WEBVTT - Early Look at Week 3 NFL Lines (Ep. 105)

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey there everybody. Welcome back to the Betting Pros Podcast,

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by bet MGM. I'm your host, Dan Harris.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. It is

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>time for an early look at the week three NFL lines.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Here with me to do that is our good friend

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Kayley, Senior content producer over at Covers. Find him

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Covers Underscore. Kaylee. That is c A. L. E.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Y Andrew. It's a big day over there for you

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. Thank you for taking time out of your

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>business schedule and joining me.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've got the Canadian federal election. For all of

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 2>us Blue Jays fan, every game is a nailbaitor at

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 2>this point, going down to the wire and Monday Night football,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>it's there's a lot going on.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I totally knew it today was the federal election day

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in Canada. Like, I don't know why you think that

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't know that or that I was completely shocked

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>when you came on and mentioned that I'm very into

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Canadian politics. Don't worry, It'll be fine. But yes, obviously

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got the Blue Jays. We're watching the game right now.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>It is currently fourteen to seven lions. A little shocking

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>here what we've got, but we'll deal with that. That

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>might impact how we feel about this Green Bay line

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for next week. But before we get into it again,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go through every spread, every over under. We're

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna see if there's value. Now we're going to talk

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not we expect the line to move

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>all that good stuff. Before we get in a couple

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of housekeeping things. First, let me tell you about the

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>latest offer from bet MGM for new customers. You bet

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars on any event and you win one hundred

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollars in free bets when you use the

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.639
<v Speaker 1>code Juice one hundred. Why is the code Juice one hundred.

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That is from our other podcast which you should also

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>check out with Matt Prawl, called The Daily Juice. You

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>can find that wherever you want, so that is free money.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You bet ten dollars, you win one hundred and fifty

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars in free bets regardless of the result. All of

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the code Juice one hundred for new users. Second, we

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing a giveaway. It's a signed to a Tongue

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of Fi LOVEO giveaway that is unfortunate right now, obviously

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the bruise ribs, but you can still have

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to signed. Jersey's still going to be amazing. Entry is

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a very simple. Leave review for the podcast on Apple

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast or Cashbox. Then go to Betting Pros dot com

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>slash review. That is it, And if you want three

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>times the entries, just subscribe to our Betting Pros YouTube

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>channel YouTube dot com slash betting Pros. Every Sunday morning

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>from eleven am Eastern to twelve pm Eastern, Matt Prout

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and I go through every single game, give our best

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bets and some player prop so you should go there again.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That's YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros. All right, let's

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>get to the games, and let's start with the Thursday

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>night game. Here, Andrew, the Panthers are visiting the Texans.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>The Texans are getting seven and a half points, and

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the over under. Don't worry about it because I totally

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>switched to both my tabs to be on the spread.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>The over under is for forty four.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>You've got it.

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying you can host the show. My bad. I'm

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>all over the places.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We were talking right before, I had seventeen tabs open,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and I was losing it anyway. So that's what we got.

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any value in either of these numbers?

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd have to say. With the Panthers right now, I

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 2>saw the line hit the board at seven. It's already

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.399
<v Speaker 2>gone to seven and a half. Panthers have looked good

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the first two weeks. The Sam Darnold haters, I know

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>you're a Jets fan. I haven't been on the way.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a hater though, I mean I feel bad

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>for him. I'm happy. I'm happy that he gets a

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to show if he can be a competent NFL quarterback. Good, good,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>good looking so far, you know, not that bad.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I think Matt Rule has a big and Joe Brady

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 2>have a big, big part in the way he's looked

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>so far. They're very good head coach, offensive coordinator combo.

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>They went out there and they beat a Saints team. Well,

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna find out, maybe this I was choking with

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 2>you the other day, We're gonna find out if this

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>tanking Aaron Rodgers thing is real or not right, But

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 2>so call it. Maybe this is the win over the Saints.

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that impressive if the Packers are just tanking? But no. Now,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Davis Mills in at quarterback for the Texans. It looks

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>like the Texans. I'll give them credit to they they

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>did look better. I made a bet before the season

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 2>that they go on seventeen, except you have to sit

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 2>there and look at it in your tickets for the

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>rest of the season. But no, they've they have some

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 2>veteran players there. I just don't know if they're going

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>to be able to do it against this line. And

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 2>these are going to be publicly bet games on Thursday nights,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 2>when it's the only game on the board, the favorite

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 2>will probably see some action. You can maybe if you

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>like the dog, I'll wait a little longer until that

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>may be closer to kickoff, and maybe there'll be a

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 2>nice little middling opportunity for us here in this one.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't. I don't see it getting back down

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to seven. I mean, do you like? I just yeah,

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I hit it when it was seven because I think

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's I mean, look, you never know, right, I mean,

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>every NFL game, the worst NFL team still has premier

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>athletes at every position. Every team plays as hard as

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I can. But Davis Mills is just not ready to

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be an NFL quarterback that obviously wasn't really the plan.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>This is where we find ourselves. So I agree if

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you like the Panthers at this number, which is fine

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>if you do bet it now, because if not, it's

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>probably moving that the total. I mean, I don't know, man,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>like I don't really a forty four like, I have

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>no idea if the Texans are going to be able

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to put up any points whatsoever. So it's just something

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>where I'm not even getting involved at all with the total.

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 2>I would stay away. I was one of those victims

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 2>last week. I was for sure that that Washington Giants

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 2>game was going to go under forty and a half

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 2>and then they put up almost sixties. So this early

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 2>there have been some very I don't know what to

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 2>say here, sobering, sobering results so far in the NFL

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>season through two weeks. So yeah, this one, it all

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 2>depends on if the Texans can score or not. I'm

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 2>not sure. I would probably stay away as well.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Totally stay away from me as well. What about the

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Chargers visiting the Chiefs. This is a fascinating game, actually,

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited to watch it. Chiefs are laying six

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half points and the total is fifty five

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half, which I like now that the totals

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>are just like, look at just fifty five, fifty six,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>no big deal, Like this is just every game right now?

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think here of these numbers.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a good example of what I was just saying

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 2>a moment ago. Last week, everybody was foreshore that Dallas

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and San Diego was going to go over that total.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it was about fifty three, and everyone was

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I talked to was on the over in that game,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and then we get forty points scored. Now that said,

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>there was some very questionable refereeing in that game, and

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 2>there was a bunch of points taking off the board

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>for the Chargers. I really like the way that Justin

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Herbert has looked this year so far, especially finding that

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>connection with Mike Williams. He could be a big, a

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>big breakout star this year for the Chargers. But fifty

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>five is a big number, and it looks like it's

0:06:57.839 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 2>going to keep going up, so I'd probably wait, let

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 2>it go up. I could see myself teasing it down

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 2>in a bunch of teasers too, around to that fifties, yeah,

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>and maybe taking or sorry, teasing it up even higher

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>gets maybe gets up to fifty seven, and I'll maybe

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 2>tease it up to sixty three or something like that

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>and take the under there.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I just I can't I imagine there's gonna be scoring here.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Like frankly, I don't think I would tease it up

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and I because there would never there would be no

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>number that I would feel okay about, right and angry

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahos game. By the way, I'm gonna let go

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that you called them San Diego. Oh

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you talk about by the way, I I it's remarkable, right,

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I talk about like sports all day long,

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's betting for me, betting and fantasy and stuff

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. And the other day I did a video

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and I called them the Oakland Raiders. Like I just

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>some things you can't get out of your head. I

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know. But anyway, I just want to make that clear.

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>We knew it. It was all for fun. Everything is

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>good anyway. Yeah, I agree that game sort of didn't

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>go as expected. I'm not going near forty five and

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a half if anything, though, Like, there's there's not gonna

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be Chiefs game where it's just gonna be like pitter

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>patter like there's gonna be a lot of scoring one

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>way or another. So if anything I actually thought would

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you said originally, would tease it down, I'd be almost

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>more apt to do. What about the spread six and

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a half? Do you think this ends up here? Do

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you think it moves one way or another? And do

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you like it at that number at all?

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>So initially I want to say yes, I like getting

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs ad anything less than a touchdown, especially at home.

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>But they're just one in eight ats in their last

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>nine regular season games, and I don't know if that's

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>just they're usually I get they're either in spreads that

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>are too big and they get a little complacent at

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>the end, or they have games like they did against

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens last week. It's an interesting number and I

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know how to feel about them. I hate fading

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes. I admittedly was on them last night. Three

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>and a half I thought was a great number, and

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I turned off the TV for a little while when

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 2>they were off by about twelve or whatever they were,

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was over. And obviously that was not

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the case. Laharjacks and the other plans, but I think

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to lay the points with the or take

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the points with the Chargers. At this point, I think

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Justin Herbert is almost good enough. He's obviously not Patrick Mahomes,

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>but he can sling it just as bout as well

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>as anybody else in the NFL. And I like a

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of these defenders on this Chargers team. If there's

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 2>someone that can cover some of these guys, it's guys

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 2>like Derwyn James and and Bosa is the type of

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>guy that you can get some pressure on Mahomes, which

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>is the key to getting to them.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Chargers defense is very solid, and they usually

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are before they eventually succumb to injuries like they do

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>every single year. But that's the thing, like, I mean,

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think the public generally really focuses

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that as great as the Chiefs are,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as great as Mahomes is, they're not great against the spread.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>That's just, you know, not really what they do. So

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's six and a half. I mean, that's a great line.

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>That's because that's basically begging the public better to take

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs at this point. But it's just I bet

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you it just hangs out there the whole time. I

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think you need to make a move.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>You like it.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Either way, it's probably going to stay there. I don't

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>see it getting up to seven. I don't see it

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>really going down. So he gets where it ends up.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a stay away from me, just because I'm terrified, basically,

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what would say? How about the Jaguars hosting the Cardinals.

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals are laying seven and a half and the

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>total is fifty two.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I really dislike the number. I dislike laying more than

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown with a road team. But this Jaguars team,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I am. I am waiting for the Urban Meyer like

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm just done with this press conference.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they are one of the most underprepared teams

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. I've watched enough of the games the

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>last two weeks to say, like, they don't look competitive.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 2>They just don't look like a competitive football team right now.

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 2>And then he goes out there last week and those

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 2>rumors about USC comes out, and he looks like my

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 2>kid when I've caught him doing something wrong. I see

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the milk, there's the milk on the counter. Did you

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>spill that milk? No? No, Like I don't. It's a

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 2>really weird situation. I think Trevor Lawrence has shown some

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>potential for what he can be. I just I just

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know if that's gonna be able to happen under

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Urban Meyer. He hates giving James Robbinson the football. I'm

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>sure the fans, the fantasy pros, the nice game all like,

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>he is the most talented skill position player on that roster.

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Now Chanolt isn't getting involved. Brother, I just don't know

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing there. So I'd have to I'd have

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to take the points with the Cardinals, particularly just also

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 2>because the way the Cardinals have played through the first

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>two weeks, particularly Kyler Murray.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this strikes me as a game that probably the

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote sharp betters are going to hit the Jaguars

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>because I remember this with the Jets last year, where

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I try to, you know, talk to whoever

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I know about and they would always be like, there's

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>value on the Jets on this number, and I would

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just watch them and I'd be like, there's no value

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>on the Jets. Like I understand a system, right something

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>A professional better completely understand why a model says this

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>number is too good. But there are teams like the

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Jets last year, and you're absolutely right with the Jaguars

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. And it's really because of the coaching staff.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. I mean, this is as quickly as

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen basically everyone realized that a coach is

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>completely just mentally checked out in over his head, despised

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>by his own players. Like just everything is terrible. You

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>can't take the Jaguars no matter what it is. I

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably fire on the Cardinals. It's not getting better.

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not getting better. Get it now, yeah, get it

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>now because it's not getting better. But man, that is ugly.

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's a big line. I mean over touchdown there.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You know the books, it's very transparent what the books

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>are doing right now, Like it's very clear when they

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>want you to bet, where they want you to bet

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that, and people will so I agree,

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, So you don't like road teams laying more

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown. You've got the Ravens then going to Detroit.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Who where This is the middle of the game as

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I speak right now, it's a little less than a

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>minute left in halftime and the Lions are putting up

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>another competitive effort. The Ravens here are laying nine and

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the total is forty nine and a half. Now, by

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the time people listen to this, Andrew, it might be

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>different because the Lions beat the Packers in this game,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe that Lion comes down a little bit. But for

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>now four nine and a half with the spread of

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens as the road team LAYG nine. What do

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you think.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe I'm saying this, but take the Lions

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>in the nine points. Like the the Ravens are coming

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>off a huge comeback win last night, they get that

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 2>even Lamar Jackson get that monkey off their back against

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs. So this is a as stereotypical of a

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>letdown spot as there could be for the Ravens, who, frankly,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 2>if not for some crazy heroics from Lamar Jackson like

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 2>last night and a fumble, they don't win that game. Yeah,

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>they come into this game and they're one too probably,

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and I just I just don't the Lions are playing well.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I still can't believe that. I'm sure Aaron Rodgers is

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 2>doing this just to mess with us all. This is

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the this is the Aaron Rodgers experience for getting this year,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's gonna be an interesting one. But you can't

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 2>deny the Lions at least being competitive. Maybe that's a

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 2>that's the difference between a guy like Dan Campbell and

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and Urban Meyer, Like this guy is gonna die for

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>this football team, and these players seem to put it

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>on the line for him, even if you think his

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>coaching strategies don't make any sense. But like the actual

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 2>x's and o's of Dan Campbell can be debated pretty

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 2>pretty easily, but those guys seem to play hard for him.

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's half the battle, man, Like, it's if you

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>want to, you know, live and die for your coach,

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that is half the battle. There have been plenty of

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>coaches who aren't phenomenal, you know, x'es and o's type

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of guys, but who their team goes out there and

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't give up. And again, you're right, this is

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a great point because you we were joking again when

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>when we were trying to come up with a time

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to record this podcast and we're going to our schedules,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, well, I mean we can do

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it during Monday night football man, Like it's okay with me,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and you were like, yeah, I really want to see

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Rogers is actually tanking, but I'm willing

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to do it there. You know, I don't know, but

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Lions really do just you know, are

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they play hard and they look okay. Jared Golf looks okay,

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks fine right now at least, so whatever's going on,

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you as right now you got to

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>take the points out. I'm interested to see if the

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Lions win this game out of curiosity so you can predict,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because who knows exactly what's going to happen. If the

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Lions win this game, what do you think that spread

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>goes to it's nine as we record this.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>It'll probably approach seven and a half. I would say, yeah,

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be the number. It kind of

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 2>lands on after that.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And well, I'm still saying that I expect the Packers

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to pull this one out, so we'll see if that happens.

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to another big one. It's a home team

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>laying nine. It's the Bills laying nine to the Washington

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>football team. And the total is pretty low here at

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>forty six. What do you think? Uh?

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to say over here, just because of how

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 2>impressive Josh Allen has looked, that offense has looked the defense. Obviously,

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 2>he threw up a shutout last week against Jacoby Brissett, right,

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 2>But and now they go against Taylor Heineke. But Kinekee

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>had his moments last week. That's against the Giants defense,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 2>which is a little different obviously. Uh. But the thing

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 2>for me about why I like over I went in

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 2>with obviously some expectations surrounding this Washington football team defense,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and that just hasn't come to fruition at this point. Besides, Chase, like,

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Chase Young is a freak and he's very good, and

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I expect that defensive line to be better. They've got

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 2>like that all SEC frontline, all first round guys, and

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>but they just were not getting enough pressure on Daniel Jones. Luckily,

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter because Daniel Jones will sometimes just on

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the run, he seems fine, but give him a clean

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 2>pocket and overthrow a guy by five yards. But I

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 2>was I was shocked about how little pressure they were

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 2>they were getting on him when they needed it sort

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>of thing. And the secondary had its problems as well.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Landing Collins well, a great run stuffer, still has his

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>issues defending the deep ball. And Josh Allen's going to

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>be throwing some deep in this one.

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I agree with you. I don't have a

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>great feel for the spread. It seems a little high

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. I mean, Washing put up points with Taylor

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Heinege and the Bills. I know, again you mentioned it.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 1>They pitched a shutout in the last game, and their

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>defense has look good, you know, look good against Pittsburgh

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. But again, I think that's more on the

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>lack of offense of the two opposing teams, and it is

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on their defense haartly. I mean, they have a great

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>pass defense and everything, but Washington is able to move

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball and put up points. The Bills are as well.

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Their offense hasn't looked great right now, but we know

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>what it can do. So at forty six, this is

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a number i'd hammer immediately, actually right now. Like that,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. The over is a play that

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I really like. I'd probably stay away from the spread

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at least for right now.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Ah, you agree, Yeah, I agree with that.

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Browns are hosting the Bears. The Browns are a lot

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of seven and a half point lines right now. The

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Browns are seven and a half point favorites total forty

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>six and a half.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you think just we have the theme tonight,

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 2>it's just like, yeah, so the books clearly want us

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to go take those points with the Bears there it

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 2>looks like. But I'm a big Justin Fields guy. He

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 2>was my leave second rated quarterback coming into this draft.

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I think he has a very good potential. He obviously

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 2>had some jitters, some jitters in that game, but I

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 2>think that also comes partly because the Bears just have

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 2>been refusing to give him first team reps. And if

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:17.959
<v Speaker 2>you give him some first team reps and give him

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 2>some real practice, then maybe he can maybe show what

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 2>he's more capable of. I guess I saw today. I

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>think you can correct me if I'm wrong. But Andy

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Dalton is okay and he will be the starter if healthy.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Is that this is correct and he's okay and that

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have serious damage. But it doesn't mean that

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be able to start this week or

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. But will they came out and said

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he will be the starter when healthy, because why not?

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Because man Hackey. I guess I don't know. The Bears

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 2>played much better last week overall. I thought the Bengals

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>had it. We're gonna win that game just because of

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the Bears situation. So I was impressed with the Bears

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 2>defense in that game. And the Bears defense is still good,

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>so they'll be able to keep them in this football game.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>So but and the Browns had trouble putting away putting

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 2>away the Texans last week. I expected the Browns to

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>cover that spread. I lined it myself at about minus

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>fourteen last week. So I took the Browns minus twelve

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 2>and a half and I got burned on it. So

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 2>this is another my mind. I think I'll probably have

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 2>to do what the books are asking me and take

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 2>that plus seven and a half points with the Bears.

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the bait. I'll take the bait now, I

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mean I will. I Look, bottom line is this, like,

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I get that the Browns run the ball beautifully. I

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>get that their system is great and they've got you know,

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>all else fouls. They can go to Hooper, they can

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>go to Ndjoku. That's totally fine. But you know, we

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know Voell Beckham Junior is going to play in

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this game. Jarvis Slandry's out. We already know that Baker's

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>banged up, Like he's okay, He's gonna play, but he's

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>banged up, like he's not one hundred percent. And if

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you get Fields with a full week of basically being

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like you're got And here's the thing, whatever you think

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>about Matt and Age, like, there's no way that they

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>went into this entire our season Andrew basically refusing to

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>have in their book somewhere buried a game plan that

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>revolves around justin Fields right like this is happening, yeah eventually,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So get it into the game plan right now. Let

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>him just open it up. I mean, think about what

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I know it didn't look at against

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers, but think about what the Eagles were

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>able to do when they first started against Atlanta. And

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you can, you know, build your your game plan around

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a running quarterback, you can do a lot. Fields is

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>very talented. I will take the bait. I understand, like

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, and they seem totally comfortable with it. And

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no surprises here. By the way, I'm sure they're

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>baking in the fact that Beckham's not going to play.

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They know Landry's not going to play. They don't care.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They want you to do it. You're you were taking

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the plunge together.

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 2>We're taking the plan. Yeah, let's do love it.

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's go all day long. Let's go to the Colts

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are visiting the Titans. The Titans are currently laying five

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half. There's some fives out there vacillates between

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>five and five and a half. The totals forty eight.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>We obviously have the wins situation here, where you know,

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't know whether or not it's going to play.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>From everything I see, it seems to suggest that it's doubtful.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Apparently he's got ankle issues on both legs or I

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know both ankles, so it just seems unlikely to me.

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But who knows. So what do you think right now?

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Five to five and a half one or the other.

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>I probably. I think we finally saw the Titans in

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the second half of that game against the Seahawks, the

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 2>real Titans. They're like, oh, yeah, we've got Derreck Henry.

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll start giving him the ball again. The

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>defense is still obviously a huge issue for that team.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>But is it it's gonna be Jacob Easton?

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Then if it's not, it will be you better believe it.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's take the Titans now, Yeah, before that gets to

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>six points. If you get I've already done it. I've

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>already done it. And by the way put wentzon there,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I still am taking them at five now. They played

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>very well, better than I expected actually against the Rams.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pittman Junior had a fantastic game, and look good.

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>They got Pascal involved. It wasn't the same week one.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me just dink and dunk to Night Hines and

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor like. They got the rest of the guys involved,

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 1>which they have to because you can't do that, you know,

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>every single time. So they look good. Their defense is fine,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>but I look, I was all over. One of my

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>bets last week was the Titans getting six or five

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and a half or whatever it was against the Seahawks,

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because I was very clear. I thought Week one was

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of just COVID the issues that they had.

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>They didn't play a lot in the preseason together. Julio

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Jones wasn't acclimated yet to the offense. You give Mike

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Rabil a full week of practice, I think they're going

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to be okay. They finally it took a half, took

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>a half, they finally got it together. I think you're

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>going to see this again, I think they're gonna put

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of points. It's not a number that

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I that I would scream or pound the desk for

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily if Wentz is healthy, but a I think even

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>if he plays, he's going to be limited. And I

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>just think that it's a recipe for a disaster for them.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm taking the Titans now. I don't think the

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.679
<v Speaker 1>number moved. I don't think if Wentz is declared in

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that this number drops or anything like that to four,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>That he's based in there.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Yet Yep, I think so too, So I would take

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it there. Let's go to the Patriots at home. They

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are laying three to the Saints and the total sorry,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>let me get it is forty three, so low total here,

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously with neither team in offensive juggernaut. The Saints go

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>from whoopen the Packers in Week one in the Aaron

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers tank Fest and then they just look absolutely terrible

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in this most recent game. What do you think here?

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Patriots lang three to the Saints at home.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm not a big I'm not a big

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones guy, so but they they have done what

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 2>they always do. The Patriots have done what they always do.

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>They've built a game plan that is going to play

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to his strength, and he's an accurate quarterback who can

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 2>read the field quickly, and he's he's got a high

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>football IQ. And they're going to take advantage that. They're

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>going to run the football with Damien Harris all game,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 2>and I think that they'll be able to run it. Yeah,

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 2>the Saints have a strong defense, but I think in

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 2>this situation at home, the public will be on the

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Patriots in this game. So I would bet it before

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it goes above that key number three.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I would be fine because I

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>do think that the worst case scenario is a push.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But I like and the Saints have are really banged

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>up on defense too. You know, Latimore didn't play like

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>who knows if he's going to be back. I know

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>it's not exactly the same because it's not really the offense.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the Alpha number one wide receiver or

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. I will say, by the way, as

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I look at the various lines on Bettingbros dot Com,

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it is three. Every book Fox Bet has it right

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>now at two and a half. So if you're listening

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, check Fox. But if you have access that

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>go hit that for sure, because I would love that

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>total is low. Here, what do you think about that

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>forty three? I mean, either team seems like they're going

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to put a point, which probably means they're going to

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>combine for like sixty five or something like that. But

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>what do you think realistically of forty three?

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I realistically think it's a good number, and I'd probably

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 2>if you put a gun in my head, i'd say

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 2>go under. But then yeah, it'll probably, like you said,

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>it'll probably end up scoring sixty points because the NFL

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 2>so far this year. But I think it's a pretty

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 2>decent number. I'm probably not going to touch it. I

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 2>would lean towards the under because of Mac Jones and

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Jamis Winston and those are the starting quarterbacks in this game,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and the Patriots defense is looking better each week as well,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>so I'm not going to put any faith in them

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 2>putting up the points. But like for me, like I said,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a stay away.

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how about the Falcons visiting the Giants? Now, the

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>consensus line is three and a half, but as I look,

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really split down the middle between three and three

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I mean, bet MGM is at three,

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Fandle is at three. DraftKings and fox Bet are at

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>three and a half, so if that matters to you

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>can let me know. But the Giants are at home.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>They're laying three and a half to the Falcons. The

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>totals forty eight and a half, so that's, you know,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>not not the highest total on the board, but certainly

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>some points here expected. What do you think they're.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll probably stay away from the side of this one

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 2>because I have literally no idea how to gauge what

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>the Giants did. They showed up on a Thursday night,

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 2>or like Daniel Jones has his best game on games

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.199
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday nights, despite the fact that he loses. He

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 2>plays well and then they lose, and then the rest

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 2>of the time he's just awful. And the Falcons have

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 2>just are the Falcons right now, because we can call

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>them a dumpster fire or whatever we want to call them.

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 2>It's not good right now. But they put up some

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 2>points at the end of that the end of the

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Bucks game, So I'm just looking at the over right here.

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Probably the forty eight and a half is a lot

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of points for some bad teams, but I still think

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 2>this is probably the best play in the game in

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>a game that I would generally stay away from for

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 2>the most part. But if my favorite play would be

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>that over forty and a half, I.

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Agree with you because I do think that, you know,

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody kind of looked at the Falcons when

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they played the Eagles and they were like, oh my god,

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the worst team I've ever seen. And other

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>than the fact that Matt Ryan threw two pick sixes

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end that really made the final score a lopsided,

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like they kind of hung in there wick a Bucks. Yeah,

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>they were able to move the ball. Like I realized

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that the Bucks were ahead, so you know, who knows what.

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>They kind of laid back on defense a little bit,

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>but they were able to move the ball. Cor Daryl

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Patterson was somehow very involved. Calvin Ridley caught a touchdown.

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where we are where Cordero Patterson is

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>like the man, but whatever. But they will be able

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to put up points here for sure. The Giants will too,

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>just because you know Daniel Jones, you know you do

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>mention it on the run. He has a good and

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you know Sterling Shepherd looks good. Galladay will get more

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>involved Saquon Barkley with another ten days of rest here,

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>they're designing a lot of like designed runs for Daniel

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Jones that look good. They'll put up points here, and

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>their defense is not strong enough to kind of hold

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a team like the Falcons that can at least move

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball. They have a veteran quarterback, they have an

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Alpha wide receiver, they have some other playmakers with pits,

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>even Mike Davis. So I agree with you. I'd hit

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the over. I'd hit it now at forty eight and

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a half because I feel pretty confident that's going over.

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 2>So that'll be a public play towards the weekend. So yeah,

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>go for it. I love it.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I love being public this one. So Andrew,

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you think about this, but Matt

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Pearl, who does you know, Hostsared Daily podcast. He

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>always says that when a line is between like four

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half and five and a half somewhere around there,

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that the books are kind of just throwing up their

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hands and basically being like, we don't exactly know what

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to do here. That's apparently what we have in this

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>game with the Steelers are laying four and a half

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>points to the Bengals. Total is low forty four divisional game.

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow looked absolutely horrific for most of that game

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and then through two touchdown passes. So what do you think?

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers don't look much better? You know, realistically, So

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what do you do here at four

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and a half?

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I take the points, I think, but I

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 2>think we wait. This is if you're gonna take the

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 2>points with the Bengals. This will be a game. The

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Steelers are the more public team, and they will get

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>they'll get better up I think closer to kickoff. So

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I think we wait on the Bengals and then we

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 2>take the points with them in that game, despite admittedly

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 2>not knowing how this game is going to go at all.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Like your description of Joe Burrow, there was perfect and

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 2>they have so many seemed like elite playmakers, but everybody

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone made fun of them at the draft because they

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't take Penny Sewell, because it doesn't matter who you're

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>throwing to if you're on your butt like and that's

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals. There's still the Bengals problem so far this season,

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 2>that offensive line play. And I am really Naje Harris

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 2>is a terrific player for the Steelers. They have some

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>good young guys. It sounds like Deantay Johnson's okay as well.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm just serious there, which is good for them.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:30.479
<v Speaker 2>But I'm starting to think that we're seeing the end

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>of the Roethlisberger effectiveness as the starting NFL quarterback. Yeah.

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I want nothing to do with this game, like I

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I honestly, because right, I mean, and you know, I get.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right though, if you do like the Bengals,

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>he can wait it because I think it's gonna go up.

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Because people still eat myself too, dude. I fight like

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>at an internal bias, like the Steelers, like I really

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>need to be like they'll be fine, Like they'll be

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, like you know, tom linill figure it out,

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Like they'll be fine. I don't care that they have

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the worst offensive line in football, Like I don't

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>care that Ben's a thousand years old and looks like,

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, let me get the ball out before

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody destroys me. I don't care. I want to bet

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, so I'm not going to do that. I'm

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>moving to fight my internal bias and I'm just going

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to stay away completely. But I agree with you that

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>if you like the Steelers, probably your best bet is

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to get on it now. If you do not, if

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you like the Bengals, I would wait. So let's talk

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>about the game that I'll probably be watching, you know,

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>more closely than most people in the country, and that

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is the Broncos hosting the Jets. The Broncos are currently

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven point favorites and the total is forty one and

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a half. You don't see that that often, by the way,

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 1>where a team is double digit favorites and the total

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is you know, fall out of bed and you can

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>basically hit it. So what do you think this is? Again?

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a Broncos team. Everybody knows. Right, you go

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>into Denver early on in the season, that's where you

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>know teams always run into trouble because it's a very

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult play place to play early in the season when

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>conditioning is an up. Yet they get hit by it

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, they don't really know. And then you

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>also have the Jets that are just like a dumpster fire,

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as we basically call them. Unsurprisingly, what do you think

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>here at eleven and forty one and a half eleven.

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>So the look aheadline for this game, if you were

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 2>into those kind of things, I believe it was six

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:21.719
<v Speaker 2>and a half or something like that. Yep, and the

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 2>first two weeks of football have really changed that. They've

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 2>all the Broncos also have Teddy two gloves. Who is

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Teddy covers now? I think it's something he covered the

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 2>first two games this year, so that makes him something

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>like thirty nine and I think eleven I want to

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 2>say ats and in his career as a starter, it's

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 2>something around that. It's close to eighty percent cover rate,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>which is just absurd. But this number is so big

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>and the total is so small. The rule. The rule

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 2>is if the total is if the spread is this

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 2>big and the total is that small, you almost have

0:31:58.000 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 2>to take the other.

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to right like, and this is someone who

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>again and again, look, I actually I can be wrong.

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel fine with Zach Wilson right now. I mean,

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that offensive line is horrific. Like, I'm not going to

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>blame him for all the picks. It's whatever. I like

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Robert stal I think long term they'll probably be okay.

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>This year they're going to be terrible. I don't want

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this I don't want to take a Jets

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>team that has no offensive line that looks completely lost

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that nobody in the world other than like people who

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>work for the team can name who starts in their secondary.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But at this point, like forty one and a half

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's an eleven point spread, how do you not

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>take the Jets in this situation? Right? Like it's it's

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that's insane, and the thing is, who's I mean, I

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>guess the Sharps will probably hit it, right.

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but I think they already have because it

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>started at eleven and a half and we're down to

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 2>eleven now.

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>But vandal by the way, it's ten and a half,

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So look at that, you know, at some spots of

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half.

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 2>So to me, I think they've probably already moved it.

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I would say. So as the kickoff comes, then the

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 2>public guys are gonna be like, oh, yeah, we're just

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the Jets, sock. We're gonna we'll just take the Broncos.

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 2>They're two and oats, Teddy two gloves always covers, and

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>then I don't know, maybe we can get it back

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 2>up to eleven is one of those weird football numbers too,

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>just like just like four and a half five. It's

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the it is the the above, the double digit version

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 2>of four and a half or five. So they don't

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 2>know really what to do. I guess they're thinking the

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Jets could either cover or lose by thirty is the

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 2>difference there. They have no idea what's gonna happen. I

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 2>have no idea what's gonna happen. I'm gonna I'll wait.

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 2>If you're gonna make me make it, make a bet,

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll wait because I think I think the public or

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna push it in the Broncos favors. So we're

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna wait and take the Jets as underdogs right before kickoff.

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I'm not doing. Ian McMillan was on early

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>last week and he joked about the fact that he

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was betting every single game this year like it making publicly.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm thankful that I don't have to do that. I

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>think the Jets are the right side. I think if

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I was a professional gambler, I would basically be like,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to take the Jets here because there's is

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>way too much value. I'm not a professional gambler, Thankfully.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I gamble, but not like this, so I will not

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>be dabbling in this. I would prefer just to watch,

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>but I eleven's too many points. Give me a total?

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Too many points, disgusting. Okay, the Raiders are hosting the Dolphins.

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders are laying three and a half, and the

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>totals forty five and a half. There are a ton

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>of question marks in this game. Tua may play, We

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm not expecting him to play. I mean,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>he's got the rib issue. You know, it's pain tolerance

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>at this point, but you know, you know, if you've

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>ever done anything to your ribs, like it's basically impossible

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to do anything, and he was carted off. You've also

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.439
<v Speaker 1>got the Raiders who have Derek Carr basically John Gruen

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>basically being like I think he'll play with his ankle

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>injury that he injured. At the very end, Josh Jacob's

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>probably not going to play. The Raiders are off to

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic start right now. They look dynamite, especially offensively.

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think here?

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 2>If Derek Carr was healthy and I knew he was

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent, I think you just go lay the

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 2>points with the Raiders as quickly as possible. Just because

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 2>of all the other question marks the Dolphins have and

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 2>don't I don't believe what I see. That's the other

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 2>problem though with the Raiders. It's my only trepidation with

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 2>them is do you believe are the Raiders good? Like

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.359
<v Speaker 2>do we think they're good or not? Like? Yeah, they

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 2>they came back and won that game against the Ravens,

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 2>but the Ravens essentially choked that game away at the end.

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 2>They should have. It's another one of those They should

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 2>have got so many opportunities to put the Raiders away

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and just couldn't do it for some reason. And then

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.879
<v Speaker 2>they go out and go into Pittsburgh and win that game.

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Henry Ruggs finally had a good game, which was great.

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I think they have two really unlike him with Brian Edwards,

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 2>are two very good second year receivers that I think

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 2>some most like professional fantasy guys are talking about. But

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if a lot of public guys are like, oh,

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Brian Edwards, But they have some really and with Darren Waller,

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 2>there's some really good skill position players there. And the

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins just like two got hurt last week, but that

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 2>defense didn't. Josh Allen just kind of viscerated them, So

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 2>it would be the Raiders for me.

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that once two went out like that,

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:30.959
<v Speaker 1>also just like we're well, we're well on the whole team,

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just kind of you know, Jacoby Brisset's a perfectly capable quarterback.

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Very tough to get in there when you haven't taken

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>any reps and anything like that. Yeah, I mean, by

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, I will say this, the conceptus line is

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>three and a half betting pros. The majority of the

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>lines that I see right here are at three and

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 1>a half, but there are a bunch of fours out there.

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a four and a half out there at Points

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Bet and Fox Bets. So it's all over the place

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I think that understandably, books are a

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>little uncertain of how to handle the injury concerns right

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>now as am I. So I'm kind of buying what

0:36:58.080 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing from the Raiders so long as Derek Carr

0:36:59.920 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is healthy, because I think a lot of it is

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>just Carr has been an underrated quarterback for a couple

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of years. Here, You've got like one of the best

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 1>tight ends in football in Darren Waller, and you do

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>have the playmakers like you said, Henry Ruggs can stretch

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the field. Brian Edwards underrated, Hunter Renfro's underrated, he's there

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. So with or without Josh Jacobs, I agree

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>with you. I just I feel uncertain about it, just

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because of obviously what we've got with all the injuries

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that.

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, keep your eye on it and just like

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of play a wait and see mentality.

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>If two is healthy. Out of curiosity, if he does

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>play in this game, do you think that the line

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>moves down from three and a half.

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I don't think it moves too

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:36.359
<v Speaker 2>much from there.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think, by the way, like we don't you know,

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it's unclear because they've really only had it now for

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this one game with fans there. But what the home

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>field advantage is like in Las Vegas? You know, it's

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a the people are crazy there, right like the fans

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are our raucous. You also got to go to Vegas

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and hang out for like three days when you're a

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>visiting team somebody who has done that. I'm sure you

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have as well, or maybe not. It takes a toll

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>on you, probably a young a young man, maybe in

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>your twenties, or thirties, you know, has an impact. But anyway,

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so I think, if anything, I probably do like the Raiders,

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm probably staying away. This game is going to

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be fun to watch. The Vikings are hosting the Seahawks.

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks are one and a half point favorites the

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>spread the totals an astronomical fifty five points. What do

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you think.

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I would side with the Seahawks just because of literally

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 2>it just comes down to they have the better quarterback

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 2>in this matchup, and I don't really know how else

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to read the rest of those teams at this point.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 2>The Vikings are a big enigma to me, and I

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know how to read them at all at this point.

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 2>But so and then the Seahawks always have their issues.

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 2>The defense is looking for us again, and Russell Wilson

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 2>is still running around like he always does, sometimes when

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 2>he needs to, sometimes when he doesn't need to, which

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 2>is the problem that some people think it is so

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 2>but just because of his talent on and the connection

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 2>he's had with like lock it right now and the

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 2>metcalf hasn't even really gotten going yet. Carson had a

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.959
<v Speaker 2>decent week last week, and I think that that gives

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 2>them the edge, and I'd probably bet the Seahawks here.

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you.

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I felt really bad for the Vikings, and I was

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Vikings. It was it was kind of my

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>best bet of the weekend, even though it made me

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>vomit right like to have them getting four and a

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>half and stuff like that. But you know, look, offensively,

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they can hang. They can hang with pretty much anyone.

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>As long as Alvin Cook obviously was banged up. He

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>went in and out, but as long as he's healthy,

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson is elite. Adam Feln still has gas left

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in the tank. Suddenly kJ Osborne is filling that void

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 1>left when IRV Smith Junior got injured. They can really

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>do some damage offensively, which is why the total of

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty five hi so high. It's really hard to take

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>it over on a fifty five. I'm not taking the under,

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that, but I agree with you. I do think,

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:00.879
<v Speaker 1>especially at coming off of loss like they did, never

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a rough loss for the Seahawks, I think they're going

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to put their foot on the gas and I don't

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to take it off in this game.

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with you, especially you know that the

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>point spread is one and a half. Doesn't really matter

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>at that point, so I will take it. Next game

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be good. The Rams are hosting the Bucks.

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>The Rams are laying a point, and the total is

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half. What do you think?

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I think? Yeah, you can't fade tom Brady at this point.

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 2>I think that's just even though they had they let

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 2>we mentioned they let Atlanta to stick around of that game,

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>probably a little longer than the Bucks probably would have liked.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 2>But Tom Brady has nine touchdowns and no interceptions in

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 2>his through two games and his age forty four season.

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 2>The defense is well. Gave up some yards to the

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Falcons last week. I still think that's a pretty good unit,

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'd have to Stafford's been fantastic and one of

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 2>the big bets I'm kicking myself for not making early

0:40:55.520 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 2>season was going to win MVP. The connection with the

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Cup is been has been so good. I'm kicking

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 2>myself from missing that one as well. But I just don't.

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the Bucks have a good enough offensive line

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.839
<v Speaker 2>to keep Aaron Donald at bay, enough to give tom

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Brady the time he needs to find his spots when

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 2>he needs to and they just have so many ways,

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Like Gronk looks young, like Antonio Brown is Antonio Brown

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 2>is going to go over his receiving yards total by

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 2>like week eight. Uh, Like Chris Godwin and Mike, like,

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 2>what are you gonna do? If there's a lot of

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the law problem they present a lot of problems.

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do I realistically, and I think that

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you look the Rams as good as they've looked. They

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>let the Bears hang around a little bit in the

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>opening game. They eventually put it away, but they let

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the Colts hang around. And the Colts are a very

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>very you know, solid football team overall, but they're not

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks and the Bucks right now, like real I

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>mean it really is with Gronk, who I really didn't

0:41:57.000 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>see this coming. I didn't really see it coming last year.

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I certainly didn't see it coming this year, giving his age,

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:04.240
<v Speaker 1>giving how much abuse when you have those four options,

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>like who cares if you can run the ball, Like

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>it really doesn't matter if you have those four options, right,

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to be remarkable. I'm not going near

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the total again, these giant totals. Dude, I just know

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't, Like I just can't.

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I can't.

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say, all right, let's go to Sunday

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>night game. The forty nine Ers are currently laying three

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and a half points to the Packers. The totals forty

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. Again, this game is going on

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. The Packers are driving. It's seventeen fourteen Lions,

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 1>great games. What do you think it's still Lions. Dude's

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>still lying. I don't have three and a half points

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 1>here with the forty nine Ers at home? What do

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you think.

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Probably the Niners like it's it's I just like we

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 2>can joke. We could joke and we could joke about

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Rodgers all we want, but it's just like it.

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 2>They're losing to the Lions right now. We're talking about that.

0:42:54.000 --> 0:43:00.720
<v Speaker 2>So I like the Niners haven't been what we've probably

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 2>what they've probably expected to be at this point. That

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 2>they've had some some good performances last week was not

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 2>probably what they expected. But against this Packers team, I

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 2>think I think it's got to be I think it's

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 2>got to be the Niners.

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>The fact that this is happening, and again, this is

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>great because it's live reaction and we don't know how

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 1>it ends. Maybe they win by twenty five points by

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the time. Maybe, but the fact that this is what

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is happening right now at Lambeau after they were embarrassed

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in Week one against the Lions is mind boggling to me.

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's crazy to the point where, unless something dramatically

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>different happens at the end of this game, I think

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you do have to take the Niners. It's gross. I

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to. And unless something crazy happens in

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this game, I don't really see the spread moving. I mean,

0:43:50.280 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it goes to three. I guess in spots it's

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>four at DraftKings where fours. Yeah, yeah, it's a lot

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of fours, So I really know if you get the three.

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>But it's disgusting. Let's to a game that everybody wants

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch Monday night football. It is the Eagles visiting

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. Cowboys are favored by four. The total is

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and a half. The four spread, which is,

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost the equivalent. Now quite again, there's some

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:14.800
<v Speaker 1>three and a half's out there, but the four is

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, like, I don't know, strikes me as

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a little high in this game for me, for the

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:22.399
<v Speaker 1>spread like, I'm surprised to see that four. I don't

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>know if you are, if you agree or you think

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's about right.

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's about right. I don't think you can

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.280
<v Speaker 2>make the cow like you get it under three points

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and people would just hammer the Cowboys, and I just

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.839
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles have been Jalen Hurts has been impressive so far,

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and the Cowboys, while they only gave up the I'm

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna say seventeen was it twenty twenty seventeen.

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Or whatever it was twenty seventeen, correct.

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Yes, twenty to seventeen. They only give up seventeen. I

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 2>feel like they should have given up thirty one in

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 2>that game. So we can't really take anything away from

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 2>that that point total there, and I believe Jalen Hurts

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 2>is the type of guy that can really do some

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 2>damage against that. Yeah, that Cowboys defense. It'll be interesting

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 2>to see how they deploy Micah Parsons against him. But

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:17.280
<v Speaker 2>if he's been he's been getting into the backfield quite

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 2>quickly and it's been impressive to watch so far. But

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 2>if he just kind of blows some assignments there, I

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:24.759
<v Speaker 2>think there could be a lot of running room for

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Hurts in this one, and I think he could

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.360
<v Speaker 2>be the difference. So I'd probably lean towards the Eagles

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:35.399
<v Speaker 2>in the and getting the points in this one. But yeah,

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Dak has looked great in his return, but the Dallas

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 2>defense is just too iffy for me.

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm taking the points, and I feel.

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 2>You feel good about it. Yeah, he was very confidently.

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh, I'm taking this points right now. I will

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>have fired on this the second we're done with this podcast.

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Eagles are completely live to win

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this game. I mean, I think they look at against

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a Lana and I get that it was Atlanta and

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>everything like that, but I think their defense is legitimate.

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 1>They've got some offense. They've got some issues again on

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the on the line and stuff like that. They lost

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Graham everything like that. But remember the Cowboys have a

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>ton of issues. You know, a Loile Collins is out.

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:14.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, they they've just you know, and and Dak

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>he does look good, but it's not perfect. Man, Like

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you watch some of those throws, there's

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>there's not the usual zip on some of those sorts.

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>He's still great, He's a phenomenon. The running backs are

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>both great Pollard is in there, Zeke is in there.

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Mark Cooper is a little banged up by the way,

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>which does you know not that that.

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Talking about zip though I don't I think Zeke has

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 2>lost some zip like he doesn't. He's still a great

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 2>running back guy like like you said, but he just

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have that I don't know, that second gear that

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 2>we've been used to him over that year.

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>It seems like, yeah, I'm I'm holding off for now

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to see how I feel about just but Pollard looks

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>great when he does look hard.

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah he does.

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>He really does, which he's earning those touches. But for me,

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.320
<v Speaker 1>what I really think is that I think the Eagles

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>defense is legitimate. I mean San Francisco certainly struggled a bit,

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know against it, and obviously Atlanta, and I think

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>that their offense is going to be able to move

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the ball pretty well. On this Cowboys team, I think

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to keep it close. So I think if

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you're giving me more than a field goal at this point,

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if you dropped to three and a half, I'd be okay,

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:17.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to hit it now. I don't think it's

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna drop because you're right. If it drops down too much.

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just going to be NonStop Cowboys, and I don't

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think the books really want that necessarily. But I'm taking

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles here. I feel okay about it, so that

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the bets. And again on Thursday. Yeah,

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a divisional game, right, it's always tight, like you know,

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so again one of these games that I feel pretty

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with my guesses, I'm going to take them on Thursday.

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It's my guest I need to dive into a little

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more when I talk about my best bets. You

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>won't be here for that, but I do hope that

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you will join us again later this season because I

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>enjoy talking to you. Your inside is great, and obviously

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you joined us on what is I assume the biggest

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>day in your country's history when you have this election day.

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But I really didn't even know what was happening.

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 2>So I see the results right now. The Liberals are

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:06.239
<v Speaker 2>leading right now, so that's justin Trudeau's party. They have

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.479
<v Speaker 2>sixty six seats. To the completely different electoral system here

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to the States, you have to win, you

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 2>win your riding. So I'm in a certain riding. I

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 2>am in a writing called Dartmouth Cole Harbor. I vote

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for the member of parliament. His name is Darren Fisher

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 2>in my riding. I vote for him, and a vote

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 2>for him is essentially a vote for Trudeau. Whoever gets

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the most elected candidates will will form government and they

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 2>need one hundred and seventy seats for a majority. And

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the Liberals are at sixty six, with the Conservatives at

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty six, the New Democrats at eleven, the Block Qubequa

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 2>at eight, and the Green Party with one. So there's

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 2>your betting pros Canada Election live updates.

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I understood about half the words of those sentences, so

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that'll be fine. But I'm sure it's a wonderful day

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for you. I appreciate you taking the time during this

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>historic day to come on here and taco love football

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>with me. I'd love to have you back in the show.

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>But before we get to there, tell everybody where they

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 1>could find more of you and your incredible work, which,

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you he like. Andrew's not like just

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a football guy. Andrew does everything. He's a great follower

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, but tell everybody about it.

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 2>You can find me on Twitter at Covers Underscore, Kaylee,

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 2>that c a l e y. I tweet Blue Jays

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:21.879
<v Speaker 2>picks every day. I admittedly I did it because I'm

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 2>a diehard Blue Jays fan and I just wanted to

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 2>see if that would benefit me. And that has actually

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 2>gone pretty well this year.

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I follow it I a lot.

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes, it's done pretty well, so I'm happy with that.

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 2>And college football has been has been a bit of

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 2>a disaster recently, so admittedly, hopefully we bounce back with

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 2>college football here this week. But yeah, I just I

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 2>love putting out content for people, and whether the picks

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:49.359
<v Speaker 2>are right or wrong, the research is always there. I'm

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 2>always trying to find those angles.

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>No, it's great. You do great stuff, honestly, over it

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>covers everyone, it covers those great stuff. But I do

0:49:57.200 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoy you as as a follow and I have travel

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your Blue Jays plays and they have

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been really good. So keep them coming across for sur

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>figures cross good luck man. I'm telling you as a

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Mets fan, no Yankees, whatever you gotta do, keep him

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:12.959
<v Speaker 1>out the playoffs. All right. So, as I mentioned, you

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>guys know at this point we'll be back later this week.

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe and Scott Bogman will be doing a college football

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 1>breakdown and then I'll be back on Thursday doing our

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Best Bets with the guests from Alex kloj Over from

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the Action Network. So again, enjoy the rest of your week.

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go watch the end of this incredible football

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>game where the Packers are just taking the lead, Like,

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:37.319
<v Speaker 1>who the heck knows what's happening? Man. Until then, take

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it ease. You can enjoy the rest of your week.