WEBVTT - Interview Only w/ Faiz Shakir - Is The Democratic Party’s Future More Progressive?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, arteisonal pastries, and

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and a new protein box. I will tell you I

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have done the gluten free box. I have done it

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a second time. I have also used the code the

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>todcast code. You use the promo code toodcast at checkout

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I really dig this.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesion bakery in your

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it. It is

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>worth giving Wildgreen to try. Right now, Wildgrain is offering

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>my listeners thirty dollars off your first box plus free

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>croissants for life. Come on when you go to wildgrain

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today. That's

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants for

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast, or

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>simply use the promo code podcast at checkout. This is

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>And joining me now.

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Is a senior advisor to Bernie Sanders, but also the

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>head of executive director of a of a progressive media

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>organization called more Perfect Union.

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 2>It's my core.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I've known Faz a long time and one thing that

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you about Faz is he.

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>He can't spin. It's it's I think it's.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>His most endearing quality, which is why so many of

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>us reporters like dealing with Faz. He is a truth teller.

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>He has very He certainly has his opinions, but he's

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>not a very good spinner, meaning he's not he doesn't

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>like the bullshit people.

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And so the.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Point is is you don't have to feel like you're

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>deciphering what he's saying to my questions. It will be

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward. I hope you take that as accomplished.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate that, and obviously it goes back to why

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>we got involved in politics in the first place. And

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 3>ideally it's not enough for spin or the tactical approaches,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>but rather some conviction.

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, you actually usually get pretty frustrated by it. I'm curious.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever had clients get frustrated with you that

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't do that?

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Thankfully, the people I've worked for have not gotten frustrated.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.839
<v Speaker 3>Harry Reid was a truth teller, you know, very kind

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 3>of classic way, and Bernie Sanders for John Podesta and

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>people like that who generally just appreciated my approach. But

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that if there are many politicians who could

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 3>potentially get frustrated, who might probably wouldn't work for.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>So this is sort of an interesting political environment we're in, right,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>You can look at it just through the lens of

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're hoping progressives have a better shot. You're

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at and tactically things couldn't be better for

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the left right. The opportunities are across the board, but

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>there's it feels that there's something right. There's it's the

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party feels very divided and sort of arguably leaderless.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It is worth noting you ran for the Yeah, you went,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and most of the time when you're the party out

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of power, it's you usually are less your your lead.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Your leaders aren't usually very well known. But in this

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>case it feels very leaderless. I do want to remind

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>people you ran for DNC chair in the race that

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that elected Ken Martin. I am curious at that rate,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>if that position opens up before the end of the year,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>would you run again.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't believe so. I mean the reason that

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I ran at that time that wasn't because I thought

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I went, but because I had a case that I

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 3>wanted to make publicly about the direction of the DNC.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 3>And as I watched Ken Martin try to struggle through

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>what I think we're foreseeable understandable challenges that you have

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>a bureaucracy, that you have to navigate and if you

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>don't come in like a bull in a china shop

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to change it, that the bureaucracy will capture you. And

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I think what I was trying to argue for at

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the time was that you have to have a clear

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 3>mandate coming in the door of what you want to

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>do and have people understand it and vote upon that.

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 3>If you don't, you'll get stuck. And I think he's

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 3>a good person stuck in a bad system. And you

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 3>can see right. I mean, the only thing he had

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>really firmly campaigned on was that the state parties would

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>get additional funding, which he has delivered, but he has

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>also put them in some difficult straits which I know

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 3>he's working his butt off to try to fix.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>No, that's a great way of putting it.

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It does feel as if that he just he doesn't

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>know how to deal with the system.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think he'd own it and tell you. I mean,

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 3>we've had some candid conversations between us about you. My

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 3>own desires would be to lay out an agenda for

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six on the Democratic Party side, to say

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 3>here four or five things we're actively going to go

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and campaign on to compel that kind of a conversation.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he necessarily sees it as the DNC role.

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I think Schumer, Jeffries, the leaders of the Democratic Party

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>right now don't want to necessarily campaign in that kind

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 3>of direction. They think, if Trump is burying himself, why

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>put anything out there affirmatively for a vision. And so

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 3>you've got a bit of a play dead philosophy and

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>mentality that is governing much of the Democratic ranks. And

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 3>for those of us who are trying to reinstill the

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 3>brand to be definitionally about something, it's an uphill climb

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 3>right now. It explains partly why Bernie Sanders so popular

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 3>within the Democratic Party right now, why in a leaderless place,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 3>why he is probably the most popular Democrat and elected

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>official in these because he's definitially about something affirmative.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're you're getting into something that I think is

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the real challenge for the party, and I just don't

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>think they have the leadership to do with the challenge

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>right that at the moment. And that is, Look, the

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>party's got a massive brand problem. It's still there. The

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>new NBC News poll. As bad as Trump is, as

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>unpopular as this war is, the Democratic brand is in

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>worse shape than the Republican brand. So that is, you know,

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that is the one thing at sort of which what

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is different from twenty eighteen.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 2>That is the one difference.

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Now it may not matter in this midterm and because

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>of what you just describe the play dead strategy, which

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>is and you know, let them this is ropen dope, right,

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>let them punch themselves out.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 2>And they're doing a pretty good job.

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Trump debates himself on Iran. Why do you

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 2>have to put out a statement? He's gonna, he's gonna

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have.

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Fractors his own coalition, you see now Joe Rugan and

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Megan Kelly and you.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Know, and he's doing it all over the place, right

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it over the last two weeks,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know. And it's always for a check, right, monsanto

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to check. So he did the executive order on the

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on the weed killer. That upsets Maha, right, he doesn't

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>run that upset like he put together this interesting coalition.

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But when you put together coalitions, you got to keep them.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>You got to you gotta deliver.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and he slut them down. I mean, I

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 3>think in my mind, the one big difference from his

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 3>first term to a second term. What what did we Well,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things were baking in the cake about

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump. If we had told each other, oh, he's

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be tough on immigration, he's going to do

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 3>some acts that are boordlight illegal, we wouldn't have been

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 3>terribly surprised about that. If you said, oh, he's gonna

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 3>even you know, engage in tax cuts for the ranch,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 3>there's lots of things that you just would have baked

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>into the cake. I think the way in which he

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>campaigned and well, at least from the moment he wins

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to immediately the inauguration, having Bezos, Zuckerberg and you know,

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Musk right behind him was a stark departure from the

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>first term, in which you know, you remember he got

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>an anti trust case against Google, and now in the

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>second term he is just wholeheartedly embraced big tech and

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the oligarchy, Saudi Arabia, the kings of the universe as

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 3>it were, as a corruption racket. And I think that

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>has more aggressively splintered the coalition faster than I think

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people would have.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Assumed, as would you accept the premise that he is

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>now the caricature that many on the left tried to

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>paint the Bush family as.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, the Bushes were.

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Never like this, right, he he's like this caricature version.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Of this because we don't give him any credit for this,

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 3>but he is brazen about putting the corruption out loud

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 3>in front of you, to say, this is exactly why

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm operating everything from you know, you take the Iran war,

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 3>it's just you know, here we're going to go do

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 3>it with Israel. It's very clear in your face how

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>we're going to execute this all the way through, you know,

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to just you know, these AI tech deals will be

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 3>done at the behest of Tim Cook sitting right here

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 3>in front of me, and then him out loud stating

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 3>that these are the people, these high IQ individuals who

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I listen to, who I think are really brillian, are

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 3>going to guide this administration. So when most working class

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Americans right now are worried that does the President even

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 3>see me understand the struggles with affordability or cost of

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 3>living that I'm going through, and they're worried that his

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>agenda is somehow not on a different is fully on

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the different plane than the one in which they live,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>they are correct, because he's telling them that. Every given

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>day he tells you the things that are most important

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 3>to him, and none of them are around affordability. You

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 3>can send Susie Wiles and company. You're trying to compel

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 3>him in the union.

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Kind of a music.

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>They set up these events that are clearly they're very

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>much You're like, they're well thought out, like you know

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. I think we're taping here on a Wednesday,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>where to eleventh. They've got a couple today and in contemptio.

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 2>You know it's this.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's this stuff that that means table stakes, right, It's

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you should be doing as president in an electioneer,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sell your agenda, show people, show people an example where

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you think your agenda's having an impact. And we know

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what he's going to do. He's going to go there

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>just whin about the word affordability. They're telling me I

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>have to do this, and you're just sitting there going

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>huh okay.

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 3>And he's stuck in the bad. As we remember about

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 3>this with Biden, you get stuck in the finger wag

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 3>of don't you people know that I am doing amazing things?

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Why aren't you appreciating all of the amazing things I've

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 3>done instead of you know what we are argued with Biden.

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it would also be true to Trump. You

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>lean forward and say, here's the fundamental problems in society

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 3>that you are dealing with that I am focused on,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 3>and I have to do next, not backwards, and they

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 3>only get stuck looking backwards and saying I've just done

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 3>all these amazing things.

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 2>What did you I.

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Noticed over the week at JD. Vance tried, right, he said,

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's trying. He was trying to say, yes,

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, there's an affordability issue, and he did the

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>old you know, which is what any presidential administration would do. Hey,

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was it was really bad when we took over. This

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to take more time meanwhile, which okay, that's

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of beam C plus B minus spin. But when

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the president says, hey, pay no attention to that, it

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and I talk about undermining whatever little attempt Vance was

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>doing to try to to try to let these people

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>know that he at least pays attention.

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, you get into the psychology of the Trump advanced thing,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>which is kind of entertaining and growing.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, yeah, right, you there were there

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>were sort of two core principles to vance that I

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>bought into.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>One is that he was genuinely.

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>A believer in in breaking up these monopolies, you know,

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>corporate consolidation. You know, he would praise Lena Khan. Not

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>many Republicans would do that.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 3>The conservatives, the right wing popula who cosed into the.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>DAHO was a JD Vance, you know. So I genuinely

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>believe this is something that is that is that he

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>believes that this isn't just something that he adopted for

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>political purposes.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 2>And then no more.

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Foreign wars, right, And here's Trump essentially firing his staffer

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>at job steps, right, allowing companies to go around the

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department, and essentially like with the Ticmaster thing, It's like,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, this is the thing that like

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows the combination to Trump, right, how do you

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a there's a and I always hate to make

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Seinfeld references because there's it's such an old show now,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but there's enough people that still spin it. But there's

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this like gag running gag with Elaine where she says,

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:28.599
<v Speaker 1>I put it in the vault and and they're like

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows, you.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Know, the the the combinations of the vault.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>You just get get a little boone in her and

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>she'll tell you all spell all the secrets. Well with Trump,

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>well know the combination. You write a check to run

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on the slush funds, you'll get what you want. You know,

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you you know there's you know, you got to do

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things here, but you do a deal

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>with the family whatever, and you'll get what you want.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty true.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think it's you know, he allows

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>people to know these things because he's trying to He's

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>hanging out a sign like, hey, this is how you

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>It's really undermine Vance.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I just don't think Vance has any anything, any

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>credibility left.

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>There's obviously this musing about him suggesting Rubio might you know,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 3>be a better candidate mar A Lago, And I was

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 3>wondering if they leaked into your thought about it. When

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>leading up into the Iran War, there's obviously some leakage

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 3>of around well Jade. Vance wasn't fully on board initially,

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 3>and I had some concerns and I was like, it

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 3>reminded me back in the day when you remember Obama

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 3>and they had the decision of going in Laden and

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 3>in let that Biden had against me with them, right,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and it felt that most are reducts of that, and

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 3>it was done at that time, right, and you could

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 3>sense of a Hillary kind of world that was setting

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 3>up twenty sixty. You know, here's the choice. And I

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 3>was felt again we got a Ruby over his vance

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 3>choice of who was with the president.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>My warning to Rubio would simply be when the president

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>besides Iran was a mistake, not if okay, we know

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>when he ain't taken the blame, right, you know, and

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Rubyo has been set up.

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean this in my view, we can get down

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 3>for a policy conversation there. So the rationales for this

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 3>war are worse than you can imagine any prior US

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 3>intervention anywhere. And it is really doing a great disservice.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And we talked about the Democratic Party and the struggles

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 3>with it that there isn't a leading security minded argument

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 3>against this war. Well, you're seeing and hearing a lot

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 3>of our process and gas prices and domestic needs, and

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 3>those are all fair and correct, but what they miss

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 3>is if the president says this is an imminent threat

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Iran was going to attack US, I had to go

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 3>do this war. Who is making this American security minded

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 3>argument that that is fully nonsense and that this war

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 3>of choice puts us in a weaker position security wise

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 3>than ever before.

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't think here more opposite of America.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>First, yeah, right, I mean, who's making the argument, Rand,

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but you're asking it's actually Rand.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Paul, which which always frustrates me that we we you know,

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate the Democrats are focused on the domestic needs

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 3>and we have to be right, and we just cost

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>of living in formula issues. But if you live in

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the place of wine, to protect America, we should be

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 3>making the art, you know.

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>The issue this is still Vietnam syndrome. Yes, And I

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think I think infiltrates the democratic brain.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, I tend to think that Israel politics is

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>also at play here and that there's some concerns around

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, the AI companies that are at play here,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 3>and how do you navigate the big money that's being

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 3>spent in the selection cycle, which we can get into, right,

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Who's who are the big spenders in these primaries? And

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 3>it tends to be it's AI of two versions, right,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>It's AI of artificial intelligence and it's AI of AI

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 3>American Israel Political Action Committee stuff.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So both of them, don't forget the crypto guys too,

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>fair shake where Chuck Schuber actually told them in the AA,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when Chuck Schumer tells the Democratic Caucus you're

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>just going to have to suck it up on crypto.

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that felt like that.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>We have we have crossed the rubicon of of of

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>financial capture, right, and and I know it's fascinating to

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>me you you would appreciate this. I moderated a panel

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago at the Principal's First Conference,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of a right, you know, sort of

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans still trying to repair the Republican Party post Trump.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>They're all anti Trump and all this stuff. And there's

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Pat McCrory advocating for campaign finance reform. And you're just

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like the number of people I've run into recently that

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>have gotten religion on campaign finance reform are people I

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>never would have put anywhere near this topic even five

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you think see in that, just to stick with

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 3>that for a second, that in that wonderful NBC pull

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 3>that you and I read closely, Democrats are at the

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 3>bottom on approval unfortunately talked about that. But you see

0:16:58.320 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 3>who is a little bit below that.

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Aif this episode of the Chuck Toodcast is brought to

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you by Quints. A thoughtfully built wardrobe comes down to

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>pieces that mix well and last. That's where Quince shines.

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Premium fabrics, considered design, and every day essentials that feel

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>effortless to wear and dependable even as the seasons change.

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Quince has the everyday essentials I love with quality that lasts,

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lightweight cashmere sweaters, not too expensive either by the way,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>short sleeve Mongolian Kashmir polos, linen bottoms, and shorts. Quinz

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>works directly with top factories and cuts out the middlemen.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's more affordable. You're not paying for the

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>brand markup or any fancy retail stores, but you're still

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>getting quality. Everything is built to hold up to regular

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>wear and still look good. Quite often I'm wearing something

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that I've gotten from Quints. It is incredibly comfortable. I've

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>become a middle aged man who loves his quarter zips.

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>They have plenty of those. I have been very pleased,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's just you know, when I like a piece

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of clothing, I probably wear it too much, and usually

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you can tell after about two or three months. That's

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>not the case. So far with Quinn's that's been impressive.

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So right now go to quins dot com slash chuck

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.719
<v Speaker 1>for free shipping and three hundred and sixty five day returns.

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a full year to build your wardrobe and you'll

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>love it. Now available in Canada too. Don't keep settling

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for clothes that don't last. Go to qu I n

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>ce dot com slash chuck for free shipping, three hundred

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five day returns, quints dot com slash chuck.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>That is you know, we're we're I was at another conference,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a tech conference earlier this week, and they haven't fully.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's because of them, is what

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I said that you guys that aiso I'm popular, right,

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a distrust, they said. The public's not being stupid here.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>They know what social media did.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Do us, the publishers.

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>It's the same companies that are that are in charge

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of this. And you know if and oh, by the way,

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the memory of globalization one point oh wasn't very good

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>for these people. What's interesting is that we are the

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>most negative on AI of any Western country in the world.

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what do you make of that?

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Understandable? And I we should be. I think if you

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>look at to your point of the understandings of what

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>upside benefits does this have to working class people living

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 3>in paycheck to paycheck sixty percent of Americans, And you say,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 3>what aren't you possibly putting on the table to improve

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 3>their lives? There's really very very little to nothing being

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>put on the line on the line by AI companies,

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 3>by the tech oligarchs. They say, you're going to generally

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 3>improve I would argue, we can get down all of

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 3>all of the rabbit hole. But just looking at the

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 3>campaign finance side of this, you know they are spending

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 3>tons of money both on Super Bowl ads, which you

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>and I watched together, but also it's spending in a

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 3>lot of political primaries and trying to capture the political system,

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 3>which means that the candidates are not actually being populous

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 3>in the way that I would like to see, well,

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 3>articulating the harms of working class people who are very

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 3>worried about it.

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>When you have a massive amount of money consume your

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>camp primary campaign. And that's what we're seeing in Illinois right.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Illinois Senate race is gross, Yeah, it is.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>It is so gross because it feels like all of

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the candidates have some sort of sponsor, right that they're

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that they have a title sponsorship.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>One is the crypto guy, one is the AI data

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>center person, one is the anthropic AI people, right. But

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it feels like they've all been captured by some

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>massive industry that is currently trying to buy off Washington.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And there's the three people, the three big the three

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>big entities, and four if you want to put an

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>APAC in there.

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 2>And it is.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is that APEX numbers are actually payo financial

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to what you're saying with Crypto and.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 2>With the ACT.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But it has made me question all those candidates running

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in Illinois.

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 3>It should, I mean, I mean, this is why it's

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>a Bernie Sanders moment in America is because it's not

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 3>about the policy agen as much as the integrity question.

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think the integrity question of do you

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 3>orient yourself of being a populast who fights for working

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 3>class people and that that is who governs your sense

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 3>of the fights. I picked the people for whom I

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 3>am going to challenge the wealthy and the powerful.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Fights that you pick. You talk about this all the time.

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>You got to learn, you know, Donald Trump was really

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>good about pick and fights. And you've said this before,

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and you think Democrats are.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Terrible about it.

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 3>They don't like friction by almost it's almost in the

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 3>DNA now you can sense it that even as we

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 3>talk right now, in this amount of leading up to

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six, what are we putting on the table

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 3>besides our hatred of Donald Trump? I mean, you go

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 3>that Illinois race and you have candidates run, you know,

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>running f Trump adds literally three seconds of just that.

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Trump got that. That's pretty clear. I think the public

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 3>has as an understanding that you and Donald Trump are not,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I time, on anything else. Is there any friction within

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 3>American society on any economic justice issues in which you're

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 3>willing to name names and take on powerful actors? And

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 3>this goes back to our AI question. They're telling you

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 3>right now, American public is telling you right now that

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 3>this is one of their top concerns. And how is

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 3>it possible that any political actors or political parties have

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 3>not gravitated to the layup that's on the table. We

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 3>could argue about the Data Center moratory method policy, but

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 3>it is clear that Bernie Sanders, just by putting it

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>on the docket, has said I am putting something out

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 3>there that it was reflecting the pain of working class people.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Does anybody want to meet me or match this bar

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 3>or suggest that.

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Shared Brown loss because of Crypto fast exactly? I mean,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like it is that has It seems like that result

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that Bernio Moreno became the crypto guy and then dropped

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the whole ton of cash on Shared Brown in twenty

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>four It seems as if that has just absolutely overwhelm.

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 3>This is why great talking with you about these kinds

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>of things, as you live these very well, because you,

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 3>unlike most political commentators, I think, are able to marry

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>policy and politics, and I think often we get into

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 3>your Democrats think so heavy heading about policy that they

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 3>let their politics suffer as a result. Meanwhile, the Republicans

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 3>are the other way around. They know when they're going

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 3>to govern, they're going to govern on behalf of crypto.

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 3>But when I politic, when I get out into the

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 3>world and talk to working class people, I say things

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 3>brazenly about, oh, I'm going to take on the wealthy

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 3>and the powerful. I hate this wealthy actor and in

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 3>ways that I think because they're better populist wise campaigning,

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 3>And it gets to my deep, deep frustration with the

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Democrat Party of how we don't campaign is to name names,

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 3>name some villains, get into fights, elevate these kinds of issues,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and then of course I want to marry that with

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 3>a policy agenda. But often the policy agenda, you know,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 3>is so much in the forefront of our mind that

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 3>we have no politics by which to reach regular people over.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So, I it's interesting that you call it. You think

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.479
<v Speaker 1>you're there's a Bernie Sanders moment here. I certainly think

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>there's an outsider, independent moment that's happening. And I'm but

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm one of those that getting close isn't

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>going to mean anything to me in twenty six. You know,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>if Osborne loses again, okay, then it didn't work. Just

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>because you come close doesn't mean it's It doesn't work.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>If Seth Bodner is not a United States Senator out

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of Montana, it didn't work. If Mike Duggan is not

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the next governor of Michigan, it didn't work.

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 2>But all three could happen. Maybe three, All three could

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 2>benefit from not having a party label A La Bernie.

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also I think the over unders matter that

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the delta's in the margins. So I wouldn't go all

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the way to saying, hey, I hear you're still trying

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 3>to figure out what is the right directional form of

0:24:55.960 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>politics that people that matches what people would support, and

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 3>for a democratic parties trying to find its way, I'm

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>arguing that some of these independents are offering a kind

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 3>of different working class economic first agenda, then should influence

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 3>the way in which we think. Right.

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Spending a little bit of extra time on the FDR

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>coalition a couple of weeks ago and going back through

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>some of it, and you do realize that FDR's decision

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to just stick to an economic focus did widen did

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>broaden his support. Now there's history is not kind on

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the on some of these things, right with him.

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>But the only way you can make you can make

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>economic justice a transformational issue is if you can get

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty five sixty percent type of coalitions. And he did

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 1>build one, and he showed I mean, I've said, if

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>if the right drops its cultural greed, the economic populace

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on the right, drop the cultural grievance issue or start

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>prioritizing the economic justice over and above everything else. And

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and Bernie's gotten in trouble at this at

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>times right where he will endorse candidates that maybe he

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't agree with on guns and doesn't agree with on abortion,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but he's like, look on the economic.

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Issues, this is the priority.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And this to me is always how the Democrats get

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in their own way, right, they punish a candidate it

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>isn't correct on these social issues, and that still seems

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the struggle the party is having.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 2>And why these these Osborne's of the world or.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Or the Bodiers of the world are going you know what,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm better off from running as an independent. That way

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I can say no to some of these groups and

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 1>not get punished for it.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 3>Right. I mean again, in the wonderful NBC poll I

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 3>they get asked, you know, Republicans and Democrats essentially, would

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 3>you prefer a candidate who has closer ideology to you?

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Or electability arguments? And it was always been generally the

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 3>case that Democrats have favored these kinds of electability arguments,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 3>and still did in that poll. Though there's a little

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 3>bit more ideological.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 2>It was a twenty point right.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>It was like Republicans were like seventy twenty and you know,

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>this is what I have a big progressive lean In

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the class that I'm teaching at USC this year, there's

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, legal studies majors. They're ready

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to go the world right justice warriors, and they're all

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>very frustrated that you would love them because they are like,

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>why does the Democratic Party?

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, they seem to always cave to its moderates.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>And I always say, look, there is a math problem

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats have, right, which is the self described

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative is about ten points more than the self described liberal,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and what does that mean in your goal to get

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to fifty percent? Republicans need fewer middle of the road

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>voters than Democrats do. Right, continues to be a math problem.

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 3>For the last maya pill fight on this within the

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Democratic Party ranks has been a kind of a rearguard

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 3>difficult fight, which is that Bernie Sanders is a stronger

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 3>under election candidate than he as a primary candidate. And

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 3>if to understand that, you haven't been able to never

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 3>been able to get there, and I would argue, well, sadly,

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll never see it, but I would. I'm firm about

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 3>my own personal views on that, and as if if

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.719
<v Speaker 3>people were to agree with me on it, then you're saying, well,

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.479
<v Speaker 3>what about Senator Sanders would would move a five percent

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 3>of conservatives independence in the column of him. Well, now

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 3>we get into the heart of what I think of

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 3>a Democratic Party should be in and around, is that

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 3>here's a fight against a billionaire class. A willingness to

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>take on corporate power and corporate greed and corporate influence,

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 3>and willingness to fight or campaign finance reform and meaningful

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>and important ways and integrity that you trust that you

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 3>wake up every day wanting to fight for working class Americans.

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 3>That is, That's clearly what they people associate with Bernie,

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think we want more of that associated with

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 3>the Democratic Party. But unfortunately this is a book wal

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>re alignment opportunity in America. In my view, I think

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 3>we get that you don't always get these opportunities, but

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 3>right now you've got one where I think if the

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 3>right hand with the right appeal gets that five seven

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 3>percent moving fully over and potentially staying with you, if

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>you you know campaign. You know, we saw this with Obama.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 3>He had the opportunity in two thousand and seven eight,

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 3>and he had it, you know for a period of time.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Somebody coming along right now could realign America in a major,

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 3>major way.

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I am near a Tandon shares your belief in that

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is that this is a moment. Now, she's

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>more in the this is a moment for the Democratic Party,

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>don't screw it up type of moment. I I'm a

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more pessimistic. I think where I think there needs

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to be another kick. You know, there's a Mitch McConnell

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>phrase that I sort of like that he uses, which is,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no second educator, there's no extra education

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>with the second kick to the head by a mule.

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Or something like that.

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet I have a feeling that I have a

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>feeling that twenty six is going to give Democrats false

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>hope about twenty eight and that they will go in

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the wrong direction. Well, what happened in eighty six eighty eight,

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a very similar situation.

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 3>The the big TVD there though, is that unlike let's

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 3>call it twenty twenty two, when you say, you know,

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 3>led to the kind of the wrong false hope that

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 3>you're referring to. There was an assumed front runner right

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.719
<v Speaker 3>of the Democratic nomination. There wasn't going to be as

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 3>much of a debate there should have been, should argue,

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 3>but there there wasn't sure by this time there will

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 3>be right, There will be actively has to be a

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 3>very competitive primary, very open debate. The question and concern

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 3>that I have, of course, is that given that Senator

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Sanders is extremely extremely unlikely to run, I do think

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that were he able to run, he would win in

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 3>this in this cycle.

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And oh, I'm more convinced today than I would have

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>been five years ago that they that Bernie wins the

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen election.

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Right unfortunate and.

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>I was probably would not have been in that camp

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen seventeen.

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think he you know, if we could rind

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the clock fifteen years younger where he could run, he

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 3>would do very well. So is there a natural follow on?

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Is the obvious question? Who most is closest to the

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 3>conceptions of what are the best political attributes of Bernie?

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 3>And at this point, as you and I talk, it

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 3>is not yet clear that there is that There's a

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of in the normy kind of moderate centrist lane.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Lots of governors, as we could rattle off, but who's

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 3>going to be out there progressive aggressively saying like Bernie Sanders,

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 3>I believe X, Y and Z.

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting, You're right, I'm I'm you know.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think another under sould aspect to Bernie, which is

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>why I'm more skeptical of AOC, is that he was

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>from a rural state. Yeah, and so there's a little

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>bit more credibility than coming from you know, had he

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>always been, had he stayed in Brooklyn and been a

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>New York senator, I don't know if.

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 2>He's the same following well.

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know that it's a small thing, but

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder because there is just a there is a

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>branding that comes with New York Democrat, California Democrat that

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't get with Vermont.

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, liberals different, you know.

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, by his orientation is very much a class base there.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a.

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Class and what the Democrats.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>This goes back to the Democrats need a good old

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.959
<v Speaker 1>fashioned class warfare. Campasely, this is what FDR did, But

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you got to drop the culture and that I don't

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>know if today's Democratic Party and the interest groups that

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>control it are ready.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 2>To do that. Right.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'd quibble with drop the culture because the thing

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I get concerned about on this front is you cannot

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 3>go before the American public and lie and deceive them

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 3>about what you might honestly believe. What you're trying to argue.

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 3>In my mind over is what is the primacy of

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.959
<v Speaker 3>the things that I most care about from my end

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 3>litigated the sober Kambla and other people, is that when

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 3>you don't have the privacy of an economic justice, class

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>based argument that people believe and trust and say, oh,

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 3>that's what animates you. When you don't have that, what

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 3>becomes subsumed by you is the sense that you probably

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 3>care a lot more about these other culture issues in

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.479
<v Speaker 3>which there's far more differences of opinions about the American public.

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 3>And we tend to think maybe that's what animates you

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and why you want to get into government? Does you

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 3>want DEI in various government agencies? And you know that

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 3>you can't fault a lot of people from understand seeming

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 3>like they're trying to hunt for what is it that

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 3>drives you? And I don't want people to feel like, oh,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 3>I have to run away from culture, but I don't

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 3>think that's the case. They just want to know that

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 3>will you give allowance for disagreement on the cultural issues

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 3>where there might be and say, hey, this is what

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I believe. I appreciate and you might have a different

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 3>point of view, but here's what I believe. But together

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 3>you and I are on the same page on these

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 3>economic justice fights on wealth and income and quality that

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 3>are the first order priorities of today.

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So what would should be doing if you were running

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the party right now with these independent candidacies in the

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the in the sort of upper Midwest, you know

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you have You're probably gonna have one in Kansas, now,

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in Nebraska, Montana, South Dakota. Well, you're a lot let me,

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>said Doug aside, Dugan is sort of a different type

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of campaign. The other ones are all very similar because

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, they actually coordinate. You know, they have their

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>own I've interviewed a couple of them and they said.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah, we're on a text chain. You know, Osborne

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and Bangs and the guy in Idaho, I'm blanking on

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>his name.

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I apologize. They're gonna be mad at me. Todd Todd yes, yes, yes, yes, yes,

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you.

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 2>What would you be doing with them if you were

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 2>at the dnc UH.

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 3>In my view, we have some really great candidates. So,

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 3>first of all, while acknowledging that you've mentioned some that

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 3>are kind of maybe problematic or challenging for you know,

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 3>do you advance a Democratic Canada surveying the field, is

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 3>there a strong candidate or not? You have to make

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 3>prioritizations the question we're just say, well, who is a

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 3>priority for you? Thankfully, the Democrats do have very strong

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 3>priorities that you know, go to Alaska, you go Iowa, Texas, Maine,

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina, hire lots of potentials of pickups and on

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 3>the Senate races alone, and you say, that's where the

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 3>prioritization for the Democratic National Committee is right. Just to

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 3>look at this field and look at the possibilities, and

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 3>we need to advertise. This is the moment to advertise

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 3>a different kind of a Democratic party. And Mary Bell

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Tolla gives you that, James Tallerico gives you on Grand

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 3>Plantner gives you that. Obviously, you have to navigate some

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 3>primary issues here. Who represents us in Iowa? Who represents

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 3>us in some of these other places? But I think

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 3>that the possibility is that for the first cycle that

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I can remember a long period of time, we will

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 3>have new faces that look and feel like working class voices,

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 3>relatively new voices across the board, although Charit and Roy

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Cooper are older. But I think you might have the

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to say, here, look at the new faces, the

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 3>new direction, the new orientation of this Democratic Party. That's

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 3>what I think is really possible for the d n

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 3>C side of it things.

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So what would you do though, about the secondary races

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of Montana and Nebraska?

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 3>What do you suggest on the table? I mean, we're

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 3>not going to be We're not going to be.

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>The ward agreed to stand down in Nebraska. I mean

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that's a that's an open secret. Montana's

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a different story where you have John Tester endorsing the Independent.

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So in my mind, if you feel like there's

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 3>a good chance that we could capture the Senate with

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Democrats majority of the Democrats, why wouldn't you let a

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 3>flyer run in Montana or wherever the case might be,

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 3>in which we don't necessarily have to feel as a

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Democratic Canadon because we think we can defeat the Republican

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.439
<v Speaker 3>with the Independent. I don't know, I haven't seen enough

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 3>with the polling on that, but we're making a theoretical

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 3>observation here that if we feel like we can get

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to fifty plus one with Democratic votes and that Osborne

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 3>or an independent and Montana could win, great, great, that's great,

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 3>great froms grateful of us.

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, I mean, I just this is the look.

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I kind of think we kind of need a a moment,

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 2>that that push that forces both parties to rethink of

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 2>what they are, right, and that's what that's what independent

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 2>candidacies can do.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not replacements, right, We're not We're not doing that.

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>There's not a third party that becomes a second party

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>per se. But there's definitely interest in this, right. You

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>see it among younger voters. I assume you see it

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot in your work at more Perfect Union.

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean the MVP, and we've seen this and Bernie

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 3>as he gets that he's done the fight, all Gurchy

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 3>rallies and the course of the last year, and we

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 3>look at the match, every attendee over the vility of

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 3>moves minutes, and then same with the MVU, and we

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 3>look at all of our audience where they're coming in.

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Particularly if you're younger than thirty five, you're you're an independent,

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 3>You're no party preference. Honestly, even if you might say

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you're done, you're not really. And so a lot of

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 3>people are just are independent minded. But when you say

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 3>independent minded, what is there? They still have ideological orientation.

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 3>That's what often gets discounted, that the sense there's sometimes

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 3>a conflation that independent is moderate centrist, not cent.

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>What I always say independent usually is is you know,

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they nobody wants to feel like they have to own everything,

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the deeds and the rs stand for these days where

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I understand why people don't want to do that.

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 3>And that the partisanship isn't what appeals to people right now.

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 3>It is I don't want to beat the dead horse

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 3>hero once again, that the people's economic lives govern their

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 3>orientation and they're thinking about politics, not the other way around.

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Politics doesn't tend to govern I mean, l sure like

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 3>you and me political animals. If you think about politics

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 3>all the time, most people I think about their economic

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 3>lives of the struggles, and then working backwards to does

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 3>politics even match or represent or or have infused anything

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 3>into this? And the answer currently right now is not really,

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 3>because you don't have working class candidates generally speaking across

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the board who are matching your concerns over AI or

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 3>the development or in the lack of a few human

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 3>labor force, who matches where your thinking is at.

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>personal experience.

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 2>I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother, single mother, now widow. Myself

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>pay for college and lo and behold. My dad had

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment. Well

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>guess what. That's why I am here to tell you

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>your family's future in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process,

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 1>require you just answer a few health questions online. You

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>can get a quote in as little as ten minutes,

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can get up to three million dollars

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in coverage, and some policies start as low as two

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. So again that's

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me,

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 1>life insurance is something you should really think about, especially

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a growing family. Where are you on

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the redistricting wards?

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a I think at some point we

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 3>were always do for some kind of natural orientation on this.

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 3>To be honest with your idea, the sustainability of these

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 3>kinds of state by state approaches is in this age,

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 3>what we understand of Trump is a sense of authoritarianism,

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.760
<v Speaker 3>and you sense that there's an appeal among some people

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 3>in the public rightly so that all structures across the

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 3>board become dysfunctional. There's lack of trust in democracy because

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 3>we don't believe that institutions can can function. So then

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 3>in my mind, there are some of these approaches that

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 3>make better sense to execute nationally. Now that we're in

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 3>a cycle, in a race to the bottom, you fight

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.839
<v Speaker 3>the fights that you have to fight to fight the

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 3>moment that we're in.

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's this mindset of.

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Do whatever it takes to grab power, then you can

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>implement an agenda. And I sense that that is where

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a little bit of a divide, almost

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>like a tactical divide on the left, which is.

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll know that there I don't even see.

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 1>That session or just get power and then we'll worry

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>about everything else.

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I guess the quibble there is do

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 3>you sense an orientation of once you have power, what

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 3>are you going to do? What is a first order

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 3>priority of how do you solve this fundamental problem? And

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 3>I think we have to make sure that it's an

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 3>integrity based movement of people are saying, hey, here's the

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 3>right way an election system should work. Let's have national readition.

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry that the left giving up it's look?

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I do think so let me defend Here's how I

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>would defend the Democratic Party's lack of why there's a

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit of fear of putting themselves out there or

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 1>picking a fight. I think I could make an argument

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that be playing the role of worthy adult in the

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>room party has helped Democrats compete in some places that

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they normally wouldn't do as well, and so there's a

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.919
<v Speaker 1>fear of giving up the adult For instance, I think

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>for instan this redistricting, you spend fifteen years branding yourself

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 1>as the party of fairness and.

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 2>Then you throw it all away here. You can't get

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:03.760
<v Speaker 2>that back.

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to regret in the long run not

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>being seen as the party that was willing to put

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>fairness above partisanship.

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't live with that fear, and I think everyone

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 3>is fully aware of why we are engaged in a

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of asymmetrical warfare and the need for a different

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 3>orientation to meet the crisis of the moment, and that

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 3>happens to be around Donald Trump, and is the lack

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 3>of value system of how he thinks about how to government,

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and so you say, okay, well we we're going to

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 3>fully lose our values. Is we got to fight a

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 3>fight right now, the bullies in the in the in

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 3>the in the alley, and then attacking you attack. But

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 3>then once you reorient say how would I better deal

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 3>with this situation in the future such to avoid these

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 3>kinds of problems. And I want that kind of a

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 3>thinking that we have to be the struthurb a foreign

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 3>party that says, hey, now that having it lived through

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 3>chaos and a reorientation what Donald Trump did to government,

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.960
<v Speaker 3>can we come in and be reform minded in our

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 3>own right. This goes back to your if you're with

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 3>a discussion of the Democrats not loving friction and fights,

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 3>we come up status quo party. It is what is

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 3>assumed of you and of us in the words that

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 3>you used as well.

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Adults, well, pragmatism has become code for status quo exactly.

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, adult minded is to say, no, listen, guys,

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 3>don't fight fights, you can't win, don't worry what this

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 3>is the system as it's always been, don't worry about it.

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 3>And I don't mean to describe oversubscribes to it, but

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 3>there has been a sign mentality around people who are

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 3>upper class, upper educated. Right have you know you're making

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 3>over one hundred fifty thousand dollars a year, you have

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 3>an advanced degree, and you're like, fundamentally there, we don't

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 3>need overhauls of any major things. But yeah, but the

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 3>rest of America sixty plus percent believes in major systemic overhauls.

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 3>We have to reflect those and they are needed in

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 3>this moment.

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Who's the heir apparent to Bernie?

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.919
<v Speaker 3>I want a lot of people competing for that, Lade Jack,

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I want I want a lot of people throwing their hands.

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Is who do you think is doing a good job

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>competing for the mantle right now?

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Good job competing is a high barber at the moment.

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's obviously people. He has a great fondness

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 3>for college Kagi pretension, He's gone out into the world

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 3>with He's done events with a number of people.

0:45:15.120 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it looks like he has a preference

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:20.839
<v Speaker 1>for her, if you're just watching observationally and how many

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 1>times he's done events with her versus others.

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 2>But by reading the.

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Word preference is doing a lot of work for you there.

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 3>But I'd say what is clear is that he respects

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 3>that she has built something of a national appeal and

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of young people in particular who believe

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.760
<v Speaker 3>in her and her vision of leadership. And he feels

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 3>like he learned something from that. Right is that, Oh,

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:46.399
<v Speaker 3>here's somebody cultivating a populist kind of large natural, wide

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 3>scale support. And for those of us, you know, Will

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.879
<v Speaker 3>Bernie and he's a populous by nature. He respects those

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 3>who have built you could be Trump, he could build

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, you could be really any kind of politicians

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.879
<v Speaker 3>building huge amounts of support, because just something to learn

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 3>from that. Then through that those kinds of people, you

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 3>are getting a better access into what American public, what

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 3>does American public think and believe? And in that way,

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 3>it's sad to say that there aren't that many competitors

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:19.399
<v Speaker 3>on this front of who is populist, who gets their

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 3>energy from people, who motivates and rallies large scales of people.

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 3>AOC is at the top of that list right now,

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:31.439
<v Speaker 3>but there aren't that many beyond her, unless you want

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:32.280
<v Speaker 3>to challenge that condition.

0:46:32.520 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, I'm you know, look, I Will Rocanna

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 1>would like to be considered.

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:37.839
<v Speaker 2>What you say, what do you make of him?

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 3>He's a very what you know about Row, he's very

0:46:40.719 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 3>strategic and smart thinker, and you know his Silicon Valley polis.

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 2>He lets the strategic thinking go get to public.

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that that's a it's a flaw I

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 3>would put on him. I mean, you want people to

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 3>be them.

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I like it, but I wonder if it plays like

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:01.320
<v Speaker 1>if it looks like he's being too calculating at times.

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean he is calculating.

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 2>He is a calculating person. That's who he is. He's

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 2>somebody is not right.

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it up front, he moved to Silicon Valley

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>simply because he thought it was better to represent that

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>world than suburban Philadelphia.

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 3>He's smart and I think you would add if you

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 3>were here, he's a strategic, smart thinking person. Like that's great.

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 3>And you know in this competitive environment you're saying, I

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 3>think in this you know, it's not the presidency, it's

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 3>not just a battle over width of intelligence. It is

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 3>really kind of who captures the emotions and the visceralness

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of the feelings of American especially post Trump, where I

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 3>think we'll have once again this moment of sensing who who.

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 3>It's an entertainment industry as much as it is policy industry,

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:54.399
<v Speaker 3>and it's who feels like they are representing understand my life.

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's not just rows. A lot of

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 3>people struggle to say, how how am I going to

0:47:59.040 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 3>capture you emotionally?

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting.

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Here'd be the I think a challenge that a sort

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of Burnie protege might have in twenty eight is that

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>while there's a big demand for change, there's an exhaustion

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>from all the disruption Trump has caused. And I think

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a competing issue, right, You're going

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to have I call it the divide is not left

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>versus center. It really is fight versus unite a little bit.

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that you know, when you

0:48:31.600 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 1>look at Biden, Biden benefited from the exhaustion wing of

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the country and then he tried to govern as a

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>massive change agent and it didn't take. And I think

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>part of it is if you don't, if you start

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>governing different than your campaign, it doesn't matter whether.

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 2>You're closer to them or not. It's just it bothers people.

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>It's disruptive, like you know, you know, it is why

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:55.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, why hasn't Trump been punished more for by

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the voters.

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, the voters kind of.

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Knew he was always going to do certain things, so

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:04.880
<v Speaker 1>there is an expectation. Biden set the expectations radically differently

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as as a campaigner versus how he attempted to govern,

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why he ran into I think

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, that's why he ran into so many roadblocks,

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because what I get from you is if you tell

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>people what you're going to do, you tell people you're

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be a disruptor, they're going to have more

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>patience for you disrupting.

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 3>And where I'm agreeing with you is that in that

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 3>disruption argument, we need or want candidates who wrestle with

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 3>coming in with an agenda and a plan on which

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:37.839
<v Speaker 3>is executable. That I think this project twenty twenty five,

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 3>which obviously has now governed a lot of what Trump

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 3>has done, and the fact that really came in with

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:44.720
<v Speaker 3>the qualifier doge and a lot of the desk.

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 2>To learn from.

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm trying to learn from that one. Yeah. I mean,

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 3>I could not stress this far, and I don't think

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 3>enough thinking is being done on the left of center

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 3>of given that you've got a reorientation if you were

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 3>to walk into the presidency right now.

0:49:58.600 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 2>It's what you know.

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, it's what says She's trying to get cap

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to do is essentially be focused on if he can

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:09.400
<v Speaker 1>destroy an agency without congressional approval, Well, what can you

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>do with agencies in other ways without congressional approval?

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 3>We want to know. It comes more from Alena con

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Wing of our party, which is to say, here's a woman,

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the talented person of integrity, comes into the FTC and says,

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 3>here's all these latent powers that many people didn't even

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:28.640
<v Speaker 3>know existed, didn't believe this agency should operate in the

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 3>way that it is. I'm coming in to reinstill a

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 3>sense of imagination and purpose and mission to this place

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 3>more akin to what it was founded to be. And

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 3>therefore one of our primary objectives is to look at

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 3>corporate concentration problems. File lawsuits. Even when people in the

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 3>bureaucracy might say, what, we haven't filed lawsuits like that before.

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Those would be very hard, those would be challenging. Those

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 3>are traditionally not what we do. It's like, guess what

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 3>new sheriff in town. We're going to file some lawsuits

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and we're putting ourselves on the front edge. Now, if

0:50:58.040 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 3>you're going to come into government, you're going to own

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:00.920
<v Speaker 3>that we're going to do stuff here. We're going to

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 3>have to shake up the way in which the corporate

0:51:03.960 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 3>world is two stacked against the American public. And that

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 3>is understood. So if you take that FTC approach authored

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:12.360
<v Speaker 3>by I think by Lena that WORL. Hitchopra at the

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 3>CFPB was great and effective as well, and you apply

0:51:15.520 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 3>that across the board. As part of agriculture, we need

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 3>somebody who shakes that up. We need Center for Medicare

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 3>and Medicaid Services shakes that up and said, what are

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 3>the powers to have more rural hospitals in America. I'm

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 3>not going to sit here and just navigate the bureaucracy

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and the rules as it were. I have some purpose

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 3>and mission to some real concrete goals, and I'm going

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:35.879
<v Speaker 3>to use the authorities to come in and do it.

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:38.239
<v Speaker 3>That kind of thinking, I think has been more associated

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 3>with the progressive wing because they believe in the sense

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 3>of a mission and a purpose and disruption. To your

0:51:44.000 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 3>point that like, we're going to tap these latent authorities

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 3>and have a concrete goal, not just I think, you know,

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 3>good people, the Sarah Bill Sack, all these kinds of

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 3>folks who've lived in government for a long period of time,

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:56.360
<v Speaker 3>and you get the sense they come in and say,

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 3>what is it that we all have agreed to do here? Okay,

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:01.800
<v Speaker 3>we'll just do what we've all agreed to do it.

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Like, no, it's a little bit of agency capture.

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:06.359
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So.

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Of the all the people that run around floating, you know,

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of that are auditioning right now to run for

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 1>president Among the Democrats, who do.

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 2>You pay attention to the most?

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Who are you like I'm curious how they were received

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with that message, or I'm intrigued by the message they're using,

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or I don't understand what they're up to.

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'll just start name names. Gavin Newsom.

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Obviously he's built the strongest small dollar fundraising network. I mean,

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 3>if you if you start not only with the polls

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.399
<v Speaker 3>of him building his traction and support off of Trump Brown,

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, in many ways, it's kind of become the

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 3>clearest you know, you almost we have the visual in

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 3>our head, the finger point right of Trump right off

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 3>the tarback right, that's what the guy, yeah, right, He's

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:56.319
<v Speaker 3>built it and he's cultivated. I think what he has

0:52:56.360 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 3>done more effectively than anybody so far is he's translated

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 3>that into an actual political apperative, so they as he

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 3>as he delivers.

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 2>In George, do you know any policy proposal he's offering.

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's really I mean, he's obviously doing

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 3>the podcast circuits, which is yeah.

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>That's my thing with him, and that's why I think

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's probably a sugar high well.

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 3>By the way, on that right, he's stuck in the

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 3>morassos where well, tax is probably one of the biggest

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 3>fights of our age right now, one of the point

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest public If I go out anywhere

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 3>to any town hall, I don'kay put a bunch of

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 3>bag of people from me and I talked about taxing

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 3>the rich. I guarantee you I got a hell lot

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 3>of support. And here he is in what in California,

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 3>basically opposing well Texan, not figuring out exactly he's.

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Probably eliminating himself from Democratic Party contention, and he doesn't

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>fully realize.

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Employees out, but I imagine he's not, you know, not

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 3>where the public is right now. AI too, by the way,

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:51.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, data centers also on the wrong side of

0:53:51.840 --> 0:53:54.320
<v Speaker 3>that one. But not only him, I mean Shapiro Winmer.

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:56.319
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the governors have been stuck in these

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 3>wrong I think, wrong positions on you know, cozying up

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 3>to big tech BOLLI guards on Datisenter's Rob Emmanuel.

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's doing it differently than everybody else right now,

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 1>which I find just I'm always interested in.

0:54:09.600 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Different you know. And I was talking before about the

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 3>sense that you have just politic better, and at least

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:19.319
<v Speaker 3>to his credit, he's like, I'll own that I'm just

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the politic better. I think the struggle that had to

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:23.439
<v Speaker 3>have with wrong right, you know, as well as here's

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 3>the person been in politics for like twenty thirty years.

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how his baggage right. I think his

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 2>resume is too long for what people are looking for today.

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Right to be on every side of various fight and

0:54:34.040 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 3>draft have you. You and I could go every text.

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You would be able to, you would be able to knit,

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you could pick a thousand knits in a Democratic primary,

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and he would be death by a thousand cuts. And

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:50.400
<v Speaker 1>yet what he's doing on the education issue is I

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>think something that and he's been right, he came on

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this podcast and said, you know, I don't know why

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party stopped talking about education. And He's right,

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 1>as a national issue, the Democrats have kind of surrendered this.

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Issue a great yes, so you and I'll challenge.

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's why Latinos. I think it's why Latinos had.

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Been flirting with the Republicans, because the one thing Republicans

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.399
<v Speaker 1>do on a state level is they talk about education. Now,

0:55:15.880 --> 0:55:19.279
<v Speaker 1>they don't want they want to gut public education. But

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're a Latino voter, you care about education.

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:24.920
<v Speaker 1>One party is talking about giving you an opportunity to

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>do something different.

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 2>The other party's saying nothing right.

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 3>So what I love about him, and I appreciate this,

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 3>is that he is willing to throw ideas into the bay.

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Mix it up. Let me just say that's on education.

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 3>What I what I worry about is obviously, you could

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:38.799
<v Speaker 3>get phones out of schools, that's easy, but you got

0:55:38.800 --> 0:55:40.320
<v Speaker 3>to take on the power a big tech. That's a

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:43.880
<v Speaker 3>funmentally different question. I think related to this is all

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:45.839
<v Speaker 3>throw an idea. You know, I'm a pro labor guy,

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 3>and I still believe that we should have year round

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 3>schooling in America. Which I'm not sure where the you

0:55:51.080 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 3>know where our teachers unions might feel about it. But

0:55:52.960 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 3>we should have year round schooling and that that's something.

0:55:55.360 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So that would be enormously popular. And I have no

0:55:57.760 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 2>idea why some of this.

0:55:58.760 --> 0:56:02.720
<v Speaker 3>It should be built around trades, food, finance. We should

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 3>teach kids how to cook those imagine summer programs that

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 3>more built not edu caring you.

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>For life skills, a summer of life skills. But it's

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>mandatory education. Nobody says you have to go to the

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:20.440
<v Speaker 1>same school. Maybe a camp offers it. Maybe it's a form.

0:56:20.800 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Look what you're getting to. I love this idea because

0:56:24.120 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what it gets me closer to is national mandatory national service.

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 3>And so now I'm one hundred. We'll stay with that one.

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:32.600
<v Speaker 3>So I think of the ideas I think to put

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:34.720
<v Speaker 3>on the agenda for twenty twenty. I hope there's Democrat

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 3>candidates who sense that having scenes around them done, you

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 3>execute a thirty dollars hour snow shoveling job in a crisis.

0:56:41.440 --> 0:56:44.360
<v Speaker 3>We need to take that kernel of an idea and

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 3>expand this nation wide. We need to put we need

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 3>to make political economy judgments for this nation of the

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:53.840
<v Speaker 3>areas that we need service workers and other kinds of

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 3>trade workers to work in that we do not have

0:56:56.520 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 3>sufficient numbers of people working in whether dentist, doctors, nurses, teachers,

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 3>whatever the case might be. We need more of these. I,

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 3>as President of United Station, prepared to make that determination

0:57:05.840 --> 0:57:09.560
<v Speaker 3>and set wages and benefits such that you can go

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:12.479
<v Speaker 3>and do public service for two three years to help

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 3>our nation to do elder care. I will make sure

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 3>you get paid eighty thousand dollars seventy thousand dollars with

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:20.720
<v Speaker 3>benefits to go and do this because the nation calls

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:24.000
<v Speaker 3>you right now. I am hungry for that kind of

0:57:24.040 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 3>a vision.

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think if you did a mandatory national service that

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was bigger than this. Is not about the military draft,

0:57:39.240 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know this is different.

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's a version of it. Domestically. It's saying that,

0:57:43.840 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 3>unlike a military, we mobilize people in service, which you

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 3>know is I'll confuse people on my views on ICE,

0:57:49.520 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 3>but I do then to think a lot of people

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 3>who sign up for ICBP right now see a fifty

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars bonus are motivated not only financially but also

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 3>a sense of purpose and mission. I got federal job

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.560
<v Speaker 3>protecting your Now I want to go after this vast

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:03.320
<v Speaker 3>majority of them say, Hey, what if I give you

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:05.600
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand dollars to be a school teacher in eighth

0:58:05.640 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 3>grade or do the summer school that we're just talking about.

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Would you do that instead? Would you help be a

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:13.080
<v Speaker 3>young male mentor for so many young men who need it?

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:14.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they would be there for it.

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Under Yeah, let's talk a little geographic tactics. If you

0:58:20.600 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 1>could pick the ideal first four states to start the

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>democratic primary process?

0:58:25.200 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I got my first. That's easy, right? Where am I going? First?

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 2>What are you? Is your four? What do you think

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 2>that should be the right test?

0:58:31.240 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 3>At one hundred percent? So that that's Nevada to.

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:35.959
<v Speaker 2>Start in Nevada. First person? Are you on the DNC?

0:58:36.160 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Did you get I'm removed?

0:58:40.440 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, removed? Congrats.

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I guess the Eurosy has got a different order. But

0:58:45.720 --> 0:58:47.800
<v Speaker 3>I understood and I was comfortable with it, to be clear,

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm just not me upset about it.

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:54.959
<v Speaker 2>So I but look, you come for the king best

0:58:55.000 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 2>not miss hey.

0:58:56.920 --> 0:58:58.960
<v Speaker 3>They do will be a service of not needing to

0:58:59.040 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 3>be off. Then well, I think that I would love

0:59:04.040 --> 0:59:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Nevadi go first. There's a lots of reasons. You know,

0:59:05.840 --> 0:59:08.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm an old free guy, and I think there's a

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:10.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of things about that state that that service it well.

0:59:10.840 --> 0:59:13.440
<v Speaker 3>And in terms of a primary the compressed geography is

0:59:13.480 --> 0:59:16.360
<v Speaker 3>he've able to meet and talk to people one to one,

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 3>do TV ads and such that don't blow the budget.

0:59:20.160 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think that that makes sense.

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 2>For one.

0:59:23.280 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I love you're.

0:59:24.400 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Not concerned that Vegas is too big of a market now, No, I.

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Think it's got a lot of working class people, culinary

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:31.840
<v Speaker 3>you know this. I mean, I love that the labor

0:59:31.880 --> 0:59:34.840
<v Speaker 3>approach of that city is one that would orient Democrats

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 3>and figuring out how to talk about labor again. I mean,

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 3>we don't go through the dough tax on tips. But

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Trump was very loud and proudly about the fact that

0:59:42.160 --> 0:59:44.680
<v Speaker 3>that state and those workers in that state have guided

0:59:44.760 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 3>him to one of his more popular proposals. You know,

0:59:47.640 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 3>So I want that time for the Democratic Party Michigan. I

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 3>would move, you know, I would take either the top four.

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:57.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a big state to put in the top four.

0:59:57.240 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah it is, but it's such a again because.

0:59:59.360 --> 1:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Always worry about the big states just favoring the money candidates.

1:00:02.200 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 3>That's all. Yeah, No, that's fair to where it's in

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:07.600
<v Speaker 3>the first four. It is an open question here. I like,

1:00:08.680 --> 1:00:11.720
<v Speaker 3>I probably put Georgia over North Carolina, but between Georgia

1:00:11.760 --> 1:00:14.800
<v Speaker 3>and North Carolina for me on one of those, uh,

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 3>and then and then we got a TVD here on

1:00:17.920 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 3>what we want us the fourth.

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I here's the here'd be.

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>My concern about your map, and and what I've been

1:00:23.960 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with is that I do think what Iowa did

1:00:26.400 --> 1:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>do for the Democratic Party for a long time is

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that it got it forced Democrats to talk to world

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>voters right and to go out and it's you know,

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and look, I understand there's this scar tissue.

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>From Iowa and.

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:44.439
<v Speaker 1>For for the you know, two times in a row

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear who won and and and you know

1:00:47.200 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that's you want to be our first in the nation,

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and you can't tell us who won twice now, right.

1:00:51.880 --> 1:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So I understand that aspect. But there's also a party

1:00:55.880 --> 1:00:56.640
<v Speaker 1>building aspect.

1:00:56.720 --> 1:00:56.919
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:00:57.000 --> 1:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you make Kansas or Nebraska, which could easily both,

1:01:02.000 --> 1:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could make the case for both of

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>them as an Iowa like replacement. You also might start

1:01:08.040 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>organizing a state and turning it and turning a state

1:01:10.240 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's light red at the moment to a swing state.

1:01:13.040 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Unfortunately, that isn't the story of Iowa as we know.

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>No, but once it was there, it was I mean

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>which case I think, Look, Iowa, New Hampshire are there

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>are two states that demographically don't belong in the battleground,

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and they were in the battleground a long time. And

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's simply because they were first in the

1:01:27.920 --> 1:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>nation states, meaning that voters, I think voters, this is

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>where we underestimate voters. If you treat voters like swing voters,

1:01:36.320 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they'll behave like swing voters. And if you treat them

1:01:40.320 --> 1:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>like you know, partisan voters, they'll behave like partisan voters sometimes.

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Right, I'll give you a crazy idea that I've long

1:01:46.200 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 3>had about this out, which was along those lines, was

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>to look at highest democratic performance of every state and

1:01:57.080 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 3>line them up by which state parlies. In other words,

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>we're doing a great job cycle after cycle of making

1:02:04.200 --> 1:02:05.560
<v Speaker 3>sure that that's almost.

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Like a reverse lottery, right, Like you you earn you

1:02:08.320 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>want first in the nation be the best democratic performing stage.

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:13.080
<v Speaker 3>You have a spot for them essentially, Like you know,

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:15.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a huge soccer fan, but be from what

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I understand, you know you have like the you know,

1:02:17.720 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>the second tier, the.

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Good stuffy exactly you want to be in the first

1:02:21.840 --> 1:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tranche of primaries where you'll get a lot of candidates

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of money, a lot of extra resources,

1:02:28.320 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or do you want to be in the second trants

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of primaries or it might be a coronation by the

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>time your your statement.

1:02:33.560 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for only challenge with my line of thinking there

1:02:36.320 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 3>is that sometimes sometimes the smaller states benefit because.

1:02:39.800 --> 1:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Every month in Delaware could both benefit.

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure right exactly, so I do though think to

1:02:47.200 --> 1:02:49.200
<v Speaker 3>your part, I mean, it's making your argument here how

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 3>and why you could have a recipe to do that.

1:02:51.200 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 3>It's okay, a smaller state that will overperform getting democratic

1:02:54.120 --> 1:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>vote out and we'll have earned a spot in the

1:02:56.320 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 3>first four by virtue of that. And I think it's

1:02:59.760 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>not a bad thing to everything that you just say.

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 3>It's probably more you know, probably rule tendencies and now

1:03:04.280 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>you're rewarding states to say, show me that you are

1:03:06.880 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 3>going to turn democratic orders out on YouTube and find

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:11.800
<v Speaker 3>yourself in the top. At least have a metric and

1:03:11.840 --> 1:03:12.760
<v Speaker 3>guide for a.

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 2>How that's where?

1:03:14.400 --> 1:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Or how about Kansas sixteen sixteen years of Democratic governors

1:03:20.080 --> 1:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty four yet they get treated like,

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, as if that's not an accomplishment worth noting.

1:03:27.000 --> 1:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, But on this though, the the thing I'm

1:03:31.800 --> 1:03:34.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to express is not just that Democrats have held offices,

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 3>is that we're building our ranks. I want to see

1:03:38.160 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 3>and reward those in the state parties who are who

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:45.120
<v Speaker 3>are doing an aggressive job of building the people. And

1:03:45.920 --> 1:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>right now that that was my number one critique of

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>a democratic natural committee of architecture is that that is

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>not one thing that we measure or assess or reward.

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:55.120
<v Speaker 3>If you're going to give money out to state parties,

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:58.920
<v Speaker 3>do it with some metrics or goals in mind, and say, hey,

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:02.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, you will earn this money by showing me

1:04:02.600 --> 1:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>that people within your ranks have grown, How have they grown,

1:04:06.120 --> 1:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>what volunteer capacities have you done? How will you earn

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 3>these dollars not just a new dolling amount.

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, but let's fast forward to the twenty thirty two

1:04:14.760 --> 1:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>problem for Democrats, which is, right, the Kamala Harris map

1:04:18.480 --> 1:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four, if she carries Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan,

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>she has two hundred and seventy electoral votes in twenty

1:04:27.520 --> 1:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, that same group of states, it's worth two

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty nine.

1:04:33.240 --> 1:04:35.600
<v Speaker 2>So where do you invest?

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Look, I understand rewarding those states, but you've I think

1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats have to put more states in play. They

1:04:42.200 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>have to start looking for And to me, Kansas is

1:04:45.720 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>just ripe. I just I view, Kansas is really ripe

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on this issue more than any other state in this

1:04:52.600 --> 1:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of mid mid in the middle part of the country.

1:04:55.920 --> 1:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the question of Texas and Florida. Right,

1:04:57.920 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they're big giant pots of money suck. But if you

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>put them in play, you really screw up the strategy

1:05:05.720 --> 1:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Republicans, right because they they count on those

1:05:08.600 --> 1:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>two states. So how would you be how would you

1:05:11.960 --> 1:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about twenty thirty two if you were sitting

1:05:14.360 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>at the DNC right now.

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>But do you got to find somewhere in the Sun

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Belt to invest in? I mean Georgia obviously we're talking.

1:05:23.880 --> 1:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if they hadn't done Georgia, right, and you know Georgia,

1:05:26.520 --> 1:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina nour must wins.

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>They're not nice to have anymore.

1:05:30.000 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 3>And how to my mind, you can't lose the SEC

1:05:34.120 --> 1:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>this year after it's like, that doesn't.

1:05:36.600 --> 1:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Which ones would you go to? I haven't been intrigued.

1:05:39.000 --> 1:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>My favorite ones to look at that I think are

1:05:43.680 --> 1:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>organizable probably the way I would begin obviously, look, we'll

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>see what Texas does. You know, winning is a big deal,

1:05:51.480 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>right if Tyllerica wins.

1:05:53.080 --> 1:05:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Winning is a big deal.

1:05:54.400 --> 1:05:57.040
<v Speaker 2>But over that does bring dollars to the state party.

1:05:57.040 --> 1:05:57.479
<v Speaker 2>I was reading.

1:05:57.520 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I was doing the history of Texas campaigns weeks ago

1:06:01.240 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and the John Tower victory in nineteen sixty one when

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Republicans broke through the first time in sensory reconstruction. It

1:06:08.920 --> 1:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>said like that was the first That following year is

1:06:12.000 --> 1:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time the national Republicans had ever written a

1:06:14.240 --> 1:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>check to the state Republicans in Texas. Right, like it opened,

1:06:17.280 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it does open the mind. Coming close doesn't always do that. Actually,

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>winning does it? So I see the path there. I

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>look at a Mississippi, which is to me, when you

1:06:27.040 --> 1:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>look at it, if you, if you if you created

1:06:29.640 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a statistic like baseball does with win above replacement, when

1:06:34.120 --> 1:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at the cost of investing versus the potential

1:06:37.560 --> 1:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for return, Mississippi is the best value on the board.

1:06:42.000 --> 1:06:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and how do you think of that as different

1:06:44.600 --> 1:06:47.760
<v Speaker 3>from Alabama as compared we obviously Doug Jones was you know,

1:06:48.400 --> 1:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>center obviously in a bit of a fluid situation, but

1:06:50.600 --> 1:06:51.320
<v Speaker 3>nevertheless we did it.

1:06:51.600 --> 1:06:54.959
<v Speaker 1>African American voters in Mississippi, Mississippi. I mean, I don't

1:06:54.960 --> 1:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>disagree that. I think, look if if you succeed in

1:06:59.280 --> 1:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi and Alabama surrounded right Georgia on one side, Mississippi

1:07:03.400 --> 1:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and the.

1:07:03.560 --> 1:07:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Other, and then you'll find out. I think Alabama is

1:07:05.840 --> 1:07:08.440
<v Speaker 2>just a little bit different.

1:07:08.760 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, probably I've been intrigued by more of the

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:14.040
<v Speaker 3>labor activity in the state. Obviously, you know U A W. D.

1:07:14.040 --> 1:07:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Donham Mercedes organizing campaign. There's Amazon warehouse organizing in Alabama.

1:07:18.920 --> 1:07:21.800
<v Speaker 3>That was United mind workers who have been fighting.

1:07:22.040 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Shipbuilders down a mobile. I mean, there's definitely some I think.

1:07:25.320 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>The labor base starts and it leads to a candidate too.

1:07:29.400 --> 1:07:32.080
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking, we're talking about candidate. It's intrigued by

1:07:32.240 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, Holly Schaffner I think is her name, Who's

1:07:34.840 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 3>who's running against Tom Cotton the cycle in Arkansas. I mean,

1:07:38.120 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously very very uphill fight. But I love a lover bio,

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:44.720
<v Speaker 3>which is a work farmer who you know who's standing

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:48.160
<v Speaker 3>with the farm workers in the very economic minded argument,

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like that that. I like for Arkansas, that's

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:52.920
<v Speaker 3>a good that's a good candidate, But I'd like to

1:07:52.960 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 3>see it for Alabama, for Mississippi putting forward those kinds

1:07:57.560 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of working class candidates that represent what I think are

1:08:01.000 --> 1:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of Democratic voters by history. I mean, we

1:08:04.160 --> 1:08:06.320
<v Speaker 3>know these about West Virginia's and these kinds of states

1:08:06.400 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 3>that if you're going back to lineage, they'd been Democratic voters,

1:08:09.320 --> 1:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>but they just feel the demacaty parties left down.

1:08:12.040 --> 1:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Let me get you out of here.

1:08:12.840 --> 1:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I realized we're just going over now, and I don't

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>mean to do that to you. Let me get you

1:08:15.800 --> 1:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>out of here on this, did you have a big

1:08:18.120 --> 1:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>preference between Tall Rico and Crockett? What did you make

1:08:21.200 --> 1:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of that primary campaign?

1:08:23.040 --> 1:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I could just tell you.

1:08:24.280 --> 1:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I say this not just as a as a guy

1:08:27.040 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>who just enjoys a good campaign, but I felt like

1:08:30.280 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I felt like I didn't want that campaign to end yet.

1:08:34.040 --> 1:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted a couple more weeks. And it wasn't just

1:08:36.280 --> 1:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>because it was fun. I actually think they didn't debate enough.

1:08:40.080 --> 1:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I wanted a little bit more of this debate. There

1:08:43.320 --> 1:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>was a stylistic debate, yes, but there was some issues

1:08:48.320 --> 1:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>that were getting lost, right, Like, you know, tall Rico

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is moderate and temperament progressive in his in his belief system.

1:08:55.040 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Crockett is, you know, a fighter obviously, but

1:09:00.120 --> 1:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>not you know, not necessity probably would probably a little

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:05.519
<v Speaker 1>bit to the right of Tallerrico, but I.

1:09:05.479 --> 1:09:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Think so, Yeah, Teller in many ways, in my view

1:09:08.840 --> 1:09:12.479
<v Speaker 3>at least, was embodying a lot of a Bernie kind

1:09:12.479 --> 1:09:15.439
<v Speaker 3>of argument with a different type of tone.

1:09:15.200 --> 1:09:17.519
<v Speaker 2>Inside, putting it with a religious tone, which is right,

1:09:17.520 --> 1:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Bernie's never gone down the religious defy.

1:09:20.280 --> 1:09:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And so I think I think I was very

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:27.000
<v Speaker 3>pleased to see that kind I mean, I did feel like,

1:09:27.120 --> 1:09:30.200
<v Speaker 3>here's a guy who's campaigning on a version of what

1:09:30.439 --> 1:09:33.080
<v Speaker 3>I could imagine centaor Sanders doing in Texas.

1:09:32.800 --> 1:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And trying to sell Bernie to a different group of voters.

1:09:35.280 --> 1:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Is what I would have at it?

1:09:36.320 --> 1:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Is that fair exactly?

1:09:37.479 --> 1:09:41.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And he's talked to about his respect admiration for

1:09:41.520 --> 1:09:44.200
<v Speaker 3>center Sanders. So I think that I was there with

1:09:44.200 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 3>with Crockett obviously having gotten Commas endorsement, it felt much

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:51.639
<v Speaker 3>more around a reflexive anti Trump type of campaign which

1:09:51.640 --> 1:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>does meet a lot of voters where they're at of

1:09:54.120 --> 1:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, give me that fight in a sense of

1:09:56.080 --> 1:09:58.519
<v Speaker 3>swagger and a comfort in the in the kind of

1:09:58.920 --> 1:10:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I am compared to not play by rules with this guy,

1:10:03.080 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, And there's some appeal to them, for sure.

1:10:05.760 --> 1:10:09.440
<v Speaker 3>We can't discount that. But if you're looking for agenda

1:10:09.720 --> 1:10:12.879
<v Speaker 3>of who is thinking economic first, of a fight against

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:16.400
<v Speaker 3>a wealthy oliguards taking out corporate greed and corporate power,

1:10:16.840 --> 1:10:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that was Tallerico, and I think it's one of the

1:10:18.760 --> 1:10:20.920
<v Speaker 3>reasons that he was able to build a You look

1:10:20.920 --> 1:10:23.439
<v Speaker 3>at the Latinos and why working classly when we think

1:10:23.439 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 3>of Latinos, they're working class Latinos, right, people making one

1:10:26.560 --> 1:10:29.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred three thousand dollars, often working and holding a job,

1:10:29.479 --> 1:10:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and not with a college degree. Those folks moving back

1:10:32.720 --> 1:10:35.400
<v Speaker 3>in democratic ten I think motivated by that kind of

1:10:35.479 --> 1:10:39.080
<v Speaker 3>an appeal and to your point of value orientation around

1:10:39.080 --> 1:10:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the religion as well.

1:10:40.240 --> 1:10:42.479
<v Speaker 1>He wins a Texas Center race or we are we

1:10:42.880 --> 1:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous to think of him as a presidential contender automatic.

1:10:46.520 --> 1:10:50.599
<v Speaker 3>No doubt, I mean that given the where it's at

1:10:50.680 --> 1:10:53.280
<v Speaker 3>right now, I think both Tellerico and if you know,

1:10:53.560 --> 1:10:55.920
<v Speaker 3>who knows what happens in Maine with Platner, But you

1:10:56.000 --> 1:10:58.080
<v Speaker 3>have these two candidates are.

1:10:58.240 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Pretty charismatic and pretty they've got outsized personalities, and you.

1:11:02.760 --> 1:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Could I mean, obviously we'll have to know who the

1:11:04.200 --> 1:11:06.439
<v Speaker 3>governor is to get on succession problems and all that.

1:11:06.720 --> 1:11:11.120
<v Speaker 3>But the in the Texas houses problem right clearly, but I.

1:11:11.000 --> 1:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Think you'd take that problem. You know, the only way

1:11:13.200 --> 1:11:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that happens is if he actually won the presidency.

1:11:15.520 --> 1:11:18.840
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, yeah, right right, But I do think that,

1:11:19.120 --> 1:11:21.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, it would be very compelling. And you remember

1:11:21.200 --> 1:11:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the Obama story well, but it was probably too he

1:11:23.360 --> 1:11:25.400
<v Speaker 3>was the incentive for two years at least. These these

1:11:25.439 --> 1:11:27.879
<v Speaker 3>folks would lily be in the Senate for immediately.

1:11:28.680 --> 1:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>No Right always asked me who's going to be the

1:11:30.640 --> 1:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Democratic nominee, and I'm like, well, none of the people

1:11:32.600 --> 1:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, And I said, I just sort of

1:11:35.680 --> 1:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>know that I kind of know Democrats. They usually want

1:11:38.720 --> 1:11:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the newest, hottest flavor, and that could be Molly McMorrow,

1:11:43.080 --> 1:11:46.919
<v Speaker 1>that could be James tall Rico, that could be Dan Osborne.

1:11:46.960 --> 1:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I say this, and I'm like, you know,

1:11:49.400 --> 1:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>none of us saw Pete Bootage as aider.

1:11:51.760 --> 1:11:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I think you mentioned this earlier on independent side, which

1:11:54.360 --> 1:11:56.800
<v Speaker 3>is true that had somebody running as a third party

1:11:56.840 --> 1:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>could definitely do very well in twenty twenty eight and

1:11:59.320 --> 1:12:02.679
<v Speaker 3>be a concern or issue here. But within the Democratic

1:12:02.680 --> 1:12:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Party ranks that outsider, I think, which.

1:12:04.960 --> 1:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>There's an outsider lane, yeah, yeah, And right now I

1:12:08.439 --> 1:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>don't see there's there's no governor that's even you know,

1:12:12.560 --> 1:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Andy Basher. I think some people thought was going to

1:12:15.320 --> 1:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>do this, and he seems to be trying. I think

1:12:18.720 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>he's at risk of losing what made him different, that

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:25.799
<v Speaker 1>he's almost becoming part of the of the leadership structure

1:12:25.800 --> 1:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>of the party DGA and stuff.

1:12:27.840 --> 1:12:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Some people don't remember Steve Bullock ran for president and

1:12:30.080 --> 1:12:32.799
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the bullet, you know, the resume

1:12:32.920 --> 1:12:35.400
<v Speaker 3>matches like it looks nice and there's a good kind

1:12:35.439 --> 1:12:37.559
<v Speaker 3>of theoretical appeal about it. And then as you know,

1:12:38.120 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 3>you're in a presidential politics butter in a frying pan.

1:12:40.439 --> 1:12:42.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's a very different beast and you have

1:12:42.400 --> 1:12:45.320
<v Speaker 3>to be kind of a lot of different things that

1:12:45.360 --> 1:12:46.439
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to be as governor.

1:12:46.960 --> 1:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I just can't imagine Bernie's going to sit on the

1:12:48.880 --> 1:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>sidelines fast this is going to once.

1:12:51.280 --> 1:12:54.080
<v Speaker 3>You have an idea, Russ, let us know, check who

1:12:54.120 --> 1:12:55.200
<v Speaker 3>should we be getting behind?

1:12:55.240 --> 1:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, no, that's the thing, like I think,

1:12:57.560 --> 1:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, why shouldn't I assume Bernie gets in.

1:13:01.200 --> 1:13:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh for the reasons that you would, I.

1:13:04.760 --> 1:13:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Know why he shouldn't. But I just know it takes

1:13:09.439 --> 1:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>to be Yah still the most popular politician in America.

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Until they come out with the anti aging pill, which

1:13:14.680 --> 1:13:17.080
<v Speaker 3>please you know looking for at pharma, you know, bring

1:13:17.080 --> 1:13:19.240
<v Speaker 3>it out, but until.

1:13:19.520 --> 1:13:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Big Farma could do right.

1:13:21.000 --> 1:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what, Big farm has been hiding that pill

1:13:23.240 --> 1:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>for fear that Berdie gets elected.

1:13:25.479 --> 1:13:29.719
<v Speaker 2>You know that I'll get you out of here. On.

1:13:30.080 --> 1:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about More Perfect Union and where people can

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>find what your work.

1:13:33.600 --> 1:13:36.000
<v Speaker 3>The love if they go to YouTube, as the kids say,

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:40.599
<v Speaker 3>like and subscribe YouTube backslash More Perfect Union. We're up

1:13:40.640 --> 1:13:43.559
<v Speaker 3>to well over three million subscribers, are getting over two

1:13:43.640 --> 1:13:46.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred million views a month, and we're like, we're rocking

1:13:46.120 --> 1:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and rolling. So please be among those who are helping

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:50.759
<v Speaker 3>us grow independent means.

1:13:51.040 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 2>And take one percent of those those liking subscribes. There.

1:13:54.360 --> 1:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty impressive, impressive movement. You got going there fast.

1:13:58.240 --> 1:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It's great to catch up,