oscillation. When growth is good, the government

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>will start to take steps to try and deleverage the economy.

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But when growth is bad, they're going to push that

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>off to the side and pile on more debt. If

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>it means they can help stimulate growth, they will let

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>companies borrow more. It'll just put deleveraging and trying to

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>fix that that problem on the back burner. More Next

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Vannie Quinn. You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Vonnie Quinn, and we're back with John Lieu, executive

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>editor for Greater China in New York for the first

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>time since the pandemic hit China and President chit and

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Ping locked down. We spoke about particular areas of vulnerability

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for China. You mentioned the property market. Will that policy

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>pivot work. Is it clear that Chinese people are as

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>interested as they were in property and the second property

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and buying properties that aren't built. So, I think the

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>steps that the government has taken recently have been aimed

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>at stabilizing the finances for the developers. And so one

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the most striking things that's happened in the the last

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>couple of years has been defaults by the developers ever

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>grant for example. And so the first thing the government

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>has been trying to do is to make sure that

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>situation is stabilized and I think that's steps that they've taken,

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>allowing companies to to raise money through share sells for

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time in a long time, helping companies sell

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>debt again. That that should help stable stabilize that situation.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not consumers come back into the market and

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>buy more homes, I think is more uncertain. Uh. I

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think in larger cities where there is obvious demand, in

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>places like Beijing and Shanghai shen Jin, I think you

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>will see people coming back into the market if they

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>see an opportunity to pick something up they want. In

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>smaller cities, I think it's less clear if that will happen,

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's going to be more challenging for

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the government to convince people to come back and start

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>buying again. Is it fair today that China has a

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>debt problem and that there are vulnerabilities there. It has

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly a debt problem, and it is certainly a vulnerability.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think the government. The government understands that.

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They see that very clearly. I think what we are

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing is this oscillation. When growth is good, when GDP

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is five six percent, the government will start to take

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>steps to try and deleverage the economy, but when growth

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is bad, they're going to push that off to the

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>side and pile on more debt. If it means they

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>can help stimulate growth, they will let companies borrow more.

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>It'll just put del averaging and trying to fix that

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>problem on the back burner. And how much of an

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation problem could that give China. China's managed to not

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>have an inflation problem for a very long time. If ever,

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>does it suddenly have to worry about inflation Right now,

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>there are no signs that the inflation is a concern. Obviously,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>as the central bank, as the government tries to simulate

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy when it comes to monetary policy, that's a

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a risk. But I think in the in the

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>recent past, the government has relied more on fiscal on

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending is a way to get the economy going again,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and so I think they've purposely tried to avoid that

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>risk because in the in the aftermath of the financial crisis,

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that became a real problem with that with the money

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that was flooded into the economy, it caused inflation, and

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the government has learned the lesson from that

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>end is relying more on the fiscal side of stimulus

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to try and get growth going. How much room fiscally

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>does China have so uh, there's a difference at the

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 1>local level. With local governments, it's very very stretched. I mean,

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we have lots of cases where, for example, we have

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a story out about how some of the people

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>who are hired to do the COVID testing mass testing

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>during COVID's era, they have not been paid because local

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>governments are so stressed in terms of their financing. At

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the central government level, there is much more room to

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>take on debt to increase fiscal spending, and I think

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where we will see it in and deficit wise,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>does China have to worry about that expanding. I think

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we will. I think the deficit will expand. The central

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>government deficit I think it was in the range of

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>about three and so they have more room and I

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>think they will take that. I don't think they're gonna

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>blow it out, but there will be an increase I expect.

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>For So this pivot too domestic priorities hasn't just happened

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in China. It happened during President Trump's era in the

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>United States. And it's also not clear that President Biden

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is interested in on doing some of those changes in

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of trade policy, semiconductor policy, and so on. Where

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>do you foresee U. S. China relations headed. I think

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in you will see from the Chinese side at least

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>more of an attempt to to be uh, to try

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and get the relationship in a more stable footing, a

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>better place. We've got a new foreign minister in office

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in China, the former ambassador to the United States. UH.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Some of the commentary that's come from him has been

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>very glowing. He was calling Americans, you know, great people, UH,

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really complimentary in a way that we haven't seen in

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I think that indicates this desire by

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese side to try and improve the relationship because

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they see that, you know, China in the

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, during the pandemic years, has really

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>lost its footing globally and is finding the relationship that

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it has with the US, with Europe, Japan, and you

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>have lots of different countries around the world UH being

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in a very problematic place that that in turn makes

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it more difficult to get the economy going and has

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>weighed on the economy, especially with the chip uh the

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>chip sanctions that have been put into place by the

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>United States. I think the government and agencies that, you know,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to improve the relationship will have a real impact

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on not only economic growth, but China's own efforts to

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>become self sufficient in technologies. Yeah, because China has a

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>problem with US, right, China is a little bit I mean,

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not behind in much, but it does seem to

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit behind when it comes to technology

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>when some technology is not all obviously, when it comes

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to chips, it's certainly behind. I mean it's several generations

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>behind the cutting you know, just if you look at

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>what happened, what has happened with Huawei. You know, Whwawi

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>used to be one of the world's biggest mobile phone vendors,

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and because the United States essentially cut it off from

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge chips, it's no longer able to compete and

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually had to unload that business. And so

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to chips, when it comes to various

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>parts of software, China is not at the cutting edge.

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>It needs access to American, European Western technologies to try

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and get ahead, to catch up and to you know,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>power its economy, and I think the government there has

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>realized that if it continues to take a more aggressive

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>stance when it comes to diplomacy, that it's going to

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>see its access cut off more quickly. And so that's

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>why I think three you probably are going to see

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a charm offensive from Beijing than anything else.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Interesting in the Year of the Rabbit Um. There seems

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a determination on the part of the US

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to not let that happen, whether it's on national security,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>go out or other grounds. Does the US change its

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>tone a little bit? I'm not sure, you know. I

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think there is a lot of bipartisan support for being

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>tough on China, and I don't think that's going to change.

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But I would say if there was a year for

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the relationship to improve, the year, because in four you

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>have the election cycle kicking off again in the United States,

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and I would have to think it would make it

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>even more difficult to improve the relationship in that year.

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>John new their executive editor for Greater China in New York.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned. We turn our attention to the eighteen Congress

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>next with Bloomberg Opinions Jonathan Bernstein. Again, they have to

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>actually function and what we saw with the speaker vote,

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and what we'd like to going forward is that this

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't the unified party that can easily keep the whole

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>party together on the floor of the House. Some of

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>them have specific policy preferences, but you know, anytime they

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>can have a tantrum that works for them, you know,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it does anything any good to anybody else or not.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Some of these members seem to enjoy just disruption for

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>disruption's sake. It's not often that they want something in particular,

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and we saw that through the fifteen votes. It seemed

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>do you foresee chaos? I think that it's going to

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be extremely hard. Yeah. I don't think we're gonna have

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a different speaker every week, as some people are talking about,

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be very difficult for them to

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>do their basic responsibilities, which you know in this Congress

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in particular, we're talking about raising the debt limit, which

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>will happen sometime in the second half of the year.

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Has to happen, with the danger being that if they

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>don't raise the debt limit, the government could default, which

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>will have a huge immediate catastrophic effect on the economy

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and passing spending bills, and if they can't do that,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then we get a government shutdown, which I would say

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is way more than fifty fifty likely. Jonathan Bernstein continues

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>with us in moments. I'd love to invite you to

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>share your thoughts and opinions with us. You can email

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>me at v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. And also,

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>don't forget we're available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>or your favorite podcast platform. More next on Bloomberg Opinion,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Vonnie Quinn. You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Vonnie Quinn.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I hope one thing is clear after this week. I

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>never give up. Well, the show went on in d

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>C last week, that's for sure. With markets largely ignoring

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the potential for dead ceiling drama later this year. If anything,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>market participants seem to enjoy the fifteen round speakership vote

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and the emergence of Kevin McCarthy's concessions for one thing,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it might lead to policies friendlier to

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>big business. But let's get an overview of where we

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>stand now with Bloomberg Opinions and Jonathan Bernstein. So, Jonathan,

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we have three Freedom Caucus members now who are going

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to be helping set rules in the Rules Committee. Tell

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>us how that's going to impact congressional business going forward. Well,

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rules Committee is terribly important when it acts independently

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of the party, which has not been the case for

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty years. But once upon a time, Rules was a

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>powerful committee which could make or break legislation. These days,

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Rules for the last sixty years has served as a

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>tool of the party leadership, therefore of the party. But

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 1>every bill that passes through a regular committee on Agriculture,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>or Ways and Means or arm Services then goes to

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Rules Committee to get what they call a rule,

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>which is the procedures under which the bill will be

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>considered in the House of Representatives. And rules can basically

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>do anything. They can kill the bill entirely by refusing

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to write a rule for it. They can rewrite the

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>bill as much as they want and send it to

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the floor rewritten, and they can decide if they are

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>sending as the floor. They can decide which amendments are

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in order in which ones are not, which also has

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of power. The people who set the agenda

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>have the power. Right, So what this is going to

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.959
<v Speaker 1>do for the first time in sixty years. Is mean

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that an independent faction of the party, an organized faction

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of the party, is going to be able to disrupt

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>what the rest of the party wants to do on

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the floor of the House. And that's huge. And as

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken about before, some of these members seem to

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoy just disruption for disruption's sake. It's not often that

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they want something in particular, and we saw that through

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen votes. It seemed. Yeah, and there's all kinds

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of things. Some of them have specific policy preferences, but

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the big thing that drives a lot of these people,

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>as you said, is they want to be on Fox News,

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>they want to be on the other Republican aligned media,

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, anytime they can have a tantrum

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that works for them, you know, whether it does anything

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and any good to anybody else or not, do you

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>foresee chaos. I think that it's going to be extremely hard. Yeah.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna have a different speaker every week,

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>because some people are talking about, but it's going to

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be very difficult for them to do their basic responsibilities,

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>which you know, in this Congress in particular, we're talking

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about raising the debt limit, which will happen sometime in

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the second half of the year, has to happen, with

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the danger being that if they don't raise the debt limit,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the government could default, which will have a huge immediate

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic effect on the economy and passing spending bills. And

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>if they can't do at then we get a government shutdown,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>which I would say is way more than fifty fifty likely,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and were opinions. John author Is on the program last

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>week said that markets really weren't taking this into account

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>enough at all, But I guess part of the reason

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for that was that there were some small market positives.

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, the Republican representative Jason Smith from Missouri is

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>now going to be leading the tax writing House Ways

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and Means Committee, which probably means that those provisions that

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are coming up for renewal soon will be renewed so

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>friendly to big business. Basically, well, it's hard to tell,

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know, again they have to actually function, And

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what we saw with the speaker vote and what we're

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like to going forward is that this isn't the unified

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>party that can easily keep the whole party together on

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the floor of the House. And because it's a small margin.

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>If they lose five votes, they lose unless they take

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>up Democrats, which is not likely for something like tax

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>extenders unless it's part of a larger deal. And the

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>problem is that the freedom calc has spokes the radicals

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>in the House don't like making deals. They don't believe

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>in compromise and bargaining, and that makes it very hard

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to function. Jonathan is not even actually scared of Kevin McCarthy.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that a little bit of a prerequisite for doing

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a good job as a speaker? Well, you know, I

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's well suited to the job from what

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>we can tell um. But he's also dealing with a

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>very difficult caucus to wrangle. And John Bayner was a

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>very good congressional leader and he couldn't deal with these people.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Paul Ryan couldn't deal with them. Again, the problem is

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>that they don't believe in normal bargaining. They like hostage taking.

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>If there's a hostage, they want to take it. But

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>normal you know, we like this, you like that, let's

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>split the difference. They're sort of as a principal against

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing, and so that's very difficult for

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.239
<v Speaker 1>any leader to deal with whether their skill or not.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>And you know McCarthy's history is that, well he's not

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>all that skilled. Well it's so interesting because the hardliners

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>feel that the US government has been weaponized. This is

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of the latest thing that they want investigated. And

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, they're quite happy to take sub

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>committee spots. They want a sub miny spots. So it's

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to know how to make logic out of the

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that they're going to try to do business within

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the rules of how Congress works, and they do seem

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to be very good at the rules, right. Um, I

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think in some cases, yes, you know, everybody from House

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Ream canc has the least conservative people the middle of

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the party, all of them wanted to get a speaker.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They were all equally hurt by not having a speaker

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and going through this fiasco on the House floor. But

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the insight of the House Fream Caucus folks, and this

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>is shared by a lot of members of US is

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, take a hostage when you can and hold

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>your breath until you turn blue, and somebody will come

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in and say, oh, we can't let you die. So

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not the case that House Republicans, for example,

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>are in favor of the government defaulting. Everybody agrees that

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we have to raise the debt limit when it's time,

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>but they are willing to risk the health of the

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>economy of the nation on the theory that somebody will

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>blink first. And over time, that hasn't really been a

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>very successful strategy for them in terms of getting things done.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's very good for getting publicity and for allowing them

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to portray themselves as the most conservative group, and everybody

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>else has a bunch of sellouts, but as far as

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>actually getting deals in their favor, it has at best

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>a very mixed records well, and also it doesn't take

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>an outright default to cause market targets in chaos. More

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>than ten years ago when we saw something like this

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>happened before, all we got was a downgrade, and that

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>was enough to throw markets into absolute terror and chaos. Absolutely.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>As for some of the other subcommittee appointments, Jonathan or

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>other concessions that Kevin McCarthy made, what were the important

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ones for you? I think that the other ones, the

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>specific chairs of committees will see how they behave. But

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking about a party where they're all

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>extremely conservative. So I don't think that we're going to

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have different policy outcomes necessarily because of one committee chair

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>or the other. And some of the promises being made

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on things like they're going to allow as many amendments

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>as people want to make on appropriations bills, on spending

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>bills this year, that's what they've pledged. The history of

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of pledges is that when you actually get

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to it and you realize that that makes it very

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>hard to pass a bill, those pledges tend to get broken,

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and everybody in the party went up saying, oh, yeah,

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this isn't working. We have to try something else. So

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the policy pledges that he made aren't

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>donn't matter that much. And some of the other things

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like sending up this I think investigative is too strong

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>award committee to well, they're gonna make a lot of

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>claims about weaponization of government, which is all pretty much fictional.

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So but they're going to do that committee and it's

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be fully funded, which is a grateful employment

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>deal for Republican opposition researchers and lawyers who are prepping

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to be future Supreme Court justices, for example. But I

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that was something that all the Republicans

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>were against in the first place. So there were a

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of commitments that really the party has sort of

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.239
<v Speaker 1>agreed on, right and things like trade and so on.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's likely that we will see just continued policy. I mean,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like there's going to be a huge

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>difference and things like trade and maybe you know, improving

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. Everybody wants that, right, Maybe more energy production independence,

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that might be something we'll see. Yeah, I mean those

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 1>are things that were not so much concessions he made that.

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>But where the party is so you know, there are

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 1>some interesting questions about where the Republican Party is right

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>now on trade, um, with sort of the trumpy side

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of things being a lot less inclined towards trade than

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>than had been the case. But the truth is that

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they're the real driver. There is going to be opposing

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>whatever Biden supports because that's how partisanship works. And then

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the same thing happens with some of the

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy questions. And we have this talk about you know,

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>bringing that the defense budget down from the and but

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the hand sides, it is very high right now, went

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>up seventy five million, the billion they're talking about, um,

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing that back down. And it's not really clear that

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>where the votes are right now within the Republican Caucus,

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>within the Republican Conference on Defense and and on Ukraine

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in particular. Is it possible that we'll actually get policies

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>from some of these people? Now? I think we're going

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to not get a whole lot, but we will get

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point, um, probably after extended government shutdown, we

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to get some sort of spending bills for

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>next year. Um, and you know, perhaps they're just going

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to kick over what there was from this year. But

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's yeah, some things will happen. And UM, I don't

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think that the deals that were made right now are

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>going to really affect that very much. What's going to

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>affect it is, you know, the leverage that different groups

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have and um, you know where the current Republican Party

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on the House side and also on the Senate side

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>where the Republican Party is. I think it's fair today

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that Kevin McCarthy will probably survive as speaker, right even

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>though one vote could potentially asked him as speaker. But

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it sort of suits everybody to keep him in that

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>spot and to keep him dangling. I think that's probably likely.

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>What we don't know is at some point this year

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>government spending will be due. For example, they need to

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pass something to keep government spending going. At the end

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of September. At some point the House fream concuss people.

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>The radicals are going to believe that McCarthy sold them out.

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's after no shutdown at all or after a

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>three month shutdown, they're going to think, oh, if only

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the government closed two more weeks, we would have gotten

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>everything we wanted. And then if they use that and decide, well,

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>let's get rid of the speaker, they may do that.

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just real hard to tell. There have been some

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about, well, maybe the Democrats would rescue the speaker

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in that case. It's all speculative, so I don't expect

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>five different speakers over the next year. But will he

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>survive the two year term hard to know. Francis Wilkinson

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Opinion this week makes the point that hacking

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey's first speech was a tour to force. I thought

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>i'd get your thoughts on how you viewed his speech.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, his speech got excellent reviews, was really remarkable,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is someplace where I think I was wrong.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Several years ago. I said, well, Nancy Pelosi's one real

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>weakness as speaker, and she was a historically terrific speaker,

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>very skilled. Whether you like her policies or not, she

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was skilled at the job, is that she hadn't really

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>provided for her own successors. Well, it turned out, of

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>course that she had, and they brought in this new slate,

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the top three new people, including Jefferies as the Democratic

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>leader and who will become the speaker if they win

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>back the House, with no friction at all. And you know,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>with apparently the entire caucus, from the most conservatives to

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the very liberal to the squad, are all very happy,

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>not just with him, but with the entire leadership plate.

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, again an amazing accomplishment. Democrats are not

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like this. They are the old Will Rogers. I belong

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to an organized political party. I'm a Democrat. It just

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't true in the House these days. So I think,

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly to Jeffreys credit, he is often we

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>get started holding a party together. The truth is it's

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>always easy to keep a party together in the minority

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>than it is as a majority. So we'll see how

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it goes if and when he ever becomes speaker. Just

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to your point about Nancy Pelosi, it does seem to

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be a feature of these types of jobs not to

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about your successor and just a weak fear

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>among your caucus, right. I mean, if you look at

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a different parliamentary system, obviously, but if you look

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at Britain, for example, people were terrified ab Alis or

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Campbell when he was whipped. They were terrified of Tony Blair. Yeah,

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a different system. I don't think

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it works through fear as much as through compromise. And

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not as top down a system, even

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>though the commission leadership is we talked about it being

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>very powerful. Certainly the leadership of the Congress comes from

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the party and the party leadership. It sounds circular, but

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it really isn't, because once upon a time the party

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>leadership was almost powerless and it was the independently acting

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>congressional committees that really were important in the House. So,

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't necessarily say that fear is the

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>top thing, but it's just the skill of keeping everybody

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in the same page, knowing how to when to listen

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and when to talk, and you know how to cut

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>deals that leave everybody reasonably happy. And Pelos, who was

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of course just a master of all that. Bloomberg Opinions

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Bernstein. That does it for this week's Bloomberg Opinion.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Do get in touch with us though, email me at

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>v Quinn at Bloomberg dot net. We love to hear

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts and opinions, and don't forget we're available as

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a podcast on Bloomberg, Spotify, Apple or your favorite podcast platform.

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We're produced by Eric mollow. Until next time on Bloomberg

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Opinion