WEBVTT - The Story of the Sony Walkman

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>tech are you So? Back in twenty sixteen, an actual

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a group of writers writing for Time magazine, or at

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 1>least Time dot Com, assembled a list of what they

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>called the fifty most influential gadgets of all time. They

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>said that the list was quote ordered by influence end quote,

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's the case. I do find it a

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>little hard to swallow because number fifty on their list,

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as in the bottom of the list, was the Apple iPhone. Now, y'all,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I am not the biggest fan of Apple. I don't

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>own an iPhone, but I think if I were to

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>make a list of most influential gadgets of all time,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone would be way higher up on that list

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>than the very bottom. You know, the iPhone really ushered

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in the era of the consumer smartphone. It was not

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the first smartphone. Apple rarely ever brings a product to

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>market as the first of its kind. They bring refined

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.839
<v Speaker 1>products to the market, and it was the first smartphone

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to see huge success with a mainstream audience, not just

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, executives on the go or executives who wanted

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a technological status symbol. Plus, I mean, the

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>entire nature of the web changed due to a shift

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>toward mobile computing, and I think we have to lay

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that largely at the feet of the Apple iPhone. While

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone is not the most popular smartphone in the world,

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's really what got the trend moving

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>toward mobile computing, and that in turn changed really like

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire web. So I put it higher on the list.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But then my guess is that making a list of

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the fifty most influential gadgets is hard in anyway. Today's

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>episode is not about the iPhone at all. It's just

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this was the article that kind of launched me into

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>where I wanted to go today. So instead of talking

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about number fifty, because I've done episodes about the iPhone before,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought we would talk about number forty seven on

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this list. So this is more influential than the iPhone

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>according to that group of writers, and it's the Sony

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Walkman as in the portable cassette player. It's still not

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>very high up on the list, but you know what

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>can you do? So the Walkman created the chance for

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>folks to experience pre recorded audio in a pretty new way,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a way that was portable, and it let them create

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of bubble around themselves, even if they were

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>walking around in public. And it meant you weren't tethered

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>to like a wall outlet or lugging around a large

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>tape deck or tape recorder. So that you can listen

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to your pre recorded cassettes. You could just PLoP in

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.839
<v Speaker 1>some batteries, a pair of double A batteries into this thing.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You put in your favorite audio cassette, You plug in

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>your headphones, put them on your ears, you push play,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you head out into the world. I think it's easy

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>for us to take for granted how portable the music

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>experience is today. You know the fact that we had

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>MP three players and iPods and then smartphones and streaming

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>services and all that that's transformed the way we experience

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>music in large part, But once upon a time that

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't so much of an option. So let's turn back

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the clock and learn about the development, the release, and

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the impact of the Sony Walkman. And before we get

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to that, we have to have some preamble, because you

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>know this is tech stuff. You know tech stuff. I

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>like to talk about the history of technologies, and not

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>just the technology, but the stuff that led to the

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>development of that tech. So let's talk about recorded media

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and the development of the cassette tape medium. Now I've

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>done full episodes about the invention of recorded media. How

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the earliest versions was recording sound to cylinders

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that were coated in wax. Recording to a wax cylinder

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially involved shouting into an acoustic horn, and that acoustic

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>horn at the narrow end had a little membrane that

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was connected to a needle, and the membrane would vibrate

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>when sound waves would come into the horn. The needle

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that vibrates would carve into the wax on the cylinder.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>The cylinder would be turned and the needle would start

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to carve a spiral into the cylinder. You could take

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the carved cylinder and put that into a player, which

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially did the same process, but in reverse. You would

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>put a stylust like another needle and fit it into

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the groove in the cylinder. You would begin to rotate

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the cylinder. The needle would travel through the groove and

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it would vibrate as it did so, which would cause

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a membrane to vibrate at the narrow end of an

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>acoustic horn, and then if you listened real carefully at

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the wide end of the acoustic horn, you would be

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>able to hear the recorded sound, the playback of whatever

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>sound had been recorded originally. Now, it didn't take too

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:26.799
<v Speaker 1>much longer after the invention of the cylinder for various

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>folks to come up with flat recorded discs as an alternative,

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>so instead of a cylinder, you would just have a

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>flat disc with audio recorded on one and then eventually

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the disc. These would ultimately become easier

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to store and to produce than wax cylinders were. They

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>were originally made all of stuff like shellac, which is

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially something that you get from insects. But eventually companies

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>would make the shift to vinyl. While different music companies

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>battled it out over formats, we would mostly settle on

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>albums playing back at either forty five revolutions per minute

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>or thirty three in a third revolutions per minut on turntables.

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Some older albums would actually play it like seventy eight

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>revolutions per minute. Now, the record album traces its history

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the late nineteenth century. By the nineteen sixties,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, more than half a century later, vinyl albums

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>were the dominant form of recorded media for home use.

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they were almost exclusively the media format for

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>home use unless you were really well off or maybe

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you worked in the music industry or something, because then

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you might have a real to real player. But otherwise

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.119
<v Speaker 1>there just wasn't any call for that. So the music

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>industry had been relying upon real to reel players for

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a while in order to make master recordings of performances,

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as to edit and put together that master

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.799
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. And this, of course is magnetic

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tape we're talking about now. Magnetic tape also traces its

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>evolution back to the late nineteenth century, though at that

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>point we weren't yet talking about tape. So back in

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen eighties, there was this feller named Oberlin Smith,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>which what a name, What a great name, Oberlin Smith.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Oberlin reckoned that you could use magnetization to record sound

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>onto a magnetic medium, and it would have to obviously

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be a medium that would respond to magnetic fields. So

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>his suggestion was using like silk thread that had been

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>coded in steel particles. And here's how he proposed such

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a device would work. So first, for recording, you would

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have a microphone, so sound goes into the microphone, like

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking into the microphone would then generate an alternating current.

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I've done episodes about how microphones work, but essentially what

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about is similar to what we were talking

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about with recording with wax cylinders, except instead of the

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>membrane moving a needle to carve into wax, the vibrating

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>membrane would interact with an electromagnet and create a current,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a variable current. That current you could then use to

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>represent the sound. You could actually just send that current

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to an amplifier and then to a speaker, a loud speaker,

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's how you get microphone to loudspeaker amplified sound. Well,

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in this case, you wouldn't be sending it to a loudspeaker. Instead,

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you'd be using that current to go to an electromagnet

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>create a fluctuating magnetic field. And meanwhile you would run

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the steel dust coded string past this electromagnet, and that

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>fluctuating magnetic field would cause the particles on that string

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to align a certain way according to whatever the magnetic

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>field was at the moment that the string was running

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>past it. And because that field is in fluck, the

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>direction of those particles would vary over time, So the

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>string would actually become a record of the magnetic fluctuations

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>over time. And you know, obviously the rate at which

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>you pulled the string past this electromagnet would determine the

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>speed of recording. So to play it back, you would

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>put the string near a conductor essentially connected to some

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of playback device like a speaker, with an amplifier

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in between, because the signal you're going to get is

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be too weak to really drive a speaker.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So the magnetized particles on the string when you pull

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it past a conductor, then you can induce current to

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>flow through that conductor, and that current, when amplified and

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>then sent to a speaker, would play back the recorded

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sound used to create the record on the string in

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Now, all Obey never build a working

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>model of his idea. However, a Danish inventor named Valdemar

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Poulsen built upon this notion. He either had read about

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the previous concept or had come to the same conclusion independently.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear which is the case, but you know,

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Obey didn't build it. So Valdemar creates a patent for

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a similar invention that he called the telegraphone, and he

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>got the patent. He was awarded the patent for this

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>invention in the late eighteen hundreds, and he landed essentially

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a licensing deal here in America. He also landed other

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>deals elsewhere in the world, but in America he got

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>some folks to buy into it, and they created the

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>American Telegraphone Company of Washington, DC. So that device used

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like steel wire to record upon, but same sort of

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>basic idea. You would run the steel wire past a

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>magnet that would magnetize the wire in various alignments, and

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>then running it back across a reader would play back

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the recorded medium or media I should say. In that case, well,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the device didn't make that big of an impact here

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. The utility was somewhat limited, and

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that it really would be more like

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a business equipment, right. It was meant for things like

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>taking notes for dictation, that kind of thing. The sound

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>quality wasn't fantastic. It was not really intended for pre

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>recorded music. It wouldn't do well for that purpose. The

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>invention actually did a little bit better in Europe than

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it did here in the United States. Here in the US,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the business didn't stay around for very long, but other

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>businesses that also took Polson's patent and licensed it, they

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>were able to create a business that stood the test

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of time a bit better than the American version. But

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the development of magnetic tape. So this

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>approach showed that it was viable to use magnetism as

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a recording medium or recording method, but the steel wire

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't really the best approach. In the mid nineteen twenties,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>there was an American named Joseph O'Neill who theorized that

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you could quote quote a strip of paper or some

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>other cheap material end quote with magnetic material for the

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>purposes of recording audio to it, and this would remove

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the need to use steel wire, or steel coated threads,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>or steel tape. These all had limited utility. With the

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>case of thread, there was limited resilience, like it could

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>eventually break or fray. So he said, why not just

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>use a strip of material coat it with this magnetic

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff and then use that for recording. However, while he

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>had suggests did the concept, he didn't appear to pursue

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>this in any serious way. As far as I am aware,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he did not produce an actual example of this. He

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of theorized that it could be done. Whereas

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a German engineer named Fritz Fleoimer had developed a method

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>to put metal stripes on cigarette paper to want purpose.

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I do not know. I'm sure there was a reason

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to put metal stripes on cigarette paper, but I don't

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>know what it was, but I didn't look it up

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>because I've got enough bunny trails going on in this

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>episode anyway. But he reasoned that because he had figured

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>out how to do that how to put metal stripes

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>on cigarette paper, he could use a similar approach to

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>coat a strip of paper like paper tape, with magnetic material,

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and then the paper tape could be used as a

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>recording medium for audio. The process of recording and playback

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>would be pretty similar as what it was with the telegraphones,

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so not that different from steel wire or steel tape.

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.679
<v Speaker 1>You would still have a right head that would use

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a fluctuating magnetic field to record audio. Signals sent from

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a microphone to this magnetically coded paper tape as it

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>passed by underneath the right head, and then later if

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to play it back, a playback head a

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>red head would pick up the magnetic stripe with its

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>particles in various alignments, and this would create the electric

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>current that was created through induction, and then that current

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>would get amplified by an amplifier and could then be

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>sent as a signal to playback sound on a loudspeaker.

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>His work in the late nineteen twenties would ultimately lead

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to the development of the Magnetophone K one, which he

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>unveiled in nineteen thirty five, which was the first practical

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>tape recorder. Okay, so that sets the first stage for

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what would become the foundation for the Walkman. When we

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>come back, I'll talk a little bit more of about

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Walkman prehistory, and we'll talk about Sony itself and how

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it came about developing the Walkman device and why it

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>became one of the top fifty most influential gadgets in

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>history according to these folks in time. But first, let's

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. Okay. When we left off. Before

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the break, I was talking about Fritz Fleoimer, a German engineer,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>an Austrian German engineer who developed this magnetic tape that

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately he would unveil in nineteen thirty five, and that

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was the Magnetophone K one that was the first practical

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>tape recorder. But this was also during a time where

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the world was heading into World War Two. Obviously, World

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>War two ends up being this massive conflict, and you

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>US forces were very much interested in one learning what

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>technology the Germans had access to and two stealing it.

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not just the Americans. Everybody was like this,

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>right in. Any country that perceived that another country had

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a technological advantage wanted to remove that advantage from their opponents,

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be able to exploit it themselves. So this

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>was going on across all enemy lines, like everybody was

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>spying on and stealing from everyone else, even allies in

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>some cases. But here US forces were able to get

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>possession of some German recording equipment as well as some

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>German tapes, and soon Americans began developing their own version

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of Floimer's technology. They began to create their own magnetic

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>tape systems and magnetic tapes themselves. By the late nineteen forties,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the recording industry had begun to use magnetic tape in

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>order for you know, music production. Tape actually opened up

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a ton of new opportunities. For one thing, you could

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>record several sessions to tape, and then you could physically

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>cut and edit the tape to put together a master recording.

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe you have some various takes that are

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>all pretty close to each other, but maybe take three

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the band had a really great intro into the song.

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It just sounded really good. But take five has the

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>best version of the bridge, and the group really nailed

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the ending of the song just on the second take. Now,

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 1>before the days of magnetic tape, you pretty much had

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to decide which of these takes was your favorite, and

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it may not have all the best qualities of all

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the best takes, but you're stuck with what you've got,

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and so you got to pick whichever one is going

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the master, and that's what you go with.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But with tape, with a really good editor, you could

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.959
<v Speaker 1>actually put together a recording that doesn't really exist right,

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>or at least it doesn't exist in one performance. It's

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>actually a combination of performances. You could do that if

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you were really good with editing, and if the band

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was really consistent, you could actually put this together. And

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you could also do other things, like you could do

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.679
<v Speaker 1>multi track recording. You could do overdubbing. That really opened

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of opportunities. Overdubbing means you would record someone,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say it's a vocalist singing, but it could just

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>as easily be a musician playing some instrument like guitar

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>or piano or whatever, and then you've got your recording.

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Then you could play the recording back, and meanwhile the

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>vocalist or musician or whatever could play their own harmonies

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>along with the original recording, so they're accompanying themselves. They're

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>accompanying the recorded version of themself live. Then you could

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>record that. That's overdubbing. This way, you could layer your

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>recordings again, a more lush, rich sound than would be

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>possible if you were just relying on a single artist

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>or band or whatever. You could really flesh sounds out

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that way. The tape machines in those days were often

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>these big, real to real devices, and so it was

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>not common for your average person to get hold of

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those. I mean they were sold sometimes to consumers,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>but they were expensive and to get the actual media

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>was hard to There weren't a lot of places selling

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>real to real tape of performances, so vinyl records were

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>still the dominant form of recorded media in the consumer space,

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>but that would change thanks to a Dutch electronics company

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>called Phillips. Now, the Phillips Electronics Company dated back to

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety one. Sensing a theme here, I'm sure like

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>all these technologies and companies date back to like the

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>late nineteenth century, Brothers Anton and Gerard Phillips created the

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Phillips Company in the Netherlands. Their original focus was on

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 1>light bulbs, and generally the company's philosophy was that they

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>would aim to create high quality products, even though that

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>meant that their products would be priced for a fairly

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>limited market, which is a nice way of saying their

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff was expensive. You know. Now, for a while, their

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>company was part of a global cartel that dominated the

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>light bulb market, and on the one hand, that did

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>lead to forming certain standards in the light bulb industry,

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but on the other it arguably prevented competition in the

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>marketplace anyway. By the late nineteen forties, Phillips was starting

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to get into other types of technologies, you know, like

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>electric shavers. But they found out the profit margins are

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>razor thin. Not really, but I couldn't resist the pun.

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But in the nineteen fifties, Phillips got into the recording business.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>They launched a music label. They later in the nineteen

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>sixties acquired smaller record labels like Mercury Records. And they

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>were also thinking, well, how can we also be in

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the business of the the medium upon which recorded music

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>can go. So an engineer at Phillips named lew Atten's

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>worked out of an office in Belgium where he was

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>pioneering a new technology that would bring magnetic tape media

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to home consumers. This was in nineteen sixty two and

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the invention that he pioneered was the cassette tape. This

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>tape would use a very thin strip of plastic film

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 1>coded in magnetic material. The film would wrap around a

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 1>pair of reels. Those reels would be encased inside a

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>plastic cartridge. On the outside of this cartridge you would

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>see like the two holes that'd be the center of

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>these two reels. They'd be pronged so that they could

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fit onto a tape player's spokes, and a small length

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of this tape is obviously uncovered. That section could be

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>then inserted into a tape recorder for recording or playback.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The cassette was such a small form factor that immediately

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>people saw advantages over larger reel to reel machine that

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>were far more bulky and expensive. Now, the initial plan

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for the audio cassette was to sell them as business

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>tools like this was an idea like again, for dictation

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and taking notes and that kind of stuff. It didn't

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>take long, however, before Phillips and other companies said, hey,

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>what if we put pre recorded music on these and

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>sold them like we do with vinyl albums. Now you

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>might wonder what artist was the first to offer an

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>album on cassette tape. The answer to that is unclear.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Christian Romer has a blog post on legacybox dot com

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>about this and lists a few potential contenders for the

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>first album on cassette tape. One is Nina Simone's Wild

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Is the Wind. Another is Johnny Mathis's The Shadow of

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Your Smile, But my favorite is Eartha Kit's Love for

0:22:54.680 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Sale album. I Love Eartha Kit, What an amazing, But

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>as Romer points out, no one was really documenting the

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>history of albums on cassette when they first started to

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>become a thing, so it's unclear what the actual answer

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is of who was first. I would also like to

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>point out that music labels likely produced more than just

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>one album on cassette at a time, because it seems

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>like an odd choice to just go with let's just

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>do one and see how it goes. Someone's album obviously

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>had to be the first off the manufacturing line, but

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just splitting hairs. At that point, cassettes

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>were easier to store than vinyl albums, they took up

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>less space. They did have their own peculiarities. However, if

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you brought a cassette tape near a strong magnet, well

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you just screwed up the recording on your cassette tape

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>because the magnetic particles on the tape would realign to

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this new powerful magnetic field, so effectively you would erase

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>your cassette. Anyone who had cassette tapes also knows the

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>pain of tape getting snagged on something and then unreeling

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>from inside the cassette. You would just have this massive

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>plastic film just unspooled from outside inside the cassette. Now

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it's outside the cassette. So to fix that you would

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do the old standby, which is what I

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>call inserting a pencil into the spokes on one reel

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and gently coaxing the tape back into place by twisting

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the pencil slowly, one twist at a time. What a

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>joy that was. But you know, while the cassette media

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>was far more portable than vinyl, the players weren't that

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>much more portable, at least not at first. I mean,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they were smaller than turntables, but they weren't pocket sized,

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>you know. Tape decks, like tape recorders, were still fairly large.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They were too large to carry around easily. Like you

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>could put a strap on one and wear it around

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>your neck like it was like a handbag or something,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was still pretty bulky. A lot of tape

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>decks did have headphone jacks, but not all of because

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them had a built in speaker in

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the tape deck itself, so you would just push play

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and listen to the music coming straight out of the

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.239
<v Speaker 1>tape deck. It's usually pretty tinny. It wasn't typically a

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>very good quality of sound. But it worked. But yeah,

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't necessarily the case that a tape deck would

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have a headphone jack. A lot of them did, but

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a sure thing, and that's kind of where

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.959
<v Speaker 1>things sat for about a decade. But now let's flash

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>forward to the nineteen seventies in Japan. So the story

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>goes that one of Sony's co founders, a guy named

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Masaru Ibuka, wanted to be able to listen to albums

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on a portable playback device. Specifically, he wanted to be

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>able to listen to opera. He took lots of flights.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Being the head of a major electronics company in Japan,

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he had to fly a lot, and he liked to

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>listen to opera, and he wanted a way to bring

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>opera albums with him on flights so that he wasn't

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>having to pay attention to everything else that's going on

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on a plane. And he asked his engineers to look

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>into a way to achieve this goal, like how could

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he listen to stuff on a device that was small

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>enough for him to easily bring it with him on

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a flight. And a designer named Noria Oga got the

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>high pressure assignment of figuring out how to make something

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that Ebuka would appreciate. So then Oga turns to a

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>product that Sony had already started producing at that point.

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>This was a product that they were producing for the

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>business market, and it was a small handheld tape recorder

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>called the TCM one hundred B. It was also known

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as the Pressman because they were thinking that this would

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 1>be a device that reporters for newspapers would want to

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>use in order to make verbal notes. That kind of

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>thing did not digital, but recorded notes, and so it

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>was a handheld cassette recorder for voice memos and stuff.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It was small enough that you could hold it in

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one hand and you would operate it by pressing the

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>various buttons, and they had buttons for stuff like rewind

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and fast forward and record and play. You know, all

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the basic functions of your tape deck all built in.

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>So the base elements for a Walkman were already present

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Pressman. So Oga just used the Pressman as

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a launching pad, and he created a prototype

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>portable cassette player. He worked with engineers to take the

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Pressman and tweak the design of that product. So one

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>thing they did was they removed the recording feature, so

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it was purely a playback device, not a recording device.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>They also changed it so that the Pressman was monaural

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>mono in other words, so you didn't have two different

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>channels of sound going to the different speakers in your headset.

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It was all mono. They changed it to stereo so

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be able to support stereo recording. He then

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>gave this prototype to Abuka before Abuka was to go

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on another flight around world to do business e things

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in order to test it out, and Abuka must have

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>really liked the result because Sony would then go on

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to produce the Walkman portable cassette player the following year,

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy nine. Now, this was never a sure thing.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, within the company, there was a lot of

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>resistance to this idea. There were a lot of executives

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>who said, I don't know about this. I don't think

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a market big enough to support the production

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and marketing of a portable cassette player. But then Sony's

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>other co founder, a guy named Marita Akio, saw the

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>potential for great success and he said, no, Abuka was right,

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like this wasn't just a project for Abuka so he

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>could listen to music when he was on his flights.

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>This thing could be a real blockbuster hit for our company.

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So with the support of the co founders, the company

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>did go into the development for a consumer portable cassette

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>player and they began to develop the Walkman. All right,

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take another quick break. When we come back,

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk more about the Walkman story and its place

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in history. So, with the support of Sony's co founder's engineers,

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that Sony got to work in creating a consumer version

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of the prototype that Oga had created for Ibuka, and

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they created a device that had the designation TPSL two,

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but it would get the name Walkman. Akio came up

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>with that name and said it should be called the

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Walkman because you can walk around with it and listen

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to music. Pressman the voice recording device that was for

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the press. Walkman is for walking around and listening to

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>your music, and they launched it in Japan in July

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine for the equivalent of around one hundred

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollars, which is a big o' yikes. One

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty dollars in nineteen seventy nine. The United States

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>would not get the Walkman until nineteen eighty. Meanwhile, you

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>might wonder, okay, one hundred fifty bucks in nineteen seventy nine,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.959
<v Speaker 1>what would that be equivalent to today? Well, using a

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>handy dandy inflation calculator, that comes out to around six

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty six dollars for a portable cassette player. Keep

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in mind that the original Walkman didn't have recording capabilities.

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Just playback Holy cats, y'all. That is as incredibly expensive.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Like again, I always think about things like video game

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>consoles that launch for around five hundred to seven hundred dollars,

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and people talk about how expensive that is. Keep in

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>mind that original Walkman would have set you back six

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty six dollars, more than what some video game

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>consoles launch at. That's expensive now. When it did launch

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, the original name for the device

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the Walkman, it was the Soundabout which sounds about

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong to me anyway. But eventually Sony would migrate back

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Walkman, which was a Buka's suggestion from the

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>get go and occhio suggestion. The two of them argued

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that it should have been that from the beginning. Interestingly,

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a dispute about the origins of the Walkman

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>concept because there was another inventor who came up with

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a very similar idea and in fact patented that idea

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy seven, two years before the Walkman came out. Now,

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this inventor was Andreas Pavel, who had an invention that

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>he called the stereo Belt. And as the name suggests,

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the stereo belt was a belt that had audio equipment

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>attached to it, which included a battery pack as well

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>as audio players, and you would connect headphones to this

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>belt in order to listen to it. So not exactly

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as the Walkman, but the idea that

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>being a portable music playing device is what made it

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>similar to Walkman. Eventually, Pavel would bring lawsuits against Sony

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in various regions, arguing that there was a patent infringement

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>going on that Sony had essentially copied the design that

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Pavel had created without paying for it, without licensing it.

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>In several places, these complaints were ultimately dismissed. In other places,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Sony would settle out of court with Pavel rather than

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have to go through the whole process of a legal proceedings,

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>which can be really expensive even if you win. So

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>while Sony never admitted any fault in this, they did

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>eventually pay a pretty hefty settlement out of court. Anyway,

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the Walkmen, so I mentioned earlier. The Walkmen

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>ran on a pair of double A batteries, which was great.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, their batteries weren't too expensive. You could take

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>them on the go, you didn't have to be tethered

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to an outlet. They did require headphones because the Walkman

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>had no on board speaker. If you pushed play on

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a Walkman and there were no headphones plugged into it,

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>all you would hear would be the gears turning as

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the spokes were being rotated by the player itself. Sony

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>made around thirty thousand units initially in nineteen seventy nine

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.479
<v Speaker 1>when they launched it in Japan, and sales were a

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>little slow in the beginning. However, Sony used some good

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>old fashioned elbow grease to get interest up in the product,

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and by that I mean that Sony employees would literally

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>hit the streets in Japan with a Walkman and cassettes

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and find people out there on the street and have

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>them listen to cassettes on the Walkmen and let them

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>have the experience of this portable music player. And it worked.

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 1>That marketing push really was effective. By August, just two

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>months after they launched, Sony had sold out of their

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>initial run of units. They were hoping for around like

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>five thousand units a month. Instead they sold thirty thousand

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and two months. Pretty incredible. Now, not everyone was super

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>happy about the Walkmen and its success in the marketplace,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>like it also saw great success here in the United

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>States once it came out in nineteen eighty, but not

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody was really thrilled about this. There were people who

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>were warning that this technology was inspiring young folks to

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>shut themselves away from the world even while they were

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>walking around in the world, rather than being engaged in

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the wholesome surroundings. Undoubtedly learning great moral lessons from their

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>wise elders. These wholigans would be listening to their Bob

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Dylan's and their Judas priests at even their smothers brothers

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on headphones and blocking out the outside world and allowing

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>themselves to be shaped by the evil, wicked whims of

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>professional musicians. Oh the humanity. I'm making fun of it,

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>but the moral panic was real, right, There was moral

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>panic around portable cassette players. It just shows that fuddy

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>duddies will find moral panic in the oddest of places.

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Heaven help you if you have to also play dungeons

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and dragons while listening to music on a Walkman, because

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you were just destined for h double hockey sticks. Alan Bloom,

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the author, said essentially as much in a book titled

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>The Closing of the American Mind. Bloom argued that young

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>people listening to personal music devices would eventually lead to

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>moral decay. Pretty crazy stuff. Sony would release many follow

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 1>ups to the original Walkman, so there were lots of

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>improvements over the device over the following models. Some of

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 1>them were even smaller. Some of them would incorporate a

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>record function because people missed having that. The Walkman would

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>also become almost synonymous with portable cassette players, kind of

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.799
<v Speaker 1>like how the iPod would become almost synonymous with MP

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>three players. Folks would use the term Walkman even if

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about a product from a competing company.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, it wasn't a portable cassette player, It was

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a Walkman. Even if it wasn't actually a Walkman, which

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>meant that Sony had to do a lot of work

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to protect their trademark. Now, around the same time, you

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>had the fate of the cassette tape itself. So initially,

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>cassette sales were going very strong in the nineteen eighties,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but cassettes didn't totally replace vinyl records. For one thing,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you had music lovers who would call themselves audio files,

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>who would tend to prefer vinyl records over cassette tapes.

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>That cassettes could warp over time, you would get audio distortion,

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you would get a hiss. There was a hiss associated

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 1>with audio cassettes, and therefore people who really valued the

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>experience of listening to music on high end equipment tended

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to prefer vinyl to cassette tapes. However, the convenience of

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>cassette tapes plus the fact that you could purchase a

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>blank cassette and then record stuff to make your own tapes,

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and thus giving birth to the cultural phenomenon of the mixtape. Now,

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>making a mixtape that's an art form unto itself. That

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>meant that the cassette had a really firm foothold and culture,

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and the incorporation of tape decks into car entertainment systems

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>helped too. This gets complicated by the introduction of eight tracks,

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's a different matter. Anyway, it appeared as though

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the party would never end. In nineteen eighty four Billboard

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>report the cassette tape sales were outpacing vinyl LPs for

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and at that point made up around

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty three percent of all albums shipped. Now that shipped

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily sold, but still cassettes were clearly making a

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of headway. They were easy to manufacture, They again

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.359
<v Speaker 1>took up less space, You could sell a whole lot

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>more of them, You could get a lot more in

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stock at a record store than you could with vinyl,

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, people were digging them. However, the introduction of

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the compact disc, which also was introduced in the early

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties, would ultimately set the stage for the cassette's decline. Now,

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it would take quite a few years for compact discs

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to really establish themselves in the market, particularly since early

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>CD players were ridiculously expensive, like just prohibitively expensive for

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>most people. However, over time CDs would start to catch on,

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and cassette sales began to take a turn, just as

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>vinyl had done before it. In nineteen ninety one, CD

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sales were higher, at least from a dollar value, than

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>cassette sales. It doesn't mean that there were more CDs sold,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but more money was made selling CDs than cassettes starting

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety one. So the nineties saw the decline

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of cassette sales continue, with more and more people switching

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to CDs. Vinyl became an almost obsolete format for the

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>general public. It never fully went away, and of course

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's enjoyed a resurgence in more recent years, but in

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the nineties and early two thousands it almost disappeared. Cassettes

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 1>did enjoy a brief little bit of a comeback. I mean,

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess arguably it's still going now because some artists

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>have released some of their albums on cassette formats, including

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>like Megan D. Stallion and Taylor Swift, but it's not

0:39:56.560 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like a common thing. Cassette sales in general were pretty low,

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and that also meant that cassette players weren't really flying

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>off store shelves either, so it didn't make much sense

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep making them, which brings us to our sad

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>little tail coming to a close here, because Sony actually

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>did continue producing the Walkman all the way through the

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:20.279
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineties and all through the first decade of the

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, despite the plunge in cassette sales over that

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>time period. But in twenty ten, Sony threw in the

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>towel and announced it would shut down the portable cassette

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>player line, so the Walkman cassette player would be no more.

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>They stopped production in twenty ten. It however, was not

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the Walkman as a brand, because Sony

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>gave the Walkman brand to other products that were also

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in the music space. They just weren't cassette players. So

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the main one would be digital music players, digital audio

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>players or DAPs, and this is what I would often

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 1>just call an MP three player back in the old days.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Like the Apple iPod, Sony started introducing digital audio players

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.439
<v Speaker 1>way back in nineteen ninety nine, which is actually two

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>years before Apple would introduce the iPod, but Sony's version

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>initially only supported a proprietary digital audio format called a

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>track at r AC. Sony had control over that file

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>format and felt like this would protect Sony's interests in

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the actual music production side. In other words, this was

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a way to prevent piracy. Sony specifically did not want

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to support file formats like MP three. Now, the Walkmen

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>would ultimately fall well behind the iPod in sales in

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>most countries. When it got to digital audio players. The

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Walkman did okay in Japan, but outside Japan it just

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it could not compete against the iPod. However, you can

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>still find digital audio players that are branded as walk today,

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 1>including high end players that cost a whole bunch of money,

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>like more than one thousand dollars for some of these devices.

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty tall order. When we live

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>in a world where smartphones have access to tons of

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>music through various music streaming platforms. Now, sure, the fidelity

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:23.319
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily top notch, you know, that depends on the

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>streaming service, the format they use, how much compression is

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>used for the files, and what kind of headphones or

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>headset you're using to listen to it. However, I think

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for the majority of people out there, the convenience and

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>accessibility that is presented through smartphones that ends up being

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>more important than musical fidelity. For most people, not everybody.

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Some folks are more concerned with the quality of the experience.

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's legitimate. I think it's legit to really

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.880
<v Speaker 1>want the absolute best quality of sound. However, that is

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:58.479
<v Speaker 1>also a very subjective thing, right. You could have two

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>people and they can have the same taste in music,

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but they might have very different perceptions of what set

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>up is best, and you can't, you know, necessarily agree

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on a common standard. The world of high fidelity audio

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is filled with a lot of marketing that strikes me

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>as being just a stone's throw away from pure pseudoscience.

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>But I've talked about that before, so I'll leave it

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>for now. So the cassette Walkman has been out of

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:29.280
<v Speaker 1>production since twenty ten. The brand still exists for digital

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>audio players, and some artists do continue to put stuff

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>out on cassette because nostalgia is a hell of a drug. Personally,

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I do miss the days of putting together the perfect mixtape.

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>There's something really special about getting one just right, like

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>finding that right progress of songs so that you know

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got like the really high energy number comes in

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at song number three, and then you've got a cool

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>down number for song number four that kind of thing.

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Making a curated playlist doesn't really scratch the same itch

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. There's something really tactle about using cassette tapes

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 1>and creating a mixtape that way, and slapping a really

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>good mixtape into a portable music player and then just

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:12.879
<v Speaker 1>going for a walk is a pleasure that I think

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>people should really seek out if they're able to. That

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing is just one of the simple pleasures

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of life if it's accessible to you. I hope that

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.359
<v Speaker 1>this episode was interesting to all of y'all. I hope

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you're doing well, and I will talk to you again

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.