WEBVTT - Is Jacob Misiorowski The Consensus SP1? | 2027 ADP Predictions with Paul Sporer (Ep. 1340)

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Everybody. Welcome into Fantasy pros. This is

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Baseball Podcast. I'm your host, Joe Rico, and

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:13.159
<v Speaker 1>today we're gonna have a little bit of fun. We're

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna look forward to twenty twenty seven, talk about some

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>ADP predictions, and I have a great guest here. He

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is the second most noteworthy mustachioed Paul s in the

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>baseball sphere. You could argue he's number one, but I

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>think Paul Skins might take that got me title from

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>mister Paul Sport. But we love him nonetheless, Paul, greaty

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>to talk with you. Different network than we're used to

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>talking on, and it's been a while since I've hosted

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you on the show. Right, well, this should be a

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun, my friend.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:39.279
<v Speaker 2>It's great to be on with you.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 3>Joe. Yeah, we usually do sleeper in the bus. I'm

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 3>driving the bus. I like to be in the passengers.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>See I can be passenger princess today and talking twenty

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven is gonna be fun. You know, we still

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 3>have a whole second half. I know they're not equal hals,

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>but you know we still got a whole chunk of games.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Things could change, but We know some of our sick

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 3>friends out here. They're gonna start doing drafts soon, and

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>we're part of that.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how early you do it.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>We know Justin will get on the draft tomorrow if

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>they asked him to, So people are going to start

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>drafting pretty soon, at least in August. I know that

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 3>there's usually that meatball draft, so they're going to have

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>to make some of these decisions right away on where

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>everyone's going to be going in the draft next year.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. It's like a few weeks ago, James

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Anderson was on the show and we did a second

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>half redrafting Welsh and I kind of ran back the

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>idea the other day, and now we can start looking ahead.

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about about fifteen players today and

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>how we think they should be drafted in twenty twenty seven,

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think we'll start right at the very top here.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Mazerowski and Cam Schlitzler have been the number one

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and number two pitchers this season, which is probably not

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>what anybody was really expecting, especially to the degree that

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. Jacob Mazerowski is thirteen dollars clear on the

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>auction calculator of the number two pitcher, who is Cam Schlitler.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>That is the difference, my god, that is the difference

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of a Braxton Ashcraft or a Bryce Miller, or a

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Williams or Kyle Harrison or even de Grom is

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen dollars player. So it's essentially the difference of

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a deGrom between the number one and number two pitchers.

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Misrowski's been amazing. Schlitler has also been amazing, right and.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 2>But for him to be that far ahead.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if they are now the new schoobl

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and Skians to some extent at the top of draft boards.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Has Scoogle done enough to move off of the number

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one pitcher in terms of the injury and you know

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll be in a new destination most likely yester year.

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Will that keep people off of him? Skeens has the

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of blows.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>He's been a little bit.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>I think we can say he's not tall Skins right now,

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 3>He's not like unquestioned six plus every time out ten

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>plus punches. He's fine. They're certainly not flailing because of him,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>but he hasn't. No, Ashcat's been the ace the last six.

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Weeks, so Yeah.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 3>As far as the Schoobl piece, I do think he's

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 3>going to be off the number one spot for me specifically.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 3>This isn't like scorned lover, leave my team. I don't

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>want to draft you, but I subscribe to the Glenn

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 3>Colton and Rick Wolf the part of their smart program

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 3>where they don't like to buy guys on the first

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 3>year of the mega deal. They never suggest that they

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>always fail, and I'm with him, that's not what it is.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>It's that you want to give a year of transition,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 3>see what happens. How's Kyle Tucker doing for you this year?

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 3>And again you can find guys who are doing great.

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Right. It's not a one way or the other.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 3>It's that we you know, those two and myself separately,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>but they pioneered it.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 2>That's why I'm giving them credit.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Want to step off for a year and just see

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>what's what what's the adjustment now that you're the dude.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Schoobl's been the dude. He's a two time side. I

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's going to be some sort of wilting flower.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 3>But Tucker wasn't some sort of you know, nobody that

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>had to go out to LA and become something and

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 3>he's folded under that.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he's.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Dealing injury or whatever's going on, but he's had a

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 3>bad year. What if schoobl goes out there and maybe

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 3>that's just I gotta deal with this. This is tougher

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>than I thought it would be. Whatever the case may be,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I doubt he will fail, but you a most certainly

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 3>won't be my number one guy. Big part of it

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>being that reason because I don't think if he's healthy,

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 3>of course that we're not worried about that.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 2>If he's injured, that's a whole different story.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 3>But if he's healthy ready to go, I think it's

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna be Miss Scooble, and then I'm gonna.

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Kind of go from there.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm still gonna have him too, but I'm not gonna

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>have him in that number one spot. And I could

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 3>see a Schlitzler, and I can still see Skeins getting

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 3>there too. I'm not gonna throw Skeins out off of

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 3>a handful of crummy stone, like two actual bad bad

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 3>starts and then a handful of like you know, you're

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 3>not being your a self. So I think there is

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 3>a new number one and miss when healthy, and that's

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 3>gonna obviously be the biggest caveat here. But we're trying

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 3>to break the future. So let's go with him healthy.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 3>How do you not take him number one? With what

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 3>he does?

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, his output is reminiscent this year of the

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>peak Patro years.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what I was gonna say here.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Johan Santana type like, it's just like the peak pictures

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of the last twenty years. This is what we're seeing

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>from him. A thirty three percent drake out to walk right,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a point seven to six whip era doesn't matter that

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>much to me, but the fact that it's at one

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty two is still pretty remarkable. Total twenty runs he's

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>allowed this year in one hundred and eleven innings. He's

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>just been outstanding. So he's healthy, he's the number one

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>guy with a bullet or I mean, can we project

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>forward and say, look, he's throwing one hundred and five,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>he's throwing one hundred and four. I just don't want

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy holding the bag or he does

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>end up getting hurt. Is that a prudence strategy?

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 3>You think there is prudence to that, And that's where

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 3>it becomes really difficult, because you take a look at

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>that leaderboard of the top x ten twelve velocity guys

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 3>in any given year lately, and you put a little

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Speaker 3>X mark next to the ones who have been injured severely,

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 3>and you're gonna have eight to ten X marks on

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>that twelve player list right like it happens all the time.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>And so he does feel like a ticking time bomb

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 3>while also being the best picture on the planet right now?

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>So how do you balance that? I still think he's

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the number one guy. I still think I could see

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 3>scenarios where I myself would take him. But if somebody said, hey,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 3>when you're throwing this hard, like we know that the

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>one hundred mile an hour throwers get hurt, this dude

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 3>throwing Buco three bucko four, how is it not a

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 3>guarantee that he's going to get hurt at some point?

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 2>And I want to lay off.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 3>I would not clown that person if they wanted to

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 3>go for a safer hitter. Nobody's safe, You're not. You're

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 3>not going to get a perfect anything. Hitters are indeed

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 3>safe for though that's a guarantee.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so is MS a first round pick then, assuming

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>definite number one pitch, or you think he's a first rounder.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, got gotta be for me. Like again, we're talking

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 3>he's healthy coming off this year. Let's say he raises

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>the VRA even all the way up to like two ten,

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 3>which would be kind of a bumpy second half, which

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>is crazy to think, right because he's at one sixty.

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Two right now. But let's say he ends two.

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Ten, eighty nine on the whip, three hundred and ninety

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 3>five thousand strikeouts. I just don't see how he's not

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>a top five pick next year.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, I agree, I think he is. Yeah, and

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where the top pitcher has been going

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. Maybe not always in the

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>top five, but you will see minimum picks like second, third, four, yes,

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>with an ADP of like five or six, and.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Schemes Google started to inch toward the middle back end

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>there as hitters got pushed up.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we could see that again. Because you know

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 2>another thing.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>About this year, and that this is where miss and

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Schlitzler came from, is that second and third tier really

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 3>paid off handsomely this year, big time. The weight on

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 3>pitching strategy that Nick Poullack loves to employ in his leagues.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 3>That was the way to go this year. You could

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 3>get a good ace, right. If you took Sanchez, you're fine.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I took Scoogle and I'm you know, he got hurt

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>and that wasn't great, but I'm not I'm not losing

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>my league because of him. So there were good ones,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 3>but crochet bust schemes SP fifteen had that from day one.

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, it was tough this year at the

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 3>top of the pitching queue, and I think that's going

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to bring some caution for some folks, excuse me, and

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 3>they're going to want to play in that middle to

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 3>find the next miss and the next Schlittler.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Easier said than done, though, of course.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Let's keep it going and we'll move to what

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's been the hottest offense in Major League Baseball this year.

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I still say it kind of hesitantly because I don't

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>really truly believe it, but the Washington Nationals have been

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the best offense in baseball this year. So let's talk

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about their three massive standouts. Offensively, James Wood, who, if

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking just among hitters this season, is the number

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.239
<v Speaker 1>one hitter in all A Fantasy Number seven is CJ

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Abrams and now at number twenty two, more shockingly than even.

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Those two biggest shams.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Luis Garcia Junior sitting here with twenty homers almost

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy ribbis at the break in a two eighty four

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>patting average. So I'll say James Wood's going to be

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a first rounder. C. J. Abrams probably a third rounder.

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>But Luis Garcia is the one where it's like it

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>really is going to come down to what he looks

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like in the second half, I think. But a top

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred or so pick I think is on the

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>table at this point, sport, what do you think?

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I certainly think so, and I don't necessarily know exactly

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 3>how I feel about that right now.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I enter it with some trepidation.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 3>And yet I look at somebody who will be turning

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 3>two seven, so certainly not old. Has been around the

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 3>block multiple times. That's the thing. Like, this guy has

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 3>years under his belt already. This is his seventh year.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Now they're not all full seasons. Abuck thirty nine, two

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>forty seven, plaited appearances in the first two, but then

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 3>three seventy seven, forty two, five, twenty eight, five, twenty

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 3>six and already three nineteen this year. This guy has

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>tons of experience, and he took a major step forward.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>He already has a career high in homers this year.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you don't get him up there,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 3>because there's some there's some viability to this too. Now

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 3>there are some things that you could poke holes in.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>He has no idea that if you take four balls

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 3>that you get a walk. He doesn't even know that

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 3>rule yet. But when you're hitting like this, I'm not

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 3>going to crush you for it. Fifteen percent. Hey rate

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 3>tells me that you don't need to walk. You know

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>how to make contact, you know how to go get

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 3>your pitches. So don't you know, sometimes we want to

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 3>force these guys to walk like a Tim Anderson type.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I remember saying if you could just walk ten percent,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>but you forget about how that would like fundamentally change

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 3>who they are. Would they give up on pitches that

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 3>they could normally hit. So I don't need to change

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 3>Luis Garcia from that standpoint. But he's gonna end the

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 3>year almost assuredly with thirty bombs, right, that's only ten

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 3>more of the rest of the way. You certainly hope

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 3>he's pushing closer to thirty five and the two eighty

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 3>four average show batting average these days is impossible. Wind

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>about mine on the sleeper and the bus in the

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 3>main this year, I'd kill for two eighty four. So

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he brings that average with it, I

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 3>think it will make Luis Garcia Junior a top one hundred,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 3>barring just a complete collapse a fade like let's say

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 3>he has a one thirty seven ops plus right now,

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's say he ends closer to one twenty eight one

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 3>point thirty, so shaves a handful of points off hits

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 3>two eighty and those thirty three homers.

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>That's top one hundred.

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Pick I think, especially with this offense, because people are

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna be excited about them next year, especially if they

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 3>do something crazy like make a playoff run, which I

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 3>don't think they're going to, but if they somehow snuck in,

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that would add to their cachet.

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, if their bullpen was even somewhat competent,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and even the rotation. I mean, this really just comes

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>down to the pitching. But that walk remark about Garcia

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of the funniest things I've heard her say

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on a show in the last couple of years. It's

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>actually hilarious too, because he has walked fifteen times this year.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>He's walked one hundred and twenty three times in his career.

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Won twenty three. James Wood James Wood has walked seventy

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>nine times this season.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Barry Bonds has a season with over one hundred and

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty three IBB's I believe that one of those mega

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 3>years like that is crazy, but again he makes it

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 3>where Louis Garcia Junior does, so hats off to him

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 3>on that. It is crazy though, how some of these

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 3>guys are just like now, I'm here to swing, and

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 3>you know what, it is definitely working. But who could

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 3>have seen this coming? You know, if you did, I'll

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 3>take your word for it, but send me a note

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter or something, let me know what you saw,

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>because I saw a guy who fell off big from

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty four when he hit two eighty two with eighteen

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 3>and twenty two, that was a really nice season. Twenty

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty four was, but then he kind of said, I'm

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a fluke. Sixteen fourteen was okay,

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 3>but two fifty two on the average and sub two

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 3>ninety OBP had me scared. I was running for the

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 3>hills on Garcia, I got that one wrong. I'll raise

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 3>my hand on that one. But if you were in

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 3>on him preseason, like you didn't just luck into him

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 3>and you saw something, please let me know because I

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>would love to know what I missed with him. But

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm enjoying watching him and the Nats. I've watched way

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 3>more Nats games this year, pretty much since their heyday

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>when they when they had strass and they were competitive.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 3>I've probably watched twenty games of theirs, which I don't

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 3>think I did in the last three years combined Joe, They're.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>A fun team. I mean, I love Foster Griffin. I was, Yeah,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the loudest mouth about Kate Cavally was me heading into

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the season, and he's kind of figured it out a

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But they've been a fun offense. Like this

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>team as a unit, I mean, Curtis Mead they figured

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>out this year. He bear had that hot run earlier

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>this season too. It's been it's been a fun team.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>And Luis Garcia. I was kind of interested in draft season.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I had him on two fab teams and then looking

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>back on it, so through the start of the season

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>through May first, he had a sixty seven w RC

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>plus he had one homer, two steals, he was hitting

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>two forty three. He made games that was three So

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>first one hundred and eight played appearances.

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is what makes this game so hard because

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 3>anybody who would have cut him there, I'd have said, hey,

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 3>you gave it a month, like and that's that's all.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 3>That's all I asked people to do with like their

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 3>breakout picks, give them some time to see where they're at.

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 2>But you can't hold people endlessly.

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 3>And we sign our boys, uh justin and I sign

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 3>our boy Scott Pianowski all the time. When when he

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 3>says if you never make a cut that you regret,

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 3>you're probably being too tight. You're probably keeping guys too

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 3>long and likely sinking with too many ships, he's saying

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 3>that you're being too passive not cut everyone after two weeks.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 3>But again, you could have waited five six weeks here

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 3>with Louis Garcia and it didn't really get going even

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 3>until about the first ten twelve days into May when

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 3>you had a two homer game on May twelfth. So

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>that's another thing too, is that Louis Garcia's probably not

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>on most of the teams that drafted him, especially in

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>your tens and twelves.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, since May first, it's a nine to eighty two ops.

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a one to sixty four wrc lous nineteen homers.

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like just unbelievable production and completely agree with

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the piano man, one of our favorites here. You're gonna

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have to try and get him on. Although now that

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it's football season, I've I've probably missed my window.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Bo.

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>You'll see we could be focused. He could be focused

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>on the old hand egg.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>You will see him at that at some point here

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>on the channel in the future. But before we keep

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it going today, one to remind he gives about my playbook.

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>With my playbook, you'll instantly identify the best pickups available

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in your league when every trade with our trade analyzer,

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and see the most optimal lineup every day based on

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>our projections and your specific scoring settings. You can sink

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>your league at fantasypros dot com slash MLB my playbook,

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>or download the Fantasy Pros app for personalized expert advice.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking to get a little sneak peak a

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of days free, it's fantasypros dot com slash free

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>for our premium tools. On the site. Let's keep it

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>going here spor really fun conversation. I do love this.

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not the most practical for people today,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a really fun conversation to look

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>forward and see something yapping guys next sek just get

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the bit, see.

0:14:58.560 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>All start break.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I know there's one game time, which, by the way,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 3>is pretty unfair to the Phillies and Mets. I never

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 3>liked for a couple of years they did it where

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 3>everyone had Thursday off. It's not the end of the world.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I know they're paid hands. I mean, I'm not saying

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 3>feel bad for the players. There's a little unfair that

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 3>two teams have to play when everyone else gets another

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 3>day off. I don't know about all that, but anyway,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>we're still on break here, so I agree with you.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 3>It's not super practical for your fantasy purposes right now,

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 3>but we're having fun this week.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>People demand baseball, and God gives them the Mets, so

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what you get, folks. And they just said that

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>opening day next year is going to be March twenty

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth or something, so it's like we're starting early. It's

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the earliest and major League history, so oh my're not.

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you're like in the World Series next year,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have the shortest amount of time that you've

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>ever had. So they're just kind of really caring about

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the breaks that guys are getting.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It seems well, but that assumes we start on time.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>This does assume.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say that, but you gotta be practical.

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Keep our fingers crossed. I hope we will. Let's talk

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about some catchers and we'll go to your neck of

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the woods here for one of them. Catchers have been

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>unbelieve and it's been talked about a lot this season,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's seven twenty dollar catchers. There's twelve catchers who

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are at least ten dollars. It's been unbelievable. Hunter Goodman

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is the name that we're gonna start with here, and

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Dingler, the two of them. I am really curious

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to wonder where they go next year because I think

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben Rice is going to be super expensive and he's

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>been great. Liam Hicks probably won't be super expensive, just

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>because this is his first time doing it. Langeliers, Contrerez, Herrera, Baldwin,

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>They're all gonna be expensive, but they were already kind

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of expensive. Goodman was in that same realm of kind

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of expensive. But he's also just surpassed expectations for me

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this season. Twenty seven homers already, he had thirty one

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>all of last year, fifty nine runs scored, he only

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>had seventy three all of last year. And he's able

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to hit for a good batting average behind the dish,

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty rare. And then your boy Dylan Dingler,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a twenty six dollars catcher, nineteen homers, sixty RBI. He's

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>already a four win player in eighty seven games this year,

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>looking like a super day in real life perspective. So

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>what are we thinking? I guess we could take it

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>from a more macro level too. It catchers in general,

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen with their prices? But Goodman and Dingler,

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm particularly interested to hear your thoughts here.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 3>I really think Goodman is going to jump up. He

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 3>was seventy two in the main. I think he's gonna

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 3>jump up into this year's Shae Langelier's territory, which was

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 3>like picks forty to fifty range. I think that's gonna

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 3>be where he's at. He's not gonna be the number

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 3>one guy, the boy you mentioned earlier, Ben Rice. He's

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna be that number one guy, and he's gonna kind

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 3>of take that cal rolly spot.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I think in that second third round range.

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I really think people are gonna though he might not

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have the eligibility though Rice, he probably won't.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 3>Wait, how many games does he have because he's eligible? Now,

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>I forgot about that.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got zero. Honestly, he might have won.

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Let me see, I think he.

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Hasn't caught it all this year. Oh my goodness, I

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>did not realize that. I thought he was still getting

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 3>catcher games. Is what happens you don't have somebody you

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 3>don't follow the day to day. I knew he was eligible,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 3>but that's, of course from last year. Okay, that changes

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the calculus. I still think he's gonna go up there

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>as a first baseman, but that's totally different.

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I wonder could Goodman be the number one? Then?

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's really a really big chance because

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 3>here's the thing. You didn't even mention it. It's the

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>easiest thing to mention, I understand. But course he's got

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 3>that in his back pocket too. So your regression concerns

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 3>can be at least a little bit mitigated with the protection.

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it can't hit the ball for you, right.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 3>We saw that over the years. In fact, we've been

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 3>searching for a Colorado catcher for fifteen years before Goodman

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 3>popped off last year. Every time I catcher would comes

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 3>like is this the guy? You know, the first decent

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 3>guy since like Chris Ayanetta, who wasn't even that.

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Good, but he had some consistency going.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 3>And now two years in a row with Goodman, I

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 3>don't know how he's not going to jump up like

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 3>there are some faults. He still strikes out a lot,

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 3>but again that's where that course protection comes in, so

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 3>that the batting average I don't want to say ant

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 3>crater because of course it can. Baseball is insane. I

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have thought that cal Rally would completely impluge this

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 3>year the way he did. But I think there's there's

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 3>a decent floor around two forty five because of cores,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 3>as long as Goodman isn't striking out like forty percent

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 3>of the time. So like I said, I'm gonna put

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>him inside the top forty five. And for context, Langliers

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 3>went exactly pick fifty this year on average in the

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 3>main event. So I got Goodman just a little bit

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 3>higher there as the number one catcher, but that's still

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 3>going to lower where the top catcher goes, because again

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Raley went twenty three this year.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I've just noticed the strangest thing with Hunter Goodman. Looking

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>back to last year at home he hit three oh seven,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>he hit thirteen homers. He actually had more home runs

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>away from course field last year. Oh if you look

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>at WRC plus was one eighteen away and one sixteen

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at home. I'm about to knock your socks offs for

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>because this season Hunter Goodman has reverse course splits. When

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he is away. He has a one to fifty seven

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus when he has at hold. When he's at

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>home this year it's a seven forty seven ops, which

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I think is maybe more prudent to you then h

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus because course gets knocked down. I think a

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit take get crushed. So a seven to fifty

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>oh ps is still totally serviceable, but nine sixty four

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>away if he starts hitting a course the way everybody

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>else does like this is and he did last year.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He hit very well at Cours last year, so it

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>feels like small sample size stuff going on there, this

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>guy might be a first round finisher in terms of

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the player raider this year, right, especially with the boost

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that catchers get, if he's able to start hitting at

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>home in the second half, which he should be able to, right.

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely, I mean I'm seeing a two eighty three Babbitt.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 3>That's probably a big culprit here as to why getan

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 3>only hitting two twenty three at home? So yeah, if

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 3>he flips that and doesn't crater on the road, right,

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 3>because if you three thirty Babbot on the road, that's high.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.959
<v Speaker 3>But it's also not like impossible to sustain that when

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 3>you smash the piss out of the ball the way

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 3>he does. So what if what if he has you know,

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>forty two bombs one hundred ribs and in a two

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 3>fifty five two sixty average, we see some first round Goodman,

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 3>am I going too crazy here?

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Raley, did I win it?

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. That's a good point.

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But Goodman, with the cores factor, it's like complete polar

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>opposites for park factors because sattles absolutely terrible and Goodman,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>just look at it now. I mean, I know that

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>our player raider at Fangrafts gives a little bit of

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>a boost to catchers, which most player raiders do. But

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Goodman's the number seven player despite not really doing

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>much at cores in the first half. So yeah, five

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>steals thrown in, Like, is he potentially going to be

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a top five player to finish the year? He might be,

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the then we might be entering the

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Rawley territory of he's a top twenty five, top thirty pick.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably fade that, but I would I wouldn't rule

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it out entirely. I wouldn't. The reason I probably would.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 3>It's less about him and more the depth a catcher, which,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I didn't see quite this good. You know,

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Justin and I talked about the catcher depth though a

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 3>lot is here and we weren't doing ones. I'm not

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not back patting here. I'm saying the fantasy community

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 3>knew that Tetcher was deep, but I don't know if

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 3>any of us saw it being this excellent who No

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 3>one really missed in these top ones except I guess

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Ralegh of course the top one, and then Salvey's been light.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 3>He has his power, but his average is created. I

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 3>think he's actually gonna be fine in the second half.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 3>But then Bengaliers, Contreras, Rice Goodman, Baldwin, I guess Augustin.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>So actually, okay, three of the top nine here, three

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 3>of the top nine did fade and it's still been

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 3>this good because of guys like Dingler, who we haven't

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 3>even mentioned yet.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 2>But I'm totally with you that Goodman is going to

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 2>be sky high.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>As for my boy, Dingler picked two thirty nine this

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 3>year as somebody who's like, hey, that's my C two.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 3>He plays every day. I did not see this coming.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Did I think that he could be a good everyday player. Yes,

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 3>I've been liking Dylan Ingler since his college days. In fact,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 3>the only thing I don't like about him is that

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 3>he went to Ohio State, but hey, he can't be perfect.

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>But everything else I really like.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 3>He calls an amazing game, and he had thirteen homers

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 3>last year with a two seven average. So I'm not

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>saying anybody should have seen exactly this, but you could

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>have been in on Dingler. I don't think you just

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 3>lucked into him. And maybe I'm saying that because I

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 3>have him on my main and I want I want

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 3>credit for finding it, but you know, it was easy

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>for somebody to make the case that they wanted to

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 3>get Dylan Dingler as somebody who could improve to this level.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>It's been crazy.

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 3>But given that he did it last year for four

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 3>and sixty to nine plate appearances, another three sixty one

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 3>this year. You add it all up, it's a two

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 3>seventy one average and sixteen homers per four hundred plate appearances.

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 3>There does he jump up into say the top one

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>fifty area, because that would be around Basaiah went one

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>fifty one this year. Could you see him being the

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 3>tenth eleventh catcher Dingler next year.

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be honest that even when you said that,

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in my mind my initial reaction was that feels even

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit light maybe but perhaps yeah, I'm.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Jiner Diaz one twenty Will Smith.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Not that catchers have to go at these specific spot

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm just trying to give a frien reference for where

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 3>they went this year. Do you think him do you

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 3>think Dingler's more in that Agustin Ramirez janer Diaz range

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 3>which was ninety three throwing sal there ninety one to

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 3>one twenty range.

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Then I mean, if we if he ends the year

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>hitting like two seventy with twenty seven homers and eighty

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>two RBI or something. I feel like he's gonna go

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Agustin Baldwin type of range, like back into

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the top one hundred maybe, but maybe. I mean, I

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>guess with.

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 3>The average this, I can see that because average, dude,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 3>two sixty two from a catcher is like three hundred

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 3>from somebody else.

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And I should have said this at the beginning, but

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>these numbers for the catchers in particular are definitely more

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>geared to two catchers. Oh yeah, you're gonna If you're

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in a one catcher league and you take Hunter Goodman

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>in the second round, I will personally yell at you

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 1>don't two catcher leagues. It's a different story altogether. But

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so Janer Diaz was like one fifty and

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Addley one fifty. Adley went one to fifty last year

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>coming off of a fairly season, but he did have

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a track record as well. Right name by,

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think one twenty five feels like a good number

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>for Dingler. If I'm predicting an ADP, I think one

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five would be where i'd set over under.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 3>As I can absolutely get behind that. I think that's

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 3>a really good number, and I think he can back

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 3>it up again. If this was this first year out

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of nowhere and he didn't have last season with it,

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 3>I'd maybe be a bit more skeptical. But this is

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 3>two years now, he's going to be twenty eight, he's

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 3>in the midst of his prime. Tigers are extensibly a

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 3>solid team at least. We'll see how the rest of

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 3>the year goes here. I know both of our teams

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 3>need to come out of the gates firing here in

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the second half to stay in the race. Less they

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 3>have to start trading pieces. But Dingler is obviously a

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 3>foundational piece to this ball club, and I'm really excited

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 3>to see what he does in the second half.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>He is far and away too this year, the best

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>real life catcher. It's not even particularly close. I guess

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want to use Baseball Reference War for catchers,

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's always a bit of a back and forth

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>between which war to use for catchers, But using Fangrafts War,

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he's at three point nine and the next best Gabby Moreno,

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>at two point five, so a full win and a

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>half clear of number one.

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to be a total company man Homer here,

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 3>but I will say that you can't use b ref

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 3>war for catchers. It doesn't include the framing. You gotta

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 3>get the framing in there to really give him a

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 3>fair shake there. That's such an instrumental part. And I

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know if anyone's baking in challenges at all, but

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 3>he's one of the best challengers out there.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Saw a great thing from him about Dingler.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Jason Bennetti was talking about how he interviewed Scooble and

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 3>he had brought up a situation to him. I don't

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>remember the exact snaris, like you throw this pitch in

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 3>this count and it's worked so well, you're giving up

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 3>like a one hundred batting average whatever it was. He's like,

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 3>how do you do that? And Scooble was like, talk

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>to that man and pointed right to Dingler because he

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 3>has such instilled trust in him. Scooble didn't even know

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 3>what Bennetti was talking about, not that he wasn't clowning Benetti,

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 3>but he didn't understand, Like he's like, that sounds awesome.

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I just execute what he tells me. I have that

0:26:56.960 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 3>implicit trust in Dingler that if he says it's slider

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 3>outside right now, then it's slider outside.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 2>And now not every pitcher's like that.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Some want to have their own say in the call,

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 3>but it's so nice when you can have that implicit trust.

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Aj Ellis got a whole career off of building Kershaw's trust,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 3>and you know, he was a fine player himself.

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't I'm not trying to integrate him with that,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 2>but like he.

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Was a backup catcher who got a ten twelve year

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 3>career because he built the trust of one of the

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 3>greatest pitchers ever.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 2>And Dingler's doing that. He's a quite a bit better

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 2>than aj.

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Ellis, And I just love how he has built that

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 3>trust with the pitching staff. And that's part of why

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the Tigers are still kicking, even because in his hitting

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 3>and his ability to bring up the pitching, they're still

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 3>navigating this dog.

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Pardon me, I can don't know if we can swear.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 3>This terrible American league that leaves both of our teams

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 3>still in it despite being several games under five hundred

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 3>on June sixteenth, July sixteenth, Excuse.

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Me, it's unbelievable. Like even looking back at last year,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the Kyle Rawley had nine wins last year, just insane.

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Next best was four point seven for Alejandro Kirk over

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole season. Dylan Dinglar's three point nine this year

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and half a season would have been the fifth best

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>catcher season last year as a whole, and he's still

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>got half a year to man, he's one of the

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>five that he would have been behind based on his

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>four point one last year. So this is like, if

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking real life baseball over the next five years,

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>if we could take any catcher in the game, if

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you said Dylan, I wouldn't argue it right right.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 2>Might not be everyone's one one choice, but I certainly

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you. I wouldn't.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't blink at anybody's saying I love Dilly ding

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 3>He's excellent.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Played disciplines there, the power metrics are pretty solid, the

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>catching is obviously elite. Like he's just he covers a

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of different bases.

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Team leader too, not that that matters for fantasy, but

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 3>like it's clear that he helps lead that Tigers team absolutely.

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Today's show is brought to you by our presenting sponsor,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. If you haven't tried hard Rock Bet,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no better time to get in on the game.

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>We talked a lot of baseball, we talked a lot

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of football here at Fantasy Pros, but right now it

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is time for the other football and is your final

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>weekend to get in on the action. There's the third

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>place game and then there is the World Cup Final

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>taking place this weekend. Lots of excitement that will all

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>be over soon, so make sure you guys are checking out.

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock Bet is the top rated sportsbook app built

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to Viva la Copa and they've got some of the

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>best soccer promos out there. Promos just keep coming every

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>single day, so make sure you guys are checking out

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the app. If your first bet hits, you get one

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty in bonus bets, So just place that

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:20.719
<v Speaker 1>five dollars bet and if it wins, you get not

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>only your winnings, but an extra one hundred and fifty

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets as well. Hard Rock Bet is Florida's

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>only legal sportsbook, but you don't have to be in

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Florida to join the party this summer. Hard Rock Bet

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is also live in Welsh Town in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan, with more states on the way. Download the

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet app today and don't let the cump's

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest games pass you by. Roll with us. Goal with

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Us hard Rock Bet payable in bonus bets, not a

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>cash offer offered by the Seminol Tribe of Florida. In Florida,

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>offered by Seminole hard Rock Digital LLC. In all other states.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Must be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>three to three play wise. In Indiana. If you are

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who knows a gambling problem and wants help, call

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred and nine with it. In Arizona, Ohio

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and Virginia, call one eight hundred My reset gambling problem

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred gambler. Now these next two players,

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I put them together because they are both guys I

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think that have a wide range of outcomes. Here for

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>their ADP in the second half, and that's Jordan Walker

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and Pete crow Armstrong. We just did this last year

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>with PCA. Over the first half of the season he

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>had been declared the MVP and YadA, YadA, YadA, and

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>then the second half of the season he was arguably

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the worst hitter in all of baseball. He picks things

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>up this season where he didn't leave off actually where

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>he started in twenty twenty five. Twenty one homers, twenty

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>four steels, sixty three runs. He's hitting two ninety one.

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's better than he was at any point

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five. And then we have Jordan Walker,

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>who I think people had kind of given up on

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Walker to some extent, especially in the redraft community.

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 3>All the way you could have over one thousand plate appearances,

0:30:58.640 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I know he was only twenty four.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>That was probably the saving grace.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 3>I am somebody who you know, if you're young and

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 3>you still maybe your story's a bit unwritten, but once

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 3>you cross that thousand plate appearance threshold, I start to see,

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is kind of maybe who you are.

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 3>So I jumped off, and I say that specifically because

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 3>I was a Jordan Walker truther for those first three

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 3>years and throughout his prospect days. So it was kind

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 3>of tough, you know, I had voice of Man, it's

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 3>so hard to say goodbye playing in the background as

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 3>I was like picking them off my draft list, man,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and he was not expensive, but I'm like, what am

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I getting here? You know, you're starting to remind me

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 3>of a write handed version of Cardinals. Jason Hayward like

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 3>couldn't hit for a lick at all, and it was

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 3>just like all the talent there. Now he's starting to

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 3>play like the comp that I gave him the very

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 3>first moment I saw him. And I know comps are

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 3>lame and I don't always do them, but this one

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 3>just struck me because he.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Looks like him too. Derek Lee.

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>I saw Derek Lee the same size, their faces looked similar,

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 3>for God's sakes, their stay chants was similar. He was

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 3>raking at Fall League and I fell in love immediately.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 3>And again three years of hell well, actually the first

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 3>one was all right, one thirteen ops plus let's be

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>fair to the rookie, pretty solid, but then two absolute

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>piles of pooh in twenty four and twenty five, and

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 3>like I said, you crossed that thousand peer and spresial.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 3>It's not magic, just like one hundred pitches isn't magic.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 3>But it is a representative sample where you start to say,

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 3>who is this guy? Jerry's twenty four, But being young

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 3>alone doesn't make you better. So until I see something,

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm out. So I didn't get him anywhere. I regret it,

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 3>but I think process versus results. Process was right to

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily being on him. The results are He's been

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 3>amazing and I love him. I like him more than PCA.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Is that crazy to say I think he has a

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 3>more bankable back. I think I'm still I think you

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 3>can make the case that as well ahead of him.

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm sticking out my neck here on Walker because I

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 3>still have the same concerns that I had about PC. Well,

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 3>actually I shouldn't say same, because he's nearly tripled his

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 3>walk rate or over doubled his walk rate from four

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 3>and a half percent to eleven percent.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 2>That's huge for PCA. What I was.

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Concerned with is when you strike out too much and

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 3>you don't walk, that's.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>A deadly combo.

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, strike out's still a little bit high at twenty six,

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 3>but an eleven percent walk rate I can live with.

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 3>So I shouldn't say he's the same guy, but I

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>am still a little bit nervous about his volatility and

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 3>where that's gonna be. I might be getting two suckered

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 3>on half a season because of my previous love of

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Walker. I'm not saying I would necessarily take him

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 3>over PCA, because frankly, I don't think you have to.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I think PCA is going to be a first round

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 3>pick unless he utterly collapses again in the second half.

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably will too. Yeah, I'm just like

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>going through Walker's profile, He's got some add at batspeed

0:33:57.160 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. I mean quite a bit of added batsby.

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I think he hit driveline by the way I think

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 2>he did.

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he did, and that sometimes it works, sometimes

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work. It appears that it really worked for

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Walker, and that's kind of the main thing here

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>because you look at the chase rates, the contact raids,

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>the swing strike rate is a little bit better, but

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>still not great at fifteen percent, and it's really just

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the bat speed. And I saw Mike Petriello tweet something

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about this the other day to say bats speed is

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>not everything. But in the top twenty five batspeed leaderboard,

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 1>there's like twenty three guys having really good seasons, So

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it does appear to be a very important.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Pretty big deal.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It's still on the newer side, and people can be

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people still don't like WRC plus and stuff,

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>so they see something like basspeed and they might think, Okay,

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to worry about this, but it is

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>something that we need to pay attention to.

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it akin to velocity for pictures though, where it

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make you good? But what it is with velocity,

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the reason we stick with guys who throw one hundred

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 3>over the guys who throw ninety two is it increases

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 3>your margin for error. It raises your floor undeniably. I

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 3>think we've see that with the pitch velocity guaranteed percent undisputable.

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not as undisputed for the bat speed stuff, just

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 3>because it's a little bit newer, but I think it's

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 3>a very similar parallel there. So yeah, I do believe

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 3>that that is something that I would care about. You

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 3>mentioned WRC plus, by the way, and just to throw

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 3>it back to our boys in the nation's capital, they

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 3>were doing some all star questions of the guys, what

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 3>stat do you use to judge yourself? And most of

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 3>them said ops, which, hey, you could do worse. You

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 3>could have said, like batting average, you know, because batting

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 3>average has.

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 2>A one unit. This is how good I am. Absolutely not.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Single tier rolled down my face when James Wood said

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 3>WRC plus single tier rolled down my face. When Corbyn

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Carrol said, whoa bah, I'm like the kids, man, they're

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna be alright.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Baby, I was.

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I was really really.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Happy to hear that they're looking at those second third

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 3>level stats to try to see how good they're And again,

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.439
<v Speaker 3>no one stat is perfect, but WRC plus overaps all day.

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And just looking at the bat speed leaderboard, the

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>only guy who's swinging the bath hearder this year than

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Walker is Junior Cam. And you keep going down the list,

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of guys that are like really like

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>cam Smith is fourth, Garrett Mitchell is fifth. But you

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>look in the top twenty five and thirty, it's Schwarbur, Wilson, Contrerez,

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>James Wood, Julio Colson, Montgomery, Vladimir Guerrero, Gordon Alvarez, Riley Green,

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Carroll like, it's the guys that are having great seasons.

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>And again it's not everything. But you sort by the

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.720
<v Speaker 1>bottom of that leader board and there are some guys

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>having good seasons. But it's like, I completely agree Paul.

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's pitching velocity for hitters. But there'll be some

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>blowhards on Twitter who say, no, no, no, we don't

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>need to care about how hard you hit the ball

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. And I feel like that it's

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>still crazy.

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Fine Jason Michaels are going to be the ones

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 3>saying that.

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but people listen to those old I know players

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason.

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 3>And I just because it confirms blues that they already

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 3>had and they don't want to learn new stuff. And

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:51.479
<v Speaker 3>like old man yon at Cloud et cetera, et cetera.

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 3>But like, come on, man, I do wonder you know

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.919
<v Speaker 3>if that makes Cam Smith interesting for next year. He'll

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 3>be twenty five or twenty four next year with guess

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 3>what about a thousand plate appearances under his belt. He's

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 3>at eight to fifty right now. He should get another

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 3>buck fifty this year and it's gonna be a better

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 3>result than Walker. But maybe that says stick with him.

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Who was the other one you said, Oh, Garrett Mitchell.

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.760
<v Speaker 3>And Garrett Mitchell is somebody who has certainly shown flashes

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 3>of greatness. If he could just make more contact with it,

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 3>so we know he beats the piss out of it

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 3>when he makes connection. The problem is is his strikeout

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 3>rate has been consistently thirty two thirty three percent the

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 3>last four years, actually his entire career. I'm sorry, he's

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 3>a thirty four percent career guy for seven hundred and

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 3>fifty six play appearances. But honestly that makes me interested

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 3>in both. From a long term standpoint, Maybe cam Smith,

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 3>if you're in a keeper league and you're out of

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 3>it this year, go see what's up. Ideally they would

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 3>be on a contending team. Cam Smith would say you

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 3>could give them some contending pieces and get yourself a

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>cam Smith. But I would be interested in buying off

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 3>of bat Speed because I used to buy off of

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't play any trading leagues anymore, but I used

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to buy off of Velocity with pictures and it doesn't

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 3>work every time, but it works generally.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, looking at cam Smith, I might declare him my

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 1>first like my guy of twenty twenty seven. Just thinking

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>about the trajectory of the bat speed, he gained three

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>miles an hour on his bat speed from twenty five

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>past six.

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 3>He has twelve and nine too. Like he's not totally worthless.

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 3>This year, despite the slash being lagging.

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It looked like he was. I think I wrote an

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>article earlier this year about like the breakout of him,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't stuck because you know, he's kind of

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>fallen off a little bit. July, it's a fifty WRC

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>plus so far. It was a seventy four in May,

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but we've seen flashes. I think it was the first

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>couple weeks of the year. Cam Smith was a hot

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>fab guy in like week one or week two or three,

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of fell up a little bit. But

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the bat speed gains, the raised launch angle this year,

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the hard hit rate, barrel ray going up. This feels

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>like the year before with Jordan, because you look at

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Walker did last season and it's kind of the

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Like he had really good bad speed. It

0:38:56.920 --> 0:39:00.720
<v Speaker 1>was an increase in bad speed. He went from seventy

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 1>seven to seventy eight from twenty four to twenty five.

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>The barrel went up, the heart e rate went up,

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was like he was on the precipice. It

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there, and obviously he had a sixty six WRC plus.

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>He needed some fine tuning. But Cam Smith coming into

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that already at an eighty seven WRC plus, a guy

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 1>who got traded and had to learn a new position

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff and in the major star yeah,

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>like you know, it's almost like Andrew Vaughan with the

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 1>White Sox, like, oh, we have Jose Bray you now,

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna be a right fielder and Cam Smith

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>has to change positions. He's traded for Kyle Tucker. A

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure still so young, Like this was not

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>meant to be a Cam Smith discussion.

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 2>No, but I'm I'm with you, dude. This is taking

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>my hand.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm putting a little star next to him mentally that

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 3>I want to keep tabs on this because you know,

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 3>you have to look at that second and third level.

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 3>We just talked about how much we like WRC plus,

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 3>but it doesn't tell you everything. It starts to story. Okay,

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 3>he his WRC plus sucks. Well, what's under the hood.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 3>And when we start to look under the hood, there

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 3>might be an engine here worth buying into. Put a

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 3>little elbow grease on it, and all of a sudden

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 3>we got a guy. Because here's the thing too. In

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 3>his uh six hundred game or six hundred point appearance average.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 3>He's fifteen to twelve cam Smith is, and so if

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 3>he is hitting them, that's with an eighty seven WRC

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 3>plus if he's closer to one hundred or one ten

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 3>even which isn't even a stud that's like average.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 2>How's he not a twenty twenty guy?

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Then, let alone the ceiling to go way higher if

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 3>things break out. So, yeah, you totally sold me just

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 3>on that one metric and what it could mean for

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 3>cam Smith with the skills we've seen around it.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Last piece I will say on cam Smith because I mean,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I could honestly spend a lot of time talking about him,

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but from last year to this year, it's it looks

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>like he's taking a downward trajectory. If you just look like, oh,

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the batting average is worse, the on base percentage is worse,

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>longercentage is about the same. But Walker kind of did

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the same thing for a couple of years. Yeah, it

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>looked like he was sputtering. It looked like the career

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like, Okay, he might end up being

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a bus but you got to

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>stick with these guys. They're still so young. Walker is

0:40:56.360 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, Cam Smith is twenty three. These are still

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so young. I'm not saying like, all right, Jared Kelvick

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna figure out, Like not everybody is gonna work

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>right out, but cam Smith, when they have the skills

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>below the surface, it really really is piquing my interest

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>here with cam Smith. I want to hop into a

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>draft right now actually for next year, just so I

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>can take cam Smith.

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 3>This is a real by low too, because you know,

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 3>it's easy to say by low when somebody has a

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 3>two point fifty wOBA and a four hundred expected wOBA,

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 3>it's like, okay.

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 2>Cool, and hey, I've done that too.

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not I sound more sarcastic than I'm trying to be,

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 3>but like, really, the only thing to cling here is

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 3>prospect pedigree, some decent counting stats for camp Smith and

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 3>this Batspeed piece, but you can truly buy low. There's

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 3>no way somebody's gonna be asking a big price in

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 3>the market right now if you go try to get

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 3>him in a Keeper of Dynasty league, there's just no

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 3>way they might ask for like a real piece back.

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 3>But nobody's gonna be asking for premium, not what it

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 3>was when the prospect hype was built up last year

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:55.800
<v Speaker 3>when he was first coming up, or at the beginning

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 3>of this year when he had like four homers and

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 3>four steels relatively quickly.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm totally with you.

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 3>We did not mean to make this a camp Smith bitch.

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>That is all we do, though, will I will stamp that.

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll stamp that part by saying, I do think PCA

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 3>that as long as he doesn't collapse like he did

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 3>last year, and I mean collapse, he can regress. But

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 3>as long as he doesn't collapse, I think he's a

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 3>first rounder. I think Jordan Walker is going to be

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 3>like a third fourth rounder type and I'll be probably

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.360
<v Speaker 3>happy to pay that because he also has some sneaky

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 3>speed too. He has thirteen steals. He had ten last year.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 3>He was ten for thirteen. He knows how to run

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 3>again the Derek Lee comps run across the board for

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 3>me with him and Derek Lee had some sneaky steel seasons.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 3>People remember him as a nice power guy, but he

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 3>had a four year run of nineteen twenty one, twelve

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.240
<v Speaker 3>and fifteen steals from a big burly first baseman.

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 2>So Jaywalk Derek Lee two point zero baby, He is.

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Just an athlete like six six, two fifty, Like he's

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>a pretty unit. But ninety ninth percentile arm strength, one

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred percentile bat speed, ninety eighth average ex at velocity,

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and ninety second percentile sprint speed. He is just a

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.439
<v Speaker 1>true package. Now, the defense as a whole, I don't

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think is that great, but he feels like a guy

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>who could develop into five tools. Typically. We spent a

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>long time there, so let's move on and talk about

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Alvarez and Byron Buxton, the guys who are the

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote injury concerns who have stayed healthy. With Buckston,

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're gonna get a couple of eye also,

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten nicked ub Yeah, but by and large, like

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy five games, he has twenty five bombs, seven steals,

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting two seventy one. And then Jordan Alvarez, it's

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just you know, a god one eighty six WRC plus

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that's like the Judge Judge Otani levels. Yeah, like it's

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that type of It's probably a tier of one right

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>now with Judge out, when Judge's back, as the two

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:44.359
<v Speaker 1>of them, and I think they're both a half step

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Otani even but what do we do with

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this going forward for guys who historically have been pretty

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>banged up, especially Buxton. I mean, we went a decade

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>without Buckston playing one hundred games, and now he seems

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to have done it a couple times in a row.

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>But he's also gonna be thirty three next year. That

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Jordon's gonna be hidden. Jordon's gonna be hitting thirty. So

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna be more fades? Especially because Jordon's gonna

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be a first rounder next.

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 3>Year at Bucks, he is only gonna be like second third.

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Second third depends on the second half goes fades.

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's say he gets through this this ile stint.

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it was a big injury.

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's say he gets off of this pretty clean, comes back,

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 3>does more of this big damage. I think we could

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 3>see some second third round Buckston. They're both gonna be

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 3>fades for me, though Alvarez's knees are forty five years old, man,

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.919
<v Speaker 3>and like, look, I'm not gonna roast anybody for taking

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 3>him because we cannot predict the future. And looking out

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 3>Grady is this year because I had the same take

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 3>coming into this year.

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I love him.

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 3>He's a great player, I'm terrified of him, and so

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I missed out on thirty one homers and seventy ribs

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 3>in the first half. That danger is not gonna wane.

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 3>It's only gonna get worse with those knees. And then,

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 3>like you said, Buxton, we do not have enough time

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:56.839
<v Speaker 3>to go over all of his injuries, and even with

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the two one hundred game seasons these last two years,

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 3>it's only one two and one twenty six.

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 2>He just can do so much and so little.

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 3>He's the present day Eric Davis, which is a compliment

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 3>but also a warning to be nervous because Eric Davis

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 3>struggled to play full seasons. He was great in the

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 3>times that he played, But do you want to invest

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 3>that much draft capital bucks then a lot more appealing

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 3>when he's more of a mid rounder and you can

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 3>take that shot on it. But when you're paying that

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 3>firm third, fourth round, maybe even second round if he

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.879
<v Speaker 3>has a great second half, I don't think I can

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 3>get there. And Alvarez as a top three, four five pick.

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm just too scared of the knees.

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Dude.

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 3>That maybe too simplistic, but I don't know why that's wrong.

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>To be worried about his body.

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Still no, And it's like the Dylan Ces type of

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>thing or the even an odd year Nola, like you

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>buy the dip. Last year was the dip on Alvarez.

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>That was the year to buy. It was the year

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy Mazarowski and Burns and those guys too. But

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez is not going to be anywhere close to a

0:45:58.200 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>fourth rounder again. I mean maybe if he gets he

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>will be, but I think he's got enough good will

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point that even if he did miss the

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 1>final to.

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Be end of the year devastating injury.

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like he's gonna be a first rounder. Yeah, maybe

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>he falls into like the one two turn, But like, regardless,

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be expensive. He's gonna be really really expensive.

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't really see what the point isn't paying that. Also,

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Houston as a whole, they used to be this juggernaut

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>offensively that if you had a piece of the Houston lineup,

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it was like, holy crap, he's got the A.

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 3>And for the first two months this year too, by

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the way, I should point out, for the first two

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 3>months they were up there. They eventually faded, but it

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 3>was looking like they might be again. But they just

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 3>lost too many people. They're too thin. It really is,

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, Alrez trying to put the team on his

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 3>back with a few with a few guys with him,

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:48.879
<v Speaker 3>but he doesn't really have a second guy there.

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 2>And then Correa got hurt.

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, Partez, Panya Walker, They're fine, but he does

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 3>not really have a Robin right now.

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no Tucker, there's no Springer, there's no Bregman. This

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is not h the teams that we were seeing over

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the last decade in Houston, they're they're at the end

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of their quote unquote dynasty. Al Twove is still not bad,

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but like, this is not a this is not a

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 1>lineup where you look at it. It's like, oh, he's

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna boost up his runs and RBI simply by existing

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in that lineup. He's gonna have a lot of them regardless.

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 1>But he doesn't get the plus being an astro that

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he would have a couple of years ago. And then Buxton,

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>who has declared unequivocally he wants to be a Twin

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:27.560
<v Speaker 1>forever even though they are literally the Titanic. I don't

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:30.479
<v Speaker 1>get it, but it's not gonna be good.

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't bag on players when they don't want to leave.

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you should have to want to leave.

0:47:37.360 --> 0:47:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not, maybe not, And why.

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:42.399
<v Speaker 2>You have to only seek out winning.

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Championship for me again, for you, for you, for me,

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:48.959
<v Speaker 1>for me.

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 3>For me.

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I would see it is the ultimate goal of winning,

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of being in this league, especially after you've made your

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>millions like Buckston has, you would think it would be

0:47:57.920 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to get a ring.

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 3>He wants to win, and I'm not saying that that's

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 3>a realistic dream, But like I don't like bagging on

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 3>players who don't want to leave, first off, when they

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 3>play long enough to earn that right, especially which he has.

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:12.720
<v Speaker 3>He's a ten to five guy, ten years in the league,

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 3>five with the same team. Listen, moving sounds like a

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 3>it's always a nightmare moving in season. I don't know

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 3>what his family situation, if he has a wife, kids

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 3>and all that that throw on extra If so, though,

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 3>because that's an extra nightmare.

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:27.719
<v Speaker 2>So I get it.

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe an offseason where he says, Okay, we can kind

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 3>of plan this whole thing out and decide. But I

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 3>totally get not wanting to be traded mid season. That

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 3>seems like hell and b shots to the guys who

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 3>can handle it. Every year you know or regular. We've

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 3>seen so Laier get traded twice. I think both times

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 3>to the braces. I wonder if they'll go get him

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:48.360
<v Speaker 3>a third time this year. Like some guys can handle

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 3>it and thrive with it and respect. But I understand

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 3>Buckston knows who he is and he's like, I'm not

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 3>going anywhere, And.

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>That's probably the fair take. I just I would view

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>it if I was a professional athlet I would think,

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>especially if I was a guy who was already financially secure,

0:49:03.920 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 1>you'd think, I want a championship. Sure, but he's he

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>wants to stay in Minnesota.

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 3>So what if he wants to secure that legacy in

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota that might not include a championship, but maybe has

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years of spars but impact play when.

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>He was playing fifteen years in the three hundred and

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>seventy two games.

0:49:22.680 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, fifteen years and four total seasons of games.

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 1>No, true, I don't. I don't mean to bag on

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.800
<v Speaker 1>him like he is. If he was healthy his whole career,

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he'd probably be a first ballot Hall of Fame.

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I think so just so talented athletically coming up, and

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it these last couple of years now that

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>he's on the wrong side of thirty, putting up a

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty five to twenty five season last year and not

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>even a whole year like he's so talented. But the

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:48.320
<v Speaker 1>team around him next year to go back to the

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>initial point, I don't expect it to be a really

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>good team either. So it's kind of Buxton has to

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do all of this on his own because I imagine

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Jeffers is going to probably get shipped out, and he's

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of the only guy that I think.

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Is that.

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Fully depends on how they're a game under.

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 3>They're in a way better situation than both of our

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 3>teams that we said aren't going to sell, So I

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know why they got to. Now we get extra time.

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:14.879
<v Speaker 3>The deadline is the third of August, so there's extra time.

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 3>These teams are gonna take every moment that they can.

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 3>But I think it would be tough to go in

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 3>there and tell the guys that you're gonna sell Jeffers

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 3>right now, I think you got not that they're legit

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 3>World Series contenders, but once you get in the dance,

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:30.279
<v Speaker 3>you never know, And so I think they owe it

0:50:30.320 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 3>to that team to at least play it out here

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 3>till about July twenty eight, twenty ninth, they kind of

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 3>see where they're at before they start moving Jeffers and

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe like an Ober or Joe Ryan. Obviously Joe Ryan

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 3>will get a lot, so they could do that thing.

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 3>Remember when the Tigers traded Flaherty and then made the run.

0:50:45.640 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 3>They could trade Joe Ryan, get impact talent for this year,

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 3>fill in two spots, and then still make a run.

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I know that's it would still strike morale in the

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 3>clubhouse to see their big dude go. But they could

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 3>definitely do that play that sort of one foot in,

0:51:01.520 --> 0:51:02.800
<v Speaker 3>one foot out type of vibe.

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess that's true. I don't know. I feel

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 1>like the way that the wind has been blowing. Maybe

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just media bs, but it feels like they are

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:14.880
<v Speaker 1>positioned more to move off of some of the expiring

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>deals that could not end up coming to fruition. Even

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if we go into next year with the team as

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>currently constructed or roughly this team, I don't think they're

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a great team. I don't think I don't great offense,

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as all had a pretty good offensive season. To their credit,

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>they have a one oh five w RC plus I

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 1>don't see them as a great offensive unit. And the

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>overall point is, I just don't think that we could

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>see like a hundred plus runs and a hundred plus rbi,

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:42.160
<v Speaker 1>especially considering a good point the likely time he's gonna miss.

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And as a second rounder, I'm kind of hoping for

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred runs and a hundred RBI. So mm hmm,

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:49.400
<v Speaker 1>they're they're both. They're both generally gonna be on the

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 1>fade for me. But if you can only take one

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or the other, who do you trust more? From a

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:56.680
<v Speaker 1>health perspective? Is it your on or is it busting

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you think?

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 2>I think I would go for for Alvarez more. It

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 2>is his knees.

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 3>It's pretty specifically that with Bucks and it's I mean,

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:07.719
<v Speaker 3>he's the operation guy from that old, that old game,

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 3>like everything is ailing him, you know, not right now,

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:10.760
<v Speaker 3>of course, thankfully.

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean he is on the il. But it's not

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:14.120
<v Speaker 2>like I forget what it was.

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 3>I should look it up before I keep saying it

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 3>wasn't a major injury. But yeah, it would be Alvarez.

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 3>But that price is so high that it'd be tough.

0:52:22.040 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 3>But he is the one I would pay for.

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's wrap it up here with a couple

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of rapid fire ones. Okay, it's the top top twenty

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>wanton rapid fire relative to you and I to us,

0:52:33.880 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it might be that might that might be a half hour.

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 3>But injury, by the way, is what he has and

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 3>it's not supposed to keep him out for a super

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:46.080
<v Speaker 3>long time. Should be eligible to return pretty much at

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 3>the ten days here, which is right after the break.

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, go ahead, Okay, that's really good.

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:51.879
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, that's goot. This good context because I wasn't

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:55.720
<v Speaker 1>sure what it was either the top twenty guys who

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have been washed out, it's mostly due to injury this year,

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and they're for the that really come to mind. Hm,

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you could probably you could probably add a couple more

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>like I could probably have Vladi in here, But I've

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:08.759
<v Speaker 1>spoken enough about him and I'm sick of talking about him.

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about Aaron Judge, Ronald Acunia Junior, Garrett Crochet,

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and cal Rawley. These were all drafted as cornerstones either

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>first or second round picks, and Judge, Acunya and Crochet's

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:22.720
<v Speaker 1>case almost exclusively first round picks, and then Raleigh usually

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more into the second. How will this impact their price?

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And I guess with Judge. You also got a factor

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in the age thing here because Aaron Judge is probably

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 1>older than you realize. He was debuted I think he

0:53:32.719 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was twenty five or twenty twenty four.

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, twenty four debut for twenty seven games, but then

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 3>his first full season age twenty five.

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Or twenty five. So he's gonna he's thirty four coming

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 1>off of what'll be, uh mostly a washed out injury season.

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:47.919
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when you look at twenty twenty one,

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>actually didn't miss that much time in twenty one. It

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:52.879
<v Speaker 1>was more twenty nineteen and twenty eighteen where he did

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:56.560
<v Speaker 1>miss significant time. Twenty three it was the I think

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he ran into the outfield at Dodgers Stadium. He like

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>ros a toe on the wall or something like that.

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 1>But we have seen injuries from him. We've also seen

0:54:03.840 --> 0:54:06.320
<v Speaker 1>like he's arguably the greatest right handed hitter who's ever lived.

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So is he still I think he's still a first

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>round pick? Is he still gonna be in the conversation

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:12.880
<v Speaker 1>for the one oh one though? If he ends the

0:54:12.880 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>season healthy, because usually the last couple of years it's

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:18.319
<v Speaker 1>been judged versus o TAWNI, could you make the argument

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.359
<v Speaker 1>for taking him at number one after the year we've seen.

0:54:21.360 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, if he finishes on the field being Aaron Judge,

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it won't be hard for a decent contingent

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 3>of fantasy managers to say he's in the one to

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 3>one conversation again, because yes, I'll be thirty five, and

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 3>yes he's got some injuries under his belt as well,

0:54:35.360 --> 0:54:39.800
<v Speaker 3>but he is so good, he's so unbelievable.

0:54:40.120 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna be fade and Judge.

0:54:41.719 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Now, the other three on this list probably gonna be

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty easy fades for me, almost assuredly, depending on where

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 3>they go. But Judge is one that, even at the

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:52.279
<v Speaker 3>extreme price, which is probably gonna be a top three,

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:55.040
<v Speaker 3>four or five pick depending on how he finishes the season,

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I can still get there if I see the Aaron

0:54:57.719 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Judge that I want in October, because I assume the

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:01.840
<v Speaker 3>ankles a make the playoffs. We'll see, but I assume

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 3>and he's there doing Aaron Judge things, and I mean

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 3>being good. And I know he's had some playoff struggles.

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 3>That wasn't a diss on him, But as long as

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 3>he's upright and playing, he's in contention for one of

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 3>those top three picks. For me.

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Acuni is also really interesting because we obviously know the ceiling.

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>But it's been three straight years now of this type

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of you know he's not gonna plays. I just I

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think I can do it anymore, especially paying exhorbited.

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:32.840
<v Speaker 1>It's exactly that I could be. I'm sorry, I keep up,

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but drafted though I know you're good, you're good. Where

0:55:35.000 --> 0:55:36.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think he's going drafted next year? Is he

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a second round or maybe third?

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:55:38.520 --> 0:55:40.399
<v Speaker 3>And that's the thing, like you said, people keep paying

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the premium form, and for years, going back to Bufston

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 3>real Quick, we kept paying the premium form, so it

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 3>was hard to even get discounts on him. It finally

0:55:47.239 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 3>took until last year and then he broke out and

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 3>really paid off the people that stuck with him. But

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 3>with a Kunya like, the talent is still there. I'm

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:58.439
<v Speaker 3>not suggesting that he's a scrub. Seven and fifteen isn't bad,

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 3>but he's fifteen for twenty two on the basis you

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:03.680
<v Speaker 3>want to talk about some Swiss cheese knees. He's had

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:07.279
<v Speaker 3>major surgeries on both and I was roasting Alvarez on

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 3>his he doesn't want to use his Alvarez all he

0:56:10.120 --> 0:56:12.799
<v Speaker 3>needs to do is trot and rip easy doubles into

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the gap that he can coast into. Acunya's legs are

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 3>a key component of his game. He's going to be

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:20.839
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine, which isn't old, but he does have ten

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 3>years in the league now. You know it'll be going

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:25.400
<v Speaker 3>into his tenth year, I should say. And so I

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:29.320
<v Speaker 3>don't see I don't see myself taking him really anywhere,

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:32.840
<v Speaker 3>barring just a huge collapse in price, which would probably

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 3>take another catastrophic injury because he's already working his way

0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 3>back on rehab right now. Hit A Homer should be

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 3>back in the second half, and we'll probably do a

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:42.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of fun Acunya things. But I don't see myself

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:44.399
<v Speaker 3>drafting him. I can't get there.

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm there too, and I think I'm there

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for Crochet as well, like I wanted to be in

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 1>on Crochet. I love him, but all these setbacks and

0:56:52.000 --> 0:56:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not even throwing the ball and it just looks

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 1>really And they said he won't need surgery, but I

0:56:57.760 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know, we've heard that before.

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:03.480
<v Speaker 2>No, I really don't think so. And you know, at

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:07.400
<v Speaker 2>this point, what do we have? One season?

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, two, that's unfair to say one the twenty twenty

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 3>four was at least two thirds of a season. I

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:16.440
<v Speaker 3>know that third coming down the stretch there he was

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 3>basically shelved, which I was actually fine with, you know,

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 3>And I totally respected him when he said, if you're

0:57:22.080 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna trade me, give me a deal, let me get it.

0:57:24.560 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, I had no problem with that. He was

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:31.400
<v Speaker 3>advocating for themselves exactly like he knows, like picture, when

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you throw this hard. We just got done talking about

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 3>with Miz. For as exciting as it can be to

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 3>talk about miss and Schlitzler, crochet is that cold water

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 3>of like, yeah, it doesn't always go perfectly, even when

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:43.920
<v Speaker 3>the skills are immaculate, and they are, and I know

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:45.920
<v Speaker 3>that his six starts that he had this year one thing,

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 3>I throw it all out injury wash out season. But

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:53.080
<v Speaker 3>it's another injury wash out season. So I don't think

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna go super cheap crochet. And so that's a

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 3>part of why too. If I thought there was going

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 3>to be some sort of substantial discount, sure, but do

0:58:00.480 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 3>you think he gets past Let's just say that. Let's

0:58:04.120 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 3>say he comes back this year September, and he's fine

0:58:08.880 --> 0:58:11.120
<v Speaker 3>He's not elite. He's kind of like what Schoobl's been

0:58:11.240 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 3>since returning from his injury. Fine, but not Schoobl. You

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 3>know what if he does that, they don't make the playoffs.

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 3>You know they could, but let's just say they don't

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and we're go into next year with him having ended

0:58:23.040 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 3>the season healthy. Do you think Crochet is going to

0:58:25.120 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 3>go later than the third round? I don't, and in

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:29.640
<v Speaker 3>which case I don't think I can get there.

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the horrible comp and I hate to say

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it is Cole Reagan of course, right, it's the bright

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 1>lefty that pops off for a year or two. And

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Cole Reagan's has still been expensive over the last couple

0:58:42.480 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of years. Even last year was a bad injury washed

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>out year, and Reagan's was still a fourth rounder. And

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think his peak is it is better. I one

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of my most rostered pitchers this year, a huge l

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But Crochet, I think at his peak is a better

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>pitcher than Reagan's. Agreed, No, it's arguable, but I think

0:58:57.440 --> 0:58:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Crochet is a little bit better. So yeah, the price

0:58:59.400 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>will be higher assuming he finishes the year healthy. Now

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the other side of that coin, what if we don't

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 1>see him again this year. Then I think we're starting scared.

0:59:08.160 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, then things start to get interesting because then I

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:13.920
<v Speaker 3>wonder if it's more an eight to eleven round range,

0:59:14.440 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and then all of a sudden, you know it's a

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.560
<v Speaker 3>little bit of wide range there building in. But then

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:20.000
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, I start to look at things

0:59:20.200 --> 0:59:22.320
<v Speaker 3>quite a bit differently where I can take that risk,

0:59:22.600 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 3>because once you start to get in those middle to

0:59:24.400 --> 0:59:26.560
<v Speaker 3>late rounds, you know that not all those guys are

0:59:26.560 --> 0:59:28.440
<v Speaker 3>going to be on your team all year anyway. You

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 3>don't just take flyers or anything, not saying that you

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 3>would want to do that, but like you could go

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 3>for a potential ace hoping to spike it big with him,

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that would be a by the dip situation. But anything

0:59:38.120 --> 0:59:41.280
<v Speaker 3>in those first four or five rounds with Crochet, I'm

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 3>probably looking elsewhere.

0:59:43.960 --> 0:59:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I have to agree. Unfortunately, as much

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 1>as I'd love to continue to draft him, it's just

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel good. It really doesn't feel like a

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:55.160
<v Speaker 1>good situation. But this is one where we really do

0:59:55.240 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>need to see the second half, because if he starts

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:59.280
<v Speaker 1>five games at the end of the year looks brilliant,

0:59:59.400 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>then you might see him in the second because people

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>are crazy.

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, we saw what happen with Bradish, and I was

1:00:04.240 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 3>part of it, so I'm not throwing stones at anybody.

1:00:06.440 --> 1:00:08.600
<v Speaker 2>He had six excellent starts down the stretch.

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 3>We thought that that magically fixed him and should have

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 3>been more cautious on it, for sure, But he was

1:00:13.800 --> 1:00:15.680
<v Speaker 3>a top twenty pitcher and it wasn't just me and

1:00:15.720 --> 1:00:18.200
<v Speaker 3>a few other end was his ADP was I think

1:00:18.320 --> 1:00:21.600
<v Speaker 3>SP twenty one, so like I was at SP seventeen,

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, so I was higher, but like the market

1:00:23.880 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 3>was hot on him too.

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I would be careful of wanting to do that with Crochet,

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 2>but I think that's exactly what happened.

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:32.120
<v Speaker 3>You're right, if he came back showed himself to be Crochet,

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 3>He's right back in the second round.

1:00:33.840 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I bet one more name and we will wrap it

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>up here, and it's cal Rawley. And this one is

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so puzzling from a number of perspectives because I don't

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>think anybody expected another sixty bombs. But cal Rawley has

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>always been a good Major League hitter. On twenty two

1:00:47.000 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>worc plus one, fourteen, one, eighteen and one sixty one

1:00:51.200 --> 1:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>last year and then down to seventy one, and I

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think Paul it feels like there was an injury going

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>back before the season or something. I know he has

1:00:58.760 --> 1:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>missed some time with the injury. The bat speed has

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>gone down, the average exit velocity, barrel heard, hit rate,

1:01:04.800 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>every important stat that we cite is down. He's chasing more,

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>worse contact within the zone, worse contact in general. I

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is one where I will probably buy

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the dip in the two catcher leagues if he's like

1:01:16.560 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a you know, pick one hundred and ten next year

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or something, which maybe you won't fall that far. But

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if he does happen to fall, well, okay, here's an

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. Next year. Would you rather have Dingler or

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I knew you were going to do that.

1:01:28.000 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I knew it.

1:01:30.120 --> 1:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, you know, I think I go Dingler. And

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'm a little bit influenced by this year. I'm

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>not saying their performances this year. I'm talking more about

1:01:39.520 --> 1:01:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the batting average. I've whined incessantly about my main event betting.

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:45.240
<v Speaker 3>I'd talked about it earlier, but I am struck by that.

1:01:45.280 --> 1:01:46.960
<v Speaker 3>And I've had a batting average problem in the last

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>couple of years. This nothing like this, but I am

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 3>clearly making draft decisions where I'm a shooting batting average

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 3>too much and I'm winding up in these situations.

1:01:55.000 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And then this year was just a.

1:01:56.240 --> 1:02:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Collection of awfulness with Meryl, Trey Turner, and Machado sinking completely,

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think that would be the reason for me

1:02:03.720 --> 1:02:07.120
<v Speaker 3>to go Dingler. We never thought sixty was coming again,

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:09.360
<v Speaker 3>but I had him down for another thirty. I was like,

1:02:09.400 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 3>even if he hits two thirty and thirty, that's not

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>a second round pick, but like, that won't kill your season.

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you, rallies injured if you know has been

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 3>injured this year that.

1:02:17.680 --> 1:02:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Has caused this.

1:02:18.680 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>If he does go down though into that let's say,

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, one ten to one twenty range, that does

1:02:26.040 --> 1:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>become a lot more appealing. And I can also see

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 3>myself doubling the two up, taking Dingler and Raleigh together

1:02:32.400 --> 1:02:35.840
<v Speaker 3>like a one safe quote unquote and then one risky

1:02:35.880 --> 1:02:38.160
<v Speaker 3>type of vibe there right in the middle of the draft.

1:02:38.280 --> 1:02:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Secure both my catchers and see what I can get

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:41.640
<v Speaker 3>out of them as a combo.

1:02:41.960 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot will depend on what we get.

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:45.000
<v Speaker 3>From Raleigh the rest of the year, but I'm not

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>totally out that is going to be very much price

1:02:48.320 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 3>dependent will the market. Like let's say he stays pretty

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:53.480
<v Speaker 3>bad and ends the season with like an eighty nine

1:02:53.520 --> 1:02:56.680
<v Speaker 3>WRC plus twenty one homers. You know that would still

1:02:56.680 --> 1:02:59.400
<v Speaker 3>give him ten to eleven twelve down the stretch here, but

1:02:59.480 --> 1:03:02.720
<v Speaker 3>like nothing special to write home about. I could see

1:03:02.720 --> 1:03:04.920
<v Speaker 3>the price createring because if you really think about it, it's

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 3>only one transcendent season. Thirty four one hundred with two

1:03:08.200 --> 1:03:10.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty and twenty twenty four was good, but two twenty's

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:13.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty tough even in today's average environment. Two twenty is

1:03:13.560 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 3>still bad. So the thirty four to one hundred good,

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>but it can only do so much, so I will

1:03:19.160 --> 1:03:22.240
<v Speaker 3>be open to buying the DIMP, but I really want

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to see where it goes with rally. And if you

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:26.240
<v Speaker 3>put me to it right now and say, hey, fifth

1:03:26.360 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 3>sixth round, maybe you no.

1:03:29.760 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Feels a little rich? Yeah, Like he hasn't really picked

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>things up in July. It's only ten games but one

1:03:35.120 --> 1:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>homer hitting two hundred in June, fourteen games yet one

1:03:37.840 --> 1:03:41.439
<v Speaker 1>seventy four with one homer just bad, just really bad.

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I do think you will turn it around. I

1:03:43.520 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>do think the price will be cheaper, but let us

1:03:45.880 --> 1:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>know down below. What do you think who would you

1:03:47.960 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>rather have? Between Cal Rawley and Dylan Dingler. I want

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to start a fight in the comments. We'll see if

1:03:52.520 --> 1:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it happens. But Paul, thank you so much for joining

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>me today. It was a lot of fun putting you

1:03:58.040 --> 1:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in the analyst chair instead of the usual verse that

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we have. But let people know where they can keep

1:04:02.200 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>up with you. Any work upcoming that you'd like to

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>plug that people should be keeping a lookout for.

1:04:06.760 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Should have an spachart update next week. I was gonna

1:04:10.360 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>get it done this week, but I'm at my sisters

1:04:12.040 --> 1:04:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and I'm on my laptop. It's a nightmare. Dude. I

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 3>like to have my big setup, my multiple monitors working

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>on my desktop, so I'm not gonna be doing that

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:21.439
<v Speaker 3>this week. I said, I really wanted to take a break,

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>So next week starting picture ranking update. Over at fangraps.

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I do my speachart daily back tomorrow. Is this gonna

1:04:28.840 --> 1:04:30.520
<v Speaker 3>come out on Thursday? The sixteenth?

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Thursday? Gonna come out on Friday?

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Should be Friday, okay, So then the speachart is up

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:37.919
<v Speaker 3>now for Friday's games, and I do that Monday through

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Friday over at fangraps. I do the podcast with you

1:04:40.080 --> 1:04:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and Justin of course, and so yeah, just follow me

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>on fangrass. I am on Twitter and Instagram, but I

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 3>don't really go on them as much anymore.

1:04:46.800 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>I really hate Twitter.

1:04:48.000 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 3>I know, I tell you that all the time, but

1:04:50.800 --> 1:04:52.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, I like to go look at Wiener dog

1:04:52.800 --> 1:04:55.960
<v Speaker 3>picks on Instagram and thankfully my feed is littered with

1:04:56.400 --> 1:04:58.640
<v Speaker 3>just a bunch of stupid Wiener dogs and they're so

1:04:58.920 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>hilariously adorable. Yeah, follow me on social but definitely come

1:05:02.600 --> 1:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>over to fangraft and I'm always in my comments, so

1:05:04.840 --> 1:05:07.480
<v Speaker 3>you wanna, hey, why you're ranking this guy here? I

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:09.160
<v Speaker 3>got this guy in a twelve team and I'm debating

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 3>these two. I'm always in there answering questions.

1:05:12.400 --> 1:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Paul is truly one of the best. You definitely should

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>be following this work at spore. He's just, you know,

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>one of my dear friends in the space. So it's

1:05:20.000 --> 1:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>really good to do a little bit of one on

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>one action here for the first time and been a

1:05:24.000 --> 1:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>minute a while a while since it's been just one

1:05:26.080 --> 1:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on one, but great stuff, Paul, Thank you so much.

1:05:28.480 --> 1:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you guys are following along on Twitter. I'm

1:05:30.480 --> 1:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at Joel Rico ninety nine, not that I use it

1:05:32.480 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>so much, but we'll share out the show links and stuff.

1:05:34.360 --> 1:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Phill John bangers at Sport. I still got the fastball.

1:05:39.160 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I could still throw one on the corner, but that

1:05:41.120 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>will do it for us for today. For Paul Sport,

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Rico. We'll talk to you next time right

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>here on the Fantasy Pros Baseball Podcast. Take it easy, everybody.

1:05:48.160 --> 1:05:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball Podcast.

1:05:51.600 --> 1:05:54.000
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

1:05:54.040 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

1:05:57.000 --> 1:06:00.720
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

1:06:00.760 --> 1:06:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

1:06:03.720 --> 1:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB