Speaker 1: All right, thank you Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
Speaker 1: of you for being with us. Right down our toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of this extra ravaganza, it is eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: for one Sean. If you want to join us news,
Speaker 1: I promise you'll never get from the state run corrupt
Speaker 1: legacy media mob officially dead as of November fifth, last year,
Speaker 1: because nobody trusts them because they lie so often. We
Speaker 1: have a lot of polling that has come out today.
Speaker 1: We'll start with that, and this is joint polling two
Speaker 1: of our favorite posters. I remind you that both Trafalgar,
Speaker 1: the Trafalgar Group that's Robert Kahaley and Insider Advantage as
Speaker 1: Matt Towery, both now the twenty sixteen presidential election, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty presidential election, twenty twenty four presidential election. And what's
Speaker 1: amazing about them is they poll Donald Trump correctly more
Speaker 1: than anybody. They have one question that they put out,
Speaker 1: what is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran
Speaker 1: must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon by any
Speaker 1: means necessary. That is a very strong question for a polster.
Speaker 1: What is your opinion of President Trump's position that Iran
Speaker 1: must be prevented from developing from developing a nuclear weapon
Speaker 1: by any means necessary. They approved seventy four point four percent,
Speaker 1: disapproved twenty two point nine percent. And it just tells
Speaker 1: me that, you know, regardless of the chatter and the
Speaker 1: radicalism of the left and some isolationist others, the world understands.
Speaker 1: And this is why why do you think all the
Speaker 1: countries in the Middle East have been eerily silent because
Speaker 1: they're all cheering for Israel to knock out these nuclear sites,
Speaker 1: because they all fear Iranian hegemony. Which is why Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: very successfully in his first term, was able to create
Speaker 1: an unprecedented alliance that he never got credit for intelligence
Speaker 1: sharing among the US and Israel and the Saudis and
Speaker 1: the Emirates and the Jordanians and the Egyptians and all
Speaker 1: of it against Iranian hegemony. Not one country in that
Speaker 1: region wants the Iranian regime to ever have a nuclear weapon,
Speaker 1: because all they do is for men terrorism, and each
Speaker 1: country individually has radicals within their ranks, and so they're
Speaker 1: constantly threading needles, and unfortunately it often results in them
Speaker 1: trying to placate both sides or turning a blind eye
Speaker 1: towards the radicalism. And then, by the way, that has
Speaker 1: to stop in these countries. They have to start arresting
Speaker 1: and they have to start eliminating those people in their
Speaker 1: countries that have bought into this radicalism. Another poll is
Speaker 1: out Harvard Harris. Eighty five percent say Tehran must never
Speaker 1: get the bomb. Fifty four percent directly back a US
Speaker 1: strike on their nuclear assets, sixty percent would support Israel
Speaker 1: if talks fail. It goes across party lines, and it
Speaker 1: couldn't be any more specific that, you know, giving up
Speaker 1: a nuclear and Richmond program has got to be a
Speaker 1: precondition to the US accept any deal, and that would
Speaker 1: have to be immediate, although I don't know. It's what
Speaker 1: one of the most amazing things is. And Elon Musk
Speaker 1: did link up Starlink for people to have some connection
Speaker 1: to the outside world because the regime shut off any
Speaker 1: access to the Internet. However, people are able to bypass
Speaker 1: it with the starlink connection. But they are leaving Tehran
Speaker 1: in droves because President Trump said get out now while
Speaker 1: you can, and they're leaving. I mean, the convoy is
Speaker 1: it's it's unbelieved to see it's bumper to bumper traffic.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like in the lead up in the
Speaker 1: days leading up to you know, a hurricane that is
Speaker 1: projected to hit your town or your city. You have
Speaker 1: one top Democrat and this now goes to the heart
Speaker 1: of where the Democratic Party is. And you know, Democratic
Speaker 1: leaders have sided with these you know, they've been silent
Speaker 1: or complicit with these pro terrorist campus protesters. They've tolerated
Speaker 1: virulent anti semitism in their own ranks in the halls
Speaker 1: of Congress on these college campuses. They've taken up the
Speaker 1: cause of you know, wife beating, gang banging, criminal illegals.
Speaker 1: They've tried to block the National Guard from interfering with
Speaker 1: anti ICE rioters even as they're arresting and doing the job,
Speaker 1: and the Constitution gives them jurisdiction through the supremacy clause.
Speaker 1: But interfering with anti ICE rioters that they try to
Speaker 1: burn city cities down and light it was like they
Speaker 1: did about Joe's cognitive state and open borders and the
Speaker 1: economy and pretty much on everything else about Donald Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: now they found another noxious cause to get behind. Democrats
Speaker 1: are now lining up what to support the Iranian regimes,
Speaker 1: you know, desire and ambition for producing nuclear weapons, which
Speaker 1: Iranian leaders have vowed to use to wipe Israel and
Speaker 1: the US off the face of the earth. You have
Speaker 1: a top Democratic Senator, Hillary Clinton's vice presidential nominee, no Less,
Speaker 1: now trying to block President Trump from helping Israel take
Speaker 1: out Iranian Iran's nuclear program. Good, by the way, good
Speaker 1: luck defending that position. In the twenty twenty six mid term,
Speaker 1: Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution seeking to prevent the
Speaker 1: US from getting involved in a military conflict with Iran
Speaker 1: without congressional approval. The resolution reaffirms existing law directing the
Speaker 1: President to end any use of US armed forces for
Speaker 1: hostilities against Iran. Blah blah blah. That this is now
Speaker 1: the party of radicalism. The only exceptions to that rule,
Speaker 1: and we'll play him later in the program today is
Speaker 1: Senator John Fetterman. He's actually calling on Israel to show
Speaker 1: no mercy and to take out the Iranian Supreme Leader
Speaker 1: Ali Kamanie, and Fetterman told the Washington Free Beacon Israel
Speaker 1: should use its successful campaign against against Hazbalah in Lebanon,
Speaker 1: which culminated in the assassination of the thirty two year
Speaker 1: leader Hassan Norasla and Neraza. I'm sorry, Nasralla a model
Speaker 1: for how to deal with Iran, and just like Nazraala,
Speaker 1: Fetterman replied. When asked whether the Jewish state should target Khamanee,
Speaker 1: he said, in fact, it should have been when Israel
Speaker 1: began to dismantle Iran. Now they've taken out their nuclear scientists.
Speaker 1: This Democratic Party, before we get into there's a lot
Speaker 1: of specifics and a lot of news to share with
Speaker 1: you today, but we saw it this weekend, the party
Speaker 1: of compact and love. You know, the base of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. I would argue it is the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: There are no moderate voices but for John Fetterman, who's
Speaker 1: under constant attack by the radical left and the likes
Speaker 1: of Chucky Schumer and Hakim Jeffries. They are scared to
Speaker 1: death of their own party members that can. It's controlled
Speaker 1: by Jasmine Crockett and the squad and AOC and Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren and Grandpa Bernie. I mean, you saw all these
Speaker 1: left wing protesters this weekend in cities all across the country.
Speaker 1: In some cases they were left wing protesters in New
Speaker 1: York openly supporting Iran. The Democratic Party is the crazy party.
Speaker 1: They're the party of radical coastal elitists that you know
Speaker 1: that champion the rights of men to play women's sports.
Speaker 1: I mean, think about this. They are so out of touch.
Speaker 1: You've got people out in the street. They're dressed like
Speaker 1: Islamic extremists calling for the destruction of it is from
Speaker 1: the river to the sea. How often have we discussed
Speaker 1: that being said on college campuses, you know, virulent hatred,
Speaker 1: anti semitism. These protests have gone on now for nearly
Speaker 1: two years, since October seventh. I'm not sure what part
Speaker 1: of murder, rape, torture, beheading, and kidnapping they don't understand,
Speaker 1: but they clearly don't understand or don't want to understand it.
Speaker 1: The same party that turned this you know, suspected human trafficker,
Speaker 1: gang member, illegal immigrant, they've become the party of Abrego Garcia.
Speaker 1: They turned this guy into a folk hero until the
Speaker 1: polls show yeah, this is backfiring on you. Okay, well
Speaker 1: we'll amandon that position now. The party that blocks highways,
Speaker 1: attacks law enforcement federal buildings all because Ice, you know,
Speaker 1: went into Los Angeles and they found criminal illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: convicted of murder and child rape and gang activity and
Speaker 1: other heinous crimes to keep the people, the law abiding
Speaker 1: citizens of Los Angeles safe. The same party that you
Speaker 1: know turned a blind eyed didn't say a word about
Speaker 1: the calls for assassination of President Trump or Elon Musk
Speaker 1: that burned Tesla's uh in dealerships around the country, firing
Speaker 1: bullets into Tesla dealerships, you know, burning Tesla charging stations.
Speaker 1: Oh what did Elon Musk do? He rescued astronauts and
Speaker 1: he found, you know, hundreds of billions of waste, fraud
Speaker 1: and abuse. You know, they think it's corrupt in a
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis that hundreds of billions of dollars on deism, wokeism, transgenderism,
Speaker 1: l g B, t q ism is being spent, not
Speaker 1: even in this, around the around the globe. You know,
Speaker 1: the US Senate Democrats supporting championing the right the rights
Speaker 1: of men to play women's sports. The same party that
Speaker 1: supports supports racist DEI policies over meritocracy and hard work.
Speaker 1: The same party that believed the Russia hoax buys abuse.
Speaker 1: They sat silent as long as it was against Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: The same party that didn't care the Statute of Limitations
Speaker 1: had run out on this issue, of which was a
Speaker 1: misdemeanor in New York turned into a novel legal theory
Speaker 1: by Alvin Bragg, just so they can call Donald Trump
Speaker 1: a convict. I mean, the things that they didn't care about,
Speaker 1: the phone evaluation of mar A Lago, They didn't care
Speaker 1: about the double standard when it came to rating mar
Speaker 1: A Lago but not rating Joe Biden's four locations where
Speaker 1: he had top secret classified information. The same party that
Speaker 1: lacks any self awareness with this ridiculous nationwide no kings
Speaker 1: protests this weekend. You know, we had an election. They lost,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump won, and they helped him win, and he
Speaker 1: won every swing state and the popular vote. And now
Speaker 1: they're acting like, you know, they don't care about acts
Speaker 1: of violence. They're mostly peaceful vandalism, mostly peaceful intimidation, you know,
Speaker 1: attacking law enforcement, mostly peaceful. You know, it's it's it's
Speaker 1: pretty bizarre. Donald Trump is now demanding the unconditional surrender
Speaker 1: from Iran. The sterness language to date, the President warning
Speaker 1: earlier today he's losing patience with Iran and for quote
Speaker 1: unconditional surrender, saying that he wouldn't target the country's leader.
Speaker 1: We know where he is, he said, but we're not
Speaker 1: going to target come a knee for now. Doesn't mean
Speaker 1: it's off the table, and a series of social media
Speaker 1: posts as of this afternoon, he said, the US knows
Speaker 1: where the Iranian Supreme Leader is hiding. He is an
Speaker 1: easy target, but it's safe there. We're not going to
Speaker 1: take him out or kill him, at least for now.
Speaker 1: Our patients is wearing thin unconditional surrender, he wrote. In
Speaker 1: a separate post, he said, Tehran has lost control of
Speaker 1: Iran's airspace. We now complete total control of the skies
Speaker 1: over Iran, and they have good skytrackers and other defensive
Speaker 1: equipment and plenty of it. But it doesn't compare to
Speaker 1: American made, conceived and manufactured weaponry. Nobody does it better
Speaker 1: than the good old US of A. And Trump used
Speaker 1: the word wei, but it wasn't immediately clear if that
Speaker 1: meant that the US is taking a more active role
Speaker 1: in Israel's unfolding attacks. The President returned to Washington, got
Speaker 1: home about four point thirty this morning on Air Force
Speaker 1: one to deal with matters at home. He's not being
Speaker 1: specific about it. He has never wavered in his space
Speaker 1: in terms of where he stands let me tell you
Speaker 1: what the three options are. Where we are right now.
Speaker 1: The Israelis took out two of their three nuclear sites.
Speaker 1: The third site, I'll go into great specificity. There are
Speaker 1: really three ways to take out that site. The first
Speaker 1: two options are not good. Off One, the Israelis can
Speaker 1: go it alone with a tactical nuke. Nobody wants that option,
Speaker 1: not a good option. Option two, they can send in commandos.
Speaker 1: That would be a great risk and harm potentially to
Speaker 1: Israeli fighters. Not the best option, but controlling the skies.
Speaker 1: The best option would be bunker buster bombs, but Israel,
Speaker 1: according to reports I can't confirm one hundred percent, they
Speaker 1: don't have bunker busters. That would take the US not
Speaker 1: only to provide it, but probably to complete the mission,
Speaker 1: because they don't have the B fifty two that would
Speaker 1: be necessary to deliver that bomb, the mother of all bombs,
Speaker 1: thirty thousand pounds. And it's a whole process to knock
Speaker 1: out this one site. It's buried three hundred feet deep
Speaker 1: into the ground. And so those are the three options
Speaker 1: on the table now. And the question is is the
Speaker 1: world better without the number one state sponsor of terror
Speaker 1: having nuclear weapons? How many rockets would need to be
Speaker 1: fired into America before you would demand, as an American
Speaker 1: citizen that your country fight back because Israel and I've
Speaker 1: told the story many times. I've been to these border
Speaker 1: towns and cities that have been hit with tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of rockets. I've seen the Golden Dome in the
Speaker 1: Iron Dome in action. I have been in the terror tunnels.
Speaker 1: They have taken enough. They deserve a peaceful solution, assuming
Speaker 1: this mission can be completed. It is not without risk.
Speaker 1: I want to be very clear, but the Trump doctrine
Speaker 1: is clear. They can't have nukes, and he still doesn't
Speaker 1: believe in forever wars. He wants this knocked out and
Speaker 1: done and over with. Then it will be up to
Speaker 1: the Israelis if they take out their power grid, which
Speaker 1: is gas driven, take out their ability to make money,
Speaker 1: which would be to knock out their refineries, an easy
Speaker 1: attack considering most of the refineries are on one little island.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred ninety four one Shawn is a number. If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, we're
Speaker 1: going to go on the ground in Tel Aviv. What
Speaker 1: has life been like there with all the hundreds and
Speaker 1: hundreds of ballistic missiles they've been able to shoot down,
Speaker 1: according to the idea, about ninety five percent of them.
Speaker 1: But it's still, you know, pretty unbelievable. The President now
Speaker 1: demanding unconditional surrender from the Iranians, and we know exactly
Speaker 1: where the so called Supreme Leader is hiding. He is
Speaker 1: an easy target but is safe there. We're not going
Speaker 1: to take him out kill at least not for now,
Speaker 1: but we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers.
Speaker 1: Our patients is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention
Speaker 1: to this matter. I mean it is. You know, there
Speaker 1: is some internal I am staying away from the noise
Speaker 1: among certain people, but I will tell you there is
Speaker 1: a lot of noise, and there's a lot of people
Speaker 1: that have agendas. Here's my agenda. My agenda is frankly
Speaker 1: in sync with what the President believes. I believe in
Speaker 1: the Trump doctrine, in this case, the Trump dot What
Speaker 1: is the Trump doctrine here? The Trump doctrine is Iran
Speaker 1: cannot have nuclear weapons. If you don't understand that, I
Speaker 1: can't I there's no way I can educate you to
Speaker 1: the level you need to be educated at to understand it.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to waste my time. The American people
Speaker 1: get it, and I go back to the insider advantage
Speaker 1: in Trafalgar Pol coming out today, what is your opinion
Speaker 1: of President Trump's position that Iran must be prevented from
Speaker 1: developing a nuclear weapon by any means necessary. Seventy four
Speaker 1: point four percent approved, twenty two point nine percent disapprove,
Speaker 1: two point seven percent no opinion. Harvard Harris eighty five
Speaker 1: percent say hey, Ron must never get the bomb, fifty
Speaker 1: four percent back of US strike on their nuclear assets,
Speaker 1: sixty percent with support Israel. If talks fail, it goes
Speaker 1: across party lines. America backs the strength. That's where we are.
Speaker 1: The inner circle of Iran Supreme leader has been hollowed out.
Speaker 1: This is a report that the eighty six year old
Speaker 1: Supreme leader Ali Kamani has seen his main military and
Speaker 1: security advisors killed by Israeli airstrikes, leaving major holes in
Speaker 1: his inner circle. I mean they took out his nuclear signedists,
Speaker 1: they took out some of the top leaders of the
Speaker 1: Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and one report that he is even
Speaker 1: negotiating a potential asylum move out of Iran and into Russia.
Speaker 1: I'm sure putin will be their arms open. But you know,
Speaker 1: the president is now seeking a real end to the escalation.
Speaker 1: Now the question is they were there's one site remaining.
Speaker 1: To me the most important thing and if you ask
Speaker 1: what the goals should be, and I know people have
Speaker 1: different views on this, and I accept that people have
Speaker 1: different views on this. Do I think the Israelis have
Speaker 1: you know, the Israelis are the country that have withstood
Speaker 1: that that the you know, hundreds of thousands of missiles
Speaker 1: being fired into their country. The Iranians have been you know,
Speaker 1: they help plot, plan and scheme with the Iranian Revolutionary
Speaker 1: Guard and their CUDS forces. The October seventh attack, that's
Speaker 1: the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans in a day
Speaker 1: based on extrapolated out population sizes, et cetera. But also
Speaker 1: the kidnapping, the torture, the beheading, you know, the rape,
Speaker 1: and everything else in between. So the Israelis, you know,
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, as far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: once the nuclear threat is forever neutralized, the world is
Speaker 1: a safer place. The Israelis have every right in my view,
Speaker 1: And if you had let's say, the one town that
Speaker 1: I was in in what twenty fourteen or fifteen, there
Speaker 1: wrote a border town with Gaza. In the previous ten
Speaker 1: years have been hit with ten thousand missiles. One little town,
Speaker 1: and I mean little. This is the town where kids
Speaker 1: playing underground bunker playgrounds. Because it only takes twelve thirteen
Speaker 1: seconds for one of these missiles when they're fired from Gaza,
Speaker 1: what you can see with the naked eye to make
Speaker 1: it into that town. And it's amazing to me that
Speaker 1: this town has been able to survive in spite of
Speaker 1: this never ending onslaught. How many missiles fired into America
Speaker 1: would you take before you would wipe out the enemy
Speaker 1: that did this? And the you know, look, we have
Speaker 1: at least twenty four dead in Israel. They are targeting,
Speaker 1: you know, large civilian population areas like Tel Aviv. And
Speaker 1: we'll get a report at the top of the hour
Speaker 1: about that they have now activated their new aerial defense
Speaker 1: system for the first time since its inception. It's the
Speaker 1: Barrock Megan meaning Lightning Shield for the first time Sunday night,
Speaker 1: saying they intercepted and destroyed multiple Iranian drones and if
Speaker 1: you're Israel, how many more it has to stop? This
Speaker 1: is now the missiles are getting bigger two thousand pound
Speaker 1: ballistic missiles they're building for their ambition is four thousand
Speaker 1: pound bombs. I mean, now you're talking about mass casualties.
Speaker 1: And does anybody ask yourself, maybe you do doubt, maybe
Speaker 1: you don't think they would do it. I personally think
Speaker 1: they would do it. And that is if you marry
Speaker 1: radical Islamic terrorism with the number one state sponsor of
Speaker 1: terror that has provided funding to Hamas and Hezbola and
Speaker 1: the Islamic Jihad and the Huti they fired directly into Israel.
Speaker 1: And then you add into that the Iraqi militia, the
Speaker 1: Syria militia, and you have one common denominator and that
Speaker 1: is that is the Mulls in Iran. And they have
Speaker 1: been hell bent on this whole thing. Now, what to
Speaker 1: know about the three options? Option one not a good
Speaker 1: option to use the tactical nuke under any circumstances. However,
Speaker 1: Irans for now fuel enrichment plant is the one remaining.
Speaker 1: It is a fortress. It is built deep within the mountains,
Speaker 1: up to three hundred feet underground, located about one hundred
Speaker 1: miles south of Tehran. Remember, the people of Tehran have
Speaker 1: been born by Donald Trump to get out of town
Speaker 1: and get out quickly. There's one facility remaining on Israel's
Speaker 1: hit list and the world's hit list, and it may
Speaker 1: take American bust bunking buster bunker bombs to do it,
Speaker 1: you know, short of commandos. You know, getting into the
Speaker 1: facility a very dangerous operation by any measure, but three
Speaker 1: hundred feet underground, and you know America has these, you know,
Speaker 1: thirty ton bunker buster bombs, and you know this what's
Speaker 1: called a fifty seven a b massive ordinance penetrator is
Speaker 1: thought to be capable of reaching the facility. Maybe it
Speaker 1: would take two of them. I'm not sure. I'm not
Speaker 1: an expert in bunker busters. While Israel has surprised Western
Speaker 1: intelligence in the past with the scope of its arms
Speaker 1: and strategies, we don't know. Nothing suggests that they have
Speaker 1: the means to penetrate this one nuclear sites defenses and
Speaker 1: get deep into the ground where it is to inflict
Speaker 1: the damage so that no more enrichment of uranium can
Speaker 1: take place. Now anyway, this this one place was was
Speaker 1: FIR completed in two thousand and nine. It's about one
Speaker 1: hundred miles south of Tehran, one of three major nuclear
Speaker 1: Richmond sites. Iran spent years fortifying this facility, which has
Speaker 1: been able to avoid most major attacks from Israel and elsewhere.
Speaker 1: Tehran has made sure the facility can survive airstrike attacks,
Speaker 1: making this a much harder target. And the way a
Speaker 1: bunker buster works is the bomber pilot uses a guidance
Speaker 1: system to lock the bomb onto the target, then exit
Speaker 1: the area. As the bomb travels to its orbit, the
Speaker 1: first charge will detonate, clearing a path for a second charge.
Speaker 1: The second charge would then enter the target following the
Speaker 1: opening created by the first charge, and the thing would
Speaker 1: then explode. Now sounds a little complicated. I can show
Speaker 1: you and make visuals for you on TV tonight so
Speaker 1: you fully completely understand it. But that's what it's going
Speaker 1: to take, and that would probably be be us. Look
Speaker 1: as far as the left goes, and you know, for years,
Speaker 1: I always knew Pap Buchanan and understood that there were
Speaker 1: certain things we'd never agree on. And I always viewed
Speaker 1: Pat as kind of like an isolationist, and you know,
Speaker 1: had certain America first policies but then had views about
Speaker 1: other countries that I found at times even reprehensible. But
Speaker 1: you know, we just agreed to disagree, and I agree
Speaker 1: to disagree with some other people. Marco Levin actually had
Speaker 1: the great one, had a great article in the New
Speaker 1: York Post today and he talks about isolationists, and he
Speaker 1: really rightly points out that isolationism, I mean, it's not
Speaker 1: the Trump doctrine of taking out Iran's nukes is not
Speaker 1: in America first, and not believing in long protracted wars
Speaker 1: is not isolationism. I mean, if we learned anything from
Speaker 1: World War Two and never Chamberlain meeting with Hitler and
Speaker 1: Munich and coming back and from claiming peace in our time,
Speaker 1: peace and our time, that that was naive and dumb
Speaker 1: and stupid. And you know, isolationism can also be appeasement,
Speaker 1: and you can also One of the biggest parts that
Speaker 1: is unspoken about the MAGA agenda is common sense. And
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons in the hands of the number one state
Speaker 1: sponsor of terror, that can't death to America, death to Israel.
Speaker 1: It just goes against common sense when you have the
Speaker 1: opportunity to prevent them from ever getting that power, and
Speaker 1: you can. And when you listen to people that almost
Speaker 1: and Mark is right, they're incoherent. They don't even agree
Speaker 1: upon themselves, and there's there's different factions of that that ideology,
Speaker 1: but it's you know, it's certainly not peace through strength.
Speaker 1: It's certainly not common sense. It's certainly if you think
Speaker 1: it's okay, and you want to try to call this
Speaker 1: program and explain to me how allowing the Iranian is
Speaker 1: to continue their their pursuit of a nuclear weapon and
Speaker 1: likely getting one and building out these two thousand and
Speaker 1: four thousand pound ballistic missiles, where are we going to
Speaker 1: be in six months or a year? The world will
Speaker 1: be held hostage. And this is an opportunity with Prime
Speaker 1: Minister net and Yahoo and President Trump at the helm
Speaker 1: where you deal with genocidal terrorists is Nazi regime. And
Speaker 1: you know, and the President did, to his credit, he
Speaker 1: bent over backwards to try to convince them to choose
Speaker 1: the path of peace, and they have chose not to
Speaker 1: do that. And he said, it's a big mistake, you know,
Speaker 1: and it's been brilliant. It doesn't mean it is without risk.
Speaker 1: It doesn't mean it is not dangerous. But this is
Speaker 1: a dangerous world. You don't define peace as the absence
Speaker 1: of conflict, of the absence of war. Now, for those
Speaker 1: that may have concerns. We don't want to be dragged
Speaker 1: into a long quagmire, as they say, or a long
Speaker 1: protracted war. That's part of the that's part of the
Speaker 1: Trump doctrine too, and that's not the plan here to
Speaker 1: send American troops on the ground, and nor should it
Speaker 1: be in my view. I think the President has it
Speaker 1: exactly right. They can't have nukes. And if it's a
Speaker 1: joint operation or an American operation to take out this
Speaker 1: final side, and it's going to be what it's going
Speaker 1: to be, and then Israel at that point will make
Speaker 1: up their minds whether they want to take out the
Speaker 1: Iranian ability to have power in their country because that
Speaker 1: grid can be taken out because they own the skies.
Speaker 1: And then they'll decide if the regime will have any
Speaker 1: opportunity to make money if they decide to take out
Speaker 1: their refineries. Again, an easy target when you control the skies.
Speaker 1: The most amazing thing that I've seen in terms of
Speaker 1: video is when Trump called for the immediate evacuation of Tehran.
Speaker 1: Everybody's they're taking Donald Trump's word for it, you know,
Speaker 1: but it's this this bunk or buster would have to
Speaker 1: be dropped from an American aircraft which would have wide
Speaker 1: ranging ramifications. We have troops in the area that would
Speaker 1: need protection. Again, there's nothing, nothing, nobody that can make
Speaker 1: an argument that this is a risk free operation. There
Speaker 1: is always risk, you know. And he said if Iran
Speaker 1: should have signed the deal, I told them to sign
Speaker 1: what a waste of human life. Simply stated, Iran cannot
Speaker 1: have a nuclear weapon. I support the Trump doctrine and
Speaker 1: also the doctrine that we can't have forever wars. It's
Speaker 1: going to be go in strike, achieved the direct the
Speaker 1: the directive, and warn them if they dare to come
Speaker 1: after one American one American installation, that there will be
Speaker 1: hell to pay. And then if they do, then there
Speaker 1: should be hell to pay. You know. Whatever motivations other
Speaker 1: people have, that's on them. I know what we have
Speaker 1: to do here.