WEBVTT - Should Women and Men Handle Money Differently? #317

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How the Money. I'm Joel and I and

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt and today we're asking the question should women and

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>men handle money differently? Oh dude, I can't believe we

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>actually went through with this topic. I'd like to ask

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>questions that could potentially get me in trouble that we're

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>actually going to do an episode on this, But we

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, after discussion, you and I thought that there,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were definitely some insights that we can

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>glean from talking about how it is that men and

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>women might be handling their money differently. And then there's

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.319
<v Speaker 1>just so many studies to that inform us about how

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>men and women have handled money differently in the past.

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think, too, um, there's a way forward after

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we see that that information, and I think, yeah, you

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and I are gonna have some some good advice, hopefully

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to share for men and women based on the stats

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen and the studies that are out there.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna also do our very best to not

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>completely step in it, because that's what I feel like

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, is that we're about to step in it. Well,

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I promise we're not going to come at this from

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like a madman perspective. Okay, even though we do like

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a nice beverage during our work day as well. Before

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we get into that, though, you want to talk about

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this fence issue that you've got going on and my

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>hyping it up. Maybe it's not an issue. Actually, well

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.839
<v Speaker 1>it remains we seen whether it's an issue or not yet.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So at one of my rental properties, um my my

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>next door neighbor who actually have never met I we

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>used to live in that home. My next door neighbor

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>rent out his home and and so even when we

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>lived in that house, I never met him, but he

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>left a note on the door saying, hey, please call me.

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about some stuff. My tenant really

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that on over to me, and it turns out he

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to replace the fence that goes in between both

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of our yards. And I will say, the fence not

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>attractive and in sections it actually, uh looks pretty rough.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a chain link fence that's just yeah, has not

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>held up well over the years. But chain link fenstance

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>have definitely fallen out of favor. I mean, I'm not

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna lie. They're pretty hideous, Like we've got one on

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the back back side of I mean from a utility standpoint,

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty great. I mean it's like they will probably

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be there for another hundred years if you let it.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, well, this one definitely will not really know,

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's already kind of fallen apart in some spots, and

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, he wants to to replace it together. And

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>so we're in the midst of getting a quote to

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of see how much it costs and if it's inexpensive.

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>UM willing to jump in on this especially. It's just

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's I feel like it's the right neighborly thing

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to do. But I will say too, man, if the

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>quote comes back and it's too high, I'm not going

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to be down for it because it is something that's

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just not a high priority on my list. I've never

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>had a tenant complain about the fact that the fence

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't in perfect shape. And so yeah, it's kind of

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those like TBD as to whether or not, UM,

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, willing to go half and half on this fence,

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But my gut is telling me probably not. I don't know.

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that frugal or cheap of me? Ah? Man, This

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is such a hard one because so on one hand,

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>with it being a rental. Like, in my mind, that's

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the benefits, you know, of having a backyard

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>here in the city is the ability to have a pet.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And so for runners thinking, hey, I've got a pet,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I would like for them to be able to run

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in the backyard. To me, like, that's a selling point

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to having, you know, having a fenced in kind of

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>closed in backyard. Well, and they do actually, so interestingly enough,

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this fence is kind of up slightly raised on a hill,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and and so many of my tenants have had animals.

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>None of those animals have ever gotten out through the fence.

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's still does this job, okay, animals and

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>still climb hills though, right, no they can, but it's

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just it's it's not possible really to get through or

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>over the fence, even with like the disrepair that it

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>might be in. So I mean, okay, So the reason

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I say that because we found ourselves in a similar

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>situation years ago at our old house. Before we moved out,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we knew that we were going to keep that house

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as a rental, and the fence between us and our

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>neighbor was in complete disrepair. I mean it was like

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>literally there are sections of it that had fallen over.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It was an old wooden fence. It had completely rotted

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>out over decades of being exposed to the elements, right,

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And so in my mind, I was like, you know what,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to pay because in this case, this is

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a selling point I guess for future pendants.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean the fact is is it sounds

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like the fence that you've got there currently it still works, uh,

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And so I would have a tough time agreeing to

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>replacing something that still is kind of getting the job done. Um.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, dude, from a personal standpoint too, like I

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>know that's like, if any of my neighbors here like

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>next to us wanted to kind of go in on

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a fence, I'm not sure if I would say yes,

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>because I partly feel that fences are a little overrated.

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Sounds specifically thinking of our next door neighbors. They don't

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have any pets. We don't have any pets. Uh, They've got,

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of young kids. And if that

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>fence were to fall over or start to rot and

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to get rid of it, like I would

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 1>be totally okay if it was just one big open backyard,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I wouldn't even mind if their kids kind of,

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, played in our back yard a little bit.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I feel like this is like one of

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>those expenses that it's found its way into our culture

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, oh, you've got to have a fence,

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.280
<v Speaker 1>or if there was in every yard, or if there

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>was the fence there, you have to replace it, right

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Whereas I want to ask the question of like, well

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>do you actually need to replace it, like is that

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>something that that you could do without, because it's not

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like I gain a lot of joy from the back

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>that there's a fence between us. And so I think

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>in my mind it kind of depends if it's Yeah,

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>if it's an investment, property or rental, I would lean

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 1>more towards making sure that there is a functional structure

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>there between homes. But if it's me personally, as long

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>as they don't have a dog, like I don't want

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a dog running over pooping in the yard, that would suck.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise fences might be overrated. All right, I think

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, And yeah, well I'll wait and see

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what the what the quote comes back out, Yeah, if

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty low estimate. If it's reasonable, then I

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>might um jump in on this, But my natural tendency

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is to say, now, the kind of crumby fence is

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>mostly doing its job, still gets it done, so let's

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>just leave good enough alone. I actually still want to

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>see how that fence is falling apart, because in my mind,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>channeling fences, they don't fall apart like I mean, they're

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>made a metal. All right, I'll show you some pictures. Yeah,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's not mentioned the beer that we're having

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>on the show today. This one's called on Cassette. It's

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>my new Anthem. This is a brewery out of North Carolina.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>They make excellent beer. So looking forward to sharing this

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>one on this episode with you today, Matt. But let's

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>get onto the subject at hand. We're asking the questions

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>should women and men handle money differently? And Matt, I

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think part of the reason that we decided to tackle

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of sensitive topic this week is because Valentine's

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Day is coming up this weekend. We figured we'd create

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>an episode that discusses the differences between how men and

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>women handle money. There will, of course be some generalizations

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in this episode. We want to get that out of

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the way upfront. Many women buck the trend and handle

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>their money very differently than how studies show, And we're

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be quoting a lot of studies in this episode

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Brace Yourself, Yeah, and vice versa two. Right, there's a

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of men who handle money a whole lot different

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>than studies show as well. I think there's a general

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>belief that men shoot from the hip when it comes

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to money, and some of the surveys bear that out.

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>But that's obviously not the case for all dudes either.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think there are things that we can learn

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 1>from the data about the tendencies of each sex and

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>their views and actions in the realm of personal finance. Matt,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we want to have an open combo today essentially about

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the pros and cons of how men and women stereotypically

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>handle money, so that we can find some common ground

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and then all start to make better financial decisions based

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on the information that's set in front of us. Yeah,

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And and you know you mentioned the research,

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad you did, because I mean, that is

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna be looking at. We're gonna be looking

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at surveys, reports, research, um. And even though these studies

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are focusing on individuals tweets, maybe some tweets, maybe no tweets. Uh, Like,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention that we're we're not necessarily downplaying

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there are like structural issues within like

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>our society and within employers, right like specific companies that

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>lead to some of these some of these differences between

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>how men and women are treated or how they handle

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>their money. Right, Like, there are certainly changes that need

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be made in different steps that companies and you know,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>our society as a whole need to take to make

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sure there is more parity. But I mean, this is

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>how the money and so what we talked about, or

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like personal changes we can make in our own lives.

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not necessarily looking at policy. We're not looking at

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>some some of these larger issues that are a part

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the equation. Yeah, but it is important to acknowledge

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that they exist and say that's, you know, part of

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the deal here. We are gonna and some of the

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>stats that we're going to convey in this episode are

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in part related to some of the structural problems that

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>exist in our society. Yeah, man, you know, it's also

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>important to note that COVID man it has had an

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>even greater impact on women than it has on men. Uh.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about the swords the end of

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>last year, but an overwhelming number of women have left

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the workplace since spring of last year, in large part

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>due to the child care needs of their families. Women

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>are leaving their jobs at a rate four times the

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>rate of men, which is crazy. And a recent Fidelity

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>study found that thirty nine percent of women who haven't

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, made a change yet are considering a change

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to their work situation, you know, either leaving their job

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>or you know, maybe reducing hours due to COVID. And

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the same study estimates that taking a short career hiatus

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>could cost upwards of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in future wealth. Yeah, and so it's just some wanting

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to note that these decisions have implications beyond just money.

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, but it's you know, worth noting that

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>many women find themselves in an even more precarious financial

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>position right now. Yeah, man, I think too. As we'll

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>see in this episode. Part of the problem isn't that

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>women are worse with money than men. That is, I

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes there prevailing narrative, but that's not actually true,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think actually, when we dig into it, we'll

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>find in many of the scenarios we're gonna talk about,

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>women actually have a better concept of how to handle

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>their money, and they actually handle money better in practice too. Yeah,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>they do a better job. Yeah, ultimately that that's that's

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly part of the takeaway today. And but one of

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the issues that women do struggle with more than men

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is the level of confidence that they have when making

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>money decisions. There was a study of small business owners

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>from the University of Cambridge, and they found that fewer

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>women admitted to their business prospering compared to their male counterparts,

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>even though their businesses were experiencing a greater level of profitability.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So women their businesses were doing better, doing great, but

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they just couldn't admit it. They couldn't they didn't have

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the confidence to say that that was the case. And

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of it was, um the the opposite, a

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>little too much bravado in the case of the mails

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in that survey, right. But I think one of the

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>things that we want to talk about today on this

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>show is you know, you and I both want to

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>see men and women exude confidence in their money choices,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and confidence is tied to knowing what you're doing. You

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can be confident when you know how the game is

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>played and you know the next steps to take, which

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is Matt just such a big part of the reason

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you and I started How to Money. So we want

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people to have confidence to make the right moves with

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>their money. And I feel like the feedback we get

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>from so many of our listeners is that that's the

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>impact that the show has had. People who didn't otherwise

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>know what to do. They now have a playbook and

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that breeds confidence. Um, and that allows them to go

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>out there and start kicking but with their personal finances, absolutely, dude. Yeah,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and and and so one of the reasons too that

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about this today, uh, and why we feel

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>this is so important is that hopefully this gives us

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit of insight into the inner workings

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of our spouse or our partner, you know, a little

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>window into how their brain functions. I think that better

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>understanding of why our significant other thinks the way they

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>do about money can be helpful in future money discussions

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and decisions. And plus two, you know, hopefully it has

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>further reaching implications as well. You know, the more known

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and understood someone feels like that's gonna lead to them

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>feeling more cared for, more loved, which is only going

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>to result in a stronger relationship. Yeah, knowing our partner's

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>tendencies is super helpful in how we approach them with

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>discussions in particular about money. Maybe we'll be less combative

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>when we're bringing up the topic in general because we

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>better understand, like where they're coming from. Also, Matt, I

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think knowing the money tendencies that each sex is prone

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to it can actually help us teach our kids to

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>handle their money better versus using outdated methods of instruction

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 1>that may be led to some of the disparities that

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we see in financial outcomes for men and women. Currently,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>families look different in one than they looked thirty years

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>ago or even just a decade. Stats show that we're

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing far more stay at home dads and more women

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>bringing home the bacon. And that's awesome. So let's make

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>sure that our sons and daughters received the identical lessons

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to money. And I think, Matt, sometimes

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in the past, um that that wasn't the case that

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>young girls and young boys were taught differently about how

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to think about money and personal finances. And I think

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in today's day and age, they need the same lessons

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>because they're both just as likely to go out in

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, they're both just as likely to own their

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>own business, to be saving for things for the future,

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and to be investing for their retirement, and so they

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>need all of the same personal finance knowledge poured into

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>their lives as youngsters. Yeah, I mean, the reason that

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they're just as likely as also too, because they're just

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>as capable, right, and so you know, another I guess

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>reason too that we feel this is important is because

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we you know, we hope that listeners will be able

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to handle their money better by being able to recognize

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>certain patterns and tendencies, you know, regardless of their gender. Uh,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>you might realize that you don't fit the gender stereotypes

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as we discuss them in that's totally okay. And in fact,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you said, you like this might be

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. And if you, you know, if you

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>do find yourself nodding your head, you know, when we

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about how your gender does typically handle their money

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>at least in some of these studies, well, then this

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>episode will be eye opening. Uh As, we're gonna talk

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about some important instructions as to how you can move forward,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll get to some of the specific ways

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, men and women might handle their money

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit differently, but then specifically what you can

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>do about that, and we'll get to all of that

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>right after this break. All right, we're back from the break.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We're asking the question today, should women and men handle

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>money differently? Matt? The answer to that question is gonna

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>mean now. But there there's so much information that we

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>came across creating this episode that we feel is important

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to share, and I think it sheds a lot of

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>light in how men and women have historically handle their

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>money differently. And then I think, you know, you and

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a way forward for all of us together

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that we want to get to. There was a book,

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt that I never read, but I remember it was

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>so popular a couple of decades ago called Men Are

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>from Mars, Women or from Venus, And that just sounds

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like a book from a bygone era. I don't know

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's still sold in books are, so I'm sure

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you can find it like he use bookstore or something

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. That also makes me think of like t

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>G I F on Friday is like going home watching

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the four shows? Which one was your favorite? Hanging Mr

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Cooper or boy Meath world Sabrina to the Teenage which,

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, that was a classic to a big fan

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of that one. Um. I obviously never read by the

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>way men are from Mars women or from Venus. I

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really because you're like ten probably came out exactly,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but you could tell by the title that the author

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was highlighting gender differences. And while men and women do

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>have far more in common than the author probably would

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>like to admit who wrote that book, there are some

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>really important divergences that are worthy of our consideration. Yeah. So,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>first of all, let's talk about how you get money

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, and that is you earn it

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>right uh. And according to the Pew Research Center, women

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>earned of what men earned in eighteen Uh. That pay

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>gap is shrinking, particularly for younger workers, which is a

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>positive trend, but that is still a meaningful hurdle to overcome.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>The pay gap is partly due to to work history,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, like having kids as great you know, but

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned with the Fidelity study earlier, taking time

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>off to have kiddos like it often leads to fewer

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>job offers and worse income prospects. Not to mention that

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the years of not generating in any income, which often

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>reflects years of not investing in a workplace retirement account,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in particular if there's a match there, right, And those

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>are some big disadvantages to overcome. Yeah, like you said

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, Matt, that stat also reflects some structural

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>issues when it comes to male and female pay. But

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>here's another thing to Matt. When we're talking about pay,

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>women are actually often averse to asking for more money

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>than their male counterparts. There was a survey from ron

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Stop last year. They found that sixty percent of women

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>have never negotiated with an employer over pay. Women are

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>also more likely to stay at a lower wage job

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to according to the personal finance website The Balance. And

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not good, right, because even just a small bump

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in pay with a new employer or in a job

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that you've been in for years, can have just a

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>massive impact on your ability to earn more throughout the

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>years and then also save more for retirement. So I

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>think of all of the things in this episode where

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we see maybe you know women as a sex falling

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>short it is in the ability to ask for more

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>knowing what they're worth. Yeah. Again, this is another instance

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>where you might be listening and you're thinking, I've never

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>had a problem negotiating a race, right, Like I've never

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>had a problem asking for more money. And so again

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it's important to keep in mind that though the research

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>shows us, like we know anecdotally that this doesn't apply

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to everyone. I'm specifically thinking of two. We had a

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Kirsten and Julian Saunders, the couple behind Rich

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and Regular. Uh. That was episode eighties X, and Julian

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>was just bragging about how great Kirston is at negotiating,

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Like evidently she's just like the Queen of negotiating more pay. Uh.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>So if you have to listen to that episode, go

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to that one. Is it regardless of

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>your gender, earning more, It's just so important, right, and

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>all of us could stand to up our abilities on

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that front. Uh. And We've had lots of different conversations

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>on the show that specifically cover, you know, not just

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>stories of individuals negotiating, but just how to go about

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>doing that. I'm thinking of Remiet Sadie, And that was

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>back in the episode one ten and he outlined a

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>great process, a great method. Uh, you know when it

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to wanting to up your salary, you know, like

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what steps you need to take in order to negotiate

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a solid raise. Yeah, I'm thinking to you, Matt. When

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we had far New Sharabi on the show. She is

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>just awesome personal finance expert. Um. And at the same time,

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>she is someone who has made a killing as a

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>small business owner. She knows her worth, she knows how

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate. Yes, So, like you said, there are many

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>women out there who are crushing it, who don't have

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a problem in asking for what they're worth, who don't

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>have a problem asking for a raise. Um, it's just

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>when you read those statistics, there are obviously a number

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of women who do, though, and I want to see

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that number changed for the benefit of women as a whole. Right,

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about spending. To do women spend more? That's

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question. My wife, personally, Matt hates to shop.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like she just defies the stereotypes. And I actually,

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't mind shopping a little bit more.

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Rolls are a little bit reversed. Yeah, exactly. But there

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>was a study by the Wharton School of Business that

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>found that women are more likely to view shopping as

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a recreational activity. My mom definitely fits that bill. But

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>most men want to leave the store with their purchases

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>quickly as possible. But even though women enjoy shopping more,

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it turns out men still spend more than women in

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a typical year. So while men might not enjoy the

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>process of shopping as much, they still like shopping just

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>from a utilitarian standpoint. Sure, yeah, well, so that increased

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>spending that actually dies with the stats as well. There's

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a survey from wallet earlier this year, and they

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>show that men are more likely to max out a

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>credit card. Women are apparently seven percent less likely than

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>men to have maxed out a credit card at least once.

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And so while women, you know, they might enjoy the

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>shopping experience more than men do, a lot of different

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>stats show that women are more cost conscious, you know.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>They they're more likely to shop at outlet stores, more

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>likely to wait till something they want is actually on sale. Uh,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they dig store brands more than men, and so you know,

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to spending. This is kind of this.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>This is definitely a win in this category for sure.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Uh and so I kind of see this as a

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>call two men to stop spending so much dang money,

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>especially on name brand items. Fan. Yeah, I feel like

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm totally guilty of this. I totally fall into the study.

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to go looking for the best deal

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like I do because I know I'm spending less, but

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like I'll look at maybe two or three different sites

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I just purchase right. Whereas for you, like,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you are so good at like hunting

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and making sure you're keeping your eyes on the best

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>deals out there, making sure that you're spending the least

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of money possible. And I feel that's something that

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we all need to sure that we're doing right. And so,

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, regardless of who you are, we should all

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>work to just become a little more conscious and how

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it is that we spend our money. Yeah, and I

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, Matt's I don't care whether you're a man

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.239
<v Speaker 1>or a woman, but store brands should be high up

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>on your list because they're gonna save a ton of

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton of money. It's just like built in savings

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>when you go for the store brand under the name

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>brand equivalent, unless it's your craft beer equivalent, and you're

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>wanting to spend a little bit more on something because

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it makes you feel nice. Yea, you just can't name

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>brand everything, though, I think I think sometimes that's a

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>tendency here, maybe that men have, uh, that men just

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>gravitate towards the name brand no matter what it is,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>without thinking about it. And and that's where we need

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to shake things up, right, we we we need to

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>consider store brands more frequently. Um. And also too, I

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>think we've talked about this, that the quality of store

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>brand items has gone up a whole lot in recent years.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Here it comes a Kirkland signature brag. There's other ones too,

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>man like Target has um some great uh store brands

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that are better than their name brand equivalent sometimes. So yeah,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not just Costco, but yeah, Costco rocks too. All right,

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's talk about saving as well. There's more good

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>news here. It turns out that the savings rate for

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>women is actually higher than their male counterparts. They save

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a higher percentage of their pay uh. They spend less

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of what they bring in, and much of that is

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>due to the more frugal tendencies that we just highlighted

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about spending differences. But even though women

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>are saving a higher percentage of their income on average,

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>they've actually got less than of what men have in

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>savings accounts according to data from the Federal Reserve from

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago. That is likely due to the

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 1>fact that overall, they're still making less like we discussed earlier,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>which means a smaller amount of money uh saved overall. Yeah.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons women have a higher savings rate

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.239
<v Speaker 1>as well, um is that, according to a survey by

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>US Bank, women of all ages value financial security more

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>than men do. But here's the thing, man, that focus

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on financial security can often backfire if you keep more

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of your overall assets in savings and CDs instead of

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>invested in the stock market. Right, Like, savings for saving

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for long term goals is really important, but so is

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>investing for the really long term. And so that's actually

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna talk about next. We're gonna talk about

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>investing right after this break, a break still tackling the

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>tenuous subject of men, women and money, how they handle

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>money differently, but then also how we can all think

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>about money in a similar way, because we're really all

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>in the same boat when it comes down to it.

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And let's talk specifically about investing for a minute. There

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>was a study from black Rock that found that women

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>find less joy in managing their investments. I found that

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting that that just like women care less, they're less interested,

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>less intrigued by investing. And honestly, I think that's okay,

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and and interestingly enough, I think that can even pay

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>off for women. I think a lack of interest can

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have a positive benefit. So we'll talk about that in

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a second. I hope everyone listening to this podcast, regardless

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of their gender, starts to gain an interest in all

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>things money and finds joy not just in saving their money,

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but investing and growing that nest egg. But let's talk

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>about how a tampered down enthusiasm can actually be more

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to your investing success in the long run. Yeah,

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about joy, right, And so this is

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like where where men might have a little more enthusiasm,

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>a little more a little bit more joy when it

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to managing their portfolios could actually lead to maybe

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more misery the stock market in general,

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and frequent trading specifically have historically been more of an

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>obsession for men. Kiplinger has reported that men trade stocks

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>much more frequently than women, and the more frequently UH

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we trade, the worst our investments are going to perform. Uh.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Men are are getting a little too into investing by

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>by getting into individual stocks. You know, it's important for

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>us to take calculated risks like these are things that

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 1>we need to do in order to see growth when

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>its specifically when it comes to our portfolios. But when

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>you take too much risk and when you're too involved

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market and specifically when you're not exactly

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>even sure what you're doing, that is going to lead

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to worse performance. Yeah, we've talked about that before. Maat

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the more frequently people trade, you might trigger tax consequences.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>You are in all likelihood going to be paying a

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>fee when you're trading stocks or ETFs as well. There's

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just so many things to consider, and the more movement

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you make in your portfolio, in all likelihood, the worst

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to perform. Another thing too, when we're talking

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>about investing and how women and men respond, well, an

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>important thing to consider is that women live longer than men.

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>About five years longer on average, according to stats from

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the CDC. So that means that they need to plan

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to invest for a longer time horizon. That includes a

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>greater willingness to invest more heavily in stocks and if possible,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>putting aside even more in retirement funds. And I know

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that that's actually hard, Matt, considering that. You know, we

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>just talked about how women earn less on average than

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>man and yet they're going to live longer and they

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>need to save and invest more of their money. But

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's so important in particular for women to be aware

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.479
<v Speaker 1>of this. I'm thinking about my the mall who's ninety

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and she's having to make decisions about her financial future

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and she might still have ten, twelve, fifteen more years

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>left to live, and planning for a longer lifespan means

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>investing early and often is just even that much more important. Exactly. Yeah,

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And so regardless of your gender, having savings is great, right,

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it's crucial. But remember that inflation is the

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>enemy of your savings account, Like, that's the real enemy here.

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Over the past few decades, we've seen inflation right at

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>two and a half percent, and regularly investing more of

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>your income that's gonna give you important options for your future.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to be able to preserve that money

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have it sitting in a savings account that's

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>not earning that inflation rate. On both ends of the

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>spectrum are sort of these extremes that we want to avoid.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We can't completely avoid investing, but we also don't want

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to become, you know, so preoccupied by it that we

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>end up shooting ourselves in the foot because we're jumping

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in and out of the market. We're trying to time

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it where you know, we're dabbling in single stock investing

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>when we don't know what we're doing. Again, it's hard

0:25:58.560 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>to find that balance. But that's what we're trying to

0:25:59.920 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>do here on how the money. Yeah, I think in particular,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>investing is a place where men and women can both

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>learn from each other. We can all stand to have

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.239
<v Speaker 1>some enthusiasm when it comes to investing, but not too

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>much that causes us to go too complex with our

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>investments or too disinterested where we don't invest at all. Right,

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a healthy approach to investing that both

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>men and women should be taking that looks pretty similar,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think to Matt, like knowledge breeds confidence. It

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter who you are. The more you know, the

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>more likely you are to make the right decisions for

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>your own financial good and for your financial future, and

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're in a relationship. Right both individuals need

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the confidence that more money knowledge provides. Too, smart and

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>savvy partners coming to the table to tackle their money

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>goals together is going to have a really important impact.

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Trying to be the lone ranger managing your family's finances

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>with a completely disinterested partner is going to lead to

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>some unhealth I think in the relationship. And I don't

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's that you both have to be just as

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>interested or just as committed. It's okay if you're spouse

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>is more fascinated by the realm of personal finance than

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you are. But at the same time, I think it's

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>really important for both members of of that couple to

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to sit down together and talk about money,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and both of you to have a say in where

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that money is going. I think some of these statistics, Matt,

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that you and I have been relaying in this episode

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>actually reflects a level of unhealthiness that has taken place

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to gender differences in how we approach

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>personal finance. And I would love it if in our lifetime,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if in the coming decades, we start to see men

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and women, both sexes, handling money better, each of them

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>having a seat at the table playing more of a

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>role in family finances, because I think, as we see,

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there's like a balance that's needed when it comes to

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>gender dynamics and personal finance. Yeah, and we're looking for

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>balance suit not just between couples, but just even within ourselves, right,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, like ultimately men and women, like they don't

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>have as opposite of an approach as the headlines might

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>make it seem. Uh, it's not like one gender is

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>better than the other, you know, when it comes to

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>how they handle their money. Men and women, they might

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have some different psychological and historical societal norms to overcome

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to achieving their financial goals, but the

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>actual path that we, you know, take his individuals should

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>look more similar than dissimilar. It's important for everyone to

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 1>have the right financial education and the tools necessary so

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're able to make the right decisions for our future.

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the numbers, we could all do

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a much better job when it comes to our personal finances.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, when it comes to our money, I feel

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we need a sort of our renaissance

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of personal finance, interest and education in our country in

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>order to raise the tide for everyone. And I think

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we could all be doing a better job when it

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:40.959
<v Speaker 1>comes to our money. Yeah, I think you're right, man.

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately the answer to the question should men

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and women handle money differently, I think the answer is no.

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We should all be working to earn more money and

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>know it or worth. When it comes to our jobs.

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>We should all be looking to spend more cautiously with

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the money that we have. We shall be saving more diligently,

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and we should actually be investing and get interested enough

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in it to do it well, uh, and to do

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it consistently, but not so interested. They were like Yosemite, Sam,

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to you pulling the trigger on you know,

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>random investment sales and stuff like that. But hopefully this

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 1>episode provided some perspective when it comes to maybe some

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the tendencies that you experience in your own life

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>with how you handle money and some of the ways

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to to move forward in a positive way. Most definitely, man,

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's shift gears. Let's get back to the

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>beer that we enjoyed on this episode. This one was

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>called on Cassette and this is a beer by a

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>new anthem and they are out of Wilmington's, North Carolina.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>What were your thoughts on this beer? Dude? Man? This

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was a delicious I p A. A little velvety some

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>night like peach fuzz actually going on. And I was

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like soft in my mouth like that. I get that

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it was slightly sweet, but it also had enough hot

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>bitterness that I just really appreciated. I think a lot

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 1>of the new I p s can be overly sweet,

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but this one still retained some bitter hot character that

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I really like having in a beer. But it offered

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 1>that inside the package of something that was more juicy

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and sweet. And so yeah, I like the combo going

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>onto the time. Yeah, that's right. So this was a

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>double I p A. And you know, it's it's not

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like this is a bitter, like a West Coast bitter

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I p A, you know, And so like for that reason,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I like, I like to describe it less as bitter

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and more as like sharp, you know. And so I

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like the hot flavors are really sharp and pungent.

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It was like so pungent, like it's almost smoky, like

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the because of the hot presence that was there. I've

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned this previously on the show before, but like it

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 1>truly does remind me of like that pungency that you

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>get with like a blue cheese, where you put it

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>in your mouth and you feel like it's kind of

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fuming a little bit, Like you can kind of feel

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it in your sinuses a little bit. And I feel

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the characteristics of these New England I

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>p a s U I can. I feel like I

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>got hops in my sinuses, which is would also probably

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty good name of a beer. Somebody will

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 1>probably do it at some point. But but yeah, man,

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed this one. Glad you and I got

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to shared on the episode. Uh and yeah, New Anthem

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they're just always making some really good beers up there.

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And I realized too, this is the actual first New

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Anthem beer I think that we've had on the show.

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I looked in our little beer catalog expecting to see

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe this one, making sure that we hadn't had it before,

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't see that we have had a single

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>New Anthem beer, which is really confusing, Like maybe we've

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>had a collaboration before with them. I don't know. I

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think a listeners send us a beer from North Carolina

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>one time and it was a collaboration beer and I

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think New Anthem was the other brewer in that or

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>like they showed up and helped out Yeah, yeah, putting

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it out. It's been a minute though, so I don't remember.

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, it was a good beer. Glad we

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>find we got to have a legit New Anthem beer

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Um, and that's gonna do it for

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this episode, Matt. So, for our listeners who want the

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>show notes for this episode, some of the links to

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the studies that we mentioned, you can go

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to our website at how to money dot com. Yeah,

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that's right up there on the website. We have a

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of different resources and also on the website if

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you go to how do money dot com, forward slash

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>do better. If you want to leave us some feedback,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if you have some thoughts to share in particular on

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a topic like we discussed today, If you have whether

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a personal story or or an anecdote, or just

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>anything else you would like to put in front of us,

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>We would love to hear from you. We're always interested

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in hearing what our listeners have to say. Just drop

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>us a line and then again that you r L

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is how do money dot com Ford slash do better? Alright, buddy,

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>let's gonna do it for this episode until next time.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Out, Best Friends Out,