WEBVTT - Surveillance: Biden’s Stimulus Plans With Hubbard

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. Right now,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to attempt an intelligent conversation. I turned to

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Keene at the ten o'clock hour last night and

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know, I figure Wheeler will cancel is

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State went down in flames? Tom Wheeler, your comment

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>on the spirit of college football in the time of

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this national crisis. My comment is, go Buckeyes. Think about

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>what brought you there, not just the outcome, but it

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>was a tragedy lesson. He is a former FCC chairman,

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're thrilled to Thomas Wheeler could join us this morning. Tom.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the phrase in net neutrality. It's Greek

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to me um, But tell us what the net looks

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>like in two or three years. We are evolving each

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and every day. With Fiorina and Wheeler on the same page,

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what does our FCC world look like in five years? Well,

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that what is important is we've got to

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>think about what the new world looks like. That, um,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have been trying to oversee, um the revolution

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>of the digital economy and digital technology using statutes and

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>regulatory structures that were created for the industrial era. And

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we need a new approach that recognizes that the world

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>has changed, that things move much more quickly than they

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>did before, and so we can't have the old scarrot

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>approach to oversight. And and secondly that we're dealing with

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a whole new class of assets, soft assets instead of

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>hard assets, and they behave differently in the marketplace. All Right,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So Tom, let's bring this to what happened over the

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>past week or so. We saw Twitter band President Trump

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>from its platform, Facebook suspending him from There's raising a

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>question about big text rule in really determining the discourse

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in the nation and frankly in the world. What is

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the government's rule in dictating the guidelines for some of

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>these big tech companies. Well, I think Creli fi Arena

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>hit the nail on the head. And this is the

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.679
<v Speaker 1>basis for things that I've been writing saying saying that Look, um,

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>what's been going on is the technology companies have assumed

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>quasi governmental role. They are making the rules because our

0:02:55.800 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>representatives in government are not. And we even step up

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>and figure out, um, as the people, what are the

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>rules that um that that should should exist. How do

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we have competition instead of these monopolies. How do we

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>have expectations for responsible behavior rather than um, well, we'll

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>do whatever we want because it's profitable. But but but, Tom,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you talk about these concepts and there's very

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>little agreement on exactly how to frame uh these issues.

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We can't even get a stimulus effort pass, and we

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>have a jobless rate that's incredibly high. I mean, what

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is your confidence level that there actually is some consensus

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on these big philosophical concepts in Washington, d C. Lisa,

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this goes back to our discussion of the

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>game last night. You know, I think you need to

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>have the willingness to get on the field and to

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>try and work it out rather than just running away

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>from it, and which is frankly what we've done for

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>too long. You know. One of the things that happened

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is that is that policymakers have been sold. For the

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>last couple of decades, policy makers have been sold this

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>snake oil that that somehow digital is different and that

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty close to magic, and if you do anything

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to provide public interest oversight, you'll break that magic. That's

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>not the case, and we need to have policy makers

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>who understand and I think they are coming up to speed,

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>who understand the realities of the digital economy, and they

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are willing to step up. I mean, let's go back

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in history for just a second. The regulatory structures that

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we have in place right now, we're created to provide

0:04:54.480 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>balance in the industrial economy to the inherent incentive to

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>excess that was created at that point in time. We

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>need to have some kind of an offsetting, countervailing structure

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>created in the digital economy. But we can't rely on

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the structures that were created for a hundred years ago,

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's a new world. Tom Well, I want to

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about your wonderful work in the Civil War, your

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>book Take Command on Leadership, and then you talk about

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 1>taking the next hill. We've got to take the next

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>technology hill. Do you assume whatever that technology hill looks like,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and let's say I see Ohio regiments at Gettysburg, do

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you just assume that's a breakup of these technology companies no, Tom,

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you have to do, uh, you know,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>another chapter in the book talks about you've got to

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>look at new techniques and new and have new thoughts

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>because because you know, I don't want to break up

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and have half a dozen mini me facebooks, all

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>with the incentive to use their monopoly power over the

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>digital assets which they hold and won't share with anybody else.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I would rather see, let's have instead of break up,

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>let's break open access to those assets. Let me give

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you one specific example. In ninety six, A T and

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>T was forced to open access to its patents, which

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was the greatest repository of of patents in the world.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And when that happened, innovation and competition took off. They

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>had been using those patents to thwart others from creating

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>competitive alternatives. And what we need to do is say, Okay,

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies are now sitting on massive databases. We will

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>never be able to compete with them if they continue

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to hoard those databases. You need to open the databases

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for free. Not for free, but you need to provide

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>access to the essential essential for the digital economy to

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. Controversial to say, at least Thomas Wheeler thinking

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>so much greatly appreciated. Stephen Whiting is with that Morrisett

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>City Group, City Group Private Bank, and he joins us

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Stephen Whiting, do you readjust your two thousand

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 1>one view with the two amult of the first twelve

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>days of this year? We don't not because of political

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>shocks like this. I think when we look back at history,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we can find twenty events all the way back and

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>including World War Two that really qualify as political or

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical shocks. Only two of them really turned to direct

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and of the world economy. And this is one that

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I would doubt is going to turn the direction of

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the world economy. And for all those that didn't, the

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>effects and financial markets weren't felt for more than ninety days.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, I want you to have common on ed

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Morris and oil to sixty as well. You've got frontline

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>commodity work filtering in the City Group Private Bank. How

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>do you filter in the work of Edward Morris. Remarkably,

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's across asset classes, it's powerful when we understand

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the oil market in particular more

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>than other commodities, but certainly in commodities like copper and

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>iron ore um. These might have directly relatively small shares

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of economic activity, but the sensitivities to credit, the movements

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and currencies, the read through the broader asset allocation, it's

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>been really powerful. So it's been a fantastic contributor to

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>to our work in terms of broader asset allocation, even

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>beyond commodities. So what you're saying is that you've either

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>flation trade. Is that what you're saying, Oh, I do

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>because I believe in a vaccine. Uh. And we see

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>already with just three producers, probably five billion vaccine doses

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>will be distributed over the course of one and that's

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>not the end of the vaccine pipeline. Uh. And you

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>can hear it from the Federal Reserve if you don't

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>want to believe me, that the course of the virus,

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and the vaccines will really determine the course

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>of the future economy. This has been uh in external

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>exogenous shock. We came into this event relatively healthy, with

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>low inflation rates, no booms in any industries, and this

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>virus knocked us down incredibly deeply. It's changed every asset

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>price in the world. And when it leaves, it will

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>change every asset price in the world. Uh. And there's

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the economy that can still be restored

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>uh in later as it departs. All right, So in

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the near term, how are you looking at the vACC

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>nations in order to determine your investing thesis? We were

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Mark McCormick about how he's tracking which nations

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>are doing the best job of getting vaccines into our arms.

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you doing the same to determine where the world

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to invest? Well, it's no surprise, for example, that throughout

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Asia the pervasiveness of the virus has been lowered. Maybe

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the experience with stars for example, very very high

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>compliance with mast wearing right has had a different economic

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>impact there. Um. I just think that we are very

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>early on in terms of vaccination. I mean, it is

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>fairly miraculous that we have effective vaccines at the levels

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that we are seeing. Right. Epidemiologists expected efficacy, you know,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit closer to fluid vaccines, and here we

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>are with some of these well above nine. The rollout

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>may be slow, but I think this is a little

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>bit like sand than a sieve. Right, It'll move faster

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>as we as we go forward, right, So equipping about

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months is not something that I'm going

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>to do with asset allocation. Steve whing been Layler over

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Tower Hudson very courageously. He's been dead out on optimism

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>on the equity markets cost for three years of double

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>digit return he says, there's a not certitude, but a

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of that you and I have lived in the

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>certitude of single digit returns. Is that where we finally

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>are We look, we're not expecting returns as robust as

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on headline, especially for US equities where we had a

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of defensive equities in the technology sector. They provided

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the solutions to the COVID economy. Their valuations were driven

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>up by falling interest rates, right, So it's more than

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the durability of their earnings. But there's that invaluation. So

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not expecting to be as strong as last year's

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>return for US equities. But there's a lot around the

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>world right now where of our equity overweight is outside

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States, where we've seen some pockets of the

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>world lag badly behind. Now when we think back to

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, where conditions perfectly lost jobs, the entirety

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand nine. That was a thirty five percent

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>game right for global equities in that year, less for

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States, more for the rest of the world.

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 1>People thought the expansion was over, that we priced in recovery.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It's now time, you know, the wait for the next crisis.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>We then went on to ten years in which we

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>had a game in global equities games and nine out

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of eleven years and what was the returning cash over

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the time six percent annuals. Yeah, well, Steve, what's the

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>distinction of the city gro view on markets in one

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>given Then what you've laid out is very much or

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.719
<v Speaker 1>hearing from most people on the show. Well, I think

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>again it's discriminating between which assets will really move that

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there are these shorter term dislocations that are quite severe.

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>We've been overweight small cap US equities for a good

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>period of time in that has mean reverted pretty significantly.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Latin America, Southeast Asia, these are markets that have not

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>come back nearly as much. The fact that there's a

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>strong correlation between what you mentioned earlier um At morses

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you on oil and financial stocks that sort of are

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>priced as if they are their businesses reflect the worst

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of the credit conditions of the most impacted industries. These

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are areas again that we'd be bullish on for a

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>practical revaient. Now, when we get all through with these distortions,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna focus in on a different set of opportunities.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Some of these are really long term growth opportunities, like

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we've only had a minimal amount of

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>shift in the world to uh to greener technologies, right

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:49.359
<v Speaker 1>electrification that you are thematic opportunities that are really incipient,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just the way e commerce was ten years ago. Stephen Whiting, UH,

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just fascinating. Thank you so much. We're gonna have to

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>leave it there right now. With the death Stephen Whiting

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of City Group, Private Think, Thank you so much. Julie

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Norman with us right now, Lisa Brownwittson, Tom King, your

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>simulcast Professor Norman at the University College London. And you know, Professor,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we've done different things here, including the TikTok with Kevin

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Surreali and the rest of it. I want to look

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:23.119
<v Speaker 1>forward with you, Professor, to the new grid Luck Democratic President,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Senate, Democratic House. Why are we even talking about Gridlock? Well, Tom,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's always going to be a bit of

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>gridlock in Washington, but for Biden especially, Yes, he does

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have a majority now in the Senate after the Georgia runoffs,

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>but that is an extremely when majority with the Senate

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>being fifty fifty and just having the vice president as

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a tiebreaker and only a four seat majority in the House,

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>one of this limits in recent memory. So just because

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, it's going to be tough to that legislation through,

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>especially in the Senate, where most meaningful legislation requires sixty votes,

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>not just the simple majority, and even more than that.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>There's some uh surmising sometimes that having a closed House

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and a close Senate increases opportunities for compromise and partisanship,

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but in fact we sometimes see the opposite that in fact,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>often the minority party is even less likely to compromise

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in those situations because they don't want to give the

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>majority a win. If we somehow get beyond our national catastrophe,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>how does a minority react to not owning either of

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the three houses? What what do the Republicans do? Based

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on histories? Take well, what we've seen historically is that

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>again whichever party is the minority, Republicans or Democrats, Republicans

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case um which I instag me some of

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that legislation that the majority party wants to put through.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>For Joe Biden and for Democrats right now, the emphasis

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>will most likely see on further stimulus bills for the

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Corona relief. We can expect that there will be some

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>opposition to that in the Senate, starting with opposition to

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>say the increase of two thousand dollar checks or increasing

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the age to state and local governments. So

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll see some kind of digging in and just trying

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to create some variers of having that legislation go through smoothly. Julie. Meantime,

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about impeachment yet again in Congress, even though

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we have eight more days of President Trump's tenure. Is

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this more of a damaging effect on Joe Biden's entry

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>into the presidency than it is help to the Democrats?

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Well visa, I think that's a big question for Democrats

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. Certainly, Joe Biden has not thrown his weight

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>behind the impeachment for speedings. He's pretty much just said

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>all that Congress do what they decide. However, Providen definitely

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to be able to hit the ground running. He

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to be able to have his cabinet members and

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>especially his national security team confirmed right away. He wants

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to get to work on the vaccination program and also

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>again on some of this relief and stimulus bills. And

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he really doesn't want the whole Senate ground to a

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>hold over an impeachment proceeding, especially one that is unlikely

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to even get all the votes. Theory for a two

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>conviction to borrow Chump from the future office, and you know,

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>something said to this also divide the country further, just

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>deepen grievances and undermine Itiden pull messaging around unity and healing.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.959
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure that's certainly on his mind too, although

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>his team is trying to spend it as more of

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity than a than a deepening problem right now.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's going to be an upho battle for Biden regardless,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and an impeachment is going to make it even trickier

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for him to navigate those waters. Yeah, I mean, I've

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>been I've been wondering, you know, what's the point at

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain point, if it's not going to get through,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>if they're not going to actually get Trump out of office,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>he only has eight days left, why go through this exercise,

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and some people have arguable for as this has international

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 1>ramifications in terms of edifying the United States view as

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a democracy that's united, do you have any sympathy for

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that view? Well, there certainly is the sense of what

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this looks like to the rest of the world. Obviously,

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the images from last week many saw as really hurting

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the global image of the US as a sort of

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>similar bastion of democracy. I think it's more important though

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>for internal messaging and optics to remote democrats, the sense

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of saying to their own voters into the country more broadly,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that this kind of behavior, this kind of incitement, can't

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>be a precedent and essentially saying that this is that

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the body would be without integrity if they didn't pursue

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>impeachment proceedings because of this. However, again, the pragmatics and

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the practicalities around it do make this difficult. They know

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that they can't remove from office and might be making

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.479
<v Speaker 1>things hard for Biden at the same time. One final question,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and we can do this with Julie Norman. She is

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>wonderful on the tensions of politics. Julie, this has been

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>under our radar because of the news flow and this

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>is the foreign policy exit of the Trump administration on

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Cuba and particularly overnight on Yemen. This was a heated

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>report reported folks, heated exchange between legislative staff members and Mr.

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Pompeo in his State department. Julie Norman explained to our

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>audience why these discussions on Yemen are so so heated

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. There was the discussions around Yemen and Yemen

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a country in the Middle East and the Gulf that

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>has really been stuffering from a quite severe civil war

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>for for years now. Pompey was preferring to declare one

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of the groups, the Footie Group, a terrorist group. Laboring

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>any group a terrorist group has very significant rampiprocations in

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of what kind of aid can go to the country,

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what kind of political conversation can happen

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with that group for peace processes and negotiations, and also

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>just start puts the US on a kind of very

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>different political expance on that conflict that they've already done on.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you assume that doesn't just because of time, Julie,

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to complete the circle. Do you assume that President Biden

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>and his team can reverse that decision if they choose.

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think they will try again. The team is

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty pragmatic. They're going to want to leave all options

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>open for negotiations and diplomacy, and the terrorism label inhibits

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that rather than facilitate that. That's why we love Julie Norman.

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>I can take a tangent like that, and there she

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>is with expert views Julie Norman with u c L

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>right now on the economics of the moment. It is

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>always good to speak to Glenn Hubbard, Columbia professor of economics,

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a former Airmen of the Council of Economic Advisors under

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>President Bush, and I do want to part here that

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>with the late Edward Lizier were the giants of conservative growth.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>The certitude that growth was good and incentivizing our private

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>economy was to way to get it. Uh don, Glenn,

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I want you to speak for ed Lazier. What a loss.

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But right now, Glenn Hubbard, there has to be an

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>optimism about a return to American growth. We have a

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>rising debt, arising deficit from a natural natural disaster. Do

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you suggest that we can see American growth out of

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this terrible tragedy that we face. I think we can.

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean Obviously, there's almost nothing good about COVID nineteen,

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>but the pace of innovation we're seeing is truly amazing,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and every business leader I think believes were well in

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the interior of the productivity growth frontier. I think as

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>long as policy focuses on recovery and renewal and reform,

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get there. And what was so distinctive here,

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Hubard, with your work and also Dul's ears, as

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, caffeinated enthusiasm, there has to be an American

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>initiative that is different. Is that exceptionalism still there? I

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think there is. You know, whether you're talking about public

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>policy or private goals, the idea of a moonshot is important.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the pace of development of vaccines

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for COVID nineteen, you see an example of what I'm

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>talking about, and we can see that throughout the economy.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think a task for our new president will

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be to try to make sure that that spirit is there,

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>both publicly and privately. Glenn, how quickly can we return

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>back to normal? There are many questions even if people

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated, how long you get protected for? So we

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>are we overthinking that? You know that once people get vaccinated,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we go back to normal economically. See, I'm not sure

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 1>what normal will mean. We we do need to think

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>about this in phases. So we need to make sure

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a vigorous recovery, get people back to work,

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure we support people while things are locked down.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>But then the economy is going to look different. People

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>may be in different jobs. If I were advising President Biden,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I would be focused on the possibility of something like

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a new g I bill. What's a way to retrain people,

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>get them going. I think that's the spirit we need.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>But retraining into what I mean when I talk about normal,

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what's really thinking about Tom and I having a drink

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of our choice? Okay, I think you would talk to

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>have the drink of your choice. But I'm saying the

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>mix of businesses and jobs in the economy last February

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to look different than what it may be

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in the new economy, and we want to make sure

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that people are ready for that. Drinks and all. How

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>different Glenn, So, is it just what we were already

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>going through so much more e commerce, much more technology

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>driven being accelerated, or does COVID ring team put us

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on a different economy path. Why don't like we know yet,

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>But I think the acceleration is a big deal. A

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of what happened during COVID was an acceleration of

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>trends like you mentioned with technology, e commerceince one, and

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that's just gonna go faster than people thought. So I

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>think we need to make sure that we have a

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>system for smaller midsized businesses that they can adapt, that

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>we have an ability to help train people for the

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs that will be instead of the jobs that were.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk about a g I bill in

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the scope of that, I'm going to take a conservative

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>guy like you and throw you on the same page

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with a great liberal economist, Claudia Son. Claudia is calling

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for far more stimulus, and I think I'm hearing that

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>from you as well. But what is the distinction of

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the application of the stimulus between conservatives and liberals. Well,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually not talking about stimulus, although I do think

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we need another recovery package. What I'm talking about is

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>actually a longer term program. We needed something like what

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about before COVID, and we need it now.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>It's a way to help train people. I'm thinking of

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>things like a block grant to interrupt. But look, we're

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at the death of Reaganism right now, I would say,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>within the uproar in Washington and all that, how do

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you drag your Republican Party economists and politicians toward a

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Hubbard view of bigger view of bigger programs? Ola Dwight D. Eisenhower. Well,

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think of going back to Adam Smith, to be honest, Tom,

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know Smith and Columbia. Yeah, I mean Smith talked

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about mass flourishing, and if you want mass flourishing, you

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have to have everybody prepared to compete. So I view

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>this as part of what a dynamic capitalist economy is.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It just we shouldn't get ourselves. It will cost money.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>We need different budget priorities to pay for Glenn Hubbard

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with us Columbia professor, and we're thrilled to come back.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got about eight ways to go with Professor Hubbard

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>here and these absolutely unique times. Thanks for listening to

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance Piecast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You can

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio