WEBVTT - The Mark Moss Show 2-9-24

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>The Federal Reserve just came out with its latest announcement

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that holds the keys to your financial future. Jerome Powell

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>had his big meeting and understanding what he said, holds

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the keys to determine if your business will survive or thrive,

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>if your job will pay you more or you'll be

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>on the unemployment line, and ultimately, what's your assets, your

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>home price, and your retirement looks like in the long run.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty insane when you think about what is going on.

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is the world that we live in now.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Before I dig into that, if you just tune in,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Mark Moss Show. I talk about

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the way the world is changing, breaking apart into globe deglobalization,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and we look at it through the lens of politics, finance,

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and technology. Today we're looking at mostly the financial side,

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit of the political decisioning as to

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>what is driving this financial movement. And unfortunately, we're forced

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand this, We're forced to pay attention, and we're

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>forced to take action on this, or we can choose

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to put our head in the stand and ignore it. However,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>say that an ostrich can put its head in the sand.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't keep it from being eaten. One of

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite authors, Ian Ran would say that you can

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>choose to ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of reality. Now, my story goes that, you know, I

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>got out of high school, I started buying bank owned

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>properties right off the bat, fixed and flipped a bunch

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of properties, built up a whole bunch of properties, sold

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of businesses, and I was basically retired. And

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>then two thousand and eight came and wiped me out.

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>And part of the reason why is I was so

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>focused on making money. I was really good at building

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>businesses and exits and making money that way. But I

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't paying attention to the business cycle, the debt cycles,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and what the Federal Reserve was doing. It wasn't even

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on my radar. I didn't know about the Federal Reserve.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I knew about it. I didn't think about it.

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, my head was in the sand, and unfortunately

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the games that Wall Street played with the Federal Reserve

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>did pumping up the housing market. The games that Wall

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Street played had an effect on my life. They hate

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>me even though my head was in the sand, and

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>so I've sort of made it my mission ever since

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>then to understand first of all, what was going on.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And for the last five six years now, I've been

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to you about what is going on so you

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>don't suffer the same fate that I did. And so

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to look at this. Shout out to Ron

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul who sort of led the charge on in the FED,

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the FED and the FED that put a lot

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of attention on the FED. And here we are looking

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and talking about the FED. So I'm going to break

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>down what the FED just did and it sort of

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sent the markets into a little bit of a tail spin,

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>although they appear to be coming out of it now.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But I want to talk about, regardless of what happens

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this month or next month, we understand what is going

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to happen because there's such thing as true constraints. I'm

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>going to break down what these true constraints are. Why

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a wall, there's a wall they can't

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>get through. Now, there's some limited flexibility within those walls,

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which is where we see them operating today, but the

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>walls are there. We're gonna break down that, and then

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about why the Federal Reserve and

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the US Treasury are fighting as opposed to working together,

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately how the Treasury is forcing their hand into

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.399
<v Speaker 1>action in a way they don't want to go. We're

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to break all that down now to break to

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of kick this off, let's just talk about the

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>fo MC meeting. That is the meaning where the Jerome

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Palle ahead of the rowerser comes out and basically again

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>tells us our fate, sort of like what is that

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Groundhog Day where everybody watches TV. Does he punks the

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Tony phil the groundhog? If he comes out and if

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>he sees his shadow one way or the other, it

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>tells us spring is coming or spring's delayed or something

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>like that. I've never really bought into it too much.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I remember the movie Groundhog Day, but that's sort of

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>what we see. We see Jerome Powell come out, and

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>does he see his own shadow? And will we be

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in winter longer than we expected? Will we be in

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a quantitative tightening cycle longer than we expected? Or will

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>he bring spring back and go back into a quantitative

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>easing cycle, ease monetary policy and allow things to flourish again.

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>You can think about the tightening and the easing sort

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of like the winter in the summer. This is the spring, right,

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and so that's sort of what we saw. Now. The

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>market has been predicting that we would see six rate cuts,

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the FED lowering rates, making the price of money cheaper

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>six times in twenty twenty four. The Federal Reserve Drome

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>pal has been saying, no, no, no, no, you guys

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are wrong. It's only going to be three. Now, I

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>am saying, what difference does it make if it's three

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>or six? What ultimately matters is the total amount of movement,

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Meaning do we get a point and a half of

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>movement this year? And if we get a point and

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a half, does it come through three half point moves

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or does it come from six quarter point moves or

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever the math is on that, And that doesn't really matter, right,

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the overall size of the move now if they

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>move slower, And this is exactly what happened in the

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>media esterday, Jerome Palace sort of came out and he

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>did what we call FED speak or what we call

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>jab owning the market through talking, he's influencing, he's moving

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the markets based off of this, and so he's saying

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do less. The market is saying we're

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>going to do more, and after being very dubvish, meaning

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of signaling that they're going to be easy in

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy. In December, the markets have been taking off.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>The real estate market took off, the stock markets are

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>doing good, bitcoins holding up, oil, all of these things.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>Gold is doing great. And I think the market started

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>getting too far ahead of itself. And so Jerome Powell again,

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the job owning isn't always doing something. A lot of

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>times it's just saying something. We can look back to

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>October when they really talk the market down. So they

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>started talking about how they've done enough, how they're going

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to start easing, and just off of that talk, it

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>pushed the market into rally into the end of the year.

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Then the markets started getting too far ahead of itself.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Too much asset price inflation. People are spending too much money,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>as known as the wealth effect. Right when your house

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>goes up in value, when your stock account, your retirement

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>account goes up in value, you feel more wealthy, you

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>feel more optimistic about your future. When that happens, you

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>spend more money, You go out to the nery book davocation. Likewise,

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the opposite happens. When your house loses value, your stocks

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>lose value, things like that, you feel more broke. Even

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>though you don't need that money for decades, potentially, you

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>still feel more broke. You still feel more pessimistic, and

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>then you naturally spend less money. And so the FED

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>has been trying to fight inflation, and so they're trying

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to control us and not allow us to spend too

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>much money to push inflation up. But at the same

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>time they're trying to walk this thin line of not

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>crashing the market. So that's where they're operating. These are

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the constraints they're operating between one not letting the over

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>exuberance and people driving the market back up, but at

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the same time not pessimism and then pushing the market

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>back down. Pushing the market down would be deflation at

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>price going up are inflation. That's the battle lines. These

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>are the walls that they're playing within. The problem is

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>they have natural constraints, and the natural constraints are really

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lined out between the battle that's being fought right now, Wager,

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the war that's being fought between Janet Yellen at the

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>US Treasury and Rome Power at the Federal reserve. I've

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about this extensively on my main YouTube channel, Mark Moss.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>If you watch that. If you don't watch it, video

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>should go check it out Mark Moss. You can just

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>search Mark Moss. FED in the Treasury fighting each other.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But this is all playing out right now. I want

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to lay out sort of what these true constraints are

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>so you can sort of understand this. Then we're going

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about how the Treasury is forcing the Fed

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>into action that they don't want. Before we talk about

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>forcing their action, let's just talk about what these true

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>constraints are. So we've heard a lot as the FED

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>went on the fastest rate hiking cycle in history, a

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would say that, well, they're going to

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>raise rates until they break something. So what does that

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>mean till they break something? Well, there's lots of things

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that could break. So, for example, as the FED raised

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>rates at the fastest rate in history, that made the

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>price of money more expensive. It made the bonds or

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the debt worth less, and so we saw banks start collapsing.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.559
<v Speaker 1>In March of twenty twenty three, we saw three banks

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>collapse in a matter of weeks or days. As a

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, totally more than the bank collapse in

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight and the FED was forced to

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>start easy. Now, technically they stayed in quantitative tightening, although

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they were easing by adding liquidity to the market. Now,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this is the point that I really want to hit

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on here for a second. Pay attention to this because

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand the difference of doing something and

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>doing something. What do I mean by that? A lot

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of very smart analysts and honestly smarter than I am,

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that understand the inner workings and plumbing of the financial markets,

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>which are very complex, way too complex in my opinion,

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't be that way. They understand it better. However,

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they get too technical, and I believe they're factually correct,

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>but intellectually dishonest. What does that mean? They're factually correct,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>they're going to say, well, look, the markets went up

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and caused inflation, but the FED didn't do anything, meaning

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't lower rates, they didn't inject money, and so

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>factually they're correct. Technically, however, it's intellectually dishonest because by

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>them saying they were going to do something, by them signaling,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.599
<v Speaker 1>by them being more dubvish in their comments, that was

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>enough to move the market. So technically they're correct. They

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually do something as far as the policy, but

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they're talking their opinions. Their dubbish sentiment statements were enough

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to move the market. And so you have to understand this.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Just talking again back to the job on is enough.

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>The other reason why it's intellectually dishonest. Well, I gotta

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>take a very quick break. I'll tell you whant to

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>come back. If you just tune in, you listen to

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the Mark Mass Show talking about the fight between the

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and the Fed and how it's going to play

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>out and what you should be doing about it. Don't

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>go away. I'll be back with more a minute. All right,

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. If you're just tuned innial listening to the

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Mark Mass Show, we're talking about the battle between the

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Fed and the Treasury. I know they're both part of

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the US government, right, they should probably be getting along,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. The reason why they're not is because

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they have different agendas. Before we get into what the

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>different agendas are, I want to go back to the

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>point I was making before the commercial break, which is

0:09:56.040 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>why a lot of these very smart analysts are factually correct,

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>technically correct but intellectually dishonest. So he talked about how

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, well, they didn't do anything. The didn't they

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't change rate policy, they didn't increase liquidity, so didn't

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>do anything. But just their sentiment, just what they said,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>does it matters a lot, as we saw in October,

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as we just saw just this week, so we can

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>see that. The other reason why is because they get

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>too technical. So, for example, quantitative easing is when they're

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>easing monetary policy, so tight monetary policy loose monetary policy,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>if we think about it like that. The problem is

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>these analysts getting too smart for their own good, have

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a very specific technical definition of quantitative easing, and so

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>if the Federal Reserve does easing, they inject liquidity through

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>other means, they would say, well, that's not technically quantitative easing.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>So for example, when the banks collapsed in March of

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, they set up a new funding facility

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>called BTFP Bank Term Funding Facility. They gave over one

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars to the market. That was easing. In

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, it propped up the market. It showed demonstrated

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>to the world that the Fed put was active, and

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw the markets take off because of that, but

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the analysts are going to say, well that's not QE. Okay,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you're right, and so the words are starting to lose definition, right,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and so we're starting to see it. The other reason

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>why I think they're wrong is again they don't understand.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 1>They're so smart on the technical analyst side, they're not

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>taking into consideration other elements such as like human psychology,

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>human greed and things like that, and those are important

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>to understand. When it comes to trying to guess what

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody's going to do. You have to look at all

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that they have in front of them,

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not just the technical, data driven ones, but you have

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at human incentives and things like that. I

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's why they're wrong as well. Now back to

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the true constraints. So the problem with the Federal Reserve

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is they're sort of boxed in, right, They're fighting between

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the Treasure and the Fed, and they want to continue

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates, make money more expensive, to slow down inflation.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is as they do that, it starts

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to drag on the economy, starts to you know, it push.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Their goal is to bring stock prices down, home price

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>down things like that. The problem is when that happens

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>is that you and I feel less wealthy, but we

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit less wealthy. So you're not selling

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>as many stocks, and there's no capital gain taxes you're paying.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You're not selling your home, you're not paying capital gains taxes.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And when you're not paying those taxes, then the government,

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the US Treasury, doesn't receive as much tax revenue. So

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's problem number one. The income for the government goes down,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but the government's spending more money. The government needs more

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>income to keep up with is high spending, but the

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>income goes down, and at the same time, as the

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>FED makes the debt more expensive, the Treasury's expenses go

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>through the room. So the Treasury's income goes down, we're

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not paying taxes, and then their interest goes up because

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the rate increases. And so the FED, by trying

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to fight inflation, is actually fighting against what the treasury wants.

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>The Treasury needs their income to go up and their

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>expenses to go down, which is the opposite of what

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury is doing. Now. A lot of people might

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>say say that the FED is doing this. They will

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with me, but they'll say that the FED wins.

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But I would say, again putting my psychologists hat on,

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>my human incentive hat back on, if I would, I

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 1>understand the FED wants to regain control, they want to

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>regain some legitimacy. They need to show that they can

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>stop inflation. However, at what cost. You see, if they

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fight against the Treasury and they end up putting the

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>government bankrupt out of business, then the dollar they're trying

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to protect basically falls apart as well. You see, they're

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all operating within these constraints. Now. The FED is losing

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a massive amount of money due to their own policies,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but they're sort of putting those off of book. They're

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>not really seeing those now. Like I said, I've been

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about this fight between the FED and the Treasury

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at length, probably over the last year. I've done several

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>videos on my main YouTube, chanel Mark Moss about these.

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get more into that, just go

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to my main YouTube channel, Mark Moss and just search that.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 1>You'll find a bunch of videos talking about that. But

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>what I want to talk about specifically is where we're

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.599
<v Speaker 1>at right now and what the Treasury is doing to

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 1>force the Fed's hand and how this is playing out

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and what we should be doing about it? All right, now,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury is in a tough spot. They don't like this.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>As I said, their income went down, their expenses went up.

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, their expenses. The interest on

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the debt, because now it's more expensive, has now exceeded

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>one trillion dollars just an interest alone. Now money is

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just going into the ether, if you will. And to

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>think about how incredible it is to put it into

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of numbers, it's now more than what the

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>US government spends on its military. And that may not

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mean much to you, but for a frame of reference,

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the US spends more on its military than the next

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>ten countries combined. So more than Russia, more than China,

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>more than Iran, more than Brazil, more than all of

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>them combined. Right, it's not just a big number, it's

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a massive number. And now we're spending more on our

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>debt than that. To put it into another frame of reference,

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it took the United States government two hundred and five

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>years to get to one trillion dollars in debt. Now

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we're thirty five trillion dollars in debt. But just the

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>interest on the debt just the interest alone is more

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>than what it took the government two hundred and five

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>years to accumulate. It's amazing. So this is where the

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>government is. They have to get this interest right down.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>That is the battle that we have. The FED needs

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>raids up. They need them higher for longer to cool

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the market, to tame price and asset inflation, so they

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>can regain the world's confidence. Right They've been in this

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>tightening stance for over two years. But the Treasury they

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>need the Fed to raise rates or lower rates back down.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>They want the Fed to switch back to easing, and

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they want it for two reasons right right, One they

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get the market's economy going so tax refeats

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>go back up, and two they need the interest rate

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to go back down. Now, as this plays out, I

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>believe they are forcing the Fed's hands. I believe this's

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>actually they've taken over the last couple months that as

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>much as Jerome Power wants to do job owned the

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>market to cool down, it's not gonna cool down. We

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>already know what's coming. If you're paying attention to this,

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you more. But I also want to

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>let you know that next week I have a live

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>event that I'm doing. It's not gonna be here pre recorded,

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be live, and I'm gonna show you how

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to seize the upside of the Fed's you turn that's

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>coming this year while side stepping market volatility. You can

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>join me live. I have about thirty five slides. I'm

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna show you ish thirty five ISH and I'm gonna

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>do all live Q and A. So if you have

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>questions about this, you can ask me. Go dot one,

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Markmoss dot com, slash you turn again. That's go dot one,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Markmoss dot com, slash U turn. But getting back in

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to sort of frame this up, like I said, we

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>know the Fed's gonna pivot. Is it gonna be three

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>times or six times? We don't know. But Jerome Power

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>just kind of came out and said, oh, we're gonna

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>drag our feet little bit. We're gonna try to push

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>out from March until May. They say they want to

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>push out as far as it can be pushed out.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And so Jane Allen and the Treasury is like, Nope,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna work for us. We need it much sooner.

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>We have all this debt that we need to refinance.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We need rates to come down, and so we're going

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to have to force you into action. Now. Depending on

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.239
<v Speaker 1>who wins this policy battle, there's going to be very

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>different outcomes for the economy, for the market, for our portfolios,

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and all of that. But if we want to dive

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>into what the Treasury is doing right now, and we're

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and we can see what's going on in the market,

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>so it makes better sense to you. We can see

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that historically, when the Treasury issues debt, right, they sell

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>bonds to issue debt, on average, about twenty percent of

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the money raise comes from the sale of short term

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>debt or less than one year's maturity. Those are what

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we call bills. The other eighty percent of the debt

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they sell are in longer term notes and bonds because

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>notes and bonds carry interest rate or what we call

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>duration risk, whereas the shorter term maturity bills they generally don't,

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So that way their effects on marketing the economy they

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>differ substantially. Right, if I borrow money for longer, you

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>want some more return. If I borrow twenty bucks off tomorrow,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't really care. If you're just tune in, you're

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Marcomas Show. We're talking about the battle

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>between the Fed and the Treasury, and we're going to

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about how this is going to play out in

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, how the Treasury is forcing the Fed's hand.

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna take a very quick break, but I'm

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be right back. You don't want to miss

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what's coming up next, so don't go away. I'll be

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>right back. All right, Welcome back. If you just tune in,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to the Mark Mass Show. We're talking about

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the battle between the Treasury, the US Treasury with Janet

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Ellen and the Federal Reserve and Jerome Powell, and how

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>that's going to affect markets this year in twenty twenty four. Now,

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about how the Treasury is taking action

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to force the Fed hand. The Fed is the Treasury

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>needs policy to ease, They need rates to come back down.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>The Fed wants to keep them higher for longer. Jerome

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Powell just had their meeting and he said that we're

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>going to keep them higher for longer than most people want.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And Janet Allen's like, uh no, you're not. I'm going

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to force you into action. So how is she doing that? Well?

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, as they issue debt, they have to

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sell bonds, bonds, bills, notes. Twenty percent is short term,

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent is long term. That's historically, But what we're

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now, if we dig into the bond market,

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we can see that instead of historically the eighty twenty

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>net issuance on the short term bill side, in twenty

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three we saw a net issuance of almost two

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in bills and negative net issuance in the

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>longer dated notes. So what does that mean. What that

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>means is that more notes were redeemed in dollar terms

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>than they were issued. And as far as I know,

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen negative net issuance in notes since the

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Clinton era surpluses. It's been a long time. And it's

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>not just that they're easing up on the note issuances.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>What they've done is they've brought it down to negative.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>And the key pieces right here is that they're front

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>loading everything they can into short term bills. So normally

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>they sell on the long end, right now they're selling

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>on the short end. Now, if you look at some charts,

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you can see just how extreme this is. But they

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>are really loading this in now again to catch you up.

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Bills are short term paper, so that's typically you know,

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>less than a year. Notes are longer dated two years

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to ten years. Right now, I've talked about this, you

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>probably heard me. Many people, include myself, have thought that

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury had no choice but to issue all these

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bills on this short side because interest rates were so high,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and they were pushed up and they were held high

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>by the Fed, and the Treasury didn't want to lock

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in that debt long term, right, so we just had

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, zero percent one percent rates. And I thought

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury should have locked all that long term dead

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in at zero percent, Like why didn't they now it's

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>at five percent. They don't want to lock it in

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for thirty years or ten years at those levels. And

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so I thought Janet Yellen was like the worst trader

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in history. We have all these homeowners like myself locked

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in some mortgages thirty year mortgages in the three percent range.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You have all these corporations who locked in long term

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt at these rates. But yet Yellen, who probably

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>knew more than anybody had insider information, didn't lock in

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the government at those rates. So I thought that was

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big mistake. But now that I'm looking at

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>this from a different lens, it looks like what's happening

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is she's loading it all on the short term rate

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to force the Fed's hands. It looks like it's deliberate

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>by yelling and the Treasury to fight against FED policy

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately force them into taking action the action

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to do. Now, there was an article

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just reading by Steven Moran. He's from the

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan Institute. He's a former senior advisor at the US Treasury,

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>just in twenty twenty one, so he's pretty in tune

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>with the inner workings over there. He said that quote,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department has offset QT quantitative tightening by increasing

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the share of total issuance for bills far beyond the norm.

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying, right. Traditionally there's more on the

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>back end. Now they're doing it much more on the

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>short end. He goes on to say the increased duration

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>risk that QT quantitative tightening supplies to the market has

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>been nullified by the reduced duration risks supplied to the

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>market by changes to the Treasury's issue, it's profile and

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>political actors at the Treasury have managed to run rough

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>shod over the stance of monetary policy end quote. So

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>he said it right there, he said, the Treasury is

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>running rough shod. I don't know if you know what

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that word means. I had to look it up. I'm

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just kidding. But in normal like non FED speak, basically

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>what that means is the Treasury is having their way

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Fed. Right, it means that the Treasury is

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>forcing their will on the FED. They're forcing their own

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>agenda on the FED. So a lot of people think

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's going to win. As I kind of laid

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>out before I even went into this, them winning means

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the government loses. That's probably not going to work out.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And as we can see right now, it looks like

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury is having their way. So how exactly does

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it do this? What's the mechanism there? So what happens

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 1>is by issuing so many short term bills, the Treasury

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is effectively printing money. Now, the FED is in quantitative tightening,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to tighten the money supply, but the Treasury

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>is effectively printing money by doing this, which counteracts them.

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>In the article that I was just read, and Stephan

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>ron is saying that Janet Yellen is draining the reverse

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>repo facility on purpose, so the Fed is forced to

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>stop quantitative tightening. He says, quote, by increasing the bill issuance,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury ensures the RRP drains more quickly. By keeping

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>bill issuance high, the Treasury is able to not only

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to counteract quantitative tightening performed by the Fed, but also

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is the key piece, but also to force the Fed

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to taper QT or to shut it down. This is

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an abomination monetary policy under the control of fiscal authorities.

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>H That's what he said. So let's think about that

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for a minute. Now, you hear a lot of people,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>will probably other analysts on TV, on YouTube, et cetera,

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about the reverse repo window. Now, the reverse repo

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is where banks put money with the FED and it

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>goes to overnight settlement. And we saw that number explode

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>after the pandemic, and now it's being drained. A lot

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of people you'll find no shorts of people saying that

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>as this gets drained, it's a big problem. And once

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it hits zero or close to that, back to normal

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>means it's going to be a big problem. And the

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is going to come crashing down. That's what

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll say. However, basically, what this article from Steve Mourana

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is saying a Treasury person, he's saying that they're draining

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the RRP on purpose, and the reason they want to

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>drain it on purpose is so that the Fed is

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>forced into easy and back into the market again. Now,

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>why would Yellen try to force the Fed back into

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>quantitay easing from a tightening position. It's a good question. Now,

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>before I answer that, let's look at the Fed's dilemma.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Why would the Fed not want to do that? Why

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>would it be a disact? Why do they have to

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>be forced into it? Why don't they just adopt it? Right? Well,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it's because the Fed has a dual mandate. Now they

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>probably have a third mandate, but they have a dual

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>mandate one stable prices, two full employment. Now, if we

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>look at the stable prices side, how stable have prices been?

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>It looks like the price of everything went up by

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>about fifty per Now prices are coming back down on

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>certain things. They're anything but stable. Their goal is two

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>percent price inflation. So even though inflation is stepped, it's

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>still in our purchasing power still in our life, if

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you will. At least, if it's at two percent, it's

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>predictable as much as they're going up. The problem is

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>when it goes from zero percent to negative percent to

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>nine percent like we saw, then it drops all the

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>way back down to two or three, and that's anything

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but stable. And when it's not stable, how do we

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>plan our lives? And more importantly, how do we plan

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>our businesses? Do I buy supplies now and lock in

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the prices now or do I wait till later, like

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>when during the pandemic, like lumber shot through the roof,

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, is it going to keep going higher?

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Or should I lock it in right now? When everything

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is shooting higher, people are rushing out to buy things,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and so they obviously didn't keep things stable, say the least,

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>then they have the full employment right, and so we

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>can see that that inflation wrecking ball messes up a

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of things, messes up the way businesses can operate,

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and mess up the way the economy works, and more

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>importantly makes the FED look horrible, because again they have

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a mandate. If they can't achieve their goals they want

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to achieve, then what do we have them for anyway.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>They you know, let's let's look at some of their truck.

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>They told us that inflation wasn't a problem. They couldn't

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>get inflation. We can't get enough. We're gonna keep going, going, going,

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>he said, Joe, and prose, we're gonna let it run hot.

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>We're just gonna we're gonna overstimulate the market. And then

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>if we overshoot our targets so up, then as we

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>got the inflation, it's not a problem. It's not a problem.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not a problem. Then it's transitory it you know,

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go away. Then it ran way too hot,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and then eventually they were forced to scramble. And then

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>they scrambled so fast at this knee jerk reaction. And

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>now they went too far right. Now they've gone too

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>far and too fast the other way, tightening everything back up.

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, in their sort of race

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to their desperation to regain confidence, the confidence of the people,

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the government and the government, uh you know, Powell and

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the Fed, they're so focused on the war on inflation

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that they've let it just go too far right. And

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, in order for the FED to

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>win the war of inflation, then the Treasury has to lose.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a zero sum game here, that's the problem. They've

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>been trying to play this dance. But the end of

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, the Treasury is gonna have to get their way.

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's the stage for the battle. That's the stage

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>we've been watching over the last year. It's the stage

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about for a long time. Now I'm

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell you how you can play this, how we

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>can set ourselves up to profit from this and not lose.

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna break that down for you in a minute.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>But if you're just tune in you're listening to the

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark Mass Show, I'm gonna be back with what I

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 1>think happens with the Fed and the Treasury battle that's

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>playing out, and how we position ourselves to profit and

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>sidestep the volatility. So'll be right back. Don't go away,

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark Mass Show, we're talking about the

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>battle between the Fed and the Treasury and what happened

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as this plays out, who ultimately wins, and more importantly,

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>how we win regardless. Now we've already seen the Fed

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>pause on raising rates, right, they paused them, and then

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they started raising them again, and now they paused them again.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, they're admitting that we're going to

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have lower rates this year, but they're dragging their feet, right,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to delay the cuts as long as possible.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>But if we go back to the question that I

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>posed earlier, that I told you, I answer, why would

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Yellen try to force the Fed back into qe would?

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Why would why would she want them to go from

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>QT tightening back to easing? And I already told you

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>why they wouldn't want to, But why does Yellen want that? Well,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a math problem. It's a math problem, and it's

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a political problem. Let's start with the math first. So

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the math. If the Fed sells ten

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>year notes, ten year paper at five percent, then that rate,

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the five percent, is locked in for ten years. And

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem with locking in that money for ten years

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is the Treasury can't afford that in order to afford

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the debt that we have now, but more importantly, the

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>death that's about to come for the rest of the

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>year probably, I mean, we've been adding a trillion dollars

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>every quarter I will probably add another trillion dollars of

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>debt this year, So not just the debt that we have,

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but the debt we're going to add in order to

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>afford that. Janet Allen, the Treasury needs rates to be

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>back to zero. She wants to get rates back down

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially close to zero before she starts issuing the notes,

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the longer duration notes in any serious quantity, and she

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to issue some serious quantity to keep the government's

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>runaway spending programs going. They cannot quit spending. I think

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it was two point seven or I think it was

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>two point seven trillion added to the national debt last year.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>My guess is it's over three trillion this year, specifically

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in an election year with wars going on, and more importantly,

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because the government just continues to grow. You know, I thought,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I was watching these debt ceiling debates

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>go down, the Republicans that thrown out an offer to

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats saying let's just hold spending down or let's

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 1>just go back to like spending and where we were

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty before the pandemic, and I'm like, life

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't horrible, and you know, before the pandemic twenty twenty,

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>or saying at twenty nineteen like that wasn't catastrophic, Like

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>why couldn't we just go back to spending like we

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>did in twenty nineteen, right, Like we had plenty of

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>government programs and social programs and you know whatever the

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>roads were there, Like, why couldn't we go back to that?

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And part of the reason why is because the government

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has grown so much. If we were to take it back,

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, millions of people are going to be affected

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>by this. All types of jobs will be lost, and

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>programs will be cut and things like that. And so

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the government continues to get bigger and bigger and bigger,

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's no way to reverse that. So they need

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to continue spending, and they need the rates to be

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>lower ones they can finance that debt. And two, like

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, so that taxes go back up as we

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>sell our stocks, as we sell our homes, things like that,

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>all right now at the current rates, to give you

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of an idea of how bad this is at

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the current rates. Right now, the US what we call

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>true interest expense is more than all of the US

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>tax re seats. Now that's just true expenses. What are

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>true expenses. True expenses is what is mandatory, what has

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to be spent. That's just the interest on the debt

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and the entitlement spending. So that's Medicare, Medicaid, SEB, security,

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that. That's money we owe to people that

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has to be paid. That's just that alone is more

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>than all the US tax receeats. So the Treasury is

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in a super tough spot now. The last big note

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>issuance when we issued them on the longer end of

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum, was back in twenty twenty one when rates

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>were still at zero, and so now Yellen is trying

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to force the Fed back into that range before she

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>can start flooding the market with those notes. Again, that's

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>why she's trying to drain the RRP with the bill issuance.

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's the math problem, but it's also a political problem.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The political problem is that we're an electioneer and with

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy sort of teetering on the brink, we gonna

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>have a recession? Are We're not gonna have recession. Yellen,

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>who's part of the Bide administration, they have an agenda,

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and their agenda is to win, right. They want to

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>win the election. They want to maintain power. They want

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats to maintain power, and so because of that,

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they cannot have a recession. I made a video on

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>my man YouTube channel saying they couldn't afford a recession.

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>They can't afford a recession because if there is a recession,

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that means tax receipts go down even more. Remember the

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>spending doesn't, just the income goes down. They can't afford

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>what they have now, how could they afford it in

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a recession? They can't. And so because of that, Yellen

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is trying to force their hands. She's continuing trying to

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>stack the short term paper, continuing to drain the RRP.

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Now will she win? Is that checkmate? Or do you know?

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Does the Fed have another rabbit out of their hat?

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Do they fight back? Well, my guess. Before I guess,

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you. Let's see. I think as I

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of started out by saying, one of these financial

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>analysts who are smarter than me and a lot of

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the inner workings and plumbings of this, but maybe fail

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to look at other things. They don't look at all

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the information in my opinion, right, so one of the

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>things like Harry Dent Junior, I hate to pick on him.

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think his work is brilliant. I've read five of

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>his books. I continue to read his books because his

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>research is correct. The assumptions are wrong, And the reason

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>why the assumptions are wrong is they fail to take

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>into consideration how many magic tricks the FED has up

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>their sleep. So, for example, when the banks collapsed, Oh

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>my god, this is it. The whole thing's crashing down. Okay, Sure,

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or they just paper over it and they just take

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that debt on their books. Oh but Mark, don't you

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>know that the commercial real estate mortgage security market is

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>going to crash two point nine trillion dollars going to

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>sink all the regional banks. Sure, or the FED just

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>takes all those bonds on their books. I mean, they've

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>taken real estate bonds on their books before. Oh but Mark,

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>don't you know there's a receession coming. All these people

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to lose their job. Yeah. Sure, the government

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>just sends everybody a thousand dollars STEMI check, like they

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>did just a couple of years ago. Right, You see

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. And so the point is is that

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:06.719
<v Speaker 1>these are the things that we already know about. How

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>many other things can they come up with that we

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>don't even know about. And that's the point that I

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>try to make on this. It's like, look, we think,

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 1>we keep thinking it's going to be checkmate. I thought

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be checkmate back in twenty twelve,

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people did. Harry Dent's been calling for

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a crash for twelve years. Now, eventually they'll be right.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>But how many more tricks stay up their sleeve? So

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>is it checkmate or are there more tricks of their sleeve? Well,

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's checkmate in a sense that they're going

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>to force the FED into action. Now, some of it

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>when it's not checkmate, is that it's going to be hidden.

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be obfuscated. They're gonna say, well, we're not easy,

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of like they're still officially in a quantitative tightening mode,

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but they injected one hundred billion dollars into the banking industry,

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>so they're in tightening. However, they're actually easing, so their

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>potential policy stance could say the same. So for example,

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe they don't lower rates as as soon as maybe

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>people would think, but they start injecting liquidity into other places.

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of games that they can play here.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's the point. However, back to these smarter people

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are factually correct, intellectually dishonest, factually, it might not be

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a pivot factually technically, but it could still be easing

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred other ways. Right, And so for you

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and I, we don't need to get into the weeds

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on this. We just need to know are we in

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>easy or are we untighten? Is the Fed going to

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:32.919
<v Speaker 1>push prices up? Are they going to push prices down?

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>And in my opinion, it's going to push prices up.

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about this for a year and a half.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I am an inflation bowl. Look, this isn't good. It's

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>not good at all. As a matter of fact, it's worse.

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Having prices crashed back down would be better because at

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>least it gives us another chance to get back in.

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 1>It gives my kids a chance, the millennials a chance

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to get back in. The problem is, I don't think

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen. I think it's going to continue

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 1>going higher, higher, higher, which sounds good if you own assets,

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's worse for society. It's worse for most people.

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We'd like things to reset. So we all have a

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>chance to get back in the game. It's like if

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you're playing a board game and you got out or

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you haven't got a chance to get back in. You're

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the game to be reset so you can

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>jump in and play the game with everybody, or you

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>can get back in. But if they don't ever reset

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the game, then you don't get in the game. And

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what it looks like is happening now. If

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to know exactly what is going on with

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this from a much more detailed level, I'm having a

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>live presentation. You can join me live hang out. It's

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>titled Seize the Upside of the Feds You Turn in

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four Walls side Stepping the Market of All Tilly.

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>If that sounds interesting, come join me live. I've got

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of charts and graphs I want to

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>show you, not just talk to you about. Go to

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>go dot one, Markmoss dot com, slash you turn to

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>join me. Not only am I going to go through

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>all the charts and graphs, I'm gonna answer all your

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.399
<v Speaker 1>questions live, So we're gonna be hanging out. You're gonna

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>ask the questions. I'm gonna be answering them. Just go

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to go dot one, Markmoss dot com, slash you turn,

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>go dot one, Markmoss dot com, slash you turn, join

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>me live and uh boy, that's what I got. This

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 1>is what's happening. It's happening this year. It's all going down.

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe that it's sort of checkmate. Maybe not officially,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 1>but the FED is going to be easy and they

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>have to with then do any good to put the

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>government out of business. Anyway, you're listening to the Mark

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Mash Show talking about this topic. Hopefully that makes sense.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me know if you're listening on hit me up

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>on social media. And that's what I got. Thanks so

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:21.479
<v Speaker 1>much for listening.