WEBVTT - Pitching Ninja joins FT to cover Miz, Melton & more + Dodgers checkup

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk to Pitching Ninja Rob Freeman right now. Check

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>out all his content Pitching Ninja everywhere, all the socials, YouTube,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole deal.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Rob.

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Great to catch up again. Man, Let's start with the

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>mizz right because he's the cy young front runner I

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>can't say the word in the National League. So gets

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the two hundred k's in a unique way. He's dealing fastballs,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what was it twenty one in a row to start

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>there against the Twins and then the one hundred plus pitches,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So what else impresses you?

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean I was watching the game and going like,

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 2>are we do we know what we're watching right now?

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Because for the first fifty five pitches yesterday he threw

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>eighty five percent strike so we're not talking about a

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>dude who sprays it around. I was like, what do

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>you do? You got to either hope to survive until

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>he leaves the game or hope he gets tired, which

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>he kind of did later on in that start. But yeah,

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of mind blowing. I don't think we should

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>ever lose lose consciousness of what is going on, of

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>what you're seeing.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Bro.

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>First of all, nice seeing you since I saw you

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>in Philly didn't introduce me to your family.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 4>That's okay.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 5>I can't blame you. I introduced I wouldn't introduce myself

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 5>to your family either. It's fine, nor well let that go, Rob,

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 5>But my wife, how good? I mean, you know you said,

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 5>we don't know what we're seeing. How special is what

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing from the miz I mean one hundred and

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 5>two hundred and three hundred and four, right, and then

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 5>when he needs to, he just goes slider and guys

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 5>swing at it obviously like it's fifty miles an hour

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 5>because they're geared up for one hundred and five. So

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 5>where would you rate this on like the special scale?

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 2>It is way up there. I was actually I've been

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to think of that. It's like the Peter Martinez

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 2>years when you're talking about like a zero point seventy

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 2>three whip and just destroying guys. It's kind of like that.

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>And for me again, it's the command that's just amazing.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like de Gram at his height of his at

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the height of his powers, but like SA's de Grom

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>two point zero and he does everything so easy. We

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 2>just need to like just appreciate this, get that.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the numbers are the numbers are impressive strikeouts. But

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 3>so you watch his start in LA, not just the

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>one they just added, the one in LA where he's

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.839
<v Speaker 3>complaining about the mound. Is that just a glimpse into

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>the fact that this guy's actually landing on a different

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I think you tweeted about it. He's landing at a

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 3>different spot than everybody else. Like you talk about people

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>in the game that are changing different things, is there

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 3>other things that he's like just that much different, not

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>just one hundred and five miles an hour.

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's actually you know, his pregame obviously, the

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 2>way he warms up is unique. It's a little schemes like,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>but his movement is so efficient at his height, so

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 2>he's a combination of really long limbs but moves like

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a smaller guy and with that added strength. Again, to me,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 2>it's he just has put everything together. This is a

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 2>dude who throws absolute flames at the height of his powers.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 2>You know, can he get better? He told me he's

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna try to hit one oh six. Let's see, is

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 2>it worth it?

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Is it worth it?

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Because the name that you just brought up, de Grom,

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 3>everyone would be like, no, rob somebody else, like somebody

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 3>that made all their starts. So is one hundred and

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 3>six is one hundred and three in the first inning?

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Is it worth it? Or are we going to have

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 3>a short, short window to watch him throw?

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Excellent question. I mean if you look at somebody like,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 2>we all go back, how hard to Nolan Ryan throw?

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>People say, whatever, he threw hard for a long time.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 2>There are guys who throw hard for a long time,

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 2>but there are also guys who don't. And you know,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 2>to me chasing one oh six while you'd go down

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 2>in history, is it worth it to risk injury? Probably not,

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a competitor, you want to be the

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 2>best at whatever you do. The one thing I noticed though,

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean I had a stat today that I tweeted out.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 2>If you look at his his slugging against fast over

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 2>one hundred versus fastballs under one hundred, it is huge different.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean we're talking about like one seventy slug on

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 2>fastballs over one hundred and five hundred slug on fastballs

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>under one hundred. So his velo does matter. He does

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 2>want to throw hard. But then again, is it party

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 2>you mean you hit? Don't you get accustomed if you're

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>seeing it all the time, and then a ninety nine

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.559
<v Speaker 2>looks slow, but a ninety nine could look really fast

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 2>if you settle at a different level.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 3>You know what they're slugged against is when he doesn't

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 3>make a start though, yeah, does exactly.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I Yeah, totally agree, And he's he's the weapon. Like

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 2>do you want you want him to pitch against the Dodgers?

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Don't you?

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 4>You do?

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 3>You want him to pitch against whoever you're facing, But

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 3>you want him to pitch. You want him you want

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 3>to go to the yard and know that every five

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>days he's going to And Nolan Ryan. Everyone talks about

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Nolan Ryan. I just read Tim Brown's book on Nolan Ryan.

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>I was I'm part way through your book on Unhittable,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 3>and it's it's almost a contradictory story the both of them.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>And the reality is the mi is ain't making any

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 3>money in this game unless he does what pitches and

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 3>so anyway, it wasn't even a question of a cop.

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah no, And I totally agree with you, Like the

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 2>biggest ability is actually showing up in it's pitchabillity being

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>in the game, right, So there's a fine line, like

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>they're doing a good job of maybe stretching him out

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>between starts and making sure they're not putting too much

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>on him. But you need him. He is your weapon,

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and do not do anything to jeopardize that.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Agreed. I agreed, Rob, And it'd be nice with him

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 4>if it was him in Schoogle. But we can't talk

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 4>about that anymore because the burs tried. Okay, the Brewers tried,

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 4>and we're not. We're not going to talk about that. Uh.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 5>Another guy that used to be this weapon, Paul Skeins.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 5>What's happened to Paul Skins? His Velo's down? Is the

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 5>rest of his numbers or have gone way up? What's

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 5>going on? What do you see with Paul Skeens? Because

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 5>last year he was Jacob Mazerowski and now, oh does

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 5>vie He's not dude.

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 2>He's like the showcase of my book Unhittable too, because

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 2>there's a bunch of things he's done that have been fantastic.

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>He is like the one thing I've heard batten around like,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 2>people are going is he injured or is he saving

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.239
<v Speaker 2>himself for his contract year and just back it off saying,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I just don't want to get hurt.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think either one of those are true. Based

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 2>on his mechanics, it looks a little bit like he

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 2>may be just in a slump. He may one of

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the things that you see, like his pregame workout when

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 2>he's doing the water bags and all these these twists,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>is sometimes you overdo it, like things that worked at

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>one point that helped correct things. Maybe you get stuck

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>after a while and it doesn't go on forever. You

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>don't get better forever at it. So it could be

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>that his body isn't just synced up perfectly, and he

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>could fix this in the off season, or it might

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>snap together in a start. But his fastball is still

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>playing really well. We're not talking about Kyle Hendrix here.

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about a guy who Garrett cole trek school

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 2>ball level. Like he's still throwing hard.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Is it one pitch though? I mean, he's still throwing hard.

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>That's why I said the other day it's a mile

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 3>and a half difference. It still should be effective, But

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 3>isn't it his slider. Isn't the shape of his slider

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>way way different right now?

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>To me, it's more of the stuff that's going armside,

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 2>like he is getting shelled on stuff going armside, so

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>his splinker isn't dropping as much, his change up isn't

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 2>moving quite the way he wants it. And if you're

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a hitter and you know that his sweeper is really

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>hard to hit, his fastball is still playing as well

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>as it's ever played. So I don't think he's a

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>guy that necessarily needs to throw, you know, one hundred

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 2>miles an hour to get hitters out. He's really good regardless,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 2>But hitters are just looking for stuff to go armside

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and saying, you know, I can deal with that because

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>it's splinker's dropping less and his change up's moving less,

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>so just look out there.

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I know this is a busy time of year for

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>many of you, including AJ. When you're home, you need

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>everything to get done fast with quality.

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely. That's why Factor meals are perfect for me. Ready

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 5>in two minutes, healthy, premade, protein, all the things I like, vegetables,

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 5>They're all mixed into one and it's quick, easy cleanup,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 5>Don boom, I'm full, move on to the next task.

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 6>No prep, no cleanup.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Every week, you'll find over one hundred nutrient dense menu

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>items to choose from and new options like salmon burgers,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>shredded pork, and much more. Plus add on Jill crave

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:29.239
<v Speaker 1>like pumpkin flavored cheesecake and protein shakes. Let's eat real.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Head to Factor meals dot com slash foul fifty off

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>and use code foul five zero off to get fifty

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>percent off and one free breakfast item per box for

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>one year while supplies last until ten thirty one twenty six.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>That's code foul fifty off at Factor meals dot Com

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Foul fifty off Factor meals dot Com see website for

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>more details.

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 3>You talk about in your book about how the journey

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 3>with your son trying to learn all this stuff and

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 3>you just learned so many different things. Do you feel

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 3>like a guy like schemes knee to look at the

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 3>shape of his pitches and then try to sync it

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 3>up where his mechanics are or does he need to

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 3>first say okay, it's his mechanics and then the shape

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.239
<v Speaker 3>of his pitches will change.

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 2>You know that's they're both connected. So to me, I

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>would look at the shape of his pitches because he

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>can continue to throw the same velo. I don't think

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 2>his velo like if he's throwing ninety seven he's going

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to be okay, but the difference in velo between that

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 2>and his off speed pitches has empressed a little bit,

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>so you know that you're not you know, if the

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 2>difference in your change up is now a mile and

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a half slower than it used to be, the gap

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 2>is a little less, Hitters can sit on it a

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit better, it's moving a little less, so to me,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>it's pitch shape. And you know, he can tinker with

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 2>all this stuff in the off season. I think there

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>are probably simple mechanic things, mechanical things that can get

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 2>him back where he was. But I'm you know, he

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 2>is far from broken his expected stats, which you're not

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>paid based on your expected stats, and your team doesn't

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 2>win based on your expected stats. But you can see

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>how his stuff is playing against real hitters, and his

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 2>expected SATs are still pretty good.

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was expected to hit a thousand, but I

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 3>did exactly. I can take those and throw him out

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 3>the window.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Another guy that has incredible stuff that aj Hinch has

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 5>talked about. I know last year when I did the

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 5>Seattle Tiger Series was Melton. Okay, Melton stuff is ridiculously good.

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 5>Troy Melton if you haven't seen this guy pitch.

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>And last year they were like Hinch was saying, oh man,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 3>this guy's going to be a stud for us.

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 5>He's kind of in a hybrid role. They started him

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 5>and his stuff was ridiculous. Now he's kind of starting

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 5>looks like to take that next step. How good can

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 5>Troy Melton be for the Tigers?

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for bringing him up, because I think he

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most untalked about players in baseball.

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Tigers fans know him, but everybody should know Troy Melton.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, those stats speak for themselves. A one four

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 2>six era, and I thought his change up is filthy.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 2>He's got a cutter Peter that I mean, Peter gets

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>on you. So yeah, I love this dude. He's pitching

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 2>beyond his years too.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 3>One of the things you mentioned, Ajsa, you can't talk

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 3>about the Schoobol trade, but I will Scooble for It's

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 3>less about schooball and more about what the Brewers may

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 3>have had to have given up. Logan Henderson, do you

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>feel like that would be fair if the Brewers had

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 3>given him up based on what you've seen from Logan Henderson.

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 2>Logan Henderson is really good. Like I get it. It

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 2>all depends on how you value winning a World Series

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 2>this year because obviously a Schooble miss combo, who's going

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>to beat that? Like, that's an unbeatable combo. But for

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 2>the future, I mean, I think Logan Henderson is a

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 2>valuable piece for the next several years. And I mean again,

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 2>another guy. Another guy's stats speak for themselves, and they

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>do have a rotation that you know, even without Schooble.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to go against them because their bullpen

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>also shortens games.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, it does.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Kept looking Anderson. That was their decision, Rob, So we

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 3>all will see how it goes. We'll see how it goes.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers School in Atlanta with Salamam, with Chrissale.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Too many lefties, too many lefties, Rob, they needed, they

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>needed Tyler Mollin.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so they too many lefties. You can't have two

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 4>lefties pitching in the same rotation. That's against the rules

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 4>of baseball.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, god forbid, especially when the Dodgers have a Toannie

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Freeman Muncy all those lefties in the lineup.

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Kyle Tucker, No, we don't want two lefties. We want righties.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 5>But anyways, well, let's get off, Scooble. I've taken enough

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 5>abuse on Twitter.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm feeling sorry for myself after all the abuse on

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Twitter saying the Brewers should have got them.

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to a couple of things to happen this. Yes,

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 4>thank you, Thank you. Rob.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 5>Next time, just introduced with your wife. Maybe she'll give

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 5>me up. Thanks Mssus Freedman, nice to meet you. But

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 5>Sale and Zach Wheeler had some interesting things happened. Chris

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Sale obviously the ball hall and I've never seen this.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 5>Usually it's once you're declared, you stay and which I

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 5>don't understand, and then we're going after you answer that question.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 5>I want to talk about Zach Wheeler because I have

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 5>seen this before.

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the Sale thing. Love Chris Sale. I mean,

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, technically sure, whatever you have, maybe you have

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to declear every hitter. I don't know that it's crystal clear,

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>but if you do, He's never had to do it

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 2>in his entire career, and I've never seen anybody do that.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 2>So this is an umpire who wanted to prove that

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>he knew he knows the rules, and kind of he

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 2>did that throughout the game. I thought, and yes, if

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you go fifty six and a fifty five, you're technically speeding.

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 2>But if you get pulled over by a guy when

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>you're going fifty six, I'm going like really, like really,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And I love that he got ejected here because this

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>is what you should do. Fire the team up, Chris Sale,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 2>he's awesome.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Agreed, Agreed.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, I once got ejected before a game started,

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>so I know how it feels.

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't a starting pitcher though, so it was fine.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 4>It was fine. It wasn't a big of a deal.

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 4>But I love Chrysale.

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 5>I taught him, well, so if you got a day

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 5>you're not starting, you want to get ejected, go for

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 5>it and pay your five hundred dollars fine, thousand dollars, fine,

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 5>and move on. But again the umpireson just said, hey,

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 5>we screwed up. Let's put the guy back on third.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 5>There was a pitch throwing. It wasn't that ball hit.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 4>It was nothing exactly. It was not super super stupid.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 5>Now the Zach Wheeler thing, right, he's pitching off the rubber,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 5>is he?

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Though?

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 4>But I did see Ted Lilly do this.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Ted Lily used to go like six to eight inches

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 5>in front of the rubber when he would go in

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 5>the wine, if he'd go like this and then he'd

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 5>move his back foot if it was like here, he

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 5>would go this far forward and then throw the pitch.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 5>And we kept telling the umpires and they just never

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 5>would do anything about it. We're like this dude literally

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 5>jump takes it. When he goes over his head, he

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 5>take moves his back foot. It moves like six to

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 5>eight inches off the rubber. Now he's off it to

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 5>a side. Okay, But I mean I was always told,

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 5>as long as a piece of your cleat is touching

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 5>the rubber, you're fine. I don't know ted Lily was

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 5>a little different because he went forward.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I noticed this with Wheeler two. I think it's like,

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 2>come on, how much it doesn't give my ton of advantage?

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Move over in inch that'll be okay. But yeah, I

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>talked to Nolan Ryan about it. Nolan Ryan, you know

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>dude who threw absolute flames on mounds that were little.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Eh.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>He moved in front by like six inches. Umpires didn't check.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>So could you imagine like Nolan Ryan throwing heaters throw

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>from six inches closer? Kind of not fair, But it's

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>been going on for forever, like this is just baseball.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Little things. You try to get an edge. Maybe they

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 2>push him back a little bit.

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I played with a reliever that would come in and

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 3>cover the rubber up with dirt so he could start closer.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, he was a different cat.

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 3>But Kevin Gosman is this was this one of the

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 3>trades that you go when he goes this new team,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to see how they handle it because of

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the trade, because he ended up throwing more splits than

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 3>what did you say in the last six years.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's the probably the change I would

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>have made, too, Like his splitter is one of the

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>wonders of baseball in the modern era, Like he is

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 2>a it's filthy, So I would throw it more often too.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 2>You throw your best stuff more often, and.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>That's the only change that you make. Or do you

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 3>feel like there's something else mechanically as far as like

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 3>a lower slot where he's releasing that splitter from.

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>It is really hard to make mechanical changes during the season.

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I hate that. I mean, it's the same thing I

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>was worried, Like, I think schemes fix himself in the

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>off season. I think you can play with things in

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the off season. I would just go based on pitch

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 2>mix and just make changes that way and say, hey, dude,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 2>throw your best stuff more often and see what else

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 2>snaps into place once you do that, versus making specific

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 2>changes lower on your arm angle whatever. Gosman knows his

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>splitter better than any pitcher knows any pitch, because that

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>dude gave me a twenty minute dissertation on splitters and

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 2>all the things he's tried, and it's on YouTube somewhere,

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's absolutely mind blowing. Nobody knows their pitch is

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 2>better than Kevin Gosman.

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, smart guy, really well spoken too. So he

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>was acquired by the Cubs along with Clay Holmes. We

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked to you, of course since the trade deadline,

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and a ton of starting pitchers move that are going

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to make an impact down the stretch, and a lot

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of guys moved that can start playoff games.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 6>What did you like? Give me a name or two.

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Where you're like, I really love that acquisition for this team.

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 2>You know, I know that people are going playing the

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Braves that didn't do it a lot, but I like

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>the Tyler Maley ad because I think he's a really

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 2>good pitcher and can give them, you know, value deep

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 2>in their in their rotation without having to do much. Obviously,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 2>schoolbol jumps out to you. But like the Dodgers needed

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 2>any more stuff? You know, those were really the two

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and the people that did the team that didn't decide

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 2>to make moves I thought were interesting.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 6>Yep, no good call.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>What about one more padres with Mees and Robbie Ray?

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that'll work out?

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I mean I I do like Casey Mies's stuff.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to keep getting better and better.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean I remember him back in college. Even dude

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>is a pitcher, knows his stuff, and I think that

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 2>is a really good ad. And Robbie Ray's is a

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 2>pro like he's going to give you innings.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, Rob, good catching up and yes, a reminder of

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone to check out his book.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 6>Just look up at Ninja and you can give it

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 6>a look. Rob. Great catching up, man, Thanks for the time.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Great catching up. And I'll make sure my wife says

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 2>hi next time, Aje. I will make sure I introduced her.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, if she walked up to me and said hi randomly,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 5>that would be really awkward for you and for her,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 5>not for me, because I would make it totally not awkward.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 6>But missus Ninja exactly.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Missus Ninja, I'd be like, whoa, Marc me.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 6>I like it? Hey, Rob, good stuff, man, thank you talk.

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:31.959
<v Speaker 2>So take care, guys.

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Science experiment for the one minute we have to tell

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you about why we love Quint's electrolytes, including watermelon salt,

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>raspberry salt. And I'm holding a citrus salt, just opened

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it and to pour some powder into my water.

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 6>Shake it up and AJ, why do you love it?

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 5>I love Quints because after a long night out, a

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 5>long day at the gym, a long walk in this

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 5>Florida humidity, it tastes great and it gives me all

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 5>the electrolytes I need. Why sugar free, steavy of free

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 5>keto approve and taste sweet because of that delicious fermented rice.

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>It does taste really good. I'm drinking it right now

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>while we talk about it. It's also made in the USA,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>rigorously third party tested, give your body what it really

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>needs to stay hydrated. Go to quints dot com slash

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>foul for free shipping on your order and three sixty

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>five day returns. That's q u I ncee dot com

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>slash fu l for free shipping and three sixty five

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>day returns quins dot com slash foul. These statements have

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>any disease. Yes, right now, he covers the Dodgers for

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>The Athletic. He's also part of a good Dodgers podcast

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to check out, and we'll let him talk about that

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>coming up in a moment. Bobby, I'm great to have

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you on the show here. And what are you watching lately?

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>A team that doesn't have it all, at least not

0:19:58.600 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 7>Huh, yeah, especially not offensively. They are not playing well

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 7>and I think it starts with the offense. It's obviously

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 7>a great rotation at this point. They're about to have

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 7>two multi time style young winners in the middle of it.

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 7>But it doesn't really matter that much if you can't

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 7>score runs, and that's been kind of the case of late.

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's been ugly. Hey, can I want to go

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to Edwin Diaz first?

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? They do stink?

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Aj is Edwin Diez Okay, I mean he missed a

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>good chunk of the year. Is he Okay, I saw

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, some people pointing out the arm angle

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>dropping significantly.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 6>What are they saying about him?

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 7>They're saying that it's less to do the arm angle.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 7>The fastball velocity's been better since he's coming off the

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 7>elbow surgery, but the slider's just not there, and it

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 7>hasn't been there before the surgery hasn't been there since.

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 7>And the blown Stacey's had have been because he gets

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 7>to two strikes and he can't get guys to chase

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 7>or swing and miss the slider. The walk off home

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 7>run he gave up on Friday, he came on a

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 7>hangar of a slider, like at the end of the day, Like,

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 7>if he can't get the right shape or command on it,

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 7>then it's hard to really make it effective. I don't

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 7>think they are a concerned long term about it, but

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 7>it's one of those things that they have to figure

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 7>out now, just because you're at this point in the season.

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 7>You have to know who you're to trust in October.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 7>They paid him to be their closer in October. But

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 7>he's got pitchwell first, okay.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's a couple of things.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 3>He only has ten innings, right, he didn't get to

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 3>go to spring training because he got hurt, so they

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 3>rushed him back.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 5>Clearly he wants to be there, so let's give him

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of time. We always say, oh, guys,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 5>rush back. They missed spring training, they missed this. We

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 5>need to give him time. I mean, I'm sure he

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 5>went on a rehab. It's not the same as being

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 5>in a big league Game's not the same as a

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 5>big league spring training. So let's give him a little

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 5>bit of time. But he did get out of a

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 5>run around third no outs the other day. It's not

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 5>like I mean, he's incapable of doing some stuff. I mean,

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 5>back to back triples against the Diamondbacks. If you didn't

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 5>see Corby and Carroll running, he got a triple down

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 5>the left field line.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 4>That might be the fastest I've ever seen a dude

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 4>run around the bases.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, that Diamax team can really put a lot

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 7>of pressure on you. But yes, I think ideally they

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 7>want to just get him on a run, and he

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 7>hasn't had that obviously. Like you mentioned, he kind of

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.959
<v Speaker 7>has stopped and start starts the year. Even now, like

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.479
<v Speaker 7>that was Friday night, was his first time having to

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 7>hold a one run lead, he's only allowed. He's only

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 7>had one scoreless outing since he's been back, so they

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 7>want to give him some time to work through some stuff.

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 7>It just comes at a time where obviously they're not

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 7>playing well as a team, and to have him blow

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 7>two straight saves when they're in the middle of this

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 7>giant losing streak, it just didn't sit very well in

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 7>terms of just like adding to the number of issues

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 7>sort of compounding for this Dodgers team. I don't think

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 7>there's a long term concern with him, but I do

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 7>still think that they need to see him kind of

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 7>go on this extended run these next two months.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 3>How important is that buy for the Dodgers. How important

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 3>is the playoff by in the first round.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's incredibly big. I know, I've kind of said

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 7>it ad nauseum this year. It's the oldest position of

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 7>player group in the majors at that point, Like it's

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 7>gonna matter to avoid those two extra games. Obviously they

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 7>won the World Series last year having those two extra

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 7>games against the Reds, but still you would rather have

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 7>it than not. Understand, you could set up your pitching staff,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 7>not that there's a wrong way to set up your

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 7>pitching staff if they're all healthy. But like that saves

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 7>you from having to use Trek Skuble for an extra start,

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 7>or Blake Snell or your snowbody got Moto for an

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 7>extra start, and you can line up where you can

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 7>have youa Moto on his optimal rest, where you can

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 7>sort of set up when you want Shoeotani to pitch

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 7>if he does pitch at all for you. So having

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 7>that buy just gives you so much freedom to sort

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 7>of optimize how you want to line things up for you.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 7>And also you just can feel safe knowing that you're

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 7>in the NLDS. You don't have to fight for your

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 7>life just to get there.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 3>The reason I asked that is because if Edwin Diaz

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 3>continues in this direction, let's say till the end of August,

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 3>so you know, a fourteen day type of period, do

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers feel like Tanner Scott can be their closer

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>that he stepped into kind of in that role in

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and out doing well. Do they feel like he could

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>be the guy for them if Edwin can't step up

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 3>and figure this out.

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 7>I think they're gonna give him a shot, Like they

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.719
<v Speaker 7>paid him to be that guy last year, and obviously

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 7>they won the World Series with Tanner Scott not throwing

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 7>a pitch for them in October, partially because of injury,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 7>but like that's the guy that they trust. Also to

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 7>remember that if they are full strength as a rotation

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 7>in October, then all of a sudden you're looking at

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 7>a bullpen that would have Justin Rabuski, he was an

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 7>All Star starter this year, a Roki Sasaki who stepped

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 7>into that closers rolling in a lot of ways for

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 7>them last year in October. So those are two guys

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 7>who all of a sudden become late ending options for you.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 7>But yeah, they have Tanner Scott, who they have a

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 7>lot of trust in. Alex Vesia has been quietly one

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 7>of the best relievers in baseball since twenty twenty one

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 7>since he arrived in LA. They have other late enning options,

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 7>but they did sign Edwin Diaz to be that guy.

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 7>So they're gonna give him, i think, at least through

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 7>the end of the regular season, just to get on

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 7>a run to figure it out. Obviously, become October, then

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 7>the decision has become a little bit harder if he

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 7>hasn't thrown the ball better by.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Then, fabe and you mentioned a little bit their age, right,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 5>is they're concerned this team got old quick? I mean

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 5>their age is old, Okay, I mean they're depending on

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 5>how you look, they're the third oldest or the oldest,

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 5>depending on what cage you want to use.

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 5>But Freddy's up there, obviously, Mookie's getting up there, some

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 5>of these Kik's getting up there, Munths, he's getting there,

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 5>all up there like for baseball ages, right, Kyle, even

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Kyle Tucker, you can throw him in there now for

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 5>even though I don't think he's old, but people say, oh,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 5>he's round thirty. That's old for baseball.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:27.959
<v Speaker 5>So they have a lot of guys that have been

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 5>through some battles, they played a ton of games. They're

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 5>having now a hard time catching up the fastballs. Is

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 5>age just caught up this team real fast.

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if it's like a long term like

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 7>they are going to be old in October, but definitely,

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 7>I think you can feel some of the impact of

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 7>how long their seasons have been in twenty four and

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 7>twenty five right now. I think it's you saw this

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 7>last year where in July they go through a seven

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 7>game skit and they really aren't looking good. And yeah,

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 7>funny how you mentioned Kyle Tucker maybe being one of

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 7>the old guys. He was signed to be the young guy,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 7>like they to be the guy under thirty in this

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 7>lineup along with Andy Pajis sort of helped the Dodgers

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 7>through these summer months. Tucker has not been the guy

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 7>that they expected him to be so far the season.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 7>He had a good road trip, so maybe he can

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 7>finally sort of get some momentum going forward, but they

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 7>haven't gotten the production that they've wanted out of Mookie Betts,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 7>out of Teoscar Hernandez, and out of Max Monzi this month.

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 7>They obviously have been the most consistent hitter all season,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 7>but it's been a down month for him. So all

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.239
<v Speaker 7>those things combined, there just isn't the floor for this

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 7>offense that you anticipated them having. Like, especially when you

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 7>have as many stars as they do, you kind of

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 7>are banking on okay, even if they're not hitting well.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 7>There's a baseline level of production if one of these

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 7>two guys, or one or two of these guys can

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 7>sort of help carry you for a while, And for

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 7>a stretch that was Otani and Freddie Freeman both guys

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 7>did not have a great weekend in Arizona, and I

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 7>think you saw like they scored seven runs in three games,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 7>like they did not have a good offensive weekend. So

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 7>they are looking yet they're not hitting the fastball well.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 7>Their OPS is below but I think seven hundred on

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 7>that pitch since it started July. And they're seeing more

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 7>fastballs than anything in baseball right now, and they aren't slugging,

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 7>they aren't getting big hits with runs and scoring positions.

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.719
<v Speaker 7>They just aren't doing a lot of anything well offensively

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 7>at the moment. I don't think it's a long term concern,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 7>but like you're seeing it every single night, how much

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 7>of a strain it's putting on this pitching staff.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>This is that time of year, aj it is Baseball's

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>time to shine, and it is sea Geek's time to

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>shine with MLB tickets and finding the best pricing seating

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and games that are even sold out available on sea Geek.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely if you want to go to the biggest matchups

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 3>coming up.

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 4>We have Yankees clubs coming up. Where's Yankees Red Sox?

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 4>That means stuff.

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 5>Again, there's some big moments that are coming up here

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 5>in the as the penachases really heat up. Go to

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 5>seke can find those green tickets with the best deals

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 5>and get yourself out to an MLB game.

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and they're straightforward with you.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>They will actually put a red dot next to a

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>ticket that they don't feel is your best look. Green

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>dot means very good code for you. It's Territory ten

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>ten percent off your next set of MLB tickets at seakeek.

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That's ten percent off MLB tickets when you use the

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>promo code Territory one zero. Make sure you click the

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>link in the description to download the app and have

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the code automatically added to your account so you can

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>use it later.

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 3>I know it's a team game, but let's narrow it

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 3>down a little bit. All those struggles you just said,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 3>who is the most concerning about? Who are you most

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>concerned about? Because if you consider in the playoffs, Andy

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Payes was a defensive replacement. If you're leaning on Andy

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Payes like it was a different look last year in

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 3>October by what he did in that time, and he

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 3>struggled since the first half. But who is the most

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 3>concerning or the most important to get hot for this

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 3>offense to be where they want to be?

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 7>For the offense be consistently good. I'd say it's and

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 7>I think it's been a season long thing. Like they've

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 7>been really good, even without Kyle Tucker swinging the bat well,

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 7>But like he this is the time where he kind

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 7>of has to get going. You look at it where

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 7>this has just not been the type of season where

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 7>he's even really looked like the Kyle Tucker he was

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 7>signed to be. Obviously he wasn't the contract figure gets

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 7>thrown out. He was signed to that contract because it

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 7>made sense for the Dodgers to have a short term window.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 7>They were willing to pay much higher AAV than maybe

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 7>he's worth, just knowing that you can sort of lock

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 7>him in for a short term deal while still not

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 7>blocking any of your outfield prospects long term. He just

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 7>hasn't been the kind of setting presence that they needed

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 7>him to be. I could say Mookie Bets. Obviously the

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 7>struggles were really concerning, and he has probably the lowest

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 7>ops of any of these stars, but they also won

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 7>a World Series. Mookie Bets not swinging the bat all

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 7>that well, and I think defensively, as long as he's

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 7>providing solid shortstop defense, it keeps the ops around like

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 7>seven hundred. I think the Dodgers will live with that

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 7>with Tucker, like he was signed to solve a lot

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 7>of problems for them, and he hasn't done that. I

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 7>I haven't seen even an extended stretch of two week

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 7>stretch where he swung the bat pretty well. So I

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 7>think they're still waiting for that, and if that comes

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 7>in September October, a lot of the conversation about how

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 7>bad he was maybe in his first season with the

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 7>Dodgers kind of goes away, especially because he was signed

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 7>to play in October, not necessarily to get them through

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 7>the regular season.

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 4>How much worry is there about Pies?

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 5>This is the second year in a row now where

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 5>he's had really good first halves and kind of the

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 5>second half has been kind of a downhill slide.

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Is there concern about Andy Pyees?

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 7>I don't think so. I think obviously had a good

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 7>weekend where like he's hit the ball hard a couple

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 7>of times, had the home run that was the go

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 7>ahead home run on Friday. I think the approach that

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 7>he has naturally is going to let itself to some

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 7>peaks and valleys. I think they're hoping to kind of

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 7>stave off the valleys being as deep as they've been

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 7>this season. But he's always going to be a guy

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 7>who when he's going right, it's because he's aggressive, and

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 7>when he's not going right, it's because he's aggressive. Like

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 7>this is just kind of who he is as a hitter,

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 7>and some of the struggle with fastball, Like Pa is

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 7>not a great fastball hitter either, So if the whole

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 7>team's getting pounded with fastballs, it's not necessarily going to

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 7>lend itself to Paz finding a lot of success. But

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 7>I still think that the defense provides such a floor

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 7>for them. As long as he can sort of do

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 7>better than he did last October when it was I

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 7>think four for fifty one in October. As long as

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 7>he can provide a little bit more than that, I

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 7>think they're fine in terms of having him there. And

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 7>I think he settled into that second spot a little

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 7>bit better than people would think, especially considering some of

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 7>the other options that they've had at the spot. He

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 7>at least has been somewhat of a more stating presence

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 7>beyond and showing it atany in the order.

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Does it seem like the Dodgers believe Dalton Rushing will

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 3>make it back this year or are they hopeful that

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 3>when he starts throwing after his few weeks off, he'll

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 3>be able to make it back.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 7>I don't think he's gonna catch this year. They haven't

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 7>flat out said no, but like when we have Dave

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 7>Roberts about it last week, like where the odds he

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 7>does catch again this year and they say very unlikely.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 7>So they're gonna keep him around like as possibly as

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 7>a hitter. And I think they that sort of speaks

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 7>to the fact that they would like to have a

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 7>left handed hitter on their bench co October. They're pretty

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 7>much exclusively right handed at the moment. But I don't

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 7>know is Dalton Rushing that left handed hitter. Do they

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 7>give a shot to a guy like Alec Thomas, who

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 7>was sort of acquired to be that Justin Dean type

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 7>off the bench and has had a really nice season

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 7>in TRIPAA offensively. I think they are looking for another

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 7>left handed bat off their bench sort of balance some

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 7>things out and allow you to maybe get some more

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 7>days off for certain guys in the lineup who they

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:34.239
<v Speaker 7>kind of have to run out there every single day

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 7>because they don't really have an alternative at the moment

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 7>on their roster. So the roster's a little clunky right now.

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 7>Adulton Rushing is the guy that they have felt really

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 7>highly about what he's been able to do this season,

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 7>his first full season the big leagues. It's unfortunate that

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 7>the injury kind of happened just as he was really

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 7>kind coming to his own on both sides of the ball.

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 7>And maybe they do keep the bat around because he

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 7>has that thump in there, and he's obviously a really

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 7>good hitter and he's shown that this season. But I

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 7>don't think if he does contribute to the Dodgers again

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 7>the season, I don't think he'll be behind the plate.

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 3>What about Schoobl's pitching a night for the Dodgers at home,

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>making his home debut for the Dodgers.

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 4>The what's the Dodgers philosophy?

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.239
<v Speaker 5>Because I'm always I'm always fascinated by this when they

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:19.719
<v Speaker 5>bring in a new pitcher like Trek Scooble, especially midyear,

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 5>do they let him go out there and pitch the

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 5>way that he's been pitching or do they does Mark

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 5>Pryor and the pitching people jump right in and say, hey, Terrek,

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 5>I know you've got back to back side Young's but

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 5>we think you could be even better if you did

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 5>X y Z.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 7>I think with established guys at school, it's a lot

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 7>more of like the slow drip, like you let him

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 7>sort of get comfortable, understand like, this is a guy

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 7>who has dealt with a lot this year, like whether

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 7>it be the arbitration case, the elbow surgery, the trade.

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 7>Like he's been open about how emotional he was after

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 7>that deal, understanding that that's the only other team he's

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 7>ever known in Detroit. So I think it's a lot

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 7>of letting him get comfortable, letting him figure some stuff out,

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 7>understanding and having a lot of trust and faith and

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 7>he knows what he's doing, and if they see something

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 7>over time, they'll say something and slow drip some stuff

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 7>in there. But it's been a lot of Hey, Terrek,

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 7>like you you are the guy that you've kind of

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 7>always been. Especially he still on the ball, probably will

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 7>since coming off surgery. The ra is still under three.

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 7>He looks like Trek's schooble. There's a lot of like

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 7>letting him sort of get comfortable. There's gonna be some

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 7>integration of how the Dodgers do things, but at the

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.919
<v Speaker 7>end of the day, like you acquired Trek's school because

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 7>of what he's done, and like they're gonna let him

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:28.919
<v Speaker 7>keep doing that the rest of the way.

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll conclude with this just to make sure there's not

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>too much negativity for the back to back champs. Do

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you think that there's some overreacting going on amongst whoever?

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>It could even be the team, It could be the ORG,

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>It definitely is fans during a stretch like this when

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they've gone through stretches like this pretty frequently. Or do

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you feel like this one's different? And the follow up

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 1>is do you think there are any teams or what

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is the one team in your mind that really poses

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the biggest threat from a matchup perspective in your mind

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to actually slay the dragon in October?

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I only there's like anything that's like pressing long

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 7>term concern for them. So I think at the end

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 7>of the day, like maybe there is some overreaction. I

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 7>do think that these are possible warning signs if they

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 7>don't get better. But I do think it's one of

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 7>the things where there's a lot of trust and faith

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 7>in a group that has won a lot of baseball

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 7>games together and at the end of the day. They

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 7>are going to come out of this eventually, and when

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 7>they do, maybe this is a point where you're sort

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 7>of looking back in October like, Okay, this is when

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 7>they maybe figured some stuff out. So I don't think

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 7>it's a long term concern. And in terms like guys,

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 7>like teams you're kind of watching, like maybe it's recency

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 7>biased having just watched them, but that Cubs team is

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 7>really built well, that they don't really have a lot

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 7>of holes. That middle up the middle defense changes so

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 7>many games for them. I love to their deadlines. So

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 7>if I had to pick a team that I'm kind

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 7>of watching the rest of the way, it might be

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 7>the Cubs.

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 6>Okay, yeah, I like that one. I like that call out.

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks for the time at The Athletic for the

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>articles and Dodgers Collective for the podcasts, right Jerry Harriston

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Junior on there, and Doug Dodger Doug right on.

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 6>There too, Hug Can yes, yeah Can yeah. Nice?

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, good catching up, Thank you for the time.

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Good to see you talk scene.

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, thanks for having me, guys,