WEBVTT - The UnstoppaBulls, NBA Expansion, All-Disappointing Team

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So en tasting. What we do is take a small

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>amount right off the top.

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't take much.

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the warmest part Right here. I'm going to invert

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the spoon cover all nine thousand taste bud aerate it,

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>warm it up, driving up that top. Note that cream

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 1>pure vanilla sweeteners. That's a ten.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Good morning, sweet world, and welcome to the Nodungs podcast

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 3>on the Athletic Network. Sorry that cold opens got me

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>giggling that cream. It's Wednesday, January sixth. Happy Armenian Christmas

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>to all my Armenians out there. I'm Jay Ski's rolling

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>with Steve Kirby's favorite son and podcaster Trey Kirby. Hey,

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>we got the international man of mystery taking it to

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the max. Lee Ellis lely last but not least making

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 3>the magic happen.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>It's JD.

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 3>Hello, there he is, and here we are. I gotta know,

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 3>I just stumble into that that clip.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 4>It's so good. I don't know I stumbled upon it.

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 2>It's really old, obviously.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 3>I compose myself here to hit the open and I

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>couldn't do it. Oh it's great, all right. Shout out

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 3>to the stream team. Please like, comment, and subscribe to

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>No Dunks on YouTube. Our ambitious goal to hit twenty

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>five thousand subs by the end of the week. We're

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 3>on our way, so keep doing your thing, keep sharing

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>those videos. Email us your questions and comments to no

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Dunks at the Athletic dot com. We'll be stepping on

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the beach late today on Wednesday here three pm Eastern

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 3>live on YouTube. Yeah, we going back to back to

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>back today. If you're counting test this video task is

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 3>going to join us for that one too, So we'll

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>have the entire band back together on the beach, the

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>boys getting together, splashing some sand, reading some emails. You

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 3>know we're gonna be talking cream on the beach. You

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>can't resist it, you can't. Speaking of Tassy, make sure

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 3>you check out this morning is what you Need to Know,

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the little Mini Recap pod. The content kings right now

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 3>are not messing around. We have tasks with the What

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 3>you Need to Know and Trey, yesterday you dropped your

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 3>latest NBA Weekly Recap video that's up on YouTube, so

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>highly recommend you go check that out. A lot of

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 3>people and I think they're right saying, WHOA. This is

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 3>very starters like in terms of the memes and the

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 3>whoopsies and some video in there night and I think

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>that's spot on. So if you miss the starters.

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 5>It could be something else coming on the weekend too quickly.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Interestingly, yes, JD is a well you're a one man production.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Seriously, interns around here, let's let's get real.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 5>Man, you got two kids, that's true, and.

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>That's it's amazing. And this is not a knock on

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 3>other companies, but JD is like basically the equivalent of

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 3>fifty Ringer employees or something like that. I mean, yeah,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>you're a rerecing machine. Man, it's amazing. Go grab your

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 3>No Dunk's merch at no dunks dot com. We got

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the hoodies and the T shirts and the mugs and uh, well,

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 3>after yesterday's show, there's some talk about whether or not

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>we should add slippers, so you tell us, yeah, it

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 3>might be a fun idea. Uh. And finally, don't miss

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 3>out on the hottest deal we're run right now at

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>the Athletic Go to the Athletic dot Com slash No Dunks.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 3>You can sign up for just three ninety nine a

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 3>month for the best damn sports writing in the world.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Go to the Athletic dot com slash no dunks, so

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 3>they know that we sent you and you can get

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>that incredible to you. All right, we got lots to

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 3>talk about as always here on no dunks, But perfectly

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>we had five games on last night, so we gotta

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 3>do five games one thing, and we're gonna we're gonna

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>flip up the order in terms of the way we

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 3>saw the games last night because we gotta go to TK.

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 3>He's pumped. He had a great Tuesday, which has bled

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>into Wednesday. Guy was up late last night. Trey Kobe

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 3>White scores twenty one and the Bulls rally to beat

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the Blazers one eleven, one o eight. They were down

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty but they came back.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>What's the big takeaway, well, Skeets, I only got one

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>thing for you. Ball stop ball stop ball stop ball

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 2>stop ball stop balls. The balls are back. Are you

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>hitting me? Win of the year? The first twenty point

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>comeback in the NBA this season. I saw some highlights

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 2>from the Clippers versus the Spurs. They were talking could

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>they be the first team to pull off a twenty

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 2>point comeback? No, they can't, but the Bulls did. This

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 2>was a crazy game. What a night in the Kirby household,

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Bulls blazing on the deck, Blazers on deck, election results

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 2>trickling in on the computer. A luxurious matchup out there,

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Red and Black, both teams January five going down in history.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 2>But this was a weird one. Like I said, the

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Bulls gave up a twenty point lead. They gave up

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine points eighty three pointers in the first quarter.

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 2>The Blazers looked like they were on fire. It looked

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>like it was gonna be sad Trey Kirby coming in

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>on the show today. But I had the faith skeets.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I said, just stick around. The comeback Bulls will take

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 2>care of this, and somehow they did. Billy Donovan has

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 2>gotten something out of Zach Lavine that feels a little

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>bit different. He was out there overpassing the ball in

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the first half of the game, but kept getting teammates involved.

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 2>This ended up being a really nice team win. The

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Bulls had so many guys in double figures. They ended

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 2>up with seven players in double figures. Everybody was doing something,

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 2>everybody was boreding. This was a fun game to watch.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, the Bulls have this huge comeback. Zach

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.799
<v Speaker 2>Lavine had said dagger three under a minute left. I'm upstairs.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Everybody else in the house is asleep. I'm just yelled

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>like this back in my arms against each other. It

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>was legendary stuff. Damian Lillard basically didn't make a shot

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in the second half, but did make the one that

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 2>was most important, knocked down that three from the right wing,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 2>the purest Swiss you could ever hope to see if

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 2>you're Damian Lillard. But this was just this was just exciting. Man.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.679
<v Speaker 2>I was going nuts in the house. Batteus Young playing

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:26.239
<v Speaker 2>small ball five auto porter, thirteen rebounds, including a huge

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>rebound highlight under a minute skeets didn't even jump off

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the FLOORI to grab it. This was legendary stuff. And

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you are a Bulls fan, you'll look

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 2>at Jim Boylan being hired as an assistant coached by

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the Trailblazers and you say, this was a revenge game.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Where's your defense, Blazers. You can't stop the Bulls, the unstoppables.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 6>What this feels finals, Yeah, he just called the Bulls

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 6>win in Portland in early January legendary twice.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 3>And I'm pumped for you, man, I'm excited, but I'm

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 3>also pissed.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I marked it down. I was like, I was getting

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 2>ready to go to bed last night, I was like,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I got I got to write this down. I gotta

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 2>remember January fifth, What a night the election, the Bulls

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I was flying.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>It felt like, I'm a little pissed with that Bull's

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 3>victory because this is what I saw in the Bulls

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>last year. Tray like a quarter contributing, Saudius Young contribute.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 3>This is what I've envisioned, and maybe yeah, just took

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 3>getting Boiling out of there and Billy in there to

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 3>help put it all together. But yeah, Lee, this was

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, really, it is an impressive comeback. And as

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Trey said, the first time this season that a team

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 3>came back from twenty down. There's been a lot of

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 3>teams down twenty so far this season. The numbers are crazy,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the blowouts we've had, and we've had some teams get

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 3>back into games. You know, the Clippers being one of

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the last night, but always tough to come back from

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty and then to continue to get to victory. You

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>see it come back a lot of times, but then

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>you know the other team start of takes control and

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>ultimately closes it.

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Out.

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>But Bulls, what do you think about this one?

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I'm mocking and either there for the bull

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 5>sided a little bit shortand but yeah, they just basically

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 5>with that first quarter and after that they clearly outplayed

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Portland for three quarters in this game. I thought Portland

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 5>just sort of got on. I think they hit their

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 5>first four to three pointers and sort of got off

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 5>to that lead. But that was really the best they

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 5>did in that first quarter. They built that big lead

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 5>and that was it. After that, Chicago and the Chicago

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Bulls went into the paint anytime they wanted, which is

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 5>a real concern here. I think for the Blazers. Their

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 5>defense was very, very ordinary, particularly in that second half

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 5>there last night. That's a question here for Portland going forward,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 5>but for the Bulls to go on the road to

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 5>get this win. This season started off so badly and

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 5>they'd look badly, but now they're starting to resemble the

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 5>team that's starting to just change a little bit. And

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Zach Lavine was asked after the game, you know, would

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 5>you guys have won this game last year? And he

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 5>was like, no, no way, because they wouldn't have. You know,

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 5>you give the Bulls a punch last year and they

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 5>lie down straight away. But this season does feel a

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 5>little bit different already. I mean it did get off

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 5>to a bit of a slow start there with Billy Donovan,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.839
<v Speaker 5>but sometimes that can be the way with a new coach.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 5>So you know, I think there's two sides here. I

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 5>think you should I go, very impressive win the Blazers

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 5>another just ordinary performance by them, and I wonder if

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 5>they will be a move made there at some point

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 5>in the season.

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of people wanting you to start to

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 3>fire up the trade machine to get the Blazer is

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 3>a defensive big if you can.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, see Nerk should be that guy though, really

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't he. I Mean he was very very good down

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:20.599
<v Speaker 5>in the bubble there, but last night a couple of

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 5>times just got beaten very very easily. And also, you

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 5>cannot have Canter and mellow out on the court together.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 5>You just cannot do that. That's just a recipe for disaster.

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 5>But again, I think what Chicago did, which was smart.

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 5>They just sort of kept attacking, attacking, attacking, in the paint,

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 5>and then when someone was over for three, they'd fire

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 5>it out to that guy to shoot the three. So yeah,

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 5>this was a fun win and you can just see

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.719
<v Speaker 5>with Trade like look happy. Isn't it that exciting to

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 5>see when someone has a big comeback, because I imagine

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 5>in that first quarter, Tray was pretty much almost ready

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 5>to just jump into bed and say, screw this, this

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 5>one's all over.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 2>No way, no way. I had a tweet during the

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 2>first quarter a Blazers fans had to me, Man, I'm

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>so sorry you got to watch the Bulls every single night.

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>This is my first time catching him. They're terrible. Zach

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Lavine barely touched the ball in the first court and

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>I said, just stick around the comeback Bulls. They've got

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 2>this taken care of. Guess what they did. Stacy King

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 2>said on the broadcast. Who could have predicted this? Only

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a being of pure positivity? And that's what it's all about.

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>This year the Bulls, they looked like the team everybody

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>thought they were going to be last year, is what

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>it was to me. You saw Kevin O'Connor tweet last

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>night where he's saying, I love the blend of youth

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and veterans that they have, and that's exactly what it

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>seemed like coming into last season. The difference, obviously, there's

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>a new coach in charge, and honestly felt last night

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 2>watching the game that Billy Donovan had had some sort

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of effect on the Bulls, right Zach Levine, like I said,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 2>he was overpassing a little bit. People were calling him

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Rondo last night because he wasn't looking for a shot.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 2>He was just trying to force passes. He didn't have

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 2>his shot for the most part, but he did a

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 2>great job of getting people involved. And Billy Donovan is

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 2>a point guard coach. Point guard's team tend to play

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>well underneath him. So I liked what I saw from

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Zach Levine. I liked what I saw from Pat Williams.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>He hid a nice little uh his push shot to

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 2>get things started there in the fourth quarter. Garrett Temple

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>had a huge game. We already mentioned Otto Porter hitting

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 2>the glass. Apparently he's a small ball four now. He

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>was a rim runner last night. Bad Young a small

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 2>ball five. That was a game changer when he came

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>in and kind of took Wendell Carter out of that

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>drop defense was able to play a little quicker and

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 2>that kind of shut things off for Damian Lillard and

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 2>c J McCollum a little bit. The Bulls they looked

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 2>good last night. They've won four out of five. Will

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>it keep going? Yes it will? Oh here positivity.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Here, positivity.

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 3>I wish it was still called the Rose Garden because

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 3>we had the florists. Pat Williams do it. Some heist

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 3>things late. That Zach Lavine three to that was ultimately

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 3>the game winner was huge. Just you know, that was

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 3>a one point game and he drains the big three

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you guys know I love a rebound highlight.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>But let's go next level with this. I thought Wendell

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Carter Junior laid down some huge highlight picks last night.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 3>He was dropping guys. Yes, yeah, dropped like two. I

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 3>was able to call him twice. Maybe they got that

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 3>sugarman call him and Lollard was but he drops on

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the big picks that the guys were not calling out

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 3>because they were not ready for the big Wendel Courage Junior,

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 3>you know screen there.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but that team needs a bit of toughness too.

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean that's one thing where you know that does

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 5>send a bit of a message to other teams when

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 5>you've got to go out there and nothing dirty. No

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 5>one was really upset with him because he was just

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 5>doing his playing his role there, Like he's a big guy,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 5>make those screens, make your body get felt there, and

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 5>he did that. So yeah, I mean that's what Chicago

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 5>has lacked in the last couple of years, is any

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 5>real defensive toughness. You know, you sort of look at

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 5>that team as pretty flimsy. You can score on them

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 5>any time, So you do need a guy who can

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 5>sort of, you know, show his size. And this is

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 5>his third season now, so you expect him to start

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 5>feeling a bit more in control out there. The Bulls

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 5>have got high hopes for Wendell Carter too. I mean,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 5>he's been injured a lot through his career so far,

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 5>but if he can stay on the floor, he's a

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 5>pretty talented guy. I mean, I don't know really what

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 5>the ceiling is until we get a good sustained period

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 5>from him.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>But it was Al Horford. We always heard the Al Horford.

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I mean that that'd be incredible. Yeah yeah.

0:12:57.320 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 5>We just again like they need to need to see

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 5>him put it together for most of a season anyway.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, injuries have played a huge part, all right. Congrats

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 3>to Tree, Kirby and the Chicgo Bulls fans out there.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 3>I love it. I love it. Big victory in Portland.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, our next game, let's keep a moving here.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Kyrie Irving leads the undermanned Nets to the one thirty

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 3>to ninety six blowout over the Jazz. Here's one of

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 3>those blowouts, Lee, what's your tickaway?

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, I was very excited for this game, especially because

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 5>Kevin Durant wasn't playing. He's out for the next few

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 5>games here with coronavirus protocols, and so I was like, Okay,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 5>let's just see because the Nets are under a little

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 5>bit of pressure.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>They need to win.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 5>They're playing against a very good team, a very good

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 5>defensive team. But Kyrie was in his bag, as the

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 5>kids say, in that first quarter, he was just incredibly

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 5>hit so many shots, the threes, to step backs inside

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 5>the paint. And this was a blowout in the first quarter.

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 5>And again in the NBA, we know first quarter, as

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 5>we were just talking with the Bulls and the Blazers

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 5>there that that usually doesn't count for anything, but in

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 5>this game it absolutely did. The Jazz had no real

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 5>counter at all. Kyrie was just incredible. They couldn't stop him,

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 5>even when they double teamed him. He was just too good.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 5>He made the right play, he made the right read

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 5>or just hit the shot. And really disappointing performance here

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 5>from the Utah Jazz. I mean, this is a team

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 5>that you know, I've looked at a couple of times.

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 5>I thought they're very good offensive there makes such a

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 5>difference when you have Bogdanovic back in that lineup, and

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 5>he stunk it up last night. Mitchell played okay, but

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 5>that was really it.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 3>And Rudy Gobert, you know.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 5>He's got into it a little bit with shack Over

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 5>on the weekend there Shaq saying that you can get

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 5>paid two hundred million if you don't have to score.

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 5>And I thought it was not a good response there

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 5>from Rudy last night. Defensely wasn't good.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 3>He got his ass handed to him by Jared.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Allen exactly like and that's the sort of thing that like,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, the haters of Rudy Gobert look at a

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 5>game like that and think, I mean, Jared Allen, he's

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 5>a solid player, but Rudy Gobert, if you're an all

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 5>NBA player, all Star, you should dominate that matchup. But

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 5>he didn't do that last night. So yeah, this one

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 5>turned into a real snoozer, So the question has to

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 5>be asked the Nets better without Kevin Durant call him.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Lee Ellis later on The Athletic I love it. Well,

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 3>here's the other takeaway too, not just Kyrie cooking early,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>but the starting lineup tray that Steve Nash ultimately went with,

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, raised some eyebrows. At least they went with

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 3>because there's no Katie Kyrie starting. Okay, Bruce Brown to

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people, that's a who you know, he

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>played for the Pistons. He's there with the Nets now,

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Torrian Prince okay, Jeff Green getting the start, and then

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 3>finally finally DeAndre Jordan, we're gonna start the better center

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>that we have, you know, the better version of basically

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 3>you younger you. Jared Allen he got the start. He

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 3>was huge nineteen and eighteen for Jared Allen, three steals,

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 3>two blocks, he thoroughly Oh played Rudy Gobert. But that

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>was It was a lot of names like shuffling around

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 3>here from Steve Nash and the Nets coaching staff, well,

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of guys that were you know, Joe Harris

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>to the bench and stuff like that. And for one

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 3>night it works out, But I guess Steve Nash says,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 3>we're just going to try things here and see what

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 3>what lineups sort of click. So far, so good with

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 3>this one.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not bad. A little experimentation by Steve. Curry is

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>put in a place where he's got to make some

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>decisions on what to do with Kevin Durant coming out,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's kind of interesting that he decided

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>to go defense first, because that's definitely what this is.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Jared Allen moves better than DeAndre Jordan at this point.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Brown a defensive player for the most part, Tory imprince.

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he stretches the corp, but he's out there for

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>his defense. And Jeff Green you just want to highlight

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>done from him every once in a while. But it

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 2>was good for the Nets that they went and tried

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 2>to figure out their defense. We've been talking about it

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>for the past couple of shows that the Nets haven't

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>committed to defense. This is a move by Steve Kersey

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>or sorry, by Steve Nash. Wrong coach Steve saying, yeah,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>we're coming out and we're playing defense. They didn't actually

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 2>need to play defense so much last night, only ninety

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 2>six to the Jazz, which is impressive, but it's a blowout.

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Who knows the defensive stats there, But Jared Allen getting

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the start, you gotta think he's going to be starting

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 2>from here on out. There's been a lot of talk.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Obviously the Internet wants him to start over DeAndre Jordan.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>He seems like the better player to me. The important

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>thing is that he has mostly been finishing their games,

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 2>which I think is a bigger deal, and he seems

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>to be fine with come off the bench, knowing he'll

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>get his chance eventually. He did last night. He was incredible.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>He was being compared to Kenyon Martin. I love to

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 2>see that felt like a throwback as well. But he

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 2>was great, dominating Gobert. There's some great highlights. Crushed one

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 2>on top of his head, blocked him a couple of

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 2>times at the rim. He was an impact player and

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly what the Nets needed with Kde going out.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my thing with him is whether he's starting or finishing. Okay,

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 3>he just needs more minutes. I mean he's He's much

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 3>better than DeAndre Jordan's. I love him. I've loved his

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 3>games basically since he was a rookie. He is just

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 3>a great you know, third fourth guy. If he's like

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 3>that type of in the pecking order on your team. Man,

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 3>you got a really good squad. I loved what he did.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 3>He also said this. He credited a change of his

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 3>pregame meal from pasta with pesto sauce to pasta with

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Alfredo sauce for his season high in points and rebounds

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 3>in last night's game. I had to get your take

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 3>on this, because you're a big pesto man.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Big pesto, big homemade pesto.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Go.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 5>I love the basil in there.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>So he switched it up with the creamier, thicker Elfred.

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 5>Interesting, interesting choice there, the sort of dairy option, which

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 5>is probably not my profet. He didn't specify what type

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 5>of pasta he was using, either, did he. That's what

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 5>we need to find out, really the sauce here, you know,

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 5>is he going with a what did he going with?

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 5>A ravioliatoni? Just a flain Spaghetti doesn't Spaghetti doesn't go

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 5>all that well pesto. Usually you need something a little

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 5>more curly and they're a little shorter, a little stuff

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 5>that's your favorite my favorite pasta, Well, that's a tough one.

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 5>I probably I mean knock, he doesn't really count as pasta,

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 5>does it.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a gray area.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 5>It's because it's potato, is it.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's not really.

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 5>I mean probably I'm probably going to default back to

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 5>the fusilli.

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I like.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 3>You just watched sin Felt bro.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that that is a great one with Crme Mom

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 5>when he calls he makes it silly Jerry because he's silly.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Pasta trey.

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh cavatapi. A favorite pasta depends on the sauce trick question,

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>that's right answered.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 5>I will say this ravioli is great, but you cannot

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 5>put like a lobster in a ravioli or anything like that.

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 5>You get those in like try to Joe's I have

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 5>lobster ravioli, Like no, no, you can't do it like that.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be more vegetable. Uh in there for the.

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I will say insane. I feel bad. I actually

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 3>felt bad for the jazz fans last night because I

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I have nothing to back this up, Like

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 3>I haven't crunched the numbers or ever gone back and

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 3>looked at other shows. But it feels like, to me,

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 3>tell me if I'm wrong. Guys that like on a

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 3>night where there's not a lot of games, and then

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 3>of course we're going to be talking about it the

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 3>next day and it's like, oh, this Jazz Nets game,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Like you said, You're like, oh, that's you know, that's intriguing.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 3>The O KD is maybe more competitive. The Jazz has

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 3>been playing all right, you know, like, well this could

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 3>we could be talking about Utah. That's what I'm getting

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 3>at here. Yeah, and then they lay a stinker and

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>you know they're just like sort of forgotten about and

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 3>with gloss over them. I feel like that happens with

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 3>the Jazz. Yeah, with our show, I don't know what

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 3>it is. And then I think the flip of it

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>is they have like really good Friday and eight performances

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>and like winner of something, you know what I mean.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>It's like Mitchell will go for forty and then they're

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's buried because we're not talking about on

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>the weekend again. It just feels that way to me.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know it does.

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 5>Last night's game was a real snooze and again a

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 5>great opportunity for Utah to get a win against a

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 5>team that has been struggling a little bit and without

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 5>their best player. But instead they lay an egg from

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 5>the start, and you just was like, where's the comeback?

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 5>Because Mike Conley, surprisingly, I don't know if you guys

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 5>knew this that he was leading the team in scoring

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 5>prior to last night. I'm not sure if he is

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 5>now because Mitchell had thirty one. I think Conley only

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 5>had ten in the end, so so Mitchell was probably

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 5>overtaken him. But it was like, Okay, he's starting to

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 5>fit into that role a little bit more than he

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 5>did last season. And again, bugg Downham should tald about

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 5>him a lot. He can lie up anytime. Joe Ingles

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 5>can be good as well. He can get it going.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 5>But they were just kind of like ah not last night,

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 5>not interested. And again you know Joe Harris coming off

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 5>the bench, so it was like a defensive look here

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 5>from the nets, and it was almost like the Jazz

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 5>had no CounterPunch or no way of sort of firing

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 5>back on the nets. And it was a real snoozer

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 5>in the end.

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Donovan Mitchell, I believe averaging twenty two basically points

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 3>per game, and conn Lee's there at nineteen, so not

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 3>far behind. And then you got Colbert at fourteen and

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 3>thirteen doing his thing, and yeah, I mean there are

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 3>four and three. I'm not saying the Jazz are like brutal.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I still like them, but again, they have this habit

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of putting up stinkers on a note where you could

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 3>really focus on them and want to focus on them

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 3>and maybe talk about them in great detail, and they

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 3>just got hammered.

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>All right, you gotta play well on a five game night.

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>You still want to get talked about on No Dogs.

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 2>But I'm also willing to pump the brakes on the

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Jazz because it kind of feels like this every single year.

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Slow out of the gate. Then they'll have a month

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>where they win eighteen out of twenty games or something. Right,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 2>So we'll talk about you a bunch of March Jazz.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Probably all right, next next game you'll kitchen. The Nuggets

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 3>regroup to rally past the Wolves one twenty three, one sixteen.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 3>It came back in this one Trey big takeaway.

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was a rally, but to me, it didn't

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>really feel like the Nuggets were ever in danger of

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 2>losing this game because Nicola Jokic is making an MVP

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 2>case right now, and it wasn't actually that hard for

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 2>him last night. He had thirty five points. He went

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 2>twelve for twenty from the field, fifteen boards, a measly

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 2>six assists. Come on, man, step up your game. But

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 2>watching Jokic, there were so many times he would just

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>catch the ball turn and there was nobody even touching

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 2>him at the free throw line, underneath the basket. There's

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 2>just no resistance inside from the Timberwolves at all. Obviously

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 2>no Carl Town's last night. There was a lot of

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>skinny what's his name, Jared Vanderbilt, Like that guy's a

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 2>little too skinny to be able to handle Jokic in

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the back guys.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Though he was fun to watch.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>He was definitely fun to watch, but he's not really

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>in Jocica's class right now. You know, there was some

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 2>nas read minutes. It just was the resistance wasn't there

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>from the Timberwolves. They don't have the defense for it.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 2>But it was great to see Yokich come out and

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>dominate once again. And he's you know, if if the

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Nuggets had won a couple of games earlier in the week,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>we were probably be talking about him at the top

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 2>of the MVP. Don't you think I'd bean the guy's

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.199
<v Speaker 2>going to be leading the league in assists as a

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 2>big man. Incredible stuff. But if you are the Timberwolves.

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Some good things to take away from this game. The

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Wancho revenge game. That was pretty wild. I think we're

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>probably the biggest Wancho Hernan Gomez fans in the world.

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Twenty five last night he was balling for the Timberwolves

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and Anthony Edwards. He is a fun watch as well.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 2>He was taking the ball strong to the hoop. He

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 2>had a huge dunk. He had a nice little jelly

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 2>on the break. The guy's been much more of a

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 2>driver than I thought he was going to be coming

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>into the league. The scouting report on him was that

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>he's going to take one hundred step back jumpers. He

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 2>still takes them, but he also gets to the hoop.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Looks like an NBA player. That was fun to watch,

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 2>but you gotta play defense eventually.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what do you think about what Trey said there?

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Lead denvers three and four. If they're five and two,

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 3>is your kitch like at the top of everybody's MVP

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>leaderboard this early in the season.

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think so, especially with Jamal Murray sort of struggling.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 5>Struggles continue there because Yokich's leading that team. He's doing everything.

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 3>And if you've got and it's not just the stats,

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 3>if you got to you gotta watch a Nugget game.

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 3>Every single possession goes through him. Yeah oh yeah, like everything,

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 3>either he's bringing it up as the giant sun footer

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 3>or then you know, the guards bring it up and

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 3>then it's past to him. Let's operate, you know. It's

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 3>it is really wild to watch that every single player

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 3>goes through So he interrupt.

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 5>You there, Yeah, no, no, I mean, but that's it.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 5>He's got the skill set as well where he doesn't

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 5>like he scored thirty five as you mentioned there last night,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 5>but he doesn't ever feel to me like he's a scorer. First,

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, he just wants to get his players involved,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 5>get his teammates involved. But one thing I learned last

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 5>night was that if you get a technical fail for

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 5>hanging on the rim, it doesn't count as a personal

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 5>technical fan.

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, it's sort of like an unsportsman like, it's.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 5>A non unsportsman like an it's negative there.

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, very weird.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Because Jokic last night threw down a couple of dunks.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 5>With the first one he goes baseline dunks it and

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 5>it does give himself a chin up, gets a technical

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 5>foul for it, and then only like a minute or

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 5>so later, he's drawing at the ref and he gets

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 5>another tech.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 3>You're like, oh, he's gone.

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but he doesn't get ejected for that, So he

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 5>gets fine for the personal for the for the non

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 5>unsportsmanlike but it doesn't count as a personal tech, which.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Is weird because why wouldn't it.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 5>Count as a personal technical foul? I mean, I understand

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 5>the illegal defense ones goes against the team, okay, because

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 5>that's like a team concept, But how is this not

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 5>a personal technical foul? And how did I not even

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 5>know this? I've been following this game forever because John

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 5>Krasinski and I last night were exchanging a little bit

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 5>on Twitter, like he was like, oh, Yokich is gone,

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 5>and I was like, yeah, I'm pretty sure that's his

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 5>second tech.

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 3>He's gone.

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 5>And then and then he stayed out there and it

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 5>wasn't until he looked into it and we found out

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 5>that it doesn't count as a technical foul against your

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 5>own So does that mean? I mean, you can get

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 5>as many of those as you want throughout a game.

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 5>You can get five of those technicals. You know, if

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 5>you keep hanging on the rim and it doesn't count

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 5>against you, I guess, so, yeah, he wouldn't be tysed.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah yeah, yeah. But to see Nikola Jokic actually do

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 5>a chin up on the rim that should not be

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 5>a technical foul. He should be applauded. And then he

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 5>had another thrown out later on. But it's so funny

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 5>because he's just not a high leaper. So when he

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 5>does get up for a dunk, it's like, wow, this guy.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 5>It takes all his effort to get up there and

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 5>throw it down. But fun to watch. Yeah, crazy stuff, man,

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 5>crazy stuff. You learn something new every day. This guy's

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 5>sixty eight years old and still learning. But also Nikola

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 5>Jokic must have known that, I guess, because you know

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 5>he got the tea. He nearly got another tech after

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:44.640
<v Speaker 5>that as well. He was really pushing it last night.

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 5>He was really trying to get himself thrown out. But

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 5>you know what, the Wolves, they could end up with

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 5>the worst record in the NBA this season, especially if

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 5>Towns is out for a prolong period here, because I

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 5>actually thought they were competitive last night. Russell was good,

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 5>but it did always feel that the Nuggets were just

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 5>going to get there because as I just there a

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 5>better take, you know, not playing at home. But yeah,

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 5>when you look at the Wolves and you just think,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 5>oh man, it's really hot. Say, they're not a great

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 5>defensive team offensively, They've got some talent there, but just

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 5>not enough if the other team has a decent defense

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 5>to throw at it.

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it could.

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Be another rough, rough season there in Minnesota.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like to see Denver turning it around here too.

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>You're right, Jamal Murray, you know, is not Bubble Murray

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 3>by any means. Y'll Kich is leading the way. But

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Jamichael Green is back to this team, or you know,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 3>with this team, I should say. And by playing the

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 3>last couple of games, I think he played really well

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>in his two game series versus Minnesota. Hit three threes

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 3>in both games, grabbed eleven rebounds total. He had seventeen

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 3>specifically off the bench last night. Those were key. And

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Will Barton this his frantic energy is very I don't

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:51.479
<v Speaker 3>know if it's because the way Yokud sort of plays,

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what, Like maybe it sticks out more

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 3>than it would on another team, but like it feels needed,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.239
<v Speaker 3>just that that manic energy. You ever watch him when

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 3>they like go to like the timeout like camera, like

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 3>we're in the huddle, they're on their chairs and stuff

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 3>like that. He is always like just like lobbing around.

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 3>He's like, no, you can never stop moving, and he

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 3>of course does that on the floor. But twenty seven

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 3>and three last night, and I think he's very important

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 3>to their success moving forward to and I like that

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 3>he talks up Yolkic too. He had he had a

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 3>quote like saying, like he tells Yolkic before every game,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>just go out there and win MVP, Like you're the

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 3>best player in the world. If you want to, would

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 3>you know, like be aggressive and no one can stop you.

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 3>And you know, some nights it works definitely with Yokich.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 3>So he was big down the stretch thirteen of his

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty five and the fourty sort of again, it's amazing everything,

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 3>every every single play goes through him. So he's either scoring,

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, or attempting a shot, or of course trying

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 3>to set a guy up or setting up the next

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 3>thing that sets up a guy, like the hockey assist.

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 3>It's it's wild. So good win by Denver and Yep

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 3>a couple more, you know, they put together a little

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 3>streak here, four wins in a row. Whatever. Yeah, the people,

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the national media will start taking notice of what the

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 3>heck yolkicch is really doing there. I know the diehards

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 3>know what's up and know how special he is, but

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 3>you'll start seeing it on some of your other shows

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 3>that maybe don't follow the league all that closely. All right,

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 3>our next game here, Lakers stretched the winning streak to four,

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 3>four straight for them. They beat the Grizzlies ninety four

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 3>ninety two. Honestly, there's not a lot to take from

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 3>this one. The first one is the score may jump

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 3>out at you. Ninety four ninety two. Yeah, it was.

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, it was a defensive minded game. The Anthony

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Melton actually had a wicked block on Anthony Davis and

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 3>then dunked it, punched one home on the other end

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 3>with about six minute remaining, And that's what it looked like.

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 3>The Grizzlies might win this game. But you didn't think

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 3>that if you saw the game prior, because this was

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>another like mini series where the Lakers had just played

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the Grizzlies like two nights prior. I guess it was

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday night, and in that one which I watched,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Lebron just took over. He literally just decided, Okay, games close,

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to start to try now, and I'm just

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna put my stamp on this game. We'll get the victory.

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 3>He sort of did it again last night. I mean

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 3>it was it was the same movie. It really really was.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 3>La trailed seventy nine to seventy seven with about five

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 3>minutes ago, and and then Lebron and Ad he got

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 3>some help in this one. They went on a combined

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 3>nine to two run. They had the lead, and they

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 3>held on for dear life at the end. It got

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 3>really weld at the end with some crazy turnovers. But Lebron,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's it's wild to watch a guy coasting

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 3>through games. And now his version of coasting is still

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 3>damn impressive, but he really is. I'm not exaggerating. The

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Lakers there as a team are doing this, and I

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 3>don't know if it's going to come back to buy

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 3>them in the ass, but it's pretty amazing to watch

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 3>them sort of just half asset for you know, two

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 3>to three quarters and then turn it on when they

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 3>need to.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 5>Did you see any resemblance to the Lebronto to Lebron

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 5>out there last night, because it felt like that to me.

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Where it was like, I mean, he knows he's going

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 3>to win the game, but.

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 5>Some of the shots he hit as well, you know,

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 5>just those those crazy sort of fallaway step backs that

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 5>like just go perfectly through the net as well, it

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 5>was kind of like he was just toying with him.

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 5>And I think a part of it was Dylan Brooks

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 5>had that little show of strength there with Lebron where

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 5>he got the ball. Lebron was on his butt and

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 5>Dylan Brooks in and got the foul and he did

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 5>the big flex. And this also reminds me a little

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 5>bit of like the Last Dance where we saw Michael

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 5>Jordans sometimes needed anything just to motivate. And well, here

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 5>we are on a Tuesday night in January and Lebron's

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 5>in Memphis. He knows he can win this game. And

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 5>it was almost like, oh, thank you, thank you Dylan

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 5>Brooks for giving me just that little bit of like,

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 5>all right, now I have to show this guy because

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 5>you saw it later on as well when he hit

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 5>that crazy fallaway he did drop the two Yeah, I

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 5>don't know if you saw as well. And I play earlier,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Lebron was blowing kisses to the Memphis bench as well,

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 5>So I didn't see that. Yeah, so so he was

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 5>kind of I think that's what it was.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Last night.

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 5>He's like, all right, I have to win this game,

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 5>but someone give me, give me a reason. Hit right up,

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 5>and Dylan Brooks did that and then it was great,

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 5>see because it is just so much fun when you

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 5>just see Lebron just just get into that rhythm where

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 5>he's like, Okay, thanks for coming guys. Now I'm going

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 5>to win this game and it's good night, greeted Memphis.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Anything from this.

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 2>One, Trey Well, I didn't watch this one very closely.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 2>I did see a fast break where Grease and Allen

0:31:57.720 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 2>just kind of tipped the body on this Valentounis running

0:31:59.920 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 2>dow on the middle of the lane. He finished with

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a very slow layup and it may be misplaying pickup ball.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I was like, this would have been the biggest highlight

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>from any game on a Wednesday night if we were

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 2>out there playing. But you look at the box scores

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's just evident how much the Lakers are in

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>flip the switch mode this season. Every one of their

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>starters except for Dennis Shruder, who is a minus one,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 2>has massive plus minus splits for last night, whereas the

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 2>bench was struggling. And that's the difference there. Once the

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Lakers put in their starting lineup, the game's going to

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 2>be over because Lebron and eighty know exactly what they

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 2>need to do to get a win. In a scenario

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 2>against the Grizzlies, it's not necessarily needing to play one

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred percent strength the entire night. We're worried about the

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Lakers taking games off last season coming in, you know,

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 2>because we're like Lebron, he knows his body. The guy

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 2>manages the season as well as anybody does. That wasn't

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the case for last season. The Lakers were one hundred

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>percent locked in we're winning the title from day one.

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>This year, they came in, they said, we already got

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 2>the title. We had to play seventy five days ago,

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 2>so let's take it a little chill this year, turn

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 2>it on when we need to. They're preserving themselves by

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>load managing during games. Lebron's quarterbacking out there. The guy

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>doesn't put in the effort until he needs to absolutely score.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's fine because he knows exactly what to do.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Impressive stuff from the Lakers. They're not even trying hard

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and they're the best team in the West.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 3>And the Grizzlies are, of course playing with other two

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 3>best players and John Moran and Jaron Jackson junior. They

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 3>put up a fight. I mean, it's nice to have

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Melton back. You know, what do they call him? Mister

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>do Something? I think is his nickname, which is a

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 3>fascinating nickname. But he does a little bit of everything.

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 3>He was helping, of course, stay in this game and

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 3>give them a lead late, and they fought. They put

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 3>up a valiant effort, but you know, it was a

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 3>little big brother little brother scenario there where it's like, Okay,

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 3>this is a little too close here, I'm just gonna

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 3>pull out this victory and what are you gonna do? Yeah,

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 3>you're right. Lebron is load managing during games, and we

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 3>talked about it. I think a big part of it

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 3>is like, hey, well I could take the night off.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I could just take the night off, but

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 3>I play rack up twenty to twenty five points. That's

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 3>gonna help in the total accumulation of catching.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Kareem Abdul Jabbar for the most points everyone, why not,

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 3>that's what he's doing it. It's really astonishing totally.

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 2>The jumper is money enough now that he can hang

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 2>out on the perimeter, right, Like he can make rees

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 2>at a high enough rate, he can hit these fallaways

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 2>at a high enough rate that he can just hang

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 2>out on the perimeter not take a million bumps. Yeah,

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 2>pick teams apart, like I remember in the bubble watching

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 2>him pick apart zones from Miami. It's similar stuff. When

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Lebron is just out there like moving people around with

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 2>his eyes. It feels like until there's a split second

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 2>where he can fit a pass in. And that's why

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the goats for sure.

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 3>All right, final game from last night, Spurs stop a

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 3>four game skid one sixteen, one thirteen victory over the Clippers.

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 3>We sort of alluded to this one. Crazy crazy Spurs

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 3>up a massive amount. The Clippers have been playing in

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 3>weird games this year. Man, They are either up thirty

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.760
<v Speaker 3>or down thirty, feels like in every single game they've played.

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 3>But it came back, but in the end Spurs pull

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:55.879
<v Speaker 3>it out. Lea anything to take away from this one,

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 3>your assie mate, pretty.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Miller, Let's see when this Biznaydawi and Hood has cut,

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Popovich go to Paddy thrill Is coming in off the bench.

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 5>I think in that first quarter he hit four threes

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 5>in like the last ninety seconds of that first quarter.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 5>It was incredible performance, and he finished with eighth for

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 5>the game, twenty seven points.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Missed one free throw.

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 5>At the end, which really could have seen it kept

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 5>the Clippers within a chance of tying the game least,

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 5>but they weren't able to do that. No, Paul George

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 5>here for the Clippers, and we'll find out tonight if

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 5>he was lured managing or if he was genuinely sore

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 5>with that ankle there last night. I suspect it was

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 5>probably a little bit more of the former rather than

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 5>the latter. But yeah, the Clippers just a weird team again,

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 5>as you mentioned there, like they were killing the Suns

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 5>on what night, Sunday night that was, and then the

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Suns nearly pulled that out, and then last night they

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 5>were half asleep in that first half, got themselves back

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 5>into it late, but the Spurs managed to hold on.

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 5>I will say those Spurs jerseys look unreal.

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 3>On the court.

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 5>I thought they looked gorgeous out there last night, the

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Fiesta jerseys, and you know you saw as well, like

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 5>that the young stars, you know, the Keldon Johnson, the

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 5>Loneie Walker, Dejonte Murray. Like again, how they went on

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:04.919
<v Speaker 5>that four game losing streak is kind of weird because

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 5>they've got some very good, young, talented athletic players who

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 5>played defense. But then last night having LaMarcus and DeRozan

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 5>out there was just the experience. Perhaps that's maybe that's

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.839
<v Speaker 5>what they've been missing, because I thought they're a good

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 5>team with the young athletic guys and then you have

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 5>the veterans out there who can just steer your team home.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 5>And Patty Mills as well, did that late in the game.

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 5>He's a veteran. Now, of course we don't make him

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 5>one of the young guys anymore. But the funny thing

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 5>about Patty Mills is the shot selection has never really

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 5>changed throughout his career. Some of those shots are a

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 5>little bit wild, a little bit early in the shot, cluck,

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 5>they just go in.

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Now that's the difference.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that's the difference. When you look at Patti's

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 5>highlights from his Portland days and even when he first

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 5>got to San Antonio, a couple of those shots, who's

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 5>just like but now he's just it's the repetition, it's

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 5>the experience, and he knocks him in. It was It

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 5>was great to see him have such a great performance.

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 3>He's shooting fifty seven point five percent from three on

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 3>the season right now. He's on fire. Yeah, he shoots

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them, as you would if you shot

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 3>the well. They hit twenty threes of Spurs. I think

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Tyer franchise wreck. That's a ton for them. Speaking of

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 3>the Clippers, I remember this tweet from Tim Reynolds last night.

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 3>I remember I liked it for a reason so I

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 3>could bring it up on the show. Listen to this.

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 3>This season, games the Clippers have played, they trailed by

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 3>fifty seven to the Mavericks. They led by thirty one

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 3>against Minnesota, They led by thirty one against Phoenix, They

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 3>led by thirty against Portland. They led by twenty four

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 3>against Denver. They trailed by twenty four against the Spurs

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 3>last night when we're talking about here. They led by

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty two against the Lakers, and they trailed by twenty

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 3>against the Jazz. Twenty or more up or down in

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 3>every game they've played this year, that's really really strange. Yeah,

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 3>that's a big gap. I mean a lot of those

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 3>were thirties for crying out loud, if not more so

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 3>weird weird stuff. But they missed Paul George, no doubt.

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, guys, he's having a good year. Obviously helps

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 3>your permanent defense too. Go ahead, right, he's having a

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.399
<v Speaker 3>good year. But a guy that's not having a good year.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Luke the Nard Dog. Canard just nine points last night,

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 3>three of ten. He's shooting all right from the field

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 3>so far this season, He's forty three percent from three.

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 3>But I think he was supposed to kind of be

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the third initiator perhaps for the Clippers this season. You know,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Landry Shammant went out in the trade kind of more

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 3>just the shooter that compared to Canard, where Canards should

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 3>theoretically be able to handle the ball and pick and roll,

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 3>make some plays and space the floor.

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 2>He's been underwhelming so far. He's only been in double

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 2>digits two games so far this season. And if the

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Clippers are going to go further this season then they

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 2>went last season, they're going to need more from him,

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 2>because all the talk in the off season was they

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 2>need another secondary creator they need somebody else who's going

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 2>to be able to make plays.

0:38:34.480 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, we've lost him.

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 3>He froze from me. He's so pumped, still over.

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 5>The back o there is Oh did you put a

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 5>spell on him? Lee? Maybe he's just watching more highlights

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 5>of the Bulls last night. He's just captivated and.

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Just all right.

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, as we try and get Trey Kirby back, let's

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 3>take a quick break to hear from our sponsors.

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 5>I got to get in on that cinnamon magic experience. Yes, yeah,

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 5>because cinnamon on anything is great, So cinnamon cereal, I mean,

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 5>cinnamon toast great, you know, great, But I want to

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 5>get it on the cinnamon on the magic spoon. I'm

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 5>sure it'd be incredible without the sugar in that.

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be.

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 3>It's got to be, I would think.

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I actually liked. I liked all of the flavors.

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not a big cocoa cereal. Yeah, and I

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't even mind that one, but frost and my favorite

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 3>fruit is right there, and then the blueberry is really

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 3>really good, and then I'd have cocoa ranked fourth. But

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it was still delicious. I saw by the way I

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 3>saw someone I don't know if it was on Instagram

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 3>DM or on Twitter. Maybe it was in the YouTube

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 3>commenting and somebody was like, I love your magic spoon

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 3>ad reads, but come on, no one's buying cereal online.

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Who buys cereal online? I said, well, first off, you

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 3>can buy anything on the exactly. Who doesn't do this

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 3>shopping online these days? I thought that was just weird. Sorry,

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 3>you're about to say something. We're you gonna say that?

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I can't really remember, but I think, oh, yeah, no, Well, like,

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, you rank the cocoa fourth because you have

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 5>to rank them, of course, but it's like, you know,

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 5>it's almost like at the Olympics if there was a

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 5>fourth place as well, you're still doing It's still a

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 5>great place to finish fourth at that level.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 3>You think, yeah, you think, you think? You think the

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.479
<v Speaker 3>guy that is the fourth best bobsledder in the world

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 3>is walking around with his chest puffed out look.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:19.479
<v Speaker 5>He wants to be on the in the medals, among

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 5>the medals, of course, but you know his family and

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 5>friends are saying, listen, man, there's only three people in

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 5>the world better than you, like, in.

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 3>The whole world. So they were only better than you

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 3>on that given day, Yeah, exactly.

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 5>So, yeah, I mean, you know, of course people want

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 5>that top nudge, but not everyone can win it. Not

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 5>everyone can have the top the top spot on the

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:38.399
<v Speaker 5>das there.

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it's worse to be silver, second or fourth?

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it depends if you I mean, because

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 5>you can get defeated and get the silver medal, but

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 5>you can also like, like, you don't get defeated if

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 5>you if you run second, if you know what I mean,

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 5>You know what I mean. Yeah, so if you lose

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 5>by half a second in the it's like, well you

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 5>came second rather than getting defeated into second place, if

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 5>you know what I mean.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Sure, sure, So what's your what's your answer? Well, I

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 3>guess you would you would you be content with a

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:14.640
<v Speaker 3>silver medal, you know, instead of no medal?

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think you'd want the silver medal. Yeah, I mean, yeah,

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 5>you'd want that silver metal. Wouldn't you show it after

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 5>the kids and the grandkids?

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, maybe bronze is the worst. I'd almost rather just

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:27.959
<v Speaker 3>be fourth at that point.

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I see, I don't know what it was like

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 5>for Canada in the eighties and early nineties, but Australia,

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 5>most of our medals at the Olympics were bronze.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't until wet around the two thousands when we

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 5>started picking up a few more gold medals. But the

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 5>bronze was always like yeah.

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 3>Well that's the thing. When you're not winning any medals,

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 3>then win was making the front front page of the newspaper.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 3>But then when your country starts winning some medals, then

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 3>you win bronze and everyone's like.

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so you can you can win bronze, you know,

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 5>because you might be battling that person for fourth, so

0:41:58.320 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 5>you win that bronze.

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, why keep saying it like that? I mean, every

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Olympic event is different. Yeah, I know, that's what I'm saying.

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying.

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Like, you can win bronze or you can lose silver,

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 5>you know what I mean. Like, so you finished with

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 5>a win, but you have to rank right right, right, right.

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Right, Okay, I'm glad we've cleared that up. Are we

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 3>stalling just to try and get trade back that baby?

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, maybe a little bit did it work?

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Does not look good.

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 3>He does not look good. Thought he was gonna he's

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 3>got a black screen. Tray Kurby coming in fourth on

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 3>today's No Ducks podcast, JD. You're always Gold. Congrats to

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 3>you late. You and I are battling now for Silver.

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 3>He's back. Hey, we got a fifth mysterious black Box. So,

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 3>like I was saying about Luke missed us talking about

0:42:56.600 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 3>the Olympics. Yeah, I'm not even gonna tell you how

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 3>we got onto that tangent. Okay, let's get to some news.

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Nice to have you back to k We have a

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 3>report coming out over the last couple of days. The

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 3>NBA is seriously discussing expansion. You know, Adam Silver has

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 3>said that himself makes sense. You know, profit's probably down

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 3>here during the pandemic. Expansion bees fees are a great

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 3>way to just inject a bunch of cold, hard cash

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.919
<v Speaker 3>to the other owners who are possibly hemorrhaging money here.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Well how much money well, according to ESPN's Brian Windhorse,

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 3>within the League office, sources said officials have floated the

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 3>price tag of two point five billion each for two

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 3>expansion teams in the near future. We're at thirty right now.

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 3>Let's say we go bumping up to thirty two, but

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 3>two point five bill. I have a couple questions off

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:49.919
<v Speaker 3>this Lee expansion you think is a good idea right

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:53.439
<v Speaker 3>now in today's NBA, And if you do, where would

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 3>you locate let's say, two teams, how about it?

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 5>I think expansion is a good idea if it's for

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 5>the right reasons. This doesn't feel like the right reasons

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:04.240
<v Speaker 5>for me. This feels more like we need some cash.

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 5>We need some quick, hard cash as soon as we can,

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 5>because I think they'll have no shortage of takers to

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:11.720
<v Speaker 5>come up with that two and a half billion dollar fee,

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 5>because there's always interest from people to buy a team

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 5>because it usually is a cash cow. Now, if you

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 5>get two teams and that's a five billion dollar cash

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 5>injection that gets split amongst the other owners, the players

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 5>don't get any of that, nop, So that would be

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:30.800
<v Speaker 5>around about one hundred and sixty odd million per team,

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 5>which sounds like a lot of money, and it is,

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 5>But to me, it's like I would like to see

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 5>a more sustainable way of trying to generate the money

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 5>that they're losing, because ultimately, if you have more teams

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 5>and you get that one hundred and sixty million, you're

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 5>going to be diluting the TV revenue that comes in.

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 5>So is that sort of like a short term like

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 5>cash quick hit, which I don't think is the right

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 5>reason to do it, So I'd be a little bit

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 5>careful right now now. I think a big part of

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 5>this is because we simply don't know when we'll have

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 5>full arenas in the NBA. Again, that might not be

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 5>for a couple of years. Potentially we might start seeing

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 5>fans strictly in and I know there's some fans at

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 5>games now, which doesn't seem like the smartest idea, but

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 5>there are some fans there. But also from what I've

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.240
<v Speaker 5>seen around the world in soccer at England and cricket

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 5>in Australia, they have brought crowds back, but as sort

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 5>of social distance, there hasn't been a capacity at any

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 5>game or anything that I've seen so far. So and

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 5>I think America, considering where they are with the virus,

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 5>is still just a long, long long way away from that,

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 5>even though we're started to get the vaccine rolling out now.

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 5>So my ultimate point is, I think, don't do this

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 5>unless it is really going to be done with a

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 5>long term financial plan in place that isn't just going

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 5>to then create a headache further down the line, because

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 5>it may just cause even more financial grief for other teams,

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 5>because again, more teams means more competition. It might be

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 5>a little bit harder to sell season tickets to in

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 5>some cities, depending on how the tea has been. And

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 5>as Danny LaRue often points out, ownership is the most

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 5>competitive advantage in the NBA, So you want to make

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 5>sure you get If you're going to get more owners,

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:09.839
<v Speaker 5>make sure they're good owners. Because there are a lot

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 5>of NBA owners right now. I won't name names, but

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 5>I think we know who they are who aren't very

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 5>good owners and their teams have been terrible for a

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 5>long time. So it's a it's a dicey proposition right now,

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 5>I think for the NBA. But if you were to

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 5>bring teams back, Seattle's obviously going getting a team, and.

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 3>That's a no brainer. I think, Trey, you'd agree with that.

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Seattle would be one of the teams that is automatically

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.320
<v Speaker 3>given one of these expansion teams, even though they'd be

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 3>bringing them back.

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it would be exactly like the Charlotte Hornets, you know,

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 2>when the Pelicans became a team and then the Bobcats

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 2>turned back into the Hornets. I think it would be

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 2>exactly like that. Obviously, Seattle would be great. You know,

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 2>they've got a championship history. We all remember the Sonics

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 2>being there ten seasons ago basically, So yeah, I think

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that one is a lot. The other place I would

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 2>like to see the NBA expand into is Mexico City,

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the biggest city in North America, bigger than New York City,

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 2>who has two teams. They've been playing occasional games in

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Mexico City for years. That'd be a great place to

0:47:04.560 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 2>grow the game ethic.

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about that, Lee, you know, Mexico

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 3>City or another place.

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I would love the NBA to go back

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 5>to Vancouver, but I just don't think that would happen.

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 5>I just don't think they had the interest there in

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 5>that city to sustain an NBA team. But as far

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 5>as beautiful cities, Vancouver for me would be top of

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 5>the top of the pile. They'd love to hear some

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 5>more Dennis Scott stories from his time playing for the

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 5>Vancouver Grizzlies. We know he had a great time there.

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:30.279
<v Speaker 5>But other than that, Mexico City, absolutely, I think that

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 5>would be fantastic for the NBA to do that, because

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 5>I don't think travel would be much of a concern

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 5>there because the way these teams travel around anyway, so

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:40.839
<v Speaker 5>it's I think it's Central time zone there in Mexico City.

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure, but any whatever it is, it would

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 5>be great for the NBA to expand across the border

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 5>if they could.

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, their cities being thrown out. Louisville is sort of

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 3>at the top of a lot of people's list. Las Vegas,

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 3>I know, is a hot one. You know, obviously they

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 3>have a hockey team there. They've got a brand new

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 3>arena there. It's Vegas. You got many people. Is there

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 3>a football travel, Yeah, there's football tea yeah. Rash Marcozi

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 3>actually he tweeted this out yesterday, an online an idea

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 3>online for a thirty two team NBA with Seattle in

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Las Vegas in the west, and then you'd have to

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 3>bump Minnesota to the east and you could do eight

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 3>divisions in two sixteen team conferences. What do you think

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 3>about this? We're showing the map and the sort of

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 3>like the division for everybody joining us on YouTube. You know,

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 3>if they were in Vegas and Seattle trade that that

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 3>makes sense to me. I don't. I don't really have

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 3>an issue with putting, you know, lump in Minnesota in

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:37.720
<v Speaker 3>with the Bucks and the Bulls and the Pistons.

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 2>No, oh yeah, I think that makes sense. It's kind

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of you know, if they expanded, you need to take

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 2>one team to the Eastern Conference. If it's going to

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 2>be Vegas and Seattle added, it's gonna be between the

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Grizzlies and the Timberwolves, right, those are the teams that

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 2>are furthest east on the map, and it seems like

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 2>they should actually kind of be in the Eastern Conference.

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Both of those teams would be a lot more competitive

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 2>in the Eastern Conference as well, And so yeah, I

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:01.800
<v Speaker 2>would be down this. It definitely feels like Las Vegas

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and Seattle would be the cities that get teams. Seattle,

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 2>like we're saying the history, and Vegas has shown that

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 2>they are ready for pro sports teams. Teams seem to

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 2>be doing well once they get to Las Vegas. Maybe

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 2>not successful. I know the Raiders haven't had a great season,

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 2>but the Aces were great in the WNBA. What's the

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 2>hockey team, the Golden Whites, and they went to the

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 2>finals their very first season, right, and they were a

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 2>huge success story. So you know, pro sports leagues were

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 2>very nervous to go to Las Vegas when betting was

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 2>completely outlawed. Now that it's more legalized, makes sense to me.

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's tear from you guys out there. Where would

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.360
<v Speaker 3>you put two expansion teams? Or do you sort of

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 3>agree with Lee? Maybe like is this the right idea?

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, so a lot of people think there's enough

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 3>talent in the league Lee to sustain two more teams

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:51.880
<v Speaker 3>in terms of like obviously distributing like these great players

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 3>to have then star players on other teams.

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 5>That's an interesting point because every year, we know a

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 5>lot of teams tank though early into the season, so

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, you don't want more teams coming into then

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 5>potentially water down the league even more, you know. So

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 5>that's I'm not sure I completely agree with that. I

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 5>mean against that comes again from ownership and management, where

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:13.880
<v Speaker 5>if they're like, listen, we want to we want this

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:16.000
<v Speaker 5>team to suck, so we try to get a higher

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 5>draft pick. But yeah, I'm not I'm not convinced that

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 5>that's entirely true myself. I think sometimes less is more

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 5>in that state an instance where you have more competitive

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 5>league with perhaps not as many teams, you know, once.

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 3>Again, let's hear from you guys out there on the

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 3>stream team and tweet at us at no, don't think. Finally,

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to bring this to your guys attention.

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Last night I tweeted my early all disappointing team, sort

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:41.840
<v Speaker 3>of just like off the top of my head, guys

0:50:41.840 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 3>that just have been pretty garbage to start the year.

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 3>It's obviously super early. Still, I had DeVante Graham and

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 3>these were these were stats heading into last night's games

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:53.399
<v Speaker 3>for some of them, but Davante Graham nine point nine

0:50:53.440 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 3>points per game, twenty seven percent shooting. My other guard

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 3>was Norman Powell with the Raps. Yeah, you could have

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:00.759
<v Speaker 3>picked a lot of raps. Eight point five points for game,

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 3>thirty one percent shooting for him. I had Karris Lavert. No,

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 3>he had a pretty decent game last night, but coming

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 3>into it thirteen point one points for games, thirty seven

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 3>percent on the floor. Kelly Bray Junior ten point nine

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 3>points per game, thirty four percent from the floor and

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 3>even way worse from three. And then Davis Bertons I

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:16.839
<v Speaker 3>had is my other forward, eleven points for game, thirty

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 3>five percent from the floor. Again, I tweeted this out.

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 3>We got a lot of great responses, but I want

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 3>to ask you, guys, is there anyone I missed or

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:25.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, like who you would add if we even

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 3>if we were building like an all disappointing second team,

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 3>who would be who would be in play there for you?

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Trey Well, when I was running up and downstairs trying

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:36.880
<v Speaker 2>to make sure my internet was right, I was fretting

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 2>about this Skeets, thinking I wasn't going to be able

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:41.720
<v Speaker 2>to get back for this question. To address your anti

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 2>big man bias once again, Not only are there no

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.959
<v Speaker 2>centers on your all disappointing team, there's only one guy

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 2>over six foot ten, Davis Burton's, and he takes all

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 2>of his shots outside. We've already lost the center spot

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 2>on the All Star Game. You guys want to get

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 2>rid of it in the All NBA. And now Skeets

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 2>is not even letting the No Dunks audience have a

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 2>center on his all disappointing team when Skeets has been

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 2>bringing up the most disappointing centers in the league for

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the first two weeks in the season. Aaron Bains, He's

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:15.280
<v Speaker 2>right there for you. Marvin Baga, Beans Bagley, the third

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and the second they're right there for you. Marvin Bagley's

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 2>six eleven and he's shooting thirty seven percent. About Al

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Horford nine seven and three, he's got nineteen combined stats

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 2>and he's making twenty seven million dollars a year use off.

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Nurkic also putting up a big triple single nine seven

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and three. The No Dunks audience demands a center on

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 2>this team, skeets, no more anti big man bias.

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 3>That's fair. I got a lot of votes for nurk

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 3>last night. Siakam was in the mix too. There was

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:45.919
<v Speaker 3>people saying, what about Jimmy Butler. I gave Jimmy Butler

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 3>a pass because of injuries. He's missed like half their games.

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:50.920
<v Speaker 3>He's been bad. But you know, in terms of shooting

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the ball, fair fair. Yeah again, I was doing this quick.

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 3>I was actually like struggling just on the fly to

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 3>think of big guys. Badley, good one, really really good one.

0:53:01.960 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess I didn't have high hopes for Beansy as

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 3>it was so yeah, I had a Raptor on the

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 3>team already, yeah, that he could be added anyone else

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:11.839
<v Speaker 3>leave well.

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 5>After the first game of the season, the Raptors and

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 5>the Hornets jj Reddick had twenty three points, went six

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:18.960
<v Speaker 5>for eleven. I said, oh, there was some six man

0:53:19.000 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 5>buzz there right now for JJ Reddick. Since then, he's

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 5>gone three for twenty six and he scored twenty four

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 5>points in the other games, and he has just been

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 5>ice cold out there. He just can't hit a shot,

0:53:30.640 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 5>which is incredible because he's got such a beautiful shooting stroke,

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 5>and he's a veteran, he's been around. This is a

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 5>great role for him and a good team, good opportunity.

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 5>But he Yeah, he's just been clunking it a lot lately,

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 5>so I expect he will shake out of that slump.

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:47.799
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, overall, he's shooting twenty four percent on the season.

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 5>He went six for eleven in that first game and

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:51.440
<v Speaker 5>a great win against Maybe it was because it was

0:53:51.440 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 5>the Raptors, although he's played the Raptors again, So but yeah,

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 5>I just you know, you know, for a guy like

0:53:57.280 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 5>him at his stage of his career, with his shooting stroke,

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 5>it's like I could easily see him getting sort of

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:03.960
<v Speaker 5>fifteen points a game in that team in New Orleans,

0:54:04.000 --> 0:54:05.399
<v Speaker 5>but not happening right now.

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 3>John Hollander also suggested a good one last night to

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:12.439
<v Speaker 3>me Gary Harris, who heading into last night's game again,

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't have the updated stats, but was averaging seven

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 3>points seven points per game on thirty six percent shooting

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:21.919
<v Speaker 3>from the floor and twelve point five percent from three. Ooh.

0:54:22.520 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 5>There was some I don't know who was who was

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 5>reporting it saying that the Nuggets were trying to shop

0:54:27.120 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 5>him around, but there wasn't a lot of interest for

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Gary Harris.

0:54:29.200 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I wunder way right now.

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I don't know.

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 5>I still sort of have belief for him.

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:35.839
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a good thing for him.

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 3>You're still Team Gary.

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:40.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm not ready to jump ship just yet. But but

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:43.400
<v Speaker 5>maybe Will Barton coming back as well, because Will Barton

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 5>wasn't there in the bubble is impacted. He's roll a little.

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure, but interesting been back.

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 3>You can't hit a shot right now, Team Gary. Shout

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 3>out to our old volleyball team up in Canada. What

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 3>a team three times on the beach? Oh man, Yeah,

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 3>that crazy Toronto beach.

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Beach.

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes you'd be paying angle of sticks and rocks. You

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to die for the ball. Yeah, but show

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:14.600
<v Speaker 3>team Carrey. I was always fun. Missed those days. Let's

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 3>take one more break to hear from our sponsors before

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:21.520
<v Speaker 3>tweeted the night. Let's get to tweet of the night.

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:24.680
<v Speaker 6>Tweet of the night.

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow, what do you got?

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Gen?

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 4>So this is a real simple today. It's a tweet

0:55:35.680 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 4>from Crooked Media producer Michael Martinez and it's just this

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 4>just says mood. And it's a picture, a lovely picture

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:49.759
<v Speaker 4>of a man and his dog for those for the listeners,

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 4>it's noted dog enthusiast Reverend or Raphael Warnock holding what

0:55:54.880 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 4>I think is a beagle. It's damn cute. Anyways, all

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 4>this to say congratulations to Reverend Warnock. He beat an

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 4>unelected incumbent who was, is to put it politely, a scumbag.

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 4>But you know what, it's a new day. Let's keep

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 4>it positive and we're rooting for us off over here

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:18.280
<v Speaker 4>in this house. I'm sure you guys are as well.

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 4>And uh oh yeah, shout out to the Cab County.

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:26.240
<v Speaker 4>During the show, Tas sent me a bunch of tweets

0:56:26.480 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 4>about the pronunciation of Dacab County, which was good. And

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 4>speaking of Tas, he mentioned this morning Lebron thinking about

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 4>uh putting together an ownership group for the Dream who's in.

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:42.240
<v Speaker 4>That's a great idea.

0:56:42.400 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 2>You love to see.

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 3>It, to see it. That is a cbe eagle too.

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:48.800
<v Speaker 3>I assume that's his dog.

0:56:48.640 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 4>Right, I don't know, he's a real puppy guy.

0:56:53.360 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 5>Was that the same one he used in that commercial?

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I think so? Yeah?

0:56:56.920 --> 0:57:00.640
<v Speaker 5>At the dog poo and great commercial, well done commercial.

0:57:00.719 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I saw it about twenty thousand dollars.

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Man, good, you're gonna miss those ads. But I don't know.

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Maybe no dungs can chip in on buying the dream

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:11.160
<v Speaker 2>here exciting, right, I don't know it's a contact of

0:57:11.200 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 2>interest for a NBA podcast to own a w NBA team,

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 2>But send us that kick fund raiser things, Lebron, whatever

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 2>you're getting for your owner bull chip in a little

0:57:21.240 --> 0:57:23.000
<v Speaker 2>bit twenty five bucks let us in.

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get to pick the results from last night.

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 3>It was the Bulls Blazers game. Blazers were favored by

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 3>ten and a half. They didn't even win, so good

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 3>call by Task and Tray to take Chicago to cover again.

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 3>They just get the outright victory. So Lee and I

0:57:37.440 --> 0:57:39.840
<v Speaker 3>were wrong with that one. We got three of us

0:57:39.840 --> 0:57:42.440
<v Speaker 3>four and four. That's Tassley in myself. And then tray

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 3>your three and five. It's very, very close, and there's

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of January left. So tonight's game is the

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Clippers Warriors. Interesting line, Warriors not the favorites at home.

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:55.240
<v Speaker 3>They're they get They're getting four and a half points,

0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 3>so Clippers got to win by five or more. We

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 3>got a busy eleven games schedule tonight, and this is

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the second game of the ESPN doubleheader Celtics Heat at

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:07.000
<v Speaker 3>seven thirty, and then this one our pickum Clippers at Warriors.

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 3>So let's go to you first, Leley Clippers favored by

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 3>four and a half on the road in Oakland. What

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 3>do you got?

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:15.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm not sure if Paul Georgie is back, second

0:58:15.120 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 5>old of it, back to back. The Warriors have been

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 5>playing so well right now, and the Clippers, you just

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 5>don't know what you're getting. So I'm going to take

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 5>the Warriors. I think they've I think they can keep

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 5>it close enough even if they don't win, to cover

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:28.920
<v Speaker 5>the spread there. So I give me the Warriors.

0:58:29.080 --> 0:58:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, And I gotta correct myself. They don't play in

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Oakland anymore. I forgot.

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 5>Oh that's right, Yes, I wear the Oakland jerseys though.

0:58:35.600 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. That's why it's very confusing. Slap in

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the face if you ask me, what do you got

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 3>to k.

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm with Lee on this one. I'm going to

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 2>go with the Warriors as well. They've been playing pretty

0:58:45.440 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty nice basketball since Draymond Green came back. Four and

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 2>a half points. Not a huge line, but a little

0:58:50.320 --> 0:58:52.520
<v Speaker 2>bit too big for my liking. So give me the Warriors.

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't sweerarve, I'll go Clippers. As we pointed out,

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:57.440
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be down twenty or up twenty, So

0:58:57.480 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 3>which one will it be? Flip a coin, give me

0:58:59.640 --> 0:59:02.800
<v Speaker 3>La to win by five or more, and then let's

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 3>hear task this pick.

0:59:04.120 --> 0:59:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Give me the Warriors and the four points, and give

0:59:07.200 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 4>me a verbal altercation between Draymond Green and somebody on

0:59:11.000 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 4>the Clippers.

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe many people on the Clippers.

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Beverley would be at the top of that list.

0:59:17.640 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Seez always got a thing to say. We will see,

0:59:19.400 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 3>all right, I'm the only one taking lac to cover

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the spread. Everybody else got the Warriors. Okay, we'll call

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 3>it there. Glad we got your back there, Tray. I

0:59:27.280 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 3>mean you started with a bang, then you were gone,

0:59:29.280 --> 0:59:31.919
<v Speaker 3>and then in style I'm trying to do my part

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 3>over here, you know, I mean, what happened just a

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:37.240
<v Speaker 3>classic Wi Fi situation or who knows, just.

0:59:37.200 --> 0:59:38.560
<v Speaker 2>A classic Wi Fi situation.

0:59:38.680 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I ran upstairs, had to turn off the router, plug

0:59:42.160 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 2>it back in. Now I'm hardwired in like the old

0:59:44.840 --> 0:59:48.920
<v Speaker 2>school days, dialing in on my modem. But it's feeling reliable,

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 2>feeling like the Bulls, ultra reliable, the comeback kids. First,

0:59:54.000 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 2>the Bulls did it. Now I did it all right?

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, make sure yeah you double triple checked that Wi

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Fi or your internet can, because we got another podcast

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 3>record later today. We don't want you freezing on the beach. Man,

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:07.040
<v Speaker 3>oh man, it gets cold on the beach. You can

1:00:07.120 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 3>you know selling me? Yeah, yeah, exactly. So we'll be

1:00:10.200 --> 1:00:13.560
<v Speaker 3>beach stepping it up answering your your questions and your

1:00:13.560 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 3>comments today at three pm Eastern on YouTube. So make

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 3>sure you join us live on YouTube or just listen

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.000
<v Speaker 3>to the podcast. Subscribe to No Dunks wherever you listen

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 3>to us, keep those questions coming. No Dunks at the

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Athletic dot com. Go grab your No Dunks merch at

1:00:27.320 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 3>no dunk dot com and subscribe to the Athletic already. Guys,

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 3>the Athletic dot Com slash no Dunks Clipper bros. You

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 3>heard it here first.

1:00:33.880 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Have a great time, turn up. Love you guys awesome,

1:00:37.960 --> 1:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>thanks for joining us, and remember talking in your T

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>shirt means you mean business.

1:00:43.760 --> 1:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Brace the day, people, you.

1:00:45.640 --> 1:00:49.040
<v Speaker 4>Could stay every day.

1:00:51.000 --> 1:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Doug, you happy every Mandy, it's been so long with

1:00:57.840 --> 1:00:59.480
<v Speaker 3>your fun way.

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>It's happened already.

1:01:04.440 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be griffy.