WEBVTT - The Behavior Emerges

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hi there, everyone, and welcome to Boards Thinking,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says, now

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's all right, It's okay, and you may look the

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>other way. We can try to understand the New York

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Times effect on man. I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren voc Obama,

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe McCormick. Hey, Joe, Yeah, why are there

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>so many lol cats on the Internet? I don't know.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Why are there so many lol cats? L Lauren, you

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>do social media, you do the stuff. Where do all

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the loll cats come from? Whom? Well, Joe? When when

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>an internet and an Internet user love each other very much? Um,

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 1>lol cats happens, happen apparently, so so whole letters of them. Yeah.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Then we're using low cats as an example of something

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that that many people refer to as a meme. It's

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a very basic idea, a germ of

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>an idea that can evolve and transform over time. It

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>gets spread around kind of like uh, you know, really

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>bad flum in many ways. In fact, it's also very

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>similar to the concept of going viral. To continue with

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the illness theme, but the idea of things things spreading

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>across the internet. This is one example of something that

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to talk about today called emergence. Yeah. So

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look at an individual meme like a low cat,

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>a low cat is part of what we might call

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a meme plex, which is a complex system that displays

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>what we would term emergent behavior. Okay, so what exactly

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is emergent behavior? Emergent behavior is a really interesting way

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of describing how complexity or rises in systems. Okay, okay,

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so think about it like this, Um, imagine a flock

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of birds. You've probably seen birds flocking before, like when

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they go into a big spiral, you know, and they're

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>all moving and you see the cloud of birds undulating

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the sky. So we're talking about like a flock

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of sparrows as opposed to like the v formation of geese. Right,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, how does that flock of birds decide how

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to move? That's an excellent question. Obviously they have a

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>foreman r Right. You seem to think, well, maybe there's

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like one bird that moves first, and the other birds

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>follow that bird and the general bird. Yeah, the birds

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have a leader the way we would describe how

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>these birds flock and create these beautiful complex patterns is

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the concept of emergence, and what that means is that

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a complex pattern that's unpredictable, that's created by individual

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>agents following local rules. So the way birds create a

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>flocking pattern like that is that each one individually has

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>no idea that it's flocking, and it has no idea

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of how to create a flock. It just knows that.

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Well when the person, when the bird flying next to

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>me gets x number of inches close, I move in

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the other direction, and I follow the bird in front

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of me, and to say, if there is a predator

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>approaching or some other stimulus, we shift in in this direction.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And surprisingly enough, if you just get enough individuals acting

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on those rules, these crazy patterns emerged. Right. So the

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>same sort of thing is true in schools of fish

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly where you'll see an enormous school of fish all

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>moving as if it's one body, and it's not that

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>there is Just like with the birds, there's not a

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>leader fish that every other fish is taking its cues

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>off of. It's all behaving this this what if you

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>were to boil it way down, if you were able

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to strip away the complexity, you would see that there

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>are these basic rules that underlie the system. It's just

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that when you get all those different individuals together and

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you have the actual environment playing a part, those those

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>usually fairly simple rules lead to this huge amount of complexity.

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>The other thing about how emergent systems behave um is

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that one tends to say that they're greater than the

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>some of their parts. And what that means, like how

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I just affirmed, yeah, doctor, yeah, they're greater than the

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>some of their parts. So what that means is that

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>if you have a bunch of birds, they're not following rules.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Just like every bird move forward six inches, that would

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>not be an emergent system. That would be a totally

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>predictable system, right, And the movement of the birds would

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>be something that we could understand is simple addition of

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>all of the steps if if this than that. Right.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>But the way birds actually flock is they interact with

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>each other, and this creates massively unpredictable patterns unless you

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have like a very powerful computer model that is simulating

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>each individual bird. Right. And we can see this not

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>just in organic behavior. It comes up in all sorts

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of systems. That have uh, layers of complexity to them. Well, yeah,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you might even say, so, how about a termite mound

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>or an ant hill. The mound itself is not living,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but the mound is an example of emergence because no

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>single termite knows how to create a mound. There's no

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>leader termite telling the other termites what to do. They're

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>all just following a rule like put a piece of

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>dirt where something is wet or something like that. And

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>then you end up with these eight foot tall monstrosities

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that look like something from a sci fi film and

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at and you think, man, that looks like

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it was built by somebody. You know, it has this

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>illusion of design. Humans can flock the same way. If

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>you've ever been in a large crowd of people on

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a sidewalk and haven't you know, run smack into anyone

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>unless you were looking at your smartphone. It's the same

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of behavior. And uh, and that is not the

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>only way that humans use emergence, As it turns out,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>What's what's all this stuff about thought? Thought processes? Oh yeah,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>well there are actually so and this is controversial, right,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't know this, but there are plenty of people

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>who are consciousness theorists who think that the very idea

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of human consciousness is an emergent property of the brain,

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>meaning that so the brain is constructed of neurons, has

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of little neurons, and no single neuron knows how

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to create a brain. What it is is that each

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one is following extremely simple local rules, but with enough

0:06:53.440 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>interconnection and feedback and interactivity, they create this aminon that

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we would think of as a mind or consciousness. Interesting,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so even emergent behavior on an individual basis, showing again

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that systems are When we talk about systems, we're not

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>just talking about a collection of people or animals. We

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>could be talking about a system as in and just

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a single person. And it's funny to think about how

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>there are levels of this. Right. So within a cell

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there is emergent behavior, right because it's individual proteins following

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>simple rules of chemistry that interact together to form this

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>mass pattern known as a cell. And then you group

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>all those cells together, and if you buy into the

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>emergence theory of consciousness, they can in a brain make consciousness.

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And then you get enough people with consciousness together acting

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>individually to follow local rules, and they can create mass patterns.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Like One example I found that's interesting is um the

0:07:55.520 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of mosh pits as emergent behavior. You know, nobody

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>he's controlling the mosh pit. They're just simple rules. I'm

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>not kidding. How many mash bits you been in this week? Hey, buddy,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I went to college in the nineties. Okay, I was

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>no I was trying to get out of the pit. Oh,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I see, you're the whimp. I'm the guy. I'm the

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>guy who I'm the guy who appreciated it when I

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have an elbow thrust into my temple. Okay, so

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. That's a fair point, I think. But I'm

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>also a guy who loves punk rock. You did head

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>banger hair, didn't you? I did back then? Yeah? Yeah, Well,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I had hair, and second of all

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it was headbanger hair. This is true, his headbanger hair

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and emergent behavior. I think it might be a meme.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you this. It's not emerging anymore. That

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>ship has sailed. I'm getting back, getting back to actual,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the actual discussion yet. So you might be wondering, how

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>does this tie into what we were talking about, which

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was social media and part of that was the discussion

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>about how is social media affecting us as society, how's

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it affecting us on individual basis? Is it actually rewiring us?

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>If you've listened to our previous podcast, you heard us

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>talk all about that theory or that hypothesis I really

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 1>should say, and that uh, and the disagreement that exists

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>around that or at least around the the rigorous, rigorous

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>scientific evidence that doesn't seem to be there for either side.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>At the moment um, we wanted to talk more about,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>well maybe all of that, Uh, all of those concerns

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>are ultimately moot. For one thing, this is the world

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we live in now, right, I mean that's It's not

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like I don't expect us to turn back from right right.

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>We're never going to put down Facebook and say, yeah,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're bored of this now, no more of that.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But but but something else, I think I think something

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>else would come along to fill that void or to

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>make a new you know, something that we can't even

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think of right now. But it would be the new

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that would connectivity. Yeah, it would be like if

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>they decided to take away television in the nineteen sixties. Yeah,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:12.079
<v Speaker 1>So right. So in one in one sense, the whole

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>discussion about emergence is really about how it's very possible

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that the way that we use social media and social

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>networking sites uh and the way that it plays a

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>role in our lives, UH, that we've only scratched the surface. No.

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say that the concept of the

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>meme comes back to six before social media sites existed. UH.

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Fellow named Richard Dawkins wrote a book called The Selfish

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Gene and this this was an entire concept that was

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>linking um the evolution of culture and pop culture specifically

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to to natural selection in biology. So it was saying

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that the way that genes are selected um and and

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>processed over the course of evolution is the same way

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that that ideas are selected within culture. Right, Because ideas,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>just like genes, are self replicating and they can change. Right,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Like an idea makes a copy of itself when you

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>share it with somebody else, But it can also mutate

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>due to uh, either either misunderstanding or the person who

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>receives that idea gene um, you know, changes it in

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>some way before they pass it on. Yeah. So in

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a weird way, ideas follow the same mechanics as as

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>our genes do. Um. And so when you get enough

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>ideas churning about in a complex system, you might generate

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>something that's known as a meme. Plex got it that

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all these memes interacting. It's kind of like a

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>gene pool. And uh and what do you know? That

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>idea has been taken to a slightly uh narrow. I

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>mean you could say everything on the Internet is a meme,

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's all it's full of ideas. But on the

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Internet a meme has come to mean something a little

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>more specific. Um, it's a what is it? It's a

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a visual or aesthetic or or literally share able

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>share able note of some kinds, usually usually a pretty

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>small unit of information. Um. I would say colloquial speaking

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that that we when we say meme, we mean you know, um, well,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, okay, it's a trend. It's a trend, and

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a small amount of information. The format of that

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>small amount of information doesn't matter. It could be a video,

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it could be an image, it could be text. On

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, for example, I would argue that hashtags are

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>really just a meme enabler. Right. There are people who

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>will come up with some sort of clever joke or

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>some maybe it's not even a joke, it might be

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>something very serious, and they do a hashtag to kind

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of separate that out from other from from the noise,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>if you will, of Twitter, and other people may or

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>may not pick up on it. And if they do

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>pick up on it, then it really becomes a meme

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>where other people are taking that, adding to it, changing it,

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>transforming it in some way, and passing it on into

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a greater network of folks. Yeah. Cool story bro um.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you just take uh cats for example, that

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>probably the internet's favorite meme, right, They're they're big, They're big. Yeah,

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I hear they're big um cats on the internet. What

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>is the cat meme plex? Who's controlling it? Cheeseburger? It's

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>probably cheeseburgers. Yeah, But but there is no one in

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>charge of the of the cat meme plex. I mean

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that's probably meme plex probably isn't the right word there,

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>but the but there's a living, breathing organism of you know,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a cat, isn't it. No? No, I mean

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger than a cat, like a like like a Kira style,

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like if you've glued a whole bunch of cats together

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like that, kind of which reminds me of slime molds. Yeah, yeah, no,

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, slime molds totally go for it. Slime molds

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>being a five starum polycephalum um. And these are these

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are single celled organisms. It's almost like I've talked about

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>slime it's before in front of say a hundred and

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy children this one time. Um. But that's a story

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>for another time. Uh uh. Julian Robert over it stuff

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind, have a really cool podcast episode

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>about this. But in in brief, these are single celled,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>brainless amiba that can that form these colonies, these moving

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking colonies that um that divert resources to uh to

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>policing to get bacteria out of there. That will you know,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>if if they run out of food in the immediate area,

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they will form a little slug like creature and move

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to another location. Um. They also spread out very long

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>ten drils to discover where food might be. And if

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they encounter evidence of a pathway that they've already crossed,

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>then instead of expelling more or expending more energy, I

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>should say, instead of expending more energy in order to

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>trace that same path again, it won't. Yeah, there's no

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>brain there, kind of like lol cats. Lol cats, I

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know that we can say they don't have a brain.

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>The interesting interesting thing to me the low cats. The

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing to me is that that one you had

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this original kind of whatever, The original idea was of

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the cute kitty cat picture with the funny caption going

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>on the internet and people thinking it was amusing and

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and then sharing it. Then someone said, oh, I should, Uh,

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this would be really funny if I changed the caption

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to this, And then they go in and they change

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the caption so it says something else, and then they

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>share it, and then someone else says, oh wait, what

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>if I took a picture of a totally different cat

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and either put the same caption on or to a

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>new caption on and it took such a life that

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>now everyone knows what lol cats are. That if you

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>say low cats, everyone who is on the internet for

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>any length of time is going to be able to

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>think of an example that meets that that word. And

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what's really fun hold them how to make one right? Yeah,

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's emergent behavior in that sense. So and but we

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>see this in lots of different ways. On the Internet.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And the whole point about the social networking uh episode

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was that this is something that's happening right now with

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the way we use social networks, and that we can't

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>predict how that's going to play a part in our

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>lives in the future. We just know it'll be a

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>big part, right, I mean, this is one of the

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>things that makes the future of the Internet so exciting

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is because it has it has their nodes everywhere. There's

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>no top down control, nobody's in charge of the Internet,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Internet itself and the Web are emergent, right,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? They are themselves examples of

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>emergence that are full of smaller examples of emergence. One

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>great thing that I I don't think I ever would

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have predicted, but in retrospect it seems so obvious is

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of wikis. I mean, but I mean, put

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>me in nineteen seventy and say, I'm I'm working on

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>our bonnet and you know, we're predicting something like the Web.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>How could I possibly have imagined wikis? I mean, it

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>seems so obvious now, Like I said, but well, and

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>these are emergent behaviors because they're created by users. Nobody's

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>really in charge, or I guess you can have some editors,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but that depends on each one. You know, they're they're

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>perfectly emergent, right and they do have they do have

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>their own sets of rules in the sense of wikis.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>It may be in this and whatever the rules of

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>what's permissible to post it may be, or it may

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>just be even more simple than that. It may just

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be the actual mechanics of the wiki itself, and that

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the complexity arises as more and more people

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>join and contribute and consume this. Uh. One I think

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is interesting is that with the Internet it's even more

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>difficult to predict any sort of emergent behaviors than it

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>would be in in other systems, because in other system

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>presumably you would be able to at least determine what

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the basic rules are for each individual element that's in

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 1>that system. Right now, we've already established that just because

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you even know all the rules, you can't really know

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what the complexity will be of the overall system, because

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the sum the whole is greater than the sum of

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>its parts. Right And you also on the Internet have

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a have a little bit of doubt about who the

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>actual participants are going to be because it's it's such

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge it's such a huge complex system that you know,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a flock of birds where you say, oh,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>well there's fifteen birds got it well and and there

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not the established rules, like we don't have a

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>set of rules that everyone follows. There are rules within

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>different groups that are on the Internet that follow you know,

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they're mostly you know, things that are they may not

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>even be uh vocalized or written down in any way,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but people just come to understand, oh, you don't do

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>such and such, even though that's not stay in a

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>rule anywhere. That's just it's kind of bad protocol or

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's bad form. For example, like I see this in

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in communities all the time, where someone will post something

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>completely innocently or at least seemingly innocently, and then the

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>response immediately comes back saying, no, you don't do that here.

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>That's not that's not okay, even though that's not explicitly

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>said anywhere. This sort of has evolved over time as

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the system has become more complex. Knowing that this is

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>not something that we want happening here. It happens all

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the time in games in particular, But we don't have

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.959
<v Speaker 1>an actual uh coda for for rules of the Internet.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean there there are a lot of joke ones

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>discuss here. Don't feed the trouble well, you know, but

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but there you see them often in groups that are

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>for better or worse. The people who who often think

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of themselves as owners of the Internet, like uh forge

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Chan and Anonymous are two good examples. They have their

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>own sets of rules, most of which are jokes, not

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>all of which are, but most of them are. And

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>uh in a way, the rules themselves have become a

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>meme and the whole ideas it's fun to continuously add

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and tweak and change them. Um usually it's just adding.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them don't like it when you change

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the rules, and they pay a lot of

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>attention to that. But uh, you know, they're they're not

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly they're not the rules that you're speaking from experience.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you one who has tried to nail some precepts

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to the door of the anonymous Cathedral? Not so much that,

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But I've seen, I've seen what happens if someone posts

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>like the rules to the Internet, but they either didn't

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>copy and paste it, or they copied and pasted it,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>copied it from someplace that had the rules quote unquote wrong.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>And then I've seen what they Oh yeah, no, no,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I I look. I I write about this stuff and

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I blog about it, podcast about so I've I've been

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in these communities. I feel like a sociologist who's hung

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>out with the Hell's Angels or something. But I've been

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in these communities in the mist, cats in the miss

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's they definitely, they definitely take their largely unspoken

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>rules very seriously. Um and uh, or maybe it's not

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>seriously at all, And that's the problem. It's kind of

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to say when they certainly react with enthusiasm if

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you were to break one of their rules. Well, here's

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>something I'm interested in asking, what are some of the

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>most interesting emergent behaviors you've observed on the Internet and

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in social networking. Well, I mean, I can start off

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>with one of my own, but sure, go ahead. Well,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think one of the most interesting things

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>is um again, the unpredictable way that especially Twitter, but

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>social media in general has been used to spread news

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and information um like breaking news or like when there's

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a disaster when things break on Twitter before the news

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>stations pick them up. Yeah, and it's so interesting to

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>watch the way that the message proceeds through the Twitter spheres, say,

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and and the way I think it's really interesting is that, Um,

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just I would say it is emergent,

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because it's not just a straightforward passing along of information

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>like copy paste pass it along. I mean that that

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>would be fairly predictable. What it tends to be I

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think is that there is some of that, but then

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>there's also a lot of passing of information by way

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of commentary on the information, and then there's a kind

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of cannibalistic message creation where the new message that's being

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>shared becomes mainly the commentary from Twitter on the original

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of information. Yeah, I will frequently, I mean, because

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I check into Twitter maybe once every

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes, which sounds really a lot now that I

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>say that outline. That's great, um but but but you know, so,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'll check in and I'll suddenly see half of

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter feed exploding about something, and It'll be Yeah,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>all of this oblique commentary or snarky commentary more more

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>likely about some other thing that's happened, and I go

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in Google whatever the key word is to figure out

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>what the actual news story is. Because from from those

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>initial posts, I'm like, well, people are upset, but this

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>must be a Tuesday. And it's like the story becomes

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the conversation about the story, like that's what the story is. Well,

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and that became really evident during the Arab Spring. I

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that was the story was how social media allowed

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>people to have a channel of communication not only to

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>each other, but to the rest of the world during

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what would normally be an event where unless you had

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>embedded journalists inside the country, you the rest of the

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>world might not be aware of what was going on,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and even then it would only be the world that's

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to a particular outlet. I was gonna say,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>since you ask the question and you want to know

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>what kind of emergent behaviors you found interesting, I find

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>viral videos fascinating. And the reason why I find it

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating is that the things that make a video go

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>viral Essentially, it's just that a lot of people share it, right,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But sharing does not mean that the video was of

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a particular quality or that it had a particular kind

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of humor to it or subject matter. It's it's completely

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>independent of all that. There's no formula for making a

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>viral video, right You can try and you know, and

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>see if you can hit into the zeitgeist, but that

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>hardly ever works. It's funny to watch people in marketing

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>like try to create viral videos. It's both funny and tragic,

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like when a clown dies. But yeah, it's like you know,

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>when you when you have seventy two hours or more

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a video uploaded every minute on YouTube, how is it

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that some videos get worldwide acceptance or are being shared

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like crazy and other videos that might be quote unquote

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>better don't. For example, if you had seen Gandham Style

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>before it exploded, if you if you were one of

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the first people who watched it when it was uploaded,

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you might think that's kind of entertaining, But there's a

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there are thousand other videos from Asia that are equally

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>weird and tongue in cheek and catchy, and because it

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>really was, it was made to be this sort of cheeky, goofy,

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>silly song. But there are lots of of songs in

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that particular kind of genre that are coming out of

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>well not just Asia but all parts of the world.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Like old people get mad because they can't understand it.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But see, to me, what it's not that I don't

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>understand it so much as I don't understand why that

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>one got shared versus all the millions of others. See,

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing that's fascinating to me. That's what I

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>find fascinating about viral videos is that you can't predict

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which one is gonna go viral. Yeah, I mean, it's

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where someone saw it, they shared it.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>All the people or a significant significant number of people

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>who who saw it from the person who shared it

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>then went on to share it, and then it just exploded.

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see that video until it was probably right

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>at when it was peaking, or maybe just before it peaked.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It was definitely before the radio started playing it. But

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but that was to me that was interesting. I watched

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought, this is it's entertaining, it's a funny video.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's there's I don't have any criticism against it. It's

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>just interesting to me that that one goes viral like

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some When you watch it go viral, you can

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of figure out why because there's also this amazing

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of shout in freuda across the Internet. So, for example,

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Black's Friday video, because a lot of that was

0:26:55.960 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>people poking fun at this young girl who she wanted

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to make a music video that was her birthday present,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and like, if I were thirteen and I were living

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in this world now, that might be what I want

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to do too. I mean, that would be awesome. She was,

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and she I think handled it way better

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>than I ever would have considering the reaction to that

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>video and how it went viral. I mean, when Stephen

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Colbert shows up on Jimmy Fallon and is singing your song,

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of weird, right, so um, but at any

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>rate like that, you can when you see a video

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>like that, you think, all right, I can, I can

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>see the elements here that would make this go viral

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and sort of a it will definitely a snarky, nasty,

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>mean spirited way. But I have an interesting question. Sure,

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>have you ever been um unknowingly caught in the crest

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:51.479
<v Speaker 1>of a viral video wave, meaning like, did you share

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>a video thinking it was something obscure um not realizing

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that it was in the process of blowing up or

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>do you know what I mean? I like you in

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that unconscious person with it, you know, having no idea

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're contributing to a mass phenomenon. I've definitely shared

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>stuff where I thought it was really interesting and I

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>thought other people would I like to see it, without

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>realizing how big it was going to get later. That

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>has happened, but more frequently than not, I'm actually on

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the crest, like it's very usually

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>late to the game, I am too, but it's been

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>weird the few times where it's like, you know, maybe

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I saw some YouTube video I was like, Oh, this

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is funny, and I share it, and then like in

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a day or two, like everybody is huge, and I

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize, like, oh, I'm I was part of the

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>wave that brought this. Yeah, I think, I think I'm.

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the last one that I remember doing that

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>with was Carmen's look At Me Now video, the cover

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Chris Brown song sung by the cute little

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>rockabilly chick and her her adorable Jewish fiance. I don't

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think I know that it's adorable. It is so cool.

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the last one for me was walk Off

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's cover of someone I used to know the

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>got Your song because that was the five people playing

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the one guitar, which when I saw it, and I

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>saw it right when they uploaded it, because I had

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>heard of walk Off the Earth already and I when

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw that, I just thought, how creative to have

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>this be your your music video that five people playing

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>one guitar all at the same time and singing this song,

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and I shared it and then shortly thereafter

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it I don't claim credit. I was just part of

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that that early group and then and then it couldn't

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>claim credit made it or like, well, I mean if

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you are the who's to say who's the person who

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was the the domino that caused all the other ones

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to fall? Right? But probably most of those dominoes don't

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>know who that person is, That's what I'm saying. Yeah,

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you can't know, not really, I mean unless

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you're just unless you're just one of those people who

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>has millions of followers and there was like no one

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>had heard of whatever the means. Yeah, when when someone

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>like like George de Kay or Will Wheaton or you

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>know these other these other gods of our Internet um

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>step up in and reblogs. I'm just waiting for them

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to rename Facebook George d ka book because that's what

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>mine has turned into. It's true, yea, yeah, yeah, it's

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>my My favorite is always and this is a little

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>bit get off my lawn of me. But um, you

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>know when when George d Kay posts something that I

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>saw like four years ago on the internet and then

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>all of my friends start reposting it, and I'm like,

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they never saw that thing or were they not on

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll see, Lauren, if you had shared it, then the

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>meme would have already run its course. But really we're

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>blaming you. When did we fear off into such weird

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>territory or emergin behaving eminhking about the mechanics then when

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you like the video, that's the mechanics of going no no,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe you right. Well, that wraps up this discussion

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>about emergence. I hope you guys found it interesting. If

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you have any topics you would like to have us

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>address in future episodes of Forward Thinking, I highly recommend

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you get in touch with us, because that way we

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>know about it. You can email us our addresses FW

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking at discovery dot com or drop us a line

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on our social media. You can find us fw Thinking.

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That's on Twitter, We're on Facebook. Go to fw thinking

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com to check out the blogs, watch the videos,

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>listen to other episodes of the podcast, and you can

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>also interact with us there. We really look forward to

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>it and having to be part of this conversation about

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the future and how amazing it's going to do. Wisten

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon for more on this

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>topic and the future of technology. Is it Forward Thinking

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Brought to you by Toyota Let's Go Places